Suche Bilder Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive Mehr »
Anmelden
Nutzer von Screenreadern: Klicke auf diesen Link, um die Bedienungshilfen zu aktivieren. Dieser Modus bietet die gleichen Grundfunktionen, funktioniert aber besser mit deinem Reader.

Patentsuche

  1. Erweiterte Patentsuche
VeröffentlichungsnummerUS6972622 B2
PublikationstypErteilung
AnmeldenummerUS 10/435,815
Veröffentlichungsdatum6. Dez. 2005
Eingetragen12. Mai 2003
Prioritätsdatum12. Mai 2003
GebührenstatusBezahlt
Auch veröffentlicht unterUS20040227570
Veröffentlichungsnummer10435815, 435815, US 6972622 B2, US 6972622B2, US-B2-6972622, US6972622 B2, US6972622B2
ErfinderDonald G. Jackson, Russell J. Hoppenstein
Ursprünglich BevollmächtigterAndrew Corporation
Zitat exportierenBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Externe Links: USPTO, USPTO-Zuordnung, Espacenet
Optimization of error loops in distributed power amplifiers
US 6972622 B2
Zusammenfassung
Several feed-forward RF power amplifiers configured for use in a distributed array, each having a main amplifier within a carrier null loop and an error amplifier within an error loop. Each carrier null loop includes a switch configured to selectively disable the carrier null loop, thereby disabling the carrier null loop, and injecting an actual RF signal into the error loop allowing the error loop to be optimized using the actual RF signal.
Bilder(2)
Previous page
Next page
Ansprüche(22)
1. An apparatus comprising:
a main amplifier within a carrier null loop and configured to receive an RF input signal;
an error amplifier within an error loop;
a switch disposed in the carrier null loop and configured to selectively disable the carrier null loop to provide injection of an actual RF signal amplified by the main amplifier into the error loop to allow optimization of the error loop using the actual RF signal, wherein the switch inhibits reception of the RF input signal by the error amplifier when the carrier null loop is disabled.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising
a power splitter disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled intermediate the switch and the main amplifier and configured to divide the RF input signal.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, further comprising a coupler disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the main amplifier and configured to sample the output of the main amplifier.
4. The apparatus of claim 3, further comprising an attenuator disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the coupler and configured to select the level of the sampled output of the main amplifier.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, further comprising a first combiner disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the attenuator and the switch and configured to substantially cancel the input signal carrier during normal operation resulting in primarily IMD products being coupled to the error amplifier.
6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the error amplifier is coupled to the first combiner.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising a second combiner disposed in the error loop and coupled to the coupler and the error amplifier and configured to combine IMD products generated by the main amplifier and IMD products manipulated in the error loop, thereby producing an output signal with acceptable IMD.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, further comprising a power detector coupled to the second combiner and configured to be read by a processor.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a processor, the switch controlled by the processor.
10. An apparatus comprising:
a main amplifier within a carrier null loop;
an error amplifier within an error loop;
a switch disposed in the carrier null loop and configured to selectively disable the carrier null loop to provide injection of an actual RF signal amplified by the main amplifier into the error loop to allow optimization of the error loop using the actual RF signal;
a processor, the switch controlled by the processor;
an attenuator, the attenuator configured to reduce the level of the actual RF signal injected into the error loop, the attenuator also controlled by the processor.
11. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising a power detector coupled to the error amplifier and configured to be read by the processor.
12. An amplifier system, the system comprising:
an array of amplifiers, with each such amplifier comprising:
a main amplifier within a carrier null loop;
an error amplifier within an error loop;
a switch disposed in the carrier null loop and configured to selectively disable the carrier null loop to provide injection of an actual RF signal amplified by the main amplifier into the error loop to allow optimization of the error loop using the actual RF signal and while the carrier null loop in at least one other amplifier in the array is enabled.
13. The amplifier system of claim 12, wherein each amplifier further comprises a power splitter disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the switch and the main amplifier and configured to divide an RF input signal.
14. The amplifier system of claim 13, wherein each amplifier further comprises a coupler disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the main amplifier and configured to sample the output signal of the main amplifier.
15. The amplifier system of claim 14, wherein each amplifier further comprises an attenuator disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the coupler and configured to select the level of the sampled output signal.
16. The amplifier system of claim 15, wherein each amplifier further comprises a first combiner disposed in the carrier null loop and coupled to the attenuator and the switch and configured to substantially cancel the input signal carrier during normal operation resulting in primarily IMD products being coupled to the error amplifier.
17. The amplifier system of claim 16, wherein the error amplifier is coupled to the first combiner in each amplifier.
18. The amplifier system of claim 17, wherein each amplifier further comprises a second combiner disposed in the error loop and coupled to the coupler and the error amplifier and configured to combine IMD products generated by the main amplifier and IMD products manipulated in the error loop, thereby producing an output signal with acceptable IMD.
19. The amplifier system of claim 18, wherein each amplifier further comprises a power detector coupled to the second combiner and configured to be read by a processor.
20. The amplifier system of claim 12, further comprising a processor, the switch within each amplifier controlled by the processor.
21. The amplifier system of claim 20, wherein each amplifier further comprises an attenuator, the attenuator configured to reduce the level of the actual RF signal injected into the error loop, the attenuator also controlled by the processor.
22. The amplifier system of claim 20, wherein each amplifier further comprises a power detector coupled to the error amplifier and configured to be read by the processor.
Beschreibung
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to radio frequency (RF) amplifier systems, and more particularly to an apparatus and method for optimizing error loops that attempt to reduce or eliminate intermodulation distortion (IMD) products in an array of distributed power amplifiers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Ideal, or theoretical, radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers act linearly, faithfully reproducing an amplified RF signal at their output without distortion. Unfortunately, in practice, physical RF power amplifiers are non-linear and add a certain amount of unwanted distortion to a signal, such distortion being realized as intermodulation distortion (IMD) products. Moreover, physical amplifiers have a finite ability to deliver gain and/or power. Thus, RF power amplifiers are often operated and configured in such a manner as to provide as much output power as possible at low cost.

In general, the cost of an amplifier increases with its maximum output power. Therefore, to maximize the cost effectiveness of a given RF power amplifier, the amplifier may be operated close to saturation to provide as much output power as possible. Operation close to saturation affords additional output power at the expense of increase IMD products.

Another manner of cost-effectively addressing the power requirements of some applications, and in particular many high power applications, is to use an array of lower cost RF power amplifiers in lieu of a single, more powerful, but more costly RF power amplifier. An array of RF power amplifiers often allows output powers beyond those attainable with a single amplifier while maintaining IMD products below the desired level. Even when such an array is used, amplifiers are operated close to saturation to reduce the number of amplifiers required in the array.

Operation of an amplifier close to saturation may increase the power of unwanted IMD products. These IMD products may cause interference within the normal operating frequency range of the amplifier, and may further impede proper transmission and reception of RF signals both within and outside the normal operating frequency range of the amplifier. Numerous techniques have been developed to reduce IMD products from amplified RF signals, including feed-forward, predistortion, and linear amplification with non-linear components (LINC), the former being briefly described hereinafter.

Recent increases in the demand for wireless communications devices have led to new frequency bands to increase capacity, such as, for example, the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) developed by the European Telecommunications Standard Institute for delivering 3G (third generation) services. Modern transmission protocols, such as UMTS, demand high linearity to prevent RF energy in one band from spilling over and interfering with other proximate channels. Certain modern transmission protocols also have high Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAR) carrier signals that make efficient linear amplifiers difficult to design.

Further, the effects of IMD products, manifested as interference and cross talk, may be compounded as a result of the close proximity of frequency bands. RF power amplifiers therefore must operate at high drive levels in order to achieve the high linearity demanded by broadband applications. Energy leakage resulting from one band spilling over into another can undesirably degrade the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio or bit-error rate (BER) of the proximate frequency band.

In practice, it is unnecessary to completely eliminate all IMD products for a selected center frequency. Certain tolerable levels of IMD products are acceptable. When the terms “eliminate” or “reduce” are used herein with reference to the IMD products, it is understood that the IMD products should be suppressed below a certain tolerable level, even though they will not be entirely eliminated.

One common technique to reduce IMD to an acceptable level is feed-forward correction, whereby IMD products are manipulated so that at the final summing point the IMD products are substantially cancelled. Many feed-forward amplifiers use what is conventionally known as a pilot or carrier tone injection to assist in the control of the gain and phase of an error amplifier thereby minimizing IMD of a main amplifier. A carrier tone is generated and injected with the RF signal to be transmitted at the input of the main amplifier to simulate an artificial signal whose frequency content is known. The main amplifier produces a desired amplified signal and a simulated distortion product based on the carrier tone. At the output of the main amplifier, a carrier tone receiver detects the simulated distortion, not the actual distortion, and the gain and phase of the error amplifier are adjusted to minimize the simulated distortion, thereby optimizing the error loop. However, because the error amplifier is not adjusted in accordance with the actual distortion products of the RF signal, but rather with a carrier tone, the actual distortion products may not be entirely cancelled or the carrier tone may leak into the output, creating unwanted byproducts.

Another approach is to digitize the RF signals to baseband, filter out the desired frequency components, and then analyze the remaining undesired distortion components in a digital signal processor (DSP). This approach does not require the use of a carrier tone. The energy of these distortion components is located and measured in the DSP, and the error loop is adjusted until the undesired components are eliminated. For example, in one such design, a feed-forward amplification system uses mask detection compensation on an RF signal modulated according to a known modulation format. The RF signal is amplified, producing in-band frequency components and undesired out-of-band distortion components. The amplified signal is heterodyned to baseband so as to be centered about DC. A wide passband (1.25 MHz) bandpass filter is used to eliminate the in-band frequency components. A microprocessor queries a DSP for the energy at predetermined offsets (representative of an IMD location), and control signals adjust the gain-phase network, i.e., optimizes the error loop, in accordance with the out-of-band distortion components.

The above approach operates in an environment where signals are modulated according to a single known modulation format (CDMA). However, such an approach would not be well suited for detecting narrowband signals such as TDMA and their associated IMD products, in part due to the wide bandwidth of the filter (1.25 MHz).

RF signals may be modulated in accordance with one of any number of modulation formats which are well known in the art, including, TDMA, GSM, CDMA, WCDMA, QAM, and OFDM, each having differing bandwidths. For example, the bandwidth for a WCDMA signal is 3.84 MHz (wideband), and the bandwidth for a CDMA signal is 1.25 MHz. By contrast, a GSM signal has a bandwidth of 250 kHz, and a TDMA signal has a bandwidth of only 30 kHz (narrowband). If the signals are located in a PCS frequency band (1930 to 1990 MHz), a 60 MHz bandwidth is used. Thus, the bandwidth of a signal, depending on the modulation format and band used, may vary from 30 kHz to 3.84 MHz.

Thus, the implementation of a narrow band receiver in a known distortion band, i.e., a band where IMD products are known to occur, is a complex undertaking. For example, a narrowband tuner may require too much time to tune across a wide bandwidth, while a wideband tuner may not be able to detect the individual carriers of TDMA or GSM signals or their associated IMD products. In short, there is a tradeoff between the bandwidth of a tuner and the speed with which it can identify and eliminate IMD products.

Thus, the optimization of error loops in feed-forward amplifiers generally requires a rather complex approach such as carrier tone injection or implementation of narrow-band receiver in known distortion bands. Both of these approaches are undesirable from a circuit complexity standpoint or, in the case of carrier tone injection, from an interference standpoint. Such complexity, and its associated cost, is furthered by the use of a number of RF power amplifiers in an array to meet a desired amount of radiated output power for a given cost.

Therefore, a need exists for an IMD reduction technique that is easy to implement and that does not introduce unwanted signals into the output of the RF amplifiers in an array.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a distributed feed-forward radio frequency (RF) amplifier array in accordance with the principles of the present invention; and,

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of one of the feed-forward RF amplifiers shown in FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, there is shown a feed-forward RF power amplifier comprising a main amplifier within a carrier null loop and an error amplifier within an error loop. The carrier null loop comprises a switch configured to selectively disable the carrier null loop. By disabling the carrier null loop, the actual RF signal is injected into the error loop to allow optimization of the error loop using the actual RF signal. Such an amplifier, when used in an array, provides a feed-forward technique that is easy to implement and that does not introduce unwanted signals into the output of the RF amplifiers in the array.

Referring first to FIG. 1, there is shown one embodiment 10 of an amplifier system in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Amplifier system 10 is defined by an array of distributed or parallel feed-forward radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers 12 a–n, there being N number of amplifiers as illustrated. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that any number of amplifiers may be used as desired in an effort to achieve a desired amount of radiated output power for a given cost without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

Coupled to the inputs and outputs of the feed-forward RF power amplifiers 12 a–n are splitter 14 and combiner 16. Splitter 14 provides an input (RF IN) to amplifier system 10, dividing an input signal between the amplifiers 12 a–n, while combiner 16 combines the outputs of the amplifiers 12 a–n for coupling to an antenna (not shown).

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, in other embodiments of the present invention, combiner 16 may be eliminated, the amplifiers 12 a–n being coupled to respective elements of an antenna, such that the antenna combines the output of the amplifiers 12 a–n through “far field summing” or “far field combining”. An example of an antenna utilizing farfield combining may be found in “Active Antenna with Interleaved Arrays of Antenna Elements” by Judd, et al., Ser. No. 10/256,860, filed Sep. 27, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which is assigned to the same assignee as the present invention.

It has been determined that, for a distributed amplifier system, such as amplifier system 10 comprised of a number (N) of feed-forward power amplifiers arranged in a parallel array, each amplifier may be sequentially disabled from the array and its error loop optimized. The net power lost to the array while a single amplifier is undergoing optimization may be described by the equation: 10(log(N/(N−1)), where N is, again, the number of amplifiers in the array. Thus, for example, for an array of 8 amplifiers (N=8), the power lost during optimization would be approximately 0.58 decibels (dB). Considering the optimization process may only be functional for a small percentage of time, such a power loss has been found to be acceptable.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that any sequence, e.g., numerically, when the amplifiers are numbered, randomly, pseudo-randomly, etc., may be used in disabling the amplifiers and optimizing their error loops. Moreover, more than one amplifier may be disabled at any one given time, provided the loss in output power is acceptable. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that neither the order of disabling the amplifiers nor the number of amplifiers disabled constitutes a departure from the spirit of the present invention.

Operably coupled to each amplifier 12 a–n is processor 18. Processor 18 is configured to sequentially disable each amplifier 12 a–n from the array and optimize its error loop as will be described hereinafter. Moreover, such optimization may be conducted using the RF signal applied to each amplifier 12 a–n in the normal course of operation or the “actual RF signal” as referred to herein, rather than a carrier tone. The use of the actual RF signal eliminates the complexity associated with carrier tone injection and the potential for interference resulting therefrom, and further eliminates the need for and difficulty of implementing a narrow-band receiver in known distortion bands.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a schematic diagram of the feed-forward RF amplifier 12 a shown in FIG. 1 is illustrated. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that amplifiers 12 b–n are substantially similar in construction and operation to amplifier 12 a, and are not shown, as such illustration would be redundant. Processor 18 is shown for purposes of further illustration.

Amplifier 12 a comprises a main amplifier 20 within a main or carrier null loop 22 and an error amplifier 24 within an error loop 26. Amplifier 12 a further comprises attenuators 28, 38, power splitter or divider 30, switch 32, coupler 36, combiners or summers 40, 44, and power detectors 46, 48.

More specifically, carrier null loop 22 comprises power splitter or divider 30, main amplifier 20, switch 32, coupler 36, attenuator 38, and combiner or summer 40. Similarly, error loop 26 comprises coupler 36, attenuator 38, combiner or summer 40, error amplifier 24, and combiner or summer 44.

Coupled to error amplifier 24 and combiner or summer 44 are power detectors 46 and 48, respectively. Power detectors 46 and 48 may be root mean squared (RMS) power detection devices that are well known to those skilled in the art.

Processor 18 is operably coupled to attenuator 28, switch 32, and error amplifier 24 for purposes of controlling the attenuation, actuation, and gain and/or phase, respectively, thereof. Processor 18 is also coupled to power detectors 46 and 48 for purposes measuring the output power of error and main amplifiers 24 and 20, respectively.

In operation the feed-forward configuration of amplifier 12 a isolates the intermodulation distortion (IMD) products generated by main amplifier 20 and manipulates them in error loop 26 such that the manipulated IMD products cancel the IMD products generated by main amplifier 20 when they are recombined in combiner or summer 44, resulting in an output signal with reduced IMD. The IMD products from the main and error amplifiers 20, 24 are ideally 180 degrees out-of-phase and have equal magnitude in order to achieve proper cancellation.

In the normal operation of amplifier 12 a, an input signal is coupled through attenuator 28, set by processor 18 for little or no attenuation, to power splitter or divider 30, a portion of the signal then being coupled to main amplifier 20 and the rest coupled to through switch 32 to combiner or summer 40. The output of main amplifier 20 is coupled to coupler 36 that samples a portion of the output signal, coupling the signal to attenuator 38, with the rest of the signal coupled to combiner or summer 44 in carrier null loop 22. Attenuator 38 sets the level of the sampled signal, and is coupled to combiner or summer 40. The sampled signal from main amplifier 20 is combined with the original input signal in combiner or summer 40 to substantially cancel the original input signal carrier, i.e., destructive interference, resulting primarily in IMD products being coupled to error amplifier 24. The output of coupler 36 in error loop 26 is combined with the output of error amplifier 24 in combiner or summer 44, such that the result of destructive interference between IMD from the output from the main and error amplifiers 20, 24 produces an output signal with acceptable IMD.

To optimize error loop 26 of amplifier 12 a, processor 18 reduces the RF input signal power by increasing the attenuation of attenuator 28. This must be done to prevent overdriving error amplifier 24 while the carrier null loop is disabled. In certain embodiments of the present invention, 20 to 30 dB of attenuation has been found to be acceptable. Processor 18 then actuates switch 32 to open-circuit or selectively disable carrier null loop 22. Such selective operation of switch 32, by disabling carrier null loop 22, provides injection of the actual RF signal into error loop 26. Processor 18 then, while monitoring power detector 46, adjusts attenuator 28 such that approximately the same power in error amplifier 24 is achieved as is present during normal operation. Processor 18 then adjusts the amplitude and phase of error amplifier 24 to minimize the power measured using power detector 48, thereby optimizing error loop 26 using the actual RF signal. Finally, processor 18 actuates switch 32, closing carrier null loop 22, and resets attenuator 28 for little or no attenuation.

Those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the instant disclosure will be readily able to synthesize the necessary program code for processor 18 to sequentially disable each amplifier 12 a–n from the array and optimize its error loop through the use and control of attenuator 28, switch 32, error amplifier 24, and power detectors 46,48 in the manner described herein. Again, such optimization is performed using the actual RF signal applied to each amplifier 12 a–n.

Thus, embodiments consistent with the present invention provide a number of unique advantages over conventional designs. For example, such embodiments eliminate the complexity associated with carrier tone injection and the potential for interference resulting therefrom. Such embodiments also eliminate the need for and difficulty of implementing a narrow-band receiver in known distortion bands, be the bandwidth narrow or wide. In addition, such embodiments are often well suited to mass production, with a relatively low per-unit cost.

Various additional modifications may be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the invention lies in the claims hereinafter appended.

Patentzitate
Zitiertes PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US324107818. Juni 196315. März 1966Honeywell IncDual output synchronous detector utilizing transistorized differential amplifiers
US368975213. Apr. 19705. Sept. 1972Tektronix IncFour-quadrant multiplier circuit
US412485224. Jan. 19777. Nov. 1978Raytheon CompanyPhased power switching system for scanning antenna array
US41562833. Okt. 197722. Mai 1979Tektronix, Inc.Multiplier circuit
US42465857. Sept. 197920. Jan. 1981The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceSubarray pattern control and null steering for subarray antenna systems
US436081319. März 198023. Nov. 1982The Boeing CompanyPower combining antenna structure
US45660131. Apr. 198321. Jan. 1986The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyCoupled amplifier module feed networks for phased array antennas
US46073893. Febr. 198419. Aug. 1986Amoco CorporationCommunication system for transmitting an electrical signal
US461494718. Apr. 198430. Sept. 1986U.S. Philips CorporationPlanar high-frequency antenna having a network of fully suspended-substrate microstrip transmission lines
US468963128. Mai 198525. Aug. 1987American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell LaboratoriesSpace amplifier
US482517230. März 198725. Apr. 1989Hughes Aircraft CompanyEqual power amplifier system for active phase array antenna and method of arranging same
US484976323. Apr. 198718. Juli 1989Hughes Aircraft CompanyLow sidelobe phased array antenna using identical solid state modules
US487951931. Okt. 19887. Nov. 1989American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell LabsPredistortion compensated linear amplifier
US489011030. Dez. 198826. Dez. 1989Nec CorporationMicrowave landing system
US497887311. Okt. 198918. Dez. 1990The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyCMOS analog four-quadrant multiplier
US499481313. Okt. 198919. Febr. 1991Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki DenkiAntenna system
US502356526. Jan. 199011. Juni 1991At&T Bell LaboratoriesLinear amplifier with automatic adjustment of feed forward loop gain and phase
US503475227. Juni 199023. Juli 1991Thomson CsfMultiple-beam antenna system with active modules and digital beam-forming
US503815014. Mai 19906. Aug. 1991Hughes Aircraft CompanyFeed network for a dual circular and dual linear polarization antenna
US504983220. Apr. 199017. Sept. 1991Simon Fraser UniversityAmplifier linearization by adaptive predistortion
US506193922. Mai 199029. Okt. 1991Harada Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaFlat-plate antenna for use in mobile communications
US511540914. Aug. 198919. Mai 1992Siemens AktiengesellschaftMultiple-input four-quadrant multiplier
US513066315. Apr. 199114. Juli 1992Motorola, Inc.Feed forward amplifier network with frequency swept pilot tone
US520660420. Dez. 199127. Apr. 1993Harris CorporationBroadband high power amplifier
US52300806. März 199120. Juli 1993Compagnie Generale Des Matieres NucleairesUltra-high frequency communication installation
US524731024. Juni 199221. Sept. 1993The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyLayered parallel interface for an active antenna array
US52489803. Apr. 199228. Sept. 1993Alcatel EspaceSpacecraft payload architecture
US527072129. Apr. 199214. Dez. 1993Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.Planar antenna
US52802976. Apr. 199218. Jan. 1994General Electric Co.Active reflectarray antenna for communication satellite frequency re-use
US532311912. Nov. 199021. Juni 1994Motorola, Inc.Amplifier having feed forward cancellation
US532509514. Juli 199228. Juni 1994The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyStepped frequency ground penetrating radar
US53271503. März 19935. Juli 1994Hughes Aircraft CompanyPhased array antenna for efficient radiation of microwave and thermal energy
US535514328. Juni 199311. Okt. 1994Huber & Suhner Ag, Kabel-, Kautschuk-, KunststoffwerkeEnhanced performance aperture-coupled planar antenna array
US537945510. Mai 19933. Jan. 1995Hewlett-Packard CompanyModular distributed antenna system
US54124148. Apr. 19882. Mai 1995Martin Marietta CorporationSelf monitoring/calibrating phased array radar and an interchangeable, adjustable transmit/receive sub-assembly
US541438324. Febr. 19949. Mai 1995U.S. Philips CorporationFour quadrant multiplier circuit and a receiver including such a circuit
US543705216. Apr. 199325. Juli 1995Conifer CorporationMMDS over-the-air bi-directional TV/data transmission system and method therefor
US545755721. Jan. 199410. Okt. 1995Ortel CorporationLow cost optical fiber RF signal distribution system
US547718717. März 199319. Dez. 1995Fujitsu LimitedFeed forward amplifier
US548512028. Juli 199416. Jan. 1996Aval Communications Inc.Feed-forward power amplifier system with adaptive control and control method
US549145431. Okt. 199413. Febr. 1996Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for reducing distortion in an output signal of an amplifier
US551317627. Aug. 199330. Apr. 1996Qualcomm IncorporatedDual distributed antenna system
US55281966. Jan. 199518. Juni 1996Spectrian, Inc.Linear RF amplifier having reduced intermodulation distortion
US554881324. März 199420. Aug. 1996Ericsson Inc.Phased array cellular base station and associated methods for enhanced power efficiency
US55548657. Juni 199510. Sept. 1996Hughes Aircraft CompanyIntegrated transmit/receive switch/low noise amplifier with dissimilar semiconductor devices
US556816010. Febr. 199522. Okt. 1996Collins; John L. F. C.Planar horn array microwave antenna
US559632912. Aug. 199421. Jan. 1997Northern Telecom LimitedBase station antenna arrangement
US560446217. Nov. 199518. Febr. 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Intermodulation distortion detection in a power shared amplifier network
US561051012. Juni 199611. März 1997The Johns Hopkins UniversityHigh-temperature superconducting thin film nonbolometric microwave detection system and method
US561706131. Aug. 19951. Apr. 1997Nec CorporationFeed-forward amplifier
US56192108. Apr. 19948. Apr. 1997Ericsson Inc.Large phased-array communications satellite
US562135417. Okt. 199515. Apr. 1997Motorola, Inc.Apparatus and method for performing error corrected amplification in a radio frequency system
US562142222. Aug. 199415. Apr. 1997Wang-Tripp CorporationSpiral-mode microstrip (SMM) antennas and associated methods for exciting, extracting and multiplexing the various spiral modes
US56232692. Febr. 199522. Apr. 1997Space Systems/Loral, Inc.Mobile communication satellite payload
US56443162. Mai 19961. Juli 1997Hughes ElectronicsActive phased array adjustment using transmit amplitude adjustment range measurements
US564462223. März 19951. Juli 1997Adc Telecommunications, Inc.Cellular communications system with centralized base stations and distributed antenna units
US564663115. Dez. 19958. Juli 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Peak power reduction in power sharing amplifier networks
US565737423. März 199512. Aug. 1997Adc Telecommunications, Inc.Cellular communications system with centralized base stations and distributed antenna units
US56593223. Dez. 199319. Aug. 1997Alcatel N.V.Variable synthesized polarization active antenna
US56801427. Nov. 199521. Okt. 1997Smith; David AnthonyCommunication system and method utilizing an antenna having adaptive characteristics
US569166812. Febr. 199625. Nov. 1997Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Feedforward amplifier
US571080419. Juli 199520. Jan. 1998Pcs Solutions, LlcService protection enclosure for and method of constructing a remote wireless telecommunication site
US571495716. Mai 19953. Febr. 1998Northern Telecom LimitedBase station antenna arrangement
US572466611. Mai 19953. März 1998Ericsson Inc.Polarization diversity phased array cellular base station and associated methods
US573233314. Febr. 199624. März 1998Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Linear transmitter using predistortion
US574584120. Mai 199628. Apr. 1998Metawave Communications CorporationSystem and method for cellular beam spectrum management
US575125013. Okt. 199512. Mai 1998Lucent Technologies, Inc.Low distortion power sharing amplifier network
US575413930. Okt. 199619. Mai 1998Motorola, Inc.Method and intelligent digital beam forming system responsive to traffic demand
US575828729. Aug. 199626. Mai 1998Airtouch Communications, Inc.Hub and remote cellular telephone system
US576064623. Juli 19962. Juni 1998SpectrianFeed-forward correction loop with adaptive predistortion injection for linearization of RF power amplifier
US577097030. Aug. 199623. Juni 1998Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Transmitter of wireless system and high frequency power amplifier used therein
US577101731. Jan. 199723. Juni 1998Northern Telecom LimitedBase station antenna arrangement
US577466618. Okt. 199630. Juni 1998Silicon Graphics, Inc.System and method for displaying uniform network resource locators embedded in time-based medium
US578403128. Febr. 199721. Juli 1998Wireless Online, Inc.Versatile anttenna array for multiple pencil beams and efficient beam combinations
US580217314. Jan. 19921. Sept. 1998Rogers Cable Systems LimitedRadiotelephony system
US580851231. Jan. 199715. Sept. 1998Ophir Rf, Inc.Feed forward amplifiers and methods
US58093957. Juni 199515. Sept. 1998Rogers Cable Systems LimitedRemote antenna driver for a radio telephony system
US582576224. Sept. 199620. Okt. 1998Motorola, Inc.Apparatus and methods for providing wireless communication to a sectorized coverage area
US583147830. Sept. 19973. Nov. 1998Motorola, Inc.Feedforward amplifier
US58323893. Apr. 19963. Nov. 1998Ericsson Inc.Wideband digitization systems and methods for cellular radiotelephones
US585461124. Juli 199529. Dez. 1998Lucent Technologies Inc.Power shared linear amplifier network
US585680430. Okt. 19965. Jan. 1999Motorola, Inc.Method and intelligent digital beam forming system with improved signal quality communications
US586245927. Aug. 199619. Jan. 1999Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonMethod of and apparatus for filtering intermodulation products in a radiocommunication system
US58670657. Mai 19972. Febr. 1999Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Frequency selective predistortion in a linear transmitter
US58725479. Sept. 199616. Febr. 1999Metawave Communications CorporationConical omni-directional coverage multibeam antenna with parasitic elements
US587765318. Nov. 19962. März 1999Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Linear power amplifier and method for removing intermodulation distortion with predistortion system and feed forward system
US58783456. Sept. 19962. März 1999Aircell, IncorporatedAntenna for nonterrestrial mobile telecommunication system
US588070125. Juni 19969. März 1999Pcs Solutions, LlcEnclosed wireless telecommunications antenna
US58841473. Jan. 199616. März 1999Metawave Communications CorporationMethod and apparatus for improved control over cellular systems
US588949427. Jan. 199730. März 1999Metawave Communications CorporationAntenna deployment sector cell shaping system and method
US589239729. März 19966. Apr. 1999SpectrianAdaptive compensation of RF amplifier distortion by injecting predistortion signal derived from respectively different functions of input signal amplitude
US59007788. Mai 19974. Mai 1999Stonick; John T.Adaptive parametric signal predistorter for compensation of time varying linear and nonlinear amplifier distortion
US591258623. Dez. 199715. Juni 1999Motorola, Inc.Feed forward amplifier with digital intermodulation control
US592321417. Dez. 199713. Juli 1999Motorola, Inc.Feedforward amplifier network with swept pilot tone for reducing distortion generated by a power amplifier
US59297036. Aug. 199727. Juli 1999Alcatel TelspaceMethod and device for modeling AM-AM and AM-PM characteristics of an amplifier, and corresponding predistortion method
US592982317. Juli 199727. Juli 1999Metawave Communications CorporationMultiple beam planar array with parasitic elements
US59331135. Sept. 19963. Aug. 1999Raytheon CompanySimultaneous multibeam and frequency active photonic array radar apparatus
US593376616. Dez. 19963. Aug. 1999Ericsson Inc.Intermodulation compensation in multi-channel amplifiers
US593657717. Okt. 199710. Aug. 1999Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaAdaptive antenna
US6255903 *6. Dez. 19993. Juli 2001MotorolaLinear power amplifier with configurable feedforward error correction circuits
US6424214 *4. Dez. 200023. Juli 2002Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Strain error compensation amplifier
US6424215 *12. Apr. 200123. Juli 2002At&T Corp.High efficiency closed loop feed forward amplifier
US6456160 *24. Apr. 200124. Sept. 2002Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaFeedforward amplifier
Nichtpatentzitate
Referenz
1DeBruyn, William P. et al., An Uncorrelated Adaptive Predistorter, U.S. Appl. No. 10/342,633, filed Jan. 15, 2003.
2Hall, P.S., and Hall, C.M., Coplanar Corporate Feed Effects in Microstrip Patch Array Design, Proc. IEEE, vol. 135, pt. H, Jun. 1998, p. 180-186 (7 pages).
3Herd, J.S., Modelling of Wideband Proximity Coupled Microstrip Array Elements, Electronic Letters, vol. 2, No. 16, Aug. 1990, pp. 1282-1284 (3 pages).
4Judd, Mano D. et al., Active Antenna for With Interleaved Arrays of Antenna Elements, U.S. Appl. No. 10/256,860, filed Sep. 27, 2002.
5Leffel, Michael D., Independence Between Paths that Predistort for Memory and Memory-Less Distortion in Power Amplifiers, U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,959, filed Apr. 3, 2003.
6Levine, E., Malamud, G., Shtrikman, S., and Treves, D., A study Microstrip Array Antennas with the Feed Network, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, vol. 37, No. 4, Apr. 1989, pp. 426-434 (8 pages).
7Lohtia, Anit et al., "Power Amplifier Linearization using Cubic Spline Interpolation", IEEE, (1993), No. 0-7803-1266-x/93, pp. 676-679.
8Song, H.J. and Bialkowski, M.E., A Multilayer Microstrip Patch Antenna Subarray Design Using CAD, Microwave Journal, Mar. 1997, pp. 22-34 (8 pages).
9Song, H.J. and Bialkowski, M.E., Ku-Band 16x16 Planar Array with Aperture-Coupled Microstrip-Patch Elements, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 40, No. 5, Oct. 1998, pp. 25-29 (5 pages).
10Stapleton, Shawn P., "Amplifier Linearization Using Adaptive Digital Predistortion-The need for greater linearity can be addressed at the digital coding level", Applied Microwave & Wireless, Technical Feature, (Feb. 2001), pp. 72-77.
11Vella-Coleiro, George, Frequency-Dependent Phase Pre-Distortion for Reducing Spurious Emmissions in Communication Networks, U.S. Appl. No. 10/O68,343, filed Feb. 5, 2002.
12Zurcher, J.F. and Gardiol, F.E., The SSFIP Principle: Broadband Patch Antennas, Artech House, 1995, Chapter 3, pp. 45-60 (17 pages).
13Zurcher, J.F. The SSFIP: A Global Concept for High-Performance Broadband Planar Antennas, Electronic Letters, vol. 24, No. 23, Nov. 1988, p. 1433-1435 (4 pages).
Referenziert von
Zitiert von PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US7830134 *9. Okt. 20079. Nov. 2010Ladybug Technologies LlcPower meter with means to eliminate the need to zero and calibrating
US838013626. Jan. 200819. Febr. 2013Funkwerk Dabendorf GmbhModular circuit arrangement used for attenuation compensation
US963463112. Sept. 201225. Apr. 2017Astrium LimitedControl system for a power amplifier
US20080084199 *9. Okt. 200710. Apr. 2008Hawkins Richard RMethod for eliminating the need to zero and calibrate a power meter before use
US20090152543 *17. Dez. 200718. Juni 2009Bonaccio Anthony RSystem, Structure and Method of Providing Dynamic Optimization of Integrated Circuits Using a Non-Contact Method of Selection, and a Design Structure
US20100291915 *26. Jan. 200818. Nov. 2010Helmut NastModular circuit arrangement used for attenuation compensation
DE102007004911A1 *26. Jan. 20077. Aug. 2008Funkwerk Dabendorf GmbhMehrteilige Schaltungsanordnung zur Dämpfungskompensation
Klassifizierungen
US-Klassifikation330/151, 330/149
Internationale KlassifikationH03F3/72, H03F3/21, H03F1/32
UnternehmensklassifikationH03F1/3229, H03F3/72, H03F3/211
Europäische KlassifikationH03F3/72, H03F3/21C, H03F1/32F2
Juristische Ereignisse
DatumCodeEreignisBeschreibung
12. Mai 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: ANDREW CORPORATION, ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JACKSON, DONALD G.;HOPPENSTEIN, RUSSELL J.;REEL/FRAME:014067/0880;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030428 TO 20030506
9. Jan. 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, CA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;ALLEN TELECOM, LLC;ANDREW CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020362/0241
Effective date: 20071227
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,CAL
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;ALLEN TELECOM, LLC;ANDREW CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020362/0241
Effective date: 20071227
7. Nov. 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: ANDREW LLC, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ANDREW CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:021805/0044
Effective date: 20080827
6. Mai 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
3. Febr. 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: ALLEN TELECOM LLC, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: PATENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:026039/0005
Effective date: 20110114
Owner name: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: PATENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:026039/0005
Effective date: 20110114
Owner name: ANDREW LLC (F/K/A ANDREW CORPORATION), NORTH CAROL
Free format text: PATENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:026039/0005
Effective date: 20110114
3. Mai 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NE
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ALLEN TELECOM LLC, A DELAWARE LLC;ANDREW LLC, A DELAWARE LLC;COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026276/0363
Effective date: 20110114
4. Mai 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NE
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ALLEN TELECOM LLC, A DELAWARE LLC;ANDREW LLC, A DELAWARE LLC;COMMSCOPE, INC OF NORTH CAROLINA, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:026272/0543
Effective date: 20110114
14. März 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
25. März 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ANDREW LLC;REEL/FRAME:035283/0849
Effective date: 20150301
28. Juli 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATE
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALLEN TELECOM LLC;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:036201/0283
Effective date: 20150611
31. März 2017ASAssignment
Owner name: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST PATENTS (RELEASES RF 036201/0283);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:042126/0434
Effective date: 20170317
Owner name: REDWOOD SYSTEMS, INC., NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST PATENTS (RELEASES RF 036201/0283);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:042126/0434
Effective date: 20170317
Owner name: ALLEN TELECOM LLC, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST PATENTS (RELEASES RF 036201/0283);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:042126/0434
Effective date: 20170317
Owner name: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST PATENTS (RELEASES RF 036201/0283);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:042126/0434
Effective date: 20170317
14. Juli 2017REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed