US20080267719A1 - Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force - Google Patents
Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080267719A1 US20080267719A1 US11/790,205 US79020507A US2008267719A1 US 20080267719 A1 US20080267719 A1 US 20080267719A1 US 79020507 A US79020507 A US 79020507A US 2008267719 A1 US2008267719 A1 US 2008267719A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- compaction
- force
- controller
- sensed
- incline
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01C—CONSTRUCTION OF, OR SURFACES FOR, ROADS, SPORTS GROUNDS, OR THE LIKE; MACHINES OR AUXILIARY TOOLS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR
- E01C19/00—Machines, tools or auxiliary devices for preparing or distributing paving materials, for working the placed materials, or for forming, consolidating, or finishing the paving
- E01C19/22—Machines, tools or auxiliary devices for preparing or distributing paving materials, for working the placed materials, or for forming, consolidating, or finishing the paving for consolidating or finishing laid-down unset materials
- E01C19/23—Rollers therefor; Such rollers usable also for compacting soil
- E01C19/28—Vibrated rollers or rollers subjected to impacts, e.g. hammering blows
- E01C19/288—Vibrated rollers or rollers subjected to impacts, e.g. hammering blows adapted for monitoring characteristics of the material being compacted, e.g. indicating resonant frequency, measuring degree of compaction, by measuring values, detectable on the roller; using detected values to control operation of the roller, e.g. automatic adjustment of vibration responsive to such measurements
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01C—CONSTRUCTION OF, OR SURFACES FOR, ROADS, SPORTS GROUNDS, OR THE LIKE; MACHINES OR AUXILIARY TOOLS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR
- E01C19/00—Machines, tools or auxiliary devices for preparing or distributing paving materials, for working the placed materials, or for forming, consolidating, or finishing the paving
- E01C19/22—Machines, tools or auxiliary devices for preparing or distributing paving materials, for working the placed materials, or for forming, consolidating, or finishing the paving for consolidating or finishing laid-down unset materials
- E01C19/23—Rollers therefor; Such rollers usable also for compacting soil
- E01C19/26—Rollers therefor; Such rollers usable also for compacting soil self-propelled or fitted to road vehicles
- E01C19/266—Rollers therefor; Such rollers usable also for compacting soil self-propelled or fitted to road vehicles fitted to vehicles, road-construction or earth-moving machinery, e.g. auxiliary roll readily movable to operative position ; provided with means for facilitating transport; Means for transporting rollers; Arrangements or attachments for converting vehicles into rollers, e.g. rolling sleeves for wheels
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/02—Improving by compacting
- E02D3/026—Improving by compacting by rolling with rollers usable only for or specially adapted for soil compaction, e.g. sheepsfoot rollers
- E02D3/039—Slope rollers
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to a compaction determination system, and more particularly, to a system for determining material compaction levels based on the drawbar force of a towed compactor.
- Compaction machines are utilized in the construction of road beds, pavements, foundations, dams, runways, landfills, and other projects. In order to ensure that these projects meet required standards of load bearing, strength, durability, space, and permeability, the materials used in the construction process must be sufficiently compacted. Thus, tight control over the compaction process is required.
- One way to control the compaction process is to periodically measure a level of compaction resulting from the process as the project progresses. That is, if a low compaction level is measured, additional compaction is provided until a stipulated level of compaction is attained.
- Common ways to measure compaction levels include impacting the material surface and measuring an indentation resulting from the impact, moving a tipped roller over the surface and measuring a distance off of the surface that the roller raises as a result of tip penetration being less than tip length, penetrating a surface with a predefined instrument and force and then measuring the penetration depth, and measurements of the density of a compacted layer of material with devices such as a nuclear density gauge.
- each of these methods have associated negative aspects such as cost, destruction of the finished surface, excessive time consumption, and being labor intensive.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,582 (the '582 patent) issued to Tiede et al. on Mar. 28, 2000.
- the '582 patent discloses a faring system for performing work on an agricultural field, while compaction conditions of the field are being recorded.
- the farming system includes an agricultural tractor equipped with ground penetrating farm tools such as a plow, an “S” shaped tine, a coil shank tool, or a sub-soil ripper. The tractor pulls the tool through the soil by way of a drawbar or hitch.
- a strain gauge is connected to the drawbar and, based on a measurement of force imparted by the tools to the soil provided by the strain gauge, soil compaction or hardness of the tilled field is calculated and recorded. From this data, a map is generated that shows varying compaction or hardness of the field, which can be utilized to effect farming practices such as tillage depth, fertilizing, seeding, watering, and the application of insecticides and herbicides.
- the faring system of the '582 patent may provide a quick and economical way to determine compaction of an agricultural field, its accuracy and use may be limited. Specifically, because the only input is drawbar force, an incline or decline could significantly affect the measured force, resulting in an inaccurate representation of soil compaction or hardness at a particular location. For example, when operating the tractor up an incline, the drawbar strain gauge may read high levels of force and associate this force with high compaction, even though a significant portion of the measured force may be due to gravity acting on the farm tool. Similarly, when operating the tractor down all incline, the drawbar strain gauge may read low levels of force and associate this force with low compaction, even though gravity may again be acting on the farm tool to lessen the measurement.
- the drawbar force measured by the strain gauge is related to the force required to move a tool through soil, only applications allowing a disruption of the surface may benefit from the farming system. That is, when creating a roadway, a measurement system that requires a tool be ripped through the surface of the roadway may be undesirable.
- the disclosed machine system is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above.
- the present disclosure is directed to a compaction determination system for monitoring the compaction in a material produced by a rotary device as the rotary device is towed over the material.
- the compaction determination system may include a force sensor associated with a drawbar used to tow the rotary device, the force sensor being configured to sense a force transmitted to the rotary device via the drawbar.
- the compaction control system may further include a controller in communication with the force sensor. The controller may be configured to determine a compaction of the surface produced by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
- the present disclosure is directed to a method of determining compaction of a material.
- the method may include towing a rotary device over a material to compact the material.
- the method may also include sensing a force of the towing, and determining an amount of compaction created by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
- FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of an exemplary disclosed machine
- FIG. 2 is a schematic and diagrammatic illustration of an exemplary disclosed control system for use with the machine of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart depicting an exemplary disclosed method performed by the compaction determination system of FIGS. 1 and 2 ;
- FIG. 4 is flowchart depicting another exemplary disclosed method performed by the compaction determination system of FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a machine 10 .
- Machine 10 may be a mobile machine that perform some type of operation associated with an industry such as mining, construction, farming, or any other industry known in the art.
- machine 10 may be an earth moving machine such as a track type tractor, a wheeled tractor, or any other suitable operation-performing machine.
- Machine 10 may include a power source 12 and at least one traction device 14 .
- Machine 10 may also have an operator cabin 16 for manual control of power source 12 and traction device 14 .
- Power source 12 may embody an engine such as, for example, a diesel engine, a gasoline engine, a gaseous fuel powered engine such as a natural gas engine, or any other type of engine apparent to one skilled in the art. Power source 12 may alternatively embody a non-combustion source of power such as a fuel cell, a power storage device, an electric motor, or other similar mechanism. Power source 12 may be connected to drive traction device 14 , thereby propelling machine 10 .
- an engine such as, for example, a diesel engine, a gasoline engine, a gaseous fuel powered engine such as a natural gas engine, or any other type of engine apparent to one skilled in the art.
- Power source 12 may alternatively embody a non-combustion source of power such as a fuel cell, a power storage device, an electric motor, or other similar mechanism. Power source 12 may be connected to drive traction device 14 , thereby propelling machine 10 .
- Traction device 14 may include tracks located on each side of machine 10 (only one side shown). Alternately, traction device 14 may include wheels, belts or other known traction devices. Traction device 14 may transmit power from power source 12 to a ground surface.
- Operator cabin 16 may contain operator controls and instruments that show various information on the operational status and modes of machine 10 .
- operator cabin 16 may, if desired, contain one or more interface devices 40 as described below in reference to FIG. 2 .
- Towed compactor 20 may include a drawbar 22 and a rotary compactor 24 .
- Drawbar 22 may transmit force from machine 10 to rotary compactor 24 .
- Rotary compactor 24 may be any rotary compactor known in the art, such as, for example, a smooth solid roller, a smooth hollow roller designed to be filled with ballast, or a tipped roller as shown.
- Rotary compactor 24 may compact material by using its weight to compress the material as rotary compactor 24 is towed over the material. Smooth rollers may provide compression from the top of the material, while tipped rollers may offer additional internal compression of the material due to the action of the tips as they penetrate the surface of the material.
- Rotary compactor 24 may additionally include a vibratory mechanism, if desired.
- machine 10 may include an attachment means 18 , for attaching towed implements, such as towed compactor 20 .
- Attachment means 18 may be any attachment means known in the art for attaching towed implements, such as, for example, a single-point hitch, a thee-point hitch, or an articulated joint.
- Attachment means 18 may also include a means known in the art (not shown) for providing electrical power to the towed implement and/or for two-way communication of control signals with towed implement 20 .
- a compaction determination system 28 may be associated with towed compactor 20 to determine an effectiveness of rotary compactor 24 based on a sensed force.
- Compaction determination system 28 may include a force sensor 32 , an inclinometer 34 , a position determining unit 38 , a display 40 a , an input 40 b , and a controller 30 .
- Controller 30 may receive communication from force sensor 32 , inclinometer 34 , position determining unit 38 , and input 40 b , and may send communication to display 40 a responsive to the received communications.
- Force sensor 32 may be associated with drawbar 22 to sense a force on towed compactor 20 and to generate a signal in response thereto.
- Force sensor 32 may be any force sensor commonly known in the art, such as, for example, a load link, a strain gauge, a transducer, or a load cell.
- Force sensor 32 may optionally include temperature compensation means commonly known in the art.
- the strain gauges may be configured in the form of a Wheatstone bridge to compensate for temperature-induced strain that may affect a reporting of the true drawbar force.
- the force reported by force sensor 32 may be indicative of the force required for machine 10 to pull towed compactor 20 over the material to be compacted when machine 10 is driven at a constant speed.
- a lower force reported by force sensor 32 may be indicative of a more compact material, while a higher force reported by force sensor 32 may be indicative of a less compact material.
- Inclinometer 34 may be associated with drawbar 22 to sense an incline of towed compactor 20 and to generate a signal in response thereto.
- inclinometer 34 may be located on machine 10 , if desired.
- the incline of towed compactor 20 may correspond with the slope of a surface over which towed compactor 20 is being towed.
- Controller 30 may use the incline of towed compactor 20 to calculate a resultant force on the drawbar associated with the incline, and subsequently to determine a true draft force on drawbar 22 .
- Position determining unit 38 may be associated with towed compactor 20 to determine the location of towed compactor 20 .
- position determining unit 38 may be located on machine 10 , if desired.
- Position determining unit 38 may be GPS based, laser based, or utilize any other technology commonly known in the art.
- Position determining unit 28 may be used by controller 30 to determine the location of towed compactor 20 .
- Controller 30 may also or alternatively use position determining unit 38 to create a visual representation of the area to be compacted on display 40 a and to show the location of the towed compactor 20 and the measured compaction in that area.
- Display 40 a may be located within the operator cabin 16 of machine 10 for viewing by the machine operator, or it may be an external display of the type commonly known in the art that is connected to a display port (not shown) of controller 30 . Alternatively, display 40 a may be in wireless communication with controller 30 and located elsewhere, including a location remote from towed compactor 20 and machine 10 .
- Display 40 a may comprise one or more cathode ray tubes (CRT), liquid crystal displays (LCD), plasma displays, or another device that is capable of displaying graphics and/or text. Display 40 a may receive data from controller 30 and display the data for an operator of machine 10 .
- CTR cathode ray tubes
- LCD liquid crystal displays
- plasma displays or another device that is capable of displaying graphics and/or text.
- Display 40 a may receive data from controller 30 and display the data for an operator of machine 10 .
- the displayed data may be relevant to the amount of compaction currently being generated, such as, for example, the force required to pull towed compactor 20 as it moves over the material.
- display 40 a may indicate the location of towed compactor 20 in real time geographic coordinates.
- the displayed information may be graphical, text, tabular, numeric, and or any other format desired to effectively display the desired data.
- Input 40 b may be located on the towed compactor 20 , within the operator cabin 16 of the machine 10 for use by the machine operator, or located remotely from towed compactor 20 .
- Input 40 b may include a wide variety of devices configured to input data into controller 30 .
- input device 40 b may include a keyboard, a mouse, a joy-stick, a touch-screen, a disk drive, a magnetic card reader, a scanner, a CD drive, a DVD drive, a floppy disk drive, a memory stick input, a USB port, or any other suitable device.
- Input 40 b may be used to input data such as results from proof compaction tests done on-site or in a laboratory, coordinates or other information describing the site to be compacted, weather information, information describing the type and condition of the material to be compacted, moisture content of the material to be compacted, desired measurement intervals, compactor width, compactor weight, compactor diameter or other parameters of rotary compactor 24 , and date and time.
- Controller 30 may embody a single microprocessor or multiple microprocessors that include a means for controlling an operation of the disclosed compaction determination system. Numerous commercially available microprocessors can be configured to perform the functions of controller 30 and it should be appreciated that controller 30 could readily embody a general machine microprocessor capable of controlling numerous machine functions, including sending and receiving control and data signals. Controller 30 may include a memory, a secondary storage device, a processor, wireless communication circuitry, external connection ports, and/or any other components for running an application. Various other circuits may be associated with controller 30 such as power supply circuitry, signal conditioning circuitry, solenoid driver circuitry, and/or other types of circuitry.
- Controller 30 may be in communication with the various components of compaction determination system 28 .
- controller 30 may be in communication with force sensor 32 , inclinometer 34 , position determining unit 38 , display 40 a , and input 40 b via communication lines 44 , 46 , 48 , 50 , and 52 , respectively.
- Controller 30 may receive and store in memory for subsequent display or calculation the signals from each of force sensor 32 , inclinometer 34 , and position determining unit 38 .
- Controller 30 may receive and store data and commands from input 40 b , and send signals to display 40 a in response to received signals and calculations performed on data stored in the memory.
- Controller 30 may perform calculations on data received or stored in memory, and store the results of the calculations in memory for use in subsequent calculations, for display on display 40 a , or for use in future compaction events.
- Controller 30 may perform a variety of calculations. For example, using the incline reported by inclinometer 34 and the weight of towed compactor 20 , which may be provided by the manufacturer or obtained by measurement, controller 30 may use Equation 1 below to calculate the incline force on drawbar 22 that is a result of an uphill or downhill incline of towed compactor 20 :
- IF is the incline force
- ⁇ is the angle of incline reported by inclinometer 34
- W is the weight of towed compactor 20 .
- the angle of incline may have a positive value for uphill inclines, and a negative value for downhill inclines.
- Controller 30 may then combine the calculated incline force with the drawbar force reported by force sensor 32 to determine the true draft force on drawbar 22 using Equation 2 below:
- Controller 30 may store the results of these calculations in memory, and/or display them on display 40 a.
- Controller 30 may compare the results of calculations with target values or the results of prior calculations. For example, controller 30 may compare the draft force with a target draft force value stored in memory and/or supplied from the input 40 b to determine whether the draft force is less than, equal to, or greater than the target draft force. If the calculated draft force is greater than the target draft force, additional passes of the area may be required. However, if the calculated draft is less than or equal to the target draft force, it can be concluded that compaction of that area is complete. Controller 30 may store the results of this calculation in memory, and/or display them on display 40 a.
- controller 30 may compare the draft force calculated for a current compacting pass of a specific area with the draft force calculated during a previous compacting pass of the same area, to determine the difference in draft force between the two passes using Equation 3 below:
- Controller 30 may then determine whether this differential draft force is less than, equal to, or greater than a target differential draft force stored in memory. If the calculated differential draft force is greater than a target differential draft force, it may be concluded that the material has not yet been compacted as fully as desired, and additional passes of the area may be required. However, if the calculated differential draft force is less than or equal to a target differential draft force, it may be concluded that the material has reached the desired compaction level. Controller 30 may store the results of this calculation in memory, and/or display them on display 40 a.
- Controller 30 may allow for input of a desired measurement interval.
- the measurement interval may be defined by a measure of length, such as, for example, one foot, one meter, or a length equivalent to the circumference of rotary compactor 24 .
- Controller 30 may use the measurement interval to virtually subdivide a compaction site area and define the resolution of the compaction determination. For example, controller 30 may use the measurement interval as a trigger for when to record and store data by receiving data from position determining unit 38 and comparing that data to the stored value of the measurement interval.
- controller 30 may then take a snapshot of the data being recorded from force sensor 32 , inclinometer 34 , and position determining unit 38 , and use the sensed values at the tine of that snapshot as values for that measurement interval.
- controller 30 may use any sampling technique known in the art to continuously record and store data while rotary compactor 24 traverses each measurement interval, and then calculate an average value of the data recorded and stored from force sensor 32 , inclinometer 34 , and position determining unit 38 as the values for the measurement interval while traversing that measurement interval.
- the memory of controller 30 may contain a virtual map of an area to be compacted.
- the data contained in the virtual map may be received from the input of controller 30 , or it may be generated by controller 30 during operation of machine 10 .
- the virtual map may contain the boundaries of the area to be compacted.
- the boundaries may be input by several methods, including, for example, by driving machine 10 around the boundary of an area and obtaining the coordinates of the boundaries from position determining unit 38 , inputting the boundaries manually by taking measurements of the area, downloading the boundaries of the area from data obtained during previous compaction activities, or downloading from commercial mapping services.
- the virtual map may also contain data such as site topography, material composition, moisture content, and other environmental conditions.
- the memory of controller 30 may also contain compaction data about the material derived from on-site or laboratory tests.
- the data may, for example, contain information about the desired compaction amount of the material and the draft force required to tow rotary compactor 24 over material in that compaction state. Such data may be used as target values for comparison with calculated values of the draft force.
- Controller 30 may control display 40 a to display a variety of compaction information in a variety of ways. For example, controller 30 may display the virtual map on display 40 a and use information from position determining unit 38 to display a representation of towed compactor 20 on the virtual map. Controller 30 may update this display in real-time as towed compactor 20 is towed around the compaction area. Controller 30 may also display on display 40 a data recorded during compaction, as well as results of compaction after controller 30 determines that compaction is complete or as compaction progresses.
- FIG. 3 shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method of operating compaction determination system 28 in a first mode.
- compaction determination system 28 may determine compaction of a material based on a proof test performed on a small portion of a compaction site.
- a compaction specification for this method of operation may include a predetermined compaction level in any terms commonly known in the art, such as, for example, the desired density of a material, as determined by a Proctor test.
- To perform the proof test towed compactor 20 may be used to fully compact a small test area of the compaction site.
- Compaction may be determined using any compaction verification method commonly known in the art to determine that the compaction of the material in the test area of the site satisfies the compaction specifications.
- towed compactor 20 may be towed once more over the compacted test area, and controller 30 may determine the draft force required to tow rotary compactor 24 over the compacted material. Controller 30 may then store this draft force for use as a target value to determine when the remaining portions of the compaction site are compacted to the specified level within a specified range, such as, for example, ⁇ 5%.
- compaction determination system 28 may determine compaction of a material based on a comparison of a calculated draft force on towed compactor 20 between successive passes.
- a compaction specification for this method of operation may specify, for example, that a rotary compactor of a certain weight is to be towed over a compaction site until a differential draft force is about equal to a desired differential draft force.
- the compaction specification may specify that a desired compaction is attained when the difference in draft force between a current pass and the previous pass over the material is about equal to a target value.
- Compaction determination system 28 may determine the differential draft force between two successive passes, and determine if the differential draft force is within a specified range of the target differential draft, such as, for example, within about ⁇ 5%.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 will be described in detail below to further illustrate aspects of the disclosed system.
- the disclosed compaction determination system may be applicable to any towed compactor where quantifiable and repeatable control of material compaction is desired. Particularly, the disclosed compaction determination system may provide a simple, reliable way to determine the amount of material compaction based on the draft force required to tow a towed compactor, without requiring destruction or penetration of the compacted material. The operation of compaction determination system 28 will now be described.
- Towed compactor 20 may be attached to machine 10 through attachment means 18 .
- An operator may then operate machine 10 and pull towed compactor 20 over a compaction area containing a material to be compacted.
- the operator may make one or more passes over the compaction area, such that the number of passes is sufficient to compact the material to a predetermined level, as determined by an operating mode of compaction determination system 28 .
- Each pass may generally correspond to the width of rotary compactor 24 , attempting to minimize overlap among contiguous passes, and ensuring that no area is left uncompacted.
- Controller 30 may use position determining unit 38 to determine that the entire compaction area reaches the desired compaction level, and alert an operator of machine 10 through display 40 a as to the results of compaction.
- controller 30 may receive and store in memory any necessary information associated with the current compacting operation, such as, for example, the boundaries of the area to be compacted, a desired measurement interval, a desired compaction amount, and any other information necessary to describe the compaction site (Step 100 ).
- the boundaries may be defined by, for example, inputting into controller 30 through input 40 b a description of the area using GPS coordinates, Cartesian coordinates, latitude and longitude, or any other coordinate system sufficient to describe the area.
- the boundaries may be input by driving machine 10 and towed compactor 20 around the boundary of the area to be compacted, while controller 10 receives and stores data from position determining unit 28 sufficient to define the boundaries of the area.
- Other information that the operator may input include, for example, material type, material moisture content, date, time, and weather information.
- Step 100 may be better understood through an example.
- controller 30 receives various data about a particular compaction site, including a weight of rotary compactor 24 being 10000 lb, a width of rotary compactor 24 being 6 feet, a measurement interval being 15 feet, the boundaries of the site in GPS coordinates, the material type being clay, the moisture content as measured on site, and the date and time.
- Controller 30 may then receive and store in memory calibration data such as, for example, the draft force on drawbar 22 reported by force sensor 32 , the incline of towed compactor 20 reported by inclinometer 34 , and the position of towed compactor 20 reported by position determining unit 38 (Step 102 ).
- the data may be received as the operator drives machine 10 with attached towed compactor 20 over material in a test area, which may be a smaller subdivision of the compaction site.
- controller 30 may create associations in memory among the various parameters, such as, for example, an association that a specific drawbar force, incline, and distance traveled are associated with a specific location or region of the compaction site.
- controller 30 may use these associations to calculate accurate determinations of the amount of compaction, as well as to provide visual representations of the amount of compaction on display 40 a .
- the data stored during this step may be used for various calculations and visual representations, including, for example, calculations by controller 30 to predict and determine the performance of rotary compactor 24 during compaction of the entire compaction site.
- controller 30 may receive and store in memory data such as, for example, the force on drawbar 22 reported by force sensor 32 , the incline of towed compactor 20 reported by inclinometer 34 , and the position of towed compactor 20 reported by position determining unit 38 , as towed compactor 20 is towed over the compacted test area. Controller 30 may then calculate the draft force on towed compactor 20 using Equations 1 and 2. Controller 30 may store this draft force as a target value for the compaction of the remainder of the compaction site.
- the test area is determined to be a small area the width of towed compactor 20 (6 feet), and the length of the measurement interval (15 feet).
- towed compactor 20 is towed over the test area once again.
- controller 30 receives a force measurement of 2700 lb from force sensor 32 , and an incline measurement of 4 deg. from inclinometer 34 .
- Controller 30 uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 698 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 2002 lb that accounts for the incline.
- Controller 30 then stores the 2002 lb value as the target draft force for use in later compaction level determinations.
- Controller 30 may receive and store in memory operational data such as, for example, the force on drawbar 22 reported by force sensor 32 , the incline of towed compactor 20 reported by inclinometer 34 , and the position of towed compactor 20 reported by position determining unit 38 , as towed compactor 20 makes one or more passes over the entire compaction site (Step 104 ).
- controller 30 may create associations in memory among the various parameters, such as, for example, an association among a drawbar force, incline, distance traveled and location or region of the compaction site. These associations may be used by controller 30 to accurately calculate the amount of compaction of the site, as well as to provide visual representations of the amount of compaction on display 40 a.
- Controller 30 may use the operational data received and stored in step 104 to calculate the draft force on towed compactor 20 for the entire compaction site (Step 106 ). Controller 30 may first use Equation 1 to calculate the incline force on the towed compactor, and then Equation 2 to calculate the draft force on towed compactor 20 . Controller 30 may then compare the draft force calculated using Equation 2 to the target draft force value stored during step 102 . Controller 30 may perform these calculations and comparisons for each pass of each subdivision of the compaction site, as defined by the measurement interval. Controller 30 may store in memory the results for each pass of each subdivision.
- controller 30 may signal the operator that compaction is not yet complete, and that one or more passes may still be required (return to Step 104 ).
- controller 30 may determine that compaction is complete. Controller 30 may evaluate the results of the comparison of the draft force using a range of acceptable compaction, such as, for example, ⁇ 5% of the desired compaction level.
- controller 30 receives a force measurement of 8500 lb from force sensor 32 , and an incline measurement of 6 deg. from inclinometer 34 during a particular measurement interval. Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 7455 lb that accounts for the incline. In Step 106 , controller 30 determines that the calculated draft force of 7455 lb is greater than the target draft force of 2002 lb determined in Step 102 , and therefore compaction is not yet complete (return to Step 104 ).
- Step 104 on the second pass of a particular area, moving in the opposite direction, controller 30 receives a force of 980 lb from force sensor 32 , and an incline of ⁇ 6 deg. from inclinometer 34 . Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of ⁇ 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 2025 lb that accounts for the incline. In Step 106 , controller 30 then determines that the calculated draft force of 2025 lb is within ⁇ 5% of the target draft force of 2002 lb, and therefore that compaction is complete.
- controller 30 may display compaction information on display 40 a for each subdivision (Step 108 ). This information may be used by the operator in determining which subdivisions of the compaction area may still need one or more passes of rotary compactor 24 to achieve the desired compaction. After controller 30 determines that the compaction level of the entire compaction site has reached the desired value, controller 30 may gather and store the final information about the compaction as an archive file within its memory. Controller 30 may display the information on display 40 a , and/or download or otherwise record it using any apparatus commonly known in the art for downloading and/or recording data. This downloaded and/or recorded data may be used in future compaction activities and/or as quality control or quality assurance of the compaction activities in validation that the proper compaction level has been achieved.
- controller 30 having determined that the calculated draft force of 2025 lb is within the specified range of the target draft force of 2002 lb, determines that compaction is complete. Controller 30 then displays information on display 40 a to notify the operator that compaction of the area is complete, and then stores the data for later use.
- Controller 30 may receive and store in memory any necessary information associated with the current compacting operation, as described above in Step 100 (Step 200 ).
- Step 200 may be better understood through an example.
- Controller 30 receives various data about a compaction site as described in Step 100 above.
- a target differential draft force of 500 lb is entered, as compaction may be determined to be complete when, according to the compaction specification, the differential draft force between two passes is less than about 500 lb, within a range of ⁇ 5%.
- Controller 30 may then receive and store in memory operational data as described in Step 104 above (Step 202 ). Controller 30 may use the operational data received and stored in step 202 to calculate a differential draft force experience by compactor 20 between passes (Step 204 ). Controller 30 may use Equation 1 to calculate the incline force on the towed compactor, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force on towed compactor 20 to account for the incline. Controller 30 may then use Equation 3 to compare the draft force of the current compacting pass over a single subdivision to the draft force for the previous compacting pass over that same subdivision.
- controller 30 may signal the operator that compaction is not yet complete, and that one or more passes may still be required (return to Step 202 ). However, when controller 30 determines that the differential draft force after the current pass is less than or equal to the target differential draft force, then controller 30 may determine that compaction is complete. Controller 30 may evaluate the results of the comparison of the differential force using a range, such as, for example, ⁇ 5%, as specified by the compaction specification.
- controller 30 receives data from force sensor 32 reporting a force measurement of 8500 lb and inclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of 6 degrees. Controller 30 uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and then uses Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 7455 lb that accounts for the incline. In Step 204 , because this was the first pass, controller 30 cannot compare the calculated draft force to the draft force from the previous pass, so controller 30 stores the calculated draft force value and returns to step 202 .
- controller 30 receives data from force sensor 32 reporting a force measurement 980 lb and inclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of ⁇ 6 degrees. Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of ⁇ 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 2025 lb that accounts for the incline. In step 204 , controller 30 uses Equation 3 to determine that the differential draft force between pass 1 and 2 is 5429 lb. Because controller 30 calculates this differential draft force is greater than the target differential force of 500 lb, controller 30 stores the draft force value of 2025 lb for pass 2 and returns to step 202 .
- controller 30 receives data from force sensor 32 reporting a force measurement of 2750 lb and inclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of 6 degrees. Controller 30 uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 1705 lb that accounts for the incline. In step 204 , controller 30 uses Equation 3 to determine that the differential draft force between pass 2 and 3 is 321 lb. Because controller 30 calculates this differential draft force of 321 lb is within the acceptable range of the target differential force of 500 lb, controller 30 has determined that compaction is complete.
- Controller 30 may make a determination that compaction is complete for one or more subdivisions of the compaction area, and/or for the entire compaction area, as described in Step 108 above (Step 206 ). Controller 30 may display information on display 40 a that shows the subdivisions for which controller 30 has determined that compaction is complete, as described above.
- the disclosed apparatus and method may allow compaction determination in a manner that does not require disruption of the material surface. This may be beneficial because a disruption of some surfaces, such as the surface of a roadway, may be undesirable.
- a second aspect of the disclosed compaction detection system is the measurement of an incline of a surface for use in determining the amount of compaction of a material. This measurement may allow compaction determination to be more accurate by accounting for the draft force that results from the incline.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
Abstract
A compaction determination system for monitoring the compaction in a material produced by a rotary device as the rotary device is towed over the material is disclosed. The compaction determination system may have a force sensor associated with a drawbar used to tow the rotary device, the force sensor being configured to sense a force transmitted to the rotary device via the drawbar. The compaction determination system may further have a controller in communication with the force sensor. The controller may be configured to determine a compaction of the material produced by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
Description
- The present disclosure relates generally to a compaction determination system, and more particularly, to a system for determining material compaction levels based on the drawbar force of a towed compactor.
- Compaction machines are utilized in the construction of road beds, pavements, foundations, dams, runways, landfills, and other projects. In order to ensure that these projects meet required standards of load bearing, strength, durability, space, and permeability, the materials used in the construction process must be sufficiently compacted. Thus, tight control over the compaction process is required.
- One way to control the compaction process is to periodically measure a level of compaction resulting from the process as the project progresses. That is, if a low compaction level is measured, additional compaction is provided until a stipulated level of compaction is attained. Common ways to measure compaction levels include impacting the material surface and measuring an indentation resulting from the impact, moving a tipped roller over the surface and measuring a distance off of the surface that the roller raises as a result of tip penetration being less than tip length, penetrating a surface with a predefined instrument and force and then measuring the penetration depth, and measurements of the density of a compacted layer of material with devices such as a nuclear density gauge. However, each of these methods have associated negative aspects such as cost, destruction of the finished surface, excessive time consumption, and being labor intensive.
- One way to quickly and economically determine soil hardness is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,582 (the '582 patent) issued to Tiede et al. on Mar. 28, 2000. The '582 patent discloses a faring system for performing work on an agricultural field, while compaction conditions of the field are being recorded. The farming system includes an agricultural tractor equipped with ground penetrating farm tools such as a plow, an “S” shaped tine, a coil shank tool, or a sub-soil ripper. The tractor pulls the tool through the soil by way of a drawbar or hitch. A strain gauge is connected to the drawbar and, based on a measurement of force imparted by the tools to the soil provided by the strain gauge, soil compaction or hardness of the tilled field is calculated and recorded. From this data, a map is generated that shows varying compaction or hardness of the field, which can be utilized to effect farming practices such as tillage depth, fertilizing, seeding, watering, and the application of insecticides and herbicides.
- Although the faring system of the '582 patent may provide a quick and economical way to determine compaction of an agricultural field, its accuracy and use may be limited. Specifically, because the only input is drawbar force, an incline or decline could significantly affect the measured force, resulting in an inaccurate representation of soil compaction or hardness at a particular location. For example, when operating the tractor up an incline, the drawbar strain gauge may read high levels of force and associate this force with high compaction, even though a significant portion of the measured force may be due to gravity acting on the farm tool. Similarly, when operating the tractor down all incline, the drawbar strain gauge may read low levels of force and associate this force with low compaction, even though gravity may again be acting on the farm tool to lessen the measurement. Further, because the drawbar force measured by the strain gauge is related to the force required to move a tool through soil, only applications allowing a disruption of the surface may benefit from the farming system. That is, when creating a roadway, a measurement system that requires a tool be ripped through the surface of the roadway may be undesirable.
- The disclosed machine system is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above.
- In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a compaction determination system for monitoring the compaction in a material produced by a rotary device as the rotary device is towed over the material. The compaction determination system may include a force sensor associated with a drawbar used to tow the rotary device, the force sensor being configured to sense a force transmitted to the rotary device via the drawbar. The compaction control system may further include a controller in communication with the force sensor. The controller may be configured to determine a compaction of the surface produced by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
- In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method of determining compaction of a material. The method may include towing a rotary device over a material to compact the material. The method may also include sensing a force of the towing, and determining an amount of compaction created by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of an exemplary disclosed machine; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic and diagrammatic illustration of an exemplary disclosed control system for use with the machine ofFIG. 1 ; -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart depicting an exemplary disclosed method performed by the compaction determination system ofFIGS. 1 and 2 ; and -
FIG. 4 is flowchart depicting another exemplary disclosed method performed by the compaction determination system ofFIGS. 1 and 2 . -
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of amachine 10.Machine 10 may be a mobile machine that perform some type of operation associated with an industry such as mining, construction, farming, or any other industry known in the art. For example,machine 10 may be an earth moving machine such as a track type tractor, a wheeled tractor, or any other suitable operation-performing machine.Machine 10 may include apower source 12 and at least onetraction device 14.Machine 10 may also have anoperator cabin 16 for manual control ofpower source 12 andtraction device 14. -
Power source 12 may embody an engine such as, for example, a diesel engine, a gasoline engine, a gaseous fuel powered engine such as a natural gas engine, or any other type of engine apparent to one skilled in the art.Power source 12 may alternatively embody a non-combustion source of power such as a fuel cell, a power storage device, an electric motor, or other similar mechanism.Power source 12 may be connected to drivetraction device 14, thereby propellingmachine 10. -
Traction device 14 may include tracks located on each side of machine 10 (only one side shown). Alternately,traction device 14 may include wheels, belts or other known traction devices.Traction device 14 may transmit power frompower source 12 to a ground surface. -
Operator cabin 16 may contain operator controls and instruments that show various information on the operational status and modes ofmachine 10. For example,operator cabin 16 may, if desired, contain one ormore interface devices 40 as described below in reference toFIG. 2 . - Towed
compactor 20 may include adrawbar 22 and arotary compactor 24. Drawbar 22 may transmit force frommachine 10 torotary compactor 24. Rotarycompactor 24 may be any rotary compactor known in the art, such as, for example, a smooth solid roller, a smooth hollow roller designed to be filled with ballast, or a tipped roller as shown. Rotarycompactor 24 may compact material by using its weight to compress the material asrotary compactor 24 is towed over the material. Smooth rollers may provide compression from the top of the material, while tipped rollers may offer additional internal compression of the material due to the action of the tips as they penetrate the surface of the material.Rotary compactor 24 may additionally include a vibratory mechanism, if desired. - As illustrated in
FIG. 2 ,machine 10 may include an attachment means 18, for attaching towed implements, such astowed compactor 20. Attachment means 18 may be any attachment means known in the art for attaching towed implements, such as, for example, a single-point hitch, a thee-point hitch, or an articulated joint. Attachment means 18 may also include a means known in the art (not shown) for providing electrical power to the towed implement and/or for two-way communication of control signals with towedimplement 20. - A
compaction determination system 28 may be associated withtowed compactor 20 to determine an effectiveness ofrotary compactor 24 based on a sensed force.Compaction determination system 28 may include aforce sensor 32, aninclinometer 34, aposition determining unit 38, adisplay 40 a, aninput 40 b, and acontroller 30.Controller 30 may receive communication fromforce sensor 32,inclinometer 34,position determining unit 38, andinput 40 b, and may send communication to display 40 a responsive to the received communications. -
Force sensor 32 may be associated withdrawbar 22 to sense a force on towedcompactor 20 and to generate a signal in response thereto.Force sensor 32 may be any force sensor commonly known in the art, such as, for example, a load link, a strain gauge, a transducer, or a load cell.Force sensor 32 may optionally include temperature compensation means commonly known in the art. For example, ifforce sensor 32 comprises strain gauges, the strain gauges may be configured in the form of a Wheatstone bridge to compensate for temperature-induced strain that may affect a reporting of the true drawbar force. The force reported byforce sensor 32 may be indicative of the force required formachine 10 to pull towedcompactor 20 over the material to be compacted whenmachine 10 is driven at a constant speed. A lower force reported byforce sensor 32 may be indicative of a more compact material, while a higher force reported byforce sensor 32 may be indicative of a less compact material. -
Inclinometer 34 may be associated withdrawbar 22 to sense an incline of towedcompactor 20 and to generate a signal in response thereto. Alternatively,inclinometer 34 may be located onmachine 10, if desired. The incline of towedcompactor 20 may correspond with the slope of a surface over which towedcompactor 20 is being towed. Alternatively, any other incline or slope sensor known in the art may be used.Controller 30 may use the incline of towedcompactor 20 to calculate a resultant force on the drawbar associated with the incline, and subsequently to determine a true draft force ondrawbar 22. -
Position determining unit 38 may be associated with towedcompactor 20 to determine the location of towedcompactor 20. Alternatively,position determining unit 38 may be located onmachine 10, if desired.Position determining unit 38 may be GPS based, laser based, or utilize any other technology commonly known in the art.Position determining unit 28 may be used bycontroller 30 to determine the location of towedcompactor 20.Controller 30 may also or alternatively useposition determining unit 38 to create a visual representation of the area to be compacted ondisplay 40 a and to show the location of the towedcompactor 20 and the measured compaction in that area. -
Display 40 a may be located within theoperator cabin 16 ofmachine 10 for viewing by the machine operator, or it may be an external display of the type commonly known in the art that is connected to a display port (not shown) ofcontroller 30. Alternatively, display 40 a may be in wireless communication withcontroller 30 and located elsewhere, including a location remote from towedcompactor 20 andmachine 10.Display 40 a may comprise one or more cathode ray tubes (CRT), liquid crystal displays (LCD), plasma displays, or another device that is capable of displaying graphics and/or text.Display 40 a may receive data fromcontroller 30 and display the data for an operator ofmachine 10. Preferably, the displayed data may be relevant to the amount of compaction currently being generated, such as, for example, the force required to pull towedcompactor 20 as it moves over the material. In addition, display 40 a may indicate the location of towedcompactor 20 in real time geographic coordinates. The displayed information may be graphical, text, tabular, numeric, and or any other format desired to effectively display the desired data. -
Input 40 b may be located on the towedcompactor 20, within theoperator cabin 16 of themachine 10 for use by the machine operator, or located remotely from towedcompactor 20.Input 40 b may include a wide variety of devices configured to input data intocontroller 30. For example,input device 40 b may include a keyboard, a mouse, a joy-stick, a touch-screen, a disk drive, a magnetic card reader, a scanner, a CD drive, a DVD drive, a floppy disk drive, a memory stick input, a USB port, or any other suitable device.Input 40 b may be used to input data such as results from proof compaction tests done on-site or in a laboratory, coordinates or other information describing the site to be compacted, weather information, information describing the type and condition of the material to be compacted, moisture content of the material to be compacted, desired measurement intervals, compactor width, compactor weight, compactor diameter or other parameters ofrotary compactor 24, and date and time. -
Controller 30 may embody a single microprocessor or multiple microprocessors that include a means for controlling an operation of the disclosed compaction determination system. Numerous commercially available microprocessors can be configured to perform the functions ofcontroller 30 and it should be appreciated thatcontroller 30 could readily embody a general machine microprocessor capable of controlling numerous machine functions, including sending and receiving control and data signals.Controller 30 may include a memory, a secondary storage device, a processor, wireless communication circuitry, external connection ports, and/or any other components for running an application. Various other circuits may be associated withcontroller 30 such as power supply circuitry, signal conditioning circuitry, solenoid driver circuitry, and/or other types of circuitry. -
Controller 30 may be in communication with the various components ofcompaction determination system 28. In particular,controller 30 may be in communication withforce sensor 32,inclinometer 34,position determining unit 38,display 40 a, andinput 40 b viacommunication lines Controller 30 may receive and store in memory for subsequent display or calculation the signals from each offorce sensor 32,inclinometer 34, andposition determining unit 38.Controller 30 may receive and store data and commands frominput 40 b, and send signals to display 40 a in response to received signals and calculations performed on data stored in the memory.Controller 30 may perform calculations on data received or stored in memory, and store the results of the calculations in memory for use in subsequent calculations, for display ondisplay 40 a, or for use in future compaction events. -
Controller 30 may perform a variety of calculations. For example, using the incline reported byinclinometer 34 and the weight of towedcompactor 20, which may be provided by the manufacturer or obtained by measurement,controller 30 may use Equation 1 below to calculate the incline force ondrawbar 22 that is a result of an uphill or downhill incline of towed compactor 20: -
IF=sin α*W (Equation 1) - where IF is the incline force, α is the angle of incline reported by
inclinometer 34, and W is the weight of towedcompactor 20. The angle of incline may have a positive value for uphill inclines, and a negative value for downhill inclines. -
Controller 30 may then combine the calculated incline force with the drawbar force reported byforce sensor 32 to determine the true draft force ondrawbar 22 using Equation 2 below: -
DF=SF−IF (Equation 2) - where SF is the drawbar force reported by
force sensor 32 and DF is the true draft force.Controller 30 may store the results of these calculations in memory, and/or display them ondisplay 40 a. -
Controller 30 may compare the results of calculations with target values or the results of prior calculations. For example,controller 30 may compare the draft force with a target draft force value stored in memory and/or supplied from theinput 40 b to determine whether the draft force is less than, equal to, or greater than the target draft force. If the calculated draft force is greater than the target draft force, additional passes of the area may be required. However, if the calculated draft is less than or equal to the target draft force, it can be concluded that compaction of that area is complete.Controller 30 may store the results of this calculation in memory, and/or display them ondisplay 40 a. - Alternatively,
controller 30 may compare the draft force calculated for a current compacting pass of a specific area with the draft force calculated during a previous compacting pass of the same area, to determine the difference in draft force between the twopasses using Equation 3 below: -
ΔDF=DF(n−1)−DF(n) (Equation 3) - where ΔDF equals a differential draft force, DF(n) equals the draft force on a current pass, and DF(n−1) equals the draft force on a previous pass.
Controller 30 may then determine whether this differential draft force is less than, equal to, or greater than a target differential draft force stored in memory. If the calculated differential draft force is greater than a target differential draft force, it may be concluded that the material has not yet been compacted as fully as desired, and additional passes of the area may be required. However, if the calculated differential draft force is less than or equal to a target differential draft force, it may be concluded that the material has reached the desired compaction level.Controller 30 may store the results of this calculation in memory, and/or display them ondisplay 40 a. -
Controller 30 may allow for input of a desired measurement interval. The measurement interval may be defined by a measure of length, such as, for example, one foot, one meter, or a length equivalent to the circumference ofrotary compactor 24.Controller 30 may use the measurement interval to virtually subdivide a compaction site area and define the resolution of the compaction determination. For example,controller 30 may use the measurement interval as a trigger for when to record and store data by receiving data fromposition determining unit 38 and comparing that data to the stored value of the measurement interval. Whencontroller 30 determines thatrotary compactor 24 has traveled a distance equal to the measurement interval,controller 30 may then take a snapshot of the data being recorded fromforce sensor 32,inclinometer 34, andposition determining unit 38, and use the sensed values at the tine of that snapshot as values for that measurement interval. Alternatively,controller 30 may use any sampling technique known in the art to continuously record and store data whilerotary compactor 24 traverses each measurement interval, and then calculate an average value of the data recorded and stored fromforce sensor 32,inclinometer 34, andposition determining unit 38 as the values for the measurement interval while traversing that measurement interval. - The memory of
controller 30 may contain a virtual map of an area to be compacted. The data contained in the virtual map may be received from the input ofcontroller 30, or it may be generated bycontroller 30 during operation ofmachine 10. For example, the virtual map may contain the boundaries of the area to be compacted. The boundaries may be input by several methods, including, for example, by drivingmachine 10 around the boundary of an area and obtaining the coordinates of the boundaries fromposition determining unit 38, inputting the boundaries manually by taking measurements of the area, downloading the boundaries of the area from data obtained during previous compaction activities, or downloading from commercial mapping services. The virtual map may also contain data such as site topography, material composition, moisture content, and other environmental conditions. - The memory of
controller 30 may also contain compaction data about the material derived from on-site or laboratory tests. The data may, for example, contain information about the desired compaction amount of the material and the draft force required to towrotary compactor 24 over material in that compaction state. Such data may be used as target values for comparison with calculated values of the draft force. -
Controller 30 may controldisplay 40 a to display a variety of compaction information in a variety of ways. For example,controller 30 may display the virtual map ondisplay 40 a and use information fromposition determining unit 38 to display a representation of towedcompactor 20 on the virtual map.Controller 30 may update this display in real-time as towedcompactor 20 is towed around the compaction area.Controller 30 may also display ondisplay 40 a data recorded during compaction, as well as results of compaction aftercontroller 30 determines that compaction is complete or as compaction progresses. -
FIG. 3 shows a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method of operatingcompaction determination system 28 in a first mode. In this first operating mode,compaction determination system 28 may determine compaction of a material based on a proof test performed on a small portion of a compaction site. A compaction specification for this method of operation may include a predetermined compaction level in any terms commonly known in the art, such as, for example, the desired density of a material, as determined by a Proctor test. To perform the proof test, towedcompactor 20 may be used to fully compact a small test area of the compaction site. Compaction may be determined using any compaction verification method commonly known in the art to determine that the compaction of the material in the test area of the site satisfies the compaction specifications. After it is verified that the compaction in the test area is complete, towedcompactor 20 may be towed once more over the compacted test area, andcontroller 30 may determine the draft force required to towrotary compactor 24 over the compacted material.Controller 30 may then store this draft force for use as a target value to determine when the remaining portions of the compaction site are compacted to the specified level within a specified range, such as, for example, ±5%. - The embodiment illustrated in
FIG. 4 shows a second operating mode ofcompaction determination system 28. In this second operating mode,compaction determination system 28 may determine compaction of a material based on a comparison of a calculated draft force on towedcompactor 20 between successive passes. A compaction specification for this method of operation may specify, for example, that a rotary compactor of a certain weight is to be towed over a compaction site until a differential draft force is about equal to a desired differential draft force. The compaction specification may specify that a desired compaction is attained when the difference in draft force between a current pass and the previous pass over the material is about equal to a target value.Compaction determination system 28 may determine the differential draft force between two successive passes, and determine if the differential draft force is within a specified range of the target differential draft, such as, for example, within about ±5%. -
FIGS. 3 and 4 will be described in detail below to further illustrate aspects of the disclosed system. - The disclosed compaction determination system may be applicable to any towed compactor where quantifiable and repeatable control of material compaction is desired. Particularly, the disclosed compaction determination system may provide a simple, reliable way to determine the amount of material compaction based on the draft force required to tow a towed compactor, without requiring destruction or penetration of the compacted material. The operation of
compaction determination system 28 will now be described. - Towed
compactor 20 may be attached tomachine 10 through attachment means 18. An operator may then operatemachine 10 and pull towedcompactor 20 over a compaction area containing a material to be compacted. The operator may make one or more passes over the compaction area, such that the number of passes is sufficient to compact the material to a predetermined level, as determined by an operating mode ofcompaction determination system 28. Each pass may generally correspond to the width ofrotary compactor 24, attempting to minimize overlap among contiguous passes, and ensuring that no area is left uncompacted.Controller 30 may useposition determining unit 38 to determine that the entire compaction area reaches the desired compaction level, and alert an operator ofmachine 10 throughdisplay 40 a as to the results of compaction. - As illustrated in
FIG. 3 ,controller 30 may receive and store in memory any necessary information associated with the current compacting operation, such as, for example, the boundaries of the area to be compacted, a desired measurement interval, a desired compaction amount, and any other information necessary to describe the compaction site (Step 100). The boundaries may be defined by, for example, inputting intocontroller 30 throughinput 40 b a description of the area using GPS coordinates, Cartesian coordinates, latitude and longitude, or any other coordinate system sufficient to describe the area. Alternatively, the boundaries may be input by drivingmachine 10 and towedcompactor 20 around the boundary of the area to be compacted, whilecontroller 10 receives and stores data fromposition determining unit 28 sufficient to define the boundaries of the area. Other information that the operator may input include, for example, material type, material moisture content, date, time, and weather information. - Step 100 may be better understood through an example. In this example,
controller 30 receives various data about a particular compaction site, including a weight ofrotary compactor 24 being 10000 lb, a width ofrotary compactor 24 being 6 feet, a measurement interval being 15 feet, the boundaries of the site in GPS coordinates, the material type being clay, the moisture content as measured on site, and the date and time. -
Controller 30 may then receive and store in memory calibration data such as, for example, the draft force ondrawbar 22 reported byforce sensor 32, the incline of towedcompactor 20 reported byinclinometer 34, and the position of towedcompactor 20 reported by position determining unit 38 (Step 102). The data may be received as the operator drivesmachine 10 with attached towedcompactor 20 over material in a test area, which may be a smaller subdivision of the compaction site. In addition to receiving and storing the calibration data into memory,controller 30 may create associations in memory among the various parameters, such as, for example, an association that a specific drawbar force, incline, and distance traveled are associated with a specific location or region of the compaction site. These associations may be used bycontroller 30 to calculate accurate determinations of the amount of compaction, as well as to provide visual representations of the amount of compaction ondisplay 40 a. The data stored during this step may be used for various calculations and visual representations, including, for example, calculations bycontroller 30 to predict and determine the performance ofrotary compactor 24 during compaction of the entire compaction site. - After it is verified by compaction verification means known in the art that the compaction value of the test site satisfies the compaction specification,
controller 30 may receive and store in memory data such as, for example, the force ondrawbar 22 reported byforce sensor 32, the incline of towedcompactor 20 reported byinclinometer 34, and the position of towedcompactor 20 reported byposition determining unit 38, as towedcompactor 20 is towed over the compacted test area.Controller 30 may then calculate the draft force on towedcompactor 20 using Equations 1 and 2.Controller 30 may store this draft force as a target value for the compaction of the remainder of the compaction site. - Continuing with the example from
step 100 above, the test area is determined to be a small area the width of towed compactor 20 (6 feet), and the length of the measurement interval (15 feet). After verifying that the desired compaction value of the test area has been reached, towedcompactor 20 is towed over the test area once again. During this final pass,controller 30 receives a force measurement of 2700 lb fromforce sensor 32, and an incline measurement of 4 deg. frominclinometer 34.Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 698 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 2002 lb that accounts for the incline.Controller 30 then stores the 2002 lb value as the target draft force for use in later compaction level determinations. -
Controller 30 may receive and store in memory operational data such as, for example, the force ondrawbar 22 reported byforce sensor 32, the incline of towedcompactor 20 reported byinclinometer 34, and the position of towedcompactor 20 reported byposition determining unit 38, as towedcompactor 20 makes one or more passes over the entire compaction site (Step 104). In addition to receiving and storing the operational data in the memory,controller 30 may create associations in memory among the various parameters, such as, for example, an association among a drawbar force, incline, distance traveled and location or region of the compaction site. These associations may be used bycontroller 30 to accurately calculate the amount of compaction of the site, as well as to provide visual representations of the amount of compaction ondisplay 40 a. -
Controller 30 may use the operational data received and stored instep 104 to calculate the draft force on towedcompactor 20 for the entire compaction site (Step 106).Controller 30 may first use Equation 1 to calculate the incline force on the towed compactor, and then Equation 2 to calculate the draft force on towedcompactor 20.Controller 30 may then compare the draft force calculated using Equation 2 to the target draft force value stored duringstep 102.Controller 30 may perform these calculations and comparisons for each pass of each subdivision of the compaction site, as defined by the measurement interval.Controller 30 may store in memory the results for each pass of each subdivision. Whencontroller 30 determines that the draft force on the most recent pass is greater than the target draft force, thencontroller 30 may signal the operator that compaction is not yet complete, and that one or more passes may still be required (return to Step 104). Whencontroller 30 determines that the draft force on the most recent pass is less than or equal to the target draft force, thencontroller 30 may determine that compaction is complete.Controller 30 may evaluate the results of the comparison of the draft force using a range of acceptable compaction, such as, for example, ±5% of the desired compaction level. - Continuing with the example from
steps controller 30 receives a force measurement of 8500 lb fromforce sensor 32, and an incline measurement of 6 deg. frominclinometer 34 during a particular measurement interval.Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 7455 lb that accounts for the incline. InStep 106,controller 30 determines that the calculated draft force of 7455 lb is greater than the target draft force of 2002 lb determined inStep 102, and therefore compaction is not yet complete (return to Step 104). InStep 104, on the second pass of a particular area, moving in the opposite direction,controller 30 receives a force of 980 lb fromforce sensor 32, and an incline of −6 deg. frominclinometer 34.Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of −1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate a draft force of 2025 lb that accounts for the incline. InStep 106,controller 30 then determines that the calculated draft force of 2025 lb is within ±5% of the target draft force of 2002 lb, and therefore that compaction is complete. - Once
controller 30 has determined that compaction is complete,controller 30 may display compaction information ondisplay 40 a for each subdivision (Step 108). This information may be used by the operator in determining which subdivisions of the compaction area may still need one or more passes ofrotary compactor 24 to achieve the desired compaction. Aftercontroller 30 determines that the compaction level of the entire compaction site has reached the desired value,controller 30 may gather and store the final information about the compaction as an archive file within its memory.Controller 30 may display the information ondisplay 40 a, and/or download or otherwise record it using any apparatus commonly known in the art for downloading and/or recording data. This downloaded and/or recorded data may be used in future compaction activities and/or as quality control or quality assurance of the compaction activities in validation that the proper compaction level has been achieved. - Continuing the example from the preceding steps, in
Step 108,controller 30, having determined that the calculated draft force of 2025 lb is within the specified range of the target draft force of 2002 lb, determines that compaction is complete.Controller 30 then displays information ondisplay 40 a to notify the operator that compaction of the area is complete, and then stores the data for later use. - The second operating mode of
compaction determination unit 38 shown inFIG. 4 will now be described.Controller 30 may receive and store in memory any necessary information associated with the current compacting operation, as described above in Step 100 (Step 200). - Step 200 may be better understood through an example.
Controller 30 receives various data about a compaction site as described inStep 100 above. In addition, a target differential draft force of 500 lb is entered, as compaction may be determined to be complete when, according to the compaction specification, the differential draft force between two passes is less than about 500 lb, within a range of ±5%. -
Controller 30 may then receive and store in memory operational data as described inStep 104 above (Step 202).Controller 30 may use the operational data received and stored instep 202 to calculate a differential draft force experience bycompactor 20 between passes (Step 204).Controller 30 may use Equation 1 to calculate the incline force on the towed compactor, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force on towedcompactor 20 to account for the incline.Controller 30 may then useEquation 3 to compare the draft force of the current compacting pass over a single subdivision to the draft force for the previous compacting pass over that same subdivision. Whencontroller 30 determines that the differential draft force after the current pass is greater than the target differential draft force,controller 30 may signal the operator that compaction is not yet complete, and that one or more passes may still be required (return to Step 202). However, whencontroller 30 determines that the differential draft force after the current pass is less than or equal to the target differential draft force, thencontroller 30 may determine that compaction is complete.Controller 30 may evaluate the results of the comparison of the differential force using a range, such as, for example, ±5%, as specified by the compaction specification. - Continuing the example from
step 200, on pass 1 of a subdivision of the compaction site,controller 30 receives data fromforce sensor 32 reporting a force measurement of 8500 lb andinclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of 6 degrees.Controller 30 uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and then uses Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 7455 lb that accounts for the incline. InStep 204, because this was the first pass,controller 30 cannot compare the calculated draft force to the draft force from the previous pass, socontroller 30 stores the calculated draft force value and returns to step 202. Instep 202, on pass 2,controller 30 receives data fromforce sensor 32 reporting a force measurement 980 lb andinclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of −6 degrees.Controller 30 then uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of −1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 2025 lb that accounts for the incline. Instep 204,controller 30 usesEquation 3 to determine that the differential draft force between pass 1 and 2 is 5429 lb. Becausecontroller 30 calculates this differential draft force is greater than the target differential force of 500 lb,controller 30 stores the draft force value of 2025 lb for pass 2 and returns to step 202. InStep 202, onpass 3 of the same area,controller 30 receives data fromforce sensor 32 reporting a force measurement of 2750 lb andinclinometer 34 reporting an incline measurement of 6 degrees.Controller 30 uses Equation 1 to calculate an incline force of 1045 lb, and Equation 2 to calculate the draft force to be 1705 lb that accounts for the incline. Instep 204,controller 30 usesEquation 3 to determine that the differential draft force betweenpass 2 and 3 is 321 lb. Becausecontroller 30 calculates this differential draft force of 321 lb is within the acceptable range of the target differential force of 500 lb,controller 30 has determined that compaction is complete. -
Controller 30 may make a determination that compaction is complete for one or more subdivisions of the compaction area, and/or for the entire compaction area, as described inStep 108 above (Step 206).Controller 30 may display information ondisplay 40 a that shows the subdivisions for whichcontroller 30 has determined that compaction is complete, as described above. - The examples in the preceding paragraphs illustrate several aspects of the disclosed compaction detection system The disclosed apparatus and method may allow compaction determination in a manner that does not require disruption of the material surface. This may be beneficial because a disruption of some surfaces, such as the surface of a roadway, may be undesirable.
- A second aspect of the disclosed compaction detection system is the measurement of an incline of a surface for use in determining the amount of compaction of a material. This measurement may allow compaction determination to be more accurate by accounting for the draft force that results from the incline.
- It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the disclosed compaction determination system without departing from the scope of the invention. Other embodiments of the compaction determination system will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the compaction determination system disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (20)
1. A compaction determination system for monitoring the compaction in a material produced by a rotary device as the rotary device is towed over the material, comprising:
a force sensor associated with a drawbar used to tow the rotary device, the force sensor being configured to sense a force transmitted to the rotary device via the drawbar; and
a controller in communication with the force sensor, the controller being configured to determine a compaction of the material produced by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
2. The compaction determination system of claim 1 , wherein the controller determines a higher compaction of the material when the sensed force is lower, and determines a lower compaction of the material when the sensed force is higher.
3. The compaction determination system of claim 1 , further including an incline sensor configured to sense an incline in a surface of the material, wherein the controller is in communication with the incline sensor and configured to determine the compaction of the material produced by the rotary device based further on the sensed incline.
4. The compaction determination system of claim 3 , wherein the controller determines a higher compaction for a given sensed force when a decline is sensed, and determines a lower compaction for the given sensed force when an incline is sensed.
5. The compaction determination system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to display within the mobile machine a representation of the determined material compaction.
6. The compaction determination system of claim 1 , wherein the controller determines compaction by comparing the sensed force to a target value.
7. The compaction determination system of claim 1 , wherein the controller determines compaction by comparing the force sensed during a current compaction pass to a force sensed during a previous compaction pass.
8. A method of determining compaction, comprising:
towing a rotary device over a material to compact the material;
sensing a force of the towing; and
determining an amount of compaction created by the rotary device based on the sensed force.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the amount of compaction is determined to be higher when the sensed force is lower, and the amount of compaction is determined to be lower when the sensed force is higher.
10. The method of claim 8 , further including sensing an incline in the surface of the material, wherein the amount of compaction is determined based further on the sensed incline.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the amount of compaction is determined to be higher for a given sensed force when a decline is sensed, and the amount of compaction is determined to be lower for the given sensed force when an incline is sensed.
12. The method of claim 8 , further including visually displaying a representation of the determined material compaction.
13. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining includes comparing the sensed force to a target value.
14. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining includes comparing the force sensed during a current compaction pass to a force sensed during a previous compaction pass.
15. A surface compaction system, comprising:
a machine;
a rotary device pulled by the machine over a material to compact the material;
a drawbar connecting the rotary device to the machine;
a force sensor associated with the drawbar being configured to sense a force transmitted from the machine to the rotary device via the drawbar;
an inclinometer configured to sense an incline in a surface over which the rotary device is operating; and
a controller in communication with the force sensor and the inclinometer, the controller being configured to determine a compaction of the material produced by the rotary device based on the sensed force and the sensed incline.
16. The surface compaction system of claim 15 , wherein the controller determines a higher compaction of the material when the sensed force is lower, and determines a lower compaction of the material when the sensed force is higher.
17. The surface compaction system of claim 15 , wherein the controller determines a higher compaction for a given sensed force when a decline is sensed, and determines a lower compaction for the given sensed force when an incline is sensed.
18. The surface compaction system of claim 15 , wherein the controller is further configured to display within an operator station of the machine a representation of the determined material compaction.
19. The surface compaction system of claim 15 , wherein the controller is configured to determine compaction by comparing the sensed force to a target value.
20. The surface compaction system of claim 15 , wherein the controller is configured to determine compaction by comparing the force sensed during a current compaction pass to a force sensed during a previous compaction pass.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/790,205 US20080267719A1 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2007-04-24 | Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/790,205 US20080267719A1 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2007-04-24 | Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080267719A1 true US20080267719A1 (en) | 2008-10-30 |
Family
ID=39887164
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/790,205 Abandoned US20080267719A1 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2007-04-24 | Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20080267719A1 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080260462A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Hamm Ag | Method for determining a compaction degree of asphalts and system for determining a compaction degree |
US20100087992A1 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2010-04-08 | Glee Katherine C | Machine system and operating method for compacting a work area |
US8639420B2 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2014-01-28 | Caterpillar Inc. | Worksite-management system |
US8700270B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2014-04-15 | Cnh America Llc | System and method for determining drawbar force magnitude and direction |
US20140358669A1 (en) * | 2013-06-03 | 2014-12-04 | Cloudwear, Inc. | Method for selecting and receiving primary and supplemental advertiser information using a wearable-computing device |
CN104457839A (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2015-03-25 | 广东惠利普路桥信息工程有限公司 | Road roller onboard detection system |
US9439340B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2016-09-13 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Frame configuration for an agricultural tillage implement |
US9516796B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2016-12-13 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | Agricultural tillage implement wheel control |
US9609800B2 (en) | 2013-12-11 | 2017-04-04 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | Remote leveling of tillage implements using inclinometers |
US9661798B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2017-05-30 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Agricultural tillage implement wheel control |
US9801323B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2017-10-31 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Rocker link lift system |
US10087587B2 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2018-10-02 | Road Widener Llc | Articulating rolling compactor attachment |
US20190055708A1 (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2019-02-21 | Independence Excavating, Inc. | Slope roller assembly |
US10420271B2 (en) | 2014-11-10 | 2019-09-24 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Fully adjustable lift system |
USD861739S1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-01 | Independence Excavating, Inc. | Slope roller |
US20190320574A1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-24 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | System for creating soil compaction maps and associated methods for controlling the operation of a tillage implement |
USD887455S1 (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2020-06-16 | Travis Erdman | Irrigation wheel design |
WO2020208430A1 (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2020-10-15 | Agco Corporation | Tillage implements and methods of identifying a compaction layer |
USD943642S1 (en) * | 2020-02-29 | 2022-02-15 | Bmic Llc | Perforating apparatus |
US11310953B2 (en) | 2019-07-02 | 2022-04-26 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | System and method for calibrating load sensors of an agricultural implement |
US11419254B2 (en) | 2019-10-28 | 2022-08-23 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | System and method for detecting levelness of tools of a tillage implement based on tool loading |
Citations (56)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4127351A (en) * | 1975-12-01 | 1978-11-28 | Koehring Gmbh - Bomag Division | Dynamic soil compaction |
US4149253A (en) * | 1970-11-21 | 1979-04-10 | Losenhausen Maschinenbau Ag | Soil compacting apparatus |
US4846283A (en) * | 1987-09-08 | 1989-07-11 | J. I. Case Company | Engine-sensing draft control system with multiple feedback compensation mechanisms |
US5177415A (en) * | 1990-05-28 | 1993-01-05 | Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling a vibratory tool |
US5253570A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1993-10-19 | Hay & Forage Industries | Baler with load sensor |
US5375059A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1994-12-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Vehicle position determination system and method |
US5426972A (en) * | 1993-04-20 | 1995-06-27 | Gas Research Institute | Monitoring soil compaction |
US5471391A (en) * | 1993-12-08 | 1995-11-28 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for operating compacting machinery relative to a work site |
US5548516A (en) * | 1989-12-11 | 1996-08-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Multi-tasked navigation system and method for an autonomous land based vehicle |
US5610815A (en) * | 1989-12-11 | 1997-03-11 | Caterpillar Inc. | Integrated vehicle positioning and navigation system, apparatus and method |
US5612864A (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 1997-03-18 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining the position of a work implement |
US5615116A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-03-25 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for autonomous vehicle navigation using path data |
US5646844A (en) * | 1994-04-18 | 1997-07-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time monitoring and coordination of multiple geography altering machines on a work site |
US5684691A (en) * | 1995-04-17 | 1997-11-04 | Case Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling draft of an agricultural implement |
US5764511A (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 1998-06-09 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for controlling slope of cut of work implement |
US5781874A (en) * | 1995-11-28 | 1998-07-14 | Ingersoll-Rand Company | Control system for a compaction roller vibratory mechanism |
US5801967A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-09-01 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the volume between previous and current site surfaces |
US5806016A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1998-09-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the course of a machine |
US5850341A (en) * | 1994-06-30 | 1998-12-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring material removal using mobile machinery |
US5897603A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 1999-04-27 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the relationship between the heading of a machine and the course of machine travel |
US5925085A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-07-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining and displaying the position of a work implement |
US5935183A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1999-08-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and system for determining the relationship between a laser plane and an external coordinate system |
US5935192A (en) * | 1996-12-12 | 1999-08-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for representing parameters in a work site database |
US5951613A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-09-14 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining the position of a work implement |
US6004076A (en) * | 1995-03-03 | 1999-12-21 | Compaction Technology (Soil) Limited | Method and apparatus for monitoring soil compaction |
US6041582A (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2000-03-28 | Case Corporation | System for recording soil conditions |
US6085130A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2000-07-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a transition scheme for use in transitioning a mobile machine from a first path to a second path |
US6088644A (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2000-07-11 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining a path to be traversed by a mobile machine |
US6112143A (en) * | 1998-08-06 | 2000-08-29 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for establishing a perimeter defining an area to be traversed by a mobile machine |
US6122601A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2000-09-19 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Compacted material density measurement and compaction tracking system |
US6188942B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2001-02-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of a compaction machine based on energy transfer |
US6460006B1 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2002-10-01 | Caterpillar Inc | System for predicting compaction performance |
US6520715B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-02-18 | John Paul Smith | Asphalt delivery and compaction system |
US6546705B2 (en) * | 2000-05-13 | 2003-04-15 | New Holland North America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/baler combination |
US6551019B1 (en) * | 1999-11-26 | 2003-04-22 | Bomag Gmbh & Co. Ohg | Device for checking the compaction for vibration compaction devices |
US6577141B2 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2003-06-10 | Sauer-Danfoss, Inc. | System and method for capacitance sensing of pavement density |
US20030195687A1 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2003-10-16 | Keefer Claude W. | Method and apparatus for controlling the updating of a machine database |
US6647799B1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-11-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Soil strength measurement for site-specific agriculture |
US20040050187A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-18 | Tritico Philip A. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US6741949B2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2004-05-25 | Caterpillar Inc | Real time pavement profile indicator |
US20040114557A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-06-17 | Machinetalker, Inc. | Self coordinated machine network |
US6834550B2 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2004-12-28 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Soil profile force measurement using an instrumented tine |
US20050019105A1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-01-27 | Tritico Philip A. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US6917846B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2005-07-12 | Caterpillar Inc | Apparatus and method of providing a work machine |
US20050158129A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-07-21 | Liqun Chi | Method and system of forecasting compaction performance |
US20050183512A1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2005-08-25 | Corcoran Paul T. | Compaction quality assurance based upon quantifying compactor interaction with base material |
US20050216195A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Eric Berger | Method of selecting a soil stabilization protocol for a construction site |
US20060016609A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2006-01-26 | Vincent Chauvel | Implement control systems |
US20060080017A1 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2006-04-13 | Corcoran Paul T | Compaction indication by effective rolling radius |
US7028554B2 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2006-04-18 | Deere & Company | Instrumented deep tillage implement |
US20060096354A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Sesh Commuri | Method and apparatus for predicting density of asphalt |
US7058495B2 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2006-06-06 | Caterpillar Inc. | Work implement control system and method |
US7058509B2 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2006-06-06 | Columbia Technologies, Llc | System, method and computer program product for subsurface contamination detection and analysis |
US7073374B2 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2006-07-11 | Bbnt Solutions Llc | Soil compaction measurement on moving platform |
US7104340B1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-09-12 | Deere & Company | Towed implement draft force sensor |
US7260922B2 (en) * | 1994-07-22 | 2007-08-28 | Ranpak Corp. | Packing material product and method and apparatus for making, monitoring and controlling the same |
-
2007
- 2007-04-24 US US11/790,205 patent/US20080267719A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (75)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4149253A (en) * | 1970-11-21 | 1979-04-10 | Losenhausen Maschinenbau Ag | Soil compacting apparatus |
US4127351A (en) * | 1975-12-01 | 1978-11-28 | Koehring Gmbh - Bomag Division | Dynamic soil compaction |
US5253570A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1993-10-19 | Hay & Forage Industries | Baler with load sensor |
US4846283A (en) * | 1987-09-08 | 1989-07-11 | J. I. Case Company | Engine-sensing draft control system with multiple feedback compensation mechanisms |
US5548516A (en) * | 1989-12-11 | 1996-08-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Multi-tasked navigation system and method for an autonomous land based vehicle |
US5610815A (en) * | 1989-12-11 | 1997-03-11 | Caterpillar Inc. | Integrated vehicle positioning and navigation system, apparatus and method |
US5390125A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1995-02-14 | Caterpillar Inc. | Vehicle position determination system and method |
US5680306A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-10-21 | Caterpillar Inc. | System, and method for enabling a vehicle to track a path |
US5438517A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1995-08-01 | Caterpillar Inc. | Vehicle position determination system and method |
US5956250A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1999-09-21 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for autonomous vehicle navigation using absolute data |
US5684696A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-11-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for enabling an autonomous vehicle to track a desired path |
US5838562A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1998-11-17 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and a method for enabling a vehicle to track a preset path |
US5375059A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1994-12-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Vehicle position determination system and method |
US5657226A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-08-12 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for causing an autonomous vehicle to track a path |
US5615116A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-03-25 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for autonomous vehicle navigation using path data |
US5629855A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-05-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for using parabolic models to improve position estimates from a global positioning system |
US5640323A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-06-17 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for operating an autonomous navigation system |
US5648901A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-07-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for generating paths in an autonomous vehicle |
US5646845A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-07-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for controlling an autonomously navigated vehicle |
US5646843A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1997-07-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for surface based vehicle control system |
US5177415A (en) * | 1990-05-28 | 1993-01-05 | Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling a vibratory tool |
US5426972A (en) * | 1993-04-20 | 1995-06-27 | Gas Research Institute | Monitoring soil compaction |
US5493494A (en) * | 1993-12-08 | 1996-02-20 | Caterpillar, Inc. | Method and apparatus for operating compacting machinery relative to a work site |
US5471391A (en) * | 1993-12-08 | 1995-11-28 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for operating compacting machinery relative to a work site |
US5646844A (en) * | 1994-04-18 | 1997-07-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time monitoring and coordination of multiple geography altering machines on a work site |
US5850341A (en) * | 1994-06-30 | 1998-12-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring material removal using mobile machinery |
US7260922B2 (en) * | 1994-07-22 | 2007-08-28 | Ranpak Corp. | Packing material product and method and apparatus for making, monitoring and controlling the same |
US6004076A (en) * | 1995-03-03 | 1999-12-21 | Compaction Technology (Soil) Limited | Method and apparatus for monitoring soil compaction |
US6065904A (en) * | 1995-03-03 | 2000-05-23 | Compaction Technology (Soil) Limited | Soil compaction apparatus |
US5684691A (en) * | 1995-04-17 | 1997-11-04 | Case Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling draft of an agricultural implement |
US5764511A (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 1998-06-09 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for controlling slope of cut of work implement |
US5612864A (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 1997-03-18 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining the position of a work implement |
US5781874A (en) * | 1995-11-28 | 1998-07-14 | Ingersoll-Rand Company | Control system for a compaction roller vibratory mechanism |
US5806016A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1998-09-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the course of a machine |
US5801967A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-09-01 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the volume between previous and current site surfaces |
US6122601A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2000-09-19 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Compacted material density measurement and compaction tracking system |
US5935183A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1999-08-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and system for determining the relationship between a laser plane and an external coordinate system |
US5925085A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-07-20 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining and displaying the position of a work implement |
US5951613A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-09-14 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining the position of a work implement |
US5935192A (en) * | 1996-12-12 | 1999-08-10 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for representing parameters in a work site database |
US5897603A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 1999-04-27 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for determining the relationship between the heading of a machine and the course of machine travel |
US6041582A (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2000-03-28 | Case Corporation | System for recording soil conditions |
US6085130A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2000-07-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a transition scheme for use in transitioning a mobile machine from a first path to a second path |
US6112143A (en) * | 1998-08-06 | 2000-08-29 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for establishing a perimeter defining an area to be traversed by a mobile machine |
US6088644A (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2000-07-11 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining a path to be traversed by a mobile machine |
US6460006B1 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2002-10-01 | Caterpillar Inc | System for predicting compaction performance |
US6188942B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2001-02-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of a compaction machine based on energy transfer |
US6551019B1 (en) * | 1999-11-26 | 2003-04-22 | Bomag Gmbh & Co. Ohg | Device for checking the compaction for vibration compaction devices |
US6546705B2 (en) * | 2000-05-13 | 2003-04-15 | New Holland North America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/baler combination |
US6917846B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2005-07-12 | Caterpillar Inc | Apparatus and method of providing a work machine |
US20050019105A1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-01-27 | Tritico Philip A. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US7110884B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2006-09-19 | Earthworks Solutions, Inc. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US6577141B2 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2003-06-10 | Sauer-Danfoss, Inc. | System and method for capacitance sensing of pavement density |
US6520715B1 (en) * | 2001-08-10 | 2003-02-18 | John Paul Smith | Asphalt delivery and compaction system |
US6834550B2 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2004-12-28 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Soil profile force measurement using an instrumented tine |
US6741949B2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2004-05-25 | Caterpillar Inc | Real time pavement profile indicator |
US6647799B1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-11-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Soil strength measurement for site-specific agriculture |
US20030195687A1 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2003-10-16 | Keefer Claude W. | Method and apparatus for controlling the updating of a machine database |
US6701239B2 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2004-03-02 | Caterpillar Inc | Method and apparatus for controlling the updating of a machine database |
US20040114557A1 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-06-17 | Machinetalker, Inc. | Self coordinated machine network |
US20040050187A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-18 | Tritico Philip A. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US6859732B2 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2005-02-22 | Philip A. Tritico | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
US7058509B2 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2006-06-06 | Columbia Technologies, Llc | System, method and computer program product for subsurface contamination detection and analysis |
US7028554B2 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2006-04-18 | Deere & Company | Instrumented deep tillage implement |
US7073374B2 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2006-07-11 | Bbnt Solutions Llc | Soil compaction measurement on moving platform |
US7058495B2 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2006-06-06 | Caterpillar Inc. | Work implement control system and method |
US20050158129A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-07-21 | Liqun Chi | Method and system of forecasting compaction performance |
US6973821B2 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2005-12-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Compaction quality assurance based upon quantifying compactor interaction with base material |
US20050183512A1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2005-08-25 | Corcoran Paul T. | Compaction quality assurance based upon quantifying compactor interaction with base material |
US20050216195A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Eric Berger | Method of selecting a soil stabilization protocol for a construction site |
US20060016609A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2006-01-26 | Vincent Chauvel | Implement control systems |
US20060080017A1 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2006-04-13 | Corcoran Paul T | Compaction indication by effective rolling radius |
US20060096354A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Sesh Commuri | Method and apparatus for predicting density of asphalt |
US7104340B1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-09-12 | Deere & Company | Towed implement draft force sensor |
US20060219417A1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-10-05 | Deere & Company, A Delaware Corporation | Towed implement draft force sensor |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080260462A1 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2008-10-23 | Hamm Ag | Method for determining a compaction degree of asphalts and system for determining a compaction degree |
US7873492B2 (en) * | 2007-04-23 | 2011-01-18 | Hamm Ag | Method for determining a compaction degree of asphalts and system for determining a compaction degree |
US20100087992A1 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2010-04-08 | Glee Katherine C | Machine system and operating method for compacting a work area |
US8116950B2 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2012-02-14 | Caterpillar Inc. | Machine system and operating method for compacting a work area |
US8639420B2 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2014-01-28 | Caterpillar Inc. | Worksite-management system |
US8700270B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2014-04-15 | Cnh America Llc | System and method for determining drawbar force magnitude and direction |
US20140358669A1 (en) * | 2013-06-03 | 2014-12-04 | Cloudwear, Inc. | Method for selecting and receiving primary and supplemental advertiser information using a wearable-computing device |
US20140358691A1 (en) * | 2013-06-03 | 2014-12-04 | Cloudwear, Inc. | System for selecting and receiving primary and supplemental advertiser information using a wearable-computing device |
US9999172B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2018-06-19 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | Agricultural tillage implement wheel control |
US9516796B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2016-12-13 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | Agricultural tillage implement wheel control |
US9661798B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2017-05-30 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Agricultural tillage implement wheel control |
US9801323B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2017-10-31 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Rocker link lift system |
US9439340B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2016-09-13 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Frame configuration for an agricultural tillage implement |
US9609800B2 (en) | 2013-12-11 | 2017-04-04 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | Remote leveling of tillage implements using inclinometers |
CN104457839A (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2015-03-25 | 广东惠利普路桥信息工程有限公司 | Road roller onboard detection system |
US10420271B2 (en) | 2014-11-10 | 2019-09-24 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | Fully adjustable lift system |
US20190136465A1 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2019-05-09 | Road Widener Llc | Articulating rolling compactor attachment |
US11384488B2 (en) | 2014-12-23 | 2022-07-12 | Road Widener Llc | Articulating rolling compactor attachment |
US10087587B2 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2018-10-02 | Road Widener Llc | Articulating rolling compactor attachment |
US11661714B2 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2023-05-30 | Road Widener Llc | Boom attachment for a host vehicle |
US10689812B2 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2020-06-23 | Road Widener Llc | Articulating rolling compactor attachment |
US20220316153A1 (en) * | 2014-12-23 | 2022-10-06 | Road Widener Llc | Boom attachment for a host vehicle |
USD887455S1 (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2020-06-16 | Travis Erdman | Irrigation wheel design |
US20190055708A1 (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2019-02-21 | Independence Excavating, Inc. | Slope roller assembly |
US10662603B2 (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2020-05-26 | Independence Excavating, Inc. | Slope roller assembly |
USD861739S1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-01 | Independence Excavating, Inc. | Slope roller |
US20190320574A1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-24 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | System for creating soil compaction maps and associated methods for controlling the operation of a tillage implement |
WO2020208430A1 (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2020-10-15 | Agco Corporation | Tillage implements and methods of identifying a compaction layer |
US11310953B2 (en) | 2019-07-02 | 2022-04-26 | Cnh Industrial America Llc | System and method for calibrating load sensors of an agricultural implement |
US11419254B2 (en) | 2019-10-28 | 2022-08-23 | Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. | System and method for detecting levelness of tools of a tillage implement based on tool loading |
USD943642S1 (en) * | 2020-02-29 | 2022-02-15 | Bmic Llc | Perforating apparatus |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20080267719A1 (en) | Towed compaction determination system utilizing drawbar force | |
US6188942B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of a compaction machine based on energy transfer | |
Ranjbarian et al. | Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil | |
US6834550B2 (en) | Soil profile force measurement using an instrumented tine | |
US10018611B2 (en) | Soil compaction system and method | |
US6973821B2 (en) | Compaction quality assurance based upon quantifying compactor interaction with base material | |
US20120107045A1 (en) | Compactor System And Methods | |
US6122601A (en) | Compacted material density measurement and compaction tracking system | |
White et al. | Field validation of intelligent compaction monitoring technology for unbound materials | |
US20080063473A1 (en) | Method of operating a compactor machine via path planning based on compaction state data and mapping information | |
JP3585237B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for operating a compression molding machine used at a worksite | |
US20180002882A1 (en) | An Impact Compactor, Compaction System and a Method of Obtaining Soil Strength | |
WO2007073451A1 (en) | Compaction monitoring system using compaction value targets | |
US20050005704A1 (en) | Instrumented deep tillage implement | |
US20090173147A1 (en) | System and method for soil strength measurement | |
US7428455B2 (en) | Compaction indication by effective rolling radius | |
US20160168806A1 (en) | System and method for determining ground stiffness | |
JP3908031B2 (en) | Embankment rolling pressure management method and apparatus | |
White et al. | Assessing soil stiffness of stabilized pavement foundations | |
Siefken et al. | Mapping soil mechanical resistance with a multiple blade system | |
Adamchuk et al. | Instrumentation system for variable depth tillage | |
Pochi et al. | Testing of soil tillage machinery | |
Tehrani | An investigation of continuous compaction control systems | |
ANDREWS | Review of Density Compliance Systems for Subgrade and Embankment Construction-Stage | |
Facas et al. | Position reporting error of intelligent compaction and continuous compaction control roller-measured soil properties |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CATERPILLAR INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CORCORAN, PAUL THOMAS;REEL/FRAME:019291/0353 Effective date: 20070411 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |