US20090295559A1 - Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation - Google Patents
Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090295559A1 US20090295559A1 US12/131,347 US13134708A US2009295559A1 US 20090295559 A1 US20090295559 A1 US 20090295559A1 US 13134708 A US13134708 A US 13134708A US 2009295559 A1 US2009295559 A1 US 2009295559A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- systems
- sub
- components
- vehicle
- fault
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60Q—ARRANGEMENT OF SIGNALLING OR LIGHTING DEVICES, THE MOUNTING OR SUPPORTING THEREOF OR CIRCUITS THEREFOR, FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60Q11/00—Arrangement of monitoring devices for devices provided for in groups B60Q1/00 - B60Q9/00
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W50/00—Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
- B60W50/02—Ensuring safety in case of control system failures, e.g. by diagnosing, circumventing or fixing failures
- B60W50/0205—Diagnosing or detecting failures; Failure detection models
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R2021/01122—Prevention of malfunction
- B60R2021/01184—Fault detection or diagnostic circuits
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W30/00—Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units, or advanced driver assistance systems for ensuring comfort, stability and safety or drive control systems for propelling or retarding the vehicle
- B60W30/02—Control of vehicle driving stability
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to a system and method for determining the root cause of faults in a vehicle system and, more particularly, to a system and method for determining the root cause of faults in a vehicle system and isolating the fault, where the system and method use multiple models and observations in a hierarchical tree to provide a confidence estimate of the source of a particular fault.
- Modern vehicles include many electrical vehicle systems, such as vehicle stability control systems.
- vehicle stability control systems For example, certain vehicle stability systems employ automatic braking in response to an undesired turning or yaw of the vehicle.
- vehicle stability systems employ active front-wheel or rear-wheel steering that assist the vehicle operator in steering the vehicle in response to the detected rotation of the steering wheel.
- active suspension systems that change the vehicle suspension in response to road conditions and other vehicle operating conditions.
- Diagnostics monitoring of vehicle stability systems is an important vehicle design consideration so as to be able to quickly detect system faults, and isolate the faults for maintenance and service purposes.
- These stability systems typically employ various sub-systems, actuators and sensors, such as yaw rate sensors, lateral acceleration sensors, steering hand-wheel angle sensors, etc., that are used to help provide control of the vehicle. If any of the sensors, actuators and sub-systems associated with these systems fail, it is desirable to quickly detect the fault and activate fail-safe strategies so as to prevent the system from improperly responding to a perceived, but false condition. It is also desirable to isolate the defective sensor, actuator or sub-system for maintenance, service and replacement purposes. Thus, it is necessary to monitor the various sensors, actuators and sub-systems employed in these systems to identify a failure.
- a vehicle may be pulling in one direction, which may be the result of a brake problem or a steering problem.
- the brake system and the steering system do not know whether the other is operating properly, the overall vehicle system may not be able to identify the root cause of that problem.
- Each individual sub-system or component may issue a diagnostic trouble code indicating a problem when they are not operating properly, but this trouble code may not be a result of a problem with the sub-system or component issuing the code.
- the diagnostic code may be set because the sub-system or component is not operating properly, but that operation may be the result of another sub-system or component not operating properly. It is desirable to know how reliable the diagnostics codes are from a particular sub-system or component to determine whether that sub-system or component is the fault of a problem.
- a system and method for determining the root cause of a fault in a vehicle system, sub-system or component using models and observations.
- a hierarchical tree is employed to combine trouble or diagnostic codes from multiple sub-systems and components to get a confidence estimate of whether a certain diagnostic code is accurately giving an indication of problem with a particular sub-system or component.
- a hierarchical diagnosis network is employed that relies on the theory of hierarchical information whereby at any level of the network only the required abstracted information is being used for decision making.
- a graph-based diagnosis and prognosis system is employed that includes a plurality of nodes interconnected by information pathways. The nodes are fault diagnosis and fault prognosis nodes for components or sub-systems, and contain fault and state-of-health diagnosis and reasoning modules.
- FIG. 1 is a hierarchical tree for analyzing diagnostic codes from vehicle systems, sub-systems and components, according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a hierarchical diagnosis network for estimating confidence levels of diagnostic codes for diagnosis and prognosis purposes in a vehicle, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a graph-based diagnosis and prognosis system for a vehicle, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention proposes a process for determining the root cause of a fault in a vehicle by using multiple models and observations.
- Each of the models provides a confidence estimate about the observation it makes regarding a potential fault condition.
- the invention can use a hierarchical tree to analyze diagnostic codes and other signals from sub-systems and components.
- Each level of the hierarchical tree accesses the information it has before making a decision.
- the information from different branches of the tree can be dynamically altered based on vehicle information, such as speed dependency.
- the model confidence estimates can also be determined using data from multiple vehicles.
- the information can be combined together by various methods, such as statistical techniques, for example, Dempster-Shafer theory or Bayes theory.
- the hierarchical architecture is scalable and flexible, thus enabling the dynamic integration of multiple faults.
- the overall vehicle state of health can be determined by looking at the top level of the tree.
- Each branch can represent a different sub-system, such as engine, electrical, steering, braking, etc., and the state-of-health of these sub-systems can be determined together with a confidence in the assessment.
- Information in the tree can also be used to replace components that are weakening the overall vehicle health.
- FIG. 1 is a hierarchical tree 10 of the type discussed above, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the tree 10 includes four layers, where a top layer is a vehicle supervisor 12 that ultimately determines the source of a fault using the information that it receives.
- the tree 10 is broken down into three systems, namely a vehicle chassis system 14 , a vehicle powertrain system 16 and a vehicle body system 18 .
- Each separate system 14 , 16 and 18 can be separated into its representative sub-systems at a third level.
- the chassis system 14 can be separated into a steering sub-system 20 and a braking sub-system 22
- the powertrain system 16 can be separated into an engine sub-system 24 and a transmission sub-system 26
- the body system 18 can be separated into a security sub-system 28 and an air bag sub-system 30 .
- Each sub-system 20 - 30 includes components at a fourth level of the tree 10 , and can be any suitable component in that particular sub-system.
- the steering sub-system includes components 32 , such as a hand wheel angle (HWA) sensor.
- HWA hand wheel angle
- the brake sub-system 22 includes components 34
- the engine sub-system 24 includes components 36
- the transmission sub-system 26 includes components 38
- the security sub-system 28 includes components 40
- the air bag sub-system 30 includes components 42
- the tree 10 can be extended to other levels below the fourth level of the components 32 - 42 if the sub-systems and components can be separated.
- Each of the components 32 - 42 , the sub-systems 20 - 30 , the systems 14 , 16 and 18 and the vehicle supervisor 12 employ various algorithms that analyze vehicle diagnostic codes, trouble codes and other information and data. These algorithms include decision making algorithms that provide a confidence estimate as to whether a particular component 32 - 42 , sub-system 20 - 30 or system 14 , 16 and 18 has a particular fault or a potential fault. For example, signals from the components 32 - 42 are sent to their respective sub-system 20 - 30 , and include diagnostic codes if a potential fault with the component occurs. Further, the components 32 - 34 include algorithms that provide additional signals sent with the diagnostic code that include the confidence estimate signal as to how confident the particular component is that the fault is occurring in that component.
- the sub-system level can then assess based on all of the signals it is receiving from its components as to whether one of those components has a fault using the diagnosis signals and the confidence estimate signals.
- the sub-systems 20 - 30 will then send diagnostic signals and confidence estimate signals to the system level, where the system 14 , 16 or 18 will use the signals from all of its sub-systems 20 - 30 to determine where a fault may exist based on the confidence estimate signals and the diagnostic codes.
- the system 14 , 16 and 18 will know whether one of the components 32 - 42 is faulty in its system hierarchical path, and can also determine whether a particular sub-system 20 - 30 includes a fault with some level of confidence.
- the signals from the system 14 , 16 and 18 are then sent to the vehicle supervisor 12 that includes supervisory algorithms to monitor all the signals from all of the systems 14 , 16 and 18 .
- the tree 10 can be used to isolate faults. This can be determined in a number of ways. The most probable fault can be determined by determining the fault path down the tree 10 .
- the decision makers in the hierarchical tree 10 will be implemented in real-time. The decision makers can be of any form, for example, parity equations, Kalman filters, fuzzy models, neural networks, etc.
- decision making algorithms in each of the levels can analyze the information to determine the confidence level as to what sub-system or component may have a fault. This confidence level can be analyzed statistically using various processes, such as the Dempster-Shafer theory or Bayes theory.
- the broader availability of state information at the vehicle level may enable the ability to diagnose failures with better coverage than using information at the sub-system level or component level alone.
- the hypothesis is that as sub-system interactions increase, a vehicle-level approach to diagnostics will be increasingly more important. Diagnosis of current vehicle systems is symptom driven, that is, following an observation of an unexpected event and/or measurement, a trouble code is issued and detection is required to isolate the cause of the fault. With the introduction of intelligent controlled systems, a detection problem becomes more complex, especially when multiple systems are interacting with each other. A combination of hierarchical and/or a distributed diagnosis approaches may be helpful in reducing the complexity of the isolation algorithms. This comes at the expense of additional processing and communication among involved systems, as well as memory requirements to store information, particularly if the diagnosis is done on-board.
- Hierarchical diagnosis relies on the theory of hierarchical information whereby at any level only the required abstracted information is being used for decision making. The highest level is in charge of making the diagnostic decisions. For example, at the component level currents and voltages may be used to understand the state of health of an electrical component. Therefore, local and existing diagnostic algorithms/procedures would provide information that will be extracted for use by a higher level in the hierarchy. The challenge is finding the correct abstraction so that the information is not lost. Two layers may be enough, but more may be added depending on the complexity of the system diagnosed.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a hierarchical diagnosis network 50 of the type discussed above, according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the network 50 includes a vehicle diagnostic supervisor 52 at the top of the network 50 that receives signals from a plurality of sub-system 54 .
- the sub-systems 54 each receive signals from all or most of the components in the network 50 .
- signals with diagnostic codes, confidence estimates and other information and data are passed up the network 50 from the component level to the sub-system level and then to the supervisor 52 so that the supervisor 52 can make a determination of where a particular problem within the vehicle exists at a certain confidence level so that appropriate action can be taken.
- Distributed diagnosis may be used to overcome the problem of gathering failure information at one location in order to make a decision about the occurrence of a failure in a vehicle system sub-system or component.
- Such techniques rely on exchanging information among a set of nodes and devising a set of rules to infer the occurrence of the failure based on the exchanged information.
- the integrated fault detection and isolation process of the invention can also be extended to create not necessarily a tree, but a graph of the system or sub-system interactions.
- a graph can provide an analysis to determine the most probable cause of a failure in real time. This is because some sub-systems may have multiple parents, for example, a sub-system may be both electrical and mechanical. Thus, a fault may be isolated by doing a search in the graph. Techniques such as fuzzy logic, Shafer-Dempster processes, etc. can be applied to find the best possible path as there may be multiple paths through the graph for a specific situation.
- FIG. 3 is a graph-based diagnosis and prognosis system 60 of the type discussed above, according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the system 60 includes a plurality of nodes 62 , including a root node 64 , interconnected by information pathways 66 .
- the nodes 62 are fault diagnosis and fault prognosis nodes for components or sub-systems, and contain fault and state-of-health diagnosis and reasoning modules.
- the reasoning modules collate information received using, for example, fuzzy logic, neural networks, etc.
- the reasoning modules process the information about the faults they know of based on the local view of the total system, and forward the information, including fault estimation and health estimation, and signals for estimating the accuracy of the information, along the information pathways 66 to the other nodes 62 to which they are connected.
- the receiving nodes 62 may have additional local information and will make different decisions based on the information flowing to them.
- the graph is dynamic with nodes entering and leaving the system 60 . This happens when the system changes to a different state or one of the nodes 62 detects a fault and shuts down.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates generally to a system and method for determining the root cause of faults in a vehicle system and, more particularly, to a system and method for determining the root cause of faults in a vehicle system and isolating the fault, where the system and method use multiple models and observations in a hierarchical tree to provide a confidence estimate of the source of a particular fault.
- 2. Discussion of the Related Art
- Modern vehicles include many electrical vehicle systems, such as vehicle stability control systems. For example, certain vehicle stability systems employ automatic braking in response to an undesired turning or yaw of the vehicle. Some vehicle stability systems employ active front-wheel or rear-wheel steering that assist the vehicle operator in steering the vehicle in response to the detected rotation of the steering wheel. Some vehicle stability systems employ active suspension systems that change the vehicle suspension in response to road conditions and other vehicle operating conditions.
- Diagnostics monitoring of vehicle stability systems is an important vehicle design consideration so as to be able to quickly detect system faults, and isolate the faults for maintenance and service purposes. These stability systems typically employ various sub-systems, actuators and sensors, such as yaw rate sensors, lateral acceleration sensors, steering hand-wheel angle sensors, etc., that are used to help provide control of the vehicle. If any of the sensors, actuators and sub-systems associated with these systems fail, it is desirable to quickly detect the fault and activate fail-safe strategies so as to prevent the system from improperly responding to a perceived, but false condition. It is also desirable to isolate the defective sensor, actuator or sub-system for maintenance, service and replacement purposes. Thus, it is necessary to monitor the various sensors, actuators and sub-systems employed in these systems to identify a failure.
- It is a design challenge to identify the root cause of a fault and isolate the fault all the way down to the component level, or even the sub-system level, in a vehicle system. The various sub-systems and components in a vehicle system, such as vehicle brake system or a vehicle steering system, are typically not designed by the vehicle manufacturer, but are provided by an outside source. Because of this, these components and sub-systems may not have knowledge of what other sub-systems or components are doing in the overall vehicle system, but will only know how their particular sub-system or component is operating. Thus, these outside sub-systems or components may know that they are not operating properly, but will not know if their component or sub-system is faulty or another sub-system or component is faulty. For example, a vehicle may be pulling in one direction, which may be the result of a brake problem or a steering problem. However, because the brake system and the steering system do not know whether the other is operating properly, the overall vehicle system may not be able to identify the root cause of that problem.
- Each individual sub-system or component may issue a diagnostic trouble code indicating a problem when they are not operating properly, but this trouble code may not be a result of a problem with the sub-system or component issuing the code. In otherwords, the diagnostic code may be set because the sub-system or component is not operating properly, but that operation may be the result of another sub-system or component not operating properly. It is desirable to know how reliable the diagnostics codes are from a particular sub-system or component to determine whether that sub-system or component is the fault of a problem.
- In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a system and method are disclosed for determining the root cause of a fault in a vehicle system, sub-system or component using models and observations. In one embodiment, a hierarchical tree is employed to combine trouble or diagnostic codes from multiple sub-systems and components to get a confidence estimate of whether a certain diagnostic code is accurately giving an indication of problem with a particular sub-system or component. In another embodiment, a hierarchical diagnosis network is employed that relies on the theory of hierarchical information whereby at any level of the network only the required abstracted information is being used for decision making. In another embodiment, a graph-based diagnosis and prognosis system is employed that includes a plurality of nodes interconnected by information pathways. The nodes are fault diagnosis and fault prognosis nodes for components or sub-systems, and contain fault and state-of-health diagnosis and reasoning modules.
- Additional features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a hierarchical tree for analyzing diagnostic codes from vehicle systems, sub-systems and components, according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a hierarchical diagnosis network for estimating confidence levels of diagnostic codes for diagnosis and prognosis purposes in a vehicle, according to an embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 3 is a graph-based diagnosis and prognosis system for a vehicle, according to an embodiment of the present invention. - The following discussion of the embodiments of the invention directed to a system and method for identifying a confidence estimate of whether a vehicle sub-system or component is the root cause of a particular fault is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its applications or uses.
- The present invention proposes a process for determining the root cause of a fault in a vehicle by using multiple models and observations. Each of the models provides a confidence estimate about the observation it makes regarding a potential fault condition. As will be discussed in detail below, the invention can use a hierarchical tree to analyze diagnostic codes and other signals from sub-systems and components. Each level of the hierarchical tree accesses the information it has before making a decision. The information from different branches of the tree can be dynamically altered based on vehicle information, such as speed dependency. The model confidence estimates can also be determined using data from multiple vehicles. The information can be combined together by various methods, such as statistical techniques, for example, Dempster-Shafer theory or Bayes theory. The hierarchical architecture is scalable and flexible, thus enabling the dynamic integration of multiple faults.
- Information flows up the hierarchical tree from sub-system and component decision makers that make the decisions based on local information. The overall vehicle state of health can be determined by looking at the top level of the tree. Each branch can represent a different sub-system, such as engine, electrical, steering, braking, etc., and the state-of-health of these sub-systems can be determined together with a confidence in the assessment. Information in the tree can also be used to replace components that are weakening the overall vehicle health.
-
FIG. 1 is ahierarchical tree 10 of the type discussed above, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Thetree 10 includes four layers, where a top layer is avehicle supervisor 12 that ultimately determines the source of a fault using the information that it receives. Thetree 10 is broken down into three systems, namely avehicle chassis system 14, avehicle powertrain system 16 and avehicle body system 18. Eachseparate system chassis system 14 can be separated into asteering sub-system 20 and abraking sub-system 22, thepowertrain system 16 can be separated into anengine sub-system 24 and atransmission sub-system 26, and thebody system 18 can be separated into asecurity sub-system 28 and anair bag sub-system 30. Each sub-system 20-30 includes components at a fourth level of thetree 10, and can be any suitable component in that particular sub-system. For example, the steering sub-system includescomponents 32, such as a hand wheel angle (HWA) sensor. Likewise, thebrake sub-system 22 includescomponents 34, theengine sub-system 24 includescomponents 36, thetransmission sub-system 26 includescomponents 38, and thesecurity sub-system 28 includescomponents 40 and theair bag sub-system 30 includescomponents 42 Thetree 10 can be extended to other levels below the fourth level of the components 32-42 if the sub-systems and components can be separated. - Each of the components 32-42, the sub-systems 20-30, the
systems vehicle supervisor 12 employ various algorithms that analyze vehicle diagnostic codes, trouble codes and other information and data. These algorithms include decision making algorithms that provide a confidence estimate as to whether a particular component 32-42, sub-system 20-30 orsystem system system system vehicle supervisor 12 that includes supervisory algorithms to monitor all the signals from all of thesystems - The
tree 10 can be used to isolate faults. This can be determined in a number of ways. The most probable fault can be determined by determining the fault path down thetree 10. The decision makers in thehierarchical tree 10 will be implemented in real-time. The decision makers can be of any form, for example, parity equations, Kalman filters, fuzzy models, neural networks, etc. Thus, as information flows up thetree 10, decision making algorithms in each of the levels can analyze the information to determine the confidence level as to what sub-system or component may have a fault. This confidence level can be analyzed statistically using various processes, such as the Dempster-Shafer theory or Bayes theory. - The broader availability of state information at the vehicle level may enable the ability to diagnose failures with better coverage than using information at the sub-system level or component level alone. The hypothesis is that as sub-system interactions increase, a vehicle-level approach to diagnostics will be increasingly more important. Diagnosis of current vehicle systems is symptom driven, that is, following an observation of an unexpected event and/or measurement, a trouble code is issued and detection is required to isolate the cause of the fault. With the introduction of intelligent controlled systems, a detection problem becomes more complex, especially when multiple systems are interacting with each other. A combination of hierarchical and/or a distributed diagnosis approaches may be helpful in reducing the complexity of the isolation algorithms. This comes at the expense of additional processing and communication among involved systems, as well as memory requirements to store information, particularly if the diagnosis is done on-board.
- Hierarchical diagnosis relies on the theory of hierarchical information whereby at any level only the required abstracted information is being used for decision making. The highest level is in charge of making the diagnostic decisions. For example, at the component level currents and voltages may be used to understand the state of health of an electrical component. Therefore, local and existing diagnostic algorithms/procedures would provide information that will be extracted for use by a higher level in the hierarchy. The challenge is finding the correct abstraction so that the information is not lost. Two layers may be enough, but more may be added depending on the complexity of the system diagnosed.
-
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of ahierarchical diagnosis network 50 of the type discussed above, according to another embodiment of the present invention. Thenetwork 50 includes a vehiclediagnostic supervisor 52 at the top of thenetwork 50 that receives signals from a plurality ofsub-system 54. Likewise, thesub-systems 54 each receive signals from all or most of the components in thenetwork 50. As with thehierarchy tree 10, signals with diagnostic codes, confidence estimates and other information and data are passed up thenetwork 50 from the component level to the sub-system level and then to thesupervisor 52 so that thesupervisor 52 can make a determination of where a particular problem within the vehicle exists at a certain confidence level so that appropriate action can be taken. - Distributed diagnosis may be used to overcome the problem of gathering failure information at one location in order to make a decision about the occurrence of a failure in a vehicle system sub-system or component. Such techniques rely on exchanging information among a set of nodes and devising a set of rules to infer the occurrence of the failure based on the exchanged information.
- The integrated fault detection and isolation process of the invention can also be extended to create not necessarily a tree, but a graph of the system or sub-system interactions. Such a graph can provide an analysis to determine the most probable cause of a failure in real time. This is because some sub-systems may have multiple parents, for example, a sub-system may be both electrical and mechanical. Thus, a fault may be isolated by doing a search in the graph. Techniques such as fuzzy logic, Shafer-Dempster processes, etc. can be applied to find the best possible path as there may be multiple paths through the graph for a specific situation.
-
FIG. 3 is a graph-based diagnosis andprognosis system 60 of the type discussed above, according to another embodiment of the present invention. Thesystem 60 includes a plurality ofnodes 62, including aroot node 64, interconnected byinformation pathways 66. Thenodes 62 are fault diagnosis and fault prognosis nodes for components or sub-systems, and contain fault and state-of-health diagnosis and reasoning modules. The reasoning modules collate information received using, for example, fuzzy logic, neural networks, etc. The reasoning modules process the information about the faults they know of based on the local view of the total system, and forward the information, including fault estimation and health estimation, and signals for estimating the accuracy of the information, along theinformation pathways 66 to theother nodes 62 to which they are connected. The receivingnodes 62 may have additional local information and will make different decisions based on the information flowing to them. The graph is dynamic with nodes entering and leaving thesystem 60. This happens when the system changes to a different state or one of thenodes 62 detects a fault and shuts down. - The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/131,347 US20090295559A1 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2008-06-02 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation |
PCT/US2009/045774 WO2009148984A1 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2009-06-01 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation |
CN2009801203496A CN102046443A (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2009-06-01 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation |
DE112009001371T DE112009001371T5 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2009-06-01 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and localization |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/131,347 US20090295559A1 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2008-06-02 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090295559A1 true US20090295559A1 (en) | 2009-12-03 |
Family
ID=41379092
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/131,347 Abandoned US20090295559A1 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2008-06-02 | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20090295559A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102046443A (en) |
DE (1) | DE112009001371T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009148984A1 (en) |
Cited By (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090271062A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Control system and method for filtering dependent diagnostic trouble codes |
US20100106357A1 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2010-04-29 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc | Combined evidence vehicle health monitoring |
CN101941439A (en) * | 2010-09-25 | 2011-01-12 | 重庆长安汽车股份有限公司 | Control system failure diagnosis method for avoiding concurrent failures of hybrid electric vehicles |
US20130136007A1 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2013-05-30 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis for in-vehicle communications |
US8615773B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2013-12-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for coordinating computing functions to accomplish a task using a configuration file and standardized executable application modules |
GB2505061A (en) * | 2012-06-26 | 2014-02-19 | Bae Systems Plc | System and method for diagnosing a vehicle and its subsystems |
US8726084B2 (en) | 2011-10-14 | 2014-05-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for distributed diagnostic reasoning |
US8751777B2 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2014-06-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and reconfigurable systems to optimize the performance of a condition based health maintenance system |
US8832716B2 (en) | 2012-08-10 | 2014-09-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for limiting user customization of task workflow in a condition based health maintenance system |
US8832649B2 (en) | 2012-05-22 | 2014-09-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for augmenting the functionality of a monitoring node without recompiling |
US20150046039A1 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2015-02-12 | Jtekt Corporation | Sensor device, motor control device, and electric power steering apparatus |
US8990770B2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2015-03-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods to configure condition based health maintenance systems |
US9158834B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2015-10-13 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for mapping repair orders within a database |
US9201930B1 (en) | 2014-05-06 | 2015-12-01 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing an auto-generated repair-hint to a vehicle repair tool |
US9336244B2 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2016-05-10 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for generating baselines regarding vehicle service request data |
US20160140776A1 (en) * | 2011-11-16 | 2016-05-19 | Autoconnect Holdings Llc | Communications based on vehicle diagnostics and indications |
US9477950B2 (en) | 2014-09-04 | 2016-10-25 | Snap-On Incorporated | Prognostics-based estimator |
US9582944B2 (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2017-02-28 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing vehicle repair information |
CN106569475A (en) * | 2016-10-15 | 2017-04-19 | 安徽省(水利部淮河水利委员会)水利科学研究院(安徽省水利工程质量检测中心站) | Remote water taking monitoring equipment fault grading diagnosis method |
US9639995B2 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2017-05-02 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for generating and outputting test drive scripts for vehicles |
US9672497B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2017-06-06 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for using natural language processing and machine-learning to produce vehicle-service content |
CN107139932A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-09-08 | 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 | Communication diagnosing method applied to whole-control system |
US20180032942A1 (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2018-02-01 | Mitchell Repair Information Company, Llc | Methods and Systems for Tracking Labor Efficiency |
JP2018506460A (en) * | 2015-01-29 | 2018-03-08 | コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト | Vehicle control apparatus and method |
CN107786897A (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2018-03-09 | 南京中兴新软件有限责任公司 | IPTV system fault locating method and system |
US10216796B2 (en) | 2015-07-29 | 2019-02-26 | Snap-On Incorporated | Systems and methods for predictive augmentation of vehicle service procedures |
CN110223416A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-10 | 深圳市德塔防爆电动汽车有限公司 | A kind of the primary data analysis method and electric vehicle of electric vehicle |
US10434868B2 (en) * | 2017-10-04 | 2019-10-08 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Grille shutter control device |
US10643158B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2020-05-05 | Snap-On Incorporated | Technician timer |
US10733548B2 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2020-08-04 | Snap-On Incorporated | Technician assignment interface |
US20200258057A1 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2020-08-13 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Repair management and execution |
WO2020211845A1 (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2020-10-22 | 深圳市德塔防爆电动汽车有限公司 | Safety tree model-based electric vehicle safety design optimization method |
CN111824173A (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2020-10-27 | 上海汽车集团股份有限公司 | Grading processing method and device suitable for faults of intelligent driving system |
WO2020249169A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-17 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Method for ensuring and maintaining the function of a complete safety-critical system |
GB2586633A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-03 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Layered electrical architecture for vehicle diagnostics |
WO2021037965A1 (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-04 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Distributed diagnostics architecture for a vehicle |
WO2021043660A1 (en) * | 2019-09-02 | 2021-03-11 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Electrical architecture for service-oriented vehicle diagnostics |
GB2591053A (en) * | 2021-03-26 | 2021-07-14 | Ashok Bongirwar Rajiv | Unintended control action (UCA) and causes within a machine |
US11144888B2 (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2021-10-12 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for augmenting real-fix tips with additional content |
US11150623B2 (en) | 2019-06-28 | 2021-10-19 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Data-driven approach for effective system change identification |
US11429936B2 (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2022-08-30 | Snap-On Incorporated | System and method for dynamically-changeable displayable pages with vehicle service information |
GB2604904A (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2022-09-21 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Diagnostics system for a vehicle |
US20230166602A1 (en) * | 2021-11-27 | 2023-06-01 | Xidong Tang | Method and apparatus for controlling distributed propulsion systems |
US11798325B2 (en) | 2020-12-09 | 2023-10-24 | Cummins Inc. | Fault isolation using on-board diagnostic (OBD) capability data |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013053134A1 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-04-18 | 中联重科股份有限公司 | Excavator, and method and system for determining equipment failure |
CN104615513A (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-13 | 张永军 | Multilevel code standardization breakdown analyzing method |
CN104133984B (en) * | 2014-07-01 | 2017-01-18 | 西北工业大学 | Modularized complicated equipment Bayesian network failure prediction method |
EP3037906A1 (en) | 2014-12-23 | 2016-06-29 | Televic Rail NV | Device and method for distributed diagnostics analysis |
CN105718327B (en) * | 2016-02-18 | 2018-12-07 | 谭晓栋 | A kind of failure depth isolation method based on testability model and Bayesian inference |
US20190066406A1 (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2019-02-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations Llc, | Method and apparatus for monitoring a vehicle |
US10424127B2 (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2019-09-24 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Controller architecture for monitoring health of an autonomous vehicle |
CN111376849A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2020-07-07 | 驭势科技(北京)有限公司 | Vehicle chassis aging detection method and device, vehicle-mounted equipment and storage medium |
CN112598287A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-02 | 武汉烽火信息集成技术有限公司 | Rail transit health assessment method and system |
DE102021115385A1 (en) | 2021-06-14 | 2022-12-15 | Hans Kallich | Vehicle diagnostic device for displaying a circuit diagram with measurement and control signals |
DE102021128916A1 (en) | 2021-11-05 | 2023-05-11 | Hans Kallich | Vehicle diagnostic device with a diagnostic process computer |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6141608A (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2000-10-31 | Snap-On Tools Company | System for dynamic diagnosis of apparatus operating conditions |
US6654910B1 (en) * | 1999-08-14 | 2003-11-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent fault management |
US6662089B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2003-12-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving fault classifications |
US6748304B2 (en) * | 2002-08-16 | 2004-06-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving fault isolation |
US6766230B1 (en) * | 2000-11-09 | 2004-07-20 | The Ohio State University | Model-based fault detection and isolation system and method |
US6999906B2 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2006-02-14 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Reconfiguration method for a sensor system comprising at least one set of observers for failure compensation and guaranteeing measured value quality |
US7136794B1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2006-11-14 | Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. | Method and apparatus for estimating values for condition indicators |
US20080033693A1 (en) * | 2005-02-15 | 2008-02-07 | Abb Research Ltd. | Diagnostic device for use in process control system |
US7509194B2 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2009-03-24 | Ricardo Uk Limited | Vehicle control |
US7650210B2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2010-01-19 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Remote vehicle diagnostic management |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07147574A (en) * | 1993-06-18 | 1995-06-06 | Nec Corp | Hierarchical fault report system |
JPH11149491A (en) * | 1997-11-17 | 1999-06-02 | Toshiba Corp | Fault detection rate evaluation method |
DE10341412A1 (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2005-01-05 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Vehicle dynamics control system for vehicles |
JP4059194B2 (en) * | 2003-12-25 | 2008-03-12 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Integrated control system for vehicles |
JP2006229421A (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2006-08-31 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Network fault diagnostic apparatus |
CN101118694A (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2008-02-06 | 李克明 | Vehicle intellectualized management system |
-
2008
- 2008-06-02 US US12/131,347 patent/US20090295559A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-06-01 DE DE112009001371T patent/DE112009001371T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2009-06-01 CN CN2009801203496A patent/CN102046443A/en active Pending
- 2009-06-01 WO PCT/US2009/045774 patent/WO2009148984A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7650210B2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2010-01-19 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Remote vehicle diagnostic management |
US6141608A (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2000-10-31 | Snap-On Tools Company | System for dynamic diagnosis of apparatus operating conditions |
US6654910B1 (en) * | 1999-08-14 | 2003-11-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent fault management |
US6766230B1 (en) * | 2000-11-09 | 2004-07-20 | The Ohio State University | Model-based fault detection and isolation system and method |
US7136794B1 (en) * | 2001-05-24 | 2006-11-14 | Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. | Method and apparatus for estimating values for condition indicators |
US7509194B2 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2009-03-24 | Ricardo Uk Limited | Vehicle control |
US6999906B2 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2006-02-14 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Reconfiguration method for a sensor system comprising at least one set of observers for failure compensation and guaranteeing measured value quality |
US6662089B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2003-12-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving fault classifications |
US6748304B2 (en) * | 2002-08-16 | 2004-06-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving fault isolation |
US20080033693A1 (en) * | 2005-02-15 | 2008-02-07 | Abb Research Ltd. | Diagnostic device for use in process control system |
Cited By (67)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090271062A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Control system and method for filtering dependent diagnostic trouble codes |
US8055400B2 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2011-11-08 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Control system and method for filtering dependent diagnostic trouble codes |
US20100106357A1 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2010-04-29 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc | Combined evidence vehicle health monitoring |
US8099206B2 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2012-01-17 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Combined evidence vehicle health monitoring |
CN101941439A (en) * | 2010-09-25 | 2011-01-12 | 重庆长安汽车股份有限公司 | Control system failure diagnosis method for avoiding concurrent failures of hybrid electric vehicles |
US8751777B2 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2014-06-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and reconfigurable systems to optimize the performance of a condition based health maintenance system |
US8615773B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2013-12-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for coordinating computing functions to accomplish a task using a configuration file and standardized executable application modules |
US8990770B2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2015-03-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods to configure condition based health maintenance systems |
US8726084B2 (en) | 2011-10-14 | 2014-05-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for distributed diagnostic reasoning |
US20160140776A1 (en) * | 2011-11-16 | 2016-05-19 | Autoconnect Holdings Llc | Communications based on vehicle diagnostics and indications |
US20130136007A1 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2013-05-30 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis for in-vehicle communications |
US9160620B2 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2015-10-13 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Integrated fault diagnosis and prognosis for in-vehicle communications |
US8832649B2 (en) | 2012-05-22 | 2014-09-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for augmenting the functionality of a monitoring node without recompiling |
US9582944B2 (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2017-02-28 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing vehicle repair information |
GB2505061A (en) * | 2012-06-26 | 2014-02-19 | Bae Systems Plc | System and method for diagnosing a vehicle and its subsystems |
US8832716B2 (en) | 2012-08-10 | 2014-09-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for limiting user customization of task workflow in a condition based health maintenance system |
US9158834B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2015-10-13 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for mapping repair orders within a database |
US9633340B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2017-04-25 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for mapping repair orders within a database |
US20150046039A1 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2015-02-12 | Jtekt Corporation | Sensor device, motor control device, and electric power steering apparatus |
US9772249B2 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2017-09-26 | Jtekt Corporation | Sensor device, motor control device, and electric power steering apparatus |
US9336244B2 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2016-05-10 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for generating baselines regarding vehicle service request data |
US9672497B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2017-06-06 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for using natural language processing and machine-learning to produce vehicle-service content |
US11720863B2 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2023-08-08 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for generating vehicle service content |
US10453036B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2019-10-22 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for generating vehicle service content based on multi-symptom rule |
US10891597B2 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2021-01-12 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for generating vehicle service content |
US10013679B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2018-07-03 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for generating vehicle service content from metadata representing meaning of vehicle service data |
US9971815B2 (en) | 2014-05-06 | 2018-05-15 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing an auto-generated repair-hint to a vehicle repair tool |
US9201930B1 (en) | 2014-05-06 | 2015-12-01 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for providing an auto-generated repair-hint to a vehicle repair tool |
US9477950B2 (en) | 2014-09-04 | 2016-10-25 | Snap-On Incorporated | Prognostics-based estimator |
JP2018506460A (en) * | 2015-01-29 | 2018-03-08 | コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト | Vehicle control apparatus and method |
US10661788B2 (en) | 2015-01-29 | 2020-05-26 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Vehicle control device and method |
US9639995B2 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2017-05-02 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for generating and outputting test drive scripts for vehicles |
US10679433B2 (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2020-06-09 | Snap-On Incorporated | Methods and systems for generating and outputting test drive scripts for vehicles |
US10216796B2 (en) | 2015-07-29 | 2019-02-26 | Snap-On Incorporated | Systems and methods for predictive augmentation of vehicle service procedures |
US11755593B2 (en) | 2015-07-29 | 2023-09-12 | Snap-On Incorporated | Systems and methods for predictive augmentation of vehicle service procedures |
US10984004B2 (en) | 2015-07-29 | 2021-04-20 | Snap-On Incorporated | Systems and methods for predictive augmentation of vehicle service procedures |
US11144888B2 (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2021-10-12 | Snap-On Incorporated | Method and system for augmenting real-fix tips with additional content |
US11429936B2 (en) | 2015-10-02 | 2022-08-30 | Snap-On Incorporated | System and method for dynamically-changeable displayable pages with vehicle service information |
US10643158B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2020-05-05 | Snap-On Incorporated | Technician timer |
US20180032942A1 (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2018-02-01 | Mitchell Repair Information Company, Llc | Methods and Systems for Tracking Labor Efficiency |
US10692035B2 (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2020-06-23 | Mitchell Repair Information Company, Llc | Methods and systems for tracking labor efficiency |
CN107786897A (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2018-03-09 | 南京中兴新软件有限责任公司 | IPTV system fault locating method and system |
CN106569475A (en) * | 2016-10-15 | 2017-04-19 | 安徽省(水利部淮河水利委员会)水利科学研究院(安徽省水利工程质量检测中心站) | Remote water taking monitoring equipment fault grading diagnosis method |
CN107139932A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-09-08 | 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 | Communication diagnosing method applied to whole-control system |
US10733548B2 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2020-08-04 | Snap-On Incorporated | Technician assignment interface |
US10434868B2 (en) * | 2017-10-04 | 2019-10-08 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Grille shutter control device |
US20200258057A1 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2020-08-13 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Repair management and execution |
CN111824173A (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2020-10-27 | 上海汽车集团股份有限公司 | Grading processing method and device suitable for faults of intelligent driving system |
WO2020211845A1 (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2020-10-22 | 深圳市德塔防爆电动汽车有限公司 | Safety tree model-based electric vehicle safety design optimization method |
CN110223416A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-10 | 深圳市德塔防爆电动汽车有限公司 | A kind of the primary data analysis method and electric vehicle of electric vehicle |
WO2020249169A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-17 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Method for ensuring and maintaining the function of a complete safety-critical system |
US11150623B2 (en) | 2019-06-28 | 2021-10-19 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Data-driven approach for effective system change identification |
WO2021037965A1 (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-04 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Distributed diagnostics architecture for a vehicle |
GB2586633A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-03 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Layered electrical architecture for vehicle diagnostics |
GB2586633B (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2022-09-07 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Layered electrical architecture for vehicle diagnostics |
US11842582B2 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2023-12-12 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Layered electrical architecture for vehicle diagnostics |
WO2021037957A1 (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2021-03-04 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Layered electrical architecture for vehicle diagnostics |
US20220332334A1 (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2022-10-20 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Distributed diagnostics architecture for a vehicle |
WO2021043660A1 (en) * | 2019-09-02 | 2021-03-11 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Electrical architecture for service-oriented vehicle diagnostics |
CN114341758A (en) * | 2019-09-02 | 2022-04-12 | 捷豹路虎有限公司 | Electrical architecture for service-oriented vehicle diagnostics |
US11798325B2 (en) | 2020-12-09 | 2023-10-24 | Cummins Inc. | Fault isolation using on-board diagnostic (OBD) capability data |
WO2022195085A1 (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2022-09-22 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Diagnostics system for a vehicle |
GB2604904A (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2022-09-21 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Diagnostics system for a vehicle |
GB2604904B (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2024-01-03 | Jaguar Land Rover Ltd | Diagnostics system for a vehicle |
GB2591053A (en) * | 2021-03-26 | 2021-07-14 | Ashok Bongirwar Rajiv | Unintended control action (UCA) and causes within a machine |
US20230166602A1 (en) * | 2021-11-27 | 2023-06-01 | Xidong Tang | Method and apparatus for controlling distributed propulsion systems |
US11801758B2 (en) * | 2021-11-27 | 2023-10-31 | Xidong Tang | Method and apparatus for controlling distributed propulsion systems |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2009148984A1 (en) | 2009-12-10 |
DE112009001371T5 (en) | 2011-04-28 |
CN102046443A (en) | 2011-05-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20090295559A1 (en) | Integrated hierarchical process for fault detection and isolation | |
US7376499B2 (en) | State-of-health monitoring and fault diagnosis with adaptive thresholds for integrated vehicle stability system | |
US7136729B2 (en) | Supervisory diagnostics for integrated vehicle stability system | |
US7133755B2 (en) | State of health monitoring and fault diagnosis for integrated vehicle stability system | |
US8260486B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosis of sensors faults using adaptive fuzzy logic | |
US7295903B2 (en) | Device and method for on-board diagnosis based on a model | |
JP5319534B2 (en) | Fault management method and fault management apparatus | |
US10532740B2 (en) | Method and arrangement for monitoring and adapting the performance of a fusion system of an autonomous vehicle | |
US8095261B2 (en) | Aggregated information fusion for enhanced diagnostics, prognostics and maintenance practices of vehicles | |
US8442702B2 (en) | Fault diagnosis device and method for optimizing maintenance measures in technical systems | |
US20070078576A1 (en) | System and method for fuzzy-logic based fault diagnosis | |
JP2005048770A (en) | Method of utilizing model-based intelligent agent for diagnosing failure for separation | |
Lanigan et al. | Diagnosis in automotive systems: A survey | |
KR101558383B1 (en) | Daignosing method for smart sensor or actuator of vehicle | |
US20190302753A1 (en) | Communications interruption system, communications interruption method, and recording medium | |
US20220101666A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Determining a Residual Service Life based on a Predictive Diagnosis of Components of an Electric Drive System Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques | |
CN112052573B (en) | Distributed fault identification method based on limited time observer | |
CN111891134A (en) | Automatic driving processing system, system on chip and method for monitoring processing module | |
KR20200022674A (en) | Apparatus for controlling fail-operational of vehicle, and method thereof | |
US20220063601A1 (en) | Measurement data evaluation for vehicle-dynamics systems having protection of the intended function | |
Ploix et al. | A logical framework for isolation in fault diagnosis | |
US20230192139A1 (en) | Method and system for addressing failure in an autonomous agent | |
US7539564B2 (en) | Device and method for central on-board diagnosis for motor vehicles | |
Alag et al. | A framework for intelligent sensor validation, sensor fusion, and supervisory control of automated vehicles in IVHS | |
US20220032966A1 (en) | On-vehicle control apparatus and on-vehicle control system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOWELL, MARK N.;SALMAN, MUTASIM A.;TANG, XIDONG;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080429 TO 20080526;REEL/FRAME:021027/0606 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0448 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0448 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022554/0538 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022554/0538 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023126/0914 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023155/0769 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023126/0914 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023155/0769 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0215 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0215 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023162/0187 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023162/0187 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0909 Effective date: 20100420 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025315/0001 Effective date: 20101026 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025324/0475 Effective date: 20101027 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025781/0211 Effective date: 20101202 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |