US20060277125A1 - Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities - Google Patents
Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060277125A1 US20060277125A1 US11/144,573 US14457305A US2006277125A1 US 20060277125 A1 US20060277125 A1 US 20060277125A1 US 14457305 A US14457305 A US 14457305A US 2006277125 A1 US2006277125 A1 US 2006277125A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- warrant
- company
- instrument
- holder
- preferred
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
Definitions
- the invention relates to the field of securities and financing, and more particularly to combining multiple types of instruments to achieve certain advantages.
- a number of financial instruments are known and used to raise funds. Each of these known instruments has certain advantages and disadvantages.
- a financial instrument is needed that can be used to raise funds that provides tax and balance sheet advantages, as well as a system and method for issue and redemption of the financial instrument.
- the invention provides a financial instrument with two parts sold as a unit, comprising a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant to buy a common security in the company.
- the instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant.
- the preferred security is perpetual. In one aspect, the preferred security is non-cumulative. In one aspect, the preferred security is cumulative. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a warrant strike price by a holder of the instrument upon redemption of the instrument. In one aspect, payment of the warrant strike price occurs if the holder of the instrument exercises the warrant. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a preferred call price by an issuer of the instrument. In one aspect, the holder of the instrument receives the common security. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a warrant call price to a holder of the instrument upon redemption of the instrument. In one aspect, payment of the warrant call price occurs if the holder of the instrument does not exercise the warrant. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a preferred call price by an issuer of the instrument. In one aspect, the holder of the instrument receives cash.
- the invention provides a system and method for raising funds comprising issuing a financial instrument with two parts as a unit.
- the two parts include a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant allowing a holder of the warrant to buy a common security in the company.
- the instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant.
- the invention further provides for redeeming the financial instrument after issue, and receiving a warrant strike price from a holder of the instrument.
- receiving the warrant strike price occurs a predetermined number of days after redeeming the instrument.
- the system and method further comprise paying a preferred call price to the holder.
- paying the preferred call price occurs a predetermined number of days after receiving the strike price.
- the system and method further comprise issuing the common security in the company to the holder.
- the system and method further comprise retiring the preferred security.
- the invention provides a system and method for raising funds comprising issuing a financial instrument with two parts as a unit.
- the two parts include a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant allowing a holder of the warrant to buy a common security in the company.
- the instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant.
- the invention further provides for redeeming the financial instrument after issue, and paying a warrant call price to a holder of the instrument.
- paying the warrant call price occurs a predetermined number of days after redeeming the instrument. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise paying a preferred call price to the holder. In one aspect, paying the preferred call price occurs a predetermined number of days after paying the warrant call price. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise retiring the preferred security.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a system according to one embodiment
- FIG. 2 illustrates a relationship between parties in one embodiment
- FIG. 3 illustrates steps in a method according to one embodiment
- FIG. 4 illustrates steps in a method according to one embodiment
- FIG. 5 illustrates a timeline for redemption in one embodiment.
- a financial instrument that includes two parts.
- One part of the instrument is a preferred security of an issuing company, and the other part of the instrument is a warrant to buy common stock of the issuing company.
- the preferred security and the warrant are issued together in what will be called for convenience a Net Equity Option Preferred or “NEO Preferred.”
- the NEO Preferred includes a redemption right that allows the issuer to call the instrument. In one embodiment, the NEO Preferred is not redeemable by the issuer during an initial period, such as 5 years.
- the issuer redeems the NEO Preferred, the investor or holder of the NEO Preferred has a period of time during which they may exercise the warrant to buy common shares of the issuing company by tendering the warrant strike price along with the warrant to the issuing company. If the investor or holder of the NEO Preferred does not exercise the warrant after the issuer redeems the instrument, then the issuer pays the holder or investor a warrant call price. Regardless of whether the warrant is exercised or not exercised, at a later date, the issuer pays the investor or holder a preferred call price, and the preferred is retired.
- system 100 includes an issuing company 102 and investor(s) 104 .
- Issuing company 102 includes computers with a central processing unit or CPU 106 , memory (RAM, ROM, etc.) 108 , input/output devices (keyboards, displays, printers, etc.) 110 , fixed and removable storage (hard drive, floppy drive, optical drive, etc.) 112 , and network interface devices (modems, ethernet cards, wifi cards, etc.) 114 .
- CPU central processing unit
- memory RAM, ROM, etc.
- input/output devices keyboards, displays, printers, etc.
- fixed and removable storage hard drive, floppy drive, optical drive, etc.
- network interface devices modems, ethernet cards, wifi cards, etc.
- investor(s) 104 also include a central processing unit or CPU 106 , memory (RAM, ROM, etc.) 108 , input/output devices (keyboards, displays, printers, etc.) 110 , fixed and removable storage (hard drive, floppy drive, optical drive, etc.) 112 , and network interface devices (modems, ethernet cards, wifi cards, etc.) 114 .
- Issuing company 102 and investor(s) 104 are interconnected by a network (LAN, WAN, intranet, extranet, the Internet, etc.) 116 .
- the disclosed components of system 100 are not particular, and variations and equivalents are envisioned.
- company 102 issues NEO Preferred financial instruments to investors 104 , and receives $50.00 cash in return for each instrument.
- the NEO Preferred financial instrument includes a preferred security and a warrant.
- the value of the preferred security is $30.00 and the value of the warrant is $20.00.
- the combined value of the preferred security and the warrant equals the $50.00 that is received in cash from the investor.
- a warrant is a derivative security that gives the holder a right to purchase securities (usually equity) from the issuer at a specific price within a certain time frame.
- a warrant is different from a call option, and one main difference is that a warrant is issued and guaranteed by the issuing company, whereas a call option is an exchange instrument and is not issued by the company.
- the lifetime of a warrant is often measured in years, while the lifetime of a typical call option is measured in months.
- a preferred security is a fixed income security that is issued by a private or public corporation and that possesses characteristics of both debt and preferred stock.
- Preferred securities rank above preferred stock but below subordinated debt and will typically pay a fixed coupon rate. This means that the stated dividend or coupon rate must be paid before dividends to common stock holders.
- Most preferred securities have a stated maturity date.
- Preferred securities can be perpetual, which means that they are issued without a maturity date but offer fixed dividend payments. Perpetual preferred securities typically have call protection for the first five years.
- Preferred securities can be cumulative, or non-cumulative.
- a cumulative preferred security will accumulate dividends from one dividend period to the next. If a dividend is not paid in a period, a non-cumulative preferred security will not accumulate dividends from one dividend period to the next.
- Convertible preferred securities are another form of preferred securities, which provides an option to convert preferred shares into common shares.
- Preferred securities whether they are perpetual, cumulative or non-cumulative, are generally issued directly by a company.
- Trust preferred securities are another known form of preferred security. Banks sometimes use trust preferred securities because they are treated as debt for tax purposes, but count as Tier I capital, within limits, for regulatory purposes. Issuing trust preferred securities does not reduce an existing shareholder's ownership interest, because issue of a trust preferred security is like borrowing.
- the bank In order for a bank to take advantage of trust preferred securities, the bank creates a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”).
- SPV special purpose vehicle
- the bank has an ownership interest in the SPV, and the SPV issues the trust preferred securities to investors.
- the SPV takes the proceeds from issue of the trust preferred securities and loans the funds to the bank.
- the bank issues debt notes as evidence of its indebtedness to the SPV.
- the embodiments of the invention differ from trust preferred securities.
- trust preferred securities have a maturity date, while in one embodiment of the invention the instrument is perpetual.
- the trust issues the trust preferred securities, while in one embodiment of the invention the company itself issues the instrument.
- the trust can suspend payments only up to five years, while in one embodiment of the invention the payments can be suspended for longer than 5 years.
- step 302 company 102 issues the NEO Preferred instrument.
- the NEO Preferred instrument includes a preferred security and a warrant.
- the issuing company is not able to redeem the instrument during an initial no-redemption period, which is typically the first 5 years after issue. This is represented by step 304 , where the methods loops until the issuer no-redeem period expires.
- system 100 determines whether issuing company 102 has started the redemption process for the instrument, and if so, executes step 402 of FIG. 4 .
- system 100 determines whether investor 104 has exercised the warrant.
- system 100 determines at step 308 that the investor has exercised the warrant, then at step 310 , investor 104 tenders the warrant strike price and warrant to issuing company 102 .
- the preferred security and the warrant of the NEO Preferred can be separated after issue.
- system 100 determines whether the holder of the warrant also holds the preferred security (i.e., the holder has not separated the warrant and the preferred security). If the holder of the warrant also holds the preferred and wants to take advantage of the remarketing terms of the NEO Preferred, which returns the value of the warrant strike price to the holder and retires the preferred security, then at step 314 , a 90 day clock starts.
- system 100 determines whether the 90 day clock has expired. If not, system 100 loops to step 316 . If so, then at step 318 , issuer 102 pays the preferred call price to investor 104 , and the preferred is retired. In one embodiment, the preferred call price and the warrant strike price are the same amount. This means that the holder of the warrant tenders the warrant strike price ($30.00) to exercise the warrant, and then 90 days later the issuer pays the holder the preferred call price ($30.00), which effectively cancels the two amounts.
- issuer 102 issues common shares to investor 104 , and the warrant is retired.
- system 100 determines that investor 104 does not also hold the preferred security or does not want to remarket the preferred security, then at step 320 , issuer 102 issues common shares to investor 104 , and the warrant is retired.
- system 100 determines whether the warrant maturity date has been reached. If not, system 100 loops to step 306 . If so, then at step 324 , the warrant expires.
- step 306 system 100 determines that issuing company 102 has started the redemption process for the instrument, then at step 402 of FIG. 4 , issuing company 102 provides notice of the redemption to investors 104 , and two time clocks start. One clock runs for 30 days, and the other clock runs for 90 days.
- system 100 determines whether investor 104 has exercised the warrant, and if not, at step 406 , system 100 determines whether the 30 day clock has expired. If the 30 day clock is still running, system 100 loops to step 404 .
- system 100 determines that the 30 day clock has expired without investor 104 exercising the warrant, then at step 408 , issuing company 102 pays a warrant call price ($20.00 in the example) to investor 104 .
- system 100 determines whether the 90 day clock is still running, and if so, system 100 loops to step 410 . If system 100 determines that the 90 day clock has expired at step 410 , then at step 412 issuing company 102 pays investor 104 a preferred call price ($30.00 in the example).
- investor 104 exercises the warrant
- investor 104 tenders the warrant and warrant strike price ($30.00 in the example) to issuing company 102
- issuing company 102 issues the common shares to investor 104 .
- system 100 determines whether the 90 day clock is still running, and if so, system 100 loops to step 416 . If, at step 416 , system 100 determines that the 90 day clock has expired, then at step 418 issuing company 102 pays investor 104 a preferred call price ($30.00 in the example). In one embodiment, the preferred call price and the warrant strike price are the same amount. This means that the holder of the warrant tenders the warrant strike price ($30.00) to exercise the warrant, and then 90 days later the issuer pays the holder the preferred call price ($30.00), which effectively cancels the two amounts.
- the warrant has a maturity of many years, such as between 50 and 99 years.
- the warrant and the preferred are technically separated. If the warrant is exercised, the preferred is redeemed within 90 days.
- the coupon can be brought down by addition of a provisional call at a small threshold (110 to 120%) above the conversion price, which guarantees share issuance if the call is exercised.
- the NEO Preferred is not puttable by the holder.
- the example $50.00 amount paid by investors for a NEO Preferred, the $30.00 warrant strike price, the $30.00 preferred call price, and the $20.00 warrant call price are just that, and variations in the amounts are clearly envisioned.
- investors 104 do not have an opportunity to exercise the warrant until after the issuer no-redeem period expires. However, it is envisioned that in other embodiments, investor 104 can exercise the warrant at any time, even during the no-redeem period.
- a NEO Preferred has high equity credit financing, E bucket for the warrant, and D bucket for the preferred security by Moody's. Proceeds from the value of the warrant (40% in the example) are booked to additional paid in capital (APIC) on the balance sheet of the issuing company as equity, thereby receiving 100% equity credit. Proceeds from the value of the preferred (60% in the example) appear on the balance sheet of the issuing company as Preferred Stock, receiving D bucket treatment by Moody's. In the example, there is an overall implied equity credit of 70%. Further, there is better agency treatment because only the proceeds from the preferred (60% in the example) are liquidation preference. There is also speed to market because of the 144 A offering format. Treasury stock method accounting for the warrant results in better earnings per share than traditional convertible preferred. There is also a lower dividend than traditional preferred, and the structure is both simple and transparent.
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to the field of securities and financing, and more particularly to combining multiple types of instruments to achieve certain advantages.
- A number of financial instruments are known and used to raise funds. Each of these known instruments has certain advantages and disadvantages. A financial instrument is needed that can be used to raise funds that provides tax and balance sheet advantages, as well as a system and method for issue and redemption of the financial instrument.
- The preceding description is not to be construed as an admission that any of the description is prior art relative to the present invention.
- In one aspect, the invention provides a financial instrument with two parts sold as a unit, comprising a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant to buy a common security in the company. The instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant.
- In one aspect, the preferred security is perpetual. In one aspect, the preferred security is non-cumulative. In one aspect, the preferred security is cumulative. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a warrant strike price by a holder of the instrument upon redemption of the instrument. In one aspect, payment of the warrant strike price occurs if the holder of the instrument exercises the warrant. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a preferred call price by an issuer of the instrument. In one aspect, the holder of the instrument receives the common security. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a warrant call price to a holder of the instrument upon redemption of the instrument. In one aspect, payment of the warrant call price occurs if the holder of the instrument does not exercise the warrant. In one aspect, the instrument further includes terms requiring payment of a preferred call price by an issuer of the instrument. In one aspect, the holder of the instrument receives cash.
- In one aspect, the invention provides a system and method for raising funds comprising issuing a financial instrument with two parts as a unit. The two parts include a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant allowing a holder of the warrant to buy a common security in the company. The instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant. The invention further provides for redeeming the financial instrument after issue, and receiving a warrant strike price from a holder of the instrument.
- In one aspect, receiving the warrant strike price occurs a predetermined number of days after redeeming the instrument. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise paying a preferred call price to the holder. In one aspect, paying the preferred call price occurs a predetermined number of days after receiving the strike price. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise issuing the common security in the company to the holder. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise retiring the preferred security.
- In one aspect, the invention provides a system and method for raising funds comprising issuing a financial instrument with two parts as a unit. The two parts include a preferred security in a company that is issued directly by the company, and a warrant allowing a holder of the warrant to buy a common security in the company. The instrument includes a redemption right that is exercisable by the company on both the preferred security and the warrant. The invention further provides for redeeming the financial instrument after issue, and paying a warrant call price to a holder of the instrument.
- In one aspect, paying the warrant call price occurs a predetermined number of days after redeeming the instrument. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise paying a preferred call price to the holder. In one aspect, paying the preferred call price occurs a predetermined number of days after paying the warrant call price. In one aspect, the system and method further comprise retiring the preferred security.
- The foregoing specific aspects are illustrative of those which can be achieved, and are not intended to be exhaustive or limiting. Thus, the objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the description herein or can be learned from practicing the invention, both as embodied herein or as modified in view of any variations which may be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the present invention resides in the novel parts, constructions, arrangements, combinations and improvements herein shown and described.
- The foregoing features and other aspects of the invention are explained in the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures wherein:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a system according to one embodiment; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a relationship between parties in one embodiment; -
FIG. 3 illustrates steps in a method according to one embodiment; -
FIG. 4 illustrates steps in a method according to one embodiment; and -
FIG. 5 illustrates a timeline for redemption in one embodiment. - It is understood that the drawings are for illustration only and are not limiting.
- In the various embodiments disclosed below, a financial instrument is described that includes two parts. One part of the instrument is a preferred security of an issuing company, and the other part of the instrument is a warrant to buy common stock of the issuing company. The preferred security and the warrant are issued together in what will be called for convenience a Net Equity Option Preferred or “NEO Preferred.” The NEO Preferred includes a redemption right that allows the issuer to call the instrument. In one embodiment, the NEO Preferred is not redeemable by the issuer during an initial period, such as 5 years. If the issuer redeems the NEO Preferred, the investor or holder of the NEO Preferred has a period of time during which they may exercise the warrant to buy common shares of the issuing company by tendering the warrant strike price along with the warrant to the issuing company. If the investor or holder of the NEO Preferred does not exercise the warrant after the issuer redeems the instrument, then the issuer pays the holder or investor a warrant call price. Regardless of whether the warrant is exercised or not exercised, at a later date, the issuer pays the investor or holder a preferred call price, and the preferred is retired. These features are illustrated in the figures, and described in greater detail below.
- An Example System
- Referring to
FIG. 1 ,system 100 according to one embodiment includes an issuingcompany 102 and investor(s) 104. Issuingcompany 102 includes computers with a central processing unit orCPU 106, memory (RAM, ROM, etc.) 108, input/output devices (keyboards, displays, printers, etc.) 110, fixed and removable storage (hard drive, floppy drive, optical drive, etc.) 112, and network interface devices (modems, ethernet cards, wifi cards, etc.) 114. Although not illustrated, investor(s) 104 also include a central processing unit orCPU 106, memory (RAM, ROM, etc.) 108, input/output devices (keyboards, displays, printers, etc.) 110, fixed and removable storage (hard drive, floppy drive, optical drive, etc.) 112, and network interface devices (modems, ethernet cards, wifi cards, etc.) 114. Issuingcompany 102 and investor(s) 104 are interconnected by a network (LAN, WAN, intranet, extranet, the Internet, etc.) 116. The disclosed components ofsystem 100 are not particular, and variations and equivalents are envisioned. - An Example Method
- Referring now to
FIG. 2 , in an example embodiment,company 102 issues NEO Preferred financial instruments toinvestors 104, and receives $50.00 cash in return for each instrument. The NEO Preferred financial instrument includes a preferred security and a warrant. In the example, the value of the preferred security is $30.00 and the value of the warrant is $20.00. The combined value of the preferred security and the warrant equals the $50.00 that is received in cash from the investor. - As known in the financial industry, a warrant is a derivative security that gives the holder a right to purchase securities (usually equity) from the issuer at a specific price within a certain time frame. A warrant is different from a call option, and one main difference is that a warrant is issued and guaranteed by the issuing company, whereas a call option is an exchange instrument and is not issued by the company. In another difference, the lifetime of a warrant is often measured in years, while the lifetime of a typical call option is measured in months.
- A preferred security is a fixed income security that is issued by a private or public corporation and that possesses characteristics of both debt and preferred stock. Preferred securities rank above preferred stock but below subordinated debt and will typically pay a fixed coupon rate. This means that the stated dividend or coupon rate must be paid before dividends to common stock holders. Most preferred securities have a stated maturity date.
- Preferred securities can be perpetual, which means that they are issued without a maturity date but offer fixed dividend payments. Perpetual preferred securities typically have call protection for the first five years.
- Preferred securities can be cumulative, or non-cumulative. A cumulative preferred security will accumulate dividends from one dividend period to the next. If a dividend is not paid in a period, a non-cumulative preferred security will not accumulate dividends from one dividend period to the next.
- Convertible preferred securities are another form of preferred securities, which provides an option to convert preferred shares into common shares.
- Preferred securities, whether they are perpetual, cumulative or non-cumulative, are generally issued directly by a company.
- Trust preferred securities are another known form of preferred security. Banks sometimes use trust preferred securities because they are treated as debt for tax purposes, but count as Tier I capital, within limits, for regulatory purposes. Issuing trust preferred securities does not reduce an existing shareholder's ownership interest, because issue of a trust preferred security is like borrowing.
- In order for a bank to take advantage of trust preferred securities, the bank creates a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”). The bank has an ownership interest in the SPV, and the SPV issues the trust preferred securities to investors. The SPV takes the proceeds from issue of the trust preferred securities and loans the funds to the bank. The bank issues debt notes as evidence of its indebtedness to the SPV.
- As discussed elsewhere in greater detail, the embodiments of the invention differ from trust preferred securities. In one difference, trust preferred securities have a maturity date, while in one embodiment of the invention the instrument is perpetual. In another difference, the trust issues the trust preferred securities, while in one embodiment of the invention the company itself issues the instrument. In another difference, the trust can suspend payments only up to five years, while in one embodiment of the invention the payments can be suspended for longer than 5 years.
- Referring to
FIG. 3 , at step 302,company 102 issues the NEO Preferred instrument. As discussed above, the NEO Preferred instrument includes a preferred security and a warrant. Under the terms of the NEO Preferred, the issuing company is not able to redeem the instrument during an initial no-redemption period, which is typically the first 5 years after issue. This is represented bystep 304, where the methods loops until the issuer no-redeem period expires. - Once the issuer no-redeem period expires, then at
step 306,system 100 determines whether issuingcompany 102 has started the redemption process for the instrument, and if so, executes step 402 ofFIG. 4 . - If at
step 306,system 100 determines that issuingcompany 102 has not started the redemption process for the instrument, then atstep 308,system 100 determines whetherinvestor 104 has exercised the warrant. - If
system 100 determines atstep 308 that the investor has exercised the warrant, then atstep 310,investor 104 tenders the warrant strike price and warrant to issuingcompany 102. - In one embodiment, the preferred security and the warrant of the NEO Preferred can be separated after issue. At
step 312,system 100 determines whether the holder of the warrant also holds the preferred security (i.e., the holder has not separated the warrant and the preferred security). If the holder of the warrant also holds the preferred and wants to take advantage of the remarketing terms of the NEO Preferred, which returns the value of the warrant strike price to the holder and retires the preferred security, then atstep 314, a 90 day clock starts. - At
step 316,system 100 determines whether the 90 day clock has expired. If not,system 100 loops to step 316. If so, then atstep 318,issuer 102 pays the preferred call price toinvestor 104, and the preferred is retired. In one embodiment, the preferred call price and the warrant strike price are the same amount. This means that the holder of the warrant tenders the warrant strike price ($30.00) to exercise the warrant, and then 90 days later the issuer pays the holder the preferred call price ($30.00), which effectively cancels the two amounts. - At
step 320,issuer 102 issues common shares toinvestor 104, and the warrant is retired. - If at
step 312,system 100 determines thatinvestor 104 does not also hold the preferred security or does not want to remarket the preferred security, then atstep 320,issuer 102 issues common shares toinvestor 104, and the warrant is retired. - If at
step 308,system 100 determines thatinvestor 104 has not exercised the warrant, then atstep 322,system 100 determines whether the warrant maturity date has been reached. If not,system 100 loops to step 306. If so, then atstep 324, the warrant expires. - As discussed above, if at
step 306system 100 determines that issuingcompany 102 has started the redemption process for the instrument, then at step 402 ofFIG. 4 , issuingcompany 102 provides notice of the redemption toinvestors 104, and two time clocks start. One clock runs for 30 days, and the other clock runs for 90 days. - At
step 404,system 100 determines whetherinvestor 104 has exercised the warrant, and if not, atstep 406,system 100 determines whether the 30 day clock has expired. If the 30 day clock is still running,system 100 loops to step 404. - If, at
step 406,system 100 determines that the 30 day clock has expired withoutinvestor 104 exercising the warrant, then atstep 408, issuingcompany 102 pays a warrant call price ($20.00 in the example) toinvestor 104. Atstep 410,system 100 then determines whether the 90 day clock is still running, and if so,system 100 loops to step 410. Ifsystem 100 determines that the 90 day clock has expired atstep 410, then atstep 412 issuingcompany 102 pays investor 104 a preferred call price ($30.00 in the example). - If, at
step 404,investor 104 exercises the warrant, then atstep 414,investor 104 tenders the warrant and warrant strike price ($30.00 in the example) to issuingcompany 102, and atstep 415, issuingcompany 102 issues the common shares toinvestor 104. - At
step 416,system 100 then determines whether the 90 day clock is still running, and if so,system 100 loops to step 416. If, atstep 416,system 100 determines that the 90 day clock has expired, then atstep 418 issuingcompany 102 pays investor 104 a preferred call price ($30.00 in the example). In one embodiment, the preferred call price and the warrant strike price are the same amount. This means that the holder of the warrant tenders the warrant strike price ($30.00) to exercise the warrant, and then 90 days later the issuer pays the holder the preferred call price ($30.00), which effectively cancels the two amounts. - Referring to
FIG. 5 , some of the steps described above are illustrated in relationship to time. Onday 1, when issuingcompany 102 decides to redeem the instrument (502), the system starts a 30 day and 90 day clock. On or beforeday 30,investor 104 can exercise the warrant by tendering the warrant and the $30.00 warrant strike price (504) to issuingcompany 102. Ifinvestor 104 does not exercise the warrant (506), then onday 30 issuingcompany 102 pays a $20.00 warrant call price toinvestor 104. Atday 90, issuingcompany 102 paysinvestor 104 the $30.00 preferred call price (508, 510). If the investor exercised the warrant, then common shares are issued to the investor (512), otherwise the investor has received the $20.00 warrant call price and the $30.00 preferred call price (514). - Further Embodiments
- In one embodiment, the warrant has a maturity of many years, such as between 50 and 99 years.
- In one embodiment the warrant and the preferred are technically separated. If the warrant is exercised, the preferred is redeemed within 90 days.
- In one embodiment, the coupon can be brought down by addition of a provisional call at a small threshold (110 to 120%) above the conversion price, which guarantees share issuance if the call is exercised.
- In one embodiment, the NEO Preferred is not puttable by the holder.
- The example $50.00 amount paid by investors for a NEO Preferred, the $30.00 warrant strike price, the $30.00 preferred call price, and the $20.00 warrant call price are just that, and variations in the amounts are clearly envisioned.
- As illustrated in
FIG. 3 ,investors 104 do not have an opportunity to exercise the warrant until after the issuer no-redeem period expires. However, it is envisioned that in other embodiments,investor 104 can exercise the warrant at any time, even during the no-redeem period. - Advantages of NEO Preferred
- A NEO Preferred has high equity credit financing, E bucket for the warrant, and D bucket for the preferred security by Moody's. Proceeds from the value of the warrant (40% in the example) are booked to additional paid in capital (APIC) on the balance sheet of the issuing company as equity, thereby receiving 100% equity credit. Proceeds from the value of the preferred (60% in the example) appear on the balance sheet of the issuing company as Preferred Stock, receiving D bucket treatment by Moody's. In the example, there is an overall implied equity credit of 70%. Further, there is better agency treatment because only the proceeds from the preferred (60% in the example) are liquidation preference. There is also speed to market because of the 144A offering format. Treasury stock method accounting for the warrant results in better earnings per share than traditional convertible preferred. There is also a lower dividend than traditional preferred, and the structure is both simple and transparent.
- Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein in detail, it should be noted and will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that numerous variations may be made within the scope of this invention without departing from the principles of this invention and without sacrificing its chief advantages.
- Unless otherwise specifically stated, the terms and expressions have been used herein as terms of description and not terms of limitation. There is no intention to use the terms or expressions to exclude any equivalents of features shown and described or portions thereof and this invention should be defined in accordance with the claims that follow.
-
- We claim:
Claims (34)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/144,573 US7739165B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2005-06-03 | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/144,573 US7739165B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2005-06-03 | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060277125A1 true US20060277125A1 (en) | 2006-12-07 |
US7739165B2 US7739165B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
Family
ID=37495310
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/144,573 Active 2028-04-07 US7739165B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2005-06-03 | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7739165B2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060287938A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2006-12-21 | Lehman Brothers Inc. | Methods and systems for providing preferred income equity replacement securities |
US20060287935A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2006-12-21 | Lehman Brothers Inc | Methods and Systems for Providing enhanced Capital Advantaged Preferred Securities |
US20070174210A1 (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-07-26 | Zajkowski Jeffrey J | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities |
US20070226115A1 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2007-09-27 | Lehman Brothers Inc. | Methods and systems for providing deductible piers |
US7921058B1 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2011-04-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Exchangeable equity-linked security |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6263321B1 (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 2001-07-17 | Economic Inventions, Llc | Apparatus and process for calculating an option |
US20020087373A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Dickstein Peter M. | System and method to organize and manage corporate capitilization and securities |
US20030028467A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-02-06 | Front End Capital Llc | Method of raising capital for early stage companies through broker-dealer |
US20030120578A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Peter Newman | System and methods for electronic securities underwriting and electronic dissemination of annual financial and disclosure information from issuers to information repositories in accordance with U.S. securities laws and regulations |
US20030128809A1 (en) * | 2002-01-07 | 2003-07-10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba. | Method for evaluating an SOI substrate, evaluation processor, and method for manufacturing a semiconductor device |
US6598028B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-07-22 | Lynn Sullivan | Computer-implemented universal financial management/translation system and method |
US20040162774A1 (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2004-08-19 | Golden Christopher Marie Paul John | Financial instrument |
US20040199442A1 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2004-10-07 | Rainer Haberle | Method and system for offering and selling a multi-purpose currency option |
US20050055303A1 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2005-03-10 | General Hydrogen Corp. | Method for incentivizing customers to confirm advance purchase orders |
US20050075976A1 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-07 | Woodruff Kevin G. | Enhanced premium equity participating securities |
US20050086148A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-04-21 | Woodruff Kevin G. | Investment structures, methods and systems involving derivative securities |
US20060117303A1 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2006-06-01 | Gizinski Gerard H | Method of simplifying & automating enhanced optimized decision making under uncertainty |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4588192A (en) | 1983-09-15 | 1986-05-13 | Pedro Laborde | Financial futures game |
US4648038A (en) | 1984-11-21 | 1987-03-03 | Lazard Freres & Co. | Methods and apparatus for restructuring debt obligations |
US5897621A (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1999-04-27 | Cybercash, Inc. | System and method for multi-currency transactions |
US6381585B1 (en) | 1998-05-04 | 2002-04-30 | Durham Russell Maples | Method and apparatus for administering a share bond |
US7401046B2 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2008-07-15 | Chicago Board Options Exchange | System and method for displaying option market information |
US7246094B1 (en) | 2001-07-31 | 2007-07-17 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method of structuring a credit entailing a fixed payment component and a variable payment component |
US7219079B2 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2007-05-15 | Birle Jr James R | Convertible financial instruments with contingent payments |
US7949593B2 (en) | 2001-10-16 | 2011-05-24 | Fannie Mae | Repurchase agreement lending facility |
US20030158809A1 (en) | 2001-11-09 | 2003-08-21 | Carney William J. | Reloadable rights plan for preferred and common stock |
US20040117282A1 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2004-06-17 | Green Richard J. | System and method for creating and managing new and existing financial instruments |
US20030050884A1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2003-03-13 | Gary Barnett | Securitizing financial assets |
US20040098327A1 (en) | 2002-11-14 | 2004-05-20 | Seaman David A. | Contingent convertible securities instrument and method of providing, trading and using the same |
US7257555B1 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2007-08-14 | Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. | Method and system for providing dividend enhanced convertible stocks with acceleration triggers |
US7257556B1 (en) | 2003-04-24 | 2007-08-14 | Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. | Method and system for providing mandatorily convertible securities with associated senior debt instruments |
US20050102206A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2005-05-12 | Serkan Savasoglu | Systems and methods for contingent obligation retainable deduction securities |
US20050160034A1 (en) | 2004-01-16 | 2005-07-21 | Woodruff Kevin G. | Convertible debt hedge |
US20070106588A1 (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2007-05-10 | Kevin Kulak | Method and system for funding a contingent event with convertible securities |
-
2005
- 2005-06-03 US US11/144,573 patent/US7739165B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6263321B1 (en) * | 1994-07-29 | 2001-07-17 | Economic Inventions, Llc | Apparatus and process for calculating an option |
US6598028B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2003-07-22 | Lynn Sullivan | Computer-implemented universal financial management/translation system and method |
US20030028467A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-02-06 | Front End Capital Llc | Method of raising capital for early stage companies through broker-dealer |
US20020087373A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Dickstein Peter M. | System and method to organize and manage corporate capitilization and securities |
US20030120578A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Peter Newman | System and methods for electronic securities underwriting and electronic dissemination of annual financial and disclosure information from issuers to information repositories in accordance with U.S. securities laws and regulations |
US20030128809A1 (en) * | 2002-01-07 | 2003-07-10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba. | Method for evaluating an SOI substrate, evaluation processor, and method for manufacturing a semiconductor device |
US20040162774A1 (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2004-08-19 | Golden Christopher Marie Paul John | Financial instrument |
US20040199442A1 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2004-10-07 | Rainer Haberle | Method and system for offering and selling a multi-purpose currency option |
US20050055303A1 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2005-03-10 | General Hydrogen Corp. | Method for incentivizing customers to confirm advance purchase orders |
US20050075976A1 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-07 | Woodruff Kevin G. | Enhanced premium equity participating securities |
US20050086148A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-04-21 | Woodruff Kevin G. | Investment structures, methods and systems involving derivative securities |
US20060117303A1 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2006-06-01 | Gizinski Gerard H | Method of simplifying & automating enhanced optimized decision making under uncertainty |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060287935A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2006-12-21 | Lehman Brothers Inc | Methods and Systems for Providing enhanced Capital Advantaged Preferred Securities |
US20060287938A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2006-12-21 | Lehman Brothers Inc. | Methods and systems for providing preferred income equity replacement securities |
US8676688B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2014-03-18 | Barclays Capital, Inc. | Methods and systems for providing preferred income equity replacement securities |
US20140222715A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2014-08-07 | Barclays Capital, Inc. | Methods and systems for providing preferred income equity replacement securities |
US20070226115A1 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2007-09-27 | Lehman Brothers Inc. | Methods and systems for providing deductible piers |
US20070174210A1 (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-07-26 | Zajkowski Jeffrey J | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities |
US7921058B1 (en) * | 2006-05-17 | 2011-04-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Exchangeable equity-linked security |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7739165B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7987129B2 (en) | Convertible financial instruments with contingent payments | |
US7219079B2 (en) | Convertible financial instruments with contingent payments | |
US6578016B1 (en) | Tax advantaged transaction structure (TATS) and method | |
Cnossen et al. | Fundamental tax reform in the Netherlands | |
US20100023436A1 (en) | Perpetual revenue participation interests and methods related thereto | |
US20040177016A1 (en) | Method and system for analyzing a capital structure for a company | |
US20030135446A1 (en) | Contingent convertible financial instruments | |
US20070011065A1 (en) | Method and system for pre-funding with merger call flexibility | |
Dittmar | Corporate cash policy and how to manage it with stock repurchases | |
Ashamu et al. | Dividend policy as strategic tool of financing in public firms: Evidence from Nigeria | |
Voss | Why do Firms Repurchase Stock? | |
US7739165B2 (en) | Method and system for issuing convertible preferred securities | |
Hines Jr | Taxation and US multinational investment | |
US20070106588A1 (en) | Method and system for funding a contingent event with convertible securities | |
US20060080193A1 (en) | Structure for generating a source of contingent capital | |
Moore et al. | Derivative pricing 60 years before Black–Scholes: evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange | |
US8429042B2 (en) | Methods for performing data processing operations associated with securities and security structures | |
Landers et al. | MDB Policy-Based Guarantees: Has Their Time Come? | |
US20050160025A1 (en) | Contingent convertible financial instruments | |
US20140222715A1 (en) | Methods and systems for providing preferred income equity replacement securities | |
US20070022035A1 (en) | System and method for continuous sale or transfer of employee stock options | |
US11538115B2 (en) | Systems and methods for administering index-linked financial products | |
US7848998B1 (en) | Convertible hybrid securities | |
Karpenko et al. | Convertible bonds for companies investment process | |
Teal et al. | IMPLICATIONS OF NEGATIVE RETAINED EARNINGS. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZAJKOWSKI, JEFFREY J.;SAREEN, GAUTAM;SEAMAN, DAVID A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016660/0146 Effective date: 20050603 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZAJKOWSKI, JEFFREY J.;SAREEN, GAUTAM;SEAMAN, DAVID A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016660/0146 Effective date: 20050603 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552) Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |