CA2553196A1 - Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories - Google Patents
Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2553196A1 CA2553196A1 CA002553196A CA2553196A CA2553196A1 CA 2553196 A1 CA2553196 A1 CA 2553196A1 CA 002553196 A CA002553196 A CA 002553196A CA 2553196 A CA2553196 A CA 2553196A CA 2553196 A1 CA2553196 A1 CA 2553196A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- entity
- records
- documents
- record
- expert
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 26
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 title description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- ZFXYFBGIUFBOJW-UHFFFAOYSA-N theophylline Chemical compound O=C1N(C)C(=O)N(C)C2=C1NC=N2 ZFXYFBGIUFBOJW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 206010002515 Animal bite Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000025470 Clusia rosea Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001124569 Lycaenidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010039491 Sarcoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000010425 asbestos Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940124446 critical care medicine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002685 pulmonary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052895 riebeckite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000153 supplemental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation; Symbolic representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering; Knowledge acquisition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/93—Document management systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/93—Document management systems
- G06F16/94—Hypermedia
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N7/00—Computing arrangements based on specific mathematical models
- G06N7/01—Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
- Y10S707/99934—Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99937—Sorting
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
- Y10S707/99942—Manipulating data structure, e.g. compression, compaction, compilation
Abstract
An information-retrieval system includes a server that receives queries for documents from client devices and means for outputting results of queries to the client devices, with the results provided in association with one or more interactive control features that are selectable to invoke display of information regarding entities, such as professionals, referenced in the results.
Description
Systems, Methods, Interfaces and Software for Automated Collection and Integration of Entity Data into Online Databases and Professional Directories Copyright Notice and Permission A portion of this patent document contains material subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever. The following notice applies to this document: Copyright D 2003, Thomson Global Resources AG.
Cross-Reference to Related Application This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application 60/533,588 filed on December 31, 2003. The provisional application is incorporated herein by reference.
Technical Field Various embodiments of the present invention concerns information-retrieval systems, such as those that provide legal documents or other related content.
Background In recent years, the fantastic growth of the Internet and other computer networks has fueled an equally fantastic growth in the data accessible via these networks. One of the seminal modes for interacting with this data is through the use of hyperlinks within electronic documents.
More recently, there has been interest in hyperlinking documents to other documents based on the names of people in the documents. For example, to facilitate legal research, West Publishing Company of St. Paul, Minnesota (doing business as Thomson West) provides thousands of electronic judicial opinions that hyperlink the names of attorneys and judges to their online biographical entries in the West Legal Directory, a proprietary directory of approximately 1,000,000 U.S. attorneys and 20,000 judges. These hyperlinks allow users accessing judicial opinions to quickly obtain contact and other specific information about lawyers and judges named in the opinions.
The hyperlinks in these judicial opinions are generated automatically, using a S system that extracts first, middle, and last names; law firm name, city, and state; and court information from the text of the opinions and uses them as clues to determine whether to link the named attorneys and judges to their corresponding entries in the professional directory. See Christopher Dozier and Robert Haschart, "Automatic Extraction and Linking of Person Names in Legal Text" (Proceedings of RIAO
2000:
Content Based Multimedia Information Access. Paris, France. pp. 1305-1321.
April 2000), which is incorporated herein by reference. An improvement to this system is described in Christopher Dozier, System, Methods And Software For Automatic Hyperlinking Of Persons' Names In Documents To Professional Directories, WO
2003/060767A3 July 24, 2003.
The present inventors have recognized still additional need for improvement in these and other systems that generate automatic links.
Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a diagram of an exemplary information-retrieval system 100 corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention;
Figure 2 is a flowchart corresponding to one or more exemplary methods of operating system 100 and one or more embodiments of the invention;
Figure 3-8 are facsimiles of exemplary user interfaces, each corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention.
Figure 9 is a flow chart corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention.
Figures 10 is a flow chart corresponding to one or more additional embodiment of the invention.
Cross-Reference to Related Application This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application 60/533,588 filed on December 31, 2003. The provisional application is incorporated herein by reference.
Technical Field Various embodiments of the present invention concerns information-retrieval systems, such as those that provide legal documents or other related content.
Background In recent years, the fantastic growth of the Internet and other computer networks has fueled an equally fantastic growth in the data accessible via these networks. One of the seminal modes for interacting with this data is through the use of hyperlinks within electronic documents.
More recently, there has been interest in hyperlinking documents to other documents based on the names of people in the documents. For example, to facilitate legal research, West Publishing Company of St. Paul, Minnesota (doing business as Thomson West) provides thousands of electronic judicial opinions that hyperlink the names of attorneys and judges to their online biographical entries in the West Legal Directory, a proprietary directory of approximately 1,000,000 U.S. attorneys and 20,000 judges. These hyperlinks allow users accessing judicial opinions to quickly obtain contact and other specific information about lawyers and judges named in the opinions.
The hyperlinks in these judicial opinions are generated automatically, using a S system that extracts first, middle, and last names; law firm name, city, and state; and court information from the text of the opinions and uses them as clues to determine whether to link the named attorneys and judges to their corresponding entries in the professional directory. See Christopher Dozier and Robert Haschart, "Automatic Extraction and Linking of Person Names in Legal Text" (Proceedings of RIAO
2000:
Content Based Multimedia Information Access. Paris, France. pp. 1305-1321.
April 2000), which is incorporated herein by reference. An improvement to this system is described in Christopher Dozier, System, Methods And Software For Automatic Hyperlinking Of Persons' Names In Documents To Professional Directories, WO
2003/060767A3 July 24, 2003.
The present inventors have recognized still additional need for improvement in these and other systems that generate automatic links.
Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a diagram of an exemplary information-retrieval system 100 corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention;
Figure 2 is a flowchart corresponding to one or more exemplary methods of operating system 100 and one or more embodiments of the invention;
Figure 3-8 are facsimiles of exemplary user interfaces, each corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention.
Figure 9 is a flow chart corresponding to one or more embodiments of the invention.
Figures 10 is a flow chart corresponding to one or more additional embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments This description, which references and incorporates the above-identified Figures, describes one or more specific embodiments of an invention. These embodiments, offered not to limit but only to exemplify and teach the invention, are shown and described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to implement or practice the invention. Thus, where appropriate to avoid obscuring the invention, the description may omit certain information known to those of skill in the art.
Exemplar~Information-Retrieval System Figure 1 shows an exemplary online information-retrieval system 100.
System 100 includes one or more databases 110, one or more servers 120, and one or more access devices 130.
Databases 110 include a set of one or more databases. In the exemplary embodiment, the set includes a caselaw database 111, an expert witness directory 112, professional directories or licensing databases 113, a verdict and settlement database 114, an court-filings database 116.
Caselaw database 111 generally includes electronic text and image copies of judicial opinions for decided cases for one or more local, state, federal, or international jurisdiction. Expert witness directory 112, which is defined in accord with one or more aspects of the present invention, includes one or more records or database structures, such as structure 1121. Structure 1121 includes an expert identifier portion 1121 A which is logically associated with one or more directory documents or entries 1121B, one or more verdict documents or entries 1121C, and one or more articles 1121D. Some embodiments logically associate the expert identifier with court filings documens, such as briefs and expert reports and/or other documents.
Professional directories or licensing databases 113 include professional licensing data from one or more state, federal, or international licensing authorities.
In the exemplary embodiment, this includes legal, medical, engineering, and scientific licensing or credentialing authorities. Verdict and settlement database 114 includes electronic text and image copies of documents related to the determined verdict, assessed damages, or negotiated settlement of legal disputes associated with cases within caselaw database 111. Articles database 115 includes articles technical, medical, professional, scientific or other scholarly or authorative journals and authoritative trade publications. Some embodiments includes patent publications.
Court-filings database 116 includes electronic text and image copies of court filings related to one or more subsets of the judicial opinions caselaw database 111.
Exemplary court-filing documents include briefs, motions, complaints, pleadings, discovery matter. Other databases 115 includes one or more other databases containing documents regarding news stories, business and finance, science and technology, medicine and bioinfonnatics, and intellectual property information. In some embodiments, the logical relationships across documents are determined manually or using automatic discovery processes that leverage information such as litigant identities, dates, jurisdictions, attorney identifies, court dockets, and so forth to determine the existence or likelihood of a relationship between any pair of documents.
Databases 110, which take the exemplary form of one or more electronic, magnetic, or optical data-storage devices, include or are otherwise associated with respective indices (not shown). Each of the indices includes terms and/or phrases in association with corresponding document addresses, identifiers, and other information for facilitating the functionality described below. Databases 112, 114, and 116 are coupled or couplable via a wireless or wireline communications network, such as a local-, wide-, private-, or virtual-private network, to server 120.
Server 120, which is generally representative of one or more servers for serving data in the form of webpages or other markup language forms with associated applets, ActiveX controls, remote-invocation objects, or other related software and data structures to service clients of various "thicknesses." More particularly, server 120 includes a processor 121, a memory 122, a subscriber database 123, one or more search engines 124 and software module 125.
Processor 121, which is generally representative of one or more local or distributed processors or virtual machines, is coupled to memory 122. Memory 122, which takes the exemplary form of one or more electronic, magnetic, or optical data-storage devices, stores subscription database 123, search engines 124, and interface module 125.
Exemplar~Information-Retrieval System Figure 1 shows an exemplary online information-retrieval system 100.
System 100 includes one or more databases 110, one or more servers 120, and one or more access devices 130.
Databases 110 include a set of one or more databases. In the exemplary embodiment, the set includes a caselaw database 111, an expert witness directory 112, professional directories or licensing databases 113, a verdict and settlement database 114, an court-filings database 116.
Caselaw database 111 generally includes electronic text and image copies of judicial opinions for decided cases for one or more local, state, federal, or international jurisdiction. Expert witness directory 112, which is defined in accord with one or more aspects of the present invention, includes one or more records or database structures, such as structure 1121. Structure 1121 includes an expert identifier portion 1121 A which is logically associated with one or more directory documents or entries 1121B, one or more verdict documents or entries 1121C, and one or more articles 1121D. Some embodiments logically associate the expert identifier with court filings documens, such as briefs and expert reports and/or other documents.
Professional directories or licensing databases 113 include professional licensing data from one or more state, federal, or international licensing authorities.
In the exemplary embodiment, this includes legal, medical, engineering, and scientific licensing or credentialing authorities. Verdict and settlement database 114 includes electronic text and image copies of documents related to the determined verdict, assessed damages, or negotiated settlement of legal disputes associated with cases within caselaw database 111. Articles database 115 includes articles technical, medical, professional, scientific or other scholarly or authorative journals and authoritative trade publications. Some embodiments includes patent publications.
Court-filings database 116 includes electronic text and image copies of court filings related to one or more subsets of the judicial opinions caselaw database 111.
Exemplary court-filing documents include briefs, motions, complaints, pleadings, discovery matter. Other databases 115 includes one or more other databases containing documents regarding news stories, business and finance, science and technology, medicine and bioinfonnatics, and intellectual property information. In some embodiments, the logical relationships across documents are determined manually or using automatic discovery processes that leverage information such as litigant identities, dates, jurisdictions, attorney identifies, court dockets, and so forth to determine the existence or likelihood of a relationship between any pair of documents.
Databases 110, which take the exemplary form of one or more electronic, magnetic, or optical data-storage devices, include or are otherwise associated with respective indices (not shown). Each of the indices includes terms and/or phrases in association with corresponding document addresses, identifiers, and other information for facilitating the functionality described below. Databases 112, 114, and 116 are coupled or couplable via a wireless or wireline communications network, such as a local-, wide-, private-, or virtual-private network, to server 120.
Server 120, which is generally representative of one or more servers for serving data in the form of webpages or other markup language forms with associated applets, ActiveX controls, remote-invocation objects, or other related software and data structures to service clients of various "thicknesses." More particularly, server 120 includes a processor 121, a memory 122, a subscriber database 123, one or more search engines 124 and software module 125.
Processor 121, which is generally representative of one or more local or distributed processors or virtual machines, is coupled to memory 122. Memory 122, which takes the exemplary form of one or more electronic, magnetic, or optical data-storage devices, stores subscription database 123, search engines 124, and interface module 125.
Subscription database 123 includes subscriber-related data for controlling, administering, and managing pay-as-you-go- or subscription-based access of databases 110. Subscriber database 123 includes subscriber-related data for controlling, administering, and managing pay-as-you-go or subscription-based access of databases 110.
Search engines 124 provides Boolean or natural-language search capabilities for databases 110.
Interface module 125, which, among, other things defines one or portion of a graphical user interface that helps users define searches for databases 110.
Software 125 includes one or more browser-compatible applets, webpage templates, user-interface elements, objects or control features or other programmatic objects or structures. More specifically, software 125 includes a search interface 1251 and a results interface 1252.
Server 120 is communicatively coupled or couplable via a wireless or wireline communications network, such as a local-, wide-, private-, or virtual-private network, to one or more accesses devices, such as access device 130.
Access device 130 is not only communicatively coupled or couplable to server 130, but also generally representative of one or more access devices. In the exemplary embodiment, access device 130 takes the form of a personal computer, workstation, personal digital assistant, mobile telephone, or any other device capable of providing an effective user interface with a server or database.
Specifically, access device 130 includes one or more processors (or processing circuits) 131, a memory 132, a display 133, a keyboard 134, and a graphical pointer or selector 135. Memory 132 stores code (machine-readable or executable instructions) for an operating system 136, a browser 137, and a graphical user interface (GUI)138.
In the exemplary embodiment, operating system 136 takes the form of a version of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and browser 137 takes the form of a version of Microsoft Internet Explorer. Operating system 136 and browser 137 not only receive inputs from keyboard 134 and selector (or mouse) 135, but also support rendering of GUI 138 on display 133. Upon rendering, GUI 138 presents data in association with one or more interactive control features (or user-interface elements).
Search engines 124 provides Boolean or natural-language search capabilities for databases 110.
Interface module 125, which, among, other things defines one or portion of a graphical user interface that helps users define searches for databases 110.
Software 125 includes one or more browser-compatible applets, webpage templates, user-interface elements, objects or control features or other programmatic objects or structures. More specifically, software 125 includes a search interface 1251 and a results interface 1252.
Server 120 is communicatively coupled or couplable via a wireless or wireline communications network, such as a local-, wide-, private-, or virtual-private network, to one or more accesses devices, such as access device 130.
Access device 130 is not only communicatively coupled or couplable to server 130, but also generally representative of one or more access devices. In the exemplary embodiment, access device 130 takes the form of a personal computer, workstation, personal digital assistant, mobile telephone, or any other device capable of providing an effective user interface with a server or database.
Specifically, access device 130 includes one or more processors (or processing circuits) 131, a memory 132, a display 133, a keyboard 134, and a graphical pointer or selector 135. Memory 132 stores code (machine-readable or executable instructions) for an operating system 136, a browser 137, and a graphical user interface (GUI)138.
In the exemplary embodiment, operating system 136 takes the form of a version of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and browser 137 takes the form of a version of Microsoft Internet Explorer. Operating system 136 and browser 137 not only receive inputs from keyboard 134 and selector (or mouse) 135, but also support rendering of GUI 138 on display 133. Upon rendering, GUI 138 presents data in association with one or more interactive control features (or user-interface elements).
(The exemplary embodiment defines one or more portions of interface 138 using applets or other programmatic objects or structures from server 120.) Specifically, graphical user interface 138 defines or provides one or more display control regions, such as a query region 1381, and a results region 1382. Each region (or page in some embodiments) is respectively defined in memory to display data from databases 110 and/or server 120 in combination with one or more interactive control features (elements or widgets). In the exemplary embodiment, each of these control features takes the form of a hyperlink or other browser-compatible command input.
More specifically, query region 1381 includes interactive control features, such as an query input portion 1381A for receiving user input at least partially defining a profile query and a query submission button 1381B for submitting the profile query to server 120 for data from, for example, experts database 112.
Results region 1382, which displays search results for a submitted query, includes a results listing portion 1382A and a document display portion 1382B.
Listing portion 1382A includes control features 2A1 and 2A2 for accessing or retrieving one or more corresponding search result documents, such as professional profile data and related documents, from one or more of databases 110, such as expert database 112, via server 120. Each control feature includes a respective document identifier or label, such as EXP 1, EXP 2 identifying respective name and/or city, state, and subject-matter expertise data for the corresponding expert or professional.
Display portion 1382B displays at least a portion of the full text of a first displayed or user-selected one of the profiles identified within listing portion 1382A, EXP 2 in the illustration. (Some embodiments present regions 1382A and 1382B
as selectable tabbed regions.) Portion 1382B also includes features 2B1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4. User selection of feature 2B 1 initiates retrieval and display of the profile text for the selected expert, EXP 2; selection of feature 2B2 initiates retrieval and display of licensing data for any licenses or other credentials held by the selected expert or professional image copy of the document displayed in region 1382B in a separate window; selection of feature 2B3 initiates display and retrieval of verdict data related to the expert or professional; and selection of feature 2B4 initiates retrieval and display of articles (from database 115) that are related to, for example authored by, the expert or professional. Other embodiments include additional control features for accessing court-filing documents, such as briefs, and/or expert reports authored by the expert or professional, or even deposition and trial transcripts where the expert or testimony was a participant. Still other embodiments provide control features for initiating an Internet search based on the selected expert and other data and for filtering results such search based on the profile of the expert or professional.
Exemplary Methods of Operation Figure 2 shows a flow chart 200 of one or more exemplary methods of operating an information-management system, such as system 100. Flow chart 200 includes blocks 210-290, which are arranged and described in a serial execution sequence in the exemplary embodiment. However, other embodiments execute two or more blocks in parallel using multiple processors or processor-like devices or a single processor organized as two or more virtual machines or sub processors.
Other embodiments also alter the process sequence or provide different functional partitions to achieve analogous results. For example, some embodiments may alter the client-server allocation of functions, such that functions shown and described on the server side are implemented in whole or in part on the client side, and vice versa.
Moreover, still other embodiments implement the blocks as two or more interconnected hardware modules with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules. Thus, this (and other exemplary process flows in this description) apply to software, hardware, and firmware implementations.
Block 210 entails presenting a search interface to a user. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails a user directing a browser in an client access device to Internet-protocol (IP) address for an online information-retrieval system, such as the Westlaw system and then logging onto the system. Successful login results in a web-based search interface, such as interface 138 in Figure 1 (or one or more portions thereof) being output from server 120, stored in memory 132, and displayed by client access device 130.
Execution then advances to block 220.
Block 220 entails receipt of a query. In the exemplary embodiment, the query defines one or more attributes of an entity, such as person professional. In some embodiments, the query string includes a set of terms and/or connectors, and in other embodiment includes a natural-language string. Also, in some embodiments, the set of target databases is defined automatically or by default based on the form of the system or search interface. Figures 3 and 4 show alternative search interfaces 300 and 400 which one or more embodiments use in place of interface 138 in Figure 1.
Execution continues at block 230.
Block 230 entails presenting search results to the user via a graphical user interface. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails the server or components under server control or command, executing the query against one or more of databases 110, for example, expert database 110, and identifying documents, such as professional profiles, that satisfy the query criteria. A listing of results is then presented or rendered as part of a web-based interface, such as interface 138 in Figure 1 or interface S00 in Figure 5. Execution proceeds to block 240.
Block 240 entails presenting additional information regarding one or more one or more of the listed professionals. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails receiving a request in the form of a user selection of one or more of the professional profiles listed in the search results. These additional results may be displayed as shown in interface 138 in Figure 1 or respective interfaces 600, 700, and 800 in Figures 6, 7, and 8. Interface 600 shows a listing of links 610 and 620 for additional information related to the selected professional. As shown in Figure 7, selection of link 610 initiates retrieval and display of a verdict document (or in some case a list of associated verdict documents) in interface 700. And, as shown in Figure 8, selection of link 620 initiates retrieval and display of an article (or in some cases a list of articles) in interface 800.
Exemplary Method of Building Expert Directory In Figure 9, flow chart 900 shows an exemplary method of building an expert directory or database such as used in system 100. Flow chart 900 includes blocks 910-960.
s At block 910, the exemplary method begins with extraction of entity reference records from text documents. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails extracting entity references from approximately 300,000 jury verdict settlement (JVS) documents using finite state transducers. JVS documents have a consistent structure that includes an expert witness section or paragraph, such as that exemplified in Table 1.
EXPERTS:
Plaintiff:
Neal Benowitz MD, pharmacologist, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco.
David M. Burns, pulmonologist, UC San Diego, Div. of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, La Jolla.
wDefendant:
Jerry Whidbv PhD., chemist. Philip Morris Co., Richmond. VA.
Table 1: Expert Witness Section of Jury Verdicts and Settlements (JVS) Document The exemplary embodiment uses a parsing program to locate expert-witness paragraphs and find lexical elements (that is, terms used in this particular subject area) pertaining to an individual. These lexical elements include name, degree, area of expertise, organization, city, and state. Parsing a paragraph entails separating it into sentences, and then parsing each element using a separate or specific finite state transducer. The following example displays regular expressions from the finite state transducer used for the organization element. (Variables are prefixed by $.) $ORG = ($UNIVERSITY ~ $COMPANY~$FIRM...) $UNIVERSITY = ($UNIVERSITY1 I $UNIVERSITY2) $UNIVERSITY1= (UniversitylCollege..) ( of ) [A-Z] [a-z] +
$UNIVERSITY2= ( [A-Z] [a-z] + $SPACE) +
(University~College..) Typically one expert is listed in a sentence along with his or her area of expertise and other information. If more than one expert is mentioned in a sentence, area of expertise and other elements closest to the name are typically associated with that name. Each JVS document generally lists only one expert witness; however, some expert witnesses are references in more than one JVS document. Table 2 shows an example of an entity reference records.
fname ARTHUR
mname Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 2: Structured Expert-Witness Reference Record Created by Regular Expression Parsers S Once the entity reference records are defined, execution continues at block 220.
Block 920 entails defining profile records from the entity reference records:
In the exemplary embodiment, defining the profile records entails merging expert-witness reference records that refer to the same person to create a unique expert-witness profile record for the expert. To this end, the exemplary embodiment sorts the reference records by last name to define a number of lastname groups.
Records within each "last-name" group are then processed by selecting an unmerged expert reference record and creating an new expert profile record from this selected record.
The new expert reference record is then marked as unmerged and compared to each unmerged reference record in the group using Bayesian matching to compute the probability that the expert in the profile record refers to the same individual referenced in the record. If the computed match probability exceeds a match threshold, the reference is marked as "merged." If unmerged records remain in the group, the cycle is repeated.
Note that it is still possible for duplicate records to reside in the profile file if two or more reference records pertain to one individual (for example, because of a misspelled last name). To address this possibility, a final pass is made over the merged profile file, and record pairs are flagged for manual review. Table 3 shows an exemplary expert profile record created from expert reference records.
fname ARTHUR
mname Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertisePediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat Subcat Subcat cate ory address cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 3: Expert Profile Record Created from Expert Reference Records Block 930 entails adding additional information to the expert reference records. In the exemplary embodiment, this entail harvesting information from other databases and sources, such as from professional licensing authorities, telephone directories, and so forth. References to experts in JVS documents, the original entity record source in this embodiment, often have little or no location information for experts, whereas professional license records typically include the expert's full name, and the full current home and/or business address, making them a promising source for additional data.
One exemplary licensing authority is the Drug Enforcement Agency, which licenses health-care professionals to prescribe drugs.
In determining whether a harvested license record (analogous to a reference record) and expert person refer to the same person, the exemplary embodiment computes a Bayesian match probability based on first name, middle name, last name, name suffix, city-state information, area of expertise, and name rarity. If the match probability meets or exceeds a threshold probability, one or more elements of information from the harvested license record are incorporated into the expert reference record. If the threshold criteria is not met, the harvested license record is stored in a database for merger consideration with later added or harvested records.
In.
(Some embodiments perform an extraction procedure on the supplemental data similar to that described at block 910 to define reference records, which are then sent as a set for merger processing as in block 910 with the expert reference records.) fname ARTHUR
mname R
Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat 1 ediatrics Subcat 2 Blood & lasma Subcat 3 oncolo cate o Medical & sur ical address 43 Culloden Pk Road city SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Zip 94901 Table 4: Expert-Profile Record in which Middle Name, Address, and ZIP-code Fields Filled or Harvested from Professional License Record Block 940 entails categorizing expert profiles by area of expertise. In the exemplary embodiment, each expert witness record is assigned one or more classification categories in an expertise taxonomy. Categorization of the entity records allows users to browse and search expert witness (or other professional) profiles by area of expertise. To map an expert profile record to an expertise subcategory, the exemplary embodiment uses an expertise categorizer and a taxonomy that contains top-level categories and subcategories.
The exemplary taxonomy includes the following top-level categories:
Accident & Injury; Accounting & Economics; Computers & Electronics;
Construction & Architecture; Criminal, Fraud and Personal Identity; Employment &
Vocational; Engineering & Science; Environmental; Family & Child Custody;
Legal & Insurance; Medical & Surgical; Property & Real Estate; Psychiatry &
Psychology;
Vehicles, Transportation, Equipment & Machines. Each categories includes one or more subcategories. For example, the "Accident & Injury" category has the following subcategories: Aerobics, Animals, Apparel, Asbestos, Boating, Bombing, Burn/Thermal, Child Care, Child Safety, Construction, Coroner, Cosmetologists/Beauticians/Barbers/Tattoos, Dog Bites, Entertainment, and Exercise.
Assignment of subject-matter categories to an expert profile record entail using a function that maps a professional descriptor associated with the expert to a leaf node in the expertise taxonomy. This function is represented with the following equation:
- f(S) where T denotes a set of taxonomy nodes, and S is the professional descriptor.
The exemplary function f uses a lexicon of 500 four-character sets that map professional descriptors to expertise area. For example, experts having the "onco"
professional descriptor are categorized to the oncology specialist, oncologist, and pediatric oncologist subcategories. Other taxonomies are also feasible. The exemplary embodiment allows descriptors to map to more than one expertise area (that is, category or subcategory) in the taxonomy. For example, "pediatric surgeon" can be mapped to both the "pediatrics" node and "surgery" nodes. Table 5 shows an example of an expert profile record in which the expertise field has been mapped to the category "Medical & Surgical" and to the subcategories "pediatrics,"
"blood &
plasma," and "oncology."
fname ARTHUR
_ mname Iname ABLIN
suffix degree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat 1 ediatrics Subcat 2 Blood & lasma Subcat 3 oncolo cate o Medical & sur ical address cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 5: Expert Profile Record with Expertise Area Mapped to "Medical & Surgical"
Block 940 entails associating one or more text documents and/or additional data sets with one or more of the professional profiles. To this end, the exemplary embodiment logically associates or links one or more JVS documents and/or Medline articles to expert-witness profile records using Bayesian based record matching.
Table 6 shows a sample Medline article.
TITLE: Functional and clinical outcomes of limb-sparing therapy for pediatric extremity sarcomas.
AUTHORS: Bertucio C S; Wara W M; Matthay K K; Ablin A R; Johnston J O;
O'Donnell R J; Weinberg V; Haas-Kogan D A
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0226, USA.
JOURNAL: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (United States) DATE: Mar 1 2001.
Table 6: Sample Text from Medline Article To link JVS documents and medline abstracts to expert profile records, expert-reference records are extracted from the articles using one or more suitable parsers through parsing and matched to profile records using a Bayesian inference network similar to the profile-matching technology described previously. For JVS
documents, the Bayesian network computes match probabilities using seven pieces of match evidence: last name, first name, middle name, name suffix, location, organization, and area of expertise. For medline articles, the match probability is based additionally on name rarity, as described in the previously mentioned Dozier patent application.
Figure 10 shows a flow chart 1000 of an exemplary method of growing and maintaining one or more entity directories, such expert database that used in system 100. Flow chart 1100 includes process blocks 1010-1050.
At block 1010, the exemplary method begins with receipt of a document. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails receipt of an unmarked document, such an a judicial opinion or brief. However, other embodiments receive and process other types of documents. Execution then advances to block 1020.
Block 1020 entails determining the type of document. The exemplary embodiments uses one or more methods for determining document type, for example, looking for particular document format and syntax and/or keywords to differentiate among a set of types. In some embodiments, type can be inferred from the source of the document. Incoming content types, such as case law, jury verdicts, law reviews, briefs, etc., have a variety of grammar, syntax, and structural differences.
After type (or document description) is determined, execution continues at block 1030.
Block 1030 entails extracting one or more entity reference records from the received document based on the determined type of the document. In the exemplary embodiment, four types of entity records are extracted: personal names, such as attorneys, judges, expert witnesses; organizational names, such as firms and companies;
product names, such as drugs and chemicals; and fact profiles ("vernacular" of subject area). Specialized or configurable parsers (finite state transducers), which are selected or configured on the basis of the determined document type and the entity record being built, identify and extract entity information for each type of entity.
Parsers extract information by specifically searching for a named entity (person, address, company, etc.) or by relationships between entities. Parser text-extraction is based on the data's input criteria. For example, the more structured (tagged) data enables a "tighter" set of rules to be built within a parser.
This set of rules allows more specific information to be extracted about a particular entity. A
more "free" data collection, such as a web site, is not as conducive to rule-based parsers. A collection could also include a combination of structured, semi-structured, and free data. More specifically, parsers are developed through "regular-expression"
methods. The regular expressions serves are "rules" for parsers to find entity types and categories of information.
Block 1040 attempts to link or logically associate each extracted entity reference record with one or more existing authority directories. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails computing a Bayesian match probability for each extracted entity reference and one more corresponding candidate records in corresponding directories (or databases) that have been designated as authoritative in terms of accepted accuracy. If the match probability satisfies match criteria, the records are merged or associated and the input document. Execution then proceeds to block 1050.
Block 1050 entails enriching unmatched entity reference records using a matching process. In the exemplary embodiment, this enriching process entails operating specific types of data harvesters on the web, other databases, and other directories or lists, to assemble a cache of new relevant profile information for databases, such as expert database 112 in Figure 1. The unmatched or unmarked entity records are then matched against the harvested entity records using Bayesian matching. Those that satisfy the match criteria are referred to a quality control process for verification or confirmation prior to addition to the relevant entity directory. The quality control process may be manual, semi-automatic, or fully automatic. For example, some embodiments base the type of quality control on the degree to which the match criteria is exceeded.
In some embodiments, blocks 1050 operates in parallel with blocks 1010-1 S 1040, continually retrieving new entity related data using any number of web crawlers, relational databases, or CDs, and attempting to building new entity records.
Conclusion The embodiments described above are intended only to illustrate and teach one or more ways of practicing or implementing the present invention, not to restrict its breadth or scope. The actual scope of the invention, which embraces all ways of practicing or implementing the teachings of the invention, is defined only by the following claims and their equivalents.
More specifically, query region 1381 includes interactive control features, such as an query input portion 1381A for receiving user input at least partially defining a profile query and a query submission button 1381B for submitting the profile query to server 120 for data from, for example, experts database 112.
Results region 1382, which displays search results for a submitted query, includes a results listing portion 1382A and a document display portion 1382B.
Listing portion 1382A includes control features 2A1 and 2A2 for accessing or retrieving one or more corresponding search result documents, such as professional profile data and related documents, from one or more of databases 110, such as expert database 112, via server 120. Each control feature includes a respective document identifier or label, such as EXP 1, EXP 2 identifying respective name and/or city, state, and subject-matter expertise data for the corresponding expert or professional.
Display portion 1382B displays at least a portion of the full text of a first displayed or user-selected one of the profiles identified within listing portion 1382A, EXP 2 in the illustration. (Some embodiments present regions 1382A and 1382B
as selectable tabbed regions.) Portion 1382B also includes features 2B1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4. User selection of feature 2B 1 initiates retrieval and display of the profile text for the selected expert, EXP 2; selection of feature 2B2 initiates retrieval and display of licensing data for any licenses or other credentials held by the selected expert or professional image copy of the document displayed in region 1382B in a separate window; selection of feature 2B3 initiates display and retrieval of verdict data related to the expert or professional; and selection of feature 2B4 initiates retrieval and display of articles (from database 115) that are related to, for example authored by, the expert or professional. Other embodiments include additional control features for accessing court-filing documents, such as briefs, and/or expert reports authored by the expert or professional, or even deposition and trial transcripts where the expert or testimony was a participant. Still other embodiments provide control features for initiating an Internet search based on the selected expert and other data and for filtering results such search based on the profile of the expert or professional.
Exemplary Methods of Operation Figure 2 shows a flow chart 200 of one or more exemplary methods of operating an information-management system, such as system 100. Flow chart 200 includes blocks 210-290, which are arranged and described in a serial execution sequence in the exemplary embodiment. However, other embodiments execute two or more blocks in parallel using multiple processors or processor-like devices or a single processor organized as two or more virtual machines or sub processors.
Other embodiments also alter the process sequence or provide different functional partitions to achieve analogous results. For example, some embodiments may alter the client-server allocation of functions, such that functions shown and described on the server side are implemented in whole or in part on the client side, and vice versa.
Moreover, still other embodiments implement the blocks as two or more interconnected hardware modules with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules. Thus, this (and other exemplary process flows in this description) apply to software, hardware, and firmware implementations.
Block 210 entails presenting a search interface to a user. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails a user directing a browser in an client access device to Internet-protocol (IP) address for an online information-retrieval system, such as the Westlaw system and then logging onto the system. Successful login results in a web-based search interface, such as interface 138 in Figure 1 (or one or more portions thereof) being output from server 120, stored in memory 132, and displayed by client access device 130.
Execution then advances to block 220.
Block 220 entails receipt of a query. In the exemplary embodiment, the query defines one or more attributes of an entity, such as person professional. In some embodiments, the query string includes a set of terms and/or connectors, and in other embodiment includes a natural-language string. Also, in some embodiments, the set of target databases is defined automatically or by default based on the form of the system or search interface. Figures 3 and 4 show alternative search interfaces 300 and 400 which one or more embodiments use in place of interface 138 in Figure 1.
Execution continues at block 230.
Block 230 entails presenting search results to the user via a graphical user interface. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails the server or components under server control or command, executing the query against one or more of databases 110, for example, expert database 110, and identifying documents, such as professional profiles, that satisfy the query criteria. A listing of results is then presented or rendered as part of a web-based interface, such as interface 138 in Figure 1 or interface S00 in Figure 5. Execution proceeds to block 240.
Block 240 entails presenting additional information regarding one or more one or more of the listed professionals. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails receiving a request in the form of a user selection of one or more of the professional profiles listed in the search results. These additional results may be displayed as shown in interface 138 in Figure 1 or respective interfaces 600, 700, and 800 in Figures 6, 7, and 8. Interface 600 shows a listing of links 610 and 620 for additional information related to the selected professional. As shown in Figure 7, selection of link 610 initiates retrieval and display of a verdict document (or in some case a list of associated verdict documents) in interface 700. And, as shown in Figure 8, selection of link 620 initiates retrieval and display of an article (or in some cases a list of articles) in interface 800.
Exemplary Method of Building Expert Directory In Figure 9, flow chart 900 shows an exemplary method of building an expert directory or database such as used in system 100. Flow chart 900 includes blocks 910-960.
s At block 910, the exemplary method begins with extraction of entity reference records from text documents. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails extracting entity references from approximately 300,000 jury verdict settlement (JVS) documents using finite state transducers. JVS documents have a consistent structure that includes an expert witness section or paragraph, such as that exemplified in Table 1.
EXPERTS:
Plaintiff:
Neal Benowitz MD, pharmacologist, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco.
David M. Burns, pulmonologist, UC San Diego, Div. of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, La Jolla.
wDefendant:
Jerry Whidbv PhD., chemist. Philip Morris Co., Richmond. VA.
Table 1: Expert Witness Section of Jury Verdicts and Settlements (JVS) Document The exemplary embodiment uses a parsing program to locate expert-witness paragraphs and find lexical elements (that is, terms used in this particular subject area) pertaining to an individual. These lexical elements include name, degree, area of expertise, organization, city, and state. Parsing a paragraph entails separating it into sentences, and then parsing each element using a separate or specific finite state transducer. The following example displays regular expressions from the finite state transducer used for the organization element. (Variables are prefixed by $.) $ORG = ($UNIVERSITY ~ $COMPANY~$FIRM...) $UNIVERSITY = ($UNIVERSITY1 I $UNIVERSITY2) $UNIVERSITY1= (UniversitylCollege..) ( of ) [A-Z] [a-z] +
$UNIVERSITY2= ( [A-Z] [a-z] + $SPACE) +
(University~College..) Typically one expert is listed in a sentence along with his or her area of expertise and other information. If more than one expert is mentioned in a sentence, area of expertise and other elements closest to the name are typically associated with that name. Each JVS document generally lists only one expert witness; however, some expert witnesses are references in more than one JVS document. Table 2 shows an example of an entity reference records.
fname ARTHUR
mname Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 2: Structured Expert-Witness Reference Record Created by Regular Expression Parsers S Once the entity reference records are defined, execution continues at block 220.
Block 920 entails defining profile records from the entity reference records:
In the exemplary embodiment, defining the profile records entails merging expert-witness reference records that refer to the same person to create a unique expert-witness profile record for the expert. To this end, the exemplary embodiment sorts the reference records by last name to define a number of lastname groups.
Records within each "last-name" group are then processed by selecting an unmerged expert reference record and creating an new expert profile record from this selected record.
The new expert reference record is then marked as unmerged and compared to each unmerged reference record in the group using Bayesian matching to compute the probability that the expert in the profile record refers to the same individual referenced in the record. If the computed match probability exceeds a match threshold, the reference is marked as "merged." If unmerged records remain in the group, the cycle is repeated.
Note that it is still possible for duplicate records to reside in the profile file if two or more reference records pertain to one individual (for example, because of a misspelled last name). To address this possibility, a final pass is made over the merged profile file, and record pairs are flagged for manual review. Table 3 shows an exemplary expert profile record created from expert reference records.
fname ARTHUR
mname Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertisePediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat Subcat Subcat cate ory address cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 3: Expert Profile Record Created from Expert Reference Records Block 930 entails adding additional information to the expert reference records. In the exemplary embodiment, this entail harvesting information from other databases and sources, such as from professional licensing authorities, telephone directories, and so forth. References to experts in JVS documents, the original entity record source in this embodiment, often have little or no location information for experts, whereas professional license records typically include the expert's full name, and the full current home and/or business address, making them a promising source for additional data.
One exemplary licensing authority is the Drug Enforcement Agency, which licenses health-care professionals to prescribe drugs.
In determining whether a harvested license record (analogous to a reference record) and expert person refer to the same person, the exemplary embodiment computes a Bayesian match probability based on first name, middle name, last name, name suffix, city-state information, area of expertise, and name rarity. If the match probability meets or exceeds a threshold probability, one or more elements of information from the harvested license record are incorporated into the expert reference record. If the threshold criteria is not met, the harvested license record is stored in a database for merger consideration with later added or harvested records.
In.
(Some embodiments perform an extraction procedure on the supplemental data similar to that described at block 910 to define reference records, which are then sent as a set for merger processing as in block 910 with the expert reference records.) fname ARTHUR
mname R
Iname ABLIN
suffix de ree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat 1 ediatrics Subcat 2 Blood & lasma Subcat 3 oncolo cate o Medical & sur ical address 43 Culloden Pk Road city SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Zip 94901 Table 4: Expert-Profile Record in which Middle Name, Address, and ZIP-code Fields Filled or Harvested from Professional License Record Block 940 entails categorizing expert profiles by area of expertise. In the exemplary embodiment, each expert witness record is assigned one or more classification categories in an expertise taxonomy. Categorization of the entity records allows users to browse and search expert witness (or other professional) profiles by area of expertise. To map an expert profile record to an expertise subcategory, the exemplary embodiment uses an expertise categorizer and a taxonomy that contains top-level categories and subcategories.
The exemplary taxonomy includes the following top-level categories:
Accident & Injury; Accounting & Economics; Computers & Electronics;
Construction & Architecture; Criminal, Fraud and Personal Identity; Employment &
Vocational; Engineering & Science; Environmental; Family & Child Custody;
Legal & Insurance; Medical & Surgical; Property & Real Estate; Psychiatry &
Psychology;
Vehicles, Transportation, Equipment & Machines. Each categories includes one or more subcategories. For example, the "Accident & Injury" category has the following subcategories: Aerobics, Animals, Apparel, Asbestos, Boating, Bombing, Burn/Thermal, Child Care, Child Safety, Construction, Coroner, Cosmetologists/Beauticians/Barbers/Tattoos, Dog Bites, Entertainment, and Exercise.
Assignment of subject-matter categories to an expert profile record entail using a function that maps a professional descriptor associated with the expert to a leaf node in the expertise taxonomy. This function is represented with the following equation:
- f(S) where T denotes a set of taxonomy nodes, and S is the professional descriptor.
The exemplary function f uses a lexicon of 500 four-character sets that map professional descriptors to expertise area. For example, experts having the "onco"
professional descriptor are categorized to the oncology specialist, oncologist, and pediatric oncologist subcategories. Other taxonomies are also feasible. The exemplary embodiment allows descriptors to map to more than one expertise area (that is, category or subcategory) in the taxonomy. For example, "pediatric surgeon" can be mapped to both the "pediatrics" node and "surgery" nodes. Table 5 shows an example of an expert profile record in which the expertise field has been mapped to the category "Medical & Surgical" and to the subcategories "pediatrics,"
"blood &
plasma," and "oncology."
fname ARTHUR
_ mname Iname ABLIN
suffix degree MD
or Ex ertise Pediatric hematolo /oncolo Subcat 1 ediatrics Subcat 2 Blood & lasma Subcat 3 oncolo cate o Medical & sur ical address cit SAN FRANCISCO
state CA
Table 5: Expert Profile Record with Expertise Area Mapped to "Medical & Surgical"
Block 940 entails associating one or more text documents and/or additional data sets with one or more of the professional profiles. To this end, the exemplary embodiment logically associates or links one or more JVS documents and/or Medline articles to expert-witness profile records using Bayesian based record matching.
Table 6 shows a sample Medline article.
TITLE: Functional and clinical outcomes of limb-sparing therapy for pediatric extremity sarcomas.
AUTHORS: Bertucio C S; Wara W M; Matthay K K; Ablin A R; Johnston J O;
O'Donnell R J; Weinberg V; Haas-Kogan D A
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0226, USA.
JOURNAL: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (United States) DATE: Mar 1 2001.
Table 6: Sample Text from Medline Article To link JVS documents and medline abstracts to expert profile records, expert-reference records are extracted from the articles using one or more suitable parsers through parsing and matched to profile records using a Bayesian inference network similar to the profile-matching technology described previously. For JVS
documents, the Bayesian network computes match probabilities using seven pieces of match evidence: last name, first name, middle name, name suffix, location, organization, and area of expertise. For medline articles, the match probability is based additionally on name rarity, as described in the previously mentioned Dozier patent application.
Figure 10 shows a flow chart 1000 of an exemplary method of growing and maintaining one or more entity directories, such expert database that used in system 100. Flow chart 1100 includes process blocks 1010-1050.
At block 1010, the exemplary method begins with receipt of a document. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails receipt of an unmarked document, such an a judicial opinion or brief. However, other embodiments receive and process other types of documents. Execution then advances to block 1020.
Block 1020 entails determining the type of document. The exemplary embodiments uses one or more methods for determining document type, for example, looking for particular document format and syntax and/or keywords to differentiate among a set of types. In some embodiments, type can be inferred from the source of the document. Incoming content types, such as case law, jury verdicts, law reviews, briefs, etc., have a variety of grammar, syntax, and structural differences.
After type (or document description) is determined, execution continues at block 1030.
Block 1030 entails extracting one or more entity reference records from the received document based on the determined type of the document. In the exemplary embodiment, four types of entity records are extracted: personal names, such as attorneys, judges, expert witnesses; organizational names, such as firms and companies;
product names, such as drugs and chemicals; and fact profiles ("vernacular" of subject area). Specialized or configurable parsers (finite state transducers), which are selected or configured on the basis of the determined document type and the entity record being built, identify and extract entity information for each type of entity.
Parsers extract information by specifically searching for a named entity (person, address, company, etc.) or by relationships between entities. Parser text-extraction is based on the data's input criteria. For example, the more structured (tagged) data enables a "tighter" set of rules to be built within a parser.
This set of rules allows more specific information to be extracted about a particular entity. A
more "free" data collection, such as a web site, is not as conducive to rule-based parsers. A collection could also include a combination of structured, semi-structured, and free data. More specifically, parsers are developed through "regular-expression"
methods. The regular expressions serves are "rules" for parsers to find entity types and categories of information.
Block 1040 attempts to link or logically associate each extracted entity reference record with one or more existing authority directories. In the exemplary embodiment, this entails computing a Bayesian match probability for each extracted entity reference and one more corresponding candidate records in corresponding directories (or databases) that have been designated as authoritative in terms of accepted accuracy. If the match probability satisfies match criteria, the records are merged or associated and the input document. Execution then proceeds to block 1050.
Block 1050 entails enriching unmatched entity reference records using a matching process. In the exemplary embodiment, this enriching process entails operating specific types of data harvesters on the web, other databases, and other directories or lists, to assemble a cache of new relevant profile information for databases, such as expert database 112 in Figure 1. The unmatched or unmarked entity records are then matched against the harvested entity records using Bayesian matching. Those that satisfy the match criteria are referred to a quality control process for verification or confirmation prior to addition to the relevant entity directory. The quality control process may be manual, semi-automatic, or fully automatic. For example, some embodiments base the type of quality control on the degree to which the match criteria is exceeded.
In some embodiments, blocks 1050 operates in parallel with blocks 1010-1 S 1040, continually retrieving new entity related data using any number of web crawlers, relational databases, or CDs, and attempting to building new entity records.
Conclusion The embodiments described above are intended only to illustrate and teach one or more ways of practicing or implementing the present invention, not to restrict its breadth or scope. The actual scope of the invention, which embraces all ways of practicing or implementing the teachings of the invention, is defined only by the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (6)
1. A system comprising:
means for extracting one or more entity reference records from documents;
means for defining one or more entity records by merging one or more of the entity reference records with one or more other entity reference records;
means for categorizing one or more of the defined entity records based on a taxonomy;
means for defining links between one or more of the defined entity records and other documents or data sets; and graphical user interface means for defining a query related to an entity, for viewing one or more documents resulting from the query, and for selecting one or more of the defined links within a legal, financial, healthcare, scientific, or educational document and causing retrieval and display of at least a portion of the one defined entity record.
means for extracting one or more entity reference records from documents;
means for defining one or more entity records by merging one or more of the entity reference records with one or more other entity reference records;
means for categorizing one or more of the defined entity records based on a taxonomy;
means for defining links between one or more of the defined entity records and other documents or data sets; and graphical user interface means for defining a query related to an entity, for viewing one or more documents resulting from the query, and for selecting one or more of the defined links within a legal, financial, healthcare, scientific, or educational document and causing retrieval and display of at least a portion of the one defined entity record.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more of the recited means include one or more processors, computer-readable medium, display devices, and network communications, with the machine-readable medium including coded instructions and data structures.
3. A method comprising:
extracting one or more entity reference records from documents;
defining one or more entity records by merging one or more of the entity reference records with one or more other entity reference records;
categorizing one or more of the defined entity records based on a taxonomy;
and defining links between one or more of the defined entity records and other documents or data sets.
extracting one or more entity reference records from documents;
defining one or more entity records by merging one or more of the entity reference records with one or more other entity reference records;
categorizing one or more of the defined entity records based on a taxonomy;
and defining links between one or more of the defined entity records and other documents or data sets.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
providing network accessible graphical user interface means for defining a query related to an entity, for viewing one or more documents resulting from the query, and for selecting one or more of the defined links within a legal, financial, healthcare, scientific, or educational document and causing retrieval and display of at least a portion of the one defined entity record.
providing network accessible graphical user interface means for defining a query related to an entity, for viewing one or more documents resulting from the query, and for selecting one or more of the defined links within a legal, financial, healthcare, scientific, or educational document and causing retrieval and display of at least a portion of the one defined entity record.
5. A method comprising:
extracting an entity reference record from a document;
in response to failing to match the entity reference record to any entity record in a set of records, attempting to match the entity reference record to a set of harvested entity records outside the set of records;
in response to a match of the entity reference records to at least one of the harvest entity records, merging the records and adding them to the set of records.
extracting an entity reference record from a document;
in response to failing to match the entity reference record to any entity record in a set of records, attempting to match the entity reference record to a set of harvested entity records outside the set of records;
in response to a match of the entity reference records to at least one of the harvest entity records, merging the records and adding them to the set of records.
6. A server comprising means for receiving queries for documents from client devices and means for outputting results of queries to the client devices, with the results provided in association with one or more interactive control features that are selectable to invoke display of information regarding entities referenced in the results.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US53358803P | 2003-12-31 | 2003-12-31 | |
US60/533,588 | 2003-12-31 | ||
PCT/US2005/000033 WO2005066848A1 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2005-01-03 | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2553196A1 true CA2553196A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
CA2553196C CA2553196C (en) | 2013-03-19 |
Family
ID=34748921
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2553196A Active CA2553196C (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2005-01-03 | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories |
Country Status (13)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7571174B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1704497B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4919487B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100472520C (en) |
AR (1) | AR047362A1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE551658T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005204147A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0506673A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2553196C (en) |
ES (1) | ES2388817T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1104101A1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ548804A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005066848A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (53)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7333966B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2008-02-19 | Thomson Global Resources | Systems, methods, and software for hyperlinking names |
JP2006512693A (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2006-04-13 | トムソン コーポレイション | A knowledge management system for law firms. |
AU2005204147A1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2005-07-21 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories |
WO2006007458A2 (en) * | 2004-06-23 | 2006-01-19 | Lexisnexis Courtlink, Inc. | Computerized system and method for creating aggregate profile reports regarding litigants, attorneys, law firms, judges, and cases by type and by court from court docket records |
US8935229B1 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2015-01-13 | West Services, Inc. | System for determining and displaying legal-practice trends and identifying corporate legal needs |
US7386550B2 (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2008-06-10 | Xerox Corporation | Document anonymization apparatus and method |
CA2632730C (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2018-12-18 | Ingenix, Inc. | Analyzing administrative healthcare claims data and other data sources |
US8738639B1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2014-05-27 | Verizon Data Services Llc | Methods and systems for an information directory providing audiovisual content |
US8392417B2 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2013-03-05 | David P. Gold | System and method for organizing, processing and presenting information |
US8595245B2 (en) * | 2006-07-26 | 2013-11-26 | Xerox Corporation | Reference resolution for text enrichment and normalization in mining mixed data |
AU2008205007A1 (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2008-07-17 | Sanpulse Technologies, Inc. | Storage optimization method |
US20080177566A1 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2008-07-24 | Kryptiq Corporation | Provider directory publisher |
WO2008111939A1 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Center'd Corporation | People and business search result optimization |
US20080228719A1 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Fatdoor, Inc. | People and business search result optimization |
CA2717462C (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2016-09-27 | Evri Inc. | Query templates and labeled search tip system, methods, and techniques |
US8156166B2 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2012-04-10 | Intuit Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a doctor based on an observed experience level |
EP2176790A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2010-04-21 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Graphical user interfaces for jury verdict information |
US20090055262A1 (en) * | 2007-08-23 | 2009-02-26 | Terri Coulter | System and method for advertising testimonial services |
US8594996B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2013-11-26 | Evri Inc. | NLP-based entity recognition and disambiguation |
AU2008312423B2 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2013-12-19 | Vcvc Iii Llc | NLP-based content recommender |
US20090106225A1 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-23 | Smith Wade S | Identification of medical practitioners who emphasize specific medical conditions or medical procedures in their practice |
US9501467B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2016-11-22 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Systems, methods, software and interfaces for entity extraction and resolution and tagging |
EP2227756A4 (en) * | 2007-12-31 | 2012-12-12 | Thomson Reuters Glo Resources | System, method, and software for researching, analyzing, and comparing expert witnesses |
US8843522B2 (en) * | 2008-09-15 | 2014-09-23 | Thomson Reuters (Markets) Llc | Systems and methods for rapid delivery of tiered metadata |
US8726236B2 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2014-05-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining context specific content |
US9111004B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2015-08-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Temporal scope translation of meta-models using semantic web technologies |
US9026412B2 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2015-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing and maintaining scope in a service oriented architecture industry model repository |
US8600173B2 (en) * | 2010-01-27 | 2013-12-03 | Dst Technologies, Inc. | Contextualization of machine indeterminable information based on machine determinable information |
US8943145B1 (en) * | 2010-02-08 | 2015-01-27 | Intuit Inc. | Customer support via social network |
US8918388B1 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2014-12-23 | Turn Inc. | Custom data warehouse on top of mapreduce |
US9710556B2 (en) * | 2010-03-01 | 2017-07-18 | Vcvc Iii Llc | Content recommendation based on collections of entities |
JP4898934B2 (en) | 2010-03-29 | 2012-03-21 | 株式会社Ubic | Forensic system, forensic method, and forensic program |
JP4868191B2 (en) | 2010-03-29 | 2012-02-01 | 株式会社Ubic | Forensic system, forensic method, and forensic program |
US8645125B2 (en) | 2010-03-30 | 2014-02-04 | Evri, Inc. | NLP-based systems and methods for providing quotations |
US11386510B2 (en) * | 2010-08-05 | 2022-07-12 | Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre Gmbh | Method and system for integrating web-based systems with local document processing applications |
CN103250129A (en) | 2010-09-24 | 2013-08-14 | 国际商业机器公司 | Providing question and answers with deferred type evaluation using text with limited structure |
US8725739B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2014-05-13 | Evri, Inc. | Category-based content recommendation |
US9195769B2 (en) * | 2011-07-20 | 2015-11-24 | Opentable, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US9202176B1 (en) * | 2011-08-08 | 2015-12-01 | Gravity.Com, Inc. | Entity analysis system |
US9158754B2 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2015-10-13 | The Echo Nest Corporation | Named entity extraction from a block of text |
JP6111938B2 (en) * | 2013-08-29 | 2017-04-12 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Information processing program and information processing apparatus |
US20150269612A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Entity platform and entity store |
US10817591B2 (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2020-10-27 | Minin Inc. | Systems and methods for mapping licenses data from disparate databases |
CA2987838A1 (en) | 2015-06-11 | 2017-02-02 | Jochen L. LEIDNER | Risk identification and risk register generation system and engine |
US11308112B2 (en) | 2018-03-08 | 2022-04-19 | Micah Mossman | Interactive library system and method of interactive, real-time creation and customization |
US11301531B2 (en) | 2018-03-08 | 2022-04-12 | Micah Mossman | Interactive library system and method of interactive, real-time creation and customization |
US11301424B2 (en) | 2018-03-08 | 2022-04-12 | Micah Mossman | Interactive library system and method of interactive, real-time creation and customization |
US10732993B2 (en) | 2018-03-08 | 2020-08-04 | Micah Mossman | Interactive library system and method of interactive, real-time creation and customization |
US11301530B2 (en) | 2018-03-08 | 2022-04-12 | Micah Mossman | Interactive library system and method of interactive, real-time creation and customization |
JP7090574B2 (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2022-06-24 | ヤフー株式会社 | Information processing equipment, information processing methods, and programs |
BR102019008715A2 (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2020-11-10 | Telefonica Brasil S.A. | method of identifying address fraud in an electronic proof of residence document. |
CN113157996B (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2022-09-16 | 久瓴(上海)智能科技有限公司 | Document information processing method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
US20220180215A1 (en) * | 2020-12-08 | 2022-06-09 | Nitin Kumar | System and computer network for knowledge search and analysis |
Family Cites Families (147)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3872448A (en) | 1972-12-11 | 1975-03-18 | Community Health Computing Inc | Hospital data processing system |
US4384288A (en) | 1980-12-31 | 1983-05-17 | Walton Charles A | Portable radio frequency emitting identifier |
US4799258A (en) | 1984-02-13 | 1989-01-17 | National Research Development Corporation | Apparatus and methods for granting access to computers |
US4575621A (en) | 1984-03-07 | 1986-03-11 | Corpra Research, Inc. | Portable electronic transaction device and system therefor |
US4817050A (en) | 1985-11-22 | 1989-03-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Database system |
US4893270A (en) | 1986-05-12 | 1990-01-09 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Medical information system |
US4887212A (en) | 1986-10-29 | 1989-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Parser for natural language text |
DE3823259C2 (en) | 1987-07-08 | 1994-09-01 | Toshiba Kawasaki Kk | Device for archiving and transmitting medical image data |
US4864501A (en) | 1987-10-07 | 1989-09-05 | Houghton Mifflin Company | Word annotation system |
US4878175A (en) | 1987-11-03 | 1989-10-31 | Emtek Health Care Systems | Method for generating patient-specific flowsheets by adding/deleting parameters |
US5157783A (en) | 1988-02-26 | 1992-10-20 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Data base system which maintains project query list, desktop list and status of multiple ongoing research projects |
US4994966A (en) | 1988-03-31 | 1991-02-19 | Emerson & Stern Associates, Inc. | System and method for natural language parsing by initiating processing prior to entry of complete sentences |
US5146439A (en) | 1989-01-04 | 1992-09-08 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Records management system having dictation/transcription capability |
US5408655A (en) | 1989-02-27 | 1995-04-18 | Apple Computer, Inc. | User interface system and method for traversing a database |
US5860136A (en) | 1989-06-16 | 1999-01-12 | Fenner; Peter R. | Method and apparatus for use of associated memory with large key spaces |
US5842224A (en) | 1989-06-16 | 1998-11-24 | Fenner; Peter R. | Method and apparatus for source filtering data packets between networks of differing media |
US5418942A (en) | 1989-07-06 | 1995-05-23 | Krawchuk; Kenneth V. | System and method for storing and managing information |
US5065315A (en) | 1989-10-24 | 1991-11-12 | Garcia Angela M | System and method for scheduling and reporting patient related services including prioritizing services |
US5233513A (en) | 1989-12-28 | 1993-08-03 | Doyle William P | Business modeling, software engineering and prototyping method and apparatus |
US5253362A (en) | 1990-01-29 | 1993-10-12 | Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc. | Method for storing, retrieving, and indicating a plurality of annotations in a data cell |
US5218697A (en) | 1990-04-18 | 1993-06-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for networking computers having varying file architectures |
US5291399A (en) | 1990-07-27 | 1994-03-01 | Executone Information Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for accessing a portable personal database as for a hospital environment |
US5317729A (en) | 1990-10-24 | 1994-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for the storage of multi-versioned data with retrieval based on searched query |
US5204947A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1993-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application independent (open) hypermedia enablement services |
US5297249A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1994-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hypermedia link marker abstract and search services |
US5581460A (en) | 1990-11-06 | 1996-12-03 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Medical diagnostic report forming apparatus capable of attaching image data on report |
US5414838A (en) | 1991-06-11 | 1995-05-09 | Logical Information Machine | System for extracting historical market information with condition and attributed windows |
CA2066559A1 (en) | 1991-07-29 | 1993-01-30 | Walter S. Rosenbaum | Non-text object storage and retrieval |
US5377323A (en) | 1991-09-13 | 1994-12-27 | Sun Microsytems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for a federated naming system which can resolve a composite name composed of names from any number of disparate naming systems |
US5488725A (en) | 1991-10-08 | 1996-01-30 | West Publishing Company | System of document representation retrieval by successive iterated probability sampling |
US5265065A (en) | 1991-10-08 | 1993-11-23 | West Publishing Company | Method and apparatus for information retrieval from a database by replacing domain specific stemmed phases in a natural language to create a search query |
JP3300391B2 (en) | 1991-10-11 | 2002-07-08 | 株式会社東芝 | Image processing device |
US5283884A (en) | 1991-12-30 | 1994-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | CKD channel with predictive track table |
US5490250A (en) | 1991-12-31 | 1996-02-06 | Amdahl Corporation | Method and apparatus for transferring indication of control error into data path of data switcher |
US5361346A (en) | 1992-01-15 | 1994-11-01 | Santa Monica Pioneer Research Inc. | Portable tester (qualifier) for evaluating and testing SCSI interface magnetic disc drives in accordance with ANSI SCSI-A and SCSI-2 definitions |
US5434974A (en) | 1992-03-30 | 1995-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Name resolution for a multisystem network |
US5319711A (en) | 1992-08-19 | 1994-06-07 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Wireless device for verifying identification |
US5515534A (en) | 1992-09-29 | 1996-05-07 | At&T Corp. | Method of translating free-format data records into a normalized format based on weighted attribute variants |
US5459860A (en) | 1992-10-05 | 1995-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computerized system and process for managing a distributed database system |
US5558638A (en) | 1993-04-30 | 1996-09-24 | Healthdyne, Inc. | Patient monitor and support system |
US5544352A (en) | 1993-06-14 | 1996-08-06 | Libertech, Inc. | Method and apparatus for indexing, searching and displaying data |
US5361202A (en) | 1993-06-18 | 1994-11-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Computer display system and method for facilitating access to patient data records in a medical information system |
US5506984A (en) | 1993-06-30 | 1996-04-09 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and system for data retrieval in a distributed system using linked location references on a plurality of nodes |
US5438655A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1995-08-01 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Methods and apparatus for updating and antialiasing waveforms |
US5477215A (en) | 1993-08-02 | 1995-12-19 | At&T Corp. | Arrangement for simultaneously interrogating a plurality of portable radio frequency communication devices |
US5806079A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1998-09-08 | Smartpatents, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects |
US5497317A (en) | 1993-12-28 | 1996-03-05 | Thomson Trading Services, Inc. | Device and method for improving the speed and reliability of security trade settlements |
US5822720A (en) | 1994-02-16 | 1998-10-13 | Sentius Corporation | System amd method for linking streams of multimedia data for reference material for display |
US5560005A (en) | 1994-02-25 | 1996-09-24 | Actamed Corp. | Methods and systems for object-based relational distributed databases |
US6141663A (en) | 1994-03-18 | 2000-10-31 | Unimax Systems Corporation | Automatic external data synchronization method |
EP0674187B1 (en) | 1994-03-22 | 1998-02-04 | Agfa-Gevaert N.V. | Radiation image identifying method |
CA2125300C (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1999-10-12 | Douglas J. Ballantyne | Method and apparatus for the electronic distribution of medical information and patient services |
US5557539A (en) | 1994-06-13 | 1996-09-17 | Centigram Communications Corporation | Apparatus and method for testing an interactive voice messaging system |
US5608900A (en) | 1994-06-21 | 1997-03-04 | Internationl Business Machines Corp. | Generation and storage of connections between objects in a computer network |
US5535372A (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1996-07-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient updating of CKD data stored on fixed block architecture devices |
US5623652A (en) | 1994-07-25 | 1997-04-22 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for searching for information in a network and for controlling the display of searchable information on display devices in the network |
US5434932A (en) | 1994-07-28 | 1995-07-18 | West Publishing Company | Line alignment apparatus and process |
US5603025A (en) | 1994-07-29 | 1997-02-11 | Borland International, Inc. | Methods for hypertext reporting in a relational database management system |
US5629981A (en) | 1994-07-29 | 1997-05-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Information management and security system |
US5715445A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1998-02-03 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document retrieval system employing a preloading procedure |
US5659676A (en) | 1994-09-20 | 1997-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for creating and refreshing compound documents |
CA2204736A1 (en) | 1994-11-08 | 1996-05-23 | Charles H. Ferguson | An online service development tool with fee setting capabilities |
US5617565A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1997-04-01 | Hitachi America, Ltd. | Broadcast interactive multimedia system |
US5530852A (en) | 1994-12-20 | 1996-06-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for extracting profiles and topics from a first file written in a first markup language and generating files in different markup languages containing the profiles and topics for use in accessing data described by the profiles and topics |
GB9426165D0 (en) | 1994-12-23 | 1995-02-22 | Anthony Andre C | Method of retrieving and displaying data |
US5794050A (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1998-08-11 | Intelligent Text Processing, Inc. | Natural language understanding system |
US5873077A (en) | 1995-01-13 | 1999-02-16 | Ricoh Corporation | Method and apparatus for searching for and retrieving documents using a facsimile machine |
US5708825A (en) | 1995-05-26 | 1998-01-13 | Iconovex Corporation | Automatic summary page creation and hyperlink generation |
US5963205A (en) | 1995-05-26 | 1999-10-05 | Iconovex Corporation | Automatic index creation for a word processor |
US5870770A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-02-09 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document research system and method for displaying citing documents |
US5664109A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-09-02 | E-Systems, Inc. | Method for extracting pre-defined data items from medical service records generated by health care providers |
US5740549A (en) | 1995-06-12 | 1998-04-14 | Pointcast, Inc. | Information and advertising distribution system and method |
JP3700733B2 (en) * | 1995-06-12 | 2005-09-28 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Document management apparatus and document management method |
US5860073A (en) | 1995-07-17 | 1999-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Style sheets for publishing system |
US5878421A (en) | 1995-07-17 | 1999-03-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Information map |
US5644720A (en) | 1995-07-31 | 1997-07-01 | West Publishing Company | Interprocess communications interface for managing transaction requests |
US5942986A (en) | 1995-08-09 | 1999-08-24 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | System and method for automatic critical event notification |
US5745360A (en) | 1995-08-14 | 1998-04-28 | International Business Machines Corp. | Dynamic hypertext link converter system and process |
US5963940A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 1999-10-05 | Syracuse University | Natural language information retrieval system and method |
US6026388A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 2000-02-15 | Textwise, Llc | User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method |
US5740252A (en) | 1995-10-13 | 1998-04-14 | C/Net, Inc. | Apparatus and method for passing private demographic information between hyperlink destinations |
US5764906A (en) | 1995-11-07 | 1998-06-09 | Netword Llc | Universal electronic resource denotation, request and delivery system |
US5754857A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1998-05-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Distributed asynchronous workflow on the net |
US5822539A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1998-10-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System for adding requested document cross references to a document by annotation proxy configured to merge and a directory generator and annotation server |
US5781900A (en) | 1996-01-02 | 1998-07-14 | Sofmap Future Design, Inc. | Flexible hyperlink association system |
US5751961A (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1998-05-12 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Integrated internet system for translating logical addresses of internet documents to physical addresses using integrated service control point |
US5862325A (en) | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5745908A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-04-28 | Systems Focus International | Method for converting a word processing file containing markup language tags and conventional computer code |
US5867562A (en) * | 1996-04-17 | 1999-02-02 | Scherer; Gordon F. | Call processing system with call screening |
US5905866A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1999-05-18 | A.I. Soft Corporation | Data-update monitoring in communications network |
US6233591B1 (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 2001-05-15 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Dropping hyperlink onto document object |
EP0810534B1 (en) | 1996-05-13 | 2003-03-19 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Document display system and electronic dictionary |
US5794236A (en) | 1996-05-29 | 1998-08-11 | Lexis-Nexis | Computer-based system for classifying documents into a hierarchy and linking the classifications to the hierarchy |
US5742181A (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1998-04-21 | Hewlett-Packard Co. | FPGA with hierarchical interconnect structure and hyperlinks |
US5724595A (en) | 1996-06-19 | 1998-03-03 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Simple method for creating hypertext links |
US5907680A (en) | 1996-06-24 | 1999-05-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Client-side, server-side and collaborative spell check of URL's |
US5963950A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 1999-10-05 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for facilitating access to selectable elements on a graphical user interface |
US5761436A (en) | 1996-07-01 | 1998-06-02 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for combining truncated hyperlinks to form a hyperlink aggregate |
US6434567B1 (en) | 1996-07-30 | 2002-08-13 | Carlos De La Huerga | Method for specifying enterprise-wide database address formats |
US6345268B1 (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2002-02-05 | Carlos De La Huerga | Method and system for resolving temporal descriptors of data records in a computer system |
US5895461A (en) | 1996-07-30 | 1999-04-20 | Telaric, Inc. | Method and system for automated data storage and retrieval with uniform addressing scheme |
US6272505B1 (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2001-08-07 | Carlos De La Huerga | Document modification based hyperlink limiting method and apparatus |
US6308171B1 (en) | 1996-07-30 | 2001-10-23 | Carlos De La Huerga | Method and system for automated data storage and retrieval |
US5903889A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 1999-05-11 | Telaric, Inc. | System and method for translating, collecting and archiving patient records |
US6516321B1 (en) * | 1996-07-30 | 2003-02-04 | Carlos De La Huerga | Method for database address specification |
US6353822B1 (en) * | 1996-08-22 | 2002-03-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Program-listing appendix |
JP3773602B2 (en) | 1996-09-18 | 2006-05-10 | 株式会社東芝 | Hypertext processing apparatus and method |
US5764916A (en) | 1996-09-27 | 1998-06-09 | Ichat, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real time communication over a computer network |
US6037944A (en) * | 1996-11-07 | 2000-03-14 | Natrificial Llc | Method and apparatus for displaying a thought network from a thought's perspective |
US5836771A (en) | 1996-12-02 | 1998-11-17 | Ho; Chi Fai | Learning method and system based on questioning |
US6216141B1 (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 2001-04-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for integrating a document into a desktop window on a client computer |
EP0848337A1 (en) | 1996-12-12 | 1998-06-17 | SONY DEUTSCHLAND GmbH | Server with automatic document assembly |
JPH10228473A (en) * | 1997-02-13 | 1998-08-25 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Document picture processing method, document picture processor and storage medium |
US5875446A (en) | 1997-02-24 | 1999-02-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for hierarchically grouping and ranking a set of objects in a query context based on one or more relationships |
US5973692A (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 1999-10-26 | Knowlton; Kenneth Charles | System for the capture and indexing of graphical representations of files, information sources and the like |
US5970505A (en) | 1997-03-31 | 1999-10-19 | Sun Mirosystems, Inc. | Linking related data in a document set including a plurality of books written by different groups of authors in a computer network |
US6038573A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 2000-03-14 | Avid Technology, Inc. | News story markup language and system and process for editing and processing documents |
US5987454A (en) | 1997-06-09 | 1999-11-16 | Hobbs; Allen | Method and apparatus for selectively augmenting retrieved text, numbers, maps, charts, still pictures and/or graphics, moving pictures and/or graphics and audio information from a network resource |
US6025844A (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 2000-02-15 | Netscape Communications Corporation | Method and system for creating dynamic link views |
US5974413A (en) | 1997-07-03 | 1999-10-26 | Activeword Systems, Inc. | Semantic user interface |
US5905991A (en) | 1997-08-21 | 1999-05-18 | Reynolds; Mark L | System and method providing navigation between documents by creating associations based on bridges between combinations of document elements and software |
US6356922B1 (en) * | 1997-09-15 | 2002-03-12 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Method and system for suggesting related documents |
US6256631B1 (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2001-07-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic creation of hyperlinks |
US6091412A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2000-07-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Universal client device permitting a computer to receive and display information from several special applications |
US6094657A (en) * | 1997-10-01 | 2000-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for dynamic meta-tagging of compound documents |
US5940843A (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1999-08-17 | Multex Systems, Inc. | Information delivery system and method including restriction processing |
US6014662A (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2000-01-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Configurable briefing presentations of search results on a graphical interface |
US6094649A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-07-25 | Partnet, Inc. | Keyword searches of structured databases |
US6085226A (en) * | 1998-01-15 | 2000-07-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for utility-directed prefetching of web pages into local cache using continual computation and user models |
US6067565A (en) * | 1998-01-15 | 2000-05-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Technique for prefetching a web page of potential future interest in lieu of continuing a current information download |
US6151624A (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2000-11-21 | Realnames Corporation | Navigating network resources based on metadata |
US6092074A (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2000-07-18 | Connect Innovations, Inc. | Dynamic insertion and updating of hypertext links for internet servers |
US6457028B1 (en) | 1998-03-18 | 2002-09-24 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for finding related collections of linked documents using co-citation analysis |
US6038574A (en) * | 1998-03-18 | 2000-03-14 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for clustering a collection of linked documents using co-citation analysis |
US6122647A (en) * | 1998-05-19 | 2000-09-19 | Perspecta, Inc. | Dynamic generation of contextual links in hypertext documents |
US6205576B1 (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2001-03-20 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for identifying indirect messaging relationships between software entities |
US6263121B1 (en) * | 1998-09-16 | 2001-07-17 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Archival and retrieval of similar documents |
US7003719B1 (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2006-02-21 | West Publishing Company, Dba West Group | System, method, and software for inserting hyperlinks into documents |
US6341306B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2002-01-22 | Atomica Corporation | Web-based information retrieval responsive to displayed word identified by a text-grabbing algorithm |
US6507837B1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-01-14 | Hyperphrase Technologies, Llc | Tiered and content based database searching |
US6654758B1 (en) | 2000-07-21 | 2003-11-25 | Unisys Corporation | Method for searching multiple file types on a CD ROM |
TW548557B (en) * | 2000-09-13 | 2003-08-21 | Intumit Inc | A method and system for electronic document to have fast-search category and mutual link |
US7143339B2 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2006-11-28 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for dynamically formatting and displaying tabular data in real time |
US20030041305A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-02-27 | Christoph Schnelle | Resilient data links |
US7333966B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2008-02-19 | Thomson Global Resources | Systems, methods, and software for hyperlinking names |
EA200400873A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2005-12-29 | Джеффри Джэймс Джонас | REAL-TIME DATA STORAGE |
AU2005204147A1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2005-07-21 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories |
-
2005
- 2005-01-03 AU AU2005204147A patent/AU2005204147A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-01-03 NZ NZ548804A patent/NZ548804A/en unknown
- 2005-01-03 WO PCT/US2005/000033 patent/WO2005066848A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-01-03 EP EP05704881A patent/EP1704497B1/en active Active
- 2005-01-03 US US11/028,464 patent/US7571174B2/en active Active
- 2005-01-03 EP EP20100075618 patent/EP2270688A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-01-03 AR ARP050100009A patent/AR047362A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-01-03 JP JP2006547606A patent/JP4919487B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-03 AT AT05704881T patent/ATE551658T1/en active
- 2005-01-03 CN CNB2005800061894A patent/CN100472520C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-03 CA CA2553196A patent/CA2553196C/en active Active
- 2005-01-03 ES ES05704881T patent/ES2388817T3/en active Active
- 2005-01-03 BR BRPI0506673-5A patent/BRPI0506673A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2007
- 2007-08-07 HK HK07108603.5A patent/HK1104101A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2009
- 2009-07-28 US US12/510,914 patent/US8001129B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-11-21 JP JP2011254058A patent/JP5670294B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2388817T3 (en) | 2012-10-18 |
JP2012043469A (en) | 2012-03-01 |
CN100472520C (en) | 2009-03-25 |
US20100121889A1 (en) | 2010-05-13 |
EP2270688A1 (en) | 2011-01-05 |
AU2005204147A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
BRPI0506673A (en) | 2007-05-15 |
JP5670294B2 (en) | 2015-02-18 |
EP1704497A1 (en) | 2006-09-27 |
HK1104101A1 (en) | 2008-01-04 |
AR047362A1 (en) | 2006-01-18 |
ATE551658T1 (en) | 2012-04-15 |
CN1934567A (en) | 2007-03-21 |
EP1704497B1 (en) | 2012-03-28 |
NZ548804A (en) | 2008-11-28 |
AU2005204147A2 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
US8001129B2 (en) | 2011-08-16 |
US7571174B2 (en) | 2009-08-04 |
CA2553196C (en) | 2013-03-19 |
JP4919487B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 |
WO2005066848A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
US20050234968A1 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
JP2007522543A (en) | 2007-08-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2553196C (en) | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories | |
Detmer et al. | Using the Internet to improve knowledge diffusion in medicine | |
Chi et al. | Improving cache performance by selective cache bypass | |
Fontelo et al. | ask MEDLINE: a free-text, natural language query tool for MEDLINE/PubMed | |
Schlosser et al. | Searching for evidence in augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature | |
Lossio Ventura et al. | Biomedical terminology extraction: A new combination of statistical and web mining approaches | |
Houston et al. | Exploring the use of concept spaces to improve medical information retrieval | |
Sneiderman et al. | Knowledge-based methods to help clinicians find answers in MEDLINE | |
Luo | Design and evaluation of the iMed intelligent medical search engine | |
Oard et al. | TREC 2006 at Maryland: Blog, Enterprise, Legal and QA Tracks. | |
AU2015201007B2 (en) | Systems, methods, interfaces and software for automated collection and integration of entity data into online databases and professional directories | |
Petrosino | The hunt for randomized experimental reports: Document search and efforts for a ‘what works?’meta-analysis | |
Dozier et al. | Creation of an expert witness database through text mining | |
Watters et al. | Filtering for medical news items | |
Choi | Supporting better treatments for meeting health consumers' needs: extracting semantics in social data for representing a consumer health ontology. | |
Soualmia et al. | Combining knowledge-based methods to refine and expand queries in medicine | |
Laforest et al. | Indexing semi-structured documents for context-based information retrieval in a medical information system | |
Brandt et al. | Web-based UMLS concept retrieval by automatic text scanning: a comparison of two methods | |
Hernandez | Visualization for seeking and comparing clinical trials | |
Appleyard | Current Techniques in Health Information Indexing on the WWW | |
Gnocchi et al. | Designing an Internet Search Engine on Disability Issues: Results of a Survey of the Users’ Information Needs | |
Malet et al. | Enhancing Internet Medical Document Retrieval with" Medical Core Metadata." | |
Dadhich | Cybermedicine and Neonatology | |
Chen | Searching for information on occupational accidents | |
Hersh | Augmenting Systems for Users |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |