US20040064323A1 - Natural language query system for accessing an information system - Google Patents

Natural language query system for accessing an information system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040064323A1
US20040064323A1 US10/634,354 US63435403A US2004064323A1 US 20040064323 A1 US20040064323 A1 US 20040064323A1 US 63435403 A US63435403 A US 63435403A US 2004064323 A1 US2004064323 A1 US 2004064323A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
user
information
aimed
phrases
domain
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/634,354
Inventor
Charles Kemper
Francois Leger
Aart Den Ouden
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
VOICE-INSIGHT
Voice Insight Belgian Corp
Original Assignee
Voice Insight Belgian Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Voice Insight Belgian Corp filed Critical Voice Insight Belgian Corp
Assigned to VOICE-INSIGHT reassignment VOICE-INSIGHT ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KEMPER, CHARLES, LEGER, FRANCOIS, OUDEN, AART DEN
Publication of US20040064323A1 publication Critical patent/US20040064323A1/en
Priority to US11/399,053 priority Critical patent/US7653604B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/26Speech to text systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2452Query translation
    • G06F16/24522Translation of natural language queries to structured queries
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903Querying
    • G06F16/9032Query formulation
    • G06F16/90332Natural language query formulation or dialogue systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/08Speech classification or search
    • G10L15/18Speech classification or search using natural language modelling
    • G10L15/183Speech classification or search using natural language modelling using context dependencies, e.g. language models
    • G10L15/19Grammatical context, e.g. disambiguation of the recognition hypotheses based on word sequence rules
    • G10L15/193Formal grammars, e.g. finite state automata, context free grammars or word networks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/22Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue
    • G10L2015/226Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue using non-speech characteristics
    • G10L2015/228Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue using non-speech characteristics of application context

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an interaction system aimed at permitting a user to interact with an information system by means of a recognition system.
  • Recognition systems usually comprise two modules: a recognition module that converts phrases generated by the user into a textual computer representation of said phrases and a text to generation module that can convert a textual computer representation in a generated phrase understandable by the user.
  • recognition systems one finds namely speech recognition systems with which the user can generate phrases by way of pronunciation and that can generate aloud phrases to the user, and text recognition systems such as text scanning systems, with which the user can generate phrases by way of a written text and that can generate phrases to the user in a written form.
  • Information systems manage data that are usually stored in databases. These data bases are commonly customised by their users, as well as the information systems aimed at exploiting said data bases.
  • the data also called objects
  • object types identified by a code.
  • Each object type gathers object instances, that is specific data or objects, of the considered type.
  • attributes may be gathered in attribute types.
  • An attribute type groups attributes that have similar characteristics e.g. textual or date attributes.
  • Each information system is adapted to the databases it has to manipulate and thus may address the object types, attribute types, and instances of objects of an object type having certain attribute instances. Therefore, the codes used by a database to identify object types and attribute types are recognized by the information system that has to manipulate said database.
  • each information system contains action types gathering actions that may be applied on the objects of a database by the system.
  • Each action type fits to one ore more object types.
  • Information systems are gathered in different domains of applications such as Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Document Management (DM) systems or Product Data Management (PDM) systems to name a few well known business application domains.
  • GIS Geographical Information Systems
  • ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
  • DM Document Management
  • PDM Product Data Management
  • the present invention overcomes these problems in providing an interaction system, called Voice Query Language, that enables interactions of a user with different pre-existing information systems of a domain of applications by using different pre-existing recognition systems.
  • This invention thus enables the user to apply, by generation of phrases, called queries, actions defined by the information, system to objects stored in the databases manipulated by the information system and identified by attributes.
  • the referred action phrase set-ups that are used to build actual phrases thus define a grammar consisting essentially of object types, attribute types, action types and production rules are provided to be used in the interactions of the user with an information system of the domain considered, both when the system presents to the user the different queries he may request and when the user addresses such a query to the information system.
  • the invention provides an interaction system for enabling a user of an information system belonging to an application domain of similar information systems to interact with said information system, said interaction system being aimed at being connected to the information system, the interaction system further being aimed at being connected to a recognition system for enabling the user to interact with the information system by means of phrases generated by said user and processed by the recognition system, said interaction system comprising at least one domain module aimed at having defined therein phrases setups that are constructed based on object classes, attribute classes and action classes that are common to said information systems of the considered application domain and are provided to be particularised with specific object types, action types, attribute types and their instances, provided from the information system, in order to define a grammar of phrases that are provided to be generated by the user to interact with the information system.
  • the interaction system comprises a generic module connected to the at least one domain module and aimed at being connected to the recognition system, said generic module being aimed at converting said phrases that can be generated by the user into a textual computer representation usable by the recognition system for the recognition of said phrases when generated by the user and being aimed at converting a textual computer representation produced by the recognition system, after recognition of a phrase generated by the user has happened, into a phrase defined by said grammar.
  • said generic module comprises an element containing information enabling configuration of the recognition system.
  • the interaction system comprises an adapter module connected to the at least one domain module and aimed at being connected to the information system, said adapter module being aimed at extracting objects, attributes, action types and their instances from the information system and pass them to the at least one domain module and being aimed at driving the information system for the latter to execute a demand for action contained in a phrase generated by the user.
  • the at least one domain module comprises an element containing information about general notions of objects and attributes identifying objects that is common to several application domains.
  • the at least one domain module is aimed at being connected to a system analyst and linguist aimed at defining object classes, attribute classes, action classes and phrases set-ups that said at least one domain module is aimed at having defined therein.
  • the aforementioned recognition system is a speech recognition system and the phrases generated by the user are generated by pronunciation by said user.
  • said recognition system is a text recognition system and the phrases generated by the user are written by said user
  • FIG. 1 represents an interaction system according to the invention integrated in its environment.
  • the environment comprising the interaction system according to the invention is composed of the following elements:
  • [0022] 1 An information system aimed at manipulating several object types being characterised by several attributes being part of attribute types, the manipulation being performed by means of several action types. Objects and attribute types have instances that can be found in the databases manipulated by the information system.
  • a recognition system comprising two modules:
  • [0024] 2 a The recognition module that converts phrases generated by the user into a textual computer representation.
  • [0026] 3 A system analyst and linguist that provides the object, attributes and action classes as well as the phrases set-ups that will be used to exercise the information system actions on the object types.
  • System analysts and linguists are human beings that are capable of analysing how the user would vocally interrogate the system. The result of that analysis will be a collection of action phrase set-ups being typical of a domain of applications.
  • [0027] 4 A user that will use the system by means of the grammar defined by the phrase set-ups particularised with the instances of objects, attributes and actions manipulated by the information system.
  • a generic module that can convert a language grammar, that is a set of object types, action types and production rules of valid phrases that can be generated by the user in view of interacting with an information system, into a computer representation that can be used by the recognition system and convert a computer representation resulting from a recognition into a phrase defined by a grammar.
  • Said generic module comprises an element c 1 containing information enabling configuration of the recognition system, namely:
  • the communication devices used such as for example microphones, or telephone devices.
  • a domain module that is able to receive elements as object types, attribute types and action types as well as instances of the latter that are manipulated by information systems of a predetermined domain of applications.
  • the domain module comprises definitions of classes of objects, actions and attributes that are typical of said domain and that are used to combine the aforementioned elements received with the aforementioned action phrase set-ups to produce the grammar needed by the generic module 5 b .
  • the action phrases set-ups are received from the system analyst and linguist in order that queries can be generated by the user in a natural language. If multiple Information Systems are available simultaneously, multiple grammars can be generated and activated.
  • the interaction system according to the invention will switch between the information systems.
  • the domain module also can take a phrase produced by the generic module after recognition happened and generate an action description on specified objects identified by specific attribute values to be executed by the information system 1 .
  • the aforementioned definitions are comprised within an element c 2 of the domain module, that contains:
  • the domain identification comprising configuration elements identifying a domain of information systems, as for example GIS information systems.
  • Each class represent a set of objects with a common characteristic.
  • objects classes such as surface class (countries, counties), linear class (rivers, streets), punctual class (cities), graphical class (aerial photography geographically referenced, maps).
  • a real object may be part of several object classes.
  • a typical object such as a city street will belong to the displayable object class, selectable object class, spatial object class and linear object class.
  • the actions classes that can be applied to the objects classes can define, for a given domain, a class of action that can be applied to that object class.
  • a class of action For example, in the GIS domain, an object belonging to the displayable object class can be displayed or hidden, an object belonging to the spatial object class can be projected on a map or be intersected with another object belonging to the same class, an object belonging to the selectable object class can be selected or deselected, an object belonging to the linear object class can be moved along for a certain distance to provide a specific location.
  • An attribute class gather attributes with a common meaning toward the objects of all the object classes. Namely, attributes belonging to the ‘instance naming’ class are used to identify a particular instance of an object type. For example, if in the GIS domain, roads have an attribute which is “road number” whose instances are numbers. “road number” is therefore of the ‘numerical’ attribute type but also part of the attribute class ‘instance naming’ because roads can be referred to in speech by their number.
  • phrase set-ups that can be used to request the execution of the actions.
  • each action class one can define a set of phrase set-ups that can be used to request the class action to be done.
  • phrase set-ups such as display ‘xyz’ or go to ‘abc’ can be defined.
  • ‘xyz’ or ‘abc’ the attribute class used to identify the object types on which the action will be performed can be referenced.
  • These set-ups will be particularised by instances of objects belonging to these types manipulated by the information system with which the user will interact.
  • the actions like ‘display’ or ‘go to’ can have synonyms that could easily be exchanged with the original terms. This means that multiple variants of a same phrase set-up can exist without substantial changes in its grammatical structure.
  • the term elements that assembled in sequences compose phrases to be generated by the user.
  • static term elements whose instances do not need to be extracted from the information system such as numbers, comparison operators, and dynamic elements whose instances do need to be extracted from the information system such as those of object types or attributes types.
  • Statically defined term elements are straightforward list of terms, which elements can be predetermined during the domain module configuration.
  • Each of these elements can also be flagged as repetitive, as for composing numerical values, spelling identification codes or specifying geographical positions.
  • [0043] For example, in the GIS domain, one may have the following sequence of static term elements: [ ⁇ 1] [2] [+3] [ ⁇ 4] where [ ⁇ 1] mark an optional term list composed of the terms ‘please’ and ‘can you’, [ 2 ] marks an obligatory term list composed of ‘pan to the’ or ‘move to the’, [+3] marks a repetitive term list composed of the terms ‘north’, ‘east’, ‘west’, south’, [ ⁇ 4] mark an optional term list composed of the terms ‘please’. Consequently, the following are valid phrases based on these elements: pan to the north east, can you move to the south south east please.
  • phrases such as [1] [2] [3] and [1] [4] [3] [5] [2] can also be built, in which [1] is either ‘show’ or ‘display’, [2] is a related object instance name, [3] is a spatial object type name, [4] is ‘the’, [5] is ‘of’. [2] and [3] are dynamic term elements. Then, if the dynamic elements extracted from the information system are two spatial objects called city and state and two instance names called New-York and Washington for the city and New-York and Idaho for the state, then the combination generation will generate the following phrases:
  • [2b] will be either New-York or Idaho
  • 5 c An information system adapter module that is created for a specific information system application. This adapter module is aimed at extracting the objects, attributes and action types as well as their instances from the considered information system and to pass them to the domain module 5 a where they are referenced in objects, attributes and action classes defining the domain of the information system. On the other hand, said adapter module is able to drive the information system in order for it to execute the demand for action contained in a phrase generated by the user. This requires the adapter module to translate the action description provided by the domain module 5 a into the application logic of the information system.
  • a domain is identified that regroups the common object, attributes and action classes of a class of information systems.
  • the system analyst and linguist 3 defines the objects, attributes and action classes and related action phrases set-ups required by the domain.
  • the information is encoded into an internal format that is usable by the domain module 5 a
  • An adapter module 5 c is defined for a specific information system 1 that belongs to the domain identified.
  • the user 4 starts the information system.
  • the information system starts the adapter module.
  • the adapter module uses the information system to extract the objects that can be used by the user and passes this information to the domain module.
  • the domain module uses the object classes, attribute classes and action phrases set-ups aforementioned to build the term lists and combination rules for the generic module Sb.
  • the generic module converts the term lists and combination rules into a form acceptable to the recognition system and starts the latter.
  • the recognition system 2 after a plausible phrase was recognized, returns the recognized phrase to the generic module.
  • the generic module parses back the phrases into a combination rule and term lists and passes it back to the domain module.
  • the domain module reports the needed information to perform the action to the adapter module.
  • the adapter module then calls the information system to perform the action.
  • Example of classification of information treated by a The an interaction system according to the invention enabling a user to interact with a GIS domain information system:
  • object types being countries and cities; the instances of the objects of these object types have two associated attributes being name and population.
  • Name is of the textual attribute type, population of the numerical attribute type.
  • Action classes (examples)
  • Hide masking of the objects from the user
  • [0141] queryable numeric attributes such as “population”.

Abstract

A spoken interaction system for enabling a user to interact with said information system, said interaction system being aimed at being connected to the information system, the interaction system being aimed at being connected to a recognition system for enabling the user to interact with the information system by means of phrases generated by said user and processed by the recognition system, said interaction system comprising at least one domain module aimed at having defined therein phrase set-ups that are constructed based on object classes, attributes classes and action classes that are common to said information systems of the considered application domain and are provided to the particularised with specific objects types, action types, attribute types and their instances, provided from the information system, in order to define a grammar of phrases that are provided to be generated by the user to interact with the information system.

Description

  • The present invention relates to an interaction system aimed at permitting a user to interact with an information system by means of a recognition system. [0001]
  • Recognition systems usually comprise two modules: a recognition module that converts phrases generated by the user into a textual computer representation of said phrases and a text to generation module that can convert a textual computer representation in a generated phrase understandable by the user. Among recognition systems, one finds namely speech recognition systems with which the user can generate phrases by way of pronunciation and that can generate aloud phrases to the user, and text recognition systems such as text scanning systems, with which the user can generate phrases by way of a written text and that can generate phrases to the user in a written form. [0002]
  • Information systems manage data that are usually stored in databases. These data bases are commonly customised by their users, as well as the information systems aimed at exploiting said data bases. [0003]
  • In databases, the data, also called objects, are gathered into object types identified by a code. Each object type gathers object instances, that is specific data or objects, of the considered type. With each object type are associated a certain number of attributes that characterise the instances of the object type. Similar to objects, attributes may be gathered in attribute types. An attribute type groups attributes that have similar characteristics e.g. textual or date attributes. [0004]
  • Each information system is adapted to the databases it has to manipulate and thus may address the object types, attribute types, and instances of objects of an object type having certain attribute instances. Therefore, the codes used by a database to identify object types and attribute types are recognized by the information system that has to manipulate said database. [0005]
  • In addition, each information system contains action types gathering actions that may be applied on the objects of a database by the system. Each action type fits to one ore more object types. [0006]
  • Information systems are gathered in different domains of applications such as Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Document Management (DM) systems or Product Data Management (PDM) systems to name a few well known business application domains. [0007]
  • Traditionally, the users of a specific information system have to interact with this system by means of an interface specially developed for the system, that will be different from one system to another even in the same domain of applications. In addition, said user will have to interact with an information system by using the keyboard and/or the mouse of the computer that accesses the information system. [0008]
  • The present invention overcomes these problems in providing an interaction system, called Voice Query Language, that enables interactions of a user with different pre-existing information systems of a domain of applications by using different pre-existing recognition systems. This invention thus enables the user to apply, by generation of phrases, called queries, actions defined by the information, system to objects stored in the databases manipulated by the information system and identified by attributes. [0009]
  • The inventor has discovered that for all the information systems of a domain of applications, common object classes, attribute classes and action classes can be defined. These classes respectively gather objects, attributes and actions that present- a common characteristic defining the considered class, said characteristic being specific for all the information systems of the domain. A same instance of an object may be part of several object classes if it presents simultaneously the characteristics of these different classes. Based on said object, attribute and action classes, action phrase set-ups can be defined, that will constitute models that can be particularised with the specific object types, attribute types and action types of a specific information system of the considered domain of applications and the instances of the objects with its attributes instances stored in the databases handled by said information system. The referred action phrase set-ups that are used to build actual phrases thus define a grammar consisting essentially of object types, attribute types, action types and production rules are provided to be used in the interactions of the user with an information system of the domain considered, both when the system presents to the user the different queries he may request and when the user addresses such a query to the information system. [0010]
  • Therefore, the invention provides an interaction system for enabling a user of an information system belonging to an application domain of similar information systems to interact with said information system, said interaction system being aimed at being connected to the information system, the interaction system further being aimed at being connected to a recognition system for enabling the user to interact with the information system by means of phrases generated by said user and processed by the recognition system, said interaction system comprising at least one domain module aimed at having defined therein phrases setups that are constructed based on object classes, attribute classes and action classes that are common to said information systems of the considered application domain and are provided to be particularised with specific object types, action types, attribute types and their instances, provided from the information system, in order to define a grammar of phrases that are provided to be generated by the user to interact with the information system. [0011]
  • Preferably, the interaction system according to the invention comprises a generic module connected to the at least one domain module and aimed at being connected to the recognition system, said generic module being aimed at converting said phrases that can be generated by the user into a textual computer representation usable by the recognition system for the recognition of said phrases when generated by the user and being aimed at converting a textual computer representation produced by the recognition system, after recognition of a phrase generated by the user has happened, into a phrase defined by said grammar. [0012]
  • It is more preferred that said generic module comprises an element containing information enabling configuration of the recognition system. [0013]
  • In another preferred configuration of the interaction system according to the invention, it comprises an adapter module connected to the at least one domain module and aimed at being connected to the information system, said adapter module being aimed at extracting objects, attributes, action types and their instances from the information system and pass them to the at least one domain module and being aimed at driving the information system for the latter to execute a demand for action contained in a phrase generated by the user. [0014]
  • Preferably, the at least one domain module comprises an element containing information about general notions of objects and attributes identifying objects that is common to several application domains. [0015]
  • One also prefers that the at least one domain module is aimed at being connected to a system analyst and linguist aimed at defining object classes, attribute classes, action classes and phrases set-ups that said at least one domain module is aimed at having defined therein. [0016]
  • More preferably, the aforementioned recognition system is a speech recognition system and the phrases generated by the user are generated by pronunciation by said user. [0017]
  • This enables the user to interact with an information system by means of the natural language of said user. [0018]
  • Alternatively, said recognition system is a text recognition system and the phrases generated by the user are written by said user[0019]
  • The invention will now be described in more details in reference to FIG. 1 that represents an interaction system according to the invention integrated in its environment.[0020]
  • Referring to FIG. 1, the environment comprising the interaction system according to the invention is composed of the following elements: [0021]
  • [0022] 1: An information system aimed at manipulating several object types being characterised by several attributes being part of attribute types, the manipulation being performed by means of several action types. Objects and attribute types have instances that can be found in the databases manipulated by the information system.
  • [0023] 2: A recognition system comprising two modules:
  • [0024] 2 a: The recognition module that converts phrases generated by the user into a textual computer representation.
  • [0025] 2 b: The text to generation module that can convert a textual computer representation into a generated phrase understandable by the user.
  • [0026] 3: A system analyst and linguist that provides the object, attributes and action classes as well as the phrases set-ups that will be used to exercise the information system actions on the object types. System analysts and linguists are human beings that are capable of analysing how the user would vocally interrogate the system. The result of that analysis will be a collection of action phrase set-ups being typical of a domain of applications.
  • [0027] 4: A user that will use the system by means of the grammar defined by the phrase set-ups particularised with the instances of objects, attributes and actions manipulated by the information system.
  • [0028] 5: The interaction system according to the invention, enabling the user to interact with the information system in generating phrases that said system must process, based on the aforementioned particularised phrase set-ups. This system consists in three modules:
  • [0029] 5 b: A generic module that can convert a language grammar, that is a set of object types, action types and production rules of valid phrases that can be generated by the user in view of interacting with an information system, into a computer representation that can be used by the recognition system and convert a computer representation resulting from a recognition into a phrase defined by a grammar. Said generic module comprises an element c1 containing information enabling configuration of the recognition system, namely:
  • The recognition software used, [0030]
  • The language used, [0031]
  • The communication devices used such as for example microphones, or telephone devices. [0032]
  • [0033] 5 a: A domain module that is able to receive elements as object types, attribute types and action types as well as instances of the latter that are manipulated by information systems of a predetermined domain of applications. The domain module comprises definitions of classes of objects, actions and attributes that are typical of said domain and that are used to combine the aforementioned elements received with the aforementioned action phrase set-ups to produce the grammar needed by the generic module 5 b. The action phrases set-ups are received from the system analyst and linguist in order that queries can be generated by the user in a natural language. If multiple Information Systems are available simultaneously, multiple grammars can be generated and activated. The interaction system according to the invention will switch between the information systems. A similar switch could be made between The an interaction system according to the invention for a domain such as GIS and The an interaction system according to the invention for another domain such as DM. The domain module also can take a phrase produced by the generic module after recognition happened and generate an action description on specified objects identified by specific attribute values to be executed by the information system 1. The aforementioned definitions are comprised within an element c2 of the domain module, that contains:
  • Information common to several domains such as general notions of objects and attributes identifying objects. [0034]
  • The domain identification comprising configuration elements identifying a domain of information systems, as for example GIS information systems. [0035]
  • The object classes belonging to this domain. Each class represent a set of objects with a common characteristic. For example, in GIS applications, objects classes such as surface class (countries, counties), linear class (rivers, streets), punctual class (cities), graphical class (aerial photography geographically referenced, maps). A real object may be part of several object classes. For example, in the GIS domain, a typical object such as a city street will belong to the displayable object class, selectable object class, spatial object class and linear object class. [0036]
  • The actions classes that can be applied to the objects classes. Indeed, associated with each object class, one can define, for a given domain, a class of action that can be applied to that object class. For example, in the GIS domain, an object belonging to the displayable object class can be displayed or hidden, an object belonging to the spatial object class can be projected on a map or be intersected with another object belonging to the same class, an object belonging to the selectable object class can be selected or deselected, an object belonging to the linear object class can be moved along for a certain distance to provide a specific location. Whatever may be the specific object types and instances, it is always possible to manipulate (show, select, highlight, . . . ) punctual, linear and surface objects contained by another surface object, manipulate surface objects crossed by linear objects or manipulate punctual objects along a given linear object. [0037]
  • The attribute classes that can be attached to the objects. An attribute class gather attributes with a common meaning toward the objects of all the object classes. Namely, attributes belonging to the ‘instance naming’ class are used to identify a particular instance of an object type. For example, if in the GIS domain, roads have an attribute which is “road number” whose instances are numbers. “road number” is therefore of the ‘numerical’ attribute type but also part of the attribute class ‘instance naming’ because roads can be referred to in speech by their number. [0038]
  • The various phrase set-ups that can be used to request the execution of the actions. Associated with each action class, one can define a set of phrase set-ups that can be used to request the class action to be done. For example, in the GIS domain, phrase set-ups such as display ‘xyz’ or go to ‘abc’ can be defined. As ‘xyz’ or ‘abc’, the attribute class used to identify the object types on which the action will be performed can be referenced. These set-ups will be particularised by instances of objects belonging to these types manipulated by the information system with which the user will interact. Furthermore, the actions like ‘display’ or ‘go to’ can have synonyms that could easily be exchanged with the original terms. This means that multiple variants of a same phrase set-up can exist without substantial changes in its grammatical structure. [0039]
  • The term elements that assembled in sequences compose phrases to be generated by the user. One finds static term elements whose instances do not need to be extracted from the information system such as numbers, comparison operators, and dynamic elements whose instances do need to be extracted from the information system such as those of object types or attributes types. Statically defined term elements are straightforward list of terms, which elements can be predetermined during the domain module configuration. [0040]
  • Each of these elements can be flagged as optional; this means they can be forgotten from the generation without impairing the meaning of the phrase, such as politeness expressions. [0041]
  • Each of these elements can also be flagged as repetitive, as for composing numerical values, spelling identification codes or specifying geographical positions. [0042]
  • For example, in the GIS domain, one may have the following sequence of static term elements: [−1] [2] [+3] [−4] where [−1] mark an optional term list composed of the terms ‘please’ and ‘can you’, [[0043] 2] marks an obligatory term list composed of ‘pan to the’ or ‘move to the’, [+3] marks a repetitive term list composed of the terms ‘north’, ‘east’, ‘west’, south’, [−4] mark an optional term list composed of the terms ‘please’. Consequently, the following are valid phrases based on these elements: pan to the north east, can you move to the south south east please.
  • Phrases such as [1] [2] [3] and [1] [4] [3] [5] [2] can also be built, in which [1] is either ‘show’ or ‘display’, [2] is a related object instance name, [3] is a spatial object type name, [4] is ‘the’, [5] is ‘of’. [2] and [3] are dynamic term elements. Then, if the dynamic elements extracted from the information system are two spatial objects called city and state and two instance names called New-York and Washington for the city and New-York and Idaho for the state, then the combination generation will generate the following phrases: [0044]
  • [1] [2a] [3a][0045]
  • [1] [2b] [3b][0046]
  • [1] [4] [3a] [5] [2a][0047]
  • [1] [4] [3b] [5] [3b][0048]
  • in which [0049]
  • [2a] will be either New-York or Washington [0050]
  • [3a] will be city [0051]
  • [2b] will be either New-York or Idaho [0052]
  • [3b] will be state [0053]
  • resulting in particular phrases like “show New-York city” or “display the state of Idaho”. [0054]
  • [0055] 5 c: An information system adapter module that is created for a specific information system application. This adapter module is aimed at extracting the objects, attributes and action types as well as their instances from the considered information system and to pass them to the domain module 5 a where they are referenced in objects, attributes and action classes defining the domain of the information system. On the other hand, said adapter module is able to drive the information system in order for it to execute the demand for action contained in a phrase generated by the user. This requires the adapter module to translate the action description provided by the domain module 5 a into the application logic of the information system.
  • The transmission of information between the different elements of the environment defined here above occurs as follows: [0056]
  • From [0057] 5 b to 2 a: a list of words and a definition of the production rules governing the combination of these words into acceptable phrases in a computer representation fit for the recognition system.
  • From [0058] 2 a to 5 b: a recognized phrase in a computer representation fit for the recognition system. This phrase corresponds to a valid sequence of words.
  • From [0059] 5 b to 2 b: a textual computer representation to be read aloud to the user.
  • From [0060] 5 a to 5 b: a set of term lists and a set of combination rules making use of the term lists to build phrase set-ups that represent the valid phrases that can be generated by the user.
  • From [0061] 5 b to 5 a: a phrase generated by the user decomposed into a combination rule identification with the identification of the associated term lists and term list items generated by the user.
  • From [0062] 5 c to 5 a: a list of object types with their corresponding classes, object instances, attribute types with their corresponding classes and attributes instances.
  • From [0063] 5 a to 5 c: an action with related parameters to be executed by the information system. These parameters may include object and attribute instances. In ambiguous cases where two different actions or two different objects could be accessed by the same user command, the different possibilities will be returned to the information system by the domain module, in the hope that the adapter module will be able to remove the ambiguity using the information system contextual information or by asking feedback from the user.
  • From [0064] 1 to 5 c: idem as from 5 c to 5 a but in the logic language of 1, thus depending on 1
  • From [0065] 5 c to 1: idem as from 5 a to 5 c but translated in the logic language of 1, thus depending on 1.
  • The use of the interaction system according to the invention implies the following sequence of events: [0066]
  • A domain is identified that regroups the common object, attributes and action classes of a class of information systems. [0067]
  • The system analyst and [0068] linguist 3 defines the objects, attributes and action classes and related action phrases set-ups required by the domain.
  • The information is encoded into an internal format that is usable by the domain module [0069] 5 a
  • An adapter module [0070] 5 c is defined for a specific information system 1 that belongs to the domain identified.
  • The user [0071] 4 starts the information system.
  • The information system starts the adapter module. [0072]
  • The adapter module uses the information system to extract the objects that can be used by the user and passes this information to the domain module. [0073]
  • The domain module uses the object classes, attribute classes and action phrases set-ups aforementioned to build the term lists and combination rules for the generic module Sb. [0074]
  • The generic module converts the term lists and combination rules into a form acceptable to the recognition system and starts the latter. [0075]
  • The user generates a phrase. [0076]
  • The [0077] recognition system 2, after a plausible phrase was recognized, returns the recognized phrase to the generic module.
  • The generic module parses back the phrases into a combination rule and term lists and passes it back to the domain module. [0078]
  • The domain module reports the needed information to perform the action to the adapter module. [0079]
  • The adapter module then calls the information system to perform the action. [0080]
  • Example of classification of information treated by a The an interaction system according to the invention enabling a user to interact with a GIS domain information system: [0081]
  • We have an information system capable to display or select spatial objects either by property values or by spatial relationships. [0082]
  • Associated with this system, we have object types being countries and cities; the instances of the objects of these object types have two associated attributes being name and population. Name is of the textual attribute type, population of the numerical attribute type. [0083]
  • For the countries, we have two instances: the U.S.A. and the France. [0084]
  • Their respective populations are 250000000 and 60000000 inhabitants. [0085]
  • For the cities we have six instances: New York, Los Angeles, Dallas, Paris, Lyon, Marseille. [0086]
  • Their respective populations are 1200000, 10000000, 500000, 6000000, 1000000, 800000 inhabitants. [0087]
  • In the English language, one can define the following phrases to access the objects by the system: [0088]
  • Generic display/hiding operations: [0089]
  • Display the countries [0090]
  • Hide the countries [0091]
  • Display the cities [0092]
  • Hide the cities [0093]
  • Global selection operation: [0094]
  • Select all the countries [0095]
  • Select all the cities [0096]
  • Naming attribute selection operation [0097]
  • Select the country named France [0098]
  • Select the city named Los Angeles [0099]
  • Attribute condition expressions: [0100]
  • Having U.S.A. as name [0101]
  • With a population exceeding 1000000 [0102]
  • Attribute related selection [0103]
  • Select the country which name is U.S.A [0104]
  • Select the city with a population of 12000000 inhabitants. [0105]
  • Spatial condition expressions: [0106]
  • Within the U.S.A. [0107]
  • Spatial related selection: [0108]
  • Select the cities within the U.S.A [0109]
  • Select the country wherein lies Paris [0110]
  • Thus we will define the following configuration items for the c2 element of the domain module of the system: [0111]
  • Domain definition [0112]
  • Domain X [0113]
  • Object classes [0114]
  • Displayable objects [0115]
  • Selectable objects [0116]
  • Spatially enclosing objects [0117]
  • Spatially enclosed objects [0118]
  • Numerically discriminated objects [0119]
  • Instance named objects. [0120]
  • Action classes (examples) [0121]
  • For displayable objects: [0122]
  • Display (presentation of the objects to the user) [0123]
  • Hide (masking of the objects from the user) [0124]
  • For selectable objects: [0125]
  • Select All (selection of the objects) [0126]
  • Deselect (de-selection of the objects) [0127]
  • Attribute classes [0128]
  • Object instance naming attribute [0129]
  • Queryable attribute [0130]
  • Attribute types [0131]
  • Numeric value attribute [0132]
  • Textual value attribute [0133]
  • Action phrases set-ups [0134]
  • List all (‘List all countries’, ‘List all cities’) [0135]
  • Select all (‘Select all countries’) [0136]
  • Condition (‘With a population exceeding 5 million’) [0137]
  • Sequences of term elements (example) [0138]
  • Condition command=[1] [2] [3] [4] [5][0139]
  • Dynamic Term elements [0140]
  • [3]: queryable numeric attributes such as “population”. [0141]
  • Static Term elements [0142]
  • [1]=With | having [0143]
  • [2]=a [0144]
  • [4]=less than | greather than | equal to [0145]
  • [5]=number values [0146]

Claims (8)

1. An interaction system (5) for enabling a user (4) of an information system (1) belonging to an application domain of similar information systems to interact with said information system (1), said interaction system (5) being aimed at being connected to the information system (1), and to a recognition system (2) for enabling said user (4) to interact with said information system (1) by means of phrases generated by said user (4) and processed by said recognition system (2), characterised in that said interaction system (5) comprises at least one domain module (5 a) aimed at having defined therein phrases set-ups that are constructed based on objects classes, attribute classes and action classes that are common to said information systems of the considered application domain and are provided to be particularized with specific object types, action types, attribute types and their instances, provided from said information system (1), in order to define a grammar of phrases that are provided to be generated by said user (4) to interact with said information system (1).
2. An interaction system (5) according to claim 1, characterised in that it comprises a generic module (5 b) connected to said at least one domain module (5 a) and aimed at being connected to said recognition system (2), said generic module (5 b) being aimed at converting said phrases that can be generated by said user (4) into a textual computer representation usable by said recognition system (2) for the recognition of said phrases when generated by said user (4) and being aimed at converting a textual computer representation produced by said recognition system (2) after recognition of a phrase generated by said user (4) has happened into a phrase defined by said grammar.
3. An interaction system (5) according to claim 2, characterised in that said generic module (5 b) comprises an element (c1) containing information enabling configuration of said recognition system (2).
4. An interaction system (5) according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that it comprises an adapter module (5 c) connected to said at least one domain module (5 a) and aimed at being connected to said information system (1), said adapter module (5 c) being aimed at extracting objects, attributes, action types and their instances from said information system (1) and pass them to said at least one domain module (5 a) and being aimed at driving said information system (1) for the latter to execute a demand for action contained in a phrase generated by said user (4).
5. An interaction system (5) according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said at least one domain module (5 a) comprises an element (c2) containing information about general notions of objects and attributes identifying objects that is common to several application domains.
6. An interaction system (5) according to any preceding claim, characterised in that said at least one domain module (5 a) is aimed at being connected to a system analyst and linguist (3) aimed at defining object classes, attribute classes, action classes and phrases set-ups that said at least one domain module (5 a) is aimed at having defined therein.
7. An interaction system (5) according to any preceding claim, characterised in that said recognition system (2) is a speech recognition system and in that the phrases generated by said user (4) are generated by pronunciation by said user (4).
8. An interaction system (5) according to one of the claims 1 to 6, characterised in that said recognition system (2) is a text recognition system and in that the phrases generated by said user (4) are written by said user (4).
US10/634,354 2001-02-28 2003-08-05 Natural language query system for accessing an information system Abandoned US20040064323A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/399,053 US7653604B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2006-04-06 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP01200749 2001-02-28
EP01200749.8 2001-02-28
PCT/BE2002/000024 WO2002071393A1 (en) 2001-02-28 2002-02-28 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/BE2002/000024 Continuation WO2002071393A1 (en) 2001-02-28 2002-02-28 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/399,053 Continuation-In-Part US7653604B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2006-04-06 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040064323A1 true US20040064323A1 (en) 2004-04-01

Family

ID=8179950

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/634,354 Abandoned US20040064323A1 (en) 2001-02-28 2003-08-05 Natural language query system for accessing an information system
US11/399,053 Expired - Fee Related US7653604B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2006-04-06 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/399,053 Expired - Fee Related US7653604B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2006-04-06 Natural language query system for accessing an information system

Country Status (19)

Country Link
US (2) US20040064323A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1366491B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4334227B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100885033B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1232948C (en)
AT (1) ATE288614T1 (en)
BR (1) BR0207642A (en)
CA (1) CA2437614C (en)
DE (1) DE60202847T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1366491T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2236483T3 (en)
HK (1) HK1062497A1 (en)
IL (2) IL157454A0 (en)
MX (1) MXPA03007724A (en)
OA (1) OA12495A (en)
PT (1) PT1366491E (en)
RU (1) RU2269164C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2002071393A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200307267B (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070078643A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2007-04-05 Sedogbo Celestin Method for formation of domain-specific grammar from subspecified grammar
US20070226258A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2007-09-27 Thomas Eldred Lambdin Article inspection apparatus
US20080157994A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 General Electric Company IP based voice communication enabled inspection system
US20100131277A1 (en) * 2005-07-26 2010-05-27 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Device, Method, and Program for Performing Interaction Between User and Machine
US20100198876A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2010-08-05 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus and method of embedding meta-data in a captured image
US20130031082A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Wolfram Alpha Llc Method and system for using natural language to generate widgets
US9519814B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2016-12-13 Hand Held Products, Inc. Portable data terminal
US9753912B1 (en) 2007-12-27 2017-09-05 Great Northern Research, LLC Method for processing the output of a speech recognizer

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11132183B2 (en) 2003-08-27 2021-09-28 Equifax Inc. Software development platform for testing and modifying decision algorithms
US20070179827A1 (en) 2003-08-27 2007-08-02 Sandeep Gupta Application processing and decision systems and processes
US7529733B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2009-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation Query builder using context sensitive grids
US7606708B2 (en) * 2005-02-01 2009-10-20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus, method, and medium for generating grammar network for use in speech recognition and dialogue speech recognition
US8229745B2 (en) * 2005-10-21 2012-07-24 Nuance Communications, Inc. Creating a mixed-initiative grammar from directed dialog grammars
US20070136222A1 (en) * 2005-12-09 2007-06-14 Microsoft Corporation Question and answer architecture for reasoning and clarifying intentions, goals, and needs from contextual clues and content
WO2009021011A2 (en) 2007-08-07 2009-02-12 Equifax, Inc. Systems and methods for managing statistical expressions
US9978365B2 (en) * 2008-10-31 2018-05-22 Nokia Technologies Oy Method and system for providing a voice interface
EP2629211A1 (en) * 2009-08-21 2013-08-21 Mikko Kalervo Väänänen Method and means for data searching and language translation
US20110106779A1 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 Research In Motion Limited System and method to implement operations, administration, maintenance and provisioning tasks based on natural language interactions
US9679561B2 (en) 2011-03-28 2017-06-13 Nuance Communications, Inc. System and method for rapid customization of speech recognition models
US10650089B1 (en) * 2012-10-25 2020-05-12 Walker Reading Technologies Sentence parsing correction system
WO2014066651A2 (en) * 2012-10-25 2014-05-01 Walker Reading Technologies, Inc. Sentence parsing correction system
RU2737598C1 (en) * 2020-02-04 2020-12-01 Павел Андреевич Морозов Method of generating operational information based on formalized conceptual model of domain

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6023697A (en) * 1997-02-24 2000-02-08 Gte Internetworking Incorporated Systems and methods for providing user assistance in retrieving data from a relational database
US6314402B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2001-11-06 Nuance Communications Method and apparatus for creating modifiable and combinable speech objects for acquiring information from a speaker in an interactive voice response system
US6356869B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2002-03-12 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for discourse management

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4688195A (en) * 1983-01-28 1987-08-18 Texas Instruments Incorporated Natural-language interface generating system
US5083268A (en) * 1986-10-15 1992-01-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method for parsing natural language by unifying lexical features of words
EP0505621A3 (en) * 1991-03-28 1993-06-02 International Business Machines Corporation Improved message recognition employing integrated speech and handwriting information
JP2818362B2 (en) * 1992-09-21 1998-10-30 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション System and method for context switching of speech recognition device
JPH06202688A (en) * 1992-12-28 1994-07-22 Sony Corp Speech recognition device
US5642519A (en) * 1994-04-29 1997-06-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Speech interpreter with a unified grammer compiler
US6157935A (en) * 1996-12-17 2000-12-05 Tran; Bao Q. Remote data access and management system
JPH11224265A (en) * 1998-02-06 1999-08-17 Pioneer Electron Corp Device and method for information retrieval and record medium where information retrieving program is recorded
JPH11231894A (en) * 1998-02-18 1999-08-27 Denso Corp Speech recognition device
JP2001034292A (en) * 1999-07-26 2001-02-09 Denso Corp Word string recognizing device
JP3980791B2 (en) * 1999-05-03 2007-09-26 パイオニア株式会社 Man-machine system with speech recognition device
KR100332966B1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2002-05-09 김일천 Toy having speech recognition function and two-way conversation for child

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6023697A (en) * 1997-02-24 2000-02-08 Gte Internetworking Incorporated Systems and methods for providing user assistance in retrieving data from a relational database
US6314402B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2001-11-06 Nuance Communications Method and apparatus for creating modifiable and combinable speech objects for acquiring information from a speaker in an interactive voice response system
US6356869B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2002-03-12 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for discourse management

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070078643A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2007-04-05 Sedogbo Celestin Method for formation of domain-specific grammar from subspecified grammar
US20100131277A1 (en) * 2005-07-26 2010-05-27 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Device, Method, and Program for Performing Interaction Between User and Machine
US8352273B2 (en) 2005-07-26 2013-01-08 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Device, method, and program for performing interaction between user and machine
US8368749B2 (en) 2006-03-27 2013-02-05 Ge Inspection Technologies Lp Article inspection apparatus
US20070226258A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2007-09-27 Thomas Eldred Lambdin Article inspection apparatus
US8310533B2 (en) 2006-03-27 2012-11-13 GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies, LP Inspection apparatus for inspecting articles
US20080157994A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 General Electric Company IP based voice communication enabled inspection system
US8625434B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2014-01-07 Ge Inspection Technologies Lp IP based voice communication enabled inspection system
US9753912B1 (en) 2007-12-27 2017-09-05 Great Northern Research, LLC Method for processing the output of a speech recognizer
US9805723B1 (en) 2007-12-27 2017-10-31 Great Northern Research, LLC Method for processing the output of a speech recognizer
US20100198876A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2010-08-05 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus and method of embedding meta-data in a captured image
US10942964B2 (en) 2009-02-02 2021-03-09 Hand Held Products, Inc. Apparatus and method of embedding meta-data in a captured image
US9519814B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2016-12-13 Hand Held Products, Inc. Portable data terminal
US9959495B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2018-05-01 Hand Held Products, Inc. Portable data terminal
US11042793B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2021-06-22 Hand Held Products, Inc. Portable data terminal
US20130031082A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Wolfram Alpha Llc Method and system for using natural language to generate widgets
US9069814B2 (en) * 2011-07-27 2015-06-30 Wolfram Alpha Llc Method and system for using natural language to generate widgets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2003128960A (en) 2005-03-27
OA12495A (en) 2006-05-24
KR20040028722A (en) 2004-04-03
PT1366491E (en) 2005-06-30
DE60202847T2 (en) 2006-02-09
JP4334227B2 (en) 2009-09-30
CA2437614A1 (en) 2002-09-12
CA2437614C (en) 2011-06-14
ES2236483T3 (en) 2005-07-16
MXPA03007724A (en) 2004-11-12
IL157454A0 (en) 2004-03-28
HK1062497A1 (en) 2004-11-05
DE60202847D1 (en) 2005-03-10
EP1366491A1 (en) 2003-12-03
EP1366491B1 (en) 2005-02-02
ATE288614T1 (en) 2005-02-15
DK1366491T3 (en) 2005-05-09
JP2004526196A (en) 2004-08-26
ZA200307267B (en) 2004-05-03
US20060184476A1 (en) 2006-08-17
KR100885033B1 (en) 2009-02-20
WO2002071393A1 (en) 2002-09-12
RU2269164C2 (en) 2006-01-27
CN1232948C (en) 2005-12-21
WO2002071393A8 (en) 2003-11-20
IL157454A (en) 2008-07-08
BR0207642A (en) 2004-06-01
US7653604B2 (en) 2010-01-26
CN1494713A (en) 2004-05-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7653604B2 (en) Natural language query system for accessing an information system
CN101510197A (en) Information retrieving system
CN1726488A (en) Integrated development tool for building a natural language understanding application
White Extended reality: protonouns and the vernacular
US6789065B2 (en) System, method and computer program product for point-to-point voice-enabled driving directions
van Heuven et al. Analysis and synthesis of speech: strategic research towards high-quality text-to-speech generation
McTear Intelligent interface technology: from theory to reality?
CN113190692B (en) Self-adaptive retrieval method, system and device for knowledge graph
KR101589626B1 (en) Method for establishing start-up data or management data from big data based on lexico semantic pattern analysis
RU2564641C1 (en) Intelligent information selection system "optimel"
US20020143553A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for a voice-enabled universal flight information finder
US20020133353A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for a voice-enabled search engine for business locations, searchable by category or brand name
Kellogg On-line translation of natural language questions into artificial language queries
US20020138494A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for building a database for large-scale speech recognition
Nijholt Linguistic engineering: a survey
US20020133344A1 (en) System, method and computer program product for large-scale street name speech recognition
WO2002007017A2 (en) Method of seeking employment opportunities and of employee recruitment
Kruschwitz et al. Natural language access to yellow pages
Terrone et al. SENTIMENT ANALYSIS: AUTOMATIC CALCULATIONS IN NOOJ ENVIRONMENT
Dash et al. Corpus and Future Indian Needs
Lee A voice response system for an office information system
Granell et al. Speech recognition on the percepción project
Ali Issues in English to Indian sign generation and translation model and developed corpus based translation system to tackle those issues
US20020138267A1 (en) Large -scale speech recognition
Baumann Document recognition of printed scores and transformation into MIDI

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: VOICE-INSIGHT, BELGIUM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KEMPER, CHARLES;LEGER, FRANCOIS;OUDEN, AART DEN;REEL/FRAME:014719/0514

Effective date: 20030807

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION