US9652042B2 - Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures - Google Patents
Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9652042B2 US9652042B2 US12/705,113 US70511310A US9652042B2 US 9652042 B2 US9652042 B2 US 9652042B2 US 70511310 A US70511310 A US 70511310A US 9652042 B2 US9652042 B2 US 9652042B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- hand
- user
- hypothesis
- computer
- window
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/017—Gesture based interaction, e.g. based on a set of recognized hand gestures
-
- G06K9/00355—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V40/00—Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
- G06V40/20—Movements or behaviour, e.g. gesture recognition
- G06V40/28—Recognition of hand or arm movements, e.g. recognition of deaf sign language
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
- G06F13/10—Program control for peripheral devices
- G06F13/105—Program control for peripheral devices where the programme performs an input/output emulation function
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/02—Input arrangements using manually operated switches, e.g. using keyboards or dials
- G06F3/023—Arrangements for converting discrete items of information into a coded form, e.g. arrangements for interpreting keyboard generated codes as alphanumeric codes, operand codes or instruction codes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/03—Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
- G06F3/033—Pointing devices displaced or positioned by the user, e.g. mice, trackballs, pens or joysticks; Accessories therefor
- G06F3/038—Control and interface arrangements therefor, e.g. drivers or device-embedded control circuitry
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to controlling a computer system, and more particularly to a system and method to implement alternative modalities for controlling computer application programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands.
- a user interface facilitates the interaction between a computer and computer user by enhancing the user's ability to utilize application programs.
- the traditional interface between a human user and a typical personal computer is implemented with graphical displays and is generally referred to as a graphical user interface (GUI).
- GUI graphical user interface
- Input to the computer or particular application program is accomplished through the presentation of graphical information on the computer screen and through the use of a keyboard and/or mouse, trackball or other similar implements.
- Many systems employed for use in public areas utilize touch screen implementations whereby the user touches a designated area of a screen to effect the desired input.
- Airport electronic ticket check-in kiosks and rental car direction systems are examples of such systems. There are, however, many applications where the traditional user interface is less practical or efficient.
- the traditional computer interface is not ideal for a number of applications.
- Providing stand-up presentations or other type of visual presentations to large audiences is but one example.
- a presenter generally stands in front of the audience and provides a verbal dialog in conjunction with the visual presentation that is projected on a large display or screen.
- Manipulation of the presentation by the presenter is generally controlled through use of awkward remote controls, which frequently suffer from inconsistent and less precise operation, or require the cooperation of another individual.
- Traditional user interfaces require the user either to provide input via the keyboard or to exhibit a degree of skill and precision more difficult to implement with a remote control than a traditional mouse and keyboard.
- Other examples include control of video, audio, and display components of a media room.
- Switching between sources, advancing fast fast-forward, rewinding, changing chapters, changing volume, etc., can be very cumbersome in a professional studio as well as in the home.
- traditional interfaces are not well suited for smaller, specialized electronic gadgets.
- WIMP Window, Icon, Menu, Pointing device (or Pull-down menu) interfaces allow fairly non-trivial operations to be performed with a few mouse motions and clicks.
- this shift in the user interaction from a primarily text-oriented experience to a point-and-click experience has erected new barriers between people with disabilities and the computer.
- using the mouse can be quite challenging.
- Perceptual user interfaces utilize alternate sensing modalities, such as the capability of sensing physical gestures of the user, to replace or complement traditional input devices such as the mouse and keyboard.
- Perceptual user interfaces promise modes of fluid computer-human interaction that complement and/or replace the mouse and keyboard, particularly in non-desktop applications such as control for a media room.
- gestures play a symbolic communication role similar to speech, suggesting that for simple tasks gesture may enhance or replace speech recognition.
- Small gestures near the keyboard or mouse do not induce fatigue as quickly as sustained whole arm postures.
- Previous studies indicate that users find gesture-based systems highly desirable, but that users are also dissatisfied with the recognition accuracy of gesture recognizers.
- experimental results indicate that a user's difficulty with gestures is in part due to a lack of understanding of how gesture recognition works. The studies highlight the ability of users to learn and remember gestures as an important design consideration.
- Gestures may compensate for the limitations of the mouse when the display is several times larger than a typical display. In such a scenario, gestures can provide mechanisms to restore the ability to quickly reach any part of the display, where once a mouse was adequate with a small display. Similarly, in a multiple display scenario it is desirable to have a fast comfortable way to indicate a particular display. For example, the foreground object may be “bumped” to another display by gesturing in the direction of the target display.
- perceptual user interfaces to date are dependent on significant limiting assumptions.
- One type of perceptual user interface utilizes color models that make certain assumptions about the color of an object. Proper operation of the system is dependent on proper lighting conditions and can be negatively impacted when the system is moved from one location to another as a result of changes in lighting conditions, or simply when the lighting conditions change in the room. Factors that impact performance include sun light versus artificial light, florescent light versus incandescent light, direct illumination versus indirect illumination, and the like.
- most attempts to develop perceptual user interfaces require the user to wear specialized devices such as gloves, headsets, or close-talk microphones. The use of such devices is generally found to be distracting and intrusive for the user.
- perceptual user interfaces have been slow to emerge. The reasons include heavy computational burdens, unreasonable calibration demands, required use of intrusive and distracting devices, and a general lack of robustness outside of specific laboratory conditions. For these and similar reasons, there has been little advancement in systems and methods for exploiting perceptual user interfaces. However, as the trend towards smaller, specialized electronic gadgets continues to grow, so does the need for alternate methods for interaction between the user and the electronic device. Many of these specialized devices are too small and the applications unsophisticated to utilize the traditional input keyboard and mouse devices. Examples of such devices include TabletPCs, Media center PCs, kiosks, hand held computers, home appliances, video games, and wall sized displays, along with many others. In these, and other applications, the perceptual user interface provides a significant advancement in computer control over traditional computer interaction modalities.
- gestures may offer significant bits of functionality where they are needed most. For example, dismissing a notification window may be accomplished by a quick gesture to the one side or the other, as in shooing a fly.
- gestures for “next” and “back” functionality found in web browsers, presentation programs (e.g., PowerPointTM) and other applications. Note that in many cases the surface forms of these various gestures may remain the same throughout these examples, while the semantics of the gestures depends on the application at hand. Providing a small set of standard gestures eases problems users have in recalling how gestures are performed, and also allows for simpler and more robust signal processing and recognition processes.
- the present invention relates to a system and methodology to implement a perceptual user interface comprising alternative modalities for controlling computer application programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands.
- a perceptual user interface system is provided that detects and tracks hand and/or object movements, and provides for the control of application programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to hand or object movements performed by the user.
- the system operates in real time, is robust, responsive, and introduces a reduced computational load due to “lightweight” sparse stereo image processing by not imaging every pixel, but only a reduced representation of image pixels. That is, the depth at every pixel in the image is not computed, which is the typical approach in conventional correlation-based stereo systems.
- the present invention utilizes the depth information at specific locations in the image that correspond to object hypotheses.
- the system provides a relatively inexpensive capability for the recognition of hand gestures.
- Mice are particularly suited to fine cursor control, and most users have much experience with them.
- the disclosed invention can provide a secondary, coarse control that may complement mice in some applications. For example, in a map application, the user might cause the viewpoint to change with a gesture, while using the mouse to select and manipulate particular objects in the view.
- the present invention may also provide a natural “push-to-talk” or “stop-listening” signal to speech recognition processes. Users were shown to prefer using a perceptual user interface for push-to-talk.
- the invention combines area cursors with gesture-based manipulation of on-screen objects, and may be configured to be driven by gross or fine movements, and may be helpful to people with limited manual dexterity.
- a multiple hypothesis tracking framework allows for the detection and tracking of multiple objects.
- tracking of both hands may be considered for a two-handed interface.
- Two-handed interfaces are often used to specify spatial relationships that are otherwise more difficult to describe in speech. For example, it is natural to describe the relative sizes of objects by holding up two hands, or to specify how an object (dominant hand) is to be moved with respect to its environment (non-dominant hand).
- a system that facilitates the processing of computer-human interaction in response to multiple input modalities.
- the system processes commands in response to hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands, or in addition to traditional computer-human interaction modalities such as a keyboard and mouse.
- the user interacts with the computer and controls the application through a series of hand gestures, or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands, but is also free to operate the system with traditional interaction devices when more appropriate.
- the system and method provide for certain actions to be performed in response to particular verbal commands. For example, a verbal command “Close” may be used to close a selected window and a verbal command “Raise” may be used to bring the window to the forefront of the display.
- the present invention facilitates adapting the system to the particular preferences of an individual user.
- the system and method allow the user to tailor the system to recognize specific hand gestures and verbal commands and to associate these hand gestures and verbal commands with particular actions to be taken. This capability allows different users, which may prefer to make different motions for a given command, the ability to tailor the system in a way most efficient for their personal use. Similarly, different users can choose to use different verbal commands to perform the same function. For example, one user may choose to say “Release” to stop moving a window while another may wish to say “Quit”.
- dwell time is used as an alternative modality to complement gestures or verbal commands.
- Dwell time is the length of time an input device pointer remains in a particular position (or location of the GUI), and is controlled by the user holding one hand stationary while the system is tracking that hand.
- the pointer may be caused to be moved by the system to a location of the GUI.
- the disclosed invention provides for a modality such that if the pointer dwell time equals or exceeds predetermined dwell criteria, the system reacts accordingly. For example, where the dwell time exceeds a first criteria, the GUI window is selected. Dwelling of the pointer for a longer period of time in a portion of a window invokes a corresponding command to bring the window to the foreground of the GUI display, while dwelling still longer invokes a command to cause the window to be grabbed and moved.
- video cameras are used to view a volume of area.
- This volume of area is generally in front of the video display (on which the video cameras may be located) and is designated as an engagement volume wherein gesture commands may be performed by the user and recognized by the system.
- Objects in motion are detected by comparing corresponding patches (subsets of video of the entire video image) of video from successive video images. By analyzing and comparing the corresponding video patches from successive images, objects in motion are detected and tracked.
- two video cameras are mounted substantially parallel to each other to generate video images that are used to determine the depth (distance from the camera, display, or other point of reference) of a moving object using a lightweight sparse stereo technique.
- the lightweight sparse stereo technique reduces the computational requirements of the system and the depth component is used as an element in determining whether that particular object is the nearest object within the engagement volume.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a system block diagram of components of the present invention for controlling a computer and/or other hardware/software peripherals interfaced thereto.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a perceptual user interface system, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a methodology for implementing a perceptual user interface system, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a methodology for determining the presence of moving objects within images, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a methodology for tracking a moving object within an image, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a disparity between two video images captured by two video cameras mounted substantially parallel to each other for the purpose of determining the depth of objects, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 illustrates an example of the hand gestures that the system may recognize and the visual feedback provided through the display, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 illustrates an alternative embodiment wherein a unique icon is displayed in association with a name of a specific recognized command, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate an engagement plane and volume of both single and multiple monitor implementations, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a briefing room environment where gestures are utilized to control a screen projector via a computer system configured in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 illustrates a block diagram of a computer system operable to execute the present invention.
- FIG. 12 illustrates a network implementation of the present invention.
- a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
- a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
- an application running on a server and the server can be a component.
- One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
- the present invention relates to a system and methodology for implementing a perceptual user interface comprising alternative modalities for controlling computer programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and/or verbal commands.
- a perceptual user interface system is provided that tracks hand movements and provides for the control of computer programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to hand gestures performed by the user.
- the system provides for the control of computer programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to verbal commands spoken by the user.
- the gestures and/or verbal commands may be tailored by a particular user to suit that user's personal preferences.
- the system operates in real time and is robust, light in weight and responsive.
- the system provides a relatively inexpensive capability for the recognition of hand gestures and verbal commands.
- the system 100 includes a tracking component 102 for detecting and tracking one or more objects 104 through image capture utilizing cameras (not shown) or other suitable conventional image-capture devices.
- the cameras operate to capture images of the object(s) 104 in a scene within the image capture capabilities of the cameras so that the images may be further processed to not only detect the presence of the object(s) 104 , but also to detect and track object(s) movements. It is appreciated that in more robust implementations, object characteristics such as object features and object orientation may also be detected, tracked, and processed.
- the object(s) 104 of the present invention include basic hand movements created by one or more hands of a system user and/or other person selected for use with the disclosed system.
- objects may include many different types of objects with object characteristics, including hand gestures each of which have gesture characteristics including but not limited to, hand movement, finger count, finger orientation, hand rotation, hand orientation, and hand pose (e.g., opened, closed, and partially closed).
- the tracking component 102 interfaces to a control component 106 of the system 100 that controls all onboard component processes.
- the control component 106 interfaces to a seeding component 108 that seeds object hypotheses to the tracking component based upon the object characteristics.
- the object(s) 104 are detected and tracked in the scene such that object characteristic data is processed according to predetermined criteria to associate the object characteristic data with commands for interacting with a user interface component 110 .
- the user interface component 110 interfaces to the control component 106 to receive control instructions that affect presentation of text, graphics, and other output (e.g., audio) provided to the user via the interface component 110 .
- the control instructions are communicated to the user interface component 110 in response to the object characteristic data processed from detection and tracking of the object(s) within a predefined engagement volume space 112 of the scene.
- a filtering component 114 interfaces to the control component 106 to receive filtering criteria in accordance with user filter configuration data, and to process the filtering criteria such that tracked object(s) of respective object hypotheses are selectively removed from the object hypotheses and/or at least one hypothesis from a set of hypotheses within the volume space 112 and the scene.
- Objects are detected and tracked either within the volume space 112 or outside the volume space 112 . Those objects outside of the volume space 112 are detected, tracked, and ignored, until entering the volume space 112 .
- the system 100 also receives user input via input port(s) 116 such as input from pointing devices, keyboards, interactive input mechanisms such as touch screens, and audio input devices.
- input port(s) 116 such as input from pointing devices, keyboards, interactive input mechanisms such as touch screens, and audio input devices.
- the subject invention can employ various artificial intelligence based schemes for carrying out various aspects of the subject invention.
- a process for determining which object is to be selected for tracking can be facilitated via an automatic classification system and process.
- Such classification can employ a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis (e.g., factoring into the analysis utilities and costs) to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed.
- a support vector machine (SVM) classifier can be employed.
- Other classification approaches include Bayesian networks, decision trees, and probabilistic classification models providing different patterns of independence can be employed. Classification as used herein also is inclusive of statistical regression that is utilized to develop models of priority.
- the subject invention can employ classifiers that are explicitly trained (e.g., via a generic training data) as well as implicitly trained (e.g., via observing user behavior, receiving extrinsic information) so that the classifier(s) is used to automatically determine according to a predetermined criteria which object(s) should be selected for tracking and which objects that were being tracked are now removed from tracking.
- the criteria can include, but is not limited to, object characteristics such as object size, object speed, direction of movement, distance from one or both cameras, object orientation, object features, and object rotation.
- classifiers which are well understood—it is to be appreciated that other classifier models may also be utilized such as Naive Bayes, Bayes Net, decision tree and other learning models—SVM's are configured via a learning or training phase within a classifier constructor and feature selection module.
- attributes are words or phrases or other data-specific attributes derived from the words (e.g., parts of speech, presence of key terms), and the classes are categories or areas of interest (e.g., levels of priorities).
- FIG. 2 there is illustrated a schematic block diagram of a perceptual user interface system, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- the system comprises a computer 200 with a traditional keyboard 202 , input pointing device (e.g., a mouse) 204 , microphone 206 , and display 208 .
- the system further comprises at least one video camera 210 , at least one user 212 , and software 214 .
- the exemplary system of FIG. 2 is comprised of two video cameras 210 mounted substantially parallel to each other (that is, the rasters are parallel) and the user 212 .
- the first camera is used to detect and track the object, and the second camera is used for determining the depth (or distance) of the object from the camera(s).
- the computer 200 is operably connected to the keyboard 202 , mouse 204 and display 208 .
- Video cameras 210 and microphone 206 are also operably connected to computer 200 .
- the video cameras 210 “look” towards the user 212 and may point downward to capture objects within the volume defined above the keyboard and in front of the user.
- User 212 is typically an individual that is capable of providing hand gestures, holding objects in a hand, verbal commands, and mouse and/or keyboard input.
- the hand gestures and/or object(s) appear in video images created by the video cameras 210 and are interpreted by the software 214 as commands to be executed by computer 200 .
- microphone 206 receives verbal commands provided by user 212 , which are in turn, interpreted by software 214 and executed by computer 200 .
- User 212 can control and operate various application programs on the computer 200 by providing a series of hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures, verbal commands, and mouse/keyboard input.
- FIGS. 3-5 methodologies in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to FIGS. 3-5 . While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies of FIGS. 3-5 are shown and described as executing serially, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other aspects from that shown and described herein. Moreover, not all illustrated features may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with an aspect the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram that illustrates a high level methodology for detecting the user's hand, tracking movement of the hand and interpreting commands in accordance with an aspect of the invention. While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies shown here and below are described as a series of acts, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein. For example, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that a methodology could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram. Moreover, not all illustrated acts may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with the present invention.
- the methodology begins at 300 where video images are scanned to determine whether any moving objects exist within the field of view (or scene) of the cameras.
- the system is capable of running one or more object hypothesis models to detect and track objects, whether moving or not moving.
- the system runs up to and including six object hypotheses. If more than one object is detected as a result of the multiple hypotheses, the system drops one of the objects if the distance from any other object falls below a threshold distance, for example, five inches. It is assumed that the two hypotheses are redundantly tracking the same object, and one of the hypotheses is removed from consideration.
- a threshold distance for example, five inches. It is assumed that the two hypotheses are redundantly tracking the same object, and one of the hypotheses is removed from consideration.
- no moving object(s) have been detected, and flow returns to 300 where the system continues to scan the current image for moving objects.
- the engagement volume is defined as a volume of space in front of the video cameras and above the keyboard wherein the user is required to introduce the hand gestures (or object(s)) in order to utilize the system.
- a purpose of the engagement volume is to provide a means for ignoring all objects and/or gestures in motion except for those intended by the user to effect control of the computer. If a moving object is detected at 302 , but is determined not to be within the engagement volume, then the system dismisses the moving object as not being a desired object to track for providing commands. Flow then loops back to the input of 300 to scan for more objects. However, if the moving object is determined to be within the engagement volume, then the methodology proceeds to 306 .
- new objects are seeded only when it is determined that the new object is a sufficient distance away from an existing object that is being tracked (in 3-D).
- the system determines the distance of each moving object from the video cameras.
- the object closest to the video camera(s) is selected as the desired command object. If by the given application context the user is predisposed to use hand gestures towards the display, the nearest object hypotheses will apply to the hands. In other scenarios, more elaborate criteria for object selection may be used. For example, an application may select a particular object based upon its quality of movement over time.
- a two-handed interaction application may select an object to the left of the dominant hand (for right handed users) as the non-dominant hand.
- the command object is the object that has been selected for tracking, the movements of which will be analyzed and interpreted for gesture commands.
- the command object is generally the user's dominant hand. Once the command object is selected, its movement is tracked, as indicated at 310 .
- the system determines whether the command object is still within the engagement volume. If NO, the object has moved outside the engagement volume, and the system dismisses the object hypothesis and returns to 300 where the current image is processed for moving objects. If NO, the object is still within the engagement volume, and flow proceeds to 314 .
- the system determines whether the object is still moving. If no movement is detected, flow is along the NO path returning to 300 to process the current camera images for moving objects. If however, movement is detected, then flow proceeds from 314 to 316 .
- the system analyzes the movements of the command object to interpret the gestures for specific commands. At 318 , it is determined whether the interpreted gesture is a recognized command.
- algorithms used to interpret gestures are kept to simple algorithms and are performed on sparse (“lightweight”) images to limit the computational overhead required to properly interpret and execute desired commands in real time.
- the system is able to exploit the presence of motion and depth to minimize computational requirements involved in determining objects that provide gesture commands.
- FIG. 4 there is illustrated a flow diagram of a methodology for determining the presence of moving objects within video images created by one or more video sources, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- the methodology exploits the notion that attention is often drawn to objects that move.
- video data is acquired from one or more video sources. Successive video images are selected from the same video source, and motion is detected by comparing a patch of a current video image, centered on a given location, to a patch from the previous video image centered on the same location.
- a video patch centered about a point located at (u 1 ,v 1 ), and (u 2 ,v 2 ) is selected from successive video images I 1 and I 2 , respectively.
- SAD absolute differences
- I(u,v) refers to the pixel at (u,v)
- D is the patch width
- the absolute difference between two pixels is the sum of the absolute differences taken over all available color channels.
- Regions in the image that have movement can be found by determining points (u,v) such that function SAD(I t-1 ,u t-1 ,v t-1 ,I t ,v t )> ⁇ , where the subscript refers to the image at time t, and ⁇ is a threshold level for motion.
- a comparison is made between patches from image I 1 and I 2 using the sum of the absolute difference algorithm.
- the result of the sum of the absolute difference algorithm is compared to a threshold value to determine whether a threshold level of motion exists within the image patch. If SAD ⁇ , no sufficient motion exists, and flow proceeds to 410 .
- the system determines whether the current image patch is the last patch to be examined within the current image. If NO, the methodology returns to 402 where a new patch is selected. If YES, then the system returns to 400 to acquire a new video image from the video source.
- the SAD algorithm is computed on a sparse regular grid within the image.
- the sparse regular grid is based on sixteen pixel centers.
- the system tracks the motion of the object.
- a position prediction algorithm is used to predict the next position of the moving object.
- the prediction algorithm is a Kalman filter. However, it is to be appreciated that any position prediction algorithm can be used.
- image operations may use the same SAD function on image patches, which allows for easy SIMD (Single-Instruction Stream Multiple-Data Stream, which architectures are essential in the parallel world of computers) optimization of the algorithm's implementation, which in turn allows it to run with sufficiently many trackers while still leaving CPU time to the user.
- SIMD Single-Instruction Stream Multiple-Data Stream
- the process of seeding process hypotheses based upon motion may place more than one hypothesis on a given moving object.
- One advantage of this multiple hypothesis approach is that a simple, fast, and imperfect tracking algorithm may be used. Thus if one tracker fails, another may be following the object of interest. Once a given tracker has been seeded, the algorithm updates the position of the object being followed using the same function over successive frames.
- the methodology begins at 500 where, after the motion detection methodology has identified the location of a moving object to be tracked, the next position of the object is predicted. Once identified, the methodology utilizes a prediction algorithm to predict the position of the object in successive frames. The prediction algorithm limits the computational burden on the system. In the successive frames, the moving object should be at the predicted location, or within a narrow range centered on the predicted location.
- the methodology selects a small pixel window (e.g., ten pixels) centered on the predicted location. Within this small window, an algorithm executes to determine the actual location of the moving object.
- the new position is determined by examining the sum of the absolute difference algorithm over successive video frames acquired at time t and time t- 1 .
- the actual location is determined by finding the location (u t , v t ) that minimizes: SAD(I t-1 ,u t-1 ,v t-1 ,I t ,u t ,v t ), where I t refers to the image at time t, I t-1 refers to the image at time t- 1 , and where (u t ,v t ) refers to the location at time t.
- the actual position is updated, at 506 .
- motion characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the motion is still greater that the threshold level required.
- the movement parameter is the average movement over a window of time.
- the duration of time for the pause is still longer such that it exceeds a predetermined average time parameter, the object will be dropped.
- the motion is sufficient, and flow returns to 500 where a new prediction for the next position is determined.
- NO the object motion is insufficient, and the given object is dropped from being tracked, as indicated by flow to 510 .
- flow is to 430 of FIG. 4 to select a new patch in the image from which to analyze motion.
- a lightweight sparse stereo approach is utilized in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
- the sparse stereo approach is a region-based approach utilized to find the disparity at only locations in the image corresponding to the object hypothesis. Note that in the stereo matching process, it is assumed that both cameras are parallel (in rasters). Object hypotheses are supported by frame-to-frame tracking through time in one view and stereo matching across both views. A second calibration issue is the distance between the two cameras (i.e., the baseline), which must be considered to recover depth in real world coordinates.
- both calibration issues maybe dealt with automatically by fixing the cameras on a prefabricated mounting bracket or semi-automatically by the user presenting objects at a known depth in a calibration routine that requires a short period of time to complete.
- the accuracy of the transform to world coordinates is improved by accounting for lens distortion effects with a static, pre-computed calibration procedure for a given camera.
- Binocular disparity is the primary means for recovering depth information from two or more images taken from different viewpoints. Given the two-dimensional position of an object in two views, it is possible to compute the depth of the object. Given that the two cameras are mounted parallel to each other in the same horizontal plane, and given that the two cameras have a focal length f, the three-dimensional position (x,y,z) of an object is computed from the positions of the object in both images (u l ,v l ) and (u r ,v r ) by the following perspective projection equations:
- the disparity, d is the shift in location of the object in one view with respect to the other, and is related to the baseline b, the distance between the two cameras.
- the vision algorithm performs 3-dimensional (3-D) tracking and 3-D depth computations.
- 3-D 3-dimensional
- each object hypothesis is supported only by consistency of the object movement in 3-D.
- the present invention does not rely on fragile appearance models such as skin color models or hand image templates, which are likely invalidated when environmental conditions change or the system is confronted with a different user.
- FIG. 6 there is illustrated a disparity between two video images captured by two video cameras mounted substantially parallel to each other for the purpose of determining the depth of objects, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- a first camera 600 and a second camera 602 are mounted substantially parallel to each other in the same horizontal plane and laterally aligned.
- the two cameras ( 600 and 602 ) are separated by a distance 604 defined between the longitudinal focal axis of each camera lens, also known as the baseline, b.
- a first video image 606 is the video image from the first camera 600 and a second video image 608 is the video image from the second camera 602 .
- the disparity d (also item number 610 ), or shift in the two video images ( 606 and 608 ), can be seen by looking to an object 612 in the center of the first image 606 , and comparing the location of that object 612 in the first image 606 to the location of that same object 612 in the second image 608 .
- the disparity 610 is illustrated as the difference between a first vertical centerline 614 of the first image 606 that intersects the center of the object 612 , and a second vertical centerline 616 of the second image 608 .
- the object 612 is centered about the vertical centerline 614 with the top of the object 612 located at point (u,v).
- the same point (u,v) of the object 612 is located at point (u-d,v) in the second image 608 , where d is the disparity 610 , or shift in the object from the first image 606 with respect to the second image 610 .
- d is the disparity 610
- a depth z can be determined.
- the depth component z is used in part to determine if an object is within the engagement volume, where the engagement volume is the volume within which objects will be selected by the system.
- a sparse stereo approach is utilized in order to limit computational requirements.
- the sparse stereo approach is that which determines disparity d only at the locations in the image that corresponds to a moving object. For a given point (u,v) in the image, the value of disparity d is found such that the sum of the absolute differences over a patch in the first image 606 (i.e., a left image I L ) centered on (u,v) and a corresponding patch in the second image 608 (i.e., a right image I R ) centered on (u-d,v) is minimized, i.e., the dispatch value d that minimizes SAD(I l ,u-d,v,I r ,u,v). If an estimate of depth z is available from a previous time, then in order to limit computational requirements, the search for the minimal disparity d is limited to a range of depth z around the last known depth.
- the search range may be further narrowed by use of an algorithm to predict the objects new location.
- the prediction is accomplished by utilization of a Kalman filter.
- the depth z can also be computed using traditional triangulation techniques.
- the sparse stereo technique is used when the system operation involves detecting moving objects within a narrow range in front of the display, e.g., within twenty inches.
- the two video cameras are mounted in parallel and separated by a distance equal to the approximate width of the display.
- the distance between the two video cameras may be much greater.
- traditional triangulation algorithms are used to determine the depth.
- a user 700 gives commands by virtue of different hand gestures 702 and/or verbal commands 704 .
- the gestures 702 are transmitted to a system computer (not shown) as part of the video images created by a pair of video cameras ( 706 and 708 ).
- Verbal and/or generally, audio commands are input to the system computer through a microphone 710 .
- Typical GUI windows 712 , 714 , and 716 are displayed in a layered presentation in an upper portion of display 718 while a lower portion of display 718 provides visual graphic feedback of in the form of icons 720 , 722 , 724 , and 726 of some of the gestures 702 recognized by the system.
- the hand icon 720 is displayed when a corresponding gesture 728 is recognized.
- the name of the recognized command (Move) is also then displayed below the icon 720 to provide additional textual feedback to the user 700 .
- Move and Raise commands may be recognized by dwelling on the window for a period of time.
- the pose of the hand may be mapped to any functionality, as described in greater detail below.
- the shape of the hand icon may be changed in association with the captured hand pose to provide visual feedback to the user that the correct hand pose is being processed.
- the hand icon is positioned for selecting the window for interaction, or to move the window, or effect scrolling.
- a Scroll command may be initiated first by voicing a corresponding command that is processed by speech recognition, and then using the hand (or object) to commence scrolling of the window by moving the hand (or object) up and down for the desired scroll direction.
- the single displayed hand icon 720 is presented for all recognized hand gestures 702 , however, the corresponding specific command name is displayed below the icon 720 .
- the same hand icon 720 is displayed in accordance with four different hand gestures utilized to indicate four different commands: Move, Close, Raise, and Scroll.
- a different hand shaped icon is used for each specific command and the name of the command is optionally displayed below the command.
- audio confirmation is provided by the computer, in addition to the displayed icon and optional command name displayed below the icon.
- FIG. 7 illustrates the embodiment where a single hand shaped icon 720 is used, and the corresponding command recognized by the system is displayed below the icon 720 .
- the icon 720 and corresponding command word “MOVE” are displayed by the display 718 .
- the icon 720 and corresponding command word “CLOSE” may be displayed by the display 718 .
- Additional examples include, but are not limited to, displaying the icon 720 and corresponding command word “RAISE” when the system recognizes a hand gesture to bring a GUI window forward.
- the icon 720 and command word “SCROLL” are displayed by the display 718 .
- the disclosed system may be configured to display any number and type of graphical icons in response to one or more hand gestures presented by the system user.
- audio feedback may be used such that a beep to tone may be presented in addition to or in lieu of the graphical feedback.
- the graphical icon may be used to provide feedback in the form of a color, combination of colors, and/or flashing color or colors. Feedback may also be provided by flashing a border of the selected window, the border in the direction of movement. For example, if the window is to be moved to the right, the right window border could be flashed to indicate the selected direction of window movement.
- a corresponding tone frequency may be emitted to indicate direction of movement, e.g., an upward movement would have and associated high pitch and a downward movement would have a low pitch.
- rotational aspects may be provided such that movement to the left effects a counterclockwise rotation of a move icon, or perhaps a leftward tilt in the GUI window in the direction of movement.
- FIG. 8 there is illustrated an alternative embodiment wherein a unique icon is displayed in association with a name of a specific recognized command, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
- each icon-word pair is unique for each recognized command.
- Icon-word pairs 800 , 802 , 804 , and 806 for the respective commands “MOVE”, “CLOSE”, “RAISE”, and “SCROLL”, are examples of visual feedback capabilities that can be provided.
- the system is capable of interpreting commands based on interpreting hand gestures, verbal commands, or both in combination.
- a hand is identified as a moving object by the motion detection algorithms and the hand movement is tracked and interpreted.
- hand gestures and verbal commands are used cooperatively.
- Speech recognition is performed using suitable voice recognition applications, for example, Microsoft SAPI 5.1, with a simple command and control grammar. However, it is understood that any similar speech recognition system can be used.
- An inexpensive microphone is placed near the display to receive audio input. However, the microphone can be placed at any location insofar as audio signals can be received thereinto and processed by the system.
- Interaction with the system can be initiated by a user moving a hand across an engagement plane and into an engagement volume.
- a user 900 is located generally in front of a display 902 , which is also within the imaging capabilities of a pair of cameras ( 906 and 908 ).
- a microphone 904 (similar to microphones 206 and 710 ) is suitably located such that user voice signals are input for processing, e.g., in front of the display 902 .
- the cameras ( 906 and 908 , similar to cameras 200 and, 706 and 708 ) are mounted substantially parallel to each other and on a horizontal plane above the display 902 .
- the two video cameras ( 906 and 908 ) are separated by a distance that provides optimum detection and tracking for the given cameras and the engagement volume.
- cameras suitable for wider fields of view, higher resolution may be placed further apart on a plane different from the top of the display 902 , for example, lower and along the sides of the display facing upwards, to capture gesture images for processing in accordance with novel aspects of the present invention.
- more robust image processing capabilities and hypothesis engines can be employed in the system to process greater amounts of data.
- the engagement volume 910 is typically defined to be located where the hands and/or objects in the hands of the user 900 are most typically situated, i.e., above a keyboard of the computer system and in front of the cameras ( 906 and 908 ) between the user 900 and the display 902 (provided the user 900 is seated in front of the display on which the cameras ( 906 and 908 ) are located).
- the user 900 may be standing while controlling the computer, which requires that the volume 910 be located accordingly to facilitate interface interaction.
- the objects may include not only the hand(s) of the user, or objects in the hand(s), but other parts of the body, such as head, torso movement, arms, or any other detectable objects. This is described in greater detail hereinbelow.
- a plane 912 defines a face of the volume 910 that is closest to the user 900 , and is called the engagement plane.
- the user 900 may effect control of the system by moving a hand (or object) through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910 .
- the hand of the user 900 is detected and tracked even when outside the engagement volume 910 .
- the object is moved across the engagement plane 912 , feedback is provided to the user in the form of displaying an alpha-blended icon on the display (e.g., an operating system desktop).
- the icon is designed to be perceived as distinct from other desktop icons and may be viewed as an area cursor.
- the engagement plane 912 is positioned such that the user's hands do not enter it during normal use of the keyboard and mouse.
- the corresponding hand icon displayed on the desktop is moved to reflect the position of the tracked object (or hand).
- the engagement and acquisition of the moving hand (or object) is implemented in the lightweight sparse stereo system by looking for the object with a depth that is less than a predetermined distance value. Any such object will be considered the command object until it is moved out of the engagement volume 910 , for example, behind the engagement plane 912 , or until the hand (or object) is otherwise removed from being a tracked object.
- the specified distance is twenty inches.
- the user 900 moves a hand through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910 established for the system.
- the system detects the hand, tracks the hand as the hand moves from outside of the volume 910 to the inside, and provides feedback by displaying a corresponding hand shaped icon on the display 902 .
- the open microphone 904 placed near the display 902 provides means for the user 900 to invoke one or more verbal commands in order to act upon the selected window under the icon.
- the window directly underneath the hand shaped icon is the selected window.
- the interpreted command is displayed along with the hand shaped icon.
- the user may initiate the continuous (or stepped) movement of the window under the hand shaped icon to follow the movement of the user's hand.
- the user 900 causes the selected window to move up or down within the display 902 by moving the hand up or down. Lateral motion is also similarly achieved. Movement of the window is terminated when the user hand is moved across the engagement plane 912 and out of the engagement volume 910 .
- Other methods of termination include stopping movement of the hand (or object) for an extended period of time, which is processed by the system as a command to drop the associated hypothesis.
- the Move command may be invoked by dwelling the hand on the window for a period of time, followed by hand motion to initiate the direction of window movement.
- the user may speak the word “Release” and the system will stop moving the selected window in response to the user's hand motion. Release may also be accomplished by dwelling a bit longer in time while in Move, and/or Scroll modes.
- the user 900 may also act upon a selected window with other actions. By speaking the words “Close”, “Minimize”, or “Maximize” the selected window is respectively closed, minimized or maximized. By speaking the word “Raise”, the selected window is brought to the foreground, and by speaking “Send to Back”, the selected window is sent behind (to the background) all other open windows. By speaking “Scroll”, the user initiates a scrolling mode on the selected window. The user may control the rate of the scroll by the position of the hand.
- the hand shaped icon tracks the user's hand position, and the rate of the scrolling of the selected window is proportional to the distance between the current hand icon position and the position of the hand icon at the time the scrolling is initiated. Scrolling can be terminated by the user speaking “Release” or by the user moving their hand behind the engagement plane and out of the engagement volume.
- dwell time can be used as a modality to control windows in lieu of, or in addition to, verbal commands and other disclosed modalities.
- Dwell time is defined as the time, after having engaged the system, that the user holds their hand position stationary such that the system hand shaped icon remains over a particular window. For example, by dwelling on a selected window for a short period of time (e.g., two seconds), the system can bring the window to the foreground of all other open windows (i.e., a RAISE command).
- GUI windows can be accomplished in a similar fashion by controlling the dwell time of the hand shaped icon over the open window.
- hand gestures are interpreted by hand motion or by pattern recognition.
- the user can bring the window to the front (or foreground), on top of all other open windows by moving a hand from a position closer to the display to position farther from the display, the hand remaining in the engagement volume 910 .
- the user can cause the selected window to be grabbed and moved by bringing fingers together with their thumb, and subsequently moving the hand.
- the selected window will move in relation to the user hand movement until the hand is opened up to release the selected window. Additional control over the selected window can be defined in response to particular hand movements or hand gestures.
- the selected window will move in response to the user pointing their hand, thumb, or finger in a particular direction. For example, if the user points their index finger to right, the window will move to the right within the display. Similarly, if the user points to the left, up, or down the selected window will move to the left, up or down within the display, respectively. Additional window controls can be achieved through the use of similar hand gestures or motions.
- the system is configurable such that an individual user selects the particular hand gestures that they wish to associate with particular commands.
- the system provides default settings that map a given set of gestures to a given set of commands.
- This mapping is configurable such that the specific command executed in response to each particular hand gesture is definable by each user. For example, one user may wish to point directly at the screen with their index finger to grab the selected window for movement while another user may wish to bring their fingers together with their thumb to grab the selected window.
- one user may wish to point a group of finger up or down in order to move a selected window up or down, while another user may wish to open the palm of their hand toward the cameras and then move their opened hand up or down to move a selected window up or down. All given gestures and commands are configurable by the individual users to best suit that particular user's individual personal preferences.
- the system may include a “Record and Define Gesture” mode.
- the system records hand gestures performed by the user.
- the recorded gestures are then stored in the system memory to be recognized during normal operation.
- the given hand gestures are then associated with a particular command to be performed by the system in response to that particular hand gesture.
- a user may further tailor the system to their personal preference or, similarly, may tailor system operation to respond to specific commands most appropriate for particular applications.
- the user can choose the particular words, from a given set, they wish to use for a particular command. For example, one user may choose to say “Release” to stop moving a window while another may wish to say “Quit”.
- This capability allows different users, which may prefer to use different words for a given command, the ability to tailor the system in a way most efficient for their personal use.
- the present invention can be utilized in an expansive list of applications. The following discussion is exemplary of only a few applications with which the present invention may be utilized.
- One such application is associated with user control of a presentation, or similar type of briefing application, wherein the user makes a presentation on a projection type screen to a group of listeners.
- the system includes three monitors (or displays) through which the user 900 exercises control of GUI features; a first display 912 , a second display 914 , and a third display 916 .
- the cameras ( 906 and 908 ) are similarly situated as in FIG. 9A , to define the engagement volume 910 .
- the user 900 can move a window 920 from the first display 912 to the second display 914 , and further from the second display 914 to the third display 916 .
- the flick motion of the user hand 918 can effect movement of the window 920 from the first display 912 to the third display 916 in a single window movement, or in multiple steps through the displays ( 914 and 916 ) using corresponding multiple hand motions.
- control by the user 900 occurs only when the user hand 918 breaks the engagement plane 912 , and is determined to be a control object (i.e., an object meeting parameters sufficient to effect control of the computer).
- the user 900 is located generally in front of the displays ( 912 , 914 , and 916 ), which is also within the imaging capabilities of the pair of cameras ( 906 and 908 ).
- the microphone 904 is suitably located to receive user voice signals.
- the cameras ( 906 and 908 ) are mounted substantially parallel to each other and on a horizontal plane above the displays ( 912 , 914 , and 916 ), and separated by a distance that provides optimum detection and tracking for the given cameras and the engagement volume 910 .
- the user 900 moves the hand 918 through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910 established for the system.
- the system which had detected and tracked the hand 918 before it entered the volume 912 , begins providing feedback to the user 900 by displaying the hand shaped icon 922 on one of the displays ( 912 , 914 , and 916 ).
- the microphone 904 provides additional means for the user 900 to invoke one or more verbal commands in order to act upon the selected window 920 under the corresponding icon 922 .
- the window 920 directly underneath the hand shaped icon is the selected window.
- the corresponding icon 922 is presented by the system on the computer display 912 .
- the associated window is assigned for control.
- the user 900 causes the selected window to move up or down within the display by invoking the ‘Move’ command as explained above and then moving the hand up or down, or to move across one or more of the monitors ( 914 and 916 ) by invoking the ‘Flick’ command and then using the flick hand motion.
- the user 900 can cause the window 920 to be moved left to the first display 912 , or right to the third display 916 . Movement of the window is terminated (or “released”) when the user hand dwells for a time longer than a predetermined dwell time, or out of the engagement volume 910 .
- the user may speak the word “Release” and the system will stop moving the selected window in response to the user's hand motion. Release may also be accomplished by dwelling a bit while in Move, and/or Scroll modes. The user may also act upon a selected window with other actions. By speaking the words “Close”, “Minimize”, or “Maximize” the selected window is respectively closed, minimized or maximized. By speaking the word “Raise”, the selected window is brought to the foreground, and by speaking “Send to Back”, the selected window is sent behind (to the background) all other open windows. By speaking “Scroll”, the user initiates a scrolling mode on the selected window. The user may control the rate of the scroll by the position of the hand.
- the hand shaped icon tracks the user's hand position, and the rate of the scrolling of the selected window is proportional to the distance between the current hand icon position and the position of the hand icon at the time the scrolling is initiated. Scrolling can be terminated by the user speaking “Release” or by the user moving their hand behind the engagement plane and out of the engagement volume.
- the briefing room 1000 comprises a large briefing table 1002 surrounded on three sides by numerous chairs 1004 , a computer 1006 , a video projector 1008 , and a projector screen 1010 .
- Utilization of the present invention adds additional elements comprising the disclosed perceptual software 1012 , two video cameras ( 1014 and 1016 ) and a microphone 1018 .
- a user 1020 is positioned between the projector screen 1010 and briefing table 1002 at which the audience is seated.
- a top face 1022 of an engagement volume 1024 is defined by rectangular area 1026 .
- a front surface indicated at 1028 represents an engagement plane.
- the user controls the content displayed on the projection screen 1010 and advancement of the slides (or presentation images) by moving their hand(s) through the engagement plane 1028 into the engagement volume 1024 , and/or speaking commands recognizable by the system.
- a simple gesture is made to advance to the next slide, back-up to a previous slide, initiate an embedded video, or to effect one of a number of many other presentation capabilities.
- a similar capability can be implemented for a home media center wherein the user can change selected video sources, change channels, control volume, advance chapter and other similar functions by moving their hand across an engagement plane into an engagement volume and subsequently performing the appropriate hand gesture.
- Additional applications include perceptual interfaces for TabletPCs, Media center PCs, kiosks, hand held computers, home appliances, video games, and wall sized displays, along with many others.
- the system can be configured such that the engagement volume travels with the user (in a “roaming” mode) as the user moves about the room.
- the cameras would be mounted on a platform that rotates such that the rotation maintains the cameras substantially equidistant from the presenter.
- the presenter may carrier a sensor that allows the system to sense or track the general location of the presenter. The system would then affect rotation of the camera mount to “point” the cameras at the presenter.
- the engagement volume may be extended to the presenter allowing control of the computer system as the presenter moves about.
- the process of “extending” the engagement volume can include increasing the depth of the volume such that the engagement plane surface moves to the presenter, or by maintaining the volume dimensions, but moving the fixed volume to the presenter. This would require on-the-fly focal adjustment of the cameras to track quick movements in the depth of objects in the volume, but also the movement of the presenter.
- Another method of triggering system attention in this mode would be to execute a predefined gesture that is not likely to be made unintentionally, e.g., raising a hand.
- the system is configurable for individual preferences such that the engagement volume of a first user may be different than the volume of a second user.
- the user preferences may be retrieved and implemented automatically by the system. This can include automatically elevating the mounted cameras for a taller person by using a telescoping camera stand so that the cameras are at the appropriate height of the particular user, whether sitting or standing. This also includes, but is not limited to, setting the system for “roaming” mode
- FIG. 11 there is illustrated a block diagram of a computer operable to execute the present invention.
- FIG. 11 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment 1100 in which the various aspects of the present invention may be implemented. While the invention has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions that may run on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention also may be implemented in combination with other program modules and/or as a combination of hardware and software.
- program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- inventive methods may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which may be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices.
- inventive methods may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where certain tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- the exemplary environment 1100 for implementing various aspects of the invention includes a computer 1102 , the computer 1102 including a processing unit 1104 , a system memory 1106 , and a system bus 1108 .
- the system bus 1108 couples system components including, but not limited to the system memory 1106 to the processing unit 1104 .
- the processing unit 1104 may be any of various commercially available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures also can be employed as the processing unit 1104 .
- the system bus 1108 can be any of several types of bus structure including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures.
- the system memory 1106 includes read only memory (ROM) 1110 and random access memory (RAM) 1112 .
- ROM read only memory
- RAM random access memory
- the computer 1102 further includes a hard disk drive 1114 , a magnetic disk drive 1116 , (e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 1118 ) and an optical disk drive 1120 , (e.g., reading a CD-ROM disk 1122 or to read from or write to other optical media).
- the hard disk drive 1114 , magnetic disk drive 1116 and optical disk drive 1120 can be connected to the system bus 1108 by a hard disk drive interface 1124 , a magnetic disk drive interface 1126 and an optical drive interface 1128 , respectively.
- the drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth.
- the drives and media accommodate the storage of broadcast programming in a suitable digital format.
- computer-readable media refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and a CD
- other types of media which are readable by a computer such as zip drives, magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, cartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment, and further that any such media may contain computer-executable instructions for performing the methods of the present invention.
- a number of program modules can be stored in the drives and RAM 1112 , including an operating system 1130 , one or more application programs 1132 , other program modules 1134 and program data 1136 . It is appreciated that the present invention can be implemented with various commercially available operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
- a user can enter commands and information into the computer 1102 through a keyboard 1138 and a pointing device, such as a mouse 1140 .
- Other input devices may include one or more video cameras, one or microphones, an IR remote control, a joystick, a game pad, a satellite dish, a scanner, or the like.
- These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 1104 through a serial port interface 1142 that is coupled to the system bus 1108 , but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, a game port, a firewire port, a universal serial bus (“USB”), an IR interface, etc.
- USB universal serial bus
- a monitor 1144 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 1108 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1146 .
- a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers, printers etc.
- the computer 1102 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer(s) 1148 .
- the remote computer(s) 1148 may be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, portable computer, microprocessor-based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 1102 , although, for purposes of brevity, only a memory storage device 1150 is illustrated.
- the logical connections depicted include a LAN 1152 and a WAN 1154 .
- Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.
- the computer 1102 When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 1102 is connected to the local network 1152 through a network interface or adapter 1156 .
- the computer 1102 When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 1102 typically includes a modem 1158 , or is connected to a communications server on the LAN, or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN 1154 , such as the Internet.
- the modem 1158 which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 1108 via the serial port interface 1142 .
- program modules depicted relative to the computer 1102 may be stored in the remote memory storage device 1150 . It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
- the implementation 1200 includes a first perceptual system 1202 and a second perceptual system 1204 , both operational according to the disclose invention.
- the first system 1202 includes cameras 1206 (also denoted C 1 and C 2 ) mounted on a rotational and telescoping camera mount 1208 .
- a first user 1210 located generally in front of the first system 1202 effects control of a GUI content A of the first system 1202 in accordance with the novel aspects of the present invention by introducing hand gestures into an engagement volume 1211 and/or voice signals.
- the first user 1210 may rove about in front of the cameras 1206 in accordance with the “roaming” operational mode described previously, or may be seated in front of the cameras 1206 .
- the second system 1204 includes cameras 1212 (also denoted C 3 and C 4 ) mounted on a rotational and telescoping camera mount 1214 .
- a second user 1216 located generally in front of the second system 1204 effects control of a GUI content B of the second system 1204 in accordance with the novel aspects of the present invention by introducing hand gestures into an engagement volume 1217 and/or voice signals.
- the second user 1216 may rove about in front of the cameras 1212 in accordance with the “roaming” operational mode described previously, or may be seated in front of the cameras 1212 .
- the first and second systems ( 1202 and 1204 ) may be networked in a conventional wired or wireless network 1207 peer configuration (or bus configuration by using a hub 1215 ).
- This particular system 1200 is employed to present both content A and content B via a single large monitor or display 1218 .
- the monitor 1218 can be driven by either of the systems ( 1202 and 1204 ), as can be provided by conventional dual-output video graphics cards, or the separate video information may be transmitted to a third monitor control system 1220 to present the content.
- Such an implementation finds application where a side-by-side comparison of product features is being presented, other similar applications where two or more users may desire to interact.
- content A and content B may be presented on a split screen layout of the monitor 1218 .
- Either or both user 1210 and 1216 may provide keyboard and/or mouse input to facilitate control according to the present invention.
Abstract
Architecture for implementing a perceptual user interface. The architecture comprises alternative modalities for controlling computer application programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands. The perceptual user interface system includes a tracking component that detects object characteristics of at least one of a plurality of objects within a scene, and tracks the respective object. Detection of object characteristics is based at least in part upon image comparison of a plurality of images relative to a course mapping of the images. A seeding component iteratively seeds the tracking component with object hypotheses based upon the presence of the object characteristics and the image comparison. A filtering component selectively removes the tracked object from the object hypotheses and/or at least one object hypothesis from the set of object hypotheses based upon predetermined removal criteria.
Description
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/396,653, filed on Mar. 25, 2003 and entitled, “ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTROLLING A COMPUTER USING HAND GESTURES,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to controlling a computer system, and more particularly to a system and method to implement alternative modalities for controlling computer application programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands.
A user interface facilitates the interaction between a computer and computer user by enhancing the user's ability to utilize application programs. The traditional interface between a human user and a typical personal computer is implemented with graphical displays and is generally referred to as a graphical user interface (GUI). Input to the computer or particular application program is accomplished through the presentation of graphical information on the computer screen and through the use of a keyboard and/or mouse, trackball or other similar implements. Many systems employed for use in public areas utilize touch screen implementations whereby the user touches a designated area of a screen to effect the desired input. Airport electronic ticket check-in kiosks and rental car direction systems are examples of such systems. There are, however, many applications where the traditional user interface is less practical or efficient.
The traditional computer interface is not ideal for a number of applications. Providing stand-up presentations or other type of visual presentations to large audiences, is but one example. In this example, a presenter generally stands in front of the audience and provides a verbal dialog in conjunction with the visual presentation that is projected on a large display or screen. Manipulation of the presentation by the presenter is generally controlled through use of awkward remote controls, which frequently suffer from inconsistent and less precise operation, or require the cooperation of another individual. Traditional user interfaces require the user either to provide input via the keyboard or to exhibit a degree of skill and precision more difficult to implement with a remote control than a traditional mouse and keyboard. Other examples include control of video, audio, and display components of a media room. Switching between sources, advancing fast fast-forward, rewinding, changing chapters, changing volume, etc., can be very cumbersome in a professional studio as well as in the home. Similarly, traditional interfaces are not well suited for smaller, specialized electronic gadgets.
Additionally, people with motion impairment conditions find it very challenging to cope with traditional user interfaces and computer access systems. Such conditions include Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy, Friedrich's Ataxia, and spinal injuries or disorders. These conditions and disorders are often accompanied by tremors, spasms, loss of coordination, restricted range of movement, reduced muscle strength, and other motion impairing symptoms.
Similar symptoms exist in the growing elderly segment of the population. As people age, their motor skills decline and impact the ability to perform many tasks. It is known that as people age, their cognitive, perceptual and motor skills decline, with negative effects in their ability to perform many tasks. The requirement to position a cursor, particularly with smaller graphical presentations, can often be a significant barrier for elderly or afflicted computer users. Computers can play an increasingly important role in helping older adults function well in society.
Graphical interfaces contribute to the ease of use of computers. WIMP (Window, Icon, Menu, Pointing device (or Pull-down menu)) interfaces allow fairly non-trivial operations to be performed with a few mouse motions and clicks. However, at the same time, this shift in the user interaction from a primarily text-oriented experience to a point-and-click experience has erected new barriers between people with disabilities and the computer. For example, for older adults, there is evidence that using the mouse can be quite challenging. There is extensive literature demonstrating that the ability to make small movements decreases with age. This decreased ability can have a major effect on the ability of older adults to use a pointing device on a computer. It has been shown that even experienced older computer users move a cursor much more slowly and less accurately than their younger counterparts. In addition, older adults seem to have increased difficulty (as compared to younger users) when targets become smaller. For older computer users, positioning a cursor can be a severe limitation.
One solution to the problem of decreased ability to position the cursor with a mouse is to simply increase the size of the targets in computer displays, which can often be counter-productive since less information is being displayed, requiring more navigation. Another approach is to constrain the movement of the mouse to follow on-screen objects, as with sticky icons or solid borders that do not allow cursors to overshoot the target. There is evidence that performance with area cursors (possibly translucent) is better than performance with regular cursors for some target acquisition tasks.
One method to facilitate computer access for users with motion impairment conditions and for applications, in which the traditional user interfaces are cumbersome, is through use of perceptual user interfaces. Perceptual user interfaces utilize alternate sensing modalities, such as the capability of sensing physical gestures of the user, to replace or complement traditional input devices such as the mouse and keyboard. Perceptual user interfaces promise modes of fluid computer-human interaction that complement and/or replace the mouse and keyboard, particularly in non-desktop applications such as control for a media room.
One study indicates that adding a simple gesture-based navigation facility to web browsers can significantly reduce the time taken to carry out one of the most common actions in computer use, i.e., using the “back” button (or function) to return to previously visited pages. Subjective ratings by users in experiments showed a strong preference for a “flick” system, where the users would flick the mouse left or right to go back or forward in the web browser.
In the simplest view, gestures play a symbolic communication role similar to speech, suggesting that for simple tasks gesture may enhance or replace speech recognition. Small gestures near the keyboard or mouse do not induce fatigue as quickly as sustained whole arm postures. Previous studies indicate that users find gesture-based systems highly desirable, but that users are also dissatisfied with the recognition accuracy of gesture recognizers. Furthermore, experimental results indicate that a user's difficulty with gestures is in part due to a lack of understanding of how gesture recognition works. The studies highlight the ability of users to learn and remember gestures as an important design consideration.
Even when a mouse and keyboard are available, users may find it attractive to manipulate often-used applications while away from the keyboard, in what can be called a “casual interface” or “lean-back” posture. Browsing e-mail over morning coffee might be accomplished by mapping simple gestures to “next message” and “delete message”.
Gestures may compensate for the limitations of the mouse when the display is several times larger than a typical display. In such a scenario, gestures can provide mechanisms to restore the ability to quickly reach any part of the display, where once a mouse was adequate with a small display. Similarly, in a multiple display scenario it is desirable to have a fast comfortable way to indicate a particular display. For example, the foreground object may be “bumped” to another display by gesturing in the direction of the target display.
However, examples of perceptual user interfaces to date are dependent on significant limiting assumptions. One type of perceptual user interface utilizes color models that make certain assumptions about the color of an object. Proper operation of the system is dependent on proper lighting conditions and can be negatively impacted when the system is moved from one location to another as a result of changes in lighting conditions, or simply when the lighting conditions change in the room. Factors that impact performance include sun light versus artificial light, florescent light versus incandescent light, direct illumination versus indirect illumination, and the like. Additionally, most attempts to develop perceptual user interfaces require the user to wear specialized devices such as gloves, headsets, or close-talk microphones. The use of such devices is generally found to be distracting and intrusive for the user.
Thus perceptual user interfaces have been slow to emerge. The reasons include heavy computational burdens, unreasonable calibration demands, required use of intrusive and distracting devices, and a general lack of robustness outside of specific laboratory conditions. For these and similar reasons, there has been little advancement in systems and methods for exploiting perceptual user interfaces. However, as the trend towards smaller, specialized electronic gadgets continues to grow, so does the need for alternate methods for interaction between the user and the electronic device. Many of these specialized devices are too small and the applications unsophisticated to utilize the traditional input keyboard and mouse devices. Examples of such devices include TabletPCs, Media center PCs, kiosks, hand held computers, home appliances, video games, and wall sized displays, along with many others. In these, and other applications, the perceptual user interface provides a significant advancement in computer control over traditional computer interaction modalities.
In light of these findings, what is needed is to standardize a small set of easily learned gestures, the semantics of which are determined by application context. A small set of very simple gestures may offer significant bits of functionality where they are needed most. For example, dismissing a notification window may be accomplished by a quick gesture to the one side or the other, as in shooing a fly. Another example is gestures for “next” and “back” functionality found in web browsers, presentation programs (e.g., PowerPoint™) and other applications. Note that in many cases the surface forms of these various gestures may remain the same throughout these examples, while the semantics of the gestures depends on the application at hand. Providing a small set of standard gestures eases problems users have in recalling how gestures are performed, and also allows for simpler and more robust signal processing and recognition processes.
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the invention nor delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The present invention relates to a system and methodology to implement a perceptual user interface comprising alternative modalities for controlling computer application programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands. A perceptual user interface system is provided that detects and tracks hand and/or object movements, and provides for the control of application programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to hand or object movements performed by the user. The system operates in real time, is robust, responsive, and introduces a reduced computational load due to “lightweight” sparse stereo image processing by not imaging every pixel, but only a reduced representation of image pixels. That is, the depth at every pixel in the image is not computed, which is the typical approach in conventional correlation-based stereo systems. The present invention utilizes the depth information at specific locations in the image that correspond to object hypotheses.
The system provides a relatively inexpensive capability for the recognition of hand gestures.
Mice are particularly suited to fine cursor control, and most users have much experience with them. The disclosed invention can provide a secondary, coarse control that may complement mice in some applications. For example, in a map application, the user might cause the viewpoint to change with a gesture, while using the mouse to select and manipulate particular objects in the view. The present invention may also provide a natural “push-to-talk” or “stop-listening” signal to speech recognition processes. Users were shown to prefer using a perceptual user interface for push-to-talk. The invention combines area cursors with gesture-based manipulation of on-screen objects, and may be configured to be driven by gross or fine movements, and may be helpful to people with limited manual dexterity.
A multiple hypothesis tracking framework allows for the detection and tracking of multiple objects. Thus tracking of both hands may be considered for a two-handed interface. Studies show that people naturally assign different tasks to each hand, and that the non-dominant hand can support the task of the dominant hand. Two-handed interfaces are often used to specify spatial relationships that are otherwise more difficult to describe in speech. For example, it is natural to describe the relative sizes of objects by holding up two hands, or to specify how an object (dominant hand) is to be moved with respect to its environment (non-dominant hand). Thus there is provided a system that facilitates the processing of computer-human interaction in response to multiple input modalities. The system processes commands in response to hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands, or in addition to traditional computer-human interaction modalities such as a keyboard and mouse. The user interacts with the computer and controls the application through a series of hand gestures, or a combination of hand gestures and verbal commands, but is also free to operate the system with traditional interaction devices when more appropriate. The system and method provide for certain actions to be performed in response to particular verbal commands. For example, a verbal command “Close” may be used to close a selected window and a verbal command “Raise” may be used to bring the window to the forefront of the display.
In accordance with another aspect thereof, the present invention facilitates adapting the system to the particular preferences of an individual user. The system and method allow the user to tailor the system to recognize specific hand gestures and verbal commands and to associate these hand gestures and verbal commands with particular actions to be taken. This capability allows different users, which may prefer to make different motions for a given command, the ability to tailor the system in a way most efficient for their personal use. Similarly, different users can choose to use different verbal commands to perform the same function. For example, one user may choose to say “Release” to stop moving a window while another may wish to say “Quit”.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, dwell time is used as an alternative modality to complement gestures or verbal commands. Dwell time is the length of time an input device pointer remains in a particular position (or location of the GUI), and is controlled by the user holding one hand stationary while the system is tracking that hand. In response to the hand gesture, or combination of hand gestures, the pointer may be caused to be moved by the system to a location of the GUI. The disclosed invention provides for a modality such that if the pointer dwell time equals or exceeds predetermined dwell criteria, the system reacts accordingly. For example, where the dwell time exceeds a first criteria, the GUI window is selected. Dwelling of the pointer for a longer period of time in a portion of a window invokes a corresponding command to bring the window to the foreground of the GUI display, while dwelling still longer invokes a command to cause the window to be grabbed and moved.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, video cameras are used to view a volume of area. This volume of area is generally in front of the video display (on which the video cameras may be located) and is designated as an engagement volume wherein gesture commands may be performed by the user and recognized by the system. Objects in motion are detected by comparing corresponding patches (subsets of video of the entire video image) of video from successive video images. By analyzing and comparing the corresponding video patches from successive images, objects in motion are detected and tracked.
In accordance with still another aspect of the invention, two video cameras are mounted substantially parallel to each other to generate video images that are used to determine the depth (distance from the camera, display, or other point of reference) of a moving object using a lightweight sparse stereo technique. The lightweight sparse stereo technique reduces the computational requirements of the system and the depth component is used as an element in determining whether that particular object is the nearest object within the engagement volume.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the present invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
As used in this application, the terms “component” and “system” are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
The present invention relates to a system and methodology for implementing a perceptual user interface comprising alternative modalities for controlling computer programs and manipulating on-screen objects through hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures and/or verbal commands. A perceptual user interface system is provided that tracks hand movements and provides for the control of computer programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to hand gestures performed by the user. Similarly the system provides for the control of computer programs and manipulation of on-screen objects in response to verbal commands spoken by the user. Further, the gestures and/or verbal commands may be tailored by a particular user to suit that user's personal preferences. The system operates in real time and is robust, light in weight and responsive. The system provides a relatively inexpensive capability for the recognition of hand gestures and verbal commands.
Referring now to FIG. 1 , there is illustrated a system block diagram of components of the present invention for controlling a computer and/or other hardware/software peripherals interfaced thereto. The system 100 includes a tracking component 102 for detecting and tracking one or more objects 104 through image capture utilizing cameras (not shown) or other suitable conventional image-capture devices. The cameras operate to capture images of the object(s) 104 in a scene within the image capture capabilities of the cameras so that the images may be further processed to not only detect the presence of the object(s) 104, but also to detect and track object(s) movements. It is appreciated that in more robust implementations, object characteristics such as object features and object orientation may also be detected, tracked, and processed. The object(s) 104 of the present invention include basic hand movements created by one or more hands of a system user and/or other person selected for use with the disclosed system. However, in more robust system implementations, such objects may include many different types of objects with object characteristics, including hand gestures each of which have gesture characteristics including but not limited to, hand movement, finger count, finger orientation, hand rotation, hand orientation, and hand pose (e.g., opened, closed, and partially closed).
The tracking component 102 interfaces to a control component 106 of the system 100 that controls all onboard component processes. The control component 106 interfaces to a seeding component 108 that seeds object hypotheses to the tracking component based upon the object characteristics.
The object(s) 104 are detected and tracked in the scene such that object characteristic data is processed according to predetermined criteria to associate the object characteristic data with commands for interacting with a user interface component 110. The user interface component 110 interfaces to the control component 106 to receive control instructions that affect presentation of text, graphics, and other output (e.g., audio) provided to the user via the interface component 110. The control instructions are communicated to the user interface component 110 in response to the object characteristic data processed from detection and tracking of the object(s) within a predefined engagement volume space 112 of the scene.
A filtering component 114 interfaces to the control component 106 to receive filtering criteria in accordance with user filter configuration data, and to process the filtering criteria such that tracked object(s) of respective object hypotheses are selectively removed from the object hypotheses and/or at least one hypothesis from a set of hypotheses within the volume space 112 and the scene. Objects are detected and tracked either within the volume space 112 or outside the volume space 112. Those objects outside of the volume space 112 are detected, tracked, and ignored, until entering the volume space 112.
The system 100 also receives user input via input port(s) 116 such as input from pointing devices, keyboards, interactive input mechanisms such as touch screens, and audio input devices.
The subject invention (e.g., in connection with object detection, tracking, and filtering) can employ various artificial intelligence based schemes for carrying out various aspects of the subject invention. For example, a process for determining which object is to be selected for tracking can be facilitated via an automatic classification system and process. Such classification can employ a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis (e.g., factoring into the analysis utilities and costs) to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed. For example, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier can be employed. Other classification approaches include Bayesian networks, decision trees, and probabilistic classification models providing different patterns of independence can be employed. Classification as used herein also is inclusive of statistical regression that is utilized to develop models of priority.
As will be readily appreciated from the subject specification, the subject invention can employ classifiers that are explicitly trained (e.g., via a generic training data) as well as implicitly trained (e.g., via observing user behavior, receiving extrinsic information) so that the classifier(s) is used to automatically determine according to a predetermined criteria which object(s) should be selected for tracking and which objects that were being tracked are now removed from tracking. The criteria can include, but is not limited to, object characteristics such as object size, object speed, direction of movement, distance from one or both cameras, object orientation, object features, and object rotation. For example, with respect to SVM's which are well understood—it is to be appreciated that other classifier models may also be utilized such as Naive Bayes, Bayes Net, decision tree and other learning models—SVM's are configured via a learning or training phase within a classifier constructor and feature selection module. A classifier is a function that maps an input attribute vector, x=(x1, x2, x3, x4, . . . , xn), to a confidence that the input belongs to a class—that is, f(x)=confidence(class). In the case of text-based data collection synchronization classification, for example, attributes are words or phrases or other data-specific attributes derived from the words (e.g., parts of speech, presence of key terms), and the classes are categories or areas of interest (e.g., levels of priorities).
Referring now to FIG. 2 , there is illustrated a schematic block diagram of a perceptual user interface system, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The system comprises a computer 200 with a traditional keyboard 202, input pointing device (e.g., a mouse) 204, microphone 206, and display 208. The system further comprises at least one video camera 210, at least one user 212, and software 214. The exemplary system of FIG. 2 is comprised of two video cameras 210 mounted substantially parallel to each other (that is, the rasters are parallel) and the user 212. The first camera is used to detect and track the object, and the second camera is used for determining the depth (or distance) of the object from the camera(s). The computer 200 is operably connected to the keyboard 202, mouse 204 and display 208. Video cameras 210 and microphone 206 are also operably connected to computer 200. The video cameras 210 “look” towards the user 212 and may point downward to capture objects within the volume defined above the keyboard and in front of the user. User 212 is typically an individual that is capable of providing hand gestures, holding objects in a hand, verbal commands, and mouse and/or keyboard input. The hand gestures and/or object(s) appear in video images created by the video cameras 210 and are interpreted by the software 214 as commands to be executed by computer 200. Similarly, microphone 206 receives verbal commands provided by user 212, which are in turn, interpreted by software 214 and executed by computer 200. User 212 can control and operate various application programs on the computer 200 by providing a series of hand gestures or a combination of hand gestures, verbal commands, and mouse/keyboard input.
In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, methodologies in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to FIGS. 3-5 . While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies of FIGS. 3-5 are shown and described as executing serially, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other aspects from that shown and described herein. Moreover, not all illustrated features may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with an aspect the present invention.
Accordingly, FIG. 3 is a flow diagram that illustrates a high level methodology for detecting the user's hand, tracking movement of the hand and interpreting commands in accordance with an aspect of the invention. While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies shown here and below are described as a series of acts, it is to be understood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may, in accordance with the present invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein. For example, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that a methodology could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram. Moreover, not all illustrated acts may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with the present invention.
The methodology begins at 300 where video images are scanned to determine whether any moving objects exist within the field of view (or scene) of the cameras. The system is capable of running one or more object hypothesis models to detect and track objects, whether moving or not moving. In one embodiment, the system runs up to and including six object hypotheses. If more than one object is detected as a result of the multiple hypotheses, the system drops one of the objects if the distance from any other object falls below a threshold distance, for example, five inches. It is assumed that the two hypotheses are redundantly tracking the same object, and one of the hypotheses is removed from consideration. At 302, if NO, no moving object(s) have been detected, and flow returns to 300 where the system continues to scan the current image for moving objects. Alternatively, if YES, object movement has been detected, and flow continues from 302 to 304 where it is determined whether or not one or more moving objects are within the engagement volume. It is appreciated that the depth of the object may be determined before determination of whether the object is within the engagement volume.
The engagement volume is defined as a volume of space in front of the video cameras and above the keyboard wherein the user is required to introduce the hand gestures (or object(s)) in order to utilize the system. A purpose of the engagement volume is to provide a means for ignoring all objects and/or gestures in motion except for those intended by the user to effect control of the computer. If a moving object is detected at 302, but is determined not to be within the engagement volume, then the system dismisses the moving object as not being a desired object to track for providing commands. Flow then loops back to the input of 300 to scan for more objects. However, if the moving object is determined to be within the engagement volume, then the methodology proceeds to 306. However, new objects are seeded only when it is determined that the new object is a sufficient distance away from an existing object that is being tracked (in 3-D). At 306, the system determines the distance of each moving object from the video cameras. At 308, if more than one moving object is detected within the engagement volume, then the object closest to the video camera(s) is selected as the desired command object. If by the given application context the user is predisposed to use hand gestures towards the display, the nearest object hypotheses will apply to the hands. In other scenarios, more elaborate criteria for object selection may be used. For example, an application may select a particular object based upon its quality of movement over time. Additionally, a two-handed interaction application may select an object to the left of the dominant hand (for right handed users) as the non-dominant hand. The command object is the object that has been selected for tracking, the movements of which will be analyzed and interpreted for gesture commands. The command object is generally the user's dominant hand. Once the command object is selected, its movement is tracked, as indicated at 310.
At 312, the system determines whether the command object is still within the engagement volume. If NO, the object has moved outside the engagement volume, and the system dismisses the object hypothesis and returns to 300 where the current image is processed for moving objects. If NO, the object is still within the engagement volume, and flow proceeds to 314. At 314, the system determines whether the object is still moving. If no movement is detected, flow is along the NO path returning to 300 to process the current camera images for moving objects. If however, movement is detected, then flow proceeds from 314 to 316. At 316, the system analyzes the movements of the command object to interpret the gestures for specific commands. At 318, it is determined whether the interpreted gesture is a recognized command. If NO, the movement is not interpreted as a recognized command, and flow returns to 310 to continue tracking the object. However, if the object movement is interpreted as a recognized command, flow is to 320 where the system executes the corresponding command. After execution thereof, flow returns to 310 to continue tracking the object. This process may continually execute to detect and interpret gestures.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, algorithms used to interpret gestures are kept to simple algorithms and are performed on sparse (“lightweight”) images to limit the computational overhead required to properly interpret and execute desired commands in real time. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the system is able to exploit the presence of motion and depth to minimize computational requirements involved in determining objects that provide gesture commands.
Referring now to FIG. 4 , there is illustrated a flow diagram of a methodology for determining the presence of moving objects within video images created by one or more video sources, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The methodology exploits the notion that attention is often drawn to objects that move. At 400, video data is acquired from one or more video sources. Successive video images are selected from the same video source, and motion is detected by comparing a patch of a current video image, centered on a given location, to a patch from the previous video image centered on the same location. At 402, a video patch centered about a point located at (u1,v1), and (u2,v2) is selected from successive video images I1 and I2, respectively. A simple comparison function is utilized wherein the sum of the absolute differences (SAD) over square patches in two images is obtained. For a patch from image I1 centered on pixel location (u1,v1) and a patch in image I2 centered on (u2,v2), the image comparison function is defined as SAD (I1u1,v1,I2,u2,v2) as:
where I(u,v) refers to the pixel at (u,v), D is the patch width, and the absolute difference between two pixels is the sum of the absolute differences taken over all available color channels. Regions in the image that have movement can be found by determining points (u,v) such that function SAD(It-1,ut-1,vt-1,It,vt)>τ, where the subscript refers to the image at time t, and τ is a threshold level for motion. At 404, a comparison is made between patches from image I1 and I2 using the sum of the absolute difference algorithm. At 406, the result of the sum of the absolute difference algorithm is compared to a threshold value to determine whether a threshold level of motion exists within the image patch. If SAD≦τ, no sufficient motion exists, and flow proceeds to 410. If at 406, SAD>τ, then sufficient motion exists within the patch, and flow is to 408 where the object is designated for continued tracking. At 410, the system determines whether the current image patch is the last patch to be examined within the current image. If NO, the methodology returns to 402 where a new patch is selected. If YES, then the system returns to 400 to acquire a new video image from the video source.
To reduce the computational load, the SAD algorithm is computed on a sparse regular grid within the image. In one embodiment, the sparse regular grid is based on sixteen pixel centers. When the motion detection methodology determines that an object has sufficient motion, then the system tracks the motion of the object. Again, in order to limit (or reduce) the computational load, a position prediction algorithm is used to predict the next position of the moving object. In one embodiment, the prediction algorithm is a Kalman filter. However, it is to be appreciated that any position prediction algorithm can be used.
Note that the image operations may use the same SAD function on image patches, which allows for easy SIMD (Single-Instruction Stream Multiple-Data Stream, which architectures are essential in the parallel world of computers) optimization of the algorithm's implementation, which in turn allows it to run with sufficiently many trackers while still leaving CPU time to the user.
The process of seeding process hypotheses based upon motion may place more than one hypothesis on a given moving object. One advantage of this multiple hypothesis approach is that a simple, fast, and imperfect tracking algorithm may be used. Thus if one tracker fails, another may be following the object of interest. Once a given tracker has been seeded, the algorithm updates the position of the object being followed using the same function over successive frames.
Referring now to FIG. 5 , there is illustrated a flow diagram of a methodology for tracking a moving object within an image, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The methodology begins at 500 where, after the motion detection methodology has identified the location of a moving object to be tracked, the next position of the object is predicted. Once identified, the methodology utilizes a prediction algorithm to predict the position of the object in successive frames. The prediction algorithm limits the computational burden on the system. In the successive frames, the moving object should be at the predicted location, or within a narrow range centered on the predicted location. At 502, the methodology selects a small pixel window (e.g., ten pixels) centered on the predicted location. Within this small window, an algorithm executes to determine the actual location of the moving object. At 504, the new position is determined by examining the sum of the absolute difference algorithm over successive video frames acquired at time t and time t-1. The actual location is determined by finding the location (ut, vt) that minimizes:
SAD(It-1,ut-1,vt-1,It,ut,vt),
where It refers to the image at time t, It-1 refers to the image at time t-1, and where (ut,vt) refers to the location at time t. Once determined, the actual position is updated, at 506. At 508, motion characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the motion is still greater that the threshold level required. What is evaluated is not only the SAD image-based computation, but also movement of the object over time. The movement parameter is the average movement over a window of time. Thus if the user pauses the object or hand for a short duration of time, it may not be dropped from consideration. However, if the duration of time for the pause is still longer such that it exceeds a predetermined average time parameter, the object will be dropped. If YES, the motion is sufficient, and flow returns to 500 where a new prediction for the next position is determined. If NO, the object motion is insufficient, and the given object is dropped from being tracked, as indicated by flow to 510. At 512, flow is to 430 ofFIG. 4 to select a new patch in the image from which to analyze motion.
SAD(It-1,ut-1,vt-1,It,ut,vt),
where It refers to the image at time t, It-1 refers to the image at time t-1, and where (ut,vt) refers to the location at time t. Once determined, the actual position is updated, at 506. At 508, motion characteristics are evaluated to determine whether the motion is still greater that the threshold level required. What is evaluated is not only the SAD image-based computation, but also movement of the object over time. The movement parameter is the average movement over a window of time. Thus if the user pauses the object or hand for a short duration of time, it may not be dropped from consideration. However, if the duration of time for the pause is still longer such that it exceeds a predetermined average time parameter, the object will be dropped. If YES, the motion is sufficient, and flow returns to 500 where a new prediction for the next position is determined. If NO, the object motion is insufficient, and the given object is dropped from being tracked, as indicated by flow to 510. At 512, flow is to 430 of
When determining the depth information of an object (i.e., the distance from the object to the display or any other chosen reference point), a lightweight sparse stereo approach is utilized in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The sparse stereo approach is a region-based approach utilized to find the disparity at only locations in the image corresponding to the object hypothesis. Note that in the stereo matching process, it is assumed that both cameras are parallel (in rasters). Object hypotheses are supported by frame-to-frame tracking through time in one view and stereo matching across both views. A second calibration issue is the distance between the two cameras (i.e., the baseline), which must be considered to recover depth in real world coordinates. In practice, both calibration issues maybe dealt with automatically by fixing the cameras on a prefabricated mounting bracket or semi-automatically by the user presenting objects at a known depth in a calibration routine that requires a short period of time to complete. The accuracy of the transform to world coordinates is improved by accounting for lens distortion effects with a static, pre-computed calibration procedure for a given camera.
Binocular disparity is the primary means for recovering depth information from two or more images taken from different viewpoints. Given the two-dimensional position of an object in two views, it is possible to compute the depth of the object. Given that the two cameras are mounted parallel to each other in the same horizontal plane, and given that the two cameras have a focal length f, the three-dimensional position (x,y,z) of an object is computed from the positions of the object in both images (ul,vl) and (ur,vr) by the following perspective projection equations:
where the disparity, d, is the shift in location of the object in one view with respect to the other, and is related to the baseline b, the distance between the two cameras.
The vision algorithm performs 3-dimensional (3-D) tracking and 3-D depth computations. In this process, each object hypothesis is supported only by consistency of the object movement in 3-D. Unlike many conventional computer vision algorithms, the present invention does not rely on fragile appearance models such as skin color models or hand image templates, which are likely invalidated when environmental conditions change or the system is confronted with a different user.
Referring now to FIG. 6 , there is illustrated a disparity between two video images captured by two video cameras mounted substantially parallel to each other for the purpose of determining the depth of objects, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. In FIG. 6 , a first camera 600 and a second camera 602 (similar to cameras 210) are mounted substantially parallel to each other in the same horizontal plane and laterally aligned. The two cameras (600 and 602) are separated by a distance 604 defined between the longitudinal focal axis of each camera lens, also known as the baseline, b. A first video image 606 is the video image from the first camera 600 and a second video image 608 is the video image from the second camera 602. The disparity d (also item number 610), or shift in the two video images (606 and 608), can be seen by looking to an object 612 in the center of the first image 606, and comparing the location of that object 612 in the first image 606 to the location of that same object 612 in the second image 608. The disparity 610 is illustrated as the difference between a first vertical centerline 614 of the first image 606 that intersects the center of the object 612, and a second vertical centerline 616 of the second image 608. In the first image 606, the object 612 is centered about the vertical centerline 614 with the top of the object 612 located at point (u,v). In the second image 608, the same point (u,v) of the object 612 is located at point (u-d,v) in the second image 608, where d is the disparity 610, or shift in the object from the first image 606 with respect to the second image 610. Given disparity d, a depth z can be determined. As will be discussed, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, the depth component z is used in part to determine if an object is within the engagement volume, where the engagement volume is the volume within which objects will be selected by the system.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a sparse stereo approach is utilized in order to limit computational requirements. The sparse stereo approach is that which determines disparity d only at the locations in the image that corresponds to a moving object. For a given point (u,v) in the image, the value of disparity d is found such that the sum of the absolute differences over a patch in the first image 606 (i.e., a left image IL) centered on (u,v) and a corresponding patch in the second image 608 (i.e., a right image IR) centered on (u-d,v) is minimized, i.e., the dispatch value d that minimizes SAD(Il,u-d,v,Ir,u,v). If an estimate of depth z is available from a previous time, then in order to limit computational requirements, the search for the minimal disparity d is limited to a range of depth z around the last known depth.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the search range may be further narrowed by use of an algorithm to predict the objects new location. In one embodiment, the prediction is accomplished by utilization of a Kalman filter.
The depth z can also be computed using traditional triangulation techniques. The sparse stereo technique is used when the system operation involves detecting moving objects within a narrow range in front of the display, e.g., within twenty inches. In such cases, the two video cameras are mounted in parallel and separated by a distance equal to the approximate width of the display. However, when the system is implemented in a larger configuration, the distance between the two video cameras may be much greater. In such cases, traditional triangulation algorithms are used to determine the depth.
The foregoing discussion has focused on some details of the methodologies associated with locating and tracking an object to effect execution of corresponding and specified commands. An overview follows as to how these capabilities are implemented in one exemplary system.
Referring now to FIG. 7 , there is illustrated an example of gestures that the system recognizes, and further illustrates visual feedback provided to the system through the display. A user 700 gives commands by virtue of different hand gestures 702 and/or verbal commands 704. The gestures 702 are transmitted to a system computer (not shown) as part of the video images created by a pair of video cameras (706 and 708). Verbal and/or generally, audio commands, are input to the system computer through a microphone 710. Typical GUI windows 712, 714, and 716 are displayed in a layered presentation in an upper portion of display 718 while a lower portion of display 718 provides visual graphic feedback of in the form of icons 720, 722, 724, and 726 of some of the gestures 702 recognized by the system.
In one example, the hand icon 720 is displayed when a corresponding gesture 728 is recognized. The name of the recognized command (Move) is also then displayed below the icon 720 to provide additional textual feedback to the user 700. Move and Raise commands may be recognized by dwelling on the window for a period of time. There is also a “flick” or “bump” command to send a window from one monitor to another monitor, in a multiple monitor configuration. This is controlled by moving the hand (or object) to the left or right, and is described in greater detail hereinbelow with respect to FIG. 9B . There are at least two ways to effect a Move; by speech recognition when voicing the word “Move”, or phrase “Move Window”, or any other associated voice command(s); and, by using the dwelling technique. It is appreciated that where more robust image capture and imaging processing systems are implemented, the pose of the hand may be mapped to any functionality, as described in greater detail below. Moreover, the shape of the hand icon may be changed in association with the captured hand pose to provide visual feedback to the user that the correct hand pose is being processed. However, as a basic implementation, the hand icon is positioned for selecting the window for interaction, or to move the window, or effect scrolling.
A Scroll command may be initiated first by voicing a corresponding command that is processed by speech recognition, and then using the hand (or object) to commence scrolling of the window by moving the hand (or object) up and down for the desired scroll direction.
In another example, the single displayed hand icon 720 is presented for all recognized hand gestures 702, however, the corresponding specific command name is displayed below the icon 720. Here, the same hand icon 720 is displayed in accordance with four different hand gestures utilized to indicate four different commands: Move, Close, Raise, and Scroll.
In still another aspect of the present invention, a different hand shaped icon is used for each specific command and the name of the command is optionally displayed below the command. In yet another embodiment, audio confirmation is provided by the computer, in addition to the displayed icon and optional command name displayed below the icon.
As previously mentioned, FIG. 7 illustrates the embodiment where a single hand shaped icon 720 is used, and the corresponding command recognized by the system is displayed below the icon 720. For example, when the system recognizes, either by virtue of gestures (with hand and/or object) and or verbal commands, the command to move a window, the icon 720 and corresponding command word “MOVE” are displayed by the display 718. Similarly, when the system recognizes a command to close a window, the icon 720 and corresponding command word “CLOSE” may be displayed by the display 718. Additional examples include, but are not limited to, displaying the icon 720 and corresponding command word “RAISE” when the system recognizes a hand gesture to bring a GUI window forward. When the system recognizes a hand gesture corresponding to a scroll command for scrolling a GUI window, the icon 720 and command word “SCROLL” are displayed by the display 718.
It is to be appreciated that the disclosed system may be configured to display any number and type of graphical icons in response to one or more hand gestures presented by the system user. Additionally, audio feedback may be used such that a beep to tone may be presented in addition to or in lieu of the graphical feedback. Furthermore the graphical icon may be used to provide feedback in the form of a color, combination of colors, and/or flashing color or colors. Feedback may also be provided by flashing a border of the selected window, the border in the direction of movement. For example, if the window is to be moved to the right, the right window border could be flashed to indicate the selected direction of window movement. In addition to or separate from, a corresponding tone frequency may be emitted to indicate direction of movement, e.g., an upward movement would have and associated high pitch and a downward movement would have a low pitch. Still further, rotational aspects may be provided such that movement to the left effects a counterclockwise rotation of a move icon, or perhaps a leftward tilt in the GUI window in the direction of movement.
Referring now to FIG. 8 , there is illustrated an alternative embodiment wherein a unique icon is displayed in association with a name of a specific recognized command, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. Here, each icon-word pair is unique for each recognized command. Icon-word pairs 800, 802, 804, and 806 for the respective commands “MOVE”, “CLOSE”, “RAISE”, and “SCROLL”, are examples of visual feedback capabilities that can be provided.
The system is capable of interpreting commands based on interpreting hand gestures, verbal commands, or both in combination. A hand is identified as a moving object by the motion detection algorithms and the hand movement is tracked and interpreted. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, hand gestures and verbal commands are used cooperatively. Speech recognition is performed using suitable voice recognition applications, for example, Microsoft SAPI 5.1, with a simple command and control grammar. However, it is understood that any similar speech recognition system can be used. An inexpensive microphone is placed near the display to receive audio input. However, the microphone can be placed at any location insofar as audio signals can be received thereinto and processed by the system.
Following is an example of functionality that is achieved by combining hand gesture and verbal modalities. Interaction with the system can be initiated by a user moving a hand across an engagement plane and into an engagement volume.
Referring now to FIG. 9A , there is illustrated the engagement plane and engagement volume for a single monitor system of the present invention. A user 900 is located generally in front of a display 902, which is also within the imaging capabilities of a pair of cameras (906 and 908). A microphone 904 (similar to microphones 206 and 710) is suitably located such that user voice signals are input for processing, e.g., in front of the display 902. The cameras (906 and 908, similar to cameras 200 and, 706 and 708) are mounted substantially parallel to each other and on a horizontal plane above the display 902. The two video cameras (906 and 908) are separated by a distance that provides optimum detection and tracking for the given cameras and the engagement volume. However, it is to be appreciated that cameras suitable for wider fields of view, higher resolution, may be placed further apart on a plane different from the top of the display 902, for example, lower and along the sides of the display facing upwards, to capture gesture images for processing in accordance with novel aspects of the present invention. In accordance therewith, more robust image processing capabilities and hypothesis engines can be employed in the system to process greater amounts of data.
Between the display 902 and the user 900 is a volume 910 defined as the engagement volume. The system detects and tracks objects inside and outside of the volume 910 to determine the depth of one or more objects with respect to the engagement volume 910. However, those objects determined to be of a depth that is outside of the volume 910 will be ignored. As mentioned hereinabove, the engagement volume 910 is typically defined to be located where the hands and/or objects in the hands of the user 900 are most typically situated, i.e., above a keyboard of the computer system and in front of the cameras (906 and 908) between the user 900 and the display 902 (provided the user 900 is seated in front of the display on which the cameras (906 and 908) are located). However, is it appreciated that the user 900 may be standing while controlling the computer, which requires that the volume 910 be located accordingly to facilitate interface interaction. Furthermore, the objects may include not only the hand(s) of the user, or objects in the hand(s), but other parts of the body, such as head, torso movement, arms, or any other detectable objects. This is described in greater detail hereinbelow.
A plane 912 defines a face of the volume 910 that is closest to the user 900, and is called the engagement plane. The user 900 may effect control of the system by moving a hand (or object) through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910. However, as noted above, the hand of the user 900 is detected and tracked even when outside the engagement volume 910. However, it would be ignored when outside of the engagement volume 910 insofar as control of the computer is concerned. When the object is moved across the engagement plane 912, feedback is provided to the user in the form of displaying an alpha-blended icon on the display (e.g., an operating system desktop). The icon is designed to be perceived as distinct from other desktop icons and may be viewed as an area cursor. The engagement plane 912 is positioned such that the user's hands do not enter it during normal use of the keyboard and mouse. When the system engages the hand or object, the corresponding hand icon displayed on the desktop is moved to reflect the position of the tracked object (or hand).
The engagement and acquisition of the moving hand (or object) is implemented in the lightweight sparse stereo system by looking for the object with a depth that is less than a predetermined distance value. Any such object will be considered the command object until it is moved out of the engagement volume 910, for example, behind the engagement plane 912, or until the hand (or object) is otherwise removed from being a tracked object. In one example, the specified distance is twenty inches.
In operation, the user 900 moves a hand through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910 established for the system. The system detects the hand, tracks the hand as the hand moves from outside of the volume 910 to the inside, and provides feedback by displaying a corresponding hand shaped icon on the display 902. The open microphone 904 placed near the display 902 provides means for the user 900 to invoke one or more verbal commands in order to act upon the selected window under the icon. The window directly underneath the hand shaped icon is the selected window. When a spoken and/or audio command is input to and understood by the system, the interpreted command is displayed along with the hand shaped icon. For example, in one embodiment, by speaking the word “Move”, the user may initiate the continuous (or stepped) movement of the window under the hand shaped icon to follow the movement of the user's hand. The user 900 causes the selected window to move up or down within the display 902 by moving the hand up or down. Lateral motion is also similarly achieved. Movement of the window is terminated when the user hand is moved across the engagement plane 912 and out of the engagement volume 910. Other methods of termination include stopping movement of the hand (or object) for an extended period of time, which is processed by the system as a command to drop the associated hypothesis. Furthermore, as described hereinabove, the Move command may be invoked by dwelling the hand on the window for a period of time, followed by hand motion to initiate the direction of window movement.
Alternatively, the user may speak the word “Release” and the system will stop moving the selected window in response to the user's hand motion. Release may also be accomplished by dwelling a bit longer in time while in Move, and/or Scroll modes. The user 900 may also act upon a selected window with other actions. By speaking the words “Close”, “Minimize”, or “Maximize” the selected window is respectively closed, minimized or maximized. By speaking the word “Raise”, the selected window is brought to the foreground, and by speaking “Send to Back”, the selected window is sent behind (to the background) all other open windows. By speaking “Scroll”, the user initiates a scrolling mode on the selected window. The user may control the rate of the scroll by the position of the hand. The hand shaped icon tracks the user's hand position, and the rate of the scrolling of the selected window is proportional to the distance between the current hand icon position and the position of the hand icon at the time the scrolling is initiated. Scrolling can be terminated by the user speaking “Release” or by the user moving their hand behind the engagement plane and out of the engagement volume. These are just a few examples of the voice recognition perceptual computer control capabilities of the disclosed architecture. It is to be appreciated that these voiced commands may also be programmed for execution in response to one or more object movements in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, dwell time can be used as a modality to control windows in lieu of, or in addition to, verbal commands and other disclosed modalities. Dwell time is defined as the time, after having engaged the system, that the user holds their hand position stationary such that the system hand shaped icon remains over a particular window. For example, by dwelling on a selected window for a short period of time (e.g., two seconds), the system can bring the window to the foreground of all other open windows (i.e., a RAISE command). Similarly, by dwelling a short time longer (e.g., four seconds), the system will grab (or select for dragging) the window, and the user causes the selected window to move up or down within the display by moving a hand up or down (i.e., a MOVE command). Lateral motion is also similarly achieved. Additional control over GUI windows can be accomplished in a similar fashion by controlling the dwell time of the hand shaped icon over the open window.
In accordance with a more robust aspect of the invention, hand gestures are interpreted by hand motion or by pattern recognition. For example, the user can bring the window to the front (or foreground), on top of all other open windows by moving a hand from a position closer to the display to position farther from the display, the hand remaining in the engagement volume 910. Similarly, the user can cause the selected window to be grabbed and moved by bringing fingers together with their thumb, and subsequently moving the hand. The selected window will move in relation to the user hand movement until the hand is opened up to release the selected window. Additional control over the selected window can be defined in response to particular hand movements or hand gestures. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the selected window will move in response to the user pointing their hand, thumb, or finger in a particular direction. For example, if the user points their index finger to right, the window will move to the right within the display. Similarly, if the user points to the left, up, or down the selected window will move to the left, up or down within the display, respectively. Additional window controls can be achieved through the use of similar hand gestures or motions.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the system is configurable such that an individual user selects the particular hand gestures that they wish to associate with particular commands. The system provides default settings that map a given set of gestures to a given set of commands. This mapping, however, is configurable such that the specific command executed in response to each particular hand gesture is definable by each user. For example, one user may wish to point directly at the screen with their index finger to grab the selected window for movement while another user may wish to bring their fingers together with their thumb to grab the selected window. Similarly, one user may wish to point a group of finger up or down in order to move a selected window up or down, while another user may wish to open the palm of their hand toward the cameras and then move their opened hand up or down to move a selected window up or down. All given gestures and commands are configurable by the individual users to best suit that particular user's individual personal preferences.
Similarly, in accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the system may include a “Record and Define Gesture” mode. In the “Record and Define Gesture” mode, the system records hand gestures performed by the user. The recorded gestures are then stored in the system memory to be recognized during normal operation. The given hand gestures are then associated with a particular command to be performed by the system in response to that particular hand gesture. With such capability, a user may further tailor the system to their personal preference or, similarly, may tailor system operation to respond to specific commands most appropriate for particular applications.
In a similar fashion, the user can choose the particular words, from a given set, they wish to use for a particular command. For example, one user may choose to say “Release” to stop moving a window while another may wish to say “Quit”. This capability allows different users, which may prefer to use different words for a given command, the ability to tailor the system in a way most efficient for their personal use.
The present invention can be utilized in an expansive list of applications. The following discussion is exemplary of only a few applications with which the present invention may be utilized. One such application is associated with user control of a presentation, or similar type of briefing application, wherein the user makes a presentation on a projection type screen to a group of listeners.
Referring now to FIG. 9B , there is illustrated a multiple monitor implementation. Here, the system includes three monitors (or displays) through which the user 900 exercises control of GUI features; a first display 912, a second display 914, and a third display 916. The cameras (906 and 908) are similarly situated as in FIG. 9A , to define the engagement volume 910. By utilizing the “flick” or “bump” motion(s) as performed by a hand 918 of the user 900, the user 900 can move a window 920 from the first display 912 to the second display 914, and further from the second display 914 to the third display 916. The flick motion of the user hand 918 can effect movement of the window 920 from the first display 912 to the third display 916 in a single window movement, or in multiple steps through the displays (914 and 916) using corresponding multiple hand motions. Of course, control by the user 900 occurs only when the user hand 918 breaks the engagement plane 912, and is determined to be a control object (i.e., an object meeting parameters sufficient to effect control of the computer).
As mentioned hereinabove, the user 900 is located generally in front of the displays (912, 914, and 916), which is also within the imaging capabilities of the pair of cameras (906 and 908). The microphone 904 is suitably located to receive user voice signals. The cameras (906 and 908) are mounted substantially parallel to each other and on a horizontal plane above the displays (912, 914, and 916), and separated by a distance that provides optimum detection and tracking for the given cameras and the engagement volume 910.
In operation, the user 900 moves the hand 918 through the engagement plane 912 and into the engagement volume 910 established for the system. The system, which had detected and tracked the hand 918 before it entered the volume 912, begins providing feedback to the user 900 by displaying the hand shaped icon 922 on one of the displays (912, 914, and 916). The microphone 904 provides additional means for the user 900 to invoke one or more verbal commands in order to act upon the selected window 920 under the corresponding icon 922. The window 920 directly underneath the hand shaped icon is the selected window. When the user hand 918 enters the volume 910, it is recognized as a control object. The corresponding icon 922 is presented by the system on the computer display 912. By dwelling a predetermined amount of time, the associated window is assigned for control. The user 900 causes the selected window to move up or down within the display by invoking the ‘Move’ command as explained above and then moving the hand up or down, or to move across one or more of the monitors (914 and 916) by invoking the ‘Flick’ command and then using the flick hand motion. Of course, if the second display 914 was the initial point of control, the user 900 can cause the window 920 to be moved left to the first display 912, or right to the third display 916. Movement of the window is terminated (or “released”) when the user hand dwells for a time longer than a predetermined dwell time, or out of the engagement volume 910.
Alternatively, the user may speak the word “Release” and the system will stop moving the selected window in response to the user's hand motion. Release may also be accomplished by dwelling a bit while in Move, and/or Scroll modes. The user may also act upon a selected window with other actions. By speaking the words “Close”, “Minimize”, or “Maximize” the selected window is respectively closed, minimized or maximized. By speaking the word “Raise”, the selected window is brought to the foreground, and by speaking “Send to Back”, the selected window is sent behind (to the background) all other open windows. By speaking “Scroll”, the user initiates a scrolling mode on the selected window. The user may control the rate of the scroll by the position of the hand. The hand shaped icon tracks the user's hand position, and the rate of the scrolling of the selected window is proportional to the distance between the current hand icon position and the position of the hand icon at the time the scrolling is initiated. Scrolling can be terminated by the user speaking “Release” or by the user moving their hand behind the engagement plane and out of the engagement volume. These are just a few examples of the voice recognition perceptual computer control capabilities of the disclosed architecture.
Referring now to FIG. 10 , there is illustrated a briefing room environment where voice and/or gestures are utilized to control a screen projector via a computer system configured in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. The briefing room 1000 comprises a large briefing table 1002 surrounded on three sides by numerous chairs 1004, a computer 1006, a video projector 1008, and a projector screen 1010. Utilization of the present invention adds additional elements comprising the disclosed perceptual software 1012, two video cameras (1014 and 1016) and a microphone 1018. In this application, a user 1020 is positioned between the projector screen 1010 and briefing table 1002 at which the audience is seated. A top face 1022 of an engagement volume 1024 is defined by rectangular area 1026. Similarly, a front surface indicated at 1028 represents an engagement plane.
As the user gives the presentation, the user controls the content displayed on the projection screen 1010 and advancement of the slides (or presentation images) by moving their hand(s) through the engagement plane 1028 into the engagement volume 1024, and/or speaking commands recognizable by the system. Once inside the engagement volume 1024, a simple gesture is made to advance to the next slide, back-up to a previous slide, initiate an embedded video, or to effect one of a number of many other presentation capabilities.
A similar capability can be implemented for a home media center wherein the user can change selected video sources, change channels, control volume, advance chapter and other similar functions by moving their hand across an engagement plane into an engagement volume and subsequently performing the appropriate hand gesture. Additional applications include perceptual interfaces for TabletPCs, Media center PCs, kiosks, hand held computers, home appliances, video games, and wall sized displays, along with many others.
It is appreciated that in more robust implementations, instead of the engagement volume being fixed at a position associated with the location of the cameras that requires the presenter to operate according to the location of the engagement volume, the system can be configured such that the engagement volume travels with the user (in a “roaming” mode) as the user moves about the room. Thus the cameras would be mounted on a platform that rotates such that the rotation maintains the cameras substantially equidistant from the presenter. The presenter may carrier a sensor that allows the system to sense or track the general location of the presenter. The system would then affect rotation of the camera mount to “point” the cameras at the presenter. In response thereto, the engagement volume may be extended to the presenter allowing control of the computer system as the presenter moves about. The process of “extending” the engagement volume can include increasing the depth of the volume such that the engagement plane surface moves to the presenter, or by maintaining the volume dimensions, but moving the fixed volume to the presenter. This would require on-the-fly focal adjustment of the cameras to track quick movements in the depth of objects in the volume, but also the movement of the presenter.
Another method of triggering system attention in this mode would be to execute a predefined gesture that is not likely to be made unintentionally, e.g., raising a hand.
It is also appreciated that the system is configurable for individual preferences such that the engagement volume of a first user may be different than the volume of a second user. For example, in accordance with a user login, or other unique user information, the user preferences may be retrieved and implemented automatically by the system. This can include automatically elevating the mounted cameras for a taller person by using a telescoping camera stand so that the cameras are at the appropriate height of the particular user, whether sitting or standing. This also includes, but is not limited to, setting the system for “roaming” mode
Referring now to FIG. 11 , there is illustrated a block diagram of a computer operable to execute the present invention. In order to provide additional context for various aspects of the present invention, FIG. 11 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment 1100 in which the various aspects of the present invention may be implemented. While the invention has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions that may run on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention also may be implemented in combination with other program modules and/or as a combination of hardware and software. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive methods may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which may be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices. The illustrated aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where certain tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
With reference again to FIG. 11 , the exemplary environment 1100 for implementing various aspects of the invention includes a computer 1102, the computer 1102 including a processing unit 1104, a system memory 1106, and a system bus 1108. The system bus 1108 couples system components including, but not limited to the system memory 1106 to the processing unit 1104. The processing unit 1104 may be any of various commercially available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures also can be employed as the processing unit 1104.
The system bus 1108 can be any of several types of bus structure including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures. The system memory 1106 includes read only memory (ROM) 1110 and random access memory (RAM) 1112. A basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 1102, such as during start-up, is stored in the ROM 1110.
The computer 1102 further includes a hard disk drive 1114, a magnetic disk drive 1116, (e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 1118) and an optical disk drive 1120, (e.g., reading a CD-ROM disk 1122 or to read from or write to other optical media). The hard disk drive 1114, magnetic disk drive 1116 and optical disk drive 1120 can be connected to the system bus 1108 by a hard disk drive interface 1124, a magnetic disk drive interface 1126 and an optical drive interface 1128, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth. For the computer 1102, the drives and media accommodate the storage of broadcast programming in a suitable digital format. Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and a CD, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such as zip drives, magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, cartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment, and further that any such media may contain computer-executable instructions for performing the methods of the present invention.
A number of program modules can be stored in the drives and RAM 1112, including an operating system 1130, one or more application programs 1132, other program modules 1134 and program data 1136. It is appreciated that the present invention can be implemented with various commercially available operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
A user can enter commands and information into the computer 1102 through a keyboard 1138 and a pointing device, such as a mouse 1140. Other input devices (not shown) may include one or more video cameras, one or microphones, an IR remote control, a joystick, a game pad, a satellite dish, a scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 1104 through a serial port interface 1142 that is coupled to the system bus 1108, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, a game port, a firewire port, a universal serial bus (“USB”), an IR interface, etc. A monitor 1144 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 1108 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1146. In addition to the monitor 1144, a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers, printers etc.
The computer 1102 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer(s) 1148. The remote computer(s) 1148 may be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, portable computer, microprocessor-based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 1102, although, for purposes of brevity, only a memory storage device 1150 is illustrated. The logical connections depicted include a LAN 1152 and a WAN 1154. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 1102 is connected to the local network 1152 through a network interface or adapter 1156. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 1102 typically includes a modem 1158, or is connected to a communications server on the LAN, or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN 1154, such as the Internet. The modem 1158, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 1108 via the serial port interface 1142. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 1102, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device 1150. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
Referring now to FIG. 12 , there is illustrated a network implementation 1200 of the present invention. The implementation 1200 includes a first perceptual system 1202 and a second perceptual system 1204, both operational according to the disclose invention. The first system 1202 includes cameras 1206 (also denoted C1 and C2) mounted on a rotational and telescoping camera mount 1208. A first user 1210 located generally in front of the first system 1202 effects control of a GUI content A of the first system 1202 in accordance with the novel aspects of the present invention by introducing hand gestures into an engagement volume 1211 and/or voice signals. The first user 1210 may rove about in front of the cameras 1206 in accordance with the “roaming” operational mode described previously, or may be seated in front of the cameras 1206. The second system 1204 includes cameras 1212 (also denoted C3 and C4) mounted on a rotational and telescoping camera mount 1214. A second user 1216 located generally in front of the second system 1204 effects control of a GUI content B of the second system 1204 in accordance with the novel aspects of the present invention by introducing hand gestures into an engagement volume 1217 and/or voice signals. The second user 1216 may rove about in front of the cameras 1212 in accordance with the “roaming” operational mode described previously, or may be seated in front of the cameras 1212.
The first and second systems (1202 and 1204) may be networked in a conventional wired or wireless network 1207 peer configuration (or bus configuration by using a hub 1215). This particular system 1200 is employed to present both content A and content B via a single large monitor or display 1218. Thus the monitor 1218 can be driven by either of the systems (1202 and 1204), as can be provided by conventional dual-output video graphics cards, or the separate video information may be transmitted to a third monitor control system 1220 to present the content. Such an implementation finds application where a side-by-side comparison of product features is being presented, other similar applications where two or more users may desire to interact. Thus content A and content B may be presented on a split screen layout of the monitor 1218. Either or both user 1210 and 1216 may provide keyboard and/or mouse input to facilitate control according to the present invention.
What has been described above includes examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
Claims (15)
1. A system that facilitates a user interface, comprising:
memory;
a tracking component configured to detect a first object within a scene and tracks the first object, detection of the first object based at least in part upon image comparison of a plurality of images relative to a course mapping of the images;
a seeding component configured to iteratively seed the tracking component with a set of object hypotheses based at least in part upon a presence of the first object and the image comparison; and
a filtering component configured to selectively remove a first object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a determination that the first object hypothesis has moved within a threshold distance of an other object hypothesis, the filtering component further configured to remove a second object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a motion threshold associated with an average movement over a window of time, wherein the second object hypothesis is removed from consideration when a duration of a pause in motion associated with the second object hypothesis exceeds an average time parameter.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first object is a hand.
3. The system of claim of claim 1 , wherein the tracking component identifies object characteristics, which include object features and object orientation.
4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the object characteristics include hand movement, hand orientation, and hand pose.
5. The system of claim 3 , wherein the object characteristics include finger count, finger orientation.
6. A computer readable storage medium that is not a signal and that stores instructions for performing a method to facilitate a user interface, the method comprising:
detecting a first object within a scene, wherein detection of the first object is based at least in part upon image comparison of a plurality of images relative to a course mapping of the images;
tracking the first object;
seeding a set of object hypotheses based at least in part upon a presence of the first object and the image comparison;
filtering the set of object hypotheses to remove a first object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a determination that the first object hypothesis has moved within a threshold distance of an other object hypothesis; and
filtering the set of object hypotheses to remove a second object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a motion threshold associated with an average movement over a window of time, wherein the second object hypothesis is removed from consideration when a duration of a pause in motion associated with the second object hypothesis exceeds an average time parameter.
7. The computer readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein the first object is identified as a dominant hand, wherein the dominant hand provides gestures that control a computer system.
8. The computer readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein object characteristics of the first object are extracted.
9. The computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the object characteristics include finger count and finger orientation.
10. The computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the object characteristics include hand movement, hand orientation, and hand pose.
11. A method to facilitate a user interface, the method comprising:
detecting a first object within a scene, wherein detection of the first object is based at least in part upon image comparison of a plurality of images relative to a course mapping of the images;
tracking the first object;
seeding a set of object hypotheses based at least in part upon a presence of the first object and the image comparison;
filtering the set of object hypotheses to remove a first object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a determination that the first object hypothesis has moved within a threshold distance of an other object hypothesis; and
filtering the set of object hypotheses to remove a second object hypothesis from consideration based at least in part on a motion threshold associated with an average movement over a window of time, wherein the second object hypothesis is removed from consideration when a duration of a pause in motion associated with the second object hypothesis exceeds an average time parameter.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first object is identified as a dominant hand, wherein the dominant hand provides gestures that control a computer system.
13. The method of claim 11 , wherein object characteristics of the first object are extracted.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the object characteristics include finger count and finger orientation.
15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the object characteristics include hand movement, hand orientation, and hand pose.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/705,113 US9652042B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-12 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/396,653 US7665041B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2003-03-25 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US12/705,113 US9652042B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-12 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/396,653 Continuation US7665041B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2003-03-25 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100146455A1 US20100146455A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
US9652042B2 true US9652042B2 (en) | 2017-05-16 |
Family
ID=32988815
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/396,653 Expired - Fee Related US7665041B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2003-03-25 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US12/494,303 Abandoned US20090268945A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2009-06-30 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US12/705,113 Active 2024-12-14 US9652042B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-12 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US12/705,014 Abandoned US20100146464A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-12 | Architecture For Controlling A Computer Using Hand Gestures |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/396,653 Expired - Fee Related US7665041B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2003-03-25 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US12/494,303 Abandoned US20090268945A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2009-06-30 | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/705,014 Abandoned US20100146464A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-12 | Architecture For Controlling A Computer Using Hand Gestures |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US7665041B2 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10331228B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2019-06-25 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | System and method for determining 3D orientation of a pointing device |
US10558341B2 (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2020-02-11 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content |
US10664041B2 (en) | 2017-11-13 | 2020-05-26 | Inernational Business Machines Corporation | Implementing a customized interaction pattern for a device |
US10684758B2 (en) | 2017-02-20 | 2020-06-16 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Unified system for bimanual interactions |
US11153472B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2021-10-19 | Cutting Edge Vision, LLC | Automatic upload of pictures from a camera |
US20220300084A1 (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2022-09-22 | Treye Tech Ug (Haftungsbeschränkt) | Computer system and method for human-machine interaction |
US11567149B2 (en) | 2020-04-21 | 2023-01-31 | Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for magnetic resonance imaging |
Families Citing this family (393)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9722766D0 (en) | 1997-10-28 | 1997-12-24 | British Telecomm | Portable computers |
US20070177804A1 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2007-08-02 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Multi-touch gesture dictionary |
US9239673B2 (en) | 1998-01-26 | 2016-01-19 | Apple Inc. | Gesturing with a multipoint sensing device |
US7614008B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2009-11-03 | Apple Inc. | Operation of a computer with touch screen interface |
US8479122B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2013-07-02 | Apple Inc. | Gestures for touch sensitive input devices |
US7840912B2 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2010-11-23 | Apple Inc. | Multi-touch gesture dictionary |
US9292111B2 (en) | 1998-01-26 | 2016-03-22 | Apple Inc. | Gesturing with a multipoint sensing device |
JP4052498B2 (en) | 1999-10-29 | 2008-02-27 | 株式会社リコー | Coordinate input apparatus and method |
JP2001184161A (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2001-07-06 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Method and device for inputting information, writing input device, method for managing written data, method for controlling display, portable electronic writing device, and recording medium |
CN1310126C (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2007-04-11 | 智能技术公司 | Camera-based touch system |
US6803906B1 (en) | 2000-07-05 | 2004-10-12 | Smart Technologies, Inc. | Passive touch system and method of detecting user input |
US8035612B2 (en) * | 2002-05-28 | 2011-10-11 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Self-contained interactive video display system |
US20050134578A1 (en) | 2001-07-13 | 2005-06-23 | Universal Electronics Inc. | System and methods for interacting with a control environment |
US20050122308A1 (en) * | 2002-05-28 | 2005-06-09 | Matthew Bell | Self-contained interactive video display system |
US7710391B2 (en) * | 2002-05-28 | 2010-05-04 | Matthew Bell | Processing an image utilizing a spatially varying pattern |
US20040001144A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Mccharles Randy | Synchronization of camera images in camera-based touch system to enhance position determination of fast moving objects |
US7161579B2 (en) * | 2002-07-18 | 2007-01-09 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Hand-held computer interactive device |
US8686939B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2014-04-01 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for three-dimensional input control |
US9393487B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2016-07-19 | Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. | Method for mapping movements of a hand-held controller to game commands |
US9474968B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2016-10-25 | Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc | Method and system for applying gearing effects to visual tracking |
US8313380B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2012-11-20 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Scheme for translating movements of a hand-held controller into inputs for a system |
US8570378B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2013-10-29 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Method and apparatus for tracking three-dimensional movements of an object using a depth sensing camera |
US7760248B2 (en) | 2002-07-27 | 2010-07-20 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Selective sound source listening in conjunction with computer interactive processing |
US9682319B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2017-06-20 | Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. | Combiner method for altering game gearing |
US7815507B2 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2010-10-19 | Igt | Game machine user interface using a non-contact eye motion recognition device |
US8460103B2 (en) | 2004-06-18 | 2013-06-11 | Igt | Gesture controlled casino gaming system |
US6954197B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2005-10-11 | Smart Technologies Inc. | Size/scale and orientation determination of a pointer in a camera-based touch system |
WO2004055776A1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-07-01 | Reactrix Systems | Interactive directed light/sound system |
US9177387B2 (en) * | 2003-02-11 | 2015-11-03 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Method and apparatus for real time motion capture |
US8456447B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2013-06-04 | Next Holdings Limited | Touch screen signal processing |
US7629967B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2009-12-08 | Next Holdings Limited | Touch screen signal processing |
US8508508B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2013-08-13 | Next Holdings Limited | Touch screen signal processing with single-point calibration |
US7532206B2 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2009-05-12 | Smart Technologies Ulc | System and method for differentiating between pointers used to contact touch surface |
US8745541B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2014-06-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US7665041B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US7256772B2 (en) | 2003-04-08 | 2007-08-14 | Smart Technologies, Inc. | Auto-aligning touch system and method |
US9207717B2 (en) * | 2010-10-01 | 2015-12-08 | Z124 | Dragging an application to a screen using the application manager |
US9213365B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2015-12-15 | Z124 | Method and system for viewing stacked screen displays using gestures |
US9223426B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2015-12-29 | Z124 | Repositioning windows in the pop-up window |
US9182937B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2015-11-10 | Z124 | Desktop reveal by moving a logical display stack with gestures |
WO2004107266A1 (en) * | 2003-05-29 | 2004-12-09 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Visual tracking using depth data |
US8072470B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2011-12-06 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | System and method for providing a real-time three-dimensional interactive environment |
WO2004111687A2 (en) * | 2003-06-12 | 2004-12-23 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Target orientation estimation using depth sensing |
US7038661B2 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2006-05-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Pointing device and cursor for use in intelligent computing environments |
JP3752246B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2006-03-08 | 学校法人慶應義塾 | Hand pattern switch device |
US7411575B2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2008-08-12 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Gesture recognition method and touch system incorporating the same |
US7274356B2 (en) | 2003-10-09 | 2007-09-25 | Smart Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for determining the location of a pointer within a region of interest |
US7478171B2 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2009-01-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for providing dialog localization in a distributed environment and enabling conversational communication using generalized user gestures |
CN102034197A (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2011-04-27 | 瑞克楚斯系统公司 | Method and system for managing an interactive video display system |
US7831087B2 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2010-11-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for visual-based recognition of an object |
JP4878842B2 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2012-02-15 | 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 | Robot drive method |
US7895537B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2011-02-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for setting attributes and initiating actions through gestures |
US7496385B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2009-02-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for viewing information underlying lists and other contexts |
US7355593B2 (en) | 2004-01-02 | 2008-04-08 | Smart Technologies, Inc. | Pointer tracking across multiple overlapping coordinate input sub-regions defining a generally contiguous input region |
FI117308B (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2006-08-31 | Nokia Corp | gesture Control |
US7232986B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2007-06-19 | Smart Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for detecting a pointer within a region of interest |
JP2005242694A (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-08 | Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp | Hand pattern switching apparatus |
US8094927B2 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2012-01-10 | Eastman Kodak Company | Stereoscopic display system with flexible rendering of disparity map according to the stereoscopic fusing capability of the observer |
US20050227217A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-13 | Wilson Andrew D | Template matching on interactive surface |
US7460110B2 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2008-12-02 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Dual mode touch system |
US7538759B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2009-05-26 | Next Holdings Limited | Touch panel display system with illumination and detection provided from a single edge |
US7308112B2 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2007-12-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Sign based human-machine interaction |
US8120596B2 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2012-02-21 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Tiled touch system |
US7787706B2 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2010-08-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Method for controlling an intensity of an infrared source used to detect objects adjacent to an interactive display surface |
US7593593B2 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2009-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for reducing effects of undesired signals in an infrared imaging system |
US8684839B2 (en) | 2004-06-18 | 2014-04-01 | Igt | Control of wager-based game using gesture recognition |
JP4572615B2 (en) * | 2004-07-27 | 2010-11-04 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, recording medium, and program |
US8381135B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2013-02-19 | Apple Inc. | Proximity detector in handheld device |
US8560972B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2013-10-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Surface UI for gesture-based interaction |
US8547401B2 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2013-10-01 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Portable augmented reality device and method |
US7942744B2 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2011-05-17 | Igt | Virtual input system |
US7761814B2 (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2010-07-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Flick gesture |
US20060072009A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Flexible interaction-based computer interfacing using visible artifacts |
US7430312B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2008-09-30 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Creating 3D images of objects by illuminating with infrared patterns |
EP1849123A2 (en) * | 2005-01-07 | 2007-10-31 | GestureTek, Inc. | Optical flow based tilt sensor |
US7796116B2 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2010-09-14 | Thinkoptics, Inc. | Electronic equipment for handheld vision based absolute pointing system |
US8144118B2 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2012-03-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Motion-based tracking |
WO2006086508A2 (en) | 2005-02-08 | 2006-08-17 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | System and method for genture based control system |
CN101133385B (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2014-05-07 | 苹果公司 | Hand held electronic device, hand held device and operation method thereof |
KR100687737B1 (en) * | 2005-03-19 | 2007-02-27 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for a virtual mouse based on two-hands gesture |
US20060215042A1 (en) * | 2005-03-24 | 2006-09-28 | Motorola, Inc. | Image processing method and apparatus with provision of status information to a user |
US9128519B1 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2015-09-08 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Method and system for state-based control of objects |
WO2006124935A2 (en) * | 2005-05-17 | 2006-11-23 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Orientation-sensitive signal output |
US8081822B1 (en) | 2005-05-31 | 2011-12-20 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | System and method for sensing a feature of an object in an interactive video display |
US7362738B2 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2008-04-22 | Deere & Company | Method and system for delivering information to a user |
US7911444B2 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2011-03-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Input method for surface of interactive display |
US20070055938A1 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-08 | Avaya Technology Corp. | Server-based method for providing internet content to users with disabilities |
US8209620B2 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2012-06-26 | Accenture Global Services Limited | System for storage and navigation of application states and interactions |
US7599520B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2009-10-06 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Detection of multiple targets on a plane of interest |
US8098277B1 (en) | 2005-12-02 | 2012-01-17 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Systems and methods for communication between a reactive video system and a mobile communication device |
US8549442B2 (en) * | 2005-12-12 | 2013-10-01 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Voice and video control of interactive electronically simulated environment |
US8060840B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2011-11-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Orientation free user interface |
US8537111B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2013-09-17 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Control system for navigating a principal dimension of a data space |
US8531396B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2013-09-10 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Control system for navigating a principal dimension of a data space |
US9910497B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2018-03-06 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Gestural control of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems |
US8370383B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2013-02-05 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Multi-process interactive systems and methods |
US9823747B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2017-11-21 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Spatial, multi-modal control device for use with spatial operating system |
DE102006037154A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2007-10-18 | Volkswagen Ag | Navigation device and method for operating a navigation device |
US8296684B2 (en) | 2008-05-23 | 2012-10-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Navigating among activities in a computing device |
US9274807B2 (en) | 2006-04-20 | 2016-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Selective hibernation of activities in an electronic device |
US8683362B2 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2014-03-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Card metaphor for activities in a computing device |
US20070265075A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-11-15 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. | Attachable structure for use with hand-held controller having tracking ability |
US7907117B2 (en) * | 2006-08-08 | 2011-03-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtual controller for visual displays |
TWI317895B (en) * | 2006-08-14 | 2009-12-01 | Lee Chia Hoang | A device for controlling a software object and the method for the same |
JP4267648B2 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2009-05-27 | 株式会社東芝 | Interface device and method thereof |
US8310656B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2012-11-13 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Mapping movements of a hand-held controller to the two-dimensional image plane of a display screen |
US9317124B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2016-04-19 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Command input by hand gestures captured from camera |
USRE48417E1 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2021-02-02 | Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. | Object direction using video input combined with tilt angle information |
US8781151B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2014-07-15 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Object detection using video input combined with tilt angle information |
US8904312B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2014-12-02 | Navisense | Method and device for touchless signing and recognition |
US9442607B2 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2016-09-13 | Smart Technologies Inc. | Interactive input system and method |
KR101304461B1 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2013-09-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus of gesture-based user interface |
JP2008146243A (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-26 | Toshiba Corp | Information processor, information processing method and program |
CN101636745A (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2010-01-27 | 格斯图尔泰克股份有限公司 | Manipulation of virtual objects using enhanced interactive system |
US9311528B2 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2016-04-12 | Apple Inc. | Gesture learning |
US7877707B2 (en) * | 2007-01-06 | 2011-01-25 | Apple Inc. | Detecting and interpreting real-world and security gestures on touch and hover sensitive devices |
US7844915B2 (en) | 2007-01-07 | 2010-11-30 | Apple Inc. | Application programming interfaces for scrolling operations |
US8212857B2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2012-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Alternating light sources to reduce specular reflection |
GB0703974D0 (en) * | 2007-03-01 | 2007-04-11 | Sony Comp Entertainment Europe | Entertainment device |
WO2008112519A1 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | University Of Pittsburgh - Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education | Fingertip visual haptic sensor controller |
US20080252596A1 (en) * | 2007-04-10 | 2008-10-16 | Matthew Bell | Display Using a Three-Dimensional vision System |
US8115753B2 (en) | 2007-04-11 | 2012-02-14 | Next Holdings Limited | Touch screen system with hover and click input methods |
KR101420419B1 (en) * | 2007-04-20 | 2014-07-30 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Electronic Device And Method Of Editing Data Using the Same And Mobile Communication Terminal |
JP5905662B2 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2016-04-20 | オブロング・インダストリーズ・インコーポレーテッド | Protein, pool, and slows processing environment |
WO2008137708A1 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2008-11-13 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Camera-based user input for compact devices |
US9176598B2 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2015-11-03 | Thinkoptics, Inc. | Free-space multi-dimensional absolute pointer with improved performance |
TWI355615B (en) * | 2007-05-11 | 2012-01-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Moving object detection apparatus and method by us |
US8532871B2 (en) * | 2007-06-05 | 2013-09-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Company | Multi-modal vehicle operating device |
US8094137B2 (en) | 2007-07-23 | 2012-01-10 | Smart Technologies Ulc | System and method of detecting contact on a display |
US8726194B2 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2014-05-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Item selection using enhanced control |
JP5091591B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2012-12-05 | 株式会社東芝 | Information processing apparatus, program, and information processing method |
WO2009029764A1 (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2009-03-05 | Next Holdings, Inc. | Low profile touch panel systems |
KR20100055516A (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2010-05-26 | 넥스트 홀딩스 인코포레이티드 | Optical touchscreen with improved illumination |
US20090058820A1 (en) * | 2007-09-04 | 2009-03-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Flick-based in situ search from ink, text, or an empty selection region |
CN101952818B (en) | 2007-09-14 | 2016-05-25 | 智慧投资控股81有限责任公司 | The processing of the user interactions based on attitude |
US9031843B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2015-05-12 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for enabling multimodal tags in a communication device by discarding redundant information in the tags training signals |
US8201108B2 (en) * | 2007-10-01 | 2012-06-12 | Vsee Lab, Llc | Automatic communication notification and answering method in communication correspondance |
US20090100383A1 (en) * | 2007-10-16 | 2009-04-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Predictive gesturing in graphical user interface |
US8005263B2 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2011-08-23 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Hand sign recognition using label assignment |
US10146320B2 (en) | 2007-10-29 | 2018-12-04 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft having gesture-based control for an onboard passenger service unit |
US20090109036A1 (en) * | 2007-10-29 | 2009-04-30 | The Boeing Company | System and Method for Alternative Communication |
US8159682B2 (en) | 2007-11-12 | 2012-04-17 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Lens system |
US9171454B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2015-10-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Magic wand |
TW200935272A (en) * | 2007-12-03 | 2009-08-16 | Tse-Hsien Yeh | Sensing apparatus and operating method thereof |
US8515052B2 (en) | 2007-12-17 | 2013-08-20 | Wai Wu | Parallel signal processing system and method |
US8542907B2 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2013-09-24 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Dynamic three-dimensional object mapping for user-defined control device |
JP2009146333A (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2009-07-02 | Panasonic Corp | Spatial input operation display apparatus |
US20090172606A1 (en) * | 2007-12-31 | 2009-07-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for two-handed computer user interface with gesture recognition |
US8413075B2 (en) * | 2008-01-04 | 2013-04-02 | Apple Inc. | Gesture movies |
US8405636B2 (en) | 2008-01-07 | 2013-03-26 | Next Holdings Limited | Optical position sensing system and optical position sensor assembly |
US20100039500A1 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2010-02-18 | Matthew Bell | Self-Contained 3D Vision System Utilizing Stereo Camera and Patterned Illuminator |
US9772689B2 (en) * | 2008-03-04 | 2017-09-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced gesture-based image manipulation |
US8259163B2 (en) | 2008-03-07 | 2012-09-04 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Display with built in 3D sensing |
US20090254855A1 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-08 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Ab | Communication terminals with superimposed user interface |
US9639531B2 (en) * | 2008-04-09 | 2017-05-02 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to play and control playing of media in a web page |
WO2009128064A2 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-22 | Pointgrab Ltd. | Vision based pointing device emulation |
JP2009265709A (en) * | 2008-04-22 | 2009-11-12 | Hitachi Ltd | Input device |
US9740293B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 | 2017-08-22 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Operating environment with gestural control and multiple client devices, displays, and users |
US9740922B2 (en) | 2008-04-24 | 2017-08-22 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Adaptive tracking system for spatial input devices |
US9684380B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 | 2017-06-20 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Operating environment with gestural control and multiple client devices, displays, and users |
US8723795B2 (en) | 2008-04-24 | 2014-05-13 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Detecting, representing, and interpreting three-space input: gestural continuum subsuming freespace, proximal, and surface-contact modes |
US9952673B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 | 2018-04-24 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Operating environment comprising multiple client devices, multiple displays, multiple users, and gestural control |
US9495013B2 (en) | 2008-04-24 | 2016-11-15 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Multi-modal gestural interface |
US10642364B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 | 2020-05-05 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Processing tracking and recognition data in gestural recognition systems |
US8902193B2 (en) | 2008-05-09 | 2014-12-02 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Interactive input system and bezel therefor |
US8595218B2 (en) * | 2008-06-12 | 2013-11-26 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Interactive display management systems and methods |
JPWO2009150747A1 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2011-11-10 | パイオニア株式会社 | User interface device by line-of-sight input, user interface method, user interface program, and recording medium on which user interface program is recorded |
KR20100003913A (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2010-01-12 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for communication using 3-dimensional image display |
WO2010006087A1 (en) * | 2008-07-08 | 2010-01-14 | David Seaberg | Process for providing and editing instructions, data, data structures, and algorithms in a computer system |
US8847739B2 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2014-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Fusing RFID and vision for surface object tracking |
US20100031202A1 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-02-04 | Microsoft Corporation | User-defined gesture set for surface computing |
US8463053B1 (en) | 2008-08-08 | 2013-06-11 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Enhanced max margin learning on multimodal data mining in a multimedia database |
JP4720874B2 (en) * | 2008-08-14 | 2011-07-13 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program |
US8755515B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2014-06-17 | Wai Wu | Parallel signal processing system and method |
US9250797B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2016-02-02 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Touch gesture interface apparatuses, systems, and methods |
CN103392163B (en) * | 2008-10-10 | 2016-10-26 | 高通股份有限公司 | Single camera tracker |
US20100105479A1 (en) | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining orientation in an external reference frame |
US8516397B2 (en) * | 2008-10-27 | 2013-08-20 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Proximity interface apparatuses, systems, and methods |
US8339378B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2012-12-25 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Interactive input system with multi-angle reflector |
JP5317630B2 (en) * | 2008-11-07 | 2013-10-16 | キヤノン株式会社 | Image distribution apparatus, method and program |
US20100162181A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-06-24 | Palm, Inc. | Interpreting Gesture Input Including Introduction Or Removal Of A Point Of Contact While A Gesture Is In Progress |
JP2010152761A (en) * | 2008-12-25 | 2010-07-08 | Sony Corp | Input apparatus, control apparatus, control system, electronic apparatus, and control method |
US8291348B2 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2012-10-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Computing device and method for selecting display regions responsive to non-discrete directional input actions and intelligent content analysis |
US8295546B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2012-10-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Pose tracking pipeline |
US9250788B2 (en) * | 2009-03-18 | 2016-02-02 | IdentifyMine, Inc. | Gesture handlers of a gesture engine |
US9317128B2 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2016-04-19 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Remote devices used in a markerless installation of a spatial operating environment incorporating gestural control |
US10824238B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 | 2020-11-03 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Operating environment with gestural control and multiple client devices, displays, and users |
DE102009017772A1 (en) * | 2009-04-16 | 2010-11-04 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Method and system for recognizing an object, and method and system for generating a marking in a screen display by means of a contactless gesture-controlled screen pointer |
JP5256109B2 (en) | 2009-04-23 | 2013-08-07 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Display device |
US9498718B2 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2016-11-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Altering a view perspective within a display environment |
US8649554B2 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2014-02-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Method to control perspective for a camera-controlled computer |
US20100295782A1 (en) | 2009-05-21 | 2010-11-25 | Yehuda Binder | System and method for control based on face ore hand gesture detection |
US9417700B2 (en) * | 2009-05-21 | 2016-08-16 | Edge3 Technologies | Gesture recognition systems and related methods |
US20100306716A1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Extending standard gestures |
US9778921B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2017-10-03 | Apple Inc. | Method for creating, exporting, sharing, and installing graphics functional blocks |
US8692768B2 (en) | 2009-07-10 | 2014-04-08 | Smart Technologies Ulc | Interactive input system |
WO2011007204A1 (en) * | 2009-07-16 | 2011-01-20 | Ondo Inc. | Control method of a graphic interface |
US9933852B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2018-04-03 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Multi-process interactive systems and methods |
US9971807B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2018-05-15 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Multi-process interactive systems and methods |
US20110099476A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Decorating a display environment |
US20110182471A1 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2011-07-28 | Abisee, Inc. | Handling information flow in printed text processing |
US9244533B2 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2016-01-26 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Camera navigation for presentations |
KR20110084128A (en) * | 2010-01-15 | 2011-07-21 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for processing scene |
US20110179376A1 (en) * | 2010-01-21 | 2011-07-21 | Sony Corporation | Three or higher dimensional graphical user interface for tv menu and document navigation |
US8499257B2 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2013-07-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Handles interactions for human—computer interface |
US8928579B2 (en) * | 2010-02-22 | 2015-01-06 | Andrew David Wilson | Interacting with an omni-directionally projected display |
EP2539797B1 (en) * | 2010-02-25 | 2019-04-03 | Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. | Representative image |
US8614663B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2013-12-24 | Empire Technology Development, Llc | Selective motor control classification |
US9218119B2 (en) * | 2010-03-25 | 2015-12-22 | Blackberry Limited | System and method for gesture detection and feedback |
US8818027B2 (en) * | 2010-04-01 | 2014-08-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Computing device interface |
US8351651B2 (en) * | 2010-04-26 | 2013-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Hand-location post-process refinement in a tracking system |
FR2960076B1 (en) * | 2010-05-12 | 2012-06-15 | Pi Corporate | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR NON-CONTACT ACQUISITION OF MOVEMENTS OF AN OBJECT. |
US8457353B2 (en) | 2010-05-18 | 2013-06-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Gestures and gesture modifiers for manipulating a user-interface |
US8396252B2 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2013-03-12 | Edge 3 Technologies | Systems and related methods for three dimensional gesture recognition in vehicles |
JP4897939B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2012-03-14 | パナソニック株式会社 | Gesture recognition device and gesture recognition method |
US9113190B2 (en) | 2010-06-04 | 2015-08-18 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Controlling power levels of electronic devices through user interaction |
US8639020B1 (en) | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-28 | Intel Corporation | Method and system for modeling subjects from a depth map |
US8964004B2 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2015-02-24 | Amchael Visual Technology Corporation | Three channel reflector imaging system |
WO2012030872A1 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2012-03-08 | Edge3 Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for confusion learning |
US8666144B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-03-04 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining disparity of texture |
US8655093B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-02-18 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing segmentation of an image |
US8582866B2 (en) | 2011-02-10 | 2013-11-12 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for disparity computation in stereo images |
US8890803B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2014-11-18 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Gesture control system |
EP2428870A1 (en) * | 2010-09-13 | 2012-03-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Device and method for controlling gesture for mobile device |
US9405444B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2016-08-02 | Z124 | User interface with independent drawer control |
US9729658B2 (en) * | 2010-10-12 | 2017-08-08 | Chris Trahan | System for managing web-based content data and applications |
US20120102400A1 (en) * | 2010-10-22 | 2012-04-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Touch Gesture Notification Dismissal Techniques |
US9195345B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2015-11-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Position aware gestures with visual feedback as input method |
US9377950B2 (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2016-06-28 | Perceptive Pixel, Inc. | Touch-based annotation system with temporary modes |
TW201220127A (en) * | 2010-11-11 | 2012-05-16 | Inst Information Industry | Interactive device and method thereof |
US20120139907A1 (en) * | 2010-12-06 | 2012-06-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 3 dimensional (3d) display system of responding to user motion and user interface for the 3d display system |
US9123316B2 (en) | 2010-12-27 | 2015-09-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interactive content creation |
US20130283202A1 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2013-10-24 | Wei Zhou | User interface, apparatus and method for gesture recognition |
KR101795574B1 (en) * | 2011-01-06 | 2017-11-13 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Electronic device controled by a motion, and control method thereof |
WO2012093394A2 (en) * | 2011-01-06 | 2012-07-12 | Pointgrab Ltd. | Computer vision based two hand control of content |
KR101858531B1 (en) | 2011-01-06 | 2018-05-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Display apparatus controled by a motion, and motion control method thereof |
US9271027B2 (en) * | 2011-01-30 | 2016-02-23 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Image display apparatus and method for operating the same |
US8970589B2 (en) | 2011-02-10 | 2015-03-03 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Near-touch interaction with a stereo camera grid structured tessellations |
US8782566B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2014-07-15 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Using gestures to schedule and manage meetings |
US9019202B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-04-28 | Sony Corporation | Dynamic virtual remote tagging |
GB201103346D0 (en) * | 2011-02-28 | 2011-04-13 | Dev Ltd | Improvements in or relating to optical navigation devices |
US9857868B2 (en) | 2011-03-19 | 2018-01-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method and system for ergonomic touch-free interface |
US9858343B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2018-01-02 | Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc | Personalization of queries, conversations, and searches |
US9244984B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2016-01-26 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Location based conversational understanding |
US9298287B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2016-03-29 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Combined activation for natural user interface systems |
US9760566B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2017-09-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Augmented conversational understanding agent to identify conversation context between two humans and taking an agent action thereof |
US9842168B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2017-12-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Task driven user intents |
US10642934B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2020-05-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Augmented conversational understanding architecture |
US20120257035A1 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Systems and methods for providing feedback by tracking user gaze and gestures |
US8620113B2 (en) | 2011-04-25 | 2013-12-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Laser diode modes |
US8840466B2 (en) | 2011-04-25 | 2014-09-23 | Aquifi, Inc. | Method and system to create three-dimensional mapping in a two-dimensional game |
US9064006B2 (en) | 2012-08-23 | 2015-06-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Translating natural language utterances to keyword search queries |
US9454962B2 (en) | 2011-05-12 | 2016-09-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Sentence simplification for spoken language understanding |
US8740702B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2014-06-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Action trigger gesturing |
US8845431B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2014-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Shape trace gesturing |
US8657683B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2014-02-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Action selection gesturing |
US8760395B2 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2014-06-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Gesture recognition techniques |
JP6074170B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2017-02-01 | インテル・コーポレーション | Short range motion tracking system and method |
US11048333B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2021-06-29 | Intel Corporation | System and method for close-range movement tracking |
US9207767B2 (en) * | 2011-06-29 | 2015-12-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Guide mode for gesture spaces |
RU2455676C2 (en) | 2011-07-04 | 2012-07-10 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "ТРИДИВИ" | Method of controlling device using gestures and 3d sensor for realising said method |
US8810533B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2014-08-19 | Z124 | Systems and methods for receiving gesture inputs spanning multiple input devices |
US9292112B2 (en) * | 2011-07-28 | 2016-03-22 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Multimodal interface |
US9030487B2 (en) * | 2011-08-01 | 2015-05-12 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Electronic device for displaying three-dimensional image and method of using the same |
US9013366B2 (en) * | 2011-08-04 | 2015-04-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Display environment for a plurality of display devices |
EP3413575A1 (en) | 2011-08-05 | 2018-12-12 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for controlling electronic apparatus based on voice recognition and electronic apparatus applying the same |
KR101262700B1 (en) * | 2011-08-05 | 2013-05-08 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for Controlling Electronic Apparatus based on Voice Recognition and Motion Recognition, and Electric Apparatus thereof |
US11133096B2 (en) * | 2011-08-08 | 2021-09-28 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Method for non-invasive motion tracking to augment patient administered physical rehabilitation |
NO333234B1 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2013-04-15 | Cisco Tech Inc | Video conferencing system, method and computer program storage device |
US8648808B2 (en) * | 2011-09-19 | 2014-02-11 | Amchael Visual Technology Corp. | Three-dimensional human-computer interaction system that supports mouse operations through the motion of a finger and an operation method thereof |
US8842057B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2014-09-23 | Z124 | Detail on triggers: transitional states |
US9672609B1 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2017-06-06 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improved depth-map estimation |
JP2013105346A (en) * | 2011-11-14 | 2013-05-30 | Sony Corp | Information presentation device, information presentation method, information presentation system, information registration device, information registration method, information registration system, and program |
US9019352B2 (en) | 2011-11-21 | 2015-04-28 | Amchael Visual Technology Corp. | Two-parallel-channel reflector with focal length and disparity control |
KR101760804B1 (en) | 2011-11-23 | 2017-07-24 | 인텔 코포레이션 | Gesture input with multiple views, displays and physics |
US8635637B2 (en) | 2011-12-02 | 2014-01-21 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface presenting an animated avatar performing a media reaction |
JP5846662B2 (en) * | 2011-12-06 | 2016-01-20 | トムソン ライセンシングThomson Licensing | Method and system for responding to user selection gestures for objects displayed in three dimensions |
US9100685B2 (en) | 2011-12-09 | 2015-08-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Determining audience state or interest using passive sensor data |
US8811938B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2014-08-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing a user interface experience based on inferred vehicle state |
US8693731B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2014-04-08 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Enhanced contrast for object detection and characterization by optical imaging |
US10691219B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2020-06-23 | Ultrahaptics IP Two Limited | Systems and methods for machine control |
US8638989B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2014-01-28 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing motion in three-dimensional space |
US20150253428A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-09-10 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Determining positional information for an object in space |
US11493998B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2022-11-08 | Ultrahaptics IP Two Limited | Systems and methods for machine control |
US9070019B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2015-06-30 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing motion in three-dimensional space |
US9679215B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2017-06-13 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Systems and methods for machine control |
US9501152B2 (en) | 2013-01-15 | 2016-11-22 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Free-space user interface and control using virtual constructs |
US8854433B1 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2014-10-07 | Aquifi, Inc. | Method and system enabling natural user interface gestures with an electronic system |
US9019603B2 (en) | 2012-03-22 | 2015-04-28 | Amchael Visual Technology Corp. | Two-parallel-channel reflector with focal length and disparity control |
US9264660B1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-02-16 | Google Inc. | Presenter control during a video conference |
US8898687B2 (en) | 2012-04-04 | 2014-11-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Controlling a media program based on a media reaction |
US9477303B2 (en) | 2012-04-09 | 2016-10-25 | Intel Corporation | System and method for combining three-dimensional tracking with a three-dimensional display for a user interface |
US9141197B2 (en) | 2012-04-16 | 2015-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interacting with a device using gestures |
JP2013225211A (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2013-10-31 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Information input device |
CA2775700C (en) | 2012-05-04 | 2013-07-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining a future portion of a currently presented media program |
US8938124B2 (en) | 2012-05-10 | 2015-01-20 | Pointgrab Ltd. | Computer vision based tracking of a hand |
US9619036B2 (en) | 2012-05-11 | 2017-04-11 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | System and methods for controlling a user experience |
US9092394B2 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2015-07-28 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Depth based context identification |
US9536135B2 (en) | 2012-06-18 | 2017-01-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic hand gesture recognition using depth data |
US9836590B2 (en) | 2012-06-22 | 2017-12-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Enhanced accuracy of user presence status determination |
US9111135B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2015-08-18 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for tracking human hands using parts based template matching using corresponding pixels in bounded regions of a sequence of frames that are a specified distance interval from a reference camera |
US9098739B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2015-08-04 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for tracking human hands using parts based template matching |
US20140007115A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-02 | Ning Lu | Multi-modal behavior awareness for human natural command control |
US9557634B2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2017-01-31 | Amchael Visual Technology Corporation | Two-channel reflector based single-lens 2D/3D camera with disparity and convergence angle control |
CN102854981A (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2013-01-02 | 成都西可科技有限公司 | Body technology based virtual keyboard character input method |
US9360932B1 (en) * | 2012-08-29 | 2016-06-07 | Intellect Motion Llc. | Systems and methods for virtually displaying real movements of objects in a 3D-space by means of 2D-video capture |
US8836768B1 (en) | 2012-09-04 | 2014-09-16 | Aquifi, Inc. | Method and system enabling natural user interface gestures with user wearable glasses |
JP2014067148A (en) * | 2012-09-25 | 2014-04-17 | Toshiba Corp | Handwritten document processor and handwritten document processing method and program |
US11386257B2 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2022-07-12 | Amaze Software, Inc. | Efficient manipulation of surfaces in multi-dimensional space using energy agents |
US10877780B2 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2020-12-29 | Famous Industries, Inc. | Visibility detection using gesture fingerprinting |
US9501171B1 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2016-11-22 | Famous Industries, Inc. | Gesture fingerprinting |
US10908929B2 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2021-02-02 | Famous Industries, Inc. | Human versus bot detection using gesture fingerprinting |
US9285893B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2016-03-15 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Object detection and tracking with variable-field illumination devices |
US9423939B2 (en) * | 2012-11-12 | 2016-08-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic adjustment of user interface |
KR20140063272A (en) * | 2012-11-16 | 2014-05-27 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Image display apparatus and method for operating the same |
US8761448B1 (en) * | 2012-12-13 | 2014-06-24 | Intel Corporation | Gesture pre-processing of video stream using a markered region |
TWI454968B (en) | 2012-12-24 | 2014-10-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Three-dimensional interactive device and operation method thereof |
US10609285B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2020-03-31 | Ultrahaptics IP Two Limited | Power consumption in motion-capture systems |
US9465461B2 (en) | 2013-01-08 | 2016-10-11 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Object detection and tracking with audio and optical signals |
US9459697B2 (en) | 2013-01-15 | 2016-10-04 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Dynamic, free-space user interactions for machine control |
US9696867B2 (en) | 2013-01-15 | 2017-07-04 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Dynamic user interactions for display control and identifying dominant gestures |
US9092665B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2015-07-28 | Aquifi, Inc | Systems and methods for initializing motion tracking of human hands |
US9129155B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2015-09-08 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for initializing motion tracking of human hands using template matching within bounded regions determined using a depth map |
US9785228B2 (en) | 2013-02-11 | 2017-10-10 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Detecting natural user-input engagement |
US8744645B1 (en) | 2013-02-26 | 2014-06-03 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | System and method for incorporating gesture and voice recognition into a single system |
US9798302B2 (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2017-10-24 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Recognition-based industrial automation control with redundant system input support |
US9393695B2 (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2016-07-19 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Recognition-based industrial automation control with person and object discrimination |
US9498885B2 (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2016-11-22 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Recognition-based industrial automation control with confidence-based decision support |
US9804576B2 (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2017-10-31 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Recognition-based industrial automation control with position and derivative decision reference |
US20140258942A1 (en) * | 2013-03-05 | 2014-09-11 | Intel Corporation | Interaction of multiple perceptual sensing inputs |
US9342230B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-05-17 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Natural user interface scrolling and targeting |
US9292103B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-03-22 | Intel Corporation | Gesture pre-processing of video stream using skintone detection |
US10721448B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-07-21 | Edge 3 Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adaptive exposure bracketing, segmentation and scene organization |
US20140280890A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for measuring user engagement using scroll dwell time |
US10491694B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-11-26 | Oath Inc. | Method and system for measuring user engagement using click/skip in content stream using a probability model |
US20140298379A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-02 | Yume, Inc. | 3D Mobile and Connected TV Ad Trafficking System |
US20140281980A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Chad A. Hage | Methods and Apparatus to Identify a Type of Media Presented by a Media Player |
US9298266B2 (en) | 2013-04-02 | 2016-03-29 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing three-dimensional (3D) gesture based graphical user interfaces (GUI) that incorporate gesture reactive interface objects |
US10620709B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2020-04-14 | Ultrahaptics IP Two Limited | Customized gesture interpretation |
US9916009B2 (en) | 2013-04-26 | 2018-03-13 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Non-tactile interface systems and methods |
WO2014185808A1 (en) * | 2013-05-13 | 2014-11-20 | 3Divi Company | System and method for controlling multiple electronic devices |
US9747696B2 (en) | 2013-05-17 | 2017-08-29 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing normalized parameters of motions of objects in three-dimensional space |
KR102227494B1 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2021-03-15 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for processing an user input using movement of an object |
US9696812B2 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2017-07-04 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for processing user input using motion of object |
US9430045B2 (en) * | 2013-07-17 | 2016-08-30 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Special gestures for camera control and image processing operations |
DE102013012285A1 (en) * | 2013-07-24 | 2015-01-29 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Method and device for value document processing |
US9798388B1 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2017-10-24 | Aquifi, Inc. | Vibrotactile system to augment 3D input systems |
US10281987B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2019-05-07 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Systems and methods of free-space gestural interaction |
TWI505135B (en) * | 2013-08-20 | 2015-10-21 | Utechzone Co Ltd | Control system for display screen, control apparatus and control method |
US9721383B1 (en) | 2013-08-29 | 2017-08-01 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Predictive information for free space gesture control and communication |
US9632572B2 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2017-04-25 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Enhanced field of view to augment three-dimensional (3D) sensory space for free-space gesture interpretation |
US9996638B1 (en) | 2013-10-31 | 2018-06-12 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Predictive information for free space gesture control and communication |
US10218660B2 (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2019-02-26 | Google Llc | Detecting user gestures for dismissing electronic notifications |
US9507417B2 (en) | 2014-01-07 | 2016-11-29 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing head tracking based graphical user interfaces (GUI) that incorporate gesture reactive interface objects |
US20150199017A1 (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2015-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Coordinated speech and gesture input |
US9613262B2 (en) | 2014-01-15 | 2017-04-04 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Object detection and tracking for providing a virtual device experience |
US9619105B1 (en) | 2014-01-30 | 2017-04-11 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for gesture based interaction with viewpoint dependent user interfaces |
US11221680B1 (en) * | 2014-03-01 | 2022-01-11 | sigmund lindsay clements | Hand gestures used to operate a control panel for a device |
US9990046B2 (en) | 2014-03-17 | 2018-06-05 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Visual collaboration interface |
US9501138B2 (en) | 2014-05-05 | 2016-11-22 | Aquifi, Inc. | Systems and methods for remapping three-dimensional gestures onto a finite-size two-dimensional surface |
US9958946B2 (en) | 2014-06-06 | 2018-05-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Switching input rails without a release command in a natural user interface |
DE202014103729U1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2014-09-09 | Leap Motion, Inc. | Augmented reality with motion detection |
US9953646B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2018-04-24 | Belleau Technologies | Method and system for dynamic speech recognition and tracking of prewritten script |
US9730671B2 (en) * | 2014-10-03 | 2017-08-15 | David Thomas Gering | System and method of voice activated image segmentation |
US9881610B2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2018-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Speech recognition system adaptation based on non-acoustic attributes and face selection based on mouth motion using pixel intensities |
US9626001B2 (en) | 2014-11-13 | 2017-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Speech recognition candidate selection based on non-acoustic input |
US9454235B2 (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2016-09-27 | Seungman KIM | Electronic apparatus having a sensing unit to input a user command and a method thereof |
US10121471B2 (en) * | 2015-06-29 | 2018-11-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Language model speech endpointing |
US10620807B2 (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2020-04-14 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Association of objects in a three-dimensional model with time-related metadata |
US10429935B2 (en) | 2016-02-08 | 2019-10-01 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Tremor correction for gesture recognition |
FR3049078B1 (en) * | 2016-03-21 | 2019-11-29 | Valeo Vision | VOICE AND / OR GESTUAL RECOGNITION CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING OF A VEHICLE |
US10074226B2 (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2018-09-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for providing UAV-based digital escort drones in visitor management and integrated access control systems |
CN107452381B (en) * | 2016-05-30 | 2020-12-29 | 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 | Multimedia voice recognition device and method |
WO2018006224A1 (en) * | 2016-07-04 | 2018-01-11 | SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. | System and method for automated tracking and navigation |
US10529302B2 (en) | 2016-07-07 | 2020-01-07 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | Spatially mediated augmentations of and interactions among distinct devices and applications via extended pixel manifold |
US10444983B2 (en) * | 2016-09-20 | 2019-10-15 | Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Signal analyzing instrument with touch gesture control and method of operating thereof |
US20180143693A1 (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2018-05-24 | David J. Calabrese | Virtual object manipulation |
US10303417B2 (en) | 2017-04-03 | 2019-05-28 | Youspace, Inc. | Interactive systems for depth-based input |
US10303259B2 (en) | 2017-04-03 | 2019-05-28 | Youspace, Inc. | Systems and methods for gesture-based interaction |
US10437342B2 (en) | 2016-12-05 | 2019-10-08 | Youspace, Inc. | Calibration systems and methods for depth-based interfaces with disparate fields of view |
CN110545886A (en) * | 2016-12-05 | 2019-12-06 | 优史佩斯公司 | System and method for gesture-based interaction |
US10013979B1 (en) * | 2017-04-17 | 2018-07-03 | Essential Products, Inc. | Expanding a set of commands to control devices in an environment |
US10585525B2 (en) | 2018-02-12 | 2020-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive notification modifications for touchscreen interfaces |
US11875012B2 (en) | 2018-05-25 | 2024-01-16 | Ultrahaptics IP Two Limited | Throwable interface for augmented reality and virtual reality environments |
US11331006B2 (en) | 2019-03-05 | 2022-05-17 | Physmodo, Inc. | System and method for human motion detection and tracking |
US11103748B1 (en) | 2019-03-05 | 2021-08-31 | Physmodo, Inc. | System and method for human motion detection and tracking |
DE102019002794A1 (en) * | 2019-04-16 | 2020-10-22 | Daimler Ag | Method for controlling lighting |
DE102019210009A1 (en) | 2019-07-08 | 2021-01-28 | Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft | Method for operating an operating system in a vehicle and operating system in a vehicle |
DE102019210010A1 (en) | 2019-07-08 | 2021-01-14 | Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft | Method and operating system for acquiring user input for a device of a vehicle |
DE102019210008A1 (en) | 2019-07-08 | 2021-01-14 | Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft | Method for operating a control system and control system |
CN111123986A (en) * | 2019-12-25 | 2020-05-08 | 四川云盾光电科技有限公司 | Control device for controlling two-degree-of-freedom turntable based on gestures |
US11418863B2 (en) | 2020-06-25 | 2022-08-16 | Damian A Lynch | Combination shower rod and entertainment system |
WO2022170105A1 (en) * | 2021-02-05 | 2022-08-11 | Pepsico, Inc. | Devices, systems, and methods for contactless interfacing |
Citations (258)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4627620A (en) | 1984-12-26 | 1986-12-09 | Yang John P | Electronic athlete trainer for improving skills in reflex, speed and accuracy |
US4630910A (en) | 1984-02-16 | 1986-12-23 | Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. | Method of measuring in three-dimensions at high speed |
US4645458A (en) | 1985-04-15 | 1987-02-24 | Harald Phillip | Athletic evaluation and training apparatus |
US4695953A (en) | 1983-08-25 | 1987-09-22 | Blair Preston E | TV animation interactively controlled by the viewer |
US4702475A (en) | 1985-08-16 | 1987-10-27 | Innovating Training Products, Inc. | Sports technique and reaction training system |
US4711543A (en) | 1986-04-14 | 1987-12-08 | Blair Preston E | TV animation interactively controlled by the viewer |
US4751642A (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1988-06-14 | Silva John M | Interactive sports simulation system with physiological sensing and psychological conditioning |
US4796997A (en) | 1986-05-27 | 1989-01-10 | Synthetic Vision Systems, Inc. | Method and system for high-speed, 3-D imaging of an object at a vision station |
US4809065A (en) | 1986-12-01 | 1989-02-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Interactive system and related method for displaying data to produce a three-dimensional image of an object |
US4817950A (en) | 1987-05-08 | 1989-04-04 | Goo Paul E | Video game control unit and attitude sensor |
US4843568A (en) | 1986-04-11 | 1989-06-27 | Krueger Myron W | Real time perception of and response to the actions of an unencumbered participant/user |
US4893183A (en) | 1988-08-11 | 1990-01-09 | Carnegie-Mellon University | Robotic vision system |
US4901362A (en) | 1988-08-08 | 1990-02-13 | Raytheon Company | Method of recognizing patterns |
US4925189A (en) | 1989-01-13 | 1990-05-15 | Braeunig Thomas F | Body-mounted video game exercise device |
US5101444A (en) | 1990-05-18 | 1992-03-31 | Panacea, Inc. | Method and apparatus for high speed object location |
US5109537A (en) | 1988-06-24 | 1992-04-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Telecommunication apparatus having an id rechecking function |
US5139261A (en) | 1989-09-15 | 1992-08-18 | Openiano Renato M | Foot-actuated computer game controller serving as a joystick |
US5148154A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1992-09-15 | Sony Corporation Of America | Multi-dimensional user interface |
US5184295A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1993-02-02 | Mann Ralph V | System and method for teaching physical skills |
WO1993010708A1 (en) | 1991-12-03 | 1993-06-10 | French Sportech Corporation | Interactive video testing and training system |
US5229754A (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1993-07-20 | Yazaki Corporation | Automotive reflection type display apparatus |
US5229756A (en) | 1989-02-07 | 1993-07-20 | Yamaha Corporation | Image control apparatus |
US5239464A (en) | 1988-08-04 | 1993-08-24 | Blair Preston E | Interactive video system providing repeated switching of multiple tracks of actions sequences |
US5239463A (en) | 1988-08-04 | 1993-08-24 | Blair Preston E | Method and apparatus for player interaction with animated characters and objects |
EP0583061A2 (en) | 1992-07-10 | 1994-02-16 | The Walt Disney Company | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced graphics in a virtual world |
US5288078A (en) | 1988-10-14 | 1994-02-22 | David G. Capper | Control interface apparatus |
US5295491A (en) | 1991-09-26 | 1994-03-22 | Sam Technology, Inc. | Non-invasive human neurocognitive performance capability testing method and system |
US5320538A (en) | 1992-09-23 | 1994-06-14 | Hughes Training, Inc. | Interactive aircraft training system and method |
US5347306A (en) | 1993-12-17 | 1994-09-13 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Animated electronic meeting place |
US5385519A (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1995-01-31 | Hsu; Chi-Hsueh | Running machine |
US5405152A (en) | 1993-06-08 | 1995-04-11 | The Walt Disney Company | Method and apparatus for an interactive video game with physical feedback |
US5414643A (en) | 1993-06-14 | 1995-05-09 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Method and apparatus for continuous time representation of multiple hypothesis tracking data |
US5417210A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1995-05-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
US5423554A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1995-06-13 | Metamedia Ventures, Inc. | Virtual reality game method and apparatus |
US5454043A (en) | 1993-07-30 | 1995-09-26 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Dynamic and static hand gesture recognition through low-level image analysis |
US5469740A (en) | 1989-07-14 | 1995-11-28 | Impulse Technology, Inc. | Interactive video testing and training system |
JPH0844490A (en) | 1994-07-28 | 1996-02-16 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Interface device |
US5495576A (en) | 1993-01-11 | 1996-02-27 | Ritchey; Kurtis J. | Panoramic image based virtual reality/telepresence audio-visual system and method |
US5516105A (en) | 1994-10-06 | 1996-05-14 | Exergame, Inc. | Acceleration activated joystick |
US5525901A (en) | 1993-02-02 | 1996-06-11 | Beaudreau Electric, Inc. | Sensor systems for monitoring and measuring angular position in two or three axes |
US5524637A (en) | 1994-06-29 | 1996-06-11 | Erickson; Jon W. | Interactive system for measuring physiological exertion |
US5528263A (en) | 1994-06-15 | 1996-06-18 | Daniel M. Platzker | Interactive projected video image display system |
US5534917A (en) | 1991-05-09 | 1996-07-09 | Very Vivid, Inc. | Video image based control system |
US5563988A (en) | 1994-08-01 | 1996-10-08 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and system for facilitating wireless, full-body, real-time user interaction with a digitally represented visual environment |
US5577981A (en) | 1994-01-19 | 1996-11-26 | Jarvik; Robert | Virtual reality exercise machine and computer controlled video system |
US5580249A (en) | 1994-02-14 | 1996-12-03 | Sarcos Group | Apparatus for simulating mobility of a human |
US5594469A (en) | 1995-02-21 | 1997-01-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America Inc. | Hand gesture machine control system |
US5597309A (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1997-01-28 | Riess; Thomas | Method and apparatus for treatment of gait problems associated with parkinson's disease |
US5611731A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 1997-03-18 | Thrustmaster, Inc. | Video pinball machine controller having an optical accelerometer for detecting slide and tilt |
US5615132A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1997-03-25 | Crossbow Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining position and orientation of a moveable object using accelerometers |
US5616078A (en) | 1993-12-28 | 1997-04-01 | Konami Co., Ltd. | Motion-controlled video entertainment system |
US5617312A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1997-04-01 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Computer system that enters control information by means of video camera |
WO1997017598A1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1997-05-15 | Impulse Technology, Inc. | System for continuous monitoring of physical activity during unrestricted movement |
US5638300A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-06-10 | Johnson; Lee E. | Golf swing analysis system |
US5641288A (en) | 1996-01-11 | 1997-06-24 | Zaenglein, Jr.; William G. | Shooting simulating process and training device using a virtual reality display screen |
US5682196A (en) | 1995-06-22 | 1997-10-28 | Actv, Inc. | Three-dimensional (3D) video presentation system providing interactive 3D presentation with personalized audio responses for multiple viewers |
US5682229A (en) | 1995-04-14 | 1997-10-28 | Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. | Laser range camera |
US5690582A (en) | 1993-02-02 | 1997-11-25 | Tectrix Fitness Equipment, Inc. | Interactive exercise apparatus |
US5703367A (en) | 1994-12-09 | 1997-12-30 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Human occupancy detection method and system for implementing the same |
US5704837A (en) | 1993-03-26 | 1998-01-06 | Namco Ltd. | Video game steering system causing translation, rotation and curvilinear motion on the object |
US5715834A (en) | 1992-11-20 | 1998-02-10 | Scuola Superiore Di Studi Universitari & Di Perfezionamento S. Anna | Device for monitoring the configuration of a distal physiological unit for use, in particular, as an advanced interface for machine and computers |
US5732227A (en) | 1994-07-05 | 1998-03-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Interactive information processing system responsive to user manipulation of physical objects and displayed images |
US5757360A (en) | 1995-05-03 | 1998-05-26 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | Hand held computer control device |
US5801943A (en) | 1993-07-23 | 1998-09-01 | Condition Monitoring Systems | Traffic surveillance and simulation apparatus |
US5801704A (en) | 1994-08-22 | 1998-09-01 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Three-dimensional input device with displayed legend and shape-changing cursor |
US5828779A (en) | 1995-05-05 | 1998-10-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for constructing a color table in a computer unit for the classification of picture elements in an image |
US5864808A (en) | 1994-04-25 | 1999-01-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Erroneous input processing method and apparatus in information processing system using composite input |
US5875108A (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1999-02-23 | Hoffberg; Steven M. | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US5877803A (en) | 1997-04-07 | 1999-03-02 | Tritech Mircoelectronics International, Ltd. | 3-D image detector |
US5909189A (en) | 1996-11-14 | 1999-06-01 | Raytheon Company | Group tracking |
US5913727A (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1999-06-22 | Ahdoot; Ned | Interactive movement and contact simulation game |
US5933125A (en) | 1995-11-27 | 1999-08-03 | Cae Electronics, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for reducing instability in the display of a virtual environment |
WO1999044698A2 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 1999-09-10 | Arena, Inc. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US5959574A (en) * | 1993-12-21 | 1999-09-28 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Method and system for tracking multiple regional objects by multi-dimensional relaxation |
US5980256A (en) | 1993-10-29 | 1999-11-09 | Carmein; David E. E. | Virtual reality system with enhanced sensory apparatus |
US5989157A (en) | 1996-08-06 | 1999-11-23 | Walton; Charles A. | Exercising system with electronic inertial game playing |
US5995649A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1999-11-30 | Nec Corporation | Dual-input image processor for recognizing, isolating, and displaying specific objects from the input images |
US6002808A (en) | 1996-07-26 | 1999-12-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | Hand gesture control system |
US6005548A (en) | 1996-08-14 | 1999-12-21 | Latypov; Nurakhmed Nurislamovich | Method for tracking and displaying user's spatial position and orientation, a method for representing virtual reality for a user, and systems of embodiment of such methods |
US6009210A (en) | 1997-03-05 | 1999-12-28 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Hands-free interface to a virtual reality environment using head tracking |
US6054991A (en) | 1991-12-02 | 2000-04-25 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method of modeling player position and movement in a virtual reality system |
US6066075A (en) | 1995-07-26 | 2000-05-23 | Poulton; Craig K. | Direct feedback controller for user interaction |
US6067077A (en) | 1998-04-10 | 2000-05-23 | Immersion Corporation | Position sensing for force feedback devices |
US6072494A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-06-06 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time gesture recognition |
US6072467A (en) | 1996-05-03 | 2000-06-06 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. (Ita) | Continuously variable control of animated on-screen characters |
US6073489A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2000-06-13 | French; Barry J. | Testing and training system for assessing the ability of a player to complete a task |
US6077201A (en) | 1998-06-12 | 2000-06-20 | Cheng; Chau-Yang | Exercise bicycle |
US6100896A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 2000-08-08 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | System for designing graphical multi-participant environments |
US6101289A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-08-08 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for unencumbered capture of an object |
US6111580A (en) | 1995-09-13 | 2000-08-29 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus and method for controlling an electronic device with user action |
US6128003A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2000-10-03 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Hand gesture recognition system and method |
US6130677A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-10-10 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Interactive computer vision system |
US6141463A (en) | 1997-10-10 | 2000-10-31 | Electric Planet Interactive | Method and system for estimating jointed-figure configurations |
US6147678A (en) | 1998-12-09 | 2000-11-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Video hand image-three-dimensional computer interface with multiple degrees of freedom |
US6152856A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 2000-11-28 | Real Vision Corporation | Real time simulation using position sensing |
US6159100A (en) | 1998-04-23 | 2000-12-12 | Smith; Michael D. | Virtual reality game |
US6173066B1 (en) | 1996-05-21 | 2001-01-09 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Pose determination and tracking by matching 3D objects to a 2D sensor |
US6181343B1 (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2001-01-30 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs |
US6188777B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2001-02-13 | Interval Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for personnel detection and tracking |
US6191773B1 (en) | 1995-04-28 | 2001-02-20 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Interface apparatus |
US6195104B1 (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2001-02-27 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs |
US6215890B1 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2001-04-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Hand gesture recognizing device |
US6215898B1 (en) | 1997-04-15 | 2001-04-10 | Interval Research Corporation | Data processing system and method |
US6222465B1 (en) | 1998-12-09 | 2001-04-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Gesture-based computer interface |
US6226396B1 (en) | 1997-07-31 | 2001-05-01 | Nec Corporation | Object extraction method and system |
US6226388B1 (en) | 1999-01-05 | 2001-05-01 | Sharp Labs Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for object tracking for automatic controls in video devices |
US6229913B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2001-05-08 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Apparatus and methods for determining the three-dimensional shape of an object using active illumination and relative blurring in two-images due to defocus |
US6256400B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-07-03 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and device for segmenting hand gestures |
US6269172B1 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 2001-07-31 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Method for tracking the motion of a 3-D figure |
US6283860B1 (en) | 1995-11-07 | 2001-09-04 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method, system, and program for gesture based option selection |
US6289112B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2001-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for determining block direction in fingerprint images |
US6299308B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2001-10-09 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Low-cost non-imaging eye tracker system for computer control |
US6301370B1 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 2001-10-09 | Eyematic Interfaces, Inc. | Face recognition from video images |
US6308565B1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2001-10-30 | Impulse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6311159B1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 2001-10-30 | Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. | Speech controlled computer user interface |
US6316934B1 (en) | 1998-09-17 | 2001-11-13 | Netmor Ltd. | System for three dimensional positioning and tracking |
US20020004422A1 (en) | 1997-01-30 | 2002-01-10 | Kabusiki Kaisha Sega Enterprises | Input device, game device, and method and recording medium for same |
US20020019258A1 (en) | 2000-05-31 | 2002-02-14 | Kim Gerard Jounghyun | Methods and apparatus of displaying and evaluating motion data in a motion game apparatus |
US6347998B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2002-02-19 | Konami Co., Ltd. | Game system and computer-readable recording medium |
US6363160B1 (en) | 1999-01-22 | 2002-03-26 | Intel Corporation | Interface using pattern recognition and tracking |
US20020041327A1 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2002-04-11 | Evan Hildreth | Video-based image control system |
US6377296B1 (en) | 1999-01-28 | 2002-04-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual map system and method for tracking objects |
US6375572B1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2002-04-23 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Portable game apparatus with acceleration sensor and information storage medium storing a game progam |
US6384819B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2002-05-07 | Electric Planet, Inc. | System and method for generating an animatable character |
US20020055383A1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2002-05-09 | Namco Ltd. | Game system and program |
US6411744B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2002-06-25 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a clean background subtraction |
US6421453B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2002-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and methods for user recognition employing behavioral passwords |
US6430997B1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2002-08-13 | Trazer Technologies, Inc. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6476834B1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2002-11-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic creation of selectable items on surfaces |
US6496598B1 (en) | 1997-09-02 | 2002-12-17 | Dynamic Digital Depth Research Pty. Ltd. | Image processing method and apparatus |
US6503195B1 (en) | 1999-05-24 | 2003-01-07 | University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Methods and systems for real-time structured light depth extraction and endoscope using real-time structured light depth extraction |
US6509889B2 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2003-01-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for enabling the adaptation of the input parameters for a computer system pointing device |
US20030040350A1 (en) | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Masayasu Nakata | Game system, puzzle game program, and storage medium having program stored therein |
US6542621B1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2003-04-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method of dealing with occlusion when tracking multiple objects and people in video sequences |
US6539931B2 (en) | 2001-04-16 | 2003-04-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Ball throwing assistant |
US6545661B1 (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2003-04-08 | Midway Amusement Games, Llc | Video game system having a control unit with an accelerometer for controlling a video game |
US6570555B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2003-05-27 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for embodied conversational characters with multimodal input/output in an interface device |
US6591236B2 (en) | 1999-04-13 | 2003-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for determining available and alternative speech commands |
US6594616B2 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2003-07-15 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing a mobile input device |
US6600475B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2003-07-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Single camera system for gesture-based input and target indication |
US6603488B2 (en) | 1997-06-25 | 2003-08-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Browser based command and control home network |
US20030156756A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-21 | Gokturk Salih Burak | Gesture recognition system using depth perceptive sensors |
US6633294B1 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2003-10-14 | Seth Rosenthal | Method and apparatus for using captured high density motion for animation |
US6640202B1 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2003-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Elastic sensor mesh system for 3-dimensional measurement, mapping and kinematics applications |
US20030216179A1 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2003-11-20 | Toshiaki Suzuki | Game device changing sound and an image in accordance with a tilt operation |
US6661918B1 (en) | 1998-12-04 | 2003-12-09 | Interval Research Corporation | Background estimation and segmentation based on range and color |
US20040001113A1 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | John Zipperer | Method and apparatus for spline-based trajectory classification, gesture detection and localization |
US6681031B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2004-01-20 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US20040056907A1 (en) | 2002-09-19 | 2004-03-25 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Prosody based audio/visual co-analysis for co-verbal gesture recognition |
US6714665B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2004-03-30 | Sarnoff Corporation | Fully automated iris recognition system utilizing wide and narrow fields of view |
US6720949B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2004-04-13 | Timothy R. Pryor | Man machine interfaces and applications |
US6731799B1 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2004-05-04 | University Of Washington | Object segmentation with background extraction and moving boundary techniques |
US6738066B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2004-05-18 | Electric Plant, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for detecting collisions between video images generated by a camera and an object depicted on a display |
US6750848B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2004-06-15 | Timothy R. Pryor | More useful man machine interfaces and applications |
US20040113933A1 (en) | 2002-10-08 | 2004-06-17 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Split and merge behavior analysis and understanding using Hidden Markov Models |
US6753879B1 (en) | 2000-07-03 | 2004-06-22 | Intel Corporation | Creating overlapping real and virtual images |
US20040155902A1 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2004-08-12 | Dempski Kelly L. | Lab window collaboration |
US20040155962A1 (en) | 2003-02-11 | 2004-08-12 | Marks Richard L. | Method and apparatus for real time motion capture |
US6788809B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2004-09-07 | Intel Corporation | System and method for gesture recognition in three dimensions using stereo imaging and color vision |
US6795567B1 (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2004-09-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for efficiently tracking object models in video sequences via dynamic ordering of features |
US20040194129A1 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2004-09-30 | Carlbom Ingrid Birgitta | Method and apparatus for intelligent and automatic sensor control using multimedia database system |
US20040189720A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Wilson Andrew D. | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US6801637B2 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2004-10-05 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Optical body tracker |
US6804396B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2004-10-12 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Gesture recognition system |
US20040204240A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2004-10-14 | Barney Jonathan A. | Magical wand and interactive play experience |
US6868383B1 (en) | 2001-07-12 | 2005-03-15 | At&T Corp. | Systems and methods for extracting meaning from multimodal inputs using finite-state devices |
US6873723B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2005-03-29 | Intel Corporation | Segmenting three-dimensional video images using stereo |
US20050076161A1 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-07 | Amro Albanna | Input system and method |
US20050085298A1 (en) | 1997-11-25 | 2005-04-21 | Woolston Thomas G. | Electronic sword game with input and feedback |
US6888960B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2005-05-03 | Nec Corporation | Fast optimal linear approximation of the images of variably illuminated solid objects for recognition |
US20050151850A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-07-14 | Korea Institute Of Science And Technology | Interactive presentation system |
US6937742B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2005-08-30 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Gesture activated home appliance |
US6950534B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2005-09-27 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US20050212753A1 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Marvit David L | Motion controlled remote controller |
US20050239548A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2005-10-27 | Hiromu Ueshima | Information processor having input system using stroboscope |
US20050238201A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2005-10-27 | Atid Shamaie | Tracking bimanual movements |
US20050255434A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-11-17 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Interactive virtual characters for training including medical diagnosis training |
US6980312B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2005-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multifunction office device having a graphical user interface implemented with a touch screen |
US6982697B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2006-01-03 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for selecting objects in a ubiquitous computing environment |
US20060007142A1 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2006-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Pointing device and cursor for use in intelligent computing environments |
US6990639B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2006-01-24 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for controlling electronic components in a ubiquitous computing environment using multimodal integration |
US20060033713A1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2006-02-16 | Pryor Timothy R | Interactive video based games using objects sensed by TV cameras |
US20060036944A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2006-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Surface UI for gesture-based interaction |
US7003134B1 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2006-02-21 | Vulcan Patents Llc | Three dimensional object pose estimation which employs dense depth information |
US7036094B1 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2006-04-25 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Behavior recognition system |
US7039676B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2006-05-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using video image analysis to automatically transmit gestures over a network in a chat or instant messaging session |
US20060098873A1 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2006-05-11 | Gesturetek, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Multiple camera control system |
US7050606B2 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2006-05-23 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Tracking and gesture recognition system particularly suited to vehicular control applications |
US7060957B2 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2006-06-13 | Csem Centre Suisse D'electronique Et Microtechinique Sa | Device and method for spatially resolved photodetection and demodulation of modulated electromagnetic waves |
US7070500B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2006-07-04 | Konami Corporation | Musical player-motion sensing game system |
US20060178212A1 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2006-08-10 | Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. | Semantic gaming and application transformation |
US7095401B2 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2006-08-22 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | System and method for gesture interface |
US7113918B1 (en) | 1999-08-01 | 2006-09-26 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method for video enabled electronic commerce |
US7121946B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2006-10-17 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Real-time head tracking system for computer games and other applications |
US7148913B2 (en) | 2001-10-12 | 2006-12-12 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Vision-based pointer tracking and object classification method and apparatus |
US7170492B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2007-01-30 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US20070060383A1 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-15 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Video game program and video game system |
US7202898B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2007-04-10 | 3Dv Systems Ltd. | Self gating photosurface |
US7206435B2 (en) | 2002-03-26 | 2007-04-17 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Real-time eye detection and tracking under various light conditions |
US7222078B2 (en) | 1992-08-06 | 2007-05-22 | Ferrara Ethereal Llc | Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network |
US7225414B1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2007-05-29 | Videomining Corporation | Method and system for virtual touch entertainment |
US7259747B2 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2007-08-21 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US7274800B2 (en) | 2001-07-18 | 2007-09-25 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic gesture recognition from stereo sequences |
US20070252898A1 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2007-11-01 | Bruno Delean | Remote control apparatus using gesture recognition |
US7308112B2 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2007-12-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Sign based human-machine interaction |
US7317836B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2008-01-08 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Pose estimation based on critical point analysis |
US20080026838A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2008-01-31 | Dunstan James E | Multi-player non-role-playing virtual world games: method for two-way interaction between participants and multi-player virtual world games |
US20080036732A1 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2008-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtual Controller For Visual Displays |
US7348963B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2008-03-25 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US20080094351A1 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
US7367887B2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2008-05-06 | Namco Bandai Games Inc. | Game apparatus, storage medium, and computer program that adjust level of game difficulty |
US7372977B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-05-13 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Visual tracking using depth data |
US7379566B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2008-05-27 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Optical flow based tilt sensor |
US7389591B2 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2008-06-24 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Orientation-sensitive signal output |
US7394346B2 (en) | 2002-01-15 | 2008-07-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Free-space gesture recognition for transaction security and command processing |
US7412077B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2008-08-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for head pose estimation and head gesture detection |
US20080193043A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-08-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for reducing effects of undesired signals in an infrared imaging system |
US7430312B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2008-09-30 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Creating 3D images of objects by illuminating with infrared patterns |
US7436496B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2008-10-14 | National University Corporation Shizuoka University | Distance image sensor |
US7450736B2 (en) | 2005-10-28 | 2008-11-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Monocular tracking of 3D human motion with a coordinated mixture of factor analyzers |
US7452275B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2008-11-18 | Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. | Game device, game controlling method and program |
US7489812B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2009-02-10 | Dynamic Digital Depth Research Pty Ltd. | Conversion and encoding techniques |
US7492367B2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2009-02-17 | Motus Corporation | Apparatus, system and method for interpreting and reproducing physical motion |
WO2009059065A1 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2009-05-07 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Interactive display system with collaborative gesture detection |
US20090121894A1 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Magic wand |
US7536032B2 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2009-05-19 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Method and system for processing captured image information in an interactive video display system |
US7560701B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2009-07-14 | Mesa Imaging Ag | Highly sensitive, fast pixel for use in an image sensor |
US7574020B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2009-08-11 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Detecting and tracking objects in images |
US7576727B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2009-08-18 | Matthew Bell | Interactive directed light/sound system |
US20090221368A1 (en) | 2007-11-28 | 2009-09-03 | Ailive Inc., | Method and system for creating a shared game space for a networked game |
US7593552B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2009-09-22 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Gesture recognition apparatus, gesture recognition method, and gesture recognition program |
US7598942B2 (en) | 2005-02-08 | 2009-10-06 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | System and method for gesture based control system |
US7607509B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2009-10-27 | Iee International Electronics & Engineering S.A. | Safety device for a vehicle |
US7620202B2 (en) | 2003-06-12 | 2009-11-17 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Target orientation estimation using depth sensing |
US7684592B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2010-03-23 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Realtime object tracking system |
US7683954B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-03-23 | Brainvision Inc. | Solid-state image sensor |
US7701439B2 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2010-04-20 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Gesture recognition simulation system and method |
US7702130B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2010-04-20 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | User interface apparatus using hand gesture recognition and method thereof |
US7704135B2 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2010-04-27 | Harrison Jr Shelton E | Integrated game system, method, and device |
US7710391B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2010-05-04 | Matthew Bell | Processing an image utilizing a spatially varying pattern |
US20100113153A1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2010-05-06 | Ailive, Inc. | Self-Contained Inertial Navigation System for Interactive Control Using Movable Controllers |
US7729530B2 (en) | 2007-03-03 | 2010-06-01 | Sergey Antonov | Method and apparatus for 3-D data input to a personal computer with a multimedia oriented operating system |
CN101254344B (en) | 2008-04-18 | 2010-06-16 | 李刚 | Game device of field orientation corresponding with display screen dot array in proportion and method |
US20100151946A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-06-17 | Wilson Andrew D | System and method for executing a game process |
US7852262B2 (en) | 2007-08-16 | 2010-12-14 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Wireless mobile indoor/outdoor tracking system |
US7890199B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-02-15 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Storage medium storing sound output control program and sound output control apparatus |
US20110081969A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2011-04-07 | Akio Ikeda | Video game system with wireless modular handheld controller |
US7927216B2 (en) | 2005-09-15 | 2011-04-19 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Video game system with wireless modular handheld controller |
US20110124410A1 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2011-05-26 | Xiaodong Mao | Controller for interfacing with a computing program using position, orientation, or motion |
US7988558B2 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2011-08-02 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game apparatus and storage medium storing game program |
US8035624B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2011-10-11 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Computer vision based touch screen |
US8072470B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2011-12-06 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | System and method for providing a real-time three-dimensional interactive environment |
US8553094B2 (en) | 2007-08-23 | 2013-10-08 | Pixart Imaging Inc. | Interactive image system, interactive apparatus and operating method thereof |
US20140142729A1 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2014-05-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Controlling hardware in an environment |
US8747224B2 (en) | 2008-11-14 | 2014-06-10 | Sony Corporation | Operating device |
US8814688B2 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2014-08-26 | Creative Kingdoms, Llc | Customizable toy for playing a wireless interactive game having both physical and virtual elements |
US8834271B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2014-09-16 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game controller and game system |
US8858336B2 (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2014-10-14 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game apparatus having general-purpose remote control function |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4288078A (en) * | 1979-11-20 | 1981-09-08 | Lugo Julio I | Game apparatus |
JP2000028799A (en) * | 1998-07-07 | 2000-01-28 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Radiation image conversion panel for method for reading by condensing light on both side and method for reading radiation image |
-
2003
- 2003-03-25 US US10/396,653 patent/US7665041B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-06-30 US US12/494,303 patent/US20090268945A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-02-12 US US12/705,113 patent/US9652042B2/en active Active
- 2010-02-12 US US12/705,014 patent/US20100146464A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (296)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4695953A (en) | 1983-08-25 | 1987-09-22 | Blair Preston E | TV animation interactively controlled by the viewer |
US4630910A (en) | 1984-02-16 | 1986-12-23 | Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. | Method of measuring in three-dimensions at high speed |
US4627620A (en) | 1984-12-26 | 1986-12-09 | Yang John P | Electronic athlete trainer for improving skills in reflex, speed and accuracy |
US4645458A (en) | 1985-04-15 | 1987-02-24 | Harald Phillip | Athletic evaluation and training apparatus |
US4702475A (en) | 1985-08-16 | 1987-10-27 | Innovating Training Products, Inc. | Sports technique and reaction training system |
US4843568A (en) | 1986-04-11 | 1989-06-27 | Krueger Myron W | Real time perception of and response to the actions of an unencumbered participant/user |
US4711543A (en) | 1986-04-14 | 1987-12-08 | Blair Preston E | TV animation interactively controlled by the viewer |
US4796997A (en) | 1986-05-27 | 1989-01-10 | Synthetic Vision Systems, Inc. | Method and system for high-speed, 3-D imaging of an object at a vision station |
US5184295A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1993-02-02 | Mann Ralph V | System and method for teaching physical skills |
US4751642A (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1988-06-14 | Silva John M | Interactive sports simulation system with physiological sensing and psychological conditioning |
US4809065A (en) | 1986-12-01 | 1989-02-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Interactive system and related method for displaying data to produce a three-dimensional image of an object |
US4817950A (en) | 1987-05-08 | 1989-04-04 | Goo Paul E | Video game control unit and attitude sensor |
US5109537A (en) | 1988-06-24 | 1992-04-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Telecommunication apparatus having an id rechecking function |
US5239464A (en) | 1988-08-04 | 1993-08-24 | Blair Preston E | Interactive video system providing repeated switching of multiple tracks of actions sequences |
US5239463A (en) | 1988-08-04 | 1993-08-24 | Blair Preston E | Method and apparatus for player interaction with animated characters and objects |
US4901362A (en) | 1988-08-08 | 1990-02-13 | Raytheon Company | Method of recognizing patterns |
US4893183A (en) | 1988-08-11 | 1990-01-09 | Carnegie-Mellon University | Robotic vision system |
US5288078A (en) | 1988-10-14 | 1994-02-22 | David G. Capper | Control interface apparatus |
US4925189A (en) | 1989-01-13 | 1990-05-15 | Braeunig Thomas F | Body-mounted video game exercise device |
US5229756A (en) | 1989-02-07 | 1993-07-20 | Yamaha Corporation | Image control apparatus |
US5469740A (en) | 1989-07-14 | 1995-11-28 | Impulse Technology, Inc. | Interactive video testing and training system |
US5139261A (en) | 1989-09-15 | 1992-08-18 | Openiano Renato M | Foot-actuated computer game controller serving as a joystick |
US5229754A (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1993-07-20 | Yazaki Corporation | Automotive reflection type display apparatus |
US5101444A (en) | 1990-05-18 | 1992-03-31 | Panacea, Inc. | Method and apparatus for high speed object location |
US5148154A (en) | 1990-12-04 | 1992-09-15 | Sony Corporation Of America | Multi-dimensional user interface |
US5534917A (en) | 1991-05-09 | 1996-07-09 | Very Vivid, Inc. | Video image based control system |
US5295491A (en) | 1991-09-26 | 1994-03-22 | Sam Technology, Inc. | Non-invasive human neurocognitive performance capability testing method and system |
US6054991A (en) | 1991-12-02 | 2000-04-25 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method of modeling player position and movement in a virtual reality system |
WO1993010708A1 (en) | 1991-12-03 | 1993-06-10 | French Sportech Corporation | Interactive video testing and training system |
US5875108A (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1999-02-23 | Hoffberg; Steven M. | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US5417210A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1995-05-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
EP0583061A2 (en) | 1992-07-10 | 1994-02-16 | The Walt Disney Company | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced graphics in a virtual world |
US7222078B2 (en) | 1992-08-06 | 2007-05-22 | Ferrara Ethereal Llc | Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network |
US5320538A (en) | 1992-09-23 | 1994-06-14 | Hughes Training, Inc. | Interactive aircraft training system and method |
US5715834A (en) | 1992-11-20 | 1998-02-10 | Scuola Superiore Di Studi Universitari & Di Perfezionamento S. Anna | Device for monitoring the configuration of a distal physiological unit for use, in particular, as an advanced interface for machine and computers |
US5495576A (en) | 1993-01-11 | 1996-02-27 | Ritchey; Kurtis J. | Panoramic image based virtual reality/telepresence audio-visual system and method |
US5690582A (en) | 1993-02-02 | 1997-11-25 | Tectrix Fitness Equipment, Inc. | Interactive exercise apparatus |
US5525901A (en) | 1993-02-02 | 1996-06-11 | Beaudreau Electric, Inc. | Sensor systems for monitoring and measuring angular position in two or three axes |
US5704837A (en) | 1993-03-26 | 1998-01-06 | Namco Ltd. | Video game steering system causing translation, rotation and curvilinear motion on the object |
US5405152A (en) | 1993-06-08 | 1995-04-11 | The Walt Disney Company | Method and apparatus for an interactive video game with physical feedback |
US5414643A (en) | 1993-06-14 | 1995-05-09 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Method and apparatus for continuous time representation of multiple hypothesis tracking data |
US5801943A (en) | 1993-07-23 | 1998-09-01 | Condition Monitoring Systems | Traffic surveillance and simulation apparatus |
US5454043A (en) | 1993-07-30 | 1995-09-26 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Dynamic and static hand gesture recognition through low-level image analysis |
US5423554A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1995-06-13 | Metamedia Ventures, Inc. | Virtual reality game method and apparatus |
US5980256A (en) | 1993-10-29 | 1999-11-09 | Carmein; David E. E. | Virtual reality system with enhanced sensory apparatus |
US5617312A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1997-04-01 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Computer system that enters control information by means of video camera |
US5347306A (en) | 1993-12-17 | 1994-09-13 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Animated electronic meeting place |
US5959574A (en) * | 1993-12-21 | 1999-09-28 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Method and system for tracking multiple regional objects by multi-dimensional relaxation |
US5616078A (en) | 1993-12-28 | 1997-04-01 | Konami Co., Ltd. | Motion-controlled video entertainment system |
US5577981A (en) | 1994-01-19 | 1996-11-26 | Jarvik; Robert | Virtual reality exercise machine and computer controlled video system |
US5615132A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1997-03-25 | Crossbow Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining position and orientation of a moveable object using accelerometers |
US5580249A (en) | 1994-02-14 | 1996-12-03 | Sarcos Group | Apparatus for simulating mobility of a human |
US5597309A (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1997-01-28 | Riess; Thomas | Method and apparatus for treatment of gait problems associated with parkinson's disease |
US5385519A (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1995-01-31 | Hsu; Chi-Hsueh | Running machine |
US5864808A (en) | 1994-04-25 | 1999-01-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Erroneous input processing method and apparatus in information processing system using composite input |
US5528263A (en) | 1994-06-15 | 1996-06-18 | Daniel M. Platzker | Interactive projected video image display system |
US5524637A (en) | 1994-06-29 | 1996-06-11 | Erickson; Jon W. | Interactive system for measuring physiological exertion |
US5732227A (en) | 1994-07-05 | 1998-03-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Interactive information processing system responsive to user manipulation of physical objects and displayed images |
JPH0844490A (en) | 1994-07-28 | 1996-02-16 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Interface device |
US5563988A (en) | 1994-08-01 | 1996-10-08 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and system for facilitating wireless, full-body, real-time user interaction with a digitally represented visual environment |
US5801704A (en) | 1994-08-22 | 1998-09-01 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Three-dimensional input device with displayed legend and shape-changing cursor |
US6714665B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2004-03-30 | Sarnoff Corporation | Fully automated iris recognition system utilizing wide and narrow fields of view |
US5516105A (en) | 1994-10-06 | 1996-05-14 | Exergame, Inc. | Acceleration activated joystick |
US5638300A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-06-10 | Johnson; Lee E. | Golf swing analysis system |
US5703367A (en) | 1994-12-09 | 1997-12-30 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Human occupancy detection method and system for implementing the same |
US5594469A (en) | 1995-02-21 | 1997-01-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America Inc. | Hand gesture machine control system |
US5682229A (en) | 1995-04-14 | 1997-10-28 | Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. | Laser range camera |
US6191773B1 (en) | 1995-04-28 | 2001-02-20 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Interface apparatus |
US5757360A (en) | 1995-05-03 | 1998-05-26 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | Hand held computer control device |
US5828779A (en) | 1995-05-05 | 1998-10-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for constructing a color table in a computer unit for the classification of picture elements in an image |
US5913727A (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1999-06-22 | Ahdoot; Ned | Interactive movement and contact simulation game |
US6229913B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2001-05-08 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Apparatus and methods for determining the three-dimensional shape of an object using active illumination and relative blurring in two-images due to defocus |
US5682196A (en) | 1995-06-22 | 1997-10-28 | Actv, Inc. | Three-dimensional (3D) video presentation system providing interactive 3D presentation with personalized audio responses for multiple viewers |
US6066075A (en) | 1995-07-26 | 2000-05-23 | Poulton; Craig K. | Direct feedback controller for user interaction |
US5611731A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 1997-03-18 | Thrustmaster, Inc. | Video pinball machine controller having an optical accelerometer for detecting slide and tilt |
US6111580A (en) | 1995-09-13 | 2000-08-29 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus and method for controlling an electronic device with user action |
US6098458A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2000-08-08 | Impulse Technology, Ltd. | Testing and training system for assessing movement and agility skills without a confining field |
US6308565B1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2001-10-30 | Impulse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US7359121B2 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2008-04-15 | Impulse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6430997B1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2002-08-13 | Trazer Technologies, Inc. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
WO1997017598A1 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1997-05-15 | Impulse Technology, Inc. | System for continuous monitoring of physical activity during unrestricted movement |
US6073489A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2000-06-13 | French; Barry J. | Testing and training system for assessing the ability of a player to complete a task |
US7038855B2 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2006-05-02 | Impulse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6765726B2 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2004-07-20 | Impluse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6876496B2 (en) | 1995-11-06 | 2005-04-05 | Impulse Technology Ltd. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6283860B1 (en) | 1995-11-07 | 2001-09-04 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method, system, and program for gesture based option selection |
US5933125A (en) | 1995-11-27 | 1999-08-03 | Cae Electronics, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for reducing instability in the display of a virtual environment |
US5641288A (en) | 1996-01-11 | 1997-06-24 | Zaenglein, Jr.; William G. | Shooting simulating process and training device using a virtual reality display screen |
US6072467A (en) | 1996-05-03 | 2000-06-06 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. (Ita) | Continuously variable control of animated on-screen characters |
US6152856A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 2000-11-28 | Real Vision Corporation | Real time simulation using position sensing |
US6173066B1 (en) | 1996-05-21 | 2001-01-09 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Pose determination and tracking by matching 3D objects to a 2D sensor |
US6002808A (en) | 1996-07-26 | 1999-12-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | Hand gesture control system |
US5989157A (en) | 1996-08-06 | 1999-11-23 | Walton; Charles A. | Exercising system with electronic inertial game playing |
US6005548A (en) | 1996-08-14 | 1999-12-21 | Latypov; Nurakhmed Nurislamovich | Method for tracking and displaying user's spatial position and orientation, a method for representing virtual reality for a user, and systems of embodiment of such methods |
US5995649A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1999-11-30 | Nec Corporation | Dual-input image processor for recognizing, isolating, and displaying specific objects from the input images |
US5909189A (en) | 1996-11-14 | 1999-06-01 | Raytheon Company | Group tracking |
US6128003A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2000-10-03 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Hand gesture recognition system and method |
US20020004422A1 (en) | 1997-01-30 | 2002-01-10 | Kabusiki Kaisha Sega Enterprises | Input device, game device, and method and recording medium for same |
US6009210A (en) | 1997-03-05 | 1999-12-28 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Hands-free interface to a virtual reality environment using head tracking |
US6100896A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 2000-08-08 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. | System for designing graphical multi-participant environments |
US5877803A (en) | 1997-04-07 | 1999-03-02 | Tritech Mircoelectronics International, Ltd. | 3-D image detector |
US6215898B1 (en) | 1997-04-15 | 2001-04-10 | Interval Research Corporation | Data processing system and method |
US6603488B2 (en) | 1997-06-25 | 2003-08-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Browser based command and control home network |
US6226396B1 (en) | 1997-07-31 | 2001-05-01 | Nec Corporation | Object extraction method and system |
US6188777B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2001-02-13 | Interval Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for personnel detection and tracking |
US20080122786A1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2008-05-29 | Pryor Timothy R | Advanced video gaming methods for education and play using camera based inputs |
US7042440B2 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2006-05-09 | Pryor Timothy R | Man machine interfaces and applications |
US6720949B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2004-04-13 | Timothy R. Pryor | Man machine interfaces and applications |
US20060033713A1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2006-02-16 | Pryor Timothy R | Interactive video based games using objects sensed by TV cameras |
US6289112B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2001-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for determining block direction in fingerprint images |
US6496598B1 (en) | 1997-09-02 | 2002-12-17 | Dynamic Digital Depth Research Pty. Ltd. | Image processing method and apparatus |
US6215890B1 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2001-04-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Hand gesture recognizing device |
US6141463A (en) | 1997-10-10 | 2000-10-31 | Electric Planet Interactive | Method and system for estimating jointed-figure configurations |
US6256033B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2001-07-03 | Electric Planet | Method and apparatus for real-time gesture recognition |
US6072494A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-06-06 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time gesture recognition |
US7184048B2 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2007-02-27 | Electric Planet, Inc. | System and method for generating an animatable character |
US6130677A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-10-10 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Interactive computer vision system |
USRE42256E1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2011-03-29 | Elet Systems L.L.C. | Method and apparatus for performing a clean background subtraction |
US6411744B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2002-06-25 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a clean background subtraction |
US6101289A (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2000-08-08 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method and apparatus for unencumbered capture of an object |
US6384819B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2002-05-07 | Electric Planet, Inc. | System and method for generating an animatable character |
US7746345B2 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2010-06-29 | Hunter Kevin L | System and method for generating an animatable character |
US20050085298A1 (en) | 1997-11-25 | 2005-04-21 | Woolston Thomas G. | Electronic sword game with input and feedback |
US6181343B1 (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2001-01-30 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs |
US6195104B1 (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2001-02-27 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs |
WO1999044698A2 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 1999-09-10 | Arena, Inc. | System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space |
US6067077A (en) | 1998-04-10 | 2000-05-23 | Immersion Corporation | Position sensing for force feedback devices |
US6301370B1 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 2001-10-09 | Eyematic Interfaces, Inc. | Face recognition from video images |
US6269172B1 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 2001-07-31 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Method for tracking the motion of a 3-D figure |
US6159100A (en) | 1998-04-23 | 2000-12-12 | Smith; Michael D. | Virtual reality game |
US6421453B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2002-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and methods for user recognition employing behavioral passwords |
US6077201A (en) | 1998-06-12 | 2000-06-20 | Cheng; Chau-Yang | Exercise bicycle |
US6950534B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2005-09-27 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US7036094B1 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2006-04-25 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Behavior recognition system |
US7668340B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2010-02-23 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US7460690B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2008-12-02 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US7684592B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2010-03-23 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Realtime object tracking system |
US6681031B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2004-01-20 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications |
US7121946B2 (en) | 1998-08-10 | 2006-10-17 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Real-time head tracking system for computer games and other applications |
US6542621B1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2003-04-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method of dealing with occlusion when tracking multiple objects and people in video sequences |
US6316934B1 (en) | 1998-09-17 | 2001-11-13 | Netmor Ltd. | System for three dimensional positioning and tracking |
US6256400B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-07-03 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and device for segmenting hand gestures |
US6311159B1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 2001-10-30 | Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. | Speech controlled computer user interface |
US6750848B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2004-06-15 | Timothy R. Pryor | More useful man machine interfaces and applications |
US6509889B2 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2003-01-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for enabling the adaptation of the input parameters for a computer system pointing device |
US6661918B1 (en) | 1998-12-04 | 2003-12-09 | Interval Research Corporation | Background estimation and segmentation based on range and color |
US6147678A (en) | 1998-12-09 | 2000-11-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Video hand image-three-dimensional computer interface with multiple degrees of freedom |
US6222465B1 (en) | 1998-12-09 | 2001-04-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Gesture-based computer interface |
US7202898B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2007-04-10 | 3Dv Systems Ltd. | Self gating photosurface |
US6570555B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2003-05-27 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for embodied conversational characters with multimodal input/output in an interface device |
US6226388B1 (en) | 1999-01-05 | 2001-05-01 | Sharp Labs Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus for object tracking for automatic controls in video devices |
US6363160B1 (en) | 1999-01-22 | 2002-03-26 | Intel Corporation | Interface using pattern recognition and tracking |
US6377296B1 (en) | 1999-01-28 | 2002-04-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual map system and method for tracking objects |
US7003134B1 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2006-02-21 | Vulcan Patents Llc | Three dimensional object pose estimation which employs dense depth information |
US6299308B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2001-10-09 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Low-cost non-imaging eye tracker system for computer control |
US6591236B2 (en) | 1999-04-13 | 2003-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for determining available and alternative speech commands |
US6503195B1 (en) | 1999-05-24 | 2003-01-07 | University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Methods and systems for real-time structured light depth extraction and endoscope using real-time structured light depth extraction |
US6476834B1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2002-11-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic creation of selectable items on surfaces |
US6545661B1 (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2003-04-08 | Midway Amusement Games, Llc | Video game system having a control unit with an accelerometer for controlling a video game |
US6347998B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2002-02-19 | Konami Co., Ltd. | Game system and computer-readable recording medium |
US6873723B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2005-03-29 | Intel Corporation | Segmenting three-dimensional video images using stereo |
US6738066B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2004-05-18 | Electric Plant, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for detecting collisions between video images generated by a camera and an object depicted on a display |
US7760182B2 (en) | 1999-08-01 | 2010-07-20 | Subutai Ahmad | Method for video enabled electronic commerce |
US7113918B1 (en) | 1999-08-01 | 2006-09-26 | Electric Planet, Inc. | Method for video enabled electronic commerce |
US6801637B2 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2004-10-05 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Optical body tracker |
US7050606B2 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2006-05-23 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Tracking and gesture recognition system particularly suited to vehicular control applications |
US7070500B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2006-07-04 | Konami Corporation | Musical player-motion sensing game system |
US6795567B1 (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2004-09-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for efficiently tracking object models in video sequences via dynamic ordering of features |
US6375572B1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2002-04-23 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Portable game apparatus with acceleration sensor and information storage medium storing a game progam |
US20020072418A1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2002-06-13 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Portable game apparatus with acceleration sensor and information storage medium storing a game program |
US7367887B2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2008-05-06 | Namco Bandai Games Inc. | Game apparatus, storage medium, and computer program that adjust level of game difficulty |
US20040204240A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2004-10-14 | Barney Jonathan A. | Magical wand and interactive play experience |
US8814688B2 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2014-08-26 | Creative Kingdoms, Llc | Customizable toy for playing a wireless interactive game having both physical and virtual elements |
US20020055383A1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2002-05-09 | Namco Ltd. | Game system and program |
US6633294B1 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2003-10-14 | Seth Rosenthal | Method and apparatus for using captured high density motion for animation |
US6980312B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2005-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multifunction office device having a graphical user interface implemented with a touch screen |
US7060957B2 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2006-06-13 | Csem Centre Suisse D'electronique Et Microtechinique Sa | Device and method for spatially resolved photodetection and demodulation of modulated electromagnetic waves |
US6640202B1 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2003-10-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Elastic sensor mesh system for 3-dimensional measurement, mapping and kinematics applications |
US20020019258A1 (en) | 2000-05-31 | 2002-02-14 | Kim Gerard Jounghyun | Methods and apparatus of displaying and evaluating motion data in a motion game apparatus |
US6731799B1 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2004-05-04 | University Of Washington | Object segmentation with background extraction and moving boundary techniques |
US6788809B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2004-09-07 | Intel Corporation | System and method for gesture recognition in three dimensions using stereo imaging and color vision |
US6753879B1 (en) | 2000-07-03 | 2004-06-22 | Intel Corporation | Creating overlapping real and virtual images |
US7227526B2 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2007-06-05 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Video-based image control system |
US20020041327A1 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2002-04-11 | Evan Hildreth | Video-based image control system |
US7898522B2 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2011-03-01 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Video-based image control system |
US7555142B2 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2009-06-30 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Multiple camera control system |
US7058204B2 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2006-06-06 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Multiple camera control system |
US20060098873A1 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2006-05-11 | Gesturetek, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Multiple camera control system |
US7421093B2 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2008-09-02 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Multiple camera control system |
US7039676B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2006-05-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using video image analysis to automatically transmit gestures over a network in a chat or instant messaging session |
US7095401B2 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2006-08-22 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | System and method for gesture interface |
US6600475B2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2003-07-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Single camera system for gesture-based input and target indication |
US6888960B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2005-05-03 | Nec Corporation | Fast optimal linear approximation of the images of variably illuminated solid objects for recognition |
US6804396B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2004-10-12 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Gesture recognition system |
US6539931B2 (en) | 2001-04-16 | 2003-04-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Ball throwing assistant |
US7259747B2 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2007-08-21 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US7834846B1 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2010-11-16 | Matthew Bell | Interactive video display system |
US6594616B2 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2003-07-15 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing a mobile input device |
US7452275B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2008-11-18 | Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. | Game device, game controlling method and program |
US6868383B1 (en) | 2001-07-12 | 2005-03-15 | At&T Corp. | Systems and methods for extracting meaning from multimodal inputs using finite-state devices |
US7274800B2 (en) | 2001-07-18 | 2007-09-25 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic gesture recognition from stereo sequences |
US20030040350A1 (en) | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Masayasu Nakata | Game system, puzzle game program, and storage medium having program stored therein |
US7094147B2 (en) | 2001-08-22 | 2006-08-22 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game system, puzzle game program, and storage medium having program stored therein |
US20060092267A1 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2006-05-04 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Lab window collaboration |
US20040155902A1 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2004-08-12 | Dempski Kelly L. | Lab window collaboration |
US7007236B2 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2006-02-28 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Lab window collaboration |
US6937742B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2005-08-30 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Gesture activated home appliance |
US7680298B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2010-03-16 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L. P. | Methods, systems, and products for gesture-activated appliances |
US7148913B2 (en) | 2001-10-12 | 2006-12-12 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Vision-based pointer tracking and object classification method and apparatus |
US7394346B2 (en) | 2002-01-15 | 2008-07-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Free-space gesture recognition for transaction security and command processing |
US8707216B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2014-04-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Controlling objects via gesturing |
US6990639B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2006-01-24 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for controlling electronic components in a ubiquitous computing environment using multimodal integration |
US7721231B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2010-05-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Controlling an object within an environment using a pointing device |
US20140292654A1 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2014-10-02 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for determining 3d orientation of a pointing device |
US7823089B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2010-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Manipulating objects displayed on a display screen |
US6982697B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2006-01-03 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for selecting objects in a ubiquitous computing environment |
US20030156756A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-21 | Gokturk Salih Burak | Gesture recognition system using depth perceptive sensors |
US7206435B2 (en) | 2002-03-26 | 2007-04-17 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Real-time eye detection and tracking under various light conditions |
US20070252898A1 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2007-11-01 | Bruno Delean | Remote control apparatus using gesture recognition |
US7607509B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2009-10-27 | Iee International Electronics & Engineering S.A. | Safety device for a vehicle |
US20030216179A1 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2003-11-20 | Toshiaki Suzuki | Game device changing sound and an image in accordance with a tilt operation |
US7348963B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2008-03-25 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US7170492B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2007-01-30 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Interactive video display system |
US7710391B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2010-05-04 | Matthew Bell | Processing an image utilizing a spatially varying pattern |
US8035614B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2011-10-11 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Interactive video window |
US8035612B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2011-10-11 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Self-contained interactive video display system |
US8035624B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2011-10-11 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 67 Llc | Computer vision based touch screen |
US7489812B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2009-02-10 | Dynamic Digital Depth Research Pty Ltd. | Conversion and encoding techniques |
US20050239548A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2005-10-27 | Hiromu Ueshima | Information processor having input system using stroboscope |
US20040001113A1 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | John Zipperer | Method and apparatus for spline-based trajectory classification, gesture detection and localization |
US7225414B1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2007-05-29 | Videomining Corporation | Method and system for virtual touch entertainment |
US20040056907A1 (en) | 2002-09-19 | 2004-03-25 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Prosody based audio/visual co-analysis for co-verbal gesture recognition |
US20040113933A1 (en) | 2002-10-08 | 2004-06-17 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Split and merge behavior analysis and understanding using Hidden Markov Models |
US7576727B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2009-08-18 | Matthew Bell | Interactive directed light/sound system |
US7436496B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2008-10-14 | National University Corporation Shizuoka University | Distance image sensor |
US20040155962A1 (en) | 2003-02-11 | 2004-08-12 | Marks Richard L. | Method and apparatus for real time motion capture |
US20100151946A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-06-17 | Wilson Andrew D | System and method for executing a game process |
US8745541B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2014-06-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US20040189720A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Wilson Andrew D. | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures |
US7593552B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2009-09-22 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Gesture recognition apparatus, gesture recognition method, and gesture recognition program |
US20040194129A1 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2004-09-30 | Carlbom Ingrid Birgitta | Method and apparatus for intelligent and automatic sensor control using multimedia database system |
US8072470B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2011-12-06 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | System and method for providing a real-time three-dimensional interactive environment |
US7590262B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2009-09-15 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Visual tracking using depth data |
US7372977B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-05-13 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Visual tracking using depth data |
US7620202B2 (en) | 2003-06-12 | 2009-11-17 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Target orientation estimation using depth sensing |
US7038661B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2006-05-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Pointing device and cursor for use in intelligent computing environments |
US20060007142A1 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2006-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Pointing device and cursor for use in intelligent computing environments |
US20050076161A1 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-07 | Amro Albanna | Input system and method |
US7536032B2 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2009-05-19 | Reactrix Systems, Inc. | Method and system for processing captured image information in an interactive video display system |
US7809167B2 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2010-10-05 | Matthew Bell | Method and system for processing captured image information in an interactive video display system |
US20050151850A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2005-07-14 | Korea Institute Of Science And Technology | Interactive presentation system |
US20050255434A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-11-17 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Interactive virtual characters for training including medical diagnosis training |
US20050212753A1 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Marvit David L | Motion controlled remote controller |
US20050238201A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2005-10-27 | Atid Shamaie | Tracking bimanual movements |
US7379563B2 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2008-05-27 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Tracking bimanual movements |
US7308112B2 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2007-12-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Sign based human-machine interaction |
US20080193043A1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2008-08-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for reducing effects of undesired signals in an infrared imaging system |
US20060036944A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2006-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Surface UI for gesture-based interaction |
US7704135B2 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2010-04-27 | Harrison Jr Shelton E | Integrated game system, method, and device |
US20060178212A1 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2006-08-10 | Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. | Semantic gaming and application transformation |
US7702130B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2010-04-20 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | User interface apparatus using hand gesture recognition and method thereof |
US7379566B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2008-05-27 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Optical flow based tilt sensor |
US7570805B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2009-08-04 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Creating 3D images of objects by illuminating with infrared patterns |
US7574020B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2009-08-11 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Detecting and tracking objects in images |
US7430312B2 (en) | 2005-01-07 | 2008-09-30 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Creating 3D images of objects by illuminating with infrared patterns |
US7598942B2 (en) | 2005-02-08 | 2009-10-06 | Oblong Industries, Inc. | System and method for gesture based control system |
US7492367B2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2009-02-17 | Motus Corporation | Apparatus, system and method for interpreting and reproducing physical motion |
US7317836B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2008-01-08 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Pose estimation based on critical point analysis |
US7389591B2 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2008-06-24 | Gesturetek, Inc. | Orientation-sensitive signal output |
US7560701B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2009-07-14 | Mesa Imaging Ag | Highly sensitive, fast pixel for use in an image sensor |
US20110081969A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2011-04-07 | Akio Ikeda | Video game system with wireless modular handheld controller |
US20080026838A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2008-01-31 | Dunstan James E | Multi-player non-role-playing virtual world games: method for two-way interaction between participants and multi-player virtual world games |
US8834271B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2014-09-16 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game controller and game system |
US20070060383A1 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-15 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Video game program and video game system |
US20110172015A1 (en) | 2005-09-15 | 2011-07-14 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Video game system with wireless modular handheld controller |
US7927216B2 (en) | 2005-09-15 | 2011-04-19 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Video game system with wireless modular handheld controller |
US7450736B2 (en) | 2005-10-28 | 2008-11-11 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Monocular tracking of 3D human motion with a coordinated mixture of factor analyzers |
US7988558B2 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2011-08-02 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game apparatus and storage medium storing game program |
US7890199B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-02-15 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Storage medium storing sound output control program and sound output control apparatus |
US7701439B2 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2010-04-20 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Gesture recognition simulation system and method |
US20100113153A1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2010-05-06 | Ailive, Inc. | Self-Contained Inertial Navigation System for Interactive Control Using Movable Controllers |
US8858336B2 (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2014-10-14 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Game apparatus having general-purpose remote control function |
US20080036732A1 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2008-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtual Controller For Visual Displays |
US7683954B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-03-23 | Brainvision Inc. | Solid-state image sensor |
US20080094351A1 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
US7412077B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2008-08-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for head pose estimation and head gesture detection |
US7729530B2 (en) | 2007-03-03 | 2010-06-01 | Sergey Antonov | Method and apparatus for 3-D data input to a personal computer with a multimedia oriented operating system |
US7852262B2 (en) | 2007-08-16 | 2010-12-14 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Wireless mobile indoor/outdoor tracking system |
US8553094B2 (en) | 2007-08-23 | 2013-10-08 | Pixart Imaging Inc. | Interactive image system, interactive apparatus and operating method thereof |
WO2009059065A1 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2009-05-07 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Interactive display system with collaborative gesture detection |
US20090121894A1 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Magic wand |
US20090221368A1 (en) | 2007-11-28 | 2009-09-03 | Ailive Inc., | Method and system for creating a shared game space for a networked game |
CN101254344B (en) | 2008-04-18 | 2010-06-16 | 李刚 | Game device of field orientation corresponding with display screen dot array in proportion and method |
US8747224B2 (en) | 2008-11-14 | 2014-06-10 | Sony Corporation | Operating device |
US20110124410A1 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2011-05-26 | Xiaodong Mao | Controller for interfacing with a computing program using position, orientation, or motion |
US20140142729A1 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2014-05-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Controlling hardware in an environment |
Non-Patent Citations (98)
Title |
---|
"GWindows: Light-Weight Stereo Vision for Interaction", http://research.micorosoft.com/˜nuria/gwindows.htm. Last Accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 2 pages. |
"Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 12 pages." |
"Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 20 pages." |
"Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 18 pages." |
"Office Action mailed Sep. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 24 pages." |
"Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 17 pages." |
"Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/396,653, 13 pages." |
"Simulation and Training", 1994, Division Incorporated. |
"Virtual High Anxiety", Tech Update, Aug. 1995, pp. 22. |
Aggarwal et al., "Human Motion Analysis: A Review", IEEE Nonrigid and Articulated Motion Workshop, 1997, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. |
Aviles-Arriaga, et al., "Dynamic Bayesian networks for visual recognition of dynamic gestures," Dec. 2002, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and technology, 4. vol. 12, Issue 3, 8 pages. |
Azarbayejani et al., "Visually Controlled Graphics", Jun. 1993, vol. 15, No. 6, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. |
Azarbayejani, et al., "Real-Time Self-Calibrating Stereo Person Tracking Using 3-D Shape Estimation from Blob Features", Proceedings of ICPR, Aug. 1996, pp. 627-632, Vienna, Austria. |
Azoz, et al., "Reliable Tracking of Human Arm Dynamics by Multiple Cue Integration and Constraint Fusion", IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1998. |
Baudel, et al., "CHARADE: Remote Control of Objects Using Free-Hand Gestures", Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, No. 7, Jul. 1993, 10 pages. |
Berard, "The Perceptual Window-Head Motion as a New Input Stream", Proceedings of the Seventh IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1999, pp. 238-244. |
Breen et al., "Interactive Occlusion and Collusion of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality", Technical Report ECRC-95-02, 1995, European Computer-Industry Research Center GmbH, Munich, Germany. |
Brogan et al., "Dynamically Simulated Characters in Virtual Environments", Sep./Oct. 1998, pp. 2-13, vol. 18, Issue 5, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. |
Buxton, et al., "A Study of Two-Handed Input", Proceedings of CHI 1986, pp. 321-326, last accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 6 pages. |
Cedras, et al., "Motion-Based Recognition: A Survey", IEEE Proceedings, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 129-155, Mar. 1995. |
Darrell, et al., "Integrated Person Tracking Using Stereo, Color and Pattern Detection", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1998, pp. 601-609, Last accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 31 pages. |
Fisher et al., "Virtual Environment Display System", ACM Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, Oct. 1986, Chapel Hill, NC. |
Fitzgerald, et al., "Multimodal Event Parsing for Intelligent User Interfaces", IUI Conference, Jan. 2003, 8 pages. |
Freeman et al., "Television Control by Hand Gestures", Dec. 1994, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, TR94-24, Caimbridge, MA. |
Freeman, et al., "Television Control by Hand Gestures", International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1995, pp. 179-183. |
Granieri et al., "Simulating Humans in VR", The British Computer Society, Oct. 1994, Academic Press. |
Guiard, "Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action: The Kinematic Chain as a Model", Journal of Motor Behavior, 1987, pp. 486-517, vol. 19, Issue 4. |
Guler, "Split and Merge Behavior Analysis and Understanding Using Hidden Markov Models", Oct. 8, 2002, all pages. |
Guler, Sadiye Zyno; Split and Merge Behavior Analysis ;U.S. Appl. No. 60/416,553, filed Oct. 8, 2002. * |
Hasegawa et al., "Human-Scale Haptic Interaction with a Reactive Virtual Human in a Real-Time Physics Simulator", Jul. 2006, vol. 4, No. 3, Article 6C, ACM Computers in Entertainment, New York, NY. |
He, "Generation of Human Body Models", Apr. 2005, University of Auckland, New Zealand. |
Hongo et al., "Focus of Attention for Face and Hand Gesture Recognition Using Multiple Cameras", Mar. 2000, pp. 156-161, 4th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Grenoble, France. |
Horvitz, "Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces", Proceedings of CHI, 1999. |
Horvitz, et al., "A Computational Architecture for Conversation", Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, 1999, pp. 201-210. |
Isard et al., "CONDENSATION-Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking", 1998, pp. 5-28, International Journal of Computer Vision 29(1), Netherlands. |
Isard et al., "CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking", 1998, pp. 5-28, International Journal of Computer Vision 29(1), Netherlands. |
Jojic, et al., "Detection and Estimation of Pointing Gestures in Dense Disparity Maps", Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2000, pp. 1000-1007, France. |
Kabbash, et al., "The 'Prince' Technique: Fitts' Law and Selection Using Area Cursors", Proceedings of CHI 1995, pp. 273-279. <<http://www.billbuxton.com/prince.html>>Last accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 11 pages. |
Kabbash, et al., "The ‘Prince’ Technique: Fitts' Law and Selection Using Area Cursors", Proceedings of CHI 1995, pp. 273-279. <<http://www.billbuxton.com/prince.html>>Last accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 11 pages. |
Kanade et al., "A Stereo Machine for Video-rate Dense Depth Mapping and Its New Applications", IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1996, pp. 196-202,The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. |
Kanade, et al., "Development of Video-Rate Stereo Matchine", Proceedings of 94 ARPA Image Understanding Workshop, 1994, pp. 549-558, Last accessed Sep. 30, 2008, 4 pages. |
Kettebekov, et al., "Toward Natural Gesture/Speech Control of a Large Display", In Proceedings of the 8th IFIP International Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001, 13 pages. |
Kjeldsen, "Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures as Practical Interface Modality", Pd.D Dissertation, 1997, Columbia University Department of Computer Science, 168 pages. |
Kohler, "Special Topics of Gesture Recognition Applied in Intelligent Home Environments", In Proceedings of the Gesture Workshop, 1998, pp. 285-296, Germany. |
Kohler, "Technical Details and Ergonomical Aspects of Gesture Recognition applied in Intelligent Home Environments", 1997, Germany. |
Kohler, "Vision Based Remote Control in Intelligent Home Environments", University of Erlangen-Nuremberg/Germany, 1996, pp. 147-154, Germany. |
Krahnstoever, et al., "Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction for Crisis Management Systems", In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 2002, 5 pages. |
Krum, et al., "Speech and Gesture Multimodal Control of a Whole Earth 3D Visualization Environment", In Proceedings of Eurographics-IEEE Visualization Symposium, 2002, 6 pages. |
Krum, et al., "Speech and Gesture Multimodal Control of a Whole Earth 3D Visualization Environment", In Proceedings of Eurographics—IEEE Visualization Symposium, 2002, 6 pages. |
Livingston, "Vision-based Tracking with Dynamic Structured Light for Video See-through Augmented Reality", 1998, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. |
Long, Jr., et al., "Implications for a Gesture Design Tool", Proceedings of CHI 1999, pp. 40-47. Last accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 8 pages. |
Maes, et al., "The ALIVE System: Wireless, Full-Body, Interaction with Autonomous Agents", ACM Multimedia Systems, Special Issue on Multimedia and Multisensory Virtual Worlds, 1996. |
Mignot, et al., "An Experimental Study of Future 'Natural' Mulimodal Human-Computer Interaction", Proceedings of INTERACHI 1993, pp. 67-68. |
Mignot, et al., "An Experimental Study of Future ‘Natural’ Mulimodal Human-Computer Interaction", Proceedings of INTERACHI 1993, pp. 67-68. |
Miyagawa et al., "CCD-Based Range Finding Sensor", Oct. 1997, pp. 1648-1652, vol. 44 No. 10, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. |
Moeslund, et al., "A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture", Computer Vision and Image Understanding; CVIU, vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 231-268, 2001. |
Moyle, et al., "Gesture Navigation: An Alternative 'Back' for the Future", Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 882-823. |
Moyle, et al., "Gesture Navigation: An Alternative ‘Back’ for the Future", Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 882-823. |
Nielsen, et al., "A Procedure for Developing Intuitive and Ergonomic Gesture Interfaces for Man-Machine Interaction", Technical Report CVMT 03-01, ISSN 1601-3646, CVMT, Aalborg University, Mar. 2003, 12 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950 mailed Feb. 11, 2011. 32 Pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950 mailed May 20, 2011. 43 Pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950 mailed Oct. 5, 2010. 30 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,014, mailed Jun. 20, 2012, 33 pages. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 21 pages. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 19 pages. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 8 pages. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 20 pages. |
Office Action mailed May 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 18 pages. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 24 pages. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 16 pages. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 13, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,950, 36 pages. |
Oh, et al., "Evaluating Look-to-Talk: A Gaze-Aware Interface in a Collaborative Environment", CHI 2002, pp. 650-651. Last Accessed Jul. 8, 2005, 3 pages. |
Oviatt, "Ten Myths of Multimodal Interaction", Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, No. 11, Nov. 1999, 8 pages. |
Pavlovic et al., "Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human-Computer Interaction: A Review", Jul. 1997, pp. 677-695, vol. 19, No. 7, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. |
Qian et al., "A Gesture-Driven Multimodal Interactive Dance System", Jun. 2004, pp. 1579-1582, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Taipei, Taiwan. |
Rigoll, et al., "High Performance Real-Time Gesture Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models", Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. LNAI 1371, Frohlich, ed., pp. 69-80, 1997. |
Rosenhahn et al., "Automatic Human Model Generation", 2005, pp. 41-48, University of Auckland (CITR), New Zealand. |
Schmidt, "Towards Model-Based Gesture Recognition," Texas A&M, 2000, 6pp. |
Shao et al., "An Open System Architecture for a Multimedia and Multimodal User Interface", Aug. 24, 1998, Japanese Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities (JSRPD), Japan. |
Sharma et al., method and system for virtual touch entertainment, Sep. 10, 2002, U.S. Appl. No. 60/409,435. * |
Sharma, et al., "Method of Visual and Acoustic Signal Co-Analysis for Co-Verbal Gesture Recognition", Sep. 19, 2002, U.S. Appl. No. 60/413,998. |
Sharma, et al., "Speech-Gesture Driven Multimodal Interfaces for Crisis Management", Proceedings of IEEE special issue on Multimodal Human-Computer Interface, 48 pages. |
Sheridan et al., "Virtual Reality Check", Technology Review, Oct. 1993, pp. 22-28, vol. 96, No. 7. |
Stevens, "Flights into Virtual Reality Treating Real World Disorders", The Washington Post, Mar. 27, 1995, Science Psychology, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/367,878, filed Mar. 26, 2002, Fujimura et al. |
Walker, et al., "Age Related Differences in Movement Control: Adjusting Submovement Structure to Optimize Performance", Journals of Gerontology, Jan. 1997, pp. p40-p52, <<http://psychsoc.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/52/1/p40>>. |
Welford, "Signal, Noise, Performance and Age", Human Factors, 1981, pp. 97-109, vol. 23, Issue 1, <<http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/hf/1981/00000023/00000001/art00009>>. |
Wilson, et al., "GWindows: Towards Robust Perception-Based UI", Microsoft Research, 2003, pp. 1-8. |
Wilson, et al., "Hidden Markov Models for Modeling and Recognizing Gesture Under Variation", Hidden Markov Models: Applications in Computer Vision, T. Caelli, ed., World Scientific, pp. 123-160, 2001. |
Worden, et al., "Making Computers Easier for Older Adults to Use: Area Cursors and Sticky Icons", CHI 1997, pp. 266-271, Atlanta, GA, USA. |
Wren et al., "Pfinder: Real-Time Tracking of the Human Body", MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 353, Jul. 1997, vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 780-785, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Caimbridge, MA. |
Yoda, et al., "Utilization of Stereo Disparity and Optical Flow Information for Human Interaction", Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, 1998, 5 pages, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC USA. |
Zhai, et al., "The 'Silk Cursor': Investigating Transparency for 3D Target Acquition", CHI 1994, pp. 273-279. |
Zhai, et al., "The ‘Silk Cursor’: Investigating Transparency for 3D Target Acquition", CHI 1994, pp. 273-279. |
Zhang, "A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nov. 2000, pp. 1330-1334, vol. 22, No. 11, last accessed Nov. 23, 2005, 5 pages. |
Zhang, "Flexible Camera Calibrating by Viewing a Place from Unknown Orientations", Microsoft Research, 1999, 8 pages. |
Zhao, "Dressed Human Modeling, Detection, and Parts Localization", 2001, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10331228B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2019-06-25 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | System and method for determining 3D orientation of a pointing device |
US10488950B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2019-11-26 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Manipulating an object utilizing a pointing device |
US11153472B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2021-10-19 | Cutting Edge Vision, LLC | Automatic upload of pictures from a camera |
US11818458B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2023-11-14 | Cutting Edge Vision, LLC | Camera touchpad |
US10558341B2 (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2020-02-11 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content |
US10684758B2 (en) | 2017-02-20 | 2020-06-16 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Unified system for bimanual interactions |
US10664041B2 (en) | 2017-11-13 | 2020-05-26 | Inernational Business Machines Corporation | Implementing a customized interaction pattern for a device |
US20220300084A1 (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2022-09-22 | Treye Tech Ug (Haftungsbeschränkt) | Computer system and method for human-machine interaction |
US11809635B2 (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2023-11-07 | Treye Tech Ug (Haftungsbeschränkt) | Computer system and method for human-machine interaction |
US11567149B2 (en) | 2020-04-21 | 2023-01-31 | Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for magnetic resonance imaging |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20090268945A1 (en) | 2009-10-29 |
US7665041B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 |
US20100146455A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
US20040189720A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 |
US20100146464A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9652042B2 (en) | Architecture for controlling a computer using hand gestures | |
US10551930B2 (en) | System and method for executing a process using accelerometer signals | |
US10521021B2 (en) | Detecting, representing, and interpreting three-space input: gestural continuum subsuming freespace, proximal, and surface-contact modes | |
US10656724B2 (en) | Operating environment comprising multiple client devices, multiple displays, multiple users, and gestural control | |
US8115732B2 (en) | Virtual controller for visual displays | |
EP2344983B1 (en) | Method, apparatus and computer program product for providing adaptive gesture analysis | |
US20180173313A1 (en) | Detecting, representing, and interpreting three-space input: gestural continuum subsuming freespace, proximal, and surface-contact modes | |
US10642364B2 (en) | Processing tracking and recognition data in gestural recognition systems | |
US8681098B2 (en) | Detecting, representing, and interpreting three-space input: gestural continuum subsuming freespace, proximal, and surface-contact modes | |
US9971491B2 (en) | Gesture library for natural user input | |
US20140035805A1 (en) | Spatial operating environment (soe) with markerless gestural control | |
EP2427857A1 (en) | Gesture-based control systems including the representation, manipulation, and exchange of data | |
EP2893421A1 (en) | Spatial operating environment (soe) with markerless gestural control | |
Kjeldsen et al. | Design issues for vision-based computer interaction systems | |
Wilson et al. | Gwindows: Towards robust perception-based ui | |
Wilson et al. | Multimodal sensing for explicit and implicit interaction | |
Kölsch et al. | Touching the visualized invisible: Wearable ar with a multimodal interface |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034564/0001 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |