US20080082448A1 - Influential digital rights management - Google Patents

Influential digital rights management Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080082448A1
US20080082448A1 US11/613,920 US61392006A US2008082448A1 US 20080082448 A1 US20080082448 A1 US 20080082448A1 US 61392006 A US61392006 A US 61392006A US 2008082448 A1 US2008082448 A1 US 2008082448A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
content
user
component
rights
license
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/613,920
Inventor
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer
William H. Gates
Thomas F. Bergstraesser
Arnold N. Blinn
William J. Bolosky
Christopher W. Brumme
Lili Cheng
Dane A. Glasgow
Daniel S. Glasser
Alexander G. Gounares
James R. Larus
Debi P. Mishra
Amit Mital
Kartik N. Raghavan
Ira L. Snyder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft Corp filed Critical Microsoft Corp
Priority to US11/613,920 priority Critical patent/US20080082448A1/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT CORPORATION reassignment MICROSOFT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BLINN, ARNOLD N., BOLOSKY, WILLIAM J., CHENG, LILI, GATES, WILLIAM H., III, RAGHAVAN, KARTIK N., GLASSER, DANIEL S., MEIJER, HENRICUS JOHANNES MARIA, SNYDER, IRA L., JR., MISHRA, DEBI P., LARUS, JAMES R., MITAL, AMIT, BRUMME, CHRISTOPHER W., GOUNARES, ALEXANDER G., BERGSTRAESSER, THOMAS F., GLASGOW, DANE A.
Publication of US20080082448A1 publication Critical patent/US20080082448A1/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC reassignment MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0273Determination of fees for advertising
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/10Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material ; Digital rights management [DRM]
    • G06F21/107License processing; Key processing
    • G06F21/1078Logging; Metering
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/21Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/2101Auditing as a secondary aspect
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/21Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/2135Metering

Definitions

  • Digital rights management refers to a collection of technologies that control access to digital content and administer usage restrictions. DRM is employed by content owners such as the entertainment industry to protect and control use of copyrighted material. Security features associated with protected content can be unlocked after agreements have been made regarding the use of such content and likely payment of a fee.
  • One of the more common DRM technologies utilizes cryptography. Content can be protected or locked via encryption. The same content can be unlocked or decrypted with a key provided by the content owner upon satisfaction of one or more conditions.
  • Content owners may allow a user to access content but with restrictions on how the content can be employed. For instance, the content may be accessed only a certain number of times or for a particular time period. Other restrictions can pertain to printing, copying, transferring, hardcopy generation, modification and the like. These restrictions can be associated with files as metadata for example as license terms. Upon access of a file, the executing application can check the license terms and manage functionality to ensure compliance.
  • DRM digital music download system
  • DRM digital music management
  • a large commercial entity namely the music industry and members thereof.
  • users can locate music tracks of interest by viewing track information and listening to a short snippet. If a user wishes to gain rights to the entire track, they must register the music service by providing a user name and password as well as a payment means.
  • an encrypted copy of the track including embedded licensing terms can be downloaded from the service to the user hardware device (e.g., personal computer (PC)).
  • PC personal computer
  • the media player contacts the music service and identifies the track to be played.
  • a key is provided by the service to the media player that can be utilized to decrypt and ultimately play the track.
  • the media player also includes mechanisms to enforce other restrictions identified in metadata associated with the track. For example, the media player can prevent burning the track to disk or saving to another device.
  • exemplary and like conventional systems are device-centric. Such systems often require information to uniquely identify hardware devices utilized to interact with downloaded content. This information is then employed to control which devices will be provided with keys to decrypt downloaded files. For example, a system may allow a user to interact with files only on a small number of designated devices. When a key is requested to decrypt a file, hardware identifying information is also passed and is compared to stored service data. If the information matches information, a key is transmitted. If there is no match, the user can add the new hardware as an authorized device and then receive the key. However, if the new device exceeds the designated number, the user will not be able to access the key and utilize the file on the device without deleting another device and adding the new device, if allowed at all.
  • the subject disclosure relates to rights management and/or enforcement in a cloud.
  • Content protection is administered as a cloud service. More particularly, content can be protected remotely and keys distributed on-demand to authenticated individuals to unlock content.
  • the system is identity-centric rather than device-centric. Identity can be authenticated by comparing initial user and/or third-party information with provided information such that identity can be validated with a high confidence. As a result, users with rights can access protected content from any network device anywhere.
  • a system is provided to support personal digital rights management. Users can apply access and/or usage restrictions to personal files typically stored on a personal computer and/or mobile device. In this manner, content can be persisted remotely and/or transmitted to others without concern of misuse, at least because only individuals designated rights can access and use the content.
  • automated mechanisms are presented that protect content by urging users not to utilized unlicensed software and/or encouraging licensing thereof. More specifically, psychological means can be employed to persuade users to utilize content for which they have rights, for instance by appealing to their conscience, influencing a measure of user reputation and/or supplying incentives.
  • rights management systems and methods are designed to provide a frictionless marketplace for content distribution.
  • Content can be protected and subsequently allowed to be freely distributed, for instance via downloading, copying, linking transmitting, etc.
  • Users who desire to access and/or utilize content can purchase license rights. Payment can be collected and fees distributed to content owners. Further, license rights can be linked to a user's identity and keys provided on-demand to authenticated identities that enable access to protected content.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a rights management system.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a representative identity component.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a representative protection component.
  • FIG. 4 a is a block diagram of a representative influence component.
  • FIG. 4 b is a block diagram of an influential digital rights management system.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a rights system that supports a frictionless marketplace for content distribution.
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a system that facilitates interaction with a rights management service.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart diagram of a method of authenticating user identity.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart diagram of a method of urging users to obtain content rights.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow chart diagram of a method of employing rights management with respect to personal content.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart diagram of a method of commercial distribution of content.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a suitable operating environment for aspects of the subject innovation.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram of a sample-computing environment.
  • systems and methods pertaining to digital rights management and/or enforcement thereof can be identity-centric rather than device centric.
  • users are able to seamlessly access content for which they have rights from any device anywhere.
  • mechanisms are provided to support application of psychological pressure to users to conform to desired access and/or usage restrictions and/or acquire rights.
  • mechanisms are provided to support personal rights management whereby users can protect individual and/or personal content such as that stored remotely (e.g., in cloud) and/or transmitted to or accessible by others.
  • rights management can be employed to afford a frictionless marketplace for content distribution.
  • a rights management system 100 is depicted in accordance with an aspect of this disclosure.
  • a user may attempt to access electronically stored or computer readable content (e.g., data, files, items, media, executables . . . ) utilizing at least one device 110 (DEVICE 1 , DEVICE 2 . . . DEVICE N , where N is an integer greater than or equal to one).
  • Devices 110 can correspond to computers or other types of computing hardware.
  • a user can employ a personal computer (PC), mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), music jukebox, set-top box, vehicle computer and/or public computer terminal to access content, among other things.
  • Such content can be local to the device or remotely located.
  • the content can be protected from unauthorized access and/or usage.
  • Cloud content and/or rights thereto can be provisioned, managed and/or enforced remotely utilizing one or more cloud services and/or components thereof.
  • a cloud is comprised of a collection of network accessible hardware and/or software resources. These resources are likely remote to a user unless of course the user is associated with affording such services.
  • cloud service 120 can be contacted to facilitate access and/or use of such content by a user regardless of the device 110 currently employed thereby.
  • a user can locate protected content anywhere in the cloud or elsewhere for which they have rights and gain access to, and use of, the content in accordance with the user's rights.
  • the cloud service 120 can be utilized by a user to obtain rights to protected content.
  • the cloud service 120 includes several components that provide particular functionality.
  • Identity component 130 is a mechanism that establishes and validates or authenticates a user's identity. This can be accomplished by storing and retrieving identification data to and from data store(s) 140 .
  • Protection component 150 provides varying degrees of security/access control with respect to content based at least in part on a user identity provided by identity component 130 . Protection component 150 can also utilize data store(s) 140 to, among other things, store data including but not limited to user rights/licenses, protected content, and keys.
  • Key distribution component 135 can be utilized to distribute keys to authenticated individuals with rights on demand, which can be employed to remove protection in accordance with rights granted. Accordingly, rights can be utilized anywhere by a validated individual.
  • the license can be obtained, for instance, from numerous sources (including the service 120 ) and reported to the protection component 150 and/or data store(s) 140 associated therewith.
  • the user can then obtain the protected song via any one of a plurality of means. For instance, the user can acquire the song from another user over an anonymous ad-hoc network or a friend's webpage or space. What is being distributed is a protected version of the song rather than an unprotected copy.
  • a key held by the protection component 150 can be provided to unlock the song.
  • identity component 150 To obtain the key, the user's identity needs to be authenticated by identity component 150 . Once validated, key distribution component 135 can determine that the user has a license to play the song and send the key to the device to enable the song to be played. As a result, a user will be able to access and utilize content for which they have rights from anywhere via substantially any network computing device.
  • a first user may obtain rights to play a song from their personal computer and subsequently employ those rights to play the song on a friend's computer or any number of personal devices.
  • the key is afforded and employable based on an authenticated/authorized identity with rights not the device being utilized.
  • the duration of key usage can be limited such that authentication need not occur each time a user desires to access restricted content.
  • a user once authenticated a user may have rights to play a song for a limited period of time after which the key expires and is no longer available to unlock content.
  • a user can then re-authenticate and receive another key.
  • mechanism can be employed to warn users if they attempt to purchase rights that they already own and/or determine rights associated therewith, as will be described further infra.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a representative identifier component 130 in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • the identifier component 130 facilitates unique identification of users.
  • User component 210 provides a mechanism for authenticating a user by comparing user provided information. For instance, a user name and pass code can be provided, which are compared to authenticate a user. However, this may not enable a user to be identified with a great degree of confidence at least because such information can be easily shared amongst a plurality of users or hacked. Such a consequence can cause problems with respect to a purely identity based rights system. Accordingly, other mechanisms can be utilized by user component 210 alone or in conjunction with user name and pass code such as biometrics. Biometrics pertain to one or more measures of user physical and/or behavioral characteristics.
  • biometric information can be compared with provided biometric information to authenticate a user with a greater degree of confidence. For instance, fingerprint data as well as a pass code can be gathered and compared to authenticate a user.
  • the identifier component 130 also includes a third party component 220 to aid in identifying individuals. While the user component 130 relies more on self-certification techniques, the third party component 220 relies on others to aid identification.
  • the third party component 220 can facilitate communication with a certification organization that will verify that a user is who they claim to be based on some shared secret.
  • These certification organizations can utilize some of the same techniques provided supra such as user name and password and/or biometric authentications. However, they can also utilize different means such as smart cards, credit cards, id cards and or the like. For instance, a card scanner can be built into a device keyboard to enable a user to scan their credit card. The credit card company can then validate a user's identity. Further yet, identity can be authenticated based on what others associated with that identity such as their reputation usage patterns and the like. Additional and/or alternative means or mechanisms can be utilized based on user actions or interactions with third parties.
  • the validation component 230 aggregates data from various sources including the user component 210 and the third party component 220 to determine whether a user should be validated or authenticated. This determination can be made based on the received or retrieved information as well as a level of trustworthiness associated with such information. Accordingly, if an third party organization with a high level of trust authenticates a user, the user may be validated based solely thereon. However, if an organization with a lower trust level authenticates a user then more information may need to be gathered to corroborate the authentication. An identity can be validated or authenticated by the validation component 230 based on a threshold level of trustworthiness. In this manner, it will be more difficult, if not impossible, to steal someone's identity and utilize rights associated with that identity.
  • authentication or authentication/authorization can imply more than the ability to identify an individual with a high degree of certainty. If this were solely the case then any authenticated identity could access any content, which is not necessarily true.
  • the authenticated identity must also be authorized to access particular content. Thus, rights are associated with particular authenticated identities. In other words, the authenticated identities are authorized to access content.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a representative protection component 150 in accordance with an aspect of the subject disclosure.
  • the component 150 can employ various mechanisms to protect content.
  • cryptographic component 310 can be employed to encrypt and decrypt content or portions thereof to control access and use.
  • encrypted content can be obtained in a myriad of different ways.
  • a cryptographic key may be needed to unlock the protected content via decryption.
  • Encryption e.g., Encryption
  • Other protection mechanisms can be employed alone or in conjunction with cryptography.
  • the protection component 150 also includes an influence component 320 .
  • Influence component 320 attempts to influence or persuade users to acquire rights associated with particular digital content. Rather than attempting to limit access to content to individuals with proper rights or restricting copying, the influence component 320 can sway users toward obtaining rights by appealing to their conscience and/or reputation, inter alia. Alternatively, the influence component 320 can facilitate rewarding individuals who pay for digital content.
  • Content such as digital files can have associated restrictions with respect to access and/or usage.
  • these restrictions can form part of the content itself as metadata, a watermark or the like.
  • Monitor component 410 can monitor content access and/or use with respect to these restrictions and detect violations. For example, the monitor component 410 can periodically check, for instance upon access, to determine whether a user has license to access the content. Similarly, if a usage restriction indicates that a file is not to be transmitted, then a violation can be detected when the file is transmitted to another. Also note that the monitor component 410 can identify attempted violations or acts leading up to possible violations such that anticipatory action can be taken.
  • the monitor component 410 is communicatively coupled to selection component 420 .
  • the selection component 420 receives, retrieves or otherwise obtains or acquires information pertaining usage of protected content including to violations or likely violations and/or licensed use from the monitor component 410 .
  • An appropriate response thereto is then identified by the selection component 420 .
  • the selection component 420 can initiate a response of a particular extent from one or both of psychology component 430 and reputation component 440 .
  • the extent and type of response can be determined based on context information obtained from or provided by context component 450 .
  • context information can pertain to a particular user such as there gender, age, ethnicity, religion and education, as well as digital content and current events.
  • Psychology component 430 is operable to affect emotional and/or behavior characteristics of a user to encourage compliance and/or deter piracy, among other things.
  • the psychology component 430 includes two sub-components deterrent component 432 and reward component 434 .
  • the deterrent component 432 provides mechanisms to discourage users from utilizing unlicensed content.
  • reward component 434 provides mechanisms to reward users who employ licensed content.
  • the psychology component 430 or sub-components thereof can interact with the reputation component 440 to impact user or group reputation.
  • the psychology component 430 via deterrent component 432 , can arise a feeling of guilt in a user.
  • this can be accomplished by providing targeted messages (e.g., text, audio, video, multimedia . . . ) to the user.
  • targeted messages e.g., text, audio, video, multimedia . . .
  • a text box message can be displayed upon accessing unlicensed content that states, “Unlicensed access to this content constitutes theft.”
  • Such messages are meant to implicitly guilt a user into acquiring the necessary rights.
  • Messages that are more explicit can also be employed such as “In addition to being unethical, your actions are illegal. Please contact ABC Company to obtain necessary rights.”
  • Messages can also describe the negative economic impact of piracy including the increased cost to more ethical users, lost jobs, and decreased research and development.
  • the messages can identify victims of theft such individuals, developers, artists and families. Pictures of such victims and also be displayed as well as the time and money expended to develop particular content. Furthermore, consequences of conviction for stealing software can be enumerated including fines, jail terms, loss of job, unable to sit for state bar exam, inability to obtain security clearance and the like. Convicted thieves can also be noted together with their sentences.
  • the psychology component 430 is not limited to punishing or threatening to punishing “bad” behavior via deterrent component 432 .
  • the reward component 432 can be employed to reward “good” behavior.
  • discounts can be offered for prompt compliance.
  • licensing fees on other content can be reduced or a free license provided and/or priority given a user for release of new software and/or versions thereof, among other things.
  • positive messages can be provided thanking the user for compliance.
  • rewards can be provided to promote other behavior besides usage of licensed content. For example, rewards can be provided for aiding distribution and/or licensing of content. For example, if a user refers a music file to a particular number of friends they can receive a free music license.
  • the psychology component 430 can also utilize content information from component 450 to tailor application to individual users.
  • various user and/or group demographics can be employed. For instance, male users may receive different messages users than female users or free or discounted beer offered for a fraternity home if everybody buys a certain song.
  • religious passages can be sited from respective user religions denouncing steeling, theft and the like.
  • Messages can also be personalized to remove the generality associated with them. For example, “John Smith you have illegally accessed this content ten times in the last week. Clearly, you value our services. Our existence is dependent on financial support from our customers. Please obtain a license for this content.”
  • the frequency and strength of message can be customized to maximize effectiveness and minimize emotional distress.
  • Machine learning can also be utilized in this regard to infer appropriate messages based on history and context, among other things.
  • the reputation component 440 can actively affect and/or threaten to affect an individual's reputation based on actions or lack thereof.
  • Reputation can refer to an aggregate reputation known to all or a particular group of one or more other users.
  • a first user provides a second user a file, which indicates that it should not be transmitted to others. If it is detected by the monitor component 410 that the file was transmitted, the first user can be notified thereby negatively affecting his/her opinion of the second user.
  • Reputation can also be updated more globally. For instance, a user can have a group (e.g., social network) or online reputation or compliance metric that can be updated based on detected rights violations.
  • the rights violation detected by transmitting the file to others can be utilized, additionally or alternatively, to adjust the second users group and/or online reputation.
  • the reputation component 440 can act to improve user reputation, for instance if over time the user continually complies with license requirements and/or usage restrictions. Further, the reputation component 440 can provide messages similar to psychology component 430 upon detection that a violation may be imminent, noting, for instance, the effect on a user's reputation and/or relationship with other users.
  • the reputation component 440 can also be utilized more in a more positive way.
  • the digital rights management system 400 b provides such a mechanism and includes a license component 460 and influence component 430 .
  • the license component 460 can manage content licenses including acceptance and/or receipt of license fees, inter alia, and a reward can be provided in by component 430 in response thereto.
  • influence component 430 a user can be rewarded with a reduced licensing fee, free licenses, priority access to additional content, versions or the like and/or prizes, among other things.
  • the licensing component 460 can maintain a compliance metric(s). Such a metric or metrics can be reflective of user or group compliance with licensing terms. Group metrics can be an aggregate of group member metrics. Rewards can subsequently be provided based thereon. Further, a list of top companies, groups, user or the like can be maintained and made public to encourage compliance via competition, among other things.
  • the license component 460 can encourage other actions alone or in conjunction with payment of license fees and/or compliant actions such as content referral and/or distribution. For example, if a user distributes a content item to five others they can be credited with a free license for that or another content item.
  • the system 100 is designed to support personal rights management/enforcement in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • the similar systems are assembled to solely to support large entities such as the music or television industry or other business organizations.
  • Such architectures are not conducive with managing individual user rights.
  • users can store content on devices, they can also choose to store various personal content in one or more cloud store(s) 140 .
  • some or all files e.g., music, pictures, video, word processing documents, spreadsheets, presentations . . .
  • a group of individual content can be protected via segmentations and/or access lists; However, it may also be desirable to associate rights with particular content. This can be effectuated via rights cloud service 120 .
  • user identity can be authenticated utilizing identity component 130 .
  • the authenticated user can then provide and/or identify digital content (e.g., file) he/she wishes to secure with protection component 150 .
  • the user can also identify access and/or usage restriction to apply.
  • the protection component 150 can then secure a file, for example, by encrypting all or a portion thereof.
  • the key or keys associated with the file can be stored as well as the identities of those with rights to the key(s).
  • a user may attempt to interact with protected content by downloading it to a local device from a remote location or another device or simply accessing it remotely.
  • user cannot successfully utilize the protected content without removing particular security features.
  • a key may be needed.
  • a user's identity can first be authenticated by the identity component 130 .
  • a key request list can then be checked to determine if the key should be provided to a particular authenticated identity. If so, the key can be utilized to unlock particular security functionality. If not, the protection remains in place. It should be noted that at least some of the usage restrictions could be managed by software associated with particular content alone or in conjunction with particular keys.
  • users with rights can seamlessly access content while protecting it from others without rights.
  • content can be freely distributed without worries.
  • files can be distributed through anonymous ad-hoc network topologies (e.g., peer-to-peer).
  • recipients need a key to access the file, distribution of which can be controlled by the file owner.
  • content can be marked with unprotected identifying information to enable such content to be located, categorized and/or organized, inter alia.
  • owner information can be exposed, for instance via unprotected metadata or electronic watermark/signature.
  • users without access rights could determine from whom rights could be requested. For example, if one receives or retrieves a song from someone or somewhere, he/she needs to be able to determine where to go to request rights to play the song.
  • protection mechanisms can be established and employed by substantially the same entity, variations are also possible.
  • means and/or mechanisms can be employed for setting up individual as well as group permissions.
  • permission and the like can be authored and/or administered separately by one entity and accessed by a different entity.
  • a parent may be the owner, but the child is the viewer.
  • a business may set policy, but the employee is the owner.
  • Other variations e.g., permutations, combinations . . . ) will become apparent upon reading and comprehending the subject disclosure, all of which are intended to be within the scope of invention.
  • Rights system 500 can be a cloud service. Similar to the rights service 120 of FIG. 1 , system 500 includes the identity component 130 , key distribution component 135 , data store(s) 140 and protection component 150 as previously described. In brief, the identity component 130 can distinguish between user identities by comparing provided information with information previously obtained and persisted to data store(s) 140 . The protection component 130 protects content in a myriad of different ways, and key distribution component 135 can provide content access to authenticated users with rights. Additionally, system 500 includes a purchase component 510 that can collect and distribute payment. In a commercial setting, rights are sold to and purchased by users.
  • System 500 includes a statistic component 520 that can track key distribution and generate statistics regarding users and/or usage patterns. This information can be provided back to a content owner or others to utilize for marketing, sales figures and awards among other things. Additionally or alternatively, the statistics can be employed to determine fees such as those associate with the service and/or owner.
  • Encrypted copies of songs can be generated by the musician or company utilizing protection component 150 .
  • Rights can then be designated to any identity associated with a purchased license as indicated by purchase component 510 .
  • a user identity is first validated by the identity component 130 .
  • the purchase component 510 can then be employed by a user to receive payment for a license from the user.
  • the purchase component 510 can associate a license with the song and the identity, for example in the data store(s) 140 .
  • the purchase component 510 can then credit the song artist or musician company an agreed upon fee (e.g., a portion of the license fee).
  • Encrypted copies of the song can be freely distributed. For example, they can be downloaded, linked to and/or transmitted amongst users. Keys are then made available on demand by key distribution component 135 .
  • a user can access the song from any device anywhere as long as identity can be authenticated. For instance, users may exchange songs or other content with each other and merely purchase licenses and retrieve keys on demand.
  • songs are stored on a computing device that crashes such that the downloaded songs are inaccessible. The songs can be downloaded freely again to a new device from any available means such as a website, music store or friend.
  • system 500 can provide the user with the identities of items for which they have licenses to aid in the recover process, among other things. Additionally, the system 500 and more particularly purchase component 510 can warn users if they already have rights to content to avoid, inter alia, purchasing something more than once. Further, yet suggestions could also be provided such as “if you like A, you may also like B.” This is a fundamentally different model than conventional systems that seek to control content distribution.
  • FIG. 6 depicts a system 600 to facilitate interaction with a rights service in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • interface component 610 is communicatively coupled to rights service 120 and one or more devices 110 .
  • Interface 610 enables communication between a user employing some device 110 and the rights service 120 .
  • the interface component includes a device interface component 612 and a service interface component 614 , communicatively coupled.
  • the device interface 612 is operable to communicate with the device 110
  • the service interface 614 is operable to communicate with the service 120 .
  • the device interface 612 implements service interface commands and service interface 614 implements device interface commands.
  • commands issued by device 110 can be received by interface component 610 and converted to service commands via device and service interface components 612 and 614 , respectively.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • a graphical user interface can be associated with the interface component 612 to aid communication.
  • the interface component 612 is illustrated as being separate from both the device 110 and the service 120 , it is to be appreciated that it may be embedded into the device 110 and/or the service 120 .
  • various portions of the disclosed systems and methods may include or consist of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or knowledge or rule based components, sub-components, processes, means, methodologies, or mechanisms (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines, classifiers . . . ).
  • Such components can automate certain mechanisms or processes performed thereby to make portions of the systems and methods more adaptive as well as efficient and intelligent.
  • influence component 330 can employ machine learning to generate timely and effective messages likely to convince a user to acquire license rights while minimizing emotional distress.
  • the identity component can utilize machine learning with respect to users, their behaviors and the like to facilitate positive identification thereof and mitigate the risk of incorrect identification.
  • identity information is obtained from a user.
  • This information can include user name and password. Additionally or alternatively, the information can include that which identifies an individual with greater confidence including but not limited to biometric information (e.g., fingerprint, handprint, iris pattern, voice, typing pattern . . . ).
  • biometric information e.g., fingerprint, handprint, iris pattern, voice, typing pattern . . .
  • third-party information can be acquired pertaining to a user's identity.
  • a user, group or organization can provide authentication information based additional checks or observations provided thereby. For instance, an organization can issue a smartcard and pass code to a user and provide the user's identity based thereon.
  • a check is made to determine whether a trust threshold is satisfied.
  • Various information can be associated with a trust level based on, among other things, reliability and the ease of which the information could have been hacked or associated with another individual. For example, a user name and pass code would be less trustworthy than a fingerprint scan. If the trust level is greater than a threshold then the user can be authenticated and/or authorized at 740 . However, if the trust level is less than the threshold, the process can continue by re-gathering or obtaining additional information. By gathering information from multiple sources, identity can be verified with a high degree of confidence. This is significant where rights are associated with identity and available on demand.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an additional or alternative protection methodology 800 in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • Content need not be protected by mechanisms that utilize cryptography and the like. There are other intangibles that prevent user from utilizing content without a license.
  • content usage is monitored. Based on the monitoring a determination is made at numeral 820 as to whether a violation has been detected or predicted. For example, content can be periodically pinged to determine if a user has rights to the content or unlicensed content could provide such notification. Similarly, machine learning can be employed to predict if and when unlicensed content will be utilized. If a violation has not been detected or predicted, the method 800 can proceed to numeral 810 where monitoring is continued.
  • the method 800 can proceed to numeral 830 .
  • one or more methods are employed to appeal to a user to acquire rights.
  • User actions are influenced by a myriad of internal and external factors.
  • Method 800 attempts to loosely protect content and/or encourage license acquisition by appealing to such intangible factors (e.g., psychological).
  • intangible factors e.g., psychological
  • a user may not utilize content for which they do not have rights because they feel guilty or fear prosecution.
  • a user can be made to feel guilty for stealing content and/or made aware of the consequences of such action via one or more targeted messages.
  • users may not utilized content without a license if others will be informed.
  • the users reputation can be negatively affected of threatened to be negatively affected, for example by informing people of such action or modifying a public or group reputation metric. Still further yet, rather than punishing or threatening punishment of user's to persuade them to acquire rights, more positive means can be employed such as improving the user's reputation and/or providing incentives
  • a method 900 of protecting personal content is depicted in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • a user item is received such as a digital file or the like.
  • Restrictions associated with the user item are received at 920 . These restrictions can pertain to access and/or usage limitations.
  • a protected item is generated. This can be accomplished by applying one or more protection techniques to the item.
  • the item can be encrypted.
  • the encrypted item, content or the like can be tagged with metadata to facilitate identification of the owner, content and/or source for acquiring rights, among other things.
  • This protected item is then persisted to a cloud at reference 940 .
  • a user can seamlessly access the protected item from any network device anywhere upon satisfactory verification of identity. Furthermore, users do not need to worry if such this item is provided intentionally or accidentally to others as it protected. Only users with rights will be able to access the item and usage may still be limited.
  • FIG. 10 a commercial distribution method 1000 is illustrated in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure.
  • content is received from a provider (e.g., artist, musician, entertainment company . . . ).
  • the content is then protected at numeral 1020 .
  • this can involve encrypting the content or portions thereof such that it can only be accessed with the key utilized to encrypt the content.
  • protected content is published to in a manner to facilitate free distribution thereof.
  • the content can be copied, linked to, and/or transmitted, among other things, free of limitation.
  • a request is received for access to content. This can be in the form of a request for a particular key.
  • payment is received and rights granted.
  • Rights can be granted by associated a key for the content with the identity such that the key can be distributed upon request to unlock the protection.
  • payment is distributed to the owner of the content. For example, at least a portion of the license fee can be credited to the owner.
  • a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
  • an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component.
  • One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
  • entity is intended to include one or more individuals/users. These users may be associated formally or informally, for instance as a member of a group, organization or enterprise. Alternatively, entities and/or users can be completely unrelated.
  • a “cloud” is intended to refer to a collection of resources (e.g., hardware and/or software) provided and maintained by an off-site party (e.g., third party), wherein the collection of resources can be accessed by an identified user over a network (e.g., Internet, WAN . . . ).
  • the resources provide services including, without limitation, data storage services, security services, and/or many other services or applications that are conventionally associated with personal computers and/or local servers.
  • exemplary is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Furthermore, examples are provided solely for purposes of clarity and understanding and are not meant to limit the subject innovation or relevant portion thereof in any manner. It is to be appreciated that a myriad of additional or alternate examples could have been presented, but have been omitted for purposes of brevity.
  • all or portions of the subject innovation may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed innovation.
  • article of manufacture as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or media.
  • computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ).
  • a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN).
  • LAN local area network
  • FIGS. 11 and 12 are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable environment in which the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter may be implemented. While the subject matter has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions of a program that runs on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the subject innovation also may be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks and/or implement particular abstract data types.
  • inventive methods may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor, multiprocessor or multi-core processor computer systems, mini-computing devices, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices (e.g., personal digital assistant (PDA), phone, watch . . . ), microprocessor-based or programmable consumer or industrial electronics, and the like.
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • the illustrated aspects may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
  • program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
  • an exemplary environment 1110 for implementing various aspects disclosed herein includes a computer 1112 (e.g., desktop, laptop, server, hand held, programmable consumer or industrial electronics . . . ).
  • the computer 1112 includes a processing unit 1114 , a system memory 1116 , and a system bus 1118 .
  • the system bus 1118 couples system components including, but not limited to, the system memory 1116 to the processing unit 1114 .
  • the processing unit 1114 can be any of various available microprocessors. It is to be appreciated that dual microprocessors, multi-core and other multiprocessor architectures can be employed as the processing unit 1114 .
  • the system memory 1116 includes volatile and nonvolatile memory.
  • the basic input/output system (BIOS) containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1112 , such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory.
  • nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM).
  • Volatile memory includes random access memory (RAM), which can act as external cache memory to facilitate processing.
  • Computer 1112 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates, for example, mass storage 1124 .
  • Mass storage 1124 includes, but is not limited to, devices like a magnetic or optical disk drive, floppy disk drive, flash memory or memory stick.
  • mass storage 1124 can include storage media separately or in combination with other storage media.
  • FIG. 11 provides software application(s) 1128 that act as an intermediary between users and/or other computers and the basic computer resources described in suitable operating environment 1110 .
  • Such software application(s) 1128 include one or both of system and application software.
  • System software can include an operating system, which can be stored on mass storage 1124 , that acts to control and allocate resources of the computer system 1112 .
  • Application software takes advantage of the management of resources by system software through program modules and data stored on either or both of system memory 1116 and mass storage 1124 .
  • the computer 1112 also includes one or more interface components 1126 that are communicatively coupled to the bus 1118 and facilitate interaction with the computer 1112 .
  • the interface component 1126 can be a port (e.g., serial, parallel, PCMCIA, USB, FireWire . . . ) or an interface card (e.g., sound, video, network . . . ) or the like.
  • the interface component 1126 can receive input and provide output (wired or wirelessly). For instance, input can be received from devices including but not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, camera, other computer and the like.
  • Output can also be supplied by the computer 1112 to output device(s) via interface component 1126 .
  • Output devices can include displays (e.g., CRT, LCD, plasma . . . ), speakers, printers and other computers, among other things.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram of a sample-computing environment 1200 with which the subject innovation can interact.
  • the system 1200 includes one or more client(s) 1210 .
  • the client(s) 1210 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
  • the system 1200 also includes one or more server(s) 1230 .
  • system 1200 can correspond to a two-tier client server model or a multi-tier model (e.g., client, middle tier server, data server), amongst other models.
  • the server(s) 1230 can also be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
  • the servers 1230 can house threads to perform transformations by employing the aspects of the subject innovation, for example.
  • One possible communication between a client 1210 and a server 1230 may be in the form of a data packet transmitted between two or more computer processes.
  • the system 1200 includes a communication framework 1250 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 1210 and the server(s) 1230 .
  • the client(s) can correspond to network computing devices and the server(s) can form at least a portion of the cloud.
  • the client(s) 1210 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 1260 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 1210 .
  • the server(s) 1230 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 1240 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 1230 .
  • the one or more servers 1230 and associated data stores 1240 can form at least part of a cloud for house aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • the client(s) 1210 and related stores 1260 can correspond to client devices.

Abstract

Innovative aspects provided herein pertain to digital rights management (DRM) and/or enforcement in conjunction with remote network clouds and services. Digital rights management licenses/rights/policies can be applied to personal files to facilitate worry free remote storage and/or file sharing. These rights can be identity-centric rather than machine centric, thereby facilitating access and usage from any network device anywhere. Various mechanisms are also disclosed to deter assorted uses of content and/or encourage rights acquisition as an alternative or in addition to technologically prohibitive means. Additionally, a system and method are provided that can afford a frictionless marketplace for file distribution, wherein content is protected and freely distributed and identity-centric rights can be purchased to access the content.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/536,598, filed Sep. 28, 2006 and entitled RIGHTS MANAGEMENT IN A CLOUD, incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Digital rights management (DRM) refers to a collection of technologies that control access to digital content and administer usage restrictions. DRM is employed by content owners such as the entertainment industry to protect and control use of copyrighted material. Security features associated with protected content can be unlocked after agreements have been made regarding the use of such content and likely payment of a fee. One of the more common DRM technologies utilizes cryptography. Content can be protected or locked via encryption. The same content can be unlocked or decrypted with a key provided by the content owner upon satisfaction of one or more conditions.
  • User applications are charged with the burden of managing finer grain usage restrictions. Content owners may allow a user to access content but with restrictions on how the content can be employed. For instance, the content may be accessed only a certain number of times or for a particular time period. Other restrictions can pertain to printing, copying, transferring, hardcopy generation, modification and the like. These restrictions can be associated with files as metadata for example as license terms. Upon access of a file, the executing application can check the license terms and manage functionality to ensure compliance.
  • Consider for example, the functionality of a conventional music download system. As is typical, DRM is employed to protect the copyrights of a large commercial entity, namely the music industry and members thereof. Utilizing particular software such as a media player, users can locate music tracks of interest by viewing track information and listening to a short snippet. If a user wishes to gain rights to the entire track, they must register the music service by providing a user name and password as well as a payment means. Upon receipt of payment, an encrypted copy of the track including embedded licensing terms can be downloaded from the service to the user hardware device (e.g., personal computer (PC)). To listen to the downloaded track, the user simply instructs a media player to being playing the track. Behind the scenes, the media player contacts the music service and identifies the track to be played. In return, a key is provided by the service to the media player that can be utilized to decrypt and ultimately play the track. In addition to playing the track, the media player also includes mechanisms to enforce other restrictions identified in metadata associated with the track. For example, the media player can prevent burning the track to disk or saving to another device.
  • It is to be noted that the exemplary and like conventional systems are device-centric. Such systems often require information to uniquely identify hardware devices utilized to interact with downloaded content. This information is then employed to control which devices will be provided with keys to decrypt downloaded files. For example, a system may allow a user to interact with files only on a small number of designated devices. When a key is requested to decrypt a file, hardware identifying information is also passed and is compared to stored service data. If the information matches information, a key is transmitted. If there is no match, the user can add the new hardware as an authorized device and then receive the key. However, if the new device exceeds the designated number, the user will not be able to access the key and utilize the file on the device without deleting another device and adding the new device, if allowed at all.
  • SUMMARY
  • The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the claimed subject matter. This summary is not an extensive overview. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of the claimed subject matter. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
  • Briefly described, the subject disclosure relates to rights management and/or enforcement in a cloud. Content protection is administered as a cloud service. More particularly, content can be protected remotely and keys distributed on-demand to authenticated individuals to unlock content. Moreover, the system is identity-centric rather than device-centric. Identity can be authenticated by comparing initial user and/or third-party information with provided information such that identity can be validated with a high confidence. As a result, users with rights can access protected content from any network device anywhere.
  • In accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, a system is provided to support personal digital rights management. Users can apply access and/or usage restrictions to personal files typically stored on a personal computer and/or mobile device. In this manner, content can be persisted remotely and/or transmitted to others without concern of misuse, at least because only individuals designated rights can access and use the content.
  • According to another aspect of the disclosure, automated mechanisms are presented that protect content by urging users not to utilized unlicensed software and/or encouraging licensing thereof. More specifically, psychological means can be employed to persuade users to utilize content for which they have rights, for instance by appealing to their conscience, influencing a measure of user reputation and/or supplying incentives.
  • In accordance with yet another aspect, rights management systems and methods are designed to provide a frictionless marketplace for content distribution. Content can be protected and subsequently allowed to be freely distributed, for instance via downloading, copying, linking transmitting, etc. Users who desire to access and/or utilize content can purchase license rights. Payment can be collected and fees distributed to content owners. Further, license rights can be linked to a user's identity and keys provided on-demand to authenticated identities that enable access to protected content.
  • To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the claimed subject matter are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative of various ways in which the subject matter may be practiced, all of which are intended to be within the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other advantages and novel features may become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a rights management system.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a representative identity component.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a representative protection component.
  • FIG. 4 a is a block diagram of a representative influence component.
  • FIG. 4 b is a block diagram of an influential digital rights management system.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a rights system that supports a frictionless marketplace for content distribution.
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a system that facilitates interaction with a rights management service.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart diagram of a method of authenticating user identity.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart diagram of a method of urging users to obtain content rights.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow chart diagram of a method of employing rights management with respect to personal content.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart diagram of a method of commercial distribution of content.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a suitable operating environment for aspects of the subject innovation.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram of a sample-computing environment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Provided herein are systems and methods pertaining to digital rights management and/or enforcement thereof. According to an aspect, such systems and methods can be identity-centric rather than device centric. As a result, users are able to seamlessly access content for which they have rights from any device anywhere. Further, rather than or in addition to DRM technologies such as those that employ encryption, mechanisms are provided to support application of psychological pressure to users to conform to desired access and/or usage restrictions and/or acquire rights. Additionally, mechanisms are provided to support personal rights management whereby users can protect individual and/or personal content such as that stored remotely (e.g., in cloud) and/or transmitted to or accessible by others. Still further yet, rights management can be employed to afford a frictionless marketplace for content distribution.
  • Various aspects of the subject innovation are now described with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like or corresponding elements throughout. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description relating thereto are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter to the particular form disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
  • Referring initially to FIG. 1, a rights management system 100 is depicted in accordance with an aspect of this disclosure. A user may attempt to access electronically stored or computer readable content (e.g., data, files, items, media, executables . . . ) utilizing at least one device 110 (DEVICE1, DEVICE2 . . . DEVICEN, where N is an integer greater than or equal to one). Devices 110 can correspond to computers or other types of computing hardware. For example, a user can employ a personal computer (PC), mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), music jukebox, set-top box, vehicle computer and/or public computer terminal to access content, among other things. Such content can be local to the device or remotely located. Moreover, the content can be protected from unauthorized access and/or usage.
  • Content and/or rights thereto can be provisioned, managed and/or enforced remotely utilizing one or more cloud services and/or components thereof. As defined herein, a cloud is comprised of a collection of network accessible hardware and/or software resources. These resources are likely remote to a user unless of course the user is associated with affording such services. Assuming a user is in possession of protected content for which they have particular rights, cloud service 120 can be contacted to facilitate access and/or use of such content by a user regardless of the device 110 currently employed thereby. Similarly, a user can locate protected content anywhere in the cloud or elsewhere for which they have rights and gain access to, and use of, the content in accordance with the user's rights. Still further yet, the cloud service 120 can be utilized by a user to obtain rights to protected content.
  • The cloud service 120 includes several components that provide particular functionality. Identity component 130 is a mechanism that establishes and validates or authenticates a user's identity. This can be accomplished by storing and retrieving identification data to and from data store(s) 140. Protection component 150 provides varying degrees of security/access control with respect to content based at least in part on a user identity provided by identity component 130. Protection component 150 can also utilize data store(s) 140 to, among other things, store data including but not limited to user rights/licenses, protected content, and keys. Once an identity is established, rights can be associated with a particular individual or associated identity, rather than a device as is the convention. Key distribution component 135 can be utilized to distribute keys to authenticated individuals with rights on demand, which can be employed to remove protection in accordance with rights granted. Accordingly, rights can be utilized anywhere by a validated individual.
  • Consider an exemplary scenario where a user has a license to play a particular protected song. As will be described further infra, the license can be obtained, for instance, from numerous sources (including the service 120) and reported to the protection component 150 and/or data store(s) 140 associated therewith. The user can then obtain the protected song via any one of a plurality of means. For instance, the user can acquire the song from another user over an anonymous ad-hoc network or a friend's webpage or space. What is being distributed is a protected version of the song rather than an unprotected copy. Accordingly, to play the song on any device 110 (e.g., public computer), a key held by the protection component 150 can be provided to unlock the song. To obtain the key, the user's identity needs to be authenticated by identity component 150. Once validated, key distribution component 135 can determine that the user has a license to play the song and send the key to the device to enable the song to be played. As a result, a user will be able to access and utilize content for which they have rights from anywhere via substantially any network computing device.
  • By way of example, a first user may obtain rights to play a song from their personal computer and subsequently employ those rights to play the song on a friend's computer or any number of personal devices. The key is afforded and employable based on an authenticated/authorized identity with rights not the device being utilized. It should also be noted that the duration of key usage can be limited such that authentication need not occur each time a user desires to access restricted content. In other words, once authenticated a user may have rights to play a song for a limited period of time after which the key expires and is no longer available to unlock content. At this point, a user can then re-authenticate and receive another key. Further yet, mechanism can be employed to warn users if they attempt to purchase rights that they already own and/or determine rights associated therewith, as will be described further infra.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a representative identifier component 130 in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. The identifier component 130 facilitates unique identification of users. User component 210 provides a mechanism for authenticating a user by comparing user provided information. For instance, a user name and pass code can be provided, which are compared to authenticate a user. However, this may not enable a user to be identified with a great degree of confidence at least because such information can be easily shared amongst a plurality of users or hacked. Such a consequence can cause problems with respect to a purely identity based rights system. Accordingly, other mechanisms can be utilized by user component 210 alone or in conjunction with user name and pass code such as biometrics. Biometrics pertain to one or more measures of user physical and/or behavioral characteristics. For example, fingerprint, handprint, iris pattern, signature, and/or typing pattern, among others, can be utilized. Once initially gathered, stored biometric information can be compared with provided biometric information to authenticate a user with a greater degree of confidence. For instance, fingerprint data as well as a pass code can be gathered and compared to authenticate a user.
  • The identifier component 130 also includes a third party component 220 to aid in identifying individuals. While the user component 130 relies more on self-certification techniques, the third party component 220 relies on others to aid identification. For example, the third party component 220 can facilitate communication with a certification organization that will verify that a user is who they claim to be based on some shared secret. These certification organizations can utilize some of the same techniques provided supra such as user name and password and/or biometric authentications. However, they can also utilize different means such as smart cards, credit cards, id cards and or the like. For instance, a card scanner can be built into a device keyboard to enable a user to scan their credit card. The credit card company can then validate a user's identity. Further yet, identity can be authenticated based on what others associated with that identity such as their reputation usage patterns and the like. Additional and/or alternative means or mechanisms can be utilized based on user actions or interactions with third parties.
  • Also included within the identity component 130 is validation component 230. The validation component 230 aggregates data from various sources including the user component 210 and the third party component 220 to determine whether a user should be validated or authenticated. This determination can be made based on the received or retrieved information as well as a level of trustworthiness associated with such information. Accordingly, if an third party organization with a high level of trust authenticates a user, the user may be validated based solely thereon. However, if an organization with a lower trust level authenticates a user then more information may need to be gathered to corroborate the authentication. An identity can be validated or authenticated by the validation component 230 based on a threshold level of trustworthiness. In this manner, it will be more difficult, if not impossible, to steal someone's identity and utilize rights associated with that identity.
  • It should be appreciated that authentication or authentication/authorization can imply more than the ability to identify an individual with a high degree of certainty. If this were solely the case then any authenticated identity could access any content, which is not necessarily true. The authenticated identity must also be authorized to access particular content. Thus, rights are associated with particular authenticated identities. In other words, the authenticated identities are authorized to access content.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a representative protection component 150 in accordance with an aspect of the subject disclosure. The component 150 can employ various mechanisms to protect content. In particular, cryptographic component 310 can be employed to encrypt and decrypt content or portions thereof to control access and use. For example, encrypted content can be obtained in a myriad of different ways. However, in order to access such content a cryptographic key may be needed to unlock the protected content via decryption. Hence, encrypted content can be easily obtained, but access to the key controlled based on identity, for instance. Other protection mechanisms can be employed alone or in conjunction with cryptography.
  • The protection component 150 also includes an influence component 320. Influence component 320 attempts to influence or persuade users to acquire rights associated with particular digital content. Rather than attempting to limit access to content to individuals with proper rights or restricting copying, the influence component 320 can sway users toward obtaining rights by appealing to their conscience and/or reputation, inter alia. Alternatively, the influence component 320 can facilitate rewarding individuals who pay for digital content.
  • Referring to FIG. 4 a, an exemplary influence component 150 is illustrated in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. Content such as digital files can have associated restrictions with respect to access and/or usage. In one instance, these restrictions can form part of the content itself as metadata, a watermark or the like. Monitor component 410 can monitor content access and/or use with respect to these restrictions and detect violations. For example, the monitor component 410 can periodically check, for instance upon access, to determine whether a user has license to access the content. Similarly, if a usage restriction indicates that a file is not to be transmitted, then a violation can be detected when the file is transmitted to another. Also note that the monitor component 410 can identify attempted violations or acts leading up to possible violations such that anticipatory action can be taken.
  • The monitor component 410 is communicatively coupled to selection component 420. The selection component 420 receives, retrieves or otherwise obtains or acquires information pertaining usage of protected content including to violations or likely violations and/or licensed use from the monitor component 410. An appropriate response thereto is then identified by the selection component 420. As illustrated, the selection component 420 can initiate a response of a particular extent from one or both of psychology component 430 and reputation component 440. The extent and type of response can be determined based on context information obtained from or provided by context component 450. Among other things, context information can pertain to a particular user such as there gender, age, ethnicity, religion and education, as well as digital content and current events.
  • Psychology component 430 is operable to affect emotional and/or behavior characteristics of a user to encourage compliance and/or deter piracy, among other things. To this end, the psychology component 430 includes two sub-components deterrent component 432 and reward component 434. The deterrent component 432 provides mechanisms to discourage users from utilizing unlicensed content. Alternatively, reward component 434 provides mechanisms to reward users who employ licensed content. Furthermore, the psychology component 430 or sub-components thereof can interact with the reputation component 440 to impact user or group reputation.
  • By way of example and not limitation, the psychology component 430, via deterrent component 432, can arise a feeling of guilt in a user. In one instance, this can be accomplished by providing targeted messages (e.g., text, audio, video, multimedia . . . ) to the user. For example, a text box message can be displayed upon accessing unlicensed content that states, “Unlicensed access to this content constitutes theft.” Such messages are meant to implicitly guilt a user into acquiring the necessary rights. Messages that are more explicit can also be employed such as “In addition to being unethical, your actions are illegal. Please contact ABC Company to obtain necessary rights.” Messages can also describe the negative economic impact of piracy including the increased cost to more ethical users, lost jobs, and decreased research and development. Additionally, the messages can identify victims of theft such individuals, developers, artists and families. Pictures of such victims and also be displayed as well as the time and money expended to develop particular content. Furthermore, consequences of conviction for stealing software can be enumerated including fines, jail terms, loss of job, unable to sit for state bar exam, inability to obtain security clearance and the like. Convicted thieves can also be noted together with their sentences.
  • The psychology component 430 is not limited to punishing or threatening to punishing “bad” behavior via deterrent component 432. The reward component 432 can be employed to reward “good” behavior. In one instance, discounts can be offered for prompt compliance. For example, licensing fees on other content can be reduced or a free license provided and/or priority given a user for release of new software and/or versions thereof, among other things. Additionally or alternatively, positive messages can be provided thanking the user for compliance. Still further yet, rewards can be provided to promote other behavior besides usage of licensed content. For example, rewards can be provided for aiding distribution and/or licensing of content. For example, if a user refers a music file to a particular number of friends they can receive a free music license.
  • The psychology component 430 can also utilize content information from component 450 to tailor application to individual users. In one instance, various user and/or group demographics can be employed. For instance, male users may receive different messages users than female users or free or discounted beer offered for a fraternity home if everybody buys a certain song. In another instance, religious passages can be sited from respective user religions denouncing steeling, theft and the like. Messages can also be personalized to remove the generality associated with them. For example, “John Smith you have illegally accessed this content ten times in the last week. Clearly, you value our services. Our existence is dependent on financial support from our customers. Please obtain a license for this content.” Furthermore, the frequency and strength of message can be customized to maximize effectiveness and minimize emotional distress. Machine learning can also be utilized in this regard to infer appropriate messages based on history and context, among other things.
  • The reputation component 440 can actively affect and/or threaten to affect an individual's reputation based on actions or lack thereof. Reputation can refer to an aggregate reputation known to all or a particular group of one or more other users. By way of example, consider an instance where a first user provides a second user a file, which indicates that it should not be transmitted to others. If it is detected by the monitor component 410 that the file was transmitted, the first user can be notified thereby negatively affecting his/her opinion of the second user. Reputation can also be updated more globally. For instance, a user can have a group (e.g., social network) or online reputation or compliance metric that can be updated based on detected rights violations. In the above example, the rights violation detected by transmitting the file to others can be utilized, additionally or alternatively, to adjust the second users group and/or online reputation. It should also be appreciated that the reputation component 440 can act to improve user reputation, for instance if over time the user continually complies with license requirements and/or usage restrictions. Further, the reputation component 440 can provide messages similar to psychology component 430 upon detection that a violation may be imminent, noting, for instance, the effect on a user's reputation and/or relationship with other users.
  • The reputation component 440 can also be utilized more in a more positive way. For example, the can be employed to identify influential people and/or social network patterns. These people and/or patterns can subsequently be utilized to promote the system via use, word of mouth, paid advertisement or the like as well as identify ways to improve the system by taking advantage of identified trends and/or group wisdom, among other things.
  • Of course, many other components can be utilized alone or in combination with the psychology and reputation components 430 and 440, respectively. These additional mechanisms can influence or persuade a user to cease unauthorized use and/or obtain rights to content within attempting to make it technologically impossible or unfeasible. For example, other components (not shown) can be employed to admonish, berate, irritate and/or report or threaten report of illegal use to proper authorities.
  • Turning briefly to FIG. 4 b, a digital rights management system 400 b is illustrated in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. It should be appreciated that most people loathe digital rights management and will go to great lengths to circumvent any technological restrictions or other mechanisms. Accordingly, rather than investing time and money trying to restrict copying, system 400 b can merely encourage license compliance and/or capitalized on copying, among other things. The digital rights management system 400 b provides such a mechanism and includes a license component 460 and influence component 430. The license component 460 can manage content licenses including acceptance and/or receipt of license fees, inter alia, and a reward can be provided in by component 430 in response thereto. As previously mentioned with respect to influence component 430 a user can be rewarded with a reduced licensing fee, free licenses, priority access to additional content, versions or the like and/or prizes, among other things.
  • Additionally or alternatively, the licensing component 460 can maintain a compliance metric(s). Such a metric or metrics can be reflective of user or group compliance with licensing terms. Group metrics can be an aggregate of group member metrics. Rewards can subsequently be provided based thereon. Further, a list of top companies, groups, user or the like can be maintained and made public to encourage compliance via competition, among other things.
  • Still further yet, the license component 460 can encourage other actions alone or in conjunction with payment of license fees and/or compliant actions such as content referral and/or distribution. For example, if a user distributes a content item to five others they can be credited with a free license for that or another content item.
  • Returning to FIG. 1, the system 100 is designed to support personal rights management/enforcement in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. Conventionally, the similar systems are assembled to solely to support large entities such as the music or television industry or other business organizations. Such architectures are not conducive with managing individual user rights. Here, while users can store content on devices, they can also choose to store various personal content in one or more cloud store(s) 140. For example, some or all files (e.g., music, pictures, video, word processing documents, spreadsheets, presentations . . . ) associated with conventional personal computers and other computing devices can be persisted remotely in at least one cloud store 140. A group of individual content can be protected via segmentations and/or access lists; However, it may also be desirable to associate rights with particular content. This can be effectuated via rights cloud service 120.
  • More specifically, user identity can be authenticated utilizing identity component 130. The authenticated user can then provide and/or identify digital content (e.g., file) he/she wishes to secure with protection component 150. The user can also identify access and/or usage restriction to apply. The protection component 150 can then secure a file, for example, by encrypting all or a portion thereof. The key or keys associated with the file can be stored as well as the identities of those with rights to the key(s).
  • A user may attempt to interact with protected content by downloading it to a local device from a remote location or another device or simply accessing it remotely. Of course, user cannot successfully utilize the protected content without removing particular security features. To unlock a file or features thereof, a key may be needed. Hence, a user's identity can first be authenticated by the identity component 130. Subsequently, a key request list can then be checked to determine if the key should be provided to a particular authenticated identity. If so, the key can be utilized to unlock particular security functionality. If not, the protection remains in place. It should be noted that at least some of the usage restrictions could be managed by software associated with particular content alone or in conjunction with particular keys.
  • In this manner, users with rights can seamlessly access content while protecting it from others without rights. Furthermore, such content can be freely distributed without worries. For example, files can be distributed through anonymous ad-hoc network topologies (e.g., peer-to-peer). However, recipients need a key to access the file, distribution of which can be controlled by the file owner. It should also be appreciated that content can be marked with unprotected identifying information to enable such content to be located, categorized and/or organized, inter alia. Further yet, owner information can be exposed, for instance via unprotected metadata or electronic watermark/signature. In this case, users without access rights could determine from whom rights could be requested. For example, if one receives or retrieves a song from someone or somewhere, he/she needs to be able to determine where to go to request rights to play the song.
  • While protection mechanisms can be established and employed by substantially the same entity, variations are also possible. For example, means and/or mechanisms can be employed for setting up individual as well as group permissions. Further, permission and the like can be authored and/or administered separately by one entity and accessed by a different entity. In a parental control scenario, a parent may be the owner, but the child is the viewer. As per a business scenario, a business may set policy, but the employee is the owner. Other variations (e.g., permutations, combinations . . . ) will become apparent upon reading and comprehending the subject disclosure, all of which are intended to be within the scope of invention.
  • Referring to FIG. 5, a rights system 500 is illustrated that facilitates a frictionless marketplace according to an aspect of the subject disclosure. Rights system 500 can be a cloud service. Similar to the rights service 120 of FIG. 1, system 500 includes the identity component 130, key distribution component 135, data store(s) 140 and protection component 150 as previously described. In brief, the identity component 130 can distinguish between user identities by comparing provided information with information previously obtained and persisted to data store(s) 140. The protection component 130 protects content in a myriad of different ways, and key distribution component 135 can provide content access to authenticated users with rights. Additionally, system 500 includes a purchase component 510 that can collect and distribute payment. In a commercial setting, rights are sold to and purchased by users. Artists or other content owners can employ the services of the identity component 130, data store(s) 140, protection component 150 and purchase component 510 to provide secure access to licensed content. Still further, system 500 includes a statistic component 520 that can track key distribution and generate statistics regarding users and/or usage patterns. This information can be provided back to a content owner or others to utilize for marketing, sales figures and awards among other things. Additionally or alternatively, the statistics can be employed to determine fees such as those associate with the service and/or owner.
  • Although not limited thereto, consider, for instance, a musician or recording company that wishes to sell music. Encrypted copies of songs can be generated by the musician or company utilizing protection component 150. Rights can then be designated to any identity associated with a purchased license as indicated by purchase component 510. To purchase rights to a song, a user identity is first validated by the identity component 130. The purchase component 510 can then be employed by a user to receive payment for a license from the user. Subsequently, the purchase component 510 can associate a license with the song and the identity, for example in the data store(s) 140. The purchase component 510 can then credit the song artist or musician company an agreed upon fee (e.g., a portion of the license fee). This can be done upon license purchase or in a periodic bulk process and possible in conjunction with statistic component 520. Encrypted copies of the song can be freely distributed. For example, they can be downloaded, linked to and/or transmitted amongst users. Keys are then made available on demand by key distribution component 135. Hence, a user can access the song from any device anywhere as long as identity can be authenticated. For instance, users may exchange songs or other content with each other and merely purchase licenses and retrieve keys on demand. Furthermore, songs are stored on a computing device that crashes such that the downloaded songs are inaccessible. The songs can be downloaded freely again to a new device from any available means such as a website, music store or friend. Still further yet, the system 500 can provide the user with the identities of items for which they have licenses to aid in the recover process, among other things. Additionally, the system 500 and more particularly purchase component 510 can warn users if they already have rights to content to avoid, inter alia, purchasing something more than once. Further, yet suggestions could also be provided such as “if you like A, you may also like B.” This is a fundamentally different model than conventional systems that seek to control content distribution.
  • FIG. 6 depicts a system 600 to facilitate interaction with a rights service in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. As depicted, interface component 610 is communicatively coupled to rights service 120 and one or more devices 110. Interface 610 enables communication between a user employing some device 110 and the rights service 120. More specifically, the interface component includes a device interface component 612 and a service interface component 614, communicatively coupled. The device interface 612 is operable to communicate with the device 110, while the service interface 614 is operable to communicate with the service 120. Furthermore, the device interface 612 implements service interface commands and service interface 614 implements device interface commands. Accordingly, commands issued by device 110 can be received by interface component 610 and converted to service commands via device and service interface components 612 and 614, respectively. It should be appreciated that a graphical user interface (GUI) can be associated with the interface component 612 to aid communication. Furthermore, while the interface component 612 is illustrated as being separate from both the device 110 and the service 120, it is to be appreciated that it may be embedded into the device 110 and/or the service 120.
  • The aforementioned systems, architectures and the like have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It should be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or sub-components specified therein, some of the specified components or sub-components, and/or additional components. Sub-components could also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components. Further yet, one or more components and/or sub-components may be combined into a single component to provide aggregate functionality. The components may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein for the sake of brevity, but known by those of skill in the art.
  • Furthermore, as will be appreciated, various portions of the disclosed systems and methods may include or consist of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or knowledge or rule based components, sub-components, processes, means, methodologies, or mechanisms (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines, classifiers . . . ). Such components, inter alia, can automate certain mechanisms or processes performed thereby to make portions of the systems and methods more adaptive as well as efficient and intelligent. By way of example and not limitation, influence component 330 can employ machine learning to generate timely and effective messages likely to convince a user to acquire license rights while minimizing emotional distress. Further yet, the identity component can utilize machine learning with respect to users, their behaviors and the like to facilitate positive identification thereof and mitigate the risk of incorrect identification.
  • In view of the exemplary systems described supra, methodologies that may be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to the flow charts of FIGS. 7-10. While for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies are shown and described as a series of blocks, it is to be understood and appreciated that the claimed subject matter is not limited by the order of the blocks, as some blocks may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other blocks from what is depicted and described herein. Moreover, not all illustrated blocks may be required to implement the methodologies described hereinafter.
  • Referring to FIG. 7, a method of authenticating user identity 700 is depicted in accordance with a disclosed aspect. At reference numeral 710, identity information is obtained from a user. This information can include user name and password. Additionally or alternatively, the information can include that which identifies an individual with greater confidence including but not limited to biometric information (e.g., fingerprint, handprint, iris pattern, voice, typing pattern . . . ). At 720, third-party information can be acquired pertaining to a user's identity. A user, group or organization can provide authentication information based additional checks or observations provided thereby. For instance, an organization can issue a smartcard and pass code to a user and provide the user's identity based thereon. At numeral 730, a check is made to determine whether a trust threshold is satisfied. Various information can be associated with a trust level based on, among other things, reliability and the ease of which the information could have been hacked or associated with another individual. For example, a user name and pass code would be less trustworthy than a fingerprint scan. If the trust level is greater than a threshold then the user can be authenticated and/or authorized at 740. However, if the trust level is less than the threshold, the process can continue by re-gathering or obtaining additional information. By gathering information from multiple sources, identity can be verified with a high degree of confidence. This is significant where rights are associated with identity and available on demand.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an additional or alternative protection methodology 800 in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. Content need not be protected by mechanisms that utilize cryptography and the like. There are other intangibles that prevent user from utilizing content without a license. At reference 810, content usage is monitored. Based on the monitoring a determination is made at numeral 820 as to whether a violation has been detected or predicted. For example, content can be periodically pinged to determine if a user has rights to the content or unlicensed content could provide such notification. Similarly, machine learning can be employed to predict if and when unlicensed content will be utilized. If a violation has not been detected or predicted, the method 800 can proceed to numeral 810 where monitoring is continued. However, if a violation is detected or predicted, the method 800 can proceed to numeral 830. At reference numeral 830, one or more methods are employed to appeal to a user to acquire rights. User actions are influenced by a myriad of internal and external factors. Method 800 attempts to loosely protect content and/or encourage license acquisition by appealing to such intangible factors (e.g., psychological). For example, a user may not utilize content for which they do not have rights because they feel guilty or fear prosecution. Hence, a user can be made to feel guilty for stealing content and/or made aware of the consequences of such action via one or more targeted messages. Additionally or alternatively, users may not utilized content without a license if others will be informed. Accordingly, the users reputation can be negatively affected of threatened to be negatively affected, for example by informing people of such action or modifying a public or group reputation metric. Still further yet, rather than punishing or threatening punishment of user's to persuade them to acquire rights, more positive means can be employed such as improving the user's reputation and/or providing incentives
  • Referring to FIG. 9, a method 900 of protecting personal content is depicted in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. At reference numeral 910, a user item is received such as a digital file or the like. Restrictions associated with the user item are received at 920. These restrictions can pertain to access and/or usage limitations. At numeral 930, a protected item is generated. This can be accomplished by applying one or more protection techniques to the item. For example, the item can be encrypted. Furthermore, during this encryption process the encrypted item, content or the like can be tagged with metadata to facilitate identification of the owner, content and/or source for acquiring rights, among other things. This protected item is then persisted to a cloud at reference 940. Subsequently, a user can seamlessly access the protected item from any network device anywhere upon satisfactory verification of identity. Furthermore, users do not need to worry if such this item is provided intentionally or accidentally to others as it protected. Only users with rights will be able to access the item and usage may still be limited.
  • FIG. 10 a commercial distribution method 1000 is illustrated in accordance with an aspect of the disclosure. At reference numeral 1010, content is received from a provider (e.g., artist, musician, entertainment company . . . ). The content is then protected at numeral 1020. For example, this can involve encrypting the content or portions thereof such that it can only be accessed with the key utilized to encrypt the content. At reference 1030, protected content is published to in a manner to facilitate free distribution thereof. The content can be copied, linked to, and/or transmitted, among other things, free of limitation. At 1040, a request is received for access to content. This can be in the form of a request for a particular key. At numeral 1050, payment is received and rights granted. Rights can be granted by associated a key for the content with the identity such that the key can be distributed upon request to unlock the protection. At reference numeral 1060, payment is distributed to the owner of the content. For example, at least a portion of the license fee can be credited to the owner.
  • As used herein, the terms “component,” “system,” “service” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
  • The term “entity” is intended to include one or more individuals/users. These users may be associated formally or informally, for instance as a member of a group, organization or enterprise. Alternatively, entities and/or users can be completely unrelated.
  • A “cloud” is intended to refer to a collection of resources (e.g., hardware and/or software) provided and maintained by an off-site party (e.g., third party), wherein the collection of resources can be accessed by an identified user over a network (e.g., Internet, WAN . . . ). The resources provide services including, without limitation, data storage services, security services, and/or many other services or applications that are conventionally associated with personal computers and/or local servers.
  • The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Furthermore, examples are provided solely for purposes of clarity and understanding and are not meant to limit the subject innovation or relevant portion thereof in any manner. It is to be appreciated that a myriad of additional or alternate examples could have been presented, but have been omitted for purposes of brevity.
  • Furthermore, all or portions of the subject innovation may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed innovation. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter.
  • In order to provide a context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter, FIGS. 11 and 12 as well as the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable environment in which the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter may be implemented. While the subject matter has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions of a program that runs on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the subject innovation also may be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks and/or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive methods may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor, multiprocessor or multi-core processor computer systems, mini-computing devices, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices (e.g., personal digital assistant (PDA), phone, watch . . . ), microprocessor-based or programmable consumer or industrial electronics, and the like. The illustrated aspects may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. However, some, if not all aspects of the claimed innovation can be practiced on stand-alone computers. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
  • With reference to FIG. 11, an exemplary environment 1110 for implementing various aspects disclosed herein includes a computer 1112 (e.g., desktop, laptop, server, hand held, programmable consumer or industrial electronics . . . ). The computer 1112 includes a processing unit 1114, a system memory 1116, and a system bus 1118. The system bus 1118 couples system components including, but not limited to, the system memory 1116 to the processing unit 1114. The processing unit 1114 can be any of various available microprocessors. It is to be appreciated that dual microprocessors, multi-core and other multiprocessor architectures can be employed as the processing unit 1114.
  • The system memory 1116 includes volatile and nonvolatile memory. The basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1112, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM). Volatile memory includes random access memory (RAM), which can act as external cache memory to facilitate processing.
  • Computer 1112 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media. FIG. 11 illustrates, for example, mass storage 1124. Mass storage 1124 includes, but is not limited to, devices like a magnetic or optical disk drive, floppy disk drive, flash memory or memory stick. In addition, mass storage 1124 can include storage media separately or in combination with other storage media.
  • FIG. 11 provides software application(s) 1128 that act as an intermediary between users and/or other computers and the basic computer resources described in suitable operating environment 1110. Such software application(s) 1128 include one or both of system and application software. System software can include an operating system, which can be stored on mass storage 1124, that acts to control and allocate resources of the computer system 1112. Application software takes advantage of the management of resources by system software through program modules and data stored on either or both of system memory 1116 and mass storage 1124.
  • The computer 1112 also includes one or more interface components 1126 that are communicatively coupled to the bus 1118 and facilitate interaction with the computer 1112. By way of example, the interface component 1126 can be a port (e.g., serial, parallel, PCMCIA, USB, FireWire . . . ) or an interface card (e.g., sound, video, network . . . ) or the like. The interface component 1126 can receive input and provide output (wired or wirelessly). For instance, input can be received from devices including but not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, camera, other computer and the like. Output can also be supplied by the computer 1112 to output device(s) via interface component 1126. Output devices can include displays (e.g., CRT, LCD, plasma . . . ), speakers, printers and other computers, among other things.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram of a sample-computing environment 1200 with which the subject innovation can interact. The system 1200 includes one or more client(s) 1210. The client(s) 1210 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices). The system 1200 also includes one or more server(s) 1230. Thus, system 1200 can correspond to a two-tier client server model or a multi-tier model (e.g., client, middle tier server, data server), amongst other models. The server(s) 1230 can also be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices). The servers 1230 can house threads to perform transformations by employing the aspects of the subject innovation, for example. One possible communication between a client 1210 and a server 1230 may be in the form of a data packet transmitted between two or more computer processes.
  • The system 1200 includes a communication framework 1250 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 1210 and the server(s) 1230. Here, the client(s) can correspond to network computing devices and the server(s) can form at least a portion of the cloud. The client(s) 1210 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 1260 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 1210. Similarly, the server(s) 1230 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 1240 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 1230. By way of example, the one or more servers 1230 and associated data stores 1240 can form at least part of a cloud for house aspects of the subject disclosure. Further, the client(s) 1210 and related stores 1260 can correspond to client devices.
  • What has been described above includes examples of aspects of the claimed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the claimed subject matter, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosed subject matter are possible. Accordingly, the disclosed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has” or “having” or variations in form thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.

Claims (20)

1. A digital rights management system, comprising:
a component to accept payment of a license fee for use of technologically unprotected content; and
an influence component that encourages users to pay the fee.
2. The system of claim 1, the influence component discounts the license fee as a function of user content distribution and/or referral.
3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a reward component that provides a reward for payment of the license fee.
4. The system of claim 3, the reward component positively impacts a publicly available license compliance metric.
5. The system of claim 3, the reward component provides a free license to other content.
6. The system of claim 3, the reward component provides priority access to content.
7. The system of claim 1, further comprising a context component that affords user context information to the influence component.
8. The system of claim 7, further comprising a deterrent component that provides one or more messages to a user that appeal to a user's conscience regarding use of unlicensed content.
9. A licensing method, comprising:
distributing computer readable content items free of technological restrictions;
receiving payment of a license fee associated with an a content item; and
rewarding the user for payment of the license fee.
10. The method of claim 9, rewarding the user comprising reducing licensing fees on other content items.
11. The method of claim 9, rewarding the user comprising providing access to otherwise restricted content.
12. The method of claim 9, further comprising maintaining a publicly accessible license compliance metric, rewarding the user comprises positively impacting the compliance metric.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising aggregating user metrics to generate associated organizational metrics.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising affording organizational compliance awards.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising providing priority access to software applications base on a metric value.
16. The method of claim 9, monitoring content item usage and notifying the user when a non-licensed content item is being utilized.
17. The method of claim 9, further comprising crediting a user the licensing fee upon the user referring and/or distributing the content to a predetermined number of individuals.
18. The method of claim 9, further comprising warning the user if rights are already owned to prevent purchase of duplicative rights.
19. A digital rights management system, comprising:
means for receiving payment of a license fee; and
means for rewarding a user for payment of the fee.
20. The system of claim 19, the means for rewarding at least one of positively impacts a publicly available compliance metric, reduces license fees on other content and/or provides a free content license.
US11/613,920 2006-09-28 2006-12-20 Influential digital rights management Abandoned US20080082448A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/613,920 US20080082448A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-12-20 Influential digital rights management

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/536,598 US20080091613A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-09-28 Rights management in a cloud
US11/613,920 US20080082448A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-12-20 Influential digital rights management

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/536,598 Continuation-In-Part US20080091613A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-09-28 Rights management in a cloud

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080082448A1 true US20080082448A1 (en) 2008-04-03

Family

ID=39262162

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/536,598 Abandoned US20080091613A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-09-28 Rights management in a cloud
US11/613,920 Abandoned US20080082448A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-12-20 Influential digital rights management

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/536,598 Abandoned US20080091613A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2006-09-28 Rights management in a cloud

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20080091613A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2076840A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2010505206A (en)
CN (1) CN101523365A (en)
CA (1) CA2659408A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008105937A2 (en)

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100251328A1 (en) * 2009-03-31 2010-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Model based security for cloud services
WO2011051595A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-05-05 France Telecom Method and client agent for monitoring the use of protected content
CN102333079A (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-01-25 北京兴宇中科科技开发股份有限公司 Method for clearing disk space
WO2012126089A1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2012-09-27 Futurestate It Incorporated System and method for information technology asset migration and lifecycle management
WO2012173837A1 (en) * 2011-06-14 2012-12-20 United Video Properties, Inc. Systems and methods for providing parental controls in a cloud-based media guidance application
WO2012173826A3 (en) * 2011-06-14 2013-03-07 Microsoft Corporation Data custodian and curation system
CN103246850A (en) * 2013-05-23 2013-08-14 福建伊时代信息科技股份有限公司 Method and device for processing file
CN103310608A (en) * 2013-05-23 2013-09-18 苏州市玮琪生物科技有限公司 Separated wireless data acquisition unit used for health cloud platform and acquisition method of unit
US8769705B2 (en) 2011-06-10 2014-07-01 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Method for flexible data protection with dynamically authorized data receivers in a content network or in cloud storage and content delivery services
US20140282680A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Jeffrey D. Brandstetter Systems and Methods for Providing Access to Rights Holder Defined Video Clips
US20150052594A1 (en) * 2011-08-05 2015-02-19 Safefaces LLC Methods and systems for identity verification in a social network using ratings
US9038127B2 (en) 2011-08-09 2015-05-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Physical interaction with virtual objects for DRM
US20160072796A1 (en) * 2014-09-09 2016-03-10 Microsoft Corporation Preserving Data Protection With Policy
US9477614B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2016-10-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sector map-based rapid data encryption policy compliance
CN106355108A (en) * 2016-09-28 2017-01-25 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 Document handover method, device and system and computer readable medium
US20170111711A1 (en) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-20 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Device-resident content protection
US9853820B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2017-12-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intelligent deletion of revoked data
US9853812B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2017-12-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Secure key management for roaming protected content
US9900295B2 (en) 2014-11-05 2018-02-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Roaming content wipe actions across devices
US9898588B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2018-02-20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for providing cloud-based digital rights management service and system thereof
US9900325B2 (en) 2015-10-09 2018-02-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Passive encryption of organization data
WO2018083192A1 (en) * 2016-11-04 2018-05-11 Nagravision Sa A method of and a device for rendering content data of a content data stream based on a level of toxicity of the content data stream
US10143916B1 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-12-04 Electronic Arts Inc. Facilitating user voting for future game content in an online game
US10528994B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2020-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Allocation of application licenses within cloud or infrastructure
US10540349B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2020-01-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Recommending data enrichments
US10615967B2 (en) 2014-03-20 2020-04-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Rapid data protection for storage devices
US10922654B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-02-16 Accenture Global Solutions Limited Software assurance and trust in a distributed delivery environment

Families Citing this family (144)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7937451B2 (en) * 2007-01-08 2011-05-03 Mspot, Inc. Method and apparatus for transferring digital content from a computer to a mobile handset
US9317179B2 (en) 2007-01-08 2016-04-19 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for providing recommendations to a user of a cloud computing service
US20090037963A1 (en) * 2007-08-02 2009-02-05 Youbiquity, Llc System for electronic retail sales of multi-media assets
US8458658B2 (en) * 2008-02-29 2013-06-04 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for dynamically building a software appliance
US8935365B1 (en) 2008-03-14 2015-01-13 Full Armor Corporation Group policy framework
US8935692B2 (en) * 2008-05-22 2015-01-13 Red Hat, Inc. Self-management of virtual machines in cloud-based networks
US7886038B2 (en) * 2008-05-27 2011-02-08 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for user identity management in cloud-based networks
US9092243B2 (en) 2008-05-28 2015-07-28 Red Hat, Inc. Managing a software appliance
US20090300423A1 (en) * 2008-05-28 2009-12-03 James Michael Ferris Systems and methods for software test management in cloud-based network
US8239509B2 (en) * 2008-05-28 2012-08-07 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for management of virtual appliances in cloud-based network
US8849971B2 (en) * 2008-05-28 2014-09-30 Red Hat, Inc. Load balancing in cloud-based networks
US8943497B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2015-01-27 Red Hat, Inc. Managing subscriptions for cloud-based virtual machines
US8868721B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2014-10-21 Red Hat, Inc. Software appliance management using broadcast data
US8108912B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2012-01-31 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for management of secure data in cloud-based network
US8341625B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2012-12-25 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for identification and management of cloud-based virtual machines
US10657466B2 (en) * 2008-05-29 2020-05-19 Red Hat, Inc. Building custom appliances in a cloud-based network
US10372490B2 (en) * 2008-05-30 2019-08-06 Red Hat, Inc. Migration of a virtual machine from a first cloud computing environment to a second cloud computing environment in response to a resource or services in the second cloud computing environment becoming available
US8538889B2 (en) * 2008-06-25 2013-09-17 Microsoft Corporation Application hierarchy and state manipulation
US8935528B2 (en) * 2008-06-26 2015-01-13 Microsoft Corporation Techniques for ensuring authentication and integrity of communications
US9842004B2 (en) * 2008-08-22 2017-12-12 Red Hat, Inc. Adjusting resource usage for cloud-based networks
US9288264B2 (en) * 2008-08-25 2016-03-15 Novell, Inc. System and method for implementing a cloud workflow
US9910708B2 (en) 2008-08-28 2018-03-06 Red Hat, Inc. Promotion of calculations to cloud-based computation resources
US9210173B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2015-12-08 Red Hat, Inc. Securing appliances for use in a cloud computing environment
US8782233B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2014-07-15 Red Hat, Inc. Embedding a cloud-based resource request in a specification language wrapper
US8984505B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2015-03-17 Red Hat, Inc. Providing access control to user-controlled resources in a cloud computing environment
US9870541B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2018-01-16 Red Hat, Inc. Service level backup using re-cloud network
US10025627B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2018-07-17 Red Hat, Inc. On-demand cloud computing environments
US9037692B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2015-05-19 Red Hat, Inc. Multiple cloud marketplace aggregation
US9165154B2 (en) * 2009-02-16 2015-10-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Trusted cloud computing and services framework
US8341427B2 (en) 2009-02-16 2012-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Trusted cloud computing and services framework
US9485117B2 (en) * 2009-02-23 2016-11-01 Red Hat, Inc. Providing user-controlled resources for cloud computing environments
US9930138B2 (en) * 2009-02-23 2018-03-27 Red Hat, Inc. Communicating with third party resources in cloud computing environment
US8977750B2 (en) * 2009-02-24 2015-03-10 Red Hat, Inc. Extending security platforms to cloud-based networks
DE102009010605A1 (en) * 2009-02-25 2010-08-26 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. A method and license server for generating a mobile usage privilege to use an application outside a local environment
US8555381B2 (en) * 2009-04-01 2013-10-08 Honeywell International Inc. Cloud computing as a security layer
US20100262837A1 (en) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-14 Haluk Kulin Systems And Methods For Personal Digital Data Ownership And Vaulting
US9311162B2 (en) * 2009-05-27 2016-04-12 Red Hat, Inc. Flexible cloud management
US9450783B2 (en) * 2009-05-28 2016-09-20 Red Hat, Inc. Abstracting cloud management
US9104407B2 (en) * 2009-05-28 2015-08-11 Red Hat, Inc. Flexible cloud management with power management support
US9703609B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2017-07-11 Red Hat, Inc. Matching resources associated with a virtual machine to offered resources
US9201485B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2015-12-01 Red Hat, Inc. Power management in managed network having hardware based and virtual resources
US20100306767A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2010-12-02 Dehaan Michael Paul Methods and systems for automated scaling of cloud computing systems
US8799322B2 (en) * 2009-07-24 2014-08-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Policy driven cloud storage management and cloud storage policy router
CA2767368C (en) * 2009-08-14 2013-10-08 Azuki Systems, Inc. Method and system for unified mobile content protection
US8832459B2 (en) * 2009-08-28 2014-09-09 Red Hat, Inc. Securely terminating processes in a cloud computing environment
US8769083B2 (en) 2009-08-31 2014-07-01 Red Hat, Inc. Metering software infrastructure in a cloud computing environment
US8316125B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2012-11-20 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for automated migration of cloud processes to external clouds
US8504443B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2013-08-06 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for pricing software infrastructure for a cloud computing environment
US8271653B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2012-09-18 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for cloud management using multiple cloud management schemes to allow communication between independently controlled clouds
US8862720B2 (en) 2009-08-31 2014-10-14 Red Hat, Inc. Flexible cloud management including external clouds
US8464356B2 (en) * 2009-09-02 2013-06-11 Sony Corporation Personal library on net
US8375223B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2013-02-12 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for secure distributed storage
US8468345B2 (en) * 2009-11-16 2013-06-18 Microsoft Corporation Containerless data for trustworthy computing and data services
US8806566B2 (en) * 2009-11-19 2014-08-12 Novell, Inc. Identity and policy enforced inter-cloud and intra-cloud channel
US9971880B2 (en) 2009-11-30 2018-05-15 Red Hat, Inc. Verifying software license compliance in cloud computing environments
US10268522B2 (en) 2009-11-30 2019-04-23 Red Hat, Inc. Service aggregation using graduated service levels in a cloud network
US10402544B2 (en) * 2009-11-30 2019-09-03 Red Hat, Inc. Generating a software license knowledge base for verifying software license compliance in cloud computing environments
US9389980B2 (en) * 2009-11-30 2016-07-12 Red Hat, Inc. Detecting events in cloud computing environments and performing actions upon occurrence of the events
US9529689B2 (en) 2009-11-30 2016-12-27 Red Hat, Inc. Monitoring cloud computing environments
US20110137947A1 (en) 2009-12-03 2011-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic access control for documents in electronic communications within a cloud computing environment
US10348693B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2019-07-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Trustworthy extensible markup language for trustworthy computing and data services
US9537650B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2017-01-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Verifiable trust for data through wrapper composition
US8924569B2 (en) 2009-12-17 2014-12-30 Intel Corporation Cloud federation as a service
US8606667B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-12-10 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for managing a software subscription in a cloud network
US8402139B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-03-19 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for matching resource requests with cloud computing environments
US8255529B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2012-08-28 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for providing deployment architectures in cloud computing environments
US20110213687A1 (en) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 James Michael Ferris Systems and methods for or a usage manager for cross-cloud appliances
US10783504B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2020-09-22 Red Hat, Inc. Converting standard software licenses for use in cloud computing environments
US11922196B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2024-03-05 Red Hat, Inc. Cloud-based utilization of software entitlements
US9053472B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2015-06-09 Red Hat, Inc. Offering additional license terms during conversion of standard software licenses for use in cloud computing environments
US20110214124A1 (en) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 James Michael Ferris Systems and methods for generating cross-cloud computing appliances
US8621220B2 (en) * 2010-03-11 2013-12-31 Ebay Inc. Systems and methods for identity encapsulated cryptography
US20110258082A1 (en) * 2010-04-14 2011-10-20 Microsoft Corporation Application Store for Shared Resource Computing
US9898342B2 (en) 2010-05-14 2018-02-20 Micro Focus Software Inc. Techniques for dynamic cloud-based edge service computing
US9552478B2 (en) 2010-05-18 2017-01-24 AO Kaspersky Lab Team security for portable information devices
US8909783B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2014-12-09 Red Hat, Inc. Managing multi-level service level agreements in cloud-based network
US9436459B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2016-09-06 Red Hat, Inc. Generating cross-mapping of vendor software in a cloud computing environment
US8954564B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2015-02-10 Red Hat, Inc. Cross-cloud vendor mapping service in cloud marketplace
US8606897B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2013-12-10 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for exporting usage history data as input to a management platform of a target cloud-based network
US9202225B2 (en) * 2010-05-28 2015-12-01 Red Hat, Inc. Aggregate monitoring of utilization data for vendor products in cloud networks
US8364819B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2013-01-29 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for cross-vendor mapping service in cloud networks
US8504689B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2013-08-06 Red Hat, Inc. Methods and systems for cloud deployment analysis featuring relative cloud resource importance
US9354939B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2016-05-31 Red Hat, Inc. Generating customized build options for cloud deployment matching usage profile against cloud infrastructure options
US8966587B2 (en) * 2010-06-03 2015-02-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Identity management via cloud
WO2012023050A2 (en) 2010-08-20 2012-02-23 Overtis Group Limited Secure cloud computing system and method
US8380837B2 (en) 2010-09-07 2013-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Software license management within a cloud computing environment
US8909784B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2014-12-09 Red Hat, Inc. Migrating subscribed services from a set of clouds to a second set of clouds
US8904005B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2014-12-02 Red Hat, Inc. Indentifying service dependencies in a cloud deployment
US9736252B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2017-08-15 Red Hat, Inc. Migrating subscribed services in a cloud deployment
US8612577B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2013-12-17 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for migrating software modules into one or more clouds
US8612615B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2013-12-17 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for identifying usage histories for producing optimized cloud utilization
US8949426B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2015-02-03 Red Hat, Inc. Aggregation of marginal subscription offsets in set of multiple host clouds
US8825791B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2014-09-02 Red Hat, Inc. Managing subscribed resource in cloud network using variable or instantaneous consumption tracking periods
US8713147B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2014-04-29 Red Hat, Inc. Matching a usage history to a new cloud
US10192246B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2019-01-29 Red Hat, Inc. Generating multi-cloud incremental billing capture and administration
US8924539B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2014-12-30 Red Hat, Inc. Combinatorial optimization of multiple resources across a set of cloud-based networks
US9442771B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2016-09-13 Red Hat, Inc. Generating configurable subscription parameters
US9563479B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2017-02-07 Red Hat, Inc. Brokering optimized resource supply costs in host cloud-based network using predictive workloads
US9606831B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2017-03-28 Red Hat, Inc. Migrating virtual machine operations
CN102045356B (en) * 2010-12-14 2013-04-10 中国科学院软件研究所 Cloud-storage-oriented trusted storage verification method and system
US8990950B2 (en) * 2010-12-27 2015-03-24 International Business Machines Corporation Enabling granular discretionary access control for data stored in a cloud computing environment
CN102202044A (en) * 2011-02-25 2011-09-28 北京兴宇中科科技开发股份有限公司 Portable cloud storage method and device
US8959221B2 (en) 2011-03-01 2015-02-17 Red Hat, Inc. Metering cloud resource consumption using multiple hierarchical subscription periods
US8832219B2 (en) 2011-03-01 2014-09-09 Red Hat, Inc. Generating optimized resource consumption periods for multiple users on combined basis
CN102761521B (en) * 2011-04-26 2016-08-31 上海格尔软件股份有限公司 Cloud security storage and sharing service platform
US8631099B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-01-14 Red Hat, Inc. Systems and methods for cloud deployment engine for selective workload migration or federation based on workload conditions
US10102018B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2018-10-16 Red Hat, Inc. Introspective application reporting to facilitate virtual machine movement between cloud hosts
US8782192B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2014-07-15 Red Hat, Inc. Detecting resource consumption events over sliding intervals in cloud-based network
US8984104B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2015-03-17 Red Hat, Inc. Self-moving operating system installation in cloud-based network
US9037723B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2015-05-19 Red Hat, Inc. Triggering workload movement based on policy stack having multiple selectable inputs
US10360122B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2019-07-23 Red Hat, Inc. Tracking cloud installation information using cloud-aware kernel of operating system
US8966652B2 (en) 2011-06-08 2015-02-24 International Business Machines Corporation Software utilization privilege brokering in a networked computing environment
JP2013004058A (en) * 2011-06-22 2013-01-07 Hitachi Systems Ltd Application cache method for cloud application and cloud provision side system
US8577809B2 (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-11-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining and utilizing value of digital assets
CN102289463A (en) * 2011-07-15 2011-12-21 北京邮电大学 Method for controlling user use capacity and proxy server
US8948381B2 (en) * 2011-09-09 2015-02-03 Fujitsu Limited Conditional key generation based on expiration date of data
US8214904B1 (en) 2011-12-21 2012-07-03 Kaspersky Lab Zao System and method for detecting computer security threats based on verdicts of computer users
RU2494453C2 (en) 2011-11-24 2013-09-27 Закрытое акционерное общество "Лаборатория Касперского" Method for distributed performance of computer security tasks
US9069984B2 (en) * 2011-12-21 2015-06-30 Sap Se On-demand authorization management
US8214905B1 (en) 2011-12-21 2012-07-03 Kaspersky Lab Zao System and method for dynamically allocating computing resources for processing security information
US8209758B1 (en) 2011-12-21 2012-06-26 Kaspersky Lab Zao System and method for classifying users of antivirus software based on their level of expertise in the field of computer security
WO2013101056A1 (en) * 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Intel Corporation Biometric cloud communication and data movement
CN102629926A (en) * 2012-04-06 2012-08-08 上海凯卓信息科技有限公司 Encrypting cloud storage method based on intelligent mobile terminal
CN103377321A (en) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-30 中兴通讯股份有限公司 DRM (digital rights management) file processing method, terminal device and cloud
CN102685122B (en) * 2012-05-06 2016-05-04 北京深思数盾科技股份有限公司 The method of the software protection based on cloud server
CN102724302A (en) * 2012-05-30 2012-10-10 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Family data center system based on cloud storage and family data management method
US9235867B2 (en) 2012-06-04 2016-01-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Concurrent media delivery
CN104662870B (en) * 2012-09-10 2019-02-05 云深系统有限公司 Data safety management system
CN103780584A (en) * 2012-10-22 2014-05-07 上海俊悦智能科技有限公司 Cloud computing-based identity authentication fusion method
EP2917871A4 (en) 2012-11-07 2015-11-11 Intertrust Tech Corp Personalized data management systems and methods
GB2508645A (en) * 2012-12-07 2014-06-11 Ibm Software licence management in a peer-to-peer network
CN104035946B (en) * 2013-03-08 2017-11-03 联想(北京)有限公司 A kind of information retrieval method, server and electronic equipment
CN105453061B (en) 2013-09-04 2018-09-18 英特尔公司 Convenient for the mechanism of the dynamic memory management to mobile computing device
US10140431B2 (en) 2013-09-25 2018-11-27 Nec Solution Innovators, Ltd. File management system and user terminal in file management system
US9137415B2 (en) * 2014-01-29 2015-09-15 Depict, Inc. Using a security feature with a digital image file
CN103944874B (en) * 2014-02-18 2017-01-25 国家超级计算深圳中心 Highly reusable cloud storage data storage verification method and system
US9792452B2 (en) * 2014-09-12 2017-10-17 Anthony Tan Pervasive intermediate network attached storage application
US10313427B2 (en) 2014-09-24 2019-06-04 Intel Corporation Contextual application management
CN105791232B (en) * 2014-12-23 2019-09-17 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 The non-public permission exchange method of social networks, device and system
CN104796411A (en) * 2015-04-01 2015-07-22 朱威 Method for safely transmitting, storing and utilizing data in cloud and mobile terminal
US9723006B2 (en) * 2015-06-27 2017-08-01 Mcafee, Inc. Temporary process deprivileging
CN106452814B (en) 2015-08-10 2019-11-26 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 A kind of method and apparatus using external account operating resource
US11669839B2 (en) * 2017-07-05 2023-06-06 Accenture Global Solutions Limited System and method for processing a digital transaction
RU2688279C1 (en) * 2018-12-17 2019-05-21 Даниял Алиханович Сурхаев Game set and game playing method

Citations (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020116395A1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2002-08-22 Maren Christensen Intellectual property rights management system
US20030005135A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-01-02 Mitsuhiro Inoue License management server, license management system and usage restriction method
US20040024727A1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2004-02-05 Sandvine Incorporated Method and system of re-sharing files with modifications
US20040034601A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-02-19 Erwin Kreuzer System and method for content distribution and reselling
US20040139326A1 (en) * 2002-12-27 2004-07-15 Panasonic Communications Co., Ltd. Server, a terminal apparatus and an image management method
US20040205028A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-10-14 Ellis Verosub Digital content store system
US6850252B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2005-02-01 Steven M. Hoffberg Intelligent electronic appliance system and method
US20050044049A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-02-24 Nobuya Okayama License and privilege management method in digital contents sale
US20050120053A1 (en) * 2003-04-18 2005-06-02 Stephen Watson Sales of collections excluding those already purchased
US20050182728A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2005-08-18 Shinichi Matsukawa Management apparatus for content distribution system, apparatus for browsing, program, and method
US20060036554A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Content and license delivery to shared devices
US7043685B2 (en) * 2001-03-12 2006-05-09 Nec Corporation Web-content providing method and web-content providing system
US20060112016A1 (en) * 2000-03-14 2006-05-25 Yoshihito Ishibashi Content usage management system method, and program providing medium therefor
US20060123484A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2006-06-08 Miodrag Babic Method of clearing and delivering digital rights management licenses to devices connected by IP networks
US20060143133A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2006-06-29 Alexander Medvinsky Flexible pricing model for persistent content
US7096202B2 (en) * 1994-11-23 2006-08-22 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Consumer distribution license system and method
US20060248038A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-02 Marc Kaplan System and method of handling file metadata
US20060253584A1 (en) * 2005-05-03 2006-11-09 Dixon Christopher J Reputation of an entity associated with a content item
US20070136205A1 (en) * 2003-10-22 2007-06-14 Koninklijke Phillips Electronics N.C. Digital rights management unit for a digital rights management system
US20070156594A1 (en) * 2006-01-03 2007-07-05 Mcgucken Elliot System and method for allowing creators, artsists, and owners to protect and profit from content
US7249107B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2007-07-24 Microsoft Corporation Redistribution of rights-managed content
US20070174919A1 (en) * 2005-11-23 2007-07-26 Msystems Ltd Digital Rights Management Device And Method
US20070226807A1 (en) * 1996-08-30 2007-09-27 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US7310729B2 (en) * 2003-03-12 2007-12-18 Limelight Networks, Inc. Digital rights management license delivery system and method
US20080148414A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Spansion Llc Portable digital rights management (drm)
US7406436B1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2008-07-29 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for collecting, aggregating and providing post-sale market data for an item
US20080228578A1 (en) * 2007-01-25 2008-09-18 Governing Dynamics, Llc Digital rights management and data license management
US20080235142A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Yahoo! Inc. System and methods for obtaining rights in playlist entries

Family Cites Families (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5263165A (en) * 1990-02-15 1993-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation System for providing user access control within a distributed data processing system having multiple resource managers
US5375068A (en) * 1992-06-03 1994-12-20 Digital Equipment Corporation Video teleconferencing for networked workstations
CA2107047C (en) * 1992-12-29 1998-04-28 Alan M. Bentley Switched circuit connection management over public data networks for wide area networks
US5495576A (en) * 1993-01-11 1996-02-27 Ritchey; Kurtis J. Panoramic image based virtual reality/telepresence audio-visual system and method
US5588914A (en) * 1994-06-28 1996-12-31 The Walt Disney Company Method and system for guiding a user in a virtual reality presentation
WO1997024842A2 (en) * 1995-12-29 1997-07-10 Mci Communications Corporation Method and system for resilient frame relay network interconnection
US5859972A (en) * 1996-05-10 1999-01-12 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Multiple server repository and multiple server remote application virtual client computer
US6745224B1 (en) * 1996-12-06 2004-06-01 Microsoft Corporation Object framework and services for periodically recurring operations
US6341127B1 (en) * 1997-07-11 2002-01-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Node device and method for controlling label switching path set up in inter-connected networks
US6469991B1 (en) * 1997-10-14 2002-10-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for overload control in a multiple access system for communication networks
US6064656A (en) * 1997-10-31 2000-05-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Distributed system and method for controlling access control to network resources
US6434532B2 (en) * 1998-03-12 2002-08-13 Aladdin Knowledge Systems, Ltd. Interactive customer support for computer programs using network connection of user machine
JP3790364B2 (en) * 1998-05-22 2006-06-28 富士通株式会社 NETWORK CONNECTION SETTING METHOD, NETWORK MONITORING / CONTROL DEVICE, ELEMENT MONITORING / CONTROL DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM CONTAINING NETWORK MONITORING / CONTROL PROGRAM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM CONTAINING ELEMENT MONITORING / CONTROL PROGRAM
US6185567B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2001-02-06 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Authenticated access to internet based research and data services
US6209039B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2001-03-27 Mci Worldcom, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an interface between a plurality of frame relay networks
US6415288B1 (en) * 1998-11-09 2002-07-02 Unisys Corporation Computer implemented system for communicating between a user terminal and a database system
US6714549B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2004-03-30 Worldcom, Inc. High resiliency network infrastructure
US6409599B1 (en) * 1999-07-19 2002-06-25 Ham On Rye Technologies, Inc. Interactive virtual reality performance theater entertainment system
US6707820B1 (en) * 1999-12-16 2004-03-16 Intervoice Limited Partnership Virtual circuit network dynamic channel management
US6620043B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-09-16 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Virtual tug of war
US6961318B2 (en) * 2000-05-12 2005-11-01 International Business Machines Corporation Data transmission system for reserving a virtual connection over multiple IP networks by means of a reservation
CA2428404C (en) * 2000-11-20 2012-02-07 Ian Barry Crabtree Information provider
US7002926B1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2006-02-21 Western Digital Ventures, Inc. Isochronous switched fabric network
US7467212B2 (en) * 2000-12-28 2008-12-16 Intel Corporation Control of access control lists based on social networks
US7725490B2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2010-05-25 Crucian Global Services, Inc. Collaborative file access management system
US7020654B1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2006-03-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for indexing content
US7065041B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2006-06-20 Siemens Communications, Inc. Method for resilient call setup through ATM networks for Softswitch applications
US20070115123A1 (en) * 2002-04-24 2007-05-24 Roberts Jon L System and method for associating baggage with a passenger
US7363375B2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2008-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive allocation of last-hop bandwidth based on monitoring of end-to-end throughput
US6950825B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2005-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Fine grained role-based access to system resources
US7353402B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2008-04-01 Microsoft Corporation Obtaining a signed rights label (SRL) for digital content and obtaining a digital license corresponding to the content based on the SRL in a digital rights management system
US8458028B2 (en) * 2002-10-16 2013-06-04 Barbaro Technologies System and method for integrating business-related content into an electronic game
US7761505B2 (en) * 2002-11-18 2010-07-20 Openpeak Inc. System, method and computer program product for concurrent performance of video teleconference and delivery of multimedia presentation and archiving of same
US6917975B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2005-07-12 Bea Systems, Inc. Method for role and resource policy management
CN1266895C (en) * 2003-03-11 2006-07-26 华为技术有限公司 Method for dynamically lossless regulating bandwidth of inner embedded elastic package circular network
CA2530045A1 (en) * 2003-06-20 2004-12-29 Newdea, Inc. Improved philanthropy management system and method of doing business
US7594275B2 (en) * 2003-10-14 2009-09-22 Microsoft Corporation Digital rights management system
US20050138419A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Pratik Gupta Automated role discovery
US7546641B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation Conditional access to digital rights management conversion
US8339988B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2012-12-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for provisioning logical circuits for intermittent use in a data network
US7478160B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2009-01-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for transparent negotiations
JP4706262B2 (en) * 2004-05-21 2011-06-22 日本電気株式会社 Access control system, access control method, and access control program
US8769126B2 (en) * 2004-06-24 2014-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Expanded membership access control in a collaborative environment
US20060036904A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Gemini Storage Data replication method over a limited bandwidth network by mirroring parities
GB2417342A (en) * 2004-08-19 2006-02-22 Fujitsu Serv Ltd Indexing system for a computer file store
US20060048224A1 (en) * 2004-08-30 2006-03-02 Encryptx Corporation Method and apparatus for automatically detecting sensitive information, applying policies based on a structured taxonomy and dynamically enforcing and reporting on the protection of sensitive data through a software permission wrapper
US8429192B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2013-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for supporting a plurality of access control list types for a file system in an operating system
TWI307593B (en) * 2005-12-14 2009-03-11 Chung Shan Inst Of Science System and method of protecting digital data

Patent Citations (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7096202B2 (en) * 1994-11-23 2006-08-22 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Consumer distribution license system and method
US20070226807A1 (en) * 1996-08-30 2007-09-27 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US6850252B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2005-02-01 Steven M. Hoffberg Intelligent electronic appliance system and method
US20060112016A1 (en) * 2000-03-14 2006-05-25 Yoshihito Ishibashi Content usage management system method, and program providing medium therefor
US20020116395A1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2002-08-22 Maren Christensen Intellectual property rights management system
US7043685B2 (en) * 2001-03-12 2006-05-09 Nec Corporation Web-content providing method and web-content providing system
US7406436B1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2008-07-29 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for collecting, aggregating and providing post-sale market data for an item
US20030005135A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-01-02 Mitsuhiro Inoue License management server, license management system and usage restriction method
US7249107B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2007-07-24 Microsoft Corporation Redistribution of rights-managed content
US20040024727A1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2004-02-05 Sandvine Incorporated Method and system of re-sharing files with modifications
US20040034601A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-02-19 Erwin Kreuzer System and method for content distribution and reselling
US20050182728A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2005-08-18 Shinichi Matsukawa Management apparatus for content distribution system, apparatus for browsing, program, and method
US20040205028A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-10-14 Ellis Verosub Digital content store system
US20040139326A1 (en) * 2002-12-27 2004-07-15 Panasonic Communications Co., Ltd. Server, a terminal apparatus and an image management method
US7310729B2 (en) * 2003-03-12 2007-12-18 Limelight Networks, Inc. Digital rights management license delivery system and method
US20050044049A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-02-24 Nobuya Okayama License and privilege management method in digital contents sale
US20050120053A1 (en) * 2003-04-18 2005-06-02 Stephen Watson Sales of collections excluding those already purchased
US20070136205A1 (en) * 2003-10-22 2007-06-14 Koninklijke Phillips Electronics N.C. Digital rights management unit for a digital rights management system
US20060123484A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2006-06-08 Miodrag Babic Method of clearing and delivering digital rights management licenses to devices connected by IP networks
US20060036554A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Content and license delivery to shared devices
US20060143133A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2006-06-29 Alexander Medvinsky Flexible pricing model for persistent content
US20060248038A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-02 Marc Kaplan System and method of handling file metadata
US20060253584A1 (en) * 2005-05-03 2006-11-09 Dixon Christopher J Reputation of an entity associated with a content item
US20070174919A1 (en) * 2005-11-23 2007-07-26 Msystems Ltd Digital Rights Management Device And Method
US20070156594A1 (en) * 2006-01-03 2007-07-05 Mcgucken Elliot System and method for allowing creators, artsists, and owners to protect and profit from content
US20080148414A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Spansion Llc Portable digital rights management (drm)
US20080228578A1 (en) * 2007-01-25 2008-09-18 Governing Dynamics, Llc Digital rights management and data license management
US20080235142A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Yahoo! Inc. System and methods for obtaining rights in playlist entries

Cited By (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8621553B2 (en) 2009-03-31 2013-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Model based security for cloud services
US20100251328A1 (en) * 2009-03-31 2010-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Model based security for cloud services
WO2011051595A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-05-05 France Telecom Method and client agent for monitoring the use of protected content
US8640261B2 (en) 2009-10-26 2014-01-28 France Telecom Method and client agent for monitoring the use of protected content
CN102333079A (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-01-25 北京兴宇中科科技开发股份有限公司 Method for clearing disk space
WO2012126089A1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2012-09-27 Futurestate It Incorporated System and method for information technology asset migration and lifecycle management
US8769705B2 (en) 2011-06-10 2014-07-01 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Method for flexible data protection with dynamically authorized data receivers in a content network or in cloud storage and content delivery services
WO2012173837A1 (en) * 2011-06-14 2012-12-20 United Video Properties, Inc. Systems and methods for providing parental controls in a cloud-based media guidance application
US10540349B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2020-01-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Recommending data enrichments
US10721220B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2020-07-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data custodian and curation system
WO2012173826A3 (en) * 2011-06-14 2013-03-07 Microsoft Corporation Data custodian and curation system
US9147195B2 (en) 2011-06-14 2015-09-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data custodian and curation system
US20150052594A1 (en) * 2011-08-05 2015-02-19 Safefaces LLC Methods and systems for identity verification in a social network using ratings
US9282090B2 (en) * 2011-08-05 2016-03-08 Safefaces LLC Methods and systems for identity verification in a social network using ratings
US9767524B2 (en) 2011-08-09 2017-09-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Interaction with virtual objects causing change of legal status
US9038127B2 (en) 2011-08-09 2015-05-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Physical interaction with virtual objects for DRM
US9740639B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2017-08-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Map-based rapid data encryption policy compliance
US9477614B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2016-10-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sector map-based rapid data encryption policy compliance
US9898588B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2018-02-20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for providing cloud-based digital rights management service and system thereof
US10528994B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2020-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Allocation of application licenses within cloud or infrastructure
US11546646B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2023-01-03 Ipar, Llc Systems and methods for providing access to rights holder defined video clips
US20140282680A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Jeffrey D. Brandstetter Systems and Methods for Providing Access to Rights Holder Defined Video Clips
US10397626B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2019-08-27 Ipar, Llc Systems and methods for providing access to rights holder defined video clips
CN103246850A (en) * 2013-05-23 2013-08-14 福建伊时代信息科技股份有限公司 Method and device for processing file
CN103310608A (en) * 2013-05-23 2013-09-18 苏州市玮琪生物科技有限公司 Separated wireless data acquisition unit used for health cloud platform and acquisition method of unit
US10143916B1 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-12-04 Electronic Arts Inc. Facilitating user voting for future game content in an online game
US10946268B2 (en) 2014-01-16 2021-03-16 Electronic Arts Inc. Facilitating user voting for future game content in an online game
US10615967B2 (en) 2014-03-20 2020-04-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Rapid data protection for storage devices
US9825945B2 (en) * 2014-09-09 2017-11-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Preserving data protection with policy
US20160072796A1 (en) * 2014-09-09 2016-03-10 Microsoft Corporation Preserving Data Protection With Policy
US9853812B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2017-12-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Secure key management for roaming protected content
US9900295B2 (en) 2014-11-05 2018-02-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Roaming content wipe actions across devices
US9853820B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2017-12-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intelligent deletion of revoked data
US9900325B2 (en) 2015-10-09 2018-02-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Passive encryption of organization data
US10045092B2 (en) * 2015-10-16 2018-08-07 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Device-resident content protection
US20170111711A1 (en) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-20 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Device-resident content protection
CN106355108A (en) * 2016-09-28 2017-01-25 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 Document handover method, device and system and computer readable medium
WO2018083192A1 (en) * 2016-11-04 2018-05-11 Nagravision Sa A method of and a device for rendering content data of a content data stream based on a level of toxicity of the content data stream
US11284169B2 (en) 2016-11-04 2022-03-22 Nagravision Sa Method of and a device for rendering content data of a content data stream based on a level of toxicity of the content data stream
US10922654B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-02-16 Accenture Global Solutions Limited Software assurance and trust in a distributed delivery environment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20080091613A1 (en) 2008-04-17
CN101523365A (en) 2009-09-02
JP2010505206A (en) 2010-02-18
WO2008105937A2 (en) 2008-09-04
WO2008105937A3 (en) 2009-01-08
EP2076840A2 (en) 2009-07-08
CA2659408A1 (en) 2008-09-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20080082448A1 (en) Influential digital rights management
US8775320B1 (en) Redistribution of rights-managed content and technique for encouraging same
US10846374B2 (en) Availability of permission models in roaming environments
TWI492085B (en) Method,device,and computer storage media for enhanced product functionality based on user identification
US20200084046A1 (en) Systems and methods for accuracy and attestation of validity of data shared in a secure distributed environment
US9246916B2 (en) Specifying rights in a digital rights license according to events
US7496540B2 (en) System and method for securing digital content
US7134144B2 (en) Detecting and responding to a clock rollback in a digital rights management system on a computing device
US20100293103A1 (en) Interaction model to migrate states and data
US20080040283A1 (en) Content protection system and method for enabling secure sharing of copy-protected content
US20030187801A1 (en) Content revocation and license modification in a digital rights management (DRM) system on a computing device
CA2485053A1 (en) System and method for multi-tiered license management and distribution using networked clearinghouses
US20230004970A1 (en) Distributed Ledgers with Ledger Entries Containing Redactable Payloads
US20230086191A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Token Content Unlocking, Biometric Authentication using Privacy-Protecting Tokens, Ownership-Based Limitations of Content Access, Policy-Based Time Capsule Technology, and Content Lock Mechanisms
US20230100422A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Transaction Management in NFT-Directed Environments
Nair et al. Enabling DRM-preserving digital content redistribution
US20230394469A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Instant NFTs and Protection Structure, Detection of Malicious Code within Blockchain Smart Contracts, Tokens with Transfer Limitations, Mirror Tokens and Parallel Addresses, Smart Contract Risk Scoring Method, and Cross-Device Digital Rights Management
US20050060544A1 (en) System and method for digital content management and controlling copyright protection
CN1759363A (en) Distribution and rights management of digital content
US20040123126A1 (en) Method and apparatus for deterring piracy
US20110166960A1 (en) Digital content recycling system
US20230421377A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Node Facilitation, Communication, and Maintenance
Ioannidis Digital Rights Management technologies versus end-user privacy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MEIJER, HENRICUS JOHANNES MARIA;GATES, WILLIAM H., III;BERGSTRAESSER, THOMAS F.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:019099/0062;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070220 TO 20070319

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034766/0509

Effective date: 20141014