Suche Bilder Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive Mehr »
Anmelden
Nutzer von Screenreadern: Klicke auf diesen Link, um die Bedienungshilfen zu aktivieren. Dieser Modus bietet die gleichen Grundfunktionen, funktioniert aber besser mit deinem Reader.

Patentsuche

  1. Erweiterte Patentsuche
VeröffentlichungsnummerUS20050071328 A1
PublikationstypAnmeldung
AnmeldenummerUS 10/676,711
Veröffentlichungsdatum31. März 2005
Eingetragen30. Sept. 2003
Prioritätsdatum30. Sept. 2003
Auch veröffentlicht unterCA2540679A1, CA2540679C, EP1673703A1, EP1673703B1, US9298777, US20100228715, US20120233142, US20130282713, US20160342695, WO2005033979A1
Veröffentlichungsnummer10676711, 676711, US 2005/0071328 A1, US 2005/071328 A1, US 20050071328 A1, US 20050071328A1, US 2005071328 A1, US 2005071328A1, US-A1-20050071328, US-A1-2005071328, US2005/0071328A1, US2005/071328A1, US20050071328 A1, US20050071328A1, US2005071328 A1, US2005071328A1
ErfinderStephen Lawrence
Ursprünglich BevollmächtigterLawrence Stephen R.
Zitat exportierenBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Externe Links: USPTO, USPTO-Zuordnung, Espacenet
Personalization of web search
US 20050071328 A1
Zusammenfassung
A system and method for creating a user profile and for using the user profile to order search results returned by a search engine. The user profile is based on search queries submitted by a user, the user's specific interaction with the documents identified by the search engine and personal information provided by the user. Generic scores associated with the search results are modulated by the user profile to measure their relevance to a user's preference and interest. The search results are re-ordered accordingly so that the most relevant results appear on the top of the list. User profiles can be created and/or stored on the client side or server side of a client-server network environment.
Bilder(13)
Previous page
Next page
Ansprüche(58)
1. A method of personalizing search results of a search engine, comprising:
accessing a user profile for a user based on information about the user, the user information including information derived from a set of documents, the set of documents comprising a plurality of documents selected from the set consisting of documents identified by search results from the search engine, documents accessed by the user, documents linked to the documents identified by search results from the search engine, and documents linked to the documents accessed by the user;
receiving a search query from the user;
identifying a set of search result documents that match the search query;
assigning a generic score to each of at least a plurality of the search result documents;
assigning a personalized score to each document of the plurality of search result documents in accordance with the generic score assigned to the document and the user profile; and
ranking the set of search result documents according to their personalized scores.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have been viewed by the user.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have not been viewed by the user.
4. The method of claim 1, including updating the user profile by:
updating a term-based profile by identifying a set of terms from a document in the set of documents, and adding information about the identified set of terms to the term-based profile; and
updating a category-based profile by classifying the document into a plurality of categories, and adding information about the plurality of categories to the category-based profile.
5. The method of claim 4, including updating the user profile by:
updating a link-based profile by analyzing links in the document, and adding information derived from the analyzed links to the link-based profile.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the link-based profile includes information about URLs or portions of URLs.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the link-based profile comprises:
a plurality of URLs and a weight associated with each URL, wherein the weight is based on one or more factors selected from the group consisting of frequency with which the user visits the URL, time the user has spent viewing a document associated with the URL and quantity of the user's scrolling activity at the document; and
a plurality of hosts and a weight associated with each host, wherein the weight is based on frequency of the user's visits to the host.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the URLs further include URLs that have not been visited by the user, but are related to the URLs that have been visited by the user and the weight of an unvisited URL depends on its distance to at least one related URLs that have been visited.
9. The method of claim 4, wherein a term in the term-based profile is an expression comprising at least one word and a weight.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the weight is a weight associated with occurrences of the term in the set of documents.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the weight of a term depends at least partially on the term's term frequency and inverse document frequency in said set of documents.
12. The method of claim 4, wherein a category in the category-based profile characterizes at least one aspect of documents in the category and the category is associated with a weight indicative of the category's importance relative to other categories.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one aspect of the documents in the category is selected from the group consisting of: document format, document type, document topic and document origin.
14. The method of claim 1, including updating the user profile by:
updating a category-based profile by classifying a document in the set of documents into a plurality of categories, and adding information about the plurality of categories to the category-based profile.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the user profile is stored on a server of the search engine.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the user profile is stored on a client associated with the user.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the user is a group of users.
18. A method of personalizing search results of a search engine, comprising:
creating a plurality of user profiles for a plurality of users, each user profile including at least a user's identification number and information derived from documents visited by the user;
receiving a search query from a user of the plurality of users, the search query including at least one query term and the user's identification number;
selecting a set of documents from the Internet, assigning to each document in the set a generic score that characterizes the relevance of the document to the at least one query term;
retrieving the user's user profile and assigning to each of the set of documents a profile score based on the user profile; and
ranking the set of documents according to their generic and profile scores.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of creating a user's user profile further comprises:
creating a term-based profile by extracting a set of terms from documents visited by the user and associating a weight with each extracted term; and
creating a category-based profile by determining a plurality of categories associated with documents visited by the user and associating a weight with each determined category.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of creating a user's user profile further comprises:
creating a link-based profile by analyzing links in documents visited by the user and associating weights with the link.
21. The method of claim 18, wherein the user profile for a particular user includes demographic and geographic information provided by the user.
22. The method of claim 18, wherein the documents visited by the user from which information is derived for use in a particular user's user profile are selected based on the user's activities when visiting the documents.
23. The method of claim 18, including storing the plurality of user profiles on a server of the search engine; and
the retrieving including identifying the user's user profile based on a user identification number associated with both the user and the user's user profile.
24. The method of claim 18, including storing the plurality of user profiles on client computers associated with the plurality of users.
25. The method of claim 18, wherein the ranked set of documents comprises two sets of documents, one set of documents ordered by their generic scores and the other set of documents ordered by personalized scored generated by combining the document's generic and profile scores.
26. The method of claim 25, including interleaving or intermixing the two sets of documents to form the ranked set of documents.
27. A search engine system, comprising:
one or more central processing units for executing programs;
an interface for receiving event messages; and
a search engine module executable by the one or more central processing units, the module comprising:
instructions for accessing a user profile for a user, the user profile based on information about the user, the user information including information derived from a set of documents, the set of documents comprising a plurality of documents selected from the set consisting of documents identified by search results from the search engine system, documents accessed by the user, documents linked to the documents identified by search results from the search engine system, and documents linked to the documents accessed by the user;
instructions for receiving a search query from the user;
instructions for identifying a set of search result documents that match the search query;
instructions for assigning a generic score to each of at least a plurality of the search result documents;
instructions for assigning a personalized score to each document of the plurality of search result documents in accordance with the generic score assigned to the document and the user profile; and
instructions for ranking at least the plurality of the search result documents according to their personalized scores.
28. The system of claim 27, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have been viewed by the user.
29. The system of claim 27, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have not been viewed by the user.
30. The system of claim 27, further including:
instructions for updating a term-based profile by identifying a set of terms from a document in the set of documents, and adding information about the identified set of terms to the term-based profile; and
instructions for updating a category-based profile by classifying the document into a plurality of categories, and adding information about the plurality of categories to the category-based profile.
31. The system of claim 30, further including:
instructions for updating a link-based profile by analyzing links in the document, and adding information derived from the analyzed links to the link-based profile.
32. The system of claim 31, wherein the link-based profile includes information about URLs or portions of URLs.
33. The system of claim 32, wherein the link-based profile comprises:
a plurality of URLs and a weight associated with each URL, wherein the weight is based on one or more factors selected from the group consisting of frequency with which the user visits the URL, time the user has spent viewing a document associated with the URL and quantity of the user's scrolling activity at the document; and
a plurality of hosts and a weight associated with each host, wherein the weight is based on frequency of the user's visits to the host.
34. The system of claim 33, wherein the URLs further include URLs that have not been visited by the user, but are related to the URLs that have been visited by the user and the weight of an unvisited URL depends on its distance to at least one related URLs that have been visited.
35. The system of claim 30, wherein a term in the term-based profile is an expression comprising at least one word and a weight.
36. The system of claim 35, wherein the weight is a weight associated with occurrences of the term in the set of documents.
37. The system of claim 35, wherein the weight of a term depends at least partially on the term's term frequency and inverse document frequency in said set of documents.
38. The system of claim 30, wherein a category in the category-based profile characterizes at least one aspect of documents in the category and the category is associated with a weight indicative of the category's importance relative to other categories.
39. The system of claim 38, wherein the at least one aspect of the documents in the category is selected from the group consisting of: document format, document type, document topic and document origin.
40. The system of claim 27, wherein the user profile is stored on a server of the search engine.
41. The system of claim 27, wherein the user profile is stored on a client associated with the user.
42. The system of claim 27, wherein the user is a group of users.
43. A computer program product for use in conjunction with a computer system, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium and a computer program mechanism embedded therein, the computer program mechanism comprising:
instructions for accessing a user profile for a user based on information about the user, the user information including information derived from a set of documents, the set of documents comprising a plurality of documents selected from the set consisting of documents identified by search results from a search engine, documents accessed by the user, documents linked to the documents identified by search results from the search engine, and documents linked to the documents accessed by the user;
instructions for receiving a search query from the user;
instructions for identifying a set of search result documents that match the search query;
instructions for assigning a generic score to each of at least a plurality of the search result documents;
instructions for assigning a personalized score to each document of the plurality of search result documents in accordance with the generic scores assigned to the document and the user profile; and
instructions for ranking at least the plurality of the search result documents according to their personalized scores.
44. The computer program product of claim 43, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have been viewed by the user.
45. The computer program product of claim 43, wherein the set of documents include a plurality of documents that have been identified by search results from the search engine and that have not been viewed by the user.
46. The computer program product of claim 43, further including:
instructions for updating a term-based profile by identifying a set of terms from a document in the set of documents, and adding information about the identified set of terms to the term-based profile; and
instructions for updating a category-based profile by classifying the document into a plurality of categories, and adding information about the plurality of categories to the category-based profile.
47. The computer program product of claim 46, further including:
instructions for updating a link-based profile by analyzing links in the document, and adding information derived from the analyzed links to the link-based profile.
48. The computer program product of claim 46, wherein the link-based profile includes information about URLs or portions of URLs.
49. The computer program product of claim 48, wherein the link-based profile comprises:
a plurality of URLs and a weight associated with each URL, wherein the weight is based on one or more factors selected from the group consisting of frequency with which the user visits the URL, time the user has spent viewing a document associated with the URL and quantity of the user's scrolling activity at the document; and
a plurality of hosts and a weight associated with each host, wherein the weight is based on frequency of the user's visits to the host.
50. The computer program product of claim 49, wherein the URLs further include URLs that have not been visited by the user, but are related to the URLs that have been visited by the user and the weight of an unvisited URL depends on its distance to at least one related URLs that have been visited.
51. The computer program product of claim 46, wherein a term in the term-based profile is an expression comprising at least one word and a weight.
52. The computer program product of claim 48, wherein the weight is a weight associated with occurrences of the term in the set of documents.
53. The computer program product of claim 48, wherein the weight of a term depends at least partially on the term's term frequency and inverse document frequency in said set of documents.
54. The computer program product of claim 46, wherein a category in the category-based profile characterizes at least one aspect of documents in the category and the category is associated with a weight indicative of the category's importance relative to other categories.
55. The computer program product of claim 54, wherein the at least one aspect of the documents in the category is selected from the group consisting of: document format, document type, document topic and document origin.
56. The computer program product of claim 43, wherein the user profile is stored on a server of the search engine.
57. The computer program product of claim 43, wherein the user profile is stored on a client associated with the user.
58. The computer program product of claim 43, wherein the user is a group of users.
Beschreibung
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention relates generally to the field of a search engine in a computer network system, in particular to system and method of creating a user profile for a user of a search engine and using the user profile to customize search results in response to search queries submitted by the user.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    Search engines provide a powerful source of indexed documents from the Internet (or an intranet) that can be rapidly scanned in response to a search query submitted by a user. Such a query is usually very short (on average about two to three words). As the number of documents accessible via the Internet grows, the number of documents that match the query may also increase. However, not every document matching the query is equally important from the user's perspective. As a result, a user is easily overwhelmed by an enormous number of documents returned by a search engine, if the engine does not order the search results based on their relevance to the user's query.
  • [0003]
    One approach to improving the relevance of search results to a search query is to use the link structure of different web pages to compute global “importance” scores that can be used to influence the ranking of search results. This is sometimes referred to as the PageRank algorithm. A more detailed description of the PageRank algorithm can be found in the article “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Search Engine” by S. Brin and L. Page, 7th International World Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia and U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,999, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference as background information.
  • [0004]
    An important assumption in the PageRank algorithm is that there is a “random surfer” who starts his web surfing journey at a randomly picked web page and keeps clicking on the links embedded in the web pages, never hitting the “back” button. Eventually, when this random surfer gets bored of the journey, he may re-start a new journey by randomly picking another web page. The probability that the random surfer visits (i.e., views or downloads) a web page depends on the web page's page rank.
  • [0005]
    From an end user's perspective, a search engine using the PageRank algorithm treats a search query the same way no matter who submits the query, because the search engine does not ask the user to provide any information that can uniquely identify the user. The only factor that affects the search results is the search query itself, e.g., how many terms are in the query and in what order. The search results are a best fit for the interest of an abstract user, the “random surfer”, and they are not be adjusted to fit a specific user's preferences or interests.
  • [0006]
    In reality, a user like the random surfer never exists. Every user has his own preferences when he submits a query to a search engine. The quality of the search results returned by the engine has to be evaluated by its users' satisfaction. When a user's preferences can be well defined by the query itself, or when the user's preference is similar to the random surfer's preference with respect to a specific query, the user is more likely to be satisfied with the search results. However, if the user's preference is significantly biased by some personal factors that are not clearly reflected in a search query itself, or if the user's preference is quite different from the random user's preference, the search results from the same search engine may be less useful to the user, if not useless.
  • [0007]
    As suggested above, the journey of the random surfer tends to be random and neutral, without any obvious inclination towards a particular direction. When a search engine returns only a handful of search results that match a query, the order of the returned results is less significant because the requesting user may be able to afford the time to browse each of them to discover the items most relevant to himself. However, with billions of web pages connected to the Internet, a search engine often returns hundreds or even thousands of documents that match a search query. In this case, the ordering of the search results is very important. A user who has a preference different from that of the random surfer may not find what he is looking for in the first five to ten documents listed in the search results. When that happens, the user is usually left with two options: (1) either spending the time required to review more of the listed documents so as to locate the relevant documents; or (2) refining the search query so as to reduce the number of documents that match the query. Query refinement is often a non-trivial task, sometimes requiring more knowledge of the subject or more expertise with search engines than the user possesses, and sometimes requiring more time and effort than the user is willing to expend.
  • [0008]
    For example, assume that a user submits to a search engine a search query having only one term “blackberry”. Without any other context, on the top of a list of documents returned by a PageRank-based search engine may be a link to www.blackberry.net, because this web page has the highest page rank. However, if the query requester is a person with interests in foods and cooking, it would be more useful to order the search results so as to include at the top of the returned results web pages with recipes or other food related text, pictures or the like. It would be desirable to have a search engine that is able to reorder its search results, or to otherwise customize the search results, so as to emphasize web pages that are most likely to be of interest to the person submitting the search query. Further, it would be desirable for such a system to require minimal input from individual users, operating largely or completely without explicit input from the user with regard to the user's preferences and interests. Finally, it would be desirable for such a system to meet users' requirements with respect to security and privacy.
  • SUMMARY
  • [0009]
    A search engine utilizes user profiles to customize search results. A user profile comprises multiple items that characterize a user's search preference. These items are extracted from various information sources, including previous search queries submitted by the user, links from or to the documents identified by the previous queries, sampled content from the identified documents as well as personal information implicitly or explicitly provided by the user.
  • [0010]
    When the search engine receives a search query from a user, it first identifies a set of documents that match the search query. Each document is associated with a generic rank based on the document's page rank, the text associated with the document, and the search query. The search engine also identifies the user's profile and correlates the user profile with each of the identified documents. The correlation between a document and the user profile produces a profile rank for the document, indicating the relevance of the document to the user. The search engine then combines the document's generic rank and profile rank into a personalized rank. Finally, the documents are ordered according to their personalized ranks.
  • [0011]
    In one embodiment, a user profile may comprise a plurality of sub-profiles, each sub-profile characterizing the user's interest from a different perspective. A term-based profile comprises a plurality of terms, each term carrying a weight indicative of its importance relative to other terms. A category-based profile comprises multiple categories, optionally organized into a hierarchical map. The user's search preferences may be associated with at least a subset of the multiple categories, each category having an associated weight indicating the user's interest in the documents falling into this category. There may be multiple category-based profiles for a user. In some embodiments, the sub-profiles include a link-based profile, which includes a plurality of links that are, directly or indirectly, related to identified documents, each link having a weight indicating the importance of the link. Links in the link-based profile may be further organized with respect to different hosts and domains.
  • [0012]
    The present invention, including user profile construction and search results re-ordering and/or scoring, can be implemented on either the client side or the server side of a client-server network environment.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    The aforementioned features and advantages of the invention as well as additional features and advantages thereof will be more clearly understood hereinafter as a result of a detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention when taken in conjunction with the drawings.
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 illustrates a client-server network environment.
  • [0015]
    FIG. 2 illustrates multiple sources of user information and their relationship to a user profile.
  • [0016]
    FIG. 3 is an exemplary data structure that may be used for storing term-based profiles for a plurality of users.
  • [0017]
    FIG. 4A is an exemplary category map that may be used for classifying a user's past search experience.
  • [0018]
    FIG. 4B is an exemplary data structure that may be used for storing category-based profiles for a plurality of users.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 5 is an exemplary data structure that may be used for storing link-based profiles for a plurality of users.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating paragraph sampling.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 7A is a flowchart illustrating context analysis.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 7B depicts a process of identifying important terms using context analysis.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 8 illustrates a plurality of exemplary data structures that may be used for storing information about documents after term-based, category-based and/or link-based analyses, respectively.
  • [0024]
    FIG. 9A is a flowchart illustrating a personalized web search process according to one embodiment.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 9B is a flowchart illustrating a personalized web search process according to another embodiment.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a personalized search engine.
  • [0027]
    Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
  • DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • [0028]
    The embodiments discussed below include systems and methods that create a user profile based a user's past experience with a search engine and then use the user profile to rank search results in response to search queries provided by the user.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 1 provides an overview of a typical client-server network environment 100 in which the present invention may be implemented. A plurality of clients 102 are connected to a search engine system 107 through a network 105, e.g., the Internet. Search engine system 107 comprises one or more search engines 104. A search engine 104 is responsible for processing a search query submitted by a client 102, generating search results in accordance with the search query and returning the results to the client. Search engine system 107 may also comprise one or more content servers 106 and one or more user profile servers 108. A content server 106 stores a large number of indexed documents retrieved from different websites. Alternately, or in addition, the content server 106 stores an index of documents stored on various websites. In one embodiment, each indexed document is assigned a page rank according to the document's link structure. The page rank serves as a query independent measure of the document's importance. A search engine 104 communicates with one or more content servers 106 to select a plurality of documents in response to a specific search query. The search engine assigns a score to each document based on the document's page rank, the text associated with the document, and the search query.
  • [0030]
    A user profile server 108 stores a plurality of user profiles. Each profile includes information that uniquely identifies a user as well as his previous search experience and personal information, which can be used to refine search results in response to the search queries submitted by this user. Different approaches are available for user profile construction. For example, a user profile can be created by requiring a first-time user to fill in a form or answer a survey. This approach may be useful in certain applications such as opening a bank account. But it is hardly a favorable one in the context of a search engine. First, a user's interaction with a search engine is usually a dynamic process. As time goes on, the user's interests may change. This change may be reflected by the search queries submitted by the user, or by the user's handling of the search results, or both. The user's answers to questions on a form tend to become less useful over time, unless the user chooses to update his answers periodically. Unlike an occasional update of phone number in the case of an on-line bank account, frequent updates of a user profile in the case of a search engine significantly affect its user friendliness, which is an important consideration when a user chooses among the search engines currently available. Further, it is known that users are reluctant to provide explicit feedback, such as filling out of a form, as many users find it too burdensome. Thus, while some users may provide explicit feedback on their interests, it is desirable to have a procedure for implicitly obtaining information about the user's interests without requiring any explicit or new actions by the user.
  • [0031]
    It is has been observed that a search engine user's past search activities provide useful hints about the user's personal search preferences. FIG. 2 provides a list of sources of user information that are beneficial for user profile construction. For example, previously submitted search queries 201 are very helpful in profiling a user's interests. If a user has submitted multiple search queries related to diabetes, it is more likely than not that this is a topic of interest to the user. If the user subsequently submits a query including the term “organic food”, it can be reasonably inferred that he may be more interested in those organic foods that are helpful in fighting diabetes. Similarly, the universal resource locators (URL) 203 associated with the search results in response to the previous search queries and their corresponding anchor texts 205, especially for search result items that have been selected or “visited” by the user (e.g., downloaded or otherwise viewed by the user), are helpful in determining the user's preferences. When a first page contains a link to a second page, and the link has text associated with it (e.g., text neighboring the link), the text associated with the link is called “anchor text” with respect to the second page. Anchor text establishes a relationship between the text associated with a URL link in a document and another document to which the URL link points. The advantages of anchor text include that it often provides an accurate description of the document to which the URL link points, and it can be used to index documents that cannot be indexed by a text-based search engine, such as images or databases.
  • [0032]
    After receiving search results, the user may click on some of the URL links, thereby downloading the documents referenced by those links, so as to learn more details about those documents. Certain types of general information 207 can be associated with a set of user selected or use identified documents. For purposes of forming a user profile, the identified documents from which information is derived for inclusion in the user profile may include: documents identified by search results from the search engine, documents accessed (e.g., viewed or downloaded, for example using a browser application) by the user (including documents not identified in prior search results), documents linked to the documents identified by search results from the search engine, and documents linked to the documents accessed by the user, or any subset of such documents.
  • [0033]
    The general information 207 about the identified documents may answer questions such as, what is the format of the document? Is it in hypertext markup language (HTML), plain text, portable document format (PDF), or Microsoft Word? What is the topic of the document? Is it about science, health or business? This information is also helpful in profiling the user's interests. In addition, information about a user's activities 209 with respect to the user selected documents (sometimes herein call the identified documents), such as how long the user spent viewing the document, the amount of scrolling activity on the document, and whether the user has printed, saved or bookmarked the document, also suggests the importance of the document to the user as well as the user's preferences. In some embodiments, information about user activities 209 is used both when weighting the importance of information extracted or derived from the user identified documents. In some embodiments, information about user activities 209 is used to determine which of the user identified documents to use as the basis for deriving the user profile. For example, information 209 may be used to select only documents that received significant user activity (in accordance with predefined criteria) for generating the user profile, or information 209 may be used to exclude from the profiling process documents that the user viewed for less than a predefined threshold amount of time.
  • [0034]
    Finally, the content of the identified documents from previous search activities is a rich source of information about a user's interests and preferences. Key terms appearing in the identified documents and their frequencies with which they appear in the identified documents are not only useful for indexing the document, but are also a strong indication of the user's personal interests, especially when they are combined with other types of user information discussed above. In one embodiment, instead of the whole documents, sampled content 211 from the identified documents is extracted for the purpose of user profile construction, to save storage space and computational cost. In another embodiment, various information related to the identified documents may be classified to constitute category information 213 about the identified documents. More discussion about content sampling, the process of identifying key terms in an identified document and the usage of the category information is provided below.
  • [0035]
    Optionally, a user may choose to offer personal information 215, including demographic and geographic information associated with the user, such as the user's age or age range, educational level or range, income level or range, language preferences, marital status, geographic location (e.g., the city, state and country in which the user resides, and possibly also including additional information such as street address, zip code, and telephone area code), cultural background or preferences, or any subset of these. Compared with other types of personal information such as a user's favorite sports or movies that are often time varying, this personal information is more static and more difficult to infer from the user's search queries and search results, but maybe crucial in correctly interpreting certain queries submitted by the user. For example, if a user submits a query containing “Japanese restaurant”, it is very likely that he may be searching for a local Japanese restaurant for dinner. Without knowing the user's geographical location, it is hard to order the search results so as to bring to the top those items that are most relevant to the user's true intention. In certain cases, however, it is possible to infer this information. For example, users often select results associated with a specific region corresponding to where they live.
  • [0036]
    Creating a user profile 230 from the various sources of user information is a dynamic and complex process. In some embodiments, the process is divided into sub-processes. Each sub-process produces one type of user profile characterizing a user's interests or preferences from a particular perspective. They are:
      • a term-based profile 231—this profile represents a user's search preferences with a plurality of terms, where each term is given a weight indicating the importance of the term to the user;
      • a category-based profile 233—this profile correlates a user's search preferences with a set of categories, which may be organized in a hierarchal fashion, with each category being given a weight indicating the extent of correlation between the user's search preferences and the category; and
      • a link-based profile 235—this profile identifies a plurality of links that are directly or indirectly related to the user's search preferences, with each link being given a weight indicating the relevance between the user's search preferences and the link.
  • [0040]
    In some embodiments, the user profile 230 includes only a subset of these profiles 231, 233, 235, for example just one or two of these profiles. In one embodiment, the user profile 230 includes a term-based profile 231 and a category-based profile 233, but not a link-based profile 235.
  • [0041]
    In one embodiment, a user profile is created and stored on a server (e.g., user profile server 108) associated with a search engine. The advantage of such deployment is that the user profile can be easily accessed by multiple computers, and that since the profile is stored on a server associated with (or part of) the search engine 104, it can be easily used by the search engine 104 to personalize the search results. In another embodiment, the user profile can be created and stored on the user's computer, sometimes called the client in a network environment. Creating and storing a user profile on a user's computer not only reduces the computational and storage cost for the search engine's servers, but also satisfies some users' privacy requirements. In yet another embodiment, the user profile may be created and updated on the client, but stored on a search engine server. Such embodiment combines some of the benefits illustrated in the other two embodiments. A disadvantage of this arrangement is that it may increase the network traffic between clients and the search engine servers. It is understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art that the user profiles of the present invention can be implemented using client computers, server computers, or both.
  • [0042]
    FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary data structure, a term-based profile table 300, that may be used for storing term-based profiles for a plurality of users. Table 300 includes a plurality of records 310, each record corresponding to a user's term-based profile. A term-based profile record 310 includes a plurality of columns including a USER_ID column 320 and multiple columns of (TERM, WEIGHT) pairs 340. The USER_ID column stores a value that uniquely identifies a user or a group of users sharing the same set of (TERM, WEIGHT) pairs, and each (TERM, WEIGHT) pair 340 includes a term, typically 1-3 words long, that is usually important to the user or the group of users and a weight associated with the term that quantifies the importance of the term. In one embodiment, the term may be represented as one or more n-grams. An n-gram is defined as a sequence of n tokens, where the tokens may be words. For example, the phrase “search engine” is an n-gram of length 2, and the word “search” is an n-gram of length 1.
  • [0043]
    N-grams can be used to represent textual objects as vectors. This makes it possible to apply geometric, statistical and other mathematical techniques, which are well defined for vectors, but not for objects in general. In the present invention, n-grams can be used to define a similarity measure between two terms based on the application of a mathematical function to the vector representations of the terms.
  • [0044]
    The weight of a term is not necessarily a positive value. If a term has a negative weight, it may suggest that the user prefers that his search results should not include this term and the magnitude of the negative weight indicates the strength of the user's preference for avoiding this term in the search results. By way of example, for a group of surfing fans at Santa Cruz, Calif., the term-based profile may include terms like “surfing club”, “surfing event” and “Santa Cruz” with positive weights. The terms like “Internet surfing” or “web surfing” may also be included in the profile. However, these terms are more likely to receive a negative weight since they are irrelevant and confusing with the authentic preference of the users sharing this term-based profile.
  • [0045]
    A term-based profile itemizes a user's preference using specific terms, each term having certain weight. If a document matches a term in a user's term-based profile, i.e., its content includes exactly this term, the term's weight will be assigned to the document; however, if a document does not match a term exactly, it will not receive any weight associated with this term. Such a requirement of relevance between a document and a user profile sometimes may be less flexible when dealing with various scenarios in which a fuzzy relevance between a user's preference and a document exists. For example, if a user's term-based profile includes terms like “Mozilla” and “browser”, a document containing no such terms, but other terms like “Galeon” or “Opera” will not receive any weight because they do not match any existing term in the profile, even though they are actually Internet browsers. To address the need for matching a user's interests without exact term matching, a user's profile may include a category-based profile.
  • [0046]
    FIG. 4A illustrates a hierarchal category map 400 according to the Open Directory Project (http://dmoz.org/). Starting from the root level of map 400, documents are organized under several major topics, such as “Art”, “News”, “Sports”, etc. These major topics are often too broad to delineate a user's specific interest. Therefore, they are further divided into sub- topics that are more specific. For example, topic “Art” may comprise sub-topics like “Movie”, “Music” and “Literature” and the sub-topic “Music” may further comprise sub-sub-topics like “Lyrics”, “News” and “Reviews”. Note that each topic is associated with a unique CATEGORY_ID like 1.1 for “Art”, 1.4.2.3 for “Talk Show” and 1.6.1 for “Basketball”.
  • [0047]
    A user's specific interests may be associated with multiple categories at various levels, each of which may have a weight indicating the degree of relevance between the category and the user's interest. In one embodiment, a category-based profile may be implemented using a Hash table data structure as shown in FIG. 4B. A category-based profile table 450 includes a table 455 that comprises a plurality of records 460, each record including a USER_ID and a pointer pointing to another data structure, such as table 460-1. Table 460-1 may include two columns, CATEGORY_ID column 470 and WEIGHT column 480. CATEGORY_ID column 470 contains a category's identification number as shown in FIG. 4A, suggesting that this category is relevant to the user's interests and the value in the WEIGHT column 480 indicates the degree of relevance of the category to the user's interests.
  • [0048]
    A user profile based upon the category map 400 is a topic-oriented implementation. The items in a category-based profile can also be organized in other ways. In one embodiment, a user's preference can be categorized based on the formats of the documents identified by the user, such as HTML, plain text, PDF, Microsoft Word, etc. Different formats may have different weights. In another embodiment, a user's preference can be categorized according to the types of the identified documents, e.g., an organization's homepage, a person's homepage, a research paper, or a news group posting, each type having an associated weight. Another type category that can be used to characterize a user's search preferences is document origin, for instance the country associated with each document's host. In yet another embodiment, the above-identified category-based profiles may co-exist, with each one reflecting one aspect of a user's preferences.
  • [0049]
    Besides term-based and category-based profiles, another type of user profile is referred to as a link-based profile. As discussed above, the PageRank algorithm is based on the link structure that connects various documents over the Internet. A document that has more links pointing to it is often assigned a higher page rank and therefore attracts more attention from a search engine. Link information related to a document identified by a user can also be used to infer the user's preferences. In one embodiment, a list of preferred URLs are identified for a user by analyzing the frequency of his access to those URLs. Each preferred URL may be further weighted according to the time spent by the user and the user's scrolling activity at the URL, and/or other user activities (209, FIG. 2) when visiting the document at the URL. In another embodiment, a list of preferred hosts are identified for a user by analyzing the user's frequency of accessing web pages of different hosts. When two preferred URLs are related to the same host the weights of the two URLs may be combined to determine a weight for the host. In another embodiment, a list of preferred domains are identified for a user by analyzing the user's frequency of accessing web pages of different domains. For example, for finance.yahoo.com, the host is “finance.yahoo.com” while the domain is “yahoo.com”.
  • [0050]
    FIG. 5 illustrates a link-based profile using a Hash table data structure. A link-based profile table 500 includes a table 510 that includes a plurality of records 520, each record including a USER_ID and a pointer pointing to another data structure, such as table 510-1. Table 510-1 may include two columns, LINK_ID column 530 and WEIGHT column 540. The identification number stored in the LINK_ID column 530 may be associated with a preferred URL or host. The actual URL/host/domain may be stored in the table instead of the LINK_ID, however it is preferable to store the LINK_ID to save storage space.
  • [0051]
    A preferred list of URLs and/or hosts includes URLs and/or hosts that have been directly identified by the user. The preferred list of URLs and/or host may furthermore extend to URLs and/or hosts indirectly identified by using methods such as collaborative filtering or bibliometric analysis, which are known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. In one embodiment, the indirectly identified URLs and/or host include URLs or hosts that have links to/from the directly identified URLs and/or hosts. These indirectly identified URLs and/or hosts are weighted by the distance between them and the associated URLs or hosts that are directly identified by the user. For example, when a directly identified URL or host has a weight of 1, URLs or hosts that are one link away may have a weight of 0.5, URLs or hosts that are two links away may have a weight of 0.25, etc. This procedure can be further refined by reducing the weight of links that are not related to the topic of the original URL or host, e.g., links to copyright pages or web browser software that can be used to view the documents associated with the user selected URL or host. Irrelevant Links can be identified based on their context or their distribution. For example, copyright links often use specific terms (e.g., copyright or “All rights reserved” are commonly used terms in the anchor text of a copyright link); and links to a website from many unrelated websites may suggest that this website is not topically related (e.g., links to the Internet Explorer website are often included in unrelated websites). The indirect links can also be classified according to a set of topics and links with very different topics may be excluded or be assigned a low weight.
  • [0052]
    The three types of user profiles discussed above are generally complimentary to one another since different profiles delineate a user's interests and preferences from different vantage points. However, this does not mean that one type of user profile, e.g., category-based profile, is incapable of playing a role that is typically played by another type of user profile. By way of example, a preferred URL or host in a link-based profile is often associated with a specific topic, e.g., finance.yahoo.com is a URL focusing on financial news. Therefore, what is achieved by a link-based profile that comprises a list of preferred URLs or hosts to characterize a user's preference may also be achievable, at least in part, by a category-based profile that has a set of categories that cover the same topics covered by preferred URLs or hosts.
  • [0053]
    It is a non-trivial operation to construct various types of user profiles that can be stored in the data structures shown in FIGS. 3-5 based on the user information listed in FIG. 2. Given a document identified (e.g., viewed) by a user, different terms in the document may have different importance in revealing the topic of the document. Some terms, e.g., the document's title, may be extremely important, while other terms may have little importance. For example, many documents contain navigational links, copyright statements, disclaimers and other text that may not be related to the topic of the document. How to efficiently select appropriate documents, content from those documents and terms from within the content is a challenging topic in computational linguistics. Additionally, it is preferred to minimize the volume of user information processed, so as make the process of user profile construction computationally efficient. Skipping less important terms in a document helps in accurately matching a document with a user's interest.
  • [0054]
    Paragraph sampling (described below with reference to FIG. 6) is a procedure for automatically extracting content from a document that may be relevant to a user. An important observation behind this procedure is that less relevant content in a document, such as navigational links, copyright statements, disclaimer, etc., tend to be relatively short segments of text. In one embodiment, paragraph sampling looks for the paragraphs of greatest length in a document, processing the paragraphs in order of decreasing length until the length of a paragraph is below a predefined threshold. The paragraph sampling procedure optionally selects up to a certain maximum amount of content from each processed paragraph. If few paragraphs of suitable length are found in a document, the procedure falls back to extracting text from other parts of the document, such as anchor text and ALT tags.
  • [0055]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the major steps of paragraph sampling. Paragraph sampling begins with the step 610 of removing predefined items, such as comments, JavaScript and style sheets, etc., from a document. These items are removed because they are usually related to visual aspects of the document when rendered on a browser and are unlikely to be relevant to the document's topic. Following that, the procedure may select the first N words (or M sentences) at step 620 from each paragraph whose length is greater than a threshold value, MinParagraphLength, as sampled content. In one embodiment, the values of N and M are chosen to be 100 and 5, respectively. Other values may be used in other embodiments.
  • [0056]
    In order to reduce the computational and storage load associated with the paragraph sampling procedure, the procedure may impose a maximum limit, e.g., 1000 words, on the sampled content from each document. In one embodiment, the paragraph sampling procedure first organizes all the paragraphs in a document in length decreasing order, and then starts the sampling process with a paragraph of maximum length. It is noted that the beginning and end of a paragraph depend on the appearance of the paragraph in a browser, not on the presence of uninterrupted a text string in the HTML representation of the paragraph. For this reason, certain HTML commands, such as commands for inline links and for bold text, are ignored when determining paragraph boundaries. In some embodiments, the paragraph sampling procedure screens the first N words (or M sentences) so as to filter out those sentences including boilerplate terms like “Terms of Service” or “Best viewed”, because such sentences are usually deemed irrelevant to the document's topic.
  • [0057]
    Before sampling a paragraph whose length is above the threshold value, the procedure may stop sampling content from the document if the number of words in the sampled content has reached the maximum word limit. If the maximum word limit has not been reached after processing all paragraphs of length greater than the threshold, optional steps 630, 640, 650 and 670 are performed. In particular, the procedure adds the document title (630), the non-inline HREF links (640), the ALT tags (650) and the meta tags (670) to the sampled content until it reaches the maximum word limit.
  • [0058]
    Once the documents identified by a user have been scanned, the sampled content can be used for identifying a list of most important (or unimportant) terms through context analysis. Context analysis attempts to learn context terms that predict the most important (or unimportant) terms in a set of identified documents. Specifically, it looks for prefix patterns, postfix patterns, and a combination of both. For example, an expression “x's home page” may identify the term “x” as an important term for a user and therefore the postfix pattern “* home page” can be used to predict the location of an important term in a document, where the asterisk “* ” represents any term that fits this postfix pattern. In general, the patterns identified by context analysis usually consist of m terms before an important (or unimportant) term and n terms after the important (or unimportant) term, where both m and n are greater than or equal to 0 and at least one of them is greater than 0. Typically, m and n are less than 5, and when non-zero are preferably between 1 and 3. Depending on its appearance frequency, a pattern may have an associated weight that indicates how important (or unimportant) the term recognized by the pattern is expected to be.
  • [0059]
    According to one embodiment of the present invention (FIG. 7A), context analysis has two distinct phases, a training phase 701 and an operational phase 703. The training phase 701 receives and utilizes a list of predefined important terms 712, an optional list of predefined unimportant terms 714, and a set of training documents (step 710). In some embodiments, the list of predefined unimportant terms is not used. The source of the lists 712, 714 is not critical. In some embodiments, these lists 712, 714 are generated by extracting words or terms from a set of documents (e.g., a set of several thousand web pages of high page rank) in accordance with a set of rules, and then editing them to remove terms that in the opinion of the editor do not belong in the lists. The source of the training documents is also not critical. In some embodiments, the training documents comprise a randomly or pseudo-randomly selected set of documents already known to the search engine. In other embodiments, the training documents are selected from a database of documents in the search engine in accordance with predefined criteria.
  • [0060]
    During the training phase 701, the training documents are processed (step 720), using the lists of predefined important and unimportant terms, so as to identify a plurality of context patterns (e.g., prefix patterns, postfix patterns, and prefix-postfix patterns) and to associate a weight with each identified context pattern. During the operational phase 703, the context patterns are applied to documents identified by the user (step 730) to identify a set of important terms (step 740) that characterize the user's specific interests and preferences. Learning and delineating a user's interests and preferences is usually an ongoing process. Therefore, the operational phase 703 may be repeated to update the set of important terms that have been captured previously. This may be done each time a user accesses a document, according to a predetermined schedule, at times determined in accordance with specified criteria, or otherwise from time to time. Similarly, the training phase 701 may also be repeated to discover new sets of context patterns and to recalibrate the weights associated with the identified context patterns.
  • [0061]
    Below is a segment of pseudo code that exemplifies the training phase:
    For each document in the set {
     For each improtant term in the document {
      For m = 0 to MaxPrefix {
       For n = 0 to MaxPostfix {
        Extract the m words before the important
        term and the n words after the important
        term as s;
        Add 1 to ImportantContext (m,n,s);
       }
      }
     }
     For each unimportant term in the document {
      For m = 0 to MaxPrefix {
       For n = 0 to MaxPostfix {
        Extract the m words before the
        unimportant term and the n words after
        the unimportant term as s;
        Add 1 to UnimportantContext (m,n,s);
       }
      }
     }
    }
    For m = 0 to MaxPrefix {
     For n = 0 to MaxPostfix {
      For each vaalue of s {
       Set the weight for s to a function of
       ImportantContext (m,n,s), and
       UnimportantContext (m,n,s);
      }
     }
    }
  • [0062]
    In the pseudo code above, the expression s refers to a prefix pattern (n=0), a postfix pattern (m=0) or a combination of both (m>0 & n>0). Each occurrence of a specific pattern is registered at one of the two multi-dimensional arrays, ImportantContext(m,n,s) or UnimportantContext(m,n,s). The weight of a prefix, postfix or combination pattern is set higher if this pattern identifies more important terms and fewer unimportant terms and vice versa. Note that it is possible that a same pattern may be associated with both important and unimportant terms. For example, the postfix expression “* operating system” may be used in the training documents 716 in conjunction with terms in the list of predefined important terms 712 and also used in conjunction with terms in the list of predefined unimportant terms 714. In this situation, the weight associated with the postfix pattern “* operating system” (represented by the expression Weight(1,0,“operating system”)) will take into account the number of times the postfix expression is used in conjunction with terms in the list of predefined important terms as well as the number of times the postfix expression is used in conjunction with terms in the list of predefined unimportant terms. One possible formula to determine the weight of a context pattern s is:
    Weight(m,n,s)=Log(ImportantContext(m,n,s)+1)−Log(UnimportantContext(m,n,s)+1).
    Other weight determination formulas may be used in other embodiments.
  • [0064]
    In the second phase of the context analysis process, the weighted context patterns are used to identify important terms in one or more documents identified by the user. Referring to FIG. 7B, in the first phase a computer system receives training data 750 and creates a set of context patterns 760, each context pattern having an associated weight. The computer system then applies the set of context patterns 760 to a document 780. In FIG. 7B, previously identified context patterns found within the document 780 are highlighted. Terms 790 associated with the context patterns are identified and each such term receives a weight based on the weights associated with the context patterns. For example, the term “Foobar” appears in the document twice, in association with two different patterns, the prefix pattern “Welcome to *” and the postfix pattern “* builds”, and the weight 1.2 assigned to “Foobar” is the sum of the two patterns' weights, 0.7 and 0.5. The other identified term “cars” has a weight of 0.8 because the matching prefix pattern “world's best *” has a weight of 0.8. In some embodiments the weight for each term is computed using a log transform, where the final weight is equal to log(initial weight+1). It is possible that the two terms “Foobar” and “cars” may not be in the training data 750 and may have never been encountered by the user before. Nevertheless, the context analysis method described above identifies these terms and adds them to the user's term-based profile. Thus, context analysis can be used to discover terms associated with a user's interests and preferences even when those terms are not included in a predefined database of terms.
  • [0065]
    As noted, the output of context analysis can be used directly in constructing a user's term-based profile. Additionally, it may be useful in building other types of user profiles, such as a user's category-based profile. For example, a set of weighted terms can be analyzed and classified into a plurality of categories covering different topics, and those categories can be added to a user's category-based profile.
  • [0066]
    After executing the context analysis on a set of documents identified by or for a user, the resulting set of terms and weights may occupy a larger amount of storage than allocated for each user's term-based profile. Also, the set of terms and corresponding weights may include some terms with weights much, much smaller than other terms within the set. Therefore, in some embodiments, at the conclusion of the context analysis, the set of terms and weights is pruned by removing terms having the lowest weights (A) so that the total amount of storage occupied by the term-based profile meets predefined limits, and/or (B) so as to remove terms whose weights are so low, or terms that correspond to older items, as defined by predefined criteria, that the terms are deemed to be not indicative of the user's search preferences and interests. In some embodiments, similar pruning criteria and techniques are also applied to the category-based profile and/or the link-based profile.
  • [0067]
    In some embodiments, a user's profile is updated each time the user performs a search and selects at least one document from the search results to download or view. In some embodiments, the search engine builds a list of documents identified by the user (e.g., by selecting the documents from search results) over time, and at predefined times (e.g., when the list reaches a predefined length, or a predefined amount of time has elapsed), performs a profile update. When performing an update, new profile data is generated, and the new profile data is merged with the previously generated profile data for the user. In some embodiments, the new profile data is assigned higher importance than the previously generated profile data, thereby enabling the system to quickly adjust a user's profile in accordance with changes in the user's search preferences and interests. For example, the weights of items in the previously generated profile data may be automatically scaled downward prior to merging with the new profile data. In one embodiment, there is a date associated with each item in the profile, and the information in the profile is weighted based on its age, with older items receiving a lower weight than when they were new. In other embodiments, the new profile data is not assigned high importance than the previously generated profile data.
  • [0068]
    The paragraph sampling and context analysis methods may be used independently or in combination. When used in combination, the output of the paragraph sampling is used as input to the context analysis method.
  • [0069]
    It is further noted that the above-described methods used for creating user profiles, e.g., paragraph sampling and context analysis, may be also leveraged for determining the relevance of a candidate document to a user's preference. Indeed, the primary mission of a search engine is to identify a series of documents that are most relevant to a user's preference based on the search queries submitted by the user as well as the user's user profile. FIG. 8 illustrates several exemplary data structures that can be used to store information about a document's relevance to a user profile from multiple perspectives. For each candidate document, each identified by a respective DOC_ID, term-based document information table 810 includes multiple pairs of terms and their weights, category-based document information table 830 includes a plurality of categories and associated weights, and link-based document information table 850 includes a set of links and corresponding weights.
  • [0070]
    The rightmost column of each of the three tables (810, 830 and 850) stores the rank (i.e., a computed score) of a document when the document is evaluated using one specific type of user profile. A user profile rank can be determined by combining the weights of the items associated with a document. For instance, a category-based or topic-based profile rank may be computed as follows. A user may prefer documents about science with a weight of 0.6, while he dislikes documents about business with a weight of −0.2. Thus, when a science document matches a search query, it will be weighted higher than a business document. In general, the document topic classification may not be exclusive. A candidate document may be classified as being a science document with probability of 0.8 and a business document with probability of 0.4. A link-based profile rank may be computed based on the relative weights allocated to a user's URL, host, domain, etc., preferences in the link-based profile. In one embodiment, term-based profile rank can be determined using known techniques, such as the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). The term frequency of a term is a function of the number of times the term appears in a document. The inverse document frequency is an inverse function of the number of documents in which the term appears within a collection of documents. For example, very common terms like “the” occur in many documents and consequently as assigned a relatively low inverse document frequency.
  • [0071]
    When a search engine generates search results in response to a search query, a candidate document D that satisfies the query is assigned a query score, QueryScore, in accordance with the search query. This query score is then modulated by document D's page rank, PageRank, to generate a generic score, GenericScore, that is expressed as
    GenericScore=QueryScore*PageRank.
  • [0072]
    This generic score may not appropriately reflect document D's importance to a particular user U if the user's interests or preferences are dramatically different from that of the random surfer. The relevance of document D to user U can be accurately characterized by a set of profile ranks, based on the correlation between document D's content and user U's term-based profile, herein called the TermScore, the correlation between one or more categories associated with document D and user U's category-based profile, herein called the CategoryScore, and the correlation between the URL and/or host of document D and user U's link-based profile, herein called the LinkScore. Therefore, document D may be assigned a personalized rank that is a function of both the document's generic score and the user profile scores. In one embodiment, this personalized score can be expressed as:
    PersonalizedScore=GenericScore*(TermScore+CategoryScore+LinkScore).
  • [0073]
    FIGS. 9A and 9B represent two embodiments, both implemented in a client-server network environment such as the network environment 100 shown in FIG. 1. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 9A, the search engine 104 receives a search query from a client 102 at step 910 that is submitted by a particular user. In response, the search engine 104 may optionally generate a query strategy at step 915 (e.g., the search query is normalized so as to be in proper form for further processing, and/or the search query may be modified in accordance with predefined criteria so as to automatically broaden or narrow the scope of the search query). At step 920, the search engine 104 submits the search query (or the query strategy, if one is generated) to the content server 106. The content server identifies a list of documents that match the search query at step 920, each document having a generic score that depends on the document's page rank and the search query. In general, all the three operations (steps 910, 915 and 920) are conducted by the search engine system 107, which is on the server side of the network environment 100. There are two options on where to implement the operations following these first three steps.
  • [0074]
    In some embodiments that employ a server-side implementation, the user's identification number is embedded in the search query. Based on the user's identification number, the user profile server 108 identifies the user's user profile at step 925. Starting from step 930, the user profile server 108 or the search engine 104 analyzes each document identified at step 920 to determine its relevance to the user's profile, creates a profile score for the identified document at step 935 and then assigns the document a personalized score that is a function of the document's generic and profile scores at step 940. At step 942, the user profile server 108 or the search engine 104 checks whether this the last one in the list of identified documents. If no, the system processes the next document in the list. Otherwise, the list of documents are re-ordered according to their personalized scores and then sent to the corresponding client from which the user submitted the search query.
  • [0075]
    Embodiments using a client-side implementation are similar to the server-side implementation, except that after step 920, the identified documents are sent to the corresponding client from which the user submitted the query. This client stores the user's user profile and it is responsible for re-ordering the documents based upon the user profile. Therefore, this client-side implementation may reduce the server's workload. Further, since there is no privacy concern with the client-side implementation, a user may be more willing to provide private information to customize the search results. However, a significant limitation to the client-side implementation is that only a limited number of documents, e.g., the top 50 documents (as determined using the generic rank), may be sent to a client for re-ordering due to limited network bandwidth. In contrast, the server-side implementation may be able to apply a user's profile to a much larger number of documents, e.g., 1000, that match the search query. Therefore, the client-side implementation may deprive a user access to those documents having relatively low generic ranks, but significantly high personalized ranks.
  • [0076]
    FIG. 9B illustrates another embodiment. Unlike the embodiment depicted in FIG. 9A, where the search query is not personalized before submitting the search query to the search engine 104, a generic query strategy is adjusted (step 965) according to the user's user profile to create a personalized query strategy. For example, relevant terms from the user profile may be added to the search query with associated weights. The creation of the personalized query strategy can be performed either on the client side or on the server side of the system. This embodiment avoids the network bandwidth restriction facing the previous embodiment. Finally, the search engine 104 submits the personalized query strategy to the content server 106 (step 970), and therefore the search results returned by the content server have already been ordered by the documents' personalized ranks (step 975).
  • [0077]
    The profiles of a group of users with related interests may be combined together to form a group profile, or a single profile may be formed based on the documents identified by the users in the group. For instance, several family members may use the same computer to submit search queries to a search engine. If the computer is tagged with a single user identifier by the search engine, the “user” will be the entire family of users, and the user profile will be represent a combination or mixture of the search preferences of the various family members. An individual user in the group may optionally have a separate user profile that differentiates this user from other group members. In operation, the search results for a user in the group are ranked according to the group profile, or according to the group profile and the user's user profile when the user also has a separate user profile.
  • [0078]
    It is possible that a user may switch his interests so dramatically that his new interests and preferences bear little resemblance to his user profile, or a user may be temporarily interested in a new topic. In this case, personalized search results produced according to the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 9A and 9B may be less favorable than search results ranked in accordance with the generic ranks of the documents in the search results. Additionally, the search results provided to a user may not include new websites among the top listed documents because the user's profile tends to increase the weight of older websites which the user has visited (i.e., older websites from which the user has viewed or downloaded web pages) in the past.
  • [0079]
    To reduce the impact caused by a change in a user's preferences and interests, the personalized search results may be merged with the generic search results. In one embodiment, the generic search results and personalized search results are interleaved, with the odd positions (e.g., 1, 3, 5, etc.) of a search results list reserved for generic search results and the even positions (e.g., 2, 4, 6, etc.) reserved for personalized search results, or vice versa. Preferably, the items in the generic search results will not duplicate the items listed in the personalized search results, and vice versa. More generally, generic search results are intermixed or interleaved with personalized search results, so that the items in the search results presented to the user include both generic and personalized search results.
  • [0080]
    In another embodiment, the personalized ranks and generic ranks are further weighted by a user profile's confidence level. The confidence level takes into account factors such as how much information has been acquired about the user, how close the current search query matches the user's profile, how old the user profile is, etc. If only a very short history of the user is available, the user's profile may be assigned a correspondingly low confidence value. The final score of an identified document can be determined as:
    FinalScore=ProfileScore*ProfileConfidence+GenericScore*(1−ProfileConfidence).
    When intermixing generic and personalized results, the fraction of personalized results may be adjusted based on the profile confidence, for example using only one personalized result when the confidence is low.
  • [0082]
    Sometimes, multiple users may share a machine, e.g., in a public library. These users may have different interests and preferences. In one embodiment, a user may explicitly login to the service so the system knows his identity. Alternatively, different users can be automatically recognized based on the items they access or other characteristics of their access patterns. For example, different users may move the mouse in different ways, type differently, and use different applications and features of those applications. Based on a corpus of events on a client and/or server, it is possible to create a model for identifying users, and for then using that identification to select an appropriate “user” profile. In such circumstances, the “user” may actually be a group of people having somewhat similar computer usage patterns, interests and the like.
  • [0083]
    Referring to FIG. 10, a personalized search engine system 1000 typically includes one or more processing units (CPU's) 1002, one or more network or other communications interfaces 1010, memory 1012, and one or more communication buses 1014 for interconnecting these components. The system 1000 may optionally include a user interface 1004, for instance a display 1006 and a keyboard 1008. Memory 1012 may include high speed random access memory and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic disk storage devices. Memory 1012 may include mass storage that is remotely located from the central processing unit(s) 1002. The memory 1012 preferably stores:
      • an operating system 1016 that includes procedures for handling various basic system services and for performing hardware dependent tasks;
      • a network communication module 1018 that is used for connecting the system 1000 to other servers or computers via one or more communication networks (wired or wireless), such as the Internet, other wide area networks, local area networks, metropolitan area networks, and so on;
      • a system initialization module 1020 that initializes other modules and data structures stored in memory 1012 required for the appropriate operation of system 1000;
      • a search engine 1022 for processing a search query, identifying and ordering search results according to the search query and a user's profile;
      • a user profile engine 1030 for gathering and processing user information, such as the user information identified in FIG. 2, and creating and updating a user's user profile that characterizes the user's search preferences and interests; and
      • data structures 1040, 1060 and 1080 for storing a plurality of user profiles.
  • [0090]
    The search engine 1022 may further comprise:
      • a generic rank module (or instructions) 1024 for processing a search query submitted by a user, identifying a list of documents matching the query and assigning each identified document a generic rank without reference to user specific information;
      • a user profile rank module (or instructions) 1026 for correlating each of a plurality of documents identified by the generic rank module 1024 with the user's user profile and assigning the document a profile rank indicating the relevance of the document to the user's search preferences and interests; and
      • a rank mixing module (or instructions) 1028 for combining the generic rank and the profile rank of an identified document into a personalized rank and re-ordering the list of documents according to their personalized ranks.
        In some embodiments, these modules 1024, 1026, 1028 may be implemented within a single procedure or in a set of procedures that reside within a single software module.
  • [0095]
    The user profile engine 1030 may further comprise:
      • a user information collection module 1032 for collecting and assorting various user information listed in FIG. 2;
      • a document content extraction module 1034 for selecting and extracting content from the documents identified by the user, to identify content relevant to the user's interests, using techniques such as paragraph sampling (as discussed above); and
      • a context analysis module 1036 for analyzing the content extracted by the document extraction module 1034 so as to identify terms that characterize a user's search preferences.
  • [0099]
    Each data structure hosting a user profile may further comprise:
      • a data structure 1042, 1062 or 1082 for storing a term-based user profile;
      • a data structure 1044, 1064 or 1084 for storing a category-based user profile; and
      • a data structure 1046, 1066 or 1086 for storing a link-based user profile.
  • [0103]
    The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Patentzitate
Zitiertes PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US5848396 *26. Apr. 19968. Dez. 1998Freedom Of Information, Inc.Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user
US6006218 *28. Febr. 199721. Dez. 1999MicrosoftMethods and apparatus for retrieving and/or processing retrieved information as a function of a user's estimated knowledge
US6584468 *29. Sept. 200024. Juni 2003Ninesigma, Inc.Method and apparatus to retrieve information from a network
US6647381 *26. Jan. 200011. Nov. 2003Nec Usa, Inc.Method of defining and utilizing logical domains to partition and to reorganize physical domains
US6912505 *29. März 200128. Juni 2005Amazon.Com, Inc.Use of product viewing histories of users to identify related products
US6981040 *20. Juni 200027. Dez. 2005Utopy, Inc.Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20040267700 *26. Juni 200330. Dez. 2004Dumais Susan T.Systems and methods for personal ubiquitous information retrieval and reuse
Referenziert von
Zitiert von PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US7165119 *14. Okt. 200316. Jan. 2007America Online, Inc.Search enhancement system and method having rankings, explicitly specified by the user, based upon applicability and validity of search parameters in regard to a subject matter
US72190732. Aug. 200015. Mai 2007Brandnamestores.ComMethod for extracting information utilizing a user-context-based search engine
US7321889 *9. Sept. 200522. Jan. 2008Suggestica, Inc.Authoring and managing personalized searchable link collections
US733399712. Aug. 200319. Febr. 2008Viziant CorporationKnowledge discovery method with utility functions and feedback loops
US73892822. Nov. 200517. Juni 2008Viziant CorporationSystem and method for predictive analysis and predictive analysis markup language
US742141912. Apr. 20062. Sept. 2008Viziant CorporationSystem and method for evidence accumulation and hypothesis generation
US746723220. Juni 200616. Dez. 2008Aol LlcSearch enhancement system and method having rankings, explicitly specified by the user, based upon applicability and validity of search parameters in regard to a subject matter
US7469276 *27. Dez. 200423. Dez. 2008International Business Machines CorporationService offering for the delivery of information with continuing improvement
US7472119 *30. Juni 200530. Dez. 2008Microsoft CorporationPrioritizing search results by client search satisfaction
US74933019. Sept. 200517. Febr. 2009Suggestica, Inc.Creating and sharing collections of links for conducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics, and a user interface therefor
US75027839. Sept. 200510. März 2009Suggestica, Inc.User interface for conducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics
US753640826. Juli 200419. Mai 2009Google Inc.Phrase-based indexing in an information retrieval system
US7562068 *30. Juni 200414. Juli 2009Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results based on tracked user preferences
US756795925. Jan. 200528. Juli 2009Google Inc.Multiple index based information retrieval system
US757771831. Juli 200618. Aug. 2009Microsoft CorporationAdaptive dissemination of personalized and contextually relevant information
US758092126. Juli 200425. Aug. 2009Google Inc.Phrase identification in an information retrieval system
US7580929 *26. Juli 200425. Aug. 2009Google Inc.Phrase-based personalization of searches in an information retrieval system
US758417526. Juli 20041. Sept. 2009Google Inc.Phrase-based generation of document descriptions
US759991426. Juli 20046. Okt. 2009Google Inc.Phrase-based searching in an information retrieval system
US7599916 *20. Apr. 20056. Okt. 2009Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for personalized search
US7606794 *28. Juni 200520. Okt. 2009Yahoo! Inc.Active Abstracts
US7624101 *31. Jan. 200624. Nov. 2009Google Inc.Enhanced search results
US764023214. Okt. 200329. Dez. 2009Aol LlcSearch enhancement system with information from a selected source
US7680786 *30. Okt. 200616. März 2010Yahoo! Inc.Optimization of targeted advertisements based on user profile information
US7685192 *30. Juni 200623. März 2010Amazon Technologies, Inc.Method and system for displaying interest space user communities
US7685199 *31. Juli 200623. März 2010Microsoft CorporationPresenting information related to topics extracted from event classes
US769381330. März 20076. Apr. 2010Google Inc.Index server architecture using tiered and sharded phrase posting lists
US770261430. März 200720. Apr. 2010Google Inc.Index updating using segment swapping
US770261825. Jan. 200520. Apr. 2010Google Inc.Information retrieval system for archiving multiple document versions
US771167926. Juli 20044. Mai 2010Google Inc.Phrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system
US771619821. Dez. 200411. Mai 2010Microsoft CorporationRanking search results using feature extraction
US7739277 *30. Sept. 200415. Juni 2010Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for incorporating anchor text into ranking search results
US773940812. Dez. 200815. Juni 2010Aol Inc.System and method for general search parameters having quantized relevance values that are associated with a user
US775220110. Mai 20076. Juli 2010Microsoft CorporationRecommendation of related electronic assets based on user search behavior
US776144830. Sept. 200420. Juli 2010Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results using click distance
US7761464 *19. Juni 200620. Juli 2010Microsoft CorporationDiversifying search results for improved search and personalization
US7774340 *30. Juni 200410. Aug. 2010Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for calculating document importance using document classifications
US7779001 *29. Okt. 200417. Aug. 2010Microsoft CorporationWeb page ranking with hierarchical considerations
US778363628. Sept. 200624. Aug. 2010Microsoft CorporationPersonalized information retrieval search with backoff
US779283326. Apr. 20067. Sept. 2010Microsoft CorporationRanking search results using language types
US7810027 *1. Mai 20065. Okt. 2010Bendik Mary MDocument management systems and methods
US782717028. Aug. 20072. Nov. 2010Google Inc.Systems and methods for demoting personalized search results based on personal information
US7827175 *10. Juni 20042. Nov. 2010International Business Machines CorporationFramework reactive search facility
US782718129. Sept. 20052. Nov. 2010Microsoft CorporationClick distance determination
US783641110. Juni 200416. Nov. 2010International Business Machines CorporationSearch framework metadata
US784056918. Okt. 200723. Nov. 2010Microsoft CorporationEnterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
US784907931. Juli 20067. Dez. 2010Microsoft CorporationTemporal ranking of search results
US78819817. Mai 20071. Febr. 2011Yoogli, Inc.Methods and computer readable media for determining a macro-context based on a micro-context of a user search
US792084913. Juli 20075. Apr. 2011Pop AdrianMethod and system for providing advertisements/messages based on wireless data communication technology
US792564930. Dez. 200512. Apr. 2011Google Inc.Method, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search
US792565530. März 200712. Apr. 2011Google Inc.Query scheduling using hierarchical tiers of index servers
US7930298 *27. Dez. 200719. Apr. 2011Institute For Information IndustrySystem and method for generating 'snapshot's of learning objects
US793397528. Aug. 200826. Apr. 2011International Business Machines CorporationService offering for the delivery of information with continuing improvement
US7962462 *31. Mai 200514. Juni 2011Google Inc.Deriving and using document and site quality signals from search query streams
US796630917. Jan. 200721. Juni 2011Google Inc.Providing relevance-ordered categories of information
US796632117. Jan. 200721. Juni 2011Google Inc.Presentation of local results
US796632430. Mai 200621. Juni 2011Microsoft CorporationPersonalizing a search results page based on search history
US7987185 *29. Dez. 200626. Juli 2011Google Inc.Ranking custom search results
US800582217. Jan. 200723. Aug. 2011Google Inc.Location in search queries
US8015184 *11. Apr. 20056. Sept. 2011Yahoo! Inc.Method and apparatus for a search-enabled remote control device
US8019777 *7. Juni 201013. Sept. 2011Nexify, Inc.Digital content personalization method and system
US8027964 *13. Juli 200727. Sept. 2011Medio Systems, Inc.Personalized query completion suggestion
US8037042 *10. Mai 200711. Okt. 2011Microsoft CorporationAutomated analysis of user search behavior
US8060520 *11. März 201015. Nov. 2011Yahoo! Inc.Optimization of targeted advertisements based on user profile information
US807860730. März 200613. Dez. 2011Google Inc.Generating website profiles based on queries from webistes and user activities on the search results
US807862913. Okt. 200913. Dez. 2011Google Inc.Detecting spam documents in a phrase based information retrieval system
US80822461. Juli 201020. Dez. 2011Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results using click distance
US808659430. März 200727. Dez. 2011Google Inc.Bifurcated document relevance scoring
US8086605 *28. Juni 200627. Dez. 2011Yahoo! Inc.Search engine with augmented relevance ranking by community participation
US80907232. März 20103. Jan. 2012Google Inc.Index server architecture using tiered and sharded phrase posting lists
US809540811. Okt. 200510. Jan. 2012Sharethis, Inc.System and method for facilitating network connectivity based on user characteristics
US80955655. Mai 200610. Jan. 2012Microsoft CorporationMetadata driven user interface
US8095582 *4. Jan. 201010. Jan. 2012Surf Canyon IncorporatedDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
US8103659 *6. Juni 200624. Jan. 2012A9.Com, Inc.Perspective-based item navigation
US8108362 *8. Febr. 200731. Jan. 2012Microsoft CorporationSecure content descriptions
US8108383 *23. Nov. 200931. Jan. 2012Google Inc.Enhanced search results
US81084124. März 201031. Jan. 2012Google, Inc.Phrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system
US81172237. Sept. 200714. Febr. 2012Google Inc.Integrating external related phrase information into a phrase-based indexing information retrieval system
US814051528. Okt. 200920. März 2012Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for building a user profile
US814570316. Nov. 200727. März 2012Iac Search & Media, Inc.User interface and method in a local search system with related search results
US816602130. März 200724. Apr. 2012Google Inc.Query phrasification
US816604530. März 200724. Apr. 2012Google Inc.Phrase extraction using subphrase scoring
US818077118. Juli 200815. Mai 2012Iac Search & Media, Inc.Search activity eraser
US8185514 *4. Mai 200922. Mai 2012Topix LlcUser-interface feature and technique for providing users of a network site links that have been determined to be of interest to the user
US8185523 *17. März 200622. Mai 2012Search Engine Technologies, LlcSearch engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
US820479711. Okt. 200719. Juni 2012William Paul WankerCustomizable electronic commerce comparison system and method
US8209337 *19. Nov. 200826. Juni 2012Core Logic, Inc.Content recommendation apparatus and method using tag cloud
US821434630. Jan. 20093. Juli 2012Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for classifying unstructured documents
US822986217. Juni 201124. Juli 2012Google Inc.Methods and systems for rating associated members in a network
US8234263 *29. Jan. 201031. Juli 2012Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for building a dynamic classification dictionary
US8244721 *13. Febr. 200814. Aug. 2012Microsoft CorporationUsing related users data to enhance web search
US824473718. Juni 200714. Aug. 2012Microsoft CorporationRanking documents based on a series of document graphs
US824476613. Apr. 201014. Aug. 2012Microsoft CorporationApplying a model of a persona to search results
US8271485 *5. Apr. 200718. Sept. 2012I-Business Center CorporationReply generation apparatus and method and program for causing computer to function as reply generating apparatus
US8316021 *30. Juni 201020. Nov. 2012Emergency 24, Inc.Methods and systems for enhanced placement search engine based on user usage
US8326861 *23. Juni 20104. Dez. 2012Google Inc.Personalized term importance evaluation in queries
US834102025. Okt. 201025. Dez. 2012Steve MorsaMatch engine marketing
US8346749 *27. Juni 20081. Jan. 2013Microsoft CorporationBalancing the costs of sharing private data with the utility of enhanced personalization of online services
US8359312 *16. März 200922. Jan. 2013Amiram GrynbergMethods for generating a personalized list of documents associated with a search query
US8359319 *21. Aug. 200822. Jan. 2013Sudhir PendseTool for personalized search
US8364670 *28. Dez. 200529. Jan. 2013Dt Labs, LlcSystem, method and apparatus for electronically searching for an item
US8370348 *6. Dez. 20115. Febr. 2013Google Inc.Magazine edition recommendations
US840203314. Okt. 201119. März 2013Google Inc.Phrase extraction using subphrase scoring
US84126987. Apr. 20052. Apr. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Customizable filters for personalized search
US8412702 *12. März 20082. Apr. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System, method, and/or apparatus for reordering search results
US843816512. Mai 20117. Mai 2013Microsoft CorporationInterest tracking using shared search queries and interactions
US8442973 *1. Mai 200714. Mai 2013Surf Canyon, Inc.Real time implicit user modeling for personalized search
US84840984. Mai 20119. Juli 2013Michael BilottaSystem for information delivery facilitating partner rating of users and user ratings of partners
US848418616. Sept. 20119. Juli 2013Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Personalized people finder
US8484219 *22. Sept. 20109. Juli 2013Sony Computer Entertainment America LlcDeveloping a knowledge base associated with a user that facilitates evolution of an intelligent user interface
US8489515 *8. Mai 200916. Juli 2013Comcast Interactive Media, LLC.Social network based recommendation method and system
US84895912. Juni 201116. Juli 2013Google Inc.Presentation of local results
US84896281. Dez. 201116. Juli 2013Google Inc.Phrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system
US8510262 *21. Mai 200813. Aug. 2013Microsoft CorporationPromoting websites based on location
US8521734 *28. Juli 201127. Aug. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Search engine with augmented relevance ranking by community participation
US8521735 *27. Febr. 201227. Aug. 2013Google Inc.Anonymous personalized recommendation method
US8538940 *17. Juni 200817. Sept. 2013International Business Machines CorporationIdentification of shared resources
US853897030. Dez. 200417. Sept. 2013Google Inc.Personalizing search results
US854357020. Jan. 201224. Sept. 2013Surf Canyon IncorporatedAdaptive user interface for real-time search relevance feedback
US85490113. Juni 20111. Okt. 2013Microsoft CorporationIdentifying and recommending experts using shared queries and interactions
US856055020. Juli 200915. Okt. 2013Google, Inc.Multiple index based information retrieval system
US8595228 *9. Jan. 200926. Nov. 2013Google Inc.Preferred sites
US86009759. Apr. 20123. Dez. 2013Google Inc.Query phrasification
US8606781 *9. Aug. 200510. Dez. 2013Palo Alto Research Center IncorporatedSystems and methods for personalized search
US86124274. März 201017. Dez. 2013Google, Inc.Information retrieval system for archiving multiple document versions
US86128516. Dez. 201117. Dez. 2013Google Inc.Edition grid layout
US8620915 *28. Aug. 200731. Dez. 2013Google Inc.Systems and methods for promoting personalized search results based on personal information
US863102710. Jan. 201214. Jan. 2014Google Inc.Integrated external related phrase information into a phrase-based indexing information retrieval system
US8635216 *30. Sept. 200421. Jan. 2014Avaya Inc.Enhancing network information retrieval according to a user search profile
US866681614. Sept. 20044. März 2014Google Inc.Method and system for access point customization
US868290120. Dez. 201125. März 2014Google Inc.Index server architecture using tiered and sharded phrase posting lists
US86944918. März 20118. Apr. 2014Google Inc.Method, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search
US8707160 *10. Aug. 200622. Apr. 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for inferring user interest based on analysis of user-generated metadata
US871302520. Nov. 201129. Apr. 2014Square Halt Solutions, Limited Liability CompanyComplete context search system
US871925528. Sept. 20056. Mai 2014Amazon Technologies, Inc.Method and system for determining interest levels of online content based on rates of change of content access
US872565921. Dez. 201213. Mai 2014Sony Computer Entertainment America LlcEvolution of a user interface based on learned idiosyncrasies and collected data of a user
US873215516. Nov. 200720. Mai 2014Iac Search & Media, Inc.Categorization in a system and method for conducting a search
US87385946. Febr. 200827. Mai 2014Chin San Sathya WongMethod and system of interacting with a server, and method and system for generating and presenting search results
US87386351. Juni 201027. Mai 2014Microsoft CorporationDetection of junk in search result ranking
US874504922. Juli 20133. Juni 2014Google Inc.Anonymous personalized recommendation method
US8745074 *14. Sept. 20123. Juni 2014Google Inc.Method and system for evaluating content via a computer network
US874510410. Febr. 20123. Juni 2014Google Inc.Collaborative rejection of media for physical establishments
US876236418. März 200824. Juni 2014Yahoo! Inc.Personalizing sponsored search advertising layout using user behavior history
US876243510. Febr. 201224. Juni 2014Google Inc.Collaborative rejection of media for physical establishments
US877542116. Okt. 20078. Juli 2014International Business Machines CorporationSearch scheduling and delivery
US879370616. Dez. 201029. Juli 2014Microsoft CorporationMetadata-based eventing supporting operations on data
US881249311. Apr. 200819. Aug. 2014Microsoft CorporationSearch results ranking using editing distance and document information
US88131237. Nov. 200319. Aug. 2014Interad Technologies, LlcContent with customized advertisement
US881898225. Apr. 201226. Aug. 2014Google Inc.Deriving and using document and site quality signals from search query streams
US8838588 *30. März 200516. Sept. 2014International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for dynamically tracking user interests based on personal information
US883862214. Juli 200316. Sept. 2014Cricket Media, Inc.Method and system for monitoring and filtering data transmission
US88433097. Okt. 200523. Sept. 2014Microsoft CorporationVirtual earth mapping
US884348629. Sept. 200923. Sept. 2014Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for scoping searches using index keys
US8849805 *8. Nov. 201230. Sept. 2014Rakuten, Inc.Information processing apparatus, information processing method, information processing program, and recording medium
US884981730. Juni 201130. Sept. 2014Google Inc.Ranking custom search results
US88500117. Okt. 200530. Sept. 2014Microsoft CorporationObtaining and displaying virtual earth images
US8862597 *27. Dez. 201114. Okt. 2014Sap Portals Israel LtdProviding contextually-relevant content
US886859017. Nov. 201121. Okt. 2014Sri InternationalMethod and system utilizing a personalized user model to develop a search request
US887457030. Nov. 200428. Okt. 2014Google Inc.Search boost vector based on co-visitation information
US8875007 *8. Nov. 201028. Okt. 2014Microsoft CorporationCreating and modifying an image wiki page
US8886644 *1. Nov. 201211. Nov. 2014Google Inc.User control of search filter bubble
US8924378 *5. Sept. 201330. Dez. 2014Surf Canyon IncorporatedAdaptive user interface for real-time search relevance feedback
US8924846 *3. Juli 200930. Dez. 2014Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Apparatus and method for text extraction
US8930358 *11. Apr. 20056. Jan. 2015Yahoo! Inc.System and method for presenting search results
US893035930. Juni 20116. Jan. 2015Google Inc.Ranking custom search results
US894301522. Dez. 201127. Jan. 2015Google Technology Holdings LLCHierarchical behavioral profile
US894306715. März 201327. Jan. 2015Google Inc.Index server architecture using tiered and sharded phrase posting lists
US89543569. Okt. 201310. Febr. 2015Sony Computer Entertainment America LlcEvolution of a user interface based on learned idiosyncrasies and collected data of a user
US896587229. Juni 201124. Febr. 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcIdentifying query formulation suggestions for low-match queries
US897763016. Sept. 201310. März 2015Google Inc.Personalizing search results
US898392412. Mai 201117. März 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcSharing public search queries and interactions
US898399523. Juni 201117. März 2015Microsoft CorporationInteractive semantic query suggestion for content search
US899640919. Jan. 201031. März 2015Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.Management of online trading services using mediated communications
US899650722. Aug. 201131. März 2015Google Inc.Location in search queries
US90151855. Dez. 201321. Apr. 2015Piksel, Inc.Ontology based recommendation systems and methods
US903757317. Juni 201319. Mai 2015Google, Inc.Phase-based personalization of searches in an information retrieval system
US903810730. Dez. 200519. Mai 2015Individual Network, LlcMethod and system for providing a customized media list
US9053177 *11. Juni 20129. Juni 2015Google Inc.Sitelinks based on visual location
US905375428. Juli 20049. Juni 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcThumbnail generation and presentation for recorded TV programs
US9092052 *9. Apr. 201328. Juli 2015Andreas KornstädtMethod and apparatus for obtaining entity-related decision support information based on user-supplied preferences
US909252327. Febr. 200628. Juli 2015Search Engine Technologies, LlcMethods of and systems for searching by incorporating user-entered information
US909857230. Jan. 20134. Aug. 2015Google Inc.Magazine edition recommendations
US91051783. Dez. 201211. Aug. 2015Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.Remote dynamic configuration of telemetry reporting through regular expressions
US910669116. Sept. 201111. Aug. 2015Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Systems and methods of identity protection and management
US911099822. Dez. 201118. Aug. 2015Google Technology Holdings LLCHierarchical behavioral profile
US91169636. Dez. 201325. Aug. 2015Google Inc.Systems and methods for promoting personalized search results based on personal information
US913532830. Apr. 200815. Sept. 2015Yahoo! Inc.Ranking documents through contextual shortcuts
US914165721. Dez. 201222. Sept. 2015Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Content delivery system with profile generation mechanism and method of operation thereof
US914704222. Nov. 201129. Sept. 2015Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Systems and methods for data verification
US91587685. Febr. 201313. Okt. 2015Paypal, Inc.System and methods to configure a query language using an operator dictionary
US9189555 *7. Sept. 201217. Nov. 2015Oracle International CorporationDisplaying customized list of links to content using client-side processing
US919564023. Dez. 201124. Nov. 2015Sri InternationalMethod and system for finding content having a desired similarity
US9195761 *15. Nov. 201324. Nov. 2015Google Inc.System and method for navigating documents
US923003128. Aug. 20135. Jan. 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcIdentifying and recommending experts using shared posts and interactions
US923028317. Juni 20135. Jan. 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Card registry systems and methods
US923586817. Apr. 200812. Jan. 2016Cricket Media, Inc.Method and system for interactive, multi-user electronic data transmission in a multi-level monitored and filtered system
US924542814. März 201326. Jan. 2016Immersion CorporationSystems and methods for haptic remote control gaming
US925690414. Aug. 20099. Febr. 2016Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze
US926884330. Juni 201023. Febr. 2016Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for building a user profile
US927825520. Dez. 20128. März 2016Arris Enterprises, Inc.System and method for activity recognition
US928800017. Dez. 200315. März 2016International Business Machines CorporationMonitoring a communication and retrieving information relevant to the communication
US9311362 *15. März 201312. Apr. 2016Google Inc.Personal knowledge panel interface
US9311401 *20. Dez. 200712. Apr. 2016Victor David UyMethod of displaying a subjective score with search engine results
US9317563 *23. Okt. 201319. Apr. 2016Google Inc.Preferred sites
US9323846 *13. Febr. 201426. Apr. 2016Google Inc.Method, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search
US934260910. Sept. 201417. Mai 2016Google Inc.Ranking custom search results
US934278314. Sept. 201217. Mai 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Systems and methods for data verification
US934891210. Sept. 200824. Mai 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcDocument length as a static relevance feature for ranking search results
US935516913. Sept. 201231. Mai 2016Google Inc.Phrase extraction using subphrase scoring
US93556848. Juni 201531. Mai 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcThumbnail generation and presentation for recorded TV programs
US936133113. März 20137. Juni 2016Google Inc.Multiple index based information retrieval system
US9367591 *6. März 201314. Juni 2016OK WaveClient system and server
US936760617. Mai 201214. Juni 2016Search Engine Technologies, LlcSearch engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
US9367618 *7. Aug. 200814. Juni 2016Yahoo! Inc.Context based search arrangement for mobile devices
US938320626. Febr. 20145. Juli 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcObtaining and displaying virtual earth images
US938422418. Nov. 20135. Juli 2016Google Inc.Information retrieval system for archiving multiple document versions
US940058912. März 201326. Juli 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information
US940608514. März 20132. Aug. 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting
US9418122 *24. Nov. 201416. Aug. 2016Surf Canyon IncorporatedAdaptive user interface for real-time search relevance feedback
US9430471 *7. Apr. 201530. Aug. 2016Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for assigning a value index to a user
US9443022 *19. Jan. 201213. Sept. 2016Google Inc.Method, system, and graphical user interface for providing personalized recommendations of popular search queries
US944326827. Jan. 201413. Sept. 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Bill payment and reporting
US94601516. Okt. 20154. Okt. 2016Paypal, Inc.System and methods to configure a query language using an operator dictionary
US9460212 *3. Dez. 20084. Okt. 2016Paypal, Inc.System and method for personalized search
US947773719. Nov. 201425. Okt. 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules
US948356816. Dez. 20131. Nov. 2016Google Inc.Indexing system
US948946310. Mai 20118. Nov. 2016Excalibur Ip, LlcSearch systems and methods with integration of user annotations
US94896944. Febr. 20168. Nov. 2016Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze
US9495452 *9. Okt. 200915. Nov. 2016Yahoo! Inc.User-sensitive PageRank
US949546227. Jan. 201215. Nov. 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcRe-ranking search results
US9501476 *7. Apr. 201522. Nov. 2016Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for characterizing a document
US950150616. Dez. 201322. Nov. 2016Google Inc.Indexing system
US950926914. Sept. 201229. Nov. 2016Google Inc.Ambient sound responsive media player
US952985126. Nov. 201427. Dez. 2016Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Server architecture for electronic data quality processing
US952991811. Dez. 201327. Dez. 2016Doat Media Ltd.System and methods thereof for downloading applications via a communication network
US953626316. Mai 20143. Jan. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Debt services candidate locator
US95424537. Aug. 201510. Jan. 2017Google Inc.Systems and methods for promoting search results based on personal information
US95425536. Aug. 201510. Jan. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Systems and methods of identity protection and management
US95426824. Jan. 201610. Jan. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Card registry systems and methods
US954769823. Apr. 201317. Jan. 2017Google Inc.Determining media consumption preferences
US955242211. Dez. 201324. Jan. 2017Doat Media Ltd.System and method for detecting a search intent
US955851929. Apr. 201131. Jan. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Exposing reporting cycle information
US956950422. Aug. 201414. Febr. 2017Google Inc.Deriving and using document and site quality signals from search query streams
US956950515. Mai 201514. Febr. 2017Google Inc.Phrase-based searching in an information retrieval system
US9576041 *29. Nov. 200621. Febr. 2017British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanyUser specific database querying method and apparatus
US957631317. Apr. 201521. Febr. 2017Piksel, Inc.Recommendation systems and methods using interest correlation
US958257219. Dez. 201228. Febr. 2017Intel CorporationPersonalized search library based on continual concept correlation
US959485010. Okt. 201414. März 2017Sri InternationalMethod and system utilizing a personalized user model to develop a search request
US959505120. Febr. 201514. März 2017Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc.Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data
US9600581 *19. Febr. 200921. März 2017Yahoo! Inc.Personalized recommendations on dynamic content
US9602444 *29. Apr. 201021. März 2017Google Inc.Participant suggestion system
US960704928. Dez. 201228. März 2017Ebay Inc.Systems and methods to build and utilize a search infrastructure
US960733615. Juni 201228. März 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Providing credit inquiry alerts
US96131473. Aug. 20154. Apr. 2017Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.Collection of telemetry data by a telemetry library within a client device
US9613221 *30. Dez. 20154. Apr. 2017Quixey, Inc.Signed application cards
US9614683 *24. Aug. 20164. Apr. 2017Quixey, Inc.Signed application cards
US9619467 *23. Juli 201211. Apr. 2017Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for building a dynamic classification dictionary
US962002817. Apr. 201411. Apr. 2017Cricket Media, Inc.Method and system for developing process, project or problem-based learning systems within a semantic collaborative social network
US9626437 *10. Juni 200418. Apr. 2017International Business Machines CorporationSearch scheduling and delivery tool for scheduling a search using a search framework profile
US9633083 *5. Dez. 201325. Apr. 2017Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.Organizing search results using smart tag inferences
US9639611 *26. Aug. 20142. Mai 2017Doat Media Ltd.System and method for providing suitable web addresses to a user device
US965454111. Nov. 201316. Mai 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Aggregating user web browsing data
US966564715. Mai 201430. Mai 2017Doat Media Ltd.System and method for indexing mobile applications
US966585415. Juni 201230. Mai 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Authentication alerts
US968490528. Sept. 201520. Juni 2017Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Systems and methods for data verification
US96972634. März 20134. Juli 2017Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Consumer data request fulfillment system
US969756828. Juni 20164. Juli 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting
US971085222. Apr. 201418. Juli 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Credit report timeline user interface
US9715542 *2. Aug. 200625. Juli 2017Search Engine Technologies, LlcSystems for and methods of finding relevant documents by analyzing tags
US972114713. Mai 20141. Aug. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Digital identity
US973421127. Febr. 201515. Aug. 2017Google Inc.Personalizing search results
US975354014. Dez. 20155. Sept. 2017Immersion CorporationSystems and methods for haptic remote control gaming
US9760547 *15. März 201312. Sept. 2017Google Inc.Monetization of online content
US9760608 *1. Nov. 201312. Sept. 2017Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcReal-time search tuning
US976751328. Dez. 201619. Sept. 2017Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Card registry systems and methods
US978598722. Apr. 201010. Okt. 2017Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcUser interface for information presentation system
US97926484. Nov. 201617. Okt. 2017Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze
US9794746 *5. Dez. 201417. Okt. 2017Apple Inc.Dynamic content presentation based on proximity and user data
US20040103118 *14. Juli 200327. Mai 2004John IrvingMethod and system for multi-level monitoring and filtering of electronic transmissions
US20040103122 *14. Juli 200327. Mai 2004John IrvingMethod and system for filtered web browsing in a multi-level monitored and filtered system
US20040111423 *14. Juli 200310. Juni 2004John IrvingMethod and system for secure, community profile generation and access via a communication system
US20040143843 *7. Nov. 200322. Juli 2004Denis KhooContent with customized advertisement
US20050038699 *30. Juli 200417. Febr. 2005Lillibridge Mark DavidSystem and method for targeted advertising via commitment
US20050038805 *12. Aug. 200317. Febr. 2005Eagleforce AssociatesKnowledge Discovery Appartus and Method
US20050080771 *14. Okt. 200314. Apr. 2005Fish Edmund J.Search enhancement system with information from a selected source
US20050097188 *14. Okt. 20035. Mai 2005Fish Edmund J.Search enhancement system having personal search parameters
US20050210006 *18. März 200422. Sept. 2005Microsoft CorporationField weighting in text searching
US20050216446 *29. März 200429. Sept. 2005Hall Karl ETechnical process to deliver pre-populated search suggestions using the intelli-match search methodology
US20050278288 *10. Juni 200415. Dez. 2005International Business Machines CorporationSearch framework metadata
US20050278312 *10. Juni 200415. Dez. 2005International Business Machines CorporationFramework reactive search facility
US20050278313 *10. Juni 200415. Dez. 2005International Business Machines CorporationSearch scheduling and delivery
US20050278362 *17. Febr. 200515. Dez. 2005Maren Alianna JKnowledge discovery system
US20060001015 *5. Mai 20055. Jan. 2006Kroy Building Products, Inc. ;Method of forming a barrier
US20060004711 *30. Juni 20045. Jan. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results based on tracked user preferences
US20060004809 *30. Juni 20045. Jan. 2006Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for calculating document importance using document classifications
US20060004871 *24. Juni 20055. Jan. 2006Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMultimedia data reproducing apparatus and multimedia data reproducing method and computer-readable medium therefor
US20060020593 *23. Juni 200526. Jan. 2006Mark RamsaierDynamic search processor
US20060022683 *27. Juli 20042. Febr. 2006Johnson Leonard AProbe apparatus for use in a separable connector, and systems including same
US20060031195 *26. Juli 20049. Febr. 2006Patterson Anna LPhrase-based searching in an information retrieval system
US20060036598 *9. Aug. 200516. Febr. 2006Jie WuComputerized method for ranking linked information items in distributed sources
US20060047643 *29. Aug. 20052. März 2006Chirag ChamanMethod and system for a personalized search engine
US20060058019 *15. Sept. 200416. März 2006Chan Wesley TMethod and system for dynamically modifying the appearance of browser screens on a client device
US20060059028 *28. Okt. 200516. März 2006Eder Jeffrey SContext search system
US20060059134 *9. Sept. 200516. März 2006Eran PalmonCreating attachments and ranking users and attachments for conducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics
US20060059135 *9. Sept. 200516. März 2006Eran PalmonConducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics
US20060059143 *9. Sept. 200516. März 2006Eran PalmonUser interface for conducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics
US20060069674 *9. Sept. 200530. März 2006Eran PalmonCreating and sharing collections of links for conducting a search directed by a hierarchy-free set of topics, and a user interface therefor
US20060069699 *9. Sept. 200530. März 2006Frank SmadjaAuthoring and managing personalized searchable link collections
US20060069982 *29. Sept. 200530. März 2006Microsoft CorporationClick distance determination
US20060074864 *24. Sept. 20046. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for controlling ranking of pages returned by a search engine
US20060074871 *30. Sept. 20046. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for incorporating anchor text into ranking search results
US20060074883 *5. Okt. 20046. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystems, methods, and interfaces for providing personalized search and information access
US20060074903 *30. Sept. 20046. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results using click distance
US20060085401 *20. Okt. 200420. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationAnalyzing operational and other data from search system or the like
US20060090183 *11. Apr. 200527. Apr. 2006David ZitoMethod and apparatus for a search-enabled remote control device
US20060095412 *11. Apr. 20054. Mai 2006David ZitoSystem and method for presenting search results
US20060095430 *29. Okt. 20044. Mai 2006Microsoft CorporationWeb page ranking with hierarchical considerations
US20060101003 *28. Juni 200511. Mai 2006Chad CarsonActive abstracts
US20060101012 *10. Juni 200511. Mai 2006Chad CarsonSearch system presenting active abstracts including linked terms
US20060101017 *7. Nov. 200511. Mai 2006Eder Jeffrey SSearch ranking system
US20060107289 *28. Juli 200418. Mai 2006Microsoft CorporationThumbnail generation and presentation for recorded TV programs
US20060136411 *21. Dez. 200422. Juni 2006Microsoft CorporationRanking search results using feature extraction
US20060143296 *27. Dez. 200429. Juni 2006International Business Machines CorporationService offering for the delivery of information with continuing improvement
US20060161621 *9. Sept. 200520. Juli 2006Outland Research, LlcSystem, method and computer program product for collaboration and synchronization of media content on a plurality of media players
US20060167576 *3. Nov. 200527. Juli 2006Outland Research, L.L.C.System, method and computer program product for automatically selecting, suggesting and playing music media files
US20060167689 *2. Nov. 200527. Juli 2006Eagleforce AssociatesSystem and method for predictive analysis and predictive analysis markup language
US20060167942 *27. Okt. 200527. Juli 2006Lucas Scott GEnhanced client relationship management systems and methods with a recommendation engine
US20060167943 *22. Nov. 200527. Juli 2006Outland Research, L.L.C.System, method and computer program product for rejecting or deferring the playing of a media file retrieved by an automated process
US20060168623 *30. Dez. 200527. Juli 2006Denis KhooMethod and system for providing a customized media list
US20060173556 *27. Jan. 20063. Aug. 2006Outland Research,. LlcMethods and apparatus for using user gender and/or age group to improve the organization of documents retrieved in response to a search query
US20060173828 *9. Dez. 20053. Aug. 2006Outland Research, LlcMethods and apparatus for using personal background data to improve the organization of documents retrieved in response to a search query
US20060179044 *21. Dez. 200510. Aug. 2006Outland Research, LlcMethods and apparatus for using life-context of a user to improve the organization of documents retrieved in response to a search query from that user
US20060179056 *12. Mai 200610. Aug. 2006Outland ResearchEnhanced storage and retrieval of spatially associated information
US20060186197 *2. Juni 200624. Aug. 2006Outland ResearchMethod and apparatus for wireless customer interaction with the attendants working in a restaurant
US20060195361 *12. Mai 200631. Aug. 2006Outland ResearchLocation-based demographic profiling system and method of use
US20060195428 *28. Dez. 200531. Aug. 2006Douglas PeckoverSystem, method and apparatus for electronically searching for an item
US20060195778 *1. Mai 200631. Aug. 2006Bendik Mary MDocument management systems and methods
US20060200460 *3. März 20057. Sept. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for ranking search results using file types
US20060204142 *25. März 200514. Sept. 2006Alamy LimitedRanking of images in the results of a search
US20060223635 *3. Apr. 20065. Okt. 2006Outland Researchmethod and apparatus for an on-screen/off-screen first person gaming experience
US20060223637 *30. März 20065. Okt. 2006Outland Research, LlcVideo game system combining gaming simulation with remote robot control and remote robot feedback
US20060229058 *22. Juni 200612. Okt. 2006Outland ResearchReal-time person-to-person communication using geospatial addressing
US20060230012 *30. März 200512. Okt. 2006International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for dynamically tracking user interests based on personal information
US20060238379 *7. Okt. 200526. Okt. 2006Microsoft CorporationObtaining and displaying virtual earth images
US20060242130 *4. Apr. 200626. Okt. 2006Clenova, LlcInformation retrieval using conjunctive search and link discovery
US20060242135 *20. Apr. 200526. Okt. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for personalized search
US20060248059 *9. Aug. 20052. Nov. 2006Palo Alto Research Center Inc.Systems and methods for personalized search
US20060253210 *31. Juli 20069. Nov. 2006Outland Research, LlcIntelligent Pace-Setting Portable Media Player
US20060253572 *13. Apr. 20069. Nov. 2006Osmani GomezMethod and system for management of an electronic mentoring program
US20060256007 *31. Jan. 200616. Nov. 2006Outland Research, LlcTriangulation method and apparatus for targeting and accessing spatially associated information
US20060256008 *31. Jan. 200616. Nov. 2006Outland Research, LlcPointing interface for person-to-person information exchange
US20060259479 *12. Mai 200516. Nov. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for automatic generation of suggested inline search terms
US20060259574 *21. Dez. 200516. Nov. 2006Outland Research, LlcMethod and apparatus for accessing spatially associated information
US20060271286 *27. Jan. 200630. Nov. 2006Outland Research, LlcImage-enhanced vehicle navigation systems and methods
US20060271524 *27. Febr. 200630. Nov. 2006Michael TanneMethods of and systems for searching by incorporating user-entered information
US20060288074 *19. Sept. 200621. Dez. 2006Outland Research, LlcSystem, Method and Computer Program Product for Collaborative Broadcast Media
US20060294100 *26. Apr. 200628. Dez. 2006Microsoft CorporationRanking search results using language types
US20060294155 *28. Juni 200628. Dez. 2006Patterson Anna LDetecting spam documents in a phrase based information retrieval system
US20070005523 *12. Apr. 20064. Jan. 2007Eagleforce Associates, Inc.System and method for evidence accumulation and hypothesis generation
US20070005575 *30. Juni 20054. Jan. 2007Microsoft CorporationPrioritizing search results by client search satisfaction
US20070005686 *20. Juni 20064. Jan. 2007Fish Edmund JSearch enhancement system having ranked general search parameters
US20070011049 *21. Febr. 200611. Jan. 2007Eder Jeffrey SIntelligent, personalized commerce chain
US20070038622 *15. Aug. 200515. Febr. 2007Microsoft CorporationMethod ranking search results using biased click distance
US20070051503 *8. Sept. 20058. März 2007Grajzl Harold ACorrosion resistant charge air cooler and method of making same
US20070075127 *21. Nov. 20065. Apr. 2007Outland Research, LlcOrientation-based power conservation for portable media devices
US20070083323 *22. Juni 200612. Apr. 2007Outland ResearchPersonal cuing for spatially associated information
US20070106659 *17. März 200610. Mai 2007Yunshan LuSearch engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
US20070112761 *28. Juni 200617. Mai 2007Zhichen XuSearch engine with augmented relevance ranking by community participation
US20070125852 *6. Okt. 20067. Juni 2007Outland Research, LlcShake responsive portable media player
US20070129888 *28. Juni 20067. Juni 2007Outland ResearchSpatially associated personal reminder system and method
US20070130205 *5. Mai 20067. Juni 2007Microsoft CorporationMetadata driven user interface
US20070150188 *7. März 200728. Juni 2007Outland Research, LlcFirst-person video-based travel planning system
US20070150473 *16. Mai 200628. Juni 2007Microsoft CorporationSearch By Document Type And Relevance
US20070156720 *31. Aug. 20065. Juli 2007Eagleforce AssociatesSystem for hypothesis generation
US20070162424 *30. Dez. 200512. Juli 2007Glen JehMethod, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search
US20070185858 *2. Aug. 20069. Aug. 2007Yunshan LuSystems for and methods of finding relevant documents by analyzing tags
US20070192289 *31. Jan. 200616. Aug. 2007Walton LinEnhanced search results
US20070198486 *24. Aug. 200623. Aug. 2007Daniel AbramsInternet search engine with browser tools
US20070198504 *23. Febr. 200623. Aug. 2007Microsoft CorporationCalculating level-based importance of a web page
US20070208730 *14. Juli 20066. Sept. 2007Microsoft CorporationMining web search user behavior to enhance web search relevance
US20070210937 *8. Jan. 200713. Sept. 2007Microsoft CorporationDynamic rendering of map information
US20070233671 *14. Febr. 20074. Okt. 2007Oztekin Bilgehan UGroup Customized Search
US20070239680 *30. März 200611. Okt. 2007Oztekin Bilgehan UWebsite flavored search
US20070255735 *7. Mai 20071. Nov. 2007Taylor David CUser-context-based search engine
US20070260597 *25. Aug. 20068. Nov. 2007Mark CramerDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
US20070276870 *15. Mai 200729. Nov. 2007Outland Research, LlcMethod and apparatus for intelligent media selection using age and/or gender
US20070294225 *19. Juni 200620. Dez. 2007Microsoft CorporationDiversifying search results for improved search and personalization
US20070294615 *30. Mai 200620. Dez. 2007Microsoft CorporationPersonalizing a search results page based on search history
US20070299785 *23. Juni 200627. Dez. 2007Dylan TullbergMethod of searching and classifying funds
US20080005064 *28. Juni 20053. Jan. 2008Yahoo! Inc.Apparatus and method for content annotation and conditional annotation retrieval in a search context
US20080027769 *9. Sept. 200231. Jan. 2008Jeff Scott EderKnowledge based performance management system
US20080027921 *31. Juli 200631. Jan. 2008Microsoft CorporationTemporal ranking of search results
US20080027979 *31. Juli 200631. Jan. 2008Microsoft CorporationPresenting information related to topics extracted from event classes
US20080028036 *31. Juli 200631. Jan. 2008Microsoft CorporationAdaptive dissemination of personalized and contextually relevant information
US20080032719 *2. Juli 20077. Febr. 2008Outland Research, LlcCentralized establishment-based tracking and messaging service
US20080033841 *11. Okt. 20077. Febr. 2008Wanker William PCustomizable electronic commerce comparison system and method
US20080040301 *10. Aug. 200614. Febr. 2008Yahoo! Inc.System and method for inferring user interest based on analysis of user-generated metadata
US20080082485 *28. Sept. 20063. Apr. 2008Microsoft CorporationPersonalized information retrieval search with backoff
US20080082528 *26. Sept. 20073. Apr. 2008Pointer S.R.L.Systems and methods for ranking search engine results
US20080091661 *16. Okt. 200717. Apr. 2008International Business Machines CorporationSearch Scheduling and Delivery
US20080104026 *30. Okt. 20061. Mai 2008Koran Joshua MOptimization of targeted advertisements based on user profile information
US20080114751 *1. Mai 200715. Mai 2008Surf Canyon IncorporatedReal time implicit user modeling for personalized search
US20080168045 *10. Jan. 200710. Juli 2008Microsoft CorporationContent rank
US20080172357 *17. Jan. 200717. Juli 2008Google Inc.Location in search queries
US20080172362 *17. Jan. 200717. Juli 2008Google Inc.Providing Relevance-Ordered Categories of Information
US20080172374 *17. Jan. 200717. Juli 2008Google Inc.Presentation of Local Results
US20080176194 *8. Nov. 200724. Juli 2008Nina ZoltSystem for developing literacy skills using loosely coupled tools in a self-directed learning process within a collaborative social network
US20080183691 *30. Jan. 200731. Juli 2008International Business Machines CorporationMethod for a networked knowledge based document retrieval and ranking utilizing extracted document metadata and content
US20080243784 *30. März 20072. Okt. 2008Tyron Jerrod StadingSystem and methods of query refinement
US20080243785 *30. März 20072. Okt. 2008Tyron Jerrod StadingSystem and methods of searching data sources
US20080243805 *17. Jan. 20052. Okt. 2008Srinivas GuttaAutomatic Creation of E-Books
US20080249798 *4. Apr. 20089. Okt. 2008Atul TulshibagwaleMethod and System of Ranking Web Content
US20080281808 *10. Mai 200713. Nov. 2008Microsoft CorporationRecommendation of related electronic assets based on user search behavior
US20080281809 *10. Mai 200713. Nov. 2008Microsoft CorporationAutomated analysis of user search behavior
US20080288588 *1. Nov. 200720. Nov. 2008Worldvuer, Inc.Method and system for searching using image based tagging
US20080300958 *29. Mai 20074. Dez. 2008Tasteindex.Com LlcTaste network content targeting
US20080301551 *29. Mai 20074. Dez. 2008Tasteindex.Com LlcTaste network system and method
US20080301582 *29. Mai 20074. Dez. 2008Tasteindex.Com LlcTaste network widget system
US20080306943 *26. Juli 200411. Dez. 2008Anna Lynn PattersonPhrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system
US20080313163 *28. Aug. 200818. Dez. 2008International Business Machiness CorporationService offering for the delivery of information with continuing improvement
US20080315331 *25. Juni 200725. Dez. 2008Robert Gideon WodnickiUltrasound system with through via interconnect structure
US20080319949 *17. Apr. 200825. Dez. 2008Epals, Inc.Method and system for interactive, multi-user electronic data transmission in a multi-level monitored and filtered system
US20080319971 *26. Juli 200425. Dez. 2008Anna Lynn PattersonPhrase-based personalization of searches in an information retrieval system
US20080320300 *4. Dez. 200625. Dez. 2008Microsoft CorporationAuthorisation and Authentication
US20090012949 *29. Nov. 20068. Jan. 2009Thompson Simon GUser Specific Database Querying Method and Apparatus
US20090017798 *13. Juli 200715. Jan. 2009Pop AdrianMethod and system for providing advertisements/messages based on bluetooth® technology
US20090019002 *13. Juli 200715. Jan. 2009Medio Systems, Inc.Personalized query completion suggestion
US20090030923 *17. Juni 200829. Jan. 2009International Business Machines CorporationIdentification of shared resources
US20090063475 *21. Aug. 20085. März 2009Sudhir PendseTool for personalized search
US20090070490 *8. Nov. 200712. März 2009Dozier Linda TDynamic Characterization of Nodes in a Semantic Network for Desired Functions Such As Search, Discovery, Matching, Content Delivery, and synchronization of Activity and Information
US20090094204 *5. Apr. 20079. Apr. 2009Tomihisa ShiraishiReply generation apparatus and method and program for causing computer to function as reply generating apparatus
US20090106221 *18. Okt. 200723. Apr. 2009Microsoft CorporationRanking and Providing Search Results Based In Part On A Number Of Click-Through Features
US20090106223 *18. Okt. 200723. Apr. 2009Microsoft CorporationEnterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
US20090106235 *10. Sept. 200823. Apr. 2009Microsoft CorporationDocument Length as a Static Relevance Feature for Ranking Search Results
US20090132484 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.User interface and method in a local search system having vertical context
US20090132504 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.Categorization in a system and method for conducting a search
US20090132513 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.Correlation of data in a system and method for conducting a search
US20090132514 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.method and system for building text descriptions in a search database
US20090132526 *19. Nov. 200821. Mai 2009Jong-Hun ParkContent recommendation apparatus and method using tag cloud
US20090132573 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.User interface and method in a local search system with search results restricted by drawn figure elements
US20090132643 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.Persistent local search interface and method
US20090132644 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Medie, Inc.User interface and method in a local search system with related search results
US20090132645 *16. Nov. 200721. Mai 2009Iac Search & Media, Inc.User interface and method in a local search system with multiple-field comparison
US20090138329 *26. Nov. 200728. Mai 2009William Paul WankerApplication of query weights input to an electronic commerce information system to target advertising
US20090138442 *27. Dez. 200728. Mai 2009Institute For Information IndustrySystem and method for generating 'snapshot's of learning objects
US20090138486 *8. Febr. 200728. Mai 2009Microsoft CorporationSecure Content Descriptions
US20090144275 *12. Dez. 20084. Juni 2009Aol LlcSystem and method for general search parameters having quantized relevance values that are associated with a user
US20090198488 *5. Febr. 20086. Aug. 2009Eric Arno VigenSystem and method for analyzing communications using multi-placement hierarchical structures
US20090204599 *13. Febr. 200813. Aug. 2009Microsoft CorporationUsing related users data to enhance web search
US20090234834 *12. März 200817. Sept. 2009Yahoo! Inc.System, method, and/or apparatus for reordering search results
US20090234876 *14. März 200817. Sept. 2009Timothy SchigelSystems and methods for content sharing
US20090240677 *18. März 200824. Sept. 2009Rajesh ParekhPersonalizing Sponsored Search Advertising Layout using User Behavior History
US20090248677 *16. März 20091. Okt. 2009Amiram GrynbergMethods for generating a personalized list of documents associated with a search query
US20090259651 *11. Apr. 200815. Okt. 2009Microsoft CorporationSearch results ranking using editing distance and document information
US20090276399 *30. Apr. 20085. Nov. 2009Yahoo! Inc.Ranking documents through contextual shortcuts
US20090292684 *21. Mai 200826. Nov. 2009Microsoft CorporationPromoting websites based on location
US20090292688 *23. Mai 200826. Nov. 2009Yahoo! Inc.Ordering relevant content by time for determining top picks
US20090327228 *27. Juni 200831. Dez. 2009Microsoft CorporationBalancing the costs of sharing private data with the utility of enhanced personalization of online services
US20090327243 *30. Jan. 200931. Dez. 2009Cbs Interactive, Inc.Personalization engine for classifying unstructured documents
US20090327270 *27. Juni 200831. Dez. 2009Microsoft CorporationUsing Variation in User Interest to Enhance the Search Experience
US20100017403 *29. Sept. 200921. Jan. 2010Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for scoping searches using index keys
US20100017414 *18. Juli 200821. Jan. 2010Leeds Douglas DSearch activity eraser
US20100023513 *9. Okt. 200928. Jan. 2010Yahoo! Inc.User-sensitive pagerank
US20100030773 *20. Juli 20094. Febr. 2010Google Inc.Multiple index based information retrieval system
US20100036830 *7. Aug. 200811. Febr. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Context based search arrangement for mobile devices
US20100082684 *1. Okt. 20081. Apr. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Method and system for providing personalized web experience
US20100094859 *17. Juni 200815. Apr. 2010Gupta Puneet KFolksonomy-Enhanced Enterprise-Centric Collaboration and Knowledge Management System
US20100106703 *4. Jan. 201029. Apr. 2010Mark CramerDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
US20100131507 *29. Jan. 201027. Mai 2010Cbs Interactive, Inc.Personalization engine for building a dynamic classification dictionary
US20100138413 *3. Dez. 20083. Juni 2010Xiaoyuan WuSystem and method for personalized search
US20100138425 *23. Nov. 20093. Juni 2010Google Inc.Enhanced search results
US20100169175 *11. März 20101. Juli 2010Koran Joshua MOptimization of Targeted Advertisements Based on User Profile Information
US20100211568 *19. Febr. 200919. Aug. 2010Wei ChuPersonalized recommendations on dynamic content
US20100235231 *26. Mai 201016. Sept. 2010Cbs Interactive, Inc.Lead acquisition, promotion and inventory management system and method
US20100250341 *7. Juni 201030. Sept. 2010Dailyme, Inc.Digital content personalization method and system
US20100287033 *8. Mai 200911. Nov. 2010Comcast Interactive Media, LlcSocial Network Based Recommendation Method and System
US20100287129 *7. Mai 200911. Nov. 2010Yahoo!, Inc., a Delaware corporationSystem, method, or apparatus relating to categorizing or selecting potential search results
US20100299140 *20. Mai 201025. Nov. 2010Cycorp, Inc.Identifying and routing of documents of potential interest to subscribers using interest determination rules
US20100299317 *20. Dez. 200725. Nov. 2010Victor David UyMethod of displaying a subjective score with search engine results
US20100318533 *10. Juni 200916. Dez. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Enriched document representations using aggregated anchor text
US20110035375 *6. Aug. 200910. Febr. 2011Ron BekkermanBuilding user profiles for website personalization
US20110040753 *11. Aug. 200917. Febr. 2011Steve KnightPersonalized search engine
US20110066607 *6. Febr. 200817. März 2011Chin San Sathya WongMethod and system of interacting with a server, and method and system for generating and presenting search results
US20110066615 *28. Okt. 200917. März 2011Cbs Interactive, Inc.Personalization engine for building a user profile
US20110106829 *30. Juni 20105. Mai 2011Cbs Interactive, Inc.Personalization engine for building a user profile
US20110119137 *25. Okt. 201019. Mai 2011Steve MorsaMatch engine marketing
US20110136542 *9. Dez. 20099. Juni 2011Nokia CorporationMethod and apparatus for suggesting information resources based on context and preferences
US20110145234 *24. Febr. 201116. Juni 2011Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Search method and system
US20110179025 *21. Jan. 201021. Juli 2011Kryptonite Systems IncSocial and contextual searching for enterprise business applications
US20110208732 *24. Febr. 201025. Aug. 2011Apple Inc.Systems and methods for organizing data items
US20110295612 *31. Mai 20111. Dez. 2011Thierry Donneau-GolencerMethod and apparatus for user modelization
US20120066587 *3. Juli 200915. März 2012Bao-Yao ZhouApparatus and Method for Text Extraction
US20120072424 *22. Sept. 201022. März 2012George WeisingDeveloping a Knowledge Base Associated with a User That Facilitates Evolution of an Intelligent User Interface
US20120078710 *8. Dez. 201129. März 2012Mark CramerDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
US20120117449 *8. Nov. 201010. Mai 2012Microsoft CorporationCreating and Modifying an Image Wiki Page
US20120185359 *11. Jan. 201219. Juli 2012Alibaba Group Holding LimitedRanking of query results based on individuals' needs
US20120215761 *24. Febr. 201223. Aug. 2012Gist Inc. Fka Minebox Inc.Method and System for Automated Search for, and Retrieval and Distribution of, Information
US20120233161 *28. Juli 201113. Sept. 2012Yahoo! Inc.Search engine with augmented relevance ranking by community participation
US20130191391 *23. Juli 201225. Juli 2013Cbs Interactive, Inc.Personalization engine for building a dynamic classification dictionary
US20130191710 *11. Febr. 201325. Juli 2013Topix LlcUser-interface feature and technique for providing users of a network site links that have been determined to be of interest to the user
US20130226946 *27. Febr. 201229. Aug. 2013Google Inc.Anonymous personalized recommendation method
US20130238601 *6. März 201312. Sept. 2013OK WaveClient system and server
US20130246392 *4. Febr. 201319. Sept. 2013Inago Inc.Conversational System and Method of Searching for Information
US20130297584 *10. Juli 20137. Nov. 2013Microsoft CorporationPromoting websites based on location
US20140032517 *1. Apr. 201330. Jan. 2014Ebay Inc.System and methods to configure a profile to rank search results
US20140075276 *7. Sept. 201213. März 2014Oracle International CorporationDisplaying customized list of links to content using client-side processing
US20140081955 *8. Nov. 201220. März 2014Rakuten,Inc.Information processing apparatus, information processing method, information processing program, and recording medium
US20140114947 *30. Dez. 201324. Apr. 2014Yahoo! Inc.Search Systems and Methods with Integration of User Annotations
US20140164347 *13. Febr. 201412. Juni 2014Google Inc.Method, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search
US20140279505 *14. März 201318. Sept. 2014Bank Of America CorporationRecommending vehicle for payment based on social network data
US20140280083 *14. März 201318. Sept. 2014Vmware,Inc.Event based object ranking in a dynamic system
US20150012515 *26. Aug. 20148. Jan. 2015Doat Media Ltd.System and method for providing suitable web addresses to a user device
US20150012524 *2. Juli 20138. Jan. 2015Google Inc.Using models for triggering personal search
US20150012532 *2. Juli 20138. Jan. 2015Google Inc.User models for implicit intents in search
US20150012558 *2. Juli 20138. Jan. 2015Google Inc.Using models to annotate search queries
US20150032717 *10. Okt. 201429. Jan. 2015Surf Canyon IncorporatedReal time implicit user modeling for personalized search
US20150039606 *13. Juni 20145. Febr. 2015Vamsi Krishna SalakaSearch phrase modification
US20150081691 *24. Nov. 201419. März 2015Surf Canyon IncorporatedAdaptive user interface for real-time search relevance feedback
US20150127637 *1. Nov. 20137. Mai 2015Microsoft CorporationReal-time search tuning
US20150161132 *5. Dez. 201311. Juni 2015Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.Organizing search results using smart tag inferences
US20150161281 *11. Juni 201211. Juni 2015Google Inc.Sitelinks based on visual location
US20150195220 *29. Apr. 20109. Juli 2015Tobias Alexander HawkerParticipant suggestion system
US20150213014 *7. Apr. 201530. Juli 2015Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for characterizing a document
US20150213015 *7. Apr. 201530. Juli 2015Cbs Interactive Inc.Personalization engine for assigning a value index to a user
US20150234882 *1. Apr. 201320. Aug. 2015Hitachi, Ltd.Computer system, data management method, and computer
US20160165395 *5. Dez. 20149. Juni 2016Apple Inc.Dynamic Content Presentation Based on Proximity and User Data
US20160323269 *28. Apr. 20153. Nov. 2016Management Systems Resources Inc.Security token with embedded data
US20160371270 *16. Juni 201522. Dez. 2016Salesforce.Com, Inc.Processing a file to generate a recommendation using a database system
USD75968925. März 201421. Juni 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD75969025. März 201421. Juni 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD76025625. März 201428. Juni 2016Consumerinfo.Com, Inc.Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
CN102253943A *21. Mai 201023. Nov. 2011卓望数码技术(深圳)有限公司Webpage rating method and webpage rating system
CN102622445A *15. März 20121. Aug. 2012华南理工大学User interest perception based webpage push system and webpage push method
CN102937951A *15. Aug. 201120. Febr. 2013北京百度网讯科技有限公司Method for building internet protocol (IP) address classification model, user classifying method and device
CN102937951B *15. Aug. 20112. Nov. 2016北京百度网讯科技有限公司建立ip地址分类模型的方法、对用户分类的方法及装置
CN104217030A *28. Sept. 201417. Dez. 2014北京奇虎科技有限公司Method and device for classifying users according to search log data of server
EP1717720A1 *28. Apr. 20062. Nov. 2006Palo Alto Research Center IncorporatedDiscovery of related documents based on a proximal neighborhood measure
EP1808786A1 *12. Jan. 200618. Juli 2007Yoogli, Inc.User context based search engine
EP1860575A116. Mai 200628. Nov. 2007Hurra Communications GmbHMethod for evaluating information to be represented on a network page
EP1862916A1 *1. Juni 20065. Dez. 2007Microsoft CorporationIndexing Documents for Information Retrieval based on additional feedback fields
EP1974297A2 *20. Dez. 20061. Okt. 2008Microsoft CorporationDynamic search with implicit user intention mining
EP1974297A4 *20. Dez. 200629. Febr. 2012Microsoft CorpDynamic search with implicit user intention mining
EP1987484A2 *16. Febr. 20075. Nov. 2008Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.Systems and methods for placing advertisements
EP1987484A4 *16. Febr. 200725. Mai 2011Hillcrest Lab IncSystems and methods for placing advertisements
EP2105846A1 *28. März 200830. Sept. 2009Sony CorporationMethod of recommending content items
EP2336905A1 *26. Aug. 200922. Juni 2011Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.A searching method and system
EP2336905A4 *26. Aug. 20092. Nov. 2011Huawei Tech Co LtdA searching method and system
EP2663917A1 *12. Jan. 201220. Nov. 2013Alibaba Group Holding LimitedRanking of query results based on individuals' needs
EP2663917A4 *12. Jan. 201216. Juli 2014Alibaba Group Holding LtdRanking of query results based on individuals' needs
EP2704080A1 *24. Apr. 20085. März 2014KIT Digital Inc.Recommendation systems and methods
EP2747442A2 *19. Dez. 201325. Juni 2014Samsung Electronics Co., LtdContent delivery system with profile generation mechanism and method of operation thereof
EP2747442A3 *19. Dez. 201330. Juli 2014Samsung Electronics Co., LtdContent delivery system with profile generation mechanism and method of operation thereof
WO2006026612A2 *30. Aug. 20059. März 2006Chirag ChamanMethod and system for a personalized search engine
WO2006026612A3 *30. Aug. 20058. Febr. 2007Chirag ChamanMethod and system for a personalized search engine
WO2006110480A1 *6. Apr. 200619. Okt. 2006Yahoo! Inc.Customizable filters for personalized search
WO2007080413A1 *12. Jan. 200719. Juli 2007Vodafone Group PlcSearch platform
WO2007106269A1 *8. Febr. 200720. Sept. 2007Microsoft CorporationMining web search user behavior to enhance web search relevance
WO2007130914A2 *30. Apr. 200715. Nov. 2007Surf Canyon IncorporatedDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
WO2007130914A3 *30. Apr. 200728. Aug. 2008Surf Canyon IncDynamic search engine results employing user behavior
WO2008089346A1 *17. Jan. 200824. Juli 2008Google Inc.Providing relevance-ordered categories of information
WO2009030990A1 *6. Febr. 200812. März 2009Chin San Sathya WongMethod and system of interacting with a server, and method and system for generating and presenting search results
WO2009117216A1 *23. Febr. 200924. Sept. 2009Yahoo, Inc.Personalizing sponsored search advertising layout using user behavior history
WO2012097124A1 *12. Jan. 201219. Juli 2012Alibaba Group Holding LimitedRanking of query results based on individuals' needs
WO2013013217A1 *20. Juli 201224. Jan. 2013Microsoft CorporationModeling search in a social graph
WO2013095901A1 *4. Dez. 201227. Juni 2013General Instrument CorporationA hierarchical behavioral profile
WO2014079534A1 *1. Nov. 201330. Mai 2014Alcatel LucentSystem and method for determination of personalization in online service provider responses
WO2014099488A1 *10. Dez. 201326. Juni 2014Stanley MoPersonalized search library based on continual concept correlation
WO2015002762A1 *23. Juni 20148. Jan. 2015Google Inc.Using models for triggering personal search
WO2015066497A1 *31. Okt. 20147. Mai 2015Microsoft CorporationReal-time search tuning
Klassifizierungen
US-Klassifikation1/1, 707/E17.109, 707/999.003
Internationale KlassifikationG06F17/30
UnternehmensklassifikationG06F17/3053, G06F17/30867, G06F17/30554, G06F17/30011
Europäische KlassifikationG06F17/30W1F
Juristische Ereignisse
DatumCodeEreignisBeschreibung
8. Sept. 2004ASAssignment
Owner name: GOOGLE INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LAWRENCE, STEPHEN R.;REEL/FRAME:015094/0672
Effective date: 20030930