US20090157305A1 - Industrial vehicle fleet management system - Google Patents

Industrial vehicle fleet management system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090157305A1
US20090157305A1 US12/379,048 US37904809A US2009157305A1 US 20090157305 A1 US20090157305 A1 US 20090157305A1 US 37904809 A US37904809 A US 37904809A US 2009157305 A1 US2009157305 A1 US 2009157305A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
pallet
transmitter
piv
container
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/379,048
Inventor
Steven A. Ding
Damon M. Manz
Donald L. Mallonee, JR.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Postal Service (USPS)
Original Assignee
US Postal Service (USPS)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by US Postal Service (USPS) filed Critical US Postal Service (USPS)
Priority to US12/379,048 priority Critical patent/US20090157305A1/en
Publication of US20090157305A1 publication Critical patent/US20090157305A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • G06Q10/047Optimisation of routes or paths, e.g. travelling salesman problem
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/083Shipping
    • G06Q10/0835Relationships between shipper or supplier and carriers
    • G06Q10/08355Routing methods
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/008Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/08Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
    • G07C5/0841Registering performance data
    • G07C5/085Registering performance data using electronic data carriers

Definitions

  • Embodiments disclosed herein relate to a method of generating data for calculating current utilization of powered industrial vehicles and a method of generating assignments, which if followed may approximate optimal utilization of the powered industrial vehicles.
  • a powered industrial vehicle is a vehicle used in transporting heavy loads.
  • Examples of powered industrial vehicles are forklifts and jitneys, sometimes referred to as tuggers.
  • Forklifts have an “L-shaped” structure with two projections extending in front of the PIV, which may be raised and lowered from the floor (level with the bottom surface of the wheels of the PIV to many feet above the floor (twelve to fifteen), depending on the design.
  • Forklifts are most often used to transport things strapped or otherwise attached to pallets.
  • Other vehicles such as a “tugger,” may have at least one, and up to six, trailers or wheeled rolling containers attached to the back of the vehicle.
  • PIVs transport pallets or rolling containers which either do, or will contain mail.
  • the U.S. Postal Service mail processing facilities are laid out with work areas and aisleways.
  • the work areas contain mail processing stations which are operated by personnel.
  • the aisleways are often shared by both PIVs and personnel, however, in some instances, dedicated PIV aisles may be utilized.
  • PIVs are used to remove the mail transport equipment (MTE) from the trucks and to transport it (either a pallet or a container) to the appropriate mail processing station. Then, to process the mail, it is removed, as stored in mail trays, from the pallet or container and after processing, the mail trays containing mail are placed in another container or on another pallet.
  • MTE mail transport equipment
  • Each processing station typically has an input and output staging area of a predetermined size where incoming or processed mail may accumulate.
  • PIVs are used to transport the pallets or containers of processed mail from one processing station to the next.
  • PIVs are used to transport the pallets or containers with processed mail, even if not full, from the last processing station to the staging area near the dock for the truck.
  • the current utilization of the PIVs and PIV drivers depends on decisions made by the PIV drivers and the number of properly working PIVs.
  • the PIV drivers learn the proper route of mail from the inbound trucks through the mail processing stations to the outbound trucks, for each approved mail process.
  • the PIV drivers are also aware of the regular schedule of inbound and outbound mail trucks at the docks.
  • PIV drivers make the routing decision for each pallet or container of mail unless a supervisor communicates with them while driving via a paging system to give instructions to remove or deliver a pallet or container at a particular mail processing station.
  • the routing decision includes the start time, drop-off location, and path of the route to transport a pallet or container from any location in the facilities to where it is or will be needed.
  • U.S. Postal Service facilities are large, but the mail processing stations and aisles are less than 100 feet apart, the current system, Asset Management and Tracking System as provided by I.D. Systems, Inc., of Hackensack, N.J. does not provide insight as to the exact location of the PIV and driver within a 100 foot radius circle.
  • the existing graphical display capabilities from radio frequency transmitters on each PIV and receivers spread through out the facility just show each PIV appearing at a location that is accurate within 100 feet of its actual location.
  • the transmitted location data is updated approximately every 30 seconds, and thus graphically, each PIV appears to “hop” throughout the building, but no particular path is depicted.
  • an embodiment consistent with the invention is a method of generating data on current utilization of powered industrial vehicles which includes recording the driver, time, and location, of the start of any motion of a powered industrial vehicle as well as the time and location of a subsequent stop of the powered industrial vehicle, the path driven by or the instantaneous speed of or total distance traveled by the powered industrial vehicle between the recorded start and stop locations, an identifier of any pallet or container that is being picked up at a start location and whether the pallet or container is carrying a load, and the identifier of any pallet or container that is being dropped off at a stop location.
  • the preferred minimum distance may be measured between all expected pick-up or drop-off locations.
  • the above recorded data and measurements may be stored in a database for tabular or graphical presentation for use in calculating desired utilization indicators by powered industrial vehicle and driver.
  • the apparatus may include a transmitter on the vehicle transmitting data therefrom and at least one load sensor operatively coupled to the transmitter.
  • the load sensor is on the vehicle and generates data from which the presence of a pallet or container being transported by the vehicle can be determined.
  • the apparatus may also include a receiver disposed to receive transmissions of data from the transmitter from which the location of the vehicle and the presence of a pallet or container being transported can be determined, a computer programmed to determine the optimal path of the vehicle and generate data commands, a transmitter operatively coupled to the computer to transmit the data commands to the vehicle, and a display disposed to display the commands in a form readable by a human operator of the vehicle.
  • FIG. 1 is a chart with example values recorded
  • FIG. 2 is a floor plan of an example U.S. Postal Service mail processing facility.
  • FIG. 3 is an example assignment for a PIV driver with expected route and times, indicating whether a pallet should be picked up or dropped-off.
  • a method for generating data on current utilization of powered industrial vehicles may comprise recording for each PIV, the driver of that PIV, and the time and location within the facility when the PIV begins to move. If a pallet is being lifted or a container being pulled by the PIV, that may be recorded as well as whether the pallet or container is carrying a load of mail. The path driven may be recorded, as well as the instantaneous speed or the total distance driven between a start location and a stop location. The time that and location where the PIV stops may be noted, as well as whether any pallet or container is removed from (dropped-off by) the PIV and if any pallet or container is connected to or picked-up by the PIV. When a pallet or container is added or removed, the identifier of that pallet or container may be recorded as well as whether it is carrying mail.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a chart that could be used to gather the needed data, except the path of the PIV.
  • This chart could be filled out by either the driver, if sufficient confidence in the data exists, or by another person either riding with or following the driver and PIV, if the loss of time to have the driver record his or her information is unacceptable, or if there is not sufficient confidence in the data recorded by the driver. Values that might be generated from a hypothetical route and floor plan are present in the chart in FIG. 1 to illustrate how such a chart might look in use.
  • a previous pallet number 408 now empty, needs to be moved, before loaded pallet 204 may be appropriately placed at station 1 .
  • the driver must move from pallet 204 to pallet 408 , then pick up pallet 408 and move it out of the way and drop it off. Then return to pallet 204 and pick it up and place it in the staging area.
  • the fork lift driver then picks up and transports pallet 408 to the processed mail staging area of station 1 , where station 1 personnel will fill it with processed mail.
  • the PIV driver returns to the dock and picks up three containers (for use in this example, the PIV is no longer a fork lift, but a tugger), numbers 205 , 206 and 112 .
  • the PIV driver then transports these to station 1 's input staging area, where the first loaded pallet 204 was brought. All three of the containers are dropped off at station 1 (see line 8 of FIG. 1 ).
  • the PIV driver travels to station 4 processed mail staging area, where he picks up a loaded container 323 and transports it to station 5 's input staging area and drops it off.
  • the PIV driver goes to station 3 's input staging area and picks up three empty containers, which used to contain mail, and drops off one of them at station S's processed mail staging area, where it is needed to receive processed mail.
  • the other two empty containers are transported to station 1 processed mail staging area, where they will be positioned to receive processed mail at a later time.
  • keeping track manually is time consuming and generates many pages if recorded on paper. If handwritten, this data would need to be entered into a database for use in utilization calculations.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example floor plan which could be provided in conjunction with the chart illustrated in FIG. 1 , on which to record the path corresponding to each line of FIG. 1 .
  • a method of collecting the data faster than recording it by hand by either the driver or another person is to make a hand-held device or a touch screen on the PIV, which has drop down menus from which the driver or other person may select the appropriate information.
  • This data may be stored electronically and then transferred or downloaded to the computer containing the database and formulas for the desired calculations.
  • the data may be automatically generated and stored by the use of improvements over existing PIV tracking products, such as Asset Management and Tracking System, sold by I.D. Systems of hackensack, N.J. Improvements would include the use of sensors and appropriate electronics on each PIV that can produce signals that allow the detection of 1) the presence and quantity of a transported load (the number of pallets or containers), 2) the identifiers of any pallets or containers which it transports, and 3) the location of the PIV to an accuracy of 10 feet or preferably the path driven by the PIV. These load and pallet or container identifier sensors and electronics would be operatively coupled to a data transmitter installed on each PIV.
  • asset Management and Tracking System sold by I.D. Systems of hackensack, N.J. Improvements would include the use of sensors and appropriate electronics on each PIV that can produce signals that allow the detection of 1) the presence and quantity of a transported load (the number of pallets or containers), 2) the identifiers of any pallets or containers which it transports, and 3) the location of the PIV to
  • This data would be transmitted from the PIV via the data transmitter and received by receivers installed through out the facility to be stored in the main computer/server available to the supervisor and industrial engineers. Once available on this computer/server, the values stored could be used by existing graphical display programs to indicate to the supervisor the historical record of any motion of a PIV and its associated driver.
  • the preferred routes between any two expected pick-up and drop-off locations within the facilities may be established and measured.
  • Statistical descriptions of the time to safely drive a PIV along any and all of the preferred routes may also be established and stored in electronic memory.
  • Statistical descriptions of the time that each mail station takes to process a fully loaded pallet or container of mail may be established and stored in electronic memory.
  • Statistics on times when the processing stations are staffed or not staffed with mail personnel [mail clerks] for processing the mail may be established and stored in electronic memory
  • the recorded, measured, and statistical data may be used in calculations of utilization by vehicle and driver. Calculations that may be of use in determining utilization of the PIVs and of the PIV drivers on a per shift basis follow in Table 1:
  • Desired information 1 time in motion 2 time transporting a pallet or container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations 3 time transporting a loaded pallet or container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations 4 number of pallets or containers picked-up and dropped-off between expected pick-up and drop-off locations 5 number of loaded pallets or containers picked-up and dropped-off between expected pick-up and drop-off locations 6 distance driven between expected pick-up and drop-off locations, in excess of preferred minimum distance, by discrete trip 7 percent of time in motion spent transporting a pallet or container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations.
  • the statistical data gathered, as described above, can be used to simulate the progress and accumulation of full and empty pallets and containers.
  • the simulation may also provide the maximum expected time transporting a pallet or container needed to calculate true utilization numbers for the PIVs and PIV drivers.
  • the simulation may be calculated by hand, but may be much more expeditiously accomplished by using a standard computer simulation program for modeling manufacturing processes. Examples of such programs are AutoMod sold by Brooks Automation/AutoMod Group and Arena, sold by Rockwell Software. Also, the Micro Analytics school bus routing model, logistics routing tools, such as Logistics Laboratory as developed by Northwestern University Production and U.S. Postal Service developed simulation models such as the Transportation Optimization Planning and Scheduling system (TOPS) and PostalCAD, as other examples, may be modified and used to develop specific PIV routes.
  • TOPS Transportation Optimization Planning and Scheduling system
  • PostalCAD PostalCAD
  • the shift supervisor's computer may contain this program or the simulation program may be resident on a server with which the shift supervisor's computer is networked.
  • optimal times and routes may be established for a minimum number of PIVs to enable the processing of that mail to proceed without delay.
  • routing assignments may be generated for each of the minimum number of powered industrial vehicles, including expected pathways, time schedules, and expected numbers of pallets or containers to transport.
  • a hypothetical routing assignment is illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • the routes are designated by letters, but would be known to the PIV drivers, or available to them in paper or in interactive graphical displays. These routing assignments may be provided on paper printouts, but would more likely be more useful as part of graphical displays available on each PIV, with the ability for the PIV driver to indicate when he or she has completed any discrete part of the assignment.
  • the computer or server which generates the preferred routing assignments may be operatively coupled to a transmitter that may transmit the preferred routing assignments in the form of data commands to the proper PIV, and the PIV would be equipped with a data receiver and display to convert such data commands into a form that a PIV driver may easily read.

Abstract

Embodiments consistent with the invention are an apparatus for and method of generating data on current utilization of powered industrial vehicles, generating preferred routing assignments for powered industrial drivers, and presenting preferred routing assignments for powered industrial vehicle drivers.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 is claimed based on U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/470,037, filed on May 13, 2003, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND Technical Field
  • Embodiments disclosed herein relate to a method of generating data for calculating current utilization of powered industrial vehicles and a method of generating assignments, which if followed may approximate optimal utilization of the powered industrial vehicles.
  • A powered industrial vehicle (“PIV”) is a vehicle used in transporting heavy loads. Examples of powered industrial vehicles are forklifts and jitneys, sometimes referred to as tuggers. Forklifts have an “L-shaped” structure with two projections extending in front of the PIV, which may be raised and lowered from the floor (level with the bottom surface of the wheels of the PIV to many feet above the floor (twelve to fifteen), depending on the design. Forklifts are most often used to transport things strapped or otherwise attached to pallets. Other vehicles, such as a “tugger,” may have at least one, and up to six, trailers or wheeled rolling containers attached to the back of the vehicle.
  • As used in the United States Postal Service mail processing facilities, PIVs transport pallets or rolling containers which either do, or will contain mail. The U.S. Postal Service mail processing facilities are laid out with work areas and aisleways. The work areas contain mail processing stations which are operated by personnel. The aisleways are often shared by both PIVs and personnel, however, in some instances, dedicated PIV aisles may be utilized.
  • When mail trucks arrive at predetermined times each day at the docks with the mail picked up from other sites, PIVs are used to remove the mail transport equipment (MTE) from the trucks and to transport it (either a pallet or a container) to the appropriate mail processing station. Then, to process the mail, it is removed, as stored in mail trays, from the pallet or container and after processing, the mail trays containing mail are placed in another container or on another pallet. Each processing station typically has an input and output staging area of a predetermined size where incoming or processed mail may accumulate. When, or before, the processed mail staging area is full, PIVs are used to transport the pallets or containers of processed mail from one processing station to the next. At predetermined times, when the processed mail needs to be available for loading onto an outbound truck, PIVs are used to transport the pallets or containers with processed mail, even if not full, from the last processing station to the staging area near the dock for the truck.
  • The current utilization of the PIVs and PIV drivers depends on decisions made by the PIV drivers and the number of properly working PIVs. The PIV drivers learn the proper route of mail from the inbound trucks through the mail processing stations to the outbound trucks, for each approved mail process. The PIV drivers are also aware of the regular schedule of inbound and outbound mail trucks at the docks. PIV drivers make the routing decision for each pallet or container of mail unless a supervisor communicates with them while driving via a paging system to give instructions to remove or deliver a pallet or container at a particular mail processing station. The routing decision includes the start time, drop-off location, and path of the route to transport a pallet or container from any location in the facilities to where it is or will be needed.
  • While the driver is enroute, the supervisor may visually locate the particular PIV the driver is using within 100 feet. As U.S. Postal Service facilities are large, but the mail processing stations and aisles are less than 100 feet apart, the current system, Asset Management and Tracking System as provided by I.D. Systems, Inc., of Hackensack, N.J. does not provide insight as to the exact location of the PIV and driver within a 100 foot radius circle. Thus the existing graphical display capabilities from radio frequency transmitters on each PIV and receivers spread through out the facility, just show each PIV appearing at a location that is accurate within 100 feet of its actual location. The transmitted location data is updated approximately every 30 seconds, and thus graphically, each PIV appears to “hop” throughout the building, but no particular path is depicted.
  • Moreover, there is no planned assignment or expected time that any particular trip should take. Experienced PIV drivers develop an estimate of how long it will take them to drive a PIV from one location to another, and use that in making the routing decisions. But a supervisor has no way of knowing whether the time that it takes a PIV driver to transport a pallet or container from point A to point B is more or less time than it takes to safely transport a pallet or container from point A to point B. Currently optimal routes between mail processing stations have not been prescribed, nor is there knowledge whether or not the current utilization of PIVs and PIV drivers is the optimal one. Thus the work flow may not be as efficient as it could be and a supervisor does not have a very accurate indication of how many PIV vehicles and associated drivers he or she should use in a day to have optimal utilization of these assets and optimal labor efficiency.
  • There is a need for data on current PIV utilization and labor efficiency. There is a need to obtain this information as inexpensively as possible. There is a need to predict how many PIVs and associated drivers are needed for any given amount of mail and number of pallets and containers in need of transporting. There is a need for generating assignments, with expected time schedules and pathways, to efficiently use the labor force, PIVs, and mail processing stations.
  • SUMMARY
  • As embodied and broadly described herein, an embodiment consistent with the invention is a method of generating data on current utilization of powered industrial vehicles which includes recording the driver, time, and location, of the start of any motion of a powered industrial vehicle as well as the time and location of a subsequent stop of the powered industrial vehicle, the path driven by or the instantaneous speed of or total distance traveled by the powered industrial vehicle between the recorded start and stop locations, an identifier of any pallet or container that is being picked up at a start location and whether the pallet or container is carrying a load, and the identifier of any pallet or container that is being dropped off at a stop location. The preferred minimum distance may be measured between all expected pick-up or drop-off locations. The above recorded data and measurements may be stored in a database for tabular or graphical presentation for use in calculating desired utilization indicators by powered industrial vehicle and driver.
  • As embodied and broadly described herein, another embodiment consistent with the invention is an apparatus for optimizing usage of a powered industrial vehicle. The apparatus may include a transmitter on the vehicle transmitting data therefrom and at least one load sensor operatively coupled to the transmitter. The load sensor is on the vehicle and generates data from which the presence of a pallet or container being transported by the vehicle can be determined. The apparatus may also include a receiver disposed to receive transmissions of data from the transmitter from which the location of the vehicle and the presence of a pallet or container being transported can be determined, a computer programmed to determine the optimal path of the vehicle and generate data commands, a transmitter operatively coupled to the computer to transmit the data commands to the vehicle, and a display disposed to display the commands in a form readable by a human operator of the vehicle.
  • It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments consistent with the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings,
  • FIG. 1 is a chart with example values recorded;
  • FIG. 2 is a floor plan of an example U.S. Postal Service mail processing facility; and
  • FIG. 3 is an example assignment for a PIV driver with expected route and times, indicating whether a pallet should be picked up or dropped-off.
  • DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments consistent with the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
  • A method for generating data on current utilization of powered industrial vehicles, consistent with the invention, may comprise recording for each PIV, the driver of that PIV, and the time and location within the facility when the PIV begins to move. If a pallet is being lifted or a container being pulled by the PIV, that may be recorded as well as whether the pallet or container is carrying a load of mail. The path driven may be recorded, as well as the instantaneous speed or the total distance driven between a start location and a stop location. The time that and location where the PIV stops may be noted, as well as whether any pallet or container is removed from (dropped-off by) the PIV and if any pallet or container is connected to or picked-up by the PIV. When a pallet or container is added or removed, the identifier of that pallet or container may be recorded as well as whether it is carrying mail.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a chart that could be used to gather the needed data, except the path of the PIV. This chart could be filled out by either the driver, if sufficient confidence in the data exists, or by another person either riding with or following the driver and PIV, if the loss of time to have the driver record his or her information is unacceptable, or if there is not sufficient confidence in the data recorded by the driver. Values that might be generated from a hypothetical route and floor plan are present in the chart in FIG. 1 to illustrate how such a chart might look in use.
  • Due to the way fork lifts operate, there may be many starts and stops as the driver positions the fork lift to align the forks in the opening of the pallet. There may also be multiple starts and stops at each staging area, if the location to be occupied by the pallet to be dropped off is currently occupied by another pallet that first needs to be removed. A fork lift driver must first drop-off the current pallet and then maneuver to pick and remove the blocking pallet, finding a location at which to drop it off, before returning to pick up the desired pallet and drop it off at the proper location in the staging area. This is illustrated in rows 1 through 6 of the chart in FIG. 1. Here the fork lift driver has picked up loaded pallet 204 from the dock and dropped it off at station 1 input staging area. However, a previous pallet number 408, now empty, needs to be moved, before loaded pallet 204 may be appropriately placed at station 1. Thus the driver must move from pallet 204 to pallet 408, then pick up pallet 408 and move it out of the way and drop it off. Then return to pallet 204 and pick it up and place it in the staging area. The fork lift driver then picks up and transports pallet 408 to the processed mail staging area of station 1, where station 1 personnel will fill it with processed mail.
  • Continuing at line 7 FIG. 1, the PIV driver returns to the dock and picks up three containers (for use in this example, the PIV is no longer a fork lift, but a tugger), numbers 205, 206 and 112. The PIV driver then transports these to station 1's input staging area, where the first loaded pallet 204 was brought. All three of the containers are dropped off at station 1 (see line 8 of FIG. 1). As recorded in lines 9 and 10, the PIV driver travels to station 4 processed mail staging area, where he picks up a loaded container 323 and transports it to station 5's input staging area and drops it off. From there, the PIV driver goes to station 3's input staging area and picks up three empty containers, which used to contain mail, and drops off one of them at station S's processed mail staging area, where it is needed to receive processed mail. The other two empty containers are transported to station 1 processed mail staging area, where they will be positioned to receive processed mail at a later time. As may be evident, keeping track manually is time consuming and generates many pages if recorded on paper. If handwritten, this data would need to be entered into a database for use in utilization calculations.
  • To record the path, a copy of the floor plan would need to be available for each complete motion. This too would generate many pages if recorded on paper. FIG. 2 illustrates an example floor plan which could be provided in conjunction with the chart illustrated in FIG. 1, on which to record the path corresponding to each line of FIG. 1.
  • A method of collecting the data faster than recording it by hand by either the driver or another person, is to make a hand-held device or a touch screen on the PIV, which has drop down menus from which the driver or other person may select the appropriate information. This data may be stored electronically and then transferred or downloaded to the computer containing the database and formulas for the desired calculations.
  • Alternatively, and preferably, the data may be automatically generated and stored by the use of improvements over existing PIV tracking products, such as Asset Management and Tracking System, sold by I.D. Systems of Hackensack, N.J. Improvements would include the use of sensors and appropriate electronics on each PIV that can produce signals that allow the detection of 1) the presence and quantity of a transported load (the number of pallets or containers), 2) the identifiers of any pallets or containers which it transports, and 3) the location of the PIV to an accuracy of 10 feet or preferably the path driven by the PIV. These load and pallet or container identifier sensors and electronics would be operatively coupled to a data transmitter installed on each PIV. This data would be transmitted from the PIV via the data transmitter and received by receivers installed through out the facility to be stored in the main computer/server available to the supervisor and industrial engineers. Once available on this computer/server, the values stored could be used by existing graphical display programs to indicate to the supervisor the historical record of any motion of a PIV and its associated driver.
  • Separate from and in addition to the above activity, the preferred routes between any two expected pick-up and drop-off locations within the facilities may be established and measured. Statistical descriptions of the time to safely drive a PIV along any and all of the preferred routes may also be established and stored in electronic memory. Statistical descriptions of the time that each mail station takes to process a fully loaded pallet or container of mail may be established and stored in electronic memory. Statistics on times when the processing stations are staffed or not staffed with mail personnel [mail clerks] for processing the mail may be established and stored in electronic memory
  • The recorded, measured, and statistical data may be used in calculations of utilization by vehicle and driver. Calculations that may be of use in determining utilization of the PIVs and of the PIV drivers on a per shift basis follow in Table 1:
  • TABLE 1
    Desired information
    1 time in motion
    2 time transporting a pallet or container between expected pick-up
    and drop-off locations
    3 time transporting a loaded pallet or container between expected
    pick-up and drop-off locations
    4 number of pallets or containers picked-up and dropped-off
    between expected pick-up and drop-off locations
    5 number of loaded pallets or containers picked-up and
    dropped-off between expected pick-up and drop-off
    locations
    6 distance driven between expected pick-up and drop-off locations,
    in excess of preferred minimum distance, by discrete trip
    7 percent of time in motion spent transporting a pallet or
    container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations.
  • Of course, until the maximum expected time transporting a pallet or container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations is calculated, these numbers only provide comparisons among drivers, and not a true measure of utilization, unless 100 percent of the time should be spent carrying a pallet or container between expected pick-up and drop-off locations, which is unlikely.
  • The statistical data gathered, as described above, can be used to simulate the progress and accumulation of full and empty pallets and containers. The simulation may also provide the maximum expected time transporting a pallet or container needed to calculate true utilization numbers for the PIVs and PIV drivers. The simulation may be calculated by hand, but may be much more expeditiously accomplished by using a standard computer simulation program for modeling manufacturing processes. Examples of such programs are AutoMod sold by Brooks Automation/AutoMod Group and Arena, sold by Rockwell Software. Also, the Micro Analytics school bus routing model, logistics routing tools, such as Logistics Laboratory as developed by Northwestern University Production and U.S. Postal Service developed simulation models such as the Transportation Optimization Planning and Scheduling system (TOPS) and PostalCAD, as other examples, may be modified and used to develop specific PIV routes. The shift supervisor's computer may contain this program or the simulation program may be resident on a server with which the shift supervisor's computer is networked. Thus for a given amount of mail arriving in a predetermined number of pallets and containers, optimal times and routes may be established for a minimum number of PIVs to enable the processing of that mail to proceed without delay.
  • From the simulation, routing assignments may be generated for each of the minimum number of powered industrial vehicles, including expected pathways, time schedules, and expected numbers of pallets or containers to transport. A hypothetical routing assignment is illustrated in FIG. 3. The routes are designated by letters, but would be known to the PIV drivers, or available to them in paper or in interactive graphical displays. These routing assignments may be provided on paper printouts, but would more likely be more useful as part of graphical displays available on each PIV, with the ability for the PIV driver to indicate when he or she has completed any discrete part of the assignment. Thus the computer or server which generates the preferred routing assignments may be operatively coupled to a transmitter that may transmit the preferred routing assignments in the form of data commands to the proper PIV, and the PIV would be equipped with a data receiver and display to convert such data commands into a form that a PIV driver may easily read.
  • Other embodiments consistent with the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Claims (9)

1-9. (canceled)
10. An apparatus for optimizing usage of a powered industrial vehicle, said apparatus comprising:
a transmitter on said vehicle transmitting data therefrom;
at least one load sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said load sensor being on said vehicle and generating data from which the presence of a pallet or container being transported by said vehicle can be determined;
a receiver disposed to receive transmissions of data from said transmitter from which the location of said vehicle and the presence of a pallet or container being transported can be determined;
a computer programmed to determine the optimal path of said vehicle and generate data commands;
a transmitter operatively coupled to said computer to transmit said data commands to said vehicle; and
a display disposed to display said commands in a form readable by a human operator of said vehicle.
11. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data from which the number of pallets being transported can be determined.
12. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data from which the number of containers being transported can be determined.
13. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data indicating whether a pallet or container in said vehicle contains a load of mail.
14. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data indicating a time and location where a pallet or container is removed from said vehicle.
15. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data indicating a time and location where a pallet or container is loaded onto said vehicle.
16. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data indicating identifiers of any pallets or containers being transported by said vehicle.
17. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising at least one sensor operatively coupled to said transmitter, said sensor generating data indicating a location of said vehicle or the path driven by said vehicle.
US12/379,048 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system Abandoned US20090157305A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/379,048 US20090157305A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US47003703P 2003-05-13 2003-05-13
US10/844,420 US20050125247A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2004-05-13 Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US12/379,048 US20090157305A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/844,420 Division US20050125247A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2004-05-13 Industrial vehicle fleet management system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090157305A1 true US20090157305A1 (en) 2009-06-18

Family

ID=33476679

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/844,420 Abandoned US20050125247A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2004-05-13 Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US12/379,049 Expired - Fee Related US8234069B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US12/379,048 Abandoned US20090157305A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/844,420 Abandoned US20050125247A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2004-05-13 Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US12/379,049 Expired - Fee Related US8234069B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2009-02-11 Industrial vehicle fleet management system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US20050125247A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2004104941A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050125247A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2005-06-09 Ding Steven A. Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20120290148A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2012-11-15 Chinagps Co., Ltd (Shenzhen) Method and system for dispatching vehicle

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1770613A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-04-04 Atlet AB Warehouse management system with data input from industrial trucks
WO2007038176A2 (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-04-05 United States Postal Service Pallet transportation method
WO2007097768A2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2007-08-30 United States Postal Service Route creation device for powered industrial vehicles
DE102006010291A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2007-09-06 Jungheinrich Ag Industrial truck with usage data acquisition
DE102006045280A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-04-03 Claas Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen Gmbh Device and method for coordinating a machine park
US10013815B2 (en) 2006-12-13 2018-07-03 Crown Equipment Corporation Information system for industrial vehicles
US11225404B2 (en) 2006-12-13 2022-01-18 Crown Equipment Corporation Information system for industrial vehicles
EP3723053B1 (en) 2006-12-13 2023-07-05 Crown Equipment Corporation Fleet management system
US9984341B2 (en) 2006-12-13 2018-05-29 Crown Equipment Corporation Information system for industrial vehicles including cyclical recurring vehicle information message
US10600256B2 (en) 2006-12-13 2020-03-24 Crown Equipment Corporation Impact sensing usable with fleet management system
US20090079555A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2009-03-26 Giadha Aguirre De Carcer Systems and methods for remotely configuring vehicle alerts and/or controls
US8626565B2 (en) * 2008-06-30 2014-01-07 Autonomous Solutions, Inc. Vehicle dispatching method and system
US9978186B2 (en) * 2009-01-09 2018-05-22 The Raymond Corporation Information reporting system for managing a fleet of an industrial vehicles
CA2757453C (en) * 2009-04-03 2020-02-18 Crown Equipment Corporation Information system for industrial vehicles
MX2012001851A (en) 2009-08-12 2012-03-07 Crown Equip Corp Information system for industrial vehicles.
US8364607B2 (en) * 2009-08-19 2013-01-29 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Shipment flow validation systems and methods
US9772625B2 (en) 2014-05-12 2017-09-26 Deere & Company Model referenced management and control of a worksite
US10114348B2 (en) 2014-05-12 2018-10-30 Deere & Company Communication system for closed loop control of a worksite
US9367827B1 (en) 2014-12-15 2016-06-14 Innovative Logistics, Inc. Cross-dock management system, method and apparatus
US10884426B2 (en) * 2016-09-06 2021-01-05 Advanced Intelligent Systems Inc. Mobile work station for transporting a plurality of articles
WO2018081730A1 (en) * 2016-10-31 2018-05-03 Innovative Logistics, Inc. System and method for automated cross-dock operations
US11593750B2 (en) * 2018-12-20 2023-02-28 KlearNow Corporation Managing and tracking shipments

Citations (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3637076A (en) * 1970-01-08 1972-01-25 William E Halopoff Method of and means for processing mail
US4136780A (en) * 1977-12-27 1979-01-30 Burroughs Corporation Mail singulation and culling system
US4757712A (en) * 1987-06-01 1988-07-19 Alert-O-Brake Systems, Inc. Electric monitoring system for load handling vehicles
US4857925A (en) * 1988-01-11 1989-08-15 Brubaker Charles E Route indicating signalling systems for transport vehicles
US4923022A (en) * 1989-04-25 1990-05-08 Chien-Hua Chang Automatic mailing apparatus
US4949263A (en) * 1987-06-01 1990-08-14 Alert-O-Brake Systems Inc. Load handling vehicle monitoring system
US5006996A (en) * 1988-03-26 1991-04-09 Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. System of conveying, storing, retrieving and distributing articles of manufacture
US5051914A (en) * 1989-10-03 1991-09-24 Pitney Bowes Inc. Optimizing mail delivery systems by merging mailings
US5216620A (en) * 1991-09-23 1993-06-01 Pitney Bowes Inc. Requesting, reporting and verification system and method for mail carrier payment
US5337236A (en) * 1990-05-21 1994-08-09 Taurean Electronics, Inc. System for categorizing and recording vehicle trip distance
US5464099A (en) * 1986-09-05 1995-11-07 Opex Corporation Method for the automated processing of documents and bulk mail
US5471393A (en) * 1994-01-26 1995-11-28 Bolger; Joe Driver's associate: a system for vehicle navigation and driving assistance
US5480032A (en) * 1991-01-22 1996-01-02 Electrocom Automation, Inc. Product sorting apparatus for variable and irregularly shaped products
US5660532A (en) * 1988-05-02 1997-08-26 Institut Francais Du Petrole Multiphase piston-type pumping system and applications of this system
US5678194A (en) * 1994-03-10 1997-10-14 Motorola, Inc. Method for providing geographic dependent instructions to a user of a communications unit
US5754965A (en) * 1994-02-15 1998-05-19 Hagenbuch; Leroy G. Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns
US5774876A (en) * 1996-06-26 1998-06-30 Par Government Systems Corporation Managing assets with active electronic tags
US5880958A (en) * 1994-04-12 1999-03-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for freight transportation using a satellite navigation system
US5922996A (en) * 1994-09-27 1999-07-13 Rizzo Development Corp. Electrical insulated cable having means for indicating malfunctions
US5933354A (en) * 1995-10-13 1999-08-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. System for controlling physical distribution pallets
US6035245A (en) * 1998-03-24 2000-03-07 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Automated material handling system method and arrangement
US6148291A (en) * 1998-01-26 2000-11-14 K & T Of Lorain, Ltd. Container and inventory monitoring methods and systems
US6212393B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2001-04-03 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for communication within a vehicle dispatch system
US6226622B1 (en) * 1995-11-27 2001-05-01 Alan James Dabbiere Methods and devices utilizing a GPS tracking system
US6239397B1 (en) * 1996-12-07 2001-05-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for sorting mailings
US6244171B1 (en) * 1997-12-22 2001-06-12 Voith Sulzer Papiertechnik Patent Gmbh Elastic coating for a calender roll, calender and process for operating the calender, and calender roll and method of forming the calender roll
US6285951B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2001-09-04 Pri Automation, Inc. Dynamic traffic based routing algorithm
US20020004366A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2002-01-10 Bjorn Thorvaldsson Integrated meat processing and information handling method
US20020007297A1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2002-01-17 Clarke Hernan Jose Method and system for enterprise wide production scheduling
US20020019759A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-14 Sundararajan Arunapuram Transportation planning, execution, and freight payments managers and related methods
US20020059075A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2002-05-16 Schick Louis A. Method and system for managing a land-based vehicle
US20020070149A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-06-13 Holger Schererz Mixed mail sorting machine
US6437272B2 (en) * 1999-03-17 2002-08-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Article delivery system
US20030055666A1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2003-03-20 Roddy Nicholas E. System and method for managing a fleet of remote assets
US20030110069A1 (en) * 2001-11-20 2003-06-12 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Workforce planning apparatus for calculating number of workers to be a allocated
US6581001B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2003-06-17 Yazaki Corporation Vehicle-mounted navigation system, and recording medium having recorded thereon a processing program for use therewith
US6600418B2 (en) * 2000-12-12 2003-07-29 3M Innovative Properties Company Object tracking and management system and method using radio-frequency identification tags
US6629004B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2003-09-30 Ut-Battelle, Llc Method for automatically evaluating a transition from a batch manufacturing technique to a lean manufacturing technique
US20030198544A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Tom Campbell Centralized cargo transfer system using a movable transfer dock
US20030200113A1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2003-10-23 Latta John S. Information based network process for mail sorting/distribution
US20040167830A1 (en) * 2003-01-22 2004-08-26 Pranab Shah Network integration alignment method
US6795823B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-09-21 Neoris Logistics, Inc. Centralized system and method for optimally routing and tracking articles
US6799099B2 (en) * 2001-08-02 2004-09-28 Rapistan Systems Advertising Corp. Material handling systems with high frequency radio location devices
US6825766B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2004-11-30 Genei Industries, Inc. Industrial data capture system including a choke point portal and tracking software for radio frequency identification of cargo
US20050125247A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2005-06-09 Ding Steven A. Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US6983883B2 (en) * 2002-04-29 2006-01-10 Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. System and method for weighing and tracking freight
US20060178812A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-08-10 Sheldon Affleck Computer-based dispatching system and method
US7707038B2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2010-04-27 United States Postal Service Method and system for distributing and transporting large numbers of items

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AT89941B (en) 1913-04-25 1922-11-10 Western Electric Co Ltd Flexible cord conductor.
MXPA02001971A (en) 1999-08-23 2002-09-30 Gen Electric Apparatus and method for managing a fleet of mobile assets.
US6560532B2 (en) * 2001-05-25 2003-05-06 Regents Of The University Of California, The Method and system for electronically determining dynamic traffic information

Patent Citations (51)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3637076A (en) * 1970-01-08 1972-01-25 William E Halopoff Method of and means for processing mail
US4136780A (en) * 1977-12-27 1979-01-30 Burroughs Corporation Mail singulation and culling system
US5464099A (en) * 1986-09-05 1995-11-07 Opex Corporation Method for the automated processing of documents and bulk mail
US4757712A (en) * 1987-06-01 1988-07-19 Alert-O-Brake Systems, Inc. Electric monitoring system for load handling vehicles
US4949263A (en) * 1987-06-01 1990-08-14 Alert-O-Brake Systems Inc. Load handling vehicle monitoring system
US4857925A (en) * 1988-01-11 1989-08-15 Brubaker Charles E Route indicating signalling systems for transport vehicles
US5006996A (en) * 1988-03-26 1991-04-09 Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. System of conveying, storing, retrieving and distributing articles of manufacture
US5660532A (en) * 1988-05-02 1997-08-26 Institut Francais Du Petrole Multiphase piston-type pumping system and applications of this system
US4923022A (en) * 1989-04-25 1990-05-08 Chien-Hua Chang Automatic mailing apparatus
US4923022B1 (en) * 1989-04-25 1994-04-12 Hsieh Tzu Yen Automatic mailing apparatus
US5051914A (en) * 1989-10-03 1991-09-24 Pitney Bowes Inc. Optimizing mail delivery systems by merging mailings
US5337236A (en) * 1990-05-21 1994-08-09 Taurean Electronics, Inc. System for categorizing and recording vehicle trip distance
US5480032A (en) * 1991-01-22 1996-01-02 Electrocom Automation, Inc. Product sorting apparatus for variable and irregularly shaped products
US5216620A (en) * 1991-09-23 1993-06-01 Pitney Bowes Inc. Requesting, reporting and verification system and method for mail carrier payment
US5471393A (en) * 1994-01-26 1995-11-28 Bolger; Joe Driver's associate: a system for vehicle navigation and driving assistance
US5754965A (en) * 1994-02-15 1998-05-19 Hagenbuch; Leroy G. Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns
US5678194A (en) * 1994-03-10 1997-10-14 Motorola, Inc. Method for providing geographic dependent instructions to a user of a communications unit
US5880958A (en) * 1994-04-12 1999-03-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for freight transportation using a satellite navigation system
US5922996A (en) * 1994-09-27 1999-07-13 Rizzo Development Corp. Electrical insulated cable having means for indicating malfunctions
US5933354A (en) * 1995-10-13 1999-08-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. System for controlling physical distribution pallets
US6226622B1 (en) * 1995-11-27 2001-05-01 Alan James Dabbiere Methods and devices utilizing a GPS tracking system
US5774876A (en) * 1996-06-26 1998-06-30 Par Government Systems Corporation Managing assets with active electronic tags
US6239397B1 (en) * 1996-12-07 2001-05-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process for sorting mailings
US6244171B1 (en) * 1997-12-22 2001-06-12 Voith Sulzer Papiertechnik Patent Gmbh Elastic coating for a calender roll, calender and process for operating the calender, and calender roll and method of forming the calender roll
US6148291A (en) * 1998-01-26 2000-11-14 K & T Of Lorain, Ltd. Container and inventory monitoring methods and systems
US6035245A (en) * 1998-03-24 2000-03-07 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Automated material handling system method and arrangement
US6437272B2 (en) * 1999-03-17 2002-08-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Article delivery system
US6285951B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2001-09-04 Pri Automation, Inc. Dynamic traffic based routing algorithm
US6212393B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2001-04-03 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for communication within a vehicle dispatch system
US20030055666A1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2003-03-20 Roddy Nicholas E. System and method for managing a fleet of remote assets
US6629004B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2003-09-30 Ut-Battelle, Llc Method for automatically evaluating a transition from a batch manufacturing technique to a lean manufacturing technique
US20030200113A1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2003-10-23 Latta John S. Information based network process for mail sorting/distribution
US6581001B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2003-06-17 Yazaki Corporation Vehicle-mounted navigation system, and recording medium having recorded thereon a processing program for use therewith
US20020007297A1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2002-01-17 Clarke Hernan Jose Method and system for enterprise wide production scheduling
US20020059075A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2002-05-16 Schick Louis A. Method and system for managing a land-based vehicle
US20020004366A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2002-01-10 Bjorn Thorvaldsson Integrated meat processing and information handling method
US20020019759A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-14 Sundararajan Arunapuram Transportation planning, execution, and freight payments managers and related methods
US6795823B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2004-09-21 Neoris Logistics, Inc. Centralized system and method for optimally routing and tracking articles
US20020070149A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-06-13 Holger Schererz Mixed mail sorting machine
US6600418B2 (en) * 2000-12-12 2003-07-29 3M Innovative Properties Company Object tracking and management system and method using radio-frequency identification tags
US6799099B2 (en) * 2001-08-02 2004-09-28 Rapistan Systems Advertising Corp. Material handling systems with high frequency radio location devices
US20030110069A1 (en) * 2001-11-20 2003-06-12 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Workforce planning apparatus for calculating number of workers to be a allocated
US6825766B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2004-11-30 Genei Industries, Inc. Industrial data capture system including a choke point portal and tracking software for radio frequency identification of cargo
US20030198544A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Tom Campbell Centralized cargo transfer system using a movable transfer dock
US6983883B2 (en) * 2002-04-29 2006-01-10 Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. System and method for weighing and tracking freight
US20040167830A1 (en) * 2003-01-22 2004-08-26 Pranab Shah Network integration alignment method
US7707038B2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2010-04-27 United States Postal Service Method and system for distributing and transporting large numbers of items
US20050125247A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2005-06-09 Ding Steven A. Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20090177377A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2009-07-09 United States Postal Service Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US8234069B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2012-07-31 United States Postal Service Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20060178812A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-08-10 Sheldon Affleck Computer-based dispatching system and method

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050125247A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2005-06-09 Ding Steven A. Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20090177377A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2009-07-09 United States Postal Service Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US8234069B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2012-07-31 United States Postal Service Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20120290148A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2012-11-15 Chinagps Co., Ltd (Shenzhen) Method and system for dispatching vehicle
US8706411B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2014-04-22 Chinagps Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen) Method and system for dispatching vehicle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050125247A1 (en) 2005-06-09
US8234069B2 (en) 2012-07-31
WO2004104941A2 (en) 2004-12-02
WO2004104941A3 (en) 2005-04-07
US20090177377A1 (en) 2009-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8234069B2 (en) Industrial vehicle fleet management system
US20200407164A1 (en) Warehouse automation systems and methods
US11789440B2 (en) Industrial vehicle fleet recommender
US8457978B2 (en) Systems and methods for creating on-demand routes for powered industrial vehicles
US11914354B2 (en) Systems and methods for automated guided vehicle control
US20060178812A1 (en) Computer-based dispatching system and method
CN112020726A (en) Information providing method and information providing system
JP5369845B2 (en) How to create a vehicle allocation plan
JP6362229B1 (en) Logistics system
CN105654268A (en) Visual management system for loading and unloading positions of logistic goods yard and method
US20200223635A1 (en) Warehouse Management System
JP6803550B1 (en) Projection instruction device and projection instruction system
CN113689056A (en) Intelligent warehouse management method and system based on supply chain
JP3516606B2 (en) Transportation planning method and system
JP5338007B2 (en) Waste management system
CA2531265A1 (en) Computer-based dispatching system and method
Urru et al. Fleet-sizing of multi-load autonomous robots for material supply
JP2002370808A (en) Device for analyzing operation efficiency of moving body, and device for monitoring physical distribution condition
Larsson et al. Transformation of internal logistics: with autonomous transportation
CN116523436B (en) Live-broadcast type warehouse management system based on ultrahigh frequency RFID technology
Peng Predictive Scheduling of Collaborative Mobile Robots for Improved Crop-transport Logistics of Manually Harvested Crops
CN117295671A (en) Information processing system, warehouse management method and warehouse control device
Hulgaard Automation of a Packaging Process
Konrad et al. Crate consolidation and standardization using lean manufacturing systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION