US20080222514A1 - Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents - Google Patents

Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080222514A1
US20080222514A1 US12/126,532 US12653208A US2008222514A1 US 20080222514 A1 US20080222514 A1 US 20080222514A1 US 12653208 A US12653208 A US 12653208A US 2008222514 A1 US2008222514 A1 US 2008222514A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
character string
electronic
node
operations
media
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/126,532
Inventor
Jonathan E. Rivers-Moore
Eugene N. Veselov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft Corp filed Critical Microsoft Corp
Priority to US12/126,532 priority Critical patent/US20080222514A1/en
Publication of US20080222514A1 publication Critical patent/US20080222514A1/en
Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC reassignment MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/166Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
    • G06F40/186Templates
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/12Use of codes for handling textual entities
    • G06F40/14Tree-structured documents
    • G06F40/143Markup, e.g. Standard Generalized Markup Language [SGML] or Document Type Definition [DTD]

Definitions

  • This invention relates to systems and methods for editing an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) document.
  • XML eXtensible Markup Language
  • XML is increasingly becoming the preferred format for transferring information.
  • XML is a tag-based hierarchical language that is extremely rich in terms of the information that it can be used to represent.
  • XML can be used to represent information spanning the spectrum from semi-structured information (such as one would find in a word processing document) to highly structured information (such as that which is contained in a table).
  • XML is well-suited for many types of communication including business-to-business and client-to-server communication.
  • XML, XSLT, and XML Schema For more information on XML, XSLT, and XML Schema, the reader is referred to the following documents which are the work of, and available from the W3C (World Wide Web consortium): XML 1.0 second edition specification; XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0; XML Schema section 1: Structures; and XML Schema section 2: Datatypes.
  • W3C World Wide Web consortium
  • Electronic forms are commonly used to aid in collecting information into an XML document.
  • Electronic forms can be governed by a template, which can provide rules by which an XML document can be presented as an electronic form, such as with data-entry fields for entry of data.
  • HTML and XML Schemas To create these templates, however, a programmer often needs a significant understanding of HTML and XML Schemas. A programmer often needs to understand how data-entry fields in an electronic form governed by the template are represented in the schema, HTML file, and XML document. The programmer also may need to understand how HTML, XML, and XML Schemas are structured and how they interrelate. Thus, to build a template, a programmer often must have significant experience and skill.
  • a programmer may need to build a program to allow a user to edit an XML document governed by this template.
  • an editing application is described that is capable of identifying nodes of an XML document that are editable and operations permitted for those nodes using elements of an electronic-form template.
  • the editing application presents an XML document as an electronic form having data-entry fields representing nodes of the XML document.
  • the editing application presents those nodes that are identified as editable in a parent element in another XML document governing the first XML document.
  • the editing application enables certain operations for those editable nodes through the data-entry fields if a child element of the parent element identifies them.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system with a display screen, computer, and user-input devices.
  • the system implements a method for designing an electronic-form template.
  • the system also implements a method for editing XML documents using an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary component display area
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for generating electronic-form templates.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a component display area and a blank form-design area.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template, and a component display area.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 6 after the electronic-form template comprises another component.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 7 after the electronic-form template comprises other components.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 8 showing also a component context menu and a structure submenu.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary hierarchical view display area, a change inquiry window, and an add window.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for editing an XML document using an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document having one editable node.
  • FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document following an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a computer system that is capable of supporting processes for creation and use of an electronic-form template.
  • the following disclosure describes a user-friendly way to design electronic-form templates using components and a form-designing area of a display.
  • Components are presented in an area of a display screen, usually graphically, such as with an arrangement of icons. Icons representing each component are a simplification so that a designer can more easily understand the purpose of and choose from a list of components. A designer can choose each component that he or she wishes to include in an electronic-form template.
  • the designer can choose a component, such as by clicking on an icon representing a component, and placing it in a form-designing area.
  • the form-designing area is presented in an area of a display screen, usually appearing as a blank page, such as is often done when viewing a new document in a word-processing application.
  • Components placed in a form-designing area can be manipulated by a designer to allow the designer to create an electronic-form template that provides a particular look and feel for an electronic-form representation of an XML document. Also by choosing particular components, a designer can build into the electronic-form template various types of permitted operations (e.g., editing operations).
  • the electronic-form template (and its views) is altered to reflect that change.
  • This incremental building of an electronic-form template and its views, and the fact that the views are linked so that a change to one can almost instantly be reflected in the other, allows a designer to quickly, easily, and intuitively create electronic-form templates.
  • the resulting electronic-form template reflects a designer's chosen look, feel, and editing options for nodes of XML documents that are to be governed by the electronic-form template.
  • nodes of an XML document can be located within the XML document, displayed, and made editable.
  • an editor application is used to determine, based on this electronic-form template, how nodes of an XML document are to be edited.
  • the visual representation of the components, hierarchical view, electronic-form design view, and XML document are described in the context of a single computer, a set of user-input devices, and a single display screen having areas for displaying a representation of the components, the electronic-form design view, the hierarchical view, and the XML document.
  • the display screen, computer, and user-input devices will be described first, followed by a discussion of the techniques in which these and other devices can be used.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary implementation of various devices and applications that can be used to facilitate the creation of an electronic-form template from components and enable editing of XML documents governed by the created electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system 100 , which comprises a screen 102 , user-input devices 104 , and a computer 106 .
  • the user-input devices 104 can comprise any device allowing a computer to receive a designer's preferences (or edits from an end-user), such as a keyboard 114 , other device(s) 116 , and a mouse 118 .
  • the other input devices 116 can comprise a touch screen, a voice-activated input device, a track ball, and any other device that allows the system 100 to receive input.
  • the computer 106 comprises a processing unit 120 and random access memory and/or read-only memory 122 including applications, such as an operating system 124 , a design application 126 , a user interface 128 , an editor application 130 , an electronic-form template 132 , and an XML document 134 .
  • the computer 106 communicates with a designer and end-user through the screen 102 and the user-input devices 104 .
  • the screen 102 comprises three displays or screen areas: a hierarchical view display area 108 ; a component display area 110 ; and an electronic-form-design area 112 . With these areas, a designer can see a representation of and select a component from a list of components. Any part or all of the screen 102 can be used to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 . With this representation an end-user can edit or view the XML document 134 .
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary design screen 200 , including an example of the form-design area 112 and the hierarchical view display area 108 (entitled “Data Source”).
  • a design view 202 of an exemplary embodiment of the electronic-form template 132 is partially within the form-design area 112 .
  • This design view 202 provides information useful to aid a designer in constructing the electronic-form template 132 .
  • an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 for editing and/or viewing by an end-user e.g., a data-entry user
  • these user interfaces can reflect operations permitted by components added to the electronic-form template 132 by the designer.
  • This electronic-form template 132 shown in the design view 202 is being built from components chosen by a designer.
  • the components chosen are used by the design application 126 to create the data-entry fields shown in the design view 202 .
  • These data-entry fields are one way in which the electronic-form template 132 can be represented to a designer or an end-user.
  • These data-entry fields correspond to parts of the electronic-form template 132 , the parts also being shown through the icons displayed in the hierarchical view display area 108 .
  • the icons displayed are a representation of part of the electronic-form template 132 and are arranged into a tree structure.
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of components from which a designer can choose, which are displayed here at the component display area 110 .
  • These various components comprise a text box 302 , a rich text box 304 , a drop-down list box 306 , a list box 308 , a date picker 310 , a check box 312 , an option button 314 , a section 316 , an optional section 318 , a repeating section 320 , a repeating table 322 , a bulleted list 324 , a numbered list 326 , a plain list 328 , a button 330 , and hyperlink 332 .
  • Other components can be included as well.
  • each of these components can be added to indicate an operation or operations that is permitted to be performed on a node or nodes of the XML document 134 .
  • some of these components will be represented in an electronic form by data-entry fields enabling the component's operation.
  • These data-entry fields can be associated with appropriate nodes of the XML document 134 .
  • the entry can be reflected in the XML document 134 .
  • the system 100 enables a designer to build the electronic-form template 132 .
  • These components enable many different possible types of operations (and user interfaces), such as those shown with various data-entry fields in the design view 202 in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2 .
  • the process used to build the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
  • FIG. 14 Another example of another known device that can be substituted for those shown in FIG. 1 is the device shown in FIG. 14 .
  • Other examples include portable, handheld, or wireless devices.
  • a system such as the system 100 of FIG. 1 , displays components to a designer.
  • the designer can choose from the components to graphically and easily build the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the system 100 can also incrementally build the electronic-form template 132 with each new component the designer adds.
  • the system 100 also allows the designer to see two views of the electronic-form template 132 , here the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 .
  • the system 100 then alters each view with each new component chosen.
  • the designer may also change components existing in the electronic-form template 132 , the change to each being incrementally reflected in the views by the system 100 .
  • FIG. 4 shows a process 400 for generating the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the process 400 and the following processes are illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by the system 100 . These processes may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, the processes represent a set of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 122 and executable by the processing unit 120 .
  • the user interface 128 displays components and a form-design area. It does so to enable a designer to graphically design the electronic-form template 132 .
  • FIG. 5 shows a design screen 500 created by the user interface 128 , having an example of the component display area 110 and a blank example of the form-design area 112 .
  • the form-design area 112 is displayed to make it easy for a designer without typical programming skills to create the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the user interface 128 can provide an editing experience to a designer similar to that commonly provided in word-processing systems.
  • the user interface 128 can, for instance, work like a word-processing system by providing similar font controls and options.
  • FIG. 5 for example, the user interface 128 displays the form-design area 112 looking like a page from a word-processing application—here, a blank white page. It can also display commonly used icons that represent operations that a designer can choose to perform, such as the font being used (in FIG. 5 , Verdana, size 10), bold/underline/italic options, and the like.
  • These word-processing icons can be displayed in many different ways, including as shown in a word-processing icon display 502 of FIG. 5 .
  • the components are displayed by the user interface 128 in the component display area 110 to make it easy for a designer without extensive knowledge of components to be able to understand what each of them can represent in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the user interface 128 displays icons and/or text to inform the designer, such as with the icons and text set forth in the component display area 110 set forth in FIGS. 3 and 5 .
  • the text box 302 comprises an icon (i.e., a symbol) and text describing what a text box component represents.
  • This icon shows a designer that, should he choose to include a text box component in his electronic-form template 132 , an operation allowing entry and editing of text for a node in the XML document 134 will be added to the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the editor application 130 can then present the node of the XML document 134 in an electronic form as a data-entry field allowing input of text.
  • the text describing the text box 302 (“Text Box”) is also descriptive.
  • the designer can begin to build the electronic-form template 132 and view what an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 can look like. He can continue to build the electronic-form template 132 by adding components, but can also alter the electronic-form template 132 by altering existing components.
  • This process of building and altering is shown as a design sub-process 403 , which includes blocks 404 to 412 .
  • the sub-process 403 includes blocks used to describe the action and interaction of the designer and the system 100 .
  • the design application 126 produces an electronic-form representation mirroring the operations allowed by the electronic-form template 132 (block 414 ). The process 403 and the block 414 will be described in greater detail below.
  • the designer can pick a component from the list of components in the component display area 110 for insertion into the form-design area 112 (block 404 ).
  • the designer can pick from components in various ways, including through the mouse 118 , the other devices 116 (such as a touch screen, track ball, voice-activation, and the like), and through the keyboard 114 , which are shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the system 100 enables the designer to move the component in the form-design area 112 to where she desires.
  • a designer can pick a component, for example, by dragging and dropping (from the component display area 110 ) a component's icon onto a form-design area 112 shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the designer can pick a component to drag and drop with various devices, such as with the mouse 118 or commands entered through the keyboard 114 .
  • the designer clicks on the icon and text for the text box 302 to select it.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary screen display 600 showing what the design application 126 creates after a designer selects the text box 302 in FIG. 5 (also shown in FIG. 6 ).
  • the system 100 creates a text-function node 604 allowing entry of text, here represented by the text-box data-entry field 602 , which looks like a gray box for entry of text and is labeled “String 1:”.
  • the design application 126 enables the designer to continue building his electronic-form template 132 by selecting components, thereby creating certain allowed operations associated with nodes of the XML document 134 .
  • the design application 126 created part of the electronic-form template 132 that indicates a permitted function (here a text-entry function) with the text-function node 604 .
  • the system 100 can identify which component was selected, identify the placement for that component on the form-design area 112 , build the electronic-form template 132 based on the component chosen and its location, and display the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 .
  • These tasks are set forth in blocks 406 , 408 , 410 , and 414 of FIG. 4 , which will be described below.
  • the design application 126 identifies which component was selected.
  • the system 100 can access and/or contain many components, either from local or remote sources. Some of these components are set forth (via icons and text) in the component display area 110 shown in FIGS. 3 , 5 , 6 , and 7 .
  • the design application 126 identifies where a component is placed in the form-design area 112 .
  • the placement of the component can alter the structure of the electronic-form template 132 . How the placement of a component can alter the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
  • the design application 126 will identify the component and this placement. With this information, the system 100 proceeds to build the electronic-form template 132 , which will be described in part using FIGS. 5 and 6 .
  • the design application 126 changes the electronic-form template 132 based on a component selected.
  • the design application 126 also changes the hierarchical view 204 and the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 by building in a representation of the added component.
  • the design application 126 changes the views to reflect that alteration.
  • a syntax also called a “character string”
  • An exemplary list of operations and their related, operational syntaxes are shown below:
  • An operation permitted can govern, for instance, how and what kind of information is permitted to be added into a node or nodes of the XML document 134 that is associated with that operational syntax.
  • the node or nodes of the XML document 134 can be associated with the operational syntax.
  • the operational syntax can be associated with a location syntax, such as an XPath expression. Both the operational syntax and the location syntax can be included within an XML element added to the electronic-form template 132 . XML elements will be described in greater detail below.
  • FIG. 7 shows an exemplary screen display 700 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the designer chose another component (the check box 312 of FIG. 6 ) to add to the electronic-form template 132 shown in FIG. 6 .
  • the design application 126 adds the following XML element to the electronic-form template 132 :
  • the design application 126 represents the added editability element as a Rich Text Box 702 .
  • the Rich Text Box 702 is labeled “Xhtml 1”.
  • the design application 126 altered the hierarchical view 204 to include an XHTML section 704 (labeled “xhtml1”) corresponding to the Rich Text Box 702 and the editability element.
  • This editability element comprises XML attributes and additional child elements. These elements and attributes provide information that the editor application 130 can use to determine that a node or nodes of the XML document 134 are editable. These elements and attributes also provide the editor application 130 with information indicating which operations are permitted for these editable nodes.
  • Syntax of the editability element indicates a name and/or location in the XML document 134 of a node or nodes. With this indicator, the editor application 130 can determine which node or nodes are potentially editable with operations permitted by this editability element. In one implementation, by using all of the electronic-form template 132 , the editor application 130 can determine all nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable.
  • the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/xhtml1” (the “value” of the attribute).
  • This indicator can be used to determine that nodes having the name and/or location of “myFields/xhtml1” are potentially editable.
  • the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate node(s) matching this XPath expression.
  • An additional attribute can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable.
  • a ‘container’ attribute can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable.
  • the node indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” is editable without contextual conditions.
  • an “operation element” in the editability element indicates operations (e.g., editing functions) permitted to be performed on or with the node(s) indicated in the editability element.
  • the operation element entitled “editWith” indicates that operations associated with “xField” of type “rich” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1”.
  • the operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from the syntax given in the operation element.
  • the syntax “xField” with the additional “type” attribute, with value “rich” indicates an operation of rich-text editing, such as deleting and inserting text, changing the formatting of text, making it bold or italics, and other familiar rich-text editing operations familiar to word-processing.
  • the nodes or data within the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” may be edited using these operations.
  • the operation element can indicate permitted operations in various manners.
  • a syntax of the operation element includes an element specifying the XML data able to be inserted by the associated operations.
  • the electronic-form template 132 governs how information is handled and operations permitted for the XML document 134 for which it corresponds. Because the electronic-form template 132 comprises an editability element and its parts for each component chosen by the designer, the chosen component affects the syntax of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • each component built into the electronic-form template 132 can govern the look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry field(s), as well as how and where information entered into these data-entry field(s) is mapped, such as to nodes of the XML document 134 .
  • the editor application 130 can, however, use less than all of the electronic-form template 132 . It can, for instance, determine potentially editable nodes and operations permitted, but use a different look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry fields (or not use data-entry fields at all).
  • Block 410 will be discussed first below, followed later by a discussion of block 414 .
  • the user interface 128 displays the electronic-form template's 132 views.
  • the hierarchical view 204 can be represented in various ways, including by visually showing the hierarchical structure of the electronic-form template 132 , if applicable.
  • One example of this is the indentations of the hierarchical view 204 set forth in the hierarchical view display area 108 of FIG. 2 .
  • the electronic-form template 132 can be represented in various ways.
  • the user interface 128 can display the design view 202 to make it easy for a designer to understand the structure of the electronic-form template 132 , or can show the electronic-form template 132 without additional information.
  • the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 can mimic an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 potentially seen by a user, such as set forth in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2 .
  • the design view 202 can show components built into the electronic-form template 132 with additional information showing details about the data-entry field or fields corresponding to the components to aid a designer in understanding and altering the components in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the user interface 128 can also display the hierarchical view 204 in order for the designer to assess the electronic-form template 132 after each change made by the designer. When the designer can quickly see the effect of his changes, the designer can more easily build the electronic-form template 132 to match the designer's intended results.
  • the designer can continue to make changes or end the process. Ending the process will be discussed as part of the block 414 , described below.
  • the design application 126 will build the electronic-form template 132 based on the identity and placement of the component.
  • the electronic-form template 132 can be built incrementally. That is to say, with each component chosen, or in some implementations with each other action taken that will affect a view of the electronic-form template 132 , the electronic-form template 132 is altered. This incrementalism allows a designer to quickly see how the electronic-form template 132 is changing with each change made by the designer. The designer does not have to work on either a form or a schema and then save the form or schema to see how the corresponding schema or form looks or performs. Instead, as the designer makes a change, it is reflected in the views of the electronic-form template 132 . This makes designing an electronic-form template 132 easy and intuitive.
  • the design application 126 can reflect each change made by a designer to both views of the electronic-form template 132 so quickly that the designer sees it in real time, regardless of whether the change was made to the electronic-form template 132 by altering the design view 202 or the hierarchical view 204 . By so doing, the designer can more easily design electronic-form templates.
  • the design application 126 continues to enable the designer to add components to the electronic-form template 132 , returning to block 404 , or alter an existing component, block 412 .
  • FIG. 2 is one view of an electronic-form template built from many components.
  • FIG. 8 shows an exemplary design screen 800 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the design screen 800 shows the views of the electronic-form template 132 from FIGS. 6 and 7 , and the results of the designer continuing to choose components.
  • a designer can build everything from a simple electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 6 , to a moderately complex electronic-form template, such as shown FIG. 8 , to a large, complex electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the design application 126 adds the following editability element to the electronic-form template 132 :
  • the editability element (entitled “xmlToEdit”) includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/container2/repeating_string” (the “value” of the attribute).
  • This indicator gives a name/location of nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable.
  • the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate (i.e., identify) the nodes.
  • This editability element also comprises a “container” attribute having a value, in this example, of: “myFields/container2”.
  • This attribute determines a dynamic contextual condition for being able to edit the potentially editable nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”. In this implementation they are editable only if a node matching the XPath expression: “/myFields/container2” (an ancestor of “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) is shown (or rendered) as a section within an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 , and if the user of the editor application has selected a field somewhere within that section. In this example, the condition is met if the data-entry field is rendered within the section corresponding to the “myFields/container2” node's. If not, the editability element does not permit its operations for the potentially editable node(s).
  • This editability element also contains an operation element entitled “editWith”. This operation element indicates that operations associated with “xCollection” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”, if the condition is met.
  • the operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from its syntax.
  • the syntax “xCollection” indicates a certain set of operations, described in part above.
  • the set indicated by “xCollection” comprises selecting, inserting, deleting, pasting, and copying the potentially editable nodes (indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) or their subordinate nodes.
  • a repeating section 804 is shown in the design view 202 of the XML document 134 .
  • This repeating section 804 comprises data-entry fields shown at numerals 810 , 812 , and 814 . These data-entry fields represent the potentially editable nodes for the editability element.
  • the editor application 130 can determine that the three nodes matching the XPath expression “myFields/container2/repeating_string” can be edited. Thus, by following the electronic-form template 132 , the editor application 130 can correctly enable editing according to the “xCollection” syntax of the operation element.
  • the editor 130 can present the data-entry fields 810 , 812 , and 814 in an electronic form (e.g., through the user interface 128 ).
  • the editor application 130 can also enable permitted operations on these data-entry fields (and thus their associated nodes of the XML document 134 ).
  • the editor application 130 enables selection of and insertion, deletion, pasting, and copying of the editable nodes associated with the data-entry fields 810 , 812 , and 814 .
  • a designer can simply make a change, like adding a component, to a view and see the change applied to both views.
  • the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 are actively linked. This active linkage makes designing and changing the electronic-form template 132 quicker, easier, and more intuitive.
  • the design application 126 enables a designer to select and alter existing components included in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the design application 126 allows the designer to intuitively and easily alter the views of the electronic-form template 132 , such as by including editing tools familiar to designers that know word-processing techniques.
  • a designer can change a component stylistically (such as the font, color, size, and the like) and structurally (such as by changing a text box to a check box, and whether or to which other components the component governs or is subordinate).
  • a designer can make these changes also by altering how a component (such as one displayed as a data-entry field) is represented on the design view 202 .
  • a designer can click on a component on the form-design screen 112 , change the style, move it, delete it, and the like.
  • the design application 126 alters the hierarchical view to continue to correspond to the altering electronic-form template 132 and its design view 202 .
  • FIG. 8 shows the exemplary design screen 800 , which provides another example of the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 of an example of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the design application 126 (through the user interface 128 ) enables the designer to click on components displayed in the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • a text box data-entry field 802 (labeled “String 5”), is shown as an example. Once the designer selects a component, in this example the text box data-entry field 802 , the design application 126 provides the designer with multiple options to change the data-entry field.
  • the design application 126 provides options in a way comfortable to a designer familiar with common word-processing techniques and icons. If the designer clicked on the text box data-entry field 802 of FIG. 8 , the design application 126 can provide multiple pop-up menus of options for the designer.
  • FIG. 9 sets forth the exemplary design screen 900 including multiple ways in which the design application 126 provides options for a designer. These comprise a component context menu 902 and a structure submenu 904 .
  • the design application 126 enables the designer to change the electronic-form template 132 by changing a representation of a component in the form-design area 112 (such as a data-entry field or accompanying graphics and text).
  • the design application 126 enables the designer to cut the component and move it (through selection and deleting or dragging the component), and change its font, borders, shading, and other style changes (through the component context menu 902 ), as well as change its structure (through the structure submenu 904 ).
  • the designer changes the component by changing the structure of a data-entry field corresponding to the component (the text box data-entry field 802 ) into a date picker data-entry field by selecting a date picker component 906 .
  • FIG. 10 shows an example of the hierarchical view display area 108 , and how it can be used by a designer to alter the electronic-form template 132 .
  • a designer selected an integer node 1002 representing an editability element of the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the design application 126 prompts the designer, asking for information, such as through a change inquiry window 1004 .
  • the design application 126 enables the designer to make various changes to the editability element represented by the node 1002 . He can change, for instance, the data type and default value allowed for this editability element in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the design application 126 presents the designer with the current name, type, and data type of a selected editability element. The designer can then make changes by altering these current parameters of a selected editability element, such as set forth in the change inquiry window 1004 by changing the name to “myNewField” from “element” and the data type to “Text (string)” from “Whole Number (integer)” for the editability element represented by the node 1002 .
  • FIG. 10 shows an example of a pop-up window with which the design application 126 can enable a designer to alter editability elements.
  • the designer can add or delete aspects of an editability element, such as a name and repeatability of an element or establish whether or not it is allowed to be blank.
  • the design application 126 makes appropriate changes to the electronic-form template 132 and its views. If the designer deletes a component, for instance, the design application 126 may delete the syntax (e.g., the editability element) corresponding to the component from the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the syntax e.g., the editability element
  • the end product is the electronic-form template 132 .
  • One example of an electronic-form template created by the design application 126 is the purchase order example of the design view 202 of FIG. 2 .
  • This purchase order electronic-form template 132 can be used by the editor application 130 to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 with appropriate permitted operations.
  • the editor application 130 can enable this electronic-form representation to be edited by an end user, such as by allowing that user to perform an operation like keying in information into some of the data-entry fields. After entry of information, the information can be stored in the XML document 134 .
  • the information stored can conform to the electronic-form template 132 , thereby allowing easy use and/or transfer of information stored in the XML document 134 .
  • the electronic-form template 132 can be written in various languages, including schemas written to govern markup languages (such as XML). Schemas governing XML documents are commonly called XML Schemas, DTD (Document Type Definition) schemas, and XDR (XML-Data Reduced) schemas.
  • the electronic-form template 132 can govern many different documents. Because of this, the electronic-form template 132 can be used to enable thousands of different users keying information into thousands of different documents, all of which can be governed by the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the electronic-form template 132 comprises information by which an application can determine which nodes of an XML document are editable and in what manner.
  • the editor application 130 of FIG. 1 is described above as one embodiment of an application that can use the electronic-form template 132 to aid in editing XML documents.
  • the XML document 134 is assumed associated with the electronic-form template 132 . This association can be determined in various manners, such as by reading text in the XML document 134 indicating a relationship with the electronic-form template 132 .
  • FIG. 11 shows a process 1100 for editing the XML document 134 .
  • the editor application 130 uses the electronic-form template 132 to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable.
  • the electronic-form template 132 can also aid the editor application 130 in determining in what way those nodes are editable.
  • the editor application 130 determines, using the electronic-form template 132 , that a node of the XML document 134 is potentially editable.
  • the editor application 130 can do so by reading and analyzing editability elements in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • the editability element comprises an indicator with a character string of “xmlToEdit”. This string indicates that a node or nodes associated with the indicator are editable (or potentially editable).
  • This editability element also comprises an “item” attribute, which is usable to identify which nodes are editable.
  • An XPath expression identifying the editable nodes is associated with this attribute (the “value” of the attribute).
  • the editor application 130 can use the XPath expression in the editability element to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable.
  • the electronic-form template 132 comprises the following editability element:
  • the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an “item” attribute, whose “value” is an XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”. This XPath expression indicates to the editor application 130 that nodes in the XML document 134 that match this expression are editable (or potentially editable).
  • the editor application 130 presents data of the editable node.
  • the editor application 130 can present this data using an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 and/or the editable node.
  • the editor application 130 can do so with aid from the user interface 128 or otherwise.
  • FIG. 12 shows an example of an electronic-form representation 1200 of the editable node.
  • the editor application 130 presents the data of the editable node as an order data-entry field 1202 .
  • a data-entry field presenting data of an editable node can be blank, such as when no information has been entered into the data-entry field.
  • a data-entry field can also include information previously stored in the editable node, which in some cases can be edited, depending on what operations are permitted for the editable node.
  • the editor application 130 determines what operations are permitted to be performed on the editable node. This determination can be performed by the editor application 130 prior to presenting the data of the editable node. In some cases determining the operations permitted can affect how data is presented.
  • the editor application 130 determines the permitted operations based on an operation element of the electronic-form template 132 , discussed in part above.
  • the operation element and the editability element are associated, such as by the operation element being a child element to the editability element.
  • the operation element indicates operations permitted to be performed on the editable node.
  • the operation element comprises a character string of “editWith”. This character string indicates to the editor application 130 that the operation element indicates certain types of operations that are permitted. Following this character string, another character sting of “component” is included. This character string can indicate that a value associated with the “component” string that is usable to determine permitted operations.
  • the operation element comprises an operational syntax of “xCollection”. This syntax indicates the operations permitted to be performed on nodes of the XML document 134 matching the XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”.
  • the editor application 130 can determine the operations associated with this syntax in various ways.
  • the editor application 130 can use this syntax to locate executable code for this operation.
  • executable code for operations indicated by various syntaxes are included within the editor application 130 .
  • the editor application 130 enables the permitted operations.
  • the editor application 130 can do so by supplying a user interface appropriate for the permitted operations.
  • the editor application 130 can provide a word-processor-like experience in a data-entry field.
  • the order data-entry field 1202 can be used as a user interface to enter data, delete data, copy and paste data, and the like.
  • the editor application 130 by determining editable nodes and permitted operations for them, can enable certain types of editing for various editable nodes of the XML document 134 .
  • the editor application 130 receives a selection of an enabled operation. Continuing the ongoing example, the editor application 130 can receive entry of “ACME Tire Company” into the order data-entry field 1202 .
  • the editor application 130 alters data in the editable node (or the editable node itself or associated nodes) of XML document 134 by performing the selected operation.
  • the editor application 130 can receive the text “ACME Tire Company” and alter data within the order node to reflect this text.
  • the editor application 130 can add the text “ACME Tire Company” to the order node.
  • the electronic-form template 132 can permit many different types of operations. These comprise, for instance, operations mentioned above and those described below.
  • the editor application 130 can use the electronic-form template 132 to determine what operations are permitted. With this determination, the editor application 130 can enable permitted operations.
  • the editor application 130 can determine that the electronic-form template 132 , for the node(s) indicated by “workItems/workItem”, permits an operation of inserting nodes adjacent to this “workItem” node (or under the node corresponding to the container attribute: “workItems”).
  • the operation element comprises a syntax of “xCollection”, which indicates a permitted operation of inserting or deleting subnodes adjacent to the editable node indicated by “workItems/workItem”.
  • This operation is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element).
  • This context is given by a value for a “container” attribute.
  • the container attribute's value is given by a syntax “workItems”.
  • This syntax comprises a XPath expression.
  • the editor application 130 can determine, based on the syntax given, that operations are not permitted unless a node locatable with the XPath expression “workItems” is exposed.
  • the editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node (the parent of the “workItems/workItem” node) is exposed, if a section associated with it is exposed in an electronic-form rendering of the “workItems” node. If the editor application 130 is rendering the XML document 134 , the editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node is exposed by checking whether it or its user interface has exposed the node.
  • Additional information useful in performing operations can also be included in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • syntax can also be included in the operation element to indicate what data is to be inserted in the XML document by the operations.
  • This syntax comprises a “fragmentToInsert” child element to the editability element. Using this information, the editor application 130 can determine that a child element of the fragmentToInsert element contains the data to be inserted.
  • the electronic-form template 132 editability element provides syntax permitting deletion of the editable node or nodes using the syntax of “xCollection”.
  • This operation element comprises a character string of “editWith” and “component”.
  • the syntax following “component” i.e., “xOptional” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine operations permitted for the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author”.
  • this operation is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element).
  • This context is given by the value of the “container” attribute, in this case: “issue”.
  • fragmentToInsert a syntax “fragmentToInsert” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine where and what to insert.
  • the character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that an “author” attribute node having an value: “author name” is permitted to be added to the “issue” node.
  • the operation element corresponding to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xOptional”, permits addition of only one node. It also permits that node (locatable with “item/@author”) to then be deleted.
  • an attribute of the operation element indicates textual operations permitted on data of the editable node. This indication corresponds to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xField”, indicating that textual operations are permitted.
  • Various types of textual operations may also be included in the electronic-form template 132 .
  • a value of “component”, here “xField”, can be used to indicate that textual editing of data of the editable node is permitted.
  • a value of “type”, here “rich”, can be used to indicate that rich-text editing is permitted.
  • the syntax following “component” of “xField” and “rich” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine that rich-text editing of data of the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author” is permitted.
  • a type attribute given by a syntax “plain” indicates that an operation for creation and modification of plain-text-data (but not rich-text-formatted data) of the editable node is permitted.
  • FIG. 13 shows an electronic-form representation 1300 of an example of the XML document 134 .
  • the electronic form 1300 shows data-entry fields enabling plain-text operations to be performed, referenced at numerals 1302 and 1304 . It also shows enabling of other operations: a repeating table shown at numeral 1306 ; a bulleted list at 1308 ; and an optional section at 1310 . Editability elements for these enabled operations can be represented in the electronic-form template 132 with:
  • FIG. 14 shows an exemplary computer system that can be used to implement the processes described herein.
  • Computer 1442 comprises one or more processors or processing units 1444 , a system memory 1446 , and a bus 1448 that couples various system components including the system memory 1446 to processors 1444 .
  • the bus 1448 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
  • the system memory 1446 comprises read only memory (ROM) 1450 and random access memory (RAM) 1452 .
  • a basic input/output system (BIOS) 1454 containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 1442 , such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 1450 .
  • BIOS basic input/output system
  • Computer 1442 further comprises a hard disk drive 1456 for reading from and writing to a hard disk (not shown), a magnetic disk drive 1458 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk 1460 , and an optical disk drive 1462 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 1464 such as a CD ROM or other optical media.
  • the hard disk drive 1456 , magnetic disk drive 1458 , and optical disk drive 1462 are connected to the bus 1448 by an SCSI interface 1466 or some other appropriate interface.
  • the drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for computer 1442 .
  • exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk 1460 and a removable optical disk 1464 , it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.
  • RAMs random access memories
  • ROMs read only memories
  • a number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk 1456 , magnetic disk 1460 , optical disk 1464 , ROM 1450 , or RAM 1452 , including an operating system 1470 , one or more application programs 1472 (such as the design application 126 and the editor application 130 ), other program modules 1474 , and program data 1476 .
  • a user may enter commands and information into computer 1442 through input devices such as a keyboard 1478 and a pointing device 1480 .
  • Other input devices may comprise a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.
  • These and other input devices are connected to the processing unit 1444 through an interface 1482 that is coupled to the bus 1448 .
  • a monitor 1484 or other type of display device is also connected to the bus 1448 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1486 .
  • personal computers typically comprise other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as speakers and printers.
  • Computer 1442 commonly operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 1488 .
  • the remote computer 1488 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 1442 .
  • the logical connections depicted in FIG. 14 comprise a local area network (LAN) 1490 and a wide area network (WAN) 1492 .
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • computer 1442 When used in a LAN networking environment, computer 1442 is connected to the local network through a network interface or adapter 1494 . When used in a WAN networking environment, computer 1442 typically comprises a modem 1496 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 1492 , such as the Internet.
  • the modem 1496 which may be internal or external, is connected to the bus 1448 via a serial port interface 1468 .
  • program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 1442 may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
  • the data processors of computer 1442 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer.
  • Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory.
  • the system described herein comprises these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the blocks described, in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor.
  • the system described can also comprise the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
  • programs and other executable program components such as the operating system are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.

Abstract

A system and method capable of identifying that a node of an extensible markup language (XML) document is editable using an element of an electronic-form template is described. In at least some embodiments, the system and method are capable of determining operations that are permitted for the identified node using another element of the electronic-form template.

Description

    RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a Divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/781,586, having a filing date of Feb. 17, 2004, and entitled SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR EDITING XML DOCUMENTS.
  • U.S. patent application having Ser. No. 10/395,505, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,275,216, filed on Mar. 24, 2003, and entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING ELECTRONIC FORMS AND HIERARCHICAL SCHEMAS of Paoli, et al is related to this application.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This invention relates to systems and methods for editing an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) document.
  • BACKGROUND
  • XML is increasingly becoming the preferred format for transferring information. XML is a tag-based hierarchical language that is extremely rich in terms of the information that it can be used to represent. For example, XML can be used to represent information spanning the spectrum from semi-structured information (such as one would find in a word processing document) to highly structured information (such as that which is contained in a table). XML is well-suited for many types of communication including business-to-business and client-to-server communication. For more information on XML, XSLT, and XML Schema, the reader is referred to the following documents which are the work of, and available from the W3C (World Wide Web consortium): XML 1.0 second edition specification; XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0; XML Schema section 1: Structures; and XML Schema section 2: Datatypes.
  • Before information can be transferred, however, it must first be collected. Electronic forms are commonly used to aid in collecting information into an XML document. Electronic forms can be governed by a template, which can provide rules by which an XML document can be presented as an electronic form, such as with data-entry fields for entry of data.
  • To create these templates, however, a programmer often needs a significant understanding of HTML and XML Schemas. A programmer often needs to understand how data-entry fields in an electronic form governed by the template are represented in the schema, HTML file, and XML document. The programmer also may need to understand how HTML, XML, and XML Schemas are structured and how they interrelate. Thus, to build a template, a programmer often must have significant experience and skill.
  • In addition, to use the template, a programmer may need to build a program to allow a user to edit an XML document governed by this template.
  • For these reasons, creating and using templates can be difficult, time consuming, and require a programmer of significant skill.
  • SUMMARY
  • In the following description and figures, an editing application is described that is capable of identifying nodes of an XML document that are editable and operations permitted for those nodes using elements of an electronic-form template.
  • In one implementation, the editing application presents an XML document as an electronic form having data-entry fields representing nodes of the XML document. The editing application presents those nodes that are identified as editable in a parent element in another XML document governing the first XML document. The editing application enables certain operations for those editable nodes through the data-entry fields if a child element of the parent element identifies them.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system with a display screen, computer, and user-input devices. The system implements a method for designing an electronic-form template. The system also implements a method for editing XML documents using an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary component display area.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for generating electronic-form templates.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a component display area and a blank form-design area.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing a hierarchical view and a design view of an electronic-form template, and a component display area.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 6 after the electronic-form template comprises another component.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 7 after the electronic-form template comprises other components.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates the exemplary screen display of FIG. 8 showing also a component context menu and a structure submenu.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary hierarchical view display area, a change inquiry window, and an add window.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for editing an XML document using an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document having one editable node.
  • FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary screen display showing an electronic-form representation of an XML document following an electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a computer system that is capable of supporting processes for creation and use of an electronic-form template.
  • The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The following disclosure describes a user-friendly way to design electronic-form templates using components and a form-designing area of a display. Components are presented in an area of a display screen, usually graphically, such as with an arrangement of icons. Icons representing each component are a simplification so that a designer can more easily understand the purpose of and choose from a list of components. A designer can choose each component that he or she wishes to include in an electronic-form template.
  • The designer can choose a component, such as by clicking on an icon representing a component, and placing it in a form-designing area. The form-designing area is presented in an area of a display screen, usually appearing as a blank page, such as is often done when viewing a new document in a word-processing application. Components placed in a form-designing area can be manipulated by a designer to allow the designer to create an electronic-form template that provides a particular look and feel for an electronic-form representation of an XML document. Also by choosing particular components, a designer can build into the electronic-form template various types of permitted operations (e.g., editing operations).
  • With each new component added or modified, and in some cases each change made to an electronic-form design view or its hierarchical view, the electronic-form template (and its views) is altered to reflect that change. This incremental building of an electronic-form template and its views, and the fact that the views are linked so that a change to one can almost instantly be reflected in the other, allows a designer to quickly, easily, and intuitively create electronic-form templates.
  • The resulting electronic-form template reflects a designer's chosen look, feel, and editing options for nodes of XML documents that are to be governed by the electronic-form template. Thus, by following this electronic-form template, nodes of an XML document can be located within the XML document, displayed, and made editable. In one embodiment, an editor application is used to determine, based on this electronic-form template, how nodes of an XML document are to be edited.
  • For discussion purposes, the visual representation of the components, hierarchical view, electronic-form design view, and XML document are described in the context of a single computer, a set of user-input devices, and a single display screen having areas for displaying a representation of the components, the electronic-form design view, the hierarchical view, and the XML document. The display screen, computer, and user-input devices will be described first, followed by a discussion of the techniques in which these and other devices can be used.
  • System Architecture
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary implementation of various devices and applications that can be used to facilitate the creation of an electronic-form template from components and enable editing of XML documents governed by the created electronic-form template.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system 100, which comprises a screen 102, user-input devices 104, and a computer 106.
  • The user-input devices 104 can comprise any device allowing a computer to receive a designer's preferences (or edits from an end-user), such as a keyboard 114, other device(s) 116, and a mouse 118. The other input devices 116 can comprise a touch screen, a voice-activated input device, a track ball, and any other device that allows the system 100 to receive input. The computer 106 comprises a processing unit 120 and random access memory and/or read-only memory 122 including applications, such as an operating system 124, a design application 126, a user interface 128, an editor application 130, an electronic-form template 132, and an XML document 134. The computer 106 communicates with a designer and end-user through the screen 102 and the user-input devices 104.
  • The screen 102 comprises three displays or screen areas: a hierarchical view display area 108; a component display area 110; and an electronic-form-design area 112. With these areas, a designer can see a representation of and select a component from a list of components. Any part or all of the screen 102 can be used to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134. With this representation an end-user can edit or view the XML document 134.
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary design screen 200, including an example of the form-design area 112 and the hierarchical view display area 108 (entitled “Data Source”). Partially within the form-design area 112 is a design view 202 of an exemplary embodiment of the electronic-form template 132. This design view 202 provides information useful to aid a designer in constructing the electronic-form template 132. As will be shown later, an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 for editing and/or viewing by an end-user (e.g., a data-entry user) can appear similar to this design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132, though this is not necessary. In cases where the electronic-form representation contains data-entry fields and similar user interfaces, these user interfaces can reflect operations permitted by components added to the electronic-form template 132 by the designer.
  • This electronic-form template 132 shown in the design view 202 is being built from components chosen by a designer. The components chosen are used by the design application 126 to create the data-entry fields shown in the design view 202. These data-entry fields are one way in which the electronic-form template 132 can be represented to a designer or an end-user. These data-entry fields correspond to parts of the electronic-form template 132, the parts also being shown through the icons displayed in the hierarchical view display area 108. The icons displayed are a representation of part of the electronic-form template 132 and are arranged into a tree structure.
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of components from which a designer can choose, which are displayed here at the component display area 110. These various components comprise a text box 302, a rich text box 304, a drop-down list box 306, a list box 308, a date picker 310, a check box 312, an option button 314, a section 316, an optional section 318, a repeating section 320, a repeating table 322, a bulleted list 324, a numbered list 326, a plain list 328, a button 330, and hyperlink 332. Other components can be included as well. As described in further detail below, each of these components can be added to indicate an operation or operations that is permitted to be performed on a node or nodes of the XML document 134. By way of example, some of these components will be represented in an electronic form by data-entry fields enabling the component's operation. These data-entry fields can be associated with appropriate nodes of the XML document 134. Thus, when an end-user uses an electronic form's data-entry field to make an entry, for instance, the entry can be reflected in the XML document 134.
  • With the listed components and other components the system 100 enables a designer to build the electronic-form template 132. These components enable many different possible types of operations (and user interfaces), such as those shown with various data-entry fields in the design view 202 in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2. The process used to build the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
  • The above devices and applications are merely representative, and other known devices and applications may be substituted for or added to those shown in FIG. 1. One example of another known device that can be substituted for those shown in FIG. 1 is the device shown in FIG. 14. Other examples include portable, handheld, or wireless devices.
  • Techniques for Building Electronic-Form Templates
  • Overview
  • A system, such as the system 100 of FIG. 1, displays components to a designer. The designer can choose from the components to graphically and easily build the electronic-form template 132. The system 100 can also incrementally build the electronic-form template 132 with each new component the designer adds. The system 100 also allows the designer to see two views of the electronic-form template 132, here the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204. The system 100 then alters each view with each new component chosen. The designer may also change components existing in the electronic-form template 132, the change to each being incrementally reflected in the views by the system 100.
  • FIG. 4 shows a process 400 for generating the electronic-form template 132. The process 400 and the following processes are illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by the system 100. These processes may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, the processes represent a set of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 122 and executable by the processing unit 120.
  • Displaying Components and Form-Design Area
  • At block 402, the user interface 128 displays components and a form-design area. It does so to enable a designer to graphically design the electronic-form template 132.
  • FIG. 5 shows a design screen 500 created by the user interface 128, having an example of the component display area 110 and a blank example of the form-design area 112. The form-design area 112 is displayed to make it easy for a designer without typical programming skills to create the electronic-form template 132.
  • To make it easy, the user interface 128 can provide an editing experience to a designer similar to that commonly provided in word-processing systems. The user interface 128 can, for instance, work like a word-processing system by providing similar font controls and options. In FIG. 5, for example, the user interface 128 displays the form-design area 112 looking like a page from a word-processing application—here, a blank white page. It can also display commonly used icons that represent operations that a designer can choose to perform, such as the font being used (in FIG. 5, Verdana, size 10), bold/underline/italic options, and the like. These word-processing icons can be displayed in many different ways, including as shown in a word-processing icon display 502 of FIG. 5.
  • Also, as stated elsewhere herein, changes made by the designer to the form-design area 112 can be reflected in the form-design area 112 instantaneously (from the perspective of the designer), further making the design process similar to a typical word-processing experience. By so doing, the user interface 128 makes designing the electronic-form template 132 simpler and more intuitive for a person skilled in word-processing.
  • The components are displayed by the user interface 128 in the component display area 110 to make it easy for a designer without extensive knowledge of components to be able to understand what each of them can represent in the electronic-form template 132. To show what each component represents, the user interface 128 displays icons and/or text to inform the designer, such as with the icons and text set forth in the component display area 110 set forth in FIGS. 3 and 5. In FIG. 3, for example, the text box 302 comprises an icon (i.e., a symbol) and text describing what a text box component represents. This icon shows a designer that, should he choose to include a text box component in his electronic-form template 132, an operation allowing entry and editing of text for a node in the XML document 134 will be added to the electronic-form template 132. The editor application 130 can then present the node of the XML document 134 in an electronic form as a data-entry field allowing input of text. Like the icon, the text describing the text box 302 (“Text Box”) is also descriptive.
  • With the component display area 110 and the form-design area 112 displayed, the designer can begin to build the electronic-form template 132 and view what an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 can look like. He can continue to build the electronic-form template 132 by adding components, but can also alter the electronic-form template 132 by altering existing components. This process of building and altering is shown as a design sub-process 403, which includes blocks 404 to 412. The sub-process 403 includes blocks used to describe the action and interaction of the designer and the system 100. When the designer has finished with the electronic-form template 132, the design application 126 produces an electronic-form representation mirroring the operations allowed by the electronic-form template 132 (block 414). The process 403 and the block 414 will be described in greater detail below.
  • When the component display area 110 and the form-design area 112 are presented, the designer can pick a component from the list of components in the component display area 110 for insertion into the form-design area 112 (block 404). The designer can pick from components in various ways, including through the mouse 118, the other devices 116 (such as a touch screen, track ball, voice-activation, and the like), and through the keyboard 114, which are shown in FIG. 1. To grant flexibility to the designer, the system 100 enables the designer to move the component in the form-design area 112 to where she desires.
  • A designer can pick a component, for example, by dragging and dropping (from the component display area 110) a component's icon onto a form-design area 112 shown in FIG. 5. The designer can pick a component to drag and drop with various devices, such as with the mouse 118 or commands entered through the keyboard 114. In FIG. 5, the designer clicks on the icon and text for the text box 302 to select it.
  • How an icon for a component looks may not exactly indicate how it will look in an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 that follows the electronic-form template 132. Icons, for instance, are often too small to be exact. Rather, icons are designed to indicate functions or operations (e.g., editing functions) associated with nodes of the XML document 134 that choosing the component will permit.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary screen display 600 showing what the design application 126 creates after a designer selects the text box 302 in FIG. 5 (also shown in FIG. 6). In this example, the system 100 creates a text-function node 604 allowing entry of text, here represented by the text-box data-entry field 602, which looks like a gray box for entry of text and is labeled “String 1:”. The design application 126 enables the designer to continue building his electronic-form template 132 by selecting components, thereby creating certain allowed operations associated with nodes of the XML document 134. In this example, the design application 126 created part of the electronic-form template 132 that indicates a permitted function (here a text-entry function) with the text-function node 604.
  • Building an Electronic-Form Template
  • Once the system 100 receives a selection of a component and the placement for the component, the system 100 can identify which component was selected, identify the placement for that component on the form-design area 112, build the electronic-form template 132 based on the component chosen and its location, and display the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204. These tasks are set forth in blocks 406, 408, 410, and 414 of FIG. 4, which will be described below.
  • In block 406, the design application 126 identifies which component was selected. The system 100 can access and/or contain many components, either from local or remote sources. Some of these components are set forth (via icons and text) in the component display area 110 shown in FIGS. 3, 5, 6, and 7.
  • Also in the block 406, the design application 126 identifies where a component is placed in the form-design area 112. The placement of the component can alter the structure of the electronic-form template 132. How the placement of a component can alter the electronic-form template 132 will be set forth in greater detail below.
  • If, for example, a designer chooses the text box 302 from the component display area 110 of FIG. 5, and places the text box 302 in the upper left corner of the form-design area 112, the design application 126 will identify the component and this placement. With this information, the system 100 proceeds to build the electronic-form template 132, which will be described in part using FIGS. 5 and 6.
  • In block 408, the design application 126 changes the electronic-form template 132 based on a component selected. When a component is added, as has been described in part above, the design application 126 also changes the hierarchical view 204 and the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 by building in a representation of the added component. When an existing component is altered (discussed in greater detail below), the design application 126 changes the views to reflect that alteration.
  • Generally, when a component is added to the form-design area 112, one or more operations are then permitted by the electronic-form template 132. A syntax (also called a “character string”) corresponding to each of these permitted operations can be added by the design application 126 to the electronic-form template 132. An exemplary list of operations and their related, operational syntaxes are shown below:
  • Component Chosen Operation Permitted Syntax Added
    Repeating Section Insertion of Nodes xCollection
    Repeating Table Before or After
    Associated Node, and
    Removal of Nodes
    Optional Section Insert or Remove Nodes xOptional
    Plain List Text Editing of Data xTextList
    Bulleted List Within Associated
    Numbered List Node(s), Plus Merge,
    Split, and Removal of
    Subordinate Node(s)
    Rich Text Box Text Editing of Data xField
    Text Box Within Associated
    Node(s)
    Picture Insertion of Images Into xImage
    Associated Node(s)
  • An operation permitted can govern, for instance, how and what kind of information is permitted to be added into a node or nodes of the XML document 134 that is associated with that operational syntax. The node or nodes of the XML document 134 can be associated with the operational syntax. The operational syntax can be associated with a location syntax, such as an XPath expression. Both the operational syntax and the location syntax can be included within an XML element added to the electronic-form template 132. XML elements will be described in greater detail below.
  • FIG. 7 shows an exemplary screen display 700 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132. Here, the designer chose another component (the check box 312 of FIG. 6) to add to the electronic-form template 132 shown in FIG. 6.
  • In one embodiment, when the designer adds the Rich Text Box component 304 to the form-design area 112, the design application 126 adds the following XML element to the electronic-form template 132:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=“xhtml1” item=“/myFields/xhtml1” >
     <xsf:editWith type=“rich” component=“xField” />
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>

    This XML element is an example of an “editability element”, described below.
  • In response to the designer's choice, the design application 126 represents the added editability element as a Rich Text Box 702. As shown in the screen display 700, the Rich Text Box 702 is labeled “Xhtml 1”. Also in response to the designer's choice, the design application 126 altered the hierarchical view 204 to include an XHTML section 704 (labeled “xhtml1”) corresponding to the Rich Text Box 702 and the editability element.
  • This editability element comprises XML attributes and additional child elements. These elements and attributes provide information that the editor application 130 can use to determine that a node or nodes of the XML document 134 are editable. These elements and attributes also provide the editor application 130 with information indicating which operations are permitted for these editable nodes.
  • Syntax of the editability element indicates a name and/or location in the XML document 134 of a node or nodes. With this indicator, the editor application 130 can determine which node or nodes are potentially editable with operations permitted by this editability element. In one implementation, by using all of the electronic-form template 132, the editor application 130 can determine all nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable.
  • Continuing the ongoing example, the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/xhtml1” (the “value” of the attribute). This indicator can be used to determine that nodes having the name and/or location of “myFields/xhtml1” are potentially editable. In this example the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate node(s) matching this XPath expression.
  • An additional attribute (a ‘container’ attribute) can also be included, to indicate contextual conditions, if any, that should be present for the node to be deemed editable. In the ongoing example, there is no ‘container’ attribute. Thus, in this example, the node indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” is editable without contextual conditions.
  • Another child XML element, called an “operation element”, in the editability element indicates operations (e.g., editing functions) permitted to be performed on or with the node(s) indicated in the editability element. In the ongoing example, the operation element entitled “editWith” indicates that operations associated with “xField” of type “rich” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1”.
  • The operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from the syntax given in the operation element. Thus, in the ongoing example the syntax “xField” with the additional “type” attribute, with value “rich”, indicates an operation of rich-text editing, such as deleting and inserting text, changing the formatting of text, making it bold or italics, and other familiar rich-text editing operations familiar to word-processing. In this example, then, the nodes or data within the nodes indicated by “myFields/xhtml1” may be edited using these operations.
  • The operation element can indicate permitted operations in various manners. In one implementation, a syntax of the operation element includes an element specifying the XML data able to be inserted by the associated operations.
  • Thus, the electronic-form template 132 governs how information is handled and operations permitted for the XML document 134 for which it corresponds. Because the electronic-form template 132 comprises an editability element and its parts for each component chosen by the designer, the chosen component affects the syntax of the electronic-form template 132.
  • With the above syntax and the editability element, each component built into the electronic-form template 132 can govern the look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry field(s), as well as how and where information entered into these data-entry field(s) is mapped, such as to nodes of the XML document 134. The editor application 130 can, however, use less than all of the electronic-form template 132. It can, for instance, determine potentially editable nodes and operations permitted, but use a different look, display, orientation, and size of data-entry fields (or not use data-entry fields at all).
  • Once the system 100 changes the electronic-form template 132 (block 408), it proceeds to block 410 to display the electronic-form template's 132 design view 202 and hierarchical view 204, or to block 414, to complete the process and produce the electronic-form template 132. Block 410 will be discussed first below, followed later by a discussion of block 414.
  • In the block 410, the user interface 128 displays the electronic-form template's 132 views. The hierarchical view 204 can be represented in various ways, including by visually showing the hierarchical structure of the electronic-form template 132, if applicable. One example of this is the indentations of the hierarchical view 204 set forth in the hierarchical view display area 108 of FIG. 2.
  • The electronic-form template 132 can be represented in various ways. The user interface 128 can display the design view 202 to make it easy for a designer to understand the structure of the electronic-form template 132, or can show the electronic-form template 132 without additional information. The design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132 can mimic an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 potentially seen by a user, such as set forth in the form-design area 112 of FIG. 2. The design view 202 can show components built into the electronic-form template 132 with additional information showing details about the data-entry field or fields corresponding to the components to aid a designer in understanding and altering the components in the electronic-form template 132.
  • The user interface 128 can also display the hierarchical view 204 in order for the designer to assess the electronic-form template 132 after each change made by the designer. When the designer can quickly see the effect of his changes, the designer can more easily build the electronic-form template 132 to match the designer's intended results. Once the design view 202 is displayed and the hierarchical view 204 is displayed (if desired) in the hierarchical view display area 108, the designer can continue to make changes or end the process. Ending the process will be discussed as part of the block 414, described below.
  • Continuing the example above, the design application 126 will build the electronic-form template 132 based on the identity and placement of the component.
  • One of the advantages of the design application 126, and the method it employs, is that the electronic-form template 132 can be built incrementally. That is to say, with each component chosen, or in some implementations with each other action taken that will affect a view of the electronic-form template 132, the electronic-form template 132 is altered. This incrementalism allows a designer to quickly see how the electronic-form template 132 is changing with each change made by the designer. The designer does not have to work on either a form or a schema and then save the form or schema to see how the corresponding schema or form looks or performs. Instead, as the designer makes a change, it is reflected in the views of the electronic-form template 132. This makes designing an electronic-form template 132 easy and intuitive.
  • In one implementation, the design application 126 can reflect each change made by a designer to both views of the electronic-form template 132 so quickly that the designer sees it in real time, regardless of whether the change was made to the electronic-form template 132 by altering the design view 202 or the hierarchical view 204. By so doing, the designer can more easily design electronic-form templates.
  • With the new change to electronic-form template 132 shown, the design application 126 continues to enable the designer to add components to the electronic-form template 132, returning to block 404, or alter an existing component, block 412.
  • If the designer chooses to add another component, the design application 126 enables him to do so in a manner similar to picking the first component as described above. The design view 202 FIG. 2 is one view of an electronic-form template built from many components.
  • FIG. 8 shows an exemplary design screen 800 showing the continued building of the electronic-form template 132. The design screen 800 shows the views of the electronic-form template 132 from FIGS. 6 and 7, and the results of the designer continuing to choose components. Through this process of adding components to the form-design area 112, a designer can build everything from a simple electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 6, to a moderately complex electronic-form template, such as shown FIG. 8, to a large, complex electronic-form template, such as shown in FIG. 2.
  • In one embodiment, when a designer adds the repeating section component 320 (shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 6) to the form-design area 112, the design application 126 adds the following editability element to the electronic-form template 132:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=”repeating_string”
      item=”/myFields/container2/repeating_string”
      container=”/myFields /container2” >
      <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/>
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>
  • In this example, the editability element (entitled “xmlToEdit”) includes an attribute having a character string of “item”, associated with an indicator of: “myFields/container2/repeating_string” (the “value” of the attribute). This indicator gives a name/location of nodes in the XML document 134 that are potentially editable. In this example the indicator comprises an XPath expression being usable to locate (i.e., identify) the nodes.
  • This editability element also comprises a “container” attribute having a value, in this example, of: “myFields/container2”. This attribute determines a dynamic contextual condition for being able to edit the potentially editable nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”. In this implementation they are editable only if a node matching the XPath expression: “/myFields/container2” (an ancestor of “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) is shown (or rendered) as a section within an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134, and if the user of the editor application has selected a field somewhere within that section. In this example, the condition is met if the data-entry field is rendered within the section corresponding to the “myFields/container2” node's. If not, the editability element does not permit its operations for the potentially editable node(s).
  • This editability element also contains an operation element entitled “editWith”. This operation element indicates that operations associated with “xCollection” may be applied on or for the nodes indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”, if the condition is met.
  • The operation or set of operations indicated by the operation element can be determined from its syntax. Thus, in the ongoing example the syntax “xCollection” indicates a certain set of operations, described in part above. The set indicated by “xCollection” comprises selecting, inserting, deleting, pasting, and copying the potentially editable nodes (indicated by “myFields/container2/repeating_string”) or their subordinate nodes.
  • In the ongoing example, a repeating section 804 is shown in the design view 202 of the XML document 134. This repeating section 804 comprises data-entry fields shown at numerals 810, 812, and 814. These data-entry fields represent the potentially editable nodes for the editability element.
  • The editor application 130 can determine that the three nodes matching the XPath expression “myFields/container2/repeating_string” can be edited. Thus, by following the electronic-form template 132, the editor application 130 can correctly enable editing according to the “xCollection” syntax of the operation element. In one implementation, the editor 130 can present the data- entry fields 810, 812, and 814 in an electronic form (e.g., through the user interface 128). The editor application 130 can also enable permitted operations on these data-entry fields (and thus their associated nodes of the XML document 134). In this implementation, the editor application 130 enables selection of and insertion, deletion, pasting, and copying of the editable nodes associated with the data- entry fields 810, 812, and 814.
  • Returning to the process 400 of FIG. 4, a designer can simply make a change, like adding a component, to a view and see the change applied to both views. In this sense, the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 are actively linked. This active linkage makes designing and changing the electronic-form template 132 quicker, easier, and more intuitive.
  • In the block 412, the design application 126 enables a designer to select and alter existing components included in the electronic-form template 132. The design application 126 allows the designer to intuitively and easily alter the views of the electronic-form template 132, such as by including editing tools familiar to designers that know word-processing techniques. A designer can change a component stylistically (such as the font, color, size, and the like) and structurally (such as by changing a text box to a check box, and whether or to which other components the component governs or is subordinate). A designer can make these changes also by altering how a component (such as one displayed as a data-entry field) is represented on the design view 202. For example, a designer can click on a component on the form-design screen 112, change the style, move it, delete it, and the like. As the designer makes changes, the design application 126 alters the hierarchical view to continue to correspond to the altering electronic-form template 132 and its design view 202.
  • FIG. 8 shows the exemplary design screen 800, which provides another example of the design view 202 and the hierarchical view 204 of an example of the electronic-form template 132. To enable the designer to make changes to a component, the design application 126 (through the user interface 128) enables the designer to click on components displayed in the design view 202 of the electronic-form template 132. One such component, a text box data-entry field 802 (labeled “String 5”), is shown as an example. Once the designer selects a component, in this example the text box data-entry field 802, the design application 126 provides the designer with multiple options to change the data-entry field. As seen in a design screen 900 (described below), the design application 126 provides options in a way comfortable to a designer familiar with common word-processing techniques and icons. If the designer clicked on the text box data-entry field 802 of FIG. 8, the design application 126 can provide multiple pop-up menus of options for the designer.
  • FIG. 9 sets forth the exemplary design screen 900 including multiple ways in which the design application 126 provides options for a designer. These comprise a component context menu 902 and a structure submenu 904. In this example, the design application 126 enables the designer to change the electronic-form template 132 by changing a representation of a component in the form-design area 112 (such as a data-entry field or accompanying graphics and text). Also, the design application 126 enables the designer to cut the component and move it (through selection and deleting or dragging the component), and change its font, borders, shading, and other style changes (through the component context menu 902), as well as change its structure (through the structure submenu 904). In this example, the designer changes the component by changing the structure of a data-entry field corresponding to the component (the text box data-entry field 802) into a date picker data-entry field by selecting a date picker component 906.
  • FIG. 10 shows an example of the hierarchical view display area 108, and how it can be used by a designer to alter the electronic-form template 132. In this example, a designer selected an integer node 1002 representing an editability element of the electronic-form template 132. Once chosen, the design application 126 prompts the designer, asking for information, such as through a change inquiry window 1004. Using the window 1004, the design application 126 enables the designer to make various changes to the editability element represented by the node 1002. He can change, for instance, the data type and default value allowed for this editability element in the electronic-form template 132.
  • Also as part of this example, the design application 126 presents the designer with the current name, type, and data type of a selected editability element. The designer can then make changes by altering these current parameters of a selected editability element, such as set forth in the change inquiry window 1004 by changing the name to “myNewField” from “element” and the data type to “Text (string)” from “Whole Number (integer)” for the editability element represented by the node 1002.
  • FIG. 10 shows an example of a pop-up window with which the design application 126 can enable a designer to alter editability elements. With an alter window 1006, the designer can add or delete aspects of an editability element, such as a name and repeatability of an element or establish whether or not it is allowed to be blank.
  • As part of enabling the designer to makes these changes, the design application 126 makes appropriate changes to the electronic-form template 132 and its views. If the designer deletes a component, for instance, the design application 126 may delete the syntax (e.g., the editability element) corresponding to the component from the electronic-form template 132.
  • According to block 414, when finished, the end product is the electronic-form template 132. One example of an electronic-form template created by the design application 126 is the purchase order example of the design view 202 of FIG. 2. This purchase order electronic-form template 132 can be used by the editor application 130 to present an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 with appropriate permitted operations. The editor application 130 can enable this electronic-form representation to be edited by an end user, such as by allowing that user to perform an operation like keying in information into some of the data-entry fields. After entry of information, the information can be stored in the XML document 134.
  • The information stored can conform to the electronic-form template 132, thereby allowing easy use and/or transfer of information stored in the XML document 134. The electronic-form template 132 can be written in various languages, including schemas written to govern markup languages (such as XML). Schemas governing XML documents are commonly called XML Schemas, DTD (Document Type Definition) schemas, and XDR (XML-Data Reduced) schemas.
  • The electronic-form template 132 can govern many different documents. Because of this, the electronic-form template 132 can be used to enable thousands of different users keying information into thousands of different documents, all of which can be governed by the electronic-form template 132.
  • More on Editing XML Documents
  • As discussed in part above, the electronic-form template 132 comprises information by which an application can determine which nodes of an XML document are editable and in what manner. The editor application 130 of FIG. 1 is described above as one embodiment of an application that can use the electronic-form template 132 to aid in editing XML documents. Here the XML document 134 is assumed associated with the electronic-form template 132. This association can be determined in various manners, such as by reading text in the XML document 134 indicating a relationship with the electronic-form template 132.
  • FIG. 11 shows a process 1100 for editing the XML document 134. As part of this editing, the editor application 130 uses the electronic-form template 132 to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable. The electronic-form template 132 can also aid the editor application 130 in determining in what way those nodes are editable.
  • At block 1102, the editor application 130 determines, using the electronic-form template 132, that a node of the XML document 134 is potentially editable. The editor application 130 can do so by reading and analyzing editability elements in the electronic-form template 132.
  • In one embodiment of the electronic-form template 132, the editability element comprises an indicator with a character string of “xmlToEdit”. This string indicates that a node or nodes associated with the indicator are editable (or potentially editable). This editability element also comprises an “item” attribute, which is usable to identify which nodes are editable. An XPath expression identifying the editable nodes is associated with this attribute (the “value” of the attribute). Thus, the editor application 130 can use the XPath expression in the editability element to determine which nodes of the XML document 134 are editable.
  • For example, if the electronic-form template 132 comprises the following editability element:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=”Order”
      item=”/Document/Orders/Order” container=”/Document” >
      <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/>
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>

    then the “xmlToEdit” editability element includes an “item” attribute, whose “value” is an XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”. This XPath expression indicates to the editor application 130 that nodes in the XML document 134 that match this expression are editable (or potentially editable).
  • At block 1104, with the node or nodes of the XML document 134 identified, the editor application 130 presents data of the editable node. The editor application 130 can present this data using an electronic-form representation of the XML document 134 and/or the editable node. The editor application 130 can do so with aid from the user interface 128 or otherwise.
  • FIG. 12 shows an example of an electronic-form representation 1200 of the editable node. Here the editor application 130 presents the data of the editable node as an order data-entry field 1202. As shown, a data-entry field presenting data of an editable node can be blank, such as when no information has been entered into the data-entry field. A data-entry field can also include information previously stored in the editable node, which in some cases can be edited, depending on what operations are permitted for the editable node.
  • At block 1106, the editor application 130 determines what operations are permitted to be performed on the editable node. This determination can be performed by the editor application 130 prior to presenting the data of the editable node. In some cases determining the operations permitted can affect how data is presented. The editor application 130 determines the permitted operations based on an operation element of the electronic-form template 132, discussed in part above. The operation element and the editability element are associated, such as by the operation element being a child element to the editability element. The operation element indicates operations permitted to be performed on the editable node.
  • In the ongoing example,
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=”Order”
      item=”/Document/Orders/Order”
      container=”/Document” >
      <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection”/>
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>

    the operation element comprises a character string of “editWith”. This character string indicates to the editor application 130 that the operation element indicates certain types of operations that are permitted. Following this character string, another character sting of “component” is included. This character string can indicate that a value associated with the “component” string that is usable to determine permitted operations.
  • In the ongoing example, the operation element comprises an operational syntax of “xCollection”. This syntax indicates the operations permitted to be performed on nodes of the XML document 134 matching the XPath expression “/Document/Orders/Order”.
  • The editor application 130 can determine the operations associated with this syntax in various ways. The editor application 130 can use this syntax to locate executable code for this operation. In one embodiment of the electronic-form template 132, executable code for operations indicated by various syntaxes are included within the editor application 130.
  • At block 1108, the editor application 130 enables the permitted operations. The editor application 130 can do so by supplying a user interface appropriate for the permitted operations. For data alteration or addition, the editor application 130 can provide a word-processor-like experience in a data-entry field. Like shown in FIG. 12, the order data-entry field 1202 can be used as a user interface to enter data, delete data, copy and paste data, and the like. Thus, the editor application 130, by determining editable nodes and permitted operations for them, can enable certain types of editing for various editable nodes of the XML document 134.
  • At block 1110, the editor application 130 receives a selection of an enabled operation. Continuing the ongoing example, the editor application 130 can receive entry of “ACME Tire Company” into the order data-entry field 1202.
  • At block 1112, the editor application 130 alters data in the editable node (or the editable node itself or associated nodes) of XML document 134 by performing the selected operation. For the ongoing example, the editor application 130 can receive the text “ACME Tire Company” and alter data within the order node to reflect this text. Thus, the editor application 130 can add the text “ACME Tire Company” to the order node.
  • Other Permitted Operations
  • The electronic-form template 132 can permit many different types of operations. These comprise, for instance, operations mentioned above and those described below.
  • The editor application 130 can use the electronic-form template 132 to determine what operations are permitted. With this determination, the editor application 130 can enable permitted operations.
  • For example, for an editability element of:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=”workItem” item=”workItems/workItem”
       container=″workItems”>
       <xsf:editWith component=”xCollection” >
        <xsf:fragmentToInsert>
         <xsf:chooseFragment>
          <workItem description=″create visuals″></workItem>
         </xsf:chooseFragment>
        </xsf:fragmentToInsert>
       </xsf:editWith>
      </xsf:xmlToEdit>
  • The editor application 130 can determine that the electronic-form template 132, for the node(s) indicated by “workItems/workItem”, permits an operation of inserting nodes adjacent to this “workItem” node (or under the node corresponding to the container attribute: “workItems”). In this example, the operation element comprises a syntax of “xCollection”, which indicates a permitted operation of inserting or deleting subnodes adjacent to the editable node indicated by “workItems/workItem”.
  • This operation, however, is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element). This context is given by a value for a “container” attribute. Here, the container attribute's value is given by a syntax “workItems”. This syntax comprises a XPath expression. Thus, the editor application 130 can determine, based on the syntax given, that operations are not permitted unless a node locatable with the XPath expression “workItems” is exposed. The editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node (the parent of the “workItems/workItem” node) is exposed, if a section associated with it is exposed in an electronic-form rendering of the “workItems” node. If the editor application 130 is rendering the XML document 134, the editor application 130 can determine if the “workItems” node is exposed by checking whether it or its user interface has exposed the node.
  • Additional information useful in performing operations can also be included in the electronic-form template 132. For the example immediately above, syntax can also be included in the operation element to indicate what data is to be inserted in the XML document by the operations. This syntax comprises a “fragmentToInsert” child element to the editability element. Using this information, the editor application 130 can determine that a child element of the fragmentToInsert element contains the data to be inserted.
  • In this example, a child element having a character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that new XML content corresponding to the XML markup: “<workItem description=“create visuals”></workItem>” can be inserted next to the “workItem” node.
  • In a similar way, the electronic-form template 132 editability element provides syntax permitting deletion of the editable node or nodes using the syntax of “xCollection”.
  • Also by way of example, for an editability element of:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit name=″author″ item=″issue/@author ″
       container=”issue”>
     <xsf:editWith component=″xOptional″>
      <xsf:fragmentToInsert>
       <xsf:chooseFragment>
        <xsf:attributeData attribute=”author” value=”author
         name”/>
       </xsf:chooseFragment>
      </xsf:fragmentToInsert>
     </xsf:editWith>
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>

    a node or nodes located with the XPath expression of “item/@author” has a permitted operation associated with the syntax “xOptional”. This operation element comprises a character string of “editWith” and “component”. The syntax following “component” (i.e., “xOptional”) can be used by the editor application 130 to determine operations permitted for the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author”.
  • Like above, this operation, however, is conditional based on a context element (here an attribute of the editability element). This context is given by the value of the “container” attribute, in this case: “issue”.
  • For the example immediately above, a syntax “fragmentToInsert” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine where and what to insert. Thus, the character string of “chooseFragment” indicates that an “author” attribute node having an value: “author name” is permitted to be added to the “issue” node.
  • Unlike the operation element having a syntax of “xCollection”, the operation element corresponding to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xOptional”, permits addition of only one node. It also permits that node (locatable with “item/@author”) to then be deleted.
  • In another embodiment of the operation element, an attribute of the operation element indicates textual operations permitted on data of the editable node. This indication corresponds to an “editWith” element whose “component” attribute value has the value “xField”, indicating that textual operations are permitted. Various types of textual operations may also be included in the electronic-form template 132.
  • For example, for an editability element of:
  • <xsf:xmlToEdit item=″description/textItem″>
       <xsf:editWith component=”xField” type=”rich” />
    </xsf:xmlToEdit>

    a node or nodes located with the XPath expression of “description/textItem” has a permitted operation specified by “editWith” and “component”. A value of “component”, here “xField”, can be used to indicate that textual editing of data of the editable node is permitted. A value of “type”, here “rich”, can be used to indicate that rich-text editing is permitted. Thus, the syntax following “component” of “xField” and “rich” can be used by the editor application 130 to determine that rich-text editing of data of the editable node(s) indicated by the XPath expression “item/@author” is permitted.
  • In another embodiment of the “xField” operation element above, a type attribute given by a syntax “plain” indicates that an operation for creation and modification of plain-text-data (but not rich-text-formatted data) of the editable node is permitted.
  • FIG. 13, for example, shows an electronic-form representation 1300 of an example of the XML document 134. Here many different nodes are presented and operations enabled. For instance, the electronic form 1300 shows data-entry fields enabling plain-text operations to be performed, referenced at numerals 1302 and 1304. It also shows enabling of other operations: a repeating table shown at numeral 1306; a bulleted list at 1308; and an optional section at 1310. Editability elements for these enabled operations can be represented in the electronic-form template 132 with:
  •    <xsf:xmlToEdit       name=“term_115”
    item=“/po:Document/po:terms/po:term” >
        <xsf:editWith component=“xTextList”/>
       </xsf:xmlToEdit>
       <xsf:editWith caption=“notes” component=“xOptional” >
        <xsf:fragmentToInsert>
        <xsf:chooseFragment>
          <po:notes/>
        </xsf:chooseFragment>
         </xsf:fragmentToInsert>
       </xsf:editWith>
  • A Computer System
  • FIG. 14 shows an exemplary computer system that can be used to implement the processes described herein. Computer 1442 comprises one or more processors or processing units 1444, a system memory 1446, and a bus 1448 that couples various system components including the system memory 1446 to processors 1444. The bus 1448 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory 1446 comprises read only memory (ROM) 1450 and random access memory (RAM) 1452. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 1454, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 1442, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 1450.
  • Computer 1442 further comprises a hard disk drive 1456 for reading from and writing to a hard disk (not shown), a magnetic disk drive 1458 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk 1460, and an optical disk drive 1462 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 1464 such as a CD ROM or other optical media. The hard disk drive 1456, magnetic disk drive 1458, and optical disk drive 1462 are connected to the bus 1448 by an SCSI interface 1466 or some other appropriate interface. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for computer 1442. Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk 1460 and a removable optical disk 1464, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.
  • A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk 1456, magnetic disk 1460, optical disk 1464, ROM 1450, or RAM 1452, including an operating system 1470, one or more application programs 1472 (such as the design application 126 and the editor application 130), other program modules 1474, and program data 1476. A user may enter commands and information into computer 1442 through input devices such as a keyboard 1478 and a pointing device 1480. Other input devices (not shown) may comprise a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to the processing unit 1444 through an interface 1482 that is coupled to the bus 1448. A monitor 1484 or other type of display device is also connected to the bus 1448 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1486. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically comprise other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as speakers and printers.
  • Computer 1442 commonly operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 1488. The remote computer 1488 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically comprises many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 1442. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 14 comprise a local area network (LAN) 1490 and a wide area network (WAN) 1492. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet.
  • When used in a LAN networking environment, computer 1442 is connected to the local network through a network interface or adapter 1494. When used in a WAN networking environment, computer 1442 typically comprises a modem 1496 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 1492, such as the Internet. The modem 1496, which may be internal or external, is connected to the bus 1448 via a serial port interface 1468. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 1442, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
  • Generally, the data processors of computer 1442 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory. The system described herein comprises these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the blocks described, in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor. The system described can also comprise the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
  • For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components such as the operating system are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
  • CONCLUSION
  • The above-described system and method enables an end user to edit an XML document is ways permitted by an electronic-form template. Although the system and method has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the system and method defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed system and method.

Claims (22)

1. One or more computer-readable media comprising computer-executable instructions that perform the following when executed by one or more computers:
identifying a node of an extensible markup language (XML) document as editable using an editability element of an electronic-form template; and
determining operations permitted for the identified node using an operation element of the electronic-form template.
2. The media of claim 1, wherein the instructions further perform a method comprising:
enabling selection of the operations through an electronic form;
receiving selection of one of the operations; and
performing the selected operation on at least one node of the XML document.
3. The media of claim 2, wherein the one node of XML document comprises the identified node.
4. The media of claim 2, wherein the one node of XML document comprises other nodes subordinate or sibling to the identified node.
5. The media of claim 1, wherein the act of determining the operations permitted comprises determining a context in which the operations are permitted.
6. The media of claim 5, wherein the act of determining the context in which the operations are permitted comprises locating a character string of “container” in the editability element.
7. The media of claim 5, wherein the act of determining the context in which the operations are permitted comprises determining the context by locating a value associated with a character string of “container” in the editability element.
8. The media of claim 1, wherein the act of identifying comprises finding an XPath expression in the editability element and comparing the XPath expression to nodes of the XML document.
9. The media of claim 1, wherein the act of identifying comprises finding a character string of “xmlToEdit” and an XPath expression associated with the character string.
10. The media of claim 1, wherein the act of determining the operations comprises finding a character string of “editWith” and syntax associated with the character string that is usable to determine the operations.
11. The media of claim 10, wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”.
12. The media of claim 10, wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”, and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xCollection”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise insertion or deletion of a node corresponding to or sibling to the identified node.
13. The media of claim 10, wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component” and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xOptional”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise insertion or deletion of the identified node.
14. The media of claim 10, wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component” and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xTextList”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise modification, insertion or deletion of a node corresponding to or sibling to the identified node.
15. The media of claim 10, wherein the syntax comprises a second character string of “component”, and a value of the second character string comprises a third character string of “xField”, the third character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise textual editing of data of the identified node.
16. The media of claim 15, wherein the syntax further comprises a fourth character string of “rich”, the fourth character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise rich-text textual editing of data of the identified node.
17. The media of claim 15, wherein the syntax further comprises a fourth character string of “plain”, the fourth character string being usable to determine that the operations comprise plain-text textual editing of data of the identified node.
18. An apparatus comprising:
means for identifying an editable node of an extensible markup language (XML) document by analyzing an editability element of an electronic-form template; and
means for determining an operation permitted for the editable node by analyzing an operation element of the electronic-form template.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising:
means for enabling selection of the operation;
means for receiving selection of the operation; and
means for performing the operation on the editable node or other nodes subordinate or sibling to the editable node.
20. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the means for identifying the editable node comprises means for finding a character string of “xmlToEdit” and an XPath expression associated with the character string.
21. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the operation permitted comprises means for determining a context in which the operation is permitted by locating a value associated with a character string of “container” in the editability element.
22. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the operation comprises means for finding a character string of “editWith” and a syntax associated with the character string that is associated with the operation.
US12/126,532 2004-02-17 2008-05-23 Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents Abandoned US20080222514A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/126,532 US20080222514A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2008-05-23 Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/781,586 US7430711B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2004-02-17 Systems and methods for editing XML documents
US12/126,532 US20080222514A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2008-05-23 Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/781,586 Division US7430711B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2004-02-17 Systems and methods for editing XML documents

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080222514A1 true US20080222514A1 (en) 2008-09-11

Family

ID=34838768

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/781,586 Expired - Fee Related US7430711B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2004-02-17 Systems and methods for editing XML documents
US12/126,532 Abandoned US20080222514A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2008-05-23 Systems and Methods for Editing XML Documents

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/781,586 Expired - Fee Related US7430711B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2004-02-17 Systems and methods for editing XML documents

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7430711B2 (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060224948A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form
US20090313743A1 (en) * 2008-06-20 2009-12-24 Craig Jason Hofmeyer Pants with saggy pants control system
US7870478B1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2011-01-11 Adobe Systems Incorporated Repurposing subsections and/or objects
US7925621B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2011-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Installing a solution
US7937651B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing operations for network forms
US7971139B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2011-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US7979856B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-07-12 Microsoft Corporation Network-based software extensions
US8001459B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US8010515B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Query to an electronic form
US8074217B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-12-06 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for delivering software
US8117552B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US8200975B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2012-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Digital signatures for network forms
US20120260200A1 (en) * 2011-04-11 2012-10-11 Data Systems International, Inc. Multi-view form design
US8892993B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2014-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Translation file
US8918729B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2014-12-23 Microsoft Corporation Designing electronic forms
US9229917B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2016-01-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Electronic form user interfaces
US9575949B2 (en) 2011-04-11 2017-02-21 Data Systems International, Inc. Multi-view runtime interrogator
JP2017201547A (en) * 2012-10-31 2017-11-09 リミテッド ライアビリティー カンパニー “1シー” Automatic report generation method

Families Citing this family (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7958443B2 (en) 2003-02-28 2011-06-07 Dictaphone Corporation System and method for structuring speech recognized text into a pre-selected document format
US20040243545A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Dictaphone Corporation Systems and methods utilizing natural language medical records
US8751950B2 (en) 2004-08-17 2014-06-10 Ice Edge Business Solutions Ltd. Capturing a user's intent in design software
US8200487B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2012-06-12 Nuance Communications Austria Gmbh Text segmentation and label assignment with user interaction by means of topic specific language models and topic-specific label statistics
US7546542B2 (en) * 2004-03-23 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation User interface incorporating graphically based management of controls
US9098476B2 (en) * 2004-06-29 2015-08-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Method and system for mapping between structured subjects and observers
WO2009111885A1 (en) 2008-03-11 2009-09-17 Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. Automatically creating and modifying furniture layouts in design software
US8487879B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2013-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen
US20060136810A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Electronic form generator
US20060174216A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-03 Trenten Peterson Providing additional hierarchical information for an object displayed in a tree view in a hierarchical relationship with other objects
US7934151B1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2011-04-26 Adobe Systems Incorporated Specification of tables including objects with arbitrary formatting
WO2007005682A2 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 Dictaphone Corporation System and method for auto-reuse of document text
US7539343B2 (en) * 2005-08-24 2009-05-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Classifying regions defined within a digital image
US20070079282A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Pawan Nachnani Browser based designer and player
US20070083805A1 (en) * 2005-10-12 2007-04-12 General Electric Company Configurable system and method for order entry
WO2007079424A2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-12 Discovery Productions, Inc. Method for combining input data with run-time parameters into xml output using xsl/xslt
US7681135B2 (en) * 2006-08-10 2010-03-16 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba System and method for generating a composite source user interface
US7624350B2 (en) * 2006-08-10 2009-11-24 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba System and method for XML based data driven generation of a composite source user interface
US9183321B2 (en) * 2006-10-16 2015-11-10 Oracle International Corporation Managing compound XML documents in a repository
US9201854B1 (en) 2006-10-25 2015-12-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Methods and systems for creating, interacting with, and utilizing a superactive document
GB2443444A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-07 Hewlett Packard Development Co Remotely editing a template document
GB2443443A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-07 Hewlett Packard Development Co method of defining editable portions within the template document
GB2443447A (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-07 Hewlett Packard Development Co A method of constructing an output document by adding data from a variable data document to a template document
GB2443446B (en) * 2006-10-30 2011-11-30 Hewlett Packard Development Co A method of identifying an extractable portion of a source machine-readable document
US20080126988A1 (en) * 2006-11-24 2008-05-29 Jayprakash Mudaliar Application management tool
US7664776B1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2010-02-16 Adobe Systems Inc. Methods and apparatus for dynamic form definition
US9613089B2 (en) * 2007-09-04 2017-04-04 Adobe Systems Incorporated Form template refactoring
US20090249187A1 (en) * 2008-03-26 2009-10-01 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and Method for Generating a Converted Workflow Extensible Markup Language File Associated with a Workflow Application
US8271442B2 (en) * 2008-05-05 2012-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Formats for database template files shared between client and server environments
US10157172B2 (en) * 2008-08-27 2018-12-18 International Business Machines Corporation Property dependency visualization
US20100199164A1 (en) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 John William Lumley Controlling editing of a portion of a document
US8707158B2 (en) 2009-08-05 2014-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Customizing a form in a model-based system
US9189244B2 (en) * 2009-08-18 2015-11-17 Adobe Systems Incorporated Methods and systems for managing data service specifications
AU2010219430B2 (en) * 2009-09-15 2016-07-28 Avoka Technologies Pty Ltd Generation of electronic forms
EP2504783A4 (en) * 2009-11-24 2015-02-25 Ice Edge Business Solutions Inc Securely sharing design renderings over a network
US20120166928A1 (en) * 2010-12-23 2012-06-28 Sap Ag Field extensibility in service interfaces and forms message types
US9015574B2 (en) 2011-03-10 2015-04-21 Jason Porter Rickabaugh Apparatus, system and method for a vector-based form field document
CA2796664C (en) 2011-06-11 2019-02-12 Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. Automated re-use of structural components
US9519631B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-12-13 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Semantic diff and automerge
US9529916B1 (en) 2012-10-30 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Managing documents based on access context
US11308037B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2022-04-19 Google Llc Automatic collaboration
US9384285B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-07-05 Google Inc. Methods for identifying related documents
US9495341B1 (en) * 2012-12-18 2016-11-15 Google Inc. Fact correction and completion during document drafting
US20140258832A1 (en) * 2013-03-11 2014-09-11 Dartmouth Journal Services, Inc. Computer Implemented System and Method for Author Editing of XML Documents With Structured Element Protection
US9514113B1 (en) 2013-07-29 2016-12-06 Google Inc. Methods for automatic footnote generation
US9842113B1 (en) 2013-08-27 2017-12-12 Google Inc. Context-based file selection
US9529791B1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Template and content aware document and template editing
US20150347352A1 (en) * 2014-06-02 2015-12-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Form preview in a development environment
US9703763B1 (en) 2014-08-14 2017-07-11 Google Inc. Automatic document citations by utilizing copied content for candidate sources
US20180165265A1 (en) * 2016-12-08 2018-06-14 International Business Machines Corporation Indicating property inheritance in object hierarchies

Citations (116)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2006A (en) * 1841-03-16 Clamp for crimping leather
US4005579A (en) * 1975-03-31 1977-02-01 The Garrett Corporation Turbocharger control and method
US4005578A (en) * 1975-03-31 1977-02-01 The Garrett Corporation Method and apparatus for turbocharger control
US4256019A (en) * 1979-06-12 1981-03-17 The Garrett Corporation Turbocharger control actuator
US5287448A (en) * 1989-05-04 1994-02-15 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing help information to users of computers
US5388968A (en) * 1994-01-12 1995-02-14 Ingersoll-Rand Company Compressor inlet valve
US5388967A (en) * 1993-03-10 1995-02-14 Sullair Corporation Compressor start control and air inlet valve therefor
US5612719A (en) * 1992-12-03 1997-03-18 Apple Computer, Inc. Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces
US5613837A (en) * 1994-04-27 1997-03-25 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Air compressor inlet and outlet valve arrangement
US5717939A (en) * 1991-11-18 1998-02-10 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for entering and manipulating spreadsheet cell data
US5720016A (en) * 1994-03-17 1998-02-17 Fujitsu Limited Multi-window display apparatus for managing writing frame memory
US5734380A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-03-31 Adams; James S. Method for controlling the presentation of displays in a multi-window computer environment
US5870735A (en) * 1996-05-01 1999-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for generating a decision-tree classifier in parallel in a multi-processor system
US5873088A (en) * 1990-08-31 1999-02-16 Fujitsu Limited Derived data base processing system enabling one program to access a plurality of data basis
US5875815A (en) * 1997-10-20 1999-03-02 Nelson Irrigation Corporation Combination pressure regulator/drain check valve
US6012066A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-01-04 Vallon, Inc. Computerized work flow system
US6021403A (en) * 1996-07-19 2000-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent user assistance facility
US6035336A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-03-07 International Business Machines Corporation Audio ticker system and method for presenting push information including pre-recorded audio
US6178551B1 (en) * 1996-12-18 2001-01-23 Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. Method of and system for installing a computer program
US6336214B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2002-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for automatically generating browsable language grammars
US6336797B1 (en) * 2000-06-01 2002-01-08 Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. Oiless rotary scroll air compressor air inlet valve
US20020010855A1 (en) * 2000-03-03 2002-01-24 Eran Reshef System for determining web application vulnerabilities
US6343377B1 (en) * 1997-12-30 2002-01-29 Netscape Communications Corp. System and method for rendering content received via the internet and world wide web via delegation of rendering processes
US6344862B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2002-02-05 Hewlett-Packard Company User interface mechanism for manipulating context in computer management applications
US20020019941A1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2002-02-14 Shannon Chan Method and system for secure running of untrusted content
US20020019812A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-14 Board Karen Eleanor System and service for receiving, customizing, and re-broadcasting high-speed financial data to users operating wireless network-capable devices
US20020023111A1 (en) * 1996-07-29 2002-02-21 Samir Arora Draw-based editor for web pages
US20020026462A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-02-28 Shotton Charles T. Apparatus for and method of selectively retrieving information and enabling its subsequent display
US6353851B1 (en) * 1998-12-28 2002-03-05 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for sharing asymmetric information and services in simultaneously viewed documents on a communication system
US20020035617A1 (en) * 2000-08-04 2002-03-21 Mark Lynch E-business mobility platform
US20020116371A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2002-08-22 David Dodds System and method for the storage, indexing and retrieval of XML documents using relation databases
US6505344B1 (en) * 2000-01-12 2003-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Object oriented apparatus and method for allocating objects on an invocation stack
US6505200B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Application-independent data synchronization technique
US20030014406A1 (en) * 2001-06-07 2003-01-16 Urbanpixel Inc. Intelligent browser windows in a multi-browser environment
US6513154B1 (en) * 1996-10-21 2003-01-28 John R. Porterfield System and method for testing of computer programs in programming effort
US20030023674A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2003-01-30 Ibm System and method for dynamically displaying HTML form elements
US20030023953A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2003-01-30 Lucassen John M. MVC (model-view-conroller) based multi-modal authoring tool and development environment
US20030028550A1 (en) * 2001-07-30 2003-02-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for maintaining information in database tables and performing operations on data in the database tables.
US20030028762A1 (en) * 2001-07-31 2003-02-06 Kevin Trilli Entity authentication in a shared hosting computer network environment
US20030025693A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-02-06 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation System and procedure for providing a user interface display
US20030033606A1 (en) * 2001-08-07 2003-02-13 Puente David S. Streaming media publishing system and method
US20030029911A1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2003-02-13 International Business Machines Corporations System and method for converting digital content
US20030033179A1 (en) * 2001-08-09 2003-02-13 Katz Steven Bruce Method for generating customized alerts related to the procurement, sourcing, strategic sourcing and/or sale of one or more items by an enterprise
US20030033037A1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2003-02-13 Kam-Por Yuen Method and system for developing a software program using compound templates
US6523027B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2003-02-18 Accenture Llp Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture
US20030037021A1 (en) * 2001-01-17 2003-02-20 Prasad Krothappalli JavaScript in a non-JavaScript environment
US20030038846A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Fujitsu Limited Message display program and message display apparatus
US20030038788A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-02-27 Pierre Demartines Automatically scrolling handwritten input user interface for personal digital assistants and the like
US20030120978A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-06-26 Fabbrizio Giuseppe Di Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions
US20030120671A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Xmlcities, Inc. Extensible stylesheet designs in visual graphic environments
US20030149934A1 (en) * 2000-05-11 2003-08-07 Worden Robert Peel Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning
US20030208533A1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2003-11-06 Digital Evolution Method and apparatus for managing web services within a computer network system
US20040002950A1 (en) * 2002-04-15 2004-01-01 Brennan Sean F. Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system using hierarchically enumerated data set
US20040002939A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Schemaless dataflow within an XML storage solution
US20040003341A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2004-01-01 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for processing electronic forms for use with resource constrained devices
US20040006744A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations
US6678625B1 (en) * 2000-07-24 2004-01-13 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for a multipurpose configurable bus independent simulation bus functional model
US20040010753A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2004-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Converting markup language files
US6681370B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2004-01-20 Microsoft Corporation HTML/XML tree synchronization
US20040015783A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2004-01-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Methods for interactively defining transforms and for generating queries by manipulating existing query data
US20040015778A1 (en) * 2002-03-16 2004-01-22 Catherine Britton Electronic healthcare management form creation
US20040024720A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-02-05 John Fairweather System and method for managing knowledge
US20040031052A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 Liberate Technologies Information platform
US20040032611A1 (en) * 1999-05-04 2004-02-19 Daly John P. Printer drivers using filters that are operating system-independent and printer-indendent
US20040039881A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-02-26 Netdelivery Corporation Systems and methods for storing differing data formats in fixed field definitions
US20040044965A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2004-03-04 Haruhiko Toyama Structured document edit apparatus, structured document edit method, and program product
US20040194016A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-09-30 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic data migration for structured markup language schema changes
US20040205592A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2004-10-14 Xmlcities, Inc. Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs
US20040210573A1 (en) * 2003-01-30 2004-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program for generating structure pattern candidates
US6842175B1 (en) * 1999-04-22 2005-01-11 Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. Tools for interacting with virtual environments
US6850895B2 (en) * 1998-11-30 2005-02-01 Siebel Systems, Inc. Assignment manager
US20050027676A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2005-02-03 Matthias Eichstaedt Method and system for delivery alerts to a user
US20050028073A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-02-03 Henry Steven G. Method and system for automating workflows
US20050033626A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2005-02-10 Sap Ag Universal worklist service and user interface
US20050033657A1 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-10 Keepmedia, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Personalized content management and presentation systems
US20050039117A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Fuhwei Lwo Method, system, and computer program product for comparing two computer files
US20050102530A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for XSL/XML based authorization rules policy implementation
US20050108634A1 (en) * 2000-04-24 2005-05-19 Ranjit Sahota Method and system for transforming content for execution on multiple platforms
US20060004910A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2006-01-05 Microsoft Corporation Postback input handling by server-side control objects
US20060004815A1 (en) * 2004-07-01 2006-01-05 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for editing metadata, and computer product
US20060004703A1 (en) * 2004-02-23 2006-01-05 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US20060010386A1 (en) * 2002-03-22 2006-01-12 Khan Emdadur R Microbrowser using voice internet rendering
US20060005978A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2006-01-12 Zaun Richard D Knock-on sweep structure and tools therefor
US20060020883A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Web page personalization
US6993722B1 (en) * 1999-02-08 2006-01-31 Cirrus Logic, Inc. User interface system methods and computer program products for multi-function consumer entertainment appliances
US20060026500A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Qa Im-Maqami Hood System and method for data collection and processing
US7003548B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2006-02-21 Gelco Corporation Method and apparatus for developing and checking technical configurations of a product
US20060041593A1 (en) * 2004-08-17 2006-02-23 Veritas Operating Corporation System and method for communicating file system events using a publish-subscribe model
US7107282B1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2006-09-12 Oracle International Corporation Managing XPath expressions in a database system
US7143103B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2006-11-28 University College London Method and apparatus for monitoring and maintaining the consistency of distributed documents
US7159011B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2007-01-02 Maquis Techtrix, Llc System and method for managing an online message board
US20070005611A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2007-01-04 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Work flow managing system
US20070011156A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 Oracle International Corporation RSS enabled logging
US20070011665A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2007-01-11 Microsoft Corporation Content syndication platform
US7178166B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2007-02-13 Internet Security Systems, Inc. Vulnerability assessment and authentication of a computer by a local scanner
US20070074106A1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2007-03-29 Microsoft Corporation Authoring Arbitrary XML Documents Using DHTML and XSLT
US7240279B1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2007-07-03 Microsoft Corporation XML patterns language
US20080021916A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2008-01-24 Timebase Pty Limited Maintenance of a markup language document in a database
US20080027896A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2008-01-31 Oracle International Corporation Hierarchical triggers for database
US20080040635A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2008-02-14 Microsoft Corporation System and Method for Real-Time Validation of Structured Data Files
US7334187B1 (en) * 2003-08-06 2008-02-19 Microsoft Corporation Electronic form aggregation
US7334178B1 (en) * 2005-09-09 2008-02-19 Xsigo Systems Randomized self-checking test system
US7337391B2 (en) * 2002-03-12 2008-02-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for stylesheet execution interactive feedback
US7337392B2 (en) * 2003-01-27 2008-02-26 Vincent Wen-Jeng Lue Method and apparatus for adapting web contents to different display area dimensions
US20090013266A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2009-01-08 Microsoft Corporation Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser
US7490167B2 (en) * 2002-05-22 2009-02-10 Sony Corporation System and method for platform and language-independent development and delivery of page-based content
US7490109B1 (en) * 2003-03-24 2009-02-10 Microsoft Corporation System and method for offline editing of data files
US20090044103A1 (en) * 2003-06-30 2009-02-12 Microsoft Corporation Rendering an html electronic form by applying xslt to xml using a solution
US20090043798A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2009-02-12 Dean Tan Techniques for automatically developing a web site
US7496837B1 (en) * 2004-04-29 2009-02-24 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing with schema awareness
US7496632B2 (en) * 1999-06-28 2009-02-24 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for distributing a public information release authorization (PIRA) form over an intranet
US7653687B2 (en) * 1994-05-31 2010-01-26 Reisman Richard R Method for distributing content to a user station
US7669116B2 (en) * 2002-03-26 2010-02-23 Accenture Global Services, Gmbh Single access point for filing of converted electronic forms to multiple processing entities
US7877400B1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2011-01-25 Adobe Systems Incorporated Optimizations of XPaths
US8117552B2 (en) * 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US8655998B1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2014-02-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Client-side XML-based development environment for network device management applications

Family Cites Families (167)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4201978A (en) 1978-10-19 1980-05-06 NCR Canada Ltd. -- NCR Canada Ltee Document processing system
US4514800A (en) * 1981-05-22 1985-04-30 Data General Corporation Digital computer system including apparatus for resolving names representing data items and capable of executing instructions belonging to general instruction sets
US4498147A (en) * 1982-11-18 1985-02-05 International Business Machines Corporation Methodology for transforming a first editable document form prepared with a batch text processing system to a second editable document form usable by an interactive or batch text processing system
US4641274A (en) 1982-12-03 1987-02-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method for communicating changes made to text form a text processor to a remote host
US4564752A (en) 1982-12-23 1986-01-14 Ncr Canada Ltd Concurrent, image-based, reject-re-entry system and method
US4739477A (en) * 1984-08-30 1988-04-19 International Business Machines Corp. Implicit creation of a superblock data structure
US4723211A (en) 1984-08-30 1988-02-02 International Business Machines Corp. Editing of a superblock data structure
US4674040A (en) 1984-12-26 1987-06-16 International Business Machines Corporation Merging of documents
US4962475A (en) 1984-12-26 1990-10-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method for generating a document utilizing a plurality of windows associated with different data objects
US4815029A (en) * 1985-09-23 1989-03-21 International Business Machines Corp. In-line dynamic editor for mixed object documents
US5182709A (en) 1986-03-31 1993-01-26 Wang Laboratories, Inc. System for parsing multidimensional and multidirectional text into encoded units and storing each encoded unit as a separate data structure
US5249275A (en) 1986-04-21 1993-09-28 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus and method enabling a compiled program to exactly recreate its source code
US4847749A (en) 1986-06-13 1989-07-11 International Business Machines Corporation Job interrupt at predetermined boundary for enhanced recovery
US5072412A (en) 1987-03-25 1991-12-10 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
US5497489A (en) 1987-05-05 1996-03-05 Menne; David M. Data storage and retrieval systems having labelling for data
US5226161A (en) 1987-08-21 1993-07-06 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Integration of data between typed data structures by mutual direct invocation between data managers corresponding to data types
US5369778A (en) 1987-08-21 1994-11-29 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Data processor that customizes program behavior by using a resource retrieval capability
US5206951A (en) * 1987-08-21 1993-04-27 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Integration of data between typed objects by mutual, direct invocation between object managers corresponding to object types
US5179703A (en) 1987-11-17 1993-01-12 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamically adaptive environment for computer programs
JPH01155484A (en) 1987-12-11 1989-06-19 Toshiba Corp Character reader
US4933880A (en) 1988-06-15 1990-06-12 International Business Machines Corp. Method for dynamically processing non-text components in compound documents
CA1323448C (en) 1989-02-24 1993-10-19 Terrence C. Miller Method and apparatus for translucent file system
US5339423A (en) 1989-06-16 1994-08-16 International Business Machines Corporation System for accessing objects external to an application using tables containing path definitions
US5297283A (en) * 1989-06-29 1994-03-22 Digital Equipment Corporation Object transferring system and method in an object based computer operating system
US5551035A (en) 1989-06-30 1996-08-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for inter-object communication in an object-oriented program controlled system
EP0407935B1 (en) 1989-07-10 1999-10-06 Hitachi, Ltd. Document data processing apparatus using image data
DE68929162T2 (en) * 1989-07-21 2000-11-16 Hewlett Packard Co Distributed object-based systems
US6044205A (en) * 1996-02-29 2000-03-28 Intermind Corporation Communications system for transferring information between memories according to processes transferred with the information
WO1991008534A1 (en) * 1989-11-29 1991-06-13 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for dynamically linking definable programme elements of an interactive data-processing system
AU631276B2 (en) 1989-12-22 1992-11-19 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Name resolution in a directory database
JP2758952B2 (en) 1989-12-28 1998-05-28 富士通株式会社 Display Method for Japanese Document Reading and Translation System at Correction
US5218672A (en) 1990-01-19 1993-06-08 Sony Corporation Of America Offline editing system with user interface for controlling edit list generation
AU628753B2 (en) 1990-08-14 1992-09-17 Digital Equipment Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing server functions in a distributed heterogeneous environment
AU639802B2 (en) 1990-08-14 1993-08-05 Oracle International Corporation Methods and apparatus for providing dynamic invocation of applications in a distributed heterogeneous environment
EP0548240A1 (en) 1990-09-10 1993-06-30 Lotus Development Corporation Apparatus and method for reformattable spreadsheet
US5237680A (en) 1990-09-27 1993-08-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method for incremental rename propagation between hierarchical file name spaces
CA2054026A1 (en) * 1990-10-31 1992-05-01 William Monroe Turpin Goal oriented electronic form system
US5204947A (en) * 1990-10-31 1993-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Application independent (open) hypermedia enablement services
US5297249A (en) * 1990-10-31 1994-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Hypermedia link marker abstract and search services
US5379419A (en) 1990-12-07 1995-01-03 Digital Equipment Corporation Methods and apparatus for accesssing non-relational data files using relational queries
JPH05303531A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-11-16 Fields Software Group Inc Electronic system and method for processing format
US5191645A (en) * 1991-02-28 1993-03-02 Sony Corporation Of America Digital signal processing system employing icon displays
US5187786A (en) * 1991-04-05 1993-02-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method for apparatus for implementing a class hierarchy of objects in a hierarchical file system
JP2811990B2 (en) 1991-04-19 1998-10-15 三菱電機株式会社 Program processing device and program processing method
US5517655A (en) 1991-04-26 1996-05-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for monitoring transactions in an object-oriented environment
US5274803A (en) 1991-04-26 1993-12-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for aligning a restored parent environment to its child environments with minimal data loss
EP0528617B1 (en) * 1991-08-19 1999-12-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for change control in multiple development environments.
US5566330A (en) 1991-08-20 1996-10-15 Powersoft Corporation Method for forming a reusable and modifiable database interface object
US5377323A (en) 1991-09-13 1994-12-27 Sun Microsytems, Inc. Apparatus and method for a federated naming system which can resolve a composite name composed of names from any number of disparate naming systems
JPH05181769A (en) 1991-12-28 1993-07-23 Nec Corp Document data managing system
US5371675A (en) 1992-06-03 1994-12-06 Lotus Development Corporation Spreadsheet program which implements alternative range references
ATE185633T1 (en) 1992-07-06 1999-10-15 Microsoft Corp METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ORGANIZING THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF A FILE
EP0578207B1 (en) * 1992-07-06 1999-12-01 Microsoft Corporation Method for naming and binding objects
US5434975A (en) 1992-09-24 1995-07-18 At&T Corp. System for interconnecting a synchronous path having semaphores and an asynchronous path having message queuing for interprocess communications
US5438659A (en) 1992-10-08 1995-08-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Object-action user interface management system
US5748807A (en) 1992-10-09 1998-05-05 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. Method and means for enhancing optical character recognition of printed documents
US5412772A (en) 1992-10-13 1995-05-02 Novell, Inc. System for permitting a view of an object or a user interface to be exchanged between operating system environments
US5396623A (en) 1992-10-30 1995-03-07 Bmc Software Inc. Method for editing the contents of a DB2 table using an editproc manager
US5600789A (en) * 1992-11-19 1997-02-04 Segue Software, Inc. Automated GUI interface testing
DE69318571T2 (en) 1992-12-01 1998-09-17 Microsoft Corp METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IN-LOCAL INTERACTION WITH EMBEDDED OBJECTS
US5550976A (en) 1992-12-08 1996-08-27 Sun Hydraulics Corporation Decentralized distributed asynchronous object oriented system and method for electronic data management, storage, and communication
GB9226137D0 (en) 1992-12-15 1993-02-10 Ibm Data entry system
US5535389A (en) 1993-01-26 1996-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Business process objects with associated attributes such as version identifier
US5446842A (en) 1993-02-26 1995-08-29 Taligent, Inc. Object-oriented collaboration system
JPH06301555A (en) 1993-02-26 1994-10-28 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> System for plural symbiotic operating systems on micro kernel and for personality use
US5608720A (en) * 1993-03-09 1997-03-04 Hubbell Incorporated Control system and operations system interface for a network element in an access system
US5369766A (en) 1993-03-25 1994-11-29 Taligent, Inc. Object-oriented loader system with support for different load formats
US5459865A (en) 1993-04-05 1995-10-17 Taligent Inc. Runtime loader
US5408665A (en) * 1993-04-30 1995-04-18 Borland International, Inc. System and methods for linking compiled code with extended dictionary support
AU6826694A (en) 1993-05-10 1994-12-12 Apple Computer, Inc. System for automatically determining the status of contents added to a document
CA2122182A1 (en) 1993-05-20 1994-11-21 Rene Leblanc Method for rapid prototyping of programming problems
US5649099A (en) 1993-06-04 1997-07-15 Xerox Corporation Method for delegating access rights through executable access control program without delegating access rights not in a specification to any intermediary nor comprising server security
US5577252A (en) 1993-07-28 1996-11-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for implementing secure name servers in an object-oriented system
US5555325A (en) 1993-10-22 1996-09-10 Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, Inc. Data capture variable priority method and system for managing varying processing capacities
US5806079A (en) 1993-11-19 1998-09-08 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects
JP2710547B2 (en) 1994-02-15 1998-02-10 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Graphical user interface
US5704029A (en) 1994-05-23 1997-12-30 Wright Strategies, Inc. System and method for completing an electronic form
US5504898A (en) * 1994-06-20 1996-04-02 Candle Distributed Solutions, Inc. Threaded environment for AS/400
US5630126A (en) 1994-12-13 1997-05-13 International Business Machines Corp. Systems and methods for integrating computations into compound documents
US5625783A (en) 1994-12-13 1997-04-29 Microsoft Corporation Automated system and method for dynamic menu construction in a graphical user interface
US5706501A (en) * 1995-02-23 1998-01-06 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for managing resources in a network combining operations with name resolution functions
US5862379A (en) * 1995-03-07 1999-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Visual programming tool for developing software applications
US5758184A (en) 1995-04-24 1998-05-26 Microsoft Corporation System for performing asynchronous file operations requested by runnable threads by processing completion messages with different queue thread and checking for completion by runnable threads
US5634121A (en) 1995-05-30 1997-05-27 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for identifying and linking domain information using a parsing process to identify keywords and phrases
US5689667A (en) 1995-06-06 1997-11-18 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Methods and system of controlling menus with radial and linear portions
US5778402A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-07-07 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for auto-formatting a document using an event-based rule engine to format a document as the user types
US5689565A (en) * 1995-06-29 1997-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Cryptography system and method for providing cryptographic services for a computer application
US5745683A (en) * 1995-07-05 1998-04-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for allowing disparate naming service providers to dynamically join a naming federation
US6016520A (en) * 1995-07-14 2000-01-18 Microsoft Corporation Method of viewing at a client viewing station a multiple media title stored at a server and containing a plurality of topics utilizing anticipatory caching
US5644738A (en) 1995-09-13 1997-07-01 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method using context identifiers for menu customization in a window
US5572643A (en) 1995-10-19 1996-11-05 Judson; David H. Web browser with dynamic display of information objects during linking
US5758358A (en) 1996-01-29 1998-05-26 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for reconciling sections of documents
US5659729A (en) 1996-02-01 1997-08-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for implementing hypertext scroll attributes
US5761683A (en) 1996-02-13 1998-06-02 Microtouch Systems, Inc. Techniques for changing the behavior of a link in a hypertext document
US5784555A (en) 1996-04-18 1998-07-21 Microsoft Corporation Automation and dial-time checking of system configuration for internet
US5802304A (en) 1996-04-18 1998-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Automatic dialer responsive to network programming interface access
US5778372A (en) 1996-04-18 1998-07-07 Microsoft Corporation Remote retrieval and display management of electronic document with incorporated images
US6026416A (en) * 1996-05-30 2000-02-15 Microsoft Corp. System and method for storing, viewing, editing, and processing ordered sections having different file formats
US5790796A (en) 1996-06-14 1998-08-04 Symantec Corporation Polymorphic package files to update software components
US6026379A (en) * 1996-06-17 2000-02-15 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for managing transactions in a high availability system
US6035297A (en) * 1996-12-06 2000-03-07 International Business Machines Machine Data management system for concurrent engineering
US6583797B1 (en) * 1997-01-21 2003-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Menu management mechanism that displays menu items based on multiple heuristic factors
US20050055627A1 (en) * 1997-03-07 2005-03-10 Signaturemail.Com, Llc System and method for personalizing electronic mail messages
WO1998059283A2 (en) * 1997-06-25 1998-12-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Improved home network, browser based, command and control
US6366912B1 (en) * 1998-04-06 2002-04-02 Microsoft Corporation Network security zones
US6345361B1 (en) * 1998-04-06 2002-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Directional set operations for permission based security in a computer system
US6182095B1 (en) * 1998-04-30 2001-01-30 General Electric Capital Corporation Document generator
US6226618B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-05-01 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic content delivery system
US6691230B1 (en) * 1998-10-15 2004-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for extending Java applets sand box with public client storage
US6910179B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2005-06-21 Clarita Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic form filling
US6369840B1 (en) * 1999-03-10 2002-04-09 America Online, Inc. Multi-layered online calendaring and purchasing
US6338082B1 (en) * 1999-03-22 2002-01-08 Eric Schneider Method, product, and apparatus for requesting a network resource
US7000179B2 (en) * 1999-03-27 2006-02-14 Movaris, Inc. Method and apparatus for programmatic learned routing in an electronic form system
US6704906B1 (en) * 1999-03-27 2004-03-09 Movaris, Inc. Self-directed routable electronic form system and method
US6711679B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2004-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Public key infrastructure delegation
US6701434B1 (en) * 1999-05-07 2004-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation Efficient hybrid public key signature scheme
US6546546B1 (en) * 1999-05-19 2003-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Integrating operating systems and run-time systems
US7249328B1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2007-07-24 E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. Tree view for reusable data markup language
AUPQ291299A0 (en) * 1999-09-17 1999-10-07 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd A self mapping surface and related applications
US6701486B1 (en) * 1999-07-29 2004-03-02 Grischa Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer program product for automatic page suppression in forms
US6697944B1 (en) * 1999-10-01 2004-02-24 Microsoft Corporation Digital content distribution, transmission and protection system and method, and portable device for use therewith
US7010580B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2006-03-07 Agile Software Corp. Method and apparatus for exchanging data in a platform independent manner
US7519905B2 (en) * 1999-10-12 2009-04-14 Webmd Corp. Automatic formatting and validating of text for a markup language graphical user interface
US6366907B1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2002-04-02 Napster, Inc. Real-time search engine
US20020032706A1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2002-03-14 Jesse Perla Method and system for building internet-based applications
US20020010743A1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2002-01-24 Ryan Mark H. Method and system for distributing and collecting spreadsheet information
US20020032590A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2002-03-14 International Business Machines Corporation E-market architecture for supporting multiple roles and reconfigurable business porcesses
WO2001095088A1 (en) * 2000-06-05 2001-12-13 Altoweb Systems, Inc. Converting, and presenting the source document in a target format
US7712024B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation Application program interfaces for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings
US6941510B1 (en) * 2000-06-06 2005-09-06 Groove Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient management of XML documents
US6948135B1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2005-09-20 Microsoft Corporation Method and systems of providing information to computer users
US6853997B2 (en) * 2000-06-29 2005-02-08 Infoglide Corporation System and method for sharing, mapping, transforming data between relational and hierarchical databases
US20020032692A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-03-14 Atsuhito Suzuki Workflow management method and workflow management system of controlling workflow process
US7020869B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2006-03-28 Corticon Technologies, Inc. Business rules user interface for development of adaptable enterprise applications
US7716591B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2010-05-11 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for dynamically generating a web page
US20030048301A1 (en) * 2001-03-23 2003-03-13 Menninger Anthony Frank System, method and computer program product for editing supplier site information in a supply chain management framework
US20030018668A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced transcoding of structured documents through use of annotation techniques
US20030023641A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-01-30 Gorman William Phillip Web page authoring tool
US20030061567A1 (en) * 2001-09-05 2003-03-27 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for protecting entries in a form using access rights information
US7120699B2 (en) * 2001-09-20 2006-10-10 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Document controlled workflow systems and methods
US20040039990A1 (en) * 2002-03-30 2004-02-26 Xorbix Technologies, Inc. Automated form and data analysis tool
WO2003096218A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2003-11-20 The Code Corporation Systems and methods for facilitating automatic completion of an electronic form
US20040003353A1 (en) * 2002-05-14 2004-01-01 Joey Rivera Workflow integration system for automatic real time data management
US7032170B2 (en) * 2002-06-03 2006-04-18 General Electric Company Creating data structures from a form file and creating a web page in conjunction with corresponding data structures
AU2003269951A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-03-19 4Gl School Solutions, Inc. Method and system for compliance forms and compliance forms user interface
US8381091B2 (en) * 2002-09-16 2013-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Real-time method, system and program product for collecting web form data
US20040061706A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Cronin Thomas M. Presentation of data to be displayed in a wireless network
US6993714B2 (en) * 2002-10-03 2006-01-31 Microsoft Corporation Grouping and nesting hierarchical namespaces
US7002560B2 (en) * 2002-10-04 2006-02-21 Human Interface Technologies Inc. Method of combining data entry of handwritten symbols with displayed character data
AU2002952106A0 (en) * 2002-10-15 2002-10-31 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Methods and systems (npw008)
US7200806B2 (en) * 2002-10-25 2007-04-03 Ubs Ag System and method for generating pre-populated forms
US7254581B2 (en) * 2002-11-13 2007-08-07 Jerry Johnson System and method for creation and maintenance of a rich content or content-centric electronic catalog
US7024417B1 (en) * 2002-11-14 2006-04-04 Hyperion Solutions Corporation Data mining framework using a signature associated with an algorithm
US20040163041A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2004-08-19 Paterra, Inc. Relational database structures for structured documents
US7168035B1 (en) * 2003-06-11 2007-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Building a view on markup language data through a set of components
US20040268229A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Markup language editing with an electronic form
CA2443454A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-03-11 Teamplate Inc. Data binding method in workflow system
US7636919B2 (en) * 2003-09-16 2009-12-22 International Business Machines Corporation User-centric policy creation and enforcement to manage visually notified state changes of disparate applications
US20050065936A1 (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-03-24 Thomas Goering System and method for reusing form elements in a form building application
US7730410B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2010-06-01 Sap Ag System and method for customizing form elements in a form building application
US20050071752A1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2005-03-31 Marlatt Jane E. Forms management system
US20050102612A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Web-enabled XML editor
US8839090B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2014-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation System and method to capture and manage input values for automatic form fill
US20060069605A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Workflow association in a collaborative application
US9298513B2 (en) * 2004-10-07 2016-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and structure for autonomic application differentiation/specialization
US20070036433A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Recognizing data conforming to a rule
US20070061467A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Sessions and session states

Patent Citations (119)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2006A (en) * 1841-03-16 Clamp for crimping leather
US4005579A (en) * 1975-03-31 1977-02-01 The Garrett Corporation Turbocharger control and method
US4005578A (en) * 1975-03-31 1977-02-01 The Garrett Corporation Method and apparatus for turbocharger control
US4256019A (en) * 1979-06-12 1981-03-17 The Garrett Corporation Turbocharger control actuator
US5287448A (en) * 1989-05-04 1994-02-15 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing help information to users of computers
US5873088A (en) * 1990-08-31 1999-02-16 Fujitsu Limited Derived data base processing system enabling one program to access a plurality of data basis
US5717939A (en) * 1991-11-18 1998-02-10 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for entering and manipulating spreadsheet cell data
US5612719A (en) * 1992-12-03 1997-03-18 Apple Computer, Inc. Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces
US5388967A (en) * 1993-03-10 1995-02-14 Sullair Corporation Compressor start control and air inlet valve therefor
US5388968A (en) * 1994-01-12 1995-02-14 Ingersoll-Rand Company Compressor inlet valve
US5720016A (en) * 1994-03-17 1998-02-17 Fujitsu Limited Multi-window display apparatus for managing writing frame memory
US5613837A (en) * 1994-04-27 1997-03-25 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Air compressor inlet and outlet valve arrangement
US7653687B2 (en) * 1994-05-31 2010-01-26 Reisman Richard R Method for distributing content to a user station
US5870735A (en) * 1996-05-01 1999-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for generating a decision-tree classifier in parallel in a multi-processor system
US6021403A (en) * 1996-07-19 2000-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent user assistance facility
US20020023111A1 (en) * 1996-07-29 2002-02-21 Samir Arora Draw-based editor for web pages
US5734380A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-03-31 Adams; James S. Method for controlling the presentation of displays in a multi-window computer environment
US6513154B1 (en) * 1996-10-21 2003-01-28 John R. Porterfield System and method for testing of computer programs in programming effort
US6178551B1 (en) * 1996-12-18 2001-01-23 Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. Method of and system for installing a computer program
US6012066A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-01-04 Vallon, Inc. Computerized work flow system
US6035336A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-03-07 International Business Machines Corporation Audio ticker system and method for presenting push information including pre-recorded audio
US5875815A (en) * 1997-10-20 1999-03-02 Nelson Irrigation Corporation Combination pressure regulator/drain check valve
US6343377B1 (en) * 1997-12-30 2002-01-29 Netscape Communications Corp. System and method for rendering content received via the internet and world wide web via delegation of rendering processes
US6344862B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2002-02-05 Hewlett-Packard Company User interface mechanism for manipulating context in computer management applications
US20020019941A1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2002-02-14 Shannon Chan Method and system for secure running of untrusted content
US6336214B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2002-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for automatically generating browsable language grammars
US6850895B2 (en) * 1998-11-30 2005-02-01 Siebel Systems, Inc. Assignment manager
US6353851B1 (en) * 1998-12-28 2002-03-05 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for sharing asymmetric information and services in simultaneously viewed documents on a communication system
US6993722B1 (en) * 1999-02-08 2006-01-31 Cirrus Logic, Inc. User interface system methods and computer program products for multi-function consumer entertainment appliances
US7003548B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2006-02-21 Gelco Corporation Method and apparatus for developing and checking technical configurations of a product
US6842175B1 (en) * 1999-04-22 2005-01-11 Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. Tools for interacting with virtual environments
US20040032611A1 (en) * 1999-05-04 2004-02-19 Daly John P. Printer drivers using filters that are operating system-independent and printer-indendent
US7159011B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2007-01-02 Maquis Techtrix, Llc System and method for managing an online message board
US6681370B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2004-01-20 Microsoft Corporation HTML/XML tree synchronization
US7143103B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2006-11-28 University College London Method and apparatus for monitoring and maintaining the consistency of distributed documents
US7496632B2 (en) * 1999-06-28 2009-02-24 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for distributing a public information release authorization (PIRA) form over an intranet
US6523027B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2003-02-18 Accenture Llp Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture
US20030033037A1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2003-02-13 Kam-Por Yuen Method and system for developing a software program using compound templates
US20020116371A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2002-08-22 David Dodds System and method for the storage, indexing and retrieval of XML documents using relation databases
US6505344B1 (en) * 2000-01-12 2003-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Object oriented apparatus and method for allocating objects on an invocation stack
US20020010855A1 (en) * 2000-03-03 2002-01-24 Eran Reshef System for determining web application vulnerabilities
US20050108634A1 (en) * 2000-04-24 2005-05-19 Ranjit Sahota Method and system for transforming content for execution on multiple platforms
US20030149934A1 (en) * 2000-05-11 2003-08-07 Worden Robert Peel Computer program connecting the structure of a xml document to its underlying meaning
US20060004910A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2006-01-05 Microsoft Corporation Postback input handling by server-side control objects
US6336797B1 (en) * 2000-06-01 2002-01-08 Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. Oiless rotary scroll air compressor air inlet valve
US20020019812A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-14 Board Karen Eleanor System and service for receiving, customizing, and re-broadcasting high-speed financial data to users operating wireless network-capable devices
US20070074106A1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2007-03-29 Microsoft Corporation Authoring Arbitrary XML Documents Using DHTML and XSLT
US6505200B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation Application-independent data synchronization technique
US20020026462A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-02-28 Shotton Charles T. Apparatus for and method of selectively retrieving information and enabling its subsequent display
US6678625B1 (en) * 2000-07-24 2004-01-13 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for a multipurpose configurable bus independent simulation bus functional model
US20020035617A1 (en) * 2000-08-04 2002-03-21 Mark Lynch E-business mobility platform
US20090043798A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2009-02-12 Dean Tan Techniques for automatically developing a web site
US7178166B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2007-02-13 Internet Security Systems, Inc. Vulnerability assessment and authentication of a computer by a local scanner
US20030023674A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2003-01-30 Ibm System and method for dynamically displaying HTML form elements
US20030023953A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2003-01-30 Lucassen John M. MVC (model-view-conroller) based multi-modal authoring tool and development environment
US20030037021A1 (en) * 2001-01-17 2003-02-20 Prasad Krothappalli JavaScript in a non-JavaScript environment
US20030014406A1 (en) * 2001-06-07 2003-01-16 Urbanpixel Inc. Intelligent browser windows in a multi-browser environment
US20030025693A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-02-06 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation System and procedure for providing a user interface display
US20030120978A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-06-26 Fabbrizio Giuseppe Di Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions
US20030029911A1 (en) * 2001-07-26 2003-02-13 International Business Machines Corporations System and method for converting digital content
US20030028550A1 (en) * 2001-07-30 2003-02-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for maintaining information in database tables and performing operations on data in the database tables.
US20030028762A1 (en) * 2001-07-31 2003-02-06 Kevin Trilli Entity authentication in a shared hosting computer network environment
US20030033606A1 (en) * 2001-08-07 2003-02-13 Puente David S. Streaming media publishing system and method
US20030033179A1 (en) * 2001-08-09 2003-02-13 Katz Steven Bruce Method for generating customized alerts related to the procurement, sourcing, strategic sourcing and/or sale of one or more items by an enterprise
US20030038788A1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-02-27 Pierre Demartines Automatically scrolling handwritten input user interface for personal digital assistants and the like
US20040205592A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2004-10-14 Xmlcities, Inc. Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs
US20030038846A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Fujitsu Limited Message display program and message display apparatus
US20060005978A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2006-01-12 Zaun Richard D Knock-on sweep structure and tools therefor
US20080021916A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2008-01-24 Timebase Pty Limited Maintenance of a markup language document in a database
US20030120671A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Xmlcities, Inc. Extensible stylesheet designs in visual graphic environments
US20040024720A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-02-05 John Fairweather System and method for managing knowledge
US7337391B2 (en) * 2002-03-12 2008-02-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for stylesheet execution interactive feedback
US20040015778A1 (en) * 2002-03-16 2004-01-22 Catherine Britton Electronic healthcare management form creation
US20060010386A1 (en) * 2002-03-22 2006-01-12 Khan Emdadur R Microbrowser using voice internet rendering
US7669116B2 (en) * 2002-03-26 2010-02-23 Accenture Global Services, Gmbh Single access point for filing of converted electronic forms to multiple processing entities
US20040002950A1 (en) * 2002-04-15 2004-01-01 Brennan Sean F. Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system using hierarchically enumerated data set
US20030208533A1 (en) * 2002-04-25 2003-11-06 Digital Evolution Method and apparatus for managing web services within a computer network system
US20040044965A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2004-03-04 Haruhiko Toyama Structured document edit apparatus, structured document edit method, and program product
US7107282B1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2006-09-12 Oracle International Corporation Managing XPath expressions in a database system
US7490167B2 (en) * 2002-05-22 2009-02-10 Sony Corporation System and method for platform and language-independent development and delivery of page-based content
US7240279B1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2007-07-03 Microsoft Corporation XML patterns language
US20040003341A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2004-01-01 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for processing electronic forms for use with resource constrained devices
US20040015783A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2004-01-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Methods for interactively defining transforms and for generating queries by manipulating existing query data
US20040006744A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations
US20040002939A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Schemaless dataflow within an XML storage solution
US20040010753A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2004-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Converting markup language files
US20040031052A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 Liberate Technologies Information platform
US20040039881A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-02-26 Netdelivery Corporation Systems and methods for storing differing data formats in fixed field definitions
US7337392B2 (en) * 2003-01-27 2008-02-26 Vincent Wen-Jeng Lue Method and apparatus for adapting web contents to different display area dimensions
US20040210573A1 (en) * 2003-01-30 2004-10-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program for generating structure pattern candidates
US8117552B2 (en) * 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US7490109B1 (en) * 2003-03-24 2009-02-10 Microsoft Corporation System and method for offline editing of data files
US20080040635A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2008-02-14 Microsoft Corporation System and Method for Real-Time Validation of Structured Data Files
US20040194016A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2004-09-30 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic data migration for structured markup language schema changes
US7865477B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2011-01-04 Microsoft Corporation System and method for real-time validation of structured data files
US20080027896A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2008-01-31 Oracle International Corporation Hierarchical triggers for database
US20050027676A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2005-02-03 Matthias Eichstaedt Method and system for delivery alerts to a user
US20050033626A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2005-02-10 Sap Ag Universal worklist service and user interface
US20090044103A1 (en) * 2003-06-30 2009-02-12 Microsoft Corporation Rendering an html electronic form by applying xslt to xml using a solution
US20050033657A1 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-10 Keepmedia, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Personalized content management and presentation systems
US20050028073A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-02-03 Henry Steven G. Method and system for automating workflows
US7334187B1 (en) * 2003-08-06 2008-02-19 Microsoft Corporation Electronic form aggregation
US20080052287A1 (en) * 2003-08-06 2008-02-28 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, Association, or Correspondence of Electronic Forms
US20050039117A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Fuhwei Lwo Method, system, and computer program product for comparing two computer files
US20050102530A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for XSL/XML based authorization rules policy implementation
US7877400B1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2011-01-25 Adobe Systems Incorporated Optimizations of XPaths
US8655998B1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2014-02-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Client-side XML-based development environment for network device management applications
US20060004703A1 (en) * 2004-02-23 2006-01-05 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US20070005611A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2007-01-04 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Work flow managing system
US7496837B1 (en) * 2004-04-29 2009-02-24 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing with schema awareness
US20060020883A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Web page personalization
US20060004815A1 (en) * 2004-07-01 2006-01-05 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for editing metadata, and computer product
US20060026500A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Qa Im-Maqami Hood System and method for data collection and processing
US20060041593A1 (en) * 2004-08-17 2006-02-23 Veritas Operating Corporation System and method for communicating file system events using a publish-subscribe model
US20090019063A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2009-01-15 Microsoft Corporation Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser
US20090013266A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2009-01-08 Microsoft Corporation Finding and Consuming Web Subscriptions in a Web Browser
US20070011665A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2007-01-11 Microsoft Corporation Content syndication platform
US20070011156A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 Oracle International Corporation RSS enabled logging
US7334178B1 (en) * 2005-09-09 2008-02-19 Xsigo Systems Randomized self-checking test system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0, by W3C Working Draft 12 November 2003, 72 pages. *

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7979856B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-07-12 Microsoft Corporation Network-based software extensions
US8074217B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-12-06 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for delivering software
US8918729B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2014-12-23 Microsoft Corporation Designing electronic forms
US8117552B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US7925621B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2011-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Installing a solution
US9229917B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2016-01-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Electronic form user interfaces
US9239821B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2016-01-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Translation file
US8892993B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2014-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Translation file
US8429522B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2013-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US9268760B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2016-02-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US7971139B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2011-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US7937651B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing operations for network forms
US20060224948A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form
US8448060B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2013-05-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and software tool for processing an electronic form
US8010515B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Query to an electronic form
US8200975B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2012-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Digital signatures for network forms
US7870478B1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2011-01-11 Adobe Systems Incorporated Repurposing subsections and/or objects
US9210234B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2015-12-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US8001459B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US20090313743A1 (en) * 2008-06-20 2009-12-24 Craig Jason Hofmeyer Pants with saggy pants control system
US20120260200A1 (en) * 2011-04-11 2012-10-11 Data Systems International, Inc. Multi-view form design
US9329839B2 (en) * 2011-04-11 2016-05-03 Data Systems International, Inc. Multi-view form design
US9575949B2 (en) 2011-04-11 2017-02-21 Data Systems International, Inc. Multi-view runtime interrogator
JP2017201547A (en) * 2012-10-31 2017-11-09 リミテッド ライアビリティー カンパニー “1シー” Automatic report generation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050183006A1 (en) 2005-08-18
US7430711B2 (en) 2008-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7430711B2 (en) Systems and methods for editing XML documents
US7275216B2 (en) System and method for designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US8918729B2 (en) Designing electronic forms
US7168035B1 (en) Building a view on markup language data through a set of components
US7506243B2 (en) System and method for integrating spreadsheets and word processing tables
US20040268229A1 (en) Markup language editing with an electronic form
US8387055B1 (en) System and method for providing information and associating information
US20050044486A1 (en) User interface for integrated spreadsheets and word processing tables
EP1818835A1 (en) Document processing device, and document processing method
EP1816586A1 (en) Data processing system, data processing method, and management server
US20080134019A1 (en) Processing Data And Documents That Use A Markup Language
US20080133563A1 (en) Data Processing Device And Data Processing Method
US20090021767A1 (en) Document processing device
JPWO2006051713A1 (en) Document processing apparatus and document processing method
WO2006051960A1 (en) Document processing device and document processing method
EP1811399A1 (en) Data processing device and data processing method
US7685229B1 (en) System and method for displaying server side code results in an application program
US20070283246A1 (en) Processing Documents In Multiple Markup Representations
US7827195B2 (en) Document management device and document management method
JPWO2006051716A1 (en) Document processing apparatus and document processing method
JPWO2006051712A1 (en) Document processing apparatus and document processing method
EP1830274A1 (en) Server device and name space issuing method
WO2006051721A1 (en) Document processing device, and document processing method
EP1933233A1 (en) Data processing apparatus
JPWO2006051714A1 (en) Document processing apparatus and document processing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034564/0001

Effective date: 20141014

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION