US3108280A - Log periodic backward wave antenna array - Google Patents

Log periodic backward wave antenna array Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3108280A
US3108280A US59671A US5967160A US3108280A US 3108280 A US3108280 A US 3108280A US 59671 A US59671 A US 59671A US 5967160 A US5967160 A US 5967160A US 3108280 A US3108280 A US 3108280A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
elements
dipoles
feeder
adjacent
dipole
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US59671A
Inventor
Paul E Mayes
Robert L Carrel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Illinois
University of Illinois Foundation
Original Assignee
University of Illinois
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
Priority to US25740D priority Critical patent/USRE25740E/en
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=22024470&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US3108280(A) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by University of Illinois filed Critical University of Illinois
Priority to US59671A priority patent/US3108280A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3108280A publication Critical patent/US3108280A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q11/00Electrically-long antennas having dimensions more than twice the shortest operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q11/02Non-resonant antennas, e.g. travelling-wave antenna
    • H01Q11/10Logperiodic antennas

Definitions

  • This invention relates to antennas and more particularly it relates to antennas having unidirectional radia tion patterns that are essentially independent of frequency over wide bandwidths.
  • these arrays comprise a number of dipoles arranged in side-by-side relationship in a plane the length of the dipoles and the spacing between adjacent dipoles varying according to a definite mathematical formula, with each of the dipoles being fed at its midpoint by a common feeder which introduces an added phase shift of 180 between connections to suecessive dipoles.
  • the dipoles which are used to make up the array vary progressively in length, the longest dipole element being about wavelength long at the low frequency limit of a given antennas effective range and the shortest element being about /8 wavelength long at the upper frequency limit.
  • the directivity of an antenna of the type described in the aforementioned application may be increased and the effective frequency range of an antenna of fixed size may be extended by inclining the dipoles of Isbell to form ll-elements, each of 'which consists of two straight arms of equal length definingan apex which points away from the direction of radiation of the antenna which is also the direction in which the element size decreases.
  • the modification of the straight dipoles of Isbell to ll-shaped elements permits the antenna to be operated over bands of frequencies higher than those established, as described above, by the length of the shortest dipole in the antenna, with increased directivity, thus obviously increasing the effective frequency range of a given antenna.
  • FIGURE 1 is a schematic plan View of an antenna made in accordance with the principles of the invention.
  • FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of a practical antenna embodying the invention.
  • FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary view of an improved and preferred form of an antenna similar to that shown in v FIGURE 2, as seen from a point directly in front of and above the narrow end of the antenna.
  • the antennas of the invention are composed of a plurality of ⁇ l-elements, e.g., l1 and 12, each of which consists of a pair of arms, e.g., l3 and 14, defining an apex in the middle of the V-elements, said V-elements being arranged in a herringbonelike pattern.
  • the arms of a given V-element are equal in length and corresponding arms of the several V-elements, i.e., the arms on the same side of a line passing through the apexes of the V-elements, are
  • the antenna is symmetrical about a line passing through the apexes of the V-elements, as shown.
  • the antenna is fed at its narrow end from a conventional source ofenergy, depicted in FIGURE 1' by alternator 16, by means of a balanced feeder line consisting of conductors 17 and 18. It will be seen that the feeder lines 17 and 13 are alternated between connections to consecutive V-elements, thereby producing a phase reversal between such connections.
  • I is the length of an arm in any intermediate V-element in the array
  • I a is the length of an arm in the adjacent smaller V-element
  • AS is the spacing between the apex of the V-element having the arm length I and the apex of the adjacent larger V-element
  • AS is the spacing between the apex of the V-element having the arm length I and the apex of the adjacent smaller V-element.
  • the arms of the individual V-elements forming the antenna array are inclined to point in the direction of decreasing V-element size so that the apex of each of the elements points in a direction away from the angle a. formed by the lines passing through the extremities of the individual V-elements.
  • the angle formed by the arms of a V-element is designated as t. It will be seen that when the angle 31/ is equal to 180", the antennas of the invention are identical with those described by Isbell in the application mentioned above. In the instant invention, howeventhe angle it preferably has a value between about 50 and It will be seen from the geometry of the invention as given above that the distances from the base line 0 at the vertex of the angle at to the apexes of the V-elements forming the array are defined by the equation:
  • the radiation pattern of the antennas of the invention having the geometrical relationship among the several parts, as defined above, is unidirectional [in the negative X direction, i.e., extending to the left from the narrow end of the antenna of FIGURE 1.
  • V-elements in the antennas of the invention, rather than dipoles, increases the directivtity of the invention and also permits more effective utilization of a given antenna since the same structure can be used in several frequency modes to achieve coverage of different frequency bands.
  • the effective frequency range is that in which the low limit corresponds to that frequency in which the largest dipole in the antenna is about A2 wavelength long and the upper frequency limit to that frequency in which the smallest dipole in the antenna is about Wavelength art-sass long.
  • the frequency range of the straight dipole array corresponds to the mode of operation in which the lengths of the dipoles in the array are about /2 wavelength long.
  • the antenna will also be found to radiate effectively at frequencies in which the dipoles are about wavelengths long (the Wavelengths mode), wavelengths long (the wavelengths mode) and so on.
  • the radiation pattern of the dipole array becomes multilobed and is, therefore, of limited usefulness.
  • FIGURE 2 The construction of an actual antenna made in accordance with the invention is shown in FIGURE 2.
  • the balanced line consists of two closely-spaced and parallel electrically conducting small diameter tubes 21 and 22 which also act as a mechanical support for the dipole elements and to which are attached the arms which form the V-elements of the invention.
  • each of the two arms, e.g., 23 and 24, making up one V-element is connected to a different one of said conductors 21 and 22.
  • consecutive arms along the length thereof extend in opposite directions. It will be seen that this construction has the effect of alternating the phase of the connections between successive V-elements, as depicted schematically in FIGURE 1.
  • the V-elements of FIGURE 2 are not precisely coplanar, differing therefrom by the distance between the parallel conductors 21 and 22, in practice this distance is usually small so that the arms of the V-elements are substantially coplanar and the advantages of the invention are maintained. In some instances, however, it may be advantageous to bend the individual arms, e.g., 27 and 28, close to the point of attachment to the feeder line, as shown in FIGURE 3, so as to position all the arms in the same plane.
  • the antennas of FIGURES 2 and 3 may be conveniently fed by means of a coaxial cable 25 positioned within conductor 21, the outer conductor of the cable making electrical contact with conductor 21 and the central conductor 26 of the cable extending to and making electrical connection with conductor 22, as shown.
  • the antennas of the invention may also be fed by a balanced two wire line which is twisted between elements to achieve the desired phase reversal.
  • Other methods of achieving the desired phasing may be employed, e.g., transmission line loops or stubs.
  • an antenna of the type shown in FIGURE 3 was constructed using 0.125" diameter tubing for the balanced line and 0.050 diameter wire for the arms of the V-elements.
  • the arms were soldered to the feeder line and the array was fed by a miniature coaxial cable inserted into one of the conductors of the balanced line.
  • the antenna had 25 arms, the largest of which was 1 ft. long with the shortest being about 3 /2" long.
  • the antenna was further defined by the parameters 1:095 and 0:70". This antenna exhibited typical directivity gains ranging from 12 db over isotropic in the W wavelengths mode to 17 db in the wavelengths mode, with essentially constant input impedance within each mode.
  • the parameters which define the antennas or" the invention are essentially similar to those of the corresponding strai ht dipole arrays in which the arms extend at right angles from the feeder lines.
  • the parameter 1- preferably has a value betwen about 0.8 and 0.95 and the angle at suitably ranges between 20 and
  • the upper and lower limits of the bandwidth for the /2 wavelength mode of operation can be adjusted as desired by making the longest V-cleinent correspond in length to about /2 wavelength at the lower limit and the shortest V-element to about wavelength at the upper frequency limit.
  • the resonant-V array of the invention has several advantages over other antennas currently used as primary feeds for parabolic and other reflectors. Its independence of frequency in any single mode assures constant illumination of the reflector. Moreover, the input impedance remains essentially independent of frequency so that no tuning is required as the frequency is varied.
  • a broadband unidirectional antenna comprising an array of a plurality of V-elements in a planar herringbonelike arrangement, each of said elements having a pair of equal arms defining an apex, the apexes of said V- elements lying on a straight line the corresponding arms of said elements progressively increasing in length and spacing, the extremities of the arms of said V-elements substantially falling on a V-shaped line forming an angle a at its vertex, the 'apexes of said V-elements pointing in a direction away from the vertex of said angle a, the ratio of the arm lengths of any pair of adjacent V-elernents being given by the formula where I is the length of an arm in the larger of said pair of V-elements, l is the length of an arm in the adjacent smaller V-element of said pair, the subscript n designating the nth arm running in an order from larger to smaller, and T is a constant having a value less than 1, the spacing between the apexes
  • the antenna of claim 1 wherein the angle formed by the arms of any V-element at the apex thereof has a value within the range from about 50 to about 3.
  • the antenna of claim 1 which is symmetrical about a line passing through the apex of each V-element therein, and in which the corresponding arms of the V-elements are parallel.
  • a broadband unidirectional antenna comprising a balanced feeder line consisting of two closely spaced, straight and parallel conductors, a plurality of substantially coplanar V-elements, each V-elernent comprising a pair of arms of equal length defining an apex, one of said arms of each V-element being connected at the apex of said V-element to one of said conductors, the other of said arms being connected directly opposite the first to the other of said conductors, the arms of any V-element extending in opposite directions at an acute angle to the plane determined by said conductors, consecutive arms on each of said conductors extending on opposite sides of said plane, the ratio of the lengths of the arms in adjacent V-elements being given by the formula Where AS is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent larger V-element, A8 is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent smaller V-element, and 1- has the significance previously assigned.
  • An aerial system for wideband use comprising a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements planarly arranged, a two-conductor balanced feeder connected to each of said elements at substantially the inner end thereof, each two opposite V-elements forming a pair constituting dipole halves, the connection from each adjacent dipole section being to a different feeder, said if-elements being selectively spaced from each other, each V-element of each pair having arms of substantially equal length substantially defining an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in substantially a straight line and terminating at the feeder, the said dipoles of each pair being of different electrical lengths with successive dipoles differing in electrical length with respect to each other by substantially the same scale factor, each dipole and the feeder between successive dipoles constituting a cell, and the selective spacings between adjacent dipoles decreasing from one end to the other with the greater spacing being between the longest dipoles and being such that the combination of dipole lengths and spacings provides
  • An aerial system for wide-band use including a twoconductor balanced feeder extending in a selected plane, a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements planarly arranged and spaced along the feeder, each of the elements having a pair of arms of substantially equal length defining substantially an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in substantially a straight line and all terminating at the feeder, a connection between each of the V-elements and one of the feeders at the inner end of the elements, the two V-elemcnts forming each pair constituting dipole halves, adjacent dipole sections being connected to different feeders, each of 5 the pairs of dipoles being of different electrical lengths with successive dipoles differing in electrical length with respect to each other by substantially a common scale factor, each dipole and the feeder connected thereto in the region between one dipole pair and the next adjacent dipole pair constituting a cell, the spacings between the dipoles as connected to the feeders differing from each other also
  • An aerial system for wide-band use including an elongated two-conductor balanced feeder, a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements plananly arranged and spaced along said feeder, each of the elements having a pair of arms of equal length defining substantially an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in a substantially straight line, a connection between each of the V-elements and the feeder to terminate the elements substantially at the feeder, the two V-elements foaming each pair constituting dipole halves, adjacent dipole sections of the plurality being connected to different feeders and the dipoles being relatively spaced so that the spacings between successive dipoles differ from each other by substantially a common scale factor, adjacent dipole sections having different electrical lengths, each dipole and the feeder connected between it and the adjacent dipole constituting a cell, the lengths of the dipoles increasing from end of array where spacings between adjacent dipoles is less to end of the array where adjacent dipoles are spaced the greatest distance,

Description

Oct. 22, 1963 Filed Sept. 30, 1960 I Beam Dlrecflon Fig. 1
Asn
P. E. MAYE S ETAL LOG PERIODIC BACKWARD WAVE ANTENNA ARRAY 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 INVENTORS Paul E. Mayes Robert L. Carrel Merriam, Smith 8 Marshall A 7' T OR/VE Y5 Oct. 22, 1963 P; E. MAYES ETAL 3,108,280
LOG PERIODIC BACKWARD WAVE ANTENNA ARRAY Filed Sept. 30, 1960 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 N if,
INVENTORS Paul E. Mayes BY Ruben L. Carrel Merriam, Smith 8 Ma'rslmll ATTOR/VE') United States Patent 3,108,280 L8G PERHGDIC BACKWARD WAVE ANTENNA ARRAY Paul E. Mayes, Champaign, and Robert L. (Farrel,
Urbana, llit, assignors to The University of Illinois Foundation, a non-profit organization of Illinois Filed Sept. 30, 196i Ser. No. 59,671 it) (liaims. (Ci. 343-7925) This invention relates to antennas and more particularly it relates to antennas having unidirectional radia tion patterns that are essentially independent of frequency over wide bandwidths.
In the copending application of Dwight E. Isbell, Ser. No. 26,589, filed May 3, 1960-, there are described certain antennas comprising coplanar dipole arrays which rave an unusually wide bandwidth over which the performance of the antennas is essentially frequency independent and the input impedance nearly constant, the antennas also having a unidirectional pattern with a directivity comparable to a Yagiarray. As described in the aforementioned application, these arrays comprise a number of dipoles arranged in side-by-side relationship in a plane the length of the dipoles and the spacing between adjacent dipoles varying according to a definite mathematical formula, with each of the dipoles being fed at its midpoint by a common feeder which introduces an added phase shift of 180 between connections to suecessive dipoles. The dipoles which are used to make up the array vary progressively in length, the longest dipole element being about wavelength long at the low frequency limit of a given antennas effective range and the shortest element being about /8 wavelength long at the upper frequency limit.
in accordance with the present invention, it has been found that the directivity of an antenna of the type described in the aforementioned application may be increased and the effective frequency range of an antenna of fixed size may be extended by inclining the dipoles of Isbell to form ll-elements, each of 'which consists of two straight arms of equal length definingan apex which points away from the direction of radiation of the antenna which is also the direction in which the element size decreases. The modification of the straight dipoles of Isbell to ll-shaped elements permits the antenna to be operated over bands of frequencies higher than those established, as described above, by the length of the shortest dipole in the antenna, with increased directivity, thus obviously increasing the effective frequency range of a given antenna.
The invention will be better understood from the following detailed description thereof taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the same numbers are used to denote corresponding elements in the several views and in which:
FIGURE 1 is a schematic plan View of an antenna made in accordance with the principles of the invention;
FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of a practical antenna embodying the invention; and
FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary view of an improved and preferred form of an antenna similar to that shown in v FIGURE 2, as seen from a point directly in front of and above the narrow end of the antenna.
Referring to FIGURE 1, it will be seen that the antennas of the invention are composed of a plurality of \l-elements, e.g., l1 and 12, each of which consists of a pair of arms, e.g., l3 and 14, defining an apex in the middle of the V-elements, said V-elements being arranged in a herringbonelike pattern. The arms of a given V-element are equal in length and corresponding arms of the several V-elements, i.e., the arms on the same side of a line passing through the apexes of the V-elements, are
substantially parallel to each other. It will be noted that the lengths of the arms of successive V-elements and the spacing between the apexes of the elements are such that the extremities of the elements fall on a pair of straight lines which intersect to form an angle a. In the preferred embodiment of the invention the antenna is symmetrical about a line passing through the apexes of the V-elements, as shown.
The antenna is fed at its narrow end from a conventional source ofenergy, depicted in FIGURE 1' by alternator 16, by means of a balanced feeder line consisting of conductors 17 and 18. It will be seen that the feeder lines 17 and 13 are alternated between connections to consecutive V-elements, thereby producing a phase reversal between such connections.
The lengths of the arms in the antenna, and the spac ing between the V-elements, are related by a constant scale factor '1' defined by the following equations:
where 7- is a constant having a value less than 1, I is the length of an arm in any intermediate V-element in the array, I a is the length of an arm in the adjacent smaller V-element, the subscript n designating the nth arm running in an order from larger to smaller, AS, is the spacing between the apex of the V-element having the arm length I and the apex of the adjacent larger V-element, and AS is the spacing between the apex of the V-element having the arm length I and the apex of the adjacent smaller V-element.
The arms of the individual V-elements forming the antenna array are inclined to point in the direction of decreasing V-element size so that the apex of each of the elements points in a direction away from the angle a. formed by the lines passing through the extremities of the individual V-elements.
The angle formed by the arms of a V-element is designated as t. It will be seen that when the angle 31/ is equal to 180", the antennas of the invention are identical with those described by Isbell in the application mentioned above. In the instant invention, howeventhe angle it preferably has a value between about 50 and It will be seen from the geometry of the invention as given above that the distances from the base line 0 at the vertex of the angle at to the apexes of the V-elements forming the array are defined by the equation:
where X is the distance from the base line 0 to the apex of the V-element having the arm length I X n+1 is the corresponding distance from the base line to the apex of the adjacent smaller V-element, the 7- has the significance previously given.
The radiation pattern of the antennas of the invention having the geometrical relationship among the several parts, as defined above, is unidirectional [in the negative X direction, i.e., extending to the left from the narrow end of the antenna of FIGURE 1.
The use of V-elements in the antennas of the invention, rather than dipoles, increases the directivtity of the invention and also permits more effective utilization of a given antenna since the same structure can be used in several frequency modes to achieve coverage of different frequency bands. In the special case of an antenna having straight dipoles rather than V-elements (i.e., when =180), the effective frequency range is that in which the low limit corresponds to that frequency in which the largest dipole in the antenna is about A2 wavelength long and the upper frequency limit to that frequency in which the smallest dipole in the antenna is about Wavelength art-sass long. In general, therefore, it may be said that the frequency range of the straight dipole array corresponds to the mode of operation in which the lengths of the dipoles in the array are about /2 wavelength long. As the frequency is raised above the upperlimit of the /2 Wavelength mode in the dipole array, the antenna will also be found to radiate effectively at frequencies in which the dipoles are about wavelengths long (the Wavelengths mode), wavelengths long (the wavelengths mode) and so on. At frequencies above the half-wavelength mode, however, the radiation pattern of the dipole array becomes multilobed and is, therefore, of limited usefulness. By including the arms of the dipole to form the V-elements of the instant invention, it has been found that a single lobe of improved directivity may be obtained as the frequency is raised from the half-wavelength mode through the intervening ranges to the wavelengths rnode and beyond. For each mode of operation there exists an optimum value for the angle 0, ranging from about 114 for the half-wavelength mode to about 62 for the Wavelengths mode. By using a compromise value for 1 within this range, however, a practical antenna can be made to achieve acceptable performance over several modes of operation, thereby increasing its effective range without increasing the number of elements therein. This result is possible since many of the elements forming the antenna array are used at more than one frequency.
The construction of an actual antenna made in accordance with the invention is shown in FIGURE 2. In this antenna the balanced line consists of two closely-spaced and parallel electrically conducting small diameter tubes 21 and 22 which also act as a mechanical support for the dipole elements and to which are attached the arms which form the V-elements of the invention. It will be noted that each of the two arms, e.g., 23 and 24, making up one V-element is connected to a different one of said conductors 21 and 22. Moreover, considering either one of the conductors 21 and 22, consecutive arms along the length thereof extend in opposite directions. It will be seen that this construction has the effect of alternating the phase of the connections between successive V-elements, as depicted schematically in FIGURE 1. Although the V-elements of FIGURE 2 are not precisely coplanar, differing therefrom by the distance between the parallel conductors 21 and 22, in practice this distance is usually small so that the arms of the V-elements are substantially coplanar and the advantages of the invention are maintained. In some instances, however, it may be advantageous to bend the individual arms, e.g., 27 and 28, close to the point of attachment to the feeder line, as shown in FIGURE 3, so as to position all the arms in the same plane. The antennas of FIGURES 2 and 3 may be conveniently fed by means of a coaxial cable 25 positioned within conductor 21, the outer conductor of the cable making electrical contact with conductor 21 and the central conductor 26 of the cable extending to and making electrical connection with conductor 22, as shown.
The antennas of the invention may also be fed by a balanced two wire line which is twisted between elements to achieve the desired phase reversal. Other methods of achieving the desired phasing may be employed, e.g., transmission line loops or stubs.
As an example of the invention, an antenna of the type shown in FIGURE 3 was constructed using 0.125" diameter tubing for the balanced line and 0.050 diameter wire for the arms of the V-elements. The arms were soldered to the feeder line and the array Was fed by a miniature coaxial cable inserted into one of the conductors of the balanced line. The antenna had 25 arms, the largest of which was 1 ft. long with the shortest being about 3 /2" long. The antenna was further defined by the parameters 1:095 and 0:70". This antenna exhibited typical directivity gains ranging from 12 db over isotropic in the W wavelengths mode to 17 db in the wavelengths mode, with essentially constant input impedance within each mode.
Except with respect to the angle of inclination of the arms of the V-elements, the parameters which define the antennas or" the invention are essentially similar to those of the corresponding strai ht dipole arrays in which the arms extend at right angles from the feeder lines. Thus, the parameter 1- preferably has a value betwen about 0.8 and 0.95 and the angle at suitably ranges between 20 and Moreover, the upper and lower limits of the bandwidth for the /2 wavelength mode of operation can be adjusted as desired by making the longest V-cleinent correspond in length to about /2 wavelength at the lower limit and the shortest V-element to about wavelength at the upper frequency limit.
In addition to its use as a direct radiator or receiver, the resonant-V array of the invention has several advantages over other antennas currently used as primary feeds for parabolic and other reflectors. Its independence of frequency in any single mode assures constant illumination of the reflector. Moreover, the input impedance remains essentially independent of frequency so that no tuning is required as the frequency is varied.
The foregoing detailed description has been given for clearness of understanding only, and no unnecessary limitations should be understood therefrom, as modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
What is claimed is:
1. A broadband unidirectional antenna comprising an array of a plurality of V-elements in a planar herringbonelike arrangement, each of said elements having a pair of equal arms defining an apex, the apexes of said V- elements lying on a straight line the corresponding arms of said elements progressively increasing in length and spacing, the extremities of the arms of said V-elements substantially falling on a V-shaped line forming an angle a at its vertex, the 'apexes of said V-elements pointing in a direction away from the vertex of said angle a, the ratio of the arm lengths of any pair of adjacent V-elernents being given by the formula where I is the length of an arm in the larger of said pair of V-elements, l is the length of an arm in the adjacent smaller V-element of said pair, the subscript n designating the nth arm running in an order from larger to smaller, and T is a constant having a value less than 1, the spacing between the apexes of said V-elements being given by the formula ASH where AS is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent larger V-element, AS is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent smaller V-element, and 1 has the significance previously assigned, said V-elements being adapted to be fed as a group from the small end of the individual V-elements fed at the apexes thereof by a common feeder which introduces an additional 180 phase shift between successive V-elements.
2. The antenna of claim 1 wherein the angle formed by the arms of any V-element at the apex thereof has a value within the range from about 50 to about 3. The antenna of claim 1 which is symmetrical about a line passing through the apex of each V-element therein, and in which the corresponding arms of the V-elements are parallel.
4. The antenna of claim 1 in which the angle a has a value between about 20 and 100 and the constant 1- has a value between about 0.8 and 0.95.
5. A broadband unidirectional antenna comprising a balanced feeder line consisting of two closely spaced, straight and parallel conductors, a plurality of substantially coplanar V-elements, each V-elernent comprising a pair of arms of equal length defining an apex, one of said arms of each V-element being connected at the apex of said V-element to one of said conductors, the other of said arms being connected directly opposite the first to the other of said conductors, the arms of any V-element extending in opposite directions at an acute angle to the plane determined by said conductors, consecutive arms on each of said conductors extending on opposite sides of said plane, the ratio of the lengths of the arms in adjacent V-elements being given by the formula Where AS is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent larger V-element, A8 is the spacing between the V-element having the arm length I and the adjacent smaller V-element, and 1- has the significance previously assigned.
6. The antenna of claim 5 in which the angle formed by said arms with the plane determined by said feeder line, measured in a plane perpendicular to said plane, has a value between about 25 and about 75.
7. The antenna of claim 5 in which ahas a value of about 0.8 to 0.95
8. An aerial system for wideband use comprising a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements planarly arranged, a two-conductor balanced feeder connected to each of said elements at substantially the inner end thereof, each two opposite V-elements forming a pair constituting dipole halves, the connection from each adjacent dipole section being to a different feeder, said if-elements being selectively spaced from each other, each V-element of each pair having arms of substantially equal length substantially defining an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in substantially a straight line and terminating at the feeder, the said dipoles of each pair being of different electrical lengths with successive dipoles differing in electrical length with respect to each other by substantially the same scale factor, each dipole and the feeder between successive dipoles constituting a cell, and the selective spacings between adjacent dipoles decreasing from one end to the other with the greater spacing being between the longest dipoles and being such that the combination of dipole lengths and spacings provides a substantially uniform wideband response over a plurality of frequency bands bearing substantially harmonic frequency relationships to each other, the connection between the dipoles and the feeder being made in such a manner that the directive gain of the antenna increases as operation shifts from one band to an adjacent band of higher frequencies, and means to connect the feeder to an external circuit at a location substantially removed from the longest of the V-elernents and in the direction of the smallest of the V- elements.
9. An aerial system for wide-band use including a twoconductor balanced feeder extending in a selected plane, a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements planarly arranged and spaced along the feeder, each of the elements having a pair of arms of substantially equal length defining substantially an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in substantially a straight line and all terminating at the feeder, a connection between each of the V-elements and one of the feeders at the inner end of the elements, the two V-elemcnts forming each pair constituting dipole halves, adjacent dipole sections being connected to different feeders, each of 5 the pairs of dipoles being of different electrical lengths with successive dipoles differing in electrical length with respect to each other by substantially a common scale factor, each dipole and the feeder connected thereto in the region between one dipole pair and the next adjacent dipole pair constituting a cell, the spacings between the dipoles as connected to the feeders differing from each other also by "substantially the same common scale factor, the scale factor being so chosen that the combination of dipole lengths and spacings providing the several cells have a substantially uniform wide-band response over sevral frequency bands bearing substantially harmonic frequency relationships to each other, the connection between the feeder and the dipoles being made in such a manner that the directive gain of the antenna increases with operational shift from one band to another band of higher frequency, and means to connect the feeder to an external circuit at a location substantially removed from the longest of the V-elements in the direction of the smallest of the V-elements.
10. An aerial system for wide-band use including an elongated two-conductor balanced feeder, a plurality of herringbone-like conducting V-elements plananly arranged and spaced along said feeder, each of the elements having a pair of arms of equal length defining substantially an apex with the apexes of the plurality of V-elements all lying in a substantially straight line, a connection between each of the V-elements and the feeder to terminate the elements substantially at the feeder, the two V-elements foaming each pair constituting dipole halves, adjacent dipole sections of the plurality being connected to different feeders and the dipoles being relatively spaced so that the spacings between successive dipoles differ from each other by substantially a common scale factor, adjacent dipole sections having different electrical lengths, each dipole and the feeder connected between it and the adjacent dipole constituting a cell, the lengths of the dipoles increasing from end of array where spacings between adjacent dipoles is less to end of the array where adjacent dipoles are spaced the greatest distance, the spacings by 45 the scale factor variation between adjacent dipoles being such that a combination of the various dipole lengths and spacings provides a substantially uniform wide-band response over several frequency bands bearing substantially harmonic frequency relationships to each other, the 50 connection being made in such a manner that the directive gain of the antenna increases as the operation shifts from one band to another band of higher frequency, and means to connect the feeder to an external circuit at a location substantially removed from the longest of the V-elements in the direction of the smallest of the V-elements.
References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1960; vol. AP-8, No. 3, pages 2'60267.
Channel Master Corp, KO. Antenna, copyright 1955, 3 pages.
Patent No. 3,108,280 October 22, 1963 Paul E. Mayes et a1.
It is hereby certified that error 2.
ant requiring correetion and that the sa ppears in the above numbered patcorrected below.
id Letters Patent should read as Column 3, line 13, for "including" read inclining Signed and sealed this 26th day of May 1964.
(SEAL) Attest:
ERNEST Wq SWIDER EDWARD J. BRENNER Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents

Claims (1)

10. AN AERIAL SYSTEM FOR WIDE-BAND USE INCLUDING AN ELONGATED TWO-CONDUCTOR BALANCED FEEDER, A PLURALITY OF HERRINGBONE-LIKE CONDUCTING V-ELEMENTS PLANARLY ARRANGED AND SPACED ALONG SAID FEEDER, EACH OF THE ELEMENTS HAVING A PAIR OF ARMS OF EQUAL LENGTH DEFINING SUBSTANTIALLY AN APEX WITH THE APEXES OF THE PLURALITY OF V-ELEMENTS ALL LYING IN A SUBSTANTIALLY STRAIGHT LINE, A CONNECTION BETWEEN EACH OF THE V-ELEMENTS AND THE FEEDER TO TERMINATE THE ELEMENTS SUBSTANTIALLY AT THE FEEDER, THE TWO V-ELEMENTS FORMING EACH PAIR CONSTITUTING DIPOLE HALVES, ADJACENT DIPOLE SECTIONS OF THE PLURALITY BEING CONNECTED TO DIFFERENT FEEDERS AND THE DIPOLES BEING RELATIVELY SPACED SO THAT THE SPACINGS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE DIPOLES DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER BY SUBSTANTIALLY A COMMON SCALE FACTOR, ADJACENT DIPOLE SECTIONS HAVING DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL LENGTHS, EACH DIPOLE AND THE FEEDER CONNECTED BETWEEN IT AND THE ADJACENT DIPOLE CONSTITUTING A CELL, THE LENGTHS OF THE DIPOLES INCREASING FROM END OF ARRAY WHERE SPACINGS BETWEEN ADJACENT DIPOLES IS LESS TO END OF THE ARRAY WHERE ADJACENT DIPOLES ARE SPACED THE GREATEST DISTANCE, THE SPACINGS BY THE SCALE FACTOR VARIATION BETWEEN ADJACENT DIPOLES BEING SUCH THAT A COMBINATION OF THE VARIOUS DIPOLES LENGTHS AND SPACINGS PROVIDES A SUBSTANTIALLY UNIFORM WIDE-BAND RESPONSE OVER SEVERAL FREQUENCY BANDS BEARING SUBSTANTIALLY HARMONIC FREQUENCY RELATIONSHIPS TO EACH OTHER, THE CONNECTION BEING MADE IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE DIRECTIVE GAIN OF THE ANTENNA INCREASES AS THE OPERATION SHIFTS FROM ONE BAND TO ANOTHER BAND OF HIGHER FREQUECY, AND MEANS TO CONNECT THE FEEDER TO AN EXTERNAL CIRCUIT AT A LOCATION SUBSTANTIALLY REMOVED FROM THE LONGEST OF THE V-ELEMENTS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE SMALLEST OF THE V-ELEMENTS.
US59671A 1960-09-30 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array Expired - Lifetime US3108280A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US25740D USRE25740E (en) 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array
US59671A US3108280A (en) 1960-09-30 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59671A US3108280A (en) 1960-09-30 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3108280A true US3108280A (en) 1963-10-22

Family

ID=22024470

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US25740D Expired USRE25740E (en) 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array
US59671A Expired - Lifetime US3108280A (en) 1960-09-30 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US25740D Expired USRE25740E (en) 1960-09-30 Log periodic backward wave antenna array

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US3108280A (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3163864A (en) * 1960-10-19 1964-12-29 Channel Master Corp End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles
US3213457A (en) * 1961-07-06 1965-10-19 Lockheed Aircraft Corp Zig-zag antenna
US3259904A (en) * 1963-11-21 1966-07-05 Blonder Tongue Elect Antenna having combined support and lead-in
US3271774A (en) * 1962-10-17 1966-09-06 Granger Associates Catenary supported log periodic antenna
US3276028A (en) * 1964-02-18 1966-09-27 Jfd Electronics Corp High gain backfire antenna array
US3454950A (en) * 1964-12-01 1969-07-08 Jfd Electronics Corp Multiple mode operational antennas employing reactive elements
US3500424A (en) * 1967-11-30 1970-03-10 Sylvania Electric Prod Furlable antenna
US5790082A (en) * 1996-03-27 1998-08-04 Podger; James Stanley Double-delta log-periodic antenna
US5966100A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-10-12 Podger; James Stanley Quadruple-delta antenna structure
US20110148729A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-23 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Log periodic antenna

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB408473A (en) * 1932-06-24 1934-04-12 Nicolaas Koomans Improvements in or relating to uni-laterally directed aerials
US2192532A (en) * 1936-02-03 1940-03-05 Rca Corp Directive antenna
US2429629A (en) * 1942-12-16 1947-10-28 Standard Telephones Cables Ltd Antenna array
US2817085A (en) * 1956-11-14 1957-12-17 Channel Master Corp Broad-band end-fire television antenna
CA574323A (en) * 1959-04-21 J. Rowland Howard Broadband television antennae

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA574323A (en) * 1959-04-21 J. Rowland Howard Broadband television antennae
GB408473A (en) * 1932-06-24 1934-04-12 Nicolaas Koomans Improvements in or relating to uni-laterally directed aerials
US2192532A (en) * 1936-02-03 1940-03-05 Rca Corp Directive antenna
US2429629A (en) * 1942-12-16 1947-10-28 Standard Telephones Cables Ltd Antenna array
US2817085A (en) * 1956-11-14 1957-12-17 Channel Master Corp Broad-band end-fire television antenna

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3163864A (en) * 1960-10-19 1964-12-29 Channel Master Corp End fire planar array of v-shaped multi-band dipoles
US3213457A (en) * 1961-07-06 1965-10-19 Lockheed Aircraft Corp Zig-zag antenna
US3271774A (en) * 1962-10-17 1966-09-06 Granger Associates Catenary supported log periodic antenna
US3259904A (en) * 1963-11-21 1966-07-05 Blonder Tongue Elect Antenna having combined support and lead-in
US3276028A (en) * 1964-02-18 1966-09-27 Jfd Electronics Corp High gain backfire antenna array
US3454950A (en) * 1964-12-01 1969-07-08 Jfd Electronics Corp Multiple mode operational antennas employing reactive elements
US3500424A (en) * 1967-11-30 1970-03-10 Sylvania Electric Prod Furlable antenna
US5790082A (en) * 1996-03-27 1998-08-04 Podger; James Stanley Double-delta log-periodic antenna
US5966100A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-10-12 Podger; James Stanley Quadruple-delta antenna structure
US20110148729A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-23 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Log periodic antenna
US8766866B2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2014-07-01 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Log periodic antenna

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
USRE25740E (en) 1965-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3942180A (en) Wide-band omnidirectional antenna
US4843403A (en) Broadband notch antenna
US3210767A (en) Frequency independent unidirectional antennas
US4160978A (en) Circularly polarized loop and helix panel antennas
US2275646A (en) Antenna
US3732572A (en) Log periodic antenna with foreshortened dipoles
US3369243A (en) Log-periodic antenna structure
CN108682940B (en) Ultra-wideband high-gain common-aperture array antenna
US3681772A (en) Modulated arm width spiral antenna
US3108280A (en) Log periodic backward wave antenna array
Alibakhshikenari et al. Wideband sub-6 GHz self-grounded bow-tie antenna with new feeding mechanism for 5G communication systems
US3286268A (en) Log periodic antenna with parasitic elements interspersed in log periodic manner
US3099836A (en) V-strip antenna with artificial dielectric lens
US2935747A (en) Broadband antenna system
US3193831A (en) Logarithmic periodic antenna
US3806946A (en) Travelling wave chain antenna
US4937588A (en) Array of collinear dipoles
US4443805A (en) Plate-type antenna with double circular loops
US2290800A (en) Antenna
US3509572A (en) Waveguide fed frequency independent antenna
US3355740A (en) Log-periodic zig zag antenna
US3101474A (en) Log periodic type antenna mounted on ground plane and fed by tapered feed
US2380519A (en) Directional aerial system
US2895134A (en) Directional antenna systems
US3150376A (en) Multi-band log periodic antenna