US20010018673A1 - Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine - Google Patents
Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010018673A1 US20010018673A1 US09/041,315 US4131598A US2001018673A1 US 20010018673 A1 US20010018673 A1 US 20010018673A1 US 4131598 A US4131598 A US 4131598A US 2001018673 A1 US2001018673 A1 US 2001018673A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- agent
- server
- computer program
- content
- customer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 6
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 title claims description 25
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 abstract description 16
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000002747 voluntary effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000013522 software testing Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013515 script Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013024 troubleshooting Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0204—Market segmentation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3466—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
- G06F11/3495—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring for systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/451—Execution arrangements for user interfaces
- G06F9/453—Help systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06315—Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/30—Administration of product recycling or disposal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys; Market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3409—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to customer support for computer programs.
- Customer support is service that computer and software manufacturers (as well as third-party service companies) offer to customers.
- customer support may include a phone number for customer to call for advice and trouble-shooting, a bulletin-board system staffed by service engineers, or a forum within an on-line service.
- Software updates may be downloaded that correct known bugs.
- Internet-based customer support, problem resolution and call tracking has been recently introduced.
- Customer support may be mutually beneficial to both the customer and an ISV. Customer support enables the customer to get the most out of a software product. At the same time, customer support fosters a relationship between an ISV and a customer and provides “up-sale” opportunities for the ISV.
- customer support has been initiated by the customer on a hit-or-miss basis.
- customer support has traditionally been human-intensive. Getting through to a service engineer may be difficult enough in itself, but then the customer must spend a significant amount of time acquainting the service engineer with the customer's individual needs and circumstances. A small “dose” of support is then given. The next occasion for interaction is likely to be much the same. No opportunity exists for broad-based, systematic, individualized customer support.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,406,269 describes a customer intelligence system in which surreptitious telephone reporting calls are made by modem from remote equipment to one or more monitoring sites.
- Various uses for information gathered in this manner are proposed, including determining those customers who are ready for upgrades, showing potential customers usage statistics pertaining to the installed base, etc.
- Communications is one-way, in the uplink direction only.
- surreptitiousness greatly restricts the manner in which the system may be used and raises many issues of privacy and intrusiveness.
- the present invention provides for broad-based, systematic, individualized, interactive customer software support through a two-way, voluntary automated exchange of information between a software agent installed on a customer's machine and a server machine via a wide area computer network, e.g., the Internet.
- Communication between the agent and the server is optimized to be unobtrusive or transparent, using spare bandwidth of intermittent Internet connections, for example.
- the agent is software non-specific and may be instructed to operate with respect to any arbitrary software program, and may further be instructed at various different times to operate with respect to various different software programs, including multiple different software programs on a single machine.
- the agent gathers activity information about the operations of the software program(s) and uploads this information to a particular server machine within a distributed server machine architecture, where it is stored in a database on a per-software-copy basis.
- a rules engine may cause instructions carrying a message targeted specifically toward the customer (based on the activity information) to be downloaded to the agent.
- the agent may take any of various actions, such as present a survey, present an advertisement, send an upgrade notice, present a limited-time offer, deliver individualized marketing messages, offer goods for sale and fulfill the commercial transaction, install an upgrade or bug fix for either an application or the agent itself, etc.
- Message presentation to the customer may be timed (e.g., delayed from the time of download) to achieve maximum impact.
- Timing may be relative to individual program menu selections. For example, a message relating to a particular product feature may be presented just after that feature has been used. The agent may be instructed to operate with additional applications, including applications shipped prior to the existence of the agent. Exemplary uses include marketing, sales, customer registration, technical support, market research, customer surveys, usage monitoring, software testing, in-product advertising, etc.
- FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of the present system
- FIG. 2 is an illustration of a preferred customer enrollment screen display
- FIG. 3 is a more detailed block diagram of the agent of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a distributed server architecture that may be used in the system
- FIG. 5 is an illustration of a screen display in which the time and place of message delivery is controlled
- FIG. 6 is an illustration of a screen display resulting from the user clicking through during display of the screen display of FIG. 5;
- FIG. 7 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message is a survey
- FIG. 8 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message relates to a software update.
- FIG. 9 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message is a banner advertisement.
- a user machine is assumed to include a run-time environment, provided by an operating system, a Web browser or the like, and to be running one or more computer programs.
- the computer programs may be software applications, system software or embedded computer programs.
- Systematic, individualized, interactive customer software support is made possible by equipping the user machine with a persistent client, or agent, that engages in two-way communication with a server.
- the agent may be installed concurrently with an application, may be pre-loaded on the user's machine, may be separately installed from a disk or download, etc.
- the connection between the agent and the server is a virtual connection, i.e., a connection that time-shares a physical communications channel with other communications.
- the virtual connection uses spare bandwidth of intermittent Internet connections to communicate with the server.
- the agent can and typically does interact with the application without a concurrent Internet connection.
- the agent when the agent is first activated on behalf of a particular application, it displays to the user a preferred customer enrollment screen display such as that of FIG. 2. By clicking on the appropriate button, the user may accept or decline to participate in the preferred customer program. If the customer accepts, then the customer enters into an invited relationship with the software vendor and agrees to the software vendor maintaining personalized information about the configuration and use of the application in order to provide individualized service.
- Communications between the agent and the server are also two-way.
- the agent communicates control, configuration and usage information, registration information, survey information, etc.
- the server communicates non-executable content, executable content, or both, including control information, agent updates, etc.
- Separate servers may be responsible for delivering non-executable content and executable content, as described more fully hereinafter.
- Non-executable content may include tips, offers, advertisements, surveys, etc.
- non-executable content may nevertheless be active, i.e., contain HTTP links enabling the user to “click through” to related Web sites.
- Executable content may relate to the application or to the agent or both.
- Executable content related to the application may include updates, bug fixes, additional code modules, etc.
- Executable content related to the agent allows the agent to be transparently upgraded with new capabilities in the field, avoiding the potential problem of agent obsolescence.
- FIG. 3 a detailed block diagram of the agent is shown.
- the agent follows a plug-in architecture.
- the agent process therefore includes a resident agent and various plug-ins that interface to the resident agent through a plug-in API.
- the plug-ins include a command processor plug-in, a message plug-in, a survey plug-in, an Inet plug-in that handles virtual connections to the Internet, and a hook plug-in.
- the message plug-in, survey plug-in, and possibly other plug-ins are capable of taking actions within the process and User Interface (UI) space of the client applications.
- Other plug-ins may be included with the agent or added to the agent by download. If a plug-in needs the assistance of another plug-in, the agent will pass parameters transparently to the target plug-in. Persistent storage is provided for the plug-ins as well as for the resident agent, e.g., within the registry file system.
- the modularity resulting from plug-in architecture of the agent is important from the standpoint of allowing for user-transparent operation.
- the core agent and the plug-ins are all small modules that are easily downloadable.
- the time needed to download a module is typically only a few seconds.
- Core tasks of the agent include the following:
- the agent is capable of interacting with software applications in all respects without modification of the application itself.
- a small system hook e.g., a DLL
- the system hook determines if any relevant actions are happening within a monitored application and if so, passes this information off asynchronously to the hook plug-in.
- the system hook is designed to not degrade the user's system performance or application performance. More particularly, in an exemplary embodiment, the agent when it first launches loads the hook plug-in, which starts execution of a separate thread. This thread interacts with the system hook and is responsible for selecting messages of interest. The separate thread ensures that processing of the messages of the client application are not noticeably slowed down. Note that, to prevent recursion in the message processing, the system hook ignores any messages related to the agent itself.
- the Inet plug-in is responsible for handling all Internet traffic. In an exemplary embodiment, it supports various types of Internet transactions, including registering an agent with the server and obtaining a user ID, retrieving a command file using the user ID, uploading data to the server, and downloading resources from the server. Data may be exchanged using POST and GET commands, for example, as in the HTTP1.1 protocol.
- the Inet plug-in is designed to gracefully fail if any transaction is not completed across the Internet.
- the command processor plug-in is responsible for converting the command file into tangible actions. For example, it scans the command file and schedules all resource downloads required by the command file, expands any macros, and generates a clean version of the command file. It then processes the command file, merges it with existing command files, removes all completed events from the command file, and schedules all events and actions to be taken by the agent. Finally, it marks the command file as active in persistent storage and uploads a command line status update that allows the server to track the execution of events in the client application.
- An agent control panel applet enables user interaction with the agent to control prospective operation of the agent, although typically the user will not have occasion to use the control panel.
- the user may accept or decline the invitation to become a preferred customer.
- the user may be provided with additional control beyond this initial decision. For example, the user may choose at a later time to modify the degree of interaction, the type or amount of information transmitted, or withdraw entirely from the preferred customer program and discontinue all communications between the agent and the server.
- the user may wish instead to continue uplink operations (e.g., monitoring by the agent to facilitate conventional kinds of customer service) but to discontinue downlink operations.
- the user may wish to continue uplink operations and a limited subset of downlink operations, e.g., upgrade notification.
- Various other options may be provided.
- the resident agent includes a scheduler/manager, a remote dialup monitor, and a command file pre-processor.
- the resident agent also includes a client map, an event map and a plug-in map.
- the resident agent is responsible for dynamically maintaining the configuration and status of active plug-ins, the registered client applications and the events working on the client applications.
- a command queue contains actual event information and is processed upon each agent start.
- the agent is started by a machine start table within the registry of the operating system.
- the scheduler/manager is responsible for establishing periodic Internet connections with the server, through the Inet plug-in. If a connection becomes available, each client object is allowed bandwidth to service the client's needs. Subsequently, all pending POST operations are processed.
- the scheduler/manager can be invoked either via an event driven method, in the case of dialup Internet access, or at periodic intervals in the case of direct (or proxied) LAN-based Internet access. In the case of dialup access, different dialup access methods may be used depending on the software configuration of the user machine.
- the remote dialup monitor determines which dialup access method is used and establishment of an Internet connection is detected accordingly.
- the client map, event map and plug-in map together operate to establish “client channels” though which interaction between the clients and the server occurs.
- the client map consists of one or more client objects.
- a privileged client object is present that is allowed to add clients to and remove agents from the client map and to add agents to and remove agents from the plug-in map. All other client channels can only be used to schedule events and direct the agent to download content from a server.
- a client object within the client map has a corresponding event object within the event map and a corresponding plug-in object within the plug-in map.
- the event map in combination with the client map causes user interactions in the client applications UI space.
- a client object contains information that allows the system hook to recognize events from a particular application.
- the agent checks in with the server when a check-in interval for the application has elapsed.
- the agent may receive back a command file from the server, which the agent then interprets.
- the interpretation of the command file may cause the agent to fetch resources from the server and/or place information back onto it.
- the agent may also be instructed to check-in for another command file.
- the privileged client is also considered an application for the agent. Therefore the agent checks in with the appropriate server on a check-in interval separate from the check-in intervals of other applications. Also, an application's command file may cause the privileged client to check in, or vice versa.
- the agent When the agent has acquired the resources and commands from the server to actually do some work, it can be instructed to immediately display appropriate messages to the user, or (more commonly) to wait until the target application is running, and work in the context of the application.
- the agent converts system event data into tangible actions events for the attached plug-ins, with messages appearing to the user as coming from the vendor, within the application's screen window and only while the application is running. There results a sense of connectedness and trust between the customer and the vendor.
- a typical sequence of events is as follows:
- the system hook determines that a new application has launched or gotten the user's focus.
- the agent queries its client objects to see if the application is a client. If it is not a client, the agent remains dormant.
- a valid client with user input will cause the agent to instruct the system hook to start detailed monitoring of the application and route selected application messages through the hook plug-in.
- the hook plug-in will reflect the message asynchronously to the agent, which will catalog the events under the current user's name.
- the agent queries its client event map to look for a match.
- the event is executed, which could include invoking a plug-in to undertake action in the application's UI space. If visible content is shown in the application's UI space, the client application is temporarily disabled and cannot receive user focus.
- the agent returns to Step 4 above until the client application loses focus.
- the agent transfers any client application-related data to persistent storage, at which point the agent reverts to Step 1 above.
- the essential job of the server is the delivery of an appropriate command file to particular agent.
- the command files in the agent determine the action that the agent is going to take—which of the various kinds of activities it will carry out, at what time, with respect to what user operation, etc.
- the server maintains a record for every single user of an application.
- the agent working for one of its user's connects to the server, it consults a table of rules that determines which, if any, of the potential command files that the server has for that application are appropriate for that agent. Those rules are predicates that are based on all the data in the database relative to that user.
- An example of a rule might be “If installation of this application took place 60 or more days ago, send Command File A,” which causes the agent to perform some action, “and if installation took place less than 60 days ago, send Command File B,” which takes some other action.
- the two actions would differ with respect to the degree of experience that particular user has with the program. For example, in the case where an upgrade has become available, a publisher may choose to send one upgrade message to experienced users, more appropriate to their experience level, and another upgrade message to less experienced users, more appropriate to their experience level.
- the determination of experience level may be based, for example, on the time elapsed since installation.
- the server applies rules that have been created in a table sequentially to determine which if any of those rules are true for a particular agent that is querying the server at a particular point in time. Upon discovering that one or more of those rules “fires,” i.e. is true, then the corresponding one or more command files are downloaded to the agent. The publisher therefore enjoys very “fine-grain” control of the activities of an agent based on the attributes of that agent. Very sharp targeting results in which particular information is sent to particular agent based its characteristics and its history.
- the server has two different types of responsibilities.
- One function of the server is to maintain the agent. Operations to maintain the agent occur through the control channel described previously.
- Another function of the server is to provide customer support for specific client applications.
- These two distinct functions can be combined on one physical server machine or on multiple physical server machines. More preferably, these two functions are separated, with agent maintenance being handled by a technology provider server and customer support being handled by a collection of software vendor servers.
- executable content is provided from the technology provider server across the control channel and non-executable content is exchanged with software vendor servers across other channels as shown in FIG. 4. In this manner, executable content may be assured to be virus-free.
- private vendor-customer information may be passed directly to the vendor without being passed through a third party.
- the privileged client periodically connects to the technology provider server and informs it of activities of the agent on behalf of various client applications.
- Identifiers are allocated to support the foregoing separation of functions.
- the agent when it is first activated seeks a connection opportunity and, when a connection is established, obtains an agent ID from the technology provider server through the control channel.
- the agent receives from the server a command file instructing the agent to look for a particular application. If that application is found installed on the user's system, a client ID is obtained for that copy of the application. Only the technology provider server need be aware of the correspondence between agent IDs and client IDs. Transactions between the agent and the vendor server use only the client ID.
- a Relational Database Management System maintains a per-client-copy database of information uploaded from various instances of an application.
- the agent collects numerical counts for each menu bar item in a client application.
- the vendor may determine from the database how often the file:print command has been used, for example.
- the RDBMS includes a rules engine. Business rules are established governing the actions to be taken in relation to a particular copy of the application depending upon the data stored for that application. When action is to be taken, a command file is prepared and transferred to the agent.
- the system has the ability to precisely target the moment a message dialog appears in a client application.
- the vendor can pick an operation from among a menu hierarchy of the application, a time delay, and a number of times to repeat the operation until it is completed with a click-through or other affirmative response.
- the system also has the ability to determine who among the vendors installed base will see a particular message. Criteria can be based on demographics, responses to past offers, responses to past surveys, usage information, time since the application was installed, even random selection. Any information in the database can be used to determine who gets a particular message.
- [0060] Send all users a message before or after use of a particular feature after that feature has been used a specified number of times (FIG. 5).
- the message may include an HTTP link, allowing for click-through (FIG. 6).
- a Web-based administration tool is provided to allow business rules to be set up and changed through a familiar Web-form interface.
- the vendor can, for example, define a survey, to whom the survey should be presented, and how it is to be timed within the vendor's application. After a survey is initiated, the vendor can go to a Web site and view the progress of the survey, including the responses in real time as they come in.
- Appendix shows a sample command file. It runs a plug-in (pi1) during the vendor's application and returns the result tot he server. Once this is done, it does a check-in so that the server can send follow-up commands. It also retrieves some usage information from the registry immediately.
- APPENDIX Here is a sample command file. It runs a plugin (pi1) during the vendor's app and returns the result to the server. Once this is done, it does a check-in so that the server can send follow-up commands.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to customer support for computer programs.
- 2. State of the Art
- Customer support is service that computer and software manufacturers (as well as third-party service companies) offer to customers. In the case of an Independent Software Vendor (ISV), customer support may include a phone number for customer to call for advice and trouble-shooting, a bulletin-board system staffed by service engineers, or a forum within an on-line service. Software updates may be downloaded that correct known bugs. Internet-based customer support, problem resolution and call tracking has been recently introduced.
- Customer support may be mutually beneficial to both the customer and an ISV. Customer support enables the customer to get the most out of a software product. At the same time, customer support fosters a relationship between an ISV and a customer and provides “up-sale” opportunities for the ISV.
- In the past, however, customer support has been initiated by the customer on a hit-or-miss basis. Ironically, when things go most smoothly for the customer, indicating a job well-done on the part of the ISV, the customer is least likely to initiate a customer support relationship, and up-sale opportunities are most likely to be missed. Furthermore, customer support has traditionally been human-intensive. Getting through to a service engineer may be difficult enough in itself, but then the customer must spend a significant amount of time acquainting the service engineer with the customer's individual needs and circumstances. A small “dose” of support is then given. The next occasion for interaction is likely to be much the same. No opportunity exists for broad-based, systematic, individualized customer support.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,406,269 describes a customer intelligence system in which surreptitious telephone reporting calls are made by modem from remote equipment to one or more monitoring sites. Various uses for information gathered in this manner are proposed, including determining those customers who are ready for upgrades, showing potential customers usage statistics pertaining to the installed base, etc. Communications is one-way, in the uplink direction only. Furthermore, surreptitiousness greatly restricts the manner in which the system may be used and raises many issues of privacy and intrusiveness.
- The present invention, generally speaking, provides for broad-based, systematic, individualized, interactive customer software support through a two-way, voluntary automated exchange of information between a software agent installed on a customer's machine and a server machine via a wide area computer network, e.g., the Internet. Communication between the agent and the server is optimized to be unobtrusive or transparent, using spare bandwidth of intermittent Internet connections, for example. The agent is software non-specific and may be instructed to operate with respect to any arbitrary software program, and may further be instructed at various different times to operate with respect to various different software programs, including multiple different software programs on a single machine. The agent, with the user's informed consent, gathers activity information about the operations of the software program(s) and uploads this information to a particular server machine within a distributed server machine architecture, where it is stored in a database on a per-software-copy basis. A rules engine may cause instructions carrying a message targeted specifically toward the customer (based on the activity information) to be downloaded to the agent. Based on these instructions, the agent may take any of various actions, such as present a survey, present an advertisement, send an upgrade notice, present a limited-time offer, deliver individualized marketing messages, offer goods for sale and fulfill the commercial transaction, install an upgrade or bug fix for either an application or the agent itself, etc. Message presentation to the customer may be timed (e.g., delayed from the time of download) to achieve maximum impact. Timing may be relative to individual program menu selections. For example, a message relating to a particular product feature may be presented just after that feature has been used. The agent may be instructed to operate with additional applications, including applications shipped prior to the existence of the agent. Exemplary uses include marketing, sales, customer registration, technical support, market research, customer surveys, usage monitoring, software testing, in-product advertising, etc.
- The present invention may be further understood from the following description in conjunction with the appended drawing. In the drawing:
- FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of the present system;
- FIG. 2 is an illustration of a preferred customer enrollment screen display;
- FIG. 3 is a more detailed block diagram of the agent of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a distributed server architecture that may be used in the system;
- FIG. 5 is an illustration of a screen display in which the time and place of message delivery is controlled;
- FIG. 6 is an illustration of a screen display resulting from the user clicking through during display of the screen display of FIG. 5;
- FIG. 7 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message is a survey;
- FIG. 8 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message relates to a software update; and
- FIG. 9 is an illustration of a screen display in which the message is a banner advertisement.
- Referring now to FIG. 1, the general architecture of the present system will be described. A user machine is assumed to include a run-time environment, provided by an operating system, a Web browser or the like, and to be running one or more computer programs. The computer programs may be software applications, system software or embedded computer programs. Systematic, individualized, interactive customer software support is made possible by equipping the user machine with a persistent client, or agent, that engages in two-way communication with a server. The agent may be installed concurrently with an application, may be pre-loaded on the user's machine, may be separately installed from a disk or download, etc. The connection between the agent and the server is a virtual connection, i.e., a connection that time-shares a physical communications channel with other communications. In an exemplary embodiment, the virtual connection uses spare bandwidth of intermittent Internet connections to communicate with the server. The agent can and typically does interact with the application without a concurrent Internet connection.
- Communications between the agent and the server are voluntary. In an exemplary embodiment, when the agent is first activated on behalf of a particular application, it displays to the user a preferred customer enrollment screen display such as that of FIG. 2. By clicking on the appropriate button, the user may accept or decline to participate in the preferred customer program. If the customer accepts, then the customer enters into an invited relationship with the software vendor and agrees to the software vendor maintaining personalized information about the configuration and use of the application in order to provide individualized service.
- Communications between the agent and the server are also two-way. In the uplink direction, the agent communicates control, configuration and usage information, registration information, survey information, etc. In the downlink direction, the server communicates non-executable content, executable content, or both, including control information, agent updates, etc. Separate servers may be responsible for delivering non-executable content and executable content, as described more fully hereinafter. Non-executable content may include tips, offers, advertisements, surveys, etc. Note that non-executable content may nevertheless be active, i.e., contain HTTP links enabling the user to “click through” to related Web sites. Executable content may relate to the application or to the agent or both. Executable content related to the application may include updates, bug fixes, additional code modules, etc. Executable content related to the agent allows the agent to be transparently upgraded with new capabilities in the field, avoiding the potential problem of agent obsolescence.
- Referring to FIG. 3, a detailed block diagram of the agent is shown.
- In an exemplary embodiment, the agent follows a plug-in architecture. The agent process therefore includes a resident agent and various plug-ins that interface to the resident agent through a plug-in API. In an exemplary embodiment, the plug-ins include a command processor plug-in, a message plug-in, a survey plug-in, an Inet plug-in that handles virtual connections to the Internet, and a hook plug-in. The message plug-in, survey plug-in, and possibly other plug-ins are capable of taking actions within the process and User Interface (UI) space of the client applications. Other plug-ins may be included with the agent or added to the agent by download. If a plug-in needs the assistance of another plug-in, the agent will pass parameters transparently to the target plug-in. Persistent storage is provided for the plug-ins as well as for the resident agent, e.g., within the registry file system.
- The modularity resulting from plug-in architecture of the agent is important from the standpoint of allowing for user-transparent operation. The core agent and the plug-ins are all small modules that are easily downloadable. The time needed to download a module is typically only a few seconds.
- Core tasks of the agent include the following:
- 1. Manage plug-ins and inter-plug-in communication.
- 2. Download content (command files) and determine an appropriate command interpreter for handling the command files. Retrieve the command interpreter plug-in from the server and invoke it with the downloaded command file.
- 3. Maintain state (e.g., the current command file) to survive system crashes and restarts. The operating system registry may be used for persistent storage of state information including the configurations of the plug-ins, the status of events and the registered client applications.
- 4. Monitor the system Internet connection and schedule uploads and downloads.
- 5. Track target applications and determine their usage. From this information and the command file data, schedule actions to be taken in the target applications user interface (UI) space through the plug-in interface.
- 6. Change its level and type of activity, including becoming inactive in response to a server.
- The agent is capable of interacting with software applications in all respects without modification of the application itself. In particular, a small system hook (e.g., a DLL) is inserted into the windows message processing loop. Using data provided by the agent, the system hook determines if any relevant actions are happening within a monitored application and if so, passes this information off asynchronously to the hook plug-in. The system hook is designed to not degrade the user's system performance or application performance. More particularly, in an exemplary embodiment, the agent when it first launches loads the hook plug-in, which starts execution of a separate thread. This thread interacts with the system hook and is responsible for selecting messages of interest. The separate thread ensures that processing of the messages of the client application are not noticeably slowed down. Note that, to prevent recursion in the message processing, the system hook ignores any messages related to the agent itself.
- The Inet plug-in is responsible for handling all Internet traffic. In an exemplary embodiment, it supports various types of Internet transactions, including registering an agent with the server and obtaining a user ID, retrieving a command file using the user ID, uploading data to the server, and downloading resources from the server. Data may be exchanged using POST and GET commands, for example, as in the HTTP1.1 protocol. The Inet plug-in is designed to gracefully fail if any transaction is not completed across the Internet.
- The command processor plug-in is responsible for converting the command file into tangible actions. For example, it scans the command file and schedules all resource downloads required by the command file, expands any macros, and generates a clean version of the command file. It then processes the command file, merges it with existing command files, removes all completed events from the command file, and schedules all events and actions to be taken by the agent. Finally, it marks the command file as active in persistent storage and uploads a command line status update that allows the server to track the execution of events in the client application.
- An agent control panel applet enables user interaction with the agent to control prospective operation of the agent, although typically the user will not have occasion to use the control panel. As described previously, the user may accept or decline the invitation to become a preferred customer. The user may be provided with additional control beyond this initial decision. For example, the user may choose at a later time to modify the degree of interaction, the type or amount of information transmitted, or withdraw entirely from the preferred customer program and discontinue all communications between the agent and the server. The user may wish instead to continue uplink operations (e.g., monitoring by the agent to facilitate conventional kinds of customer service) but to discontinue downlink operations. Alternatively, the user may wish to continue uplink operations and a limited subset of downlink operations, e.g., upgrade notification. Various other options may be provided.
- In an exemplary embodiment, the resident agent includes a scheduler/manager, a remote dialup monitor, and a command file pre-processor. The resident agent also includes a client map, an event map and a plug-in map. The resident agent is responsible for dynamically maintaining the configuration and status of active plug-ins, the registered client applications and the events working on the client applications. A command queue contains actual event information and is processed upon each agent start. In an exemplary embodiment, the agent is started by a machine start table within the registry of the operating system.
- The scheduler/manager is responsible for establishing periodic Internet connections with the server, through the Inet plug-in. If a connection becomes available, each client object is allowed bandwidth to service the client's needs. Subsequently, all pending POST operations are processed. The scheduler/manager can be invoked either via an event driven method, in the case of dialup Internet access, or at periodic intervals in the case of direct (or proxied) LAN-based Internet access. In the case of dialup access, different dialup access methods may be used depending on the software configuration of the user machine. The remote dialup monitor determines which dialup access method is used and establishment of an Internet connection is detected accordingly.
- The client map, event map and plug-in map together operate to establish “client channels” though which interaction between the clients and the server occurs. The client map consists of one or more client objects. At a minimum, a privileged client object is present that is allowed to add clients to and remove agents from the client map and to add agents to and remove agents from the plug-in map. All other client channels can only be used to schedule events and direct the agent to download content from a server. A client object within the client map has a corresponding event object within the event map and a corresponding plug-in object within the plug-in map. The event map in combination with the client map causes user interactions in the client applications UI space.
- Note that preferred support for copies of applications already in the field can be added simply by causing the agent to download client objects for those applications. A client object (or “affinity module”) contains information that allows the system hook to recognize events from a particular application.
- The agent checks in with the server when a check-in interval for the application has elapsed. The agent may receive back a command file from the server, which the agent then interprets. The interpretation of the command file may cause the agent to fetch resources from the server and/or place information back onto it. The agent may also be instructed to check-in for another command file. The privileged client is also considered an application for the agent. Therefore the agent checks in with the appropriate server on a check-in interval separate from the check-in intervals of other applications. Also, an application's command file may cause the privileged client to check in, or vice versa.
- When the agent has acquired the resources and commands from the server to actually do some work, it can be instructed to immediately display appropriate messages to the user, or (more commonly) to wait until the target application is running, and work in the context of the application. The agent converts system event data into tangible actions events for the attached plug-ins, with messages appearing to the user as coming from the vendor, within the application's screen window and only while the application is running. There results a sense of connectedness and trust between the customer and the vendor. A typical sequence of events is as follows:
- 1. The system hook determines that a new application has launched or gotten the user's focus.
- 2. The agent queries its client objects to see if the application is a client. If it is not a client, the agent remains dormant.
- 3. A valid client with user input will cause the agent to instruct the system hook to start detailed monitoring of the application and route selected application messages through the hook plug-in.
- 4. The hook plug-in will reflect the message asynchronously to the agent, which will catalog the events under the current user's name.
- 5. The agent queries its client event map to look for a match.
- 6. If a match exists, the event is executed, which could include invoking a plug-in to undertake action in the application's UI space. If visible content is shown in the application's UI space, the client application is temporarily disabled and cannot receive user focus.
- 7. If any uploadable content is generated during this event, it is passed to the Inet plug-in, which will either send it or schedule it to be sent the next time bandwidth is available.
- 8. After completion of the event, the user focus is set back to the client application.
- 9. The agent returns to Step 4 above until the client application loses focus. When the client application loses focus, the agent transfers any client application-related data to persistent storage, at which point the agent reverts to Step 1 above.
- Having described the structure and function of the agent, the server will now be described.
- The essential job of the server is the delivery of an appropriate command file to particular agent. The command files in the agent determine the action that the agent is going to take—which of the various kinds of activities it will carry out, at what time, with respect to what user operation, etc. The server maintains a record for every single user of an application. When the agent working for one of its user's connects to the server, it consults a table of rules that determines which, if any, of the potential command files that the server has for that application are appropriate for that agent. Those rules are predicates that are based on all the data in the database relative to that user.
- An example of a rule might be “If installation of this application took place 60 or more days ago, send Command File A,” which causes the agent to perform some action, “and if installation took place less than 60 days ago, send Command File B,” which takes some other action. The two actions would differ with respect to the degree of experience that particular user has with the program. For example, in the case where an upgrade has become available, a publisher may choose to send one upgrade message to experienced users, more appropriate to their experience level, and another upgrade message to less experienced users, more appropriate to their experience level. The determination of experience level may be based, for example, on the time elapsed since installation.
- The server applies rules that have been created in a table sequentially to determine which if any of those rules are true for a particular agent that is querying the server at a particular point in time. Upon discovering that one or more of those rules “fires,” i.e. is true, then the corresponding one or more command files are downloaded to the agent. The publisher therefore enjoys very “fine-grain” control of the activities of an agent based on the attributes of that agent. Very sharp targeting results in which particular information is sent to particular agent based its characteristics and its history.
- As may be appreciated from the foregoing description, the server has two different types of responsibilities. One function of the server is to maintain the agent. Operations to maintain the agent occur through the control channel described previously. Another function of the server is to provide customer support for specific client applications. These two distinct functions can be combined on one physical server machine or on multiple physical server machines. More preferably, these two functions are separated, with agent maintenance being handled by a technology provider server and customer support being handled by a collection of software vendor servers. In general, executable content is provided from the technology provider server across the control channel and non-executable content is exchanged with software vendor servers across other channels as shown in FIG. 4. In this manner, executable content may be assured to be virus-free. Also, private vendor-customer information may be passed directly to the vendor without being passed through a third party. For tracing and billing purposes, the privileged client periodically connects to the technology provider server and informs it of activities of the agent on behalf of various client applications.
- Identifiers are allocated to support the foregoing separation of functions. In particular, the agent when it is first activated seeks a connection opportunity and, when a connection is established, obtains an agent ID from the technology provider server through the control channel. At the same time or at a later time, the agent receives from the server a command file instructing the agent to look for a particular application. If that application is found installed on the user's system, a client ID is obtained for that copy of the application. Only the technology provider server need be aware of the correspondence between agent IDs and client IDs. Transactions between the agent and the vendor server use only the client ID.
- At a vendor server, a Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) maintains a per-client-copy database of information uploaded from various instances of an application. In an exemplary embodiment, the agent collects numerical counts for each menu bar item in a client application. The vendor may determine from the database how often the file:print command has been used, for example. The RDBMS includes a rules engine. Business rules are established governing the actions to be taken in relation to a particular copy of the application depending upon the data stored for that application. When action is to be taken, a command file is prepared and transferred to the agent.
- Note that the system has the ability to precisely target the moment a message dialog appears in a client application. The vendor can pick an operation from among a menu hierarchy of the application, a time delay, and a number of times to repeat the operation until it is completed with a click-through or other affirmative response. The system also has the ability to determine who among the vendors installed base will see a particular message. Criteria can be based on demographics, responses to past offers, responses to past surveys, usage information, time since the application was installed, even random selection. Any information in the database can be used to determine who gets a particular message.
- The following examples illustrate possible actions of the server triggered based on data stored within the database:
- 1. Send all users a message before or after use of a particular feature after that feature has been used a specified number of times (FIG. 5). The message may include an HTTP link, allowing for click-through (FIG. 6).
- 2. Present a survey to all users after a specified time has passed or a specified level of usage has been achieved (FIG. 7).
- 3. Present an update message to all users at next use of the application or a particular feature of the application (FIG. 8).
- 4. Present a banner ad to each user upon application start up, with the banner ad being chosen based on an ad presentation history for that user (FIG. 9).
- Preferably, a Web-based administration tool is provided to allow business rules to be set up and changed through a familiar Web-form interface. Using the Web-form interface, the vendor can, for example, define a survey, to whom the survey should be presented, and how it is to be timed within the vendor's application. After a survey is initiated, the vendor can go to a Web site and view the progress of the survey, including the responses in real time as they come in.
- The following Appendix shows a sample command file. It runs a plug-in (pi1) during the vendor's application and returns the result tot he server. Once this is done, it does a check-in so that the server can send follow-up commands. It also retrieves some usage information from the registry immediately.
APPENDIX Here is a sample command file. It runs a plugin (pi1) during the vendor's app and returns the result to the server. Once this is done, it does a check-in so that the server can send follow-up commands. It also retrieves some usage information from the registry immediately: [ci]http://fullcircle-sys.com/ci1.fcp[flags]“-p” [eventmanager]http://fullcircle-sys.com/acem.fcp [define]plugname[=]http://fullcircle-sys.com/ad/pi1.fcp [define]plugi[=]http://fullcircle-sys.com/ad/pi1i?UID,$TID [define]plugo[=]http://fullcircle-sys.com/ad/pi1o?$UID,$TID [define]soon[=]31-Dec-1997 [transid]12345 [cobegin] [get]$plugname [get]$plugi- [coend] [wait]app_running // Really should be on line with plugin command [plugin]$plugname[command]1[input]$plugi[output]plugo[expires]soon [post]plugo [delete]plugo [pause]15 [checkin] [define]usage[=]http://fullcircle-sys.com/ad/usage1?$UID,$TID [transid]9876 [copy]$usage[=]reg://some.path.in.the.registry [post]$usage Here is another sample command file: t10040001.fcc [ci]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/resources/fccmd32.fcp[Function] 80000[Version]0102[UnLoad]1[Name]fccommand01[command]1[flags]-p // Last Updated 11/10/97 by SG [eventmanager]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/acem.fcp // D E F I N E S // [define]p6[=]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/resources/fcsurvey32.fcp[Functi on]60000[Version]0105[UnLoad]1[Name]FCMultipleDialogPlugin [define]plugi[=]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/resources/INTUIT— LOGO.BMP // trigger on backup to offer customer a zip drive [define]qziq[=]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/resources/q_zip.fcr // [define]plugo[=]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/scripts/fullcircle_scripts/f c_return_data01.idc?#UID&#TID [define]soon[=]31-Dec-1997 [define]usage[=]http://fc1.previewsoft.com/scripts/fullcircle_scripts/f c_return_data01.idc?#UID&#TID // T R A N S A C T I O N S // [transid]10040001 [cobegin] [get]$p6 [get]$plugi [get]$qzip [coend] // use backup menu to offer a promotion with Iomega for a zip drive [wait]app_running[menucmd]7010[delay]0[skip]0[run]9[plugin]$p6 [command]1[input]$qzip[output]$plugo[expires]$soon // - It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential character thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (30)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/041,315 US6434532B2 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 1998-03-12 | Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine |
PCT/US1999/005546 WO1999046712A1 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 1999-03-12 | Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/041,315 US6434532B2 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 1998-03-12 | Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010018673A1 true US20010018673A1 (en) | 2001-08-30 |
US6434532B2 US6434532B2 (en) | 2002-08-13 |
Family
ID=21915885
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/041,315 Expired - Lifetime US6434532B2 (en) | 1998-03-12 | 1998-03-12 | Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6434532B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1999046712A1 (en) |
Cited By (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20010051919A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2001-12-13 | Mason Elaine Scott | Early-payment discount for E-billing system |
US20020065802A1 (en) * | 2000-05-30 | 2002-05-30 | Koki Uchiyama | Distributed monitoring system providing knowledge services |
US20020067429A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-06-06 | Nason D. David | Alternate display content controller |
US20020101452A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-08-01 | Xside Corporation | Secondary user interface |
US20020112097A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-08-15 | Rajko Milovanovic | Media accelerator quality of service |
US20020122058A1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-09-05 | Ken Kutaragi | Information processing system, entertainment system, startup screen display method and information recording medium |
WO2002077762A2 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2002-10-03 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System and method for providing personalized customer support |
US20020149593A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-10-17 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for displaying data in a second display area |
US20030004826A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-01-02 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Sales supporting system associated with navigation system and method thereof |
US20030188040A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Software agent hosting environment with extensible middleware integration |
US20030204644A1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2003-10-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for developing, deploying, and debugging software agents |
US20040027387A1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-02-12 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US6717596B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2004-04-06 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US20040136327A1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2004-07-15 | Sitaraman Ramesh K. | Method and apparatus for measuring stream availability, quality and performance |
US20040226041A1 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2004-11-11 | Xsides Corporation | System and method for parallel data display of multiple executing environments |
WO2004109490A2 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2004-12-16 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Methods and systems for recording user actions in computer programs |
EP1569107A2 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | A method and system for monitoring distributed applications on-demand |
US7216104B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2007-05-08 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Disallow payment for E-billing system |
US20070192161A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | On-demand customer satisfaction measurement |
US7308434B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2007-12-11 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Account management tool for e-billing system |
US7313619B2 (en) * | 2003-03-21 | 2007-12-25 | Intel Corporation | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
US20080028395A1 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | Giovanni Motta | User Experience And Dependency Management In A Mobile Device |
US20080133681A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-06-05 | Jackson Troy V | System and method for diagnosis of and recommendations for remote processor system |
US20090037967A1 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2009-02-05 | Oren Barkan | Video upload system |
US20090037287A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2009-02-05 | Ahmad Baitalmal | Software Marketplace and Distribution System |
US20090300438A1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2009-12-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Connection monitoring method, connection monitoring apparatus, and connection monitoring system |
US20100114705A1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2010-05-06 | B.E. Technologies, Llc | Method of reactive targeted advertising |
US20100217673A1 (en) * | 2007-10-12 | 2010-08-26 | Gemalto Sa | Device and method for the customised delivery of targeted advertisements from a local server |
US20100217716A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2010-08-26 | Tobid Pieper | Method and apparatus for restricting access to an electronic product release within an electronic software delivery system |
US20110138061A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-06-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Establishing and utilizing terminal server dynamic virtual channels |
US20110145056A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2011-06-16 | Spiceworks, Inc. | Interactive online closed loop marketing system and method |
US20110264509A1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2011-10-27 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US8271387B2 (en) | 2005-06-20 | 2012-09-18 | Intraware, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing limited access to data objects or files within an electronic software delivery and management system |
US8468515B2 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2013-06-18 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Initialization and update of software and/or firmware in electronic devices |
US8479189B2 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2013-07-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Pattern detection preprocessor in an electronic device update generation system |
US8526940B1 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2013-09-03 | Palm, Inc. | Centralized rules repository for smart phone customer care |
US8555273B1 (en) | 2003-09-17 | 2013-10-08 | Palm. Inc. | Network for updating electronic devices |
US8578361B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2013-11-05 | Palm, Inc. | Updating an electronic device with update agent code |
US20140229236A1 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2014-08-14 | Unify Square, Inc. | User Survey Service for Unified Communications |
US8893110B2 (en) | 2006-06-08 | 2014-11-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Device management in a network |
US9483791B2 (en) | 2007-03-02 | 2016-11-01 | Spiceworks, Inc. | Network software and hardware monitoring and marketplace |
US10255609B2 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2019-04-09 | Micronotes, Inc. | Interactive marketing system |
US10997567B2 (en) * | 2016-07-14 | 2021-05-04 | Casio Computer Co., Ltd | Work support device, work support method and computer readable storage medium |
Families Citing this family (106)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7770230B2 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2010-08-03 | Arvato Digital Services Canada, Inc. | System for dynamically encrypting content for secure internet commerce and providing embedded fulfillment software |
US7356847B2 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2008-04-08 | Protexis, Inc. | System for dynamically encrypting content for secure internet commerce and providing embedded fulfillment software |
US6108637A (en) | 1996-09-03 | 2000-08-22 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Content display monitor |
US7729945B1 (en) * | 1998-03-11 | 2010-06-01 | West Corporation | Systems and methods that use geographic data to intelligently select goods and services to offer in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US7364068B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2008-04-29 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services offered to conferees |
US6055513A (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2000-04-25 | Telebuyer, Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US7437313B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2008-10-14 | West Direct, Llc | Methods, computer-readable media, and apparatus for offering users a plurality of scenarios under which to conduct at least one primary transaction |
US8315909B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2012-11-20 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in point-of-sale commerce |
US7386485B1 (en) | 2004-06-25 | 2008-06-10 | West Corporation | Method and system for providing offers in real time to prospective customers |
AUPQ206399A0 (en) | 1999-08-06 | 1999-08-26 | Imr Worldwide Pty Ltd. | Network user measurement system and method |
US7305475B2 (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2007-12-04 | Webmd Health | System and method for enabling a client application to operate offline from a server |
US6973478B1 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2005-12-06 | Top Moxie, Inc. | Autonomous local assistant for managing business processes |
GB2355821A (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2001-05-02 | Futuremark Oy | Computer upgrading and technical support |
US8661111B1 (en) | 2000-01-12 | 2014-02-25 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | System and method for estimating prevalence of digital content on the world-wide-web |
US7076400B2 (en) * | 2000-02-14 | 2006-07-11 | Nextnine Ltd. | Support network |
US7409318B2 (en) * | 2000-02-14 | 2008-08-05 | Nextnine Ltd. | Support network |
US6912578B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2005-06-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving utilization of a resource on a shared client |
US20010037280A1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-11-01 | Ingraham Scott S. | System and method for facilitating renting and purchasing relationships |
US20030229524A1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2003-12-11 | Eran Reuveni | System for workflow analysis and response |
US6725454B1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2004-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for capacity consumption profiling in a client/server environment |
KR100801445B1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2008-02-11 | 소니 가부시끼 가이샤 | Information management system using agent |
TW552539B (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2003-09-11 | Sony Corp | Agent system, agent transaction method, data providing device, and data recording medium |
US20030195803A1 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2003-10-16 | Jussi Ketonen | Method and system for retrieving and analyzing data to customize the behavior of automated web agents |
US20020147974A1 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2002-10-10 | Wookey Michael J. | Networked installation system for deploying systems management platforms |
US7739162B1 (en) | 2001-05-04 | 2010-06-15 | West Corporation | System, method, and business method for setting micropayment transaction to a pre-paid instrument |
US20020169871A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2002-11-14 | Cravo De Almeida Marcio | Remote monitoring |
US20030055931A1 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2003-03-20 | Cravo De Almeida Marcio | Managing a remote device |
JP2003036242A (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2003-02-07 | Fujitsu Ltd | Server machine, client machine, server program storage medium, client program storage medium, server program, and client program |
WO2003014936A1 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2003-02-20 | Eg Innovations Pte. Ltd. | A method for providing real-time monitoring of components of a data network to a plurality of users |
US7594176B1 (en) * | 2001-09-05 | 2009-09-22 | Intuit Inc. | Automated retrieval, evaluation, and presentation of context-sensitive user support |
US7742999B2 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2010-06-22 | Aol Inc. | Help center and print center applications |
US7290247B2 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2007-10-30 | Aol, Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Help center and filtering applications |
AU2002363072A1 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-06 | America Online, Inc. | Help center applications |
US7350146B2 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2008-03-25 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Help center and condition-based applications |
US20030115091A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2003-06-19 | Gateway, Inc. | Remote out-of-box experience |
US7382724B1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2008-06-03 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Automatic switchover mechanism in a network device |
US20120072995A1 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2012-03-22 | Crawford C S Lee | Systems and methods for managing software licenses |
US8590013B2 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2013-11-19 | C. S. Lee Crawford | Method of managing and communicating data pertaining to software applications for processor-based devices comprising wireless communication circuitry |
US7698162B2 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2010-04-13 | Xerox Corporation | Customer satisfaction system and method |
US7430590B1 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2008-09-30 | Everdream Corporation | Method and system to manage services for multiple managed computer systems |
US20040039916A1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2004-02-26 | David Aldis | System and method for multi-tiered license management and distribution using networked clearinghouses |
US8271778B1 (en) | 2002-07-24 | 2012-09-18 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | System and method for monitoring secure data on a network |
US8306908B1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2012-11-06 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US8712857B1 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2014-04-29 | Tuxis Technologies Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in mobile commerce |
US7546470B2 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2009-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selective computer component activation apparatus method and system |
US20050038832A1 (en) * | 2003-08-14 | 2005-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application error recovery using solution database |
US7747940B2 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2010-06-29 | Barclays Capital Inc. | System and method for data collection and processing |
US7178720B1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2007-02-20 | West Corporation | Methods, computer-readable media, and computer program product for intelligent selection of items encoded onto portable machine-playable entertainment media |
US20060101277A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Meenan Patrick A | Detecting and remedying unauthorized computer programs |
US7698169B2 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2010-04-13 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to provide wanted ad listing within an e-commerce system |
US8457108B1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2013-06-04 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and apparatus for monitoring client software usage in end user device |
DE102005024327B4 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2009-04-09 | Siemens Ag | Watch-Dog in a distributed application environment |
US8908846B2 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2014-12-09 | Viva Group, Llc | System to capture communication information |
US8571999B2 (en) | 2005-11-14 | 2013-10-29 | C. S. Lee Crawford | Method of conducting operations for a social network application including activity list generation |
US8025572B2 (en) * | 2005-11-21 | 2011-09-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic spectator mode |
US7647522B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Operating system with corrective action service and isolation |
US7657493B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-02-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Recommendation system that identifies a valuable user action by mining data supplied by a plurality of users to find a correlation that suggests one or more actions for notification |
US20080091613A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Rights management in a cloud |
US20080082667A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote provisioning of information technology |
US20080104699A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-05-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Secure service computation |
US8402110B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2013-03-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote provisioning of information technology |
US8595356B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2013-11-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Serialization of run-time state |
US8014308B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-09-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Hardware architecture for cloud services |
US8341405B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2012-12-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Access management in an off-premise environment |
US20080082465A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Guardian angel |
US7689524B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-03-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic environment evaluation and service adjustment based on multiple user profiles including data classification and information sharing with authorized other users |
US7672909B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-03-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Machine learning system and method comprising segregator convergence and recognition components to determine the existence of possible tagging data trends and identify that predetermined convergence criteria have been met or establish criteria for taxonomy purpose then recognize items based on an aggregate of user tagging behavior |
US8012023B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-09-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtual entertainment |
US7680908B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-03-16 | Microsoft Corporation | State replication |
US7716280B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-05-11 | Microsoft Corporation | State reflection |
US20080082600A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote network operating system |
US7836056B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-11-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Location management of off-premise resources |
US20080215450A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-09-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote provisioning of information technology |
US20080080396A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Marketplace for cloud services resources |
US20080104393A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-05-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Cloud-based access control list |
US20080080526A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Migrating data to new cloud |
US7930197B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-04-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Personal data mining |
US7716150B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2010-05-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Machine learning system for analyzing and establishing tagging trends based on convergence criteria |
US20080082670A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Resilient communications between clients comprising a cloud |
US20080082490A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Rich index to cloud-based resources |
US8719143B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2014-05-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Determination of optimized location for services and data |
US9746912B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2017-08-29 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Transformations for virtual guest representation |
US8601598B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2013-12-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Off-premise encryption of data storage |
US8705746B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-04-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Data security in an off-premise environment |
US20080082480A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Data normalization |
US8474027B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2013-06-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote management of resource license |
US20080083040A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Aggregated resource license |
US7797453B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2010-09-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Resource standardization in an off-premise environment |
US20080083031A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2008-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Secure service computation |
US10169781B1 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2019-01-01 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Method and system for generating information about portable device advertising |
EP2015173A1 (en) * | 2007-07-05 | 2009-01-14 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method of maintaining software updates by means of dependency expressions |
US20090063266A1 (en) * | 2007-09-04 | 2009-03-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Performing of marketing actions while preserving confidentiality |
US8826242B2 (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2014-09-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Data driven profiling for distributed applications |
US8112329B2 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2012-02-07 | Ebay Inc. | Consolidating leads received from potential renters for billing a lister |
US20100169198A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Ebay Inc. | Billing a lister for leads received from potential renters within a lead threshold |
US9569231B2 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2017-02-14 | Kryon Systems Ltd. | Device, system, and method for providing interactive guidance with execution of operations |
US20100205529A1 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2010-08-12 | Emma Noya Butin | Device, system, and method for creating interactive guidance with execution of operations |
US8918739B2 (en) * | 2009-08-24 | 2014-12-23 | Kryon Systems Ltd. | Display-independent recognition of graphical user interface control |
US9405558B2 (en) * | 2009-08-24 | 2016-08-02 | Kryon Systems Ltd. | Display-independent computerized guidance |
US9098313B2 (en) * | 2009-08-24 | 2015-08-04 | Kryon Systems Ltd. | Recording display-independent computerized guidance |
CN102033883B (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2016-03-02 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of method, Apparatus and system improving data transmission speed of website |
US9219928B2 (en) | 2013-06-25 | 2015-12-22 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to characterize households with media meter data |
KR102206426B1 (en) * | 2014-01-15 | 2021-01-22 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for providing help of user device |
US9277265B2 (en) | 2014-02-11 | 2016-03-01 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to calculate video-on-demand and dynamically inserted advertisement viewing probability |
US10219039B2 (en) | 2015-03-09 | 2019-02-26 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to assign viewers to media meter data |
US10791355B2 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2020-09-29 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to determine probabilistic media viewing metrics |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5406269A (en) | 1991-07-05 | 1995-04-11 | David Baran | Method and apparatus for the remote verification of the operation of electronic devices by standard transmission mediums |
US5367635A (en) * | 1991-08-29 | 1994-11-22 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Network management agent with user created objects providing additional functionality |
US5432940A (en) | 1992-11-02 | 1995-07-11 | Borland International, Inc. | System and methods for improved computer-based training |
JPH07302236A (en) * | 1994-05-06 | 1995-11-14 | Hitachi Ltd | Information processing system, method therefor and service providing method in the information processing system |
US5694546A (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 1997-12-02 | Reisman; Richard R. | System for automatic unattended electronic information transport between a server and a client by a vendor provided transport software with a manifest list |
JP3946275B2 (en) * | 1995-01-10 | 2007-07-18 | 富士通株式会社 | Remote installation system and method |
US5546452A (en) * | 1995-03-02 | 1996-08-13 | Geotel Communications Corp. | Communications system using a central controller to control at least one network and agent system |
US5655081A (en) * | 1995-03-08 | 1997-08-05 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System for monitoring and managing computer resources and applications across a distributed computing environment using an intelligent autonomous agent architecture |
US5764992A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1998-06-09 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic software replacement |
US5768382A (en) * | 1995-11-22 | 1998-06-16 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Remote-auditing of computer generated outcomes and authenticated biling and access control system using cryptographic and other protocols |
US5913040A (en) * | 1995-08-22 | 1999-06-15 | Backweb Ltd. | Method and apparatus for transmitting and displaying information between a remote network and a local computer |
US5845077A (en) * | 1995-11-27 | 1998-12-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for identifying and obtaining computer software from a remote computer |
US5832483A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1998-11-03 | Novell, Inc. | Distributed control interface for managing the interoperability and concurrency of agents and resources in a real-time environment |
US5732275A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1998-03-24 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing and automatically updating software programs |
US5931907A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1999-08-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Software agent for comparing locally accessible keywords with meta-information and having pointers associated with distributed information |
US5862325A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5870610A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1999-02-09 | Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc. | Autoconfigurable method and system having automated downloading |
US5809251A (en) * | 1996-10-09 | 1998-09-15 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Remote installation of software by a management information system into a remote computer |
US5923885A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-07-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Acquisition and operation of remotely loaded software using applet modification of browser software |
US5867714A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-02-02 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for distributing configuration-dependent software revisions to a computer system |
US6137805A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 2000-10-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus to remotely configure a data processing system |
US5953533A (en) * | 1997-08-27 | 1999-09-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Computer software distribution, installation and maintenance method and apparatus |
US6178449B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2001-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for measuring transaction time in a computer system |
-
1998
- 1998-03-12 US US09/041,315 patent/US6434532B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-03-12 WO PCT/US1999/005546 patent/WO1999046712A1/en active Application Filing
Cited By (82)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020149593A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-10-17 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for displaying data in a second display area |
US6828991B2 (en) | 1997-11-21 | 2004-12-07 | Xsides Corporation | Secondary user interface |
US20020067429A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-06-06 | Nason D. David | Alternate display content controller |
US20020101452A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-08-01 | Xside Corporation | Secondary user interface |
US6966036B2 (en) | 1997-11-21 | 2005-11-15 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for displaying data in a second display area |
US20020113807A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2002-08-22 | Xsides Corporation | Secondary user interface |
US20050052473A1 (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2005-03-10 | Xsides Corporation | Secondary user interface |
US8769440B2 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2014-07-01 | B.E. Technology, L.L.C. | Method of reactive targeted advertising |
US20100114705A1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2010-05-06 | B.E. Technologies, Llc | Method of reactive targeted advertising |
US20110208582A1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2011-08-25 | B.E. Technology, L.L.C. | Targeted advertising services method |
US9779415B2 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2017-10-03 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Method and system for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US9779412B2 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2017-10-03 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Method and system for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US9779413B2 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2017-10-03 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Method and system for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US9779414B2 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2017-10-03 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Method and system for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US20110264509A1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2011-10-27 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US20110264510A1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2011-10-27 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage |
US20020122058A1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-09-05 | Ken Kutaragi | Information processing system, entertainment system, startup screen display method and information recording medium |
US7165223B2 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2007-01-16 | Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. | Information processing system, entertainment system, startup screen display method and information recording medium |
US20040027387A1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-02-12 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US20040032423A1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-02-19 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US7340682B2 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2008-03-04 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US20100064245A1 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2010-03-11 | Xsides Corporation | System and method for parallel data display of multiple executing environments |
US20040226041A1 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2004-11-11 | Xsides Corporation | System and method for parallel data display of multiple executing environments |
US6892359B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2005-05-10 | Xside Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US6717596B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2004-04-06 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US6727918B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2004-04-27 | Xsides Corporation | Method and system for controlling a complementary user interface on a display surface |
US7216104B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2007-05-08 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Disallow payment for E-billing system |
US20100332309A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2010-12-30 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Early-payment discount for e-billing system |
US7881962B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2011-02-01 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Early-payment discount for E-billing system |
US8121894B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2012-02-21 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Early-payment discount for e-billing system |
US20010051919A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2001-12-13 | Mason Elaine Scott | Early-payment discount for E-billing system |
US7308434B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2007-12-11 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Account management tool for e-billing system |
US20020065802A1 (en) * | 2000-05-30 | 2002-05-30 | Koki Uchiyama | Distributed monitoring system providing knowledge services |
US7725472B2 (en) * | 2000-05-30 | 2010-05-25 | Hottolink, Inc. | Distributed monitoring system providing knowledge services |
US8468515B2 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2013-06-18 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Initialization and update of software and/or firmware in electronic devices |
US8479189B2 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2013-07-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Pattern detection preprocessor in an electronic device update generation system |
US7140016B2 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2006-11-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Media accelerator quality of service |
US20020112097A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-08-15 | Rajko Milovanovic | Media accelerator quality of service |
WO2002077762A2 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2002-10-03 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System and method for providing personalized customer support |
US20020143898A1 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2002-10-03 | Mansfield Michael A. | System and method for providing personalized customer support |
WO2002077762A3 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2003-04-10 | Hewlett Packard Co | System and method for providing personalized customer support |
US20030004826A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-01-02 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Sales supporting system associated with navigation system and method thereof |
US7177826B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2007-02-13 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Sales supporting system associated with navigation system and method thereof |
US7010598B2 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2006-03-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring stream availability, quality and performance |
US20040136327A1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2004-07-15 | Sitaraman Ramesh K. | Method and apparatus for measuring stream availability, quality and performance |
US20030188040A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Software agent hosting environment with extensible middleware integration |
US20030204644A1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2003-10-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for developing, deploying, and debugging software agents |
US8271605B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2012-09-18 | Intel Corporation | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
US10313260B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2019-06-04 | Intel Corporation | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
US7313619B2 (en) * | 2003-03-21 | 2007-12-25 | Intel Corporation | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
US7831713B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2010-11-09 | Intel Corporation | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
US20080091769A1 (en) * | 2003-03-21 | 2008-04-17 | Torrant Marc D | System and method for managing distributed objects as a single representation |
WO2004109490A2 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2004-12-16 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Methods and systems for recording user actions in computer programs |
US7694223B2 (en) | 2003-06-04 | 2010-04-06 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Methods and systems for recording user actions in computer programs |
WO2004109490A3 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2005-11-10 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc | Methods and systems for recording user actions in computer programs |
US8555273B1 (en) | 2003-09-17 | 2013-10-08 | Palm. Inc. | Network for updating electronic devices |
EP1569107A3 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2006-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | A method and system for monitoring distributed applications on-demand |
EP1569107A2 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | A method and system for monitoring distributed applications on-demand |
US8578361B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2013-11-05 | Palm, Inc. | Updating an electronic device with update agent code |
US8526940B1 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2013-09-03 | Palm, Inc. | Centralized rules repository for smart phone customer care |
US8271387B2 (en) | 2005-06-20 | 2012-09-18 | Intraware, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing limited access to data objects or files within an electronic software delivery and management system |
US20100217716A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2010-08-26 | Tobid Pieper | Method and apparatus for restricting access to an electronic product release within an electronic software delivery system |
US20070192161A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | On-demand customer satisfaction measurement |
US20110138061A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-06-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Establishing and utilizing terminal server dynamic virtual channels |
US8799479B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2014-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Establishing and utilizing terminal server dynamic virtual channels |
US8893110B2 (en) | 2006-06-08 | 2014-11-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Device management in a network |
US20080028395A1 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | Giovanni Motta | User Experience And Dependency Management In A Mobile Device |
WO2008014454A3 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-12-31 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | User experience and dependency management in a mobile device |
US8752044B2 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2014-06-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | User experience and dependency management in a mobile device |
US9081638B2 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2015-07-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | User experience and dependency management in a mobile device |
US20080133681A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-06-05 | Jackson Troy V | System and method for diagnosis of and recommendations for remote processor system |
US9483791B2 (en) | 2007-03-02 | 2016-11-01 | Spiceworks, Inc. | Network software and hardware monitoring and marketplace |
US20090037287A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2009-02-05 | Ahmad Baitalmal | Software Marketplace and Distribution System |
US20090037967A1 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2009-02-05 | Oren Barkan | Video upload system |
US20100217673A1 (en) * | 2007-10-12 | 2010-08-26 | Gemalto Sa | Device and method for the customised delivery of targeted advertisements from a local server |
US10255609B2 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2019-04-09 | Micronotes, Inc. | Interactive marketing system |
US10943242B2 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2021-03-09 | Micronotes, Inc. | Interactive marketing system |
US20110145056A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2011-06-16 | Spiceworks, Inc. | Interactive online closed loop marketing system and method |
US20090300438A1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2009-12-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Connection monitoring method, connection monitoring apparatus, and connection monitoring system |
US8151148B2 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2012-04-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Connection monitoring method, connection monitoring apparatus, and connection monitoring system |
US20140229236A1 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2014-08-14 | Unify Square, Inc. | User Survey Service for Unified Communications |
US10997567B2 (en) * | 2016-07-14 | 2021-05-04 | Casio Computer Co., Ltd | Work support device, work support method and computer readable storage medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1999046712A1 (en) | 1999-09-16 |
US6434532B2 (en) | 2002-08-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6434532B2 (en) | Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine | |
US20020112048A1 (en) | System and method for providing behavioral information of a user accessing on-line resources | |
US6895437B1 (en) | System for monitoring browsing activity of a visitor and decrementing a reference count upon a web page change for automatic unloading a client program | |
AU763468B2 (en) | Post-deployment monitoring of server performance | |
US7069271B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for implementing internet storefronts to provide integrated functions | |
US7822844B2 (en) | System and methods for monitoring application server performance | |
US20140019228A1 (en) | System and Method for Performing Application-Level Analytics and Testing to Tailor Actions and Communications to a User's Experience | |
US20160006840A1 (en) | Dynamically configurable session agent | |
US6901595B2 (en) | Method, apparatus, and system for implementing a framework to support a web-based application | |
US9632817B2 (en) | Correlating business workflows with transaction tracking | |
US6907451B1 (en) | Method, apparatus, and system for immediate posting of changes in a client server environment | |
US20020019844A1 (en) | Method and system for network-distributed computing | |
US20030041050A1 (en) | System and method for web-based marketing and campaign management | |
US20070157192A1 (en) | Software maintenance management | |
US20070266305A1 (en) | System and method for monitoring user behavior with regard to interactive rich-media content | |
US20030140120A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for network access | |
US20050278630A1 (en) | Tracking user operations | |
US20080177600A1 (en) | Methods and systems for measuring online chat performance | |
US20080215438A1 (en) | System and method for controlling distribution of electronic coupons | |
JP2014513353A (en) | How to track software application internet downloads | |
WO2001069412A2 (en) | Monitoring and modifying services provided over a network | |
CN103403685A (en) | Online privacy management | |
US20150051972A1 (en) | Advertising and promotional system | |
GB2357679A (en) | Monitoring of services provided over a network with recording and redisplay of user interactions with a web page | |
AU2004217337A1 (en) | E-business operations measurements reporting |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PREVIEW SOFTWARE, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GOLDBAND, STEVE;VAN OS, RON;BARTH, JEFFREY;REEL/FRAME:009273/0769;SIGNING DATES FROM 19980520 TO 19980601 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PREVIEW SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PREVIEW SOFTWARE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010871/0287 Effective date: 20000526 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, INC., ISRAEL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PREVIEW SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012407/0094 Effective date: 20010727 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, LTD, ISRAEL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PREVIEW SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013758/0278 Effective date: 20010717 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERA Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ALLADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD.;REEL/FRAME:024892/0677 Effective date: 20100826 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERA Free format text: SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ALLADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD.;REEL/FRAME:024900/0702 Effective date: 20100826 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAFENET DATA SECURITY (ISRAEL) LTD., ISRAEL Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD.;REEL/FRAME:025848/0923 Effective date: 20101119 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD, MARYLAND Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:032437/0257 Effective date: 20140305 Owner name: ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD, MARYLAND Free format text: SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:032437/0341 Effective date: 20140305 |