CA2404968C - Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process - Google Patents

Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2404968C
CA2404968C CA2404968A CA2404968A CA2404968C CA 2404968 C CA2404968 C CA 2404968C CA 2404968 A CA2404968 A CA 2404968A CA 2404968 A CA2404968 A CA 2404968A CA 2404968 C CA2404968 C CA 2404968C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
fingerprint
presented
user
output vector
neural network
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA2404968A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2404968A1 (en
Inventor
Sakari Laitinen-Vellonen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Liqum Paper Oy
Original Assignee
Liqum Paper Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from FI20000796A external-priority patent/FI20000796A/en
Application filed by Liqum Paper Oy filed Critical Liqum Paper Oy
Publication of CA2404968A1 publication Critical patent/CA2404968A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2404968C publication Critical patent/CA2404968C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0224Process history based detection method, e.g. whereby history implies the availability of large amounts of data
    • G05B23/024Quantitative history assessment, e.g. mathematical relationships between available data; Functions therefor; Principal component analysis [PCA]; Partial least square [PLS]; Statistical classifiers, e.g. Bayesian networks, linear regression or correlation analysis; Neural networks
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21GCALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
    • D21G9/00Other accessories for paper-making machines
    • D21G9/0009Paper-making control systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0267Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0267Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
    • G05B23/0272Presentation of monitored results, e.g. selection of status reports to be displayed; Filtering information to the user

Abstract

The invention concerns a method for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process, in which method a large number of quantities (xi, t) are measured from the process, the measured quantities (xi, t) are entered as an input vector (X, t) into a neural network, which, in response to the input vector, produces an output vector (Y, t) as a continuous quantity, at least one fingerprint consistent with a good process situation in regard of runnability, i.e. an optimal output vector (Yo, t) is determined and stored in memory, the stored fingerprints and fingerprints or output vectors obtained in a normal process situation are compared substantially in real time, based on the comparison, a difference to be presented in a graphic form to the user is determined. According to the invention, a continuous time-dependent scalar quantity k=k(t) to be presented as a result to the user is determined as a geometric distance between the instantaneous measured fingerprint (Y, t) and the taught fingerprint (Yo), and the scalar quantity k=k(t) is displayed via a display device to the user.

Description

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND ANALYZING A PAPER
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
Definition of the nature of the invention The invention concerns a method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process, in which method a large number of quantities are measured from the process and entered as an input vector into a neural network which to produces an output vector as a continuous quantity, and in which method at least one fingerprint representing a good process situation, i.e. an optimal output vector is defined, and fingerprints or output vectors obtained in a normal process situation are compared to the said optimal finger-prints) or output vectors) substantially in real time and, based on this comparison, the difference is determined and presented to the user in a graphic form.
Background of the invention Using teachable neural networks, large amounts of data can be effectively classified and links or groupings present in measurements and large masses of data can be revealed that are very difficult to detect via statistical calculation, 2s mathematical models and logical rules. The learning ability makes it possible to perform various functions with a reason-able accuracy by the aid of examples without detailed pro-gramming of all different situations and exceptions.
3o A neural network consists of simple computing elements, neurons, having a plurality of inputs and one response. A
neural network is 'created by linking neurons to each other.
The overall operation of the network is a combination of several weighted values which is difficult to understand via 35 individual weights. The weights in the neural network are generally determined by teaching using examples. There are a fairly large number of different network structures and teaching algorithms.
Diversified descriptions of the principles and applications of neural networks are to be found in the publications "Neurolaskennan mahdollisuudet"; Pasi Koikkalainen, Tekes 1994, and "Neural Computing Theory and Practise"; Philip D.
Wassermann, New York 1989, ISBN 0-442-20743-2.
to In a paper manufacturing process, the operator should be able to obtain concentrated information about how well the process is performing as compared with previously identified good situations. So far, the paper manufacturing process has been analyzed e.g. by the SOM (Self Oriented Map) technique. Quite i5 often, history data for a large number of variables is available in the form of various curves, of which the opera-tor can select desired ones to be presented on his display.
Generally, detecting a significant change in the set of history values is impossible because such changes are lost in 2o normal random variation. Therefore, a method is needed that allows the entire process situation to be analyzed using a neural network and divergent situations to be classified as early as possible to enable the operator to start searching for the cause that led to the situation.
Neural network solutions so far applied in the paper manufac-turing industry have not produced satisfactory results.
Analyzing the results is difficult for the user; especially the results obtained by the above-mentioned SOM method are 3o unclear.
Finnish patent application 941058 (Taipale) presents a method for the treatment of especially a paper manufacturing pro-cess. According to this application, a set of measurement 3s results from the process is fed into a neural network, e.g. a perceptron network, and, using a special algorithm, adjust-able variables are corrected in order to correct the operat-ing point of the process. The method aims at directly opti-mizing the quality of the final product, which is determined via 100 - 300 measurements for each machine roll.
European patent 815320 (Furumoto) discloses a method for process control of a paper machine by utilizing a neural network. A set of measurements comprises spectral values of the substances used, and statements regarding the quality of to the product are transmitted via the neural network and corresponding control signals are passed further to a so called stock preparation stage. In this case, too, product quality is the primary control variable. Spectral (optical) measurements are ill suited for the determination of chemical changes.
US specification 5,347,446 (Iino) presents a regulation system resembling the process and based on creating a model of the process. Computations produce a scalar cost function 2o as a result. In practice, creating a model is probably only possible in the case of limited processes. It is not possible to create a model for the entire paper machine by this method.
In general, the experiences about control processes designed to control the entire paper machine are not encouraging.
Among other things, incidental factors have a considerable effect on the process, which means that a rationally calcu lated correction in itself produces more changes and insta 3o bility.
Brief description of the invention The object of the present invention is to achieve a new type 3s of method utilizing a neural network in a paper manufacturing process whereby the process can be more easily and accurately analyzed and monitored than before. The basic idea of the invention is only to monitor the process in a reliable manner especially in regard of its runnability. The task of monitor-ing the quality of the final product is entrusted to other s measurement processes because a high quality of a good process situation is generally always achieved when the process situation itself is equally stable. The primary aim of the method of the invention is to describe the runnability of a paper machine. The instant of occurrence of a change in to the fingerprints can be seen from history data, so it is possible to find out what changes have taken place in the output variables at this instant. Correcting a bad situation is outside the scope of the present invention, because correcting a given output variable is not a straightforward i5 task as a given difference may be the result of many factors.
Local know-how is preferably utilized. The personnel of each plant know their own plant, and this special knowledge is important when the process is to be corrected after it has got into an unstable condition.
The features characteristic of the method of the invention are presented in the claims below.
The output vector of the neural network is processed so as to 2s produce a scalar or otherwise unambiguous quantity. The processing consists of applying a mathematical algorithm, and this can be done using a general-purpose computer.
According to a preferred embodiment, a polar conversion of a 3o continuous difference quantity, expressing the state and history of the process in an extremely concentrated form, is presented to the user. According to a third embodiment, both the aforesaid polar conversion and sets of history values are presented side by side to the user, so that, when the process 35 gets into an abnormal state, it will be easier to establish the reason for this. Even incidental causes of process instability can often be established by utilizing local know-how because the precise instant of occurrence.of a change can be determined from history data. Preferably a multi-layer perception neural network is used.
s The other advantages and embodiments of the invention will be described below in conjunction with examples of embodiments.
Brief description of illustrations to In the following, the invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings, wherein , Fig. 1 presents a general arrangement for implementing the method of the invention, Fig. 2 presents a preferred user interface to a neural network, especially a presentation reducing the process data into a concentrated form.
Detailed description of the invention Typically, 20 - 30 variable quantities, consisting of various flow, temperature, consistency and pH values and data ob-tained from preferably electrochemical sensors, are measured from the manufacturing process. These variable quantities 2s form an input vector (X, t) for a neural network, and an output vector (Y, t) is generated from them by means of the neural network. During the teaching phase, an optimal output vector (Yo,t) has been established. The continuously measured output vector is compared to this optimal output vector, and 3o the difference is produced in a graphic form clearly visible to the user. In practice, it has been found that this task can be best accomplished by using a mufti-layer perception (MLP) neural network, and the difference to be presented in a graphic form is generated as a scalar quantity k=k(t) ex-35 pressing the geometric distance between the instantaneous measured fingerprint (Y, t) and the taught fingerprint (Yo).

The geometric distance is computed e.g. as a Euclidean distance.
n t A polar conversion k(cp,t) is determined from the scalar quantity k=k (t) according to the formula: cp (t) = t/T * 2TT, to where T is a selected trend r(t)=k.
The invention pertains to a paper machine environment as presented in Fig. 1. In most cases, a system according to the invention for use in conjunction with a paper machine 1 can i5 be constructed using general-purpose computers provided with a display device 5 which are provided with an application implementing a neural network 2, computing means 3 and a memory 4. The system is connected to the paper machine 1 partly using existing measuring channels, partly via measur-2o ing sensors installed for this purpose. In this example, preferably a mufti-channel electrochemical sensor 7 is connected to the short circulation of the paper machine. The control 6 and installation of the neural network 2 are preferably implemented using either the same or a separate 2s computer. The broke system, headbox, wire section and press section are measured at least via the process data. Electro-chemical measurements in at least some of these provide a substantial addition to the initial data. In the light of latest information, measurement of smell emitted by process 30 liquids also looks promising. The electrochemical measure-ments include polarization, galvanostatic or only resting potential measurements.
The dimension of the output vector of the neural network is 35 generally in the range of 3 - 15; in the examples in Fig. 1 and 2, it is 3 (with 21 input quantities). The minimum dimension is the number of categories to be distinguished.
Fig. 2 presents a preferred user interface to the neural s network, in which a carefully selected set of data is dis-played in a graphic form to the user. In this example, an array of bars 11, "Grade profile", in the upper right-hand part of the display represents a fingerprint consistent with a good process situation, i.e. dimensionless values of the 1o measured quantities presented as bars. Correspondingly, displayed on the left is an array of bars 12, "Online pro-file", in which the instantaneously measured .values are presented as dimensionless values and bars. Presented in the lower left-hand part of the display is a third array of bars 15 14, "Difference profile", showing the difference between each measured value and the corresponding optimal fingerprint value as a corresponding bar. The arrays of bars can natu-rally be presented as a continuous curve, although in both cases the same information is presented.
By observing the arrays of bars themselves, it is practically not possible to monitor the process because any changes that may occur are lost in random variation. Instead, the user is offered very concentrated information about the process z5 situation via a graph 10, "Quality radar", in which a time-dependent difference quantity is presented as a polar conver-sion k(cp,t). As long as the dot representing the difference quantity obtained is circulating near the origin, the process is well under control. In an abnormal situation, the dot will 3o move away from the origin. Changes in the difference quantity can be readily detected over a trend period whose length is selected e.g. so that it covers three working shifts.
In addition, the display presents a set of history values 13, 35 "Color chart", showing bars which have been generated from the measured quantities (xi) over a period of time corre-sponding to a multiple of the trend, successive measurement values being displayed as a bar 13' of brightness/color information in which each value (xi, t") is shown as a trans-verse line of corresponding brightness/color. If the bright-s ness/color of the bar remains unchanged, then its value has not varied, whereas confirmed changes are clearly visible as variations in bar color/brightness. Moreover, each bar in the set of history values can be presented as a separate curve 15 according to selection 15'.
to In addition to the time-dependent scalar quantity k=k(t), other parameters can naturally also be computed " although, on the other hand, any extra result information may be confusing to the user.
Since the runnability of the machine is influenced by the electrochemical surface charges which are present on differ-ent rollers, wires and felts and which, with time, further have an effect on the accumulation of dirt in the machine, 2o the most advantageous alternative will probably be to measure the electrochemical values of the initial materials, espe-cially those of the liquid flows in pulp production and process waters, as inputs to the neural network. The detec-tion of smell of the waters will also be advantageous in this 2s connection because certain changes, e.g. microbiological reactions produce a distinct smell trace before they can be discerned in the electrochemistry.

Claims (9)

1. Method for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process, in which method a large number of quantities (x i,t) are measured from the process, the measured quantities (x i,t) are entered as an input vector (~, t) into a neural network, which, in response to the input vector, produces an output vector (~, t) as a continuous quantity, at least one fingerprint consistent with a good process situation in regard of runnability, namely a fingerprint of an optimal output vector (~o), is determined and stored in memory, the stored fingerprint and each fingerprint of output vectors obtained in a normal process situation are compared substantially in real time, based on the comparison, a difference to be presented in a graphic form to a user is determined, wherein a continuous time-dependent quantity k=k(t) to be presented as a result to the user is determined as a geometric distance between said each fingerprint of output vector (~,t) and the stored fingerprint of the optimal output vector (~o), and the aforesaid quantity k=k(t) for the period of a selected trend T is displayed via a display device to the user.
2. Method as defined in claim 1, wherein a multi-layer perceptron network (MLP) is selected as the neural network to be used.
3. Method as defined in claim 1 or 2, wherein a polar conversion k(.phi.,t) to be presented in a graphic form is generated from the said quantity k=k(t) as follows:
(t)= t/T * 2.PI., where T is the selected trend r(t)=k.
4. Method as defined in claim 3, wherein a set of history values is determined from the measured quantities (x i, t n) over a period of time corresponding to a multiple of the trend, by periodically saving the dimensionless value (y i,t n) of each input quantity, which is stored and coded so as to produce brightness/color information, said values being displayed graphically in succession as a bar (13') in which each value (y i,t n) is visible as a transverse line or similar area of corresponding brightness/color.
5. Method as defined in claim 4, wherein both a graph of the polar conversion k(.phi.,t) and the history bars (13) are presented to the user at the same time, especially via the same display.
6. Method as defined in any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein the information presented to the user on the same display additionally comprises the measured quantities and the good fingerprint as sets of values converted into a dimensionless and graphic form.
7. Method as defined in any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein a set of difference quantities (~o-~) together with a sequence of times is presented to the user in a graphic form.
8. Method as defined in any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the dimension of the output vector of the neural network is in the range of 3-10, preferably equaling the number of categories to be distinguished.
9. System for monitoring and analyzing the paper production process in a paper machine (1), said system comprising a neural network (2) having inputs for the entering of a large number of quantities (x i,t) measured from the process and outputs for the delivery of a response, and computing means (3) for the processing of the response, and storage means (4) for the storage of a fingerprint consistent with a good process situation, namely an optimal output vector (Y o), means for comparing substantially in real time the stored fingerprints of optimal output vectors (Y o) and the fingerprints of output vectors obtained in a normal process situation, and for determining on the basis of the comparison a difference to be presented to a user, a display device (5) for displaying the difference in a graphic form, wherein said neural network (2) has been adapted to implement a multi-layer perception network (MLP), and the computing means (3) have been adapted to determine from the output vector a continuous time-dependent scalar quantity k=k(t) as a geometric distance between each fingerprint of output vector (Y , t) and the stored fingerprint of the optimal output vector(Y o), and the display device (5) has been adapted to display the said scalar quantity k=k(t).
CA2404968A 2000-04-05 2001-04-04 Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process Expired - Fee Related CA2404968C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20000796A FI20000796A (en) 2000-04-05 2000-04-05 Method and system for monitoring and analyzing the papermaking process
FI20000796 2000-04-05
US24191900P 2000-10-20 2000-10-20
US60/241,919 2000-10-20
PCT/FI2001/000324 WO2001075222A2 (en) 2000-04-05 2001-04-04 Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2404968A1 CA2404968A1 (en) 2001-10-11
CA2404968C true CA2404968C (en) 2011-08-30

Family

ID=26160985

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2404968A Expired - Fee Related CA2404968C (en) 2000-04-05 2001-04-04 Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US6792388B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1290507B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE275740T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2001252298A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2404968C (en)
DE (1) DE60105421T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2228845T3 (en)
PT (1) PT1290507E (en)
WO (1) WO2001075222A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI20025023A (en) * 2001-08-21 2003-02-22 Liqum Oy Process of a paper or cellulose process to check chemical status in a pulp and backwater system
FI115081B (en) * 2001-10-19 2005-02-28 Metso Automation Oy Method and apparatus for controlling the operation of a pulp department of a paper machine
US7371214B2 (en) * 2002-08-27 2008-05-13 Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. Vital sign display device and method thereof
FI20021901A0 (en) * 2002-10-24 2002-10-24 Liqum Oy Procedure for controlling a process
DE10305596A1 (en) * 2003-02-11 2004-09-02 Voith Paper Patent Gmbh Method for creating a standardized state analysis of parameters and / or operating states influencing the quality of the fibrous web to be produced during the production of a fibrous web and machine for carrying out the method
US7050875B2 (en) * 2003-07-01 2006-05-23 General Electric Company System and method for detecting an anomalous condition
US6980874B2 (en) * 2003-07-01 2005-12-27 General Electric Company System and method for detecting an anomalous condition in a multi-step process
US20050004684A1 (en) * 2003-07-01 2005-01-06 General Electric Company System and method for adjusting a control model
US6993404B2 (en) * 2003-07-11 2006-01-31 Mks Instruments, Inc. Graphical user interface with process quality indicator
DE102004020495A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-11-24 Siemens Ag Process and plant for the treatment of waste paper
DE102009011217A1 (en) 2009-03-04 2010-09-09 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Control of the extended dryer section of a paper machine
EP3392405A1 (en) * 2017-04-18 2018-10-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for operating a paper machine, drive system and paper machine

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5347446A (en) * 1991-02-08 1994-09-13 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Model predictive control apparatus
US5671335A (en) 1991-05-23 1997-09-23 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Process optimization using a neural network
DE19510009C2 (en) * 1995-03-23 2000-05-11 Siemens Ag Process and device for process control of a paper machine
DE59712546D1 (en) 1997-07-31 2006-04-06 Sulzer Markets & Technology Ag Method for monitoring systems with mechanical components
US5960381A (en) * 1998-07-07 1999-09-28 Johnson Controls Technology Company Starfield display of control system diagnostic information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2404968A1 (en) 2001-10-11
ES2228845T3 (en) 2005-04-16
PT1290507E (en) 2005-01-31
AU2001252298A1 (en) 2001-10-15
DE60105421T2 (en) 2005-09-22
ATE275740T1 (en) 2004-09-15
EP1290507B1 (en) 2004-09-08
DE60105421D1 (en) 2004-10-14
WO2001075222A3 (en) 2001-12-13
US6792388B2 (en) 2004-09-14
WO2001075222A2 (en) 2001-10-11
US20030139904A1 (en) 2003-07-24
EP1290507A2 (en) 2003-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2404968C (en) Method and system for monitoring and analyzing a paper manufacturing process
Sánchez-Fernández et al. Fault detection based on time series modeling and multivariate statistical process control
US5282131A (en) Control system for controlling a pulp washing system using a neural network controller
US5949678A (en) Method for monitoring multivariate processes
Piovoso et al. Process data chemometrics
US6542852B2 (en) System and method for paper web time-to-break prediction
Goulding et al. Fault detection in continuous processes using multivariate statistical methods
US7181308B2 (en) Method for monitoring and analyzing a paper production process
Rawlings et al. Gage control of film and sheet‐forming processes
JPH11161327A (en) Method and device for diagnosing abnormality of process
KR101840419B1 (en) System and method for predicting fault of elements in skin pass mill and leveler
Hölttä et al. Quality index framework for plant-wide performance evaluation
Yin et al. On-line monitoring of papermaking processes
Bhatia et al. Fuzzy modeling and control of basis weight of paper using simulink
Prajapati A new approach to monitor the process dispersion
Latva-Käyrä Fuzzy logic and SPC
WO2007138169A1 (en) A method and a system for monitoring the performance of a paper or pulp production process
Skoglund et al. Applying process monitoring with multivariate analysis through a knowledge-based systems approach to a paperboard machine
Castillo et al. 15 A New Approach for Plant Monitoring Using Type-2 Fuzzy Logic and Fractal Theory
Tatara et al. Intelligent sensor auditing by interfacing knowledge-based systems and multivariate SPM tools
Latva-Käyrä et al. Dynamic calibration of on-line quality measurement
Keski-Säntti et al. Production optimisation of the pulp bleach plant-intelligent methods utilisation approach
Paunonen et al. Automatic process diagnostic
Leiviskä Data-based modelling in web break sensitivity indicator
Gupta et al. ON-LINE FAULT DETECTION IN NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS USING SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20130404