| Veröffentlichungsnummer | USRE40425 E1 | | Publikationstyp | Erteilung | | Anmeldenummer | 11/258,588 | | Veröffentlichungsdatum | 8. Juli 2008 | | Eingetragen | 24. Okt. 2005 | | Prioritätsdatum | 27. Sept. 2002 | | Auch veröffentlicht unter | US6912339, US20040062474, WO2004030243A1 | | Veröffentlichungsnummer | 11258588, 258588, US RE40425 E1, US RE40425E1, US-E1-RE40425, USRE40425 E1, USRE40425E1 | | Erfinder | G. Allan Whittaker, Wilber A. Williams | | Ursprünglich Bevollmächtigter | Lockheed Martin Corporation | | Patentzitate (99), Nichtpatentzitate (49), Klassifizierungen (6) | | |
| Externe Links: USPTO, USPTO-Zuordnung, Espacenet | |
Optical interface devices having balanced amplification US RE40425 E1 An optical interface devices (OID) routes signals entering each of its ports to all other ports. The OID passively routes the optical signals and performs no conversion of the signals into the electrical domain. In addition to signal routing, the OID also performs bi-directional amplification of the optical signals to compensate for splitting losses, coupling losses, signal variations, and to provide additional gain. As a result, the power level of a signal entering one port is the same power level at which corresponding signals exit all other ports of the OID. The OID is useful in a number of network topologies, including but not limited to bus, point-to-point, star, ring, broken ring, hub, and a tree-like topology. The OID enables signal quality to be maintained throughout the network which is especially beneficial in the transmission of Radio Frequency and other analog signals.
1. An optical interface device, comprising:
a first port;
a second port;
a third port;
each of the first, second, and third ports for receiving optical signals;
a first coupler for splitting optical signals from the first port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the second and third ports;
a second coupler for splitting optical signals from the second port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the first and third ports;
a third coupler for splitting optical signals from the third port into a plurality of optical signal components and for routing one of the optical signal components to each of the first and second ports;
a first optical amplifier located between the first and second ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the first and second ports;
a second optical amplifier located between the second and third ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the second and third ports;
a third optical amplifier located between the first and third ports for amplifying optical signals routed between the first and third ports;
wherein each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers has a gain that is sufficient to compensate for coupling losses associated with the first, second, and third ports, respectively, and splitting losses associated with the first, second, and third splitter, respectively.
2. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third amplifiers comprise fiber amplifiers.
3. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third couplers comprise 50/50 splitters.
4. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the optical interface device has more than three ports.
5. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the gain is the same for each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers.
6. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the gain in the first optical amplifier differs from the gain in the second and third optical amplifier.
7. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a fourth optical amplifier associated with the first port, the fourth optical amplifier for providing optical amplification of signals traveling between the first port and the first coupler.
8. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein each of the first, second, and third optical amplifiers receive an excitation signal from a common pump.
9. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third optical amplifiers receive excitation signals from different pumps.
10. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first, second, and third optical couplers split the optical signals into equal optical components.
11. An optical interface device, comprising:
means for receiving an optical signal from a first port;
means for separating the optical signal into a plurality of signal components;
means for amplifying the optical signal components to compensate for losses associated with the receiving means and the separating means, the amplifying means generating amplified optical signal components; and
means for passing the amplified optical signal components from at least a second port and a third port.
12. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the receiving means comprises a port.
13. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the separating means comprises a splitter.
14. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means comprises a fiber amplifier.
15. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means amplifies each signal component with the same gain.
16. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the amplifying means amplifies the signal components with different gains.
17. The optical interface device as set forth in claim 11, further comprising second amplifying means for amplifying the optical signal.
18. A method for routing an optical signal from a first line onto at least a second line and a third line, comprising:
receiving the optical signal from the first line;
splitting the optical signal into a plurality of signal components;
amplifying each of the signal components to compensate for coupling and splitting losses, the amplifying of the signal components resulting in amplified signal components; and
passing the amplified signal components onto each of the second line and the third line.
19. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein splitting comprises splitting the optical signal into equal optical signal components.
20. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein amplifying comprises amplifying the optical signal components to a level greater than a level of the optical signal.
21. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein splitting comprises splitting the optical signal into two optical signal components and the passing comprises passing the two optical signal components onto the second and third lines.
RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference, provisional application Ser. No. 60/414,746 entitled “Optical Interface Devices Having Balanced Amplification,” filed on Sep. 27, 2002.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates generally to systems and methods for providing an optical interface and, more particularly, to systems, methods, and devices for routing optical signals and for compensating for optical losses.
BACKGROUND Optical communication has many benefits over transmission of signals in an electrical domain. For one, the losses in an optical medium are much less than those incurred in an electrical medium. As a result, signals can travel greater distances through an optical fiber before any necessary regeneration. Another advantage is that optical signals are much less susceptible to electromagnetic radiation. An electrical medium, such as a coaxial cable, generates electromagnetic fields as the signals travel down the cable. These electromagnetic fields can induce noise in neighboring cables and cause interference with the signals traveling on such cables. In addition, noise can be induced upon the coaxial cable signals from the electromagnetic fields generated by the neighboring cables. For these and many other reasons, optical communication is often the preferred mode of communication.
In optical communication networks, as with electrical communication networks, the network needs some manner of adding and dropping signals at points throughout the network. One approach to adding and dropping signals onto an optical medium involves the use of regeneration devices. These regeneration devices convert the optical signals traveling along the optical medium into the electrical domain and route these electrical signals to terminal equipment. Any electrical signals that need to be added and forwarded on to the optical medium are added to the electrical signals that had been detected. A combination of these signals is then converted into optical signals and passed along the optical medium. Some drawbacks to this approach include the loss of signal quality in needing to convert the optical signals into electrical signals and then back to optical signals at each node or station throughout the network, the accompanying loss of speed and increase in latency, and the limitations in bandwidth associated with the electrical medium.
Rather than coupling signals in the electrical domain, a preferred device for coupling signals operates purely in the optical domain. By maintaining the signals in the optical domain, the coupling device can maintain signal quality, operate at higher speeds and at an increased bandwidth. U.S. Pat. No. 5,901,260, which is incorporated by reference, is an example of an optical interface device operating solely in the optical domain. This optical interface device is useful in routing optical signals traveling along either direction on an optical bus to a node and for directing signals from that node onto the bus in both directions. With such an optical interface device, signals that originate at any node within a network can be transmitted to every other node and, conversely, signals from all of the nodes are received at each node. This type of optical interface device is useful in an optical transport system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801, which is incorporated by reference.
While optical interface devices have many advantages over electrical interface devices, optical interface devices can still limit the performance of the network. For example, each time optical signals are diverted off of an optical bus to a node, the optical interface device necessarily reduces the optical signal level. Consequently, after a certain number of nodes, the remaining signal has such a low optical signal to noise level that the signal is underneath the noise floor and can no longer be detected. In addition to those losses due to splitting of the signal at each node, the optical interface device also introduces losses resulting from the imperfect coupling of light from an input optical fiber to the optical interface device, from the optical interface device to an exit optical fiber, and from the optical interface device to the terminal equipment. The optical interface device therefore introduces losses at each node, which causes the signal to vary at points throughout the network.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801 describes a network having a number of optical interface devices that bi-directionally amplifies the optical signals. By amplifying the optical signals traveling along the optical bus, the number of nodes along the network can be greatly increased. The optical amplifier may comprise a fiber amplifier and, more particularly a rare earth doped fiber amplifier. The doped fiber amplifier is energized with an excitation light, typically at 980 nanometers. This fiber amplifier may be located between nodes along the bus and/or between the terminal equipment and the optical interface device.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,801, the length of the rare earth doped fiber influences the amount of amplification provided by the fiber amplifier. By placing the fiber amplifiers between each node, the fiber amplifiers can compensate for losses incurred by splitting the signals at each node. Thus, a signal that originates at one end of the bus can travel along the bus, have a fraction of the signal diverted at each node, and then be amplified after incurring those losses. This approach to amplification, as mentioned above, greatly increases the number of nodes that may be in a network. This approach to amplification, however, is more challenging when the network topology is dynamic. For example, a network may have different amplification needs with an initial set of nodes than it would need later when nodes are added at other points within the network, are removed from the network, or are placed at different points within the network. The placement of fiber amplifiers at certain points may therefore not be optimal for a different configuration of nodes on the network. As a result, the signal level and quality of the signal may vary throughout the network. For certain types of signals, these variations may not affect performance of the network overall. On the other hand, for other types of signals, such as radio frequency (RF) signals and other analog signals, maintaining a consistent signal dynamic range and waveform quality throughout the network is imperative.
SUMMARY The invention addresses the problems above by providing systems, networks, and devices for coupling and routing optical signals. An optical interface device according to a preferred embodiment of the invention has three ports with the signals entering any one of the ports being split and routed to each of the other two ports. The optical interface device maintains the optical signal level so that the level of the signal entering one of the three ports is the same level at which the signal exits the other two ports.
The optical interface device is very beneficial in the use of networks carrying radio frequency (RF) and other analog signals as it provides the least interference with the preservation of the quality of the dynamic range and waveform of these signals. The optical interface device may be used in many different network topologies, such as but not limited to, a bus, ring, star, or tree-like topology. In the preferred embodiment, the optical interface device has a balanced set of fiber amplifiers providing the necessary amplification of these signals. These fiber amplifiers are pumped with an excitation light, such as at 980 nanometers.
Other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the description below, and from the accompanying papers forming this application.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, disclose the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an optical interface device according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B) are exemplary networks having the optical interface device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a more detailed diagram of the optical interface device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a more detailed diagram of the optical interface device of FIG. 1 according to another embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a detailed diagram of an optical interface device according to another embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 6 is a detailed diagram of an optical interface device according to a further embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION An optical interface device (OID) 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 1. The OID 10 has a number of ports, in this example three ports A, B, and C, and operates such that the output to any one of its ports is split and routed to each of the other ports. For example, a signal entering port A is split and directed to each of the ports B and C. Similarly, signals entering port B are split and routed to ports A and C and signals entering port C are split and routed to ports A and B.
The OID 10 operates solely in the optical domain and thus does not require any electrical regeneration of the optical signals. Because the optical signals are not converted into electrical signals and then regenerated as optical signals, the OID 10 is able to operate at higher speeds and have a lower latency than electrical interface devices. The OID 10 is also able to preserve signal quality by avoiding the deterioration that often occurs when converting signals between the electrical and optical domains.
The OID 10 furthermore provides balanced amplification of the signals entering each of the ports. This balanced amplification operates such that the power level of the signals entering any of the ports is equal to the power level of the corresponding signals that exit the other two ports. For example, a 10 dBm optical signal entering port A is split into two components, routed to ports B and C, and each of the signals at ports B and C is a 10 dB optical signal.
The OID 10 may operate in a number of different environments, including a variety of different network topologies. One such network is the simple interconnection of two or more devices coupled to the ports A, B, and/or C. Thus, the OID 10 may interconnect a first device coupled to port A with a second device on port B. Additionally, the OID 10 may couple each of the first and second devices on ports A and B, respectively, with a third device on port C. As mentioned above, the routing of signals between each of the ports A, B, and C is performed passively without any conversion into the electrical domain.
FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B) illustrate two other network topologies within which the OID 10 may operate. With reference to FIG. 2(A), the network has a bus 12, such as a bi-directional bus, which interconnects a number of OIDs 10A. In the example shown in FIG. 2(A), each OID 10A has a first port receiving signals from a preceding OID 10A and a second port passing signals to the next OID 10A. Each OID 10A also has a line 14 for providing and/or receiving signals from terminal equipment. Each OID 10A can be associated with a node or point within the network, such as a workstation on a Local Area Network (LAN). The OID 10A is not limited to such a use and FIG. 2(A) illustrates the ability of the OID 10A to operate in a bus network. As will be apparent from this bus topology example, the OIDs 10A can also operate in a ring, broken ring, or point to point network topology.
FIG. 2(B) provides an example of a tree-like network having a number of OIDs 10B. The network has a first OID 10B that couples the signals on a first line 16A with signals traveling along branch lines 16B. These branch lines 16B may feed into additional OIDs 10B along that branch and/or into OIDs B along different branches. For instance, the upper branch 16B is coupled to an OID 10B that is connected to lines 16C. In addition to this tree-like topology, the OIDs 10B may also operate in a star network as well as those having hubs and/or switches.
For the networks shown and suggested by both FIGS. 2(A) and 2(B), the OIDs 10 enable signals generated anywhere in the network to be routed to any other OID 10 with minimal loss in signal quality or signal power level. This ability to maintain the signal waveform is of utmost importance in the transmission of analog signals, especially Radio Frequency (RF) signals. RF and other analog signals contain a great deal of information within the waveform itself and within the signal level. As a result, when an analog signal is transmitted at one point within a network, all other nodes within the network must receive the same exact signal in order to provide consistency and integrity throughout the network.
The OID 10 may be fabricated with any technology. FIG. 3 provides an example of the OID 10 fabricated using discrete components. The OID 10 has three ports A, B, and C. A 50/50 coupler 21 is positioned at each port and splits the incoming signal into two equal components that are directed along one of the three legs within the OID 10. Thus, each leg of the OID 10 interconnects one of the ports to the other two ports. The 50/50 couplers 21 at each port also combine the signals traveling in the opposite direction along the legs which originate from the two other ports.
For example, a signal entering port A is divided into two components A1 and A2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 with component A1 traveling to port B and component A2 traveling to port C. Similarly, a signal B at port B is divided into components B1 and B2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 at port B and a signal C at port C is divided into components C1 and C2 by the 50/50 coupler 21 at port C. The 50/50 coupler 21 at port A combines the signals B1 and C1 and route them so they exit port A. Similarly, the 50/50 coupler 21 at port B combines the signals A1 and C2 and route them so they exit port B and the 50/50 coupler 21 at port C combines the signals A2 and B2 and route them so they exit port C.
Each leg provides for bi-directional amplification of the optical signals. The OID 10 has fiber amplifiers 20 and, more preferably rare earth doped fiber amplifiers, such as erbium doped fiber amplifiers. The amplifiers 20 preferably amplify the optical signals to compensate for optical splitting and coupling loss, which in the Figure are shown by 7.8 dB. This amplification compensates for the 6 dB splitting loss resulting from the 50/50 coupler 21 as well as an additional 1.8 dB loss from losses associated with coupling of the rare earth doped fiber, optional connectors, lengths of fiber and manufacturing component variations. Because the coupling losses associated with the OID 10 will vary with the precise couplers used and the optical medium to which the OID is coupled, the precise amount of amplification provided by the fiber amplifiers 20 may vary.
The fiber amplifiers 20 receive an excitation light from a pump P which is divided into the three essentially equal components and provided to each leg through a 68/32 coupler 25 and a 50/50 coupler 26. The excitation light is coupled to each leg of the OID 10 through couplers 22, which are preferably wavelength division multiplexers 22. The excitation light in this example is at 980 nm while the optical signals have wavelengths of light within the 1550 nm window.
According to another embodiment shown in FIG. 4, an OID 30 may include a plurality of pumps, such as three pumps P1, P2, and P3 for separately providing excitation light to each of the three legs. With this example, the OID 30 need not have the couplers 25 and 26 for dividing the excitation light into thirds for each of the three legs. In this manner, each of three erbium loops 40 may be pumped from independent power suppliers P1, P2, and P3 so that they may be independently regulated. In the example shown in FIG. 4, each of the rare earth amplifiers 40 has its own controllable 980 nm excitation light sources, P1, P2 and P3, which can independently provide different amplification levels in each leg, as shown by example as 6.8 dB, 7.8 dB and 8.8 dB of gain. The amplification may differ in the legs if the losses and the signals traveling in each leg are not the same.
FIG. 5 is yet another embodiment of an OID 50 according to an embodiment of the invention. The OID 50 is similar to the OID 20 shown in FIG. 3 but has an additional optical amplifier 52. The optical amplifier 52 may comprise any type of amplifier and, in the example shown in FIG. 5, is a fiber amplifier. The fiber amplifier 52 receives an excitation signal from a pump P2. The amplifier 52 enables some additional amplification of the optical signals beyond that offered by the amplifiers 20, such as but not limited to 6 dB. While just one additional amplifier 52 is shown, it should be understood that the OID 50 may comprise additional amplifiers for amplifying optical signals originating and/or exiting from each of the ports A, B, and C. Furthermore, while the amplifier 52 is illustrated as being at a location other than on one of the legs, the amplifier 52 may be located on one of the legs. As a result, the amplifiers 20 may be configured not only to amplify the optical signals to compensate for coupling, splitting losses, and signal variations but may also provide some additional gain.
FIG. 6 is another example of an OID 60 according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown in this figure, the OID 60 has optical amplifiers 20 within each leg of the OID and has an additional optical amplifier 62 located on the receiving side of port B. Thus, optical signals received at port B from either port A or port C undergo amplification through fiber amplifiers 20 to compensate for coupling, splitting losses, signal variations and undergo amplification through amplifier 62 to provide additional gain.
The OIDs 10 shown in FIGS. 3 to 6 are non-limiting examples of how an OID may be fabricated. In addition to using discrete components, the OID may be fabricated using semiconductor technology, through polymers, ion migration, and other existing or future developed techniques.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical applications so as to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
| Zitiertes Patent | Eingetragen | Veröffentlichungsdatum | Antragsteller | Titel |
|---|
| US3883217 | 5. Juli 1973 | 13. Mai 1975 | Corning Glass Works | Optical communication system | | US3887876 | 21. Sept. 1973 | 3. Juni 1975 | Siemens Ag | Optical intermediate amplifier for a communication system | | US3936141 | 29. Nov. 1974 | 3. Febr. 1976 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Multiple optical connector | | US3943358 | 23. Juli 1974 | 9. März 1976 | Thomson-Csf | Terminal and repeater stations for telecommunication system using optical fibers | | US4054366 | 12. Juli 1976 | 18. Okt. 1977 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Fiber optics access coupler | | US4166946 | 8. Juni 1977 | 4. Sept. 1979 | International Standard Electric Corporation | Data transmission system | | US4234969 | 5. Sept. 1978 | 18. Nov. 1980 | Ncr Corporation | Bidirectional optical coupler for a data processing system | | US4249266 | 6. Nov. 1979 | 3. Febr. 1981 | Perkins Research & Mfg. Co., Inc. | Fiber optics communication system | | US4301543 | 20. Febr. 1980 | 17. Nov. 1981 | General Dynamics Corporation, Pomona Division | Fiber optic transceiver and full duplex point-to-point data link | | US4307933 | 20. Febr. 1980 | 29. Dez. 1981 | General Dynamics, Pomona Division | Optical fiber launch coupler | | US4317614 | 20. Febr. 1980 | 2. März 1982 | General Dynamics, Pomona Division | Fiber optic bus manifold | | US4366565 | 29. Juli 1980 | 28. Dez. 1982 | Herskowitz; Gerald J. | Local area network optical fiber data communication | | US4367460 | 17. Okt. 1979 | 4. Jan. 1983 | Hodara; Henri | Intrusion sensor using optic fiber | | US4400054 | 22. Jan. 1982 | 23. Aug. 1983 | Spectronics, Inc. | Passive optical coupler | | US4423922 | 18. Dez. 1978 | 3. Jan. 1984 | The Boeing Company | Directional coupler for optical communications system | | US4435849 | 27. Febr. 1981 | 6. März 1984 | Hartmann & Braun Ag | Optical transmission system | | US4446515 | 31. Dez. 1980 | 1. Mai 1984 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Passive bus system for decentrally organized multi-computer systems | | US4457581 | 27. Okt. 1981 | 3. Juli 1984 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Of Her Majesty'S Canadian Government | Passive fiber optic data bus configurations | | US4482980 | 3. Mai 1982 | 13. Nov. 1984 | General Signal Corporation | Hybrid optical/electrical data highway | | US4506153 | 20. Apr. 1982 | 19. März 1985 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Process signal collecting apparatus | | US4543574 | 27. Sept. 1982 | 24. Sept. 1985 | Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Public Corporation | System for resolving collision in local network | | US4545074 | 22. Okt. 1982 | 1. Okt. 1985 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fiber optic loop system with bypass mode | | US4554511 | 29. Sept. 1982 | 19. Nov. 1985 | Tetra Tech, Inc. | Offset voltage correction network for instantaneous floating point amplifier | | US4577184 | 23. Mai 1983 | 18. März 1986 | Tetra-Tech, Inc. | Security system with randomly modulated probe signal | | US4595839 | 15. Mai 1985 | 17. Juni 1986 | Tetra-Tech, Inc. | Bidirectional optical electronic converting connector with integral preamplification | | US4630256 | 19. Apr. 1985 | 16. Dez. 1986 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Bidirectional dual network | | US4654890 | 4. Sept. 1985 | 31. März 1987 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Multiplex communication system | | US4671608 | 27. Nov. 1984 | 9. Juni 1987 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Optical coupling unit | | US4674830 | 25. Nov. 1983 | 23. Juni 1987 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Fiber optic amplifier | | US4705350 | 19. Sept. 1985 | 10. Nov. 1987 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Optical transmission network | | US4715012 | 15. Okt. 1980 | 22. Dez. 1987 | Massey-Ferguson Services N.V. | Electronic tractor control | | US4717229 | 20. Sept. 1985 | 5. Jan. 1988 | Communications Patents Limited | Bi-directional optical fiber coupler | | US4731784 | 26. Febr. 1986 | 15. März 1988 | International Business Machines Corp. | Communication system comprising overlayed multiple-access transmission networks | | US4739183 | 24. Juli 1986 | 19. Apr. 1988 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Local area network for vehicle | | US4756595 | 21. Apr. 1986 | 12. Juli 1988 | Honeywell Inc. | Optical fiber connector for high pressure environments | | US4759011 | 3. März 1986 | 19. Juli 1988 | Polaroid Corporation | Intranetwork and internetwork optical communications system and method | | US4761833 | 14. Okt. 1986 | 2. Aug. 1988 | Stc Plc | Optical fibre network | | US4786130 | 19. Mai 1986 | 22. Nov. 1988 | The General Electric Company, P.L.C. | Fibre optic coupler | | US4810052 | 7. Jan. 1986 | 7. März 1989 | Litton Systems, Inc | Fiber optic bidirectional data bus tap | | US4829593 | 18. März 1987 | 9. Mai 1989 | Nec Corporation | Automatic gain control apparatus | | US4845483 | 16. Febr. 1988 | 4. Juli 1989 | Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Malfunction communicating device for optical unit of laser printer | | US4850047 | 19. Aug. 1987 | 18. Juli 1989 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical bus communication system utilizing frame format signals | | US4883335 | 20. Jan. 1988 | 28. Nov. 1989 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Single-mode optical fiber tap | | US4898565 | 5. Nov. 1984 | 6. Febr. 1990 | Honeywell Inc. | Direction sensing apparatus for data transmission cable connections | | US4932004 | 23. Dez. 1987 | 5. Juni 1990 | Honeywell Inc. | Fiber optic seismic system | | US4946244 | 13. März 1989 | 7. Aug. 1990 | Pacific Bell | Fiber optic distribution system and method of using same | | US4947134 | 30. Okt. 1987 | 7. Aug. 1990 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Lightwave systems using optical amplifiers | | US4948218 | 12. Juli 1989 | 14. Aug. 1990 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Optoelectronic device for an optical communication system | | US4958354 | 8. Mai 1989 | 18. Sept. 1990 | Hamamatsu Photonics Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for stabilizing the intensity of light | | US4959837 | 13. Nov. 1989 | 25. Sept. 1990 | Societe Anonyme Dite: Compagnie Generale D'Electricite | Doped optical fiber laser amplifier | | US5029306 | 10. Aug. 1989 | 2. Juli 1991 | The Boeing Company | Optically fed module for phased-array antennas | | US5046137 | 23. Jan. 1990 | 3. Sept. 1991 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Optical communication system | | US5055827 | 20. Febr. 1990 | 8. Okt. 1991 | Philipp; Harald | Fiber optic security system | | US5058101 | 16. Jan. 1991 | 15. Okt. 1991 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Coherent detection loop distribution system | | US5058974 | 6. Okt. 1989 | 22. Okt. 1991 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Distributed amplification for lightwave transmission system | | US5080505 | 31. Dez. 1990 | 14. Jan. 1992 | Stc Plc | Optical transmission system | | US5083874 | 10. Apr. 1990 | 28. Jan. 1992 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Optical repeater and optical network using the same | | US5117196 | 23. Apr. 1990 | 26. Mai 1992 | Stc Plc | Optical amplifier gain control | | US5117303 | 23. Aug. 1990 | 26. Mai 1992 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Method of operating concatenated optical amplifiers | | US5129019 | 10. Sept. 1990 | 7. Juli 1992 | Alcatel N.V. | Method of manufacturing a fused-fiber optical coupler | | US5133031 | 12. Juli 1989 | 21. Juli 1992 | Du Pont Opto Electronics Kabushiki Kaisha | Optical shunt device | | US5179603 | 18. März 1991 | 12. Jan. 1993 | Corning Incorporated | Optical fiber amplifier and coupler | | US5181134 | 15. März 1991 | 19. Jan. 1993 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Photonic cross-connect switch | | US5185735 | 10. Juli 1991 | 9. Febr. 1993 | Hewlett Packard Company | Lan noise monitor | | US5187605 | 4. Sept. 1991 | 16. Febr. 1993 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical transceiver | | US5189541 | 12. Aug. 1991 | 23. Febr. 1993 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and apparatus for connecting branch networks with a trunk network in optical transmission system | | US5212577 | 4. Aug. 1992 | 18. Mai 1993 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Optical communication equipment and optical communication method | | US5222166 | 19. Mai 1992 | 22. Juni 1993 | Rockwell International Corporation | Aircraft fiber optic data distribution system | | US5267071 | 3. Sept. 1991 | 30. Nov. 1993 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Signal level control circuitry for a fiber communications system | | US5283687 | 1. Okt. 1992 | 1. Febr. 1994 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Amplifier for optical fiber communication link | | US5296957 | 13. Sept. 1991 | 22. März 1994 | Fujitsu Limited | Optical repeater having loop-back function used in transmission system | | US5307197 | 27. Aug. 1992 | 26. Apr. 1994 | Nec Corporation | Optical circuit for a polarization diversity receiver | | US5309564 | 19. März 1992 | 3. Mai 1994 | Bradley; Graham C. | Apparatus for networking computers for multimedia applications | | US5315424 | 30. Juni 1992 | 24. Mai 1994 | Loral Aerospace Corp. | Computer fiber optic interface | | US5317580 | 11. Juni 1991 | 31. Mai 1994 | France Telecom Etablissement Autonome De Droit Public | Bidirectional transmission system with identical laser components | | US5319642 | 24. Apr. 1992 | 7. Juni 1994 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Method of communication using a two-way bus with contention detection | | US5345230 | 13. Apr. 1992 | 6. Sept. 1994 | Dr. Johannes Heidenhain Gmbh | Method and apparatus for optical transceiver testing | | US5347384 | 30. Juni 1992 | 13. Sept. 1994 | Loral Aerospace Corp. | Fiber optic distribution of image data | | US5361262 | 16. Apr. 1993 | 1. Nov. 1994 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Estimated-queue, expanded-bus communication network | | US5363367 | 31. Aug. 1992 | 8. Nov. 1994 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Data transmission system using an optical fiber loop | | US5369516 | 7. Sept. 1993 | 29. Nov. 1994 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Optical communication network system and communication method using the same | | US5392154 | 30. März 1994 | 21. Febr. 1995 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Self-regulating multiwavelength optical amplifier module for scalable lightwave communications systems | | US5412746 | 22. März 1994 | 2. Mai 1995 | Alcatel N.V. | Optical coupler and amplifier | | US5414416 | 2. Sept. 1992 | 9. Mai 1995 | Nippondenso Co., Ltd. | Temperature dependent control module cluster unit for motor vehicle | | US5424864 | 2. Aug. 1994 | 13. Juni 1995 | Nec Corporation | Microcellular mobile communication system | | US5432874 | 16. Febr. 1994 | 11. Juli 1995 | Sony Corporation | Duplex optical fiber link | | US5434861 | 4. Febr. 1994 | 18. Juli 1995 | Masson; Derek | Deterministic timed bus access method | | US5471342 | 30. März 1994 | 28. Nov. 1995 | Alcatel N.V. | Fiber optical amplifier having a detector for measuring scattered light at a splice | | US5479082 | 6. Juli 1994 | 26. Dez. 1995 | Cselt-Centro Studi E Laboratorti Telecommunicazioni S.P.A. | Device for extraction and re-insertion of an optical carrier in optical communications networks | | US5481478 | 3. Juni 1994 | 2. Jan. 1996 | Gutwerk; Martin | Broadcast system for a facility | | US5483233 | 12. Nov. 1993 | 9. Jan. 1996 | Northern Telecom Limited | Analogue telemetry system and method for fault detection in optical transmission systems | | US5500857 | 15. Nov. 1993 | 19. März 1996 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Inter-nodal communication method and system using multiplexing | | US5500867 | 13. Sept. 1994 | 19. März 1996 | At&T Corp. | Laser package having an impedance matching transformer | | US5502589 | 5. Juni 1995 | 26. März 1996 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Optical communication systems and optical nodes for use therein | | US5506709 | 29. Juli 1994 | 9. Apr. 1996 | The State Of Israel, Ministry Of Defence, Rafael Armament Development Authority | Electro-optical communication station with built-in test means | | US5508689 | 18. Aug. 1994 | 16. Apr. 1996 | Ford Motor Company | Control system and method utilizing generic modules | | US5517622 | 9. März 1994 | 14. Mai 1996 | Galileo International Partnership | Method and apparatus for pacing communications in a distributed heterogeneous network | | US5533153 | 19. Apr. 1995 | 2. Juli 1996 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Optical relay amplifier with a bypass waveguide | | US5539558 | 15. Mai 1995 | 23. Juli 1996 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | System of detecting troubles of an optical communication line |
| Referenz |
|---|
| 1 | | "Performance Management-Management of SONET Networks-White Paper," Clear Communications, Sonet and Performance Management, Issuel, Apr. 1996 (pp. 1-21). | | 2 | | 0034-P PCI 1-Gig Fibre Channel Optical Host Bus Adapter 1-4 available at http://solutions.sun.com/dbsearch/index.cgi?STATE=product&CMD=show&p_id=58181 (Sep. 9, 2000). | | 3 | | 3.0 IEEE Acronyms, available at http://spacey.net/ldavis/Design_Ethernet_Note.html, no date. | | 4 | | AJ-Raweshidy and Komaki, Radio Over Fiber Technologies. | | 5 | | Architectural and Engineering Isues for Building an Optical Internet 1-55 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://www.canet3.net/papers/ArschandEngissues.html. | | 6 | | Baker, Monomode Fiber-Optic Design with Local-Area and Long-Haul Network Applications, pp. 370-371. | | 7 | | Bi-Directional Optical Backplane Bus for Board to Board Optoelectronic Interconnects, Gicheri Kim, Jinghuai Fa and Ray T. Chen, 1-4 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://ece.utexas.edu/projects/ece/mrc/profs/chen_projects/optbus/optbus.html. | | 8 | | Challenges in IP LANs on Higher-Dimensional Encoding (slide 4) (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://thebusinessedge.com/reruns/cito/sargent/sld004.htm. | | 9 | | Chart and figures for optical fiber cable and baseband transmission, available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/WFW/wfw31/1_ch1.asp. | | 10 | | Chinlon Lin, Systems Applications of WDM Technologies in Optical Communications, SPIE-International Society for Optical Engineering (Aug. 15-18, 1994). | | 11 | | Cisco Wavelength Router Manager-Data Sheet, www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/olso/cwrm_ds.htm (Apr. 25, 2001). | | 12 | | DeCotignie, J.D., et al., "Producer-Distributor-Consumer Model on Controller Area Network," Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIC Workshop, Real Time Programming, 1995, pp. 35-42, XP002074139, Oxford, Great Britain. | | 13 | | Ethernet FAST Ethernet Fiber Optic Media Converters, http://www.versitron.com/Ethernet.html, 2 pages (Nov. 5, 2002). | | 14 | | Fibre Channel Overview http://his.web.cem.ch/HIS/fcs/spec/overview.htm, pp. 1-10 (Nov. 15, 2002). | | 15 | | Fibre Channel, http://www.lol.unh.edu/training/fc/fc_tutorial.html, 22 pages (Nov. 5, 2002). | | 16 | | Fibre Channel-Overview of the Technology, Sep. 9, 2000, pp. 1-9 available at http://fibrechannel.org/technology. | | 17 | | Francesco Matera & Marina Settembre, Performance Evaluation of Optically Amplified Systems Operating in Optical Networks, Microwave & Optical Technology Letters (Nov. 1996). | | 18 | | Gallardo, et al., "Fast Simulation of Broadband Telecommunications Networks Carrying Long-Range Dependent Bursty Traffic," Preceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 374-381 (Winter 1999). | | 19 | | H. Hodara, and E. Miles, "High-Speed Local Area Networks", Fiber and Integrated Optics: (1992) pp. 253-277. | | 20 | | HDR 7.0 2 73; 7.0 Fiber Optic Ethernet-Types FOIRL and 10 BASE-F available at http://www.uni-trier.de/infos/ether/ethernet-guide/ethernet-guide.html. | | 21 | | HomeNetHelp.com, http://www.homenethelp.com/web/explain.about-hubs-and-switches.asp, 5 pages (Nov. 5, 2002). | | 22 | | Iannone, et al., "A 160-km transparent metro WDM ring network featuring cascaded erbium-doped waveguide amplifiers," published by Optical Society of America (2000). | | 23 | | Integrated Explorations of the Spectral, Temporal and Spatial Degrees of Freedom 1 (Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://thebusinessedge.com/reruns/cito/sargent/sld001.htm. | | 24 | * | International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/03310. | | 25 | * | International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/03329. | | 26 | * | International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/10053. | | 27 | * | International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/29970. | | 28 | * | International Search Report in related Application No. PCT/US03/30326. | | 29 | | ITU-T Recommendation G.681, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks; Functional characteristics of interoffice and long-haul systems using optical amplifiers, including optical multiplexing (Oct. 1996). | | 30 | | ITU-T Recommendation G.692, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks; Optical Interfaces for multichannel systems with optical amplifiers (Oct. 1998). | | 31 | | Karim, Chapter 9: Electro-Optical Devices and Systems, Fiber-Optics-Based Devices and Systems, pp. 434-435. | | 32 | | Kempainen, "Optical Networking lightens carrier-backbone burden," EDN, pp. 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 72 (Oct. 8, 1998). | | 33 | | Keyserling, A. and R.C.L., "Chapter 2: Number, Dimensions, Manderibrot, Chaos, 4 Attractors, Music and Color," www.chanceandchoice.com/ChanceandChoice/chapter2.html. | | 34 | | Liew, "A Broad-Band Optical Network Based on Hierarchical Multiplexing of Wavelengths and RF Subcarariers," Journal of Lightwave Technology, 7(11):1825-1838 (1989). | | 35 | | Manuel Lopez-Amo, Loudon T Blair & Paul Urquhart, Wavelength-Division-Multiplexed distributed optical fiber amplifier bus network for data and sensors, Optics Letter 1159-61 (Jul. 15, 1993). | | 36 | | N.A. Olsson, Lightwave Systems With Optical Amplifiers, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jul. 1989, pp. 1071-1082 (Jul. 1989). | | 37 | | Paper authored by Stewart, William L. and James G. Blaylock, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, entitled 'The Challenge of Transmitting Super-High Frequency Radio Signals Over Short-Fiber-Optic Networks on Aerospace Platforms,', pp. 3-1 to 3-8 (Oct. 2002). | | 38 | | Personick, Stewart D., Optical Fiber Transmission Systems, 1981, pp. 1-3. | | 39 | | Philip J. Koopman, Jr., and Bhargav P. Upender., "Time Division Multiple Access Without a Bus Master," United Technologies Research Center, UTRC Technical Report RR-9500470 (Jun. 1995). | | 40 | | Press Release entitled "Lucent Technologies announces record-breaking 320-channel optical networking system," (pp. 1-2) (Apr. 17, 2000). | | 41 | | SOME Bus (Simultaneous Optical Multiprocessor Exchange Bus)(Sep. 9, 2000) available at http://eb.uah.edu/~cohen/some_bus/some_bus.html. | | 42 | | Spirit et al., 140-km 20-Gbit/s repeaterless transmission employing distributed erbium amplification, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (1992). | | 43 | | Stewart, William L., Senior Staff Specialist, and James Blaylock, Senior Staff Specialist, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, presentation entitled 'The Challenge of Transmitting Super-High Frequency Radio Signals Over Short-Fiber-Optic Networks on Aerospace Platforms,', 21st DASC: Oct. 31, 2002 (Oct. 2002), 14 pages. | | 44 | | Technical Report CSRI-209 entitled "A New Binary Logarithmic Arbitration Method for Ethernet," by Mart L. Molle of Computer Systems Research Institute, pp. 1-57 (Apr. 1994). | | 45 | | Thomas, et al., "Physics in the Whirlwind of Optical Communications," Physics Today, pp. 30-36 (Sep. 2000). | | 46 | * | Whittaker et al., "Optical Distribution Network . . . ", Pub. No.: 2004/0076434 A1, publication date: Apr. 22, 2004.* | | 47 | | Willinger, et al., "Self-Similarity Through High-Variability: Statistical Analysis of Ethernet LAN Traffic at the Source Level," pp. 1-31 (Apr. 15, 1997). | | 48 | | WRL Research Report 88/4 entitled "Measured Capacity of an Ethernet: Myths and Reality" by David R. Boggs, et al., printed by Digital Western Research Laboratory, Palo Alto, California (Sep. 1998) (pp. 1-31), originally published in Proceedings of the SIGCOMM '88 Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols, ACM SIGCOMM, Stanford, California, Aug. 1988. | | 49 | | Yamashita, et al., "Studies of a system gathering multi-channel visual signals using a single optical fiber and a bi-directional optical amplifier," T.IEE Japan, 119-C(12):1528-1534 (1999). |
|