US4884064A - Intruder detection and control apparatus - Google Patents

Intruder detection and control apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4884064A
US4884064A US07/052,738 US5273887A US4884064A US 4884064 A US4884064 A US 4884064A US 5273887 A US5273887 A US 5273887A US 4884064 A US4884064 A US 4884064A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
rodent
sensors
indicating
sensor
sensed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US07/052,738
Inventor
Adrian P. Meehan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rentokil Ltd
Original Assignee
Rentokil Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rentokil Ltd filed Critical Rentokil Ltd
Assigned to RENTOKIL LIMITED reassignment RENTOKIL LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: MEEHAN, ADRIAN P.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4884064A publication Critical patent/US4884064A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01MCATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M1/00Stationary means for catching or killing insects
    • A01M1/02Stationary means for catching or killing insects with devices or substances, e.g. food, pheronones attracting the insects
    • A01M1/026Stationary means for catching or killing insects with devices or substances, e.g. food, pheronones attracting the insects combined with devices for monitoring insect presence, e.g. termites
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01MCATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M31/00Hunting appliances
    • A01M31/002Detecting animals in a given area
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B21/00Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for
    • G08B21/18Status alarms
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01MCATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M2200/00Kind of animal
    • A01M2200/01Insects
    • A01M2200/011Crawling insects
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01MCATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M2200/00Kind of animal
    • A01M2200/01Insects
    • A01M2200/012Flying insects

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and apparatus suitable for use in the control of free-ranging pests.
  • the invention has particular relevance to the control of mice, but may also be useful in the control of other pests, for example, rats or cockroaches.
  • the present invention is concerned primarily with alleviating problems that have arisen in connection with methods previously adopted for the control of pests such as mice.
  • the present invention provides a method of detecting free-ranging pests without providing an attractant material in which method the presence of a pest is sensed by at least one of a plurality of sensors, a signal is emitted indicating the sensing of a pest by that sensor, and the fact that a signal has been emitted is indicated by an indicating means that is operatively coupled to the sensors.
  • the invention also provides apparatus for detecting free-ranging pests which apparatus is free from means providing an attractant material and comprises a plurality of sensors for sensing the presence of a pest, each sensor having associated therewith means for signalling that a pest has been sensed by that sensor, and indicating means for indicating that a signal has been emitted, the indicating means being operatively coupled to the sensors.
  • the presence of a pest in the vicinity of one of the sensors will cause an indication of at least the first such event to be given by the indicating means.
  • the indicating means includes recording means, a record of at least the first such event, and preferably each subsequent event, will be made at the recording means.
  • the indicating means may include, for example, a warning light so that it is easy to see when an event has taken place.
  • the indicating means includes both a warning light and recording means, the arrangement is preferably such that the warning light indicates that a pest has been detected by one of the sensors and that further inspection of the recording means is desirable.
  • the indicating means When the indicating means indicates that a pest has been detected, a decision can be taken as to whether a rodenticidal operation should be carried out. If, as is preferred, the indicating means is also capable of indicating which sensor(s) detected the pest(s), a particularly accurate placement of a rodenticidal preparation is possible.
  • means providing a relatively favoured environment for the pests may be provided in the vicinity of each sensor.
  • the provision of a relatively favoured environment in the vicinity of the sensors may increase the likelihood of pests that are present in the location, for example, the building, in which the apparatus is installed, being detected by the apparatus.
  • mice are to be detected a relatively favoured environment may be provided by situating each sensor in a narrow channel, or in an enclosure, for example a box, which channel or enclosure is provided with holes through which the mice may enter or leave.
  • an enclosure for example a box, which channel or enclosure is provided with holes through which the mice may enter or leave.
  • mice favour enclosed spaces especially when these are small enough for the mice to contact opposed walls simultaneously.
  • the use of enclosed spaces may also be advantageous in detecting other creatures having cryptic habits.
  • the channel advantageously comprises one or more tubes running, for example, along the floor at the bottom of a wall, or up a wall, for example, in a corner.
  • Such tubes are advantageously provided with holes at intervals along their length so that mice can enter the tubes.
  • the tubes provide preferred runways for the mice.
  • Sensors are so positioned that mice in the tubes can be detected.
  • An advantageous enclosure is a small box containing the sensor, the box being provided with two holes through which a mouse can squeeze. In both the tube(s) and the box, the holes(s) and sensor(s) are normally so arranged that sensors are not triggered by a finger or other extraneous item inserted through a hole.
  • Any suitable sensing means may be used in accordance with the invention.
  • Possible sensors include those responsive to changes in pressure, temperature, smell, sound (including ultrasound), and/or capacitance in the vicinity of the sensor.
  • Transducers especially pressure transducers, may of course be used.
  • Other possibilities are the use of a microswitch which is activated when a mouse or other pest pushes past a wire, or any other device that is capable of responding when the pest brushes against it.
  • Preferred sensors are those in which the pest interrupts a light beam, for example an infra-red beam.
  • such a beam may be deflected round corners using mirrors or light guides or pipes, and/or the beam could be positioned so that it is too high to be interrupted by, for example, a small insect crawling over the floor but is sufficiently low to be interrupted by, for example, a mouse.
  • the sensors are such that they do not respond to the presence of bodies substantially larger or substantially smaller than the pests it is desired to detect.
  • the apparatus is to be used to detect the presence of mice it will normally be advantageous for the sensors to be unresponsive to people on the one hand and insects on the other.
  • the sensors will normally be advantageous for the sensors to be responsive to all bodies of or below that size but unresponsive to bodies substantially above that size.
  • the sensors In any given method or apparatus the sensors must of course be chosen having regard to the pests to be detected and the location in which the sensors are to be installed.
  • the sensors should as far as possible be free from the risk of responding to extraneous events, for example, vibrations due to the operation of machinery nearby.
  • the sensors Preferably the sensors merely sense the presence of the pests and the pests are unaffected by the system.
  • the means for signalling that a pest has been detected by a sensor may be such that the same signal is produced by each sensor. If desired, however, each sensor, or group of sensors, may have a characteristic signal so that it is possible to identify more accurately the place where pests have been detected. This may be of particular advantage when the method and apparatus are used in very large premises.
  • the signals emitted on sensing of a pest by a sensor are transmitted to an indicating means which is capable of indicating the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location, of at least the first event that occurs after the apparatus has been set.
  • the indicating means may comprise recording means capable of recording the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location of at least the first event.
  • the recording means is also capable of recording the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location, of each successive event.
  • each sensor can be individually linked to the indicating means, or signals from sensors in a group of sensors may be transmitted via a common link to the indicating means.
  • a common link is used, it may not be possible (depending on the type of signals used) to distinguish between the signals from different sensors.
  • the apparatus may include means for transmitting the signals via the main electricity supply conductors and means for receiving the signals from these conductors. Where signals are transmitted via the mains it is necessary to take into consideration fluctuations that can occur in the mains voltage and to prevent spurious responses occurring as a result of them.
  • An advantageous method of transmitting the signals involves the use of a radio transmitter associated with each sensor and one or more radio receivers. Preferably there is a common receiver for all the transmitters, the common receiver advantageously being in the vicinity of the indicating means.
  • One advantage of the use of radio transmission is that the sensors can readily be moved from one location to another. Due regard must be had, however, to the surroundings in which the transmitter is to be used so that, for example, interference can be eliminated or reduced and so that the operation of surrounding equipment is not adversely affected.
  • each sensor could be provided with means for transmitting infra-red light, there being one or more receivers for the infra-red light. If desired a common receiver could be used for two or more of the sensors.
  • the apparatus When the invention is to be used for detecting the presence of a pest that could adversely affect the operation of the apparatus, the apparatus preferably comprises means for indicating that the apparatus has been so affected.
  • the apparatus advantageously includes means for indicating that part of the apparatus has been rendered inoperative by the mice (by, for example, the mice nibbling through a wire).
  • the method and apparatus of the invention are suitable for detecting pests in premises of all sizes. It will be appreciated that for reliable detection over the entire premises sensors will be situated at a plurality of different locations in the premises. Where increased vigilance is desirable in one particular area, for example, one particular room, a greater than average number of sensors may of course be located in that area. In very large premises it may in some cases be desirable to install more than one system according to the invention, that is to say there may be more than one indicating means, each indicating means having associated with it a plurality of sensors, but preferably there will be only one system according to the invention and thus a single indicating means for the entire premises, for example, a building in which pests are to be detected.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of an apparatus in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of an alternate embodiment of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of another alternate embodiment of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of the steps of a method in accordance with the present invention.
  • one form of the apparatus comprises a plurality of sensors 1 each of which is provided with signalling means 2 and transmitting means 3 for the signal from the signalling means.
  • An indicating means indicated generally by the reference numeral 4 is operatively coupled with means 5 for receiving the transmitted signals.
  • the indicating means comprises a warning light 6 and recording means 7.
  • the respective signalling means 2 In use, when a pest 8 passes one of the sensors 1 the respective signalling means 2 emits a signal, which is transmitted by the respective transmitting means 3 to the receiving means 5.
  • the receiving means 5 passes the signal to the indicating means 4, which illuminates the warning light 6, and records in the recording means 7 the fact that, and the time at which, the signal was emitted. If more than one signal is received, the warning light 6 is illuminated when the first signal is received and remains lit, while each signal is recorded in the recording means.
  • the indicating means 4 which include both time indicating means 12 and recording mechanism 7 in addition to the warning light 6, can indicate the time and/or the location of at least the first event that occurs after the apparatus has been set.
  • warning lamps 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e and 9f each associated with a respective sensor 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, and the indicating means then illuminates each respective lamp 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e or 9f if and when its respective sensor 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e or 1f senses a pest 8.
  • the recording means records which respective signalling means 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e or 2f emitted each signal that it records.
  • each respective sensor 1a-1f is at least partially surrounded by an enclosure 14 provided with holes 15 through which pests 8 may enter or leave.
  • another alternate embodiment provides channels 16 in the vicinity of each respective sensor 1a-1f.
  • the sensors 1 may be divided into a plurality of groups 10, and the indicating means 4 may record and indicate the group of sensors, but not the individual sensor, but which each signal was emitted.
  • FIG. 4 a flow chart is shown which diagrammatically sets forth the steps of a preferred method of controlling free-ranging pests in an area under surveillance.
  • the method comprises providing an apparatus free of attractant material and having a plurality of sensors (indicated generally by the reference numeral 21), distributing the plurality of sensors over the said area, each sensor having associated therewith an enclosure or channel which a rodent can enter (indicated generally by the reference numeral 22), sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the enclosure or channel associated therewith (indicated generally by the reference numeral 23), signalling with signalling means when a rodent has been sensed by the sensor, each of said sensors having signalling means associated therewith (indicated generally by the reference numeral 24), indicating with an indicating means whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled through the signalling means to each of the sensors (indicated generally by the reference numeral 25), recording with recording means the fact that a rodent has been sensed (in

Abstract

A method of and apparatus for detecting free-ranging pests, for example mice, without providing an attractant material. The presence of a pest is sensed by at least one of a plurality of sensors, a signal is emitted indicating the sensing of a pest by that sensor, and the fact that a signal has been emitted is indicated by an indicating means that is operatively coupled to the sensors.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a method and apparatus suitable for use in the control of free-ranging pests. The invention has particular relevance to the control of mice, but may also be useful in the control of other pests, for example, rats or cockroaches.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the past the control of free-ranging pests such as mice has normally involved placing bait, which may include poison, in places that the pests can be expected to frequent, the supply of bait being replenished from time to time. While replenishment of the bait may not cause problems in relatively small buildings, problems increase in large premises, for example, factories for processing food. Moreover, in both large and small premises it is in many circumstances necessary to take steps to ensure that the bait is not tampered with or swallowed by humans or other animals. The present invention is concerned primarily with alleviating problems that have arisen in connection with methods previously adopted for the control of pests such as mice.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method of detecting free-ranging pests without providing an attractant material in which method the presence of a pest is sensed by at least one of a plurality of sensors, a signal is emitted indicating the sensing of a pest by that sensor, and the fact that a signal has been emitted is indicated by an indicating means that is operatively coupled to the sensors.
The invention also provides apparatus for detecting free-ranging pests which apparatus is free from means providing an attractant material and comprises a plurality of sensors for sensing the presence of a pest, each sensor having associated therewith means for signalling that a pest has been sensed by that sensor, and indicating means for indicating that a signal has been emitted, the indicating means being operatively coupled to the sensors.
In accordance with the invention, the presence of a pest in the vicinity of one of the sensors will cause an indication of at least the first such event to be given by the indicating means. Where, as is preferred, the indicating means includes recording means, a record of at least the first such event, and preferably each subsequent event, will be made at the recording means.
The indicating means may include, for example, a warning light so that it is easy to see when an event has taken place. Where the indicating means includes both a warning light and recording means, the arrangement is preferably such that the warning light indicates that a pest has been detected by one of the sensors and that further inspection of the recording means is desirable.
When the indicating means indicates that a pest has been detected, a decision can be taken as to whether a rodenticidal operation should be carried out. If, as is preferred, the indicating means is also capable of indicating which sensor(s) detected the pest(s), a particularly accurate placement of a rodenticidal preparation is possible.
The fact that a rodenticidal operation, for example the placement of a preparation, need not take place until pests have been detected and, with the preferred apparatus, can be restricted to locations where mice or other pests are known to run, constitutes a significant improvement over previously proposed methods of pest control. It will be appreciated that with appropriate apparatus and sufficient sensors it will be possible to identify preferred runways followed by the pests in the premises in which the apparatus is installed, thus facilitating even further the correct placement of a rodenticidal preparation.
As the method and apparatus of the invention do not involve the use of an attractant material such as a foodstuff, the unnecessary introduction of extraneous materials into the areas to be protected is avoided. In accordance with the invention, however, means providing a relatively favoured environment for the pests may be provided in the vicinity of each sensor. The provision of a relatively favoured environment in the vicinity of the sensors may increase the likelihood of pests that are present in the location, for example, the building, in which the apparatus is installed, being detected by the apparatus.
Where mice are to be detected a relatively favoured environment may be provided by situating each sensor in a narrow channel, or in an enclosure, for example a box, which channel or enclosure is provided with holes through which the mice may enter or leave. We have observed that mice favour enclosed spaces, especially when these are small enough for the mice to contact opposed walls simultaneously. The use of enclosed spaces may also be advantageous in detecting other creatures having cryptic habits.
Where a narrow channel is used to provide the relatively favoured environment, the channel advantageously comprises one or more tubes running, for example, along the floor at the bottom of a wall, or up a wall, for example, in a corner. Such tubes are advantageously provided with holes at intervals along their length so that mice can enter the tubes. The tubes provide preferred runways for the mice. Sensors are so positioned that mice in the tubes can be detected. An advantageous enclosure is a small box containing the sensor, the box being provided with two holes through which a mouse can squeeze. In both the tube(s) and the box, the holes(s) and sensor(s) are normally so arranged that sensors are not triggered by a finger or other extraneous item inserted through a hole.
Any suitable sensing means may be used in accordance with the invention. Possible sensors include those responsive to changes in pressure, temperature, smell, sound (including ultrasound), and/or capacitance in the vicinity of the sensor. Transducers, especially pressure transducers, may of course be used. Other possibilities are the use of a microswitch which is activated when a mouse or other pest pushes past a wire, or any other device that is capable of responding when the pest brushes against it. Preferred sensors are those in which the pest interrupts a light beam, for example an infra-red beam. If desired such a beam may be deflected round corners using mirrors or light guides or pipes, and/or the beam could be positioned so that it is too high to be interrupted by, for example, a small insect crawling over the floor but is sufficiently low to be interrupted by, for example, a mouse.
More generally, it may in some circumstances be advantageous if the sensors are such that they do not respond to the presence of bodies substantially larger or substantially smaller than the pests it is desired to detect. For example, where the apparatus is to be used to detect the presence of mice it will normally be advantageous for the sensors to be unresponsive to people on the one hand and insects on the other. In other circumstances, however, for example, if it is desired to detect the presence of all pests of or below a certain size, it will be advantageous for the sensors to be responsive to all bodies of or below that size but unresponsive to bodies substantially above that size.
In any given method or apparatus the sensors must of course be chosen having regard to the pests to be detected and the location in which the sensors are to be installed. The sensors should as far as possible be free from the risk of responding to extraneous events, for example, vibrations due to the operation of machinery nearby. Preferably the sensors merely sense the presence of the pests and the pests are unaffected by the system.
The means for signalling that a pest has been detected by a sensor may be such that the same signal is produced by each sensor. If desired, however, each sensor, or group of sensors, may have a characteristic signal so that it is possible to identify more accurately the place where pests have been detected. This may be of particular advantage when the method and apparatus are used in very large premises.
The signals emitted on sensing of a pest by a sensor are transmitted to an indicating means which is capable of indicating the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location, of at least the first event that occurs after the apparatus has been set. As indicated above, the indicating means may comprise recording means capable of recording the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location of at least the first event. Preferably the recording means is also capable of recording the occurrence, and advantageously the time and/or the location, of each successive event.
If desired, each sensor can be individually linked to the indicating means, or signals from sensors in a group of sensors may be transmitted via a common link to the indicating means. Such a system, however, has the disadvantage that very great lengths of cable could be necessary in large premises, and it is relatively complicated and expensive to change the positions of the sensors. Moreover, where a common link is used, it may not be possible (depending on the type of signals used) to distinguish between the signals from different sensors.
Advantageously, there is also provided means for transmitting the signal from signalling means associated with each sensor and means for receiving the transmitted signals and passing signals to the indicating means. Thus, for example, the apparatus may include means for transmitting the signals via the main electricity supply conductors and means for receiving the signals from these conductors. Where signals are transmitted via the mains it is necessary to take into consideration fluctuations that can occur in the mains voltage and to prevent spurious responses occurring as a result of them.
An advantageous method of transmitting the signals involves the use of a radio transmitter associated with each sensor and one or more radio receivers. Preferably there is a common receiver for all the transmitters, the common receiver advantageously being in the vicinity of the indicating means. One advantage of the use of radio transmission is that the sensors can readily be moved from one location to another. Due regard must be had, however, to the surroundings in which the transmitter is to be used so that, for example, interference can be eliminated or reduced and so that the operation of surrounding equipment is not adversely affected.
A further advantageous method of transmitting the signals involves the use of infra-red light. Thus, for example, each sensor could be provided with means for transmitting infra-red light, there being one or more receivers for the infra-red light. If desired a common receiver could be used for two or more of the sensors.
When the invention is to be used for detecting the presence of a pest that could adversely affect the operation of the apparatus, the apparatus preferably comprises means for indicating that the apparatus has been so affected. Thus, for example, where the apparatus is to be used for detecting mice the apparatus advantageously includes means for indicating that part of the apparatus has been rendered inoperative by the mice (by, for example, the mice nibbling through a wire).
The method and apparatus of the invention are suitable for detecting pests in premises of all sizes. It will be appreciated that for reliable detection over the entire premises sensors will be situated at a plurality of different locations in the premises. Where increased vigilance is desirable in one particular area, for example, one particular room, a greater than average number of sensors may of course be located in that area. In very large premises it may in some cases be desirable to install more than one system according to the invention, that is to say there may be more than one indicating means, each indicating means having associated with it a plurality of sensors, but preferably there will be only one system according to the invention and thus a single indicating means for the entire premises, for example, a building in which pests are to be detected.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Various forms of apparatus for detecting free-ranging pests constructed in accordance with the invention are described by way of example in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of an apparatus in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of an alternate embodiment of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of another alternate embodiment of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1; and
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of the steps of a method in accordance with the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to the Drawings, and FIG. 1 in particular, one form of the apparatus comprises a plurality of sensors 1 each of which is provided with signalling means 2 and transmitting means 3 for the signal from the signalling means.
An indicating means indicated generally by the reference numeral 4 is operatively coupled with means 5 for receiving the transmitted signals. The indicating means comprises a warning light 6 and recording means 7.
In use, when a pest 8 passes one of the sensors 1 the respective signalling means 2 emits a signal, which is transmitted by the respective transmitting means 3 to the receiving means 5. The receiving means 5 passes the signal to the indicating means 4, which illuminates the warning light 6, and records in the recording means 7 the fact that, and the time at which, the signal was emitted. If more than one signal is received, the warning light 6 is illuminated when the first signal is received and remains lit, while each signal is recorded in the recording means.
In addition to indicating occurrence, the indicating means 4, which include both time indicating means 12 and recording mechanism 7 in addition to the warning light 6, can indicate the time and/or the location of at least the first event that occurs after the apparatus has been set.
Instead or in addition there may be a plurality of warning lamps 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e and 9f each associated with a respective sensor 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, and the indicating means then illuminates each respective lamp 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e or 9f if and when its respective sensor 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e or 1f senses a pest 8. The recording means records which respective signalling means 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e or 2f emitted each signal that it records.
In FIG. 2 each respective sensor 1a-1f is at least partially surrounded by an enclosure 14 provided with holes 15 through which pests 8 may enter or leave. In FIG. 3, another alternate embodiment provides channels 16 in the vicinity of each respective sensor 1a-1f.
Instead, the sensors 1 may be divided into a plurality of groups 10, and the indicating means 4 may record and indicate the group of sensors, but not the individual sensor, but which each signal was emitted.
In FIG. 4, a flow chart is shown which diagrammatically sets forth the steps of a preferred method of controlling free-ranging pests in an area under surveillance. The method comprises providing an apparatus free of attractant material and having a plurality of sensors (indicated generally by the reference numeral 21), distributing the plurality of sensors over the said area, each sensor having associated therewith an enclosure or channel which a rodent can enter (indicated generally by the reference numeral 22), sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the enclosure or channel associated therewith (indicated generally by the reference numeral 23), signalling with signalling means when a rodent has been sensed by the sensor, each of said sensors having signalling means associated therewith (indicated generally by the reference numeral 24), indicating with an indicating means whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled through the signalling means to each of the sensors (indicated generally by the reference numeral 25), recording with recording means the fact that a rodent has been sensed (indicated generally by the reference numeral 26), and carrying out a rodenticidal operation following detection of the rodent by the apparatus (indicated generally by the reference numeral 27).

Claims (16)

I claim:
1. Apparatus for detecting whether or not free-ranging rodent pests are present in an area under surveillance, which apparatus is free from means providing an attractant material and comprises a plurality of sensors distributed over the said area, each sensor having associated therewith an enclosure or channel which a rodent can enter and being capable of sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the enclosure or channel associated therewith, and an indicating means for indicating whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled to each of the sensors and each sensor having associated therewith signaling means for signaling to the indicating means when a rodent has been sensed by that sensor, and the indicating means including recording means and being capable of recording and indicating the fact that a rodent has been sensed.
2. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sensors include a plurality of groups of sensors, the number of sensors in each group being smaller than the total number of sensors, the indicating means also being capable of indicating to which group the sensor that senses a rodent belongs.
3. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the indicating means is also capable of indicating which sensor senses the presence of the rodent.
4. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the indicating means is also capable of indicating the time or approximate time at which the rodent is sensed.
5. Apparatus as claimed in claimed 1, wherein said
recording means is capable, during a given working period, of recording information from more than one sensor.
6. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the indicating means comprises at least one warning light.
7. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the indicating means comprises a warning light that is illuminated on sensing of the first rodent, and wherein the indicating means is not only capable of recording and indicating the sensing of the first rodent but also the sensing of subsequent rodents.
8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein there is also provided means for transmitting signals from the signaling means and means for receiving the transmitted signals and passing the signals to the indicating means.
9. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein, each enclosure is a box.
10. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, suitable for detecting whether or not mice are present in the said area.
11. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, which is such that the sensors merely sense the rodents and the rodents are unaffected by the system.
12. Apparatus for detecting whether or not free-ranging rodent pests are present in an area under surveillance, which apparatus is free from means providing an attractant material and comprises a plurality of sensors distributed over the said area, each sensor being positioned in a box which a rodent can enter and being capable of sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the said box, and an indicating means for indicating whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled to each of the sensors and each sensor having associated therewith signaling means for signaling to the indicating means when a rodent has been sensed by that sensor, and the indicating means including recording means and being capable of recording and indicating the fact that a rodent has been sensed.
13. A method of detecting whether or not free-ranging rodent pests are present in an area under surveillance, which method comprises the steps of providing apparatus free of attractant material and having a plurality of sensors, distributing a plurality of sensors over the said area, each sensor having associated therewith an enclosure or channel which a rodent can enter, sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the enclosure or channel associated therewith, signalling with signalling means when a rodent has been sensed by the sensor, each of said sensors having signaling means associated therewith, and indicating with an indicating means whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled through the signalling means to each of the sensors, and recording with recording means the fact that a rodent has been sensed.
14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein a number of rodents are sensed and the indicating means comprises a warning light that is illuminated on sensing of the first rodent,
and wherein the sensing of subsequent rodents is recorded and indicated by the indicating means.
15. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the rodents are mice.
16. A method of controlling free-ranging rodent pests in an area under surveillance, which method comprises the steps of providing
apparatus free of attractant material and having a plurality of sensors, distributing
the plurality of sensors over the said area, each sensor having associated therewith an enclosure or channel which a rodent can enter, sensing whether or not a rodent is present in the enclosure or channel associated therewith, signaling with signaling means when a rodent has been sensed by the sensor, each of said sensors having signaling means associated therewith,
indicating with an indicating means whether or not a rodent has been sensed by any of the sensors, the indicating means being operatively coupled through the signalling means to each of the sensors, recording with recording means the fact that a rodent has been sensed, and carrying out a rodenticidal operation following detection of a rodent by the apparatus.
US07/052,738 1985-08-20 1986-08-19 Intruder detection and control apparatus Expired - Fee Related US4884064A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8520769A GB2179481B (en) 1985-08-20 1985-08-20 Pest detection apparatus and method
GB8520769 1985-08-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4884064A true US4884064A (en) 1989-11-28

Family

ID=10584009

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/052,738 Expired - Fee Related US4884064A (en) 1985-08-20 1986-08-19 Intruder detection and control apparatus

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US4884064A (en)
EP (1) EP0233240B1 (en)
AU (1) AU586023B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3680785D1 (en)
DK (1) DK164471C (en)
GB (1) GB2179481B (en)
WO (1) WO1987001011A1 (en)

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5239587A (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-08-24 Bruce Muckelrath Sound recording device for use by hunters
US5575105A (en) * 1994-06-29 1996-11-19 Cats, Inc. Termite alarm unit
WO2002021912A3 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-06-06 Liphatech Inc Electronic pest monitoring system and method
US20030184442A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for capacitively sensing pests
WO2003084320A1 (en) 2002-03-29 2003-10-16 Ecolab, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and for recording additional trap parameter data
US20030218543A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-11-27 Gardner James P. Light extinction based non-destructive flying insect detector
US6886292B2 (en) * 2003-03-19 2005-05-03 Gardner Manufacturing Co., Inc. Insect trap
US20050219951A1 (en) * 2004-04-02 2005-10-06 Walton Charles A Finding underground animals using transducer probes
US20060123693A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2006-06-15 Frank Muller Electrocution animal trap with a sender
US20060150470A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2006-07-13 Per Ronnau Pest control system
US20060215885A1 (en) * 2005-03-22 2006-09-28 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US7411497B2 (en) 2006-08-15 2008-08-12 Lawrence Kates System and method for intruder detection
US20080222942A1 (en) * 2007-03-12 2008-09-18 Dalton D Vernon Method of Detecting and Exterminating Rodents
US20080236023A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Automated pest-trapping device
US20090193707A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-08-06 Todd Moran Telemetry-Enabled Trap Monitoring System
US20100170074A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-07-08 PAF Holdings ApS Rat trap
US20110119987A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2011-05-26 Ryan Carl Alter Bear trap
JP2019170234A (en) * 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 Necプラットフォームズ株式会社 Extermination agent spraying device, extermination agent spraying method and program
US20210392866A1 (en) * 2018-10-22 2021-12-23 Brandenburg Connect Limited Intelligent trap and consumables

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB8704375D0 (en) * 1987-02-25 1987-04-01 Rentokil Ltd Pest monitoring system
GB9106969D0 (en) * 1991-04-03 1991-05-22 Virtual Logic Ltd Elapsed event display
GB2271873B (en) * 1992-09-03 1997-02-26 Josef Petr Prokopius Electronic burglar alarm system
GB2319376A (en) * 1996-10-29 1998-05-20 Michael John Burke Vermin indicator
GB9622459D0 (en) * 1996-10-29 1997-01-08 Rentokil Ltd Rodent detection apparatus
NZ554311A (en) 2007-04-02 2009-10-30 Contimo Ltd A pest control device

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3111608A (en) * 1961-02-27 1963-11-19 Walter G Finch Contact switch device
US3764984A (en) * 1972-01-28 1973-10-09 Benz G Information coding system
GB1390913A (en) * 1971-05-24 1975-04-16 Microwave & Electronic Syst Monitoring systems
US4048745A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-09-20 Morford Marvin A Rodent trap
GB2039400A (en) * 1978-10-16 1980-08-06 Baker Protective Services Central station alarm system
US4242670A (en) * 1979-03-02 1980-12-30 Smith William V Photosensitive alarm systems
US4372074A (en) * 1980-10-20 1983-02-08 Pierre Arrabit Animal trap
DE3211731A1 (en) * 1982-03-30 1983-10-06 Fritzmeier Ag Device for detecting animals on cultivated land
DE3302917A1 (en) * 1983-01-26 1984-07-26 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Wild-animal protection along roads or the like
US4503399A (en) * 1983-01-05 1985-03-05 Keith A. Tidball Electronic cattle guard
US4517557A (en) * 1983-06-21 1985-05-14 Ace Pest & Termite Control Co. Alarm housing for rodent control device
US4523185A (en) * 1982-03-15 1985-06-11 Albert Roth Zoned intrusion display with series-connected sensors
US4651143A (en) * 1984-09-25 1987-03-17 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Security system including a daughter station for monitoring an area and a remote parent station connected thereto
US4658386A (en) * 1985-02-01 1987-04-14 Mobil Oil Corporation Ultrasonic sound wave generating device for repelling animals

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1050652A (en) * 1975-01-21 1979-03-13 Sontrix Multi-zone intrusion detection system
AU505276B2 (en) * 1976-03-31 1979-11-15 Cutler-Hammer New Zealand Limited Cutler - hammer new zealand limited
US4321592A (en) * 1978-05-30 1982-03-23 American District Telegraph Company Multiple sensor intrusion detection system

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3111608A (en) * 1961-02-27 1963-11-19 Walter G Finch Contact switch device
GB1390913A (en) * 1971-05-24 1975-04-16 Microwave & Electronic Syst Monitoring systems
US3764984A (en) * 1972-01-28 1973-10-09 Benz G Information coding system
US4048745A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-09-20 Morford Marvin A Rodent trap
GB2039400A (en) * 1978-10-16 1980-08-06 Baker Protective Services Central station alarm system
US4242670A (en) * 1979-03-02 1980-12-30 Smith William V Photosensitive alarm systems
US4372074A (en) * 1980-10-20 1983-02-08 Pierre Arrabit Animal trap
US4523185A (en) * 1982-03-15 1985-06-11 Albert Roth Zoned intrusion display with series-connected sensors
DE3211731A1 (en) * 1982-03-30 1983-10-06 Fritzmeier Ag Device for detecting animals on cultivated land
US4503399A (en) * 1983-01-05 1985-03-05 Keith A. Tidball Electronic cattle guard
DE3302917A1 (en) * 1983-01-26 1984-07-26 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Wild-animal protection along roads or the like
US4517557A (en) * 1983-06-21 1985-05-14 Ace Pest & Termite Control Co. Alarm housing for rodent control device
US4651143A (en) * 1984-09-25 1987-03-17 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Security system including a daughter station for monitoring an area and a remote parent station connected thereto
US4658386A (en) * 1985-02-01 1987-04-14 Mobil Oil Corporation Ultrasonic sound wave generating device for repelling animals

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Article, "Field Method for Census Taking of Commensal Rodents in Rodenticide Evaluations" (Special Technical Publication 680, ASTM, 1979), D. E. Kaukeinen.
Article, "One Mouse", British Food Journal, Mar./Apr. 1975, British Food Journal.
Article, Field Method for Census Taking of Commensal Rodents in Rodenticide Evaluations (Special Technical Publication 680, ASTM, 1979), D. E. Kaukeinen. *
Article, One Mouse , British Food Journal, Mar./Apr. 1975, British Food Journal. *

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5239587A (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-08-24 Bruce Muckelrath Sound recording device for use by hunters
US5575105A (en) * 1994-06-29 1996-11-19 Cats, Inc. Termite alarm unit
WO2002021912A3 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-06-06 Liphatech Inc Electronic pest monitoring system and method
US6445301B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2002-09-03 Liphatech, Inc. Electronic pest monitoring system and method
WO2003084321A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-16 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for capacitively sensing pests
US20030184442A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for capacitively sensing pests
US20030213161A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-11-20 Gardner James P. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and additional trap parameter data
US20030218543A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-11-27 Gardner James P. Light extinction based non-destructive flying insect detector
US6937156B2 (en) 2002-03-29 2005-08-30 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for capacitively sensing pests
US7509770B2 (en) 2002-03-29 2009-03-31 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and additional trap parameter data
US7071829B2 (en) 2002-03-29 2006-07-04 Ecolab Inc. Light extinction based non-destructive flying insect detector
US20090192763A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2009-07-30 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and additional trap parameter data
WO2003084320A1 (en) 2002-03-29 2003-10-16 Ecolab, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and for recording additional trap parameter data
US8635806B2 (en) * 2002-03-29 2014-01-28 Ecolab Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and additional trap parameter data
US7530195B2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-05-12 Ratco Aps Electrocution animal trap with a sender
US20060123693A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2006-06-15 Frank Muller Electrocution animal trap with a sender
US6886292B2 (en) * 2003-03-19 2005-05-03 Gardner Manufacturing Co., Inc. Insect trap
US7656300B2 (en) * 2003-06-16 2010-02-02 Rønnau Development ApS Pest control system
US20060150470A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2006-07-13 Per Ronnau Pest control system
US20050219951A1 (en) * 2004-04-02 2005-10-06 Walton Charles A Finding underground animals using transducer probes
US20080069401A1 (en) * 2005-03-22 2008-03-20 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US7286056B2 (en) * 2005-03-22 2007-10-23 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US20060215885A1 (en) * 2005-03-22 2006-09-28 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US20090002493A1 (en) * 2005-03-22 2009-01-01 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US7504956B2 (en) * 2005-03-22 2009-03-17 Lawrence Kates System and method for pest detection
US7411497B2 (en) 2006-08-15 2008-08-12 Lawrence Kates System and method for intruder detection
US20080278308A1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-11-13 Lawrence Kates System and method for intruder detection
US20100170074A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-07-08 PAF Holdings ApS Rat trap
US20080222942A1 (en) * 2007-03-12 2008-09-18 Dalton D Vernon Method of Detecting and Exterminating Rodents
US20080236023A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Ecolab Inc. Automated pest-trapping device
US20090193707A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-08-06 Todd Moran Telemetry-Enabled Trap Monitoring System
US9015987B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2015-04-28 New Frequency, Inc. Telemetry-enabled trap monitoring system
US20160012703A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2016-01-14 New Frequency, Inc. Telemetry-enabled trap monitoring system
US20110119987A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2011-05-26 Ryan Carl Alter Bear trap
US8112934B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2012-02-14 Alter Enterprise Llc Bear trap
JP2019170234A (en) * 2018-03-28 2019-10-10 Necプラットフォームズ株式会社 Extermination agent spraying device, extermination agent spraying method and program
US20210392866A1 (en) * 2018-10-22 2021-12-23 Brandenburg Connect Limited Intelligent trap and consumables

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK164471B (en) 1992-07-06
WO1987001011A1 (en) 1987-02-26
DK198887A (en) 1987-04-15
DE3680785D1 (en) 1991-09-12
EP0233240B1 (en) 1991-08-07
GB2179481A (en) 1987-03-04
DK164471C (en) 1992-11-16
EP0233240A1 (en) 1987-08-26
GB2179481B (en) 1989-08-02
AU586023B2 (en) 1989-06-29
GB8520769D0 (en) 1985-09-25
AU6224286A (en) 1987-03-10
DK198887D0 (en) 1987-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4884064A (en) Intruder detection and control apparatus
EP0283142B1 (en) Pest monitoring system
JP7455061B2 (en) System and method
EP1635633B1 (en) Pest control system
US6445301B1 (en) Electronic pest monitoring system and method
EP3119196B1 (en) Apparatus for sensing bed bug excretion
CA2476932A1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic pest trap report generation and for recording additional trap parameter data
EP3682737A1 (en) System and method for counting agricultural pests inside a trap
US5896082A (en) Fire detection system
Kaukeinen Field methods for census taking of commensal rodents in rodenticide evaluations
US11464221B2 (en) Animal trap detection system using a glue board
KR100884874B1 (en) Box for capturing vermin
EP0608948A2 (en) Activity monitors
CN114096151A (en) Device for determining bed bug activity and method for detecting bed bugs
WO2003082002A1 (en) Hermetically sealed baits for termites
AU2021102427A4 (en) Ai-based micro-ecosystem monitoring device and method thereof
US11864548B1 (en) Remote sensing repeating rodent trap
US6192825B1 (en) Device for detecting rodents
Hendricks Electronic systems to automatically detect insect pests that respond to species-specific chemical sex pheromone baits

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: RENTOKIL LIMITED, FELCOURT, EAST GRINSTEAD, WEST S

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:MEEHAN, ADRIAN P.;REEL/FRAME:004757/0696

Effective date: 19870728

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 19971203

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362