US20020032802A1 - Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support - Google Patents
Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020032802A1 US20020032802A1 US08/993,319 US99331997A US2002032802A1 US 20020032802 A1 US20020032802 A1 US 20020032802A1 US 99331997 A US99331997 A US 99331997A US 2002032802 A1 US2002032802 A1 US 2002032802A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- user
- application programs
- message
- communication
- computer application
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/362—Software debugging
- G06F11/366—Software debugging using diagnostics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3409—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to error detection, to error correction, and to monitoring
- G06F2201/865—Monitoring of software
Definitions
- This invention relates to computer communication systems, that is for communication between software users and software developers. More specifically, this invention relates to systems for communicating information concerning software program usage, comments, suggestions and defects from software users to software program developers which take advantage of computer networks, electronic mail services, and automated software reporting means to provide to provide feed-back information to software program developers.
- Certain technologies have been proposed to address feed-back information communication concerning software and/or computer systems, including: a system which measures and reports the use of a personal computer by a user through a log file; a database system which reports the frequency of search queries and the occurrences of terms; a training and testing system that runs concurrently with a target software application program, which asks the user to perform a series of application functions and monitors the user's responses; an expert system for tuning the performance of a large scale software system; a method for verifying the conformance of an application program to a set of system rules; and a computer program that measures the execution of machine code instructions in an executing program.
- a system which measures and reports the use of a personal computer by a user through a log file
- a database system which reports the frequency of search queries and the occurrences of terms
- a training and testing system that runs concurrently with a target software application program, which asks the user to perform a series of application functions and monitors the user's responses
- an expert system for tuning the
- Another object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating software program use statistics.
- a further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating defects from computer software users to the computer software developer.
- a still further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating defect identification and correction status to software program users from software program developers.
- Another object of this invention is to provide a method and system for receiving and logging feature requests from software program users for use by software program developers.
- a still further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating feed-back information to a software program developer which minimizes the impact on the performance of the user's computer system and software program.
- a further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for facilitating communication between software program users and software program developers which reduces the burden on human support centers.
- a computer program which is capable of searching, ranking, sorting and displaying information contained within a computer database, and which tracks usage information, using the usage information to affect the relevance ranking algorithm.
- the primary functional sections of the preferred computer program embodiment of the invention include: an initialization routine; an error detection routine; a software timer; an user interface control routine; an event logging routine; and a statistics categorization routine.
- Commercially available Internet communications software along with the Internet itself provides the preferred communication channel.
- the preferred embodiment of this invention is designed to be used on any standard computer system that is linked by a network or other communication means to another computer system.
- Information is collected and communicated to a monitoring system, which is capable of producing usage reports, features request reports, defect reproduction step reports and user comment reports. Usage information is gathered and communicated without user intervention. While feature requests, defect reports, comments and questions are sent after being created or initiated by the user.
- a software button or menu item is provided in the application software, preferably with the label “Empowerment.”
- Empowerment When a user selects this button or menu item a dialog window is opened and the user is provided with a choice for selection of the type of communication, for example: defect report, feature request, comment, and/or question, and an edit control (pre-initialized with the user's e-mail address) for a reply-to-e-mail address and an edit control for user created text.
- the dialog may be exited by either engaging a “send” button or a “cancel” button. The engagement of the “send” button will cause the information to be sent to the developer while providing the user with a status window for the process.
- a computer program user is able to provide requests or comments, describe program defects, or ask questions of the developer, all in a manner which is integrated with the application program and which is communicated directly with the vendor of the software.
- This direct form of user feed-back both provides an efficient and direct method of gathering important information by the program developer and enhances the relationship between the vendor of the software and the user by giving the user a feeling of control and empowerment with respect to the application software program at issue.
- FIG. 1 is a system level block diagram of this invention.
- FIG. 2 is a top level flow diagram of the major components of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a detailed flow diagram of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a system diagram of the computer system with which the software embodiment of the invention operates.
- FIG. 5 is a system block diagram of the data communication paths used in the preferred embodiment of the invention.
- This invention is a process for enabling communication between computer software users and computer software developers.
- This invention provides a solution to the software development problem of providing the developer with direct information concerning the usefulness and functionality of his or her application program.
- This invention also provides the application software user with the means of commenting on and inquiring about a particular program.
- this invention provides the capability for the software vendor to automatically provide defect information, up-grade information, fix schedules and help information to customers, thereby improving customer relations in a cost effective manner.
- This invention is typically practiced with standard commercially available computer hardware, software and communication equipment. This invention requires that the user have access to a digital computer system and an electronic communication means. It also requires that the developer or vendor have access to a digital computer system and the means of sending and receiving messages to and from the user. A computer network with an Internet electronic mail (e-mail) service may be used for the communication means, or a simple dial up telephone modem connection can alternatively be used.
- e-mail Internet electronic mail
- Application program is software which is designed to interact with the user to perform a specific function.
- Computer hardware includes the physical components of a digital computer system and may include: a processor, memory, a display, a printer, a key board or other user input device, a modem or other communication device, a disk drive or other long term storage device, and the necessary electrical connections between all of the above.
- Developer is the author or developer of the application program.
- Program is a general term for software.
- Software is programmed instructions which work with digital computer hardware to perform a given function.
- Vendor is the manufacturer, distributor or supplier of a program.
- User is a person or entity which makes use of an application program and who uses the process of this invention to communicate with the developer or vendor of the application program.
- this process is performed in both the user's computer system and the vendor or developer's computer system, by a specific computer program.
- this specific computer program is coded in the Pascal computer language and is compiled to correctly execute on the desired computer hardware.
- a software appendix is provided at the conclusion of this detailed description to enable a those of ordinary skill in the art to use the current best mode of the invention. It should be noted that the software included in the software appendix provides only the sections of the invention that are not otherwise commonly available commercially. Such sections are linked in to provide standard interface, control and similar functions.
- FIG. 1 shows a system level block diagram of the minimum preferred embodiment of the invention.
- a monitoring computer system 101 is provided wherein the vendor or developer communicates with the user computer system 102 and where the data base and reporting functions of the invention are performed.
- the preferred monitoring computer system 101 and the preferred user computer system 102 are standalone digital computers, having a processor, memory, a display and an input device. Typically, such computers are known in the industry as PCs or personal computers. Alternatively, this invention could also operate where the monitoring computer system 101 and/or the user computer system 102 are work stations, minicomputers, main frame computers and the like. Communication 103 between the user computer system 102 and the monitoring computer system 101 is provided.
- this communication 103 is an Internet connection which provide electronic mail (e-mail) service to both the user and the vendor and/or developer.
- this invention could also work with dedicated dial-up modem lines or the like for providing communication 103 .
- the empower monitor program 105 enabling this invention and a data base 104 for storage and retrieval of communicated information.
- the empower program 106 enabling the user communication and the application program 107 , upon which the user and vendor or developer are communicating.
- Additional programs, such as operating system, hardware and software driver routines, other application programs and the like may also be operating on or within both the user computer system 102 and the monitoring computer system 101 .
- FIG. 2 shows the top level flow diagram showing the major component steps of this invention.
- the application program is started 201 , whereupon this invention cooperates.
- the invention logs 203 the occurrence of this event in a log for communicating with the monitoring computer system 101 .
- usage events include, but are not limited to: viewing time, copy functions, printing, e-mailing, linking and/or jumping through the document and searching.
- the invention logs 205 the occurrence of this event in a log for communicating with the monitoring computer system 101 .
- application events include, but are not limited to: menu item clicks, button clicks, editing events, procedure values and returns.
- FIG. 3 shows the detailed flow diagram of the process of the invention.
- FIG. 3 has a FIG. 3 a section showing the first twelve steps and a FIG. 3 b section showing steps 13 through 22 of the invention.
- the division between FIG. 3 a and FIG. 3 b is done only for page size convenience and not to imply a functional break or limitation.
- this invention monitors the operation of the application for whether the user has chosen empowerment 304 , that is whether the user has initiated communication; whether a timer event has fired 303 ; whether a programmatic failure has occurred 302 ; and whether the application has ended 301 . If the user has completed use of the application and the application has ended the use of the invention process also terminates 206 . If the user chooses empowerment 304 then a dialog display is provided 306 to permit the user to add comments and to indicate the type of communication the comments represent, such as: an enhancement request; a comment; a defect report; and/or a question. The dialog display 306 also provides a “send” button which the user may click to send the message to the vendor and/or the developer.
- the document usage event is appended 305 to the message. If a programmatic failure 302 has occurred then the application event log is appended 308 to the message. The application event log is also appended 308 to the message after the document usage event is appended 305 or the user has clicked the send 307 to send a communication to the vendor or developer. Following the appending of the application event 308 , the message is sent 309 to the vendor or user. The sending of the message is accomplished using the communication channel discussed above, that is typically and preferably by e-mail, file transfer protocol and/or datagram protocols. Once sent the message is received and stored 310 by the monitoring computer system 101 .
- a test 311 is performed to determine if the message is from either a timer (see step 303 ) or a defect (see step 302 ). If the test 311 is positive then statistics are stored and categorized 312 for later report generation. After which the process of the invention ends 322 , or alternatively returns to the application start step 201 . If the test 311 is negative then the data base is searched 313 and the results of the search are relevance ranked 314 with the top few hits sent with an automated response message back to the user. Based upon the search results, this automated response notifies the user that the message was received and that there may be certain actions that the user can take to fix, prevent, or workaround the problem.
- the program of this invention ends 322 , or alternatively returns to the application start 210 step. If, however, the user does not respond that the problem has been solved, then, preferably, customer support processes of the vendor and/or developer proceed to evaluate 316 the user's message and the automated response provided in 314 . A test 317 is performed to determine if the automatic response was correct. If correct, customer support confirms 320 the proper answer and inquires of the user in a follow-on message if the problem was solved 321 , and the process returns to the problem solved test of step 315 .
- the problem is addressed manually 318 and the status of the problem as it using such indications as: unverified, verified, fixed, worked around, deferred until next release, rejected, resolved, and the like are logged.
- the user is notified 319 of one or more of the following: the final resolution of the problem; when the feature is scheduled to be available if a feature request has been made; the answer if a question was posed; a fix availability if a defect report has been made.
- the process of the invention ends 322 , or alternatively returns to step 201 for detection of further defects, problems or user messages.
- FIG. 4 shows the preferred computer systems used with this invention.
- the monitoring computer system 101 is shown with a disk long term storage unit 401 , a processor 402 , memory 403 , a display device 404 , an input device 405 and a communication channel 406 for communicating with the user computer system 102 .
- the user computer system is shown with a like long term storage unit 408 , processor 409 , memory 410 , display device 407 , and input device 411 .
- FIG. 5 shows a system block diagram of the data communication is shown to provide the each computer system uses an operating system 504 , 505 for controlling the use of software programs.
- the operating systems 504 , 505 control the access of the invention to the communication channel 103 .
- the monitoring computer system 101 routes data received from the user computer system 102 to the empower monitor 501 routine which interfaces with a stored data base 502 and a report generator routine 503 .
- the user computer system 102 sends and receives information through the control of its operating system 505 . Sent messages and received information is controlled by the empower user routine 506 which is linked to the application 507 being used by the user.
- This embodiment of the invention is written in the Pascal computer language and is provided using two primary routines: Main and Empower.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates to computer communication systems, that is for communication between software users and software developers. More specifically, this invention relates to systems for communicating information concerning software program usage, comments, suggestions and defects from software users to software program developers which take advantage of computer networks, electronic mail services, and automated software reporting means to provide to provide feed-back information to software program developers.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- A variety of techniques have been developed for providing feedback to computer software developers including stand-alone debuggers, web page hits and usage reporters, telephone support centers and e-mail electronic support services. Such techniques may provide support and feed-back in the limited application in which it is applied, however, automatic coordination and reporting of information from a wide variety of sources without undue human intervention is not generally available in any of these techniques. Certain technologies have been proposed to address feed-back information communication concerning software and/or computer systems, including: a system which measures and reports the use of a personal computer by a user through a log file; a database system which reports the frequency of search queries and the occurrences of terms; a training and testing system that runs concurrently with a target software application program, which asks the user to perform a series of application functions and monitors the user's responses; an expert system for tuning the performance of a large scale software system; a method for verifying the conformance of an application program to a set of system rules; and a computer program that measures the execution of machine code instructions in an executing program. For general background material, the reader is directed to U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,910,663, 5,313,616, 5,367,473, 5,602,982, 5,659,732, 5,675,510, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for the material disclosed therein.
- It is desirable to provide a method and system which facilitates the communication of feed-back information to a software developer, including specifically the communication of which sections of the software program are most useful or are not used and which program defects are the most troublesome to users and to provide such information with minimal human interaction, minimal time delay, and minimal interference with the user's computer system or the application program being monitored. Such information assists developers in managing, maintaining and improving the quality of computer programs. It is also desirable to provide software users with feed-back as to defects that have been identified along with expected fix dates. Similarly it is desirable to have a software quality control system in which defects can be reproduced by a software developer with minimal user interaction, thus enabling a more timely defect repair response time. It is desirable to have a means for requesting and logging feature requests from users, so that developers can prioritize requested features for inclusion in future software updates. Moreover, it is desirable to provide an automated software quality control system which is capable of coordinating information received from a variety of sources and a variety of users and presenting such information to the software developer, while simultaneously reducing the burden on human support centers.
- Accordingly, it is the primary object of this invention to provide a method and system for communicating software program feed-back from a user to a software program developer.
- Another object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating software program use statistics.
- A further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating defects from computer software users to the computer software developer.
- A still further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating defect identification and correction status to software program users from software program developers.
- Another object of this invention is to provide a method and system for receiving and logging feature requests from software program users for use by software program developers.
- It is still another object of this invention to provide a method and system for communicating feed-back information between software users and developers which is automated and requires minimal human interaction.
- A still further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for communicating feed-back information to a software program developer which minimizes the impact on the performance of the user's computer system and software program.
- A further object of this invention is to provide a method and system for facilitating communication between software program users and software program developers which reduces the burden on human support centers.
- Additional objects, advantages, and other novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description that follows and in part will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned with the practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of this invention may be realized and attainted by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
- To achieve the foregoing and other objectives, and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention, a computer program is provided which is capable of searching, ranking, sorting and displaying information contained within a computer database, and which tracks usage information, using the usage information to affect the relevance ranking algorithm. The primary functional sections of the preferred computer program embodiment of the invention include: an initialization routine; an error detection routine; a software timer; an user interface control routine; an event logging routine; and a statistics categorization routine. Commercially available Internet communications software along with the Internet itself provides the preferred communication channel.
- The preferred embodiment of this invention is designed to be used on any standard computer system that is linked by a network or other communication means to another computer system. Information is collected and communicated to a monitoring system, which is capable of producing usage reports, features request reports, defect reproduction step reports and user comment reports. Usage information is gathered and communicated without user intervention. While feature requests, defect reports, comments and questions are sent after being created or initiated by the user. In the preferred embodiment, a software button or menu item is provided in the application software, preferably with the label “Empowerment.” When a user selects this button or menu item a dialog window is opened and the user is provided with a choice for selection of the type of communication, for example: defect report, feature request, comment, and/or question, and an edit control (pre-initialized with the user's e-mail address) for a reply-to-e-mail address and an edit control for user created text. The dialog may be exited by either engaging a “send” button or a “cancel” button. The engagement of the “send” button will cause the information to be sent to the developer while providing the user with a status window for the process.
- Through the use of this invention a computer program user is able to provide requests or comments, describe program defects, or ask questions of the developer, all in a manner which is integrated with the application program and which is communicated directly with the vendor of the software. This direct form of user feed-back both provides an efficient and direct method of gathering important information by the program developer and enhances the relationship between the vendor of the software and the user by giving the user a feeling of control and empowerment with respect to the application software program at issue.
- The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification of this invention, illustrates several aspects of the present invention, and together with the description serves to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
- FIG. 1 is a system level block diagram of this invention.
- FIG. 2 is a top level flow diagram of the major components of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a detailed flow diagram of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a system diagram of the computer system with which the software embodiment of the invention operates.
- FIG. 5 is a system block diagram of the data communication paths used in the preferred embodiment of the invention.
- Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiment of the invention, an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
- This invention is a process for enabling communication between computer software users and computer software developers. This invention provides a solution to the software development problem of providing the developer with direct information concerning the usefulness and functionality of his or her application program. This invention also provides the application software user with the means of commenting on and inquiring about a particular program. Moreover, this invention provides the capability for the software vendor to automatically provide defect information, up-grade information, fix schedules and help information to customers, thereby improving customer relations in a cost effective manner.
- This invention is typically practiced with standard commercially available computer hardware, software and communication equipment. This invention requires that the user have access to a digital computer system and an electronic communication means. It also requires that the developer or vendor have access to a digital computer system and the means of sending and receiving messages to and from the user. A computer network with an Internet electronic mail (e-mail) service may be used for the communication means, or a simple dial up telephone modem connection can alternatively be used.
- For the purposes of this description the following terms should be interpreted to mean as follows.
- Application program is software which is designed to interact with the user to perform a specific function.
- Computer hardware includes the physical components of a digital computer system and may include: a processor, memory, a display, a printer, a key board or other user input device, a modem or other communication device, a disk drive or other long term storage device, and the necessary electrical connections between all of the above.
- Developer is the author or developer of the application program. Program is a general term for software.
- Software is programmed instructions which work with digital computer hardware to perform a given function.
- Vendor is the manufacturer, distributor or supplier of a program.
- User is a person or entity which makes use of an application program and who uses the process of this invention to communicate with the developer or vendor of the application program.
- In the preferred embodiment of this invention, this process is performed in both the user's computer system and the vendor or developer's computer system, by a specific computer program. In the preferred embodiment, this specific computer program is coded in the Pascal computer language and is compiled to correctly execute on the desired computer hardware. A software appendix is provided at the conclusion of this detailed description to enable a those of ordinary skill in the art to use the current best mode of the invention. It should be noted that the software included in the software appendix provides only the sections of the invention that are not otherwise commonly available commercially. Such sections are linked in to provide standard interface, control and similar functions. It is envisioned that this invention could be practiced in a variety of ways, including but not limited to: alternative program languages, such as assembly code, C, C++, Fortran, Java, etc.; firmware or specially designed hardware; and/or some combination of the two. Therefore, the reader should consider the software appendix as exemplary of the current best mode of the invention and not as limiting the scope of the invention. Likewise, the following description of the invention is intended to provide the current preferred mode of the invention. The scope and limitations of this invention are found in the claims which follow this detailed description.
- FIG. 1 shows a system level block diagram of the minimum preferred embodiment of the invention. A monitoring computer system101 is provided wherein the vendor or developer communicates with the user computer system 102 and where the data base and reporting functions of the invention are performed. The preferred monitoring computer system 101 and the preferred user computer system 102 are standalone digital computers, having a processor, memory, a display and an input device. Typically, such computers are known in the industry as PCs or personal computers. Alternatively, this invention could also operate where the monitoring computer system 101 and/or the user computer system 102 are work stations, minicomputers, main frame computers and the like. Communication 103 between the user computer system 102 and the monitoring computer system 101 is provided. In the preferred embodiment of the invention this communication 103 is an Internet connection which provide electronic mail (e-mail) service to both the user and the vendor and/or developer. Alternatively, this invention could also work with dedicated dial-up modem lines or the like for providing communication 103. Within the monitoring computer system 101 resides the empower monitor program 105 enabling this invention and a data base 104 for storage and retrieval of communicated information. With the user computer system 102 resides the empower program 106 enabling the user communication and the
application program 107, upon which the user and vendor or developer are communicating. Additional programs, such as operating system, hardware and software driver routines, other application programs and the like may also be operating on or within both the user computer system 102 and the monitoring computer system 101. - FIG. 2 shows the top level flow diagram showing the major component steps of this invention. The application program is started201, whereupon this invention cooperates. When a particular designated document usage event in the application program is detected 202 the invention logs 203 the occurrence of this event in a log for communicating with the monitoring computer system 101. Typically, such usage events include, but are not limited to: viewing time, copy functions, printing, e-mailing, linking and/or jumping through the document and searching. When an application event is detected 204 the invention logs 205 the occurrence of this event in a log for communicating with the monitoring computer system 101. Typically, such application events include, but are not limited to: menu item clicks, button clicks, editing events, procedure values and returns. When the user has completed use of the application program or document the application ends 206, thereby terminating the execution of this invention.
- FIG. 3 shows the detailed flow diagram of the process of the invention. FIG. 3 has a FIG. 3a section showing the first twelve steps and a FIG. 3b section showing steps 13 through 22 of the invention. The division between FIG. 3a and FIG. 3b is done only for page size convenience and not to imply a functional break or limitation.
- Once the application is started201 this invention monitors the operation of the application for whether the user has chosen
empowerment 304, that is whether the user has initiated communication; whether a timer event has fired 303; whether a programmatic failure has occurred 302; and whether the application has ended 301. If the user has completed use of the application and the application has ended the use of the invention process also terminates 206. If the user choosesempowerment 304 then a dialog display is provided 306 to permit the user to add comments and to indicate the type of communication the comments represent, such as: an enhancement request; a comment; a defect report; and/or a question. Thedialog display 306 also provides a “send” button which the user may click to send the message to the vendor and/or the developer. If the timer event has fired 303 or occurred then the document usage event is appended 305 to the message. If aprogrammatic failure 302 has occurred then the application event log is appended 308 to the message. The application event log is also appended 308 to the message after the document usage event is appended 305 or the user has clicked thesend 307 to send a communication to the vendor or developer. Following the appending of theapplication event 308, the message is sent 309 to the vendor or user. The sending of the message is accomplished using the communication channel discussed above, that is typically and preferably by e-mail, file transfer protocol and/or datagram protocols. Once sent the message is received and stored 310 by the monitoring computer system 101. A test 311 is performed to determine if the message is from either a timer (see step 303) or a defect (see step 302). If the test 311 is positive then statistics are stored and categorized 312 for later report generation. After which the process of the invention ends 322, or alternatively returns to theapplication start step 201. If the test 311 is negative then the data base is searched 313 and the results of the search are relevance ranked 314 with the top few hits sent with an automated response message back to the user. Based upon the search results, this automated response notifies the user that the message was received and that there may be certain actions that the user can take to fix, prevent, or workaround the problem. Once the user receives this message, if the user responds that the problem was solved 315, then no other communication dialog is required, therefore the program of this invention ends 322, or alternatively returns to the application start 210 step. If, however, the user does not respond that the problem has been solved, then, preferably, customer support processes of the vendor and/or developer proceed to evaluate 316 the user's message and the automated response provided in 314. Atest 317 is performed to determine if the automatic response was correct. If correct, customer support confirms 320 the proper answer and inquires of the user in a follow-on message if the problem was solved 321, and the process returns to the problem solved test ofstep 315. If, however, the automated answer is determined to be incorrect, the problem is addressed manually 318 and the status of the problem as it using such indications as: unverified, verified, fixed, worked around, deferred until next release, rejected, resolved, and the like are logged. Next, the user is notified 319 of one or more of the following: the final resolution of the problem; when the feature is scheduled to be available if a feature request has been made; the answer if a question was posed; a fix availability if a defect report has been made. Following the notification of theuser 319, the process of the invention ends 322, or alternatively returns to step 201 for detection of further defects, problems or user messages. - FIG. 4 shows the preferred computer systems used with this invention. The monitoring computer system101 is shown with a disk long term storage unit 401, a
processor 402,memory 403, adisplay device 404, aninput device 405 and a communication channel 406 for communicating with the user computer system 102. Similarly, the user computer system is shown with a like longterm storage unit 408,processor 409,memory 410, display device 407, and input device 411. - FIG. 5 shows a system block diagram of the data communication is shown to provide the each computer system uses an
operating system 504, 505 for controlling the use of software programs. Theoperating systems 504, 505 control the access of the invention to the communication channel 103. The monitoring computer system 101 routes data received from the user computer system 102 to the empowermonitor 501 routine which interfaces with a storeddata base 502 and areport generator routine 503. The user computer system 102 sends and receives information through the control of its operating system 505. Sent messages and received information is controlled by the empoweruser routine 506 which is linked to theapplication 507 being used by the user. - It is to be understood that the above described embodiment of the invention is merely illustrative of numerous and varied other embodiments which may constitute applications of the principles of this invention. Such other embodiments may be readily devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention, and it is the inventors' intent that such other embodiments be deemed to be within the scope of this invention.
- The following is one preferred embodiment of the software source code which accomplishes the steps of this invention. It is being included herein not to limit the scope of the invention but rather only to provide a fully enabled disclosure of the best mode of the invention known to the inventors which is sufficient to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art to make and practice the invention.
-
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/993,319 US6393490B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 1997-12-18 | Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/993,319 US6393490B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 1997-12-18 | Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020032802A1 true US20020032802A1 (en) | 2002-03-14 |
US6393490B1 US6393490B1 (en) | 2002-05-21 |
Family
ID=25539381
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/993,319 Expired - Fee Related US6393490B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 1997-12-18 | Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6393490B1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002029759A2 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-11 | Charles Wong | Virtual training sales and support |
US20050015487A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2005-01-20 | Tetsuro Motoyama | Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using a dynamic linked library of multiple formats and multiple protocols with intelligent protocol processor |
US20060167955A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-07-27 | Vertes Marc P | Non-intrusive method for logging of internal events within an application process, and system implementing this method |
US20060184829A1 (en) * | 2005-02-14 | 2006-08-17 | Cheong Gerald I | Web-based analysis of defective computer programs |
US20060241909A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System review toolset and method |
AU2003255356B2 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2007-06-21 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Change navigation toolkit |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6782530B1 (en) * | 1999-04-05 | 2004-08-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Method of ranking messages generated in a computer system |
US6609106B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2003-08-19 | Steven C. Robertson | System and method for providing electronic multi-merchant gift registry services over a distributed network |
US8346626B2 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2013-01-01 | Robertson Steven C | System and method for providing electronic multi-merchant gift registry services over a distributed network |
JP2001290844A (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2001-10-19 | Nec Corp | System developing method, development assistance system, and storage medium stored with program |
US6999941B1 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2006-02-14 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Providing gift clustering functionality to assist a user in ordering multiple items for a recipient |
US20060265188A1 (en) * | 2005-05-05 | 2006-11-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for defect reduction analysis |
US20070006166A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2007-01-04 | Seagate Technology Llc | Code coverage for an embedded processor system |
US7703120B2 (en) * | 2006-09-13 | 2010-04-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Set-top box initiated contact center interaction |
US8990400B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2015-03-24 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Facilitating communications among message recipients |
US8583267B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2013-11-12 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Selective invocation of playback content supplementation |
US7733223B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2010-06-08 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Effectively documenting irregularities in a responsive user's environment |
US8079018B2 (en) * | 2007-11-22 | 2011-12-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Test impact feedback system for software developers |
US20090248729A1 (en) * | 2008-03-25 | 2009-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Online application platform and user communities |
US10108440B2 (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2018-10-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interactive troubleshooting flowcharts |
US10324970B2 (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2019-06-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Feedback analysis for content improvement tasks |
US10331786B2 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2019-06-25 | Google Llc | Device compatibility management |
US10592821B2 (en) | 2015-06-19 | 2020-03-17 | Trane International Inc. | Self-learning fault detection for HVAC systems |
US10684035B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2020-06-16 | Trane International Inc. | HVAC system that collects customer feedback in connection with failure triage |
Family Cites Families (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4910663A (en) | 1987-07-10 | 1990-03-20 | Tandem Computers Incorporated | System for measuring program execution by replacing an executable instruction with interrupt causing instruction |
US5218605A (en) * | 1990-01-31 | 1993-06-08 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Software modules for testing computer hardware and software |
US5367473A (en) | 1990-06-18 | 1994-11-22 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Expert system for computer system resource management |
US5313616A (en) | 1990-09-18 | 1994-05-17 | 88Open Consortium, Ltd. | Method for analyzing calls of application program by inserting monitoring routines into the executable version and redirecting calls to the monitoring routines |
US5333302A (en) * | 1991-02-28 | 1994-07-26 | Hensley Billy W | Filtering event capture data for computer software evaluation |
US5542047A (en) * | 1991-04-23 | 1996-07-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Distributed network monitoring system for monitoring node and link status |
US5463764A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1995-10-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for system debugging through a keyboard device driver |
US5566339A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1996-10-15 | Fox Network Systems, Inc. | System and method for monitoring computer environment and operation |
US5446883A (en) * | 1992-10-23 | 1995-08-29 | Answer Systems, Inc. | Method and system for distributed information management and document retrieval |
US5513315A (en) * | 1992-12-22 | 1996-04-30 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for automatic testing of computer software |
US5371883A (en) * | 1993-03-26 | 1994-12-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of testing programs in a distributed environment |
JPH0772767A (en) * | 1993-06-15 | 1995-03-17 | Xerox Corp | Interactive user support system |
GB9320052D0 (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1993-11-17 | Philips Electronics Uk Ltd | Testing and monitoring of programmed devices |
US5862322A (en) * | 1994-03-14 | 1999-01-19 | Dun & Bradstreet Software Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating customer service communications in a computing environment |
US5463768A (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1995-10-31 | General Electric Company | Method and system for analyzing error logs for diagnostics |
US5633909A (en) * | 1994-06-17 | 1997-05-27 | Centigram Communications Corporation | Apparatus and method for generating calls and testing telephone equipment |
US5602982A (en) | 1994-09-23 | 1997-02-11 | Kelly Properties, Inc. | Universal automated training and testing software system |
US5745767A (en) * | 1995-03-28 | 1998-04-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for testing the interoperability of application programs |
US5671351A (en) * | 1995-04-13 | 1997-09-23 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method for automated testing and monitoring of software applications |
US5659732A (en) | 1995-05-17 | 1997-08-19 | Infoseek Corporation | Document retrieval over networks wherein ranking and relevance scores are computed at the client for multiple database documents |
US5675510A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-10-07 | Pc Meter L.P. | Computer use meter and analyzer |
US5621886A (en) * | 1995-06-19 | 1997-04-15 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing efficient software debugging |
US5812780A (en) * | 1996-05-24 | 1998-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Method, system, and product for assessing a server application performance |
US5754760A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1998-05-19 | Integrity Qa Software, Inc. | Automatic software testing tool |
US6279124B1 (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 2001-08-21 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Method and system for testing hardware and/or software applications |
US5938729A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 1999-08-17 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for monitoring server performance at a client computer |
US5708774A (en) * | 1996-07-23 | 1998-01-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated testing of software application interfaces, object methods and commands |
JPH10228311A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1998-08-25 | Shimadzu Corp | Remote diagnostic system for failure of instrument |
US5905855A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-05-18 | Transmeta Corporation | Method and apparatus for correcting errors in computer systems |
US6134674A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 2000-10-17 | Sony Corporation | Computer based test operating system |
US5796952A (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 1998-08-18 | Dot Com Development, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database |
-
1997
- 1997-12-18 US US08/993,319 patent/US6393490B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050015487A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2005-01-20 | Tetsuro Motoyama | Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using a dynamic linked library of multiple formats and multiple protocols with intelligent protocol processor |
US7617311B2 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2009-11-10 | Ricoh Company Ltd. | Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using a dynamic linked library of multiple formats and multiple protocols with intelligent protocol processor |
WO2002029759A2 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-11 | Charles Wong | Virtual training sales and support |
WO2002029759A3 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2003-02-13 | Charles Wong | Virtual training sales and support |
AU2003255356B2 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2007-06-21 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Change navigation toolkit |
US20060167955A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-07-27 | Vertes Marc P | Non-intrusive method for logging of internal events within an application process, and system implementing this method |
US8904361B2 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2014-12-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Non-intrusive method for logging of internal events within an application process, and system implementing this method |
US20060184829A1 (en) * | 2005-02-14 | 2006-08-17 | Cheong Gerald I | Web-based analysis of defective computer programs |
US7343523B2 (en) * | 2005-02-14 | 2008-03-11 | Aristoga, Inc. | Web-based analysis of defective computer programs |
US20060241909A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System review toolset and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6393490B1 (en) | 2002-05-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20020032802A1 (en) | Method and system for a programmatic feedback process for end-user support | |
US7305465B2 (en) | Collecting appliance problem information over network and providing remote technical support to deliver appliance fix information to an end user | |
US6539499B1 (en) | Graphical interface, method, and system for the provision of diagnostic and support services in a computer system | |
US8312322B2 (en) | System for automated generation of computer test procedures | |
US20040236843A1 (en) | Online diagnosing of computer hardware and software | |
EP0324736B1 (en) | Test automation system | |
US8250563B2 (en) | Distributed autonomic solutions repository | |
US7100083B2 (en) | Checks for product knowledge management | |
US5812436A (en) | Method and apparatus for testing and analyzing the conformance of a proposed set of requirements for a proposed network management application | |
US7398530B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for event handling | |
US7458064B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for generating a work item in a bug tracking system | |
NZ526097A (en) | Online diagnosing of computer hardware and software from a remote location without requiring human assistance | |
US20050022176A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring compatibility of software combinations | |
US20040078726A1 (en) | Check creation and maintenance for product knowledge management | |
US20030084379A1 (en) | Fact collection for product knowledge management | |
US20040015908A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for analysis driven issue report generation | |
US7793262B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for facilitating software testing and report generation with interactive graphical user interface | |
US7451391B1 (en) | Method for web page rules compliance testing | |
US5715373A (en) | Method and apparatus for preparing a suite of test scripts for testing a proposed network management application | |
JPH0644242B2 (en) | How to solve problems in computer systems | |
WO1998027488A1 (en) | Software release metric reporting system and method | |
US7475293B1 (en) | Product check matrix | |
US20030149677A1 (en) | Knowledge automation engine for product knowledge management | |
CN116820920A (en) | Buried point test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
CN116206719A (en) | Intelligent screening system for hospital diseases |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KNOWLIX CORPORATION, UTAH Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STILES, IAN JAMES;AHLSTROM, PAUL B.;REEL/FRAME:008951/0312 Effective date: 19971217 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC., ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PEREGRINE SYSTEMS, INC.;PEREGRINE REMEDY, INC.;LORAN NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013280/0917 Effective date: 20020826 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KNOWLIX CORPORATION, UTAH Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 Owner name: LORAN NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 Owner name: OCTOBER ACQUISITION CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 Owner name: PEREGRINE FEDERAL SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 Owner name: PEREGRINE REMEDY, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 Owner name: PEREGRINE SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:FLEET BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:015223/0827 Effective date: 20040114 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:PEREGRINE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017696/0705 Effective date: 20060120 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:017905/0174 Effective date: 20060705 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140521 |