US20140180936A1 - Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner - Google Patents

Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140180936A1
US20140180936A1 US14/191,388 US201414191388A US2014180936A1 US 20140180936 A1 US20140180936 A1 US 20140180936A1 US 201414191388 A US201414191388 A US 201414191388A US 2014180936 A1 US2014180936 A1 US 2014180936A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
valuation
property
facility
home
user
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/191,388
Inventor
Brian Chi-Yat Ma
Jonathan Lee Burstein
Timothy VanderMey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zillow LLC
Original Assignee
Zillow LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/347,024 external-priority patent/US7970674B2/en
Application filed by Zillow LLC filed Critical Zillow LLC
Priority to US14/191,388 priority Critical patent/US20140180936A1/en
Publication of US20140180936A1 publication Critical patent/US20140180936A1/en
Priority to US14/318,536 priority patent/US20140316999A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0278Product appraisal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0283Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/16Real estate
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/08Payment architectures
    • G06Q20/10Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/02Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/03Credit; Loans; Processing thereof

Definitions

  • the described technology is directed to the field of electronic commerce techniques, and, more particularly, to the field of electronic commerce techniques relating to real estate.
  • taxing bodies can equitably set property tax levels; sellers and their agents can optimally set listing prices; and buyers and their agents can determine appropriate offer amounts.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility executes.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility to automatically determine current values for homes in a geographic area.
  • FIG. 3 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a recent sales table.
  • FIG. 4A is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to construct a tree.
  • FIG. 4B is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to determine whether and how to split a node of a tree.
  • FIG. 5 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a basis table containing the basis information selected for the tree.
  • FIG. 6 is a tree diagram showing a root node corresponding to the basis table 500 .
  • FIG. 7 is a tree diagram showing a completed version of the sample tree.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to score a tree.
  • FIG. 9 is a table diagram showing sample results for scoring a tree.
  • FIG. 10 is a display diagram showing detailed information about an individual home.
  • FIG. 11 is a display diagram showing a map identifying a number of homes in the same geographic area.
  • FIG. 12 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility containing the attributes of a particular home.
  • FIG. 13 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility to identify possible comparable sales on a map.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to tailor a valuation of a subject home based on information provided by a user such as the home's owner.
  • FIG. 15 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to display an initial valuation of the subject home and solicit updated home attributes from the user.
  • FIG. 16 is a display diagram showing a typical display presented by the facility to permit the user to describe improvements made to the subject home.
  • FIG. 17 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to enable the user to describe other aspects of the subject home that affect its value.
  • FIG. 18 is a display diagram showing a sample display presented by the facility in order to enable the user to identify comps regarded by the owner as similar to the subject home.
  • FIGS. 19A-19F show a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present an overall revised value for the subject home.
  • FIG. 20 is a table diagram showing sample contents of recent sales information used to construct a linear regression valuation model that is based on the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating a tailored valuation.
  • FIG. 21 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present a refined valuation for the subject home, together with a control for saving this refined valuation.
  • FIG. 22 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility when the user selects the save my estimate button.
  • FIG. 23 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the shared level of access.
  • FIG. 24 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the private level of access.
  • FIG. 25 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the public level of access.
  • a software facility for automatically determining a persistent value for a home or other property that is tailored to input from its owner or another user (“the facility”) is described. While the following discussion liberally employs the word “home” to refer to the property being valued in other nearby properties, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the facility may be straightforwardly applied to properties of other types. Similarly, a wide variety of users may use the facility, including the owner, an agent or other person representing the owner, a prospective buyer, an agent or other person representing prospective buyer, or another third party.
  • the facility uses a web site to receive information from a user and display to the user a refined valuation for the home that is based upon the information provided by the user.
  • the information provided by the user may include additional, corrected, and/or updated attributes of the home relative to the attributes known by the facility, such as attributes retrieved by the facility from a public or private database of home attributes; information about improvements to the home; information about other factors likely to affect the value of the home, such as well-kept grounds, historical significance, ground water issues, etc.; and information identifying, among recent, nearby sales of comparable homes (“comps”), those that the user regards as the most similar to the subject home.
  • the facility displays the results of refining its valuation in a manner that makes clear how the valuation was affected by the different information provided by the user.
  • the facility permits a user generating a refined valuation to store it and the input on which it is based for later use.
  • the user may designate a variety of levels of access to the stored refined valuation, including: private, which makes the refined valuation inaccessible to all users but the creating user; shared, which enables the user to share the refined valuation with other users that s/he chooses; or public, which makes access to the refined valuation available to any user viewing information about the home.
  • private which makes the refined valuation inaccessible to all users but the creating user
  • shared which enables the user to share the refined valuation with other users that s/he chooses
  • public which makes access to the refined valuation available to any user viewing information about the home.
  • the facility lends persistence to estimates, increasing their value to the generating user and providing a basis for additional communication about the house.
  • the facility in many cases makes the valuation more accurate than would otherwise be possible, and/or helps the user to more fully accept the valuation as appropriate.
  • the facility constructs and/or applies housing price models each constituting a forest of classification trees.
  • the facility uses a data table that identifies, for each of a number of homes recently sold in the geographic region to which the forest corresponds, attributes of the home and its selling price. For each of the trees comprising the forest, the facility randomly selects a fraction of homes identified in the table, as well as a fraction of the attributes identified in the table. The facility uses the selected attributes of the selected homes, together with the selling prices of the selected homes, to construct a classification tree in which each non-leaf node represents a basis for differentiating selected homes based upon one of the selected attributes.
  • a non-leaf node may represent the test “number of bedrooms ⁇ 4.” This node defines 2 subtrees in the tree: one representing the selected homes having 4 or fewer bedrooms, the other representing the selected homes having 5 or more bedrooms.
  • Each leaf node of the tree represents all of the selected homes having attributes matching the ranges of attribute values corresponding to the path from the tree's root node to the leaf node.
  • the facility assigns each leaf node a value corresponding to the mean of the selling prices of the selected homes represented by the leaf node.
  • the facility estimates the selling price of a home in such an area based upon loan values associated with its sale and an estimated loan-to-value ratio.
  • the facility In order to weight the trees of the forest, the facility further scores the usefulness of each tree by applying the tree to homes in the table other than the homes that were selected to construct the tree, and, for each such home, comparing the value indicated for the home by the classification tree (i.e., the value of the root leaf node into which the tree classifies the home) to its selling price. The closer the values indicated by the tree to the selling prices, the higher the score for the tree.
  • the classification tree i.e., the value of the root leaf node into which the tree classifies the home
  • a home's attributes may be inputted by a person familiar with them, such as the owner, a listing agent, or a person that derives the information from the owner or listing agent.
  • the facility applies all of the trees of the forest to the home, so that each tree indicates a value for the home.
  • the facility then calculates an average of these values, each weighted by the score for its tree, to obtain a value for the home.
  • the facility presents this value to the owner of the home, a prospective buyer of the home, a real estate agent, or another person interested in the value of the home or the value of a group of homes including the home.
  • the facility applies its model to the attributes of a large percentage of homes in a geographic area to obtain and convey an average home value for the homes in that area. In some embodiments, the facility periodically determines an average home value for the homes in a geographic area, and uses them as a basis for determining and conveying a home value index for the geographic area.
  • the approach employed by the facility to determine the value of a home does not rely on the home having recently been sold, it can be used to accurately value virtually any home whose attributes are known or can be determined. Further, because this approach does not require the services of a professional appraiser, it can typically determine a home's value quickly and inexpensively, in a manner generally free from subjective bias.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility executes.
  • These computer systems and devices 100 may include one or more central processing units (“CPUs”) 101 for executing computer programs; a computer memory 102 for storing programs and data—including data structures, database tables, other data tables, etc.—while they are being used; a persistent storage device 103 , such as a hard drive, for persistently storing programs and data; a computer-readable media drive 104 , such as a CD-ROM drive, for reading programs and data stored on a computer-readable medium; and a network connection 105 for connecting the computer system to other computer systems, such as via the Internet, to exchange programs and/or data-including data structures.
  • CPUs central processing units
  • a computer memory 102 for storing programs and data—including data structures, database tables, other data tables, etc.—while they are being used
  • a persistent storage device 103 such as a hard drive, for persistently storing programs
  • the facility can be accessed by any suitable user interface including Web services calls to suitable APIs. While computer systems configured as described above are typically used to support the operation of the facility, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the facility may be implemented using devices of various types and configurations, and having various components.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility to automatically determine current values for homes in a geographic area.
  • the facility may perform these steps for one or more geographic areas of one or more different granularities, including neighborhood, city, county, state, country, etc. These steps may be performed periodically for each geographic area, such as daily.
  • step 201 the facility selects recent sales occurring in the geographic area.
  • the facility may use sales data obtained from a variety of public or private sources.
  • FIG. 3 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a recent sales table.
  • the recent sales table 300 is made up of rows 301 - 315 , each representing a home sale that occurred in a recent period of time, such as the preceding 60 days. Each row is divided into the following columns: an identifier column 321 containing an identifier for the sale; an address column 322 containing the address of the sold home; a square foot column 323 containing the floor area of the home; a bedrooms column 324 containing the number of bedrooms in the home; a bathrooms column 325 containing the number of bathrooms in the home; a floors column 326 containing the number of floors in the home; a view column 327 indicating whether the home has a view; a year column 328 showing the year in which the house was constructed; a selling price column 329 containing the selling price at which the home was sold; and a date column 330 showing the date on which the home was sold.
  • row 301 indicates that sale number 1 of the home at 111 Main St., Hendricks, Ill. 62012 having a floor area of 1850 square feet, 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2 floors, no view, built in 1953, was for $132,500, and occurred on Jan. 3, 2005. While the contents of recent sales table 300 were included to pose a comprehensible example, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the facility can use a recent sales table having columns corresponding to different and/or a larger number of attributes, as well as a larger number of rows.
  • Attributes that may be used include, for example, construction materials, cooling technology, structure type, fireplace type, parking structure, driveway, heating technology, swimming pool type, roofing material, occupancy type, home design type, view type, view quality, lot size and dimensions, number of rooms, number of stories, school district, longitude and latitude, neighborhood or subdivision, tax assessment, attic and other storage, etc. For a variety of reasons, certain values may be omitted from the recent sales table. In some embodiments, the facility imputes missing values using the median value in the same column for continuous variables, or the mode (i.e., most frequent) value for categorical values.
  • FIG. 3 and each of the table diagrams discussed below show a table whose contents and organization are designed to make them more comprehensible by a human reader, those skilled in the art will appreciate that actual data structures used by the facility to store this information may differ from the table shown, in that they, for example, may be organized in a different manner; may contain more or less information than shown; may be compressed and/or encrypted; etc.
  • the facility constructs and scores a number of trees, such as 100. This number is configurable, with larger numbers typically yielding better results but requiring the application of greater computing resources.
  • the facility constructs a tree. In some embodiments, the facility constructs and applies random forest valuation models using an R mathematical software package available at http://cran.r-project.org/ and described at http://www.maths.lth.se/help/R/.R/library/random Forest/html/random Forest.html. Step 203 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 4 .
  • the facility scores the tree constructed in step 203 . Step 204 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 8 .
  • the facility uses the forest of trees constructed and scored in steps 202 - 205 to process requests for home valuations.
  • requests may be individually issued by users, or issued by a program, such as a program that automatically requests valuations for all homes in the geographic area at a standard frequency, such as daily, or a program that requests valuations for all of the homes occurring on a particular map in response to a request from a user to retrieve the map.
  • the facility receives a request for valuation identifying the home to be valued.
  • step 207 the facility applies the trees constructed in step 203 , weighted by the scores generated for them in step 204 , to the attributes in the home identified in the received request in order to obtain a valuation for the home identified in the request.
  • step 207 the facility continues in step 206 to receive the next request.
  • FIG. 4A is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to construct a tree.
  • the facility randomly selects a fraction of the recent sales in the geographic area to which the tree corresponds, as well as a fraction of the available attributes, as a basis for the tree.
  • FIG. 5 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a basis table containing the basis information selected for the tree.
  • Basis table 500 contains rows randomly selected from the recent sales table 300 , here rows 302 , 308 , 209 , 311 , 313 , and 315 .
  • the basis table further includes the identifier column 321 , address column 322 , and selling price column 329 from the recent sales table, as well as randomly selected columns for two available attributes: a bedrooms column 324 and a view column 327 .
  • the facility selects various fractions of the rows and attribute columns of the recent sales table for inclusion in the basis table; here, the fraction one third is used for both.
  • the facility filters rows from the basis table having selling prices that reflect particularly rapid appreciation or depreciation of the home relative to its immediately-preceding selling price. For example, in some embodiments, the facility filters from the basis table recent sales whose selling prices represent more than 50% annual appreciation or more than 50% annual depreciation. In other embodiments, however, the facility initially performs the filtering described above, then uses the filtered basis table to construct a preliminary model, applies the preliminary model to the unfiltered basis table, and excludes from the basis table used to construct the primary model those sales where the valuation produced by the preliminary model is either more than 2 times the actual selling price or less than one-half of the actual selling price.
  • step 402 the facility creates a root node for the tree that represents all of the basis sales contained in the basis table and the full range of each of the basis attributes.
  • FIG. 6 is a tree diagram showing a root node corresponding to the basis table 500 .
  • the root node 601 represents the sales having identifiers 2, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 15; values of the bedrooms attribute between 1- ⁇ ; and values of the view attribute of yes and no.
  • steps 403 - 407 the facility loops through each node of the tree, including both the root node created in step 402 and any additional nodes added to the tree in step 405 .
  • step 404 if it is possible to “split” the node, i.e., create two children of the node each representing a different subrange of an attribute value range represented by the node, then the facility continues in step 405 , else the facility continues in step 406 .
  • FIG. 4B is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to determine whether and how to split a node of a tree.
  • step 451 the facility determines whether the node's population—that is, the number of basis sales represented by the node—satisfies a split threshold, such as a split threshold that requires more than three basis sales. If the threshold is not satisfied, then the facility returns to step 404 in step 452 without identifying any split opportunity, such that the facility will not split the node; otherwise, the facility continues in step 453 .
  • the facility analyzes the characteristics of the node in order to be able to compare them to characteristics of pairs of possible child nodes that would result from different opportunities for splitting the node.
  • the facility determines the mean selling price among the sales represented by the node to obtain a node mean selling price for the node. Applying step 453 to root node 600 shown in FIG. 6 , the facility determines a mean selling price for the node as shown below in Table 1 by determining the mean of all the selling prices shown in basis table 500 .
  • step 454 the facility sums the squares of the differences between the node mean selling price determined in step 454 and the selling price of each sale represented by the node to obtain a node overall squared error. This calculation is shown below in table 2 for root node 601 .
  • step 455 the facility divides the overall squared error by one fewer than the number of sales represented by the node in order to obtain a node variance. The calculation of step 455 for root node 600 is shown below in table 3.
  • the facility analyzes the characteristics of each possible split opportunity that exists in the node; that is, for each attribute range represented by the node, any point at which that range could be divided.
  • the facility determines the mean selling price among sales on that side to obtain a split side mean selling price. Table 4 below shows the performance of this calculation for both sides of each of the three possible split opportunities of root node 600 .
  • step 458 the facility sums the squares of the differences between the selling price of each sale represented by the node and the split side mean selling price on the same side of the possible split opportunity to obtain a possible split opportunity squared error.
  • the result of the calculation of step 458 for root node 600 is shown below in table 5.
  • step 459 the facility divides the possible split opportunity squared error by two less than the number of sales represented by the node to obtain a variance for the possible split opportunity.
  • the calculation of step 459 is shown below for the three possible split opportunities of root node 600 .
  • step 460 if another possible split opportunity remains to be processed, then the facility continues in step 456 to process the next possible split opportunity, else the facility continues in step 461 .
  • step 461 the facility selects the possible split opportunity having the lowest variance.
  • the facility compares lines 37, 38 and 39 to identify the possible split opportunity 2 as having the lowest variance.
  • step 462 if the selected possible split opportunity variance determined in step 461 is less than the node variance determined in step 455 , then the facility continues in step 464 to return, identifying the split opportunity selected in step 461 , else the facility continues in step 463 to return without identifying a split opportunity.
  • the facility compares line 38 to line 9, and accordingly determines to split the root node in accordance with split opportunity 2.
  • step 405 where the steps shown in FIG. 4B determine that the node should be split, the facility creates a pair of children for the node.
  • Each child represents one of the subranges of the split opportunity identified in step 404 and the node's full range of unselected attributes.
  • Each child represents all basis sales whose attributes satisfy the attribute ranges represented by the child. Step 405 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 7 .
  • step 406 because the node will be a leaf node, the facility determines the mean selling price of basis sales represented by the node.
  • step 407 the facility processes the next node of the tree. After step 407 , these steps conclude.
  • FIG. 7 is a tree diagram showing a completed version of the sample tree. It can be seen that the facility added child nodes 702 and 703 to root node 601 , corresponding to the subranges defined by the split opportunity selected in step 461 .
  • Node 702 represents sales whose bedrooms attribute is less than or equal to 4, that is, between 1 and 4, as well as the full range of view attribute values represented by node 601 . Accordingly, node 702 represents sales 8 and 11. Because this number of sales is below the threshold of 4, node 702 qualifies as a leaf node, and its valuation of $152,450 is calculated by determining the mean selling price of sales 8 and 11.
  • Node 703 represents sales with bedrooms attribute values greater than 4, that is, 5- ⁇ .
  • split opportunity 4 has the smaller variance, shown on line 61. It can further be seen that the variance of possible split opportunity 4 shown on line 61 is smaller than the node variance shown on line 46. Accordingly, the facility uses possible split opportunity 4 to split node 703 , creating child nodes 704 and 705 .
  • Node 704 has a valuation of $206,000, obtained by averaging the selling prices of the base of sales 2 and 13.
  • Node 705 has valuation $245,750, obtained by averaging the selling price of sales 9 and 15.
  • the facility retrieves that home's attributes.
  • the facility begins at root node 601 , and among edges 711 and 712 , traverses the one whose condition is satisfied by the attributes of the home.
  • the facility traverses edge 712 to node 703 .
  • the facility determines, among edges 713 and 714 , which edge's condition is satisfied. Because the home's value of the view attribute is yes, the facility traverses edge 714 to leaf node 705 , and obtains a valuation for the sample home of $245,750.
  • the tree shown in FIG. 7 may not be representative in all respects of trees constructed by the facility.
  • such trees may have a larger number of nodes, and/or a larger depth.
  • a single attribute may be split multiple times, i.e., in multiple levels of the tree.
  • FIG. 8 shows steps typically performed by the facility in order to score a tree.
  • the facility identifies recent sales in the geographic area that were not used as a basis for constructing the tree in order to score the tree.
  • steps 802 - 805 the facility loops through each sale identified in step 801 .
  • the facility applies the tree to the attributes of the sale to obtain a value.
  • the facility compares the value obtained in step 803 to the selling price for the sale to determine an error magnitude, dividing the difference between valuation and selling price by selling price.
  • the facility calculates a score that is inversely related to the median error magnitude determined in step 804 . After step 806 , these steps conclude.
  • FIG. 9 is a table diagram showing sample results for scoring a tree.
  • Scoring table 900 scores tree 700 based upon the contents of recent sales table 300 .
  • the scoring table is made up of the rows of recent sales table 300 other than those used as basis sales for constructing the tree, i.e., rows 301 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 310 , 312 , and 314 . It further contains the following columns from recent sales table 300 : identifier column 321 , address column 322 , bedroom column 324 , view column 327 , and selling price column 329 .
  • the scoring table further contains a valuation column 911 containing the valuation of each home determined in step 803 .
  • row 307 shows that the facility determines the valuation of $245,750 for sale 7 using tree 700 .
  • Scoring table 900 further contains an error column 912 indicating the difference between each home's valuation and selling price.
  • row 307 contains an error of 0.0685, the difference between valuation $245,750 and selling price $230,000, divided by selling price $230,000.
  • a median error field 951 containing the median of error values in the scoring table, or 0.3734.
  • Each tree's median error value is used to determine weightings for the trees that are inversely related to their median error values.
  • the facility determines the particular tree's weighting by generating an accuracy metric for each tree by subtracting its median error value from 1, and dividing the tree's accuracy measure by the sum of all of the trees' accuracy measures. Also, a variety of different approaches to determine a score that is negatively correlated with the average error may be used by the facility.
  • the sample tree When a home is valued using the forest, the sample tree will be applied to the attributes of the home in the same way it was applied to homes in the scoring process described above. (If any attributes of the home are missing, the facility typically imputes a value for the missing attribute based upon the median or mode for that attribute in the recent sales table.)
  • the valuation produced will be averaged with the valuations produced by the other trees of the forest. In the average, each valuation will be weighted by the score attributed by the facility to the tree. This resultant average is presented as the valuation for the home.
  • FIGS. 10-11 show ways in which valuations generated by the facility may be presented.
  • FIG. 10 is a display diagram showing detailed information about an individual home.
  • the display 1000 includes detailed information 1001 about the home.
  • the facility also displays a valuation 1002 for the home, enabling prospective buyers and listing agents to gauge their interest in the home, or permitting the home's owner to gauge his interest in listing the home for sale.
  • FIG. 11 is a display diagram showing a map identifying a number of homes in the same geographic area.
  • the display 1100 shows homes 1101 - 1112 .
  • the facility also displays its valuations 1151 - 1162 of these homes in connection with their location on the map. Presenting the facility's valuations in this way permits home shoppers to obtain an overview of the geographic area, identify special trends within the geographic area, identify the anomalous values as good values or poor picks, etc.
  • the valuations displayed or otherwise reported by the facility are not the “raw” valuations directly produced by the valuation model, but rather “smoothed” valuations that are generated by blending the raw valuation generated by the current iteration of the model with earlier valuations.
  • the facility generates a current smoothed valuation for a home by calculating a weighted average of a current raw valuation and a smoothed valuation of the same home from the immediately-preceding time period, where the prior smooth valuation is weighted more heavily than the current raw valuation.
  • the prior smoothed valuation is weighted 49 times as heavily as the current raw valuation; where a new iteration of the model is constructed and applied weekly, the prior smoothed valuation is weighted 9 times as heavily as the current raw valuation; where new iterations of the model are constructed and applied monthly, the previous smoothed valuation is weighted twice as heavily as the current raw valuation.
  • smoothing techniques may be used in order to dampen erratic movement in a particular home's reported valuation over time.
  • the facility constructs and applies compound valuation models to one or more geographic areas.
  • a compound valuation model includes two or more separate classification tree forests, some or all of which may be applied to the attributes of a particular home in order to value it.
  • the facility constructs a compound model including both a forest constructed as described above (referred to as a “core forest”), as well as a separate, “high-end” forest constructed from basis sales having a selling price above the 97.5 percentile selling price in the geographic area.
  • the compound model is applied as follows. First, the core forest is applied to the attributes of a home.
  • the facility also applies the high-end forest to the attributes of the home. If the valuation produced by the core forest is above the 99 percentile selling price, then the valuation produced by the high-end forest is used directly as the model's valuation. Otherwise, a weighted average of the valuations produced by the core forest and the high-end forest is used, where the weight of the core forest valuation is based upon nearness of the core model valuation to the 97.5 percentile selling price, while the weight of the high-end forest valuation is based on the nearness of the core forest valuation to the 99 percentile selling price.
  • the facility typically initiates the tailoring of a valuation for a subject home to input from the subject home's user in response to expression of interest by the user in performing such tailoring.
  • the facility enables the user to express such interest in a variety of ways.
  • the user may select link 1011 from the display of detailed information about a particular home shown in FIG. 10 .
  • FIGS. 12 and 13 show additional ways that the facility permits the user to express such interest in some embodiments.
  • FIG. 12 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility containing the attributes of a particular home, also called “home facts.”
  • the display 1200 includes a list 1201 of attributes and their values, as well as a link 1202 to display a more extensive list.
  • the display further includes a way 1210 that the user may traverse in order to express interest in tailoring the valuation of the home.
  • FIG. 13 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility to identify possible comparable sales on a map.
  • the display 1300 includes such a map 1301 and well as a link 1310 that the user can follow in order to express interest in tailoring evaluation of this home.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to tailor a valuation of a subject home based on information provided by the home's user.
  • the interactions described herein are typically performed by serving web pages to a user who is the user of the subject home, and receiving input from that user based upon the user's interaction with the web pages. These web pages may be part of a web site relating to aspects of residential or other real estate.
  • FIGS. 15-19 discussed in greater detail below, contain sample displays presented by the facility in some embodiments in performing the steps of FIG. 14 .
  • step 1401 the facility displays an initial valuation of the subject home.
  • step 1402 the facility solicits updated home attributes from the user.
  • FIG. 15 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to display an initial valuation of the subject home and solicit updated home attributes from the user.
  • the display 1500 includes a navigation area 1510 which includes a progress indicator made up of step indicators 1511 - 1515 .
  • the display of step indicator 1511 for the first step more prominently than the other step indicators indicates that the first step is presently being performed.
  • the display further includes an initial valuation 1520 in the amount of $550,727.
  • home valuations are identified as “Zestimates.”
  • the display also includes a number of controls 1531 - 1541 , each corresponding to a different attribute or “home fact” of the subject home.
  • attribute controls are only displayed for attributes whose value has a non-zero influence on the valuations provided by the valuation model for the geographic area containing the home, or a level of influence that exceeds a threshold larger than zero.
  • these attribute controls are populated with attribute values automatically retrieved from a data source and used to determine the subject home's initial valuation in the manner described above.
  • the user can interact with any of these controls to change the corresponding attribute value. For example, the user may interact with control 1532 to correct the number of bedrooms from 3 to 4, or may interact with control 1537 to update the indicated territorial view to a water view that was created when a nearby building was demolished.
  • the facility updates an indication 1550 of the extent to which the user's updates have altered the valuation of the home. In some embodiments, the facility determines this amount by determining a new valuation for the home by applying the existing geographically-specific valuation model for the home—in other words, the existing forest of decision trees for the home—to the updated attributes, and subtracting the original valuation from the result. For example, where the user uses control 1537 to change the value of the view attribute from territorial to none, the facility retraverses all of the trees of the forest constituting the model for the geographic region containing the home. In particular, when the facility traverses sample tree 700 shown in FIG.
  • the facility traverses from node 703 to node 704 based upon the new negative value of the view attribute.
  • the weighted average of the valuations for all the trees of the forest include a valuation of $206,000 from tree 700 , obtained from leaf node 704 , rather than valuation of $245,750 obtained from node 705 .
  • the facility further includes in the display a warning that, because an updated attribute value provided by the user is not represented among the basis sales used to construct the valuation model, updated valuations based upon this updated attribute value may be inaccurate.
  • a next control 1591 to move to the next step of the process, describing home improvements.
  • step 1403 the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the attributes updated by the user.
  • step 1404 the facility solicits information from the user about improvements to the subject home.
  • FIG. 16 is a display diagram showing a typical display presented by the facility to permit the user to describe improvements made to the subject home.
  • the display 1600 includes a highlighted step indication 1612 that indicates that the user is performing the second step of the process.
  • Indication 1680 reflects the addition of $1500 to the initial valuation based upon the attribute updates performed by the user in the first step of the process.
  • the display includes an area 1830 that the user can use to describe improvements to the subject home. These include an improvement type control 1631 , an improvement timing control 1632 , and an improvement cost control 1633 .
  • the facility typically uses the improvement type and the geographical region containing the subject home to access a table containing average recovery rates for different improvement types and regions.
  • the facility applies the looked-up recovery rate to the improvement cost amount to obtain an estimated present value.
  • the facility further applies a depreciation schedule to the estimated present value, such as one specifying smooth depreciation from one hundred percent to twenty-five percent over the period between zero and ten years after the improvement, and a flat twenty-five percent thereafter.
  • the values of various improvements are incorporated directly in the valuation model—i.e., are represented in the trees of the forest—therefore may be handled in the application of the valuation model to the home, rather than computed separately.
  • the facility further monitors for the entry of home improvement in display 1600 that are redundant with attribute updates in FIG.
  • the facility then displays an indication 1634 of an estimated present value of the improvement.
  • the user may select an edit link 1635 to override this estimate of present value.
  • the display further includes a link 1639 that the user may follow to extend the improvement description area for describing another improvement.
  • the display further includes an indication 1640 of the total present value of the described improvements.
  • the display further includes a description 1650 of different improvement types made available by the facility. The user can click the next control 1691 to proceed to the next step of the process, describing other aspects of the home that affect its value.
  • step 1405 the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the improvements described by the user.
  • step 1406 the facility solicits information from the user about other factors affecting the value of the subject home.
  • FIG. 17 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to enable the user to describe other aspects of the subject home that affect its value. It can be seen that indication 1780 of the refined value reflects the addition of $3300 for improvements listed in the previous step.
  • the display includes a feature description area 1730 for inputting information about additional aspects. This area includes a description control 1731 for entering a description of the aspect, the control 1732 for indicating whether the aspect adds to or subtracts from the value of the home, and a control 1733 for indicating the magnitude of the impact of the aspect on the value of the home.
  • the display further includes a link 1739 that the user may traverse to expand the aspect description area to describe another aspect.
  • the display further includes an indication 1740 of the total amount added to or subtracted from the subject home's value by the described aspects. The user may select next control 1791 to proceed to the next step of the process, identifying comps regarded by the user as similar to the subject home.
  • step 1407 the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the other factors described by the user.
  • step 1408 the facility solicits from the user a list of nearby homes that have recently sold (“comps”) that are the most similar to the subject home.
  • FIG. 18 is a display diagram showing a sample display presented by the facility in order to enable the user to identify comps regarded by the user as similar to the subject home. It can be seen that the indication 1880 of refined value has been decreased by $300 to reflect a net reduction in the value corresponding to the sum of the inputted values for the aspects described in the previous step of the process.
  • the display includes a map 1830 on which possible comps are displayed as numbers appearing in circles. For example, a possible comp 1831 appears as a circle with the number one in it. When the user hovers over and/or clicks on one of these possible comps, the facility displays a pop-up balloon including information about the possible comp. Additional information about the possible comps is also shown below in table 1840 .
  • the user can traverse link 1833 in the pop-up balloon or link 1834 in the table in order to add the first possible comp to a “My Comps” list 1835 .
  • the user populates the My Comps list in this manner, until it contains what he or she regards as up to ten comps most similar to the subject home.
  • the facility determines an updated valuation for the subject home based upon the population of the My Comps list.
  • the facility makes a copy of the recent sales table 300 for the geographic region that contains the subject home and was used to construct the forest for this geographic area.
  • the facility alters the copy of the recent sales table to increase a weighting in the copy of the recent sales table of the comps in the My Comps list, causing them to be significantly more likely to be selected from the copy of the recent sales table for inclusion in tree basis tables.
  • the facility achieves this weighting by adding copies of the rows for each comp in the My Comps list to the recent sales table. In some embodiments, the facility also increases to a lesser extent the weighting in a copy of the recent sales table of the sales of homes that are near the subject home, such as having the same zip code, having the same neighborhood name, or having a calculated distance from the subject home that is below a particular distance threshold. The facility then uses this altered copy of the recent sales table to generate a new forest for the geographic region. The facility applies this forest, which is tailored to the comps included in the My Comps list, to the attributes of the home as updated in the first step of the process.
  • the result of applying the tailored forest is adjusted by averaging it with a separate valuation determined by multiplying the floor area of the subject home by an average selling price per square foot value among the sales on the My Comps list.
  • the facility determines the valuation by averaging the average selling price per square foot valuation with the original model valuation rather than the updated model valuation if the initial model valuation is between the adjusted model valuation and the average price per square foot valuation. The facility then subtracts from the resulting valuation the change in value from step one—$1500 in the example—because this amount is represented in the new valuation. To arrive at an overall valuation, the facility adds to the result the additional amounts identified in the second and third steps of the process, in the example $3300 and negative $300.
  • the facility permits the user to populate the My Comps list with any similar nearby home, irrespective of whether it has recently been sold.
  • the facility then emphasize the valuations of these homes, such as valuations automatically determined by the facility, in determining a refined valuation for the subject home.
  • FIGS. 19A-19F show a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present an overall revised value for the subject home.
  • FIG. 19A shows the entire display 1900
  • FIGS. 19B-19F show portions of the display at a greater level of magnification.
  • the display includes an overall summary section 1930 containing an overview of the calculation of the new revised value, as well as detailed sections 1940 , 1950 , 1960 , and 1970 , each displaying additional detail about the value added or subtracted by each of the four steps of the process.
  • FIG. 19B shows that section 1930 contains a breakdown beginning with the initial valuation 1920 , and adding value increments 1931 - 1934 for each of the four steps of the process to arrive at the new revised value 1980 .
  • FIG. 19A shows the entire display 1900
  • FIGS. 19B-19F show portions of the display at a greater level of magnification.
  • the display includes an overall summary section 1930 containing an overview of the calculation of the new revised value, as well as detailed sections 1940 , 1950 , 1960 , and 1970
  • FIG. 19C shows that the increment 1931 for the updated attributes is the result of increasing the number of bedrooms from 3-4 ( 1941 ) and changing the view from none to water ( 1942 ).
  • FIG. 19D shows that the value increment for home improvements 1931 is the result of adding a value of $300 for a new roof ( 1951 ) and $3000 for a kitchen remodel ( 1952 ).
  • FIG. 19E shows that the increment for other aspects affecting the value of the subject home is arrived at by adding $700 for an orchard ( 1961 ) and subtracting $1000 because a new fence is needed ( 1962 ).
  • FIG. 19F shows that the user's selection of comps has established an increment of $2650 ( 1935 ).
  • Section 1970 further includes a map 1971 showing the comps selected by the user, as well as a table 1972 showing the same in a different form.
  • the behavior of the facility described above is adapted in various ways.
  • the facility uses a smoothed version of the valuation produced by the valuation model, rather than a raw version.
  • a smoothed version of this valuation may be obtained by blending the raw valuation produced using a current iteration of the model with one or more valuations produced using earlier iterations of the model.
  • such blending involves calculating a weighted average of the current raw valuation and the immediately-preceding smoothed valuation in which the smoothed valuation is weighted more heavily. For example, where the valuation model is updated daily, in some embodiments, the facility weights the preceding smoothed valuation 49 times more heavily than the current raw valuation.
  • the facility displays a warning message indicating that the valuation has changed significantly, and may not be accurate.
  • the facility generates a tailored valuation using a valuation model that is constrained to use a proper subset of available home attributes, such as only the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating the tailored valuation.
  • this involves using a separate decision tree forest valuation model that is constructed using only the subset of attributes.
  • a valuation model of another type that is constructed using only the subset of attributes, such as a linear regression model constructed by plotting each of the base of sales as a point in N+1-space, where N is the number of continuous attributes in the subset plus the sum of the unique values of categorical attributes in the subset minus the number of categorical attributes in the subset, N of the
  • FIG. 20 is a table diagram showing sample contents of recent sales information used to construct a linear regression valuation model that is based on the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating a tailored valuation.
  • the table 2000 includes the following columns for each sale: a sale id column 2021 containing an identifier for the sale; a square foot column 2022 containing the improved floor area of the home; a lot size column 2023 containing the area of the home's lot, in square feet; a bedrooms column 2024 containing the number of bedrooms in the home; a bathrooms column 2025 containing the number of bathrooms in the home; a floors column 2026 containing the number of stories in the home; a year column 2027 showing the year in which the house was constructed; a selling price column 2028 containing the selling price at which the home was sold; a roof type column 2029 indicating the type of material from which the home's roof is constructed; and a use code column 2030 containing an indication of the primary use of the home.
  • Table 8 lists variables derived from these sale attribute values that are used as independent variables to construct a linear regression model.
  • the facility For each of a group of recent sales, the facility creates a tuple made up of the values of the variables showing lines 63-78 in Table 8 based upon the sale's attribute values, as well as the selling price for the sale.
  • the facility submits the generated tuples to a linear regression engine, which fits a curve to the points represented by the tuples, resulting in a set of coefficients representing a linear valuation formula.
  • the facility performs the curve-fitting by invoking a lm( ) function described at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html#Linear-models, and available as part of the R statistical computing environment, available at http://www.r-project.org/.
  • This formula can then be used as a valuation model to determine a valuation for an arbitrary home, given a tuple corresponding to the home's attribute values.
  • the facility when the facility considers the recent sales data shown in FIG. 20 , it constructs a valuation formula shown as the sum of the lines of Table 9 below.
  • the facility filters out the recent sales data used by the facility to generate a valuation formula sales whose attributes have extreme values, such as an age greater than 300 years.
  • the facility tailors the valuation formula created by the process described above to a particular home using one or more of the following techniques: more heavily weighting sales having a high selling price in valuation formulas constructed for valuing a home whose primary valuation is near the average selling price of these high-end homes; more heavily weighting recent sales that are geographically near the home to be valued, such as in the same zip code; and, where the user has selected particular recent sales as My Comps, more heavily weighting these sales in constructing the valuation formula.
  • data missing from the recent sales data used to construct the valuation function is imputed in a manner similar to that described above.
  • the facility employs a model of a type other than the primary, decision-tree forest model, but does not use it to directly generate valuations of the subject home. Rather, it is used to generate valuations of the subject home before and after the user updates attributes of the subject home, and the percentage change in the valuation produced by the other model is applied to a valuation produced for the subject home using the original attribute values by the primary, decision-tree forest model.
  • the facility may construct separate copies of the other model before and after the performance of the fourth, My Comps step of the process use each of the copies to value the subject home, determine the percentage change between these valuations, and apply it to a valuation produced for the subject home by the primary model before the fourth step of the process is performed.
  • FIG. 21 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present a refined valuation for the subject home, together with a control for saving this refined valuation.
  • the display 2100 similar to display 1900 shown in FIG. 19A , includes a save my estimate button 2101 that the user may select in order to save this estimate and the information upon which it is based.
  • the display further includes a help control 2102 that the user may select in order to obtain more information about saving the refined valuation.
  • the facility solicits additional information about how the refined valuation is to be saved.
  • FIG. 22 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility when the user selects the save my estimate button.
  • This display 2200 includes a field 2210 into which the user may enter comments about the information on which the refined valuation is based.
  • the display also includes controls 2221 - 2223 for specifying a “save option,” or a level of access that is to be permitted to the saved refined valuation, specifically private radio button 2221 , shared radio button 2222 , and public radio button 2223 .
  • the user can select a save button 2231 to complete the save operation, or a cancel button 2232 to cancel the save operation.
  • the facility determines whether the user is authorized to save a public refined valuation for this home. For example, in some embodiments, the facility tests whether the user is the owner of the home, in some cases in accordance with one or more techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/524,047 (patent counsel's docket no. 56920-8010), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • FIGS. 23-25 show the results of saving the refined valuation with various levels of access.
  • FIG. 23 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the shared level of access.
  • the display 2300 includes a URL 2310 that the user may copy from the display into an email message addressed to any other people that the user wishes to be able to access the saved refined valuation.
  • the display 2300 includes a field into which the user may simply enter email addresses for these people, causing the facility to automatically send them a message containing URL 2310 .
  • the display also includes a link 2320 that the user may traverse in order to display information about the saved refined valuation, such as is shown in the Figures that follow.
  • FIG. 24 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the private level of access.
  • the display 2400 includes a list of “favorite homes”, such as favorite homes 2410 , 2420 , and 2430 .
  • Each favorite home includes information identifying the favorite home, such as identifying information 2431 for favorite home 2430 , as well as indications of any valuations determined for each favorite home that is accessible to the current user.
  • Favorite home 2430 has an initial valuation 2432 based upon information publicly available about the home, as well as a refined valuation 2434 generated by the current user and saved with the private level of access. This user is the only one who can view this refined valuation. Additionally, this user can traverse links 2435 in order to update the refined valuation.
  • the facility displays a public refined valuation 2413 generated by the same user. Also, for favorite home 2420 , the facility shows an indication 2425 that the user has not generated his or her own refined valuation for this home, and includes a link 2426 that the user may traverse in order to generate his or her own refined valuation.
  • FIG. 25 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the public level of access.
  • the display 2500 is accessible to any user, and in some embodiments may be accessed from a home detail page presented for the home and containing various information about the home. It contains information 2501 identifying home, and initial valuation 2502 , and a refined valuation 2503 generated by the owner.
  • the display includes comments 2505 entered by the owner as part of saving the refined Valuation the display further includes an overview breakdown 2506 of the value added or subtracted by each of the stages of the refined valuation.
  • the display further includes a list 2507 of some or all of the home facts as modified by the owner, and an indication 2508 of the value added or subtracted as a result; a list 2509 of any home improvements identified by the owner, and an indication 2510 of the value added or subtracted as a result; and a list 2511 of any other features identified by the owner, and an indication 2512 of the value added or subjected as a result.
  • the facility includes in this display similar detail sections for the other features and comps stages of the refined valuation process.
  • the display further includes a print control 2513 that the user may activate in order to print the estimate shown in the display, as well as a send control 2514 that the user may activate in order to email the estimate to other users.
  • the display contains the following additional controls: a control 2521 that the user may activate in order to rescind the publication of the owner's estimate; a control 2522 that the user may activate in order to update the owner's estimate; a control 2523 that the user may activate to delete the owner's estimate; and a control 2524 that the user may activate in order to edit the comments 2505 about the owner's estimate.
  • each refined valuation is displayed with exactly the same value it had at the time it was generated.
  • the facility begins with the initial valuation that existed at the time that the refined valuation was generated, but applies a refined valuation model to the information provided to generate the refined valuation that is updated based upon current information to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated.
  • the facility when a refined valuation is displayed, the facility begins with the latest (i.e., most current) initial valuation that existed is presently available for the home, and adjusts this initial valuation by the original differential produced by the refined valuation when originally to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated.
  • the facility when a refined valuation is displayed, the facility begins with the latest (i.e., most current) initial valuation that existed is presently available for the home, and adjusts this initial valuation by a differential determined by applying a refined valuation model to the information provided to generate the refined valuation that is updated based upon current information to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated.
  • the above-described facility may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways.
  • the facility may use a variety of user interfaces to collect various information usable in determining valuations from users and other people knowledgeable about homes, and a variety of user interfaces to display refined valuations. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that follow and the elements recited therein.

Abstract

A facility procuring information about a distinguished property from a user knowledgeable about the distinguished property that is usable to refine an automatic valuation of the distinguished property is described. The facility displays information about the distinguished property used in the automatic valuation of the distinguished property. The facility obtains user input from of the user adjusting at least one aspect of information about the distinguished property used in the automatic valuation of the distinguished property. On a later the day, facility displays to the user a refined valuation of the distinguished property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/943,604, filed on Jul. 16, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/524,048 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,839), filed Sep. 19, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/347,024, filed on Feb. 3, 2006, which are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The described technology is directed to the field of electronic commerce techniques, and, more particularly, to the field of electronic commerce techniques relating to real estate.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In many roles, it can be useful to be able to accurately determine the value of real estate properties (“properties”), such as residential real estate properties (“homes”). As examples, by using accurate values for properties: taxing bodies can equitably set property tax levels; sellers and their agents can optimally set listing prices; and buyers and their agents can determine appropriate offer amounts.
  • A variety of conventional approaches exist for valuing homes. Perhaps the most reliable is, for a home that was very recently sold, attributing its selling price as its value. Unfortunately, following the sale of a home, its current value can quickly diverge from its sale price. Accordingly, the sale price approach to valuing a home tends to be accurate for only a short period after the sale occurs. For that reason, at any given time, only a small percentage of homes can be accurately valued using the sale price approach.
  • Another widely-used conventional approach to valuing homes is appraisal, where a professional appraiser determines a value for a home by comparing some of its attributes to the attributes of similar nearby homes that have recently sold (“comps”). The appraiser arrives at an appraised value by subjectively adjusting the sale prices of the comps to reflect differences between the attributes of the comps and the attributes of the home being appraised. The accuracy of the appraisal approach can be adversely affected by the subjectivity involved. Also, appraisals can be expensive, can take days or weeks to complete, and may require physical access to the home by the appraiser.
  • While it might be possible to design systems that automatically value homes, such automatic valuations would generally be performed based upon the contents of a public database, and without input from each home's owner or other information not in the public database. In such systems, failing to consider such information may result in valuations that are significantly inaccurate in some instances.
  • In view of the shortcomings of conventional approaches to valuing homes discussed above, a new approach to valuing homes that was responsive to owner input, as well as having a high level of accuracy, and being inexpensive and convenient, would have significant utility.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility executes.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility to automatically determine current values for homes in a geographic area.
  • FIG. 3 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a recent sales table.
  • FIG. 4A is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to construct a tree.
  • FIG. 4B is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to determine whether and how to split a node of a tree.
  • FIG. 5 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a basis table containing the basis information selected for the tree.
  • FIG. 6 is a tree diagram showing a root node corresponding to the basis table 500.
  • FIG. 7 is a tree diagram showing a completed version of the sample tree.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to score a tree.
  • FIG. 9 is a table diagram showing sample results for scoring a tree.
  • FIG. 10 is a display diagram showing detailed information about an individual home.
  • FIG. 11 is a display diagram showing a map identifying a number of homes in the same geographic area.
  • FIG. 12 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility containing the attributes of a particular home.
  • FIG. 13 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility to identify possible comparable sales on a map.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to tailor a valuation of a subject home based on information provided by a user such as the home's owner.
  • FIG. 15 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to display an initial valuation of the subject home and solicit updated home attributes from the user.
  • FIG. 16 is a display diagram showing a typical display presented by the facility to permit the user to describe improvements made to the subject home.
  • FIG. 17 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to enable the user to describe other aspects of the subject home that affect its value.
  • FIG. 18 is a display diagram showing a sample display presented by the facility in order to enable the user to identify comps regarded by the owner as similar to the subject home.
  • FIGS. 19A-19F show a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present an overall revised value for the subject home.
  • FIG. 20 is a table diagram showing sample contents of recent sales information used to construct a linear regression valuation model that is based on the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating a tailored valuation.
  • FIG. 21 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present a refined valuation for the subject home, together with a control for saving this refined valuation.
  • FIG. 22 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility when the user selects the save my estimate button.
  • FIG. 23 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the shared level of access.
  • FIG. 24 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the private level of access.
  • FIG. 25 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the public level of access.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION Overview
  • A software facility for automatically determining a persistent value for a home or other property that is tailored to input from its owner or another user (“the facility”) is described. While the following discussion liberally employs the word “home” to refer to the property being valued in other nearby properties, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the facility may be straightforwardly applied to properties of other types. Similarly, a wide variety of users may use the facility, including the owner, an agent or other person representing the owner, a prospective buyer, an agent or other person representing prospective buyer, or another third party.
  • In some embodiments, the facility uses a web site to receive information from a user and display to the user a refined valuation for the home that is based upon the information provided by the user. In some embodiments, the information provided by the user may include additional, corrected, and/or updated attributes of the home relative to the attributes known by the facility, such as attributes retrieved by the facility from a public or private database of home attributes; information about improvements to the home; information about other factors likely to affect the value of the home, such as well-kept grounds, historical significance, ground water issues, etc.; and information identifying, among recent, nearby sales of comparable homes (“comps”), those that the user regards as the most similar to the subject home. In some embodiments, the facility displays the results of refining its valuation in a manner that makes clear how the valuation was affected by the different information provided by the user.
  • In some embodiments, the facility permits a user generating a refined valuation to store it and the input on which it is based for later use. The user may designate a variety of levels of access to the stored refined valuation, including: private, which makes the refined valuation inaccessible to all users but the creating user; shared, which enables the user to share the refined valuation with other users that s/he chooses; or public, which makes access to the refined valuation available to any user viewing information about the home. Where a user has access to the stored refined valuation, that user can view the stored refined valuation. In this way, the facility lends persistence to estimates, increasing their value to the generating user and providing a basis for additional communication about the house.
  • By enabling an user to refine a valuation of his or her home based upon information about the home known to the user, the facility in many cases makes the valuation more accurate than would otherwise be possible, and/or helps the user to more fully accept the valuation as appropriate.
  • Home Valuation
  • In some embodiments, the facility constructs and/or applies housing price models each constituting a forest of classification trees. In some such embodiments, the facility uses a data table that identifies, for each of a number of homes recently sold in the geographic region to which the forest corresponds, attributes of the home and its selling price. For each of the trees comprising the forest, the facility randomly selects a fraction of homes identified in the table, as well as a fraction of the attributes identified in the table. The facility uses the selected attributes of the selected homes, together with the selling prices of the selected homes, to construct a classification tree in which each non-leaf node represents a basis for differentiating selected homes based upon one of the selected attributes. For example, where number of bedrooms is a selected attribute, a non-leaf node may represent the test “number of bedrooms≦4.” This node defines 2 subtrees in the tree: one representing the selected homes having 4 or fewer bedrooms, the other representing the selected homes having 5 or more bedrooms. Each leaf node of the tree represents all of the selected homes having attributes matching the ranges of attribute values corresponding to the path from the tree's root node to the leaf node. The facility assigns each leaf node a value corresponding to the mean of the selling prices of the selected homes represented by the leaf node.
  • In some areas of the country, home selling prices are not public records, and may be difficult or impossible to obtain. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the facility estimates the selling price of a home in such an area based upon loan values associated with its sale and an estimated loan-to-value ratio.
  • In order to weight the trees of the forest, the facility further scores the usefulness of each tree by applying the tree to homes in the table other than the homes that were selected to construct the tree, and, for each such home, comparing the value indicated for the home by the classification tree (i.e., the value of the root leaf node into which the tree classifies the home) to its selling price. The closer the values indicated by the tree to the selling prices, the higher the score for the tree.
  • In most cases, it is possible to determine the attributes of a home to be valued. For example, they can often be obtained from existing tax or sales records maintained by local governments. Alternatively, a home's attributes may be inputted by a person familiar with them, such as the owner, a listing agent, or a person that derives the information from the owner or listing agent. In order to determine a value for a home whose attributes are known, the facility applies all of the trees of the forest to the home, so that each tree indicates a value for the home. The facility then calculates an average of these values, each weighted by the score for its tree, to obtain a value for the home. In various embodiments, the facility presents this value to the owner of the home, a prospective buyer of the home, a real estate agent, or another person interested in the value of the home or the value of a group of homes including the home.
  • In some embodiments, the facility applies its model to the attributes of a large percentage of homes in a geographic area to obtain and convey an average home value for the homes in that area. In some embodiments, the facility periodically determines an average home value for the homes in a geographic area, and uses them as a basis for determining and conveying a home value index for the geographic area.
  • Because the approach employed by the facility to determine the value of a home does not rely on the home having recently been sold, it can be used to accurately value virtually any home whose attributes are known or can be determined. Further, because this approach does not require the services of a professional appraiser, it can typically determine a home's value quickly and inexpensively, in a manner generally free from subjective bias.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the components typically incorporated in at least some of the computer systems and other devices on which the facility executes. These computer systems and devices 100 may include one or more central processing units (“CPUs”) 101 for executing computer programs; a computer memory 102 for storing programs and data—including data structures, database tables, other data tables, etc.—while they are being used; a persistent storage device 103, such as a hard drive, for persistently storing programs and data; a computer-readable media drive 104, such as a CD-ROM drive, for reading programs and data stored on a computer-readable medium; and a network connection 105 for connecting the computer system to other computer systems, such as via the Internet, to exchange programs and/or data-including data structures. In various embodiments, the facility can be accessed by any suitable user interface including Web services calls to suitable APIs. While computer systems configured as described above are typically used to support the operation of the facility, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the facility may be implemented using devices of various types and configurations, and having various components.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility to automatically determine current values for homes in a geographic area. The facility may perform these steps for one or more geographic areas of one or more different granularities, including neighborhood, city, county, state, country, etc. These steps may be performed periodically for each geographic area, such as daily. In step 201, the facility selects recent sales occurring in the geographic area. The facility may use sales data obtained from a variety of public or private sources.
  • FIG. 3 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a recent sales table. The recent sales table 300 is made up of rows 301-315, each representing a home sale that occurred in a recent period of time, such as the preceding 60 days. Each row is divided into the following columns: an identifier column 321 containing an identifier for the sale; an address column 322 containing the address of the sold home; a square foot column 323 containing the floor area of the home; a bedrooms column 324 containing the number of bedrooms in the home; a bathrooms column 325 containing the number of bathrooms in the home; a floors column 326 containing the number of floors in the home; a view column 327 indicating whether the home has a view; a year column 328 showing the year in which the house was constructed; a selling price column 329 containing the selling price at which the home was sold; and a date column 330 showing the date on which the home was sold. For example, row 301 indicates that sale number 1 of the home at 111 Main St., Hendricks, Ill. 62012 having a floor area of 1850 square feet, 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2 floors, no view, built in 1953, was for $132,500, and occurred on Jan. 3, 2005. While the contents of recent sales table 300 were included to pose a comprehensible example, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the facility can use a recent sales table having columns corresponding to different and/or a larger number of attributes, as well as a larger number of rows. Attributes that may be used include, for example, construction materials, cooling technology, structure type, fireplace type, parking structure, driveway, heating technology, swimming pool type, roofing material, occupancy type, home design type, view type, view quality, lot size and dimensions, number of rooms, number of stories, school district, longitude and latitude, neighborhood or subdivision, tax assessment, attic and other storage, etc. For a variety of reasons, certain values may be omitted from the recent sales table. In some embodiments, the facility imputes missing values using the median value in the same column for continuous variables, or the mode (i.e., most frequent) value for categorical values.
  • While FIG. 3 and each of the table diagrams discussed below show a table whose contents and organization are designed to make them more comprehensible by a human reader, those skilled in the art will appreciate that actual data structures used by the facility to store this information may differ from the table shown, in that they, for example, may be organized in a different manner; may contain more or less information than shown; may be compressed and/or encrypted; etc.
  • Returning to FIG. 2, in steps 202-205, the facility constructs and scores a number of trees, such as 100. This number is configurable, with larger numbers typically yielding better results but requiring the application of greater computing resources. In step 203, the facility constructs a tree. In some embodiments, the facility constructs and applies random forest valuation models using an R mathematical software package available at http://cran.r-project.org/ and described at http://www.maths.lth.se/help/R/.R/library/random Forest/html/random Forest.html. Step 203 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 4. In step 204, the facility scores the tree constructed in step 203. Step 204 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 8.
  • In steps 206-207, the facility uses the forest of trees constructed and scored in steps 202-205 to process requests for home valuations. Such requests may be individually issued by users, or issued by a program, such as a program that automatically requests valuations for all homes in the geographic area at a standard frequency, such as daily, or a program that requests valuations for all of the homes occurring on a particular map in response to a request from a user to retrieve the map. In step 206, the facility receives a request for valuation identifying the home to be valued. In step 207, the facility applies the trees constructed in step 203, weighted by the scores generated for them in step 204, to the attributes in the home identified in the received request in order to obtain a valuation for the home identified in the request. After step 207, the facility continues in step 206 to receive the next request.
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the steps shown in FIG. 2 and in each of the flow diagrams discussed below may be altered in a variety of ways. For example, the order of the steps may be rearranged; substeps may be performed in parallel; shown steps may be omitted, or other steps may be included; etc.
  • FIG. 4A is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to construct a tree. In step 401, the facility randomly selects a fraction of the recent sales in the geographic area to which the tree corresponds, as well as a fraction of the available attributes, as a basis for the tree.
  • FIG. 5 is a table diagram showing sample contents of a basis table containing the basis information selected for the tree. Basis table 500 contains rows randomly selected from the recent sales table 300, here rows 302, 308, 209, 311, 313, and 315. The basis table further includes the identifier column 321, address column 322, and selling price column 329 from the recent sales table, as well as randomly selected columns for two available attributes: a bedrooms column 324 and a view column 327. In various embodiments, the facility selects various fractions of the rows and attribute columns of the recent sales table for inclusion in the basis table; here, the fraction one third is used for both.
  • In some embodiments, the facility filters rows from the basis table having selling prices that reflect particularly rapid appreciation or depreciation of the home relative to its immediately-preceding selling price. For example, in some embodiments, the facility filters from the basis table recent sales whose selling prices represent more than 50% annual appreciation or more than 50% annual depreciation. In other embodiments, however, the facility initially performs the filtering described above, then uses the filtered basis table to construct a preliminary model, applies the preliminary model to the unfiltered basis table, and excludes from the basis table used to construct the primary model those sales where the valuation produced by the preliminary model is either more than 2 times the actual selling price or less than one-half of the actual selling price.
  • Returning to FIG. 4A, in step 402, the facility creates a root node for the tree that represents all of the basis sales contained in the basis table and the full range of each of the basis attributes.
  • FIG. 6 is a tree diagram showing a root node corresponding to the basis table 500. The root node 601 represents the sales having identifiers 2, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 15; values of the bedrooms attribute between 1-∞; and values of the view attribute of yes and no.
  • Returning to FIG. 4A, in steps 403-407, the facility loops through each node of the tree, including both the root node created in step 402 and any additional nodes added to the tree in step 405. In step 404, if it is possible to “split” the node, i.e., create two children of the node each representing a different subrange of an attribute value range represented by the node, then the facility continues in step 405, else the facility continues in step 406. FIG. 4B is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to determine whether and how to split a node of a tree. These steps generally identify a potential split opportunity having the highest information gain, and determine whether the information gain of that potential split opportunity exceeds the information gain of the current node. In step 451, the facility determines whether the node's population—that is, the number of basis sales represented by the node—satisfies a split threshold, such as a split threshold that requires more than three basis sales. If the threshold is not satisfied, then the facility returns to step 404 in step 452 without identifying any split opportunity, such that the facility will not split the node; otherwise, the facility continues in step 453. Though not shown, the facility may apply a variety of other tests to determine whether the node should be split, including whether any of the selected attribute ranges represented by the node is divisible. For example, where the selected attributes are bedrooms and view, and a node represents the ranges bedrooms=5 and view=no, none of the node's selected attribute ranges can be split.
  • In steps 453-455, the facility analyzes the characteristics of the node in order to be able to compare them to characteristics of pairs of possible child nodes that would result from different opportunities for splitting the node. In step 453, the facility determines the mean selling price among the sales represented by the node to obtain a node mean selling price for the node. Applying step 453 to root node 600 shown in FIG. 6, the facility determines a mean selling price for the node as shown below in Table 1 by determining the mean of all the selling prices shown in basis table 500.
  • TABLE 1
    1 Node mean selling price = $201,400
  • In step 454, the facility sums the squares of the differences between the node mean selling price determined in step 454 and the selling price of each sale represented by the node to obtain a node overall squared error. This calculation is shown below in table 2 for root node 601.
  • TABLE 2
    2 Sale 2 overall squared error = ($201,000 − line 1)2 = 160000
    3 Sale 8 overall squared error = ($74,900 − line 1)2 = 16002250000
    4 Sale 9 overall squared error = ($253,500 − line 1)2 = 2714410000
    5 Sale 11 overall squared error = 817960000
    ($230,000 − line 1)2 =
    6 Sale 13 overall squared error = 92160000
    ($211,000 − line 1)2 =
    7 Sale 15 overall squared error = 1339560000
    ($238,000 − line 1)2 =
    8 Node overall squared error = 20966500000

    In step 455, the facility divides the overall squared error by one fewer than the number of sales represented by the node in order to obtain a node variance. The calculation of step 455 for root node 600 is shown below in table 3.
  • TABLE 3
    9 Node variance = line 8/5 = 4193300000
  • In steps 456-460, the facility analyzes the characteristics of each possible split opportunity that exists in the node; that is, for each attribute range represented by the node, any point at which that range could be divided. For root node 600, three such split opportunities exist: (1) view=no/view=yes; (2) bedrooms≦4/bedrooms>4; and (3) bedrooms≦5/bedrooms>5. In step 457, for each side of the possible split opportunity, the facility determines the mean selling price among sales on that side to obtain a split side mean selling price. Table 4 below shows the performance of this calculation for both sides of each of the three possible split opportunities of root node 600.
  • TABLE 4
    10 Split side mean selling price of view = no side of $179,225
    possible split opportunity 1 = mean of selling prices for
    sales 2, 8, 11, and 13 =
    11 Split side mean selling price of view = yes side of $245,750
    possible split opportunity 1 = mean of selling prices for
    sales 9 and 15 =
    12 Split side mean selling price for bedrooms ≦4 side of $152,450
    possible split opportunity 2 = mean of selling prices of
    sales 8 and 11 =
    13 Split side mean selling price for bedrooms >4 side of $225,875
    possible split opportunity 2 = mean of selling prices of
    sales 2, 9, 13, and 15 =
    14 Split side mean selling price for bedrooms ≦5 side of $188,475
    possible split opportunity 3 = mean of selling prices of
    sales 8, 11, 13, and 15 =
    15 Split side mean selling price for bedrooms >5 side of $227,250
    possible split opportunity 3 = mean of selling prices of
    sales 2 and 9 =
  • In step 458, the facility sums the squares of the differences between the selling price of each sale represented by the node and the split side mean selling price on the same side of the possible split opportunity to obtain a possible split opportunity squared error. The result of the calculation of step 458 for root node 600 is shown below in table 5.
  • TABLE 5
    16 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 474150625
    2 = ($201,000 − line 10)2 =
    17 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 10883705625
    8 = ($74,900 − line 10)2 =
    18 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 60062500
    9 = ($253,500 − line 11)2 =
    19 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 2578100625
    11 = ($230,000 − line 10)2 =
    20 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 1009650625
    13 = ($211,000 − line 10)2 =
    21 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error for sale 60062500
    15 = ($238,000 − line 11)2 =
    22 Possible split opportunity 1 squared error = sum of 15065732500
    lines 16-21 =
    23 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 618765625
    2 = ($201,000 − line 13)2 =
    24 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 6014002500
    8 = ($74,900 − line 12)2 =
    25 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 763140625
    9 = ($253,500 − line 13)2 =
    26 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 6014002500
    11 = ($230,000 − line 12)2 =
    27 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 221265625
    13 = ($211,000 − line 13)2 =
    28 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error for sale 147015625
    15 = ($238,000 − line 13)2 =
    29 Possible split opportunity 2 squared error = sum of 13778192500
    lines 23-28 =
    30 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 689062500
    2 = ($201,000 − line 15)2 =
    31 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 12899280625
    8 = ($74,900 − line 14)2 =
    32 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 689062500
    9 = ($253,500 − line 15)2 =
    33 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 1724325625
    11 = ($230,000 − line 14)2 =
    34 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 507375625
    13 = ($211,000 − line 14)2 =
    35 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error for sale 2452725625
    15 = ($238,000 − line 14)2 =
    36 Possible split opportunity 3 squared error = sum of 18961832500
    lines 30-35 =
  • In line 459, the facility divides the possible split opportunity squared error by two less than the number of sales represented by the node to obtain a variance for the possible split opportunity. The calculation of step 459 is shown below for the three possible split opportunities of root node 600.
  • TABLE 6
    37 Variance for possible split opportunity 1 = line 22/4 = 3766433125
    38 Variance for possible split opportunity 2 = line 29/4 = 3444548125
    39 Variance for possible split opportunity 3 = line 36/4 = 4740458125
  • In step 460, if another possible split opportunity remains to be processed, then the facility continues in step 456 to process the next possible split opportunity, else the facility continues in step 461.
  • In step 461, the facility selects the possible split opportunity having the lowest variance. In the example, the facility compares lines 37, 38 and 39 to identify the possible split opportunity 2 as having the lowest variance. In step 462, if the selected possible split opportunity variance determined in step 461 is less than the node variance determined in step 455, then the facility continues in step 464 to return, identifying the split opportunity selected in step 461, else the facility continues in step 463 to return without identifying a split opportunity. In the example, the facility compares line 38 to line 9, and accordingly determines to split the root node in accordance with split opportunity 2.
  • Returning to FIG. 4A, in step 405, where the steps shown in FIG. 4B determine that the node should be split, the facility creates a pair of children for the node. Each child represents one of the subranges of the split opportunity identified in step 404 and the node's full range of unselected attributes. Each child represents all basis sales whose attributes satisfy the attribute ranges represented by the child. Step 405 is discussed in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 7.
  • In step 406, because the node will be a leaf node, the facility determines the mean selling price of basis sales represented by the node.
  • In step 407, the facility processes the next node of the tree. After step 407, these steps conclude.
  • FIG. 7 is a tree diagram showing a completed version of the sample tree. It can be seen that the facility added child nodes 702 and 703 to root node 601, corresponding to the subranges defined by the split opportunity selected in step 461. Node 702 represents sales whose bedrooms attribute is less than or equal to 4, that is, between 1 and 4, as well as the full range of view attribute values represented by node 601. Accordingly, node 702 represents sales 8 and 11. Because this number of sales is below the threshold of 4, node 702 qualifies as a leaf node, and its valuation of $152,450 is calculated by determining the mean selling price of sales 8 and 11.
  • Node 703 represents sales with bedrooms attribute values greater than 4, that is, 5-∞. Node 703 further represents the full range of view attributes values for node 601. Accordingly, node 703 represents sales 2, 9, 13, and 15. Because this number of sales is not smaller than the threshold number and the node's ranges are not indivisible, the facility proceeded to consider possible split opportunities. In order to do so, the facility performs the calculation shown below in Table 7. For the following two possible split opportunities: (4) view=no/view=yes; and (5) bedrooms=5/bedrooms>5.
  • TABLE 7
    40 node mean selling price = mean of selling prices for $225,875
    sales 2, 9, 13, and 15 =
    41 sale 2 overall squared error = ($201,000 − line 40)2 = 618765625
    42 sale 9 overall squared error = ($253,500 − line 40)2 = 76314625
    43 sale 13 overall squared error = ($211,000 − line 40)2 = 221265625
    44 sale 15 overall squared error = ($238,000 − line 40)2 = 147015625
    45 node overall squared error = 1750187500
    46 node variance = line 45/3 = 583395833
    47 split side mean selling price of view = no side of $206,000
    possible split opportunity 4 = mean selling prices of
    sales 2 and 13 =
    48 split side mean selling price of view = yes side of $245,750
    possible split opportunity 4 = mean selling prices of
    sales 9 and 15 =
    49 split side mean selling price for bedrooms ≦5 side of $224,500
    possible split opportunity 5 = mean selling prices of
    sales 13 and 15 =
    50 split side mean selling price of bedrooms >5 side of $227,250
    possible split opportunity 5 = mean selling prices of
    sales 2 and 9 =
    51 possible split opportunity 4 squared error for sale 2 = 25000000
    ($201,000 − line 47)2 =
    52 possible split opportunity 4 squared error for sale 9 = 60062500
    ($253,500 − line 48)2 =
    53 possible split opportunity 4 squared error for sale 13 = 25000000
    ($211,000 − line 47)2 =
    54 possible split opportunity 4 squared error for sale 15 = 60062500
    ($238,000 − line 48)2 =
    55 possible split opportunity 4 squared error = sum of 17012500
    lines 51-54 =
    56 possible split opportunity 5 squared error for sale 2 = 689062500
    ($201,000 − line 50)2 =
    57 possible split opportunity 5 squared error for sale 9 = 689062500
    ($253,500 − line 50)2 =
    58 possible split opportunity 5 squared error for sale 13 = 182250000
    ($211,000 − line 49)2 =
    59 possible split opportunity 5 squared error for sale 15 = 182250000
    ($238,000 − line 49)2 =
    60 possible split opportunity 5 squared error = sum of 1742625000
    lines 56-59 =
    61 variance for possible split opportunity 4 = line 55/2 = 85062500
    62 variance for possible split opportunity 5 = line 60/2 = 871312500
  • From Table 7, it can be seen that, between split opportunities 4 and 5, split opportunity 4 has the smaller variance, shown on line 61. It can further be seen that the variance of possible split opportunity 4 shown on line 61 is smaller than the node variance shown on line 46. Accordingly, the facility uses possible split opportunity 4 to split node 703, creating child nodes 704 and 705. Child node 704 represents basis sales 2 and 13, and that attribute ranges bedrooms=5-∞ and view=no. Node 704 has a valuation of $206,000, obtained by averaging the selling prices of the base of sales 2 and 13. Node 705 represents base of sales 9 and 15, and attribute value ranges bedrooms=5-∞ and view=yes. Node 705 has valuation $245,750, obtained by averaging the selling price of sales 9 and 15.
  • In order to apply the completed tree 700 shown in FIG. 7 to obtain its valuation for a particular home, the facility retrieves that home's attributes. As an example, consider a home having attribute values bedrooms=5 and view=yes. The facility begins at root node 601, and among edges 711 and 712, traverses the one whose condition is satisfied by the attributes of the home. In the example, because the value of the bedroom's attribute for the home is 5, the facility traverses edge 712 to node 703. In order to proceed from node 703, the facility determines, among edges 713 and 714, which edge's condition is satisfied. Because the home's value of the view attribute is yes, the facility traverses edge 714 to leaf node 705, and obtains a valuation for the sample home of $245,750.
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the tree shown in FIG. 7 may not be representative in all respects of trees constructed by the facility. For example, such trees may have a larger number of nodes, and/or a larger depth. Also, though not shown in this tree, a single attribute may be split multiple times, i.e., in multiple levels of the tree.
  • FIG. 8 shows steps typically performed by the facility in order to score a tree. In step 801, the facility identifies recent sales in the geographic area that were not used as a basis for constructing the tree in order to score the tree. In steps 802-805, the facility loops through each sale identified in step 801. In step 803, the facility applies the tree to the attributes of the sale to obtain a value. In step 804, the facility compares the value obtained in step 803 to the selling price for the sale to determine an error magnitude, dividing the difference between valuation and selling price by selling price. In step 806, the facility calculates a score that is inversely related to the median error magnitude determined in step 804. After step 806, these steps conclude.
  • FIG. 9 is a table diagram showing sample results for scoring a tree. Scoring table 900 scores tree 700 based upon the contents of recent sales table 300. The scoring table is made up of the rows of recent sales table 300 other than those used as basis sales for constructing the tree, i.e., rows 301, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 310, 312, and 314. It further contains the following columns from recent sales table 300: identifier column 321, address column 322, bedroom column 324, view column 327, and selling price column 329. The scoring table further contains a valuation column 911 containing the valuation of each home determined in step 803. For example, row 307 shows that the facility determines the valuation of $245,750 for sale 7 using tree 700. In particular, the facility begins at root node 601; traverses to node 703 because the number of bedrooms 5 is greater than 4; traverses to node 705 because view=yes; and adopts the valuation of node 705, $245,750. Scoring table 900 further contains an error column 912 indicating the difference between each home's valuation and selling price. For example, row 307 contains an error of 0.0685, the difference between valuation $245,750 and selling price $230,000, divided by selling price $230,000. Associated with the table is a median error field 951 containing the median of error values in the scoring table, or 0.3734. Each tree's median error value is used to determine weightings for the trees that are inversely related to their median error values. In some embodiments, the facility determines the particular tree's weighting by generating an accuracy metric for each tree by subtracting its median error value from 1, and dividing the tree's accuracy measure by the sum of all of the trees' accuracy measures. Also, a variety of different approaches to determine a score that is negatively correlated with the average error may be used by the facility.
  • When a home is valued using the forest, the sample tree will be applied to the attributes of the home in the same way it was applied to homes in the scoring process described above. (If any attributes of the home are missing, the facility typically imputes a value for the missing attribute based upon the median or mode for that attribute in the recent sales table.) The valuation produced will be averaged with the valuations produced by the other trees of the forest. In the average, each valuation will be weighted by the score attributed by the facility to the tree. This resultant average is presented as the valuation for the home.
  • FIGS. 10-11 show ways in which valuations generated by the facility may be presented. FIG. 10 is a display diagram showing detailed information about an individual home. The display 1000 includes detailed information 1001 about the home. Despite the fact that the home has not been sold recently, the facility also displays a valuation 1002 for the home, enabling prospective buyers and listing agents to gauge their interest in the home, or permitting the home's owner to gauge his interest in listing the home for sale.
  • FIG. 11 is a display diagram showing a map identifying a number of homes in the same geographic area. The display 1100 shows homes 1101-1112. The facility also displays its valuations 1151-1162 of these homes in connection with their location on the map. Presenting the facility's valuations in this way permits home shoppers to obtain an overview of the geographic area, identify special trends within the geographic area, identify the anomalous values as good values or poor picks, etc.
  • In some embodiments, the valuations displayed or otherwise reported by the facility are not the “raw” valuations directly produced by the valuation model, but rather “smoothed” valuations that are generated by blending the raw valuation generated by the current iteration of the model with earlier valuations. As one example, in some embodiments, the facility generates a current smoothed valuation for a home by calculating a weighted average of a current raw valuation and a smoothed valuation of the same home from the immediately-preceding time period, where the prior smooth valuation is weighted more heavily than the current raw valuation. In some embodiments, where new iterations of the model are constructed and applied daily, the prior smoothed valuation is weighted 49 times as heavily as the current raw valuation; where a new iteration of the model is constructed and applied weekly, the prior smoothed valuation is weighted 9 times as heavily as the current raw valuation; where new iterations of the model are constructed and applied monthly, the previous smoothed valuation is weighted twice as heavily as the current raw valuation. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of other smoothing techniques may be used in order to dampen erratic movement in a particular home's reported valuation over time.
  • In some embodiments, the facility constructs and applies compound valuation models to one or more geographic areas. A compound valuation model includes two or more separate classification tree forests, some or all of which may be applied to the attributes of a particular home in order to value it. As one example, in some embodiments, the facility constructs a compound model including both a forest constructed as described above (referred to as a “core forest”), as well as a separate, “high-end” forest constructed from basis sales having a selling price above the 97.5 percentile selling price in the geographic area. In these embodiments, the compound model is applied as follows. First, the core forest is applied to the attributes of a home. If the valuation produced by the core forest is no larger than the 97.5 percentile selling price in the geographic area, then this valuation is used directly as the model's valuation. Otherwise, the facility also applies the high-end forest to the attributes of the home. If the valuation produced by the core forest is above the 99 percentile selling price, then the valuation produced by the high-end forest is used directly as the model's valuation. Otherwise, a weighted average of the valuations produced by the core forest and the high-end forest is used, where the weight of the core forest valuation is based upon nearness of the core model valuation to the 97.5 percentile selling price, while the weight of the high-end forest valuation is based on the nearness of the core forest valuation to the 99 percentile selling price.
  • Tailoring Valuation to User Input
  • The facility typically initiates the tailoring of a valuation for a subject home to input from the subject home's user in response to expression of interest by the user in performing such tailoring. In various embodiments, the facility enables the user to express such interest in a variety of ways. As one example, the user may select link 1011 from the display of detailed information about a particular home shown in FIG. 10. FIGS. 12 and 13 show additional ways that the facility permits the user to express such interest in some embodiments. FIG. 12 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility containing the attributes of a particular home, also called “home facts.” The display 1200 includes a list 1201 of attributes and their values, as well as a link 1202 to display a more extensive list. The display further includes a way 1210 that the user may traverse in order to express interest in tailoring the valuation of the home.
  • FIG. 13 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility to identify possible comparable sales on a map. The display 1300 includes such a map 1301 and well as a link 1310 that the user can follow in order to express interest in tailoring evaluation of this home.
  • FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the facility in order to tailor a valuation of a subject home based on information provided by the home's user. The interactions described herein are typically performed by serving web pages to a user who is the user of the subject home, and receiving input from that user based upon the user's interaction with the web pages. These web pages may be part of a web site relating to aspects of residential or other real estate. FIGS. 15-19, discussed in greater detail below, contain sample displays presented by the facility in some embodiments in performing the steps of FIG. 14.
  • In step 1401, the facility displays an initial valuation of the subject home. In step 1402, the facility solicits updated home attributes from the user.
  • FIG. 15 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to display an initial valuation of the subject home and solicit updated home attributes from the user. The display 1500 includes a navigation area 1510 which includes a progress indicator made up of step indicators 1511-1515. The display of step indicator 1511 for the first step more prominently than the other step indicators indicates that the first step is presently being performed. The display further includes an initial valuation 1520 in the amount of $550,727. In this and the display diagrams that follow, home valuations are identified as “Zestimates.” The display also includes a number of controls 1531-1541, each corresponding to a different attribute or “home fact” of the subject home. In some embodiments, attribute controls are only displayed for attributes whose value has a non-zero influence on the valuations provided by the valuation model for the geographic area containing the home, or a level of influence that exceeds a threshold larger than zero. Initially, these attribute controls are populated with attribute values automatically retrieved from a data source and used to determine the subject home's initial valuation in the manner described above. The user can interact with any of these controls to change the corresponding attribute value. For example, the user may interact with control 1532 to correct the number of bedrooms from 3 to 4, or may interact with control 1537 to update the indicated territorial view to a water view that was created when a nearby building was demolished. In some embodiments, as the user interacts with these controls, the facility updates an indication 1550 of the extent to which the user's updates have altered the valuation of the home. In some embodiments, the facility determines this amount by determining a new valuation for the home by applying the existing geographically-specific valuation model for the home—in other words, the existing forest of decision trees for the home—to the updated attributes, and subtracting the original valuation from the result. For example, where the user uses control 1537 to change the value of the view attribute from territorial to none, the facility retraverses all of the trees of the forest constituting the model for the geographic region containing the home. In particular, when the facility traverses sample tree 700 shown in FIG. 7, rather than traversing from node 703 to node 705 for the home as the facility initially did based upon an affirmative value of the view attribute, the facility traverses from node 703 to node 704 based upon the new negative value of the view attribute. Accordingly, the weighted average of the valuations for all the trees of the forest include a valuation of $206,000 from tree 700, obtained from leaf node 704, rather than valuation of $245,750 obtained from node 705.
  • If the user makes a mistake, he or she can select a control 1560 in order to restore the original facts on which the initial valuation was based. The user can select a control 1570 in order to update an indication 1580 of the valuation of home adjusted to take into account the user's updates to the attributes. In some embodiments (not shown), the facility further includes in the display a warning that, because an updated attribute value provided by the user is not represented among the basis sales used to construct the valuation model, updated valuations based upon this updated attribute value may be inaccurate. When the user has finished updating home attributes, he or she can select a next control 1591 to move to the next step of the process, describing home improvements.
  • Returning to FIG. 14, in step 1403, the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the attributes updated by the user. In step 1404, the facility solicits information from the user about improvements to the subject home.
  • FIG. 16 is a display diagram showing a typical display presented by the facility to permit the user to describe improvements made to the subject home. The display 1600 includes a highlighted step indication 1612 that indicates that the user is performing the second step of the process. Indication 1680 reflects the addition of $1500 to the initial valuation based upon the attribute updates performed by the user in the first step of the process. The display includes an area 1830 that the user can use to describe improvements to the subject home. These include an improvement type control 1631, an improvement timing control 1632, and an improvement cost control 1633. When the user interacts with these controls to describe an improvement, the facility typically uses the improvement type and the geographical region containing the subject home to access a table containing average recovery rates for different improvement types and regions. The facility applies the looked-up recovery rate to the improvement cost amount to obtain an estimated present value. In some embodiments, the facility further applies a depreciation schedule to the estimated present value, such as one specifying smooth depreciation from one hundred percent to twenty-five percent over the period between zero and ten years after the improvement, and a flat twenty-five percent thereafter. In some embodiments, however, the values of various improvements are incorporated directly in the valuation model—i.e., are represented in the trees of the forest—therefore may be handled in the application of the valuation model to the home, rather than computed separately. In some embodiments, the facility further monitors for the entry of home improvement in display 1600 that are redundant with attribute updates in FIG. 15, and prevents them from contributing redundantly to calculating the overall revised value for the subject home, either by preventing such an entry, or by reducing the value of such an entry to avoid double-counting. The facility then displays an indication 1634 of an estimated present value of the improvement. The user may select an edit link 1635 to override this estimate of present value. The display further includes a link 1639 that the user may follow to extend the improvement description area for describing another improvement. The display further includes an indication 1640 of the total present value of the described improvements. The display further includes a description 1650 of different improvement types made available by the facility. The user can click the next control 1691 to proceed to the next step of the process, describing other aspects of the home that affect its value.
  • Returning to FIG. 14, in step 1405, the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the improvements described by the user. In step 1406, the facility solicits information from the user about other factors affecting the value of the subject home.
  • FIG. 17 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility to enable the user to describe other aspects of the subject home that affect its value. It can be seen that indication 1780 of the refined value reflects the addition of $3300 for improvements listed in the previous step. The display includes a feature description area 1730 for inputting information about additional aspects. This area includes a description control 1731 for entering a description of the aspect, the control 1732 for indicating whether the aspect adds to or subtracts from the value of the home, and a control 1733 for indicating the magnitude of the impact of the aspect on the value of the home. The display further includes a link 1739 that the user may traverse to expand the aspect description area to describe another aspect. The display further includes an indication 1740 of the total amount added to or subtracted from the subject home's value by the described aspects. The user may select next control 1791 to proceed to the next step of the process, identifying comps regarded by the user as similar to the subject home.
  • Returning to FIG. 14, in step 1407, the facility displays a refined valuation that takes into account the other factors described by the user. In step 1408, the facility solicits from the user a list of nearby homes that have recently sold (“comps”) that are the most similar to the subject home.
  • FIG. 18 is a display diagram showing a sample display presented by the facility in order to enable the user to identify comps regarded by the user as similar to the subject home. It can be seen that the indication 1880 of refined value has been decreased by $300 to reflect a net reduction in the value corresponding to the sum of the inputted values for the aspects described in the previous step of the process. The display includes a map 1830 on which possible comps are displayed as numbers appearing in circles. For example, a possible comp 1831 appears as a circle with the number one in it. When the user hovers over and/or clicks on one of these possible comps, the facility displays a pop-up balloon including information about the possible comp. Additional information about the possible comps is also shown below in table 1840. The user can traverse link 1833 in the pop-up balloon or link 1834 in the table in order to add the first possible comp to a “My Comps” list 1835. The user populates the My Comps list in this manner, until it contains what he or she regards as up to ten comps most similar to the subject home.
  • After the user has populated the My Comps list, and selects either the updated value control 1870 or the next control 1891, in step 1409, the facility determines an updated valuation for the subject home based upon the population of the My Comps list. In particular, in some embodiments, the facility makes a copy of the recent sales table 300 for the geographic region that contains the subject home and was used to construct the forest for this geographic area. The facility alters the copy of the recent sales table to increase a weighting in the copy of the recent sales table of the comps in the My Comps list, causing them to be significantly more likely to be selected from the copy of the recent sales table for inclusion in tree basis tables. In some embodiments, the facility achieves this weighting by adding copies of the rows for each comp in the My Comps list to the recent sales table. In some embodiments, the facility also increases to a lesser extent the weighting in a copy of the recent sales table of the sales of homes that are near the subject home, such as having the same zip code, having the same neighborhood name, or having a calculated distance from the subject home that is below a particular distance threshold. The facility then uses this altered copy of the recent sales table to generate a new forest for the geographic region. The facility applies this forest, which is tailored to the comps included in the My Comps list, to the attributes of the home as updated in the first step of the process. In some embodiments, the result of applying the tailored forest is adjusted by averaging it with a separate valuation determined by multiplying the floor area of the subject home by an average selling price per square foot value among the sales on the My Comps list. In some embodiments, the facility determines the valuation by averaging the average selling price per square foot valuation with the original model valuation rather than the updated model valuation if the initial model valuation is between the adjusted model valuation and the average price per square foot valuation. The facility then subtracts from the resulting valuation the change in value from step one—$1500 in the example—because this amount is represented in the new valuation. To arrive at an overall valuation, the facility adds to the result the additional amounts identified in the second and third steps of the process, in the example $3300 and negative $300.
  • In some embodiments, the facility permits the user to populate the My Comps list with any similar nearby home, irrespective of whether it has recently been sold. The facility then emphasize the valuations of these homes, such as valuations automatically determined by the facility, in determining a refined valuation for the subject home.
  • FIGS. 19A-19F show a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present an overall revised value for the subject home. FIG. 19A shows the entire display 1900, while FIGS. 19B-19F show portions of the display at a greater level of magnification. The display includes an overall summary section 1930 containing an overview of the calculation of the new revised value, as well as detailed sections 1940, 1950, 1960, and 1970, each displaying additional detail about the value added or subtracted by each of the four steps of the process. FIG. 19B shows that section 1930 contains a breakdown beginning with the initial valuation 1920, and adding value increments 1931-1934 for each of the four steps of the process to arrive at the new revised value 1980. FIG. 19C shows that the increment 1931 for the updated attributes is the result of increasing the number of bedrooms from 3-4 (1941) and changing the view from none to water (1942). FIG. 19D shows that the value increment for home improvements 1931 is the result of adding a value of $300 for a new roof (1951) and $3000 for a kitchen remodel (1952). FIG. 19E shows that the increment for other aspects affecting the value of the subject home is arrived at by adding $700 for an orchard (1961) and subtracting $1000 because a new fence is needed (1962). FIG. 19F shows that the user's selection of comps has established an increment of $2650 (1935). Section 1970 further includes a map 1971 showing the comps selected by the user, as well as a table 1972 showing the same in a different form.
  • In various embodiments, the behavior of the facility described above is adapted in various ways. As one adaptation, in some embodiments, the facility uses a smoothed version of the valuation produced by the valuation model, rather than a raw version. For example, a smoothed version of this valuation may be obtained by blending the raw valuation produced using a current iteration of the model with one or more valuations produced using earlier iterations of the model. In some embodiments, such blending involves calculating a weighted average of the current raw valuation and the immediately-preceding smoothed valuation in which the smoothed valuation is weighted more heavily. For example, where the valuation model is updated daily, in some embodiments, the facility weights the preceding smoothed valuation 49 times more heavily than the current raw valuation.
  • As another adaptation, in some embodiments, where user input causes the facility to produce an updated valuation for a home that varies from the original valuation of the home by more than a threshold percentage, the facility displays a warning message indicating that the valuation has changed significantly, and may not be accurate.
  • As another adaptation, in some embodiments, the facility generates a tailored valuation using a valuation model that is constrained to use a proper subset of available home attributes, such as only the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating the tailored valuation. In some embodiments, this involves using a separate decision tree forest valuation model that is constructed using only the subset of attributes. In some embodiments, this involves using a valuation model of another type that is constructed using only the subset of attributes, such as a linear regression model constructed by plotting each of the base of sales as a point in N+1-space, where N is the number of continuous attributes in the subset plus the sum of the unique values of categorical attributes in the subset minus the number of categorical attributes in the subset, N of the dimensions are devoted individually to the values of attributes among the subset, and the final dimension is devoted to selling price; and using curve-fitting techniques to construct a function yielding home value whose independent variables are the values of the attributes among the subset; this function is used to determine valuations of the subject home.
  • FIG. 20 is a table diagram showing sample contents of recent sales information used to construct a linear regression valuation model that is based on the attributes whose values are available for the user to update in the first step of the process of generating a tailored valuation. It can be seen that the table 2000 includes the following columns for each sale: a sale id column 2021 containing an identifier for the sale; a square foot column 2022 containing the improved floor area of the home; a lot size column 2023 containing the area of the home's lot, in square feet; a bedrooms column 2024 containing the number of bedrooms in the home; a bathrooms column 2025 containing the number of bathrooms in the home; a floors column 2026 containing the number of stories in the home; a year column 2027 showing the year in which the house was constructed; a selling price column 2028 containing the selling price at which the home was sold; a roof type column 2029 indicating the type of material from which the home's roof is constructed; and a use code column 2030 containing an indication of the primary use of the home.
  • Table 8 below lists variables derived from these sale attribute values that are used as independent variables to construct a linear regression model.
  • TABLE 8
    63 SQUAREFEETPERBEDROOM = column 2022/column 2024
    64 BUILTDATEDIFFERENCEYEARS = current year − column 2027
    65 BATHROOMCNT = column 2025
    66 BEDROOMCNT = column 2024, or, if empty, total number of rooms
    67 FINISHEDSQUAREFEET = column 2022
    68 LOTSIZESQUAREFEET = column 2023
    69 STORYCNT = column 2026
    70 USECODETYPEIDSTANDARD = encoded version of column 2030
    71 ROOFTYPEID = encoded version of column 2029
    72 BEDSQFT = line 66 * line 67
    73 BEDLOT = line 66 * line 68
    74 SQFTLOT = line 67 * line 68
    75 BED2 = (line 66)2
    76 LOT2 = (line 68)2
    77 YEAR2 = (line 64)2
    78 SQFT2 = (line 67)2
  • For each of a group of recent sales, the facility creates a tuple made up of the values of the variables showing lines 63-78 in Table 8 based upon the sale's attribute values, as well as the selling price for the sale. The facility submits the generated tuples to a linear regression engine, which fits a curve to the points represented by the tuples, resulting in a set of coefficients representing a linear valuation formula. For example, in some embodiments, the facility performs the curve-fitting by invoking a lm( ) function described at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html#Linear-models, and available as part of the R statistical computing environment, available at http://www.r-project.org/. This formula can then be used as a valuation model to determine a valuation for an arbitrary home, given a tuple corresponding to the home's attribute values.
  • As an example, when the facility considers the recent sales data shown in FIG. 20, it constructs a valuation formula shown as the sum of the lines of Table 9 below.
  • TABLE 9
    79 $219,000
    80 −$16 * FINISHEDSQUAREFEET
    81 −$171 * LOTSIZESQUAREFEET
    82 $0 * SQFT2
    83 $0 * LOT2
    84 $0 * SQFTLOT
    85 $2 * YEAR2
    86 $1,933 * BUILTDATEDIFFERENCEYEAR
    87 $4,940 * STORYCNT
    88 $26,100 * BATHROOMCNT
    89 $35,110 * BED2
    90 −$337 * BEDSQFT
    91 $55 * BEDLOT
    92 $62,980 * BEDROOMCNT
    93 $15,390 if (ROOFTYPE = tile)
    94 $87,640 if (ROOFTYPE = shake)
  • In some embodiments, the facility filters out the recent sales data used by the facility to generate a valuation formula sales whose attributes have extreme values, such as an age greater than 300 years. In some embodiments, the facility tailors the valuation formula created by the process described above to a particular home using one or more of the following techniques: more heavily weighting sales having a high selling price in valuation formulas constructed for valuing a home whose primary valuation is near the average selling price of these high-end homes; more heavily weighting recent sales that are geographically near the home to be valued, such as in the same zip code; and, where the user has selected particular recent sales as My Comps, more heavily weighting these sales in constructing the valuation formula. In some embodiments, data missing from the recent sales data used to construct the valuation function is imputed in a manner similar to that described above.
  • In some embodiments, the facility employs a model of a type other than the primary, decision-tree forest model, but does not use it to directly generate valuations of the subject home. Rather, it is used to generate valuations of the subject home before and after the user updates attributes of the subject home, and the percentage change in the valuation produced by the other model is applied to a valuation produced for the subject home using the original attribute values by the primary, decision-tree forest model. Similarly, in these embodiments, the facility may construct separate copies of the other model before and after the performance of the fourth, My Comps step of the process use each of the copies to value the subject home, determine the percentage change between these valuations, and apply it to a valuation produced for the subject home by the primary model before the fourth step of the process is performed.
  • Storing Tailored Valuation
  • FIG. 21 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility in order to present a refined valuation for the subject home, together with a control for saving this refined valuation. The display 2100, similar to display 1900 shown in FIG. 19A, includes a save my estimate button 2101 that the user may select in order to save this estimate and the information upon which it is based. The display further includes a help control 2102 that the user may select in order to obtain more information about saving the refined valuation. When the user selects button 2101, the facility solicits additional information about how the refined valuation is to be saved.
  • FIG. 22 is a display diagram showing a sample display typically presented by the facility when the user selects the save my estimate button. This display 2200 includes a field 2210 into which the user may enter comments about the information on which the refined valuation is based. The display also includes controls 2221-2223 for specifying a “save option,” or a level of access that is to be permitted to the saved refined valuation, specifically private radio button 2221, shared radio button 2222, and public radio button 2223. Once the user has selected one of these three radio buttons, the user can select a save button 2231 to complete the save operation, or a cancel button 2232 to cancel the save operation. Where the user selects the public radio button 2223, the facility determines whether the user is authorized to save a public refined valuation for this home. For example, in some embodiments, the facility tests whether the user is the owner of the home, in some cases in accordance with one or more techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/524,047 (patent counsel's docket no. 56920-8010), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. FIGS. 23-25 show the results of saving the refined valuation with various levels of access.
  • FIG. 23 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the shared level of access. The display 2300 includes a URL 2310 that the user may copy from the display into an email message addressed to any other people that the user wishes to be able to access the saved refined valuation. In some embodiments (not shown), the display 2300 includes a field into which the user may simply enter email addresses for these people, causing the facility to automatically send them a message containing URL 2310. The display also includes a link 2320 that the user may traverse in order to display information about the saved refined valuation, such as is shown in the Figures that follow.
  • FIG. 24 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the private level of access. The display 2400 includes a list of “favorite homes”, such as favorite homes 2410, 2420, and 2430. Each favorite home includes information identifying the favorite home, such as identifying information 2431 for favorite home 2430, as well as indications of any valuations determined for each favorite home that is accessible to the current user. Favorite home 2430 has an initial valuation 2432 based upon information publicly available about the home, as well as a refined valuation 2434 generated by the current user and saved with the private level of access. This user is the only one who can view this refined valuation. Additionally, this user can traverse links 2435 in order to update the refined valuation. For favorite home 2410, the facility displays a public refined valuation 2413 generated by the same user. Also, for favorite home 2420, the facility shows an indication 2425 that the user has not generated his or her own refined valuation for this home, and includes a link 2426 that the user may traverse in order to generate his or her own refined valuation.
  • FIG. 25 is a display diagram showing a display typically presented by the facility where the user selects to save the refined valuation with the public level of access. The display 2500 is accessible to any user, and in some embodiments may be accessed from a home detail page presented for the home and containing various information about the home. It contains information 2501 identifying home, and initial valuation 2502, and a refined valuation 2503 generated by the owner. The display includes comments 2505 entered by the owner as part of saving the refined Valuation the display further includes an overview breakdown 2506 of the value added or subtracted by each of the stages of the refined valuation. The display further includes a list 2507 of some or all of the home facts as modified by the owner, and an indication 2508 of the value added or subtracted as a result; a list 2509 of any home improvements identified by the owner, and an indication 2510 of the value added or subtracted as a result; and a list 2511 of any other features identified by the owner, and an indication 2512 of the value added or subjected as a result. In some embodiments (not shown), the facility includes in this display similar detail sections for the other features and comps stages of the refined valuation process. The display further includes a print control 2513 that the user may activate in order to print the estimate shown in the display, as well as a send control 2514 that the user may activate in order to email the estimate to other users. Additionally, the display contains the following additional controls: a control 2521 that the user may activate in order to rescind the publication of the owner's estimate; a control 2522 that the user may activate in order to update the owner's estimate; a control 2523 that the user may activate to delete the owner's estimate; and a control 2524 that the user may activate in order to edit the comments 2505 about the owner's estimate.
  • In various embodiments, where a refined valuation is saved, the facility uses different approaches to displaying it. In some embodiments, each refined valuation is displayed with exactly the same value it had at the time it was generated. In some embodiments, when a refined valuation is displayed, the facility begins with the initial valuation that existed at the time that the refined valuation was generated, but applies a refined valuation model to the information provided to generate the refined valuation that is updated based upon current information to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated. In some embodiments, when a refined valuation is displayed, the facility begins with the latest (i.e., most current) initial valuation that existed is presently available for the home, and adjusts this initial valuation by the original differential produced by the refined valuation when originally to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated. In some embodiments, when a refined valuation is displayed, the facility begins with the latest (i.e., most current) initial valuation that existed is presently available for the home, and adjusts this initial valuation by a differential determined by applying a refined valuation model to the information provided to generate the refined valuation that is updated based upon current information to arrive at a refined valuation is potentially different than the refined valuation originally generated.
  • CONCLUSION
  • It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described facility may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways. For example, the facility may use a variety of user interfaces to collect various information usable in determining valuations from users and other people knowledgeable about homes, and a variety of user interfaces to display refined valuations. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that follow and the elements recited therein.

Claims (13)

We claim:
1. A computer-readable storage device whose contents cause a computing system to perform a method for procuring information about a property from its owner that is usable to refine an automatic valuation of the property, the method comprising:
generating the automatic valuation of the property using only information about the property originated by a public source;
displaying at least a portion of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property;
on a first day:
obtaining user input from the owner adjusting at least one aspect of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property;
storing the obtained user input in a non-volatile medium; and
on a second day that is after the first day,
using the stored user input to display to the owner a refined valuation of the property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input.
2. The computer-readable storage device of claim 1, further comprising, on a third day after the first day, using the stored user input to display to a user other than the owner a refined valuation of the property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input.
3. The computer-readable storage device of claim 1, further comprising, on the first day, displaying to the owner a refined valuation of the property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input, and wherein the refined valuation displayed on the first day is the same as the refined valuation displayed on the second day.
4. The computer-readable storage device of claim 1, further comprising, on the first day, displaying to the owner a refined valuation of the property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input, and wherein the refined valuation displayed on the first day is different from the refined valuation displayed on the second day.
5. A method in a computing system having a processor for refining an automatic valuation of a property based upon input from a user knowledgeable about the property, comprising:
generating the automatic valuation of the property using only information about the property originated by a public source;
displaying at least a portion of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property;
on a first day, obtaining user input adjusting at least one aspect of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property;
with a computer processor, automatically determining a first refined valuation of the property that is based on the adjustment of the obtained user input; and
presenting the first refined valuation of the property on a second day that is after the first day.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the presenting involves displaying the first refined valuation of the property to a user providing the user input.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein the presenting involves displaying the first refined valuation of the property to a user other than the user providing the user input.
8. The method of claim 5 further comprising:
on the first day, obtaining user input specifying a level of access to be permitted to refined valuations that are based on the adjustment of the obtained user input; and
on a third day that is later than the first day, presenting the first refined valuation of the property in accordance with the specified level of access.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein specified level of access is private, and wherein the presenting on the third day involves displaying the first refined valuation of the property to the user providing the user input.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein specified level of access is public, and wherein the presenting on the third day involves displaying the first refined valuation of the property to any user.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein the specified level of access is public, and wherein the presenting on the third day involves displaying the first refined valuation of the property to any user designated by the user providing the user input.
12. The computer-readable storage device of claim 1 wherein the user input obtained from the owner adjusts at least one aspect of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property by identifying at least one sale of another property comparable to the property.
13. The method of claim 5 wherein the obtained user input adjusts at least one aspect of information about the property used in the automatic valuation of the property by identifying at least one sale of another property comparable to the property.
US14/191,388 2006-02-03 2014-02-26 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner Abandoned US20140180936A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/191,388 US20140180936A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-02-26 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US14/318,536 US20140316999A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-06-27 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner.

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/347,024 US7970674B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-02-03 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US11/524,048 US8515839B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-09-19 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US13/943,604 US20130304654A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-07-16 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US14/191,388 US20140180936A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-02-26 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/943,604 Continuation US20130304654A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-07-16 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/318,536 Continuation US20140316999A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-06-27 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140180936A1 true US20140180936A1 (en) 2014-06-26

Family

ID=37891123

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/524,048 Active 2030-12-12 US8515839B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-09-19 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US13/943,604 Abandoned US20130304654A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-07-16 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US14/191,388 Abandoned US20140180936A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-02-26 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US14/318,536 Abandoned US20140316999A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-06-27 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner.
US14/846,632 Active 2027-04-02 US10896449B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2015-09-04 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/524,048 Active 2030-12-12 US8515839B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-09-19 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US13/943,604 Abandoned US20130304654A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-07-16 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/318,536 Abandoned US20140316999A1 (en) 2006-02-03 2014-06-27 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner.
US14/846,632 Active 2027-04-02 US10896449B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2015-09-04 Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (5) US8515839B2 (en)
GB (1) GB2436159A (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150379588A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2015-12-31 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US9934490B2 (en) 2015-12-29 2018-04-03 Setschedule Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for transacting lead and scheduled appointment records
US10380653B1 (en) 2010-09-16 2019-08-13 Trulia, Llc Valuation system
US10643232B1 (en) 2015-03-18 2020-05-05 Zillow, Inc. Allocating electronic advertising opportunities
US10754884B1 (en) 2013-11-12 2020-08-25 Zillow, Inc. Flexible real estate search
US10789549B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2020-09-29 Zillow, Inc. Enforcing, with respect to changes in one or more distinguished independent variable values, monotonicity in the predictions produced by a statistical model
US10984489B1 (en) 2014-02-13 2021-04-20 Zillow, Inc. Estimating the value of a property in a manner sensitive to nearby value-affecting geographic features
US11068911B1 (en) 2011-03-09 2021-07-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining market rental rate index for properties
US11093982B1 (en) 2014-10-02 2021-08-17 Zillow, Inc. Determine regional rate of return on home improvements
US11244361B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2022-02-08 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11288756B1 (en) 2011-03-09 2022-03-29 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining market rental rates for properties
US11315202B2 (en) 2006-09-19 2022-04-26 Zillow, Inc. Collecting and representing home attributes
US11449958B1 (en) 2008-01-09 2022-09-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11682052B2 (en) 2019-10-15 2023-06-20 Orchard Technologies, Inc. Machine learning systems and methods for determining home value
US11861748B1 (en) 2019-06-28 2024-01-02 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Valuation of homes using geographic regions of varying granularity

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7970674B2 (en) * 2006-02-03 2011-06-28 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US9798518B1 (en) * 2010-03-26 2017-10-24 Open Invention Network Llc Method and apparatus for processing data based on touch events on a touch sensitive device
US10191609B1 (en) 2010-03-26 2019-01-29 Open Invention Network Llc Method and apparatus of providing a customized user interface
US9223529B1 (en) 2010-03-26 2015-12-29 Open Invention Network, Llc Method and apparatus of processing information in an environment with multiple devices and limited resources
US8892594B1 (en) 2010-06-28 2014-11-18 Open Invention Network, Llc System and method for search with the aid of images associated with product categories
US8832115B2 (en) * 2010-12-20 2014-09-09 Quantarium, Llc Ranking real estate based on its value and other factors
US20120330714A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2012-12-27 Ashutosh Malaviya Enhanced systems, processes, and user interfaces for targeted marketing associated with a population of assets
US20130080340A1 (en) * 2011-09-23 2013-03-28 Elif Onmus-Baykal Indexing and adjusting for property condition in an automated valuation model
US20140039983A1 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-02-06 Knowledge Support Systems Ltd. Location evaluation
US20150254587A1 (en) * 2014-03-10 2015-09-10 International Business Machines Corporation Estimates using historical analysis
US20150302419A1 (en) * 2014-04-22 2015-10-22 Fannie Mae Appraisal adjustments scoring system and method
US10762510B2 (en) * 2014-08-01 2020-09-01 International Business Machines Corporation Modifying a number of opportunities in a customer relationship management (CRM) system
US20170357984A1 (en) * 2015-02-27 2017-12-14 Sony Corporation Information processing device, information processing method, and program
US9654549B2 (en) * 2015-05-18 2017-05-16 Somchai Akkarawittayapoom Systems and methods for creating user-managed online pages (MAPpages) linked to locations on an interactive digital map
US10296569B2 (en) 2015-05-18 2019-05-21 Somchai Akkarawittayapoom Systems and methods for creating user-managed online pages (MAPpages) linked to locations on an interactive digital map
CN106372748A (en) * 2016-08-29 2017-02-01 上海交通大学 Hard-rock tunnel boring machine boring efficiency prediction method
US20180130152A1 (en) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-10 Fannie Mae Property characteristics filtering to automatically update sub-markets for a subject property
US20180158156A1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Bank Of America Corporation Property Assessments Using Augmented Reality User Devices
US20180159838A1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Bank Of America Corporation Real Estate Property Project Analysis Using Augmented Reality User Devices
US20180158157A1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Bank Of America Corporation Geo-targeted Property Analysis Using Augmented Reality User Devices
US11568433B2 (en) 2017-05-16 2023-01-31 Carrier Corporation Predictive change for real estate application
US11861747B1 (en) * 2017-09-07 2024-01-02 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Time on market and likelihood of sale prediction
US20190130226A1 (en) * 2017-10-27 2019-05-02 International Business Machines Corporation Facilitating automatic handling of incomplete data in a random forest model
US11861635B1 (en) * 2019-03-20 2024-01-02 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Automatic analysis of regional housing markets based on the appreciation or depreciation of individual homes
US20200402116A1 (en) * 2019-06-19 2020-12-24 Reali Inc. System, method, computer program product or platform for efficient real estate value estimation and/or optimization
US20210081977A1 (en) * 2019-09-12 2021-03-18 Capital One Services, Llc Method and System for Crowdsourcing Home Value Estimate
US11682090B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-06-20 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation and employment of parcel production stability attributes for land parcel valuation
US11823296B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-11-21 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation and employment of parcel productivity attributes for land parcel valuation
US11798043B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-10-24 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation and employment of agro-economic metrics for land parcel valuation
US11727170B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-08-15 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation of land parcel valuation based on supplemented parcel productivity attributes
US11720723B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-08-08 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation and employment of parcel sustainability attributes for land parcel valuation
US11720724B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2023-08-08 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation of land parcel valuation tailored for use
US11436240B1 (en) * 2020-07-03 2022-09-06 Kathleen Warnaar Systems and methods for mapping real estate to real estate seeker preferences
US11768840B2 (en) 2020-07-08 2023-09-26 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for rapid search for agricultural parcels and generation of relevant search results
US11580116B2 (en) 2020-07-08 2023-02-14 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Viewport location based method and apparatus for generation and promotion of type ahead results in a multi-source agricultural parcel search
US11657042B2 (en) 2020-07-08 2023-05-23 Cibo Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for generation and promotion of type ahead results in a multi-source agricultural parcel search

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5361201A (en) * 1992-10-19 1994-11-01 Hnc, Inc. Real estate appraisal using predictive modeling
US6178406B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-01-23 General Electric Company Method for estimating the value of real property
US20020087389A1 (en) * 2000-08-28 2002-07-04 Michael Sklarz Value your home
US20030033176A1 (en) * 1996-08-22 2003-02-13 Hancock S. Lee Geographic location multiple listing service identifier and method of assigning and using the same
US6609118B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2003-08-19 General Electric Company Methods and systems for automated property valuation
US20040073508A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-04-15 Paul Foster Method and system for property valuation in an on-line computing environment
US20060020424A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-01-26 Carl Quindel Apparatus and method for analyzing trends with values of interest
US20060085210A1 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-20 Michael Owens System and method for facilitating like kind exchanges
WO2006043951A2 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-27 Network Real Estate Corporation System and method for facilitating like kind exchanges
US20060105342A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2006-05-18 Mario Villena Computerized systems for formation and update of databases
US20070005373A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2007-01-04 Villena Mario A Computerized agent and systems for automatic searching of properties having favorable attributes
US7788186B1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2010-08-31 Fannie Mae Method and system for automated property valuation adjustment
US8051089B2 (en) * 2003-04-30 2011-11-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and methods for location-based real estate service
US8660919B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2014-02-25 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Method for monitoring and reporting changes in the value of real estate

Family Cites Families (181)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4870576A (en) 1986-03-19 1989-09-26 Realpro, Ltd. Real estate search and location system and method
US5414621A (en) * 1992-03-06 1995-05-09 Hough; John R. System and method for computing a comparative value of real estate
JPH09507108A (en) 1993-10-29 1997-07-15 ケイスリー,ロナルド,ディ. Interactive multimedia communication system to access industry-specific information
US5592375A (en) 1994-03-11 1997-01-07 Eagleview, Inc. Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5754850A (en) * 1994-05-11 1998-05-19 Realselect, Inc. Real-estate method and apparatus for searching for homes in a search pool for exact and close matches according to primary and non-primary selection criteria
US5680305A (en) 1995-02-16 1997-10-21 Apgar, Iv; Mahlon System and method for evaluating real estate
US5794216A (en) * 1995-07-14 1998-08-11 Brown; Timothy Robert Methods and system for data acquisition in a multimedia real estate database
US6115694A (en) 1995-08-25 2000-09-05 General Electric Company Method for validating specified prices on real property
US5855011A (en) * 1996-09-13 1998-12-29 Tatsuoka; Curtis M. Method for classifying test subjects in knowledge and functionality states
US6401070B1 (en) * 1996-10-11 2002-06-04 Freddie Mac System and method for providing house price forecasts based on repeat sales model
BR9714949A (en) 1996-12-20 2005-04-12 Princeton Video Image Inc Superior adjustment device for targeted electronic insertion of video indications
US5857174A (en) * 1997-11-21 1999-01-05 Dugan; John W. Real estate appraisal method and device for standardizing real property marketing analysis by using pre-adjusted appraised comparable sales
US6240425B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2001-05-29 John Naughton Geographic search engine having independent selections of direction and distance from a relocatable hub
US6877015B1 (en) * 1998-09-04 2005-04-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamically adjusting data values in response to remote user input
US6397208B1 (en) 1999-01-19 2002-05-28 Microsoft Corporation System and method for locating real estate in the context of points-of-interest
WO2000055771A1 (en) 1999-03-17 2000-09-21 Gioia Sandra L System for specifying building upgrade options and determining building cost
US6493721B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2002-12-10 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Techniques for performing incremental data updates
US7058817B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2006-06-06 The Chase Manhattan Bank System and method for single sign on process for websites with multiple applications and services
US7120599B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2006-10-10 Ge Capital Commercial Finance, Inc. Methods and systems for modeling using classification and regression trees
US6615187B1 (en) 2000-02-09 2003-09-02 Warren S. Ashenmil Method of securitizing and trading real estate brokerage options
US6871140B1 (en) 2000-02-25 2005-03-22 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for collection, distribution, and use of information in connection with commercial real estate
US20010039506A1 (en) 2000-04-04 2001-11-08 Robbins Michael L. Process for automated real estate valuation
US20020007336A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2002-01-17 Robbins Michael L. Process for automated owner-occupied residental real estate valuation
US7454355B2 (en) 2000-04-27 2008-11-18 Milman Robert N Method and system for providing real estate information using a computer network, such as the internet
US9875492B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2018-01-23 Dennis J. Dupray Real estate transaction system
US20020082903A1 (en) 2000-06-22 2002-06-27 Seiichiro Yasuzawa Real estate net-market system
US20040093270A1 (en) 2000-06-30 2004-05-13 Gilbert Hugh Heathcote Method and system for amplifying advertisements
US20020052814A1 (en) 2000-07-10 2002-05-02 Ketterer Robert M. Virtual real estate brokage system
US20040054605A1 (en) 2000-07-18 2004-03-18 Whittet William Clayton Method and system for publishing a real estate listing through a global computer network
US20020035520A1 (en) 2000-08-02 2002-03-21 Weiss Allan N. Property rating and ranking system and method
US7333943B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2008-02-19 The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Method and system for managing real property transactions having internet access and control
US7870576B2 (en) 2000-09-08 2011-01-11 Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. Targeted advertising through electronic program guide
US7487114B2 (en) * 2000-10-23 2009-02-03 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for associating aerial images, map features, and information
US7640204B2 (en) 2000-10-23 2009-12-29 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for collection, distribution, and use of information in connection with commercial real estate
US20090132316A1 (en) * 2000-10-23 2009-05-21 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for associating aerial images, map features, and information
US7174301B2 (en) 2000-10-23 2007-02-06 Costar Group, Inc. System and method for accessing geographic-based data
US7016866B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2006-03-21 Accenture Sdn. Bhd. System and method for assisting the buying and selling of property
US7523047B1 (en) 2000-12-20 2009-04-21 Demandtec, Inc. Price optimization system
CN1304967C (en) 2001-03-22 2007-03-14 郑明真 Methods and systems for electronic mail, internet target and direct marketing, and electronic mail banner
US7346519B2 (en) 2001-04-10 2008-03-18 Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc Method and system for MRIS platinum database
US6760707B2 (en) * 2001-06-01 2004-07-06 Amanda Provost Method for advertising real estate over the internet
US20030004781A1 (en) 2001-06-18 2003-01-02 Mallon Kenneth P. Method and system for predicting aggregate behavior using on-line interest data
US7711574B1 (en) 2001-08-10 2010-05-04 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) System and method for providing automated value estimates of properties as of a specified previous time period
US7289965B1 (en) * 2001-08-10 2007-10-30 Freddie Mac Systems and methods for home value scoring
US7249146B2 (en) 2001-09-06 2007-07-24 Shimon Brecher Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate
US7219078B2 (en) 2001-09-06 2007-05-15 Causeway Data Communications Limited Spatially-based valuation of property
US20030101063A1 (en) 2001-09-28 2003-05-29 Sexton Ashley K. Real estate information system
US20030078878A1 (en) 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Opsahl-Ong Lorinda R. Systems and methods for evaluating commercial real estate property using stochastic vacancy information
US8015091B1 (en) 2001-11-21 2011-09-06 Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc. Analyzing investment data
US7783562B1 (en) * 2001-11-21 2010-08-24 Clayton Fixed Income Services Inc. Credit risk managing loan pools
US7136871B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2006-11-14 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for selectively displaying advertisements
US20030101074A1 (en) * 2001-11-29 2003-05-29 Takeshi Suzuki System and method for evaluating real estate and the surrounding environment and visualizing the evaluation results
US20030110122A1 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-06-12 Nalebuff Barry J. Home equity insurance financial product
US7818219B2 (en) 2001-12-27 2010-10-19 American Hungarian Technologies Inc. Electronic realty and transaction system and method therein
US6876955B1 (en) 2001-12-28 2005-04-05 Fannie Mae Method and apparatus for predicting and reporting a real estate value based on a weighted average of predicted values
US20110066510A1 (en) 2002-01-16 2011-03-17 Galip Talegon Methods for valuing and placing advertising
US20030149658A1 (en) 2002-02-06 2003-08-07 Radian Group, Inc. System for providing a warranty for the automated valuation of property
US7451065B2 (en) 2002-03-11 2008-11-11 International Business Machines Corporation Method for constructing segmentation-based predictive models
US8521619B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2013-08-27 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Computer-based system and method for determining a quantitative scarcity index value based on online computer search activities
US20030191723A1 (en) 2002-03-28 2003-10-09 Foretich James Christopher System and method for valuing real property
US20030212565A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-13 Badali Robert C. Appraisal and home inspection process
US20040039629A1 (en) 2002-05-23 2004-02-26 Kevin Hoffman Web based method and system for managing and transferring business information
JP3954454B2 (en) * 2002-07-05 2007-08-08 アルパイン株式会社 Map data distribution system and navigation device
US20040019517A1 (en) 2002-07-26 2004-01-29 Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. Method of establishing an insurable value estimate for a real estate property
US20040049440A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 Masahiro Shinoda Real estate appraisal auxiliary system, a storage medium with a computer software program stored therein for use by a computer system to assist in appraising real estate, and a real estate appraisal auxiliary method
US20040153330A1 (en) 2003-02-05 2004-08-05 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. System and method for evaluating future collateral risk quality of real estate
US20040220872A1 (en) 2003-04-29 2004-11-04 Pollock Frederick E. Lending based on an asset and securitization of loan interests
IL156392A0 (en) 2003-06-11 2004-01-04 Makor Issues & Rights Ltd A method and system for optimized real estate appraisal
US20040267657A1 (en) 2003-06-28 2004-12-30 Global Skyline Llc Method for valuing forwards, futures and options on real estate
US7908248B2 (en) 2003-07-22 2011-03-15 Sap Ag Dynamic meta data
WO2005015360A2 (en) * 2003-08-08 2005-02-17 Ernst & Young Llp Methods and systems for valuing a business decision
US7464109B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2008-12-09 U-Haul International, Inc. System and method of compiling real property information from a central database
US20050071376A1 (en) 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Manoj Modi System and method of managing real property through a central database
US20050154656A1 (en) * 2004-01-12 2005-07-14 Kim Christopher D.Y. Ranking comparable properties for appraisal
US20050154657A1 (en) * 2004-01-12 2005-07-14 Kim Christopher D.Y. Condition scoring for a property appraisal system
US20050187778A1 (en) 2004-02-20 2005-08-25 Guy Mitchell Method and system for estimating the value of real estate
US20050192930A1 (en) 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Terradatum, Inc. System and method of real estate data analysis and display to support business management
US20050240429A1 (en) 2004-04-22 2005-10-27 Andrew Dieden Method for assembling, organizing, disseminating and managing information relating to real estate transactions
JP4330488B2 (en) 2004-05-12 2009-09-16 達實 小野 Heat treatment equipment using superheated steam
US20090043637A1 (en) * 2004-06-01 2009-02-12 Eder Jeffrey Scott Extended value and risk management system
US9213461B2 (en) * 2004-06-16 2015-12-15 Redfin Corporation Web-based real estate mapping system
US20050288942A1 (en) 2004-06-25 2005-12-29 First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. Method and apparatus for valuing property
US20060015357A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2006-01-19 First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. Method and apparatus for spatiotemporal valuation of real estate
WO2006025830A1 (en) 2004-08-31 2006-03-09 Homexperts, Inc. System and method for updating value of a property
US20060080114A1 (en) 2004-10-07 2006-04-13 Real Soft Commercial Connection, Llc Method and system for providing real estate search information
US8370267B2 (en) 2004-10-14 2013-02-05 Carey Mead Consultants, Inc. System and method for appraiser-assisted valuation
US20060089842A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-04-27 Medawar Cherif R System and method for finding, analyzing, controlling, timing and strategizing real estate investing online
US9076185B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2015-07-07 Michael Dell Orfano System and method for managing electronic real estate registry information
US8001024B2 (en) 2004-12-08 2011-08-16 Corelogic Information Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for testing automated valuation models
US20060167710A1 (en) 2005-01-25 2006-07-27 King Martin T Method and system for registering potential acquirers of assets that are not currently on the market
US7567262B1 (en) * 2005-02-25 2009-07-28 IDV Solutions LLC Hybrid graphics for interactive reporting
US7725359B1 (en) 2005-04-21 2010-05-25 Jennifer Katzfey Electronic realty systems and methods
US7826965B2 (en) 2005-06-16 2010-11-02 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for determining a relevance rank for a point of interest
US20070050342A1 (en) 2005-08-16 2007-03-01 Sami Inkinen Real estate listing and advertising system
US20070043770A1 (en) 2005-08-22 2007-02-22 Redfin Discovery method for buyers, sellers of real estate
US8311888B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-11-13 Jumptap, Inc. Revenue models associated with syndication of a behavioral profile using a monetization platform
WO2007033402A1 (en) 2005-09-19 2007-03-29 Property Ratings Pty Ltd Property rating and ranking system and method
FI20051118L (en) 2005-11-04 2007-05-05 Igglo Oy Method and system for providing an automated search service in the real estate market
US20070106523A1 (en) 2005-11-07 2007-05-10 Eaton James M Information system and method for generating appraisal reports for real properties
US20070124235A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-05-31 Anindya Chakraborty Method and system for income estimation
US8099683B2 (en) 2005-12-08 2012-01-17 International Business Machines Corporation Movement-based dynamic filtering of search results in a graphical user interface
US20080086356A1 (en) 2005-12-09 2008-04-10 Steve Glassman Determining advertisements using user interest information and map-based location information
US20070143132A1 (en) 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Linne Mark R Automated valuation of a plurality of properties
US7725477B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2010-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Power filter for online listing service
JP4909360B2 (en) 2005-12-24 2012-04-04 リッチ メディア クラブ エルエルシィ System and method for creating, distributing and tracking advertisements via an electronic network
US8676680B2 (en) * 2006-02-03 2014-03-18 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US8515839B2 (en) * 2006-02-03 2013-08-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US7970674B2 (en) * 2006-02-03 2011-06-28 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US20070244780A1 (en) 2006-03-26 2007-10-18 Liu Ralph Y Real estate derivative financial products, index design, trading methods, and supporting computer systems
US20070255581A1 (en) 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Otto Jay P Online real estate marketplace
US20070265957A1 (en) 2006-05-10 2007-11-15 Asheesh Advani System and method for automated flexible person-to-person lending
US9031881B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2015-05-12 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score
US20080077458A1 (en) 2006-09-19 2008-03-27 Andersen Timothy J Collecting and representing home attributes
US20080301064A1 (en) 2006-10-05 2008-12-04 Burns James M System and Method for Determining a Real Estate Property Valuation
US20080109409A1 (en) 2006-11-08 2008-05-08 Ma Capital Lllp Brokering keywords in radio broadcasts
US20080133319A1 (en) 2006-11-30 2008-06-05 Oia Intellectuals, Inc. Method and apparatus of determining effect of price on distribution of time to sell real property
US7974904B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-07-05 Paul Frischer Method of trading in real estate derivatives
US8650067B1 (en) 2007-02-27 2014-02-11 Richard Moss Systems, methods, and computer program product for real estate value analysis
US20080255921A1 (en) 2007-04-11 2008-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Percentage based online advertising
US7827128B1 (en) 2007-05-11 2010-11-02 Aol Advertising Inc. System identification, estimation, and prediction of advertising-related data
US7917431B2 (en) * 2007-05-18 2011-03-29 Bank Of America Corporation Equity protection
US20080288335A1 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-11-20 Goldberg Neal J Home valuator
US7933798B1 (en) 2007-05-25 2011-04-26 Google Inc. Determining and displaying impression share to advertisers
US7856370B2 (en) 2007-06-15 2010-12-21 Saama Technologies, Inc. Method and system for displaying predictions on a spatial map
US8046306B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2011-10-25 Zaio Corporation System, method, and apparatus for property appraisals
US8219471B2 (en) 2007-07-05 2012-07-10 Alvi Abuaf Real estate appreciation contract
US8032401B2 (en) * 2007-07-18 2011-10-04 General Electric Company System and method to calculate procurement of assets
US20090030707A1 (en) 2007-07-23 2009-01-29 Yahoo! Inc. System and method of researching real estate
US20090043603A1 (en) 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 Sage Properties, Inc. Systems and methods for commercial real estate investment services
US20090076902A1 (en) 2007-09-17 2009-03-19 Yahoo! Inc. Advertising within address books
US20080015890A1 (en) 2007-09-28 2008-01-17 Krishna Malyala Method and apparatus for searching for real property
US20110066561A1 (en) 2009-07-28 2011-03-17 Lazarre Paul E Leveraged Usage of Information Regarding Real Estate Offerings
US20090254841A1 (en) 2007-11-12 2009-10-08 Move Sales, Inc. Apparatus, method, and computer program product for characterizing user-defined areas
US8341089B2 (en) 2007-11-29 2012-12-25 Ross Stores, Inc. Real estate management system and method
US8095434B1 (en) 2007-12-17 2012-01-10 Zillow, Inc. Automatically performing varying levels of summarization of geographic data points in response to a user's selection of zoom level
US8566327B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2013-10-22 Match.Com, L.L.C. Matching process system and method
US8140421B1 (en) 2008-01-09 2012-03-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US20090210287A1 (en) 2008-02-18 2009-08-20 Microsoft Corporation Advertisement space allocation
US20120005111A2 (en) * 2008-03-06 2012-01-05 Lowenstein Douglas Financing of tenant improvements
US20090287596A1 (en) 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Alex Henriquez Torrenegra Method, System, and Apparatus for Facilitating Transactions Between Sellers and Buyers for Travel Related Services
US8712908B2 (en) 2008-07-01 2014-04-29 Habitat Economics, LLC Home appreciation participation notes
US20100023379A1 (en) 2008-07-07 2010-01-28 HMVP Partners, LLC Method and system for determining real estate market value changes
US9141640B2 (en) 2008-07-09 2015-09-22 MLSListings, Inc. Methods and systems of advanced real estate searching
US20100076881A1 (en) 2008-09-19 2010-03-25 O'grady Thomas Liam Enhanced Valuation System and Method for Real Estate
US8583562B1 (en) 2008-10-01 2013-11-12 RealAgile, Inc. Predicting real estate and other transactions
US10380652B1 (en) 2008-10-18 2019-08-13 Clearcapital.Com, Inc. Method and system for providing a home data index model
US20100114678A1 (en) 2008-11-05 2010-05-06 Google Inc. Compensation Distribution Using Quality Score
US20100161498A1 (en) 2008-12-12 2010-06-24 First American Corelogic, Inc. Method, system and computer program product for creating a real estate pricing indicator and predicting real estate trends
US8442908B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2013-05-14 MCMCAP Partners, LLC Systems and methods for asset valuation
WO2011005960A1 (en) 2009-07-08 2011-01-13 Trada, Inc. Creating, managing and optimizing online advertising
US8401877B2 (en) 2009-08-05 2013-03-19 Qbe Holdings, Inc. Insurance claim processing
US20110047083A1 (en) 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Lawler Rebecca J Computer system and method for negotiating a price of a rental property
US8478643B1 (en) 2009-10-12 2013-07-02 Google Inc. Optimal pricing and advertisement slot allocation
US8433512B1 (en) 2009-11-12 2013-04-30 Google Inc. Enhanced identification of interesting points-of-interest
US20110196762A1 (en) 2010-02-04 2011-08-11 Dupont David W Online user directed valuation model (udvm)
US20110218937A1 (en) * 2010-03-03 2011-09-08 Jeremy Elser System and Methods for Management of Real Property
US20110218934A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-09-08 Jeremy Elser System and methods for comparing real properties for purchase and for generating heat maps to aid in identifying price anomalies of such real properties
US20110251974A1 (en) 2010-04-07 2011-10-13 Woodard Scott E System and method for utilizing sentiment based indicators in determining real property prices and days on market
US8458074B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2013-06-04 Corelogic Solutions, Llc. Data analytics models for loan treatment
US20120030092A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Bank Of America Corporation Loan collateral equity tracker
US20120072357A1 (en) 2010-09-22 2012-03-22 Bradford Technologies, Inc. Method and system for predicting property values within discrete finite market elements
US8856028B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2014-10-07 Yahoo! Inc. Inventory allocation for advertising with changeable supply landscape
US8628151B1 (en) 2011-02-18 2014-01-14 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Systems and methods for facilitating financial transactions involving bundles of properties
US20120330714A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2012-12-27 Ashutosh Malaviya Enhanced systems, processes, and user interfaces for targeted marketing associated with a population of assets
US20150356576A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2015-12-10 Ashutosh Malaviya Computerized systems, processes, and user interfaces for targeted marketing associated with a population of real-estate assets
US20120311431A1 (en) 2011-05-31 2012-12-06 HomeFinder.com, LLC System and method for automatically generating a single property website
US20120323798A1 (en) 2011-06-17 2012-12-20 Fannie Mae Valuation of properties bordering specified geographic features
US20130041841A1 (en) 2011-08-11 2013-02-14 Revestor Llc Real Estate Investment System and Method of Controlling a Commercial System by Generating Key Investment Indicators
WO2013090784A1 (en) 2011-12-15 2013-06-20 Irick Robert Graham Methods for facilitating a real estate transaction
EP2823409A4 (en) 2012-03-04 2015-12-02 Adam Jeffries Data systems processing
US9009610B2 (en) 2012-06-07 2015-04-14 Costar Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing real estate data
US10672088B2 (en) 2012-06-19 2020-06-02 Fannie Mae Automated valuation model with comparative value history information
US20140012720A1 (en) 2012-07-03 2014-01-09 William H. O'Kane Integrated property mortgage and property improvement loan application system and method
US20140257924A1 (en) 2013-03-08 2014-09-11 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Automated rental amount modeling and prediction
US9361274B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2016-06-07 International Business Machines Corporation Interaction detection for generalized linear models for a purchase decision
US20140279692A1 (en) 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Brad A. Boothby Optimizing return on investment in real property
US20140316857A1 (en) 2013-04-22 2014-10-23 Lawrence Roberts Housing price estimator
US20140372203A1 (en) 2013-06-14 2014-12-18 Microsoft Corporation Quality-weighted second-price auctions for advertisements
US20150149275A1 (en) 2013-11-25 2015-05-28 Yahoo! Inc. Quasi-proportional allocation of combination items for serving in an online auction-based marketplace
US20150269264A1 (en) 2014-03-20 2015-09-24 RealAnalogics, Inc. Interactive Real Estate Information Resource Systems And Methods
US9536011B1 (en) 2014-08-18 2017-01-03 Google Inc. Applying string matching algorithms to finding ad unit availability interval

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5361201A (en) * 1992-10-19 1994-11-01 Hnc, Inc. Real estate appraisal using predictive modeling
US6178406B1 (en) * 1995-08-25 2001-01-23 General Electric Company Method for estimating the value of real property
US20030033176A1 (en) * 1996-08-22 2003-02-13 Hancock S. Lee Geographic location multiple listing service identifier and method of assigning and using the same
US6609118B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2003-08-19 General Electric Company Methods and systems for automated property valuation
US20020087389A1 (en) * 2000-08-28 2002-07-04 Michael Sklarz Value your home
US20040073508A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-04-15 Paul Foster Method and system for property valuation in an on-line computing environment
US8051089B2 (en) * 2003-04-30 2011-11-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and methods for location-based real estate service
US7788186B1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2010-08-31 Fannie Mae Method and system for automated property valuation adjustment
US20060020424A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-01-26 Carl Quindel Apparatus and method for analyzing trends with values of interest
US20060105342A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2006-05-18 Mario Villena Computerized systems for formation and update of databases
US20070005373A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2007-01-04 Villena Mario A Computerized agent and systems for automatic searching of properties having favorable attributes
WO2006043951A2 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-27 Network Real Estate Corporation System and method for facilitating like kind exchanges
US20060085210A1 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-20 Michael Owens System and method for facilitating like kind exchanges
US8660919B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2014-02-25 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Method for monitoring and reporting changes in the value of real estate

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11769181B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2023-09-26 Mftb Holdco. Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11244361B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2022-02-08 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US20150379588A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2015-12-31 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US10896449B2 (en) * 2006-02-03 2021-01-19 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US11315202B2 (en) 2006-09-19 2022-04-26 Zillow, Inc. Collecting and representing home attributes
US11449958B1 (en) 2008-01-09 2022-09-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11727449B2 (en) 2010-09-16 2023-08-15 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Valuation system
US10380653B1 (en) 2010-09-16 2019-08-13 Trulia, Llc Valuation system
US11068911B1 (en) 2011-03-09 2021-07-20 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining market rental rate index for properties
US11288756B1 (en) 2011-03-09 2022-03-29 Zillow, Inc. Automatically determining market rental rates for properties
US10754884B1 (en) 2013-11-12 2020-08-25 Zillow, Inc. Flexible real estate search
US11232142B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2022-01-25 Zillow, Inc. Flexible real estate search
US10984489B1 (en) 2014-02-13 2021-04-20 Zillow, Inc. Estimating the value of a property in a manner sensitive to nearby value-affecting geographic features
US11093982B1 (en) 2014-10-02 2021-08-17 Zillow, Inc. Determine regional rate of return on home improvements
US11354701B1 (en) 2015-03-18 2022-06-07 Zillow, Inc. Allocating electronic advertising opportunities
US10643232B1 (en) 2015-03-18 2020-05-05 Zillow, Inc. Allocating electronic advertising opportunities
US10650354B2 (en) 2015-12-29 2020-05-12 Setschedule Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for transacting lead and scheduled appointment records
US9934490B2 (en) 2015-12-29 2018-04-03 Setschedule Ip Holdings, Llc System and method for transacting lead and scheduled appointment records
US10789549B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2020-09-29 Zillow, Inc. Enforcing, with respect to changes in one or more distinguished independent variable values, monotonicity in the predictions produced by a statistical model
US11886962B1 (en) 2016-02-25 2024-01-30 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Enforcing, with respect to changes in one or more distinguished independent variable values, monotonicity in the predictions produced by a statistical model
US11861748B1 (en) 2019-06-28 2024-01-02 MFTB Holdco, Inc. Valuation of homes using geographic regions of varying granularity
US11682052B2 (en) 2019-10-15 2023-06-20 Orchard Technologies, Inc. Machine learning systems and methods for determining home value
US11769180B2 (en) 2019-10-15 2023-09-26 Orchard Technologies, Inc. Machine learning systems and methods for determining home value

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20140316999A1 (en) 2014-10-23
US8515839B2 (en) 2013-08-20
GB0701944D0 (en) 2007-03-14
US20150379588A1 (en) 2015-12-31
US10896449B2 (en) 2021-01-19
GB2436159A (en) 2007-09-19
US20130304654A1 (en) 2013-11-14
US20070185727A1 (en) 2007-08-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10896449B2 (en) Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US7970674B2 (en) Automatically determining a current value for a real estate property, such as a home, that is tailored to input from a human user, such as its owner
US11769181B2 (en) Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11449958B1 (en) Automatically determining a current value for a home
US11068911B1 (en) Automatically determining market rental rate index for properties
US11727449B2 (en) Valuation system
US10984489B1 (en) Estimating the value of a property in a manner sensitive to nearby value-affecting geographic features
US20170053297A1 (en) Enhanced systems, processes, and user interfaces for scoring assets associated with a population of data
US8370239B2 (en) Method and apparatus for testing automated valuation models
US20140257924A1 (en) Automated rental amount modeling and prediction
US11288756B1 (en) Automatically determining market rental rates for properties
WO2002019216A2 (en) Value your home
US20130144683A1 (en) Determining residential transaction price indices based on prior transaction prices
US20140289070A1 (en) Buyer-seller matching method
US20180330390A1 (en) Enhanced systems, processes, and user interfaces for targeted marketing associated with a population of assets
Fung et al. Potential effects of eliminating the individual mandate penalty in California
US11093982B1 (en) Determine regional rate of return on home improvements
US20130219315A1 (en) Graphical User Interface for Real Estate Search
Yung et al. Economic valuation of historic properties: review and recent developments
PROPERTY et al. Cheng et al.
Ayzenberg Analyzing Housing Demand and its Role in the US Economy
Hartman COVID-19 and Counter Urbanization? An Investigation of Residential Price Trends in Flevoland and Surrounding Areas Between 2018 and 2021.
NZ586822A (en) Estimation of building contents replacement cost

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION