US20120265756A1 - Method for determining relevant search results - Google Patents

Method for determining relevant search results Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120265756A1
US20120265756A1 US13/315,086 US201113315086A US2012265756A1 US 20120265756 A1 US20120265756 A1 US 20120265756A1 US 201113315086 A US201113315086 A US 201113315086A US 2012265756 A1 US2012265756 A1 US 2012265756A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
keyword
measure
search
result
search term
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/315,086
Inventor
Shaun William Ryan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
S L I Systems Inc
Original Assignee
S L I Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by S L I Systems Inc filed Critical S L I Systems Inc
Assigned to S.L.I. SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment S.L.I. SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RYAN, SHAUN WILLIAM
Publication of US20120265756A1 publication Critical patent/US20120265756A1/en
Priority to US14/524,984 priority Critical patent/US9460161B2/en
Priority to US15/264,584 priority patent/US9990442B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903Querying
    • G06F16/9032Query formulation
    • G06F16/90324Query formulation using system suggestions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2457Query processing with adaptation to user needs
    • G06F16/24578Query processing with adaptation to user needs using ranking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/3331Query processing
    • G06F16/3332Query translation
    • G06F16/3334Selection or weighting of terms from queries, including natural language queries
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/3331Query processing
    • G06F16/3332Query translation
    • G06F16/3338Query expansion
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/951Indexing; Web crawling techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0623Item investigation
    • G06Q30/0625Directed, with specific intent or strategy

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of determining relevant search results.
  • the present invention relates to determining relevant search results for keywords suggested following receiving an at least partial search term.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,564,213 describes one such system and associated methods for suggesting auto-completion strings to users during entry of search terms.
  • the suggested strings are based on attributes such as popularity (resulting in the best-selling product, or most frequently accessed link) specific to the database being searched.
  • Such a method still requires users to conduct the search before gaining access to potentially relevant results.
  • minimising the number of steps, or amount of time it takes for a user to gain access to relevant results, could be useful. Even providing a point of difference in searching functionality could be a significant advantage.
  • a computer implemented method for determining search results comprising the steps of:
  • a computer program product tangibly embodied on a machine readable medium, the computer program product comprising instructions that, when read by a machine, operate to cause data processing apparatus to:
  • keyword will be understood to mean a searchable word in an online record or database.
  • a keyword is a complete word or phrase that relates to the at least partial search term.
  • the keyword may be an extension of the partial search term, or a corrected spelling thereof, or a combination.
  • the keyword may be a synonym of the search term.
  • the at least partial search term may be an empty string, having no characters, as known in the art.
  • all keywords available to the system would be identified as being based on the search term and subsequently used in providing at least one of the results as a search result based on the relevance measure.
  • Reference to a keyword measure should be understood to mean a quantified representation of the likelihood of a keyword being relevant to a user conducting a search.
  • the keyword measure may indicate the likelihood of the keyword being the intended search term in view of the at least partial search term.
  • the keyword measure may relate to popularity of the keyword. This may be determined by any number of methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, popularity may reflect the number of times a keyword has been entered into the text entry field within a predetermined time period. This may be a time weighted calculation, with more recent searching being given a higher weighting.
  • the keyword measure may also be based on or influenced by the selection of the keyword following presentation in a list of suggested keywords, using a similar concept to the invention described in the Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 7,725,422.
  • the search measure may be any way by which the likelihood of a search result being relevant to a keyword may be quantified.
  • the search measure may be influenced or based on the number of times a search result is selected following a keyword search, or by ratings manually given by a user according to their perceived relevance of the result.
  • the search result may be any virtual object such as a website, a product name or associated webpage, or a catalogue, to which a user may be directed, or open in a new tab or window.
  • Each search result is preferably represented by a unique identifier, for example a URL, such that results relating to more than one keyword can be identified to avoid repetition of search results for the at least partial search term.
  • the calculation for determining a relevance measure for each result may comprise multiplication of the keyword measure by the search measure. It should be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and other calculations involving the keyword measure and search measure may be used.
  • the search results are ranked according to relevance measure.
  • an overall relevance measure for a result appearing in the search results associated with more than one keyword is determined by summing the relevance measures determined for the result in relation to each keyword.
  • steps of the invention may be performed, for example, by a website, or by a search module associated with or external to the website.
  • a list of most relevant results for the at least partial search term is displayed together with a list of suggested keywords for potential selection by the user. It should be appreciated that while it is envisaged that the most relevant results may be presented in order of ranking, this should not be considered a limitation.
  • each result being displayed may comprise an image of the product, and a description of the product.
  • this display may be on a dropdown display beneath the search form, with the relevant results being displayed below the list of suggested keywords.
  • Alternative embodiments include showing the relevant results without the keywords, or displaying the results in other positions relative to the keywords,
  • the suggested keywords and therefore most relevant results may be dynamically re-identified or redetermined and displayed accordingly.
  • a user highlighting a suggested keyword may cause the associated keyword measure to be temporarily increased. In turn, this may influence the most relevant search results presented at that time.
  • Monitoring of a graphical user interface such as a text entry field, or search form, for entry of an at least partial search term and suggesting relevant keywords may be achieved by any suitable means known to a person skilled in the art. Such functionality is commonly known as “auto-completion”, and may be referred to as such throughout the present specification.
  • the keywords are retrieved from a database of previously used search terms.
  • the database may comprise previously used search terms for the website being used, or any other website.
  • Keyword measures search results
  • relevance measures may be achieved using any suitable means known to a person skilled in the art.
  • firmware and/or software also known as a computer program
  • the techniques of the present invention may be implemented as instructions (for example, procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described. It should be appreciated that the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming languages, and that a variety of programming languages could be used to implement the present invention.
  • the firmware and/or software codes may be stored in a memory, or embodied in any other processor readable medium, and executed by a processor or processors.
  • the memory may be implemented within the processor or external to the processor.
  • a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine.
  • a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, for example, a combination of a digital signal processor (DSP) and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • the processors may function in conjunction with servers and network connections as known in the art.
  • steps of a method, process, or algorithm described in connection with the present invention may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two.
  • the various steps or acts in a method or process may be performed in the order shown, or may be performed in another order. Additionally, one or more process or method steps may be omitted or one or more process or method steps may be added to the methods and processes. An additional step, block, or action may be added in the beginning, end, or intervening existing elements of the methods and processes.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an environment in which one embodiment of the present invention may be implemented
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of a webpage displayed in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system ( 1 ) in which one embodiment of the present invention may be implemented.
  • the system ( 1 ) includes user devices such as personal computer ( 2 ) and mobile phone ( 3 ).
  • the user devices may communicate with a server device ( 4 ) over a network ( 5 )—for example the Internet.
  • the server device ( 4 ) includes a processor ( 6 ) coupled to processor memory ( 7 ).
  • the memory ( 7 ) contains a program for performing the method described with reference to FIG. 2 when executed by the processor ( 6 ).
  • the server device ( 4 ) may also access a database ( 8 ) storing search terms, keywords, keyword measures, search results, search measures, and relevance measures in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • system ( 1 ) illustrated is not intended to be limiting, and that the present invention may be implemented using alternative architecture as known in the art.
  • the functionality of the server device ( 4 ) may be allocated across a plurality of devices, or comprise a plurality of processors.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method (generally illustrated by arrow 100 ) for determining relevant results following reception of an at least partial search term.
  • the method ( 100 ) begins at step 101 , where an at least partial search term is received.
  • an at least partial search term is received.
  • a user enters the partial search term “VIT” into a text box providing a search field in a health product website, such as described below in relation to FIG. 2 .
  • the website recognises that text has been provided and passes the text or string to a search module.
  • a number of suggested keywords based on the at least partial search term are identified, the keywords being retrieved from a database of previously used search terms. For example, in response to the partial search term “VIT”, the keywords “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, “hair vitamins”, “vitamin e” and “prenatal vitamins” are identified. Each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times the keyword has been searched for previously.
  • a number of possible search results for each of the keywords “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, “hair vitamins”, “vitamin e” and “prenatal vitamins” are identified.
  • the keyword measure is multiplied by the search measure associated with each possible search result to determine a relevance measure for each possible search result.
  • the possible search results are ranked in order of relevance measure.
  • At step 104 at least one of the results is provided to the website for presentation as a search result for the at least partial search term. For example, the top five possible search results by relevance measure are provided for presentation as a search result for the at least partial search term.
  • k 1 ,km 1 ( sr 11 ,sm 11), ( sr 12 ,sm 12) . . . , ( sr 1 N,sr 1 N );
  • a relevance, or overall relevance measure may be determined as follows:
  • rm_sr 12 (km 1 *sm 12 )+(km 3 *sm 32 ); and so on.
  • the latter example illustrates one way of calculating the relevance measure of a search result where the same search result is associated with more than one keyword.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a portion of a webpage (generally indicated by arrow 200 ) for presenting suggested keywords and relevant results to a user.
  • the webpage ( 200 ) comprises a search form ( 201 ) into which a user may enter a search term.
  • a search term for example “VIT”
  • the method as described in relation to FIG. 1 is performed, and a dropdown box ( 202 ) is presented.
  • the dropdown box ( 202 ) comprises a list of suggested keywords ( 203 ), for example “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, and “hair vitamins”, each of which may be selected by the user.
  • the dropdown box ( 202 ) also comprises a list of most relevant results ( 204 ) associated with the keywords, each of which may also be selected by the user.
  • the most relevant results are based on the relevance measure which, in some embodiments, is the sum of the products of the associated keyword measure and corresponding search measure.
  • Each result within the list of relevant results ( 204 ) comprises an image ( 205 ) of a product associated with the result, the title or label ( 206 ) of the product, and a description ( 207 ) of the product.

Abstract

Systems and methods for determining search results. The method may include receiving an at least partial search term, and identifying keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period. For each keyword search results associated with the keyword may be identified, wherein each result has an associated search measure. A relevance measure may be determined for each result using the keyword measure the search measure, and used to provide at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is based on the New Zealand Patent Application Number 589787 filed 8 Dec. 2010, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a method of determining relevant search results. In particular the present invention relates to determining relevant search results for keywords suggested following receiving an at least partial search term.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • With internet access becoming more readily available, and users becoming more sophisticated in the use of same, searching for data has become a key aspect of the online experience. This has had a particular impact on those operating in the area of electronic commerce (e-commerce), from parties such as online retailers seeking to make their stock more readily accessible, to search engine providers looking to capitalise on such demand by providing a service.
  • There are a wide array of existing techniques intended to enable a search engine user to quickly and easily locate or identify relevant results. These include ranking search results for a keyword based on the frequency with which users have selected the result following a search, or auto-completion of partially entered search terms, among many others.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,564,213 describes one such system and associated methods for suggesting auto-completion strings to users during entry of search terms. The suggested strings are based on attributes such as popularity (resulting in the best-selling product, or most frequently accessed link) specific to the database being searched. Such a method still requires users to conduct the search before gaining access to potentially relevant results.
  • The provision of relevant results is particularly important to online retailers, where the ease with which a customer can find a desired product or service can directly correlate to sales, and customer loyalty.
  • With the normalisation of e-commerce and the increasing number of online retailers and searching providers being established, competition to gain or maintain market share is intensifying. With users becoming more sophisticated and critical of website appearance and functionality, any improvement or innovation can be useful in gaining a competitive edge.
  • In particular, minimising the number of steps, or amount of time it takes for a user to gain access to relevant results, could be useful. Even providing a point of difference in searching functionality could be a significant advantage.
  • It is an object of the present invention to address the foregoing problems or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
  • All references, including any patents or patent applications cited in this specification are hereby incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any reference constitutes prior art. The discussion of the references states what their authors assert, and the applicants reserve the right to challenge the accuracy and pertinency of the cited documents. It will be clearly understood that, although a number of prior art publications are referred to herein, this reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents form part of the common general knowledge in the art, in New Zealand or in any other country.
  • Throughout this specification, the word “comprise”, or variations thereof such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.
  • Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only.
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer implemented method for determining search results, comprising the steps of:
      • receiving an at least partial search term;
      • identifying keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
      • for each keyword:
        • identifying search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
        • determining a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
      • providing at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
  • According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer program product, tangibly embodied on a machine readable medium, the computer program product comprising instructions that, when read by a machine, operate to cause data processing apparatus to:
      • receive an at least partial search term;
      • identify keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
      • for each keyword:
        • identify search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
        • determine a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
      • provide at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
  • According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a system comprising:
      • at least one processor; and
      • at least one storage device storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
      • receiving an at least partial search term;
      • identifying keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
      • for each keyword:
        • identifying search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
        • determining a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
      • providing at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
  • In this context, “keyword” will be understood to mean a searchable word in an online record or database. Typically, a keyword is a complete word or phrase that relates to the at least partial search term. For example, the keyword may be an extension of the partial search term, or a corrected spelling thereof, or a combination. Alternatively, the keyword may be a synonym of the search term.
  • It should be appreciated that the at least partial search term may be an empty string, having no characters, as known in the art. In this case, all keywords available to the system would be identified as being based on the search term and subsequently used in providing at least one of the results as a search result based on the relevance measure.
  • Reference to a keyword measure should be understood to mean a quantified representation of the likelihood of a keyword being relevant to a user conducting a search. For example, the keyword measure may indicate the likelihood of the keyword being the intended search term in view of the at least partial search term.
  • In a preferred embodiment the keyword measure may relate to popularity of the keyword. This may be determined by any number of methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, popularity may reflect the number of times a keyword has been entered into the text entry field within a predetermined time period. This may be a time weighted calculation, with more recent searching being given a higher weighting.
  • The keyword measure may also be based on or influenced by the selection of the keyword following presentation in a list of suggested keywords, using a similar concept to the invention described in the Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 7,725,422.
  • Similarly, the search measure may be any way by which the likelihood of a search result being relevant to a keyword may be quantified. For example, the search measure may be influenced or based on the number of times a search result is selected following a keyword search, or by ratings manually given by a user according to their perceived relevance of the result.
  • While the present invention may have particular application to online retailers and site specific search engines, it is envisaged that it may be utilised by broader searching applications. As such, the search result may be any virtual object such as a website, a product name or associated webpage, or a catalogue, to which a user may be directed, or open in a new tab or window.
  • Each search result is preferably represented by a unique identifier, for example a URL, such that results relating to more than one keyword can be identified to avoid repetition of search results for the at least partial search term.
  • It is envisaged that the calculation for determining a relevance measure for each result may comprise multiplication of the keyword measure by the search measure. It should be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and other calculations involving the keyword measure and search measure may be used.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the search results are ranked according to relevance measure.
  • Preferably, an overall relevance measure for a result appearing in the search results associated with more than one keyword is determined by summing the relevance measures determined for the result in relation to each keyword.
  • It should be appreciated that the steps of the invention may be performed, for example, by a website, or by a search module associated with or external to the website.
  • In a preferred embodiment, a list of most relevant results for the at least partial search term is displayed together with a list of suggested keywords for potential selection by the user. It should be appreciated that while it is envisaged that the most relevant results may be presented in order of ranking, this should not be considered a limitation.
  • In the example of a product, each result being displayed may comprise an image of the product, and a description of the product.
  • It is envisaged that in one embodiment this display may be on a dropdown display beneath the search form, with the relevant results being displayed below the list of suggested keywords.
  • Alternative embodiments include showing the relevant results without the keywords, or displaying the results in other positions relative to the keywords,
  • As continuations or updates of the partial search term, or a new at least partial search term, are received the suggested keywords and therefore most relevant results may be dynamically re-identified or redetermined and displayed accordingly.
  • It is envisaged that a user highlighting a suggested keyword (whether hovering over the keyword or scrolling down the list) may cause the associated keyword measure to be temporarily increased. In turn, this may influence the most relevant search results presented at that time.
  • A person skilled in art should appreciate that limitations to the precise number of suggested keywords, search results associated with the keyword, or contained in the list of most relevant results are not significant to working of the present invention. Although there is likely to be a degree of diminishing returns, the predominant influence on these factors will be a particular provider's capabilities and desired specifications.
  • Monitoring of a graphical user interface such as a text entry field, or search form, for entry of an at least partial search term and suggesting relevant keywords may be achieved by any suitable means known to a person skilled in the art. Such functionality is commonly known as “auto-completion”, and may be referred to as such throughout the present specification.
  • Preferably, the keywords are retrieved from a database of previously used search terms. For example, the database may comprise previously used search terms for the website being used, or any other website.
  • However, there are many techniques known in the art for suggestion or auto-completion of keywords based on entries into a search form. It should be appreciated that the present invention may utilise any number of algorithms or strategies to achieve this functionality, and particular embodiments have been described for the purposes of clarity.
  • Similarly, the creation and maintenance of database structures storing keywords, search results, and associated data such as the keyword measures, search measures, and relevance measures may be achieved using any suitable means known to a person skilled in the art.
  • For a firmware and/or software (also known as a computer program) implementation, the techniques of the present invention may be implemented as instructions (for example, procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described. It should be appreciated that the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming languages, and that a variety of programming languages could be used to implement the present invention. The firmware and/or software codes may be stored in a memory, or embodied in any other processor readable medium, and executed by a processor or processors. The memory may be implemented within the processor or external to the processor.
  • A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, for example, a combination of a digital signal processor (DSP) and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. The processors may function in conjunction with servers and network connections as known in the art.
  • The steps of a method, process, or algorithm described in connection with the present invention may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. The various steps or acts in a method or process may be performed in the order shown, or may be performed in another order. Additionally, one or more process or method steps may be omitted or one or more process or method steps may be added to the methods and processes. An additional step, block, or action may be added in the beginning, end, or intervening existing elements of the methods and processes.
  • The present invention provides at least the following advantages:
      • Increased conversion rate as the result of people being more likely to find a particular product; and
      • Increased user satisfaction by enabling them to identify a desired result more rapidly.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an environment in which one embodiment of the present invention may be implemented;
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of a webpage displayed in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system (1) in which one embodiment of the present invention may be implemented.
  • The system (1) includes user devices such as personal computer (2) and mobile phone (3). The user devices may communicate with a server device (4) over a network (5)—for example the Internet.
  • The server device (4) includes a processor (6) coupled to processor memory (7). The memory (7) contains a program for performing the method described with reference to FIG. 2 when executed by the processor (6). The server device (4) may also access a database (8) storing search terms, keywords, keyword measures, search results, search measures, and relevance measures in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • It should be appreciated that the system (1) illustrated is not intended to be limiting, and that the present invention may be implemented using alternative architecture as known in the art. For example, the functionality of the server device (4) may be allocated across a plurality of devices, or comprise a plurality of processors.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method (generally illustrated by arrow 100) for determining relevant results following reception of an at least partial search term.
  • The method (100) begins at step 101, where an at least partial search term is received. For example, a user enters the partial search term “VIT” into a text box providing a search field in a health product website, such as described below in relation to FIG. 2. The website recognises that text has been provided and passes the text or string to a search module.
  • At step 102, a number of suggested keywords based on the at least partial search term are identified, the keywords being retrieved from a database of previously used search terms. For example, in response to the partial search term “VIT”, the keywords “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, “hair vitamins”, “vitamin e” and “prenatal vitamins” are identified. Each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times the keyword has been searched for previously.
  • For each keyword:
      • a number of search results associated with the keyword are identified (step 102). Such search results are possible search results should the keyword be used as a search term. Using the example keyword “vitamin d”, results include those products sold by the website which are directed to, or at least include, vitamin d. Each result has an associated search measure indicating the frequency with which the result is selected following a search for the keyword; and
      • a relevance measure for each result is determined (step 103) by multiplying the keyword measure by the search measure.
  • In the example, a number of possible search results for each of the keywords “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, “hair vitamins”, “vitamin e” and “prenatal vitamins” are identified. The keyword measure is multiplied by the search measure associated with each possible search result to determine a relevance measure for each possible search result. In this embodiment, the possible search results are ranked in order of relevance measure.
  • At step 104, at least one of the results is provided to the website for presentation as a search result for the at least partial search term. For example, the top five possible search results by relevance measure are provided for presentation as a search result for the at least partial search term.
  • The following example illustrates associations between the various integers of the present invention, where k=a keyword, km=a keyword measure, sr=a search result, and sm=a search measure.

  • k1,km1:(sr11,sm11), (sr12,sm12) . . . , (sr1N,sr1N);

  • k2,km2:(sr21,sm21), (sr22,sm22) . . . ; and

  • k3,km3:(sr31,sm31), (sr12,sm32) . . . .
  • For each search result, a relevance, or overall relevance measure (rm) may be determined as follows:

  • rm sr11=km1*sm11;
  • rm_sr12=(km1*sm12)+(km3*sm32); and so on. The latter example illustrates one way of calculating the relevance measure of a search result where the same search result is associated with more than one keyword.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a portion of a webpage (generally indicated by arrow 200) for presenting suggested keywords and relevant results to a user.
  • The webpage (200) comprises a search form (201) into which a user may enter a search term.
  • Once the user begins to enter a search term, for example “VIT”, into the search form (201), the method as described in relation to FIG. 1 is performed, and a dropdown box (202) is presented.
  • The dropdown box (202) comprises a list of suggested keywords (203), for example “vitamin d”, “vitamin b complex”, and “hair vitamins”, each of which may be selected by the user.
  • The dropdown box (202) also comprises a list of most relevant results (204) associated with the keywords, each of which may also be selected by the user. The most relevant results are based on the relevance measure which, in some embodiments, is the sum of the products of the associated keyword measure and corresponding search measure.
  • Each result within the list of relevant results (204) comprises an image (205) of a product associated with the result, the title or label (206) of the product, and a description (207) of the product.
  • Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (18)

1. A computer implemented method for determining search results, comprising the steps of:
receiving an at least partial search term;
identifying keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
for each keyword:
identifying search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
determining a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
providing at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the keyword measure is time weighted to give more recently searched for keywords a higher weighting.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the search measure is based on the number of times a search result is selected following a keyword search.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the relevance measure for each result is determined by multiplying the respective keyword measure by the respective search measure.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an overall relevance measure for a result appearing in the search results associated with more than one keyword by summing the relevance measures determined for the result in relation to each keyword.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising ranking the search results for the at least partial search term according to relevance measure.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting at least one search result for the at least partial search term together with at least one keyword for selection by a user.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
receiving notification that one of the keywords presented for selection has been highlighted by the user; and
increasing the keyword measure associated with the highlighted keyword.
9. The method claim 1, further comprising:
receiving an updated at least partial search term;
re-identifying keywords based on the updated at least partial search term; and
re-determining relevant search results based on the re-identified keywords.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
re-presenting search results based on the updated at least partial search term.
11. A computer program product, tangibly embodied on a machine readable medium, the computer program product comprising instructions that, when read by a machine, operate to cause data processing apparatus to:
receive an at least partial search term;
identify keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
for each keyword:
identify search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
determine a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
provide at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
12. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the keyword measure is time weighted to give more recently searched for keywords a higher weighting.
13. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the relevance measure for each result is determined by multiplying the respective keyword measure by the respective search measure.
14. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising instructions to: determine an overall relevance measure for a result appearing in the search results associated with more than one keyword by summing the relevance measures determined for the result in relation to each keyword.
15. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising instructions to: present at least one search result for the at least partial search term together with at least one keyword for selection by a user.
16. The computer program product of claim 17, further comprising instructions to:
receive notification that one of the keywords presented for selection has been highlighted by the user; and
increase the keyword measure associated with the highlighted keyword.
17. The computer program product of claim 11, further comprising instructions to:
receive an updated at least partial search term;
re-identify keywords based on the updated at least partial search term; and
re-determine relevant search results based on the re-identified keywords.
18. A system comprising:
at least one processor; and
at least one storage device storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
receiving an at least partial search term;
identifying keywords based on the at least partial search term, wherein each keyword has an associated keyword measure based on the number of times each keyword has been previously searched for within a predetermined time period;
for each keyword:
identifying search results associated with the keyword, wherein each result has an associated search measure; and
determining a relevance measure for each result using the keyword measure and the search measure; and
providing at least one of the results as a search result for the at least partial search term based on the corresponding relevance measure.
US13/315,086 2010-12-08 2011-12-08 Method for determining relevant search results Abandoned US20120265756A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/524,984 US9460161B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-10-27 Method for determining relevant search results
US15/264,584 US9990442B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2016-09-13 Method for determining relevant search results

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ589787A NZ589787A (en) 2010-12-08 2010-12-08 A method for determining relevant search results
NZ589787 2010-12-08

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/524,984 Continuation US9460161B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-10-27 Method for determining relevant search results

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120265756A1 true US20120265756A1 (en) 2012-10-18

Family

ID=46125029

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/315,086 Abandoned US20120265756A1 (en) 2010-12-08 2011-12-08 Method for determining relevant search results
US14/524,984 Active US9460161B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-10-27 Method for determining relevant search results
US15/264,584 Active US9990442B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2016-09-13 Method for determining relevant search results

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/524,984 Active US9460161B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2014-10-27 Method for determining relevant search results
US15/264,584 Active US9990442B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2016-09-13 Method for determining relevant search results

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US20120265756A1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ589787A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140093175A1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2014-04-03 Melco Holdings Inc. Information processing system, information processing device, information processing method, and computer readable recording medium
US20140122388A1 (en) * 2012-10-28 2014-05-01 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Query generation and time difference features for supervised semantic indexing
US20150348108A1 (en) * 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Blake Quinn System and method of electronic searching and advertising
US20170109363A1 (en) * 2014-10-17 2017-04-20 Tribune Media Company Computing system with dynamic web page feature
US9875284B1 (en) * 2012-06-18 2018-01-23 A9.Com, Inc. Displaying search completion results
US9990442B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2018-06-05 S.L.I. Systems, Inc. Method for determining relevant search results
US10339564B2 (en) * 2016-02-16 2019-07-02 Oracle International Corporation System and method for providing an adaptively ordered presentation of objects
US10956502B2 (en) 2018-05-18 2021-03-23 Yandex Europe Ag Method of and system for recommending fresh search query suggestions on search engine

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11461340B2 (en) * 2018-01-16 2022-10-04 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Adaptive search using social graph information

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050203888A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-09-15 Iron Mountain Incorporated Method and apparatus for improved relevance of search results
US20060106769A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2006-05-18 Gibbs Kevin A Method and system for autocompletion for languages having ideographs and phonetic characters
US20060206454A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-09-14 Forstall Scott J Immediate search feedback
US20070214131A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Microsoft Corporation Re-ranking search results based on query log
US20080021884A1 (en) * 2006-07-18 2008-01-24 Chacha Search, Inc Anonymous search system using human searchers
US20090063462A1 (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-05 Google Inc. Word decompounder
US20090228817A1 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-10 Randy Adams Systems and methods for displaying a search result
US20090271374A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Social network powered query refinement and recommendations
US20090299853A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Chacha Search, Inc. Method and system of improving selection of search results
US7725422B2 (en) * 1998-03-16 2010-05-25 S.L.I. Systems, Inc. Search engine
US20110055185A1 (en) * 2005-03-28 2011-03-03 Elan Bitan Interactive user-controlled search direction for retrieved information in an information search system
US20110202520A1 (en) * 2008-11-26 2011-08-18 Yahoo! Inc. Navigation assistance for search engines
US20110307498A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2011-12-15 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for dynamically suggesting answers to questions submitted to a portal of an online service
US8135712B1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Posting questions from search queries
US20120123855A1 (en) * 2010-11-11 2012-05-17 Nhn Business Platform Corporation System and method for suggesting recommended keyword

Family Cites Families (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5704060A (en) * 1995-05-22 1997-12-30 Del Monte; Michael G. Text storage and retrieval system and method
JP3865169B2 (en) * 1997-11-28 2007-01-10 ソニー株式会社 COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE CONTROL METHOD
US6691108B2 (en) * 1999-12-14 2004-02-10 Nec Corporation Focused search engine and method
JP2001216316A (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-10 Nec Corp System and method for electronic manual retrieval and recording medium
US6564213B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2003-05-13 Amazon.Com, Inc. Search query autocompletion
US20080148193A1 (en) * 2001-09-13 2008-06-19 John Moetteli System and method of efficient web browsing
US20030130994A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-07-10 Contentscan, Inc. Method, system, and software for retrieving information based on front and back matter data
GB2383153A (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-18 Hemera Technologies Inc Search engine for computer graphic images
US20040199397A1 (en) * 2003-03-26 2004-10-07 Scott Dresden Integrated dynamic pricing and procurement support for e-commerce advertising channels
US20050021440A1 (en) * 2003-04-04 2005-01-27 Scott Dresden Integrated dynamic pricing and procurement support for e-commerce advertising channels
US8024335B2 (en) * 2004-05-03 2011-09-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamically generating a selectable search extension
KR100806862B1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2008-02-26 (주)이네스트커뮤니케이션 Method and apparatus for providing a list of second keywords related with first keyword being searched in a web site
US8364670B2 (en) * 2004-12-28 2013-01-29 Dt Labs, Llc System, method and apparatus for electronically searching for an item
US8019749B2 (en) * 2005-03-17 2011-09-13 Roy Leban System, method, and user interface for organizing and searching information
US20060282416A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-12-14 William Gross Search apparatus and method for providing a collapsed search
US7747639B2 (en) * 2005-08-24 2010-06-29 Yahoo! Inc. Alternative search query prediction
US20070255702A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-11-01 Orme Gregory M Search Engine
US8037051B2 (en) * 2006-11-08 2011-10-11 Intertrust Technologies Corporation Matching and recommending relevant videos and media to individual search engine results
US7555478B2 (en) * 2006-12-05 2009-06-30 Yahoo! Inc. Search results presented as visually illustrative concepts
JP2008242836A (en) * 2007-03-27 2008-10-09 Toshiba Corp Dictionary updating apparatus and program
JP4980148B2 (en) * 2007-06-07 2012-07-18 株式会社日立製作所 Document search method
KR100898142B1 (en) * 2007-06-26 2009-05-19 박근섭 Method for providing and searching information keyword and information contents related to contents and system thereof
WO2009030246A1 (en) * 2007-09-03 2009-03-12 Iqser Ip Ag Detecting correlations between data representing information
US20090106225A1 (en) * 2007-10-19 2009-04-23 Smith Wade S Identification of medical practitioners who emphasize specific medical conditions or medical procedures in their practice
US20090132645A1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-05-21 Iac Search & Media, Inc. User interface and method in a local search system with multiple-field comparison
US20090132646A1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-05-21 Iac Search & Media, Inc. User interface and method in a local search system with static location markers
US7921108B2 (en) * 2007-11-16 2011-04-05 Iac Search & Media, Inc. User interface and method in a local search system with automatic expansion
US8364693B2 (en) 2008-06-13 2013-01-29 News Distribution Network, Inc. Searching, sorting, and displaying video clips and sound files by relevance
US8010545B2 (en) * 2008-08-28 2011-08-30 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated System and method for providing a topic-directed search
US8539359B2 (en) * 2009-02-11 2013-09-17 Jeffrey A. Rapaport Social network driven indexing system for instantly clustering people with concurrent focus on same topic into on-topic chat rooms and/or for generating on-topic search results tailored to user preferences regarding topic
US20100299367A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2010-11-25 Microsoft Corporation Keyword Searching On Database Views
US20110191332A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2011-08-04 Veveo, Inc. Method of and System for Updating Locally Cached Content Descriptor Information
NZ589787A (en) 2010-12-08 2012-03-30 S L I Systems Inc A method for determining relevant search results
TW201239642A (en) * 2011-03-03 2012-10-01 Brightedge Technologies Inc Optimization of social media engagement
US20120278318A1 (en) * 2011-05-01 2012-11-01 Reznik Alan M Systems and methods for facilitating enhancements to electronic group searches
CN103136262B (en) * 2011-11-30 2016-08-24 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Information retrieval method and device
US8484208B1 (en) * 2012-02-16 2013-07-09 Oracle International Corporation Displaying results of keyword search over enterprise data
US20130325839A1 (en) * 2012-03-05 2013-12-05 TeleCommunication Communication Systems, Inc. Single Search Box Global
US9836554B2 (en) * 2014-04-30 2017-12-05 Excalibur Ip, Llc Method and system for providing query suggestions including entities

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7725422B2 (en) * 1998-03-16 2010-05-25 S.L.I. Systems, Inc. Search engine
US20050203888A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-09-15 Iron Mountain Incorporated Method and apparatus for improved relevance of search results
US20060106769A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2006-05-18 Gibbs Kevin A Method and system for autocompletion for languages having ideographs and phonetic characters
US20060206454A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-09-14 Forstall Scott J Immediate search feedback
US20100325100A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2010-12-23 Scott James Forstall Immediate search feedback
US7788248B2 (en) * 2005-03-08 2010-08-31 Apple Inc. Immediate search feedback
US20110055185A1 (en) * 2005-03-28 2011-03-03 Elan Bitan Interactive user-controlled search direction for retrieved information in an information search system
US20070214131A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Microsoft Corporation Re-ranking search results based on query log
US20080021884A1 (en) * 2006-07-18 2008-01-24 Chacha Search, Inc Anonymous search system using human searchers
US20090063462A1 (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-05 Google Inc. Word decompounder
US20090228817A1 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-10 Randy Adams Systems and methods for displaying a search result
US20090271374A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Social network powered query refinement and recommendations
US20090299853A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Chacha Search, Inc. Method and system of improving selection of search results
US8135712B1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Posting questions from search queries
US20110202520A1 (en) * 2008-11-26 2011-08-18 Yahoo! Inc. Navigation assistance for search engines
US8484184B2 (en) * 2008-11-26 2013-07-09 Yahoo! Inc. Navigation assistance for search engines
US20110307498A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2011-12-15 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for dynamically suggesting answers to questions submitted to a portal of an online service
US20130246406A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2013-09-19 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for dynamically suggesting answers to questions submitted to a portal of an online service
US20120123855A1 (en) * 2010-11-11 2012-05-17 Nhn Business Platform Corporation System and method for suggesting recommended keyword

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9990442B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2018-06-05 S.L.I. Systems, Inc. Method for determining relevant search results
US9875284B1 (en) * 2012-06-18 2018-01-23 A9.Com, Inc. Displaying search completion results
US9286360B2 (en) * 2012-09-28 2016-03-15 Melco Holdings Inc. Information processing system, information processing device, information processing method, and computer readable recording medium
US20160132534A1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2016-05-12 Melco Holdings Inc. Information processing system, information processing device, inofrmation processing method, and computer readable recording medium
US20140093175A1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2014-04-03 Melco Holdings Inc. Information processing system, information processing device, information processing method, and computer readable recording medium
US20140122388A1 (en) * 2012-10-28 2014-05-01 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Query generation and time difference features for supervised semantic indexing
US9336495B2 (en) * 2012-10-28 2016-05-10 Nec Corporation Query generation and time difference features for supervised semantic indexing
US20150348108A1 (en) * 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Blake Quinn System and method of electronic searching and advertising
US20170109363A1 (en) * 2014-10-17 2017-04-20 Tribune Media Company Computing system with dynamic web page feature
US10210277B2 (en) 2014-10-17 2019-02-19 Tribune Media Company Computing system with dynamic web page feature
US10579699B2 (en) * 2014-10-17 2020-03-03 Tribune Media Company Computing system with dynamic web page feature
US20200151227A1 (en) * 2014-10-17 2020-05-14 Tribune Media Company Computing system with dynamic web page feature
US10339564B2 (en) * 2016-02-16 2019-07-02 Oracle International Corporation System and method for providing an adaptively ordered presentation of objects
US10956502B2 (en) 2018-05-18 2021-03-23 Yandex Europe Ag Method of and system for recommending fresh search query suggestions on search engine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20170004143A1 (en) 2017-01-05
US9460161B2 (en) 2016-10-04
US20150046290A1 (en) 2015-02-12
NZ589787A (en) 2012-03-30
US9990442B2 (en) 2018-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9460161B2 (en) Method for determining relevant search results
JP6301958B2 (en) Method and apparatus for configuring search terms, delivering advertisements, and retrieving product information
US8768922B2 (en) Ad retrieval for user search on social network sites
US9754044B2 (en) System and method for trail identification with search results
CN103970857B (en) Content recommendation determines system and method
US8880548B2 (en) Dynamic search interaction
US20170300562A1 (en) Method for matching queries with answer items in a knowledge base
US8799260B2 (en) Method and system for generating web pages for topics unassociated with a dominant URL
US20150254714A1 (en) Systems and methods for keyword suggestion
US20160267189A1 (en) Method for performing network search at a browser side and a browser
US20210383455A1 (en) System and method for recommending entities based on interest indicators
US10025807B2 (en) Dynamic data acquisition method and system
US11100169B2 (en) Alternative query suggestion in electronic searching
BR112013011573B1 (en) related word registration device and method, server system and computer-readable recording media
CN106462613B (en) Ranking suggestions based on user attributes
US10795938B2 (en) Spell checker
US10606895B2 (en) Multiple entity aware typeahead in searches
US20240070209A1 (en) Method and system for providing alternative result for an online search previously with no result
US11609919B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for automatically providing personalized search results
US20180060427A1 (en) Navigating a Taxonomy Using Search Queries
US20150154294A1 (en) Suggested domain names positioning based on term frequency or term co-occurrence
US20120278159A1 (en) Method and apparatus for enhancing customer service experience
US20120072281A1 (en) Method and system to monetize domain queries in sponsored search
US20090112847A1 (en) Apparatus and method for enhancing a composition with relevant content pointers
WO2017153828A1 (en) Information processor, information processing method and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: S.L.I. SYSTEMS, INC., NEW ZEALAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RYAN, SHAUN WILLIAM;REEL/FRAME:027364/0086

Effective date: 20101213

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION