US20070095988A1 - Method and System for Compensating for Wheel Wear on a Train - Google Patents
Method and System for Compensating for Wheel Wear on a Train Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070095988A1 US20070095988A1 US11/608,324 US60832406A US2007095988A1 US 20070095988 A1 US20070095988 A1 US 20070095988A1 US 60832406 A US60832406 A US 60832406A US 2007095988 A1 US2007095988 A1 US 2007095988A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- wheel
- train
- speed
- size
- positioning system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains or setting of track apparatus
- B61L25/02—Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains
- B61L25/021—Measuring and recording of train speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61K—AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR RAILWAYS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61K9/00—Railway vehicle profile gauges; Detecting or indicating overheating of components; Apparatus on locomotives or cars to indicate bad track sections; General design of track recording vehicles
- B61K9/12—Measuring or surveying wheel-rims
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains or setting of track apparatus
- B61L25/02—Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains
- B61L25/025—Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains or setting of track apparatus
- B61L25/02—Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains
- B61L25/026—Relative localisation, e.g. using odometer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C22/00—Measuring distance traversed on the ground by vehicles, persons, animals or other moving solid bodies, e.g. using odometers, using pedometers
- G01C22/02—Measuring distance traversed on the ground by vehicles, persons, animals or other moving solid bodies, e.g. using odometers, using pedometers by conversion into electric waveforms and subsequent integration, e.g. using tachometer generator
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L2205/00—Communication or navigation systems for railway traffic
- B61L2205/04—Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. GPS
Definitions
- the invention relates to railroads generally, and more particularly, to a system and method for determining wheel size to compensate of wheel wear.
- GPS global positioning system
- INS inertial navigation systems
- One method that can be used in case of a positioning system failure is to measure the rotation of motor, axle or wheel rotation to determine the speed at which a train is traveling and/or the distance which a train has traveled.
- the distance traveled by the wheel is equal to its circumference in the absence of any slippage.
- the radius R of the wheel is known, the distance traveled for each revolution of the wheel is equal to 2 ⁇ R.
- the radius of a wheel changes over time due to wheel wear. For example, a standard train wheel can decrease in size from 40 inches to 36 inches over its useful life. Therefore, the distance traveled in each wheel revolution can vary between 125.7′′ and 113.1′′ a difference of approximately 12.6 or 10%. This error is significant.
- the present invention meets the aforementioned need to a great extent by providing a method and system for compensating for wheel wear in which wheel rotation information from a revolution counter or a tachometer and position and/or speed information from an independent positioning system such as GPS or INS are measured over a predetermined distance and used to determine the size of the train wheels. This process is performed periodically to compensate for wheel wear.
- the system includes a map database and the position information from the independent positioning system is used to as an index to ensure that the rotation data used for the speed/position comparison between the position system and rotation data is collected in an area of straight and flat track so as to exclude errors in the rotation data caused by wheel slippage and turns.
- the data used for the comparison between the speeds/distances indicated by the positioning system and by the rotation data is collected over a long distance to minimize known errors in the positioning system.
- a total distance traveled is calculated using an integration technique by adding a plurality of linear differences in successive positions reported by the positioning system over short periods of time. This technique is particularly advantageous when performed over curved sections of track.
- FIG. 1 is a logical block diagram of a train control system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a wheel wear compensation technique according to one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a logical block diagram of a train speed signal distribution system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 ( a ) and 4 ( b ) are, respectively, schematic drawings of distance calculated by a linear method and an integration method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a wheel wear compensation technique employing the integration method of FIG. 4 ( b ) according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 1 is a logical block diagram of a train control system 100 according to the present invention.
- the system 100 includes a control module 110 , which typically, but not necessarily, includes a microprocessor.
- the control module 110 is connected to a revolution counter 120 .
- the revolution counter 120 measures rotation of a locomotive wheel (not shown in FIG. 1 ) on a train.
- the revolution counter 120 may be of any type, including mechanical, magnetic, and optical.
- the revolution counter 120 may measure the rotation of a wheel directly, or may measure rotation of an axle to which the wheel is connected, or may measure rotation of a motor driveshaft or gear that powers the wheel.
- the GPS 130 receiver can be of any type, including a differential GPS receiver. Other types of positioning systems, such as inertial navigation systems (INSs) and Loran systems, can also be used.
- INSs inertial navigation systems
- Loran systems can also be used.
- the tern “positioning system” refers to the portion of a positioning system that is commonly located on a mobile vehicle, which may or may not comprise the entire system. Thus, for example, in connection with a global positioning system, the term “positioning system” as used herein refers to a GPS receiver and does not include the satellites that are used to transmit information to the GPS receiver.
- the GPS receiver 130 provides position and speed information to the control module 110 .
- the control module 110 uses the position information from the GPS receiver 130 as an index into a map database 140 .
- the map database 140 provides information including track grade and curvature to the control module 110 . As will be explained in further detail below, this information is used in some embodiments to ensure that rotation information from the revolution counter will not include rotation information that is corrupted due to wheel slippage and/or errors due to track curvature.
- a flowchart 200 illustrates operation of a wheel wear correction method according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- the control module 110 determines whether track conditions are acceptable at step 210 . In some embodiments, this is accomplished by obtaining the current position from the GPS receiver 130 and indexing the map database 140 to determine the track grade and curvature over a predetermined length of upcoming track over which rotation information is to be collected.
- the predetermined length of track is preferably of a sufficient length such that any errors introduced by the inaccuracy of the global positioning system receiver 130 are minimized. Obviously, it is advantageous to use as great a length as possible since the effect of positioning systems errors are decreased as the length is increased. However, there is a trade-off that must be made because if the length is too great, the time required to complete the wheel correction algorithm is too long and/or the amount of curvature and grade in the track segment over which the data is to be taken preclude running the algorithm over too much track in the system.
- the determination as to whether track conditions are acceptable is made at the start of the algorithm.
- rotation data is only collected if the train is traveling greater than some minimum. The reason behind this is that most wheel slippage occurs at slow speeds as a locomotive is attempting to accelerate. Most locomotives use electric induction motors, and most electric motors used in locomotives have torque curves with torques decreasing as speed increases such that it is not possible for the locomotive to generate enough torque to cause the wheels to slip above certain speeds.
- the minimum speed at which data will be collected is 15 m.p.h.; in other embodiments, the minimum speed is 20 m.p.h.
- the wheel acceleration is monitored to detect wheel slippage. If an acceleration exceeds a threshold, the collected information is discarded and the entire process is started over.
- the system notes the upcoming sections of the track in which either the grade or curvature is above a corresponding threshold and does not include those distances and any corresponding rotation information collected over those distances in the calculations.
- Such embodiments are particularly useful for railroads in which long, straight and level sections of track are not present in many areas.
- the system delays for a period of time at step 220 and repeats step 210 until track conditions air favorable.
- the control module 110 determines a start position from the global positioning receiver 130 at step 230 and counts rotations as measured by the revolution counter 120 at step 240 .
- a threshold which may be a number of rotations and/or a time period has been reached at step 250
- the control module 110 determines a stop position from the global positioning receiver 130 at step 260 .
- the control module 130 calculates the distance D traveled based on the start and stop positions measured at steps 230 and 260 , respectively.
- the control module 110 then delays, at step 290 , for a period of time such as a day (it is not necessary to run the algorithm often as train wheels wear slowly).
- a predetermined distance is used. It should be noted that the predetermined distance will vary depending upon the accuracy of the positioning system used and the particular environment in which the invention is used.
- data is not collected when the system determines the track conditions are not favorable.
- curvature exceeds the threshold, it is also possible to allow data collection to occur and correct the data for the curvature.
- an integration technique is utilized to correct for track curvature.
- the total distance traveled is determined by adding linear differences between positions reported by the positioning system at a plurality of short intervals. In this manner, the sum of linear distances closely approximates the actual “track distance” (the actual distance traveled by the train over the track).
- FIGS. 4 ( a ) and 4 ( b ) which illustrate a section of track 400 between two points A and B.
- a linear distance D 0 between points A and B is illustrated. This distance D 0 is obviously less than the actual track distance between points A and B.
- FIG. 4 ( b ) several linear distances D 1-9 between a plurality of intermediate points I 0-9 are calculated. The sum of these linear distances D 1-9 is a much closer approximation of the track distance between points A and B. As the distance between the intermediate points I 0-9 decreases, the approximation of the actual track distance becomes more accurate.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart 500 of the steps performed by the control module 110 in an embodiment employing this integration technique.
- the revolution counter 120 is reset to zero at step 502 (in other embodiments, the revolution counter is simply read at step 502 ).
- the position is then obtained from the positioning system 130 at step 504 and temporarily stored as the last, position at step 506 .
- the control module 110 then delays for a period of time at step 508 . As discussed above the shorter the period is, the more accurate the approximation will be. In preferred embodiments, the period is one second.
- control module 110 again obtains the current position at step 510 .
- the linear difference between the current position and the temporarily stored last position is calculated at step 512 and the difference is added to a total distance at step 514 .
- steps 506 et seq. are repeated.
- the selection of the threshold involves a tradeoff. Again, a threshold of 100,000 meters is used in some embodiments.
- the revolution counter is read at step 518 .
- the wheel circumference is then calculated by dividing the total distance by the number of revolutions from the revolution counter 120 .
- the periods of time during which the total distance was traveled were contiguous such that one period began as soon as a previous period ended. This simplified the method by eliminating the necessity of reading the revolution counter at the beginning and end of each period.
- the invention may also be practiced by using a plurality of non-contiguous periods and reading the revolution counter at the beginning and end of each period (or, alternatively, resetting the revolution counter at the beginning of each period).
- positional inputs from the positioning system are used; however, it will be readily apparent that speed can also be used.
- the speed from the global positioning system may be read a number of times and the wheel size corresponding to each reading may be averaged.
- speed rather than position information allows the wheel size to be determined more rapidly than using position information and is therefore preferable when wheel size is needed quickly (such as when a gross error has been detected).
- position information especially over a long distance, results in greater accuracy. Accordingly, in some embodiments, speed is used to rapidly generate an initial, estimate and position is used to generate a better estimate at a later time.
- curvature and grade can be determined from altitude and direction information provided by the global positioning system.
- the track curvature may be determined by recording the train's position as reported by the positioning system at several times during the period in which data is collected. This position information can be used to construct a curvature profile so that the amount of curvature can be determined after the data is collected. If the curvature is greater than a threshold, the data can be ignored, or, in some embodiments, can be corrected for the curvature such as by using the integration technique discussed herein. The same techniques can be used to construct a grade profile.
- the wheel wear compensation method is incorporated into a wheel revolution sensor signal distribution/conversion system such as the QUIPTM system manufactured by the assignee of the present invention, Quantum Engineering.
- QUIPTM wheel revolution sensor signal distribution/conversion system
- many locomotives that have been retro-fitted with a train control system also are equipped with a separate speed display.
- Such systems typically require the conductor/engineer or maintenance personnel to measure the diameter of the train wheel to which the wheel sensor is attached and set DIP switches or otherwise configure the devices to indicate the wheel size. Because the wheel size changes over time as discussed above, these other devices must be reconfigured on some periodic basis, thereby increasing labor costs.
- signal conversion/distribution systems such as the aforementioned QUIPTM distribution/conversion system have been devised.
- a substantial savings can be realized by modifying these distribution/conversion systems to output a modified signal that is representative of a wheel sensor signal would be generated by a wheel of a fixed size.
- the conversion/distribution system outputs a modified wheel sensor signal that is representative of a 40 inch wheel
- each of the other systems that use the wheel sensor signal could be configured once for a 40 inch wheel and would thereafter not need to be periodically reconfigured.
- the system includes a control unit 110 connected to a wheel revolution sensor 320 .
- the wheel sensor 320 outputs a square wave, with each rising edge representing a revolution of the wheel.
- the time between leading edges represents the time taken for one full revolution of the wheel.
- the signal output by the wheel sensor 320 may be of many forms, analog or digital, and that the particular form of the signal is not important.
- the control unit 110 is configured to determine the wheel size using the method described in FIG. 2 or one of the other methods described herein.
- This 0.238 second period is supplied by the control unit 110 to a signal generator 180 , which generates a square wave of the type discussed above with a period of 0.238 seconds.
- the signal generated by the signal generator 180 is then supplied to other systems A,B and C 191 - 193 . Because the signal output by signal generator 180 will always be representative of a 40 inch wheel, it is not necessary to reconfigure the other systems 191 - 193 once they have been configured for a 40 inch wheel, thereby substantially reducing labor costs associated with these operations.
- speed is determined as part of the process of determining the parameters of the signal to be generated by the signal generator 180 .
- the parameters can be determined without actually calculating the speed.
- that wheel size can be used to form a ratio of the predetermined wheel size to the actual wheel size.
- the predetermined wheel size is 40 inches
- the actual wheel size is 36
- the ratio would be 40/36.
- the control unit can then measure the period of the square wave and multiply the period by the ratio to determine the period of the signal that would be generated by the wheel sensor 320 if the wheel were actually 40 inches, and supply this period to the signal generator 180 to generate this signal.
- the speed can be determined from the positional system (e.g., GPS receiver 130 ) and the parameters of the desired signal can be sent to the signal generator so that a signal can be generated and distributed to the other systems, all without an actual wheel rotation sensor 320 .
- the system can serve as a back up for situations where the wheel sensor fails.
- This also allows the wheel sensor to be replaced, but such a system has the drawback that it will not provide a correct signal when the GPS system is not operational.
Abstract
A method and system for compensating for wheel wear uses position and/or speed information from an independent positioning system to measure some distance over which the train has traveled. Wheel rotation information is also collected over the distance. The wheel rotation information and distance and/or speed information are then use to determine the size of the train wheels. The method is performed periodically to correct for changes in wheel size over time due to wear so that the wheel rotation information can be used to determine train position and speed in the event of a positioning system failure.
Description
- This application is a U.S. Divisional Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/609,377, filed Jul. 1, 2003, which is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 10/157,874, filed May 31, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,701,228, issued Mar. 2, 2004. The entirety of both of the above-mentioned applications are incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The invention relates to railroads generally, and more particularly, to a system and method for determining wheel size to compensate of wheel wear.
- 2. Discussion of the Background
- Controlling the movement of trains in a modern environment is a complex process. Collisions with other trains must be avoided and regulations in areas such as grade crossings must be complied with. The pressure to increase the performance of rail systems, in terms of speed, reliability and safety, has led to many proposals to automate various aspects of train operation. For example, positive train control (PTC) and automatic train control (ATC) systems have been widely discussed in recent years.
- Some automated systems rely on global positioning system (GPS) receivers for indications of train speed and position (as used herein, “global positioning system” and “GPS” refer to all varieties of global positioning system receivers, including, but not limited to, differential global positioning system receivers. Still other systems use inertial navigation systems (INSs) for determining speed and location. However, GPS receivers and INSs sometimes fail, and for that reason it is desirable to have a back-up system.
- One method that can be used in case of a positioning system failure is to measure the rotation of motor, axle or wheel rotation to determine the speed at which a train is traveling and/or the distance which a train has traveled. Each time the wheel makes a compete revolution, the distance traveled by the wheel is equal to its circumference in the absence of any slippage. Thus, if the radius R of the wheel is known, the distance traveled for each revolution of the wheel is equal to 2πR. However, the radius of a wheel changes over time due to wheel wear. For example, a standard train wheel can decrease in size from 40 inches to 36 inches over its useful life. Therefore, the distance traveled in each wheel revolution can vary between 125.7″ and 113.1″ a difference of approximately 12.6 or 10%. This error is significant.
- What is needed is a method and system that compensates for wheel wear.
- The present invention meets the aforementioned need to a great extent by providing a method and system for compensating for wheel wear in which wheel rotation information from a revolution counter or a tachometer and position and/or speed information from an independent positioning system such as GPS or INS are measured over a predetermined distance and used to determine the size of the train wheels. This process is performed periodically to compensate for wheel wear.
- In one aspect of the invention, the system includes a map database and the position information from the independent positioning system is used to as an index to ensure that the rotation data used for the speed/position comparison between the position system and rotation data is collected in an area of straight and flat track so as to exclude errors in the rotation data caused by wheel slippage and turns.
- In another aspect of the invention, the data used for the comparison between the speeds/distances indicated by the positioning system and by the rotation data is collected over a long distance to minimize known errors in the positioning system. In yet another aspect of the invention, a total distance traveled is calculated using an integration technique by adding a plurality of linear differences in successive positions reported by the positioning system over short periods of time. This technique is particularly advantageous when performed over curved sections of track.
- A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant features and advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a logical block diagram of a train control system according to one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a wheel wear compensation technique according to one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 3 is a logical block diagram of a train speed signal distribution system according to another embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 (a) and 4(b) are, respectively, schematic drawings of distance calculated by a linear method and an integration method according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a wheel wear compensation technique employing the integration method ofFIG. 4 (b) according to an embodiment of the invention. - The present invention will be discussed with reference to preferred embodiments of train control systems. Specific details, such as wheel sizes and types of positioning systems, are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The preferred embodiments and specific details discussed herein should not be understood to limit the invention.
- Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
FIG. 1 is a logical block diagram of atrain control system 100 according to the present invention. Thesystem 100 includes acontrol module 110, which typically, but not necessarily, includes a microprocessor. Thecontrol module 110 is connected to arevolution counter 120. The revolution counter 120 measures rotation of a locomotive wheel (not shown inFIG. 1 ) on a train. Therevolution counter 120 may be of any type, including mechanical, magnetic, and optical. Therevolution counter 120 may measure the rotation of a wheel directly, or may measure rotation of an axle to which the wheel is connected, or may measure rotation of a motor driveshaft or gear that powers the wheel. - Also connected to the
control module 110 is a positioning system such as aGPS receiver 130. TheGPS 130 receiver can be of any type, including a differential GPS receiver. Other types of positioning systems, such as inertial navigation systems (INSs) and Loran systems, can also be used. [As used herein, the tern “positioning system” refers to the portion of a positioning system that is commonly located on a mobile vehicle, which may or may not comprise the entire system. Thus, for example, in connection with a global positioning system, the term “positioning system” as used herein refers to a GPS receiver and does not include the satellites that are used to transmit information to the GPS receiver.] TheGPS receiver 130 provides position and speed information to thecontrol module 110. - The
control module 110 uses the position information from theGPS receiver 130 as an index into amap database 140. Themap database 140 provides information including track grade and curvature to thecontrol module 110. As will be explained in further detail below, this information is used in some embodiments to ensure that rotation information from the revolution counter will not include rotation information that is corrupted due to wheel slippage and/or errors due to track curvature. - Referring now to
FIG. 2 , aflowchart 200 illustrates operation of a wheel wear correction method according to one embodiment of the present invention. Thecontrol module 110 determines whether track conditions are acceptable atstep 210. In some embodiments, this is accomplished by obtaining the current position from theGPS receiver 130 and indexing themap database 140 to determine the track grade and curvature over a predetermined length of upcoming track over which rotation information is to be collected. - The predetermined length of track is preferably of a sufficient length such that any errors introduced by the inaccuracy of the global
positioning system receiver 130 are minimized. Obviously, it is advantageous to use as great a length as possible since the effect of positioning systems errors are decreased as the length is increased. However, there is a trade-off that must be made because if the length is too great, the time required to complete the wheel correction algorithm is too long and/or the amount of curvature and grade in the track segment over which the data is to be taken preclude running the algorithm over too much track in the system. In some embodiments, the predetermined length of track is 100,000 meters. In such an embodiment, with a global positioning system having a position error on the order of 30 meters, the total error is equal to (30+30)/100,000=0.0006=0.06%. - In the embodiment described by
FIG. 2 , the determination as to whether track conditions are acceptable is made at the start of the algorithm. In other embodiments, rotation data is only collected if the train is traveling greater than some minimum. The reason behind this is that most wheel slippage occurs at slow speeds as a locomotive is attempting to accelerate. Most locomotives use electric induction motors, and most electric motors used in locomotives have torque curves with torques decreasing as speed increases such that it is not possible for the locomotive to generate enough torque to cause the wheels to slip above certain speeds. In some embodiments, the minimum speed at which data will be collected is 15 m.p.h.; in other embodiments, the minimum speed is 20 m.p.h. - In yet other embodiments, the wheel acceleration is monitored to detect wheel slippage. If an acceleration exceeds a threshold, the collected information is discarded and the entire process is started over.
- In still other embodiments, the system notes the upcoming sections of the track in which either the grade or curvature is above a corresponding threshold and does not include those distances and any corresponding rotation information collected over those distances in the calculations. Such embodiments are particularly useful for railroads in which long, straight and level sections of track are not present in many areas.
- If the track conditions are not favorable at
step 210, the system delays for a period of time atstep 220 and repeats step 210 until track conditions air favorable. When track conditions are favorable atstep 210, thecontrol module 110 determines a start position from theglobal positioning receiver 130 atstep 230 and counts rotations as measured by therevolution counter 120 atstep 240. When a threshold (which may be a number of rotations and/or a time period has been reached atstep 250, thecontrol module 110 determines a stop position from theglobal positioning receiver 130 atstep 260. Next, atstep 270, thecontrol module 130 calculates the distance D traveled based on the start and stop positions measured atsteps control module 130 determines the radius R of the wheel atstep 280 according to the equation R=D/2πTr, where Tr is the total number of rotations counted over the distance D. Thecontrol module 110 then delays, atstep 290, for a period of time such as a day (it is not necessary to run the algorithm often as train wheels wear slowly). - In the above-discussed embodiments, a predetermined distance is used. It should be noted that the predetermined distance will vary depending upon the accuracy of the positioning system used and the particular environment in which the invention is used.
- In the foregoing embodiments, data is not collected when the system determines the track conditions are not favorable. However, in cases where curvature exceeds the threshold, it is also possible to allow data collection to occur and correct the data for the curvature.
- In another embodiment of the invention, an integration technique is utilized to correct for track curvature. In this technique, the total distance traveled is determined by adding linear differences between positions reported by the positioning system at a plurality of short intervals. In this manner, the sum of linear distances closely approximates the actual “track distance” (the actual distance traveled by the train over the track). Consider the examples shown in FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b), which illustrate a section of
track 400 between two points A and B. InFIG. 4 (a), a linear distance D0 between points A and B is illustrated. This distance D0 is obviously less than the actual track distance between points A and B. InFIG. 4 (b), several linear distances D1-9 between a plurality of intermediate points I0-9 are calculated. The sum of these linear distances D1-9 is a much closer approximation of the track distance between points A and B. As the distance between the intermediate points I0-9 decreases, the approximation of the actual track distance becomes more accurate. -
FIG. 5 illustrates aflow chart 500 of the steps performed by thecontrol module 110 in an embodiment employing this integration technique. Therevolution counter 120 is reset to zero at step 502 (in other embodiments, the revolution counter is simply read at step 502). The position is then obtained from thepositioning system 130 atstep 504 and temporarily stored as the last, position atstep 506. Thecontrol module 110 then delays for a period of time atstep 508. As discussed above the shorter the period is, the more accurate the approximation will be. In preferred embodiments, the period is one second. - After the delay at
step 508, thecontrol module 110 again obtains the current position at step 510. Next, the linear difference between the current position and the temporarily stored last position is calculated atstep 512 and the difference is added to a total distance atstep 514. - If the total distance does not exceed a threshold at
step 516,steps 506 et seq. are repeated. As discussed above, the selection of the threshold involves a tradeoff. Again, a threshold of 100,000 meters is used in some embodiments. - If the threshold is exceeded at
step 516, the revolution counter is read atstep 518. The wheel circumference is then calculated by dividing the total distance by the number of revolutions from therevolution counter 120. - In the embodiment described above, the periods of time during which the total distance was traveled were contiguous such that one period began as soon as a previous period ended. This simplified the method by eliminating the necessity of reading the revolution counter at the beginning and end of each period. Those of skill in the art will recognize that it is not necessary for the periods to be contiguous and that the invention may also be practiced by using a plurality of non-contiguous periods and reading the revolution counter at the beginning and end of each period (or, alternatively, resetting the revolution counter at the beginning of each period).
- In the foregoing embodiments, positional inputs from the positioning system are used; however, it will be readily apparent that speed can also be used. For example, if the current speed S of the train is known from the positioning system, then the wheel size can be determined according to the equation S=DFr=2πRFr where D is the distance traveled in each rotation, Fr is the rotation frequency of the wheel, and R is the radius of the wheel. In practice, the speed from the global positioning system may be read a number of times and the wheel size corresponding to each reading may be averaged. It should be noted that using speed rather than position information allows the wheel size to be determined more rapidly than using position information and is therefore preferable when wheel size is needed quickly (such as when a gross error has been detected). However, using, position information, especially over a long distance, results in greater accuracy. Accordingly, in some embodiments, speed is used to rapidly generate an initial, estimate and position is used to generate a better estimate at a later time.
- Furthermore, while track curvature and grade were determined by referencing a map database in the embodiments discussed above, it will be readily recognized by those of skill in the art that curvature and grade can be determined from altitude and direction information provided by the global positioning system. For example, the track curvature, may be determined by recording the train's position as reported by the positioning system at several times during the period in which data is collected. This position information can be used to construct a curvature profile so that the amount of curvature can be determined after the data is collected. If the curvature is greater than a threshold, the data can be ignored, or, in some embodiments, can be corrected for the curvature such as by using the integration technique discussed herein. The same techniques can be used to construct a grade profile.
- It should also be noted that the invention may be incorporated into various types of train control systems, including the aforementioned PTC and ATC systems as well as many others.
- In another embodiment of the invention, the wheel wear compensation method is incorporated into a wheel revolution sensor signal distribution/conversion system such as the QUIP™ system manufactured by the assignee of the present invention, Quantum Engineering. There may be several systems on board a train that input a signal representative of the wheel rotation and use that signal to calculate speed. For example, many locomotives that have been retro-fitted with a train control system also are equipped with a separate speed display. Such systems typically require the conductor/engineer or maintenance personnel to measure the diameter of the train wheel to which the wheel sensor is attached and set DIP switches or otherwise configure the devices to indicate the wheel size. Because the wheel size changes over time as discussed above, these other devices must be reconfigured on some periodic basis, thereby increasing labor costs.
- Because there may be several systems that require the wheel sensor signal which together constitute a larger electrical load than the wheel sensor is capable of handling, and because some of these systems require an input signal of a different form than is supplied by the wheel sensor, signal conversion/distribution systems such as the aforementioned QUIP™ distribution/conversion system have been devised. A substantial savings can be realized by modifying these distribution/conversion systems to output a modified signal that is representative of a wheel sensor signal would be generated by a wheel of a fixed size. Thus, for example, if the conversion/distribution system outputs a modified wheel sensor signal that is representative of a 40 inch wheel, each of the other systems that use the wheel sensor signal could be configured once for a 40 inch wheel and would thereafter not need to be periodically reconfigured.
- Such a conversion/
distribution system 300 is illustrated in FIG 3. The system includes acontrol unit 110 connected to awheel revolution sensor 320. In some embodiments, thewheel sensor 320 outputs a square wave, with each rising edge representing a revolution of the wheel. Thus, the time between leading edges represents the time taken for one full revolution of the wheel. It will be readily understood that the signal output by thewheel sensor 320 may be of many forms, analog or digital, and that the particular form of the signal is not important. Also connected to thecontrol unit 10 is aGPS receiver 130 and amap database 140. Thecontrol unit 110 is configured to determine the wheel size using the method described inFIG. 2 or one of the other methods described herein. Thecontrol unit 110 determines the speed of the train, which can be taken from theGPS receiver 130 or can be determined with the knowledge of the previously determined wheel size. Using the actual speed of the train, thecontrol unit 110 then determines the parameters necessary for a signal that would be representative of the signal that would be generated by thewheel sensor 320 if the wheel were a predetermined size such as 40″. For example, where the wheel sensor outputs a square wave signal as discussed above, the period of the square wave when the train is traveling 30 m.p.h. would be the distance traveled by one revolution, 2*π*20 inches, divided by the train speed, 30 m.p.h. or 528 inches/sec, which is equal to 125.7/528=0.238 seconds. This 0.238 second period is supplied by thecontrol unit 110 to asignal generator 180, which generates a square wave of the type discussed above with a period of 0.238 seconds. The signal generated by thesignal generator 180 is then supplied to other systems A,B and C 191-193. Because the signal output bysignal generator 180 will always be representative of a 40 inch wheel, it is not necessary to reconfigure the other systems 191-193 once they have been configured for a 40 inch wheel, thereby substantially reducing labor costs associated with these operations. - In the embodiment discussed above, speed is determined as part of the process of determining the parameters of the signal to be generated by the
signal generator 180. It will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art that the parameters can be determined without actually calculating the speed. For example, once the wheel size is determined using the method ofFIG. 2 , that wheel size can be used to form a ratio of the predetermined wheel size to the actual wheel size. Thus, for example, if the predetermined wheel size is 40 inches, and the actual wheel size is 36, the ratio would be 40/36. The control unit can then measure the period of the square wave and multiply the period by the ratio to determine the period of the signal that would be generated by thewheel sensor 320 if the wheel were actually 40 inches, and supply this period to thesignal generator 180 to generate this signal. - As discussed above, it is possible to generate a signal for the other devices without using the signal from the
wheel sensor 320. That is, the speed can be determined from the positional system (e.g., GPS receiver 130) and the parameters of the desired signal can be sent to the signal generator so that a signal can be generated and distributed to the other systems, all without an actualwheel rotation sensor 320. This allows the system to serve as a back up for situations where the wheel sensor fails. This also allows the wheel sensor to be replaced, but such a system has the drawback that it will not provide a correct signal when the GPS system is not operational. - Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Claims (22)
1. A computerized method for determining a size of a train wheel comprising the steps of;
inputting a speed from a positioning system installed on a train;
obtaining rotation information from a tachometer;
determining a wheel size based on the rotation information and the speed; and
outputting a signal indicating the wheel size.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of repeating the inputting, obtaining and determining steps a plurality of times and calculating a average of the wheel sizes determined in the determining steps.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of the train wheel.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a motor connected to drive the train wheel.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a driveshaft connected to the train wheel.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a gear connected to the train wheel.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wheel size based on the rotation information and the speed is used as an initial estimate, and further comprising the steps of:
obtaining a first position from the positioning system;
obtaining a second position from the positioning system;
calculating a distance between the first position and the second position; and
calculating an updated wheel size based at least in part of the distance and a number of wheel revolutions occurring between the first position and the second position.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the positioning system is a global positioning system receiver.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of generating a second signal using the signal indicating the wheel size, the second signal having a parameter of a signal that would be generated by a wheel rotation sensor associated with a wheel of a predetermined size different from the wheel size determined in the determining step.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the signal indicating the wheel size is used by a train control system to determine a correct speed of the train.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the signal indicating the wheel size is used by a train control system to determine a correct distance traveled by the train.
12. A system for determining a size of a train wheel comprising:
a control unit;
a positioning system connected to the control unit; and
a tachometer connected to the control unit and configured to measure a rotation speed of a component on the train;
wherein the control unit is configured to perform the steps of:
receiving rotation information from the tachometer;
obtaining a speed from the positioning system;
determining a wheel size based on the rotation information and the speed; and
outputting a signal indicating the wheel size.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control unit is further configured to repeat the receiving, obtaining and determining steps a plurality of times and calculating an average of the wheel sizes determined in the determining steps.
14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of the train wheel.
15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a motor connected to drive the train wheel.
16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a driveshaft connected to the train wheel.
17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the tachometer measures a rotation speed of a gear connected to the train wheel.
18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the wheel size is based on the rotation information and the speed is used as an initial estimate, and wherein the control unit is further configured to perform the steps of:
obtaining a first position from the positioning system;
obtaining a second position from the positioning system;
calculating a distance between the first position and the second position; and
calculating an updated wheel size based at least in part on the distance and a number of wheel revolutions occurring between the first position and the second position.
19. The system of claim 12 , wherein the positioning system is a global positioning system receiver.
20. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform the step of generating a second signal using the signal indicating the wheel size, the second signal having a parameter of a signal that would be generated by a wheel rotation sensor associated with a wheel of a predetermined size different from the wheel size determined in the determining step.
21. The system of claim 12 , wherein the signal indicating the wheel size is used by a train control system to determine a correct speed of the train.
22. The system of claim 12 , wherein the signal indicating the wheel size is used by a train control system to determine a correct distance traveled by the train.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/608,324 US20070095988A1 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-12-08 | Method and System for Compensating for Wheel Wear on a Train |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/157,874 US6701228B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2002-05-31 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US10/609,377 US7283897B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2003-07-01 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US11/608,324 US20070095988A1 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-12-08 | Method and System for Compensating for Wheel Wear on a Train |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/609,377 Division US7283897B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2003-07-01 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070095988A1 true US20070095988A1 (en) | 2007-05-03 |
Family
ID=34062306
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/609,377 Expired - Lifetime US7283897B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2003-07-01 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US11/560,277 Expired - Lifetime US7593795B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-11-15 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US11/608,324 Abandoned US20070095988A1 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-12-08 | Method and System for Compensating for Wheel Wear on a Train |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/609,377 Expired - Lifetime US7283897B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2003-07-01 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US11/560,277 Expired - Lifetime US7593795B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-11-15 | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7283897B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0412083B1 (en) |
CA (2) | CA2530299C (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA05014041A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005005222A2 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090043435A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Methods and systems for making a gps signal vital |
US20090109013A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Display of non-linked eot units having an emergency status |
US20100332058A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track |
CN102476556A (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-30 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and apparatus for adjusting wheel diameters |
CN105667542A (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2016-06-15 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Rail transit train wheel diameter calibrating method |
US20180335782A1 (en) * | 2016-01-04 | 2018-11-22 | Hangzhou Yameilijia Technology Co., Ltd. | Wheel diameter compensation method and apparatus for robot |
DE102017222324A1 (en) * | 2017-12-08 | 2019-06-13 | Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH | Method and device for determining a state of wear of wheels of a rail vehicle |
Families Citing this family (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040172175A1 (en) * | 2003-02-27 | 2004-09-02 | Julich Paul M. | System and method for dispatching by exception |
US7283897B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2007-10-16 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US6970774B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2005-11-29 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US10331121B2 (en) * | 2006-04-17 | 2019-06-25 | Ge Global Sourcing Llc | Vehicle communication system |
US6865454B2 (en) * | 2002-07-02 | 2005-03-08 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Train control system and method of controlling a train or trains |
US7142982B2 (en) | 2004-09-13 | 2006-11-28 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | System and method for determining relative differential positioning system measurement solutions |
US7722134B2 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2010-05-25 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Failsafe electronic braking system for trains |
JP4375253B2 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2009-12-02 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Signal security system |
US8655540B2 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2014-02-18 | International Electronic Machines Corp. | Rail vehicle identification and processing |
AU2009214833B2 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2013-02-07 | Schaffler International Pty Limited | Traction control system and method |
US8583313B2 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2013-11-12 | International Electronic Machines Corp. | Robotic vehicle for performing rail-related actions |
US8606458B2 (en) | 2008-12-12 | 2013-12-10 | Fleetcor Technologies Operating Company, Llc | Navigation system having mileage mechanism and method of operation thereof |
DE102009037637A1 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2011-02-24 | Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH | Method and electronic device for condition monitoring of components in rail vehicles |
KR101727329B1 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2017-04-17 | 엘에스산전 주식회사 | An apparatus and method for mesuring velocity of train |
US8874345B2 (en) | 2012-04-04 | 2014-10-28 | General Electric Company | Method and system for identifying an erroneous speed of a vehicle |
CN104019049B (en) * | 2013-03-01 | 2016-08-10 | 鸿富锦精密电子(天津)有限公司 | Rotation speed of the fan test device |
US9205759B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-12-08 | General Electric Company | System and method of vehicle system control |
US9469318B2 (en) | 2013-11-12 | 2016-10-18 | Thales Canada Inc | Dynamic wheel diameter determination system and method |
CN104477210B (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2017-05-03 | 西南交通大学 | Vehicle wheel pair triggering system |
DE102015225702B4 (en) * | 2015-12-17 | 2019-10-17 | Thales Management & Services Deutschland Gmbh | Method for determining a current wheel diameter |
US10525991B2 (en) * | 2016-04-28 | 2020-01-07 | Ge Global Sourcing Llc | System and method for vehicle control based on detected wheel condition |
US10279823B2 (en) * | 2016-08-08 | 2019-05-07 | General Electric Company | System for controlling or monitoring a vehicle system along a route |
US10730536B2 (en) | 2016-08-10 | 2020-08-04 | Ge Global Sourcing Llc | Systems and methods for route mapping |
CN106627670B (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-06-15 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | A kind of train protection system and method based on laser detection |
CN114620096B (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2023-05-09 | 比亚迪股份有限公司 | Processing method after wheel diameter calibration failure, vehicle-mounted controller, train and medium |
Citations (54)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4181943A (en) * | 1978-05-22 | 1980-01-01 | Hugg Steven B | Speed control device for trains |
US4459668A (en) * | 1980-03-31 | 1984-07-10 | Japanese National Railways | Automatic train control device |
US4561057A (en) * | 1983-04-14 | 1985-12-24 | Halliburton Company | Apparatus and method for monitoring motion of a railroad train |
US4711418A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1987-12-08 | General Signal Corporation | Radio based railway signaling and traffic control system |
US5072900A (en) * | 1989-03-17 | 1991-12-17 | Aigle Azur Concept | System for the control of the progression of several railway trains in a network |
US5129605A (en) * | 1990-09-17 | 1992-07-14 | Rockwell International Corporation | Rail vehicle positioning system |
US5177685A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-01-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Automobile navigation system using real time spoken driving instructions |
US5247338A (en) * | 1989-04-14 | 1993-09-21 | Caltronis A/S | Plant for track-based detection of the wheel profile of train wheels |
US5332180A (en) * | 1992-12-28 | 1994-07-26 | Union Switch & Signal Inc. | Traffic control system utilizing on-board vehicle information measurement apparatus |
US5340062A (en) * | 1992-08-13 | 1994-08-23 | Harmon Industries, Inc. | Train control system integrating dynamic and fixed data |
US5364047A (en) * | 1993-04-02 | 1994-11-15 | General Railway Signal Corporation | Automatic vehicle control and location system |
US5394333A (en) * | 1991-12-23 | 1995-02-28 | Zexel Usa Corp. | Correcting GPS position in a hybrid naviation system |
US5398894A (en) * | 1993-08-10 | 1995-03-21 | Union Switch & Signal Inc. | Virtual block control system for railway vehicle |
US5420883A (en) * | 1993-05-17 | 1995-05-30 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Train location and control using spread spectrum radio communications |
US5433111A (en) * | 1994-05-05 | 1995-07-18 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method for detecting defective conditions in railway vehicle wheels and railtracks |
US5533695A (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 1996-07-09 | Harmon Industries, Inc. | Incremental train control system |
US5579013A (en) * | 1994-05-05 | 1996-11-26 | General Electric Company | Mobile tracking unit capable of detecting defective conditions in railway vehicle wheels and railtracks |
US5620155A (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1997-04-15 | Michalek; Jan K. | Railway train signalling system for remotely operating warning devices at crossings and for receiving warning device operational information |
US5699986A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 1997-12-23 | Alternative Safety Technologies | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
US5740547A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-04-14 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Rail navigation system |
US5751569A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-05-12 | Safetran Systems Corporation | Geographic train control |
US5796613A (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1998-08-18 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Navigation system for vehicles including present position calculating means |
US5803411A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-09-08 | Abb Daimler-Benz Transportation (North America) Inc. | Method and apparatus for initializing an automated train control system |
US5828979A (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1998-10-27 | Harris Corporation | Automatic train control system and method |
US5867122A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-02-02 | Harris Corporation | Application of GPS to a railroad navigation system using two satellites and a stored database |
US5944768A (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 1999-08-31 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Navigation system |
US5950966A (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 1999-09-14 | Westinghouse Airbrake Company | Distributed positive train control system |
US5978718A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-11-02 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Rail vision system |
US5995881A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-11-30 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Integrated cab signal rail navigation system |
US6049745A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 2000-04-11 | Fmc Corporation | Navigation system for automatic guided vehicle |
US6081769A (en) * | 1998-02-23 | 2000-06-27 | Wabtec Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining the overall length of a train |
US6102340A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2000-08-15 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Broken rail detection system and method |
US6112142A (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-08-29 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Positive signal comparator and method |
US6135396A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2000-10-24 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | System and method for automatic train operation |
US6148269A (en) * | 1998-07-20 | 2000-11-14 | General Electric Company | Wheel diameter calibration system for vehicle slip/slide control |
US6179252B1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2001-01-30 | The Texas A&M University System | Intelligent rail crossing control system and train tracking system |
US6218961B1 (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 2001-04-17 | G.E. Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. | Method and system for proximity detection and location determination |
US6219609B1 (en) * | 1997-10-21 | 2001-04-17 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle dynamic control system |
US6311109B1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2001-10-30 | New York Air Brake Corporation | Method of determining train and track characteristics using navigational data |
US6322025B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2001-11-27 | Wabtec Railway Electronics, Inc. | Dual-protocol locomotive control system and method |
US20010056544A1 (en) * | 1998-06-18 | 2001-12-27 | Walker Richard C. | Electrically controlled automated devices to operate, slow, guide, stop and secure, equipment and machinery for the purpose of controlling their unsafe, unattended, unauthorized, unlawful hazardous and/or legal use, with remote control and accountability worldwide |
US6345233B1 (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 2002-02-05 | Dynamic Vehicle Safety Systems, Ltd. | Collision avoidance using GPS device and train proximity detector |
US6347265B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2002-02-12 | Andian Technologies Ltd. | Railroad track geometry defect detector |
US6371416B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2002-04-16 | New York Air Brake Corporation | Portable beacons |
US6374184B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-04-16 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Methods and apparatus for determining that a train has changed paths |
US6373403B1 (en) * | 1997-03-03 | 2002-04-16 | Kelvin Korver | Apparatus and method for improving the safety of railroad systems |
US6377877B1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2002-04-23 | Ge Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Method of determining railyard status using locomotive location |
US6381536B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2002-04-30 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for generating road information from stored digital map database |
US6397147B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2002-05-28 | Csi Wireless Inc. | Relative GPS positioning using a single GPS receiver with internally generated differential correction terms |
US20020070879A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-13 | Gazit Hanoch Amatzia | "On-board" vehicle safety system |
US20030225490A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-04 | Kane Mark Edward | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US20040006411A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2004-01-08 | Kane Mark Edward | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US20040102877A1 (en) * | 2002-11-21 | 2004-05-27 | Kane Mark Edward | Positive signal comparator and method |
US6909514B2 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2005-06-21 | Beena Vision Systems, Inc. | Wheel profile inspection apparatus and method |
Family Cites Families (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5937809A (en) * | 1982-08-27 | 1984-03-01 | Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd | Automatic operation device for rubber tire train |
DE3445812A1 (en) * | 1984-12-15 | 1986-06-19 | Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, 8000 München | PASSENGER VEHICLE |
JPS6271405A (en) * | 1985-09-20 | 1987-04-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Control method of drive of electric rolling stock |
DE3717531C2 (en) * | 1986-05-30 | 1993-12-23 | Tokico Ltd | Circuit arrangement for determining the reference speed in an anti-lock vehicle brake system |
US4819168A (en) * | 1988-01-19 | 1989-04-04 | Aeg Westinghouse Transportation Systems, Inc. | Train control having improved wheel wear adjustment for more accurate train operation |
US5155684A (en) * | 1988-10-25 | 1992-10-13 | Tennant Company | Guiding an unmanned vehicle by reference to overhead features |
JPH03169791A (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1991-07-23 | Suzuki Motor Corp | Front wheel drive device for 2 wheel drive motor cycle |
JP2850414B2 (en) * | 1989-11-30 | 1999-01-27 | スズキ株式会社 | Front wheel drive system for front and rear wheel drive motorcycles |
US5129695A (en) * | 1991-05-20 | 1992-07-14 | Norman Ii Charles E | Vehicle side protector |
US5701965A (en) * | 1993-02-24 | 1997-12-30 | Deka Products Limited Partnership | Human transporter |
JP3431229B2 (en) * | 1993-09-27 | 2003-07-28 | 株式会社東芝 | Mileage measurement device |
JPH07108933A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1995-04-25 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Travel position correcting method for rolling stock |
WO1996001462A1 (en) * | 1994-07-04 | 1996-01-18 | Philips Electronics N.V. | Method of determining a directional change during vehicle navigation, apparatus for carrying out such a method, and vehicle comprising such an apparatus |
US5629668A (en) * | 1994-08-10 | 1997-05-13 | Trek Bicycle, Corp. | Data display unit for a bicycle |
US6459964B1 (en) | 1994-09-01 | 2002-10-01 | G.E. Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. | Train schedule repairer |
US6645953B2 (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 2003-11-11 | Novo Nordisk A/S | Meiosis regulating compounds |
JP3490584B2 (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 2004-01-26 | 東日本旅客鉄道株式会社 | Railway vehicle traveling position correction method and erroneous correction prevention method |
US5950965A (en) * | 1997-07-17 | 1999-09-14 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Split shell spacecraft |
US6332180B1 (en) * | 1998-06-10 | 2001-12-18 | Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. | Method and apparatus for communication in a multi-processor computer system |
US6446005B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2002-09-03 | Prolink, Inc. | Magnetic wheel sensor for vehicle navigation system |
US6360165B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-03-19 | Visteon Technologies, Llc | Method and apparatus for improving dead reckoning distance calculation in vehicle navigation system |
US6487478B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2002-11-26 | General Electric Company | On-board monitor for railroad locomotive |
US6611755B1 (en) * | 1999-12-19 | 2003-08-26 | Trimble Navigation Ltd. | Vehicle tracking, communication and fleet management system |
MXPA02006553A (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2003-04-10 | Ge Transp Systems Global Signa | Methods and apparatus for locomotive position determination. |
US6456937B1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2002-09-24 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for locomotive tracking |
US6401036B1 (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2002-06-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Heading and position error-correction method and apparatus for vehicle navigation systems |
US6459965B1 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2002-10-01 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Method for advanced communication-based vehicle control |
US6577952B2 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2003-06-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Position and heading error-correction method and apparatus for vehicle navigation systems |
US6882309B2 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2005-04-19 | Fast Location. Net, Llc | Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment |
EP1329727A1 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2003-07-23 | Nsk Ltd | Rotation-speed sensor device |
JP4037131B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2008-01-23 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Behavior measuring device |
US6970774B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2005-11-29 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US6609049B1 (en) | 2002-07-01 | 2003-08-19 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for automatically activating a warning device on a train |
US6865454B2 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2005-03-08 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Train control system and method of controlling a train or trains |
US6845953B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2005-01-25 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for checking track integrity |
US6996461B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2006-02-07 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for ensuring that a train does not pass an improperly configured device |
US6863246B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2005-03-08 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for automated fault reporting |
US6853888B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2005-02-08 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Lifting restrictive signaling in a block |
US6915191B2 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2005-07-05 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for detecting when an end of train has passed a point |
US7096096B2 (en) | 2003-07-02 | 2006-08-22 | Quantum Engineering Inc. | Method and system for automatically locating end of train devices |
-
2003
- 2003-07-01 US US10/609,377 patent/US7283897B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-07-01 CA CA002530299A patent/CA2530299C/en active Active
- 2004-07-01 BR BRPI0412083-3A patent/BRPI0412083B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-07-01 MX MXPA05014041A patent/MXPA05014041A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-07-01 CA CA2689057A patent/CA2689057C/en active Active
- 2004-07-01 WO PCT/US2004/020991 patent/WO2005005222A2/en active Application Filing
-
2006
- 2006-11-15 US US11/560,277 patent/US7593795B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2006-12-08 US US11/608,324 patent/US20070095988A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (57)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4181943A (en) * | 1978-05-22 | 1980-01-01 | Hugg Steven B | Speed control device for trains |
US4459668A (en) * | 1980-03-31 | 1984-07-10 | Japanese National Railways | Automatic train control device |
US4561057A (en) * | 1983-04-14 | 1985-12-24 | Halliburton Company | Apparatus and method for monitoring motion of a railroad train |
US4711418A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1987-12-08 | General Signal Corporation | Radio based railway signaling and traffic control system |
US5072900A (en) * | 1989-03-17 | 1991-12-17 | Aigle Azur Concept | System for the control of the progression of several railway trains in a network |
US5247338A (en) * | 1989-04-14 | 1993-09-21 | Caltronis A/S | Plant for track-based detection of the wheel profile of train wheels |
US5177685A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1993-01-05 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Automobile navigation system using real time spoken driving instructions |
US5129605A (en) * | 1990-09-17 | 1992-07-14 | Rockwell International Corporation | Rail vehicle positioning system |
US5394333A (en) * | 1991-12-23 | 1995-02-28 | Zexel Usa Corp. | Correcting GPS position in a hybrid naviation system |
US5452870A (en) * | 1992-08-13 | 1995-09-26 | Harmon Industries, Inc. | Fixed data transmission system for controlling train movement |
US5340062A (en) * | 1992-08-13 | 1994-08-23 | Harmon Industries, Inc. | Train control system integrating dynamic and fixed data |
US5332180A (en) * | 1992-12-28 | 1994-07-26 | Union Switch & Signal Inc. | Traffic control system utilizing on-board vehicle information measurement apparatus |
US5364047A (en) * | 1993-04-02 | 1994-11-15 | General Railway Signal Corporation | Automatic vehicle control and location system |
US5420883A (en) * | 1993-05-17 | 1995-05-30 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Train location and control using spread spectrum radio communications |
US5398894B1 (en) * | 1993-08-10 | 1998-09-29 | Union Switch & Signal Inc | Virtual block control system for railway vehicle |
US5398894A (en) * | 1993-08-10 | 1995-03-21 | Union Switch & Signal Inc. | Virtual block control system for railway vehicle |
US5579013A (en) * | 1994-05-05 | 1996-11-26 | General Electric Company | Mobile tracking unit capable of detecting defective conditions in railway vehicle wheels and railtracks |
US5433111A (en) * | 1994-05-05 | 1995-07-18 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method for detecting defective conditions in railway vehicle wheels and railtracks |
US5533695A (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 1996-07-09 | Harmon Industries, Inc. | Incremental train control system |
US5828979A (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1998-10-27 | Harris Corporation | Automatic train control system and method |
US5796613A (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1998-08-18 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Navigation system for vehicles including present position calculating means |
US5620155A (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1997-04-15 | Michalek; Jan K. | Railway train signalling system for remotely operating warning devices at crossings and for receiving warning device operational information |
US5944768A (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 1999-08-31 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Navigation system |
US5740547A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-04-14 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Rail navigation system |
US5751569A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1998-05-12 | Safetran Systems Corporation | Geographic train control |
US5699986A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 1997-12-23 | Alternative Safety Technologies | Railway crossing collision avoidance system |
US5803411A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-09-08 | Abb Daimler-Benz Transportation (North America) Inc. | Method and apparatus for initializing an automated train control system |
US5867122A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-02-02 | Harris Corporation | Application of GPS to a railroad navigation system using two satellites and a stored database |
US6218961B1 (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 2001-04-17 | G.E. Harris Railway Electronics, L.L.C. | Method and system for proximity detection and location determination |
US6102340A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2000-08-15 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Broken rail detection system and method |
US6135396A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2000-10-24 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | System and method for automatic train operation |
US6049745A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 2000-04-11 | Fmc Corporation | Navigation system for automatic guided vehicle |
US6373403B1 (en) * | 1997-03-03 | 2002-04-16 | Kelvin Korver | Apparatus and method for improving the safety of railroad systems |
US5978718A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-11-02 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Rail vision system |
US5995881A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-11-30 | Westinghouse Air Brake Company | Integrated cab signal rail navigation system |
US6345233B1 (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 2002-02-05 | Dynamic Vehicle Safety Systems, Ltd. | Collision avoidance using GPS device and train proximity detector |
US5950966A (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 1999-09-14 | Westinghouse Airbrake Company | Distributed positive train control system |
US6219609B1 (en) * | 1997-10-21 | 2001-04-17 | Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle dynamic control system |
US6081769A (en) * | 1998-02-23 | 2000-06-27 | Wabtec Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining the overall length of a train |
US20010056544A1 (en) * | 1998-06-18 | 2001-12-27 | Walker Richard C. | Electrically controlled automated devices to operate, slow, guide, stop and secure, equipment and machinery for the purpose of controlling their unsafe, unattended, unauthorized, unlawful hazardous and/or legal use, with remote control and accountability worldwide |
US6112142A (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-08-29 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Positive signal comparator and method |
US6179252B1 (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2001-01-30 | The Texas A&M University System | Intelligent rail crossing control system and train tracking system |
US6148269A (en) * | 1998-07-20 | 2000-11-14 | General Electric Company | Wheel diameter calibration system for vehicle slip/slide control |
US6347265B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2002-02-12 | Andian Technologies Ltd. | Railroad track geometry defect detector |
US6381536B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2002-04-30 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for generating road information from stored digital map database |
US6374184B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-04-16 | Ge-Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Methods and apparatus for determining that a train has changed paths |
US6322025B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2001-11-27 | Wabtec Railway Electronics, Inc. | Dual-protocol locomotive control system and method |
US6397147B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2002-05-28 | Csi Wireless Inc. | Relative GPS positioning using a single GPS receiver with internally generated differential correction terms |
US6311109B1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2001-10-30 | New York Air Brake Corporation | Method of determining train and track characteristics using navigational data |
US6371416B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2002-04-16 | New York Air Brake Corporation | Portable beacons |
US6377877B1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2002-04-23 | Ge Harris Railway Electronics, Llc | Method of determining railyard status using locomotive location |
US20020070879A1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-13 | Gazit Hanoch Amatzia | "On-board" vehicle safety system |
US20030225490A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-04 | Kane Mark Edward | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US20040006411A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2004-01-08 | Kane Mark Edward | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US6701228B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2004-03-02 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train |
US6909514B2 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2005-06-21 | Beena Vision Systems, Inc. | Wheel profile inspection apparatus and method |
US20040102877A1 (en) * | 2002-11-21 | 2004-05-27 | Kane Mark Edward | Positive signal comparator and method |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090043435A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Methods and systems for making a gps signal vital |
US7872591B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2011-01-18 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Display of non-linked EOT units having an emergency status |
US20090109013A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Display of non-linked eot units having an emergency status |
US8509970B2 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2013-08-13 | Invensys Rail Corporation | Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track |
US20100332058A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Quantum Engineering, Inc. | Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track |
US9168935B2 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2015-10-27 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Vital speed profile to control a train moving along a track |
CN102476556A (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-30 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and apparatus for adjusting wheel diameters |
US20120136637A1 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adjusting wheel diameter |
US8855975B2 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2014-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adjusting wheel diameter |
US20180335782A1 (en) * | 2016-01-04 | 2018-11-22 | Hangzhou Yameilijia Technology Co., Ltd. | Wheel diameter compensation method and apparatus for robot |
JP2019507447A (en) * | 2016-01-04 | 2019-03-14 | 浙江立▲ビアオ▼机器人有限公司Zhejiang Libiao Robots Co., Ltd. | Robot wheel diameter complementing method and apparatus |
US10416674B2 (en) * | 2016-01-04 | 2019-09-17 | Hangzhou Yameilijia Technology Co., Ltd. | Wheel diameter compensation method and apparatus for robot |
CN105667542A (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2016-06-15 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Rail transit train wheel diameter calibrating method |
DE102017222324A1 (en) * | 2017-12-08 | 2019-06-13 | Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH | Method and device for determining a state of wear of wheels of a rail vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2530299A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
BRPI0412083B1 (en) | 2019-04-02 |
US7283897B2 (en) | 2007-10-16 |
US7593795B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 |
BRPI0412083A (en) | 2006-09-05 |
US20070112482A1 (en) | 2007-05-17 |
CA2530299C (en) | 2010-03-09 |
MXPA05014041A (en) | 2006-03-17 |
CA2689057C (en) | 2012-09-18 |
US20040006411A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 |
CA2689057A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
WO2005005222A2 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
WO2005005222A3 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7593795B2 (en) | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train | |
US6970774B2 (en) | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train | |
US6701228B2 (en) | Method and system for compensating for wheel wear on a train | |
US8874345B2 (en) | Method and system for identifying an erroneous speed of a vehicle | |
US5129605A (en) | Rail vehicle positioning system | |
AU710752B2 (en) | Rail navigation system | |
CN103707903B (en) | A kind of Automatic train wheel diameter bearing calibration | |
US6347265B1 (en) | Railroad track geometry defect detector | |
US6681160B2 (en) | Geometric track and track/vehicle analyzers and methods for controlling railroad systems | |
US7966126B2 (en) | Vital system for determining location and location uncertainty of a railroad vehicle with respect to a predetermined track map using a global positioning system and other diverse sensors | |
US6915191B2 (en) | Method and system for detecting when an end of train has passed a point | |
US20160082987A1 (en) | System and method of vehicle system control | |
WO2008079456A1 (en) | System, method, and computer readable media for odometer calibration | |
CN113758450B (en) | Train length measuring method and device, computer equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN114518141B (en) | High-precision train speed and distance measuring method and vehicle-mounted speed and distance measuring unit | |
EP4194313A1 (en) | On-board detection device for a railway vehicle, railway vehicle comprising such device and associated railway system | |
CN209878793U (en) | Accurate speed measuring system for train | |
CA2474757C (en) | Track analyzers and methods for controlling railroad systems | |
WO2003069064A1 (en) | Track/vehicle analyzers and methods for controlling railroad systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: QUANTUM ENGINEERING, INC., FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KANE, MARK E;SHOCKLEY, JAMES F;HICKENLOOPER, HARRISON T;REEL/FRAME:018602/0596;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030626 TO 20030627 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |