WO1993015767A1 - Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation - Google Patents

Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1993015767A1
WO1993015767A1 PCT/US1993/000946 US9300946W WO9315767A1 WO 1993015767 A1 WO1993015767 A1 WO 1993015767A1 US 9300946 W US9300946 W US 9300946W WO 9315767 A1 WO9315767 A1 WO 9315767A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pge
bone
site
polymer
bone growth
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1993/000946
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Leah E. Appel
Gaylen M. Zentner
Gideon A. Rodan
Original Assignee
Merck & Co., Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Merck & Co., Inc. filed Critical Merck & Co., Inc.
Publication of WO1993015767A1 publication Critical patent/WO1993015767A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0019Injectable compositions; Intramuscular, intravenous, arterial, subcutaneous administration; Compositions to be administered through the skin in an invasive manner
    • A61K9/0024Solid, semi-solid or solidifying implants, which are implanted or injected in body tissue
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/2004Excipients; Inactive ingredients
    • A61K9/2022Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/2031Organic macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, poloxamers
    • A61K9/204Polyesters, e.g. poly(lactide-co-glycolide)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L24/00Surgical adhesives or cements; Adhesives for colostomy devices
    • A61L24/001Use of materials characterised by their function or physical properties
    • A61L24/0015Medicaments; Biocides
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L26/00Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, wound dressings or bandages in liquid, gel or powder form
    • A61L26/0009Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, wound dressings or bandages in liquid, gel or powder form containing macromolecular materials
    • A61L26/0019Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, wound dressings or bandages in liquid, gel or powder form containing macromolecular materials obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/20Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices containing or releasing organic materials
    • A61L2300/22Lipids, fatty acids, e.g. prostaglandins, oils, fats, waxes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/20Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices containing or releasing organic materials
    • A61L2300/22Lipids, fatty acids, e.g. prostaglandins, oils, fats, waxes
    • A61L2300/222Steroids, e.g. corticosteroids
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/60Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a special physical form
    • A61L2300/602Type of release, e.g. controlled, sustained, slow

Definitions

  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The function of this device is dependent upon proper placement in or near the bone in need of therapy.
  • the device is positioned as close as possible to the site of therapy, thereby maximizing target site drug delivery while minimizing the systemic uptake of drug. That is, by placing the device in close proximity to the target treatment area, higher concentration of the released PGE 2 can be utilized in the bone formation process. This allows for delivery of higher therapeutic levels of PGE 2 to the bone and less distribution to other organs and tissue of the body.
  • SUBSTITUTESHEET are involved in resorption. Hayward, M. and Fiedler-Nagy, Ch. , Agents and Actions, 22, 251-254 (1987). PGE 2 has also been implicated in bone loss. See Hayward, M. A. and Caggiano, T. J. , Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry, 22, Sect. IV, Chapter 17, 169-178 (1987).
  • U.S. patent 4,621,100 discloses a method for treatment or prevention of non-growth related osteoporosis in an animal, based upon oral administration of PGE 2 and intravenous administration of prostaglandin E, . Bone growth effects were observed after ninety days of oral PGE 2 therapy. These results included an increase in bone turnover, including increased activation, resorption and formation rates. Side effects of oral dosing of GE 2 such as loose stools, diarrhea, vomiting, injected sclerae, and increased serum alkaline phosphatase were observed during the dosing period. Toxicity, due to systemic distribution of
  • PGE 2 has reduced the pharmaceutical utility of this compound. Delivery of PGE 2 in a non-specific manner requires elevated concentrations of the drug and as noted in U.S. patent 4,621,100 results in unwanted side effects.
  • British patent 1,494,463 discloses that therapeutic levels of PGE 2 results in increased blood pressure, stimulated smooth muscle reactions, inhibited gastric secretion, controlled spasm and facilitated breathing in asthmatic conditions, decongested nasal passages, decreased blood platelet adhesion and has affected the reproductive organs of
  • WO-90-15586 teaches a controlled release drug delivery device comprising a bioerodible polymer admixed with gentamicin.
  • the device was implanted in bone that had been inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus to induce osteomyelitis in rats.
  • a polymer composed of poly(propylene fu arate) prepolymer crosslinked with methylmethacrylate was used as a matrix for the implantation and controlled release of the antibiotic.
  • the medicament supplied as a paste composed of the polymer and the antiboitic was able to reduce the degree of infection.
  • the polymer used by this system decomposed to non-toxic residues.
  • WO-90-15586 further teaches the use of this paste for the delivery of Insulin Growth Factor 1, hereinafter IGF, as a means of enhancing bone formation. A twelve week treatment period is recommended.
  • controled release dosage from containing PGERAN By placing the controled release dosage from containing PGERAN at the site where bone growth stimulation is required, side effects normally seen during treatment by traditional routes of administration with this compound were not observed.
  • the stimulation of bone growth is useful in the treatment of bone fractures, osteoporosis, osteopenia or the like.
  • free PGE 2 refers to the PGE 2 which is released from the dosage form and available for therapeutic use.
  • Free PGE 2 is the PGE 2 medicament which is administered to the site where bone growth stimulation is desired, in a controlled release manner.
  • site at which bone growth stimulation is desired is meant, both the area adjacent to a section of bone of group of bones in need of
  • Stimulation at the site where bone growth is desired also may be accomplished by infusing a solution containing PGE 2 into the treatment area.
  • a controlled release dosage from, designed for controlled delivery of PGE 2 can be implanted at the desired location of, either adjacent to the site or within the bone.
  • the present method is particularly versatile and can be applied to the stimulation of bone growth at the site of a broken bone or a region of bone affected by osteoporosis or osteopenia or the like.
  • the novel method of treatment of this invention is not meant to be limited to these bone conditions, since those skilled in the art would recognize other bone conditions in need of this therapy.
  • broken bone is meant all types of broken bones i.e. green stick fracture, compound fracture, lateral fracture, pathologic fractures resulting from invasive tumors, compression fractures, fractures that require surgical procedures for realignment of bones, etc.
  • osteoporosis in meant a reduction in bone matter associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. This term includes what is sometimes called osteopenia.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET Stimulation of bone growth requires the daily delivery of about 0.01 ⁇ g to about 100 ⁇ g of 0GE 2 to the site at which bone growth stimulation is desired.
  • about 0.01 ⁇ g to about 100 ⁇ g of PGE 2 is meant that during the course of any 24 hour period, the procedure requires delivery of an amount of PGE 2 that is within this range and that deviations at either extreme of the range of up to 507_ can be tolerated once the treatment regiment is established.
  • This procedure provides for delivery of PGE , in an uninterrupted manner, for from about 1 to about 28 days.
  • uninterrupted manner is meant, that the device will deliver PGE 2 to the area in need of therapy, for a sustained period of time, at an average daily dose level of PGE 2 of about 0.01 ⁇ g/day to about lOO ⁇ g/day.
  • the actual level of PGE 2 delivered is dependent upon the therapeutic level required for the specific treatment regimen.
  • release of PGE 2 may not occur immediately upon the initiation of treatment. However, within twelve to thirty six hours, delivery of PGE 2 to the area in need of therapy will commence.
  • One embodiment of the novel device of this invention comprises a biodegradable dosage form consisting essentially of a bioerodible polymer and PGE 2 .
  • the dosage form is designed to release free PGE 2 to the area in need of therapy at a desired rate.
  • the novel device of this invention is designed for easy implantation either adjacent to the bone or within the bone in need of therapy.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The procedure involves the surgical implantation of a controlled release dosage form which dispenses PGE 2 at the site of bone fracture. As bioerosion of the polymer occurs, PGE 2 is released directly ot the site where new bone growth is required.
  • surgical implantation is meant utilizing aseptic technique; cutting open the skin, muscle or other tissue to expose the bone in the area where stimulation of bone growth is required; placing the dosage form either into the boen or adjacent to the bone, that is, as close to the bone as possible; and then closing the disturbed tissue, muscle and skin using standard medical techniques.
  • Techniques such as arthroscopy, and any other invasive methods which would allow the placement of the dosage form within or near a bone in need of growth stimulation therapy would also be included within this definition.
  • bioerosion or “bioerodible” or “erosion” or “erodes” is meant the process, including hydrolysis, dissolution, abrasion, and corrosion, by which the dosage form is reduced in size due to the chemical or physical action of the aqueous fluids, bone and tissue present in the area of surgical implantation.
  • bioerodible polymer useful in the novel device of this invention are those that completely degrade to compounds which are water soluble and are easily excreted from the body of a subject in need of treatment, in such a manner that no decomposition residue remains at the implant area following release of all of the PGE 2 .
  • subject is meant humans, other mammals, amphibians and any other animal which is partially composed of bone.
  • the novel device includes sufficient PGE 2 to release O.Ol ⁇ g/day to 100 ⁇ g/day to PGE 2 over a period of time required for ininterrupted therapy.
  • the bioerodible polymer is a poly(ortho ester) such as or a polyacetal such as ....
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET A further procedure involves mixing the PGE 2 with the monomers prior to the polymerization step. During the polymerization step the mixture is stirred so that the PGE 2 is homogeneously mixed with the forming polymer.
  • the final dosage forms can be prepared by compressing the dried mixture of polymer and PGE 2 into the desired form. Other techniques, known to those skilled in the art can also be utilized.
  • the polymer must reproducibly bioerode, in the environment of use, and result in products that are cleared from tissue surrounding the site of bone fracture and ultimately excreted from the body.
  • the release of PGE 2 from a polymer matrix is dependent on the erosion rate of the polymer with which it is admixed. Therefore, the polymer/PGE 2 formulation must result in a dosage form that erodes, in the environment of use, at a predictable rate, resulting in the complete release of PGE 2 to the site of bone therapy. Side reactions that would retard release of PGE 2 are avoided by proper choice of a polymer.
  • SUBSTITUTESHEET Poly(ortho esters) have been utilized in pharmaceutically acceptable controlled release devices in the past mainly becuase they erode in a controlled manner via hydrolysis.
  • One example of a polymer that meets the criteria of this novel procedure has the formula.
  • the synthesis of this polymer is described in U.S. patent 4,304,767.
  • the polymerization proceeds through a condensation reaction between a ketene acetal and an alcohol. There are no reaction by-products that need to be removed in order to achieve a high molecular weight polymer.
  • the polymer utilized in one embodiment and in example 2 has a molecular weight of about 84,000. That is the molecular weight range, determined by gel permeation chromatography was 84,000 +/- 1000 8/mole.
  • One embodiment of the method utilizes the polyacetal previously described and enough PGE 2 to sssure delivery at a rate of about 1 ug/day over the course of 28 days.
  • the actual concentration of PGE 2 in the dosage form can range from about 0.01% to about 27- by weight.
  • about 0.01% to about 2% is meant that deviations at either extreme of the range of up to 507o can be tolerated in the dosage form prior to implantation.
  • the amount of bioerodable polymer in the dosage form can range from about 99.99% to about 987, by weight of the components. By “about 99.99% to about 98%” is meant that minor deviations in the percentage of bioerodable polymer at either extreme of the range can be tolerated in the dosage form prior to implantation.
  • the desired delivery rate can be assured by first determining the jji vitro dissolution rate of the polymer in 0.15M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 and adjusting the concentration of PGE 2 in the final product so that as the polymer bioerodes, the proper amount of PGE 2 is released.
  • the volume of phosphate buffered saline utilized is based upon the total PGE 2 content of the dosage form.
  • the high dose [what was amount per dosage form for high dose] utilized 75 ml of buffer. Samples were collected daily and the dissolved PGE 2 was quantified using routine analytical procedures.
  • dosage form used in this novel method was prepared using the procedure described in example 2. This dosage form released approximately 807. of the PGE 2 within 10 days in an in vitro dissolution study.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET Devices were fabricated in two steps. First, a disk of PGE 2 / polymer material, weighing approximately 35 mg, was made using 1/4" flat punches in a Carver press at 500 psi. The disk was then positioned in the center of a die containing six cylindrical cut-outs. The die and pellet were sandwiched between two KAPTON sheets. This was placed between two heated plates (90°C) for 10 seconds before compression at 1 ton for 10-15 seconds. The die was immediately removed from the plates and placed on a cold steel plate. The devices were punched out of the die and stored at -80°C. Each device was a transparent disk with a diameter of 2 mm and a thickness of 1 mm and weighed about 4 mg.
  • Placebo devices that is those which contain only the polymer, were made by the same method except no E 2 was added.
  • Table 1 shows the PGE 2 nominal content of each group of devices. Devices from groups A, B and C were tested for jji vitro dissolution properties. Five dosage forms from each group were placed in a bottle containing 0.15M phosphate buffered saline at pH 7.4. The lowest two dosages were tested using 75 ml of buffer. The bottles were capped and then rotated constantly for up to 14 days. A sample was removed each day and the PGE 2 released into the buffer was quantified using standard analytical procedures. The results of thes studies are shown in Table II.
  • H ET were in each of the four treatment groups .
  • the animals were anesthetized intraperitoneally using ketamine hydrochloride (KETASET, Aveco, 80 mg/kg).
  • KETASET ketamine hydrochloride
  • a longitudinal incision was made along the medial aspect of the proximal tibia down to the periosteum.
  • Under saline irrigation of 2 mm hole was drilled through the cortex approximately 2 mm inferior to the epiphyseal growth plate using a #8 carbide plain round excavating bur with a high speed dental drill.
  • the devices were placed within the marrow cavity and the incisins closed. The animals recovered without incident and within 24 hours following surgery demonstrated normal locomotion and grooming behavior.
  • Table III lists the cortical bone thickness and percent cancellous bone found for the difference groups in this trial. This histomorphometic data provides evidence for a dose-related increase in metaphyseal bone formed as a result of prostaglandin treatment. Bond volume was 8.66% for the placebo treated group and was significantly increased (p,0.05) threefold with the group A devices. Also, the rate treated with group A devices showed a significant increase in cortical bone thickness.

Abstract

Therapeutic stimulation of bone formation is accomplished through the controlled release of the prostaglandins E1, E2 or F2α, or the steroid, β-estradiol to the site where bone growth stimulation is desired. A rigid, solid, controlled release dosage form, consisting of a non-residue producing, bioerodible polymer, selected from a poly(ortho ester) or a polyacetal and a prostaglandin, or β-estradiol is implanted at the site of desired bone growth stimulation. The figure shows E2 release at .81 (Group A), .035 (Group B) and .003 (Group C) weight %.

Description

TITLE OF INVENTION
IMPLANT THERAPY FOR BONE GROWTH STIMULATION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention comprises both a useful and novel method of stimulating bone formation. The method utilizes a drug-delivery device which releases prostaglandin E2, hereinafter PGE2, to a specific section of bone, in a therapeu- tically effective manner, whereby bone formation is stimulated. Particularly, the invention pertains to the implantation of a bioerodible polymer drug delivery device containing PGE2, which is implanted at a site in or near the bone of a mammal, and which delivers a therapeutically effective amount of PGE? to the bone over an extended period of time, resulting in bone formation and bone development in an unexpected reduced time period.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The function of this device is dependent upon proper placement in or near the bone in need of therapy. The device is positioned as close as possible to the site of therapy, thereby maximizing target site drug delivery while minimizing the systemic uptake of drug. That is, by placing the device in close proximity to the target treatment area, higher concentration of the released PGE2 can be utilized in the bone formation process. This allows for delivery of higher therapeutic levels of PGE2 to the bone and less distribution to other organs and tissue of the body.
Placement of the device at the site of a bone fracture has resulted in unexpectedly rapid healing of the bone and development of dense bone matter around the area of the break.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The need for a procedure that promotes the development of dense bone in areas of fracture or weakness, and reduces the time required for the repair of broken bones is well established. Several studies attempting to induce bone development have been reported.
Studies using hormones such as parahyroid hormone (PTH), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and GE2> as well as cytokines such as lymphotoxin, interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor, epidermal growth factore and transforming growth factor have demonstrated some ability to affect bone resorption both in vivo and i vitro. It is thought that these agents exhibit an effect on intermediary cells which
SUBSTITUTESHEET are involved in resorption. Hayward, M. and Fiedler-Nagy, Ch. , Agents and Actions, 22, 251-254 (1987). PGE2 has also been implicated in bone loss. See Hayward, M. A. and Caggiano, T. J. , Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry, 22, Sect. IV, Chapter 17, 169-178 (1987).
U.S. patent 4,621,100 discloses a method for treatment or prevention of non-growth related osteoporosis in an animal, based upon oral administration of PGE2 and intravenous administration of prostaglandin E, . Bone growth effects were observed after ninety days of oral PGE2 therapy. These results included an increase in bone turnover, including increased activation, resorption and formation rates. Side effects of oral dosing of GE2 such as loose stools, diarrhea, vomiting, injected sclerae, and increased serum alkaline phosphatase were observed during the dosing period. Toxicity, due to systemic distribution of
PGE2, has reduced the pharmaceutical utility of this compound. Delivery of PGE2 in a non-specific manner requires elevated concentrations of the drug and as noted in U.S. patent 4,621,100 results in unwanted side effects.
British patent 1,494,463 discloses that therapeutic levels of PGE2 results in increased blood pressure, stimulated smooth muscle reactions, inhibited gastric secretion, controlled spasm and facilitated breathing in asthmatic conditions, decongested nasal passages, decreased blood platelet adhesion and has affected the reproductive organs of
SUBSTITUTE SRΞE? mammals as a labor inducer, abortifacien , cervical dilator, regulator of the estrus and regulator of the menstrual cycle.
Delivery of GE2 in a polymer based controlled dosage form has been suggested in U.S. patents 4,093,709 and 4,639,366. However, a method for delivering E2 directly to the site of the bone or the use of a controlled release device to deliver PGE2 to the site of a broken bone has not been reported.
WO-90-15586 teaches a controlled release drug delivery device comprising a bioerodible polymer admixed with gentamicin. The device was implanted in bone that had been inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus to induce osteomyelitis in rats. A polymer composed of poly(propylene fu arate) prepolymer crosslinked with methylmethacrylate was used as a matrix for the implantation and controlled release of the antibiotic. The medicament, supplied as a paste composed of the polymer and the antiboitic was able to reduce the degree of infection. The polymer used by this system decomposed to non-toxic residues.
WO-90-15586 further teaches the use of this paste for the delivery of Insulin Growth Factor 1, hereinafter IGF, as a means of enhancing bone formation. A twelve week treatment period is recommended.
However, as shown in Example 1 of the present invention, a study which compared controlled infusion of IGF, and PGE2> demonstrated that controlled delivery of IGF, did not promote bone growth as taught by this reference. Further, as
SUBSTITUTESHEET Example 2 demonstrates, enhanced bone growth stimulation using site specific, controlled dosing of PGE2, can be accomplished in much less time than would have been expected based on the reports using IGF, treatment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is concerned with a novel method of promoting bone growth which is useful in the treatment of bone fractures, osteoporosis, osteopenia or the like, which comprises the slow controlled release of therapuetic levels of PGE2 at the sige where bone growth stimulation is required. A novel device useful for the slow controlled release of PGE2 at the desired site, which forms another embodiment of this invention, is an implantable biodegradable dosage form, consisting essentially of a bioerodible polymer selected from a poly(ortho ester) or a polyacetal and the bone-growth promoting agent, PGE2. The polymer used in this device completely degrades to compounds which are water soluble and are excreted from the body in such a manner that a decomposition residue does not remain in the implant area.
By placing the controled release dosage from containing PGE„ at the site where bone growth stimulation is required, side effects normally seen during treatment by traditional routes of administration with this compound were not observed.
f-> > fffT?*"' t I1' ~ 1 1^"«""1 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The novel method of this invention comprises the stimulation of bone growth by the administration of PGE2, in a controlled release manner at a sige at which bone growth stimulation is desired.
The stimulation of bone growth is useful in the treatment of bone fractures, osteoporosis, osteopenia or the like.
By stimulation of bone growth is meant enhanced recruitment of bone forming cells, their differentiation and functions as matrix forming cells about the area of bone fracture.
By administration of PGE2 is meant the release of free PGE2 from any delivery device, media or matrix intended to function as a transportation or storage media for the PGE2- The term "free PGE2" refers to the PGE2 which is released from the dosage form and available for therapeutic use. "Free PGE2" is the PGE2 medicament which is administered to the site where bone growth stimulation is desired, in a controlled release manner.
By "controlled release manner" is mean delivery of free PGE2 to the site where bone stimulation is required at a predetermined, therapeutic rate. The duration of the delivery of PGE2 to affect therapeutic stimulation of bone growth, is maintained for a period of time that is dependent upon the condition being treated.
By "site at which bone growth stimulation is desired" is meant, both the area adjacent to a section of bone of group of bones in need of
SUBSTITUTESHEET treatment or a region inside the bone including the site of a fracture or opening which occurs naturally or is intentionally made in the bone or group of bones where treatment can be administered.
Stimulation at the site where bone growth is desired also may be accomplished by infusing a solution containing PGE2 into the treatment area. However, this procedure is inconvenient and of little practical value in the treatment of bone disease or fracture. More conveniently, a controlled release dosage from, designed for controlled delivery of PGE2, can be implanted at the desired location of, either adjacent to the site or within the bone. The present method is particularly versatile and can be applied to the stimulation of bone growth at the site of a broken bone or a region of bone affected by osteoporosis or osteopenia or the like. The novel method of treatment of this invention is not meant to be limited to these bone conditions, since those skilled in the art would recognize other bone conditions in need of this therapy.
By broken bone is meant all types of broken bones i.e. green stick fracture, compound fracture, lateral fracture, pathologic fractures resulting from invasive tumors, compression fractures, fractures that require surgical procedures for realignment of bones, etc.
By osteoporosis in meant a reduction in bone matter associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. This term includes what is sometimes called osteopenia.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Stimulation of bone growth, utilizing this procedure, requires the daily delivery of about 0.01 μg to about 100 μg of 0GE2 to the site at which bone growth stimulation is desired. By "about 0.01 μg to about 100 μg of PGE2" is meant that during the course of any 24 hour period, the procedure requires delivery of an amount of PGE2 that is within this range and that deviations at either extreme of the range of up to 507_ can be tolerated once the treatment regiment is established.
This procedure provides for delivery of PGE , in an uninterrupted manner, for from about 1 to about 28 days. By "uninterrupted manner" is meant, that the device will deliver PGE2 to the area in need of therapy, for a sustained period of time, at an average daily dose level of PGE2 of about 0.01 μg/day to about lOOμg/day. The actual level of PGE2 delivered is dependent upon the therapeutic level required for the specific treatment regimen.
Under certain circumstances, release of PGE2 may not occur immediately upon the initiation of treatment. However, within twelve to thirty six hours, delivery of PGE2 to the area in need of therapy will commence.
One embodiment of the novel device of this invention comprises a biodegradable dosage form consisting essentially of a bioerodible polymer and PGE2. The dosage form is designed to release free PGE2 to the area in need of therapy at a desired rate. The novel device of this invention, is designed for easy implantation either adjacent to the bone or within the bone in need of therapy.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The procedure involves the surgical implantation of a controlled release dosage form which dispenses PGE2 at the site of bone fracture. As bioerosion of the polymer occurs, PGE2 is released directly ot the site where new bone growth is required.
By surgical implantation is meant utilizing aseptic technique; cutting open the skin, muscle or other tissue to expose the bone in the area where stimulation of bone growth is required; placing the dosage form either into the boen or adjacent to the bone, that is, as close to the bone as possible; and then closing the disturbed tissue, muscle and skin using standard medical techniques. Techniques such as arthroscopy, and any other invasive methods which would allow the placement of the dosage form within or near a bone in need of growth stimulation therapy would also be included within this definition. By "bioerosion" or "bioerodible" or "erosion" or "erodes" is meant the process, including hydrolysis, dissolution, abrasion, and corrosion, by which the dosage form is reduced in size due to the chemical or physical action of the aqueous fluids, bone and tissue present in the area of surgical implantation.
The bioerodible polymer useful in the novel device of this invention are those that completely degrade to compounds which are water soluble and are easily excreted from the body of a subject in need of treatment, in such a manner that no decomposition residue remains at the implant area following release of all of the PGE2.
SUBSTITUTESHEET By "subject" is meant humans, other mammals, amphibians and any other animal which is partially composed of bone.
The novel device includes sufficient PGE2 to release O.Olμg/day to 100 μg/day to PGE2 over a period of time required for ininterrupted therapy. The bioerodible polymer is a poly(ortho ester) such as or a polyacetal such as ....
A variety of polymers exist that have the characteristics necessary to deliver PGE2 to the site of a bone fracture. That is, the polymer must be compatible with the biological environment where therapy is to be delivered. By compatibility is meant, that the polymer must be non-toxic and non-mutagenic. In addition, since the device may be implanted at the site of a break in a bone, it must not creat more than a minimal inflammatory reaction.
The polymers useful in this system must also be pharmaceutically acceptable that is, in admixtures with the PGE2, a uniform product must result. Since the polymer is the primary component, by weight, in the dosage form, it must support homogeneous admixture with PGE2. Admixtures can be accomplished by a number of means that are known by those skilled in the pharmaceutical arts such as simple compounding of ground polymer and PGE~ followed by compression into forms suitable for implantation or by granulating the polymer and PGE2 with a suitable solvent. After mixing, the solvent is evaporated leaving behind a homogeneous mixture of polymer and PGE2. In the later procedure, PGE2 need not be soluble in the solvent.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET A further procedure involves mixing the PGE2 with the monomers prior to the polymerization step. During the polymerization step the mixture is stirred so that the PGE2 is homogeneously mixed with the forming polymer.
The final dosage forms can be prepared by compressing the dried mixture of polymer and PGE2 into the desired form. Other techniques, known to those skilled in the art can also be utilized. The polymer must reproducibly bioerode, in the environment of use, and result in products that are cleared from tissue surrounding the site of bone fracture and ultimately excreted from the body. The release of PGE2 from a polymer matrix is dependent on the erosion rate of the polymer with which it is admixed. Therefore, the polymer/PGE2 formulation must result in a dosage form that erodes, in the environment of use, at a predictable rate, resulting in the complete release of PGE2 to the site of bone therapy. Side reactions that would retard release of PGE2 are avoided by proper choice of a polymer.
Since the polymer is implanted, sterility of the device must be maintained. This is most easily accomplished with sterile components and utilizing aseptic techniques during a mixing and manufacture of the device. Other methods to assure a sterile product can be employed provided they do not degrade the polymer or PGE2.
There are many polymers which meet the criteria for this type of implant. The use of any of these that deliver PGE2, at the desired rate, to the site in need of bone therapy, are considered within the scope of this invention.
SUBSTITUTESHEET Poly(ortho esters) have been utilized in pharmaceutically acceptable controlled release devices in the past mainly becuase they erode in a controlled manner via hydrolysis. One example of a polymer that meets the criteria of this novel procedure has the formula.
The synthesis of this polymer is described in U.S. patent 4,304,767. The polymerization proceeds through a condensation reaction between a ketene acetal and an alcohol. There are no reaction by-products that need to be removed in order to achieve a high molecular weight polymer. The polymer utilized in one embodiment and in example 2 has a molecular weight of about 84,000. That is the molecular weight range, determined by gel permeation chromatography was 84,000 +/- 1000 8/mole.
Once implanted at the site of a bone fracture, this polymer erodes through ahydrolysis mechanism to produce pentaerythritol dipropionate, 1,6-hexanediol and transcyclohexanedimethanol. These compounds are soluble in aqueous solution which assures complete removal of any polymer erosion residue from the implantation site.
One embodiment of the method utilizes the polyacetal previously described and enough PGE2 to sssure delivery at a rate of about 1 ug/day over the course of 28 days.
The actual concentration of PGE2 in the dosage form can range from about 0.01% to about 27- by weight. By "about 0.01% to about 2%" is meant that deviations at either extreme of the range of up to 507o can be tolerated in the dosage form prior to implantation.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The amount of bioerodable polymer in the dosage form can range from about 99.99% to about 987, by weight of the components. By "about 99.99% to about 98%" is meant that minor deviations in the percentage of bioerodable polymer at either extreme of the range can be tolerated in the dosage form prior to implantation.
The desired delivery rate can be assured by first determining the jji vitro dissolution rate of the polymer in 0.15M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 and adjusting the concentration of PGE2 in the final product so that as the polymer bioerodes, the proper amount of PGE2 is released. The volume of phosphate buffered saline utilized is based upon the total PGE2 content of the dosage form. In testing of the low dose [what was amount per dosage form for low dose] 10 ml of potassium phosphate buffer was utilized. The high dose [what was amount per dosage form for high dose] utilized 75 ml of buffer. Samples were collected daily and the dissolved PGE2 was quantified using routine analytical procedures.
One embodiment of the dosage form used in this novel method was prepared using the procedure described in example 2. This dosage form released approximately 807. of the PGE2 within 10 days in an in vitro dissolution study.
As the following non-limiting examples show, the present invention has many advantages over any other known technology in that unexpedtely rapid bone knitting results from the implanation of this device at the site of a bone fracture.
SUBSTITUTESHEET EXAMPLES
Example 1:
Comparison ob Bone Growth and Repair Resulting from Infusion of Insulin Growth Factor 1 and
Prostaglandin E2.
As the above results demonstrate, no change in bone formation was observed relative to the infusion of vehicle when IGF, was infused into the area requiring treatment. However, the infusion of PGE2 resulted in an unexpected and increase in bone growth.
Example 2: Controlled delivery devices were fabricated by granulation of 1 g of spray dried poly(ortho ester) powder of the formula shown above (MW 84000 +/- 1000), with a PGE2 in ethanol solution in a teflon jar. Devices with three different loadings of PGE2 were fabricated to produce dosage forms which were nominally (A) 0.01%, (B) 0.1% and (C) 1.0% w/w PGE2. The PGE2 solution was slowly added to the polymer while stirring with a small spatula. Several ethanol rinses of the PGE2 container were made and added to the granulation. The total amount of ethanol added to the polymer was enough to thoroughly wet the polymer (ca. 1-2 ml). After stirring with a spatula, the lid was loosely placed on the jar and the contents were vacuum dried for 18 hours.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Devices were fabricated in two steps. First, a disk of PGE2/ polymer material, weighing approximately 35 mg, was made using 1/4" flat punches in a Carver press at 500 psi. The disk was then positioned in the center of a die containing six cylindrical cut-outs. The die and pellet were sandwiched between two KAPTON sheets. This was placed between two heated plates (90°C) for 10 seconds before compression at 1 ton for 10-15 seconds. The die was immediately removed from the plates and placed on a cold steel plate. The devices were punched out of the die and stored at -80°C. Each device was a transparent disk with a diameter of 2 mm and a thickness of 1 mm and weighed about 4 mg. Placebo devices, that is those which contain only the polymer, were made by the same method except no E2 was added. Table 1 shows the PGE2 nominal content of each group of devices. Devices from groups A, B and C were tested for jji vitro dissolution properties. Five dosage forms from each group were placed in a bottle containing 0.15M phosphate buffered saline at pH 7.4. The lowest two dosages were tested using 75 ml of buffer. The bottles were capped and then rotated constantly for up to 14 days. A sample was removed each day and the PGE2 released into the buffer was quantified using standard analytical procedures. The results of thes studies are shown in Table II.
Devices from groups A, B, C and placebo pellets were tested in vivo in a rat model. An untreated control group was maintained as a further control. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250 g (Taconic Farms, NY) were divided so that four rats
H ET were in each of the four treatment groups . The animals were anesthetized intraperitoneally using ketamine hydrochloride (KETASET, Aveco, 80 mg/kg). A longitudinal incision was made along the medial aspect of the proximal tibia down to the periosteum. Under saline irrigation of 2 mm hole was drilled through the cortex approximately 2 mm inferior to the epiphyseal growth plate using a #8 carbide plain round excavating bur with a high speed dental drill. The devices were placed within the marrow cavity and the incisins closed. The animals recovered without incident and within 24 hours following surgery demonstrated normal locomotion and grooming behavior.
Eight days following surgery animals were sacrificed using a C02 inhalation chamber and the tibia removed and fixed in 70%. ethanol for histological processing and methacrylate embedding. Coronal six micron thick sections were cut using a microtome and stained with toluidine blue. Tissue sections were analyzed histomorphometrically.
Table III lists the cortical bone thickness and percent cancellous bone found for the difference groups in this trial. This histomorphometic data provides evidence for a dose-related increase in metaphyseal bone formed as a result of prostaglandin treatment. Bond volume was 8.66% for the placebo treated group and was significantly increased (p,0.05) threefold with the group A devices. Also, the rate treated with group A devices showed a significant increase in cortical bone thickness.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Results from previous studies indicate that control rats with holes drilled in their tibia do not show growth statistically different from untreated controls.
TITUTE SHEET

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method of stimulating bone growth comprising the administration of PGE,, PGE2, PGF2α' β-estradl01 or their salt in a controlled release manner, from a rod shaped, rigid, solid, biodegradable polymer, at a site at which bone growth stimulation is desired.
2. A method of stimulating bone growth of Claim 1, wherein the site of desired stimulation is selected from the group consisting of bone fractures and osteoporosis.
3. The method of stimulating bone growth of Claim 2, wherein the site of desired stimulation is at a bone fracture.
4. The method of stimulating bone growth of Claim 1, wherein the amount of free PGE,, PGE2, PGF2 , or β-estradiol administered to the site where bone growth stimulation is desired is about 0.01 ug/day to about 1 g/day.
5. An implantable controlled release dosage form, shaped for ready implantation in or near a bone in need of therapy, consisting essentially of:
(a) a rigid, solid, bioerodible polymer selected from a poly(ortho ester) or a polyacetal, which upon bioerosion, produces water soluble compounds which do not leave a
SUBSTITUTE SHEET residue at the site of implantation in the subject undergoing treatment; and implantation therewith,
(b) a therapeutically effective amount of PGE1, GE2,
PGF, β-estradiol or their salt.
6. The controlled release dosage form of Claim 5, wherein organic and inorganic compounds are added to the polymer and drug mixture to modulate the bioerosion process.
7. The controlled release dosage form or Claim 5, wherein the bioerodible polymer release PGE1, PGE2, p F2a or their salt in a controlled manner, at the site of implantation, whereby these compounds are available for therapeutic stimulation of bone growth.
8. The controlled release dosage form of Claim 5 wherein rigid, solid, bioerodible polymer is a poly(ortho ester).
9. The controlled release dosage form of Claim 5 which consists essentially of about 0.01% to about 2% PGE2 by weight and between about 99.99% and about 98% of polymer.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
PCT/US1993/000946 1992-02-05 1993-02-04 Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation WO1993015767A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US83216792A 1992-02-05 1992-02-05
US832,167 1992-02-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1993015767A1 true WO1993015767A1 (en) 1993-08-19

Family

ID=25260877

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1993/000946 WO1993015767A1 (en) 1992-02-05 1993-02-04 Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU3607293A (en)
WO (1) WO1993015767A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5876452A (en) * 1992-02-14 1999-03-02 Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System Biodegradable implant
WO1999012550A1 (en) * 1997-09-09 1999-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of increasing bone volume
WO1999012551A1 (en) * 1997-09-09 1999-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of increasing bone volume using non-naturally-occurring fp selective agonists
US6013853A (en) * 1992-02-14 2000-01-11 The University Of Texas System Continuous release polymeric implant carrier
EP1335686A2 (en) * 2000-10-24 2003-08-20 SDGI Holdings, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
WO2007083643A1 (en) * 2006-01-18 2007-07-26 National University Corporation Tokyo Medical And Dental University Biomaterial for osteogenesis containing osteogenesis promoter and nanogel

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4093709A (en) * 1975-01-28 1978-06-06 Alza Corporation Drug delivery devices manufactured from poly(orthoesters) and poly(orthocarbonates)

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4093709A (en) * 1975-01-28 1978-06-06 Alza Corporation Drug delivery devices manufactured from poly(orthoesters) and poly(orthocarbonates)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5876452A (en) * 1992-02-14 1999-03-02 Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System Biodegradable implant
US6013853A (en) * 1992-02-14 2000-01-11 The University Of Texas System Continuous release polymeric implant carrier
WO1999012550A1 (en) * 1997-09-09 1999-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of increasing bone volume
WO1999012551A1 (en) * 1997-09-09 1999-03-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of increasing bone volume using non-naturally-occurring fp selective agonists
US6156799A (en) * 1997-09-09 2000-12-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of increasing bone volume using non-naturally-occurring FP selective agonists
AU739275B2 (en) * 1997-09-09 2001-10-11 Procter & Gamble Company, The Method of increasing bone volume using non-naturally-occurring FP selective agonists
EP1335686A2 (en) * 2000-10-24 2003-08-20 SDGI Holdings, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
EP1335686A4 (en) * 2000-10-24 2005-06-01 Sdgi Holdings Inc Spinal fusion methods and devices
EP2085055A1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-08-05 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion devices
US8226729B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2012-07-24 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
US8617252B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2013-12-31 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal fusion methods and devices
WO2007083643A1 (en) * 2006-01-18 2007-07-26 National University Corporation Tokyo Medical And Dental University Biomaterial for osteogenesis containing osteogenesis promoter and nanogel
JP4843797B2 (en) * 2006-01-18 2011-12-21 国立大学法人 東京医科歯科大学 Biomaterial for bone formation containing osteogenesis promoting substance and nanogel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU3607293A (en) 1993-09-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2565488B2 (en) Composition comprising active agent with controlled release of active agent and absorbable matrix
US4650665A (en) Controlled release of pharmacologically active agents from an absorbable biologically compatible putty-like composition
US9549920B2 (en) Methods and compositions for treating post-operative pain comprising a local anesthetic
US9833548B2 (en) Methods and compositions for treating post-operative pain comprising clonidine
US9375420B2 (en) Methods and compositions for treating infections comprising a local anesthetic
US8017144B2 (en) Controlled release polymeric compositions of bone growth promoting compounds
US9265733B2 (en) Drug depots having different release profiles for reducing, preventing or treating pain and inflammation
Einmahl et al. Therapeutic applications of viscous and injectable poly (ortho esters)
US8591935B2 (en) Methods and compositions for treating pain comprising a statin
US20100015049A1 (en) Methods and compositions for treating postoperative pain comprising nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents
JPH05503286A (en) Bioerodible polymers for drug delivery in bone
US4491575A (en) Compressed products with retarded release of active substance, a process for their preparation and a process for the long-term administration of medicaments
CN101827592A (en) Methods for treating post-operative effects such as spasticity and shivering with clonidine
WO1993015767A1 (en) Implant therapy for bone growth stimulation
MXPA05002589A (en) Antibiotic microspheres for treatment of infections and osteomyelitis.
US9060978B2 (en) Method for treating an intervertebral disc disorder by administering a dominant negative tumor necrosis factor antagonist

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BB BG BR CA CZ FI HU JP KR LK MG MN MW NO NZ PL RO RU SD SK UA

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA