US20110161812A1 - Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search - Google Patents

Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110161812A1
US20110161812A1 US13/042,250 US201113042250A US2011161812A1 US 20110161812 A1 US20110161812 A1 US 20110161812A1 US 201113042250 A US201113042250 A US 201113042250A US 2011161812 A1 US2011161812 A1 US 2011161812A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
choices
sequence
path
search
interface object
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/042,250
Inventor
Mohit Srivastava
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/042,250 priority Critical patent/US20110161812A1/en
Publication of US20110161812A1 publication Critical patent/US20110161812A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/048Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
    • G06F3/0481Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
    • G06F3/0482Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • G06F9/451Execution arrangements for user interfaces

Definitions

  • a user interface may comprise one or more pull-down menus, dialog boxes, and/or palettes.
  • a user interface may comprise one or more pull-down menus, dialog boxes, and/or palettes.
  • dialog boxes To preserve screen space for the file, image, or other data being viewed or operated on, not all user interface objects are displayed. For example, to invoke a command, a user may proceed through a sequence of choices and in the process bring up and/or go through one or more windows or dialog boxes.
  • Some software applications are powerful and have many commands, capabilities, and/or features associated with it. As a result, it may be difficult for a user to find and/or remember a sequence of choices associated with, for example, a particular command. New users may be intimidated or discouraged by a new application. Even some experienced users may not remember the path or sequence of choices to access a less commonly used feature. It would be desirable if techniques could be developed to assist users in learning and/or locating the path to access a feature, command, or capabilities associated with a user interface.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a user interface configured to have menu items that are searchable.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a submenu associated with a pull down menu in which choices associated with search results are indicated using visual cues.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a tools window in which choices associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue.
  • FIG. 4 is flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects and indicating at least a portion of a sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for determining a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying visual cues for the portion of a sequence of choices that is currently being displayed.
  • the invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a composition of matter, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or communication links.
  • these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques.
  • a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task includes both a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task.
  • the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.
  • Searching objects associated with a user interface and displaying visual cues for at least a portion of a path to a search result is disclosed.
  • One or more search criteria are received.
  • One or more objects that are associated with a user interface are searched based at least in part on the one or more search criteria to obtain a search result.
  • searching includes obtaining a collection of information that is separate from files or other data associated with a help feature of a software application. For example, in some cases help files or other help data is quite large and loading and/or searching through help files may take a relatively long time.
  • a collection of information that is obtained and searched through is smaller than files or data associated with a help feature.
  • metadata or tags associated with user interface objects are searched.
  • a sequence of one or more choices associated with accessing the search result is obtained.
  • the sequence may comprise items in a pull down menu that must be selected in order to get to the search result.
  • a visual cue is displayed for at least a portion of the sequence of one or more choices.
  • the portion that is displayed corresponds to what is currently displayed.
  • windows, dialog boxes, or submenus associated with pull down menus that include part of a path to a search result do not automatically pop up as a result of a search.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a user interface configured to have menu items that are searchable.
  • user interface 100 is associated with a software application, in this case Adobe® Photoshop®, and includes pull down menu 101 .
  • User interface 100 provides access to the various capabilities, commands, and/or features implemented by a software application for viewing, manipulating, exporting, printing, and/or deleting data associated with a file, image, or other data.
  • a sequence of choices or a path associated with user interface 100 may be selected by a user.
  • User interface 100 is configured so that objects associated with user interface 100 are searchable.
  • Pull down menu 101 includes search box 102 in which a user has entered, “Layer.”
  • a search interface (such as search box 102 ) is implemented in a variety of ways.
  • a user is able control the display of a search interface.
  • search box 102 may initially be displayed.
  • a user may be able to toggle off/on the display of search box 102 .
  • search criteria are specified using natural language and a natural language processor is used to interpret the search criteria into data that can be used to search the collection.
  • a search interface not integrated into a pull down menu such as pull down menu 101 .
  • a search interface is included in a dialog box. The size and/or location of a dialog box may be adjusted as desired by a user, for example so that a file or other data that is being worked on is not blocked by the dialog box.
  • a user interface includes a variety of objects. Accordingly, user interface objects that are searched may comprise a variety of objects in various embodiments.
  • a user interface object comprises or includes graphical icons (some examples of which are illustrated in this figure) in addition to or as an alternative to text.
  • tool tips associated with graphical icons are searched and sequences of choices or paths for search results are indicating using visual cues.
  • a user interface object is associated with a palette, dialog box, tab, and/or menu.
  • a palette remains displayed until a user closes the palette; display of a palette does not necessarily interrupt usage of a software application.
  • a dialog box is used to obtain data at a certain point and/or usage of a software application is halted or interrupted until data is provided via the dialog box.
  • a user interface is associated with a software application configured to run on a computer, such as Adobe® Acrobat® or Microsoft Internet Explorer.
  • a user interface is associated with a web-based application.
  • a user interface is associated with a client-server application.
  • a user interface object that is searched is a node within a tree or hierarchy associated with user interface 100 .
  • layer 104 may be one user interface object.
  • Other user interface objects are accessible via layer 104 (e.g., objects in a submenu that is displayed by clicking on Layer 104 ) and each of those objects may be searched (e.g., separately from their parent, layer 104 ).
  • a given file system object will match a search or otherwise satisfy search criteria but a parent, (grand)child, and/or sibling will not.
  • search criteria comprise one or more words that are searched for. Any appropriate search technique may be used. For example, Boolean operators such as AND or OR may be used in a search if there are multiple words being searched for. File system objects that match the search criteria and/or any search parameters (e.g., all search words found, at least one search word found, etc.) are added to a collection of search results.
  • Sequences of choices or paths are determined for each search result and at least a portion of these paths are indicating using a visual cue.
  • a visual cue comprises a highlight and Layer 104 , Select 106 , and Window 108 are highlighted.
  • Layer 104 is highlighted because the name includes the search word and/or user interface object that are accessible via Layer 104 (e.g., subsequent or lower-level nodes) include the search word.
  • Select 106 and Window 108 do not include the search word “Layer” in their names, but are the top-level node in a sequence of choices or a path associated with a search result that does.
  • An example associated with Window 108 is discussed in further detail below.
  • a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result is indicated using a visual cue.
  • Each choice in a sequence or path may be a user interface object that is similarly searched.
  • a new user may be able to learn about the features or capabilities of a computer application, and/or learn the path or sequence of menu choices, button pushes, and/or tab selections via which a command, operation or feature is invoked or otherwise accessed. Similarly, this may enable an experienced user to, for example, learn about new features of a new version of an application, or enable the user to search for the path to bring up a less frequently used dialogue box.
  • a visual cue is overlaid on an object.
  • a visual cue is a check, a star, or other mark placed adjacent to an object, surrounds an object, etc.
  • a path or sequence of choices that is indicated using a visual cue includes text and/or an icon.
  • icons that are associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue.
  • An icon may be an initial, intermediate, or end/terminal choice in a sequence of choices via which a search result is accessed.
  • Illustrating a path or sequence of choices as described may be more helpful to a user than some other techniques.
  • some applications have a help application or feature that includes search capabilities.
  • Some of these help features are relatively resource intensive (e.g., with respect to shared processing or memory resources) and take resources away from the software application itself.
  • these help features may have their own separate display. These help displays may obstruct or block a user's view of the software application.
  • Some other techniques highlight or otherwise illustrate only a search result and do not illustrate the path or sequence of choices that corresponds to a search result. In some cases this may not be as helpful, since a user would first have to correctly select all but one choice in a sequence in order to see the last choice (i.e., the user interface objects that resulted from a search) highlighted or otherwise indicated.
  • a user interface is configured to be able to clear or otherwise remove visual cues that are displayed.
  • a search interface may include a clear button. Pushing the clear button may cause the highlight or other visual cue to be removed and/or for search criteria to be cleared (e.g., the word “Layer” is removed from search box 102 ).
  • a new search causes visual cues associated with a previous search to be removed or cleared.
  • a visual cue is cleared as or after a user selects the choice corresponding to that visual cue.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a submenu associated with a pull down menu in which choices associated with search results are indicated using visual cues.
  • a user has selected Window 108 (which is highlighted as a result of a search using the search word “Layer” entered into search box 102 ) and submenu 110 is displayed as a result of the user's selection of Window 108 .
  • a user may cause submenu 110 to be displayed in a variety of ways, for example by placing a mouse pointer over Window 108 and holding down or clicking a button of the mouse.
  • Layer Comps 112 and Layer 114 in submenu 110 are highlighted. Both items contain the search word “Layer” and are indicated using a highlight, which is the visual cue for this example.
  • Window 108 To access the highlighted items Layer Comps 112 and Layer 114 , Window 108 must first be selected. As such, Window 108 is indicated using a visual cue since it is included in the paths for Layer Comps 112 and Layers 114 even though Window 108 does not necessarily include the search word “Layers” in its name.
  • a path or sequence of choices does not necessarily end at an end or terminal object or item.
  • a sequence of choices ends at an intermediate object or item that has subsequent or lower level choices associated with it.
  • subsequent or lower level choices associated with Layers 114 including all subsequent or lower level choices until end or terminal objects are reached
  • Layers 114 would still be highlighted.
  • Subsequent or lower level choices that do not satisfy a search are not necessarily highlighted or otherwise indicated using a visual cue.
  • submenu 110 will not automatically pop up or otherwise be automatically displayed if submenu 110 is not already being displayed. For example, a user may find it annoying to have submenu 110 and/or other windows, dialog boxes, or palettes pop up each time a search is performed.
  • a user interacts with a user interface.
  • new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes are displayed as a user interacts with user interface 100 .
  • visual cues e.g., highlighting
  • This may, for example, enable a user to go through the entire path or sequence of choices to find the user interface object the user is searching for.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a tools window in which choices associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue.
  • a user has entered the word “Magic” in search box 102 .
  • Two tools accessible via tools window 112 that result from the search are the Magic Eraser tool and Magic Wand tool.
  • the names of tools are searched and the search results include the Magic Eraser tool and the Magic Wand tool since both of their names include the word “magic.”
  • other information besides a name e.g., a tag or metadata
  • the objects being searched include other objects in addition to or as an alternative to tools.
  • the Magic Wand tool is accessible via Magic Wand icon 115 in tools window 112 .
  • a second row is displayed under pull down menu 101 .
  • This second row includes commands, features, and/or operations associated with the Magic Wand tool.
  • Magic Wand icon 115 is indicated using a visual cue.
  • the visual cue comprises blinking, and Magic Wand icon 115 blinks.
  • the Magic Eraser tool is accessible via Eraser icon 116 .
  • a user may place his mouse pointer over and right-click on Eraser Tool icon 116 to display a list of eraser tools, including Eraser tool, Background Eraser tool, and Magic Eraser tool (which may also be blinking).
  • the user may move his mouse over the displayed list of eraser related tools and select the Magic Eraser tool, which in some embodiments is blinking in the displayed list. Since Eraser Tool icon 116 is included in a path or sequence of choices via which a search result (i.e., Magic Eraser tool) is accessible, Eraser Tool icon 116 is visually indicated using blinking.
  • a visual cue comprises a variety of things.
  • a visual cue uses color or highlighting (e.g., an icon or text that is colored and other icons or text are grey or black).
  • a border or outline is used.
  • a visual cue is a mark or some indicator displayed adjacent to a selection or choice.
  • some font effect is used, such as italicizing, bold typing, or underlining.
  • a visual cue is time varying. For example, in some embodiments a visual cue uses blinking, fading in/out, moving, etc.
  • FIG. 4 is flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects and indicating at least a portion of a sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • a user interface associated with an application is configured so that a user is able to search through objects associated with the object interface.
  • a search interface comprises a palette, a search box embedded into the menu bar of a user interface (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 1-3 ), etc.
  • Object(s) associated with a user interface are searched based at least in part on search criteria to obtain a search result at 402 .
  • search criteria e.g., search criteria for searching a user interface.
  • a collection of information that contains information associated with user interface objects is obtained and searched through.
  • a sequence of one or more choices is obtained that is associated with accessing that search result. For example, the path of a search result is traced or crawled through the tree or hierarchy of the user interface until the highest point or initial choice is reached. An embodiment of this is discussed in further detail below.
  • a visual cue is displayed for at least a portion of the corresponding sequence of one or more choices.
  • the portion that is displayed may be the portion that is currently displayed.
  • visual cues are displayed for those newly displayed portions.
  • paths or sequences associated with a particular search result are displayed.
  • more than one user interface object satisfies the search criteria.
  • paths are displayed for a subset of the user interface objects that satisfy the search criteria (e.g., user interface objects are ranked and paths are visually indicated for those user interface objects with the highest rankings).
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects.
  • a collection of information that includes information associated with user interface objects is obtained and searched.
  • the illustrated process is used at 502 to perform a search.
  • other techniques besides the example illustrated are used.
  • a collection of information associated with user interface objects is accessed.
  • a collection of information comprises one or more files, databases, tables, etc.
  • a collection of information is a relatively small collection of information so that a search may be performed relatively quickly and/or using relatively few resources.
  • a collection of information is organized or otherwise arranged to enable faster searching.
  • a collection of information accessed at 500 includes names of user interface objects.
  • a collection of information includes other information in addition to or as an alternative to names.
  • metadata associated with user interface objects is included in a collection of information that is searched.
  • metadata includes information assigned to a user interface object by a developer associated with the user interface.
  • metadata may be used to include alternate or root forms of a word so that if a user searches on the word “Coloring” a user object with a name that includes “Color” would be included in the search results.
  • metadata includes synonyms of a word.
  • metadata includes a general category or classification associated with a file system object. Metadata may include a variety of information in various embodiments.
  • a collection of information that is searched includes one or more tags associated with user interface objects.
  • a tag is specified by a user (e.g., the user currently interacting with a user interface or another user). For example, a user may user a certain command infrequently. To locate a path associated with the command later, the user may assign a tag to a user interface object associated with the command. For example, the tag may be “Jackpot” or something else the user will remember to use as a search word later on.
  • a tag is applied to more than one user interface object. This may, for example, enable a user to be able to find paths for a user-defined set of objects.
  • a collection of information that is searched is not part of or is not associated with a help feature.
  • some help features associated with user interfaces are very resource intensive.
  • there are many help files or other data associated with a help feature and searching through these help files may be time consuming.
  • the collection of information is searched through based at least in part on search criteria.
  • one or more search parameters are used in searching. Some or all of these search parameters may user specified.
  • a search parameter includes a maximum number of search results to display paths for, Boolean operators to use (e.g., use the Boolean operator AND so that a search result contains all search criteria, or use the Boolean operator OR so that a search result contains at least one of the search criteria), etc.
  • a search parameter is set to a default or initial value.
  • User interface objects that match search criteria are added to a collection of search results at 504 .
  • all search results that are found are used in subsequent processing (e.g., determining paths associated with search results, displaying visual cues, etc.).
  • not all search results are added to a collection of search results.
  • search results are ranked and only a certain number of search results are processed further.
  • a maximum number of search results (should such a maximum be used) is specified by a user.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for determining a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • the process is used in some embodiments at 404 .
  • a first search result is obtained from collection of search results.
  • search results in a collection are processed in various orders.
  • a current node is set to the location of current search result.
  • the current node may be used to track where in a tree or hierarchy associated with a user interface a process is currently at.
  • a parent of the current node is determined at 604 . In some cases, there is more than one parent.
  • the process determines all paths associated with a given search result. For example, a process may remember the current node at which there where multiple parents, copy the path up to the branch, and return later to continue tracing the other path from the branch upwards.
  • the current node is set to a parent and a parent is added to the path. It is determined at 608 whether a current node is a top level node. Referring back to the example of FIG. 2 , Layer 104 , Select 106 , and Window 108 are top level nodes. Layer Comps 112 and Layers 114 are not top level nodes.
  • a parent of the current node is determined at 604 . Otherwise, it is decided at 610 whether it is the last search result. If it is not the last search result, a next search result is obtained from the collection of search results at 612 .
  • a different technique is used to obtain a path associated with a search result.
  • paths are pre-determined and stored in a library, file, database, or table of paths.
  • a process may retrieve this stored information to obtain a path associated with a given user interface object.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying visual cues for the portion of a sequence of choices that is currently being displayed.
  • the technique may be used for user interfaces associated with a software application running on a computer, a web-based application, or a client-server application. Some of the techniques described may be modified as appropriate based on the implementation or environment of a particular embodiment.
  • portions of sequences that are currently being displayed are determined.
  • identifiers are obtained for each object in portions that are currently being displayed.
  • each user interface object is associated with a unique identifier which is used to identify a given user interface object.
  • An identifier may be passed to, for example, an Application Programming Interface (API) when requesting an API to indicate part of a path by, for example, redrawing or redisplaying a user interface object to have a visual cue.
  • API Application Programming Interface
  • an appropriate entity is requested to redraw objects with a visual cue for portions currently being displayed.
  • a display e.g., by causing new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes to be displayed
  • new portions of paths are displayed.
  • Visual cues may be displayed for these newly exposed objects using various techniques.
  • visual cues are indicated on the fly and corresponding processing is triggered each time a user causes the display of a user interface to change. For example, as a user traverses through the path and causes new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes to be displayed, newly exposed portions of paths are determined and visual cues for those newly exposed portions are displayed.
  • the processed described above is repeated as new submenus, tabs, dialog boxes or other objects are visually exposed.
  • modifications or changes associated with displaying visual cues are performed ahead of time (e.g., to reduce processing). For example, even though a given object in a path may not necessarily be displayed at the time a search is performed, data associated with that object is modified so that should it be displayed, the object will have a visual cue displayed with it.
  • one or more resource files are used in displaying a visual cue associated with a path.
  • a resource file may be compiled into a software application.
  • a resource file is loaded into memory.
  • An identifier associated with a user interface object (for which a visual cue will be displayed) is passed to a resource file and an index is obtained.
  • This index may be passed to an API and the API may be instructed to, for example, color (or use some other visual cue) user interface object.

Abstract

Displaying a visual cue is disclosed. One or more search criteria is/are received. One or more objects that are associated with a user interface is/are searched based at least in part on the one or more search criteria to obtain a search result. A sequence of one or more choices associated with accessing the search result is/are obtained. A visual cue is displayed for at least a portion of the sequence of one or more choices.

Description

  • This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/499,441, which was filed on Aug. 4, 2006, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • In software applications, users access operations, features and/or commands via a user interface. A user interface may comprise one or more pull-down menus, dialog boxes, and/or palettes. To preserve screen space for the file, image, or other data being viewed or operated on, not all user interface objects are displayed. For example, to invoke a command, a user may proceed through a sequence of choices and in the process bring up and/or go through one or more windows or dialog boxes. Some software applications are powerful and have many commands, capabilities, and/or features associated with it. As a result, it may be difficult for a user to find and/or remember a sequence of choices associated with, for example, a particular command. New users may be intimidated or discouraged by a new application. Even some experienced users may not remember the path or sequence of choices to access a less commonly used feature. It would be desirable if techniques could be developed to assist users in learning and/or locating the path to access a feature, command, or capabilities associated with a user interface.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a user interface configured to have menu items that are searchable.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a submenu associated with a pull down menu in which choices associated with search results are indicated using visual cues.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a tools window in which choices associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue.
  • FIG. 4 is flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects and indicating at least a portion of a sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for determining a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying visual cues for the portion of a sequence of choices that is currently being displayed.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a composition of matter, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or communication links. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. A component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task includes both a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.
  • A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
  • Searching objects associated with a user interface and displaying visual cues for at least a portion of a path to a search result is disclosed. One or more search criteria are received. One or more objects that are associated with a user interface are searched based at least in part on the one or more search criteria to obtain a search result. In some embodiments, searching includes obtaining a collection of information that is separate from files or other data associated with a help feature of a software application. For example, in some cases help files or other help data is quite large and loading and/or searching through help files may take a relatively long time. In some embodiments, a collection of information that is obtained and searched through is smaller than files or data associated with a help feature. In some embodiments, metadata or tags associated with user interface objects are searched. A sequence of one or more choices associated with accessing the search result is obtained. For example, the sequence may comprise items in a pull down menu that must be selected in order to get to the search result. A visual cue is displayed for at least a portion of the sequence of one or more choices. In some embodiments, the portion that is displayed corresponds to what is currently displayed. In some embodiments, windows, dialog boxes, or submenus associated with pull down menus that include part of a path to a search result do not automatically pop up as a result of a search.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a user interface configured to have menu items that are searchable. In the example shown, user interface 100 is associated with a software application, in this case Adobe® Photoshop®, and includes pull down menu 101. User interface 100 provides access to the various capabilities, commands, and/or features implemented by a software application for viewing, manipulating, exporting, printing, and/or deleting data associated with a file, image, or other data. To access a particular command, feature, or capability, a sequence of choices or a path associated with user interface 100 may be selected by a user. In some software applications, there may be more than one sequence of choices via which a particular command, operation, or feature is able to be accessed.
  • Some software applications have so many features or commands that a user may have difficulty remembering or locating a path that corresponds to a given command or feature. For example, a user may be a new user, or the command or feature may be used infrequently. User interface 100 is configured so that objects associated with user interface 100 are searchable.
  • Pull down menu 101 includes search box 102 in which a user has entered, “Layer.” In various embodiments, a search interface (such as search box 102) is implemented in a variety of ways. In some embodiments, a user is able control the display of a search interface. For example, search box 102 may initially be displayed. A user may be able to toggle off/on the display of search box 102. In some embodiments, search criteria are specified using natural language and a natural language processor is used to interpret the search criteria into data that can be used to search the collection. In some embodiments, a search interface not integrated into a pull down menu such as pull down menu 101. In some embodiments, a search interface is included in a dialog box. The size and/or location of a dialog box may be adjusted as desired by a user, for example so that a file or other data that is being worked on is not blocked by the dialog box.
  • In various embodiments, a user interface includes a variety of objects. Accordingly, user interface objects that are searched may comprise a variety of objects in various embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, a user interface object comprises or includes graphical icons (some examples of which are illustrated in this figure) in addition to or as an alternative to text. In some embodiments, tool tips associated with graphical icons are searched and sequences of choices or paths for search results are indicating using visual cues. In some embodiments, a user interface object is associated with a palette, dialog box, tab, and/or menu. In some user interfaces, a palette remains displayed until a user closes the palette; display of a palette does not necessarily interrupt usage of a software application. In some user interfaces, a dialog box is used to obtain data at a certain point and/or usage of a software application is halted or interrupted until data is provided via the dialog box.
  • In some embodiments, a user interface is associated with a software application configured to run on a computer, such as Adobe® Acrobat® or Microsoft Internet Explorer. In some embodiments, a user interface is associated with a web-based application. In some embodiments, a user interface is associated with a client-server application. Some of the techniques described herein (e.g., for displaying visual cues) are modified in some embodiments.
  • In the examples illustrated herein, a user interface object that is searched is a node within a tree or hierarchy associated with user interface 100. For example, layer 104 may be one user interface object. Other user interface objects are accessible via layer 104 (e.g., objects in a submenu that is displayed by clicking on Layer 104) and each of those objects may be searched (e.g., separately from their parent, layer 104). In some embodiments, a given file system object will match a search or otherwise satisfy search criteria but a parent, (grand)child, and/or sibling will not.
  • In the example shown, the word “Layer” is used as a search criteria. In some embodiments, search criteria comprise one or more words that are searched for. Any appropriate search technique may be used. For example, Boolean operators such as AND or OR may be used in a search if there are multiple words being searched for. File system objects that match the search criteria and/or any search parameters (e.g., all search words found, at least one search word found, etc.) are added to a collection of search results.
  • Sequences of choices or paths are determined for each search result and at least a portion of these paths are indicating using a visual cue. In this example, a visual cue comprises a highlight and Layer 104, Select 106, and Window 108 are highlighted. Layer 104 is highlighted because the name includes the search word and/or user interface object that are accessible via Layer 104 (e.g., subsequent or lower-level nodes) include the search word. Select 106 and Window 108 do not include the search word “Layer” in their names, but are the top-level node in a sequence of choices or a path associated with a search result that does. An example associated with Window 108 is discussed in further detail below.
  • In the example shown, some portion of a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result is indicated using a visual cue. Each choice in a sequence or path may be a user interface object that is similarly searched. By indicating a path or sequence of choices using a visual cue, a new user may be able to learn about the features or capabilities of a computer application, and/or learn the path or sequence of menu choices, button pushes, and/or tab selections via which a command, operation or feature is invoked or otherwise accessed. Similarly, this may enable an experienced user to, for example, learn about new features of a new version of an application, or enable the user to search for the path to bring up a less frequently used dialogue box.
  • In various embodiments, the location or placement of a visual cue with respect to an associated user interface object varies. For example, in some embodiments, a visual cue is overlaid on an object. In some embodiments, a visual cue is a check, a star, or other mark placed adjacent to an object, surrounds an object, etc. In some embodiments, a path or sequence of choices that is indicated using a visual cue includes text and/or an icon. For example, in some embodiments, icons that are associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue. An icon may be an initial, intermediate, or end/terminal choice in a sequence of choices via which a search result is accessed.
  • Illustrating a path or sequence of choices as described may be more helpful to a user than some other techniques. For example, some applications have a help application or feature that includes search capabilities. Some of these help features are relatively resource intensive (e.g., with respect to shared processing or memory resources) and take resources away from the software application itself. Also, these help features may have their own separate display. These help displays may obstruct or block a user's view of the software application. Some other techniques highlight or otherwise illustrate only a search result and do not illustrate the path or sequence of choices that corresponds to a search result. In some cases this may not be as helpful, since a user would first have to correctly select all but one choice in a sequence in order to see the last choice (i.e., the user interface objects that resulted from a search) highlighted or otherwise indicated.
  • In some embodiments, a user interface is configured to be able to clear or otherwise remove visual cues that are displayed. For example, in some embodiments, a search interface may include a clear button. Pushing the clear button may cause the highlight or other visual cue to be removed and/or for search criteria to be cleared (e.g., the word “Layer” is removed from search box 102). In some embodiments, a new search causes visual cues associated with a previous search to be removed or cleared. In some embodiments, a visual cue is cleared as or after a user selects the choice corresponding to that visual cue.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a submenu associated with a pull down menu in which choices associated with search results are indicated using visual cues. In the example shown, a user has selected Window 108 (which is highlighted as a result of a search using the search word “Layer” entered into search box 102) and submenu 110 is displayed as a result of the user's selection of Window 108. A user may cause submenu 110 to be displayed in a variety of ways, for example by placing a mouse pointer over Window 108 and holding down or clicking a button of the mouse. Layer Comps 112 and Layer 114 in submenu 110 are highlighted. Both items contain the search word “Layer” and are indicated using a highlight, which is the visual cue for this example. To access the highlighted items Layer Comps 112 and Layer 114, Window 108 must first be selected. As such, Window 108 is indicated using a visual cue since it is included in the paths for Layer Comps 112 and Layers 114 even though Window 108 does not necessarily include the search word “Layers” in its name.
  • There may be any number of choices in a sequence of choices or path associated with a search result. In some embodiments, a path or sequence of choices does not necessarily end at an end or terminal object or item. For example, in some embodiments, a sequence of choices ends at an intermediate object or item that has subsequent or lower level choices associated with it. For example, if subsequent or lower level choices associated with Layers 114 (including all subsequent or lower level choices until end or terminal objects are reached) do not include the word “Layer,” in some embodiments Layers 114 would still be highlighted. Subsequent or lower level choices that do not satisfy a search are not necessarily highlighted or otherwise indicated using a visual cue.
  • In some embodiments, only the portion of a path that is currently being displayed is illustrated. That is, in some embodiments, submenu 110 will not automatically pop up or otherwise be automatically displayed if submenu 110 is not already being displayed. For example, a user may find it annoying to have submenu 110 and/or other windows, dialog boxes, or palettes pop up each time a search is performed.
  • As shown in this example, other portions of a path or sequence of choices are indicated as a user interacts with a user interface. For example, new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes are displayed as a user interacts with user interface 100. In some embodiments, visual cues (e.g., highlighting) are displayed until they are cleared and/or a new search is performed. This may, for example, enable a user to go through the entire path or sequence of choices to find the user interface object the user is searching for.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a tools window in which choices associated with a search result are indicated using a visual cue. In the example shown, a user has entered the word “Magic” in search box 102. Two tools accessible via tools window 112 that result from the search are the Magic Eraser tool and Magic Wand tool. In this example, the names of tools are searched and the search results include the Magic Eraser tool and the Magic Wand tool since both of their names include the word “magic.” In some embodiments, other information besides a name (e.g., a tag or metadata) is searched and/or the objects being searched include other objects in addition to or as an alternative to tools.
  • The Magic Wand tool is accessible via Magic Wand icon 115 in tools window 112. For example, by left-clicking on Magic Wand icon 115, a second row is displayed under pull down menu 101. This second row includes commands, features, and/or operations associated with the Magic Wand tool. To indicate that a path or sequence of choices to the Magic Wand tool includes Magic Wand icon 115, Magic Wand icon 115 is indicated using a visual cue. In this example, the visual cue comprises blinking, and Magic Wand icon 115 blinks.
  • The Magic Eraser tool is accessible via Eraser icon 116. To access the Magic Eraser tool, a user may place his mouse pointer over and right-click on Eraser Tool icon 116 to display a list of eraser tools, including Eraser tool, Background Eraser tool, and Magic Eraser tool (which may also be blinking). The user may move his mouse over the displayed list of eraser related tools and select the Magic Eraser tool, which in some embodiments is blinking in the displayed list. Since Eraser Tool icon 116 is included in a path or sequence of choices via which a search result (i.e., Magic Eraser tool) is accessible, Eraser Tool icon 116 is visually indicated using blinking.
  • In various embodiments, a visual cue comprises a variety of things. In some embodiments, a visual cue uses color or highlighting (e.g., an icon or text that is colored and other icons or text are grey or black). In some embodiments, a border or outline is used. In some embodiments, a visual cue is a mark or some indicator displayed adjacent to a selection or choice. In some embodiments, some font effect is used, such as italicizing, bold typing, or underlining. In some embodiments, a visual cue is time varying. For example, in some embodiments a visual cue uses blinking, fading in/out, moving, etc.
  • FIG. 4 is flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects and indicating at least a portion of a sequence of choices associated with a search result. In the example shown, a user interface associated with an application is configured so that a user is able to search through objects associated with the object interface.
  • At 400, one or more search criteria are received. For example, a user may provide one or more words to search for via a search interface. In various embodiments, a search interface comprises a palette, a search box embedded into the menu bar of a user interface (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 1-3), etc.
  • Object(s) associated with a user interface are searched based at least in part on search criteria to obtain a search result at 402. In some embodiments, a collection of information that contains information associated with user interface objects is obtained and searched through. Some embodiments of searching are described in further detail below.
  • At 404, for each search result, a sequence of one or more choices is obtained that is associated with accessing that search result. For example, the path of a search result is traced or crawled through the tree or hierarchy of the user interface until the highest point or initial choice is reached. An embodiment of this is discussed in further detail below.
  • At 406, for each search result, a visual cue is displayed for at least a portion of the corresponding sequence of one or more choices. For example, the portion that is displayed may be the portion that is currently displayed. As additional portions of the sequence or path are displayed (e.g., as a user causes windows, dialogue boxes, or submenus associated with pull down menus to be displayed), visual cues are displayed for those newly displayed portions. Some techniques for displaying a visual cue are described in further detail below.
  • In some cases there is more than one path or sequence associated with a search result. In some embodiments, all paths or sequences associated with a particular search result are displayed. In some embodiments, more than one user interface object satisfies the search criteria. In some embodiments, paths are displayed for a subset of the user interface objects that satisfy the search criteria (e.g., user interface objects are ranked and paths are visually indicated for those user interface objects with the highest rankings).
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for searching user interface objects. In the example shown, a collection of information that includes information associated with user interface objects is obtained and searched. In some embodiments, the illustrated process is used at 502 to perform a search. In some embodiments, other techniques besides the example illustrated are used.
  • At 500, a collection of information associated with user interface objects is accessed. In some embodiments, a collection of information comprises one or more files, databases, tables, etc. In some embodiments, a collection of information is a relatively small collection of information so that a search may be performed relatively quickly and/or using relatively few resources. In some embodiments, a collection of information is organized or otherwise arranged to enable faster searching.
  • In some embodiments, a collection of information accessed at 500 includes names of user interface objects. In some embodiments, a collection of information includes other information in addition to or as an alternative to names. For example, in some embodiments, metadata associated with user interface objects is included in a collection of information that is searched. In some embodiments, metadata includes information assigned to a user interface object by a developer associated with the user interface. For example, metadata may be used to include alternate or root forms of a word so that if a user searches on the word “Coloring” a user object with a name that includes “Color” would be included in the search results. In some cases, metadata includes synonyms of a word. In some cases, metadata includes a general category or classification associated with a file system object. Metadata may include a variety of information in various embodiments.
  • In some embodiments, a collection of information that is searched includes one or more tags associated with user interface objects. In some embodiments, a tag is specified by a user (e.g., the user currently interacting with a user interface or another user). For example, a user may user a certain command infrequently. To locate a path associated with the command later, the user may assign a tag to a user interface object associated with the command. For example, the tag may be “Jackpot” or something else the user will remember to use as a search word later on. In some embodiments, a tag is applied to more than one user interface object. This may, for example, enable a user to be able to find paths for a user-defined set of objects.
  • In some embodiments, a collection of information that is searched is not part of or is not associated with a help feature. For example, some help features associated with user interfaces are very resource intensive. In some cases, there are many help files or other data associated with a help feature and searching through these help files may be time consuming.
  • At 502, the collection of information is searched through based at least in part on search criteria. In some embodiments, one or more search parameters are used in searching. Some or all of these search parameters may user specified. In some embodiments, a search parameter includes a maximum number of search results to display paths for, Boolean operators to use (e.g., use the Boolean operator AND so that a search result contains all search criteria, or use the Boolean operator OR so that a search result contains at least one of the search criteria), etc. In some embodiments, a search parameter is set to a default or initial value.
  • User interface objects that match search criteria are added to a collection of search results at 504. In some embodiments, all search results that are found are used in subsequent processing (e.g., determining paths associated with search results, displaying visual cues, etc.). In some embodiments, not all search results are added to a collection of search results. For example, in some embodiments, search results are ranked and only a certain number of search results are processed further. In some embodiments, a maximum number of search results (should such a maximum be used) is specified by a user.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for determining a path or sequence of choices associated with a search result. In the example shown, the process is used in some embodiments at 404.
  • At 600, a first search result is obtained from collection of search results. In various embodiments, search results in a collection are processed in various orders. At 602, a current node is set to the location of current search result. The current node may be used to track where in a tree or hierarchy associated with a user interface a process is currently at. A parent of the current node is determined at 604. In some cases, there is more than one parent. In some embodiments, the process determines all paths associated with a given search result. For example, a process may remember the current node at which there where multiple parents, copy the path up to the branch, and return later to continue tracing the other path from the branch upwards.
  • At 606, the current node is set to a parent and a parent is added to the path. It is determined at 608 whether a current node is a top level node. Referring back to the example of FIG. 2, Layer 104, Select 106, and Window 108 are top level nodes. Layer Comps 112 and Layers 114 are not top level nodes.
  • If a current node is not a top level node, a parent of the current node is determined at 604. Otherwise, it is decided at 610 whether it is the last search result. If it is not the last search result, a next search result is obtained from the collection of search results at 612.
  • In some embodiments, a different technique is used to obtain a path associated with a search result. For example, in some embodiments, paths are pre-determined and stored in a library, file, database, or table of paths. A process may retrieve this stored information to obtain a path associated with a given user interface object.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying visual cues for the portion of a sequence of choices that is currently being displayed. In the example shown, the technique may be used for user interfaces associated with a software application running on a computer, a web-based application, or a client-server application. Some of the techniques described may be modified as appropriate based on the implementation or environment of a particular embodiment.
  • At 700, portions of sequences that are currently being displayed are determined. At 702, identifiers are obtained for each object in portions that are currently being displayed. In some embodiments each user interface object is associated with a unique identifier which is used to identify a given user interface object. An identifier may be passed to, for example, an Application Programming Interface (API) when requesting an API to indicate part of a path by, for example, redrawing or redisplaying a user interface object to have a visual cue. At 704, using the identifiers, an appropriate entity is requested to redraw objects with a visual cue for portions currently being displayed.
  • In some embodiments, as a user changes a display (e.g., by causing new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes to be displayed) new portions of paths are displayed. Visual cues may be displayed for these newly exposed objects using various techniques. In some embodiments visual cues are indicated on the fly and corresponding processing is triggered each time a user causes the display of a user interface to change. For example, as a user traverses through the path and causes new windows, dialog boxes, or palettes to be displayed, newly exposed portions of paths are determined and visual cues for those newly exposed portions are displayed. In some embodiments, the processed described above (or some modified version of it) is repeated as new submenus, tabs, dialog boxes or other objects are visually exposed. In some embodiments, modifications or changes associated with displaying visual cues are performed ahead of time (e.g., to reduce processing). For example, even though a given object in a path may not necessarily be displayed at the time a search is performed, data associated with that object is modified so that should it be displayed, the object will have a visual cue displayed with it.
  • In some embodiments, one or more resource files are used in displaying a visual cue associated with a path. For example, a resource file may be compiled into a software application. When the software application is initiated, a resource file is loaded into memory. An identifier associated with a user interface object (for which a visual cue will be displayed) is passed to a resource file and an index is obtained. This index may be passed to an API and the API may be instructed to, for example, color (or use some other visual cue) user interface object.
  • Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims (21)

1-24. (canceled)
25. A method, comprising:
identifying, in response to a search, an interface object that is accessible via a user interface of a software application;
determining a path or sequence of choices that enables access to the interface object in the user interface; and
displaying a visual cue on the user interface that indicates at least a first portion of the path or sequence of choices.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the search includes a keyword search or a graphical search.
27. The method of claim 25, wherein determining the path or sequence of choices includes determining a plurality of menu selections that provides access to the interface object, and wherein the interface object is configured to invoke a particular command, operation, feature, or capability of the software application.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein displaying the visual cue comprises surrounding, marking, or highlighting one or more of the plurality of menu selections.
29. The method of claim 25, wherein displaying the visual cue comprises surrounding, marking, or highlighting the interface object.
30. The method of claim 25, further comprising displaying another visual cue on the user interface that indicates at least a second portion of the path or sequence of choices.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the displaying of the another visual cue is in response to a selection corresponding to the first portion of the path or sequence of choices.
32. The method of claim 25, wherein the software application includes a web-based application, a client-server application, or a network application.
33. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by a computer system, cause the computer system to perform operations comprising:
identifying an interface object of a software application;
determining a path or sequence of choices that exposes a corresponding interface object in a new version of the software application; and
displaying a visual cue that indicates at least a first portion of the path or sequence of choices in the new version of the software application.
34. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein identifying the interface object includes performing a keyword search or a graphical search.
35. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein the interface object is configured to invoke a particular command, operation, feature, or capability of the new version of the software application.
36. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein determining the path or sequence of choices includes determining a plurality of menu selections that exposes the corresponding interface object.
37. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 36, wherein displaying the visual cue comprises surrounding, marking, or highlighting one or more of the plurality of menu selections.
38. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, further comprising displaying another visual cue on the user interface that indicates at least a second portion of the path or sequence of choices in response to a selection corresponding to the first portion of the path or sequence of choices.
39. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein the software application is one of a web-based application, a client-server application, or a network application.
40. A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory coupled to the processor and configured to store program instructions which, upon execution, cause the system to:
identify an interface object of a software application, wherein the interface object is configured to invoke a particular command, operation, feature, or capability of the software application;
determine a path or sequence of choices that exposes the interface object in the software application; and
display a visual cue that indicates at least a first portion of the path or sequence of choices in the software application.
41. The system of claim 40, wherein to identify the interface object, the system performs a keyword search or a graphical search.
42. The system of claim 40, wherein to display the visual cue, the system surrounds, marks, or highlights the interface object.
43. The system claim 40, wherein the program instructions, upon execution, cause the system to display another visual cue that indicates at least a second portion of the path or sequence of choices.
44. The system of claim 40, wherein the software application is a web-based application, a client-server application, or a network application.
US13/042,250 2006-08-04 2011-03-07 Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search Abandoned US20110161812A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/042,250 US20110161812A1 (en) 2006-08-04 2011-03-07 Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/499,441 US7904446B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2006-08-04 Searchable menu system via keyword search
US13/042,250 US20110161812A1 (en) 2006-08-04 2011-03-07 Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/499,441 Continuation US7904446B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2006-08-04 Searchable menu system via keyword search

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110161812A1 true US20110161812A1 (en) 2011-06-30

Family

ID=43639383

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/499,441 Active 2028-03-17 US7904446B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2006-08-04 Searchable menu system via keyword search
US13/042,250 Abandoned US20110161812A1 (en) 2006-08-04 2011-03-07 Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/499,441 Active 2028-03-17 US7904446B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2006-08-04 Searchable menu system via keyword search

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7904446B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150381831A1 (en) * 2014-06-25 2015-12-31 Konica Minolta, Inc. Image processing apparatus, screen display method for the same, and recording medium
CN105739989A (en) * 2016-02-15 2016-07-06 北京金山安全软件有限公司 Method and device for setting system search box and electronic equipment

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7992106B2 (en) * 2007-01-08 2011-08-02 Varia Holdings Llc Menu trails for a portable media player
US9697016B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2017-07-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Search augmented menu and configuration for computer applications
US8583678B2 (en) * 2011-11-21 2013-11-12 Sap Portals Israel Ltd Graphical exploration of a database
US9141707B2 (en) * 2012-07-19 2015-09-22 Facebook, Inc. Context-based object retrieval in a social networking system
WO2015044625A1 (en) 2013-09-27 2015-04-02 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Search system interface

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020194164A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2002-12-19 Microsoft Corporation Answer wizard drop-down control
US20040061720A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Matt Weber Multi-function browser toolbar with method for online institutional administrative browser control
US20050010563A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2005-01-13 William Gross Internet search application
US6901446B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2005-05-31 Microsoft Corp. System and method for describing and automatically managing resources
US20060080432A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-13 Spataro Jared M Systems and methods for collaboration
US20060129915A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2006-06-15 Ning-Ping Chan Blinking annotation callouts highlighting cross language search results
US7181438B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2007-02-20 Alberti Anemometer, Llc Database access system
US20080005101A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-01-03 Rohit Chandra Method and apparatus for determining the significance and relevance of a web page, or a portion thereof
US7353246B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2008-04-01 Miva Direct, Inc. System and method for enabling information associations
US7456832B1 (en) * 1989-05-15 2008-11-25 International Business Machines Corporation Object database-driven interactive shell for a data processing system
US7979796B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2011-07-12 Apple Inc. Searching for commands and other elements of a user interface

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7149983B1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2006-12-12 Microsoft Corporation User interface and method to facilitate hierarchical specification of queries using an information taxonomy
US7451455B1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2008-11-11 Microsoft Corporation Apparatus and method for automatically manipulating software products

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7456832B1 (en) * 1989-05-15 2008-11-25 International Business Machines Corporation Object database-driven interactive shell for a data processing system
US7181438B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2007-02-20 Alberti Anemometer, Llc Database access system
US7353246B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2008-04-01 Miva Direct, Inc. System and method for enabling information associations
US6901446B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2005-05-31 Microsoft Corp. System and method for describing and automatically managing resources
US20020194164A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2002-12-19 Microsoft Corporation Answer wizard drop-down control
US6983271B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2006-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Answer wizard drop-down control
US20040061720A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Matt Weber Multi-function browser toolbar with method for online institutional administrative browser control
US20060129915A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2006-06-15 Ning-Ping Chan Blinking annotation callouts highlighting cross language search results
US20050010563A1 (en) * 2003-05-15 2005-01-13 William Gross Internet search application
US20060080432A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-13 Spataro Jared M Systems and methods for collaboration
US7979796B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2011-07-12 Apple Inc. Searching for commands and other elements of a user interface
US20080005101A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-01-03 Rohit Chandra Method and apparatus for determining the significance and relevance of a web page, or a portion thereof

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150381831A1 (en) * 2014-06-25 2015-12-31 Konica Minolta, Inc. Image processing apparatus, screen display method for the same, and recording medium
CN105739989A (en) * 2016-02-15 2016-07-06 北京金山安全软件有限公司 Method and device for setting system search box and electronic equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7904446B1 (en) 2011-03-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Van Welie et al. Interaction patterns in user interfaces
US5982370A (en) Highlighting tool for search specification in a user interface of a computer system
US20110161812A1 (en) Searchable Menu system via Keyword Search
US9411788B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for improved navigation among controlled terms in one or more user documents
US7614016B2 (en) Multiple roots in navigation pane
US5696916A (en) Information storage and retrieval system and display method therefor
RU2405186C2 (en) Operating system program launch menu search
US6434554B1 (en) Method for querying a database in which a query statement is issued to a database management system for which data types can be defined
US7802194B2 (en) Business query language
RU2367013C2 (en) System and method for dynamic generation of extension which allows for search selection
US7661074B2 (en) Keyboard accelerator
US7512904B2 (en) Operating system launch menu program listing
US7383269B2 (en) Navigating a software project repository
CA2266457C (en) System and method for search and retrieval of digital information
US7890499B1 (en) Presentation of search results with common subject matters
US7644374B2 (en) Computer input control for specifying scope with explicit exclusions
US7849419B2 (en) Computer-implemented graphical user interface previews
US20100257479A1 (en) Graphical User Interface with Dynamic Toolbar Search Functionality
US7549130B2 (en) Pattern-based keyboard controls
JPH08241336A (en) Apparatus and method for retrieval
WO2010000074A1 (en) Method and system for applying metadata to data sets of file objects
US7908586B1 (en) Collapse on content property
GB2260007A (en) Information storage/retrieval system and display method
CA2666305A1 (en) Method, system, and program for supporting object selection in web page authoring
Becker et al. Software tools for formal concept analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION