Suche Bilder Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive Mehr »
Anmelden
Nutzer von Screenreadern: Klicke auf diesen Link, um die Bedienungshilfen zu aktivieren. Dieser Modus bietet die gleichen Grundfunktionen, funktioniert aber besser mit deinem Reader.

Patentsuche

  1. Erweiterte Patentsuche
VeröffentlichungsnummerUS7778816 B2
PublikationstypErteilung
AnmeldenummerUS 09/841,265
Veröffentlichungsdatum17. Aug. 2010
Eingetragen24. Apr. 2001
Prioritätsdatum24. Apr. 2001
GebührenstatusBezahlt
Auch veröffentlicht unterEP1253527A2, EP1253527A3, US20020178008
Veröffentlichungsnummer09841265, 841265, US 7778816 B2, US 7778816B2, US-B2-7778816, US7778816 B2, US7778816B2
ErfinderJeff Reynar
Ursprünglich BevollmächtigterMicrosoft Corporation
Zitat exportierenBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Externe Links: USPTO, USPTO-Zuordnung, Espacenet
Method and system for applying input mode bias
US 7778816 B2
Zusammenfassung
A method and system for applying input mode bias is disclosed. A schema is applied to an input field of an electronic document. The schema is associated with a grammar that defines the set of acceptable strings that may be input into the input field. When text is input into the input field, the schema is determined and the associated grammar is determined. The grammar is then sent to the input method. Based on the grammar, the input method may determine what text the user is trying to enter. The grammar may also be used to apply semantic categories to text input into a document. After the text is entered it is compared to a grammar. If the entered text matches the form of the grammar, then the schema is applied to the text as a semantic category.
Bilder(8)
Previous page
Next page
Ansprüche(25)
1. A computer system for applying mode bias to an input field of an electronic document of an application, the system comprising:
a mark-up language schema registry in communication with the application, wherein the mark-up language schema registry comprises a schema database and a grammar database, wherein the schema database comprises a plurality of schema names and a plurality of pointers to the grammar database associated with the plurality of schema names, the grammar database comprising a plurality of grammars, wherein the plurality of grammars comprise a first grammar associated with a union of data from a plurality of user data sources, the union of data from the plurality of user data sources being a context free grammar built from a union of a contacts list, a global address book, and a list of first and last names; and
an input engine in communication with the mark-up language schema registry, wherein the mark-up language schema registry is configured to:
receive a schema name based on a hierarchical analysis of a textual input to the input field from the application,
locate a corresponding grammar from among the plurality of grammars comprising one of: a regular expression and a statistical language model, the corresponding grammar having a language setting and a locale setting, and the corresponding grammar being associated with the schema name, and
send the corresponding grammar to the input engine, wherein the corresponding grammar defines an appropriate input for the input field, and wherein the schema in the mark-up language schema registry is associated with the corresponding grammar by one of: referring to the corresponding grammar directly, mapping to the corresponding grammar, and encoding the corresponding grammar within the schema.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is a speech recognition engine.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is a handwriting recognition engine.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is an input method editor (IME).
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is a keypad of a cellphone.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is a gesture-based input method.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine is a sign language recognition engine.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein the corresponding grammar is the context free grammar.
9. The system of claim 1 wherein the corresponding grammar is a context sensitive grammar.
10. The system of claim 1 wherein the corresponding grammar defines the appropriate input for the input field by defining a list of acceptable inputs for the input field.
11. The system of claim 1 wherein the input engine uses the corresponding grammar to receive input from a user of the application.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein the input engine further uses the corresponding grammar to bias the user's input toward a correct input for the input field.
13. The system of claim 11 wherein the input engine compares the input of the user to the corresponding grammar to determine whether the input matches and is an appropriate input.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein if the input engine determines that the input of the user does not match an appropriate input, then the input engine rejects the input and causes the application to display an error message to the user.
15. The system of claim 1 wherein the mark-up language schema registry is in communication with the application through a text service framework.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of grammars further comprise a second grammar built exclusively from a content of the contacts list.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of grammars further comprise a second grammar built exclusively from a content of the global address list.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of grammars further comprise a second grammar associated with regular expressions.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of grammars further comprise a second grammar associated with statistical language models.
20. A computer system for applying mode bias to an input field of an electronic document of an application, the system comprising:
a mark-up language schema registry in communication with the application, the mark-up language schema registry operable to point to code for dynamically generating a plurality of grammars, wherein the plurality of grammars are used to define an appropriate input for the input field, wherein each mark-up language schema in the registry is associated with a corresponding grammar by one of: referring to the corresponding grammar directly and mapping to the corresponding grammar, and encoding the corresponding grammar within the schema, and wherein the plurality of grammars comprise:
a first grammar associated with a union of data from a plurality of user data sources, the union of data from the plurality of user data sources being a context free grammar built from a union of a contacts list, a global address book, and a list of first and last names,
a second grammar built exclusively from a contents list of the contacts list,
a third grammar built exclusively from a contents list of the global address list,
a fourth grammar associated with regular expressions, and
a fifth grammar associated with statistical language models;
an input engine in communication with the mark-up language schema registry, wherein the mark-up language schema registry receives a schema name from the application through a text service framework, locates an identifier of the corresponding grammar among the plurality of grammars associated with the schema name and sends the located identifier of the corresponding grammar to the input engine, wherein the input engine uses at least one of the plurality of grammars to bias input from a user of the application toward a correctly formatted input, wherein if the input engine determines that the input of the user does not match an appropriate input, then the input engine recommends an alternate input, wherein the input engine is at least one of the following: a speech recognition engine, a handwriting recognition engine, an input method editor, a phone keypad, a gesture-based input method, a keyboard, and a sign language recognition engine; and
a recognizer library in communication with the application, wherein the recognizer library is configured to apply a semantic category to the textual input.
21. A computer-implemented method for applying mode bias to an input field of an electronic document of an application program module, the method comprising:
determining that an insertion point is within the input field;
determining a mode bias schema that is attached to the input field, wherein the determination of the mode bias schema uses a ranked list of mode bias schemas;
dynamically generating a plurality of grammars based on the input field and a mark-up language schema registry, wherein the plurality of grammars define an appropriate input for the input field, wherein each of the plurality of grammars has a language setting and a locale setting and is associated with a schema name, and wherein the plurality of grammars comprise:
a first grammar associated with a union of data from a plurality of user data sources, the union of data from the plurality of user data sources being a context free grammar built from a union of a contacts list, a global address book, and a list of first and last names,
a second grammar built exclusively from a contents list of the contacts list,
a third grammar built exclusively from a contents list of the global address list,
a fourth grammar associated with regular expressions, and
a fifth grammar associated with statistical language models;
determining an appropriate grammar from the generated plurality of grammars that is associated with the mode bias schema; and
sending the appropriate grammar associated with the mode bias schema to an input engine wherein the input engine uses the appropriate grammar associated with the mode bias schema to receive the appropriate input for the input field.
22. The method of claim 21 further comprising: receiving text at the insertion point and determining whether the received text matches an input type defined by the appropriate grammar and, if so, then displaying the text in the input field.
23. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of:
if the text received at the insertion point does not match the input type defined by the appropriate grammar, then displaying an error message.
24. The method of claim 21 wherein determining the appropriate grammar that is associated with the mode bias schema comprises:
cross-referencing the mode bias schema in a schema database to determine the appropriate grammar that is associated with the mode bias schema.
25. The method of claim 24 wherein sending the appropriate grammar to the input engine comprises retrieving the grammar from a grammar database and sending the grammar to the input engine.
Beschreibung
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention generally relates to software program modules, and even more particularly, relates to using grammars to apply input mode bias to portions of an electronic document, including fields, and using the same grammars to apply semantic categories to strings in the document.

BACKGROUND

Computer software is becoming more and more accessible to receiving inputs from many different input methods such as through speech recognition, handwriting recognition, and East Asian input method editors, just to name a few. However, these stochastic input methods sometimes are less than reliable. For example, if speech recognition software is unaware of the particular type of input required in a particular field, then it may be difficult for it to understand what the user is trying to say. For example, it may be difficult to enter a phone number due to the speech recognition software being unaware of the particular type of input required.

Solutions have been developed that constrain input so that authors of text entry controls may set a property on a field so that an input method editor will recognize the bit and adjust the language model that the input method editor uses. Constraining input of a field, constraining input of part or all of a document, etc. may be referred to as mode bias. However, there are some drawbacks to these solutions. These solutions are limited to a fixed list of categories that may be indicated by the bit. Thus, there is an inflexible hard-coded list of ways to constrain input. A developer must select from the fixed list of categories and is not allowed to define new mode bias settings that may be useful.

Another problem with the current solution of using a fixed list of categories is that the response to these categories is not consistent between different input methods. A user expects different input methods to react similarly for the same input field. However, prior art solutions allow input methods to define their own response to particular categories of text entry controls. For example, a speech recognizer and a handwriting recognizer may handle a phone number entirely differently.

Thus, there is a need for a method for providing mode bias that is flexible in allowing developers to define what forms of input are acceptable for a particular field. There is still a further need for a method for providing mode bias that is consistent across different input methods.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention meets the above-described needs by providing a method and system for applying input mode bias to input fields (and other regions) of an electronic document. A schema is applied to an input field of an electronic document and the schema is associated with a grammar that defines the set of acceptable strings that may be input into the input field. When text is input into the input field, the schema is determined and the associated grammar is determined. The grammar is then sent to the input method. Based on the grammar, the input method may determine what text the user is trying to enter. The grammar may also be used to apply semantic categories to text input into a document. After the text is entered it is compared to a grammar. If the entered text matches the form of the grammar, then the schema is applied to the text as a semantic category.

Typically, the schema names are stored in a schema database and the grammars are stored in a grammar database. The schema names may also be stored with other properties such as locale and language and a pointer to the associated grammar. Thus, when a user places the insertion point in an input field with mode bias applied, then the schema name and other properties are sent to the schema database for a look-up of the appropriate grammar. Based on the schema name (and other properties), the grammar (or a pointer to the grammar) is sent to the input method. The input method will then use the grammar to determine what the user is trying to enter into the input field. The input method may also provide suggestions or error messages if the user attempts to enter text that does not conform to the grammar.

Because the schema database and grammar database are outside of the control of the input methods, the present invention improves upon the prior art problem that input methods would handle mode bias differently. Using the present invention, each input method receives the same grammar and should handle it similarly whether the input method is a speech recognition engine, handwriting recognition engine, etc. The present invention is also flexible because new schemas and grammars may be defined and implemented by system administrators to provide custom mode bias that may be needed within an organization. In addition to providing mode bias, the grammars may be used to recognize semantic categories in a document.

That the invention improves over the drawbacks of the prior art and accomplishes the advantages described above will become apparent from the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments and the appended drawings and claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer that provides the exemplary operating environment for the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an architecture for implementing mode bias in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for applying mode bias to text in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary architecture for implementing semantic categories.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for semantically labeling strings during creation of an electronic document.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of a display of a semantic category and its associated dropdown menu.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method for semantic category recognition using grammars in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed toward a method and system for applying input mode bias. A schema is applied to an input field of an electronic document. The schema is the name of the type of input that should be input into the input field. As an example, the schema may be a telephone number schema. Associated with the schema is a grammar that defines the set of acceptable strings that may be input into the input field. For example, the grammar associated with the telephone number schema may define the input as being of the form (XXX) XXX-XXXX, where X represents a digit from 0-9.

Having briefly described an embodiment of the present invention, an exemplary operating environment for the present invention is described below.

Exemplary Operating Environment

Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures, aspects of the present invention and the exemplary operating environment will be described.

FIG. 1 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the invention may be implemented. While the invention will be described in the general context of an application program that runs on an operating system in conjunction with a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention also may be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.

With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary system for implementing the invention includes a conventional personal computer 20, including a processing unit 21, a system memory 22 and a system bus 23 that couples the system memory to the processing unit 21. The system memory 22 includes read only memory (ROM) 24 and random access memory (RAM) 25. A basic input/output system 26 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the personal computer 20, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 24. The personal computer 20 further includes a hard disk drive 27, a magnetic disk drive 28, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 29, and an optical disk drive 30, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM disk 31 or to read from or write to other optical media. The hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 28, and optical disk drive 30 are connected to the system bus 23 by a hard disk drive interface 32, a magnetic disk drive interface 33, and an optical drive interface 34, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage for the personal computer 20. Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and a CD-ROM disk, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.

A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 36, a word processor program module 37 (or other type of program module), program data 38, and other program modules (not shown).

A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 20 through a keyboard 40 and pointing device, such as a mouse 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, stylus, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers or printers.

The personal computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 49. The remote computer 49 may be a server, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the personal computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated in FIG. 1. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 1 include a local area network (LAN) 51 and a wide area network (WAN) 52. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.

When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.

Applying Input Mode Bias

Stochastic input methods are being used more frequently today than ever before. For some time stochastic input mechanisms have been used in East Asia in the form of Input Method Editors (IMEs). Recently, speech and handwriting input mechanisms have become more common. Unlike typing (outside of East Asia) where the user is able to easily type whatever he chooses, stochastic input methods by their nature presuppose that the user is trying to enter more common words and phrases. This presupposition typically works well when the user intends to enter common words and phrases. However, it can make it difficult to enter certain types of less common text. This can be particularly frustrating when inputting text into a form where there are constraints placed on what sort of information should be entered and the input mechanism doesn't adhere to these constraints. For example, it makes little sense to enter anything other than digits into a phone number field in contact management software, but speech and handwriting recognizers are rarely cognizant of this sort of constraint. In one embodiment, the present invention solves this problem with a mechanism for controlling mode bias of input controls, or input fields.

In one embodiment, the present invention may be used to define an XML schema associated with an input control. The schema may be associated with a grammar. A grammar is a definition of appropriate input (e.g. acceptable strings) for the input control. In one embodiment, the grammar may be a context free grammar, statistical language model, a list of possible inputs, etc.

The grammar is used to constrain the user's input so that the user completes an input field properly. For example, an input control may specify that it accepts part numbers by attaching <schemas-microsoft-com#partnumber> to the control. The schema microsoft-com#partnumber may be associated with a grammar that specifies that this specific sort of part number comprises a digit from 0 to 9 followed by a letter from a-z. In the example described above, the grammar is used to constrain the user's input to match the form of a part number. If the user enters something other than a part number, an error message or a suggestion may be presented to the user.

In other embodiments, the grammar may be used by different input methods to correctly identify the user's input. For example, a user of a speech recognition engine may say “four”. Using the present invention, the speech recognition input method editor may determine whether the user meant “four”, or “for”. If the user is entering text into an input field that has a phone number schema attached to it and is defined by a grammar that accepts numbers, then it is likely that the user meant the word “four”. Thus, the speech recognition input method editor will recognize that it should enter the numeral “4” into the input field.

FIG. 2 illustrates an architecture 500 for implementing mode bias in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. An application, such as application 37, is connected to a text services framework 505. The text services framework allows input from stochastic input sources. The text services framework is an application programming interface (API) set that allows input sources to communicate with applications. The text services framework is the successor to both the IMM32 (East Asian input method API for the WINDOWS operating system) and AIMM (active input method manager). The text services framework provides numerous advantages over IMM32 and AIMM such as wider access to context, the ability to associate arbitrary properties with text, etc. Although the text services framework is used in one embodiment of the invention, it should be understood that in other embodiments the invention may include other tools for connecting the application to different input methods.

The application 37 may optionally support semantic categories as described below. Input methods, such as a speech recognition engine 525, a handwriting recognition engine 530, input method editors 535 and other stochastic input mechanisms 540 (e.g. sign language recognition) allow the user to enter text into a document of application 37 via the text services framework 505. Other input mechanisms such as gesture-based recognition engines that determine input based on movements or gestures of the user may be used. Input methods such as the keypad of a cellphone or personal digital assistant (PDA) may also be used.

The text services framework 505 and the different input methods are connected to a schema registry. In a preferred embodiment, the schema registry comprises a schema registry manager 510 connected to a grammar database 515 and a schema database 520.

In a preferred embodiment, the schema database comprises a plurality of XML schema used to control mode bias. XML schema are preferably used because they're general and flexible and are already being used for semantic category information (semantic categories are described below). XML schema may also be customized as needed to extend the present invention to new types of data (for example, part numbers within a large organization that conform to a standardized syntax). Although new schema will need to be defined for some inputs, standard schema used in semantic categories may be reused as schema in the present invention.

In order to maximize the ability to reuse grammars for standard broadly applicable types of input controls (such as phone numbers) and for types of input controls that are standard within an organization (such as part numbers), in a preferred embodiment of the present invention the schema either refer to grammars directly or map to them via the schema registry that associates each schema with a particular grammar. For example, the schema names may be referred to in the schema database 520 along with an associated grammar(s) for the schema name. The grammars themselves may be stored in the grammar database 515. One advantage of this indirect mapping approach is that it allows for additional abstraction across, for example, language or region. For example, a field may specify that it accepts phone numbers without needing to build the grammars for different phone formats for each user locale. The schema registry manager 510 controls both the schema database 520 and the grammar database 515. Of course, other architectures will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be implemented without departing from the present invention.

In other embodiments, the XML schema could directly encode the grammar, but that would make sharing of grammars more difficult. For example, to directly encode the grammar, the XML schema could include the grammar in the form of XML tags that described the list of or form of acceptable input (rather than pointing to a grammar file such as numbers.xml).

Having a schema registry system is beneficial because it easily allows independent software vendors and sophisticated users to modify existing schema or define their own schema and have them used within applications by input methods and for semantic category recognition immediately—that is, without waiting for the next version of the application or input method that is savvy about this new schema. For example, a developer within an organization may notice that users are having a difficult time entering certain types of input when using stochastic input methods (such as when entering part numbers that are specific to the organization). So, the developer may create a new schema to describe part numbers and a grammar to recognize these part numbers. The developer may then attach this schema to form fields in their application and their web pages. The end user may do this as well by annotating a field in a form he created with this new schema.

The schema registry may include entries like those in the first two columns in Table 1 below. The third column explains what the grammar is meant to do. In some cases the grammar may be built dynamically based on the contents of the user's computer, exchange server, etc. Thus, one way that the present invention constrains an input method to adhere to a particular pattern is to specify a grammar that the input method should use. In other words, the invention specifies a regular expression, context free grammar (CFG) or statistical language model that the input method should use. It should be understood that Table 1 is illustrative only and does not limit the number or types of schemas that may be used in the present invention.

TABLE 1
Interpretation of
Schema name (namespace#tag) Grammar grammar
Schemas-microsoft-com- A simple regular Permits dates to be
modes#date expression: entered in Month Date
(January|February|March| format (e.g. January 12)
. . . ) digit digit
Schemas-microsoft-com- A context free grammar Almost any name
modes#personname (CFG) built from the union
of the contacts list, the
global address book, and
lists of first and last names
Schemas-microsoft-com- A CFG built exclusively Any name in the
modes#contact from the contents of the contacts folder
contacts list
Schemas-microsoft-com- A CFG built exclusively Employees of the
modes#global_address_list from the contents of the company the user works
global address list (GAL) in
Schemas-microsoft-com- Digit+ An arbitrary sequence
modes#number of digits
Schemas-microsoft-com- A statistical language Allows entry of legal
modes#legalText model (SLM) for legal text text
entry

Thus, in one embodiment, the schema registry comprises an XML schema name (comprising a namespace and a tag) and a grammar associated with the XML schema name. The schema registry may also comprise other defining properties that are necessary to determine which grammar to use. A language setting and a locale setting may be used in the schema registry to further define which grammar to use. For example, an address schema may be associated with several different grammars. The grammar that should be sent to the input method may be determined by looking at the language and locale of the computer (or operating system, application, etc.) and then performing a database look-up in the schema registry to locate the appropriate grammar. The schema registry may also include a semantic category setting to indicate whether a particular schema name and grammars should be used for semantic category recognition (as described further below).

The schema registry may be hierarchical. In other words, several hierarchical schemas may be associated with an input control. For example, searching for particular names, such as those in the contacts folder, may be helpful in some cases. However, ruling out other names may be too extreme. As a result, an input field might best be described as expecting input biased towards names in the contacts folder but permitting other names to be entered. Organizing schemas hierarchically addresses this. For example, the Personname schema may be at the top of the name hierarchy while a contacts schema and corporate employee schema may be hierarchically below the Personname schema. A large organization may define the corporate employee schema to make it easier to enter employee names into form fields. Thus, in this example, when a field calls for a Personname schema, the contacts schema and corporate employee schema may be searched before searching for other person's names. In other words, the schemas may be hierarchical in that each schema may return a grammar to the input method and the input method may prefer the most specific schema or otherwise combine the schemas.

There are also cases where a user might try to fill out a form that asked for a schema that the user's machine doesn't know about. For these cases, an embodiment of the present invention may specify an ordered sequence of preferred schemas. The best schema would then be used if it was in the registry or if it could be downloaded in time. However, if it was not available the input method may fall back on the second favorite schema, and so on. For example, a user may try to fill out a form which requests the type Microsoft part number, but the user might not have that type of schema (and/or grammar associated with the schema) on their machine. Much better than allowing arbitrary input then would be to fall back on sequences of letters and digits rather than arbitrary input, which might be predisposed to favor words (as is the case for most speech engines).

Having briefly described an architecture for implementing the present invention, a flowchart illustrating a method 600 for applying mode bias to text in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will be described in reference to FIG. 3. It should be understood that the method 600 occurs in an application after the author of a template (or form), or the creator of an application, attaches mode bias to a region of text or a field. A tool such as the “VISUAL STUDIO” application or another similar tool may be provisioned in the future to allow an author to apply such mode bias.

At step 605, the insertion point (IP) is placed into a region of an electronic document with mode bias attached (such as an XML schema attached). At step 610, the input method the user is using retrieves the ranked list of mode biases (schemas) (e.g. best schema=Microsoft employee, 2nd best=person name) from the application 37 through the operating system. At step 615, the input method (or operating system) calls into the schema registry and retrieves the grammars associated with the highest ranked schema. Alternatively, the input method (or operating system) calls into the schema registry and retrieves all of the grammars associated with all of the schemas associated with the insertion point region.

At step 620, the user enters text using an input method and the input method recognizes text using the grammars from the registry. Text is inserted into the application as the input methods use the grammars to determine what the user is inputting. The schema, or series of schema, may also be inserted into the document along with the text. When the document is saved, the text is saved, and in some cases so is the schema applied to that text.

It should be understood from the foregoing description that if a document managed by an application has mode bias set on a particular field (or region within a document) that information would be conveyed to the input method. In a preferred embodiment, the information is conveyed from the application through the text services framework. However, it should be understood that other methods of conveying this mode bias information to the input method may be used without departing from the present invention. After receiving the information, the input method would then interface with the schema registry manager in order to identify an appropriate grammar in the grammar database to use. Typically, the input method requests that the schema registry manager return a grammar for the XML tag used to apply mode bias in the document. The schema registry manager would then pass this grammar (or more likely a pointer to it) to the input method for use in determining the user's input.

Thus, in one embodiment, the invention provides a mechanism for using schema (XML tags) to apply mode bias to inputs. The schema tags are used by a stochastic input method to retrieve grammars for use during user input. The grammars define what may be input into certain fields. For example, a form may specify that it accepts part numbers by attaching <schemas-microsoft-com#partnumber> to the control. That schema may be associated with a grammar that specifies that this specific sort of part number comprises a digit from 0 to 9 follow by a letter from a-z. That grammar would constrain the user's input to match that form of part number. The input method would then be able to understand what the user is attempting to input and may provide hints, examples or error messages if the user attempts to enter input that does not match the form defined by the grammar. The same grammar could also be used to recognize part numbers and apply the <schemas-microsoft-com#partnumber> semantic category to free text the user edits (as will be described below). It should be understood that the schema <schemas-microsoft-com#partnumber> is only one example. Schemas may be widely defined and the above example is not meant to limit the schemas in any way.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the schema registry manager itself may be responsible for generating grammars, e.g., the schema may point to code for generating the grammar. This embodiment may be particularly useful for grammars that depend on dynamic databases, such as company e-mail addresses. Rather than having to update each user's computer with revisions to the e-mail addresses, an administrator may set the schema to point to code for generating the grammar so that the latest e-mail addresses may be retrieved.

An application may provide properties along with schema. The properties may be used to limit or further define a proper input for the input field. For example, the schema may be a telephone number and the properties are that it is not a telephone number beginning with the (555) area code. The schema registry manager may interpret the properties to modify the grammar or modify which selections of grammars are sent to the input method.

The use of XML schema and grammars has been described above with regard to applying mode bias to input fields. After XML schema and grammars have been implemented as described above, they may be used to drive recognition of semantic categories because the same grammars used during input with a stochastic input method can be used after text is entered to identify semantic categories.

Semantic Category Recognition Using Grammars

Some of the grammars described above in relation to mode bias may be used for recognition of semantic categories. In a preferred embodiment, a semantic category comprises a type label, a download URL and metadata that is associated with a string that is recognized in a document. A string is a data structure composed of a sequence of characters usually representing human-readable text. When a user enters a string into a document, semantic categories may be labeled for the string and specific actions may be presented to the user in association with the semantic categories. For example, when a user enters the title of a book into a document, it may be labeled as a book and certain actions such as “Buy the book” may be presented to the user based on the labeling.

Before proceeding with a description of using grammars to recognize semantic categories, a more detailed description of semantic categories is provided below. Semantic categories are discussed further in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/588,411, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SEMANTICALLY LABELING STRINGS AND PROVIDING ACTIONS BASED ON SEMANTICALLY LABELED STRINGS”, filed Jun. 6, 2000, which is commonly assigned and incorporated by reference herein.

To implement semantic categories, strings are recognized and annotated, or labeled, with a type label. After the strings are annotated with a type label, application program modules may use the type label and other metadata to provide users with a choice of actions. If the user's computer does not have any actions associated with that type label, the user may be provided with the option to use a download Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and download action plug-ins for that type label.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary architecture 200 for use in conjunction with labeling semantic categories in a document. The architecture includes an application program module 205, such as program module 37 (FIG. 1). The application program module 205 is able to communicate with a recognizer dynamic-link library 210 (hereinafter recognizer DLL) and an action dynamic-link library 215 (hereinafter action DLL) as a user is creating, editing, viewing, etc. an electronic document. The recognizer DLL 210 controls a number of recognizer plug-ins 220. The action DLL 215 controls a number of action plug-ins 225. The action DLL also controls a type-action database 230.

The recognizer DLL 210 handles the distribution of strings from the electronic document running on the application program module 205 to the individual recognizer plug-ins 220. The recognizer plug-ins 220 recognize particular strings in an electronic document, such as a word processing document, a spreadsheet document, a web page, etc. The recognizer plug-ins 220 may be packaged with the application program module 205 or they may be written by third parties to recognize particular strings that are of interest. Typically, the recognizer DLL 210 passes strings to the recognizer plug-ins 220 in one paragraph or cell value increments. It should also be understood that, in a preferred embodiment, the action DLL and recognizer DLL are merged into a single DLL.

As part of recognizing certain strings as including semantic information, the recognizer plug-ins 220 determine which strings are to be labeled and how they are to be labeled. After receiving these results from the various recognizer plug-ins 220, the recognizer DLL 210 sends semantic categories to the application program module. In a preferred embodiment, a semantic category comprises the recognized string, a type label, and a download URL. A semantic category may also comprise metadata. The recognizer plug-ins 220 each run separately and the recognizer DLL 210 is responsible for handling the asynchronicity that results from different recognizer plug-ins returning results with different delays.

After a string is labeled by a recognizer plug-in 220 and a semantic category is sent to the application program module 205, the user of the application program module 205 will be able to execute actions that are associated with the type label of the semantic category. The action DLL 215 manages the action plug-ins 225 that are run to execute the actions. As with the recognizer plug-ins 220, the action plug-ins 225 may be packaged with the application program module 205 or written by third parties to perform particular actions that are of interest to the third party. The action plug-ins provide possible actions to be presented to the user based upon the type label associated with the string. The action DLL 215 determines what type label the semantic category includes and cross-references the type label in the type-action database 230 with a list of actions to determine what actions to present to the user. It should be understood that, in a preferred embodiment, the type-action database is not used. Instead, the list of actions is dynamically generated for each type by looking in the registry to determine which actions are installed and then querying the action DLLs to determine which types they apply to.

After the user chooses an action, the action DLL 215 manages the appropriate action plug-ins 225 and passes the necessary information between the action plug-ins and the application program module 205 so that the action plug-in may execute the desired action. Typically, the application program module sends the action DLL an automation request to invoke the action the user has selected.

As described above, the combination of the recognized string, type label, metadata and download URL is referred to herein as a semantic category. The type label is a semantic information label. The semantic category may also comprise metadata, which are hidden properties of the semantic category. An example of a semantic category may clarify the definition. Suppose a user enters the text “Gone With the Wind” into an electronic document. The string “Gone With the Wind” may be identified as a semantic category of type label “Book Title” and of type label “Movie Title”. In addition, metadata such as the ISBN number may be returned by the recognizer plug-in to the application program module as part of the semantic category. A download URL may be provided with the type labels “Book Title” and “Movie Title” in case the user's machine has not stored action plug-ins for these type labels. For example, an action for the type label “Book Title” may be “Buy this Book” from an online retailer. If the user does not have the action plug-in DLL 225 corresponding to “Buy this book”, then the download URL may be used to navigate the user's web browser to an appropriate website to download this action plug-in. In other implementations of the invention, multiple download URLs may be provided for a single type label.

Having described an exemplary architecture, an exemplary method 300 for semantically labeling strings during document creation will be described below in reference to FIGS. 4 and 5.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method 300 for semantically labeling strings during creation of an electronic document. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that this is a computer-implemented process that is carried out by the computer in response to input from the user and instructions provided by a program module.

Referring to FIG. 5, the method 300 begins at start step 305 and proceeds to step 310 when a user opens an electronic document in application program module 205. In a preferred embodiment, the electronic document is a word processing document or a spreadsheet document. However, the method 300 is not limited to either of these specific types of electronic documents.

At step 310, the application program module 205 receives a new string, such as when the user enters a new paragraph into the electronic document or edits a previously entered paragraph. The method 300 then proceeds to step 315.

At step 315, the paragraph containing the new string is passed from the application program module 205 to the recognizer DLL 210. The recognizer DLL is responsible for communicating with the application program module, managing the jobs that need to be performed by the recognizer plug-ins, receiving results from the recognizer plug-ins and sending semantic category information to the application program module. At boot time, the recognizer DLL communicates with its recognizer plug-ins to determine what languages it supports, what types it can apply, etc. It should be understood that, in a preferred embodiment, a paragraph is passed to the recognizer DLL at step 315. However, in alternative embodiments, a sentence, the contents of a spreadsheet cell, a section of the document, the entire document, etc. may be passed to the recognizer DLL. In other words, the present invention is not limited to simply passing a paragraph to the recognizer DLL. The method 300 then proceeds to step 320.

Still referring to step 315, the application program module 205 typically sends one paragraph at a time to the recognizer DLL. In addition, in a preferred embodiment, a grammar checker program module sends all semantic categories (without type labels) to the recognizer DLL that have been identified by the grammar checker program module. Passing these semantic categories (without type labels) to the recognizer DLL is important because doing so saves each recognizer plug-in from needing to decide whether something is a capitalized string interspersed with function words (a task that would require writing a number of regular expressions: Cap Cap Unc Cap; Cap Unc Cap; etc.). If a label is applied by a recognizer plug-in to a string the grammar checker program module labeled, the grammar checker label will then be removed.

At step 320, during idle time, the paragraph (and information from the grammar checker program module) is passed to the recognizer plug-ins. The method then proceeds to step 325.

It should be understood that, in a preferred embodiment, the recognizer DLL 210 maintains a job queue. If before the recognizer DLL 210 sends the paragraph to the recognizer plug-ins 220 the user edits the paragraph, then the job containing the edited paragraph is deleted and is not sent to the recognizer plug-ins. Then, a new job enters the queue at step 315 after the edited paragraph is received at step 310. This job deletion is necessary to prevent the recognizer plug-ins from performing unnecessary work on a paragraph that has been edited.

At step 325, the recognizer plug-ins are executed on the paragraph to recognize keywords or perform other actions defined by the recognizer plug-in. As part of executing the recognizer plug-in, the paragraph may be broken into sentences by the recognizer plug-in. However, each recognizer plug-in is responsible for its own sentence-breaking. After the keywords are found at step 325, then the method proceeds to step 330.

At step 330, the results from each of the recognizer plug-ins are received by the recognizer DLL. The method then proceeds to decision step 335.

At decision step 335, it is determined whether the paragraph that has been reviewed by the recognizer plug-ins has been edited after the paragraph was sent to the recognizer DLL. If so, then the method 300 returns to step 315 and the edited paragraph is received by the recognizer DLL from the application program module. If not, then the method proceeds to step 340.

At step 340, the results from the recognizer plug-ins are compiled into semantic categories by the recognizer DLL and the semantic categories are sent to the application program module. At step 345, the application program module displays the semantic categories to the user in the electronic document. The method 300 then ends at step 399.

As should be understood from the description above, the architecture for recognizing semantic categories permits third parties to develop recognizer plug-ins to identify strings of one or more particular types. The recognizer plug-ins communicate with the application program module and receive a string from the application program module. The recognizer plug-ins may apply recognition algorithms to the string and communicate the identity of recognized strings back to the application program module.

After a string is labeled with a particular type label, the user will be able to execute action plug-ins that pertain to that type label. The action plug-ins preferably are COM objects that are executed via communication between the application program module and the action DLL. Parameters necessary to execute the action (the HTML of the string labeled as being of a particular type, the HTML of the string representing the current selection) will be passed from the application program module to the action DLL and, in turn, passed to the action plug-in.

An architecture for identifying and executing a set of actions associated with a semantic category may also be provided. This architecture comprises actions that apply to a particular type label (e.g. an action for book titles may be “Buy this book from shop.Microsoft.com”) and executing those actions when the user so desires. An action is a user-initiated function applied to a typed string. For example, adding a name to the contacts folder is one action possible for a type label “Person name”.

Different actions may be assigned to different type labels and these type label-action assignments may be stored in the type-action database 230. Table 2 below illustrates some possible type label-action pairings.

TABLE 2
Type Labels Actions
Person name Show contact info
Add to contacts
E-mail
Insert address into document
Send instant message to
Date Show calendar for that day
New task with that due date
Schedule meeting that day
Place Display EXPEDIA map
Add to contacts
Address Add to contacts
Phone number Add to contacts
E-mail Add to contacts
Date Schedule a meeting
Task Schedule a task
Meeting Schedule a meeting

For each type label, the type-action database 230 may store a download URL specified by the creator of the type label that users who do not have action-plug-ins or recognizer plug-ins for that semantic category type can go to in order to get action plug-ins and/or recognizer plug-ins. For example, the download URL for the type label “Book Title” might be microsoft.com/semanticcategories.asp. Once at that web page, a user may be offered downloads of various action plug-ins and recognizer plug-ins. There may also be an option on the user interface to navigate to the download URL so that recipients of documents with semantic categories can easily get the action plug-ins for those semantic categories.

Semantic categories may be saved as a unique namespace plus a tag name. A namespace is an XML construct for uniquely identifying a group of XML tags that belong to a logical category. Thus, every semantic category is uniquely identified by its nametag (e.g., “streetname”) in addition to its namespace (e.g., “schemas-microsoft-com:outlook:contact”)

Although the method 300 described above is one method for identifying semantic categories, there may be other mechanisms for identifying semantic categories. One mechanism is a grammar checker program module (not shown) connected to word processor program module 37. Another mechanism is receiving a semantic category from another electronic document. For example, when text containing a semantic category is copied from one electronic document and pasted into another electronic document of the word processor program module 37, the information identifying the semantic category is preserved and copied along with the copied text.

Referring now to FIG. 6, an illustration of a display of a semantic category 400 and its associated dropdown menu 405 will be described. It should be understood that FIG. 6 is an illustration of a semantic category 400 and dropdown menu 405 as displayed to a user by the application program module 205.

The string 410 associated with semantic category 400 is the string “Bob Smith”. As shown in FIG. 6, the string 410 of a semantic category 400 may be identified to the user by brackets 415. Of course, many other devices such as coloring, underlining, icons, etc. may be used to indicate to the user that a particular string is a semantic category.

In a preferred embodiment, when the user hovers a cursor over the string 410 or places the insertion point within string 410, then dropdown menu 405 is displayed to the user. The dropdown menu may display a list of actions associated with a semantic category. The dropdown menu may appear above and to the left of the semantic category string.

Typically, the first line of the dropdown menu indicates which string is the semantic category string (Bob Smith in FIG. 6) and what type the semantic category is (Person name in FIG. 6). Listed below the first line are actions 420 available for the semantic category type, such as “Send mail to . . . ”, “Insert Address”, and “Display contact information . . . ”.

The first item on the drop down menu below the separator line is “Check for new actions . . . ” 425. “Check for new actions . . . ” 425 will appear only for semantic categories whose download URL is available to the application program module. If selected, “Check for new actions . . . ” 425 uses the semantic category download URL to navigate the user's web browser to the homepage for the semantic category type applied to the string. For example, suppose new actions have been defined for the semantic category type “person name”. If so, then new actions will be downloaded to the user's computer after selecting “Check for new actions . . . ” 425. “Check for new actions . . . ” 425 will be grayed out if a download URL is unavailable for the semantic category.

If selected, the “Remove this semantic category” item 430 deletes the semantic category label from the string. If selected, the “Semantic categories” item 435 navigates the user to the semantic categories tab of the autocorrect dialog.

It should be understood that the application program module sends a request to the action DLL to determine which actions are shown with each semantic category type.

As described above with reference to FIG. 6, the application program module may include the option to display an in-document user interface to indicate the location of semantic categories. This in-document user interface may use a colored indication to indicate the location of a semantic category, such as the brackets 415 in FIG. 6. The in-document user interface will also be able to show nesting of semantic categories. For example, if Michael Jordan is labeled as a semantic category with type label “Person Name”, Michael is a semantic category with type label “First Name” and Jordan is a semantic category with type label “Last Name”, the document may look like this with the brackets indicating semantic categories:
[[Michael][Jordan]]

Of course, the in-document user interface may be any sort of indication. For example, in the “EXCEL” spreadsheet application program, the interface comprises a triangle in the lower right hand portion of a cell to indicate that one or more semantic categories are present in the cell.

As described above, the semantic category may also include metadata returned by the recognizer plug-ins. For example, a recognizer plug-in that recognizes the titles of books may return as metadata an ISDN book number when it recognizes the title of a book. The ISDN book number metadata may then be used to provide actions. Metadata may also be used to disambiguate for actions and searches. For example, suppose a recognizer DLL is linked to a corporate employee database to recognize names. When the recognizer DLL recognizes “Bob Smith”, it may store “employeeID=12345” as metadata in the background. Then, when an action is fired, the text in question will be known to reference Bob Smith, employee no. 12345 rather than Bob Smith, employee no. 45678. Also, the metadata may allow searches to be performed independent of the actual text in a document. So, a search may be conducted on “Robert Smith” by looking for employee 12345 in the employee databases and by performing a search on the metadata for employee number 12345 to find documents with “Bob Smith” in them. There are also numerous other functions for metadata. For instance, DHTML could be inserted so special tricks may be performed within a web browser. Additionally, data used by other actions may be inserted such as someone's e-mail address that could be used by the send-mail-to action, a normalized version of the date could be stored to easily interact with a personal information manager, etc.

Having described semantic categories in detail above, the description below focuses on providing semantic category recognition using grammars and XML schemas that are also used to apply mode bias. It should be understood that, in addition to applying mode bias as described above, the application 37 (assuming it supports semantic categories) would also be passing text to the set of recognizer plug-ins via the infrastructure described in FIG. 4. One or more of the recognizer plug-ins may be connected to the grammar database 515 and schema database 520. These recognizer plug-ins may use the grammars in the grammar database to recognize semantic categories. In a preferred embodiment, only certain grammars are designated for use for semantic category recognition and the list of the designated grammars would be obtained from the schema registry manager. A more detailed description of using grammars to recognize semantic categories is provided below.

Referring now to FIG. 7, a flowchart illustrating a method 700 for semantic category recognition using grammars in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will be described. At step 705, the user starts an application that in turn boots several recognizer plug-ins. At step 710, one or more of the recognizer plug-ins communicates with the schema registry manager and retrieves a complete set of schema/grammar pairs to use for semantic category recognition. At step 715, the user enters some text in a place in a document where there is no mode bias. At step 720, during idle time, the text is passed to the recognizer plug-ins. At step 725, the recognizer plug-ins apply the schema from the schema registry to the text if the text conforms to the grammars found in the schema registry. At step 730, when the document is saved, the text is saved along with the schema applied to that text. Thus, as will be understood from the foregoing description, the schema has been used to label the text as a semantic category. The action plug-ins may then use this schema to provide actions.

Thus, as described above, applying mode bias in accordance with the present invention may also be related to recognizing semantic categories. Recognizing semantic categories requires determining what category some text is in after it is entered whereas applying mode bias requires specifying in advance what type of text will be entered. The same rules or statistical models (grammars) can be used to recognize semantic categories by determining if the text matches any of the rules and for specifying mode bias by constraining input with a probabilistic input method to conform to those rules.

Thus, in one embodiment of the present invention, once the user has entered a phone number into a field that has phone number mode bias set, the fact that that field contains a phone number is retained. Thus, the fact that the field is a phone number will be apparent to whatever person (such as a user who requests a list of actions pertinent to that data type) or process (e.g. a search engine) looks at the document later. Moreover, if the user had entered a phone number in an arbitrary location in a document—that is, in a place where there was no a priori specification of mode bias—the phone number will be labeled as such by recognizer plug-ins. That is, once the mode bias mechanism of the present invention is in place, a recognizer plug-in may identify many of the items in the schema registry using the same patterns that are used for input. However, not all of the grammars necessarily have to be used because some grammars may be for particular genres of text, such as legal text or medical text, or even something as specific as case law text. There may be little use in labeling all text that appears to be from one particular genre. Similarly, some grammars are so generic as to be useless. For example, generic types such as numbers may not facilitate good semantic category actions.

Thus, it should be understood from the foregoing description that the same grammar could be used to apply mode bias and also to recognize semantic categories. Leveraging this relationship is advantageous for developers who will have fewer grammars to build and for users who will receive better input and richer functionality via semantic categories. In addition, the relationship between mode bias and semantic categories maximizes consistency because if something is labeled as a part number semantic category then you should be able to enter it when a form requests a part number and vice versa.

It should be understood from the foregoing description that it is important to have a standard way to specify that input into a particular region of a document or form should conform to some pattern because the expected input is of a particular type or has particular properties. The present invention provides a way to specify that input into a particular region of a document or form should conform to some pattern. For example, when entering a telephone number into a telephone number field of contact management software, the user will almost certainly enter a well-formed phone number and whatever input method they're using should make that as easy as possible. The exact form of the phone number may differ depending on the user's location, but wherever the user is in the world, it's unlikely that they'll expect to be able to enter free text into a telephone number field.

It should be understood that tools other than input methods, such as speech, handwriting or East Asian input method editors, also need to know about mode bias. For example, proofing tools such as spelling, grammar and style checkers should be able to adapt to the mode bias of the present invention to some extent. For example, if text is entered into a form that has mode bias using a non-probabilistic input method (such as typing English), then whatever proofing tools are run on that text should be cognizant of the constraints placed on that text by the mode bias. For example, it may make sense to turn spell checking off in fields that allow names to be entered. Or, a speller checker that uses a statistical language model might be able to swap in a more appropriate model with the knowledge that the text is medical or legal in nature.

It should be understood from the foregoing description that the present invention allows all input methods to become standardized in their handling of mode bias. For example, for a telephone number input, a speech recognizer and a handwriting recognizer will receive the same (or a similar) grammar from the schema registry manager. Then, the speech recognizer and handwriting recognizer will be able to handle telephone number inputs similarly and there will be a standardization of input methods. The present invention is also more flexible than the prior art because new schemas and grammars may be added to the databases and may be updated as necessary.

It should be understood from the foregoing description that after an input method receives a grammar, it may use it in many different ways that will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, in the case of a context free grammar, an input method may attempt to match what the user said (or typed or handwrote, etc.) with elements of the grammar and, if not present, then reject the input. As another example, the input method may use the grammar as a way to disambiguate words, phrases, etc. (e.g. if the grammar includes the word “two” but not “to”, this information may be used to recognize what the user is inputting).

It should be understood that the foregoing pertains only to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and that numerous changes may be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Patentzitate
Zitiertes PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US467406510. Dez. 198516. Juni 1987International Business Machines CorporationSystem for detecting and correcting contextual errors in a text processing system
US48687507. Okt. 198719. Sept. 1989Houghton Mifflin CompanyCollocational grammar system
US502001925. Mai 199028. Mai 1991Ricoh Company, Ltd.Document retrieval system
US51288652. März 19907. Juli 1992Bso/Buro Voor Systeemontwikkeling B.V.Method for determining the semantic relatedness of lexical items in a text
US515955220. Sept. 199027. Okt. 1992Oce-Nederland B.V.Method for checking the correct and consistent use of units or chemical formulae in a text processing system
US52671556. März 199230. Nov. 1993Medical Documenting Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for computer-assisted document generation
US528744824. März 199315. Febr. 1994Apple Computer, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing help information to users of computers
US529703927. Jan. 199222. März 1994Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaText search system for locating on the basis of keyword matching and keyword relationship matching
US531754630. Juni 199331. Mai 1994General Electric CompanyTime-of-use calendar events method and apparatus for a meter register
US533723313. Apr. 19929. Aug. 1994Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for mapping multiple-byte characters to unique strings of ASCII characters for use in text retrieval
US53412933. Sept. 199223. Aug. 1994Apple Computer, Inc.User interface system having programmable user interface elements
US535119010. Okt. 199127. Sept. 1994Canon Kabushiki KaishaCommunication apparatus and method establishing a language dependent sort order search
US538656424. Febr. 199331. Jan. 1995Hewlett-Packard CompanyConversion of data and objects across classes in an object management system
US53923863. Febr. 199421. Febr. 1995Inter Hi-Tec AgMethod and apparatus for adding functionality to computer programs executing under graphical user interfaces
US541890212. Okt. 199323. Mai 1995International Computers LimitedElectronic spreadsheet system producing generalized answers including formulas
US54468912. Nov. 199429. Aug. 1995International Business Machines CorporationSystem for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities
US552208912. Sept. 199428. Mai 1996Cordata, Inc.Personal digital assistant module adapted for initiating telephone communications through DTMF dialing
US55353239. Aug. 19959. Juli 1996Digital Equipment CorporationMethod of and system for displaying context sensitive and application independent help information
US554183630. Dez. 199130. Juli 1996At&T Corp.Word disambiguation apparatus and methods
US554652117. Okt. 199413. Aug. 1996International Business Machines CorporationDynamic presentation of contextual help and status information
US55816849. Aug. 19943. Dez. 1996Ddtec SaApplication-external help system for a windowing user interface
US559670017. Febr. 199321. Jan. 1997International Business Machines CorporationSystem for annotating software windows
US561756529. Nov. 19941. Apr. 1997Hitachi America, Ltd.Broadcast interactive multimedia system
US562578313. Dez. 199429. Apr. 1997Microsoft CorporationAutomated system and method for dynamic menu construction in a graphical user interface
US562756730. Jan. 19966. Mai 1997Hewlett-Packard CompanyMethod and apparatus for adaptive touch recognition in a touch sensitive user interface
US562795817. März 19956. Mai 1997Borland International, Inc.System and method for improved computer-based training
US56340196. Juni 199527. Mai 1997Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for in-place interaction with contained objects
US56405602. Aug. 199517. Juni 1997Microsoft CorporationCD-ROM content repurposing
US565725921. Jan. 199412. Aug. 1997Object Technology Licensing Corp.Number formatting framework
US56850004. Jan. 19954. Nov. 1997U S West Technologies, Inc.Method for providing a linguistically competent dialogue with a computerized service representative
US570882526. Mai 199513. Jan. 1998Iconovex CorporationAutomatic summary page creation and hyperlink generation
US57154155. Juni 19963. Febr. 1998Microsoft CorporationComputer application with help pane integrated into workspace
US57179233. Nov. 199410. Febr. 1998Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users
US57520227. Aug. 199512. Mai 1998International Business Machines Corp.Method for creating a hypertext language for a distributed computer network
US57616891. Sept. 19942. Juni 1998Microsoft CorporationAutocorrecting text typed into a word processing document
US576479413. Juni 19969. Juni 1998Perlin; KennethMethod and apparatus for electronically storing alphanumeric characters
US576515619. Febr. 19979. Juni 1998Microsoft CorporationData transfer with expanded clipboard formats
US57811895. Mai 199514. Juli 1998Apple Computer, Inc.Embedding internet browser/buttons within components of a network component system
US57819041. Mai 199714. Juli 1998Apple Computer, Inc.User interface system and method for traversing a database
US579425714. Juli 199511. Aug. 1998Siemens Corporate Research, Inc.Automatic hyperlinking on multimedia by compiling link specifications
US579906826. Nov. 199725. Aug. 1998Elonex I.P. Holdings Ltd.Smart phone integration with computer systems
US580225326. Febr. 19961. Sept. 1998Banyan Systems IncorporatedEvent-driven rule-based messaging system
US580226215. Okt. 19971. Sept. 1998Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for diagnosing lexical errors
US580229913. Febr. 19961. Sept. 1998Microtouch Systems, Inc.Interactive system for authoring hypertext document collections
US58025301. Juli 19961. Sept. 1998Sun Microsystems, Inc.Web document based graphical user interface
US58059111. Febr. 19958. Sept. 1998Microsoft CorporationWord prediction system
US58093184. Apr. 199715. Sept. 1998Smartpatents, Inc.Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US581583018. Dez. 199529. Sept. 1998Anthony; Andre CharlesAutomatic generation of hypertext links to multimedia topic objects
US58184476. Juni 19966. Okt. 1998Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for in-place editing of an electronic mail message using a separate program
US58219311. Dez. 199513. Okt. 1998Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyAttachment and control of software notes
US58225398. Dez. 199513. Okt. 1998Sun Microsystems, Inc.System for adding requested document cross references to a document by annotation proxy configured to merge and a directory generator and annotation server
US58227208. Juli 199613. Okt. 1998Sentius CorporationSystem amd method for linking streams of multimedia data for reference material for display
US58260258. Sept. 199520. Okt. 1998Sun Microsystems, Inc.System for annotation overlay proxy configured to retrieve associated overlays associated with a document request from annotation directory created from list of overlay groups
US58321003. Mai 19933. Nov. 1998Trw Inc.Method and apparatus for converting documents between paper medium and electronic media using a user profile
US584507727. Nov. 19951. Dez. 1998Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for identifying and obtaining computer software from a remote computer
US585500715. Nov. 199529. Dez. 1998Jovicic; NeboisaElectronic coupon communication system
US585963627. Dez. 199512. Jan. 1999Intel CorporationRecognition of and operation on text data
US587297326. Okt. 199516. Febr. 1999Viewsoft, Inc.Method for managing dynamic relations between objects in dynamic object-oriented languages
US587544330. Jan. 199623. Febr. 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Internet-based spelling checker dictionary system with automatic updating
US587775723. Mai 19972. März 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for providing user help information in network applications
US58842662. Apr. 199716. März 1999Motorola, Inc.Audio interface for document based information resource navigation and method therefor
US589291923. Juni 19976. Apr. 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Spell checking universal resource locator (URL) by comparing the URL against a cache containing entries relating incorrect URLs submitted by users to corresponding correct URLs
US589307327. Febr. 19956. Apr. 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for representing recurring events
US589313214. Dez. 19956. Apr. 1999Motorola, Inc.Method and system for encoding a book for reading using an electronic book
US58954619. Okt. 199620. Apr. 1999Telaric, Inc.Method and system for automated data storage and retrieval with uniform addressing scheme
US589632114. Nov. 199720. Apr. 1999Microsoft CorporationText completion system for a miniature computer
US590000415. Sept. 19974. Mai 1999Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for interactive formatting of word processing documents with deferred rule evaluation and format editing
US59078521. Febr. 199625. Mai 1999Nec CorporationDocument editing apparatus
US59132148. Aug. 199615. Juni 1999Massachusetts Inst TechnologyData extraction from world wide web pages
US59208595. Febr. 19976. Juli 1999Idd Enterprises, L.P.Hypertext document retrieval system and method
US59240995. Juni 199813. Juli 1999Microsoft CorporationData transfer with expanded clipboard formats
US593313931. Jan. 19973. Aug. 1999Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for creating help functions
US593314030. Juni 19973. Aug. 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Child window containing context-based help and a miniaturized web page
US59334985. Nov. 19973. Aug. 1999Mrj, Inc.System for controlling access and distribution of digital property
US594061418. Apr. 199117. Aug. 1999International Business Machines CorporationHypertext control method and apparatus for displaying help information in an interactive data processing system
US594478721. Apr. 199731. Aug. 1999Sift, Inc.Method for automatically finding postal addresses from e-mail addresses
US59466471. Febr. 199631. Aug. 1999Apple Computer, Inc.System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data
US594806129. Okt. 19967. Sept. 1999Double Click, Inc.Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks
US5956681 *6. Nov. 199721. Sept. 1999Casio Computer Co., Ltd.Apparatus for generating text data on the basis of speech data input from terminal
US5974413 *3. Juli 199726. Okt. 1999Activeword Systems, Inc.Semantic user interface
US598748025. Juli 199616. Nov. 1999Donohue; MichaelMethod and system for delivering documents customized for a particular user over the internet using imbedded dynamic content
US599171911. Sept. 199823. Nov. 1999Fujistu LimitedSemantic recognition system
US599575614. Febr. 199730. Nov. 1999Inprise CorporationSystem for internet-based delivery of computer applications
US60062652. Apr. 199821. Dez. 1999Hotv, Inc.Hyperlinks resolution at and by a special network server in order to enable diverse sophisticated hyperlinking upon a digital network
US600627921. Jan. 199721. Dez. 1999Canon Information Systems, Inc.Plug-in module host framework
US6014616 *13. Nov. 199711. Jan. 2000Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for monitoring the language used for character generation by an operating system
US601876111. Dez. 199625. Jan. 2000The Robert G. Uomini And Louise B. Bidwell TrustSystem for adding to electronic mail messages information obtained from sources external to the electronic mail transport process
US60286053. Febr. 199822. Febr. 2000Documentum, Inc.Multi-dimensional analysis of objects by manipulating discovered semantic properties
US602913514. Nov. 199522. Febr. 2000Siemens AktiengesellschaftHypertext navigation system controlled by spoken words
US602917110. Febr. 199722. Febr. 2000Actioneer, Inc.Method and apparatus for group action processing between users of a collaboration system
US60315251. Apr. 199829. Febr. 2000New York UniversityMethod and apparatus for writing
US605253125. März 199818. Apr. 2000Symantec CorporationMulti-tiered incremental software updating
US6061516 *12. Aug. 19979. Mai 2000Hitachi, Ltd.Online application processing system
US60670873. März 199823. Mai 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod for building menus during idle times
US607247522. Aug. 19976. Juni 2000Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonTouch screen
US607309015. Apr. 19976. Juni 2000Silicon Graphics, Inc.System and method for independently configuring international location and language
US608520128. Juni 19964. Juli 2000Intel CorporationContext-sensitive template engine
US60887111. Juli 199711. Juli 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for defining and applying a style to a paragraph
US609207410. Febr. 199818. Juli 2000Connect Innovations, Inc.Dynamic insertion and updating of hypertext links for internet servers
US610864013. Jan. 199822. Aug. 2000Slotznick; BenjaminSystem for calculating occasion dates and converting between different calendar systems, and intelligent agent for using same
US610867416. Juli 199722. Aug. 2000Casio Computer Co., Ltd.Image output devices which automatically selects and outputs a stored selected image in correspondence with input data
US611220917. Juni 199829. Aug. 2000Gusack; Mark DavidAssociative database model for electronic-based informational assemblies
US612196817. Juni 199819. Sept. 2000Microsoft CorporationAdaptive menus
US612264719. Mai 199819. Sept. 2000Perspecta, Inc.Dynamic generation of contextual links in hypertext documents
US612630610. Sept. 19923. Okt. 2000Ando; ShimonNatural language processing method for converting a first natural language into a second natural language using data structures
US613791116. Juni 199724. Okt. 2000The Dialog Corporation PlcTest classification system and method
US614100510. Sept. 199831. Okt. 2000International Business Machines CorporationCombined display of locale-sensitive calendars in a distributed computer enterprise environment
US61516437. Juni 199621. Nov. 2000Networks Associates, Inc.Automatic updating of diverse software products on multiple client computer systems by downloading scanning application to client computer and generating software list on client computer
US615473821. Mai 199928. Nov. 2000Call; Charles GainorMethods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet using universal product codes
US616746918. Mai 199826. Dez. 2000Agilent Technologies, Inc.Digital camera having display device for displaying graphical representation of user input and method for transporting the selected digital images thereof
US6167523 *5. Mai 199726. Dez. 2000Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for forms data validation and processing control
US616756830. Juni 199826. Dez. 2000Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for implementing electronic software distribution
US61733168. Apr. 19989. Jan. 2001Geoworks CorporationWireless communication device with markup language based man-machine interface
US6182029 *6. Aug. 199930. Jan. 2001The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkSystem and method for language extraction and encoding utilizing the parsing of text data in accordance with domain parameters
US618555013. Juni 19976. Febr. 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for classifying documents within a class hierarchy creating term vector, term file and relevance ranking
US618557621. Okt. 19986. Febr. 2001Mcintosh LowrieDefining a uniform subject classification system incorporating document management/records retention functions
US619904629. Juli 19976. März 2001Adsura Pty Ltd.Method system and article of manufacture for performing real time currency conversion
US619908130. Juni 19986. März 2001Microsoft CorporationAutomatic tagging of documents and exclusion by content
US620833815. Mai 199827. März 2001Hewlett-Packard CompanyOnline documentation and help system for computer-based systems
US621969819. Dez. 199717. Apr. 2001Compaq Computer CorporationConfiguring client software using remote notification
US624640418. März 199912. Juni 2001Microsoft CorporationAutomatically generating code for integrating context-sensitive help functions into a computer software application
US62627283. Nov. 199817. Juli 2001Agilent Technologies, Inc.System and method for annotating a graphical user interface display in a computer-based system
US62720741. Juli 19977. Aug. 2001Oracle CorporationMethod and apparatus for generating recurring events in a calendar/schedule system
US62725057. Juli 19987. Aug. 2001Carlos De La HuergaDocument modification based hyperlink limiting method and apparatus
US628248928. Mai 199328. Aug. 2001Mapquest.Com, Inc.Methods and apparatus for displaying a travel route and generating a list of places of interest located near the travel route
US62917858. Febr. 199918. Sept. 2001Hitachi, Ltd.Address reader, sorting machine such as a mail thing and character string recognition method
US629276810. Dez. 199618. Sept. 2001Kun Chun ChanMethod for converting non-phonetic characters into surrogate words for inputting into a computer
US629506130. Nov. 199925. Sept. 2001Dbm KoreaComputer system and method for dynamic information display
US629782230. Dez. 19982. Okt. 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Results-oriented help displays for computer software programs
US63009502. Apr. 19989. Okt. 2001International Business Machines CorporationPresentation of help information via a computer system user interface in response to user interaction
US630817124. Febr. 200023. Okt. 2001Carlos De La HuergaMethod and system for automated data storage and retrieval
US63111528. Apr. 199930. Okt. 2001Kent Ridge Digital LabsSystem for chinese tokenization and named entity recognition
US631117716. Febr. 199930. Okt. 2001International Business Machines CorporationAccessing databases when viewing text on the web
US631119421. Aug. 200030. Okt. 2001Taalee, Inc.System and method for creating a semantic web and its applications in browsing, searching, profiling, personalization and advertising
US632049629. Apr. 199920. Nov. 2001Fuji Xerox Co., LtdSystems and methods providing tactile guidance using sensory supplementation
US632385310. Nov. 199827. Nov. 2001Arendi AsMethod, system and computer readable medium for addressing handling from a computer program
US633612528. Juli 19981. Jan. 2002Sharp Kabushiki KaishaMethod and device for generating application data and storage medium containing thereon a program for generating application data
US63361315. Apr. 20001. Jan. 2002Mark A. WolfeSystem and method for communicating information relating to a network resource
US633805917. Dez. 19988. Jan. 2002International Business Machines CorporationHyperlinked search interface for distributed database
US633943618. Dez. 199815. Jan. 2002International Business Machines CorporationUser defined dynamic help
US6339755 *15. Dez. 199815. Jan. 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system and data structure for splitting language and locale properties in a data processing system
US63473988. Nov. 199912. Febr. 2002Microsoft CorporationAutomatic software downloading from a computer network
US634929531. Dez. 199819. Febr. 2002Walker Digital, LlcMethod and apparatus for performing supplemental searches over a network
US635392615. Juli 19985. März 2002Microsoft CorporationSoftware update notification
US638174219. Juni 199830. Apr. 2002Microsoft CorporationSoftware package management
US63823502. Apr. 20017. Mai 2002Collins & Aikman Products Corp.Molded acoustic and decorative mats and methods for forming the same
US639266812. Nov. 199921. Mai 2002Kendara, Inc.Client-side system and method for network link differentiation
US639651515. Dez. 199828. Mai 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system and computer program product for dynamic language switching in user interface menus, help text, and dialogs
US6401067 *28. Jan. 19994. Juni 2002International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for providing user-directed constraints for handwriting recognition
US640832319. Febr. 199818. Juni 2002Justsystem CorporationJob execution managing apparatus and computer-readable recording medium with program recorded therein for making a computer function as a job execution managing apparatus
US64131008. Aug. 20002. Juli 2002Netucation, LlcSystem and methods for searching for and delivering solutions to specific problems and problem types
US641530417. Mai 19992. Juli 2002Microsoft CorporationWaiting prior to engaging in action for enhancement of automated service
US642167820. Okt. 199916. Juli 2002Actioneer, Inc.Method and apparatus for group action processing between users of a collaboration system
US642497930. Dez. 199823. Juli 2002American Management Systems, Inc.System for presenting and managing enterprise architectures
US6434567 *4. Juni 199913. Aug. 2002Carlos De La HuergaMethod for specifying enterprise-wide database address formats
US643854515. Apr. 199920. Aug. 2002Value Capital ManagementSemantic user interface
US644175325. Okt. 200027. Aug. 2002Motorola, Inc.Multi-function key assembly for an electronic device
US64425451. Juni 199927. Aug. 2002Clearforest Ltd.Term-level text with mining with taxonomies
US64425912. Nov. 199827. Aug. 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for automatic electronic mail address maintenance
US645630430. Juni 199924. Sept. 2002Microsoft CorporationProcedural toolbar user interface
US64700912. Apr. 200122. Okt. 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Address reader, sorting machine such as a mail thing and character string recognition method
US647306913. Nov. 199529. Okt. 2002Cirque CorporationApparatus and method for tactile feedback from input device
US647751015. März 19995. Nov. 2002Andrew Johnson, Inc.Euro booking currency conversion method
US648086011. Febr. 199912. Nov. 2002International Business Machines CorporationTagged markup language interface with document type definition to access data in object oriented database
US649300610. Mai 199610. Dez. 2002Apple Computer, Inc.Graphical user interface having contextual menus
US649898210. Juli 200124. Dez. 2002Mapquest. Com, Inc.Methods and apparatus for displaying a travel route and/or generating a list of places of interest located near the travel route
US651050429. Juni 199821. Jan. 2003Oracle CorporationMethods and apparatus for memory allocation for object instances in an object-oriented software environment
US651632113. Aug. 19994. Febr. 2003Carlos De La HuergaMethod for database address specification
US65195576. Juni 200011. Febr. 2003International Business Machines CorporationSoftware and method for recognizing similarity of documents written in different languages based on a quantitative measure of similarity
US651960328. Okt. 199911. Febr. 2003International Business Machine CorporationMethod and system for organizing an annotation structure and for querying data and annotations
US6546433 *27. Jan. 20008. Apr. 2003Novell, Inc.Method and system for integrating external functions into an application environment
US65533851. Sept. 199822. Apr. 2003International Business Machines CorporationArchitecture of a framework for information extraction from natural language documents
US655697216. März 200029. Apr. 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for time-synchronized translation and synthesis of natural-language speech
US655698419. Jan. 199929. Apr. 2003International Business Machines CorporationHierarchical string matching using multi-path dynamic programming
US65642648. Dez. 199913. Mai 2003At&T Corp.System, apparatus and method for automatic address updating of outgoing and incoming user messages in a communications network
US65712412. März 199927. Mai 2003Mazda Motor CorporationMultilingual patent information search system
US6571253 *28. Apr. 200027. Mai 2003International Business Machines CorporationHierarchical view of data binding between display elements that are organized in a hierarchical structure to a data store that is also organized in a hierarchical structure
US659126028. Jan. 20008. Juli 2003Commerce One Operations, Inc.Method of retrieving schemas for interpreting documents in an electronic commerce system
US65953427. Dez. 200022. Juli 2003Sony CorporationMethod and apparatus for a biometrically-secured self-service kiosk system for guaranteed product delivery and return
US660107527. Juli 200029. Juli 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method of ranking and retrieving documents based on authority scores of schemas and documents
US660409927. Juli 20005. Aug. 2003International Business Machines CorporationMajority schema in semi-structured data
US6615131 *17. Mai 20002. Sept. 2003Televigation, Inc.Method and system for an efficient operating environment in a real-time navigation system
US661873314. Nov. 20009. Sept. 2003Revelink Inc.View navigation for creation, update and querying of data objects and textual annotations of relations between data objects
US662214015. Nov. 200016. Sept. 2003Justsystem CorporationMethod and apparatus for analyzing affect and emotion in text
US662352719. Nov. 199723. Sept. 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod for providing a document with a button for a network service
US662558122. Nov. 199923. Sept. 2003Ipf, Inc.Method of and system for enabling the access of consumer product related information and the purchase of consumer products at points of consumer presence on the world wide web (www) at which consumer product information request (cpir) enabling servlet tags are embedded within html-encoded documents
US662907925. Juni 199830. Sept. 2003Amazon.Com, Inc.Method and system for electronic commerce using multiple roles
US663151930. März 20007. Okt. 2003Microsoft CorporationAutomated schema and interface generation
US663688018. Sept. 200021. Okt. 2003International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic conversion of units in a computer program
US664365012. Sept. 20004. Nov. 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Mechanism and apparatus for using messages to look up documents stored in spaces in a distributed computing environment
US665473430. Aug. 200025. Nov. 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for query processing and optimization for XML repositories
US6654932 *29. Okt. 199925. Nov. 2003International Business Machines CorporationValidating data within container objects handled by view controllers
US665862315. Sept. 19972. Dez. 2003Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Displaying in a first document a selectable link to a second document based on a passive query
US668748521. Mai 20023. Febr. 2004Thinksmark Performance Systems LlcSystem and method for providing help/training content for a web-based application
US66943077. März 200117. Febr. 2004NetventionSystem for collecting specific information from several sources of unstructured digitized data
US669782431. Aug. 199924. Febr. 2004Accenture LlpRelationship management in an E-commerce application framework
US669783719. Nov. 199924. Febr. 2004Installation Software Technologies, Inc.End user profiling method
US670818927. März 200016. März 2004Desknet, Inc.Computer file transfer system
US671514429. Dez. 200030. März 2004International Business Machines CorporationRequest based automation of software installation, customization and activation
US671759312. Sept. 20006. Apr. 2004Avaya Technology Corp.Mark-up language implementation of graphical or non-graphical user interfaces
US671851630. Sept. 19996. Apr. 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod for verifying context between multiple related XML tags in document object model (DOM)
US6728679 *30. Okt. 200027. Apr. 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Self-updating user interface/entertainment device that simulates personal interaction
US67320905. Dez. 20014. Mai 2004Xerox CorporationMeta-document management system with user definable personalities
US673236128. Juli 19994. Mai 2004Xerox CorporationGenerating combinations of offers and using action identifiers from the offers to obtain performance of combinations of actions
US6741994 *27. Juli 199825. Mai 2004Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Method and automatic organization of data
US6742054 *7. Apr. 200025. Mai 2004Vitria Technology, Inc.Method of executing a data transformation specification
US674520831. Mai 20011. Juni 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for synchronizing an XML document with its object model
US676632624. Juli 200020. Juli 2004Resty M CenaUniversal storage for dynamic databases
US6795808 *30. Okt. 200021. Sept. 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.User interface/entertainment device that simulates personal interaction and charges external database with relevant data
US680206121. Dez. 20015. Okt. 2004Microsoft CorporationAutomatic software downloading from a computer network
US682672617. Aug. 200130. Nov. 2004Vaultus Mobile Technologies, Inc.Remote document updating system using XML and DOM
US682963121. Sept. 20007. Dez. 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for screening electronic messages
US684549931. Jan. 200118. Jan. 2005I2 Technologies Us, Inc.System and method for developing software applications using an extended XML-based framework
US685710314. Juli 200015. Febr. 2005International Business Machines CorporationFlexible help support in an object oriented application
US685990831. Aug. 199922. Febr. 2005Intel CorporationAutomated text entry for processor-based system
US6868525 *26. Mai 200015. März 2005Alberti Anemometer LlcComputer graphic display visualization system and method
US68741253. Mai 200029. März 2005Microsoft CorporationMethod for providing feedback on windows, messages and dialog boxes
US687414321. Juni 200029. März 2005Microsoft CorporationArchitectures for and methods of providing network-based software extensions
US688012920. Apr. 200012. Apr. 2005Silverstream Software, LlcMethod and apparatus for using name spaces in a graphical user interface
US688313717. Apr. 200019. Apr. 2005International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for schema-driven compression of extensible mark-up language (XML) documents
US689860429. Juni 200124. Mai 2005Microsoft CorporationXML serialization and deserialization
US690140218. Juni 199931. Mai 2005Microsoft CorporationSystem for improving the performance of information retrieval-type tasks by identifying the relations of constituents
US690456023. März 20007. Juni 2005Adobe Systems IncorporatedIdentifying key images in a document in correspondence to document text
US692545721. Nov. 20022. Aug. 2005Metatomix, Inc.Methods and apparatus for querying a relational data store using schema-less queries
US692547025. Jan. 20022. Aug. 2005Amphire Solutions, Inc.Method and apparatus for database mapping of XML objects into a relational database
US694485712. Okt. 200013. Sept. 2005International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, computer program product, and article of manufacture for updating a computer program according to a stored configuration
US694813319. März 200220. Sept. 2005Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services CorporationSystem for dynamically configuring a user interface display
US6950831 *19. März 200227. Sept. 2005Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services CorporationProcessing system for use with a user interface display
US695098219. Nov. 199927. Sept. 2005Xerox CorporationActive annotation mechanism for document management systems
US69573855. Jan. 200118. Okt. 2005Microsoft CorporationWorldwide number format for a spreadsheet program module
US696386731. März 20038. Nov. 2005A9.Com, Inc.Search query processing to provide category-ranked presentation of search results
US6964010 *14. Dez. 19988. Nov. 2005International Business Machines CorporationFormatted-item list control
US6975983 *31. Okt. 200013. Dez. 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaNatural language input method and apparatus
US697609016. Febr. 200113. Dez. 2005Actona Technologies Ltd.Differentiated content and application delivery via internet
US697620915. Apr. 199913. Dez. 2005International Business Machines CorporationActivemark mechanism in a live parsing editor
US698121230. Sept. 199927. Dez. 2005International Business Machines CorporationExtensible markup language (XML) server pages having custom document object model (DOM) tags
US698610426. Juni 200110. Jan. 2006Silver Creek Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for normalizing and converting structured content
US699065414. Sept. 200124. Jan. 2006Bea Systems, Inc.XML-based graphical user interface application development toolkit
US700352224. Juni 200221. Febr. 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for incorporating smart tags in online content
US701328921. Febr. 200114. März 2006Michel HornGlobal electronic commerce system
US702465828. Sept. 20014. Apr. 2006Adobe Systems IncorporatedExtensible help facility for a computer software application
US702831223. März 199911. Apr. 2006WebmethodsXML remote procedure call (XML-RPC)
US703217427. März 200118. Apr. 2006Microsoft CorporationAutomatically adding proper names to a database
US703985912. Nov. 19982. Mai 2006International Business Machines CorporationGenerating visual editors from schema descriptions
US705107616. Jan. 200223. Mai 2006Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaAutomatically creating mailing address directory in an image communication apparatus
US7082392 *17. Aug. 200025. Juli 2006International Business Machines CorporationManagement of speech technology modules in an interactive voice response system
US710011531. Okt. 200029. Aug. 2006Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing computer-based help
US711397628. Jan. 200226. Sept. 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaCommunication apparatus and control method of the same
US714656420. Dez. 20025. Dez. 2006Xmlcities, Inc.Extensible stylesheet designs using meta-tag and/or associated meta-tag information
US7216351 *18. Febr. 20008. Mai 2007International Business Machines CorporationSystems and methods for synchronizing multi-modal interactions
US72371907. März 200126. Juni 2007International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for generating multiple customizable interfaces for XML documents
US72812455. Juni 20029. Okt. 2007Microsoft CorporationMechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a local software application
US730263422. Okt. 200127. Nov. 2007Microsoft CorporationSchema-based services for identity-based data access
US7305354 *20. März 20014. Dez. 2007Lightsurf,Technologies, Inc.Media asset management system
US739247927. Juni 200224. Juni 2008Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for providing namespace related information
US742164524. Apr. 20012. Sept. 2008Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for providing electronic commerce actions based on semantically labeled strings
US74544594. Sept. 200218. Nov. 2008Jarna, Inc.Method and apparatus for implementing a real-time event management platform
US2001002960519. Juni 199811. Okt. 2001Jonathan A. ForbesSoftware package management
US20010041328 *11. Mai 200115. Nov. 2001Fisher Samuel HeywardForeign language immersion simulation process and apparatus
US2001004209815. Sept. 199915. Nov. 2001Anoop GuptaFacilitating annotation creation and notification via electronic mail
US2001004970222. Mai 20016. Dez. 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Service side filtering XML messages in a distributed network
US200100564612. Mai 200127. Dez. 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Cluster configuration repository
US200200025909. März 20013. Jan. 2002Tim KingSystem and method for sending electronic mail and parcel delivery notification using recipient's identification information
US2002000346923. Mai 200010. Jan. 2002Hewlett -Packard CompanyInternet browser facility and method for the visually impaired
US2002000389815. Juli 199810. Jan. 2002Andi WuProper name identification in chinese
US2002000480325. Juni 200110. Jan. 2002Oleg SerebrennikovMethod and apparatus for the dynamic modification of relational information in electronic documents such as HTML pages and the like
US2002000730924. Apr. 200117. Jan. 2002Micrsoft CorporationMethod and system for providing electronic commerce actions based on semantically labeled strings
US2002002311317. Aug. 200121. Febr. 2002Jeff HsingRemote document updating system using XML and DOM
US2002002313615. Juni 200121. Febr. 2002Silver Edward MichaelElectronic mail (email) internet applicance methods and systems
US20020026450 *20. Febr. 200128. Febr. 2002Mamiko KuramochiData processing system and data processing method
US2002002930417. Juli 20017. März 2002Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for defining semantic categories and actions
US2002003558116. Juli 200121. März 2002Microsoft CorporationApplication program interfaces for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings
US2002003818010. Juli 200128. März 2002Mapquest.Com, Inc., Delaware CorporationMethods and apparatus for displaying a travel route and/or generating a list of places of interest located near the travel route
US2002006511013. Sept. 200130. Mai 2002Enns Neil Robin NewmanCustomizing the display of a mobile computing device
US2002006589130. Nov. 200030. Mai 2002Malik Dale W.Method and apparatus for automatically checking e-mail addresses in outgoing e-mail communications
US200200660738. Jan. 200130. Mai 2002Heinz LienhardMethod and system for implementing process-based Web applications
US2002007822214. Dez. 200020. Juni 2002Compas Jeffrey C.Updating information in network devices
US2002009180318. Juli 200111. Juli 2002Kokoro ImamuraMulti-user management process enabling user privacy for use in a network entertainment center
US200200996876. Sept. 200125. Juli 2002Muralidhar KrishnaprasadApparatus and method for mapping relational data and metadata to XML
US2002010003620. Sept. 200125. Juli 2002Patchlink.Com CorporationNon-invasive automatic offsite patch fingerprinting and updating system and method
US2002010382930. Jan. 20011. Aug. 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, program, and data structures for managing structured documents in a database
US2002010408010. Mai 20011. Aug. 2002Virtual Access Networks, Inc.Server based extraction, transfer, storage and processing of remote settings, files and data
US2002011022518. Jan. 200215. Aug. 2002Gary CullisAddress book for a voice message delivery method and system
US20020111928 *30. Jan. 200115. Aug. 2002Haddad Wadieh GeorgeSystem for processing document production orders over computer network
US2002012068510. Apr. 200229. Aug. 2002Alok SrivastavaSystem for dynamically invoking remote network services using service descriptions stored in a service registry
US2002012910712. März 200112. Sept. 2002Loughran Stephen A.Method and apparatus for automatic content handling
US2002013352319. Juli 200119. Sept. 2002Anthony AmblerMultilingual graphic user interface system and method
US2002014960111. Dez. 200117. Okt. 2002Vij RajarajanUser interface for managing multiple network resources
US200201567748. Apr. 200224. Okt. 2002Activeword Systems Inc.Semantic user interface
US200201567926. Dez. 200124. Okt. 2002Biosentients, Inc.Intelligent object handling device and method for intelligent object data in heterogeneous data environments with high data density and dynamic application needs
US2002016980210. Mai 200114. Nov. 2002International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for improving the performance of a web application by building only requested web pages only in a requested human language
US2002017595512. Juli 200228. Nov. 2002Arno GourdolGraphical user interface having contextual menus
US2002017818220. Sept. 200128. Nov. 2002Kuansan WangMarkup language extensions for web enabled recognition
US2002018424729. Mai 20025. Dez. 2002Jokela Sami SanteriMethod of data block aggregation
US2002018894112. Juni 200112. Dez. 2002International Business Machines CorporationEfficient installation of software packages
US2002019628117. Aug. 199926. Dez. 2002Kevin Forbes AudlemanGenerating a graphical user interface from a command syntax for managing multiple computer systems as one computer system
US2002019890927. Juni 200226. Dez. 2002Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for semantically labeling data and providing actions based on semantically labeled data
US2003000239129. Juni 20012. Jan. 2003Kevin BiggsSystem and method for customized time display
US2003000541129. Juni 20012. Jan. 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for dynamic packaging of component objects
US2003000948929. Mai 20029. Jan. 2003Griffin Steven K.Method for mining data and automatically associating source locations
US2003001474524. Juni 200216. Jan. 2003Mah John M.Document update method
US2003002572810. Juli 20016. Febr. 2003Ebbo David S.User control objects for providing server-side code generation from a user-defined dynamic web page content file
US20030046316 *18. Apr. 20016. März 2003Jaroslav GergicSystems and methods for providing conversational computing via javaserver pages and javabeans
US2003005091122. Okt. 200113. März 2003Mark LucovskySchema-based services for identity-based access to profile data
US200300512364. Sept. 200113. März 2003Pace Charles P.Method, system, and structure for distributing and executing software and data on different network and computer devices, platforms, and environments
US200300562075. Juni 200220. März 2003Claudius FischerProcess for deploying software from a central computer system to remotely located devices
US2003008179126. Okt. 20011. Mai 2003Hewlett-Packard Co.,Message exchange in an information technology network
US2003008391029. Aug. 20011. Mai 2003Mehmet SayalMethod and system for integrating workflow management systems with business-to-business interaction standards
US2003008413824. Okt. 20011. Mai 2003Groove Networks, Inc.Method and apparatus for managing software component downloads and updates
US200300973188. März 199922. Mai 2003Christopher C. YuMethod and apparatus for converting, formatting, and displaying currency values
US2003010119028. Juni 200229. Mai 2003Microsoft CorporationSchema-based notification service
US2003010120424. März 200129. Mai 2003Watson Todd E.Method for converting units of measurement
US2003010141625. Nov. 200229. Mai 2003Evolution Consulting Group PlcCreating XML documents
US2003010604015. Aug. 20025. Juni 2003Rubin Michael H.Parser, code generator, and data calculation and transformation engine for spreadsheet calculations
US2003011503921. Aug. 200119. Juni 2003Wang YeyiMethod and apparatus for robust efficient parsing
US200301210335. Dez. 200126. Juni 2003Peev Igor B.Installing software on a mobile computing device using the rollback and security features of a configuration manager
US2003012613624. Juni 20023. Juli 2003Nosa OmoiguiSystem and method for knowledge retrieval, management, delivery and presentation
US2003014030827. Sept. 200224. Juli 2003Ravi MurthyMechanism for mapping XML schemas to object-relational database systems
US2003015414427. Nov. 200214. Aug. 2003Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Integrating event-based production information with financial and purchasing systems in product manufacturing
US2003015884121. Nov. 200221. Aug. 2003Britton Colin P.Methods and apparatus for querying a relational data store using schema-less queries
US2003015885121. Nov. 200221. Aug. 2003Britton Colin P.Methods and apparatus for statistical data analysis and reduction for an enterprise application
US200301674454. März 20024. Sept. 2003Hong SuMethod and system of document transformation between a source extensible markup language (XML) schema and a target XML schema
US200301723436. März 200211. Sept. 2003Leymaster Mark HendricksMethods and systems for generating documents
US200301773418. Febr. 200218. Sept. 2003Sylvain DevillersSchema, syntactic analysis method and method of generating a bit stream based on a schema
US2003018239119. März 200225. Sept. 2003Mike LeberInternet based personal information manager
US200301920403. Apr. 20029. Okt. 2003Vaughan Robert D.System and method for obtaining software
US2003019593716. Apr. 200216. Okt. 2003Kontact Software Inc.Intelligent message screening
US200302125277. Mai 200213. Nov. 2003Microsoft CorporationMethod, system, and apparatus for converting numbers between measurement systems based upon semantically labeled strings
US2003022079523. Mai 200227. Nov. 2003Microsoft CorporationMethod, system, and apparatus for converting currency values based upon semantically lableled strings
US2003022959314. März 200311. Dez. 2003Michael RaleyRights expression profile system and method
US2003023333014. März 200318. Dez. 2003Contentguard Holdings, Inc.Rights expression profile system and method using templates
US2004000293928. Juni 20021. Jan. 2004Microsoft CorporationSchemaless dataflow within an XML storage solution
US200400033895. Juni 20021. Jan. 2004Microsoft CorporationMechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a local software application
US2004000656428. Juni 20028. Jan. 2004Lucovsky Mark H.Schema-based service for identity-based data access to category data
US2004000674124. Apr. 20038. Jan. 2004Radja Coumara D.System and method for efficient processing of XML documents represented as an event stream
US2004002487530. Juli 20025. Febr. 2004Microsoft CorporationSchema-based services for identity-based access to device data
US2004003999028. März 200326. Febr. 2004Xorbix Technologies, Inc.Automated form and data analysis tool
US2004004495930. Aug. 20024. März 2004Jayavel ShanmugasundaramSystem, method, and computer program product for querying XML documents using a relational database system
US200400686943. Okt. 20028. Apr. 2004Kaler Christopher G.Grouping and nesting hierarchical namespaces
US2004008321823. Okt. 200229. Apr. 2004An FengXML schema evolution
US200401338463. Jan. 20038. Juli 2004Ramin KhoshatefehInteractive system and method for graphical document generation
US2004014358115. Jan. 200322. Juli 2004Bohannon Philip L.Cost-based storage of extensible markup language (XML) data
US2004016500728. Okt. 199926. Aug. 2004Yahoo! Inc.Method of controlling an internet browser interface and a controllable browser interface
US200401998616. Aug. 20027. Okt. 2004Lucovsky Mark H.Schema-based services for identity-based data access to document data
US2004020186731. März 200314. Okt. 2004Seiichi KatanoMethod and system for providing updated help and solution information at a printing device
US2004023671710. März 200425. Nov. 2004Demartini Thomas M.Rights expression profile system and method
US2005005016414. Okt. 20043. März 2005Burd Gary S.Server-side control objects for processing client-side user interface elements
US200500553307. Juli 200410. März 2005Britton Colin P.Surveillance, monitoring and real-time events platform
US20050094850 *6. Dez. 20045. Mai 2005Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaLocation information recognition apparatus and method and recording medium
US2005010819524. Sept. 200419. Mai 2005Microsoft CorporationMethod, system, and apparatus for processing information based on the discovery of semantically labeled strings
US2005012031328. Dez. 20042. Juni 2005Rudd Michael L.System and method for personalizing an electrical device interface
US200501879266. Apr. 200525. Aug. 2005Metatomix, Inc.Methods and apparatus for querying a relational data store using schema-less queries
US20060173674 *31. März 20063. Aug. 2006Microsoft CorporationLanguage model sharing
CA2246920A110. Sept. 199810. März 2000Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada LimiteeAn activemark mechanism for a live parsing editor
EP0364180A26. Okt. 198918. Apr. 1990NeXT COMPUTER, INC.Method and apparatus for indexing files on a computer system
EP0481784A217. Okt. 199122. Apr. 1992Moore Business Forms, Inc.Form automation system
EP0598511A228. Okt. 199325. Mai 1994Canon Information Systems, Inc.A method and apparatus for remotely downloading and executing files in a memory
EP0810520B13. Mai 199723. Dez. 1998Sun Microsystems Inc.Dynamic linkable labels in a network browser page
EP0872827A28. Apr. 199821. Okt. 1998AT&amp;T Corp.System and method for providing remote automatic speech recognition services via a packet network
EP1093058A128. Sept. 200018. Apr. 2001Cloanto CorporationMethod and apparatus for processing text and character data
EP1280068A23. Juli 200229. Jan. 2003Microsoft CorporationApplication program interfaces for semantically labeling strings and providing actions based on semantically labeled strings
EP1361523A27. Mai 200312. Nov. 2003Microsoft CorporationConverting numbers between measurement systems based upon semantically labeled strings
EP1376392A230. Mai 20032. Jan. 2004Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for associating actions with semantic labels in electronic documents
EP1447754A12. Febr. 200418. Aug. 2004Microsoft CorporationLinking elements of a document to corresponding fields, queries and/or procedures in a database
EP1452966A318. Febr. 200411. Apr. 2007Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for enhancing the paste functionality of a software application
JP2002163250A Titel nicht verfügbar
WO1995007510A17. Sept. 199416. März 1995Jetform CorporationMethod and system for an electronic forms generation user interface
WO1999017240A12. Juni 19988. Apr. 1999Security First Technologies, Inc.Three tier financial transaction system with cache memory
WO2000054174A113. März 200014. Sept. 2000Sun Microsystems, Inc.Extending the capabilities of an xsl style sheet to include components for content transformation
WO2000073949A131. Mai 19997. Dez. 2000Eurosymbol LimitedComputer system
WO2001018687A11. Sept. 200015. März 2001Hedloey AtleMethod, system and computer readable medium for retrieving information
WO2001037170A215. Nov. 200025. Mai 2001Science Management CorporationForms creation method and e-commerce method
WO2001086390A24. Mai 200115. Nov. 2001Walker Digital, LlcMethod and system for providing a link in an electronic file being presented to a user
WO2002015518A216. Aug. 200121. Febr. 2002Filestream, Inc.End-to-end secure file transfer method and system
WO2002042928A121. Nov. 200130. Mai 2002Bisket Co., Ltd.Information processing system and method, and recorded medium on which information processing software is recorded
WO2002099627A12. Juli 200112. Dez. 2002Funmail, Inc.Text-to-animation process
WO2004012099A231. Juli 20035. Febr. 2004Adobe Systems IncorporatedGlyphlets
Nichtpatentzitate
Referenz
1"Altova markup your mind!" http://web.archive.org/web/20021204211721/http://altova.com/products—ide.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
2"Being ‘Smart’ with Smart Tags in Office XP", Create for Mississippi, Aug. 2001, http://www.create.cett.msstate.edu/create/howto/smart—tags.pdf, 7 pp.
3"BizTalk Server 2002 Compiling Maps", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts-2002/htm/lat-xmltools-map-concept-drgl.a..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
4"BizTalk Server 2002 Compiling Maps", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—drgl.a..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
5"BizTalk Server 2002 Mapper User Interface", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts-2002/htm/lat-xmltools-map-concept-codw..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
6"BizTalk Server 2002 Mapper User Interface", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—codw..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
7"BizTalk Server 2002 Testing Maps", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts-2002/htm/lat-xmltools-map-concept-fhhy.a..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
8"BizTalk Server 2002 Testing Maps", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—fhhy.a..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
9"BizTalk Server 2002 View Links and Functoids By Using Grid Preview", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts-2002/htm/lat-xmltools-map-check-fuwn.as..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
10"BizTalk Server 2002 View Links and Functoids By Using Grid Preview", http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—check—fuwn.as..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
11"Chapter 8-Standard Input and Output", http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/eiamjw/unix/chap8.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
12"Chapter 8—Standard Input and Output", http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/eiamjw/unix/chap8.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
13"Handout 38: Spell Checking, Word Counting, and Textual Analysis", http://courses.cs.emporia.edu/pheattch/courses/2002/cs501s02/hand38/, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
14"How to Use XSL to Transform Excel XML Spreadsheet for Server-Side Use", http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278976, Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-7.
15"InfoPath: Microsoft Names New Product from Office Group", http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2003/feb03/02-10infopath.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4.
16"Integrated Development Enviorment (IDE)", http://web.archive.org/web/20020602032242/http:altova.com/products—ide.html, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-2.
17"Integrating with External Systems: iPlanet(TM) Unified Development Server", Sun Microsystems, Inc., Ver. 5.0, Aug. 2001, pp. 127-156.
18"Integrating with External Systems: iPlanet™ Unified Development Server", Sun Microsystems, Inc., Ver. 5.0, Aug. 2001, pp. 127-156.
19"Intelligent Text Processing: About", http://www.syntalex.co.uk/about/about.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 1 pp.
20"Intelligent Text Processing: Automatic Cross-Referencing", http://www.syntalex.co.uk/services/acrl.html, download date Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp.
21"Intelligent Text Processing: Case Study: Context", http://www.syntalex.co.uk/casestudies/context.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp.
22"Microsoft BizTalk Server 2002-Using BizTalk Mapper", http://msdn.Microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts-2002/htm/lat-xmltools-map-intro-zkqb.asp..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
23"Microsoft BizTalk Server 2002—Using BizTalk Mapper", http://msdn.Microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—intro—zkqb.asp..., Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
24"Microsoft Extends XML Web Services Support in .NET Enterprise Servers Through Visual Studio .NET", http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/feb02/02-13servervspr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Feb. 2002, pp. 1-3.
25"Microsoft Measurement Converter Smart Tag—Chinese Version", http://www.jiyang.gov/cn/laiying/My%20Pictures/%E8%B4%E5%BA%86%E8%BE%89/office2003/FILES/PFI LES/COMMON/MSSHARED/SMARTTAG/CMEASURE/1033/CHMCABT.HTM, retrieved on Nov. 7, 2006, 2 pgs.
26"Microsoft Unveils Visual Studio.NET Enterprise Tools", Microsoft Corporation, http://microsoft.com/presspass/press/2001/may01/05-21vseepr.mspx, May 2001, pp. 1-4.
27"Module 123-Spell", http://duplex.hypermart.net/books/bsd/501-504.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
28"Module 123—Spell", http://duplex.hypermart.net/books/bsd/501-504.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
29"New Microsoft Office Family Application Taps Power of Industry-Standard XML", http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamilypr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-2.
30"Q&A: How ‘XDocs’ Alters the Paradigm for Gathering Business-Critical Information", http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamily.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4.
31"Q&A: How 'XDocs' Alters the Paradigm for Gathering Business-Critical Information", http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamily.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4.
32"Smart Tags: Dumb Technology?", webreference.com, Online, Aug. 29, 2001, http://www.webreference.com/xml/column30/3.html, 3 pp.
33"Spellout Command", Commands Reference, vol. 5, http://www.rz.uni-hohenheim.de/betriebssysteme/unix/aix/ aix-4.3.3-doc/base-doc/usr/ share/man/inf..., 1 page, publication date unknown.
34"Spellout Command", Commands Reference, vol. 5, http://www.rz.uni-hohenheim.de/betriebssysteme/unix/aix/ aix—4.3.3—doc/base—doc/usr/ share/man/inf..., 1 page, publication date unknown.
35"The Spatial Smart Tag", Geomatic Technologies, Mar. 10, 2005, 2 pp.
36"The StarOffice(TM) 6.0 Suite: New Features Guide", Sun Microsystems, V. 1.1, Jul. 2002, pp. 1-31.
37"The StarOffice™ 6.0 Suite: New Features Guide", Sun Microsystems, V. 1.1, Jul. 2002, pp. 1-31.
38"Using Flyswat", http://www.flywsat.com/using.html, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 1 pp.
39"What is Flyswat", http://www.flyswat.com, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 5 pp.
40"Word 2002 Add in: measurement Converter Smart Tag", http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=f67fc42c-5f41-4c3f-9d5a-71354471dc32&DisplayLang=en, retrieved on Nov. 9, 2006, 2 pgs.
41"XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes," W3C, May 2, 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/, pp. 1-146 (separated into 2 documents A & B).
42(Previously cited) Koyaku, H., "What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000", Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53 (with English language translation).
43A. Bonifati, "Active Behaviors within XML Document Management", EDBT Ph. D. Workshop, Mar. 2000, pp. 1-4.
44An XML framework for agent-based E-commerce; Robert J. Glushko, Jay M. Tenenbaum and Bart Meltzer; Commun. ACM 42, 3 (Mar. 1999) p. 106.
45Anonymous, "Adding Data from Other Sources in PowerPoint 2002," Jul. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420700, A Professional Approach Series the E-Zine Approach, http://www.glencoe.com/ps/computered/pas/article.php4?articleId-437, 8 pgs.
46Anonymous, "Moving and Copying Text Tutorial," Aug. 17, 2001, Internet Article, XP-002307566, http://tutorials.findtutorials.com/read/category/102/id/342/p/3, 4 pgs.
47Apple Data Detectors User's Manual, Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-15.
48Arbortext, "Arbortext and Accessibilty", http://web.archive.org/web/20021219133536/www.arbortext.com/html/accessibility.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-5.
49Arbortext, "Arbortext's Support for XSL-FO", http://web.archive.org/web/20021221021632/www.arbortext.com/html/xsl-fo.html. Dec. 2002, pp. 1-4.
50Arbortext, "Schemas", http://web.archive.org/web/20021221023148/www.arbortext.com/html/schemas.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
51Arbortext, "XML Compliance, 100% Pure XML", http:web.archive.org/web/20021209185855/www.arbortext.com/html/xml—compliance, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
52Australian First Examiner's Report dated Sep. 15, 2008 in Application No. 2003204379.
53Australian First Official Action dated Oct. 21, 2008 cited in Application No. 2003204800.
54Australian First Official Action Report dated Jan. 18, 2009 cited in Application No. 2004200459.
55Australian Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478.
56Australian Third Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478.
57Beitner, N.D.; Hall, W.; Goble, C.A., "Multimedia Support and Authoring in Microcosm: An Extended Model," Dept. of Electronics and Computer Science, Univ. of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK: Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK, pp. 1-12, publication date unknown.
58Bischof, Hans-Peter, "Spell, Spellin, Spellout-Finding Spelling Errors", http://www.vorlesungen.uni-osnabrueck.de/informatik/shellscript/Html/Man/-Man-NeXT-html/html..., Apr. 21, 1997, 2 pp.
59Bischof, Hans-Peter, "Spell, Spellin, Spellout—Finding Spelling Errors", http://www.vorlesungen.uni-osnabrueck.de/informatik/shellscript/Html/Man/—Man—NeXT—html/html..., Apr. 21, 1997, 2 pp.
60Blaheta et al., "Assigning Function Tags to Parsed Text," Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2000, pp. 234-240.
61Boone, "Concept Features in Re: Agent, An Intelligent Email Agent", Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, May 9-13, 1998, pp. 141-148.
62Bosak, "XML: The Universal Publishing Format", SGML/XML Europe '98, May 1998, pp. A1-C17.
63Brockschmidt, K., "Inside OLE, Second Edition", 1995, Microsoft Press, p. 169.
64Brooks-Bilson, "Programming ColdFusion" [electronic resource] 2001, Safari Tech Books Online, 1st Edition, 25 pp.
65C. Goldfarb, XML Handbook, 1st Ed., Pearson Education, Japan, May 10, 1999, pp. 246-254 (no English translation).
66C. Heinemann, "Cross-Reference your XML Data", Microsoft Corporation, Dec. 7, 1998, 6 pgs.
67Camarda, B., Special Editing Using® Microsoft® Office Word 2003, Que, Dec. 12, 2003, pp. 1-5.
68Chilean Second Office Action cited in Chilean Application No. 67-2005 (date unknown).
69Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jul. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 03143003.1.
70Chinese Final Rejection dated Mar. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 03145242.6.
71Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2008 cited in Application No. 03145242.6.
72Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 cited in Application No. 200410005390.8.
73Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4.
74Chinese Official Action dated Jan. 4, 2008 cited in Application No. 200510009487.0.
75Chinese Second Official Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4.
76Claris Em@iler Getting Started User's Guide, For Macintosh, Claris Corporation, 1995-1997, 61 pp.
77Clark, James, and DeRose, Steve, "XML Path Language (XPath), Version 1.0", W3C, http://web.archive.org/web/2021010034434/http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, 1999-2000, pp. 1-31.
78Clues: dynamic personalized message filtering; Matthew Marx and Chris Schmandt; Proceedings of the ACM 1996 conference on computer supported cooperative work (1996) p. 113-121.
79Command management system for next-generation user input; M. Tsai, P. Reiher and G.J. Popck; Proceedings of the seventh workshop on hottopics in operating systems. (1999) p. 17984.
80Constructing, organizing, and visualizing collections of tropically related Web resources; Loren Terveen, Will Hill and Brian Amento; ACM Trans. Comput.-um. Interact 6, 1 (Mar. 1999) p. 67-94.
81Corel, "Corel XMetal 4 and Interwoven TeamXML", http://web.archive.org/web/20030807211225/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+xml+4+and+interwoven+teamxml.pdf , Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2.
82Corel, "Corel XMetal4, Making XML Content Creation Easy", http://web.archive.org/web/20031118215158/www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename, Nov. 2003, pp. 1-2.
83Corel, "The Corel-XyEnterprise XML Solution", http://web.archive.org/web/20030807154355/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+and+XY+enterprise+XML+solution.pdf, Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2.
84Corel® Office Professional 7 Quick Results User's Manual, vol. 1, Version 7.0 (first printing), Corel Corporation, Limited, pp. 1-531, publication date unknown.
85Cornell, Paul, "Developing Smart Tag DLLs", MSDN Library, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsmarttag/html/odc—smarttags.asp, Apr. 2001, pp. 8.
86D. Obasanjo, "XML—Namespaces and How They Affect Xpath and XSLT", Microsoft Corporation, May 20, 2002, 19 pgs.
87D. Richter, "Windows for professionals" (Win32 API programming for Windows NT 3.5 and Windows 95, translation from English, Moscow: Russian Edition, 1995, ISBN 5-7502-0010-8, pp. 26, 31, 215.
88David D. Lewis et al., "A Sequential Algorithm for Training Text Classifiers," Spring-Verlag New York, Inc., 1994, pp. 1-10.
89Design methodology and formal validation of hypermedia documents; C.A.S. Santos, L.F.G Soares, G.L. de Souza and J.P. Courtiat; Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on multimedia, (1998) p. 39-48.
90Devanbue, P. et al., "Chime: customizable hyperlink insertion and maintenance engine for software engineering environments", Software Engineering, Publication date: 1999, ISBN: 1-58113-07400.
91Developer's Guide To Apple Data Detectors, For Version 1.0.2., Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 3, 7-9 16-33.
92Driza, Scott, "Learn Word 2000 VBA Document Automation", Wordware Publishing Inc., 2001, 6 pp.
93Dynamic hyperlink generation for navigation in relational databases; Karl M. Goschka and Jurgen FalbProceedings of the tenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots (1999) p. 23-24.
94European Communication dated Apr. 19, 2006 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527.
95European Communication dated Dec. 11, 2006 in EP 03 012 830.0-2211.
96European Communication dated Feb. 16, 2007 cited in European Application No. 04 003 683.2-2211.
97European Communication dated Jun. 3, 2008 cited in European Application No. 03 011 851.7-2211.
98European Communication dated Mar. 18, 2009 cited in European Application No. 04003683.2-2211.
99European Communication dated Nov. 17, 2006 in EP 03 011 851.7-2211.
100European Communication dated Nov. 9, 2006 in EP 03010292.5.
101European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2006 in EP 03 01 4181.
102European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2007 cited in European Application No. 03 014 181.6-1243.
103European Communication Minutes of Oral Proceedings and Decision dated Sep. 15, 2008 in European Application No. 05 000 506.5-1527.
104European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 10, 2008 in EP 03 01 0292.5-1527.
105European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 4, 2008 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527.
106European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated May 7, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6.
107European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 02 014 717.9-1527.
108European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 03 012 432.5-1527.
109European Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2007 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527.
110European Preliminary Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6-1527 / 1447754.
111European Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2006 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527.
112European Statement regarding Grounds of Appeal dated Jan. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 04 002 224.6.
113European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Aug. 5, 2009 cited in Application No. 03003931.7.
114European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Feb. 26, 2009 cited in European Application No. 0301283.0-2211.
115European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 20, 2009 cited in European Application No. 03012830.0.
116Exploring the applications user-expertise assessment for intelligent interfaces; Michel C. Desmarais and Jiming Liu; Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, (1993) p. 308-313.
117Fan et al., "FormPlus: A Form Authoring Toolkit", Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oct. 31, 1990-Nov. 2, 1990, pp. 255-260.
118Flanagan, D., "JavaScript—The Definitive Guide, Fourth Edition", Jan. 2002, O'Reilly, 12 pp.
119Frye, C., Microsoft Office Systems: Step by Step, Microsoft Press, 2003 Edition, Sep. 3, 2003, pp. 1-6.
120Future directions in user-computer interface software, James D. Foley; Conference proceedings on organizational computer systems. (1991) p. 289-297.
121G. Falquet et al., "Design and Analysis of Active Hypertext Views on Databases", Information Sciences Institute, Jan. 2002, pp. 1-24.
122Getting Results With Microsoft® Office 97, Real World Solutions For The Work You Do, Microsoft Corporation, 1995-1997, pp. 1-703.
123Ghamrawi et al., "Collective Multi-Label Classification," ACM, 2005, pp. 195-200.
124Glover et al., "Inferring hierarchical Descriptions," ACM, 2002, pp. 507-514.
125Hara, T. et al., "Inside Microsoft.NET-Complete Explanation, ‘What Microsoft Aims For’", msdn magazine, No. 6, pp. 20-35, ASCII, Japan, Sep. 18, 2000, 19 pp.
126Harmon, D., "Microsoft MapPoint 2002", Geoworld Quick-Take Reviews, Aug. 2001, 3 pp.
127Harold, E.R., "XML: Extensible Markup Language", IDG Books Worldwide, Books 24×7.com printout, 1998, pp. 1-11.
128Hewkin, "Smart Tags—the Distributed-Memory Resolution", IEE Review, Jun. 22, 1989, pp. 203-206.
129Homer, Alex et al., Professional Active Services Pages, 1997, Wrox Press Ltd., Section"Client-Side Scripting and Components", subsection "Choosing Your Applets, and Controls", 16 pp.
130How to personalize the Web; Rob Barrett, Paul P. Maglio and Daniel C. Kellem; Conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems (1997) p. 75-82.
131Human-computer interface development: concepts and systems for its management; H. Rex Hartson and Deborah Hix; ACM Comput. Surv. I (Mar. 1989) p. 5-92.
132IBM Corporation, "IBM Research Disclosure #368; Multimedia Hyperlinks Automatically Created For Reference Documents," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jun. 1993, pp. 1-5.
133IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, "National Language Support Enhancement for Culture-Specific Options", Nov. 1, 1993, vol. 36, Issue 11, pp. 629-638.
134InfoCentral(TM) 7, User's Manual, Corel Corporation, vol. 1, Version 7.0, 1996, pp. 1-86.
135InfoCentral™ 7, User's Manual, Corel Corporation, vol. 1, Version 7.0, 1996, pp. 1-86.
136Integrating computer technology, people technology; strategies and case studies from Georgia Tech's Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center: Jim Foley: Proceedings of the workshop on advanced visual interfaces. (1994) p. 3443.
137Interface and execution models in the fluke kernel, Bryan Ford, Mike Hibler, Jay Lepreau, Roland McGrath and Patrick Tullman; Proceedings of the third symposium on operating systems design and implementation (1999) p. 10-1115.
138Irie R. et al., "Resources for Place Name Analysis", May 28, 2004, 4 pp.
139Ispell 4, "Ispell-Format of Ispell Dictionaries and Affix Files", http://www.bigbiz.com/cgi-bin/manpage?4+ispell, 11 pp., publication date unknown.
140Ispell 4, "Ispell—Format of Ispell Dictionaries and Affix Files", http://www.bigbiz.com/cgi-bin/manpage?4+ispell, 11 pp., publication date unknown.
141Ivens, K., Office XP Smart Tags, Microsoft, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 1-4.
142Japanese Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-161338.
143Japanese Final Official Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 cited in Application No. 2002-207514.
144Japanese Final Rejection dated Apr. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 2002-207514.
145Japanese Final Rejection dated Mar. 17, 2009 cited in Application No. 2004-037158.
146Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2002-207514.
147Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008 cited in Application No. 2004-037158.
148Japanese Official Action dated Apr. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417.
149Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 13, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-162911.
150Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-161338.
151Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-180218.
152Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 28, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-178497.
153Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2004-042140.
154Japanese Official Action dated May 26, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005-039754.
155Japanese Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417.
156Japanese Official Notice of Final Rejection dated Oct. 2, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-162911.
157Johnson, L., "What's So Special About Paste Special?", Jun. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420702, http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=40, 5 pgs.
158Keunning, Geoff, "International Spell", http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff.ispell.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
159Korean Official Action dated Sep. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. 10-2003-40988.
160Koyaku, H., "What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000", Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53.
161Kristensen, "Template Resolution in XML/HTML", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 30, 1998, pp. 239-249.
162Kuenning, Geoff, "Using ISPELL from Emacs", http://theochem.ki.ku.dk/on-line-docs/ispell/ispell-1.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
163Kuenning, Geoff, "Using ISPELL from Emacs", http://theochem.ki.ku.dk/on—line—docs/ispell/ispell—1.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
164M. Fernandez et al., "SilkRoute: trading between relations and XML", Computer Networks, vol. 33, No. 1-6, Jun. 2000, pp. 723-745.
165M. Stowe, "XML in Excel and the Spreadsheet Component", Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2001, 6 pgs.
166Malaysian Examination Report dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. PI 20040559.
167Malaysian Official Action dated Aug. 29, 2008 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20031902.
168Malaysian Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2007 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20040265.
169Marais, Hannes, "Supporting Cooperative and Personal Surfing With a Desktop Assistant", 1997, ACM Press, pp. 129-138.
170Martensson, Bengt, "Thread-Enhanced Spell Front End for GNU Emacs + Detex + Delatex", http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/337/1987/8/0/1871981/, Aug. 20, 1987, 1 page.
171McMahon, Lee. E., "SED-A Non-Interactive Text Editor," Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, Aug. 15, 1978, pp. 1-19.
172McMahon, Lee. E., "SED—A Non-Interactive Text Editor," Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, Aug. 15, 1978, pp. 1-19.
173Measuring Units Conversion Table—http://web.archie.org- 1997 Internet French Property, pp. 1-4.
174Menu Customizing, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1991, pp. 91-92 (4 pp. total).
175Mexican Official Action dated Feb. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. PA/a/2003/005451.
176Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, p. 409, Apr. 9, 2004.
177Mueller, Jennifer M., "Work Smarter with Smart Tags", Journal of Accounting-Online, vol. 194, No. 5, Nov. 2002, http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/nov2002/Mueller.htm>, retrieved on Apr. 22, 2005.
178Mueller, Jennifer M., "Work Smarter with Smart Tags", Journal of Accounting—Online, vol. 194, No. 5, Nov. 2002, http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/nov2002/Mueller.htm>, retrieved on Apr. 22, 2005.
179Nardi, Bonnie A.; Miller, James R.; Wright, David J., "Collaborative, Programmable Intelligent Agents," Jim Miller/Miramontes Computing, Apple Computer Advanced Technology Group, http://www.miramontes.com/writing/add-cacm/add-cacm/html, Mar. 1998, pp. 1-11.
180Norwegian Official Action dated Aug. 24, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003 2550.
181Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 16-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1993-1997, pp. 1-231.
182Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 32-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1998, pp. 1-318.
183Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.calpoly.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell+1, 1994, 3 pp.
184Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.physics.umn,edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell, 1994, 5 pp.
185Perceptual user interfaces: perceptual intelligence; Alex Pentland; Commun. ACM 43,3 (Mar. 2000) p. 35-44.
186Perry, Brad, et al., "Discovering Similar Resources by Content Park-Linking", Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, published by ACM Press 1997, pp. 317-324.
187Pershikov, V.I., "Explanatory Dictionary in Informatics," Finances and Statistics, Moscow, 1991 (in Russian with translated sections) 5 pgs.
188Pixley, "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification Version 1.0", World Wide Web Consortium, Nov. 13, 2000, www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf.
189Polish Official Action dated Aug. 27, 2008 in Polish Application No. P360520.
190Polish Official Action dated Jul. 21, 2008 cited in Polish Application No. P 364854.
191Polish Official Letter dated Jun. 24, 2008 cited Polish Application No. P 365553.
192Polish Official Notice dated Aug. 25, 2009 cited in Application No. P.365553/DP.
193Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 22, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 364854/DP.
194Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 360520/DP.
195Polish Second Official Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 in Polish Application No. P36553.
196Putting People First: Specifying Proper Names in Speech Interfaces; Matt Marx and Chris Schmandt; Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology; 1994; pp. 29-37.
197Quin, Liam, "Extensible Markup Language (XML)", W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/2002121962057/http://www.w3.org/XML/, 1996-2002, pp. 1-3.
198Rajabifard, A. et al., "Creating an Enabling Platform for the Delivery of Spatial Information", Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial Conference, Sep. 12, 2005, 10 pp.
199Rice, F.C., "Transform XML Files with XSLT When Importing into Microsoft Excel 2002," Jul. 2001, Internet article, XP-002420701, http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa140055(office.10.d=printer).aspx, 9 pgs.
200Rubin, C., "Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual", First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217.
201Rubin, Charles, "Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual," First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217.
202Russian Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004105880/09(006292).
203Russian Official Action dated Jun. 21, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005104223/09(005505).
204Russian Official Action dated Mar. 13, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004104096/09(004398).
205Russian Official Action dated Oct. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2003118722.
206S. Ceri et al., "Deriving Production Rules for Incremental View Maintenance", Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Sep. 1991, pp. 577-589.
207S. Tanaka, "Verifying the XML Schema Definition," XML Magazine, Shoeisha Co., Ltd., vol. 10, No. 3, Jul. 1, 2000, pp. 135-155 (no English translation).
208Schulz, Charles, "Writing Applications for Uniform Operation on a Mainframe or PC: A Metric Conversion Program", Lockheed Missles & Space Company, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, May 1990, pp. 348-361.
209Shiroiwa, K., "iMac&iBook, Must-see for User, Full of Recommended Setting Methods and Specially Selected Tips, Mastering Mac OS9", MacPeople, ASCII Corporation, Japan, Dec. 3, 1999, vol. 5, No. 24, p. 50 (in Japanese—no translation yet).
210Singapore Examination Reported (conducted by Austrian Patent Office) dated Jan. 25, 2008 cited in SG Application No. 200500214-2.
211Singapore Search Report/Written Opinion dated Jan. 26, 2007 in SG 200500214-2.
212Sperberg-McQueen, C.M. and Thompson, Henry, "XML Schema", W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/20020802155904/http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema, 2000-2002, pp. 1-10.
213Sriram, V., "ComponentXchange: An E-Exchange for Software Components", Master Thesis, CitSeer, May 2001, pp. i-v, 1-77.
214Takkinen et al., "CAFÉ: A Conceptual Model for Managing Information in Electronic Mail", Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998, pp. 44-53.
215Technique for Automatically Correcting Words in Text; Karen Kukich;ACM Comput. Surv., 24, 4 (Dec. 1992); pp. 377-439.
216Textual context analysis for information retrieval; Mark A. Stairmand; Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (1997) p. 140-147.
217The Complete LINUX(TM) Operating System 5.2 Deluxe, Red Hat,® Macmillian Digital Publishing USA, A Viacom Company, Red Hat Software, Inc., ISBN 1-57595-199-1B, 1995-1998, pp. 1-385.
218The Complete LINUX™ Operating System 5.2 Deluxe, Red Hat,® Macmillian Digital Publishing USA, A Viacom Company, Red Hat Software, Inc., ISBN 1-57595-199-1B, 1995-1998, pp. 1-385.
219Toth, V., "Visual C++ 4 Unleashed", 1996, Sams Publishing, p. 174.
220Towers, J. Tarin, Visual Quickstart Guide: Dreamweaver 2 for Windows and Macintosh, 1999, Peachpit Press, pp. 150-151.
221U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411, filed Jun. 6, 2000, entitled "Method and System for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings."
222U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled "Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database."
223U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266, filed Apr. 24, 2001, entitled "Method and System for Providing Electronic Commerce Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings."
224U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled "Application Program Interfaces for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings."
225U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled "Method and System for Providing Restricted Actions for Recognized Semantic Categories."
226U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418, filed Jul. 17, 2001, entitled "Method and System for Defining Semantic Categories and Actions."
227U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544, filed May 7, 2002, entitled "Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Between Measurement Systems Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings."
228U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712, filed May 9, 2002, entitled "Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Dates Between Calendars and Languages Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings."
229U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630, filed May 23, 2002, entitled "Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings."
230U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680, filed May 23, 2002, entitled "Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Currency Values Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings."
231U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, entitled "Mechanism for Downloading Software Components from a Remote Source for Use by a Local Software Application".
232U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,960, filed Jun. 6, 2002, entitled "Providing Contextually Sensitive Actions and Help Content in Computer-Generated Documents".
233U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680, filed Jun. 24, 2002, entitled "System and Method for Incorporating Smart Tags in Online Content."
234U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled "Method and System for Dynamically Providing Actions Associated with Semantically Labeled Strings."
235U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810, filed Jun. 25, 2002, enitled "Method, System, and Apparatus for Performing Custom Actions on Digital Content."
236U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled "System and Method for Issuing a Message to a Program", Inventors: Sawicki et al.
237U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled "System and Method for Providing Namespace Related Information".
238U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled "Method and System for Associating Actions with Semantic Labels in Electronic Documents."
239U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141, filed Feb. 13, 2003, entitled "Linking Elements of a Document to Corresponding Fields, Queries and/or Procedures in a Database".
240U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258, filed Feb. 28, 2003, entitled "Method and System for Enhancing Paste Functionality of a Computer Software Application".
241U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446, filed Apr. 29, 2003, Feinberg et al.
242U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267, filed Jun. 27, 2003, entitled "Leveraging Markup Language Data for Semantically Labeling Text Strings and Data and for Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Text Strings and Data".
243U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899, filed Dec. 9, 2003, entitled "Mechanism for Downloading Components Associated with XML Documents and Smart Documents".
244U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376, filed Feb. 17, 2004, entitled "Methods and Systems for Providing Automatic Actions on Recognized Text Strings in a Computer-Generated Document".
245U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,937, filed Apr. 3, 2006, entitled "Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database".
246U.S. Appl. No. 11/924,856, filed Oct. 26, 2007 entitled "Providing Contextually Sensitive Tools and Help Content in Computer-Generated Documents".
247U.S. Examiner's Answer BPAI dated Jun. 5, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
248U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
249U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
250U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
251U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
252U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
253U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
254U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
255U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
256U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,960.
257U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
258U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
259U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376.
260U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
261U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
262U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
263U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
264U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
265U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
266U.S. Final Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
267U.S. Final Official Action dated Aug. 18, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
268U.S. Final Official Action dated Dec. 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
269U.S. Final Official Action dated Jul. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
270U.S. Final Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
271U.S. Final Official Action dated May 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
272U.S. Final Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
273U.S. Final Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
274U.S. Final Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
275U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
276U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
277U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
278U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
279U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
280U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
281U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
282U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
283U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
284U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
285U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
286U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
287U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
288U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376.
289U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
290U.S. Office Action dated May 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
291U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
292U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
293U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
294U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
295U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
296U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,439.
297U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
298U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
299U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
300U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
301U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
302U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 5, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
303U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 8, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,960.
304U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
305U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
306U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 9, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,960.
307U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
308U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
309U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 20, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
310U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 29, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
311U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
312U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
313U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 12, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
314U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 16, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
315U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
316U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
317U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
318U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
319U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
320U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
321U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
322U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
323U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
324U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
325U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 26, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
326U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 5, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,717.
327U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 15, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
328U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
329U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
330U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
331U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
332U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
333U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
334U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260.
335U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 1, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
336U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
337U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
338U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
339U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
340U.S. Official Action dated May 14, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
341U.S. Official Action dated May 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
342U.S. Official Action dated May 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
343U.S. Official Action dated May 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
344U.S. Official Action dated May 31, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
345U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
346U.S. Official Action dated May 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
347U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 10, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260.
348U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680.
349U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
350U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 22, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
351U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
352U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 4, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
353U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
354U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
355U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
356U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
357U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 28, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
358U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
359U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 7, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
360U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
361U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
362U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 4, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
363U.S. Official Action mailed Feb. 15, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
364U.S. Official Action mailed Mar. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
365U.S. Official Action mailed May 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
366U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
367U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
368U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
369U.S. Official Action mailed Sep. 8, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
370User Manual For AddressMate and AddressMate Plus, CoStar Corporation, AddressMate Software, 1994-1995, pp. 1-210.
371V. Braganholo, "Updating Relational Databases Through XML Views", Technical Report, Sep. 2002, pp. 1-61.
372V. Doroth et al., "Modern Computer Vocabulary," St. Petersburg, BHV-Peterburg, 2001, p. 465 (with English language translation).
373Wei Ying-bin et al., "A New Technology ColdFusion of Realizing Dynamic Webpage," 2000, 6 pgs. (English language translation, pp. 1-6).
374Wilker, John, "ColdFusion MX Adds J2EE, XML, and Web Services Compatibility", Aug. 9, 2002, http://builder.com.com/5102-6387-104585.html, 3 pp.
375Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), "User Commands", http://www.csee.usf.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?ispell, 1983, 18 pp.
376Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), http://www.rt.com/man/findaffix.1.html, 1983, 15 pp.
377World Wide Web Consortium, "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification, Version 1.0", http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Core-20001113/DOM2-Core.pdf, Nov. 2000, 107 pp.
378World Wide Web Consortium, "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification, Version 1.0", http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf, Nov. 2000, 50 pp.
Referenziert von
Zitiert von PatentEingetragen Veröffentlichungsdatum Antragsteller Titel
US78275469. Dez. 20032. Nov. 2010Microsoft CorporationMechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a local software application
US82961424. März 201123. Okt. 2012Google Inc.Speech recognition using dock context
US835224531. März 20118. Jan. 2013Google Inc.Adjusting language models
US835224630. Sept. 20118. Jan. 2013Google Inc.Adjusting language models
US839670930. Sept. 201112. März 2013Google Inc.Speech recognition using device docking context
US841274916. Jan. 20092. Apr. 2013Google Inc.Populating a structured presentation with new values
US845279116. Jan. 200928. Mai 2013Google Inc.Adding new instances to a structured presentation
US861570716. Jan. 200924. Dez. 2013Google Inc.Adding new attributes to a structured presentation
US8688747 *31. Okt. 20071. Apr. 2014Wtviii, Inc.Schema framework and method and apparatus for normalizing schema
US870670826. Okt. 200722. Apr. 2014Microsoft CorporationProviding contextually sensitive tools and help content in computer-generated documents
US8751217 *29. Sept. 201110. Juni 2014Google Inc.Multi-modal input on an electronic device
US89244361. Apr. 201330. Dez. 2014Google Inc.Populating a structured presentation with new values
US895908230. Nov. 201117. Febr. 2015Elwha LlcContext-sensitive query enrichment
US897764516. Jan. 200910. März 2015Google Inc.Accessing a search interface in a structured presentation
US903183022. Dez. 201012. Mai 2015Google Inc.Multi-modal input on an electronic device
US904787029. Sept. 20112. Juni 2015Google Inc.Context based language model selection
US90764455. Dez. 20127. Juli 2015Google Inc.Adjusting language models using context information
US9251791 *9. Juni 20142. Febr. 2016Google Inc.Multi-modal input on an electronic device
US925669827. Febr. 20129. Febr. 2016Wtviii, Inc.System for creating and editing mark up language forms and documents
US941236524. März 20159. Aug. 2016Google Inc.Enhanced maximum entropy models
US949512722. Dez. 201015. Nov. 2016Google Inc.Language model selection for speech-to-text conversion
US954294510. Juni 201510. Jan. 2017Google Inc.Adjusting language models based on topics identified using context
US956943930. Nov. 201114. Febr. 2017Elwha LlcContext-sensitive query enrichment
US9576066 *12. März 201421. Febr. 2017Captora Inc.Webpage form optimization
US959483122. Juni 201214. März 2017Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcTargeted disambiguation of named entities
US20080052325 *31. Okt. 200728. Febr. 2008Wtviii, Inc.Schema framework and method and apparatus for normalizing schema
US20100185651 *16. Jan. 200922. Juli 2010Google Inc.Retrieving and displaying information from an unstructured electronic document collection
US20100268793 *11. Mai 201021. Okt. 2010Microsoft CorporationMethod and System for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings
US20140288929 *9. Juni 201425. Sept. 2014Google Inc.Multi-Modal Input on an Electronic Device
US20150039622 *12. März 20145. Febr. 2015Srihari P. Sampath-KumarWebpage Form Optimization
Klassifizierungen
US-Klassifikation704/9, 704/251, 715/221, 715/223, 715/224, 715/222, 704/231, 715/226, 704/1, 715/225
Internationale KlassifikationG06F17/24, G10L15/10, G10L15/00, G06K9/20, G10L15/26, G10L15/18, G06F17/27, G10L15/28, G06K9/00
UnternehmensklassifikationG06F17/271, G06K9/2054, G06F17/243, G06K2209/01
Europäische KlassifikationG06F17/27A2, G06F17/24F, G06K9/20R
Juristische Ereignisse
DatumCodeEreignisBeschreibung
24. Apr. 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REYNAR, JEFF;REEL/FRAME:011738/0101
Effective date: 20010419
28. Jan. 2014FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
9. Dez. 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034541/0001
Effective date: 20141014