US20110153509A1 - Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110153509A1
US20110153509A1 US11/915,718 US91571806A US2011153509A1 US 20110153509 A1 US20110153509 A1 US 20110153509A1 US 91571806 A US91571806 A US 91571806A US 2011153509 A1 US2011153509 A1 US 2011153509A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
information
matter
node
client
area
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/915,718
Inventor
Steven W. Lundberg
Janal M. Kalis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Black Hills IP Holdings LLC
IP DEV VENTURE
Original Assignee
IP DEV VENTURE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IP DEV VENTURE filed Critical IP DEV VENTURE
Priority to US11/915,718 priority Critical patent/US20110153509A1/en
Assigned to IP DEVELOPMENT VENTURE reassignment IP DEVELOPMENT VENTURE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LUNDBERG, STEVEN W., KALIS, JANAL M.
Assigned to Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. reassignment Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LUNDBERG, STEVEN W., KALIS, JANAL M.
Publication of US20110153509A1 publication Critical patent/US20110153509A1/en
Assigned to Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. reassignment Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LUNDBERG, STEVEN W, KALIS, JANAL M
Assigned to BLACK HILLS IP HOLDINGS, LLC reassignment BLACK HILLS IP HOLDINGS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/18Legal services; Handling legal documents
    • G06Q50/184Intellectual property management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/242Query formulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management

Definitions

  • This patent document pertains generally to data collection and presentation, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a method and apparatus for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
  • claims define the scope of an issued patent, and consequently, the claims also define the scope and breadth of the associated intellectual rights or property.
  • a system and method to concisely catalog and describe pending and issue claims may assist a practitioner when providing advice to a client, drafting well-formed claims, and avoiding unnecessary costs during prosecution.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system.
  • FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node.
  • FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a product space grandchild node.
  • FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a concept ontology grandchild node.
  • FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a claims grandchild node.
  • FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a references grandchild node.
  • FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a claims grandchild node.
  • FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
  • FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
  • FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a product space grandchild node.
  • FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a concepts grandchild node.
  • FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a cited references grandchild node.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment, in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.
  • one or more of the features described below are included to provide a system or method for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
  • information describing patent applications and related information is displayed within one or more screens on a computer display.
  • the screens may, for example, be child screens in a framed web presentation.
  • navigational links are provided, such as by tabs at the top of a computer display screen. Using the navigational links or tabs, a user can view refined subsets of information.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy 100 used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system.
  • a home node 102 which may have the physical embodiment of a home page in a web page environment, may provide two child nodes (e.g., sub-screens), such as a client node 104 and a matter node 106 .
  • two child nodes e.g., sub-screens
  • client node 104 e.g., sub-screens
  • a matter node 106 e.g., sub-screens
  • fewer or more child nodes are available from the home node 102 , such as a search node (not shown), a billing node (not shown), or a reports node (not shown).
  • each grandchild node is designed to display information from a particular perspective.
  • the matter node 106 information related to the matter is available, such as the matter name, number, file date, client identification, file status, and the like.
  • the general information in the matter node 106 is made available using a static area of a web presentation.
  • the matter node 106 may have, in various embodiments, one or more related grandchild nodes.
  • the matter node 106 has a claims node 116 , a prosecution node 118 , a product space node 120 , a concepts node 122 , and a cited references node 124 as related grandchild nodes.
  • the grandchild nodes 108 - 124 may additionally have related great grandchild nodes, which may provide further refined views of related information.
  • FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node 102 .
  • two or more tabs are provided in a navigational area of a web page.
  • a computer display screen may be divided into two or more areas including a navigational area 204 and a content area 206 .
  • the navigational area 204 may include hypertext links, for example in the form of graphical tabs, and form input controls, for example a drop down or text input controls to input search criteria or navigate the browser display.
  • a matters tab 200 and a client tab 202 are provided to a user. Activating the matters tab 200 may load content into the content area 206 .
  • FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a product space grandchild node 108 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 300 and a client specific content area 302 .
  • the client information area 300 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 302 .
  • the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 3 includes product space information.
  • a product space may be described using one or more attributes, such as a product space name or description 304 , a product space protection indicia 306 , a product space status 308 , related claims 310 to each product space, and related patents or patent applications 312 to each product space.
  • a product space may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad.
  • a product space may have a status of pending, issued, or not available (N/A).
  • one or more claims may be listed as related to a particular product space.
  • one or more file numbers which refer to files, such as patent applications or issued patents, may be listed as related to a particular product space.
  • FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a concept ontology grandchild node 110 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 400 and a client specific content area 402 .
  • the client information area 400 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 402 .
  • the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 4 includes concept ontology information.
  • the concept ontology is represented as a graph, including nodes that represent concepts, and lines or arrows connecting the nodes that represent relationships.
  • the concept ontology is represented in a chart or structured list, where a genus concept is arranged in a position relative to its related species concepts.
  • a concept ontology may be represented as a bulleted list, where each species is listed under its related genus.
  • FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a claims grandchild node 112 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 500 and a client specific content area 502 .
  • the client information area 500 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 502 .
  • the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 5 includes information about related claims.
  • related information may include an application or patent name or description 504 , one or more related claims 506 , a product space 508 , a status 510 , and related concepts 512 .
  • a claim may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad.
  • claims may have a status of pending, issued, or not applicable (NA).
  • one or more concepts may be listed as related to a particular claim.
  • FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a references grandchild node 114 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 600 and a client specific content area 602 .
  • the client information area 600 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 602 .
  • the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 6 includes information about related references.
  • each related reference 604 may include information showing a claim 606 the reference was cited against, a patent or application identifier 608 where the reference was used, an alleged teaching 610 of the reference, for example by an examiner in an office action, an applicant's arguments 612 , for example in an attempt to overcome the alleged teaching 610 , and a status 614 of the reference's use in the particular patent or application 608 for the particular claim 604 .
  • a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
  • FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a claims grandchild node 116 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 700 and a matter specific content area 702 .
  • the matter information area 700 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 702 .
  • the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 7 includes information about related claims.
  • each related claim may be grouped by claim sets, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set.
  • Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include a claim identification or description 704 , a related product space 706 , and related claims or claim sets 708 .
  • the claim identification of description includes a date and a date type.
  • a date type may include “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, or “Issued” dates.
  • additional claim sets 710 and related information are displayed and described in the same display.
  • FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 800 and a matter specific content area 802 .
  • the matter information area 800 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 802 .
  • the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 8 includes information about prosecution history.
  • two or more views are provided, such as a condensed view and an expanded view.
  • each claim may be grouped by claim sets 804 , organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set.
  • Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include an amendment status 806 , an examination status 808 , related art cited 810 , reasons for an Patent and Trademark Office Examiner's position 812 , and any arguments by the applicant 814 .
  • additional claim sets and related information are displayed and described in the same display.
  • the examination status 808 includes allowed, rejected, unamended, or objected to.
  • FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118 .
  • FIG. 9 is an example of an expanded or detailed view of the information provided in FIG. 8 .
  • claims, represented by their claim number in the collapsed view illustrated in FIG. 8 are displayed in some or all of the text of the claim in the expanded or detailed view in FIG. 9 .
  • FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a product space grandchild node 120 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1000 and a matter specific content area 1002 .
  • the matter information area 1000 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1002 .
  • the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 10 includes information about related product space. In the example illustrated in FIG.
  • each product space 1004 may include attributes, such as an indicia of protection 1006 , a status 1008 , and related claims 1010 .
  • the indicia of protection 1006 may include selected, none, or broad.
  • the status 1008 may include pending, issued, or not applicable (NA).
  • related claims 1010 may be listed by claim number or an indicia of a claim set and a claim number.
  • FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a concepts grandchild node 122 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1100 and a matter specific content area 1102 .
  • the matter information area 1100 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1102 .
  • the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 11 includes information about concepts related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG.
  • each concept 1104 may include one or more related claims 1106 .
  • an indicia such as a check mark or an “x,” is provided in the intersecting portion of the table.
  • FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a cited references grandchild node 124 .
  • the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
  • the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1200 and a matter specific content area 1202 .
  • the matter information area 1200 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1202 .
  • the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 12 includes information about cited references related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG.
  • each cited reference 1204 may include one or more related claims 1206 , an alleged teaching 1208 related to each claim 1206 , an applicant's argument 1210 , and a status 1212 .
  • a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method 1300 of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • information is collected and stored.
  • Information may include data related to a patent portfolio, such as concepts, products, product spaces, patents, references, and the like. Information may also include prosecution history related to the patents or references.
  • relationships are generated. Relationships may include mappings between a claim and a reference, a claim and a concept, or the like.
  • one or more of the relationships are provided. In an embodiment, the relationships are provided using a graphical user interface, such as a web browser.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment 1400 , in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • Embodiments of the inventive subject matter may find application in many different types of computer-based or network-based facilities or systems. Accordingly, the example embodiment is not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter solely to such systems.
  • the client-server networked environment 1400 includes a web server 1402 , which can communicate over a network 1404 to a client computer 1406 .
  • the web server 1402 additionally can communicate using one or more direct or networked connections with other servers, such as an application server (not shown), an email server (not shown), and a database management server (not shown).
  • a database 1408 is communicatively coupled to the network 1404 .
  • the client-server networked environment 1400 is accessed by a client program, for example a browser 1410 (e.g., Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on the client computer 1406 and accesses the web server 1402 via the network 1404 .
  • the network 1404 may include the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) network, or the like.
  • WAN wide area network
  • LAN local area network
  • PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
  • the web server 1402 uses software 1412 to receive a request from a client computer 1406 , where in response to the request, the web server 1402 accesses the database 1408 and provides information to the client computer 1406 .
  • the information may include intellectual property information, as described above.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system 1500 , within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.
  • the machine may comprise a computer, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, set-top box (STB) or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
  • PDA Personal Digital Assistant
  • STB set-top box
  • the computer system 1500 includes a processor 1502 , a main memory 1504 and a static memory 1506 , which communicate with each other via a bus 608 .
  • the computer system 1500 may further include a video display unit 1510 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)).
  • the computer system 1500 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1512 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1514 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1516 , a signal generation device 1518 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 1520 to interface the computer system to a network 1522 .
  • the disk drive unit 1516 includes a machine-readable medium 1524 on which is stored a set of instructions or software 1526 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein.
  • the software 1526 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1504 and/or within the processor 1502 .
  • the software 1526 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 1520 .
  • the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium which is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the inventive subject matter.
  • machine-readable medium shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals. Further, while the software is shown in FIG. 15 to reside within a single device, it will be appreciated that the software could be distributed across multiple machines or storage media, which may include the machine-readable medium.
  • Method embodiments described herein may be computer-implemented. Some embodiments may include computer-readable media encoded with a computer program (e.g., software), which includes instructions operable to cause an electronic device to perform methods of various embodiments.
  • a software implementation (or method) may include microcode, assembly language code, or a higher-level language code, which further may include computer readable instructions for performing various methods.
  • the code may form portions of computer program products. Further, the code may be tangibly stored on one or more volatile or non-volatile computer-readable media during execution or at other times.
  • These computer-readable media may include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMS), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.

Abstract

This document discusses, among other things, a system and method to provide cross-referencing of important IP relationships. The system comprising software executing on a computing platform for displaying relationships between various domains of IP information selected from the group of claims, prosecution history, products, concepts or art.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This patent document pertains generally to data collection and presentation, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a method and apparatus for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In a patent application, claims define the scope of an issued patent, and consequently, the claims also define the scope and breadth of the associated intellectual rights or property. A system and method to concisely catalog and describe pending and issue claims may assist a practitioner when providing advice to a client, drafting well-formed claims, and avoiding unnecessary costs during prosecution.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes represent different instances of substantially similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system.
  • FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node.
  • FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a product space grandchild node.
  • FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a concept ontology grandchild node.
  • FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a claims grandchild node.
  • FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a references grandchild node.
  • FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a claims grandchild node.
  • FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
  • FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
  • FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a product space grandchild node.
  • FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a concepts grandchild node.
  • FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a cited references grandchild node.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment, in accordance with an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. The embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, or structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
  • In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, unless otherwise indicated.
  • In various embodiments, one or more of the features described below are included to provide a system or method for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
  • The High Level Purposes of CoreIP are as follows:
      • Map relationships between the following data:
        • Claim Space—this is the “atomic” level of IP protection. Claims define what the IP exclusivity is. Claims are the core of patents. While claims belong to patents, we are tracking first and foremost claims, and only secondarily the patents these claims belong to.
          • Claim space includes claims as filed, as amended during prosecution, and as allowed and issued.
        • Product space—this is the “space” that the business people live in. They think in terms of products and services, product lines, product features, product functions. We want CoreIP to be able to show business people what they have for IP protection with respect to this space, so that they can quickly understand where they stand on IP protection. Also, this capability will allow patent attorneys to see the strategic value of the protection they are getting for the client.
          • Claims are mapped to the Product space, so that a user can see which if any claims cover which products/features
        • Concept Space. Claims are made up of concepts. There are Common Concepts and Specialization Concepts
          • A concept ontology is provided, having a hierarchy with nodes.
          • Claims are indexed/mapped using the ontology
          • Claims as a whole are mapped to at least one (or more) of the narrowest nodes in the ontology that is broader than the breadth of the claim.
          • A Claimed Concept space can be filtered to eliminate patents that are not of a scope of interest
        • References Space. This is the space of prior art. In particular, the references space includes prior art patents or other prior art teachings, such as prior products or publications.
          • References are mapped to claims
          • References can also be mapped to the concept space
        • Prosecution History Space. The prosecution space is defined by the prosecution history. In this context, the prosecution space focuses on the history of filed claims, claim amendments, prior art citation and patent office rejections/objections, and attorney arguments.
          • Rejections/rejections are mapped to claims
          • attorney arguments are mapped to claims and references
      • Using the above indexes and mappings, attorneys will be able to do the following:
        • Find all other instances of a reference being cited or argued in the same or another case
        • Continuously understand the relationship between the Product Space and the Claims
        • Quickly understand the scope of claims by looking at the Concept Space map for a claim
        • Quickly find claims of a particular scope by searching and filtering in the Claimed Concept space
        • Cross reference Claimed Concept space to the Product Space
        • Find References that have been cited against concepts in a particular branch of the Concept space
        • View a summary/compact view of the file history space to quickly
    Sets of Claims
  • The simplest way to track and display claims is to model it as follows:
      • claims are tracked as a “Set”
      • an application is filed with an Initial Set of claims (“claims as filed”)
      • if a Set of claims is amended, it is amended on a certain Date
      • the Set of allowed claims has an “allowance date”
      • a Set of issued claims has an “issue date”
  • So, claims are grouped in Sets, and each Set has a Date associated with it, and each Date can have a Date Type, like “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, “Issued”
  • Thus, we have: Claims in Sets and each Set has a Date and each Date has a Date Type.
  • Amendment Status of Claims in a Set
  • Now, for each Claim in each Set, we want to be able to assign an Amendment Status.
  • The Amendment Status's are as follows:
      • Filed
      • Amended— <number> (for example: Amended-1, Amended-2, etc. . . . (allow up to 20 for a number)
      • Cancelled
      • New
    Examination Status of Claims in a Set
  • Now, for each Claim in each Set, we also want to be able to assign an Examination Status.
  • The Amendment Status's are as follows:
      • Not Examined
      • Rejected
      • Objected to
      • Allowed
      • Restricted Out
    Prior Art Cited Against of Claims in a Set
  • Now, for each Claim in each Set, we also want to be able to track Prior Art Cited against each claim.
  • The Prior Art Cited for each claim includes the following:
      • Identify Patent cited
      • Reason Claim Rejected
        • take this text from patent office paperwork
    Arguments Made in Favor of Patentability
  • In addition, for each claim, we want to keep track of:
      • all arguments made for patentability with respect to the claim; AND
      • all arguments made for patentability with respect to a particular prior art Reference
  • In an embodiment, information describing patent applications and related information is displayed within one or more screens on a computer display. The screens may, for example, be child screens in a framed web presentation. In an embodiment, navigational links are provided, such as by tabs at the top of a computer display screen. Using the navigational links or tabs, a user can view refined subsets of information.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy 100 used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system. In an embodiment, a home node 102, which may have the physical embodiment of a home page in a web page environment, may provide two child nodes (e.g., sub-screens), such as a client node 104 and a matter node 106. In alternative embodiments, fewer or more child nodes are available from the home node 102, such as a search node (not shown), a billing node (not shown), or a reports node (not shown).
  • At the client node 104, general information regarding is available, such as in a static area of a web page. In addition, one or more grandchild nodes may be provided to allow a user to drill down into further detail regarding the client node 104. In an embodiment, a product space node 108, a concept ontology node 110, a claims node 112, and a references node 114 are provided as children to the client node 104. While, in some example embodiments, the grandchildren node 108-114 may display some of the same or substantially similar information, each grandchild node is designed to display information from a particular perspective.
  • At the matter node 106, information related to the matter is available, such as the matter name, number, file date, client identification, file status, and the like. In an embodiment, the general information in the matter node 106 is made available using a static area of a web presentation. As with the client node 104, the matter node 106, may have, in various embodiments, one or more related grandchild nodes. In this example embodiment, the matter node 106 has a claims node 116, a prosecution node 118, a product space node 120, a concepts node 122, and a cited references node 124 as related grandchild nodes.
  • In various embodiments, the grandchild nodes 108-124 may additionally have related great grandchild nodes, which may provide further refined views of related information.
  • FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node 102. In FIG. 2, two or more tabs are provided in a navigational area of a web page. For example, a computer display screen may be divided into two or more areas including a navigational area 204 and a content area 206. The navigational area 204 may include hypertext links, for example in the form of graphical tabs, and form input controls, for example a drop down or text input controls to input search criteria or navigate the browser display. In an example embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, a matters tab 200 and a client tab 202 are provided to a user. Activating the matters tab 200 may load content into the content area 206.
  • FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a product space grandchild node 108. In FIG. 3, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 3, the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 300 and a client specific content area 302. In an embodiment, the client information area 300 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 302. The client specific information illustrated in FIG. 3 includes product space information. For example, a product space may be described using one or more attributes, such as a product space name or description 304, a product space protection indicia 306, a product space status 308, related claims 310 to each product space, and related patents or patent applications 312 to each product space. In an embodiment, a product space may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, a product space may have a status of pending, issued, or not available (N/A). In some embodiments, one or more claims may be listed as related to a particular product space. In some embodiments, one or more file numbers, which refer to files, such as patent applications or issued patents, may be listed as related to a particular product space.
  • FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a concept ontology grandchild node 110. In FIG. 4, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 4, as was the case in FIG. 3, the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 400 and a client specific content area 402. In an embodiment, the client information area 400 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 402. The client specific information illustrated in FIG. 4 includes concept ontology information. In various embodiments, the concept ontology is represented as a graph, including nodes that represent concepts, and lines or arrows connecting the nodes that represent relationships. In alternative embodiments, the concept ontology is represented in a chart or structured list, where a genus concept is arranged in a position relative to its related species concepts. For example, a concept ontology may be represented as a bulleted list, where each species is listed under its related genus.
  • FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a claims grandchild node 112. In FIG. 5, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 5, as was the case in FIG. 3, the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 500 and a client specific content area 502. In an embodiment, the client information area 500 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 502. The client specific information illustrated in FIG. 5 includes information about related claims. For example, related information may include an application or patent name or description 504, one or more related claims 506, a product space 508, a status 510, and related concepts 512. In an embodiment, a claim may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, claims may have a status of pending, issued, or not applicable (NA). In some embodiments, one or more concepts may be listed as related to a particular claim.
  • FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a references grandchild node 114. In FIG. 6, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 6, as was the case in FIG. 3, the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 600 and a client specific content area 602. In an embodiment, the client information area 600 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 602. The client specific information illustrated in FIG. 6 includes information about related references. For example, each related reference 604 may include information showing a claim 606 the reference was cited against, a patent or application identifier 608 where the reference was used, an alleged teaching 610 of the reference, for example by an examiner in an office action, an applicant's arguments 612, for example in an attempt to overcome the alleged teaching 610, and a status 614 of the reference's use in the particular patent or application 608 for the particular claim 604. In an embodiment, a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
  • FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a claims grandchild node 116. In FIG. 7, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 7, the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 700 and a matter specific content area 702. In an embodiment, the matter information area 700 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 702. The matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 7 includes information about related claims. For example, each related claim may be grouped by claim sets, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set. Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include a claim identification or description 704, a related product space 706, and related claims or claim sets 708. In an embodiment, the claim identification of description includes a date and a date type. A date type may include “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, or “Issued” dates. In addition, in some example embodiments, additional claim sets 710 and related information are displayed and described in the same display.
  • FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118. In FIG. 8, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 8, the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 800 and a matter specific content area 802. In an embodiment, the matter information area 800 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 802. The matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 8 includes information about prosecution history. In some example embodiments, two or more views are provided, such as a condensed view and an expanded view. For example, in a condensed view, such as the one illustrated in FIG. 8, claim numbers only or hypertext links may be used to conserve display screen space. In another example, an expanded or detailed view may include some or all of the text for a particular field. In the example illustrated in FIG. 8, each claim may be grouped by claim sets 804, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set. Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include an amendment status 806, an examination status 808, related art cited 810, reasons for an Patent and Trademark Office Examiner's position 812, and any arguments by the applicant 814. In addition, in some example embodiments, additional claim sets and related information are displayed and described in the same display. In an embodiment, the examination status 808 includes allowed, rejected, unamended, or objected to.
  • FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118. FIG. 9 is an example of an expanded or detailed view of the information provided in FIG. 8. For example, claims, represented by their claim number in the collapsed view illustrated in FIG. 8, are displayed in some or all of the text of the claim in the expanded or detailed view in FIG. 9.
  • FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a product space grandchild node 120. In FIG. 10, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 10, the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1000 and a matter specific content area 1002. In an embodiment, the matter information area 1000 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1002. The matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 10 includes information about related product space. In the example illustrated in FIG. 10, each product space 1004 may include attributes, such as an indicia of protection 1006, a status 1008, and related claims 1010. In an embodiment, the indicia of protection 1006 may include selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, the status 1008 may include pending, issued, or not applicable (NA). In various embodiments, related claims 1010 may be listed by claim number or an indicia of a claim set and a claim number.
  • FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a concepts grandchild node 122. In FIG. 11, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 11, the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1100 and a matter specific content area 1102. In an embodiment, the matter information area 1100 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1102. The matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 11 includes information about concepts related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG. 11, each concept 1104 may include one or more related claims 1106. In an embodiment, if a concept 1104 exists in a claim 1106, then an indicia, such as a check mark or an “x,” is provided in the intersecting portion of the table.
  • FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a cited references grandchild node 124. In FIG. 12, the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206, as described in FIG. 2, or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. In FIG. 12, the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1200 and a matter specific content area 1202. In an embodiment, the matter information area 1200 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1202. The matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 12 includes information about cited references related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG. 12, each cited reference 1204 may include one or more related claims 1206, an alleged teaching 1208 related to each claim 1206, an applicant's argument 1210, and a status 1212. In an embodiment, a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method 1300 of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment. At 1302, information is collected and stored. Information may include data related to a patent portfolio, such as concepts, products, product spaces, patents, references, and the like. Information may also include prosecution history related to the patents or references. At 1304, relationships are generated. Relationships may include mappings between a claim and a reference, a claim and a concept, or the like. At 1306, one or more of the relationships are provided. In an embodiment, the relationships are provided using a graphical user interface, such as a web browser.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment 1400, in accordance with an example embodiment. Embodiments of the inventive subject matter may find application in many different types of computer-based or network-based facilities or systems. Accordingly, the example embodiment is not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter solely to such systems.
  • In an embodiment, the client-server networked environment 1400 includes a web server 1402, which can communicate over a network 1404 to a client computer 1406. The web server 1402 additionally can communicate using one or more direct or networked connections with other servers, such as an application server (not shown), an email server (not shown), and a database management server (not shown). In addition, a database 1408 is communicatively coupled to the network 1404.
  • In an embodiment, the client-server networked environment 1400 is accessed by a client program, for example a browser 1410 (e.g., Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on the client computer 1406 and accesses the web server 1402 via the network 1404. In various embodiments, the network 1404 may include the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) network, or the like.
  • In an embodiment, the web server 1402 uses software 1412 to receive a request from a client computer 1406, where in response to the request, the web server 1402 accesses the database 1408 and provides information to the client computer 1406. The information may include intellectual property information, as described above.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system 1500, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine may comprise a computer, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, set-top box (STB) or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
  • The computer system 1500 includes a processor 1502, a main memory 1504 and a static memory 1506, which communicate with each other via a bus 608. The computer system 1500 may further include a video display unit 1510 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 1500 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1512 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1514 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1516, a signal generation device 1518 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 1520 to interface the computer system to a network 1522.
  • The disk drive unit 1516 includes a machine-readable medium 1524 on which is stored a set of instructions or software 1526 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein. The software 1526 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1504 and/or within the processor 1502. The software 1526 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 1520. For the purposes of this specification, the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium which is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the inventive subject matter. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals. Further, while the software is shown in FIG. 15 to reside within a single device, it will be appreciated that the software could be distributed across multiple machines or storage media, which may include the machine-readable medium.
  • The foregoing description of specific embodiments reveals the general nature of the inventive subject matter sufficiently that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt it for various applications without departing from the generic concept. Therefore, such adaptations and modifications are within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. The phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Accordingly, the inventive subject matter embraces all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
  • Method embodiments described herein may be computer-implemented. Some embodiments may include computer-readable media encoded with a computer program (e.g., software), which includes instructions operable to cause an electronic device to perform methods of various embodiments. A software implementation (or method) may include microcode, assembly language code, or a higher-level language code, which further may include computer readable instructions for performing various methods. The code may form portions of computer program products. Further, the code may be tangibly stored on one or more volatile or non-volatile computer-readable media during execution or at other times. These computer-readable media may include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMS), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
  • It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments (and/or aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
  • The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), which requires that it allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.

Claims (2)

1. A system comprising software executing on a computing platform for displaying relationships between various domains of IP information selected from the group of claims, prosecution history, products, concepts or art.
2. A method comprising tracking and displaying relationships between various domains of IP information selected from the group of claims, prosecution history, products, concepts or art.
US11/915,718 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships Abandoned US20110153509A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/915,718 US20110153509A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US68575905P 2005-05-27 2005-05-27
US11/915,718 US20110153509A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
PCT/US2006/020950 WO2006128183A2 (en) 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/020950 A-371-Of-International WO2006128183A2 (en) 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/536,320 Continuation US20150134549A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2014-11-07 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110153509A1 true US20110153509A1 (en) 2011-06-23

Family

ID=37453004

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/915,718 Abandoned US20110153509A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2006-05-30 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
US14/536,320 Abandoned US20150134549A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2014-11-07 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
US14/750,559 Active 2028-05-24 US10810693B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2015-06-25 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships
US17/025,847 Active 2027-03-16 US11798111B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2020-09-18 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/536,320 Abandoned US20150134549A1 (en) 2005-05-27 2014-11-07 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
US14/750,559 Active 2028-05-24 US10810693B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2015-06-25 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships
US17/025,847 Active 2027-03-16 US11798111B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2020-09-18 Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (4) US20110153509A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006128183A2 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080216013A1 (en) * 2006-08-01 2008-09-04 Lundberg Steven W Patent tracking
US20100131513A1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2010-05-27 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20130086045A1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2013-04-04 Steven W. Lundberg Patent mapping
US9201956B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2015-12-01 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Patent mapping
US9904726B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-02-27 Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC. Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning
US10579662B2 (en) 2013-04-23 2020-03-03 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent claim scope evaluator
US10810693B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2020-10-20 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships
US11048709B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2021-06-29 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11080807B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2021-08-03 Lucid Patent Llc Patent mapping
US11461862B2 (en) 2012-08-20 2022-10-04 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Analytics generation for patent portfolio management

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020012116A1 (en) 2018-07-09 2020-01-16 Arkyan Method, device and information medium for estimating the chances and/or probable date of granting a patent application

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030033295A1 (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-02-13 Adler Marc Stephen Method for analyzing and recording innovations
US20030046307A1 (en) * 1997-06-02 2003-03-06 Rivette Kevin G. Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
US20030167181A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-09-04 Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. Systems and methods for managing information disclosure statement (IDS) references
US20040054672A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-18 International Business Machines Corporation Information search support system, application server, information search method, and program product
US20050246194A1 (en) * 2004-04-06 2005-11-03 Lundberg Steven W System and method for information disclosure statement management
US20060190449A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Lundberg Steven W System and method for prior art cross citation
US20070198578A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-08-23 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20080216013A1 (en) * 2006-08-01 2008-09-04 Lundberg Steven W Patent tracking
US20100131513A1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2010-05-27 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20120284199A1 (en) * 2011-05-04 2012-11-08 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning

Family Cites Families (338)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2156112A (en) 1984-03-20 1985-10-02 Brian Ledwith Data processing system and method
US5553226A (en) 1985-03-27 1996-09-03 Hitachi, Ltd. System for displaying concept networks
JPS61220027A (en) 1985-03-27 1986-09-30 Hitachi Ltd Information memory system
US5696916A (en) 1985-03-27 1997-12-09 Hitachi, Ltd. Information storage and retrieval system and display method therefor
US5404506A (en) 1985-03-27 1995-04-04 Hitachi, Ltd. Knowledge based information retrieval system
US6182062B1 (en) 1986-03-26 2001-01-30 Hitachi, Ltd. Knowledge based information retrieval system
US4807154A (en) 1987-01-29 1989-02-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method for developing automatic replies in an interactive electronic calendaring system
US5557515A (en) 1989-08-11 1996-09-17 Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Inc. Computerized system and method for work management
JP2943447B2 (en) 1991-01-30 1999-08-30 三菱電機株式会社 Text information extraction device, text similarity matching device, text search system, text information extraction method, text similarity matching method, and question analysis device
JPH05303531A (en) 1991-01-31 1993-11-16 Fields Software Group Inc Electronic system and method for processing format
US5592664A (en) 1991-07-29 1997-01-07 Borland International Inc. Database server system with methods for alerting clients of occurrence of database server events of interest to the clients
GB2260007A (en) 1991-09-20 1993-03-31 Hitachi Ltd Information storage/retrieval system and display method
US5329447A (en) 1992-03-12 1994-07-12 Leedom Jr Charles M High integrity computer implemented docketing system
US5742834A (en) 1992-06-24 1998-04-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Document processing apparatus using a synonym dictionary
JPH06176081A (en) 1992-12-02 1994-06-24 Hitachi Ltd Hierarchical structure browsing method and device
US5623681A (en) 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US6963920B1 (en) 1993-11-19 2005-11-08 Rose Blush Software Llc Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same
US5623679A (en) 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects
US5799325A (en) 1993-11-19 1998-08-25 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for generating equivalent text files
US5991751A (en) 1997-06-02 1999-11-23 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
US5548506A (en) 1994-03-17 1996-08-20 Srinivasan; Seshan R. Automated, electronic network based, project management server system, for managing multiple work-groups
US5745745A (en) 1994-06-29 1998-04-28 Hitachi, Ltd. Text search method and apparatus for structured documents
US5548753A (en) 1994-09-14 1996-08-20 Johnson Service Company Automatic electronic mail notification of database events
US5664063A (en) 1994-12-01 1997-09-02 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic user notification of certain meeting attributes of a posted calendar event
US5530852A (en) 1994-12-20 1996-06-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method for extracting profiles and topics from a first file written in a first markup language and generating files in different markup languages containing the profiles and topics for use in accessing data described by the profiles and topics
US5664714A (en) 1995-01-18 1997-09-09 Navarro; Jose Vehicular entertainment component stand
US5694523A (en) 1995-05-31 1997-12-02 Oracle Corporation Content processing system for discourse
US5768580A (en) 1995-05-31 1998-06-16 Oracle Corporation Methods and apparatus for dynamic classification of discourse
US5907837A (en) 1995-07-17 1999-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Information retrieval system in an on-line network including separate content and layout of published titles
WO1997008604A2 (en) 1995-08-16 1997-03-06 Syracuse University Multilingual document retrieval system and method using semantic vector matching
US5699528A (en) 1995-10-31 1997-12-16 Mastercard International, Inc. System and method for bill delivery and payment over a communications network
US5774833A (en) 1995-12-08 1998-06-30 Motorola, Inc. Method for syntactic and semantic analysis of patent text and drawings
US5754840A (en) 1996-01-23 1998-05-19 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for developing and maintaining documents which includes analyzing a patent application with regards to the specification and claims
US5659729A (en) 1996-02-01 1997-08-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for implementing hypertext scroll attributes
US6076088A (en) 1996-02-09 2000-06-13 Paik; Woojin Information extraction system and method using concept relation concept (CRC) triples
US5758328A (en) 1996-02-22 1998-05-26 Giovannoli; Joseph Computerized quotation system and method
US5926811A (en) 1996-03-15 1999-07-20 Lexis-Nexis Statistical thesaurus, method of forming same, and use thereof in query expansion in automated text searching
US5787411A (en) 1996-03-20 1998-07-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for database filter generation by display selection
US5970463A (en) 1996-05-01 1999-10-19 Practice Patterns Science, Inc. Medical claims integration and data analysis system
US5794236A (en) 1996-05-29 1998-08-11 Lexis-Nexis Computer-based system for classifying documents into a hierarchy and linking the classifications to the hierarchy
US5721910A (en) 1996-06-04 1998-02-24 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Relational database system containing a multidimensional hierachical model of interrelated subject categories with recognition capabilities
US5850520A (en) 1996-07-01 1998-12-15 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for electronic publication distribution including return receipt
US5870745A (en) 1996-09-26 1999-02-09 Mciworldcom, Inc. Automated system and method for processing and tracking requests and responses required for repetitive tasks
US6049801A (en) 1996-10-07 2000-04-11 Whitmyer, Jr.; Wesley W. Web site providing professional services
US5895468A (en) 1996-10-07 1999-04-20 Whitmyer, Jr.; Wesley W. System automating delivery of professional services
US6038561A (en) 1996-10-15 2000-03-14 Manning & Napier Information Services Management and analysis of document information text
US6415319B1 (en) 1997-02-07 2002-07-02 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Intelligent network browser using incremental conceptual indexer
US5940821A (en) 1997-05-21 1999-08-17 Oracle Corporation Information presentation in a knowledge base search and retrieval system
US5903881A (en) 1997-06-05 1999-05-11 Intuit, Inc. Personal online banking with integrated online statement and checkbook user interface
US7680733B1 (en) 1997-07-22 2010-03-16 Patent And Trademark Fee Management, Llc Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system
US6363361B1 (en) 1997-07-22 2002-03-26 Patent & Trademark Fee Management, Llc Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system for law firms
US6216128B1 (en) 1997-10-09 2001-04-10 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. System and method for private information retrieval from a single electronic storage device using commodities
US5991756A (en) 1997-11-03 1999-11-23 Yahoo, Inc. Information retrieval from hierarchical compound documents
US5953726A (en) 1997-11-24 1999-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining multiple inheritance concept hierarchies
US6055538A (en) 1997-12-22 2000-04-25 Hewlett Packard Company Methods and system for using web browser to search large collections of documents
US6094652A (en) 1998-06-10 2000-07-25 Oracle Corporation Hierarchical query feedback in an information retrieval system
US7383294B1 (en) 1998-06-30 2008-06-03 Emc Corporation System for determining the mapping of logical objects in a data storage system
US6363375B1 (en) 1998-09-30 2002-03-26 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Company Classification tree based information retrieval scheme
US6363378B1 (en) 1998-10-13 2002-03-26 Oracle Corporation Ranking of query feedback terms in an information retrieval system
US6415283B1 (en) 1998-10-13 2002-07-02 Orack Corporation Methods and apparatus for determining focal points of clusters in a tree structure
US6226792B1 (en) 1998-10-14 2001-05-01 Unisys Corporation Object management system supporting the use of application domain knowledge mapped to technology domain knowledge
US6453312B1 (en) 1998-10-14 2002-09-17 Unisys Corporation System and method for developing a selectably-expandable concept-based search
US6574632B2 (en) 1998-11-18 2003-06-03 Harris Corporation Multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system
EP1129417A4 (en) 1998-12-04 2004-06-30 Technology Enabling Company Ll Systems and methods for organizing data
US6327593B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2001-12-04 Unisys Corporation Automated system and method for capturing and managing user knowledge within a search system
US8095581B2 (en) 1999-02-05 2012-01-10 Gregory A Stobbs Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus
US6654731B1 (en) 1999-03-01 2003-11-25 Oracle Corporation Automated integration of terminological information into a knowledge base
WO2000052645A1 (en) 1999-03-01 2000-09-08 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Document image processor, method for extracting document title, and method for imparting document tag information
US7716060B2 (en) 1999-03-02 2010-05-11 Germeraad Paul B Patent-related tools and methodology for use in the merger and acquisition process
US7966328B2 (en) 1999-03-02 2011-06-21 Rose Blush Software Llc Patent-related tools and methodology for use in research and development projects
EP1212697A1 (en) 1999-03-08 2002-06-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Method and apparatus for building a user-defined technical thesaurus using on-line databases
US6405190B1 (en) 1999-03-16 2002-06-11 Oracle Corporation Free format query processing in an information search and retrieval system
US6513027B1 (en) 1999-03-16 2003-01-28 Oracle Corporation Automated category discovery for a terminological knowledge base
US20020004775A1 (en) 1999-03-17 2002-01-10 Nir Kossovsky Online patent and license exchange
US6629097B1 (en) 1999-04-28 2003-09-30 Douglas K. Keith Displaying implicit associations among items in loosely-structured data sets
US6269361B1 (en) 1999-05-28 2001-07-31 Goto.Com System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US6711585B1 (en) 1999-06-15 2004-03-23 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US6981007B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2005-12-27 Whitmyer Jr Wesley W Onsite backup for internet-based data processing
CA2381460A1 (en) 1999-08-06 2001-02-15 James S. Wiltshire, Jr. System and method for classifying legal concepts using legal topic scheme
US6556992B1 (en) 1999-09-14 2003-04-29 Patent Ratings, Llc Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets
US7016852B1 (en) 1999-09-30 2006-03-21 Eugene M. Lee Fee transaction system and method for intellectual property acquisition and/or maintenance
US20040103112A1 (en) 1999-10-08 2004-05-27 Colson Thomas J. Computer based method and apparatus for mining and displaying patent data
JP3754253B2 (en) 1999-11-19 2006-03-08 株式会社東芝 Structured document search method, structured document search apparatus, and structured document search system
US7634415B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2009-12-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Systems and processes for technology asset management
US7127405B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2006-10-24 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corp. System and method for selecting and protecting intellectual property assets
US7801830B1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2010-09-21 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for marketing, managing, and maintaining intellectual property
EP1115076A1 (en) 2000-01-06 2001-07-11 Venner, Alan J. A reminder and actioning system
US7849117B2 (en) 2000-01-12 2010-12-07 Knowledge Sphere, Inc. Multi-term frequency analysis
US6751621B1 (en) 2000-01-27 2004-06-15 Manning & Napier Information Services, Llc. Construction of trainable semantic vectors and clustering, classification, and searching using trainable semantic vectors
US6640098B1 (en) 2000-02-14 2003-10-28 Action Engine Corporation System for obtaining service-related information for local interactive wireless devices
US8386456B1 (en) 2000-02-24 2013-02-26 Richard Paiz Codex search patterns
EP1272912A2 (en) 2000-02-25 2003-01-08 Synquiry Technologies, Ltd Conceptual factoring and unification of graphs representing semantic models
US20010049707A1 (en) 2000-02-29 2001-12-06 Tran Bao Q. Systems and methods for generating intellectual property
WO2001067225A2 (en) 2000-03-06 2001-09-13 Kanisa Inc. A system and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US6970842B1 (en) 2000-03-21 2005-11-29 Halo Management, Llc Project docket management apparatus and method
US7757168B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2010-07-13 Xerox Corporation Meta-document and method of managing
US20020022974A1 (en) 2000-04-14 2002-02-21 Urban Lindh Display of patent information
US20020163541A1 (en) 2000-05-04 2002-11-07 Williams G. Thomas System and method for organizing and presenting information relating to the interpretation of multiple information elements, such as patent claim elements, in at least one reference source and graphical user interface incorporating the same
US6885999B1 (en) 2000-05-10 2005-04-26 Cisco Technology, Inc. Digital identifiers and digital identifier control systems for intellectual properties
US6490581B1 (en) 2000-05-24 2002-12-03 At&T Corp. System and method for providing an object-oriented interface to a relational database
WO2001093081A2 (en) 2000-06-02 2001-12-06 First To File, Inc. Computer-implemented method for securing intellectual property
US20020091541A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2002-07-11 Seekip.Com Method and apparatus for intellectual property management on the internet
US6839665B1 (en) 2000-06-27 2005-01-04 Text Analysis International, Inc. Automated generation of text analysis systems
US20020078090A1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-06-20 Hwang Chung Hee Ontological concept-based, user-centric text summarization
US6678692B1 (en) 2000-07-10 2004-01-13 Northrop Grumman Corporation Hierarchy statistical analysis system and method
US6675159B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2004-01-06 Science Applic Int Corp Concept-based search and retrieval system
US6823331B1 (en) 2000-08-28 2004-11-23 Entrust Limited Concept identification system and method for use in reducing and/or representing text content of an electronic document
WO2002021337A1 (en) 2000-09-06 2002-03-14 Daryl Craig Josephson Data gathering and distribution apparatus and methods
US20040260569A1 (en) 2000-09-07 2004-12-23 Cyber Legal Solutions, Inc. Expert legal task management
US20020035571A1 (en) 2000-09-15 2002-03-21 Coult John H Digital patent marking method
AU2001293596A1 (en) 2000-09-29 2002-04-08 Gavagai Technology Incorporated A method and system for adapting synonym resources to specific domains
US20020042784A1 (en) 2000-10-06 2002-04-11 Kerven David S. System and method for automatically searching and analyzing intellectual property-related materials
US7487114B2 (en) 2000-10-23 2009-02-03 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for associating aerial images, map features, and information
JP3266602B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2002-03-18 洋一 奥寺 Address inquiry system, computer program product and method thereof
US6999956B2 (en) 2000-11-16 2006-02-14 Ward Mullins Dynamic object-driven database manipulation and mapping system
US20020111824A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-08-15 First To File, Inc. Method of defining workflow rules for managing intellectual property
US20020065677A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-05-30 First To File, Inc. Computer implemented method of managing information disclosure statements
US20020111953A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-08-15 First To File, Inc. Docketing system
US20020065675A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-05-30 Grainger Jeffry J. Computer implemented method of managing information disclosure statements
US20020116363A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-08-22 First To File, Inc. Method of deleting unnecessary information from a database
US20020161733A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-10-31 First To File, Inc. Method of creating electronic prosecution experience for patent applicant
US7653551B2 (en) 2000-12-05 2010-01-26 Ipwealth.Com, Inc. Method and system for searching and submitting online via an aggregation portal
US6678677B2 (en) 2000-12-19 2004-01-13 Xerox Corporation Apparatus and method for information retrieval using self-appending semantic lattice
US7051022B1 (en) 2000-12-19 2006-05-23 Oracle International Corporation Automated extension for generation of cross references in a knowledge base
US20030220891A1 (en) 2000-12-22 2003-11-27 Fish Robert D Matter management computer software
US6839707B2 (en) 2001-01-17 2005-01-04 General Electric Company Web-based system and method for managing legal information
US6766316B2 (en) 2001-01-18 2004-07-20 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval
US6526440B1 (en) 2001-01-30 2003-02-25 Google, Inc. Ranking search results by reranking the results based on local inter-connectivity
US20020107896A1 (en) 2001-02-02 2002-08-08 Abraham Ronai Patent application drafting assistance tool
US20030160812A1 (en) 2002-02-26 2003-08-28 Gary Dommer Representation of EPG programming information
US8484177B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2013-07-09 Eugene M. Lee Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing a field-of-search
US6694331B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2004-02-17 Knowledge Management Objects, Llc Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing a classification system
US20020184234A1 (en) 2001-06-01 2002-12-05 Lundberg Steven W. Internet-based patent and trademark applicaton management system
EP1386262A4 (en) 2001-03-29 2007-12-19 Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & Internet-based patent and trademark application management system
JP3842573B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2006-11-08 株式会社東芝 Structured document search method, structured document management apparatus and program
JP3842577B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2006-11-08 株式会社東芝 Structured document search method, structured document search apparatus and program
US6665670B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2003-12-16 M.Cam, Inc. Method and system for graphical representation of multitemporal, multidimensional data relationships
US6976016B2 (en) 2001-04-02 2005-12-13 Vima Technologies, Inc. Maximizing expected generalization for learning complex query concepts
US20020147738A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-10-10 Reader Scot A. Method and appratus for finding patent-relevant web documents
US6970881B1 (en) 2001-05-07 2005-11-29 Intelligenxia, Inc. Concept-based method and system for dynamically analyzing unstructured information
JP4489994B2 (en) 2001-05-11 2010-06-23 富士通株式会社 Topic extraction apparatus, method, program, and recording medium for recording the program
US6980984B1 (en) 2001-05-16 2005-12-27 Kanisa, Inc. Content provider systems and methods using structured data
US6968341B2 (en) 2001-05-25 2005-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for post-analyzing, and sequentially visualizing plurality of predefined metrics in a stored dynamic data values associated identifiers within determined time range
US6871324B2 (en) 2001-05-25 2005-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for efficiently and dynamically updating monitored metrics in a heterogeneous system
US7103843B2 (en) 2001-05-25 2006-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for visualizing metrics in a data space
GB2377047A (en) 2001-06-29 2002-12-31 Nokia Corp Intellectual property rights contract
US8326851B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2012-12-04 Grune Guerry L Simultaneous intellectual property search and valuation system and methodology (SIPS-VSM)
KR20030009704A (en) 2001-07-23 2003-02-05 한국전자통신연구원 System for drawing patent map using technical field word, its method
EP1429258A4 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-08-29 Ibm Data processing method, data processing system, and program
US9460414B2 (en) 2001-08-28 2016-10-04 Eugene M. Lee Computer assisted and/or implemented process and system for annotating and/or linking documents and data, optionally in an intellectual property management system
US6778995B1 (en) 2001-08-31 2004-08-17 Attenex Corporation System and method for efficiently generating cluster groupings in a multi-dimensional concept space
US8078545B1 (en) 2001-09-24 2011-12-13 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for collecting strategic patent data associated with an identifier
US20030084066A1 (en) 2001-10-31 2003-05-01 Waterman Scott A. Device and method for assisting knowledge engineer in associating intelligence with content
US20040006594A1 (en) 2001-11-27 2004-01-08 Ftf Technologies Inc. Data access control techniques using roles and permissions
US20030115191A1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Max Copperman Efficient and cost-effective content provider for customer relationship management (CRM) or other applications
AU2003210789A1 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-09-02 John Fairweather A system and method for managing dataflows
US20030154085A1 (en) 2002-02-08 2003-08-14 Onevoice Medical Corporation Interactive knowledge base system
US8589413B1 (en) 2002-03-01 2013-11-19 Ixreveal, Inc. Concept-based method and system for dynamically analyzing results from search engines
US20030187832A1 (en) 2002-04-02 2003-10-02 Reader Scot A. Method for locating patent-relevant web pages and search agent for use therein
US20030191654A1 (en) 2002-04-05 2003-10-09 Panchal Kiran D. Patent product map
DE10215495A1 (en) 2002-04-09 2003-10-30 Bayer Ag Computer system and method for research, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents
US6847966B1 (en) 2002-04-24 2005-01-25 Engenium Corporation Method and system for optimally searching a document database using a representative semantic space
CN1666207A (en) 2002-04-29 2005-09-07 康坦夹德控股股份有限公司 Rights management system using legality expression language
US20030212706A1 (en) 2002-05-07 2003-11-13 Shih Yu Li Patent management system
US7085771B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2006-08-01 Verity, Inc System and method for automatically discovering a hierarchy of concepts from a corpus of documents
US20040015481A1 (en) 2002-05-23 2004-01-22 Kenneth Zinda Patent data mining
US6996575B2 (en) 2002-05-31 2006-02-07 Sas Institute Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for text-based document processing
US7024408B2 (en) 2002-07-03 2006-04-04 Word Data Corp. Text-classification code, system and method
US20040006547A1 (en) 2002-07-03 2004-01-08 Dehlinger Peter J. Text-processing database
US7003516B2 (en) 2002-07-03 2006-02-21 Word Data Corp. Text representation and method
US7181451B2 (en) 2002-07-03 2007-02-20 Word Data Corp. Processing input text to generate the selectivity value of a word or word group in a library of texts in a field is related to the frequency of occurrence of that word or word group in library
US20040006459A1 (en) 2002-07-05 2004-01-08 Dehlinger Peter J. Text-searching system and method
US7016895B2 (en) 2002-07-05 2006-03-21 Word Data Corp. Text-classification system and method
KR100490725B1 (en) 2002-07-11 2005-05-24 한국전자통신연구원 Method for constructing database of technique classification patent map
US7493253B1 (en) 2002-07-12 2009-02-17 Language And Computing, Inc. Conceptual world representation natural language understanding system and method
US20060225000A1 (en) 2005-04-01 2006-10-05 Paul Albrecht Graphical application interface using browser
US7136807B2 (en) 2002-08-26 2006-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Inferencing using disambiguated natural language rules
US20040044688A1 (en) 2002-08-30 2004-03-04 Brudz John Jason Patent asset management systems and methods
US20040059994A1 (en) 2002-09-23 2004-03-25 Ronny Fogel Method of checking patent claims
US7158983B2 (en) 2002-09-23 2007-01-02 Battelle Memorial Institute Text analysis technique
US6886010B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US7296015B2 (en) 2002-10-17 2007-11-13 Poltorak Alexander I Apparatus and method for identifying and/or for analyzing potential patent infringement
EP1411448A3 (en) 2002-10-17 2007-12-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Data searching apparatus
US7904453B2 (en) 2002-10-17 2011-03-08 Poltorak Alexander I Apparatus and method for analyzing patent claim validity
US7801909B2 (en) 2002-10-17 2010-09-21 Poltorak Alexander I Apparatus and method for identifying and/or for analyzing potential patent infringement
WO2004042493A2 (en) 2002-10-24 2004-05-21 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Method and system for discovering knowledge from text documents
US20040186738A1 (en) 2002-10-24 2004-09-23 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for an idea adoption marketplace
US7142713B1 (en) 2002-10-24 2006-11-28 Foundationip, Llc Automated docketing system
US7231384B2 (en) 2002-10-25 2007-06-12 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Navigation tool for exploring a knowledge base
EP1562570A4 (en) 2002-11-06 2007-09-05 Sinai School Medicine Treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with nimesulide
US20040199400A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2004-10-07 Lundberg Steven W. Internet-based patent and trademark application management system
US20040122841A1 (en) 2002-12-19 2004-06-24 Ford Motor Company Method and system for evaluating intellectual property
US20040167875A1 (en) 2003-02-20 2004-08-26 Eriks Sneiders Information processing method and system
US8694504B2 (en) 2003-03-05 2014-04-08 Spore, Inc. Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping
US20040181417A1 (en) 2003-03-14 2004-09-16 Gunther Piller Managing the definition of a product innovation
US20040186705A1 (en) 2003-03-18 2004-09-23 Morgan Alexander P. Concept word management
US20120102427A1 (en) 2010-10-21 2012-04-26 Marc Aaron Fenster Systems and methods for automated claim chart generation
EP1623339A2 (en) 2003-05-01 2006-02-08 Axonwave Software Inc. A method and system for concept generation and management
US7406459B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2008-07-29 Microsoft Corporation Concept network
US7496892B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2009-02-24 Andrew Nuss Polymorphic regular expressions
WO2004104762A2 (en) 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Apparatus, method and computer readable medium for evaluating a network of entities and assets
US20050004806A1 (en) 2003-06-20 2005-01-06 Dah-Chih Lin Automatic patent claim reader and computer-aided claim reading method
JP3966515B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2007-08-29 日本アイ・ビー・エム株式会社 Network system, server, data recording / reproducing apparatus, method and program thereof
US20050005239A1 (en) 2003-07-03 2005-01-06 Richards James L. System and method for automatic insertion of cross references in a document
US7171618B2 (en) 2003-07-30 2007-01-30 Xerox Corporation Multi-versioned documents and method for creation and use thereof
EP1673702A4 (en) 2003-09-11 2008-11-05 Ipx Inc System for software source code comparison
TW200511048A (en) 2003-09-12 2005-03-16 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Patent family analysis system and method
US7219105B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2007-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and computer program product for profiling entities
US20050171760A1 (en) 2003-10-08 2005-08-04 Marc Tinkler Visual thesaurus
US20070271366A1 (en) 2003-10-09 2007-11-22 Demers Timothy B Multimedia player and browser system
US7555441B2 (en) 2003-10-10 2009-06-30 Kronos Talent Management Inc. Conceptualization of job candidate information
US10198478B2 (en) 2003-10-11 2019-02-05 Magic Number, Inc. Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping
US9922383B2 (en) 2003-11-07 2018-03-20 Spore, Inc. Patent claims analysis system and method
US9483551B2 (en) 2003-10-11 2016-11-01 Spore, Inc. Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping
US7185172B1 (en) 2003-10-31 2007-02-27 Integrated Device Technology, Inc. CAM-based search engine devices having index translation capability
WO2005048055A2 (en) 2003-11-07 2005-05-26 Spore, Inc. Patent claims analysis system and method
US20050144177A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-06-30 Hodes Alan S. Patent analysis and formulation using ontologies
US20050234738A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-10-20 Hodes Alan S Competitive product intelligence system and method, including patent analysis and formulation using one or more ontologies
US20050120011A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-06-02 Word Data Corp. Code, method, and system for manipulating texts
CN1622083A (en) 2003-11-29 2005-06-01 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Patent download system and method
KR100452086B1 (en) 2003-12-22 2004-10-13 엔에이치엔(주) Search System For Providing Information of Keyword Input Frequency By Category And Method Thereof
US20060106793A1 (en) 2003-12-29 2006-05-18 Ping Liang Internet and computer information retrieval and mining with intelligent conceptual filtering, visualization and automation
US7447678B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2008-11-04 Google Inc. Interface for a universal search engine
US7702516B2 (en) 2004-01-13 2010-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Payment control to inventors in patent tracking system
KR100452085B1 (en) 2004-01-14 2004-10-12 엔에이치엔(주) Search System For Providing Information of Keyword Input Frequency By Category And Method Thereof
US8868405B2 (en) 2004-01-27 2014-10-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L. P. System and method for comparative analysis of textual documents
US20050198026A1 (en) 2004-02-03 2005-09-08 Dehlinger Peter J. Code, system, and method for generating concepts
US20050182755A1 (en) 2004-02-14 2005-08-18 Bao Tran Systems and methods for analyzing documents over a network
US20050210008A1 (en) 2004-03-18 2005-09-22 Bao Tran Systems and methods for analyzing documents over a network
US20050210009A1 (en) 2004-03-18 2005-09-22 Bao Tran Systems and methods for intellectual property management
US20050210042A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Goedken James F Methods and apparatus to search and analyze prior art
US8612208B2 (en) 2004-04-07 2013-12-17 Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc Ontology for use with a system, method, and computer readable medium for retrieving information and response to a query
US20050228684A1 (en) 2004-04-13 2005-10-13 Pavel Pogodin Integrated computerized system and method for management of intellectual property
US20050234881A1 (en) 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Anna Burago Search wizard
US7962453B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2011-06-14 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic redistribution of a distributed memory index when individual nodes have different lookup indexes
US20070067297A1 (en) 2004-04-30 2007-03-22 Kublickis Peter J System and methods for a micropayment-enabled marketplace with permission-based, self-service, precision-targeted delivery of advertising, entertainment and informational content and relationship marketing to anonymous internet users
EP2487601A1 (en) 2004-05-04 2012-08-15 Boston Consulting Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting, analyzing and visualizing related database records as a network
US7996753B1 (en) 2004-05-10 2011-08-09 Google Inc. Method and system for automatically creating an image advertisement
US7447665B2 (en) 2004-05-10 2008-11-04 Kinetx, Inc. System and method of self-learning conceptual mapping to organize and interpret data
US20050256734A1 (en) 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Clikeman Richard R Method and data structure for augmenting invention and analysis of intellectual property
DE602004022517D1 (en) 2004-06-15 2009-09-24 Sap Ag A data processing system and method for monitoring database replication
WO2006002234A2 (en) 2004-06-22 2006-01-05 Coras, Inc. Systems and methods for software based on business concepts
US20060026174A1 (en) 2004-07-27 2006-02-02 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20060036451A1 (en) 2004-08-10 2006-02-16 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
EP1774432A4 (en) 2004-07-27 2009-04-22 Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & Patent mapping
US7840460B2 (en) 2004-08-11 2010-11-23 Allan Williams System and method for patent portfolio evaluation
US8145640B2 (en) 2004-08-11 2012-03-27 Allan Williams System and method for patent evaluation and visualization of the results thereof
US8161049B2 (en) 2004-08-11 2012-04-17 Allan Williams System and method for patent evaluation using artificial intelligence
US8145639B2 (en) 2004-08-11 2012-03-27 Allan Williams System and methods for patent evaluation
US20060036453A1 (en) 2004-08-11 2006-02-16 Allan Williams Bias compensated method and system for patent evaluation
US20060074836A1 (en) 2004-09-03 2006-04-06 Biowisdom Limited System and method for graphically displaying ontology data
US20060074980A1 (en) 2004-09-29 2006-04-06 Sarkar Pte. Ltd. System for semantically disambiguating text information
US20060173903A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-08-03 Zimmerman Mark C Methods and apparatus to automatically generate claim charts
US20060085478A1 (en) 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Michael Landau Third-party automated tracking, analysis, and distribution of registry status information
US7801874B2 (en) 2004-10-22 2010-09-21 Mahle Powertrain Llc Reporting tools
US20080077570A1 (en) 2004-10-25 2008-03-27 Infovell, Inc. Full Text Query and Search Systems and Method of Use
US7783619B2 (en) 2004-10-27 2010-08-24 Elsevier B.V. Methods and software for analysis of research publications
US7444589B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2008-10-28 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Automated patent office documentation
US8229905B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2012-07-24 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Adaptive document management system using a physical representation of a document
US20060212402A1 (en) 2005-03-21 2006-09-21 Lundberg Steven W System and method for export control of technical documents
US20060212480A1 (en) 2005-03-21 2006-09-21 Lundberg Steven W System and method for matter clusters in an IP management system
US7853629B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2010-12-14 Executive Data Systems, Inc. Document imaging and management system for paperless workflow
US20060218491A1 (en) 2005-03-25 2006-09-28 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product for community review of documents
US20060258397A1 (en) 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Kaplan Mark M Integrated mobile application server and communication gateway
EP1875336A2 (en) 2005-04-11 2008-01-09 Textdigger, Inc. System and method for searching for a query
US20080195601A1 (en) 2005-04-14 2008-08-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Method For Information Retrieval
US20110153509A1 (en) * 2005-05-27 2011-06-23 Ip Development Venture Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
US8805781B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2014-08-12 Geronimo Development Document quotation indexing system and method
US20070130112A1 (en) 2005-06-30 2007-06-07 Intelligentek Corp. Multimedia conceptual search system and associated search method
US7849049B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2010-12-07 Clarabridge, Inc. Schema and ETL tools for structured and unstructured data
US20070057967A1 (en) 2005-07-13 2007-03-15 Armstrong Orin R System and method for the display of versioned documents and amendments
AU2012200701B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2014-01-30 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Patent Mapping
US8566789B2 (en) 2005-08-25 2013-10-22 Infosys Limited Semantic-based query techniques for source code
US7716226B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2010-05-11 Patentratings, Llc Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects
US20080015968A1 (en) 2005-10-14 2008-01-17 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Fee-Based Priority Queuing for Insurance Claim Processing
US7702640B1 (en) 2005-12-29 2010-04-20 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Stratified unbalanced trees for indexing of data items within a computer system
US7676485B2 (en) 2006-01-20 2010-03-09 Ixreveal, Inc. Method and computer program product for converting ontologies into concept semantic networks
US8060357B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2011-11-15 Xerox Corporation Linguistic user interface
KR100785352B1 (en) 2006-04-21 2007-12-18 엔에이치엔(주) Method and system for creating search-result-list
US8069182B2 (en) 2006-04-24 2011-11-29 Working Research, Inc. Relevancy-based domain classification
US20080005144A1 (en) 2006-05-23 2008-01-03 Seapass Solutions Inc. Apparatus and method for transferring data between incompatible computer systems
US20070288256A1 (en) 2006-06-07 2007-12-13 Speier Gary J Patent claim reference generation
US20080005103A1 (en) 2006-06-08 2008-01-03 Invequity, Llc Intellectual property search, marketing and licensing connection system and method
US20080021900A1 (en) 2006-07-14 2008-01-24 Ficus Enterprises, Llc Examiner information system
US8392174B2 (en) 2006-08-07 2013-03-05 International Characters, Inc. Method and apparatus for lexical analysis using parallel bit streams
US9318108B2 (en) 2010-01-18 2016-04-19 Apple Inc. Intelligent automated assistant
US20090282054A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2009-11-12 Casey Michael R IDS Reference Tracking System
US20080109454A1 (en) 2006-11-03 2008-05-08 Willse Alan R Text analysis techniques
US8037051B2 (en) 2006-11-08 2011-10-11 Intertrust Technologies Corporation Matching and recommending relevant videos and media to individual search engine results
US8065307B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2011-11-22 Microsoft Corporation Parsing, analysis and scoring of document content
US7890521B1 (en) 2007-02-07 2011-02-15 Google Inc. Document-based synonym generation
US7881937B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2011-02-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method for analyzing patent claims
US7801749B2 (en) 2007-06-07 2010-09-21 Ingenix, Inc. System and method for grouping claim records associated with a procedure
US8271473B2 (en) 2007-06-25 2012-09-18 Jobs2Web, Inc. System and method for career website optimization
CN101334771A (en) 2007-06-28 2008-12-31 冠亚智财股份有限公司 Correlation screening system and method for patent constituted element combination
US20090006328A1 (en) 2007-06-29 2009-01-01 Nokia Corporation Identifying commonalities between contacts
KR101103766B1 (en) 2007-07-03 2012-01-12 성균관대학교산학협력단 Terminal, method, recording medium for collecting user preference information using tag information
WO2009018223A1 (en) 2007-07-27 2009-02-05 Sparkip, Inc. System and methods for clustering large database of documents
KR100901938B1 (en) 2007-08-14 2009-06-10 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 Method and system for revising click through rate
US20090228777A1 (en) 2007-08-17 2009-09-10 Accupatent, Inc. System and Method for Search
US20090083049A1 (en) 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Sciarrino David M Claim chart creation system
US8862622B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2014-10-14 Sprylogics International Corp. Analysis, inference, and visualization of social networks
US20090158186A1 (en) 2007-12-17 2009-06-18 Bonev Robert Drag and drop glads
US8112174B2 (en) 2008-02-25 2012-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Processor, method and computer program product for fast selective invalidation of translation lookaside buffer
US8218487B2 (en) 2008-04-09 2012-07-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method of adaptive frequency hopping with look ahead interference prediction
WO2009144698A1 (en) 2008-05-26 2009-12-03 Kenshoo Ltd. A system for finding website invitation cueing keywords and for attribute-based generation of invitation-cueing instructions
KR20110027729A (en) 2008-06-24 2011-03-16 샤론 벨렌손 Search engine and methodology, particularly applicable to patent literature
US20100023386A1 (en) 2008-07-23 2010-01-28 Sol Avisar Social networking platform for intellectual property assets
US20100082395A1 (en) 2008-09-29 2010-04-01 Anthony Bernard De Andrade Systems and methods for analyzing a portfolio of intellectual property assets
US9336304B2 (en) 2008-11-10 2016-05-10 Gary J. Speier Patent analytics system
US20100174698A1 (en) 2009-01-06 2010-07-08 Global Patent Solutions, Llc Method for a customized and automated forward and backward patent citation search
US8768960B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2014-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Enhancing keyword advertising using online encyclopedia semantics
CN102439610A (en) 2009-04-20 2012-05-02 美国安牌可有限公司 Systems and methods for managing patent licenses
US20100306825A1 (en) 2009-05-27 2010-12-02 Lucid Ventures, Inc. System and method for facilitating user interaction with a simulated object associated with a physical location
US8756229B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2014-06-17 Quantifind, Inc. System and methods for units-based numeric information retrieval
US8572084B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2013-10-29 Fti Consulting, Inc. System and method for displaying relationships between electronically stored information to provide classification suggestions via nearest neighbor
US20110029476A1 (en) 2009-07-29 2011-02-03 Kas Kasravi Indicating relationships among text documents including a patent based on characteristics of the text documents
US8713078B2 (en) 2009-08-13 2014-04-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for building taxonomy of topics and categorizing videos
US20110047166A1 (en) 2009-08-20 2011-02-24 Innography, Inc. System and methods of relating trademarks and patent documents
US20110246473A1 (en) 2009-09-16 2011-10-06 John Stec Computerized method for analyizing innovation interrelationships within and between large patent portfolios
US20110112824A1 (en) 2009-11-06 2011-05-12 Craig Peter Sayers Determining at least one category path for identifying input text
US8954893B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2015-02-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Visually representing a hierarchy of category nodes
US9183288B2 (en) 2010-01-27 2015-11-10 Kinetx, Inc. System and method of structuring data for search using latent semantic analysis techniques
US20110231449A1 (en) 2010-03-17 2011-09-22 Ashley William B System, Method, and Apparatus for Managing Patent Reference Reporting
US9384678B2 (en) 2010-04-14 2016-07-05 Thinkmap, Inc. System and method for generating questions and multiple choice answers to adaptively aid in word comprehension
US20110320582A1 (en) 2010-06-23 2011-12-29 Lewis George C Online presence management system
US20120095984A1 (en) 2010-10-18 2012-04-19 Peter Michael Wren-Hilton Universal Search Engine Interface and Application
US20130282599A1 (en) 2010-11-02 2013-10-24 Kwanggaeto Co., Ltd. Method of generating patent evaluation model, method of evaluating patent, method of generating patent dispute prediction model, method of generating patent dispute prediction information, and method and system for generating patent risk hedging information
US8712894B2 (en) 2010-11-04 2014-04-29 National Yunlin University Of Science And Technology Method and system for evaluating/analyzing patent portfolio using patent priority approach
US8316030B2 (en) 2010-11-05 2012-11-20 Nextgen Datacom, Inc. Method and system for document classification or search using discrete words
US20120174017A1 (en) 2010-12-29 2012-07-05 Verisign, Inc. Systems, methods and computer software for innovation management
US9665637B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2017-05-30 H. Paul Zellweger Method and apparatus for creating binary attribute data relations
US20120240026A1 (en) 2011-03-14 2012-09-20 Anaqua, Inc. Method and system for related art citation management
US20120290487A1 (en) 2011-04-15 2012-11-15 IP Street Evaluating intellectual property
US8856181B2 (en) 2011-07-08 2014-10-07 First Retail, Inc. Semantic matching
US20130086093A1 (en) 2011-10-03 2013-04-04 Steven W. Lundberg System and method for competitive prior art analytics and mapping
US20130282409A1 (en) 2011-10-03 2013-10-24 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Systems and methods for patent portfolio management
US8972385B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2015-03-03 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for tracking patent ownership change

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030046307A1 (en) * 1997-06-02 2003-03-06 Rivette Kevin G. Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
US20030033295A1 (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-02-13 Adler Marc Stephen Method for analyzing and recording innovations
US20030167181A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-09-04 Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. Systems and methods for managing information disclosure statement (IDS) references
US20040054672A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-18 International Business Machines Corporation Information search support system, application server, information search method, and program product
US20050246194A1 (en) * 2004-04-06 2005-11-03 Lundberg Steven W System and method for information disclosure statement management
US20060190449A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Lundberg Steven W System and method for prior art cross citation
US20070198578A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-08-23 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20080216013A1 (en) * 2006-08-01 2008-09-04 Lundberg Steven W Patent tracking
US20100131513A1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2010-05-27 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US20120284199A1 (en) * 2011-05-04 2012-11-08 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"A translational approach to portable ontology specifications", Thomas R. Gruber, Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 24 total pages *

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11776084B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2023-10-03 Lucid Patent Llc Patent mapping
US11080807B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2021-08-03 Lucid Patent Llc Patent mapping
US10810693B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2020-10-20 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships
US11798111B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2023-10-24 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships
US9201956B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2015-12-01 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Patent mapping
US9659071B2 (en) 2005-07-27 2017-05-23 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Patent mapping
US20080216013A1 (en) * 2006-08-01 2008-09-04 Lundberg Steven W Patent tracking
US10546273B2 (en) 2008-10-23 2020-01-28 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11301810B2 (en) 2008-10-23 2022-04-12 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US20100131513A1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2010-05-27 Lundberg Steven W Patent mapping
US10885078B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2021-01-05 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning
US11714839B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2023-08-01 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning
US9904726B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-02-27 Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC. Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning
US11360988B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2022-06-14 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Systems, methods and user interfaces in a patent management system
US11256706B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2022-02-22 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for patent and prior art analysis
US11714819B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-08-01 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11048709B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2021-06-29 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11775538B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-10-03 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Systems, methods and user interfaces in a patent management system
US20130086045A1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2013-04-04 Steven W. Lundberg Patent mapping
US11789954B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-10-17 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for patent and prior art analysis
US10860657B2 (en) * 2011-10-03 2020-12-08 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11797546B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-10-24 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent mapping
US11803560B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2023-10-31 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent claim mapping
US11461862B2 (en) 2012-08-20 2022-10-04 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Analytics generation for patent portfolio management
US11354344B2 (en) 2013-04-23 2022-06-07 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent claim scope evaluator
US10579662B2 (en) 2013-04-23 2020-03-03 Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc Patent claim scope evaluator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20150371349A1 (en) 2015-12-24
US20150134549A1 (en) 2015-05-14
US20210073932A1 (en) 2021-03-11
US11798111B2 (en) 2023-10-24
WO2006128183A3 (en) 2007-03-29
WO2006128183A2 (en) 2006-11-30
US10810693B2 (en) 2020-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210073932A1 (en) Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships
Akpınar et al. Vision based page segmentation algorithm: Extended and perceived success
JP2006512693A (en) A knowledge management system for law firms.
US20050102308A1 (en) Adaptively interfacing with a data repository
Linderman et al. Defensive Design for the Web: How to improve error messages, help, forms, and other crisis points
Völkel Personal knowledge models with semantic technologies
US20110191663A1 (en) Efficient presentation of important profile information to a profile reader
US8341176B1 (en) Structure-based expansion of user element selection
Verhoeven et al. Experiences with the ARIADNE pedagogical document repository
Yoo et al. Finding linking opportunities through relationship-based analysis
He et al. Integrating both Wikis and XML with case bases to facilitate case base development and maintenance
Rintjema et al. Creating an HTML help system for web-based products
Tan et al. Web information monitoring: an analysis of Web page updates
Hofstetter A step-by-step guide for data scraping
KR20190098867A (en) Paper curation service system and method based on Web
Coe Whom should we aim to please when creating ebook indexes?
Bruner et al. Managing Open Content Resources from Discovery to Delivery
Abelson Integrity of the research process
Hostetler et al. Web accessibility trends and implementation in dynamic web applications
Whitman Intellogist: an online community dedicated to comparing major patent search systems
Subramaniam et al. Web content of library portals in Karnataka: role of librarians in the Internet world
Kudělka et al. Web communities defined by web page content
Pribeanu et al. A corpus of design guidelines for electronic commerce web sites
Hixson If we build it, will they come (eventually)? Scholarly communication and institutional repositories
Saxena A Study On Web Mining As Web Services Framework

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: IP DEVELOPMENT VENTURE, MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W.;KALIS, JANAL M.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061016 TO 20061222;REEL/FRAME:018763/0678

AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A., MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W.;KALIS, JANAL M.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080626 TO 20080627;REEL/FRAME:021229/0395

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A., MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W;KALIS, JANAL M;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080626 TO 20080627;REEL/FRAME:050277/0006

AS Assignment

Owner name: BLACK HILLS IP HOLDINGS, LLC, MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.;REEL/FRAME:054099/0540

Effective date: 20201017