US20050130848A1 - Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well - Google Patents

Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050130848A1
US20050130848A1 US11/048,489 US4848905A US2005130848A1 US 20050130848 A1 US20050130848 A1 US 20050130848A1 US 4848905 A US4848905 A US 4848905A US 2005130848 A1 US2005130848 A1 US 2005130848A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
poly
proppant
composition
composite particles
degradable material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/048,489
Inventor
Bradley Todd
Michael Mang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Original Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/608,291 external-priority patent/US7044220B2/en
Application filed by Halliburton Energy Services Inc filed Critical Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority to US11/048,489 priority Critical patent/US20050130848A1/en
Assigned to HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. reassignment HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TODD, BRADLEY L., MANG, MICHAEL N.
Publication of US20050130848A1 publication Critical patent/US20050130848A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/80Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/80Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
    • C09K8/805Coated proppants
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • E21B43/267Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is a technique for stimulating the production of desirable fluids from a subterranean formation.
  • the technique normally involves introducing a viscous liquid through a well bore into a formation at achosen rate and pressure to enhance and/or create a fracture in a portion of the formation, and placing proppant particulates in the resultant fracture to, inter alia, maintain the fracture in a propped condition when the pressure is released.
  • the resultant propped fracture provides a conductive channel in the formation for fluids to flow to the well bore.
  • the degree of stimulation afforded by the hydraulic fracturing treatment is largely dependent on the conductivity and width of the propped fracture.
  • the productivity of the well in effect becomes a function of fracture conductivity, which is commonly defined as proppant permeability times fracture width.
  • proppant permeability times fracture width.
  • the proppant particulates are caused or allowed to consolidate into proppant matrixes within the fractures.
  • One conventional means of doing this is to use resin-coated proppant particulates so that when the resin cures downhole, the proppant particulates can consolidate to form a relatively stable proppant matrix within the fracture.
  • Other methods also have been used to facilitate the consolidation of the proppant particulates within the fractures.
  • consolidating the proppant particulates within a fracture may have some benefits, for example preventing proppant flowback, such methods may adversely affect the conductivity of the fracture. That is, some methods of consolidating proppant particulates themselves may introduce a barrier to the free flow of desirable fluids from the subterranean formation to the well bore for subsequent production. Fracture conductivity may suffer as a result. This is undesirable as this may affect overall well productivity.
  • One technique involves adding calcium carbonate or salt to the proppant matrix composition.
  • the proppant particulates consolidate, after a subsequent fluid is added to the well bore, the calcium carbonate or salt is dissolved out of the matrix.
  • At least one problem associated with this method is the incomplete removal of the calcium carbonate or salt if not adequately contacted with the subsequent fluid.
  • Another method has been to add wax beads to the proppant matrix composition. Once incorporated into the consolidated proppant particulates, the wax beads melt as a result of the temperature of the formation. A problem with this method is that the wax may re-solidify in the well, causing countless problems.
  • Another method that has been used is to add an oil-soluble resin to the proppant matrix composition; however, this method has not been successful because of, inter alia, nonuniform removal of the particles.
  • proppant particulates Another way to address fracture conductivity has been to use bigger proppant particulates.
  • size of the proppant particulates there are practical limits to the size of the proppant particulates that may be used. For instance, if the particles used are too large, premature screenout at the perforations and/or fractures during the proppant stage of fracturing treatment often occurs as a large amount of proppant particulates is being injected into the fractures.
  • proppant particulates that are too large the ability to control formation sand is lost as the formation sand or fines tend to invade or penetrate the large pore space of the proppant matrix during production of hydrocarbons, thus potentially choking the flow paths of the fluids.
  • the present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • the present invention provides a proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
  • the present invention provides a treatment fluid for use in a subterranean application comprising a proppant matrix composition, the proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
  • the present invention provides a proppant matrix having at least one void therein, the void resulting from the degradation of a degradable material in a composite particle.
  • the present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods for enhancing subterranean well productivity by enhancing fracture conductivity.
  • the compositions and methods of the present invention may be used to enhance the conductivity of proppant matrixes within fractures so that fluids from the subterranean formation may flow more freely to the well bore.
  • the compositions and methods may be used without negatively affecting the ability of the proppant matrix to perform other desired functions within the fracture, e.g., propping the fracture open or providing some degree of sand control.
  • the compositions and methods also may be used to avoid the production of undesirable acids within the matrix that may result from the degradation of degradable materials within the matrix.
  • a proppant matrix composition may be made to consolidate within a fracture to form a proppant matrix, e.g., a substantially stable proppant matrix.
  • proppant matrix refers to a consolidation of proppant particulates within a fracture that may be adjacent to a well bore in a subterranean formation.
  • the mechanism by which the proppant matrix consolidates within the fracture is not important and so any suitable method can be used in conjunction with the present invention, e.g., through the use of curable resins, tackifying agents, and/or a mechanical method such as interlocking proppant particulates.
  • curable resins may be preferred.
  • the proppant matrix compositions of the present invention comprise proppant particulates and at least one “composite particle,” at least a portion of which is capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole.
  • the composite particles used in the methods and compositions of this invention comprise, a degradable material and a filler material.
  • the term “particle” or “particles” refers to a particle or particles that may have a physical shape of platelets, shavings, fibers, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other suitable shape.
  • the composite particles generally are more resistant to crushing forces within a fracture (as compared to degradable materials by themselves) and, therefore, may help support the fracture and maintain the integrity of the proppant matrix. Also, when the composite particle degrades from the proppant matrix, voids that have a desirable degree of integrity are formed, at least in part due to the high crush strength of the composite particles and the consolidation of the proppant matrix. Suitable degradable materials and filler materials will be discussed below.
  • the proppant matrix compositions of the present invention also may comprise an acid reactive material. Each element of the proppant matrix compositions of this invention is discussed below.
  • the concentration of composite particles in the proppant matrix compositions of this invention may range from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in a particular composition. A concentration of composite particles between about 1% and about 5% by weight of the proppant particulates is preferred. At higher concentrations, there may be a point of diminishing returns, but this will be dependent on the particular factors, e.g., temperature, stress, how much filler is in the composite particle, etc. Additionally, one should note that the relative amounts of the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, an undesirable percentage of voids result in the proppant matrix that could potentially make the proppant matrix ineffective in maintaining the integrity of the fracture.
  • concentration of composite particles in the proppant matrix compositions of this invention may range from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in a particular composition. A concentration of composite particles between about 1% and about 5% by weight of the proppant particulates is preferred.
  • proppant particulates suitable for use in subterranean applications are suitable for use in the compositions and methods of the present invention.
  • natural sand, ground nut hulls, man-made proppant particulates, bauxite, ceramics, polymeric particulate materials, low-density proppant particulates, or the like are suitable.
  • Ceramic proppant particulates, in certain embodiments, are preferred because of their strength.
  • Natural sand is also a preferred material, especially when cost may be a concern.
  • the term “particulate” implies no particular shape or size of proppant particulates.
  • Preferred particulates should conform generally to API RP-56 and/or RP-60. Suitable sizes for such proppant particulates may range from 4 to 100 U.S. mesh, but are preferably in the range of 10 to 60 U.S. mesh.
  • the proppant particulates may be used in conjunction with a curable resin, e.g., the resin may be coated on the proppant particulates, such that the resin cures when downhole, resulting in a consolidation of the proppant particulates into a proppant matrix.
  • a curable resin e.g., the resin may be coated on the proppant particulates, such that the resin cures when downhole, resulting in a consolidation of the proppant particulates into a proppant matrix.
  • the proppant particulates can either be pre-coated or coated on the fly with a suitable curable resin. Any type of curable resin that will allow the proppant particulates to consolidate to form a proppant matrix is suitable for use in the present invention.
  • Examples include, but are not limited to, epoxies, furans, phenolics, furfuryl aldehyde, furfuryl alcohol, or derivatives thereof, or a mixture thereof. If a curable resin is utilized, a better result may be achieved if the proppant particulates are coated with a suitable curable resin prior to being mixed with the composite particles.
  • suitable tackifying agents may be used as an alternative to or in conjunction with curable resins. If used, the tackifying agent is preferably incorporated with the proppant particulates before it is mixed with the composite particles.
  • a tackifying agent rather than a curable resin.
  • a tackifying agent is preferably incorporated with the proppant particulates before they are mixed with the degradable material.
  • the tackifying agent helps distribute the composite particle within the proppant matrix composition and helps keep it in place within the proppant matrix.
  • Using a tackifying agent as opposed to a curable resin may be particularly useful if the composite particles used have a low density or specific gravity, or have a substantially different particle size than the proppant particulates.
  • a tackifying agent may help to reduce or eliminate the negative effects of segregation between the proppant particulates and the degradable material.
  • the composite particles will exhibit a significantly different density from the proppant particulates.
  • the composite particles may separate from the denser proppant particulates. Since the methods of the present invention preferably create a relatively uniform matrix of proppant particulates mixed with degradable material, that separation may cause the job to be less successful.
  • the tacky nature of a chosen tackifying agent may help the chosen composite particles to at least temporarily attach to the proppant particulates. By becoming so attached, the negative effects of segregation may be reduced or eliminated.
  • the tackifying agent is coated onto the proppant particulates early in the proppant stage of the fracturing treatment. Then, resin-coated proppant particulates are used during the tail-in stage of the fracturing treatment. In another embodiment, the tackifying agent and the curable resin are coated on the proppant particulates intermittently.
  • compositions suitable for use as tackifying agents in the present invention comprise any compound that, when in liquid form or in a solvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate.
  • suitable tackifying agents include non-aqueous tackifying agents, aqueous tackifying agents, and silyl modified polyamides.
  • Suitable non-aqueous tackifying agents generally comprise polyamides that are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterranean formation such that they are, by themselves, non-hardening when introduced into the subterranean formation.
  • One suitable such tackifying agent comprises a condensation reaction product comprised of a polyacid and a polyamine.
  • Such commercial products include compounds such as mixtures of C36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higher oligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids that are reacted with polyamines.
  • Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acids produced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like. Such acid compounds are commercially available from companies such as Witco Corporation, Union Camp, Chemtall, and Emery Industries.
  • reaction products are available from, for example, Champion Technologies, Inc. and Witco Corporation.
  • Additional compounds which may be used as tackifying compounds include liquids and solutions of, for example, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, and natural resins such as shellac and the like.
  • Other suitable tackifying agents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,048, issued to Weaver, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,000, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • non-aqueous tackifying agents may be either used such that they form non-hardening coating or they may be combined with a multifunctional material capable of reacting with the tackifying compound to form a hardened coating.
  • a “hardened coating,” as used herein, means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with the multifunctional material will result in a substantially non-flowable reaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in a consolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with the particulates.
  • the tackifying agent may function similarly to a hardenable resin.
  • Multifunctional materials suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, aldehydes such as formaldehyde, dialdehydes such as glutaraldehyde, hemiacetals or aldehyde, releasing compounds, diacid halides, dihalides such as dichlorides and dibromides, polyacid anhydrides such as citric acid, epoxides, furfuraldehyde, glutaraldehyde or aldehyde condensates and the like, and combinations thereof.
  • the multifunctional material may be admixed with the tackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.01% to about 50% by weight of the tackifying compound to effect formation of the reaction product.
  • the compound is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 1% by weight of the tackifying compound.
  • Suitable multifunctional materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,510, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • aqueous tackifying agents that is, tackifying agents that are soluble in aqueous fluids.
  • Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are capable of forming at least a partial coating upon the surface of a particulate (such as proppant particulates).
  • suitable aqueous tackifying agents are not significantly tacky when placed onto a particulate, but are capable of being “activated” (that is destabilized, coalesced and/or reacted) to transform the compound into a sticky, tackifying compound at a desirable time. Such activation may occur before, during, or after the aqueous tackifying agent is placed in the subterranean formation.
  • a pretreatment may be first contacted with the surface of a particulate to prepare it to be coated with an aqueous tackifying agent.
  • Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are generally charged polymers that comprise compounds that, when in an aqueous solvent or solution, will form a non-hardening coating (by itself or with an activator) and, when placed on a particulate, will increase the continuous critical resuspension velocity of the particulate when contacted by a stream of water.
  • aqueous tackifying agents enhance the grain-to-grain contact between the individual particulates within the formation (be they proppant particulates, formation fines, or other particulates), helping to bring about the consolidation of the particulates into a cohesive, flexible, and permeable mass.
  • aqueous tackifier compounds suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, acrylic acid polymers, acrylic acid ester polymers, acrylic acid derivative polymers, acrylic acid homopolymers, acrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl acrylate), poly (butyl acrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate)), acrylic acid ester co-polymers, methacrylic acid derivative polymers, methacrylic acid homopolymers, methacrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate)), acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate derivative polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and acrylic acid/acrylamido-methyl-propane sulf
  • Silyl-modified polyamide compounds suitable for use as a tackifying agent in the present invention may be described as substantially self-hardening compositions that are capable of at least partially adhering to particulates in the unhardened state, and that are further capable of self-hardening themselves to a substantially non-tacky state to which individual particulates such as formation fines will not adhere to, for example, in formation or proppant matrix pore throats.
  • Such silyl-modified polyamides may be based, for example, on the reaction product of a silating compound with a polyamide or a mixture of polyamides.
  • the polyamide or mixture of polyamides may be one or more polyamide intermediate compounds obtained, for example, from the reaction of a polyacid (e.g., diacid or higher) with a polyamine (e.g., diamine or higher) to form a polyamide polymer with the elimination of water.
  • a polyacid e.g., diacid or higher
  • a polyamine e.g., diamine or higher
  • suitable silyl-modified polyamides and methods of making such compounds are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,309, issued to Matherly, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • the matrix may consolidate and avoid migration of the proppant particulates.
  • the composite particles should be distributed within the proppant matrix.
  • the distribution of the composite particles in the proppant matrix should be relatively uniform.
  • the removal of the degradable material in the composite particles occurs after the proppant matrix has significantly developed and become relatively stable to minimize shifting or rearrangement of proppant particulates within the matrix.
  • Suitable degradable materials in the composite particles used in the proppant matrix compositions of this invention should be capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole.
  • irreversible means that the degradable material should not reform a solid or reconsolidate while downhole, e.g., the degradable material should degrade in situ but should not recrystallize or reconsolidate in situ after degradation.
  • degradation or “degradable” refers to at least the partial decomposition of the degradable material, and includes both homogeneous and heterogeneous forms of degradation. This degradation can be a result of, for example, a chemical or thermal reaction, or a reaction induced by radiation.
  • voids are created in the proppant matrix. Additionally, this degradation may result in the production of an acid, e.g., to perform a desired function like breaking a filter cake (for example, a filter cake in or near the fracture), breaking a viscosified fluid, and curing a resin in a fracture (for instance, resin coated on proppant particulates or on the faces of a fracture).
  • the filler used in the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition can enhance either effect, i.e., the creation of voids or the production of an acid.
  • the filler also may enhance the mechanical properties of the composite particles, and may be selected so as to not impair the mechanical properties of the proppant matrix.
  • the resultant voids enhance the permeability of the matrix, which may result in, inter alia, enhanced fracture conductivity, which should lead to an enhancement in the productivity of the well.
  • Enhanced fracture conductivity generally enhances well productivity as well productivity is a function of, inter alia, fracture conductivity.
  • the degradation of the degradable material takes place after the proppant particulates consolidate to form a matrix inside a fracture or in place to minimize shifting or rearrangement of proppant particulates within the proppant matrix.
  • Nonlimiting examples of degradable materials that may be used in conjunction with the composite particles and the proppant matrix compositions and methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, degradable polymers.
  • the differing molecular structures of the degradable materials that are suitable for the present invention give a wide range of possibilities regarding regulating the degradation rate of the degradable material.
  • choosing the appropriate degradable material one should consider the degradation products that will result. For instance, some may form an acid upon degradation, and the presence of the acid may be undesirable; others may form degradation products that would be insoluble, and these may be undesirable. Moreover, these degradation products should not adversely affect other operations or components.
  • the degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbone structure.
  • One of the more common structural characteristics is the presence of hydrolyzable and/or oxidizable linkages in the backbone.
  • the rates of degradation of, for example, polyesters are dependent on the type of repeat unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity, surface area, and additives.
  • the environment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how the polymer degrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like.
  • Suitable examples of polymers that may be used in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, homopolymers, random aliphatic polyester copolymers, block aliphatic polyester copolymers, star aliphatic polyester copolymers, or hyperbranched aliphatic polyester copolymers.
  • Such suitable polymers may be prepared by polycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radical polymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations, coordinative ring-opening polymerization for, such as, lactones, and any other suitable process.
  • suitable polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran or cellulose; chitins; chitosans; proteins; aliphatic polyesters; poly(lactides); poly(glycolides); poly( ⁇ -caprolactones); poly(hydroxy ester ethers); poly(hydroxybutyrates); polyanhydrides; polycarbonates; poly(orthoesters); poly(acetals); poly(acrylates); poly(alkylacrylates); poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxide); poly ether esters; polyester amides; polyamides; polyphosphazenes; and copolymers or blends thereof.
  • Other degradable polymers that are subject to hydrolytic degradation also may be suitable.
  • One guideline for choosing which composite particles to use in a particular application is what degradation products will result. Another guideline is the conditions surrounding a particular application.
  • aliphatic polyesters are preferred. Of the suitable aliphatic polyesters, polyesters of ⁇ or ⁇ hydroxy acids are preferred.
  • Poly(lactide) is most preferred. Poly(lactide) is synthesized either from lactic acid by a condensation reaction or more commonly by ring-opening polymerization of cyclic lactide monomer. The lactide monomer exists generally in three different forms: two stereoisomers L- and D-lactide; and D,L-lactide (meso-lactide). The chirality of the lactide units provides a means to adjust, inter alia, degradation rates, as well as the physical and mechanical properties after the lactide is polymerized.
  • Poly(L-lactide), for instance, is a semicrystalline polymer with a relatively slow hydrolysis rate. This could be desirable in applications of the present invention where slow degradation of the degradable material is desired.
  • Poly(D,L-lactide) is an amorphous polymer with a much faster hydrolysis rate. This may be suitable for other applications of the methods and compositions of the present invention.
  • the stereoisomers of lactic acid may be used individually or combined for use in the compositions and methods of the present invention. Additionally, they may be copolymerized with, for example, glycolide or other monomers like ⁇ -caprolactone, 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, trimethylene carbonate, or other suitable monomers to obtain polymers with different properties or degradation times.
  • the lactic acid stereoisomers can be modified by blending high and low molecular weight polylactide or by blending polylactide with other aliphatic polyesters.
  • the degradation rate of polylactic acid may be affected by blending, for example, high and low molecular weight polylactides; mixtures of polylactide and lactide monomer; or by blending polylactide with other aliphatic polyesters.
  • degradable polymers may depend on several factors such as the composition of the repeat units, flexibility of the chain, presence of polar groups, molecular mass, degree of branching, crystallinity, orientation, etc.
  • short chain branches reduce the degree of crystallinity of polymers while long chain branches lower the melt viscosity and impart, inter alia, extensional viscosity with tension-stiffening behavior.
  • the properties of the material utilized can be further tailored by blending, and copolymerizing it with another polymer, or by a change in the macromolecular architecture (e.g., hyper-branched polymers, star-shaped, or dendrimers, etc.).
  • any such suitable degradable polymers can be tailored by introducing functional groups along the polymer chains.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine the appropriate functional groups to introduce to the polymer chains to achieve the desired effect.
  • the filler material chosen for the composite particles of this invention may enhance the mechanical properties of the composite particles (e.g., to enhance the crush strength of the composite particles), or may react with any degradation products that result from the degradation of the degradable material.
  • the filler material may comprise from about 0.5% to about 60% of the composition of a composite particle.
  • the filler will comprise about 10% to about 40% of the composition of a composite particle.
  • the filler material may improve the modulus between the T g (the glass transition temperature) and the melting point of the degradable material.
  • the filler material chosen can interact with the degradation products produced when the degradable material degrades.
  • filler materials include anhydrous salts (see below), glass, talc, calcium carbonate, mica, magnesium oxide, mineral filler, barite, silica, materials that may be used as conventional bridging agents, derivatives thereof, and combinations thereof.
  • the filler may neutralize or enhance that acid.
  • An example of a filler material that could neutralize the acid includes a base; an example of a filler material that could enhance the acid includes another complimentary acid.
  • the filler material may release a second chemical.
  • the filler material may comprise ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (“EDTA”), an oxidizer, a breaker, sodium persulfate, or magnesium peroxide.
  • EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
  • the filler material should not negatively impact the degradable material; preferably, the filler material and the degradable material should compliment one another.
  • Examples of preferred nonreactive filler materials include anhydrous salts.
  • An anhydrous salt is suitable for use in the present invention if it will degrade over time as it hydrates.
  • a particulate solid anhydrous borate material that degrades over time may be suitable.
  • Specific examples of particulate solid anhydrous borate materials that may be used include, but are not limited to, anhydrous sodium tetraborate (also known as anhydrous borax), and anhydrous boric acid. These anhydrous borate materials are only slightly soluble in water. However, with time and heat in a subterranean environment, the anhydrous borate materials react with the surrounding aqueous fluid and may become hydrated.
  • the resulting hydrated borate materials are highly soluble in water as compared to anhydrous borate materials and as a result degrade in the aqueous fluid.
  • the total time required for the anhydrous borate materials to degrade in an aqueous fluid is in the range of from about 8 hours to about 72 hours depending upon the temperature of the subterranean zone in which they are placed.
  • Other examples include organic or inorganic salts like sodium acetate trihydrate.
  • the composite particles of the present invention may comprise additional additives such as processing aids, lubricants, antistats, antiblock agents, pigments, derivatives thereof, or combinations thereof.
  • the composite particles used in conjunction with the present invention can be prepared by any suitable process for example, by bringing the components in solid form and dry-blending using conventional means such as a barrel mixer, a tumble mixer, and the like, followed by fluxing or melting in an appropriate apparatus, such as a Banbury type internal mixer, rubber mill, single or twin screw extruder or compounder, or the like.
  • an appropriate apparatus such as a Banbury type internal mixer, rubber mill, single or twin screw extruder or compounder, or the like.
  • the two components are brought together and processed in an appropriate melt extruder, from which the blend is extruded in the form of strands, which are pelletized for fabrication purposes.
  • Other suitable techniques well known to those skilled in the art can be used as well.
  • the degradable material can be mixed with an inorganic or organic compound in addition to or as a filler material.
  • the inorganic or organic compound in the composite is hydrated.
  • Examples of the hydrated organic or inorganic solid compounds that can be utilized include, but are not limited to, hydrates of organic acids or their salts such as sodium acetate trihydrate, L-tartaric acid disodium salt dihydrate, sodium citrate dihydrate, hydrates of inorganic acids or their salts such as sodium tetraborate decahydrate, sodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, sodium phosphate dodecahydrate, amylose, starch-based hydrophilic polymers, and cellulose-based hydrophilic polymers. Of these, sodium acetate trihydrate is preferred. Additionally, if the degradable material is susceptible to hydrolysis, it is preferred that a sufficient amount of water is produced to effect hydrolytic degradation of the degradable material.
  • the degradable material is then in a sense self-degradable, in that the degradable material should at least partially degrade in the releasable water provided by the hydrated organic or inorganic compound which dehydrates over time when heated in the subterranean zone.
  • the specific features of the composite particles may be chosen or modified to provide the proppant matrix with optimum conductivity while maintaining its desirable filtering capability.
  • the composite particles are selected to have a size and shape similar to the size and shape of the proppant particulates to help maintain substantial uniformity within the mixture. It is preferable if the proppant particulates and the composite particles do not segregate within the proppant matrix composition.
  • the composite particles may have any shape, depending on the desired characteristics of the resultant voids in the proppant matrix including, but not limited to, particles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other physical shape.
  • the physical shape of the composite particles should be chosen so as to enhance the desired shape and relative composition of the resultant voids within the proppant matrix.
  • a rod-like particle shape may be suitable in applications wherein channel-like voids in the proppant matrix are desired.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize the specific degradable material and the preferred size and shape for a given application.
  • Additional materials may be incorporated in the proppant matrix, if desired, including, but not limited to, acid-reactive materials.
  • acid-reactive materials in the proppant matrix compositions may comprise any material that reacts with an acid so that the acid is at least partially neutralized. Suitable examples include, but are not limited to, materials such as calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide, and calcium hydroxide.
  • the acid-reactive material may react with the degradation products of the degradable material. This may be beneficial when the degradation products comprise an undesirable acid.
  • the acid-reactive material should be included in an amount sufficient to control the pH of any fluid in the proppant matrix and/or neutralize any acid present. Considerations that may be taken into account when considering the type and amount of acid-soluble component to include are, among others, the solubility of the reaction products, corrosion of any metals, and the control of scale formation.
  • An inert filler may be included in the proppant matrix compositions.
  • Suitable inert fillers are materials that, inter alia, enhance the compressive strength of a proppant matrix.
  • Suitable fillers include, but are not limited to, calcium carbonate, talc, mica, glass, silica, silica flour, or other similar mineral fillers.
  • the proppant matrix composition can either be pre-blended and then transported to the drill site, or it can be prepared on the fly at the drill site and then introduced downhole within a relatively short period of time.
  • drill site refers to the workplace at the site of a drill hole.
  • the proppant particulates and the composite particles should be mixed so as to form a mixture in a fracturing treatment fluid. Any conventional fracturing treatment fluid may be used in accordance with the present invention.
  • the concentration of the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in the mixture. In certain preferred embodiments of the proppant matrix compositions of the present invention, the composite particles make up about 1% to about 5% of the proppant matrix composition. Additionally, the relative amounts in the proppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, an undesirable percentage of voids results in the proppant matrix making the proppant matrix potentially ineffective in maintaining the integrity of the fracture.
  • concentration of composite particles in the proppant matrix composition ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in the mixture. In certain preferred embodiments of the proppant matrix compositions of the present invention, the composite particles make up about 1% to about 5% of the proppant matrix composition. Additionally, the relative amounts in the proppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, an undesirable percentage of voids results in the proppant matrix making the proppant matrix potentially ineffective

Abstract

The invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This Application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/608,291, entitled “Compositions and Methods for Improving Proppant Pack Permeability in a Subterranean Well,” filed on Jun. 27, 2003.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is a technique for stimulating the production of desirable fluids from a subterranean formation. The technique normally involves introducing a viscous liquid through a well bore into a formation at achosen rate and pressure to enhance and/or create a fracture in a portion of the formation, and placing proppant particulates in the resultant fracture to, inter alia, maintain the fracture in a propped condition when the pressure is released. The resultant propped fracture provides a conductive channel in the formation for fluids to flow to the well bore.
  • The degree of stimulation afforded by the hydraulic fracturing treatment is largely dependent on the conductivity and width of the propped fracture. Thus, the productivity of the well in effect becomes a function of fracture conductivity, which is commonly defined as proppant permeability times fracture width. To enhance well productivity, it may be beneficial to enhance fracture conductivity.
  • Oftentimes, to effectively prop open the fractures as well as prevent proppant particulate flowback, the proppant particulates are caused or allowed to consolidate into proppant matrixes within the fractures. One conventional means of doing this is to use resin-coated proppant particulates so that when the resin cures downhole, the proppant particulates can consolidate to form a relatively stable proppant matrix within the fracture. Other methods also have been used to facilitate the consolidation of the proppant particulates within the fractures.
  • Although consolidating the proppant particulates within a fracture may have some benefits, for example preventing proppant flowback, such methods may adversely affect the conductivity of the fracture. That is, some methods of consolidating proppant particulates themselves may introduce a barrier to the free flow of desirable fluids from the subterranean formation to the well bore for subsequent production. Fracture conductivity may suffer as a result. This is undesirable as this may affect overall well productivity.
  • To counteract this potential problem, many different techniques have been developed. One technique involves adding calcium carbonate or salt to the proppant matrix composition. When the proppant particulates consolidate, after a subsequent fluid is added to the well bore, the calcium carbonate or salt is dissolved out of the matrix. At least one problem associated with this method is the incomplete removal of the calcium carbonate or salt if not adequately contacted with the subsequent fluid. Another method has been to add wax beads to the proppant matrix composition. Once incorporated into the consolidated proppant particulates, the wax beads melt as a result of the temperature of the formation. A problem with this method is that the wax may re-solidify in the well, causing countless problems. Another method that has been used is to add an oil-soluble resin to the proppant matrix composition; however, this method has not been successful because of, inter alia, nonuniform removal of the particles.
  • Another way to address fracture conductivity has been to use bigger proppant particulates. However, there are practical limits to the size of the proppant particulates that may be used. For instance, if the particles used are too large, premature screenout at the perforations and/or fractures during the proppant stage of fracturing treatment often occurs as a large amount of proppant particulates is being injected into the fractures. In addition, by using proppant particulates that are too large, the ability to control formation sand is lost as the formation sand or fines tend to invade or penetrate the large pore space of the proppant matrix during production of hydrocarbons, thus potentially choking the flow paths of the fluids.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • In one embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
  • In another embodiment, the present invention provides a treatment fluid for use in a subterranean application comprising a proppant matrix composition, the proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
  • In another embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrix having at least one void therein, the void resulting from the degradation of a degradable material in a composite particle.
  • The objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the preferred embodiments that follows.
  • DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough.
  • In preferred embodiments, the present invention provides compositions and methods for enhancing subterranean well productivity by enhancing fracture conductivity. The compositions and methods of the present invention may be used to enhance the conductivity of proppant matrixes within fractures so that fluids from the subterranean formation may flow more freely to the well bore. The compositions and methods may be used without negatively affecting the ability of the proppant matrix to perform other desired functions within the fracture, e.g., propping the fracture open or providing some degree of sand control. The compositions and methods also may be used to avoid the production of undesirable acids within the matrix that may result from the degradation of degradable materials within the matrix.
  • In the compositions and methods of this invention, a proppant matrix composition may be made to consolidate within a fracture to form a proppant matrix, e.g., a substantially stable proppant matrix. The term “proppant matrix,” as used herein, refers to a consolidation of proppant particulates within a fracture that may be adjacent to a well bore in a subterranean formation. The mechanism by which the proppant matrix consolidates within the fracture is not important and so any suitable method can be used in conjunction with the present invention, e.g., through the use of curable resins, tackifying agents, and/or a mechanical method such as interlocking proppant particulates. The use of curable resins may be preferred.
  • The proppant matrix compositions of the present invention comprise proppant particulates and at least one “composite particle,” at least a portion of which is capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole. The composite particles used in the methods and compositions of this invention comprise, a degradable material and a filler material. As used herein, the term “particle” or “particles” refers to a particle or particles that may have a physical shape of platelets, shavings, fibers, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other suitable shape. The composite particles generally are more resistant to crushing forces within a fracture (as compared to degradable materials by themselves) and, therefore, may help support the fracture and maintain the integrity of the proppant matrix. Also, when the composite particle degrades from the proppant matrix, voids that have a desirable degree of integrity are formed, at least in part due to the high crush strength of the composite particles and the consolidation of the proppant matrix. Suitable degradable materials and filler materials will be discussed below. The proppant matrix compositions of the present invention also may comprise an acid reactive material. Each element of the proppant matrix compositions of this invention is discussed below.
  • The concentration of composite particles in the proppant matrix compositions of this invention may range from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in a particular composition. A concentration of composite particles between about 1% and about 5% by weight of the proppant particulates is preferred. At higher concentrations, there may be a point of diminishing returns, but this will be dependent on the particular factors, e.g., temperature, stress, how much filler is in the composite particle, etc. Additionally, one should note that the relative amounts of the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, an undesirable percentage of voids result in the proppant matrix that could potentially make the proppant matrix ineffective in maintaining the integrity of the fracture. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize an optimum concentration of composite particles that provides desirable values in terms of enhanced conductivity or permeability without undermining the stability of the proppant matrix itself.
  • Any proppant particulates suitable for use in subterranean applications are suitable for use in the compositions and methods of the present invention. For instance, natural sand, ground nut hulls, man-made proppant particulates, bauxite, ceramics, polymeric particulate materials, low-density proppant particulates, or the like are suitable. Ceramic proppant particulates, in certain embodiments, are preferred because of their strength. Natural sand is also a preferred material, especially when cost may be a concern. Note that the term “particulate” implies no particular shape or size of proppant particulates. Preferred particulates should conform generally to API RP-56 and/or RP-60. Suitable sizes for such proppant particulates may range from 4 to 100 U.S. mesh, but are preferably in the range of 10 to 60 U.S. mesh.
  • In some embodiments, the proppant particulates may be used in conjunction with a curable resin, e.g., the resin may be coated on the proppant particulates, such that the resin cures when downhole, resulting in a consolidation of the proppant particulates into a proppant matrix. If a resin is used, the proppant particulates can either be pre-coated or coated on the fly with a suitable curable resin. Any type of curable resin that will allow the proppant particulates to consolidate to form a proppant matrix is suitable for use in the present invention. Examples include, but are not limited to, epoxies, furans, phenolics, furfuryl aldehyde, furfuryl alcohol, or derivatives thereof, or a mixture thereof. If a curable resin is utilized, a better result may be achieved if the proppant particulates are coated with a suitable curable resin prior to being mixed with the composite particles.
  • Additionally, suitable tackifying agents may be used as an alternative to or in conjunction with curable resins. If used, the tackifying agent is preferably incorporated with the proppant particulates before it is mixed with the composite particles.
  • In some embodiments, it may be desirable to coat the proppant particulates with a tackifying agent rather than a curable resin. Such a tackifying agent is preferably incorporated with the proppant particulates before they are mixed with the degradable material. The tackifying agent, among other things, helps distribute the composite particle within the proppant matrix composition and helps keep it in place within the proppant matrix. Using a tackifying agent as opposed to a curable resin may be particularly useful if the composite particles used have a low density or specific gravity, or have a substantially different particle size than the proppant particulates. The use of a tackifying agent may help to reduce or eliminate the negative effects of segregation between the proppant particulates and the degradable material. Often, the composite particles will exhibit a significantly different density from the proppant particulates. In such cases, when the particulates are slurried into a carrier fluid to be sent to a portion of a subterranean formation, the composite particles may separate from the denser proppant particulates. Since the methods of the present invention preferably create a relatively uniform matrix of proppant particulates mixed with degradable material, that separation may cause the job to be less successful. The tacky nature of a chosen tackifying agent may help the chosen composite particles to at least temporarily attach to the proppant particulates. By becoming so attached, the negative effects of segregation may be reduced or eliminated.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the tackifying agent is coated onto the proppant particulates early in the proppant stage of the fracturing treatment. Then, resin-coated proppant particulates are used during the tail-in stage of the fracturing treatment. In another embodiment, the tackifying agent and the curable resin are coated on the proppant particulates intermittently.
  • Compositions suitable for use as tackifying agents in the present invention comprise any compound that, when in liquid form or in a solvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate. Some examples of suitable tackifying agents include non-aqueous tackifying agents, aqueous tackifying agents, and silyl modified polyamides.
  • Suitable non-aqueous tackifying agents generally comprise polyamides that are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterranean formation such that they are, by themselves, non-hardening when introduced into the subterranean formation. One suitable such tackifying agent comprises a condensation reaction product comprised of a polyacid and a polyamine. Such commercial products include compounds such as mixtures of C36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higher oligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids that are reacted with polyamines. Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acids produced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like. Such acid compounds are commercially available from companies such as Witco Corporation, Union Camp, Chemtall, and Emery Industries. The reaction products are available from, for example, Champion Technologies, Inc. and Witco Corporation. Additional compounds which may be used as tackifying compounds include liquids and solutions of, for example, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, and natural resins such as shellac and the like. Other suitable tackifying agents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,048, issued to Weaver, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,000, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • Such non-aqueous tackifying agents may be either used such that they form non-hardening coating or they may be combined with a multifunctional material capable of reacting with the tackifying compound to form a hardened coating. A “hardened coating,” as used herein, means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with the multifunctional material will result in a substantially non-flowable reaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in a consolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with the particulates. In this instance, the tackifying agent may function similarly to a hardenable resin. Multifunctional materials suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, aldehydes such as formaldehyde, dialdehydes such as glutaraldehyde, hemiacetals or aldehyde, releasing compounds, diacid halides, dihalides such as dichlorides and dibromides, polyacid anhydrides such as citric acid, epoxides, furfuraldehyde, glutaraldehyde or aldehyde condensates and the like, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments of the present invention, the multifunctional material may be admixed with the tackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.01% to about 50% by weight of the tackifying compound to effect formation of the reaction product. In some preferred embodiments, the compound is present in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 1% by weight of the tackifying compound. Suitable multifunctional materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,510, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • Another suitable group of tackifying agents is aqueous tackifying agents; that is, tackifying agents that are soluble in aqueous fluids. Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are capable of forming at least a partial coating upon the surface of a particulate (such as proppant particulates). Generally, suitable aqueous tackifying agents are not significantly tacky when placed onto a particulate, but are capable of being “activated” (that is destabilized, coalesced and/or reacted) to transform the compound into a sticky, tackifying compound at a desirable time. Such activation may occur before, during, or after the aqueous tackifying agent is placed in the subterranean formation. In some embodiments, a pretreatment may be first contacted with the surface of a particulate to prepare it to be coated with an aqueous tackifying agent. Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are generally charged polymers that comprise compounds that, when in an aqueous solvent or solution, will form a non-hardening coating (by itself or with an activator) and, when placed on a particulate, will increase the continuous critical resuspension velocity of the particulate when contacted by a stream of water. The aqueous tackifying agents enhance the grain-to-grain contact between the individual particulates within the formation (be they proppant particulates, formation fines, or other particulates), helping to bring about the consolidation of the particulates into a cohesive, flexible, and permeable mass.
  • Examples of aqueous tackifier compounds suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, acrylic acid polymers, acrylic acid ester polymers, acrylic acid derivative polymers, acrylic acid homopolymers, acrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl acrylate), poly (butyl acrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate)), acrylic acid ester co-polymers, methacrylic acid derivative polymers, methacrylic acid homopolymers, methacrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate)), acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate derivative polymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and acrylic acid/acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers and combinations thereof. These and other suitable aqueous tackifying agents are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/864,061, filed on Jun. 9, 2004, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/864,618, filed on Jun. 9, 2004, the relevant disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • Silyl-modified polyamide compounds suitable for use as a tackifying agent in the present invention may be described as substantially self-hardening compositions that are capable of at least partially adhering to particulates in the unhardened state, and that are further capable of self-hardening themselves to a substantially non-tacky state to which individual particulates such as formation fines will not adhere to, for example, in formation or proppant matrix pore throats. Such silyl-modified polyamides may be based, for example, on the reaction product of a silating compound with a polyamide or a mixture of polyamides. The polyamide or mixture of polyamides may be one or more polyamide intermediate compounds obtained, for example, from the reaction of a polyacid (e.g., diacid or higher) with a polyamine (e.g., diamine or higher) to form a polyamide polymer with the elimination of water. Other suitable silyl-modified polyamides and methods of making such compounds are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,309, issued to Matherly, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • Where the proppant particulates are coated with a resin and/or a tackifying agent, the matrix may consolidate and avoid migration of the proppant particulates. As a proppant matrix is formed within a fracture, the composite particles should be distributed within the proppant matrix. In certain preferred embodiments, the distribution of the composite particles in the proppant matrix should be relatively uniform. In a preferred embodiment, the removal of the degradable material in the composite particles occurs after the proppant matrix has significantly developed and become relatively stable to minimize shifting or rearrangement of proppant particulates within the matrix.
  • Suitable degradable materials in the composite particles used in the proppant matrix compositions of this invention should be capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole. The term “irreversible,” as used herein, means that the degradable material should not reform a solid or reconsolidate while downhole, e.g., the degradable material should degrade in situ but should not recrystallize or reconsolidate in situ after degradation. The term “degradation” or “degradable” refers to at least the partial decomposition of the degradable material, and includes both homogeneous and heterogeneous forms of degradation. This degradation can be a result of, for example, a chemical or thermal reaction, or a reaction induced by radiation.
  • After the requisite time period dictated by the characteristics of the particular degradable material utilized in the composite particles of this invention, voids are created in the proppant matrix. Additionally, this degradation may result in the production of an acid, e.g., to perform a desired function like breaking a filter cake (for example, a filter cake in or near the fracture), breaking a viscosified fluid, and curing a resin in a fracture (for instance, resin coated on proppant particulates or on the faces of a fracture). The filler used in the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition can enhance either effect, i.e., the creation of voids or the production of an acid. The filler also may enhance the mechanical properties of the composite particles, and may be selected so as to not impair the mechanical properties of the proppant matrix. The resultant voids enhance the permeability of the matrix, which may result in, inter alia, enhanced fracture conductivity, which should lead to an enhancement in the productivity of the well. Enhanced fracture conductivity generally enhances well productivity as well productivity is a function of, inter alia, fracture conductivity. In a preferred embodiment, the degradation of the degradable material takes place after the proppant particulates consolidate to form a matrix inside a fracture or in place to minimize shifting or rearrangement of proppant particulates within the proppant matrix.
  • Nonlimiting examples of degradable materials that may be used in conjunction with the composite particles and the proppant matrix compositions and methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, degradable polymers. The differing molecular structures of the degradable materials that are suitable for the present invention give a wide range of possibilities regarding regulating the degradation rate of the degradable material. In choosing the appropriate degradable material, one should consider the degradation products that will result. For instance, some may form an acid upon degradation, and the presence of the acid may be undesirable; others may form degradation products that would be insoluble, and these may be undesirable. Moreover, these degradation products should not adversely affect other operations or components.
  • The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbone structure. One of the more common structural characteristics is the presence of hydrolyzable and/or oxidizable linkages in the backbone. The rates of degradation of, for example, polyesters, are dependent on the type of repeat unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity, surface area, and additives. Also, the environment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how the polymer degrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine what the optimum polymer would be for a given application considering the characteristics of the polymer utilized and the environment to which it will be subjected.
  • Suitable examples of polymers that may be used in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, homopolymers, random aliphatic polyester copolymers, block aliphatic polyester copolymers, star aliphatic polyester copolymers, or hyperbranched aliphatic polyester copolymers. Such suitable polymers may be prepared by polycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radical polymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations, coordinative ring-opening polymerization for, such as, lactones, and any other suitable process. Specific examples of suitable polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran or cellulose; chitins; chitosans; proteins; aliphatic polyesters; poly(lactides); poly(glycolides); poly(ε-caprolactones); poly(hydroxy ester ethers); poly(hydroxybutyrates); polyanhydrides; polycarbonates; poly(orthoesters); poly(acetals); poly(acrylates); poly(alkylacrylates); poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxide); poly ether esters; polyester amides; polyamides; polyphosphazenes; and copolymers or blends thereof. Other degradable polymers that are subject to hydrolytic degradation also may be suitable. One guideline for choosing which composite particles to use in a particular application is what degradation products will result. Another guideline is the conditions surrounding a particular application.
  • Of these suitable polymers, aliphatic polyesters are preferred. Of the suitable aliphatic polyesters, polyesters of α or β hydroxy acids are preferred. Poly(lactide) is most preferred. Poly(lactide) is synthesized either from lactic acid by a condensation reaction or more commonly by ring-opening polymerization of cyclic lactide monomer. The lactide monomer exists generally in three different forms: two stereoisomers L- and D-lactide; and D,L-lactide (meso-lactide). The chirality of the lactide units provides a means to adjust, inter alia, degradation rates, as well as the physical and mechanical properties after the lactide is polymerized. Poly(L-lactide), for instance, is a semicrystalline polymer with a relatively slow hydrolysis rate. This could be desirable in applications of the present invention where slow degradation of the degradable material is desired. Poly(D,L-lactide) is an amorphous polymer with a much faster hydrolysis rate. This may be suitable for other applications of the methods and compositions of the present invention. The stereoisomers of lactic acid may be used individually or combined for use in the compositions and methods of the present invention. Additionally, they may be copolymerized with, for example, glycolide or other monomers like ε-caprolactone, 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, trimethylene carbonate, or other suitable monomers to obtain polymers with different properties or degradation times. Additionally, the lactic acid stereoisomers can be modified by blending high and low molecular weight polylactide or by blending polylactide with other aliphatic polyesters. For example, the degradation rate of polylactic acid may be affected by blending, for example, high and low molecular weight polylactides; mixtures of polylactide and lactide monomer; or by blending polylactide with other aliphatic polyesters.
  • The physical properties of degradable polymers may depend on several factors such as the composition of the repeat units, flexibility of the chain, presence of polar groups, molecular mass, degree of branching, crystallinity, orientation, etc. For example, short chain branches reduce the degree of crystallinity of polymers while long chain branches lower the melt viscosity and impart, inter alia, extensional viscosity with tension-stiffening behavior. The properties of the material utilized can be further tailored by blending, and copolymerizing it with another polymer, or by a change in the macromolecular architecture (e.g., hyper-branched polymers, star-shaped, or dendrimers, etc.). The properties of any such suitable degradable polymers (such as hydrophilicity, rate of biodegration, etc.) can be tailored by introducing functional groups along the polymer chains. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine the appropriate functional groups to introduce to the polymer chains to achieve the desired effect.
  • Also, we have found that a preferable result is achieved if the degradable material degrades slowly over time as opposed to instantaneously. Even more preferable results have been obtained when the degradable material does not begin to degrade until after the proppant matrix has developed some compressive strength. The slow degradation of the degradable material, inter alia, helps to maintain the stability of the proppant matrix.
  • The filler material chosen for the composite particles of this invention, inter alia, may enhance the mechanical properties of the composite particles (e.g., to enhance the crush strength of the composite particles), or may react with any degradation products that result from the degradation of the degradable material. In certain embodiments, the filler material may comprise from about 0.5% to about 60% of the composition of a composite particle. In preferred embodiments, the filler will comprise about 10% to about 40% of the composition of a composite particle. Also, the filler material may improve the modulus between the Tg (the glass transition temperature) and the melting point of the degradable material. In other embodiments, the filler material chosen can interact with the degradation products produced when the degradable material degrades. Examples of such filler materials include anhydrous salts (see below), glass, talc, calcium carbonate, mica, magnesium oxide, mineral filler, barite, silica, materials that may be used as conventional bridging agents, derivatives thereof, and combinations thereof. For instance, if the degradation products include an acid, the filler may neutralize or enhance that acid. An example of a filler material that could neutralize the acid includes a base; an example of a filler material that could enhance the acid includes another complimentary acid. In still other embodiments, the filler material may release a second chemical. For instance, the filler material may comprise ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (“EDTA”), an oxidizer, a breaker, sodium persulfate, or magnesium peroxide. In such embodiments the filler material should not negatively impact the degradable material; preferably, the filler material and the degradable material should compliment one another.
  • Examples of preferred nonreactive filler materials include anhydrous salts. An anhydrous salt is suitable for use in the present invention if it will degrade over time as it hydrates. For example, a particulate solid anhydrous borate material that degrades over time may be suitable. Specific examples of particulate solid anhydrous borate materials that may be used include, but are not limited to, anhydrous sodium tetraborate (also known as anhydrous borax), and anhydrous boric acid. These anhydrous borate materials are only slightly soluble in water. However, with time and heat in a subterranean environment, the anhydrous borate materials react with the surrounding aqueous fluid and may become hydrated. The resulting hydrated borate materials are highly soluble in water as compared to anhydrous borate materials and as a result degrade in the aqueous fluid. In some instances, the total time required for the anhydrous borate materials to degrade in an aqueous fluid is in the range of from about 8 hours to about 72 hours depending upon the temperature of the subterranean zone in which they are placed. Other examples include organic or inorganic salts like sodium acetate trihydrate.
  • Optionally, the composite particles of the present invention may comprise additional additives such as processing aids, lubricants, antistats, antiblock agents, pigments, derivatives thereof, or combinations thereof.
  • The composite particles used in conjunction with the present invention can be prepared by any suitable process for example, by bringing the components in solid form and dry-blending using conventional means such as a barrel mixer, a tumble mixer, and the like, followed by fluxing or melting in an appropriate apparatus, such as a Banbury type internal mixer, rubber mill, single or twin screw extruder or compounder, or the like. Preferably, the two components are brought together and processed in an appropriate melt extruder, from which the blend is extruded in the form of strands, which are pelletized for fabrication purposes. Other suitable techniques well known to those skilled in the art can be used as well.
  • If the application in which the composite particles will be used does not contain a component that will enable the degradable material to degrade, e.g., in a dry gas hole, then in alternative embodiments of the present invention, the degradable material can be mixed with an inorganic or organic compound in addition to or as a filler material. In preferred alternative embodiments, the inorganic or organic compound in the composite is hydrated. Examples of the hydrated organic or inorganic solid compounds that can be utilized include, but are not limited to, hydrates of organic acids or their salts such as sodium acetate trihydrate, L-tartaric acid disodium salt dihydrate, sodium citrate dihydrate, hydrates of inorganic acids or their salts such as sodium tetraborate decahydrate, sodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, sodium phosphate dodecahydrate, amylose, starch-based hydrophilic polymers, and cellulose-based hydrophilic polymers. Of these, sodium acetate trihydrate is preferred. Additionally, if the degradable material is susceptible to hydrolysis, it is preferred that a sufficient amount of water is produced to effect hydrolytic degradation of the degradable material. The degradable material is then in a sense self-degradable, in that the degradable material should at least partially degrade in the releasable water provided by the hydrated organic or inorganic compound which dehydrates over time when heated in the subterranean zone.
  • The specific features of the composite particles may be chosen or modified to provide the proppant matrix with optimum conductivity while maintaining its desirable filtering capability. Preferably, the composite particles are selected to have a size and shape similar to the size and shape of the proppant particulates to help maintain substantial uniformity within the mixture. It is preferable if the proppant particulates and the composite particles do not segregate within the proppant matrix composition. Whichever composite particles are utilized, the composite particles may have any shape, depending on the desired characteristics of the resultant voids in the proppant matrix including, but not limited to, particles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other physical shape. The physical shape of the composite particles should be chosen so as to enhance the desired shape and relative composition of the resultant voids within the proppant matrix. For example, a rod-like particle shape may be suitable in applications wherein channel-like voids in the proppant matrix are desired. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize the specific degradable material and the preferred size and shape for a given application.
  • Additional materials may be incorporated in the proppant matrix, if desired, including, but not limited to, acid-reactive materials. Such acid-reactive materials in the proppant matrix compositions may comprise any material that reacts with an acid so that the acid is at least partially neutralized. Suitable examples include, but are not limited to, materials such as calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide, and calcium hydroxide. The acid-reactive material may react with the degradation products of the degradable material. This may be beneficial when the degradation products comprise an undesirable acid. When included in a proppant matrix composition, the acid-reactive material should be included in an amount sufficient to control the pH of any fluid in the proppant matrix and/or neutralize any acid present. Considerations that may be taken into account when considering the type and amount of acid-soluble component to include are, among others, the solubility of the reaction products, corrosion of any metals, and the control of scale formation.
  • An inert filler may be included in the proppant matrix compositions. Suitable inert fillers are materials that, inter alia, enhance the compressive strength of a proppant matrix. Suitable fillers include, but are not limited to, calcium carbonate, talc, mica, glass, silica, silica flour, or other similar mineral fillers.
  • The proppant matrix composition can either be pre-blended and then transported to the drill site, or it can be prepared on the fly at the drill site and then introduced downhole within a relatively short period of time. The term drill site, as used herein, refers to the workplace at the site of a drill hole. Preferably, the proppant particulates and the composite particles should be mixed so as to form a mixture in a fracturing treatment fluid. Any conventional fracturing treatment fluid may be used in accordance with the present invention.
  • The concentration of the composite particles in the proppant matrix composition ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight of the proppant particulates in the mixture. In certain preferred embodiments of the proppant matrix compositions of the present invention, the composite particles make up about 1% to about 5% of the proppant matrix composition. Additionally, the relative amounts in the proppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, an undesirable percentage of voids results in the proppant matrix making the proppant matrix potentially ineffective in maintaining the integrity of the fracture. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize an optimum concentration of composite particles that provides desirable values in terms of enhanced conductivity or permeability without undermining the stability of the proppant matrix itself.
  • Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit and scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. A proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the proppant particulates comprises at least one of the following: interlocking proppant particulates, or proppant particulates coated with a curable resin and/or a tackifying agent.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the proppant particulates comprise at least one of the following: natural sand, a ground nut hull, a man-made proppant particulate, bauxite, a ceramic, a polymeric particulate, or a low density particulate.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of the composite particles has a physical shape of a platelet, shaving, fiber, flake, ribbon, rod, strip, spheroid, toroid, pellet, or tablet.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein the proppant matrix composition comprises at least one of the following: an acid reactive material or an inert filler.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein the degradable material is capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein the composite particles are present in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 30% based on the weight of the proppant particulates in the proppant matrix composition.
8. The composition of claim 1 wherein the degradable material comprises a degradable polymer.
9. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of the composite particles comprises at least one of the following: a polysaccharide; a chitin; a chitosan; a protein;
an aliphatic polyester; a poly(lactide); a poly(glycolide); a poly(ε-caprolactone); a poly(hydroxy ester ether); a poly(hydroxybutyrate); a polyanhydride; a polycarbonate; a poly(orthoester); a poly(acetal); a poly(acrylate); a poly(alkylacrylate); a poly(amino acid); a poly(ethylene oxide); a poly ether ester; a polyester amide; a polyamide; a polyphosphazene; or a copolymer or blend thereof.
10. The composition of claim 1 wherein the filler comprises at least one of the following: an anhydrous salt, glass, talc, calcium carbonate, mica, magnesium oxide, miheral filler, barite, silica, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, an oxidizer, a breaker, sodium persulfate, magnesium peroxide, an inorganic compound, an organic compound, or a derivative thereof.
11. The composition of claim 1 wherein the filler comprises from about 0.5% to about 60% of one of the composite particles.
12. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of the composite particles comprises at least one of the following: a processing aid, a lubricant, an antistat, an antiblock agent, a pigment, or a derivative thereof.
13. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of the composite particles is formed by a melt extrusion process.
14. A treatment fluid for use in a subterranean application comprising a proppant matrix composition, the proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.
15. The treatment fluid of claim 13 wherein the treatment fluid is formed at a drill site.
16. The treatment fluid of claim 13 wherein the degradable material comprises at least one of the following: a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a polyanhydride, an aliphatic polycarbonate, an aromatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(acetal), a poly(acrylate), a poly(alkylacrylate), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), or a polyphosphazene.
17. The treatment fluid of claim 13 wherein the degradable material produces an acid upon degradation.
18. A proppant matrix having at least one void therein, the void resulting from the degradation of a degradable material in a composite particle.
19. The proppant matrix of claim 18 wherein the degradable material did not completely degrade until the proppant matrix developed some compressive strength.
20. The proppant matrix of claim 18 wherein the degradable material comprises at least one of the following: a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a polyanhydride, an aliphatic polycarbonate, an aromatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(acetal), a poly(acrylate), a poly(alkylacrylate), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), or a polyphosphazene.
US11/048,489 2003-06-27 2005-02-01 Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well Abandoned US20050130848A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/048,489 US20050130848A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-02-01 Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/608,291 US7044220B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2003-06-27 Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US11/048,489 US20050130848A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-02-01 Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/608,291 Continuation-In-Part US7044220B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2003-06-27 Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050130848A1 true US20050130848A1 (en) 2005-06-16

Family

ID=46205463

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/048,489 Abandoned US20050130848A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-02-01 Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20050130848A1 (en)

Cited By (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040040708A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-04 Stephenson Christopher John Method of treating subterranean formations with porous ceramic particulate materials
US20060065398A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Bj Services Company Method of enhancing hydraulic fracturing using ultra lightweight proppants
US20060169451A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Self-degrading cement compositions and methods of using self-degrading cement compositions in subterranean formations
WO2006082359A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US20060258543A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use cross-reference to related applications
US20060264332A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of using reactive surfactants in subterranean operations
US20070066491A1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2007-03-22 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US20080070810A1 (en) * 2005-02-02 2008-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preparing degradable materials and methods of use in subterranean formations
US20080135242A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-06-12 Timothy Lesko Heterogeneous Proppant Placement in a Fracture with Removable Channelant Fill
US7654323B2 (en) 2005-09-21 2010-02-02 Imerys Electrofused proppant, method of manufacture, and method of use
US7662753B2 (en) 2005-05-12 2010-02-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use
US7674753B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-03-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids and methods of forming degradable filter cakes comprising aliphatic polyester and their use in subterranean formations
US7678742B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7677315B2 (en) 2005-05-12 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use
US7678743B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7686080B2 (en) 2006-11-09 2010-03-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acid-generating fluid loss control additives and associated methods
US7687438B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7700525B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-04-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Orthoester-based surfactants and associated methods
US7829507B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-11-09 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Subterranean treatment fluids comprising a degradable bridging agent and methods of treating subterranean formations
US20100282464A1 (en) * 2007-05-30 2010-11-11 Oleg Olegovich Medvedev Method of propping agent delivery to the well
US7833944B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and compositions using crosslinked aliphatic polyesters in well bore applications
US7833943B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2010-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Microemulsifiers and methods of making and using same
US20100294500A1 (en) * 2007-05-22 2010-11-25 Timothy Michael Lesko Method of improving the conductivity of a fracture in the space between proppant pillars
US20110036571A1 (en) * 2007-07-03 2011-02-17 Ivan Vitalievich Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydraulic fracturing
US7906464B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2011-03-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for the removal of oil-based filtercakes
US20110114313A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2011-05-19 Timothy Lesko Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US20110120712A1 (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-05-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US7950455B2 (en) 2008-01-14 2011-05-31 Baker Hughes Incorporated Non-spherical well treating particulates and methods of using the same
US20110180259A1 (en) * 2008-08-21 2011-07-28 Dean Willberg Hydraulic Fracturing Proppants
US7998910B2 (en) 2009-02-24 2011-08-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids comprising relative permeability modifiers and methods of use
US8006760B2 (en) 2008-04-10 2011-08-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Clean fluid systems for partial monolayer fracturing
US20110220358A1 (en) * 2008-09-08 2011-09-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Assemblies for the purification of a reservoir or process fluid
US8082992B2 (en) 2009-07-13 2011-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of fluid-controlled geometry stimulation
US8220548B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2012-07-17 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Surfactant wash treatment fluids and associated methods
WO2012135419A3 (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-11-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated High permeability frac proppant
US8329621B2 (en) 2006-07-25 2012-12-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable particulates and associated methods
WO2013036478A2 (en) * 2011-09-07 2013-03-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Disintegrative particles to release agglomeration agent for water shut-off downhole
US8490699B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry methods
US8490698B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content methods and slurries
US8505628B2 (en) 2010-06-30 2013-08-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurries, systems and methods
US8511381B2 (en) 2010-06-30 2013-08-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry methods and systems
US8541051B2 (en) 2003-08-14 2013-09-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. On-the fly coating of acid-releasing degradable material onto a particulate
US8562900B2 (en) 2006-09-01 2013-10-22 Imerys Method of manufacturing and using rod-shaped proppants and anti-flowback additives
US8607870B2 (en) 2010-11-19 2013-12-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to create high conductivity fractures that connect hydraulic fracture networks in a well
US8636065B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2014-01-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US8662172B2 (en) 2010-04-12 2014-03-04 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to gravel pack a well using expanding materials
US20140083709A1 (en) * 2012-09-21 2014-03-27 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Acid soluble abrasive material and method of use
US8697612B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2014-04-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US20140131041A1 (en) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of Forming and Placing Proppant Pillars Into a Subterranean Formation
US8763699B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2014-07-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US8853137B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2014-10-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US8936082B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2015-01-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry systems and methods
US9080440B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2015-07-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Proppant pillar placement in a fracture with high solid content fluid
US9085727B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2015-07-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable extrametrical material fill
US9133387B2 (en) 2011-06-06 2015-09-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to improve stability of high solid content fluid
US9388335B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2016-07-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pickering emulsion treatment fluid
US9528354B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2016-12-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole tool positioning system and method
US9528351B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2016-12-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Gravel and fracture packing using fibers
US9803457B2 (en) 2012-03-08 2017-10-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for delivering treatment fluid
US9850423B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2017-12-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hydrolyzable particle compositions, treatment fluids and methods
US9863228B2 (en) 2012-03-08 2018-01-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for delivering treatment fluid
US9919966B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of using phthalic and terephthalic acids and derivatives thereof in well treatment operations
US9920607B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods of improving hydraulic fracture network
US9920610B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of using diverter and proppant mixture
US9938811B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2018-04-10 Baker Hughes, LLC Method of enhancing fracture complexity using far-field divert systems
US10011763B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2018-07-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to deliver fluids on a well site with variable solids concentration from solid slurries
US10041327B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-08-07 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Diverting systems for use in low temperature well treatment operations
WO2018190835A1 (en) * 2017-04-12 2018-10-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Staged propping of fracture networks
CN109777394A (en) * 2019-02-28 2019-05-21 东北石油大学 One kind is from suspension self-degradation proppant production method
US10988678B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2021-04-27 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Well treatment operations using diverting system
US11111766B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2021-09-07 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Methods of improving hydraulic fracture network

Citations (97)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2238671A (en) * 1940-02-09 1941-04-15 Du Pont Method of treating wells
US2703316A (en) * 1951-06-05 1955-03-01 Du Pont Polymers of high melting lactide
US3173484A (en) * 1958-09-02 1965-03-16 Gulf Research Development Co Fracturing process employing a heterogeneous propping agent
US3195635A (en) * 1963-05-23 1965-07-20 Pan American Petroleum Corp Spacers for fracture props
US3302719A (en) * 1965-01-25 1967-02-07 Union Oil Co Method for treating subterranean formations
US3364995A (en) * 1966-02-14 1968-01-23 Dow Chemical Co Hydraulic fracturing fluid-bearing earth formations
US3366178A (en) * 1965-09-10 1968-01-30 Halliburton Co Method of fracturing and propping a subterranean formation
US3455390A (en) * 1965-12-03 1969-07-15 Union Oil Co Low fluid loss well treating composition and method
US3784585A (en) * 1971-10-21 1974-01-08 American Cyanamid Co Water-degradable resins containing recurring,contiguous,polymerized glycolide units and process for preparing same
US3819525A (en) * 1972-08-21 1974-06-25 Avon Prod Inc Cosmetic cleansing preparation
US3868998A (en) * 1974-05-15 1975-03-04 Shell Oil Co Self-acidifying treating fluid positioning process
US3948672A (en) * 1973-12-28 1976-04-06 Texaco Inc. Permeable cement composition and method
US3955993A (en) * 1973-12-28 1976-05-11 Texaco Inc. Method and composition for stabilizing incompetent oil-containing formations
US3960736A (en) * 1974-06-03 1976-06-01 The Dow Chemical Company Self-breaking viscous aqueous solutions and the use thereof in fracturing subterranean formations
US3968840A (en) * 1973-05-25 1976-07-13 Texaco Inc. Controlled rate acidization process
US4068718A (en) * 1975-09-26 1978-01-17 Exxon Production Research Company Hydraulic fracturing method using sintered bauxite propping agent
US4261421A (en) * 1980-03-24 1981-04-14 Union Oil Company Of California Method for selectively acidizing the less permeable zones of a high temperature subterranean formation
US4387769A (en) * 1981-08-10 1983-06-14 Exxon Production Research Co. Method for reducing the permeability of subterranean formations
US4460052A (en) * 1981-08-10 1984-07-17 Judith Gockel Prevention of lost circulation of drilling muds
US4498995A (en) * 1981-08-10 1985-02-12 Judith Gockel Lost circulation drilling fluid
US4526695A (en) * 1981-08-10 1985-07-02 Exxon Production Research Co. Composition for reducing the permeability of subterranean formations
US4716964A (en) * 1981-08-10 1988-01-05 Exxon Production Research Company Use of degradable ball sealers to seal casing perforations in well treatment fluid diversion
US4797262A (en) * 1986-06-16 1989-01-10 Shell Oil Company Downflow fluidized catalytic cracking system
US4809783A (en) * 1988-01-14 1989-03-07 Halliburton Services Method of dissolving organic filter cake
US4817721A (en) * 1987-12-14 1989-04-04 Conoco Inc. Reducing the permeability of a rock formation
US4843118A (en) * 1986-10-01 1989-06-27 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Acidized fracturing fluids containing high molecular weight poly(vinylamines) for enhanced oil recovery
US4848467A (en) * 1988-02-16 1989-07-18 Conoco Inc. Formation fracturing process
US4986355A (en) * 1989-05-18 1991-01-22 Conoco Inc. Process for the preparation of fluid loss additive and gel breaker
US4986354A (en) * 1988-09-14 1991-01-22 Conoco Inc. Composition and placement process for oil field chemicals
US5082056A (en) * 1990-10-16 1992-01-21 Marathon Oil Company In situ reversible crosslinked polymer gel used in hydrocarbon recovery applications
US5216050A (en) * 1988-08-08 1993-06-01 Biopak Technology, Ltd. Blends of polyactic acid
US5295542A (en) * 1992-10-05 1994-03-22 Halliburton Company Well gravel packing methods
US5325923A (en) * 1992-09-29 1994-07-05 Halliburton Company Well completions with expandable casing portions
US5330005A (en) * 1993-04-05 1994-07-19 Dowell Schlumberger Incorporated Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5386874A (en) * 1993-11-08 1995-02-07 Halliburton Company Perphosphate viscosity breakers in well fracture fluids
US5396957A (en) * 1992-09-29 1995-03-14 Halliburton Company Well completions with expandable casing portions
US5402846A (en) * 1993-11-15 1995-04-04 Mobil Oil Corporation Unique method of hydraulic fracturing
US5484881A (en) * 1992-10-02 1996-01-16 Cargill, Inc. Melt-stable amorphous lactide polymer film and process for manufacturing thereof
US5497830A (en) * 1995-04-06 1996-03-12 Bj Services Company Coated breaker for crosslinked acid
US5499678A (en) * 1994-08-02 1996-03-19 Halliburton Company Coplanar angular jetting head for well perforating
US5505787A (en) * 1993-02-01 1996-04-09 Total Service Co., Inc. Method for cleaning surface of external wall of building
US5512071A (en) * 1993-01-21 1996-04-30 Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Water soluble blast media containing surfactant
US5591700A (en) * 1994-12-22 1997-01-07 Halliburton Company Fracturing fluid with encapsulated breaker
US5594095A (en) * 1993-07-30 1997-01-14 Cargill, Incorporated Viscosity-modified lactide polymer composition and process for manufacture thereof
US5604186A (en) * 1995-02-15 1997-02-18 Halliburton Company Encapsulated enzyme breaker and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US5607905A (en) * 1994-03-15 1997-03-04 Texas United Chemical Company, Llc. Well drilling and servicing fluids which deposit an easily removable filter cake
US5765642A (en) * 1996-12-23 1998-06-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Subterranean formation fracturing methods
US5893416A (en) * 1993-11-27 1999-04-13 Aea Technology Plc Oil well treatment
US5908073A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-06-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6024170A (en) * 1998-06-03 2000-02-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of treating subterranean formation using borate cross-linking compositions
US6028113A (en) * 1995-09-27 2000-02-22 Sunburst Chemicals, Inc. Solid sanitizers and cleaner disinfectants
US6047772A (en) * 1995-03-29 2000-04-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6059034A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-05-09 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US6169058B1 (en) * 1997-06-05 2001-01-02 Bj Services Company Compositions and methods for hydraulic fracturing
US6172011B1 (en) * 1993-04-05 2001-01-09 Schlumberger Technolgy Corporation Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6189615B1 (en) * 1998-12-15 2001-02-20 Marathon Oil Company Application of a stabilized polymer gel to an alkaline treatment region for improved hydrocarbon recovery
US6202751B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2001-03-20 Halliburton Energy Sevices, Inc. Methods and compositions for forming permeable cement sand screens in well bores
US6209646B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Controlling the release of chemical additives in well treating fluids
US6209643B1 (en) * 1995-03-29 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of controlling particulate flowback in subterranean wells and introducing treatment chemicals
US6214773B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2001-04-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. High temperature, low residue well treating fluids and methods
US6242390B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2001-06-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cleanup additive
US20020020527A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-02-21 Lars Kilaas Combined liner and matrix system
US6357527B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2002-03-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US20020036088A1 (en) * 2000-08-01 2002-03-28 Todd Bradley L. Well drilling and servicing fluids and methods of removing filter cake deposited thereby
US6380138B1 (en) * 1999-04-06 2002-04-30 Fairmount Minerals Ltd. Injection molded degradable casing perforation ball sealers fluid loss additive and method of use
US6387986B1 (en) * 1999-06-24 2002-05-14 Ahmad Moradi-Araghi Compositions and processes for oil field applications
US6390195B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-05-21 Halliburton Energy Service,S Inc. Methods and compositions for forming permeable cement sand screens in well bores
US6394185B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2002-05-28 Vernon George Constien Product and process for coating wellbore screens
US6508305B1 (en) * 1999-09-16 2003-01-21 Bj Services Company Compositions and methods for cementing using elastic particles
US6527051B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2003-03-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
US20030060374A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Cooke Claude E. Method and materials for hydraulic fracturing of wells
US6569814B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-05-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Fluids and techniques for hydrocarbon well completion
US20030114314A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-19 Ballard David A. Internal breaker
US20040014607A1 (en) * 2002-07-16 2004-01-22 Sinclair A. Richard Downhole chemical delivery system for oil and gas wells
US6681856B1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-01-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of cementing in subterranean zones penetrated by well bores using biodegradable dispersants
US6686328B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2004-02-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent tablet
US20040040706A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-04 Tetra Technologies, Inc. Filter cake removal fluid and method
US6702023B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2004-03-09 Cleansorb Limited Method for treatment of underground reservoirs
US6710019B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2004-03-23 Christopher Alan Sawdon Wellbore fluid
US20040055747A1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2004-03-25 M-I Llc. Acid coated sand for gravel pack and filter cake clean-up
US20040094300A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2004-05-20 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Dissolving Filter Cake
US20040106525A1 (en) * 2002-10-28 2004-06-03 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Self-Destructing Filter Cake
US6837309B2 (en) * 2001-09-11 2005-01-04 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and fluid compositions designed to cause tip screenouts
US20050006095A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-01-13 Donald Justus Reduced-density proppants and methods of using reduced-density proppants to enhance their transport in well bores and fractures
US20050028976A1 (en) * 2003-08-05 2005-02-10 Nguyen Philip D. Compositions and methods for controlling the release of chemicals placed on particulates
US20050034861A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Saini Rajesh K. On-the fly coating of acid-releasing degradable material onto a particulate
US20050034868A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Frost Keith A. Orthoester compositions and methods of use in subterranean applications
US20050034865A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Todd Bradley L. Compositions and methods for degrading filter cake
US20050103496A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2005-05-19 Todd Bradley L. Compositions and methods for weighting a breaker coating for uniform distribution in a particulate pack
US6896058B2 (en) * 2002-10-22 2005-05-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of introducing treating fluids into subterranean producing zones
US20050126785A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Todd Bradley L. Filter cake degradation compositions and methods of use in subterranean operations
US7044220B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2006-05-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US20060105917A1 (en) * 2004-11-17 2006-05-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. In-situ filter cake degradation compositions and methods of use in subterranean formations
US7178596B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2007-02-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7196040B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2007-03-27 T R Oil Services Limited Microcapsule well treatment
US20070078064A1 (en) * 2003-09-17 2007-04-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids and methods of forming degradable filter cakes and their use in subterranean formations
US7228904B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2007-06-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2238671A (en) * 1940-02-09 1941-04-15 Du Pont Method of treating wells
US2703316A (en) * 1951-06-05 1955-03-01 Du Pont Polymers of high melting lactide
US3173484A (en) * 1958-09-02 1965-03-16 Gulf Research Development Co Fracturing process employing a heterogeneous propping agent
US3195635A (en) * 1963-05-23 1965-07-20 Pan American Petroleum Corp Spacers for fracture props
US3302719A (en) * 1965-01-25 1967-02-07 Union Oil Co Method for treating subterranean formations
US3366178A (en) * 1965-09-10 1968-01-30 Halliburton Co Method of fracturing and propping a subterranean formation
US3455390A (en) * 1965-12-03 1969-07-15 Union Oil Co Low fluid loss well treating composition and method
US3364995A (en) * 1966-02-14 1968-01-23 Dow Chemical Co Hydraulic fracturing fluid-bearing earth formations
US3784585A (en) * 1971-10-21 1974-01-08 American Cyanamid Co Water-degradable resins containing recurring,contiguous,polymerized glycolide units and process for preparing same
US3819525A (en) * 1972-08-21 1974-06-25 Avon Prod Inc Cosmetic cleansing preparation
US3968840A (en) * 1973-05-25 1976-07-13 Texaco Inc. Controlled rate acidization process
US3955993A (en) * 1973-12-28 1976-05-11 Texaco Inc. Method and composition for stabilizing incompetent oil-containing formations
US3948672A (en) * 1973-12-28 1976-04-06 Texaco Inc. Permeable cement composition and method
US3868998A (en) * 1974-05-15 1975-03-04 Shell Oil Co Self-acidifying treating fluid positioning process
US3960736A (en) * 1974-06-03 1976-06-01 The Dow Chemical Company Self-breaking viscous aqueous solutions and the use thereof in fracturing subterranean formations
US4068718A (en) * 1975-09-26 1978-01-17 Exxon Production Research Company Hydraulic fracturing method using sintered bauxite propping agent
US4261421A (en) * 1980-03-24 1981-04-14 Union Oil Company Of California Method for selectively acidizing the less permeable zones of a high temperature subterranean formation
US4460052A (en) * 1981-08-10 1984-07-17 Judith Gockel Prevention of lost circulation of drilling muds
US4387769A (en) * 1981-08-10 1983-06-14 Exxon Production Research Co. Method for reducing the permeability of subterranean formations
US4498995A (en) * 1981-08-10 1985-02-12 Judith Gockel Lost circulation drilling fluid
US4526695A (en) * 1981-08-10 1985-07-02 Exxon Production Research Co. Composition for reducing the permeability of subterranean formations
US4716964A (en) * 1981-08-10 1988-01-05 Exxon Production Research Company Use of degradable ball sealers to seal casing perforations in well treatment fluid diversion
US4797262A (en) * 1986-06-16 1989-01-10 Shell Oil Company Downflow fluidized catalytic cracking system
US4843118A (en) * 1986-10-01 1989-06-27 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Acidized fracturing fluids containing high molecular weight poly(vinylamines) for enhanced oil recovery
US4817721A (en) * 1987-12-14 1989-04-04 Conoco Inc. Reducing the permeability of a rock formation
US4809783A (en) * 1988-01-14 1989-03-07 Halliburton Services Method of dissolving organic filter cake
US4848467A (en) * 1988-02-16 1989-07-18 Conoco Inc. Formation fracturing process
US5216050A (en) * 1988-08-08 1993-06-01 Biopak Technology, Ltd. Blends of polyactic acid
US4986354A (en) * 1988-09-14 1991-01-22 Conoco Inc. Composition and placement process for oil field chemicals
US4986355A (en) * 1989-05-18 1991-01-22 Conoco Inc. Process for the preparation of fluid loss additive and gel breaker
US5082056A (en) * 1990-10-16 1992-01-21 Marathon Oil Company In situ reversible crosslinked polymer gel used in hydrocarbon recovery applications
US5396957A (en) * 1992-09-29 1995-03-14 Halliburton Company Well completions with expandable casing portions
US5325923A (en) * 1992-09-29 1994-07-05 Halliburton Company Well completions with expandable casing portions
US5484881A (en) * 1992-10-02 1996-01-16 Cargill, Inc. Melt-stable amorphous lactide polymer film and process for manufacturing thereof
US5295542A (en) * 1992-10-05 1994-03-22 Halliburton Company Well gravel packing methods
US5512071A (en) * 1993-01-21 1996-04-30 Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Water soluble blast media containing surfactant
US5505787A (en) * 1993-02-01 1996-04-09 Total Service Co., Inc. Method for cleaning surface of external wall of building
US5330005A (en) * 1993-04-05 1994-07-19 Dowell Schlumberger Incorporated Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6172011B1 (en) * 1993-04-05 2001-01-09 Schlumberger Technolgy Corporation Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5594095A (en) * 1993-07-30 1997-01-14 Cargill, Incorporated Viscosity-modified lactide polymer composition and process for manufacture thereof
US5386874A (en) * 1993-11-08 1995-02-07 Halliburton Company Perphosphate viscosity breakers in well fracture fluids
US5402846A (en) * 1993-11-15 1995-04-04 Mobil Oil Corporation Unique method of hydraulic fracturing
US5893416A (en) * 1993-11-27 1999-04-13 Aea Technology Plc Oil well treatment
US5607905A (en) * 1994-03-15 1997-03-04 Texas United Chemical Company, Llc. Well drilling and servicing fluids which deposit an easily removable filter cake
US5499678A (en) * 1994-08-02 1996-03-19 Halliburton Company Coplanar angular jetting head for well perforating
US5591700A (en) * 1994-12-22 1997-01-07 Halliburton Company Fracturing fluid with encapsulated breaker
US5604186A (en) * 1995-02-15 1997-02-18 Halliburton Company Encapsulated enzyme breaker and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US6209643B1 (en) * 1995-03-29 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of controlling particulate flowback in subterranean wells and introducing treatment chemicals
US6047772A (en) * 1995-03-29 2000-04-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5497830A (en) * 1995-04-06 1996-03-12 Bj Services Company Coated breaker for crosslinked acid
US6028113A (en) * 1995-09-27 2000-02-22 Sunburst Chemicals, Inc. Solid sanitizers and cleaner disinfectants
US6059034A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-05-09 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US5765642A (en) * 1996-12-23 1998-06-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Subterranean formation fracturing methods
US6169058B1 (en) * 1997-06-05 2001-01-02 Bj Services Company Compositions and methods for hydraulic fracturing
US5908073A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-06-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6024170A (en) * 1998-06-03 2000-02-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of treating subterranean formation using borate cross-linking compositions
US6686328B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2004-02-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent tablet
US6710019B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2004-03-23 Christopher Alan Sawdon Wellbore fluid
US6242390B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2001-06-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cleanup additive
US6189615B1 (en) * 1998-12-15 2001-02-20 Marathon Oil Company Application of a stabilized polymer gel to an alkaline treatment region for improved hydrocarbon recovery
US6569814B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2003-05-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Fluids and techniques for hydrocarbon well completion
US6380138B1 (en) * 1999-04-06 2002-04-30 Fairmount Minerals Ltd. Injection molded degradable casing perforation ball sealers fluid loss additive and method of use
US6209646B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Controlling the release of chemical additives in well treating fluids
US6387986B1 (en) * 1999-06-24 2002-05-14 Ahmad Moradi-Araghi Compositions and processes for oil field applications
US6702023B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2004-03-09 Cleansorb Limited Method for treatment of underground reservoirs
US6508305B1 (en) * 1999-09-16 2003-01-21 Bj Services Company Compositions and methods for cementing using elastic particles
US6214773B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2001-04-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. High temperature, low residue well treating fluids and methods
US6357527B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2002-03-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US6527051B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2003-03-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
US6554071B1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2003-04-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
US7196040B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2007-03-27 T R Oil Services Limited Microcapsule well treatment
US20020020527A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-02-21 Lars Kilaas Combined liner and matrix system
US6394185B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2002-05-28 Vernon George Constien Product and process for coating wellbore screens
US6202751B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2001-03-20 Halliburton Energy Sevices, Inc. Methods and compositions for forming permeable cement sand screens in well bores
US6390195B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-05-21 Halliburton Energy Service,S Inc. Methods and compositions for forming permeable cement sand screens in well bores
US6364945B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-04-02 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and compositions for forming permeable cement sand screens in well bores
US20020036088A1 (en) * 2000-08-01 2002-03-28 Todd Bradley L. Well drilling and servicing fluids and methods of removing filter cake deposited thereby
US6837309B2 (en) * 2001-09-11 2005-01-04 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and fluid compositions designed to cause tip screenouts
US20030060374A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Cooke Claude E. Method and materials for hydraulic fracturing of wells
US20030114314A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-19 Ballard David A. Internal breaker
US20040014607A1 (en) * 2002-07-16 2004-01-22 Sinclair A. Richard Downhole chemical delivery system for oil and gas wells
US20040094300A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2004-05-20 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Dissolving Filter Cake
US20040040706A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-04 Tetra Technologies, Inc. Filter cake removal fluid and method
US20040055747A1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2004-03-25 M-I Llc. Acid coated sand for gravel pack and filter cake clean-up
US6896058B2 (en) * 2002-10-22 2005-05-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of introducing treating fluids into subterranean producing zones
US20040106525A1 (en) * 2002-10-28 2004-06-03 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Self-Destructing Filter Cake
US6681856B1 (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-01-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of cementing in subterranean zones penetrated by well bores using biodegradable dispersants
US7228904B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2007-06-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7178596B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2007-02-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7044220B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2006-05-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US20050006095A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-01-13 Donald Justus Reduced-density proppants and methods of using reduced-density proppants to enhance their transport in well bores and fractures
US20050028976A1 (en) * 2003-08-05 2005-02-10 Nguyen Philip D. Compositions and methods for controlling the release of chemicals placed on particulates
US20050034865A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Todd Bradley L. Compositions and methods for degrading filter cake
US20050034868A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Frost Keith A. Orthoester compositions and methods of use in subterranean applications
US20050034861A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 Saini Rajesh K. On-the fly coating of acid-releasing degradable material onto a particulate
US20070078064A1 (en) * 2003-09-17 2007-04-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids and methods of forming degradable filter cakes and their use in subterranean formations
US20050103496A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2005-05-19 Todd Bradley L. Compositions and methods for weighting a breaker coating for uniform distribution in a particulate pack
US20050126785A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Todd Bradley L. Filter cake degradation compositions and methods of use in subterranean operations
US20060105917A1 (en) * 2004-11-17 2006-05-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. In-situ filter cake degradation compositions and methods of use in subterranean formations

Cited By (110)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040200617A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-10-14 Stephenson Christopher John Method of treating subterranean formations with porous ceramic particulate materials
US7426961B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2008-09-23 Bj Services Company Method of treating subterranean formations with porous particulate materials
US7713918B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2010-05-11 Bj Services Company Porous particulate materials and compositions thereof
US20040040708A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-04 Stephenson Christopher John Method of treating subterranean formations with porous ceramic particulate materials
US8541051B2 (en) 2003-08-14 2013-09-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. On-the fly coating of acid-releasing degradable material onto a particulate
US7833944B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and compositions using crosslinked aliphatic polyesters in well bore applications
US7829507B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-11-09 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Subterranean treatment fluids comprising a degradable bridging agent and methods of treating subterranean formations
US7674753B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2010-03-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids and methods of forming degradable filter cakes comprising aliphatic polyester and their use in subterranean formations
US20060065398A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Bj Services Company Method of enhancing hydraulic fracturing using ultra lightweight proppants
US7726399B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-06-01 Bj Services Company Method of enhancing hydraulic fracturing using ultra lightweight proppants
US20070066491A1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2007-03-22 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US9505974B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2016-11-29 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US9630881B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2017-04-25 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US9777209B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2017-10-03 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US7803740B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2010-09-28 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US7803741B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2010-09-28 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US7803742B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2010-09-28 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications
US20060169451A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Self-degrading cement compositions and methods of using self-degrading cement compositions in subterranean formations
WO2006082359A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US8598092B2 (en) 2005-02-02 2013-12-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preparing degradable materials and methods of use in subterranean formations
US20080070810A1 (en) * 2005-02-02 2008-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preparing degradable materials and methods of use in subterranean formations
US7662753B2 (en) 2005-05-12 2010-02-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use
US7677315B2 (en) 2005-05-12 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use
US20060258543A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable surfactants and methods for use cross-reference to related applications
US20060264332A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of using reactive surfactants in subterranean operations
US8653010B2 (en) 2005-05-20 2014-02-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of using reactive surfactants in subterranean operations
US20090221454A1 (en) * 2005-05-20 2009-09-03 Welton Thomas D Methods of Using Reactive Surfactants in Subterranean Operations
US7654323B2 (en) 2005-09-21 2010-02-02 Imerys Electrofused proppant, method of manufacture, and method of use
US7700525B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-04-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Orthoester-based surfactants and associated methods
US7713916B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-05-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Orthoester-based surfactants and associated methods
US8329621B2 (en) 2006-07-25 2012-12-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Degradable particulates and associated methods
US8562900B2 (en) 2006-09-01 2013-10-22 Imerys Method of manufacturing and using rod-shaped proppants and anti-flowback additives
US10344206B2 (en) 2006-09-01 2019-07-09 US Ceramics LLC Method of manufacture and using rod-shaped proppants and anti-flowback additives
US7678742B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7678743B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7687438B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-03-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drill-in fluids and associated methods
US7686080B2 (en) 2006-11-09 2010-03-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acid-generating fluid loss control additives and associated methods
US8490700B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US7581590B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2009-09-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US9670764B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2017-06-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US20080135242A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-06-12 Timothy Lesko Heterogeneous Proppant Placement in a Fracture with Removable Channelant Fill
US20110114313A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2011-05-19 Timothy Lesko Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US9085727B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2015-07-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable extrametrical material fill
US8636065B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2014-01-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US8066068B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2011-11-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US8763699B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2014-07-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US10030495B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2018-07-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable extrametrical material fill
US8757259B2 (en) 2006-12-08 2014-06-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US20090286700A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2009-11-19 Timothy Lesko Heterogeneous Proppant Placement in a Fracture with Removable Channelant Fill
US8220548B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2012-07-17 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Surfactant wash treatment fluids and associated methods
US8479816B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2013-07-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of improving the conductivity of a fracture in the space between proppant pillars
US20100294500A1 (en) * 2007-05-22 2010-11-25 Timothy Michael Lesko Method of improving the conductivity of a fracture in the space between proppant pillars
US8960293B2 (en) 2007-05-30 2015-02-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of propping agent delivery to the well
US9797232B2 (en) 2007-05-30 2017-10-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of propping agent delivery to the well
US20100282464A1 (en) * 2007-05-30 2010-11-11 Oleg Olegovich Medvedev Method of propping agent delivery to the well
US20110036571A1 (en) * 2007-07-03 2011-02-17 Ivan Vitalievich Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydraulic fracturing
US8540024B2 (en) 2007-07-03 2013-09-24 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydraulic fracturing
US8490699B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry methods
US10011763B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2018-07-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to deliver fluids on a well site with variable solids concentration from solid slurries
US8490698B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2013-07-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content methods and slurries
US9080440B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2015-07-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Proppant pillar placement in a fracture with high solid content fluid
US8936082B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2015-01-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry systems and methods
US7950455B2 (en) 2008-01-14 2011-05-31 Baker Hughes Incorporated Non-spherical well treating particulates and methods of using the same
US8006760B2 (en) 2008-04-10 2011-08-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Clean fluid systems for partial monolayer fracturing
US7906464B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2011-03-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for the removal of oil-based filtercakes
US20110180259A1 (en) * 2008-08-21 2011-07-28 Dean Willberg Hydraulic Fracturing Proppants
US8991494B2 (en) * 2008-08-21 2015-03-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hydraulic fracturing proppants
US20110220358A1 (en) * 2008-09-08 2011-09-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Assemblies for the purification of a reservoir or process fluid
GB2463115B (en) * 2008-09-08 2013-04-10 Schlumberger Holdings Assemblies for the purification of a reservoir or process fluid
US7960314B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2011-06-14 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Microemulsifiers and methods of making and using same
US7833943B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2010-11-16 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Microemulsifiers and methods of making and using same
US7998910B2 (en) 2009-02-24 2011-08-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Treatment fluids comprising relative permeability modifiers and methods of use
US8082992B2 (en) 2009-07-13 2011-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of fluid-controlled geometry stimulation
US8853137B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2014-10-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US8697612B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2014-04-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US20110120712A1 (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-05-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US9023770B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2015-05-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate
US8662172B2 (en) 2010-04-12 2014-03-04 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to gravel pack a well using expanding materials
US8511381B2 (en) 2010-06-30 2013-08-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurry methods and systems
US8505628B2 (en) 2010-06-30 2013-08-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High solids content slurries, systems and methods
US8607870B2 (en) 2010-11-19 2013-12-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to create high conductivity fractures that connect hydraulic fracture networks in a well
AU2012236490B2 (en) * 2011-03-29 2016-09-08 Baker Hughes Incorporated High permeability frac proppant
CN103459770A (en) * 2011-03-29 2013-12-18 贝克休斯公司 High permeability frac proppant
US9010424B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2015-04-21 Baker Hughes Incorporated High permeability frac proppant
WO2012135419A3 (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-11-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated High permeability frac proppant
US9133387B2 (en) 2011-06-06 2015-09-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods to improve stability of high solid content fluid
WO2013036478A3 (en) * 2011-09-07 2013-06-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Disintegrative particles to release agglomeration agent for water shut-off downhole
WO2013036478A2 (en) * 2011-09-07 2013-03-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Disintegrative particles to release agglomeration agent for water shut-off downhole
US9850423B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2017-12-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hydrolyzable particle compositions, treatment fluids and methods
US10351762B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2019-07-16 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hydrolyzable particle compositions, treatment fluids and methods
US9528351B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2016-12-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Gravel and fracture packing using fibers
US9803457B2 (en) 2012-03-08 2017-10-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for delivering treatment fluid
US9863228B2 (en) 2012-03-08 2018-01-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for delivering treatment fluid
US10041327B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-08-07 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Diverting systems for use in low temperature well treatment operations
US10988678B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2021-04-27 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Well treatment operations using diverting system
US9919966B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of using phthalic and terephthalic acids and derivatives thereof in well treatment operations
US9920607B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods of improving hydraulic fracture network
US9920610B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2018-03-20 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of using diverter and proppant mixture
US11111766B2 (en) 2012-06-26 2021-09-07 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Methods of improving hydraulic fracture network
US10161234B2 (en) 2012-09-21 2018-12-25 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Acid soluble abrasive material
US9840896B2 (en) * 2012-09-21 2017-12-12 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Acid soluble abrasive material and method of use
US20140083709A1 (en) * 2012-09-21 2014-03-27 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Acid soluble abrasive material and method of use
US20140131041A1 (en) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of Forming and Placing Proppant Pillars Into a Subterranean Formation
US9279077B2 (en) * 2012-11-09 2016-03-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of forming and placing proppant pillars into a subterranean formation
US9528354B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2016-12-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole tool positioning system and method
US9938811B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2018-04-10 Baker Hughes, LLC Method of enhancing fracture complexity using far-field divert systems
US9388335B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2016-07-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pickering emulsion treatment fluid
WO2018190835A1 (en) * 2017-04-12 2018-10-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Staged propping of fracture networks
US11391139B2 (en) 2017-04-12 2022-07-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Staged propping of fracture networks
CN109777394A (en) * 2019-02-28 2019-05-21 东北石油大学 One kind is from suspension self-degradation proppant production method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7228904B2 (en) Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US20050130848A1 (en) Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7178596B2 (en) Methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7044220B2 (en) Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US8763699B2 (en) Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US8490700B2 (en) Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US9670764B2 (en) Heterogeneous proppant placement in a fracture with removable channelant fill
US7281581B2 (en) Methods of hydraulic fracturing and of propping fractures in subterranean formations
US7571767B2 (en) High porosity fractures and methods of creating high porosity fractures
US7036587B2 (en) Methods of diverting treating fluids in subterranean zones and degradable diverting materials
US7325608B2 (en) Methods of hydraulic fracturing and of propping fractures in subterranean formations
US9816365B2 (en) Fracturing treatments in subterranean formations using reducible materials
US7814980B2 (en) Micro-crosslinked gels and associated methods
US9080440B2 (en) Proppant pillar placement in a fracture with high solid content fluid
CA2532303C (en) Methods for fracturing subterranean wells
AU2013240180B2 (en) Methods of forming high-porosity fractures in weakly consolidated or unconsolidated formations
MX2012007645A (en) A method of fluid slug consolidation within a fluid system in downhole applications.
AU2015202225B2 (en) Methods of forming high-porosity fractures in weakly consolidated or unconsolidated formations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TODD, BRADLEY L.;MANG, MICHAEL N.;REEL/FRAME:016246/0020;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050124 TO 20050131

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION