US20050137915A1 - Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration - Google Patents

Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050137915A1
US20050137915A1 US11/042,683 US4268305A US2005137915A1 US 20050137915 A1 US20050137915 A1 US 20050137915A1 US 4268305 A US4268305 A US 4268305A US 2005137915 A1 US2005137915 A1 US 2005137915A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
credentialing
medical malpractice
insurance
malpractice insurance
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/042,683
Inventor
David Martin
David Montgomery
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sinclair Allison Inc
Original Assignee
Premium Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23329185&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20050137915(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Premium Group Inc filed Critical Premium Group Inc
Priority to US11/042,683 priority Critical patent/US20050137915A1/en
Publication of US20050137915A1 publication Critical patent/US20050137915A1/en
Assigned to SINCLAIR ALLISON, INC. reassignment SINCLAIR ALLISON, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: THE PREMIUM GROUP, INC.
Priority to US13/182,509 priority patent/US20110270627A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/02Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08Insurance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H10/00ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
    • G16H10/20ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for electronic clinical trials or questionnaires

Definitions

  • This invention pertains to the art of processes for linking an information database with an insurance application, and more particularly to the process of linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application.
  • Verification is a time consuming process that typically includes the assembly of various documents, including proof of the physician's license, a valid Drug Enforcement Agency certificate, proof of completion of medical school, proof of board certification, proof of appropriate work history, etc. Thus, the verification process often takes many days and sometimes weeks to complete. Unfortunately, this time consuming process is the only known way that the regulatory agencies can ensure the public that it is receiving care from a qualified medical professional.
  • NCQA National Committee for Quality Assurance
  • the basic elements required in establishing proper credentialing information for a physician are likely to include the following: a valid and current license, clinical privileges in a hospital, valid Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) or Controlled Dangerous Substance certificate (CDS), appropriate education and training (i.e. graduation from an approved medical school and completion of an appropriate residency or specialty program), board certification, appropriate work history, malpractice insurance, and a history of any liability claims.
  • Managed care organizations also credential nonphysician practitioners, such as dentists, chiropractors, and podiatrists. The primary differences between physician and non-physician practitioners for purposes of credentialing, lie in the requirements, and therefore, in the verification of select data. For example, chiropractors are not board certified and do not require DEA or CDS certificates.
  • Credentialing is a necessary and critical step in securing qualified practitioners to render and manage the care of managed care organization subscribers or members.
  • the managed care organizations oftentimes delegate certain activities in the credentialing process.
  • a Credentials Verification Organization (CVO) which may be certified by NCQA, will verify a practitioner's credentials for a set price. Contracting with a NCQA-certified CVO exempts the hospital, healthcare entity, or managed care organization from the due diligence oversight requirements, specified by NCQA and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), for all the verification services. By contracting out the necessary credentialing to a NCQA-certrified CVO, the managed care organizations have met their due diligence requirements.
  • CompHealth a licensed CVO in the United States, has developed a new web-based credentialing service, moving as much of the process online as possible.
  • One of the keys to the credentialing service is an Internet application called Apply.net. Medical professionals can use the Apply.net application to submit their information to CompHealth via the Internet.
  • Apply.net an Internet application
  • the Federal government has attempted to alleviate some of the problems of credential sharing among separate government entities.
  • the Federal Credentialing Program was created to attempt to electronically link credentialing databases among the federal agencies and departments.
  • this credentialing information sharing is limited to the federal government and does not involve the insurance industry.
  • the present invention provides a process for quickly and efficiently linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance policy. Difficulties inherent in the related art are therefore overcome in a way that is simple and efficient while providing better and more advantageous results.
  • the credentialing information is automatically transferred to an insurance application.
  • At least one medical malpractice insurance premium quote can be generated without the physician having to fill out an application.
  • Yet another aspect of the current invention includes generating a two year medical malpractice insurance policy in order to coincide with the required re-credentialing of the physician.
  • the process includes means for generating the information database for any non-insurance purpose, means for forwarding at least a portion of the information from the information database to an insurance participant, means for generating an insurance premium quote, and means for transferring the at least a portion of the information from the information database to an insurance application.
  • the process includes a means for providing a questionnaire for gathering information for the database, means for inserting a means for obtaining a customer's permission for release of the information to the insurance participant into the questionnaire, means for inserting at least one more question into the questionnaire, the at least one more question for gathering further information related to a particular insurance product, and means for forwarding all of the questionnaires with an affirmative response to the first question to the insurance participant.
  • One advantage of the present invention is that the physician will not have to fill out a separate application form for medical malpractice insurance.
  • Another advantage of the present invention is that the medical malpractice insurance policy is of a duration that corresponds to the recredentialing process, thus eliminating the long term need for physicians to recomplete insurance applications or insurance renewal applications.
  • Yet another advantage of the current invention is that the entire process can be automated, thereby, creating a quick and efficient process.
  • Still another advantage of the current invention is that the process increases competition among malpractice insurers by giving them easier access to potential insureds.
  • One more advantage of the current invention is that the process will drive down the healthcare provider's processing costs, thereby lowering costs of one of physicians' largest line item expenses, thereby lowering the costs of healthcare to consumers.
  • the inventive process is designed to link credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application.
  • the credentialing information which the regulatory agencies require of health professionals, can be compiled for each physician by a credentials verification organization (CVO).
  • the credentialing information can be gathered by any entity licensed to do so.
  • the CVO typically obtains and/or verifies required information about each physician, including, a valid and current license, clinical privileges at a hospital, valid DEA or CDS certificates, appropriate education and training (i.e., graduation from an approved medical school and completion of an appropriate residency or specialty program), board certification, appropriate work history, malpractice insurance, and a history of liability claims.
  • This information is used by healthcare entities to ensure the public that it is receiving adequate care from a qualified medical professional. What is to be especially noted is that the information gathered by the CVO is virtually identical to the information required to underwrite a medical malpractice insurance policy.
  • the inventive process begins by having the CVO include means for obtaining the physician's permission for release of the credentialing information to the medical malpractice insurance participant.
  • This means for obtaining the physician's permission could be in the form of a question added to the questionnaire, requesting the physician's permission. An example of what the question might be is, “May we release this information for the purpose of obtaining competitive malpractice insurance quotes for you?”
  • the means for obtaining permission could also include a statement above the signature line stating that by signing the questionnaire the doctor is giving the CVO permission to release the information to the medical malpractice insurance participant. All of the credentialing questionnaires in which such permission is granted are then automatically forwarded by the CVO to the medical malpractice insurance participant.
  • medical malpractice insurance participant is any one, or more, of the following: insurance companies, brokers, agents, third party administrators, risk bearers, claims managers, risk managers, insurance marketers, and the like.
  • At least one insurance premium quote is generated for the medical malpractice insurance policy.
  • the medical malpractice insurance participant can provide multiple quotes from various insurance companies to the physician.
  • the insurance participant then contacts the physician with the premium quotes and policy terms and conditions.
  • quote it is meant either a non-binding or binding quote of the cost of the insurance policy premium.
  • the credentialing information is transferred from the credentialing questionnaire to a medical malpractice insurance application.
  • An application for medical malpractice insurance is then generated by a computer for the physician.
  • the insurance participant then delivers the completed application to the physician for the physician's review and approval.
  • the two year medical malpractice insurance policy is a preferred embodiment of the invention, and is not intended to limit the invention in any way.
  • the current inventive process also encompasses any length of policy term that coincides with the re-credentialing process. For example, if the re-credentialing occurs every three years, instead of every two years, a three year medical malpractice insurance policy can be issued.
  • the information on the medical malpractice insurance application since it is almost identical to the credentialing information, can be transferred back to a credentialing questionnaire for any subsequent health organizations that require credentialing of the subject physician.
  • the medical malpractice insurance participant can transfer this information, and send copies of the credentialing questionnaires to the various health organizations, thereby saving the physician a great deal of time and effort.
  • the physician will no longer be required to fill out multiple credentialing questionnaires for multiple health organizations.
  • a physician had to fill out a credentialing questionnaire for each and every health organization from which they desired approval.
  • the inventive process the physician need only fill out one credentialing questionnaire, and from that, the process transfers the information to a medical malpractice insurance application.
  • the credentialing information can be transferred to multiple questionnaires to send out to multiple health organizations. All that the physician needs to do is to contact the medical malpractice insurance participant and request that the insurance participant complete a credentialing application for whichever health organization the physician wishes. The medical malpractice insurance participant can then transfer the information from the insurance application to the credentialing questionnaire and provide the completed questionnaire to the physician. The physician then reviews the credentialing questionnaire, signs it, and submits it to the credentialing entity, or health organization.
  • the inventive process encompasses all of the subsequent applications and questionnaires that the physician would need for any subsequent health organizations that require the credentialing information.
  • This invention also encompasses the initial step of the process being the medical malpractice participant transferring the information from the medical malpractice insurance application to the credentialing questionnaire. In this manner, the credentialing process can be efficiently and quickly completed even after the physician has a medical malpractice insurance policy.
  • the inventive process occurs automatically via electronic transmission and computer data manipulation.
  • the required computer hardware, and the necessary computer code, would be obvious to one skilled in the computer art.
  • this invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment, and can be accomplished without the use of computers or electronic means.
  • the methods of transferring information manually, or by way of a hybrid combination of manual and electronic transference, are both encompassed by this invention.
  • the steps taken to link the insurance application with the credentialing information are identical to the steps taken in the preferred embodiment, and those steps are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the present invention is also not limited to the medical malpractice field, but includes the entire range of insurance participants.
  • the present invention can be used to link any information database, not created for insurance purposes, to any type of insurance application.
  • the only information databases not encompassed within this invention would be databases created for the purpose of filling out an insurance application, or for the purpose of obtaining any type of insurance.
  • An example of the type of information database not encompassed within this invention would be an Internet insurance application form.
  • any other information database, not created for insurance purposes can be linked by this inventive process to an insurance application.
  • the means by which this information is linked with the insurance application is identical to the process described in the medical malpractice insurance process, and the steps of the process are incorporated herein by reference.
  • further questions may need to be added in order to gather further, necessary information.
  • An example of some further questions, necessary for life insurance would be whether someone is a smoker or a nonsmoker.
  • the types of insurance applications that can be linked can include, but are not limited to, the following: life insurance, automobile insurance, medical malpractice insurance, legal malpractice insurance, professional liability insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, renter's insurance, homeowner's insurance, flood insurance, fire insurance, hurricane insurance, and earthquake insurance, or any other line of insurance.
  • the invention encompasses the idea that the credentialing organization, the healthcare entity, the insurance participant, etc. can be one entity or separate entities.
  • the credentialing organization can be one entity or separate entities.
  • a hospital that does its own credentialing and provides insurance for its physicians is encompassed within this invention.
  • the initial step of the process would be transferring the credentialing information from the CVO directly into either an insurance application or an insurance policy.
  • the invention also encompasses the use of electronic transmission of the information to the physician for the physician's approval.
  • the physician could then send approval for the insurance policy back to the insurance participant.
  • no signature is required by the physician, only the physician's approval of the insurance policy.

Abstract

An inventive process is disclosed for linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application. The credentialing information is automatically transferred from the credentialing questionnaire to an insurance application, and this credentialing information is then used to generate a medical malpractice insurance policy. The medical malpractice insurance policy is a two year policy, in order to coincide with the required re-credentialing of the healthcare provider. The inventive process also includes linking an information database, not created for insurance purposes, with an insurance application.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of Invention
  • This invention pertains to the art of processes for linking an information database with an insurance application, and more particularly to the process of linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • It is well known that regulatory agencies in the United States require health professionals to have their credentials verified every two years. Verification is a time consuming process that typically includes the assembly of various documents, including proof of the physician's license, a valid Drug Enforcement Agency certificate, proof of completion of medical school, proof of board certification, proof of appropriate work history, etc. Thus, the verification process often takes many days and sometimes weeks to complete. Unfortunately, this time consuming process is the only known way that the regulatory agencies can ensure the public that it is receiving care from a qualified medical professional.
  • It is also well known that the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) sets the standard for credentialing in managed care organizations. Defined as “the process by which a managed care organization authorizes, contracts, or employs, practitioners, who are licensed to practice independently, to provide services to its members,” credentialing simply means making sure that a practitioner is qualified to render care to patients.
  • Although there is likely to be some variation on the specific criteria used, the basic elements required in establishing proper credentialing information for a physician are likely to include the following: a valid and current license, clinical privileges in a hospital, valid Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) or Controlled Dangerous Substance certificate (CDS), appropriate education and training (i.e. graduation from an approved medical school and completion of an appropriate residency or specialty program), board certification, appropriate work history, malpractice insurance, and a history of any liability claims. Managed care organizations also credential nonphysician practitioners, such as dentists, chiropractors, and podiatrists. The primary differences between physician and non-physician practitioners for purposes of credentialing, lie in the requirements, and therefore, in the verification of select data. For example, chiropractors are not board certified and do not require DEA or CDS certificates.
  • Credentialing is a necessary and critical step in securing qualified practitioners to render and manage the care of managed care organization subscribers or members. The managed care organizations oftentimes delegate certain activities in the credentialing process. A Credentials Verification Organization (CVO), which may be certified by NCQA, will verify a practitioner's credentials for a set price. Contracting with a NCQA-certified CVO exempts the hospital, healthcare entity, or managed care organization from the due diligence oversight requirements, specified by NCQA and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), for all the verification services. By contracting out the necessary credentialing to a NCQA-certrified CVO, the managed care organizations have met their due diligence requirements.
  • CompHealth, a licensed CVO in the United States, has developed a new web-based credentialing service, moving as much of the process online as possible. One of the keys to the credentialing service is an Internet application called Apply.net. Medical professionals can use the Apply.net application to submit their information to CompHealth via the Internet. However, there is currently in the art no known connection between the credentialing services, the credentialing information, and the insurance industry.
  • The Federal government has attempted to alleviate some of the problems of credential sharing among separate government entities. The Federal Credentialing Program was created to attempt to electronically link credentialing databases among the federal agencies and departments. However, this credentialing information sharing is limited to the federal government and does not involve the insurance industry.
  • The present invention provides a process for quickly and efficiently linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance policy. Difficulties inherent in the related art are therefore overcome in a way that is simple and efficient while providing better and more advantageous results.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with one aspect of the current invention, the credentialing information is automatically transferred to an insurance application.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, at least one medical malpractice insurance premium quote can be generated without the physician having to fill out an application.
  • Yet another aspect of the current invention includes generating a two year medical malpractice insurance policy in order to coincide with the required re-credentialing of the physician.
  • In accordance with still another aspect of the current invention, the process includes means for generating the information database for any non-insurance purpose, means for forwarding at least a portion of the information from the information database to an insurance participant, means for generating an insurance premium quote, and means for transferring the at least a portion of the information from the information database to an insurance application.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the current invention, the process includes a means for providing a questionnaire for gathering information for the database, means for inserting a means for obtaining a customer's permission for release of the information to the insurance participant into the questionnaire, means for inserting at least one more question into the questionnaire, the at least one more question for gathering further information related to a particular insurance product, and means for forwarding all of the questionnaires with an affirmative response to the first question to the insurance participant.
  • One advantage of the present invention is that the physician will not have to fill out a separate application form for medical malpractice insurance.
  • Another advantage of the present invention is that the medical malpractice insurance policy is of a duration that corresponds to the recredentialing process, thus eliminating the long term need for physicians to recomplete insurance applications or insurance renewal applications.
  • Yet another advantage of the current invention is that the entire process can be automated, thereby, creating a quick and efficient process.
  • Still another advantage of the current invention is that the process increases competition among malpractice insurers by giving them easier access to potential insureds.
  • One more advantage of the current invention is that the process will drive down the healthcare provider's processing costs, thereby lowering costs of one of physicians' largest line item expenses, thereby lowering the costs of healthcare to consumers.
  • Still other benefits and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which it pertains upon a reading and understanding of the following detailed specification.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • The inventive process is designed to link credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application. The credentialing information, which the regulatory agencies require of health professionals, can be compiled for each physician by a credentials verification organization (CVO). The credentialing information, however, can be gathered by any entity licensed to do so. The CVO typically obtains and/or verifies required information about each physician, including, a valid and current license, clinical privileges at a hospital, valid DEA or CDS certificates, appropriate education and training (i.e., graduation from an approved medical school and completion of an appropriate residency or specialty program), board certification, appropriate work history, malpractice insurance, and a history of liability claims. This information is used by healthcare entities to ensure the public that it is receiving adequate care from a qualified medical professional. What is to be especially noted is that the information gathered by the CVO is virtually identical to the information required to underwrite a medical malpractice insurance policy.
  • The inventive process begins by having the CVO include means for obtaining the physician's permission for release of the credentialing information to the medical malpractice insurance participant. This means for obtaining the physician's permission could be in the form of a question added to the questionnaire, requesting the physician's permission. An example of what the question might be is, “May we release this information for the purpose of obtaining competitive malpractice insurance quotes for you?” The means for obtaining permission could also include a statement above the signature line stating that by signing the questionnaire the doctor is giving the CVO permission to release the information to the medical malpractice insurance participant. All of the credentialing questionnaires in which such permission is granted are then automatically forwarded by the CVO to the medical malpractice insurance participant. What is meant by the term “medical malpractice insurance participant” is any one, or more, of the following: insurance companies, brokers, agents, third party administrators, risk bearers, claims managers, risk managers, insurance marketers, and the like.
  • Using the credentialing information, at least one insurance premium quote is generated for the medical malpractice insurance policy. The medical malpractice insurance participant can provide multiple quotes from various insurance companies to the physician. The insurance participant then contacts the physician with the premium quotes and policy terms and conditions. By “quote” it is meant either a non-binding or binding quote of the cost of the insurance policy premium.
  • If the physician orders the medical malpractice insurance, the credentialing information is transferred from the credentialing questionnaire to a medical malpractice insurance application. An application for medical malpractice insurance is then generated by a computer for the physician.
  • The insurance participant then delivers the completed application to the physician for the physician's review and approval.
  • Once the medical malpractice insurance policy has been approved by the physician, a two year policy is generated by the insurance participant. This two year policy coincides with the required re-credentialing procedure for the physician. The physician will no longer be required to fill out a new application for medical malpractice insurance each time the medical malpractice policy comes up for renewal. Each time the re-credentialing is done, which, in the preferred embodiment, occurs every two years, the updated credentialing information can then be sent again to the insurance participant, and the medical malpractice insurance policy can be renewed with expediency and efficiency.
  • The two year medical malpractice insurance policy is a preferred embodiment of the invention, and is not intended to limit the invention in any way. The current inventive process also encompasses any length of policy term that coincides with the re-credentialing process. For example, if the re-credentialing occurs every three years, instead of every two years, a three year medical malpractice insurance policy can be issued.
  • Also, the information on the medical malpractice insurance application, since it is almost identical to the credentialing information, can be transferred back to a credentialing questionnaire for any subsequent health organizations that require credentialing of the subject physician. The medical malpractice insurance participant can transfer this information, and send copies of the credentialing questionnaires to the various health organizations, thereby saving the physician a great deal of time and effort. The physician will no longer be required to fill out multiple credentialing questionnaires for multiple health organizations. In the past, a physician had to fill out a credentialing questionnaire for each and every health organization from which they desired approval. With the inventive process, the physician need only fill out one credentialing questionnaire, and from that, the process transfers the information to a medical malpractice insurance application. From the insurance application, the credentialing information can be transferred to multiple questionnaires to send out to multiple health organizations. All that the physician needs to do is to contact the medical malpractice insurance participant and request that the insurance participant complete a credentialing application for whichever health organization the physician wishes. The medical malpractice insurance participant can then transfer the information from the insurance application to the credentialing questionnaire and provide the completed questionnaire to the physician. The physician then reviews the credentialing questionnaire, signs it, and submits it to the credentialing entity, or health organization. The inventive process encompasses all of the subsequent applications and questionnaires that the physician would need for any subsequent health organizations that require the credentialing information.
  • If a physician has already obtained medical malpractice insurance coverage, the medical malpractice insurance participant will have all, or most, of the information necessary for the credentialing process. This invention also encompasses the initial step of the process being the medical malpractice participant transferring the information from the medical malpractice insurance application to the credentialing questionnaire. In this manner, the credentialing process can be efficiently and quickly completed even after the physician has a medical malpractice insurance policy.
  • In either of the situations where the information is going from the insurance application to the credentialing questionnaire, or vice versa, it is possible that some of the questions will not match up. If one of the questions on either the credentialing questionnaire or the insurance application is left blank due to the questions not matching up, these questions will be highlighted, and when the physician receives the application or questionnaire, the physician will fill in the highlighted blank spaces.
  • In the preferred embodiment, the inventive process occurs automatically via electronic transmission and computer data manipulation. The required computer hardware, and the necessary computer code, would be obvious to one skilled in the computer art.
  • However, this invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment, and can be accomplished without the use of computers or electronic means. The methods of transferring information manually, or by way of a hybrid combination of manual and electronic transference, are both encompassed by this invention. In the manual, or hybrid of manual and electronic, transference embodiments, the steps taken to link the insurance application with the credentialing information are identical to the steps taken in the preferred embodiment, and those steps are incorporated herein by reference.
  • The present invention is also not limited to the medical malpractice field, but includes the entire range of insurance participants. The present invention can be used to link any information database, not created for insurance purposes, to any type of insurance application. The only information databases not encompassed within this invention would be databases created for the purpose of filling out an insurance application, or for the purpose of obtaining any type of insurance. An example of the type of information database not encompassed within this invention would be an Internet insurance application form. However, any other information database, not created for insurance purposes, can be linked by this inventive process to an insurance application. The means by which this information is linked with the insurance application is identical to the process described in the medical malpractice insurance process, and the steps of the process are incorporated herein by reference. However, when linking the information to other forms of insurance, further questions may need to be added in order to gather further, necessary information. An example of some further questions, necessary for life insurance, would be whether someone is a smoker or a nonsmoker.
  • The types of insurance applications that can be linked can include, but are not limited to, the following: life insurance, automobile insurance, medical malpractice insurance, legal malpractice insurance, professional liability insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, renter's insurance, homeowner's insurance, flood insurance, fire insurance, hurricane insurance, and earthquake insurance, or any other line of insurance.
  • It is to be noted that the invention encompasses the idea that the credentialing organization, the healthcare entity, the insurance participant, etc. can be one entity or separate entities. For example, a hospital that does its own credentialing and provides insurance for its physicians is encompassed within this invention.
  • In another embodiment of this invention, there is no need for a credentialing questionnaire to be provided. The CVO should have all the data necessary for filling out an insurance application, and all that would be needed would be the physician's permission for use of the information. In this embodiment, the initial step of the process would be transferring the credentialing information from the CVO directly into either an insurance application or an insurance policy.
  • The invention also encompasses the use of electronic transmission of the information to the physician for the physician's approval. The physician could then send approval for the insurance policy back to the insurance participant. Under this method of the invention, no signature is required by the physician, only the physician's approval of the insurance policy.
  • The invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alternations in so far as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims (20)

1. A process of linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application, the process comprising the steps of:
providing a questionnaire for use in compiling credentialing information concerning an associated physician to create a first credentialing application, the questionnaire including means for obtaining the physician's permission for release of the credentialing information to an associated medical malpractice insurance participant;
electronically forwarding the information to an associated credentialing entity;
verifying the credentialing information;
electronically forwarding the questionnaire from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant if the physician gave permission for release of the credentialing information;
providing the physician with at least one insurance premium quote generated by the medical malpractice insurance participant for use in generating a medical malpractice insurance policy for the physician based at least in part on the credentialing information;
preparing a medical malpractice insurance application for the physician;
electronically transferring at least a portion of the verified credentialing information from the questionnaire to the medical malpractice insurance application;
completing the formation of the medical malpractice insurance application;
delivering the medical malpractice insurance application to the physician for the physician's review and approval;
generating the medical malpractice insurance policy to coincide with subsequent credentialing applications for the physician;
electronically transferring the credentialing information from the medical malpractice insurance policy to the subsequent credentialing application;
generating a subsequent credentialing application; and,
sending the subsequent credentialing application to an associated healthcare organization to which the physician must provide the credentialing information.
2. A process of linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application, the process comprising the steps of:
compiling credentialing information from a credentialing questionnaire regarding an associated healthcare provider;
obtaining the healthcare providers permission for release of the credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance provider;
electronically forwarding at least a portion of the credentialing information to an associated medical malpractice insurance participant;
electronically transferring the at least a portion of the credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance application; and,
processing the medical malpractice insurance application based on the at least a portion of the credentialing information.
3. The process of claim 2, wherein after forwarding at least a portion of the credentialing information from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant, the process comprises the step of:
providing the healthcare provider with at least one insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy generated by the medical malpractice insurance participant.
4. The process of claim 2, wherein the process further comprises the step of:
delivering the medical malpractice insurance application to the healthcare provider for the healthcare provider's review and approval.
5. The process of claim 4, wherein the step of generating an insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy comprises the steps of:
quoting the insurance premium to the healthcare provider; and,
selling the medical malpractice insurance policy to the healthcare provider.
6. The process of claim 5, wherein the process further comprises the step of:
generating the medical malpractice insurance policy, the policy being a two-year policy, in order to coincide with a required re-credentialing procedure for the healthcare provider.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein the step of forwarding the credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance participant comprises the steps of:
inserting means for obtaining the healthcare providers permission for release of the credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance provider into the questionnaire, and,
electronically forwarding all of the credentialing questionnaires with an affirmative response to the medical malpractice insurance participant.
8. The process of claim 7, wherein the process further comprises the steps of:
generating a second credentialing application;
electronically transferring the credentialing information from the medical malpractice insurance application to the second credentialing application; and,
sending the second credentialing application to another health organization to which the physician must provide the credentialing information.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein the process further comprises the step of:
repeating the preceding three steps of claim 8.
10-17. (canceled)
18. An apparatus for linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance application, the apparatus comprising:
means for compiling credentialing information regarding an associated healthcare provider from a credentialing questionnaire;
means for electronically forwarding the credentialing information to an associated medical malpractice insurance participant;
means for generating at least one insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy; and,
means for electronically transferring the credentialing information from the credentialing questionnaire to the medical malpractice insurance application.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the apparatus further comprises means for generating the medical malpractice insurance policy, the policy being of a duration, in order to coincide with a required re-credentialing procedure for the healthcare provider.
20-24. (canceled)
25. A process for linking credentialing information with a medical malpractice insurance policy, the process comprising the steps of:
providing means for obtaining an associated healthcare provider's permission to release the credentialing information to an associated medical malpractice insurance participant;
receiving permission from the healthcare provider to release the credentialing information;
electronically forwarding at least a portion of the credentialing information from an associated credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant; and,
providing the healthcare provider with at least one insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy generated by the medical malpractice insurance participant.
26. The process of claim 25, wherein the process further comprises the steps of:
receiving the healthcare provider's approval of the at least one insurance premium quote; and,
creating a medical malpractice insurance policy.
27. The process of claim 26, wherein providing the healthcare provider with at least one insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy generated by the medical malpractice insurance participant comprises the steps of:
providing the healthcare provider with at least one insurance premium quote for a medical malpractice insurance policy generated by the medical malpractice insurance participant; and,
electronically transferring the credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance application.
28. The process of claim 2, wherein electronically forwarding at least a portion of the credentialing information from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant further comprises the step of:
electronically forwarding at least a portion of verified credentialing information from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice participant.
29. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the means for electronically forwarding the credentialing information to a medical malpractice participant further comprises:
means for electronically forwarding verified credentialing information to a medical malpractice insurance participant.
30. The process of claim 25, wherein electronically forwarding at least a portion of the credentialing information from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant further comprises the step of:
electronically forwarding at least a portion of verified credentialing information from the credentialing entity to the medical malpractice insurance participant.
31-34. (canceled)
US11/042,683 1999-06-24 2005-01-25 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration Abandoned US20050137915A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/042,683 US20050137915A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2005-01-25 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US13/182,509 US20110270627A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2011-07-14 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/339,479 US6862571B2 (en) 1999-06-24 1999-06-24 Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US11/042,683 US20050137915A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2005-01-25 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/339,479 Continuation US6862571B2 (en) 1999-06-24 1999-06-24 Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US12/133,467 Continuation US20080262876A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2008-06-05 Credentialer medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/182,509 Continuation US20110270627A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2011-07-14 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050137915A1 true US20050137915A1 (en) 2005-06-23

Family

ID=23329185

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/339,479 Expired - Fee Related US6862571B2 (en) 1999-06-24 1999-06-24 Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US10/628,538 Abandoned US20040024618A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2003-07-28 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US11/042,683 Abandoned US20050137915A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2005-01-25 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US13/182,509 Abandoned US20110270627A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2011-07-14 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/339,479 Expired - Fee Related US6862571B2 (en) 1999-06-24 1999-06-24 Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US10/628,538 Abandoned US20040024618A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2003-07-28 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/182,509 Abandoned US20110270627A1 (en) 1999-06-24 2011-07-14 Credentialer/medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US6862571B2 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030125990A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Robert Rudy Methods and apparatus for selecting an insurance carrier for an online insurance policy purchase
US20080154653A1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2008-06-26 Timothy Gayle Goux System and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereof
US20090063272A1 (en) * 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 John Topete Method, system and computer-readable media for acquiring, providing and responding to data, requests and commands related to real property rental
US7698159B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2010-04-13 Genworth Financial Inc. Systems and methods for performing data collection
US7801748B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2010-09-21 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for detecting outliers for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7813945B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2010-10-12 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for multivariate adaptive regression splines classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7818186B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-10-19 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7844477B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-11-30 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7844476B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-11-30 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7895062B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-02-22 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7899688B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-03-01 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8005693B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-08-23 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8214314B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2012-07-03 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for a fusion classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8793146B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2014-07-29 Genworth Holdings, Inc. System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system

Families Citing this family (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6862571B2 (en) * 1999-06-24 2005-03-01 The Premium Group, Inc. Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US20010039547A1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2001-11-08 Black Jonathan K. Internet web-based technology for storing, archiving, and updating key personal identity items
JP3711324B2 (en) * 2000-06-13 2005-11-02 株式会社日本統計事務センター Authentication history certification system and method
WO2002019242A1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2002-03-07 American International Group, Inc. Method for selling marine cargo insurance in a network environment
AU2001292760A1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2002-04-02 American International Group, Inc. Internet insurance product
US20020198744A1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2002-12-26 Ty Sagalow Integrated suite of products/services for conducting business online
WO2002035758A2 (en) * 2000-10-26 2002-05-02 American International Group, Inc. Identity insurance transaction method
WO2002052480A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-07-04 Trac Medical Solutions, Inc. Dynamic electronic chain-of-trust document with audit trail
US7908304B2 (en) 2001-03-15 2011-03-15 Versata Development Group, Inc. Method and system for managing distributor information
US7925513B2 (en) 2001-03-15 2011-04-12 Versata Development Group, Inc. Framework for processing sales transaction data
US20020143583A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2002-10-03 Reader Robert A. Online reinsurance renewal method
US20020184052A1 (en) * 2001-06-05 2002-12-05 Parker Matthew A. Method of providing an elective organization providing premium health services for members of the organization
US7904326B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2011-03-08 Versata Development Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for performing collective validation of credential information
US20030028406A1 (en) * 2001-07-24 2003-02-06 Herz Frederick S. M. Database for pre-screening potentially litigious patients
EP1425680A4 (en) * 2001-08-31 2006-05-03 Trac Medical Solutions Inc System for interactive processing of form documents
US7630910B2 (en) * 2001-12-31 2009-12-08 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US20030182159A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-09-25 Bonissone Piero Patrone Process for summarizing information for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US20030177032A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-09-18 Bonissone Piero Patrone System for summerizing information for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US20030130875A1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2003-07-10 Hawash Maher M. Real-time prescription renewal transaction across a network
US20030130867A1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2003-07-10 Rohan Coelho Consent system for accessing health information
US20040148201A1 (en) * 2003-01-27 2004-07-29 Smith Tracy Lee Insurance management system
US7689444B2 (en) * 2003-02-19 2010-03-30 Internet Pipeline, Inc. Electronic insurance application fulfillment system and method
DE10311634A1 (en) * 2003-03-14 2004-09-30 Authentidate International Ag Electronic transmission of documents
US7930192B1 (en) 2003-03-27 2011-04-19 Philip John Milanovich Health savings account system
US7930190B1 (en) 2003-03-27 2011-04-19 Philip John Milanovich Methods of rating service providers
US7346525B1 (en) 2003-03-27 2008-03-18 Philip John Milanovich Method and system for providing insurance to consumers against unfavorable outcomes resulting from services, and method of rating risks associated with the services
US20040236611A1 (en) * 2003-04-30 2004-11-25 Ge Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. System and process for a neural network classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7567914B2 (en) * 2003-04-30 2009-07-28 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for dominance classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US20050125253A1 (en) * 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 Ge Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. System and method for using medication and medical condition information in automated insurance underwriting
US7320003B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2008-01-15 Genworth Financial, Inc. Method and system for storing and retrieving document data using a markup language string and a serialized string
US20050182666A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-08-18 Perry Timothy P.J. Method and system for electronically routing and processing information
US8024784B1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2011-09-20 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Method and system for providing remote secure access to a peer computer
US7752060B2 (en) * 2006-02-08 2010-07-06 Health Grades, Inc. Internet system for connecting healthcare providers and patients
US7467113B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2008-12-16 Walgreen Co. License verification system and method
US20080281631A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2008-11-13 Syth Linda H Health Information Management System
US20100077349A1 (en) * 2009-11-06 2010-03-25 Health Grades, Inc. Patient direct connect
US8973115B2 (en) 2012-10-04 2015-03-03 American Nurses Credentialing Center System and method for assembling and analyzing a candidate application for a credential
US20170293723A1 (en) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Scott T. Friesen Techniques for centrally managing a credentialing life cycle for hospitals, providers, insurance payers, contract management, and claims data processing organizations

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4831526A (en) * 1986-04-22 1989-05-16 The Chubb Corporation Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system
US4858121A (en) * 1986-12-12 1989-08-15 Medical Payment Systems, Incorporated Medical payment system
US5070452A (en) * 1987-06-30 1991-12-03 Ngs American, Inc. Computerized medical insurance system including means to automatically update member eligibility files at pre-established intervals
US5272623A (en) * 1990-11-07 1993-12-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Software programming method for forming Government contracting documents
US5325478A (en) * 1989-09-15 1994-06-28 Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc. Method for displaying information from an information based computer system
US5483443A (en) * 1994-04-08 1996-01-09 Promt Medical Systems Method for computing current procedural terminology codes from physician generated documentation
US5640501A (en) * 1990-10-31 1997-06-17 Borland International, Inc. Development system and methods for visually creating goal oriented electronic form applications having decision trees
US5644778A (en) * 1993-11-02 1997-07-01 Athena Of North America, Inc. Medical transaction system
US5664109A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-09-02 E-Systems, Inc. Method for extracting pre-defined data items from medical service records generated by health care providers
US5701423A (en) * 1992-04-10 1997-12-23 Puma Technology, Inc. Method for mapping, translating, and dynamically reconciling data between disparate computer platforms
US5758324A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-05-26 Hartman; Richard L. Resume storage and retrieval system
US5787434A (en) * 1995-02-24 1998-07-28 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. File processing apparatus, file processing method and a computer readable memory media
US6035276A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-03-07 Veritas Medical Services, Inc. Medical practitioner credentialing system
US6104793A (en) * 1997-04-24 2000-08-15 Dyer; Bruce F. Facility modem-to-modem application
US6189029B1 (en) * 1996-09-20 2001-02-13 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Web survey tool builder and result compiler
US6272471B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2001-08-07 Jeffrey J. Segal Method and apparatus for deterring frivolous professional liability claims

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2231420A (en) * 1989-04-04 1990-11-14 Agency Management Services Inc Insurance rating
US6862571B2 (en) * 1999-06-24 2005-03-01 The Premium Group, Inc. Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4831526A (en) * 1986-04-22 1989-05-16 The Chubb Corporation Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system
US4858121A (en) * 1986-12-12 1989-08-15 Medical Payment Systems, Incorporated Medical payment system
US5070452A (en) * 1987-06-30 1991-12-03 Ngs American, Inc. Computerized medical insurance system including means to automatically update member eligibility files at pre-established intervals
US5325478A (en) * 1989-09-15 1994-06-28 Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc. Method for displaying information from an information based computer system
US5640501A (en) * 1990-10-31 1997-06-17 Borland International, Inc. Development system and methods for visually creating goal oriented electronic form applications having decision trees
US5272623A (en) * 1990-11-07 1993-12-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Software programming method for forming Government contracting documents
US5701423A (en) * 1992-04-10 1997-12-23 Puma Technology, Inc. Method for mapping, translating, and dynamically reconciling data between disparate computer platforms
US5644778A (en) * 1993-11-02 1997-07-01 Athena Of North America, Inc. Medical transaction system
US5483443A (en) * 1994-04-08 1996-01-09 Promt Medical Systems Method for computing current procedural terminology codes from physician generated documentation
US5787434A (en) * 1995-02-24 1998-07-28 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. File processing apparatus, file processing method and a computer readable memory media
US5664109A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-09-02 E-Systems, Inc. Method for extracting pre-defined data items from medical service records generated by health care providers
US5758324A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-05-26 Hartman; Richard L. Resume storage and retrieval system
US6189029B1 (en) * 1996-09-20 2001-02-13 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Web survey tool builder and result compiler
US6104793A (en) * 1997-04-24 2000-08-15 Dyer; Bruce F. Facility modem-to-modem application
US6035276A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-03-07 Veritas Medical Services, Inc. Medical practitioner credentialing system
US6571214B2 (en) * 1997-10-17 2003-05-27 Veritas Medical Services, Inc. Medical practitioner credentialing system
US6272471B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2001-08-07 Jeffrey J. Segal Method and apparatus for deterring frivolous professional liability claims

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Turner, Missy, "Medical Society taking credentialing unit national", San Antonio Business Journal, February 26, 1999 *

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080154653A1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2008-06-26 Timothy Gayle Goux System and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereof
US8799024B2 (en) * 2001-10-23 2014-08-05 Timothy Gayle Goux System and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereof
US20030125990A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Robert Rudy Methods and apparatus for selecting an insurance carrier for an online insurance policy purchase
US7203734B2 (en) 2001-12-28 2007-04-10 Insurancenoodle, Inc. Methods and apparatus for selecting an insurance carrier for an online insurance policy purchase
US7904532B2 (en) 2001-12-28 2011-03-08 Insurancenoodle, Inc. Methods and apparatus for selecting an insurance carrier for an online insurance policy purchase
US7844477B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-11-30 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7818186B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-10-19 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7844476B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2010-11-30 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7895062B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-02-22 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7899688B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-03-01 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8005693B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-08-23 Genworth Financial, Inc. Process for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8793146B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2014-07-29 Genworth Holdings, Inc. System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7813945B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2010-10-12 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for multivariate adaptive regression splines classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7801748B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2010-09-21 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for detecting outliers for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US8214314B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2012-07-03 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and process for a fusion classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7698159B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2010-04-13 Genworth Financial Inc. Systems and methods for performing data collection
US20090063272A1 (en) * 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 John Topete Method, system and computer-readable media for acquiring, providing and responding to data, requests and commands related to real property rental

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20020087354A1 (en) 2002-07-04
US20110270627A1 (en) 2011-11-03
US20040024618A1 (en) 2004-02-05
US6862571B2 (en) 2005-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6862571B2 (en) Credentialer/Medical malpractice insurance collaboration
US7469214B2 (en) Method of medical malpractice and insurance collaboration
US20100106554A1 (en) Office management solution
US20020107703A1 (en) Method and system for automated lien management
Phillips 30th Annual APRN Legislative Update: Improving access to healthcare one state at a time
Phillips 29th annual APRN legislative update
Phillips 25th annual legislative update: Evidence-based practice reforms improve access to APRN care
Fortney et al. Developing telemental health partnerships between state medical schools and federally qualified health centers: navigating the regulatory landscape and policy recommendations
US20220019975A1 (en) Methods and systems for providing authenticated fiduciaries with access to secured digital assets
US20040015432A1 (en) Business method for creating and managing multilateral contractual relationships electronically and on a large scale
US20080262876A1 (en) Credentialer medical malpractice insurance collaboration
CA3155024A1 (en) Method and system for auditing, creating, storing and/or issuing digital powers of attorney and other legal and/or related health documents
Sherer et al. Physician Law Evolving Trends and Hot Topics: Telehealth
Gorham et al. Developing an integrated clinical decision support system for the early identification and management of kidney disease—building cross-sectoral partnerships
Johnson A case for an efficient system: how relaxing midlevel provider supervision and prescriptive authority laws will reduce costs and increase access to health care in Alabama
GILROY et al. Reimbursement Considerations
Williamson et al. VA Health Care-Further Action Needed to Address Weaknesses in Management and Oversight of Non-VA Medical Care:.
Muck TO: Invited Vendors FROM: Judith Muck, Executive Director RE: Request for Proposal for Dental Services
Whitten Telemedicine in Michigan: a policy report addressing legal and regulatory barriers
Kadzielski et al. Managed Care Contracting: Pitfalls and Promises
Hodder et al. Resource Guide for Consumers: How to Access Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Benefits
Perry Making credentialing better: a process to bring all of SCDMH agencies credentialing under one umbrella
Komen Policies and Procedures
Brenner Building Up Telecommunications in the German Health Insurance Systems: Aims, Requirements, Barriers, Components
Williamson et al. VA Health Care: Improved Oversight Needed for Reviewing and Reporting Providers for Quality and Safety Concerns

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SINCLAIR ALLISON, INC., OHIO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THE PREMIUM GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017746/0528

Effective date: 20060601

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION