US20070210914A1 - System and method for asset tracking and monitoring - Google Patents
System and method for asset tracking and monitoring Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070210914A1 US20070210914A1 US11/005,307 US530704A US2007210914A1 US 20070210914 A1 US20070210914 A1 US 20070210914A1 US 530704 A US530704 A US 530704A US 2007210914 A1 US2007210914 A1 US 2007210914A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- satellite
- monitoring
- asset
- monitoring system
- sensor information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lithium Chemical compound [Li] WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052744 lithium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
- G06Q10/0833—Tracking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
-
- G06Q50/40—
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to monitoring and tracking and, more particularly, to a system and method for asset tracking and monitoring.
- the present invention meets the above-mentioned needs by providing a multi-mode asset tracking and monitoring system and method that enables comprehensive reporting of asset position, status, and alerts.
- the multi-mode system and method is based on the addition of a local network monitoring system to a wide area satellite network monitoring system.
- the local network monitoring system would add container presence and status monitoring in crowded environments (e.g., within a port facility, on-board a ship, etc.), while the wide area satellite network monitoring system would provide tracking and monitoring coverage when the container is in dispersed environments.
- Both the local and wide area monitoring systems work together to provide end-to-end container tracking and monitoring to thereby ensure continuous container tracking and monitoring from container loading to container unloading.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a system of the present invention
- FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process of the present invention
- FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a local network portion of the present invention.
- assets e.g., containers, deployments, shipments, trailers, heavy equipment, vehicles, and other mobile assets
- Security for these assets is a natural hazard due to the inherent inability to control access to these assets along their entire journey into and through a U.S. port.
- assets e.g., containers, deployments, shipments, trailers, heavy equipment, vehicles, and other mobile assets
- these assets are brought to a foreign port, loaded onto a ship, transported to a U.S. port, and loaded onto rail or semi-trailer transport to a domestic destination.
- the asset is susceptible to potential terrorist elements that seek to subvert the asset shipment to their own purposes. Securing and tracking these assets throughout their journey into the U.S. is therefore a necessary task in reducing the likelihood of asset-borne security threats.
- one of the objectives of the present invention is to provide a framework that enables an asset to be tracked and monitored whether or not the asset is sitting in a rail or ship yard, or sitting on a train or ship during transport.
- each of these environments can present their own challenges in providing proper communication facilities that enable real-time or near real-time reporting of position, status, and alert information from the asset.
- a single monitoring mechanism may not be sufficient to satisfy the security objectives.
- a multi-mode asset monitoring capability is envisioned to provide high-availability coverage over a range of transport phases.
- satellite-based communications and positioning means operate with relatively small link margins and can therefore require relatively unimpaired paths from the terminal to the satellite. Such paths, however, may not be available within container yards, where assets are often stacked. This problem can also exist in those asset environments where assets are stored within the bowels of a ship.
- Terrestrial mode communications also have their limitations. For example, cellular systems offer much better link margins than satellite communications means except in fringe and shadowed areas. However, once out of cellular coverage terrestrial mode communications does not work. The unfortunate consequence is that terrestrial mode communications would not supply coverage over many rail routes, and certainly not on offshore shipping routes.
- local monitoring networks seem to offer strengths precisely where satellite networks fall short (i.e., in relatively confined yard and shipboard environments).
- local monitoring networks can represent those networks that are largely directed to the operating area of the supported operation, such as in a marine terminal, a truck terminal, aboard a ship, on a train, in a rail yard, in a shipping depot, in a tunnel, etc.
- the local network collects information from terminals scattered within the local area, processes and screens the data, and presents it to a communications node within the local area for routing to a remote central data collection facility.
- a local wireless network simplifies the communications problem at the operating site (i.e., yard or ship) by enabling a single, central communications means from the site to the central facility.
- this could be done by Internet, leased line, wireless telephone or data services (e.g., PCS), another satellite network, or a combination of the above.
- a local monitoring network can be used in combination with a wide area monitoring network (e.g., satellite) to produce a multi-mode solution.
- This multi-mode solution would facilitate complete coverage across an asset's international route.
- the local monitoring network can be used to report tracking and monitoring information to a central facility when out of contact with a satellite network
- the wide area satellite network can be used to report tracking and monitoring information to a central facility when out of contact with a local monitoring network.
- each mode would use a different communications network to report asset position, status, and alert information.
- the various communications networks would have different performance characteristics, to thereby complement each other for a particular monitoring application.
- distinct modes of network communications can be used to monitor assets.
- complementary modes of communication can also be used simultaneously or in sequence when multiple modes are available.
- one network's availability can preempt report via another network, thereby increasing efficiency in communications network use.
- each network could be used to provide reports whenever available regardless of the status of another network, thereby providing improved reliability through redundancy.
- any one network could facilitate control operations in another network, or for configuration of devices in another network.
- Information from the various monitoring networks can then be combined or otherwise integrated at a remote central information processing and delivery facility to produce a continuous tracking and monitoring log during the asset's entire international journey.
- the security framework includes asset 111 that is contained within a local area 110 (e.g., ship, ship yard, rail yard, or the like). Position, status, and alert information can be communicated to service operations center (SOC) 140 via satellite 120 and antenna 130 .
- SOC service operations center
- SOC 140 is built around a relational data base managing all relevant system, user, terminal, and transaction data.
- Several back end servers manage internal system functions, such as terminal and protocol management and position solving, while front-end servers manage applications and web delivery.
- SOC 140 can deliver information to customers in a number of ways, including by web account, URL query, XML data delivery (including the XML trailer tracking standard), email, and file transfer protocol (FTP).
- FTP file transfer protocol
- asset 111 can include sensors 114 that are used to detect various conditions at asset 111 .
- sensors 114 can be used to detect intrusion, light, movement, heat, radiation, or any other characteristic that would bear on the container's security.
- Events detected by sensors 114 are communicated to service operations center 140 using mobile terminal (MT) 112 and/or local network terminal (LNT) 113 .
- MT 112 and LNT 113 are illustrated as separate devices, they can be combined into a single multi-mode device. More generally, the multi-mode device can be designed to communicate in any number of modes dictated by a particular implementation.
- MT 112 can be used to communicate tracking and monitoring information to SOC 140 directly via satellite 120 .
- LNT 113 can be used to communicate tracking and monitoring information to SOC 140 through local area terminal (LAT) 116 .
- LAT local area terminal
- LAT 116 would forward information communicated by LNT 113 to SOC 140 through satellite 120 .
- LAT 116 can communicate information to SOC 140 using a leased line, Internet or other land-based connection scheme.
- sensor 114 can be designed to detect various conditions such as intrusion (e.g., door sensor), light, heat, motion, radiation, or the like.
- asset 111 can be configured to include any number or combination of sensors depending on the particular application and level of security desired. Once sensor 114 detects an event, it would then alert at least one of MT 112 and LNT 113 at step 204 .
- sensors 114 can be coupled directly to MT 112 and/or LNT 113 .
- sensors 114 can be coupled directly to MT 112 and/or LNT 113 .
- a connection may also be established between MT 112 and LNT 113 , to thereby facilitate an effective connection between LNT 113 and sensors 114 .
- MT 112 and/or LNT 113 After MT 112 and/or LNT 113 has been alerted to the detected event, MT 112 and/or LNT 113 would then proceed to communicate the detected event information to SOC 140 .
- sensor 114 awakens MT 112 and causes it to enter a mode to report immediately on sensor status and activation. This process is represented by step 206 where MT 112 would attempt to report the event to SOC 140 through a direct connection to satellite 120 .
- MT 112 is represented by the MT developed by SkyBitz, Inc. for use in their Global Locating System (GLS).
- the SkyBitz MT is built to Mil-Std 810F and SAE-J1077 environmental specifications, and is built as a software-configurable radio. Eight AA lithium batteries give it a battery lifetime of 4500 position reports combined with a shelf-life of over 10 years.
- the combination of the protocol and mobile terminal design enables the mobile terminal to support position reports, MT paging (unscheduled requests for information from the MT), event reports (unscheduled, real time reporting of events detected by the MT), and low bandwidth data traffic.
- the MT can accommodate multiple simultaneous assignments, and can be configured remotely over the air. It also automatically adapts to changes in the network, and roams automatically among beams within a satellite footprint and among satellites.
- the GLS system is configured to use transponding satellites using the international geostationary L-band mobile satellite allocation.
- the MT supports a number of local interfaces through a single weather-tight, triply-sealed connector. Through this connector the MT can monitor two simple contact closure sensors and operates two internal switches to control local external devices. It accepts external power and uses it when present in preference to internal batteries. And it controls an RS-485 data bus, enabling communications with up to six simultaneously connected intelligent devices.
- MT 112 determines that satellite 120 is not in view, it would then set a timer at step 210 for a short delay (e.g., seconds to minutes), go back to sleep, and reawaken when the timer expires to try again. When the timer has expired, the process would continue back to step 208 , where MT 112 would again determine if satellite 120 is in view. This process will repeat until it is successful. In one embodiment, timer intervals will increase with successive failures to receive the satellite signal in order to conserve battery when blocked from satellite 120 for an extended period.
- a short delay e.g., seconds to minutes
- MT 112 determines at step 208 that the satellite is in view, then MT 112 would then proceed to report the event to SOC 140 through satellite 120 .
- MT 112 reports the event by seeking an event timeslot or otherwise unoccupied timeslot (as evidenced by the forward link on that timeslot), and transmits a position and sensor status report over the corresponding return timeslot. It then proceeds to a slightly later timeslot to receive an acknowledgement. MT 112 will retry if it receives no acknowledgement.
- a sensor alert provided to LNT 113 will also cause LNT 113 to report the event to SOC 140 .
- This process is represented by step 214 where LNT 113 reports the event using a local area network.
- LNT 113 receives the alert by sensor 114 directly.
- LNT 113 is awakened by MT 112 .
- MT 112 when MT 112 initially awakens due to a sensor alert, it can be designed to also close an appropriate contact controlling LNT 113 to alert LNT 113 as well of the event.
- LNT 113 can then send “blinks”, or brief emissions, on an ongoing basis at regular settable intervals (e.g., up to four minutes) between blinks. If a sensor contact is closed, LNT 113 can immediately send a set of blinks with the change in status.
- LNT 113 can be generally designed to communicate with LAT 116 via a local network connection. LAT 116 can then proceed to communicate information generated by LNT 113 to SOC 140 via satellite 120 .
- LAT 116 is embodied as a similar unit to MT 112 . In this embodiment, the primary difference between LAT 116 and MT 112 would be the item to which the units are fixed. MT 112 would be fixed to an asset being tracked and monitored, while LAT 116 would be fixed to an element within local area 110 .
- location sensor 320 is operative to listen to emissions by tags 310 , which are individually fixed to the plurality of container assets that are distributed in a local area 110 . Location sensor 320 would then report inform server 330 of the presence and status of tags 310 in local area 110 . Any location sensor 320 able to hear tag 310 in turn reports the change in tag status to server 330 . In one embodiment, several sensors 320 can be arranged around a local area 110 (e.g., ship yard, rail yard, ship, or the like) to locate each tag 310 using time difference of arrival techniques.
- a local area 110 e.g., ship yard, rail yard, ship, or the like
- tags 310 and location sensor 320 are the tags and location sensors manufactured by WhereNet, Inc.
- WhereNet's local wireless locating and monitoring system has been used for locating and monitoring tags within a yard, depot, or plant environment.
- WhereNet's WhereTags operate in the 2.4 Ghz Industrial, Scientific, and Medical band, and can be set up to emit periodically from every few seconds to every few minutes.
- Tag emissions are spread spectrum, spread across 30 megahertz, and operate either at 2.5 milliwatts or 50 milliwatts, depending on the model. Each emission contains data on tag identity, tag state, the state of various sensor inputs, and other information. Emissions last only several milliseconds each, permitting very long battery life, up to seven years depending on type and report rate.
- server 330 After server 330 collects reported information from tags 310 , server 330 would then proceed to report this information back to SOC 140 .
- server 330 communicates with MT 340 , which is operative to transmit information to the SOC via satellite 350 .
- communication between server 330 and MT 340 is enabled using the local RS-485 data bus of MT 340 .
- the RS-485 data bus supports among other things an RS-485 interface to local digital devices.
- the RS-485 interface is used to transport packets from server 330 to the SOC using satellite 350 .
- a software application hosted on server 330 extracts data from the database on server 330 , formats it, adds the necessary RS-485 communications protocol layers, and deliver it to MT 340 .
- application software would then extract the data from the incoming packets.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims priority to provisional application No. 60/528,780, entitled “System and Method for Container Tracking and Monitoring,” filed Dec. 12, 2003. The above-identified application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- This invention was made with Government support under contract DTMA1G02001 awarded by the United States Maritime Administration. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to monitoring and tracking and, more particularly, to a system and method for asset tracking and monitoring.
- 2. Introduction
- Security from terrorist actions has taken on an increased level of prominence in the United States. These terrorist threats can arise from internal sources or from external sources. With regard to external borne threats, one concern is the tracking and monitoring of semi-trailers, rail cars, and related shipping industry assets in the container arena as they cross into United States territory. Unless these assets can be secured and tracked prior to and subsequent to entry into the United States, the risk of terrorist activities will be significant. What is needed therefore is a system and method for global container tracking.
- The present invention meets the above-mentioned needs by providing a multi-mode asset tracking and monitoring system and method that enables comprehensive reporting of asset position, status, and alerts. In one embodiment, the multi-mode system and method is based on the addition of a local network monitoring system to a wide area satellite network monitoring system. In this example, the local network monitoring system would add container presence and status monitoring in crowded environments (e.g., within a port facility, on-board a ship, etc.), while the wide area satellite network monitoring system would provide tracking and monitoring coverage when the container is in dispersed environments. Both the local and wide area monitoring systems work together to provide end-to-end container tracking and monitoring to thereby ensure continuous container tracking and monitoring from container loading to container unloading.
- Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by practice of the invention as set forth herein.
- In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the invention can be obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a system of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process of the present invention; and -
FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a local network portion of the present invention. - Various embodiments of the invention are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the invention.
- As noted, one of the security issues that has faced increased scrutiny is the risks associated with assets (e.g., containers, deployments, shipments, trailers, heavy equipment, vehicles, and other mobile assets) that cross U.S. borders. Security for these assets is a natural hazard due to the inherent inability to control access to these assets along their entire journey into and through a U.S. port. Typically, these assets are brought to a foreign port, loaded onto a ship, transported to a U.S. port, and loaded onto rail or semi-trailer transport to a domestic destination. Throughout this journey, the asset is susceptible to potential terrorist elements that seek to subvert the asset shipment to their own purposes. Securing and tracking these assets throughout their journey into the U.S. is therefore a necessary task in reducing the likelihood of asset-borne security threats.
- In this environment, maintaining continuous tracking and monitoring visibility of an asset is of paramount importance. A loss of visibility provides terrorist elements with an unchecked opportunity to access and subvert an asset. Thus, one of the objectives of the present invention is to provide a framework that enables an asset to be tracked and monitored whether or not the asset is sitting in a rail or ship yard, or sitting on a train or ship during transport. As would be appreciated, each of these environments can present their own challenges in providing proper communication facilities that enable real-time or near real-time reporting of position, status, and alert information from the asset.
- In designing a proper security framework where it is possible to maintain contact with an asset during all phases of shipment from origin to destination, it has become apparent that a single monitoring mechanism may not be sufficient to satisfy the security objectives. In accordance with the present invention, a multi-mode asset monitoring capability is envisioned to provide high-availability coverage over a range of transport phases.
- For example, satellite-based communications and positioning means operate with relatively small link margins and can therefore require relatively unimpaired paths from the terminal to the satellite. Such paths, however, may not be available within container yards, where assets are often stacked. This problem can also exist in those asset environments where assets are stored within the bowels of a ship.
- Terrestrial mode communications also have their limitations. For example, cellular systems offer much better link margins than satellite communications means except in fringe and shadowed areas. However, once out of cellular coverage terrestrial mode communications does not work. The unfortunate consequence is that terrestrial mode communications would not supply coverage over many rail routes, and certainly not on offshore shipping routes.
- Notwithstanding the limitations of satellite and terrestrial communication systems, it is recognized that local monitoring networks seem to offer strengths precisely where satellite networks fall short (i.e., in relatively confined yard and shipboard environments). Here, local monitoring networks can represent those networks that are largely directed to the operating area of the supported operation, such as in a marine terminal, a truck terminal, aboard a ship, on a train, in a rail yard, in a shipping depot, in a tunnel, etc. In one embodiment, the local network collects information from terminals scattered within the local area, processes and screens the data, and presents it to a communications node within the local area for routing to a remote central data collection facility. In this manner, a local wireless network simplifies the communications problem at the operating site (i.e., yard or ship) by enabling a single, central communications means from the site to the central facility. In various embodiments, this could be done by Internet, leased line, wireless telephone or data services (e.g., PCS), another satellite network, or a combination of the above.
- It is a feature of the present invention that a local monitoring network can be used in combination with a wide area monitoring network (e.g., satellite) to produce a multi-mode solution. This multi-mode solution would facilitate complete coverage across an asset's international route. In this framework, the local monitoring network can be used to report tracking and monitoring information to a central facility when out of contact with a satellite network, while the wide area satellite network can be used to report tracking and monitoring information to a central facility when out of contact with a local monitoring network. Here, each mode would use a different communications network to report asset position, status, and alert information. As would be appreciated, the various communications networks would have different performance characteristics, to thereby complement each other for a particular monitoring application.
- Thus, in accordance with the present invention, distinct modes of network communications can be used to monitor assets. In one embodiment, complementary modes of communication can also be used simultaneously or in sequence when multiple modes are available. Further, in one embodiment, one network's availability can preempt report via another network, thereby increasing efficiency in communications network use. In another embodiment, each network could be used to provide reports whenever available regardless of the status of another network, thereby providing improved reliability through redundancy. In general, any one network could facilitate control operations in another network, or for configuration of devices in another network.
- Information from the various monitoring networks can then be combined or otherwise integrated at a remote central information processing and delivery facility to produce a continuous tracking and monitoring log during the asset's entire international journey.
- To illustrate the features of the security framework of the present invention, reference is now made to the system diagram of
FIG. 1 . As illustrated, the security framework includesasset 111 that is contained within a local area 110 (e.g., ship, ship yard, rail yard, or the like). Position, status, and alert information can be communicated to service operations center (SOC) 140 viasatellite 120 andantenna 130. - In one embodiment,
SOC 140 is built around a relational data base managing all relevant system, user, terminal, and transaction data. Several back end servers manage internal system functions, such as terminal and protocol management and position solving, while front-end servers manage applications and web delivery.SOC 140 can deliver information to customers in a number of ways, including by web account, URL query, XML data delivery (including the XML trailer tracking standard), email, and file transfer protocol (FTP). - As further illustrated in
FIG. 1 ,asset 111 can includesensors 114 that are used to detect various conditions atasset 111. In various examples,sensors 114 can be used to detect intrusion, light, movement, heat, radiation, or any other characteristic that would bear on the container's security. Events detected bysensors 114 are communicated toservice operations center 140 using mobile terminal (MT) 112 and/or local network terminal (LNT) 113. It should be noted that whileMT 112 andLNT 113 are illustrated as separate devices, they can be combined into a single multi-mode device. More generally, the multi-mode device can be designed to communicate in any number of modes dictated by a particular implementation. - In general,
MT 112 can be used to communicate tracking and monitoring information toSOC 140 directly viasatellite 120.LNT 113, on the other hand, can be used to communicate tracking and monitoring information toSOC 140 through local area terminal (LAT) 116. In the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 1 ,LAT 116 would forward information communicated byLNT 113 toSOC 140 throughsatellite 120. In an alternative embodiment,LAT 116 can communicate information toSOC 140 using a leased line, Internet or other land-based connection scheme. The operation of the alternative communication paths reflected byMT 112 andLNT 113 will now be described in greater detail with reference to the flowchart ofFIG. 2 . - As illustrated, the flowchart of
FIG. 2 begins with the detection bysensor 114 of an event. As noted,sensor 114 can be designed to detect various conditions such as intrusion (e.g., door sensor), light, heat, motion, radiation, or the like. As would be appreciated,asset 111 can be configured to include any number or combination of sensors depending on the particular application and level of security desired. Oncesensor 114 detects an event, it would then alert at least one ofMT 112 andLNT 113 atstep 204. - In various embodiments,
sensors 114 can be coupled directly toMT 112 and/orLNT 113. For example, ifsensors 114 are coupled directly only toMT 112, then a connection may also be established betweenMT 112 andLNT 113, to thereby facilitate an effective connection betweenLNT 113 andsensors 114. - After
MT 112 and/orLNT 113 has been alerted to the detected event,MT 112 and/orLNT 113 would then proceed to communicate the detected event information toSOC 140. Consideringfirst MT 112, when any ofsensors 114 activates,sensor 114 awakensMT 112 and causes it to enter a mode to report immediately on sensor status and activation. This process is represented bystep 206 whereMT 112 would attempt to report the event toSOC 140 through a direct connection tosatellite 120. - In one embodiment,
MT 112 is represented by the MT developed by SkyBitz, Inc. for use in their Global Locating System (GLS). The SkyBitz MT is built to Mil-Std 810F and SAE-J1077 environmental specifications, and is built as a software-configurable radio. Eight AA lithium batteries give it a battery lifetime of 4500 position reports combined with a shelf-life of over 10 years. - The combination of the protocol and mobile terminal design enables the mobile terminal to support position reports, MT paging (unscheduled requests for information from the MT), event reports (unscheduled, real time reporting of events detected by the MT), and low bandwidth data traffic. The MT can accommodate multiple simultaneous assignments, and can be configured remotely over the air. It also automatically adapts to changes in the network, and roams automatically among beams within a satellite footprint and among satellites. The GLS system is configured to use transponding satellites using the international geostationary L-band mobile satellite allocation.
- The MT supports a number of local interfaces through a single weather-tight, triply-sealed connector. Through this connector the MT can monitor two simple contact closure sensors and operates two internal switches to control local external devices. It accepts external power and uses it when present in preference to internal batteries. And it controls an RS-485 data bus, enabling communications with up to six simultaneously connected intelligent devices.
- Referring back to
FIG. 2 , ifMT 112 determines thatsatellite 120 is not in view, it would then set a timer atstep 210 for a short delay (e.g., seconds to minutes), go back to sleep, and reawaken when the timer expires to try again. When the timer has expired, the process would continue back to step 208, whereMT 112 would again determine ifsatellite 120 is in view. This process will repeat until it is successful. In one embodiment, timer intervals will increase with successive failures to receive the satellite signal in order to conserve battery when blocked fromsatellite 120 for an extended period. - If
MT 112 determines atstep 208 that the satellite is in view, thenMT 112 would then proceed to report the event toSOC 140 throughsatellite 120. In one embodiment,MT 112 reports the event by seeking an event timeslot or otherwise unoccupied timeslot (as evidenced by the forward link on that timeslot), and transmits a position and sensor status report over the corresponding return timeslot. It then proceeds to a slightly later timeslot to receive an acknowledgement.MT 112 will retry if it receives no acknowledgement. - As
FIG. 2 further illustrates, a sensor alert provided toLNT 113 will also causeLNT 113 to report the event toSOC 140. This process is represented bystep 214 whereLNT 113 reports the event using a local area network. In one embodiment,LNT 113 receives the alert bysensor 114 directly. In another embodiment,LNT 113 is awakened byMT 112. Here, whenMT 112 initially awakens due to a sensor alert, it can be designed to also close an appropriatecontact controlling LNT 113 to alertLNT 113 as well of the event. In one embodiment,LNT 113 can then send “blinks”, or brief emissions, on an ongoing basis at regular settable intervals (e.g., up to four minutes) between blinks. If a sensor contact is closed,LNT 113 can immediately send a set of blinks with the change in status. - As illustrated in
FIG. 1 ,LNT 113 can be generally designed to communicate withLAT 116 via a local network connection.LAT 116 can then proceed to communicate information generated byLNT 113 toSOC 140 viasatellite 120. In one embodiment,LAT 116 is embodied as a similar unit toMT 112. In this embodiment, the primary difference betweenLAT 116 andMT 112 would be the item to which the units are fixed.MT 112 would be fixed to an asset being tracked and monitored, whileLAT 116 would be fixed to an element withinlocal area 110. - As would be appreciated, the specific method by which
LNT 113 would communicate withLAT 116 would be implementation dependent. One embodiment of a communication mechanism betweenLNT 113 andLAT 116 is illustrated inFIG. 3 . In this embodiment,location sensor 320 is operative to listen to emissions bytags 310, which are individually fixed to the plurality of container assets that are distributed in alocal area 110.Location sensor 320 would then report informserver 330 of the presence and status oftags 310 inlocal area 110. Anylocation sensor 320 able to heartag 310 in turn reports the change in tag status toserver 330. In one embodiment,several sensors 320 can be arranged around a local area 110 (e.g., ship yard, rail yard, ship, or the like) to locate eachtag 310 using time difference of arrival techniques. - One example of
tags 310 andlocation sensor 320 are the tags and location sensors manufactured by WhereNet, Inc. In general, WhereNet's local wireless locating and monitoring system has been used for locating and monitoring tags within a yard, depot, or plant environment. WhereNet's WhereTags operate in the 2.4 Ghz Industrial, Scientific, and Medical band, and can be set up to emit periodically from every few seconds to every few minutes. Tag emissions are spread spectrum, spread across 30 megahertz, and operate either at 2.5 milliwatts or 50 milliwatts, depending on the model. Each emission contains data on tag identity, tag state, the state of various sensor inputs, and other information. Emissions last only several milliseconds each, permitting very long battery life, up to seven years depending on type and report rate. - After
server 330 collects reported information fromtags 310,server 330 would then proceed to report this information back toSOC 140. In the illustrated embodiment,server 330 communicates withMT 340, which is operative to transmit information to the SOC viasatellite 350. - In one embodiment, communication between
server 330 andMT 340 is enabled using the local RS-485 data bus ofMT 340. In general, the RS-485 data bus supports among other things an RS-485 interface to local digital devices. In this embodiment, the RS-485 interface is used to transport packets fromserver 330 to theSOC using satellite 350. Here, a software application hosted onserver 330 extracts data from the database onserver 330, formats it, adds the necessary RS-485 communications protocol layers, and deliver it toMT 340. At the SOC, application software would then extract the data from the incoming packets. - It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the system and method of the present invention can be used in environments other than those disclosed herein. It will thus be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other variations of the present invention will be possible without departing from the scope of the invention as disclosed.
- These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art by a review of the preceding detailed description. Although a number of salient features of the present invention have been described above, the invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways that would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading the disclosed invention, therefore the above description should not be considered to be exclusive of these other embodiments. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (11)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/005,307 US7265668B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-07 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
EP04821781A EP1721185A4 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
PCT/US2004/041373 WO2005104675A2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
MXPA06006667A MXPA06006667A (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring. |
CA2548841A CA2548841C (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US11/639,425 US20070216542A1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2006-12-15 | System and method for remotely tracking and monitoring a container and its contents |
US11/834,052 US7545266B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-08-06 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US12/465,892 US7898411B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2009-05-14 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/031,497 US8242904B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2011-02-21 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/584,174 US8633819B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2012-08-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US14/158,195 US9607282B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2014-01-17 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US52878003P | 2003-12-12 | 2003-12-12 | |
US11/005,307 US7265668B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-07 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/639,425 Continuation-In-Part US20070216542A1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2006-12-15 | System and method for remotely tracking and monitoring a container and its contents |
US11/834,052 Continuation US7545266B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-08-06 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7265668B1 US7265668B1 (en) | 2007-09-04 |
US20070210914A1 true US20070210914A1 (en) | 2007-09-13 |
Family
ID=35242110
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/005,307 Active 2025-09-30 US7265668B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-12-07 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US11/834,052 Active US7545266B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-08-06 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US12/465,892 Active US7898411B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2009-05-14 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/031,497 Active US8242904B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2011-02-21 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/584,174 Active US8633819B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2012-08-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US14/158,195 Active 2026-05-12 US9607282B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2014-01-17 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
Family Applications After (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/834,052 Active US7545266B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-08-06 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US12/465,892 Active US7898411B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2009-05-14 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/031,497 Active US8242904B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2011-02-21 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US13/584,174 Active US8633819B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2012-08-13 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US14/158,195 Active 2026-05-12 US9607282B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2014-01-17 | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US7265668B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1721185A4 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2548841C (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA06006667A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005104675A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7974637B1 (en) * | 2007-09-24 | 2011-07-05 | Mikael Bror Taveniku | Passive mode tracking through existing and future wireless networks |
US20140136429A1 (en) * | 2011-05-18 | 2014-05-15 | Axios Mobile Assets Corp. | Systems and methods for tracking the usage of environmentally efficient shipping equipment and for providing environmental credits based on such usage |
US20190098466A1 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2019-03-28 | Pa. Cotte Sa | System for forwarding objects by individuals of a community, implementing a spatiotemporal tracking system |
Families Citing this family (51)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8948442B2 (en) * | 1982-06-18 | 2015-02-03 | Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. | Optical monitoring of vehicle interiors |
US20040143392A1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2004-07-22 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for fast acquisition reporting using communication satellite range measurement |
US8255149B2 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2012-08-28 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for dual-mode location determination |
US20070216542A1 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2007-09-20 | Jay Brosius | System and method for remotely tracking and monitoring a container and its contents |
US7265668B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-09-04 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
CA2564393C (en) * | 2004-04-26 | 2013-03-12 | Armstrong's Intelligent Monitoring Ltd. | Container monitoring system |
US20070210905A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-09-13 | Rich Battista | System and method for satellite aided truck/trailer tracking and monitoring |
US8971227B2 (en) | 2005-09-12 | 2015-03-03 | Skybitz, Inc. | Wireless sensor interface with mobile terminal satellite modem and global location system |
US7468927B1 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2008-12-23 | Skybitz, Inc. | Wireless sensor interface with mobile terminal satellite modem and global location system |
US7877208B1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2011-01-25 | Skybitz, Inc. | Sensor interface with mobile terminal satellite modem and global location system |
US8010058B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2011-08-30 | System Planning Corporation | System and method for using meteor burst communications in a container tracking system |
WO2007109838A1 (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2007-10-04 | Sirion Global Pty Ltd | An asset monitoring and location system |
US8049619B2 (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2011-11-01 | Armstrong's Communication Ltd. | Monitoring system and device |
US20080228514A1 (en) | 2007-01-09 | 2008-09-18 | Robinson Thomas A | Identification and Association of Refrigerated Containers With Dispatch Orders |
US7746248B2 (en) * | 2007-08-14 | 2010-06-29 | Airbus Deutschland Gmbh | Method and system for automatically exchanging information concerning an amount of water by wireless communication between a vehicle and an information center |
US8140262B2 (en) * | 2008-01-08 | 2012-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method to identify the vessel a container is loaded on |
US20090240373A1 (en) * | 2008-03-23 | 2009-09-24 | Brown Rork S | Establishing a use cycle using a container condition |
US8301330B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2012-10-30 | General Electric Company | Method and system for providing supplemental services to telematics systems |
US8510180B2 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2013-08-13 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for increasing asset utilization using satellite aided location tracking |
US20110106284A1 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2011-05-05 | Mold-Masters (2007) Limited | System for use in performance of injection molding operations |
US8280544B2 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2012-10-02 | Mold Masters (2007) Limited | System for use in performance of injection molding operations |
US20110106285A1 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2011-05-05 | Mold-Masters (2007) Limited | System for use in performance of injection molding operations |
JP2013522142A (en) * | 2010-03-10 | 2013-06-13 | エーピーエル リミテッド | Real-time monitoring of cargo |
US9124920B2 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2015-09-01 | The Nielson Company (Us), Llc | Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to identify media presentation devices |
US8924548B2 (en) | 2011-08-16 | 2014-12-30 | Panduit Corp. | Integrated asset tracking, task manager, and virtual container for data center management |
US9355381B2 (en) | 2012-06-01 | 2016-05-31 | Senaya, Inc. | Asset tracking system with adjusted ping rate and ping period |
FI123560B (en) * | 2012-08-16 | 2013-07-15 | Waertsilae Finland Oy | Integrated monitoring system and method |
US20140058772A1 (en) * | 2012-08-22 | 2014-02-27 | James Moskos | System and method for conducting an electronic auction for available cargo capacity on a cargo carrier |
US11553857B1 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2023-01-17 | Micro Mobio Corporation | System and method for through window personal cloud transmission |
US9402160B2 (en) | 2012-12-31 | 2016-07-26 | Senaya, Inc. | Methodology to extend battery power in asset-tracking device |
US9830424B2 (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2017-11-28 | Hill-Rom Services, Inc. | Bed/room/patient association systems and methods |
US11775892B2 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2023-10-03 | Crc R&D, Llc | Apparatus and method for freight delivery and pick-up |
SG2014013288A (en) * | 2014-02-13 | 2015-09-29 | Brightree Pte Ltd | A system and method for satellite remote monitoring of marine based assets |
US10631366B2 (en) | 2014-03-15 | 2020-04-21 | Micro Mobio Corporation | Handy base station system, device and method |
US11492114B1 (en) | 2014-03-15 | 2022-11-08 | Micro Mobio Corporation | Handy base station with through barrier radio frequency transmission system and method |
US11062255B2 (en) | 2015-06-24 | 2021-07-13 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for managing the security and custody of assets in transit |
US10093232B2 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2018-10-09 | Truck-Lite Co., Llc | Telematics road ready system |
US10388161B2 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2019-08-20 | Truck-Lite Co., Llc | Telematics road ready system with user interface |
WO2017222734A1 (en) * | 2016-06-23 | 2017-12-28 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for managing the security and custody of assets in transit |
WO2018017588A1 (en) | 2016-07-18 | 2018-01-25 | Transvoyant Llc | System and method for tracking assets |
US20190268675A1 (en) | 2017-03-15 | 2019-08-29 | Scott Troutman | Telematics Road Ready System including a Bridge Integrator Unit |
US10403104B2 (en) * | 2017-08-17 | 2019-09-03 | Vivek KANGRALKAR | System and method for tracking of deployed units |
EP3676791A4 (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2021-06-02 | Crc R&D, Llc | Management of vehicular traffic at a facility having allocable space resources |
US10679173B2 (en) | 2018-02-19 | 2020-06-09 | Rpmanetworks Holdings | End to end logistic chain tracking and control of shipping containers |
US11288624B2 (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2022-03-29 | Blackberry Limited | Method and system for yard asset management |
US11326909B2 (en) | 2018-10-29 | 2022-05-10 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | System and method for monitoring environmental conditions within shipping containers |
US11911325B2 (en) | 2019-02-26 | 2024-02-27 | Hill-Rom Services, Inc. | Bed interface for manual location |
US11423499B2 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2022-08-23 | Bank Of America Corporation | Logistics sensors for smart contract arbitration |
EP3772664A1 (en) * | 2019-08-08 | 2021-02-10 | HERE Global B.V. | Tracking of items/assets |
US11958628B2 (en) | 2020-04-14 | 2024-04-16 | Goodrich Corporation | Systems and methods for run-time self-assessment of cargo handling systems |
US11964542B2 (en) | 2021-10-29 | 2024-04-23 | Themro King Llc | Methods and systems for camera vision applications for perishable goods transportation visual aids to improve performance |
Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5565858A (en) * | 1994-09-14 | 1996-10-15 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Electronic inventory system for stacked containers |
US5691980A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-11-25 | General Electric Company | Local communication network for power reduction and enhanced reliability in a multiple node tracking system |
US5955986A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 1999-09-21 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6169514B1 (en) * | 1999-02-04 | 2001-01-02 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6243648B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2001-06-05 | Eagle Eye, Inc. | Fast acquisition position reporting system |
US6408178B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2002-06-18 | Ericsson Inc. | Systems and methods for resolving GPS pseudo-range ambiguity |
US6480788B2 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2002-11-12 | Eagle-Eye, Inc. | System and method for fast acquisition reporting using communication satellite range measurement |
US6560536B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2003-05-06 | Eagle-Eye, Inc. | System and method for rapid telepositioning |
US20040041706A1 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2004-03-04 | Stratmoen Scott Alan | Smart and secure container |
US6725158B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2004-04-20 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for fast acquisition reporting using communication satellite range measurement |
US6753775B2 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-06-22 | Hi-G-Tek Ltd. | Smart container monitoring system |
US6972682B2 (en) * | 2002-01-18 | 2005-12-06 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Monitoring and tracking of assets by utilizing wireless communications |
US20060164239A1 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2006-07-27 | Loda David C | Shipping container and method of using same |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19943317C1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2001-03-15 | Lohmann Therapie Syst Lts | Plastic films, in particular for use in a dermal or transdermal therapeutic system and process for their manufacture |
WO2001067127A2 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-09-13 | Ecargoservice, Inc. | Rule based proximity and time based tracking system |
US7969306B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2011-06-28 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Context-aware and real-time item tracking system architecture and scenarios |
US20030229559A1 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2003-12-11 | Panttaja James T. | Asset management platform |
US20030204407A1 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2003-10-30 | John Nabors | System and apparatus for tracking, monitoring, and reporting parameter of a mobile unit |
US7119716B2 (en) * | 2003-05-28 | 2006-10-10 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications |
US7265668B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2007-09-04 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring |
US7273172B2 (en) * | 2004-07-14 | 2007-09-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Methods and systems for automating inventory and dispatch procedures at a staging area |
US7663484B1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2010-02-16 | Erudite, Inc. | Reporting and eliminating detected active threats while in transit |
US20070182544A1 (en) * | 2005-05-03 | 2007-08-09 | Greg Benson | Trusted monitoring system and method |
-
2004
- 2004-12-07 US US11/005,307 patent/US7265668B1/en active Active
- 2004-12-13 CA CA2548841A patent/CA2548841C/en active Active
- 2004-12-13 WO PCT/US2004/041373 patent/WO2005104675A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-12-13 EP EP04821781A patent/EP1721185A4/en not_active Ceased
- 2004-12-13 MX MXPA06006667A patent/MXPA06006667A/en active IP Right Grant
-
2007
- 2007-08-06 US US11/834,052 patent/US7545266B2/en active Active
-
2009
- 2009-05-14 US US12/465,892 patent/US7898411B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-02-21 US US13/031,497 patent/US8242904B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-08-13 US US13/584,174 patent/US8633819B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-01-17 US US14/158,195 patent/US9607282B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5565858A (en) * | 1994-09-14 | 1996-10-15 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Electronic inventory system for stacked containers |
US5691980A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-11-25 | General Electric Company | Local communication network for power reduction and enhanced reliability in a multiple node tracking system |
US5955986A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 1999-09-21 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6094162A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2000-07-25 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6154171A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2000-11-28 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6169514B1 (en) * | 1999-02-04 | 2001-01-02 | Eagle Eye Technologies, Inc. | Low-power satellite-based geopositioning system |
US6408178B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2002-06-18 | Ericsson Inc. | Systems and methods for resolving GPS pseudo-range ambiguity |
US6243648B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2001-06-05 | Eagle Eye, Inc. | Fast acquisition position reporting system |
US6480788B2 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2002-11-12 | Eagle-Eye, Inc. | System and method for fast acquisition reporting using communication satellite range measurement |
US6560536B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2003-05-06 | Eagle-Eye, Inc. | System and method for rapid telepositioning |
US6725158B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2004-04-20 | Skybitz, Inc. | System and method for fast acquisition reporting using communication satellite range measurement |
US6972682B2 (en) * | 2002-01-18 | 2005-12-06 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Monitoring and tracking of assets by utilizing wireless communications |
US6753775B2 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-06-22 | Hi-G-Tek Ltd. | Smart container monitoring system |
US20040041706A1 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2004-03-04 | Stratmoen Scott Alan | Smart and secure container |
US20060164239A1 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2006-07-27 | Loda David C | Shipping container and method of using same |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7974637B1 (en) * | 2007-09-24 | 2011-07-05 | Mikael Bror Taveniku | Passive mode tracking through existing and future wireless networks |
US20140136429A1 (en) * | 2011-05-18 | 2014-05-15 | Axios Mobile Assets Corp. | Systems and methods for tracking the usage of environmentally efficient shipping equipment and for providing environmental credits based on such usage |
US20190098466A1 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2019-03-28 | Pa. Cotte Sa | System for forwarding objects by individuals of a community, implementing a spatiotemporal tracking system |
US10542397B2 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2020-01-21 | Pa. Cotte Sa | System for forwarding objects by individuals of a community, implementing a spatiotemporal tracking system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20110279264A1 (en) | 2011-11-17 |
US20090237237A1 (en) | 2009-09-24 |
US7898411B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 |
US7545266B2 (en) | 2009-06-09 |
US20070273505A1 (en) | 2007-11-29 |
US8633819B2 (en) | 2014-01-21 |
MXPA06006667A (en) | 2007-04-17 |
EP1721185A2 (en) | 2006-11-15 |
CA2548841C (en) | 2015-08-25 |
EP1721185A4 (en) | 2009-08-19 |
WO2005104675A2 (en) | 2005-11-10 |
US20120317048A1 (en) | 2012-12-13 |
CA2548841A1 (en) | 2005-11-10 |
WO2005104675A3 (en) | 2007-08-23 |
US7265668B1 (en) | 2007-09-04 |
US20140310194A1 (en) | 2014-10-16 |
US8242904B2 (en) | 2012-08-14 |
US9607282B2 (en) | 2017-03-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7265668B1 (en) | System and method for asset tracking and monitoring | |
US20070216542A1 (en) | System and method for remotely tracking and monitoring a container and its contents | |
CN1898688B (en) | Tracking of containers | |
US8611323B2 (en) | Managing and monitoring emergency services sector resources | |
US5774876A (en) | Managing assets with active electronic tags | |
US7099770B2 (en) | Location monitoring and transmitting device, method, and computer program product using a simplex satellite transmitter | |
US5959568A (en) | Measuring distance | |
US5804810A (en) | Communicating with electronic tags | |
US7451927B2 (en) | Multimode system and apparatus for locating lost items | |
US5892441A (en) | Sensing with active electronic tags | |
US8280345B2 (en) | LPRF device wake up using wireless tag | |
US20100130267A1 (en) | Lprf device wake up using wireless tag | |
JP2008041104A (en) | Method for gathering data on cargo container | |
US20110153469A1 (en) | System and method for managing mobile inventory within a virtual warehouse | |
IES20040748A2 (en) | Tracking of containers | |
IES83963Y1 (en) | Tracking of containers | |
IE84021B1 (en) | Tracking of containers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SKYBITZ, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROSIUS, JAY;REEL/FRAME:016754/0777 Effective date: 20050602 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ORIX VENTURE FINANCE LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SKYBITZ, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021439/0420 Effective date: 20080826 Owner name: ORIX VENTURE FINANCE LLC,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SKYBITZ, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021439/0420 Effective date: 20080826 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SKYBITZ, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ORIX VENTURE FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:027640/0001 Effective date: 20120201 Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SKYBITZ, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027645/0702 Effective date: 20120201 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUNTRUST BANK, AS FIRST LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TELULAR CORPORATION;SKYBITZ, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030724/0331 Effective date: 20130624 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUNTRUST BANK, AS SECOND LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TELULAR CORPORATION;SKYBITZ, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030739/0932 Effective date: 20130624 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SKYBITZ, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SILICON VALLEY BANK;REEL/FRAME:030754/0239 Effective date: 20130624 Owner name: TELULAR CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SILICON VALLEY BANK;REEL/FRAME:030754/0239 Effective date: 20130624 Owner name: TANKLINK CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SILICON VALLEY BANK;REEL/FRAME:030754/0239 Effective date: 20130624 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SKYBITZ, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SUNTRUST BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:036084/0195 Effective date: 20150708 Owner name: TELULAR CORPORATON, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SUNTRUST BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:036084/0195 Effective date: 20150708 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TELULAR CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SUNTRUST BANK;REEL/FRAME:047719/0345 Effective date: 20181024 Owner name: SKYBITZ, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:SUNTRUST BANK;REEL/FRAME:047719/0345 Effective date: 20181024 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |