US20100049743A1 - User interface in an information technology (it) system - Google Patents

User interface in an information technology (it) system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100049743A1
US20100049743A1 US12/541,537 US54153709A US2010049743A1 US 20100049743 A1 US20100049743 A1 US 20100049743A1 US 54153709 A US54153709 A US 54153709A US 2010049743 A1 US2010049743 A1 US 2010049743A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
control unit
operable
interactions
user interface
manufacturer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/541,537
Other versions
US8839116B2 (en
Inventor
Sebastian Schmidt
Katharina Socher
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Priority to US12/541,537 priority Critical patent/US8839116B2/en
Assigned to SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT reassignment SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SOCHER, KATHARINA, SCHMIDT, SEBASTIAN
Publication of US20100049743A1 publication Critical patent/US20100049743A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8839116B2 publication Critical patent/US8839116B2/en
Assigned to SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH reassignment SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22—Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2294—Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing by remote test

Definitions

  • Intuitive usability is important for customers of complex medical devices. It is difficult for the manufacturer to differentiate basic technologies purely by technologies. The number of devices in hospitals is growing continuously so that increasingly less time remains to train users. Furthermore, user interfaces become more complex as the number of features and applications increases.
  • Device and user interface prototypes are generated and tested with carefully selected trial customers. This procedure is disadvantageous in that the selected customers are often not representative because they indicate a high affinity (i.e., have a close relationship) to the manufacturer and are already accustomed to the manufacturer's systems.
  • the present embodiments may obviate one or more of the problems or drawbacks inherent in the related art. It is the object of the invention to improve this situation.
  • a method for remotely controlling and supporting complex devices is extended to such a degree that the interactions implemented during the session are archived separately in a database.
  • the database is accessible to the manufacturer of the system and is used to identify typical user errors or problems.
  • a system and/or method may be used to collect representative data, which relates to problem situations, during operation of the software.
  • the support is extended such that during the session, data relating to the behavior of a local user and supporter is recorded and written into a database.
  • the database is finally evaluated by the manufacturer of the device.
  • the coordinates of the mouse pointer and the “clicking” user may be stored.
  • the selected menu item may be stored with each selection of a menu item.
  • the name of the application may be stored with each start of an application.
  • a film may be recorded, and subsequently evaluated automatically, for example, by the mouse pointer being identified and the coordinates being written into the database.
  • the database is in this case accessible to the manufacturer of the system and detects a plurality (e.g., ranging from hundreds to thousands) of support sessions and users.
  • the database is subsequently analyzed in order to identify frequent patterns.
  • the patterns may be screen areas (e.g., coordinate ranges), which are particularly frequently “clicked” during the support session.
  • the information is then used to identify user problems in this region and to take them into consideration during additional product development.
  • an evaluation indicates that in the case of a large number of support sessions, the supporter clicks into a certain area on the screen, at which a push button is located in order to carry out a certain setting. It is possible to conclude herefrom that these settings form the object of the support requests and require improvement.
  • the stored actions may be stored without context-sensitive or customer-specific data, e.g. patient data, by only the coordinates of the mouse click and not the screen contents being stored, and/or the displayed screen contents are deleted again after evaluation.
  • the recordings can be anonymized, with respect to the customer, in order to take account data protection issues. The data determined is used to assess the development efficiency (e.g. by the number of support actions for a sub application being evaluated before and after a further development).
  • the invention is advantageous in that the manufacturer of the information technology (IT) system obtains statistically significant data relating to typical user problems and is able to take account the data in the development and to use the development resources in a targeted fashion.
  • IT information technology
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an information technology system
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of improving the development of a user interface.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an information technology system 10 .
  • the system includes a control unit 12 and a database 14 .
  • a user may use the control unit 12 to operate a remote maintenance function of a user interface to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation.
  • the control unit 12 may record interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function.
  • the control unit 12 may store the interactions in the database 14 of the manufacturer of the IT system.
  • the control unit 12 may evaluate the recorded interactions in order to derive indications of an improvement in the user interface.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a method 20 of improving the development of a user interface.
  • the method may include using a remote maintenance function by a user of a user interface in order to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation (act 22 ), recording interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function in a database of the manufacturer of the IT system (act 24 ) and evaluating the recorded interactions by the manufacturer in order to derive t indications of an improvement in the user interface using the recorded data (act 26 ).

Abstract

A method and system for improving user interfaces in IT systems is provided. In one embodiment, the method includes using a remote maintenance function by a user of a user interface in order to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation, recording interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function in a database of the manufacturer of the IT system and evaluating the recorded interactions by the manufacturer in order to derive therefrom indications of an improvement in the user interface.

Description

  • The present patent document claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/090,914, which was filed Aug. 22, 2008, and is incorporated by reference.
    • BACKGROUND
  • Intuitive usability is important for customers of complex medical devices. It is difficult for the manufacturer to differentiate basic technologies purely by technologies. The number of devices in hospitals is growing continuously so that increasingly less time remains to train users. Furthermore, user interfaces become more complex as the number of features and applications increases.
  • This is particularly noticeable within the field of medical imaging devices. “Traditional” film-based x-ray devices had very few adjustment possibilities. However, nowadays, digital, computer-controlled devices, which offer very complex adjustment possibilities, are standard. It is difficult for manufacturers to optimize the operability since there is a lack of corresponding information for the developer. Operating errors are not detected by the manufacturer and adjustments to the device, which could in future prevent operating errors, do not take place. With other products outside the field of medicine, the problem of the ever increasing complexity of the user interfaces is apparent. It is also difficult for the manufacturer to optimize the usability of the user interfaces since an information flow based on the general usability seldom takes place, with mainly the acute problems being discussed and solved.
  • Device and user interface prototypes are generated and tested with carefully selected trial customers. This procedure is disadvantageous in that the selected customers are often not representative because they indicate a high affinity (i.e., have a close relationship) to the manufacturer and are already accustomed to the manufacturer's systems.
    • SUMMARY AND DESCRIPTION
  • The present embodiments may obviate one or more of the problems or drawbacks inherent in the related art. It is the object of the invention to improve this situation.
  • In one embodiment, a method for remotely controlling and supporting complex devices, e.g. medical devices with a user interface, is extended to such a degree that the interactions implemented during the session are archived separately in a database. The database is accessible to the manufacturer of the system and is used to identify typical user errors or problems. A system and/or method may be used to collect representative data, which relates to problem situations, during operation of the software.
  • Functions relating to the remote control of medical systems may be used. One example is the product “syngo Expert” by Siemens. A user of a system is able to call a supporting technician (“supporter”) for help. Once a session has been started, both participants view the same screen content on their computer screens and both are able to control the system using a keyboard and mouse click. Some systems of this type offer the possibility of recording the session as “film”.
  • The support is extended such that during the session, data relating to the behavior of a local user and supporter is recorded and written into a database. The database is finally evaluated by the manufacturer of the device. In one embodiment, with each mouse click, the coordinates of the mouse pointer and the “clicking” user may be stored. In another embodiment, the selected menu item may be stored with each selection of a menu item. In yet another embodiment, the name of the application may be stored with each start of an application. In yet another embodiment, a film may be recorded, and subsequently evaluated automatically, for example, by the mouse pointer being identified and the coordinates being written into the database.
  • The database is in this case accessible to the manufacturer of the system and detects a plurality (e.g., ranging from hundreds to thousands) of support sessions and users. The database is subsequently analyzed in order to identify frequent patterns. The patterns may be screen areas (e.g., coordinate ranges), which are particularly frequently “clicked” during the support session. The information is then used to identify user problems in this region and to take them into consideration during additional product development.
  • In one example, an evaluation indicates that in the case of a large number of support sessions, the supporter clicks into a certain area on the screen, at which a push button is located in order to carry out a certain setting. It is possible to conclude herefrom that these settings form the object of the support requests and require improvement.
  • The stored actions may be stored without context-sensitive or customer-specific data, e.g. patient data, by only the coordinates of the mouse click and not the screen contents being stored, and/or the displayed screen contents are deleted again after evaluation. The recordings can be anonymized, with respect to the customer, in order to take account data protection issues. The data determined is used to assess the development efficiency (e.g. by the number of support actions for a sub application being evaluated before and after a further development).
  • The invention is advantageous in that the manufacturer of the information technology (IT) system obtains statistically significant data relating to typical user problems and is able to take account the data in the development and to use the development resources in a targeted fashion.
  • An additional advantage results compared with existing methods such as e.g. so-called “Focus Groups” in that the data determined relates to the overall installed base and is collected in a realistic user situation and not in a lab situation.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an information technology system; and
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of improving the development of a user interface.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an information technology system 10. The system includes a control unit 12 and a database 14. A user may use the control unit 12 to operate a remote maintenance function of a user interface to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation. The control unit 12 may record interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function. The control unit 12 may store the interactions in the database 14 of the manufacturer of the IT system. The control unit 12 may evaluate the recorded interactions in order to derive indications of an improvement in the user interface.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a method 20 of improving the development of a user interface. The method may include using a remote maintenance function by a user of a user interface in order to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation (act 22), recording interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function in a database of the manufacturer of the IT system (act 24) and evaluating the recorded interactions by the manufacturer in order to derive t indications of an improvement in the user interface using the recorded data (act 26).
  • Various embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another. The forgoing detailed description has described only a few of the many possible implementations of the present invention. For this reason, this detailed description is intended by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation. It is only the following claims, including all equivalents that are intended to define the scope of this invention.

Claims (20)

1. A method for improving user interfaces in information technology (IT) systems, the method comprising:
a) using a remote maintenance function by a user of a user interface in order to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation,
b) recording interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function in a database of the manufacturer of the IT system and
c) evaluating the recorded interactions by the manufacturer in order to derive therefrom indications of an improvement in the user interface.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein recording interactions includes storing the coordinates of a mouse click of a mouse pointer and the identity of the user controlling the mouse when a mouse is used to interact as an input device.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising storing a selected menu item with each selection of a menu item.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising storing a name of an application upon a start of an application.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising recording a control sequence and automatically evaluating after the recording.
6. The method as claimed in claim 2, further comprising identifying the mouse pointer and writing the coordinates into the database.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising storing the interactions without context-sensitive or customer-specific data, by only the coordinates of the mouse click and not the screen contents being stored.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising storing actions without context-sensitive or customer-specific data by the recorded screen contents being deleted again after evaluation.
9. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the recordings are anonymized in respect of the customer in order to take account of data protection issues.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the data determined is used to assess development efficiency.
11. An information technology (IT) system comprising:
a control unit that is operable to:
use a remote maintenance function by a user of a user interface to allow a technician to take control of a data transmission connection during operation,
record interactions implemented during the use of the remote maintenance function in a database of the manufacturer of the IT system and
evaluate the recorded interactions by the manufacturer in order to derive therefrom indications of an improvement in the user interface.
12. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to store a selected menu item with each selection of a menu item.
13. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to store a selected menu item with each selection of a menu item.
14. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to store a name of an application upon a start of an application.
15. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to record a control sequence and automatically evaluating after the recording.
16. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to identify the mouse pointer and writing the coordinates into the database.
17. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to store the interactions without context-sensitive or customer-specific data, by only the coordinates of the mouse click and not the screen contents being stored.
18. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the control unit is operable to store actions without context-sensitive or customer-specific data by the recorded screen contents being deleted again after evaluation.
19. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the recordings are anonymized in respect of the customer in order to take account of data protection issues.
20. The IT system of claim 11, wherein the data determined is used to assess development efficiency.
US12/541,537 2008-08-22 2009-08-14 User interface in an information technology (IT) system Expired - Fee Related US8839116B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/541,537 US8839116B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2009-08-14 User interface in an information technology (IT) system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US9091408P 2008-08-22 2008-08-22
US12/541,537 US8839116B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2009-08-14 User interface in an information technology (IT) system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100049743A1 true US20100049743A1 (en) 2010-02-25
US8839116B2 US8839116B2 (en) 2014-09-16

Family

ID=41697305

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/541,537 Expired - Fee Related US8839116B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2009-08-14 User interface in an information technology (IT) system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8839116B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120210215A1 (en) * 2011-02-16 2012-08-16 Rovi Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for providing networked assistance and feedback control for consumer electronic devices
US20210243233A1 (en) * 2020-02-03 2021-08-05 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and sytem for protecting privacy of users in session recordings
US20210369561A1 (en) * 2018-06-07 2021-12-02 Gecko Alliance Group Inc. Method, system, computer program product and device for facilitating centralized control and monitoring over a network of a set of remote bathing unit systems
US11450069B2 (en) 2018-11-09 2022-09-20 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for a SaaS lens to view obfuscated content
US11539709B2 (en) 2019-12-23 2022-12-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Restricted access to sensitive content
US11544415B2 (en) 2019-12-17 2023-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Context-aware obfuscation and unobfuscation of sensitive content
US11627102B2 (en) 2020-08-29 2023-04-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Identity leak prevention

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9766769B1 (en) 2014-12-31 2017-09-19 FullStory, Inc. Evaluation of interactions with a user interface
US10699556B1 (en) 2019-03-01 2020-06-30 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for plant operation gap analysis and guidance solution

Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5072412A (en) * 1987-03-25 1991-12-10 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
US5917929A (en) * 1996-07-23 1999-06-29 R2 Technology, Inc. User interface for computer aided diagnosis system
US6384843B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2002-05-07 Ergolight Ltd. Apparatus and methods for analyzing software systems
US6734880B2 (en) * 1999-11-24 2004-05-11 Stentor, Inc. User interface for a medical informatics systems
US20040095383A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Behavior analysis based optimization of navigation in E-commerce user interfaces
US20040123129A1 (en) * 1995-02-13 2004-06-24 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Trusted infrastructure support systems, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management
US20040143594A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-07-22 Kalies Ralph F. Method for generating medical intelligence from patient-specific data
US20050190769A1 (en) * 2004-01-28 2005-09-01 Smith B. S. System and method for securing remote access to a remote system
US20050278728A1 (en) * 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Microsoft Corporation Recording/playback tools for UI-based applications
US20050278630A1 (en) * 2004-06-14 2005-12-15 Bracey William M Tracking user operations
US20060242638A1 (en) * 2005-04-22 2006-10-26 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive systems and methods for making software easy to use via software usage mining
US20080126931A1 (en) * 2006-11-02 2008-05-29 Gou Kojima System and method for recording and reproducing user operation
US20090112629A1 (en) * 2005-01-24 2009-04-30 Leiper Thomas W Blinded Electronic Medical Records
US20090276728A1 (en) * 2008-05-02 2009-11-05 Doan Christopher H Arrangements for Managing Assistance Requests for Computer Services
US20090300510A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Supportspace Ltd. Simultaneous remote and local control of computer desktop
US20100095208A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2010-04-15 White Alexei R Systems and Methods for Remote Tracking and Replay of User Interaction with a Webpage
US20100229112A1 (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-09 Microsoft Corporation Problem reporting system based on user interface interactions

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5072412A (en) * 1987-03-25 1991-12-10 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
US20040123129A1 (en) * 1995-02-13 2004-06-24 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Trusted infrastructure support systems, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management
US5917929A (en) * 1996-07-23 1999-06-29 R2 Technology, Inc. User interface for computer aided diagnosis system
US6384843B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2002-05-07 Ergolight Ltd. Apparatus and methods for analyzing software systems
US6734880B2 (en) * 1999-11-24 2004-05-11 Stentor, Inc. User interface for a medical informatics systems
US20040095383A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Behavior analysis based optimization of navigation in E-commerce user interfaces
US20040143594A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-07-22 Kalies Ralph F. Method for generating medical intelligence from patient-specific data
US20050190769A1 (en) * 2004-01-28 2005-09-01 Smith B. S. System and method for securing remote access to a remote system
US20050278630A1 (en) * 2004-06-14 2005-12-15 Bracey William M Tracking user operations
US20050278728A1 (en) * 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Microsoft Corporation Recording/playback tools for UI-based applications
US20090112629A1 (en) * 2005-01-24 2009-04-30 Leiper Thomas W Blinded Electronic Medical Records
US20060242638A1 (en) * 2005-04-22 2006-10-26 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive systems and methods for making software easy to use via software usage mining
US20080126931A1 (en) * 2006-11-02 2008-05-29 Gou Kojima System and method for recording and reproducing user operation
US20100095208A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2010-04-15 White Alexei R Systems and Methods for Remote Tracking and Replay of User Interaction with a Webpage
US20090276728A1 (en) * 2008-05-02 2009-11-05 Doan Christopher H Arrangements for Managing Assistance Requests for Computer Services
US20090300510A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Supportspace Ltd. Simultaneous remote and local control of computer desktop
US20100229112A1 (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-09 Microsoft Corporation Problem reporting system based on user interface interactions

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Device - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary", retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/device on February 6, 2012, Merriam-Webster, page 1 *
"Microsoft Computer Dictionary", March 15, 2002, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, p 639 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120210215A1 (en) * 2011-02-16 2012-08-16 Rovi Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for providing networked assistance and feedback control for consumer electronic devices
US20210369561A1 (en) * 2018-06-07 2021-12-02 Gecko Alliance Group Inc. Method, system, computer program product and device for facilitating centralized control and monitoring over a network of a set of remote bathing unit systems
US11759391B2 (en) * 2018-06-07 2023-09-19 Gecko Alliance Group Inc. Method, system, computer program product and device for facilitating centralized control and monitoring over a network of a set of remote bathing unit systems
US11450069B2 (en) 2018-11-09 2022-09-20 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for a SaaS lens to view obfuscated content
US11544415B2 (en) 2019-12-17 2023-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Context-aware obfuscation and unobfuscation of sensitive content
US11539709B2 (en) 2019-12-23 2022-12-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Restricted access to sensitive content
US20210243233A1 (en) * 2020-02-03 2021-08-05 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and sytem for protecting privacy of users in session recordings
US11582266B2 (en) * 2020-02-03 2023-02-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for protecting privacy of users in session recordings
US11627102B2 (en) 2020-08-29 2023-04-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Identity leak prevention

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8839116B2 (en) 2014-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8839116B2 (en) User interface in an information technology (IT) system
US7421683B2 (en) Method for the use of information in an auxiliary data system in relation to automated testing of graphical user interface based applications
US8869115B2 (en) Systems and methods for emotive software usability
US20090132963A1 (en) Method and apparatus for pacs software tool customization and interaction
US20090064000A1 (en) SYSTEMS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PRODUCTS TO AUTOMATICALLY COMPLETE a GUI TASK
US8799796B2 (en) System and method for generating graphical dashboards with drill down navigation
US20070277061A1 (en) System, Method, Computer Program Product And Article Of Manufacture For Remote Fault Diagnosis And Correction In A Computer System
US20100223566A1 (en) Method and system for enabling interaction with a plurality of applications using a single user interface
EP1898328A2 (en) An interface between clinical and research information systems
US20150212676A1 (en) Multi-Touch Gesture Sensing and Speech Activated Radiological Device and methods of use
EP2807541B1 (en) Image-based application automation
US20210132717A1 (en) Hierarchical interface environment
JP5935216B2 (en) Medical information display device and medical information display program
CN108089737B (en) Multi-mouse control method and device for single computer
US20110179383A1 (en) Methods, systems, and computer program products for automatically selecting objects in a plurality of objects
US20110179364A1 (en) Methods, systems, and computer program products for automating operations on a plurality of objects
CN109213668B (en) Operation recording method and device and terminal
US10824306B2 (en) Presenting captured data
JP6198206B2 (en) Device and program for testing software
US20120124091A1 (en) Application file system access
JP2021532520A (en) Medical information inquiry and input system, medical information inquiry and input method, and programs to execute it
JP2013109541A (en) Information processing device and information processing method
KR101480427B1 (en) Method and system for providing medical data record writing based emr system
US20140019915A1 (en) Data storage and retrieval system
JP2008123191A (en) Operation management server, operation management method and computer program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHMIDT, SEBASTIAN;SOCHER, KATHARINA;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090901 TO 20091110;REEL/FRAME:023553/0920

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHMIDT, SEBASTIAN;SOCHER, KATHARINA;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090901 TO 20091110;REEL/FRAME:023553/0920

AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT;REEL/FRAME:039271/0561

Effective date: 20160610

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20180916