WO1997015068A2 - Improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse and methods of programming - Google Patents

Improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse and methods of programming Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997015068A2
WO1997015068A2 PCT/US1996/015872 US9615872W WO9715068A2 WO 1997015068 A2 WO1997015068 A2 WO 1997015068A2 US 9615872 W US9615872 W US 9615872W WO 9715068 A2 WO9715068 A2 WO 9715068A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
antifuse
barrier metal
metal layer
disposed over
potential
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1996/015872
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1997015068A9 (en
WO1997015068A3 (en
Inventor
Frank W. Hawley
Abdelshafy A. Eltoukhy
John L. Mccollum
Original Assignee
Actel Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Actel Corporation filed Critical Actel Corporation
Publication of WO1997015068A2 publication Critical patent/WO1997015068A2/en
Publication of WO1997015068A3 publication Critical patent/WO1997015068A3/en
Publication of WO1997015068A9 publication Critical patent/WO1997015068A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L23/00Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
    • H01L23/52Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames
    • H01L23/522Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames including external interconnections consisting of a multilayer structure of conductive and insulating layers inseparably formed on the semiconductor body
    • H01L23/525Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames including external interconnections consisting of a multilayer structure of conductive and insulating layers inseparably formed on the semiconductor body with adaptable interconnections
    • H01L23/5252Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames including external interconnections consisting of a multilayer structure of conductive and insulating layers inseparably formed on the semiconductor body with adaptable interconnections comprising anti-fuses, i.e. connections having their state changed from non-conductive to conductive
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L2924/00Indexing scheme for arrangements or methods for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies as covered by H01L24/00
    • H01L2924/0001Technical content checked by a classifier
    • H01L2924/0002Not covered by any one of groups H01L24/00, H01L24/00 and H01L2224/00

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the field of metal-to-metal antifuses which are used in integrated circuit devices to form selectively programmable conductive links between metallization layers of the integrated circuit devices. More particularly, this invention relates to improved antifuses and methods for programming such antifuses which yield, after programming, an antifuse link disposed through the antifuse material layer which does not include any significant quantities of aluminum metal and which is, therefore, more reliable and of more predictable resistance.
  • Antifuses and metal-to-metal antifuses are well known in the art. A problem exists, however, which affects the useful life of devices incorporating metal-to-metal antifuses. Most metal-to-metal antifuses exist between two aluminum metal film metallization layers in an integrated circuit device such as a CMOS-type device.
  • the antifuse material layer and a portion of the adjacent metallization layers will disrupt and/or melt or vaporize and a conductive link will form through the antifuse material layer due to metal from the adjacent metallization layer being drawn in and intermixed through mass transport and thermal driven material diffusion and chemical reaction, effectively shorting the two metallization layers together at the location of the antifuse.
  • the conductive link is primarily formed of the material in the adjacent metallization layer in the immediate vicinity of the disruption.
  • Aluminum is well known to be subject to electromigration, i.e., in the presence of " an electron current flow, the aluminum metal atoms tend to move along with the electron current flow (opposite to the direction of normal positive to ground electric current flow) . Accordingly, researchers in the prior art have attempted to block aluminum flow into the antifuse material layer with barrier layers of various materials and various thicknesses. The barrier metals, in turn, have to take the place of the aluminum and provide essentially the entirety of the conductive material which flows into the antifuse material layer to form the conductive links that short the two metallization layers together.
  • the resistance between the two metallization layers of the antifuse goes from a few gigaohms to less than 1 00 ohms -- a change of over seven orders of magnitude.
  • a relatively large amount of heat is also released during this process. This heat, if near enough to the aluminum metallization layer, can melt or vaporize it, making it easy for aluminum to flow into the antifuse material layer to undesirably participate in the formation of conductive links.
  • FIG. 1 One prior art method for forming antifuses is illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • an antifuse aperture or via 1 0 is formed between two metallization layers 1 2, 1 4 separated by a dielectric material 1 6 such as SiO 2
  • the lower antifuse electrode 1 8 is formed of an aluminum metallization layer 1 2 covered by a barrier metal layer 20; the upper antifuse electrode 22 is formed of aluminum metallization layer 14 disposed over barrier metal layer 24.
  • Antifuse material layer 26 is deposited into the antifuse aperture 10 with any of a number of techniques and may comprise any of a number of materials including multiple layers of different materials, and is subject to step coverage problems which occur whenever a material is deposited into an aperture, namely, a thinning of the deposited layers at the edges or corners of the aperture 28, 30 relative to the thickness of the layer at the center 32 of the aperture 10. This thinning of both antifuse material layer 26 and barrier metal layer
  • FIG. 2 antifuse 34 comprises a lower electrode 36 formed of an aluminum metallization layer 38 overlaid by a layer of a barrier metal 40. Over the barrier metal layer 40 is disposed an antifuse material layer 42 which may be of a multi-layer multi-material construction or other construction as is well known in the art. Over the antifuse material layer 42 is an antifuse via 44 through interlayer dielectric layer 52 into which is deposited upper electrode 46 which consists of barrier metal layer 48 and aluminum metallization layer 50. An interlayer dielectric layer 52 is disposed between the electrodes 36, 46.
  • Such an antifuse may be programmed as follows: provide a first voltage pulse across electrodes 36, 46 with the less positive voltage tied to electrode 46 and the more positive voltage tied to electrode 36, the difference between the less positive and more positive voltages being a potential sufficient to program the antifuse, followed by a series of other voltage pulses, known as an "ac soak" (See, e.g. , United States Patent Application Serial No. 08/1 1 0,681 filed August 23, 1 993 in the name of Steve S. Chiang, et al., entitled “Methods For Programming Antifuses Having at Least One Metal Electrode", which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) , to aid in the formation of the conductive link.
  • a method often used in programming antifuses is to apply a series of programming pulses having an amplitude in one direction greater than the amplitude in the other direction, e.g., + 10 volt pulse followed by -8 volt pulse. In this way, the greater stress is applied during the + 10 volt pulse, thus the antifuse is more likely to program during the + 1 0 volt pulse. If it fails to program on the first pulse, it probably won't program on the -8 volt pulse and will likely program on a subsequent + 10 volt pulse. In this way it can be assured that the antifuse will only disrupt while the current is flowing in one particular and predetermined direction.
  • VOT and VOB refer to either a pure DC programming voltage, or more commonly, to the first pulse, or to the pulse having the greater magnitude when it is not the first pulse.
  • VOT and VOB refer to the conditions during actual initial formation of the conductive link.
  • FIG. 3 is a histogram plot showing the resulting resistance of the programmed antifuse along the horizontal axis against the number of antifuses having that resistance along the vertical axis. As can be seen, the grouping is not very tight with an average of 21 ohms, an outlier at nearly 100 ohms and a standard deviation of 3.1 . Aluminum content in the conductive links is believed responsible for this relatively poor performance.
  • Photographs 1 and 2 are scanning electron micrographs of sectioned, programmed antifuses. Referring now to Photographs 1 and 2 (P1 and P2, respectively), in P1 and P2 antifuses comprising upper aluminum metal layer A, barrier layer B, antifuse layer C, lower barrier layer D and lower aluminum metal layer E are shown.
  • the antifuse of P1 was programmed VOT resulting in visible disruption/mixing of layers D and C but no visible effects to layer B.
  • a more positive voltage applied to the top electrode (A/B) produces a downward electric current and an upward electron current.
  • the result is a conductive filament shorting layers B and D.
  • FIG. 1 of Gordon, et al. reproduced here as FIG. 4, an antifuse 54 is shown which incorporates non-conductive spacers 56, 58 disposed in the corners 60, 62, respectively, of the antifuse aperture 64. These spacers 56, 58 force the conductive metal electrode 66 formed of barrier metal 68 and aluminum metallization layer 70 away from the comers 60, 62 so that it is disposed immediately above only the thickest part 72 of the antifuse material layer 74.
  • Antifuse 54 is constructed over a lower electrode 78 which is disposed over dielectric layer 80 which is in turn disposed over substrate 82.
  • Interlayer dielectric layer 84 separates electrodes 66 and 76.
  • An important drawback to this solution is that formation of spacers 56, 58 requires additional process steps which increase costs.
  • Gordon, et al. further teach using a VOT programming scheme with their antifuse, however, they do not suggest why this is to be preferred to a
  • VOB scheme nor do they teach any utility in providing differential barrier metal layer thicknesses in conjunction with such a scheme or a realization that the spacers 56, 58 may be obviated by choice of materials and programming technique. Accordingly, it would be extremely desirable to formulate a design for a metal-to-metal via-type antifuse which is not susceptible to conductive link failure or "read-disturb" as a solution to this problem would open the door to wide commercial acceptance of metal-to-metal antifuses.
  • the present invention solves the problem of conductive link failure in metal-to-metal via-type antifuses.
  • the solution is essentially independent of antifuse configuration.
  • the solution is to form the lower barrier metal layer below the via thicker than the upper barrier metal layer in the via and to provide for programming the antifuse VOT so as to drive electrons upward through the thinner upper barrier metal layer and into the overlying aluminum layer during programming.
  • This results in the creation of an essentially aluminum free conductive link (preferably less than 1 % aluminum content in the link itself) .
  • Titanium Nitride (TiN) is highly preferred to use Titanium Nitride (TiN) as the barrier metal because of its low thermal conductivity which holds heat in a small region around the rupture caused by blowing the antifuse thus allowing a minimum of electrical energy to be used
  • an antifuse having a first barrier metal layer of a first minimum thickness and a second barrier metal layer of a second minimum thickness may be fabricated wherein the first minimum thickness is less than the second minimum thickness and wherein programming of the antifuse is accomplished by placing the more positive voltage of the programming voltage supply on the electrode of the antifuse adjacent the first
  • a third aspect of the present invention it is possible to fabricate reliable antifuses having upper and lower TiN barrier metal layers surrounding an antifuse material layer and adjacent to aluminum metallization layers with one barrier metal layer thinner than the other, and having a minimum thickness of as little as 1 00 ⁇ by applying the programming signal as follows: (I) where the upper barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 1 000A - 2000A and the lower barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 200 ⁇ or more, using VOT programming to take advantage of the thicker lower barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion and (II) where the upper barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 2000A or more and the lower barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 1 000A - 2000A, using VOB programming to take advantage of the thicker upper barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion.
  • a fourth aspect of the present invention it is possible to fabricate reliable antifuses having upper and lower TiN barrier metal layers both exceeding 2000A in minimum thickness surrounding an antifuse material layer and adjacent to aluminum metallization layers with by applying the programming signal as follows: using either VOT or VOB programming as the thick barrier layers will protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross sectional diagram of a prior art antifuse.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross sectional diagram of an antifuse.
  • FIG. 3 is a histogram of resistance vs. quantity for a series of tests run with antifuses fabricated according to FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross sectional diagram of a prior art antifuse.
  • FIG. 5 is a cross sectional diagram of an antifuse structure according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is an enlargement of a portion of FIG. 5 additionally showing a conductive link formed according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a histogram of resistance vs. quantity for a series of tests run with antifuses fabricated according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a typical metal/barrier/antifuse/barrier/metal antifuse structure.
  • PHOTOGRAPH 1 is a scanning electron micrograph of a sectioned, programmed antifuse which was programmed VOT.
  • PHOTOGRAPH 2 is a scanning electron micrograph of a sectioned, programmed antifuse which was programmed VOB.
  • the preferred embodiment described herein is for an antifuse having an antifuse aperture of diameter approximately 1 0000A or less and programmable with an applied potential preferably in the range of about 9.5 V to about 1 2 V at a programming current of about 10 - 30 mA. Changes in the programming voltage will scale with changes in dimension and antifuse material(s) choice as known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • One of the main purposes for developing metal-to-metal antifuses is so that they may be disposed over an active region of a semiconductor substrate which has transistors formed in it. In this way, the "real estate" taken by the transistors is reused by the antifuses, much the way as a sky scraper is able to reuse the same land with each additional floor thus increasing areal building density.
  • the ability to safely place antifuses over an active region of a semiconductor substrate depends upon the ability of the antifuses to behave in a manner before, during and after programming that does not result in contamination or other damage to the transistors already constructed in the active region.
  • the structure of FIG. 5 is capable of meeting these requirements.
  • the layers are: active transistor region 86, insulating layer 88 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 7500 A presently preferred, preferred material(s): SiO 2 ), barrier metal layer 90 (thickness range of about 100 - 1000 A with about 500 ⁇ presently preferred, preferred material(s) : Ti adhesion layer of thickness about 100 - 500 A (preferably about 250 A) under a TiN barrier layer of thickness about 100 - 500 A (preferably about 250 A)), first metallization layer or "Metal-1 " 92 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 8000 A presently preferred), interlayer dielectric 94 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 7500 A presently preferred, preferred material(s) : SiO 2 ), second metallization layer or "Metal-2" 96 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 8000 A presently preferred), another barrier metal layer 98 (th
  • the three metallization layers 92, 96 and 1 08 are all fabricated of an aluminum alloy in a conventional and well-known manner.
  • FIG. 6 is an enlarged portion of FIG. 5 showing a conductive antifuse link 1 1 0 formed in antifuse material layer 104 shorting barrier metal layer 98 to barrier metal layer 106.
  • TiN is highly preferred for the barrier metal layers 98 and 106.
  • TiN is a very poor thermal conductor, unlike Titanium Tungsten (TiW) which is often used as a barrier metal.
  • TiN's thermal conductivity is 0.291 Wcm "1 K "1 . Because TiN acts, in essence, as a thermal insulator, it is preferred in this application as follows: When a voltage is applied between MetaI-2 and Metal-3 of sufficient magnitude to blow antifuse material layer 104, great amounts of thermal energy will be released as evidenced by P1 and P2 discussed above.
  • barrier metal layers 98 and 106 had a high thermal conductivity, they would rapidly conduct away the heat released in blowing the antifuse 1 04 with two results: first, it would simply take more energy to disrupt/intermix enough of barrier metal layers 98 and 1 06 to form the conductive links bridging antifuse material layer 104; and second, this additional energy would be likely to result in melting and/or vaporization of Metal-2 and/or Metal-3, freeing up aluminum so that it can participate in link formation within antifuse material layer 104.
  • TiN While one might thus seek to coat all antifuses with copious layers of TiN, a practical limitation on the use of TiN in this application is that it is difficult to put an arbitrarily large thickness of TiN within an aperture in a conventional CMOS- type fabrication process.
  • CMOS- type fabrication process For circular apertures of diameter approximately 1 .O ⁇ m d OOOOA), or less, as presently preferred, it is convenient to deposit a layer of TiN of approximately 100 ⁇ thickness (at the edge of the aperture which may require that up to about 300 ⁇ A be deposited (due to step coverage-caused thinning at the edges) within such an aperture. This thickness at the edge may be stretched to approximately 2000A thickness at increased cost and throughput, and significantly thicker films are difficult to achieve with TiN in an aperture using available technology.
  • the antifuse 1 12 has a lower aluminum metallization layer 1 1 4 covered by a lower TiN barrier layer 1 1 6 of minimum thickness BB.
  • Over layer 1 1 6 is disposed antifuse material layer(s) 1 1 8 which may be of any desired construction including multi-layer multi-material construction as known in the art.
  • Through antifuse material layer 1 18 is disposed conductive antifuse filament 124 shown schematically as a jagged line.
  • Over antifuse layer 1 1 8 is upper TiN barrier layer 1 20 of minimum thickness AA and over that is upper metallization layer 122 of aluminum.
  • VOT programming as in P1 will take advantage of the thicker lower barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament 1 24 from aluminum incursion;
  • VOB programming as in P2 will take advantage of the thicker upper barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament 124 from aluminum incursion;
  • VOB programming as in P2 will take advantage of the thicker upper barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament 124 from aluminum incursion;
  • VOT or VOB programming can be used as the thick barrier layers will protect the antifuse filament 1 24 from aluminum incursion in any event.
  • This technique assures that the more positive voltage side (as opposed to ground or the less positive voltage side) of the first (or only) pulse is applied to the side of the antifuse having the thinnest layer of TiN barrier metal.
  • the electron current opposite the direction of the electric current
  • the thinner barrier metal at the more positive terminal is not likely to allow the release of aluminum into the antifuse material layer because the electron flow toward the aluminum will cause any flow of aluminum to be away from the antifuse material layer and since less disruption occurs to the low potential material the TiN will retain enough material to prevent aluminum diffusion at some later time during chip operational lifetime.
  • FIG. 7 a histogram much like that of FIG. 3 is shown.
  • the devices were programmed "VOT” rather than “VOB” as in FIG. 3.
  • the result is a much tighter distribution with no outliers, an average programmed antifuse resistance of 20 ohms, and a standard deviation of 1.25.
  • the antifuse design of FIG. 7 incorporated a lower TiN barrier layer having a thickness of 200 ⁇ A or more and an upper TiN barrier layer having a thickness in the range of about 100 ⁇ A - 200 ⁇ A
  • antifuse structures which can be programmed as described to provide substantially aluminum-free conductive links.
  • Such antifuse structures will not suffer from read disturb due to aluminum contamination and will provide stable reliable metal-to-metal antifuses for use in semiconductor devices.

Abstract

A metal-to-metal antifuse disposed between two aluminum metallization layers in a CMOS integrated circuit or similar structure includes an antifuse material layer having an aluminum-free conductive link. The aluminum-free link is formed by forming a first barrier metal layer out of TiN having a first thickness, a second barrier metal layer out of TiN having a second thickness which may be less than said first thickness, the first and second barrier metal layers separating the antifuse material layer from first and second electrodes. The antifuse is programmed by applying a voltage potential capable of programming the antifuse across the electrodes with the more positive side of the potential applied to the electrode adjacent the barrier metal layer having the least thickness. In another aspect of the invention, an antifuse having a first barrier metal layer of a first thickness and a second barrier metal layer of a second thickness may be fabricated wherein the first thickness is less than the second thickness and wherein programming of the antifuse is accomplished by placing the more positive voltage of the programming voltage supply on the electrode of the antifuse adjacent the first barrier metal layer.

Description

TITLE OF THE INVENTION
IMPROVED METAL-TO-METAL VIA-TYPE ANTIFUSE AND METHODS OF PROGRAMMING
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1 . Field of the Invention This invention relates generally to the field of metal-to-metal antifuses which are used in integrated circuit devices to form selectively programmable conductive links between metallization layers of the integrated circuit devices. More particularly, this invention relates to improved antifuses and methods for programming such antifuses which yield, after programming, an antifuse link disposed through the antifuse material layer which does not include any significant quantities of aluminum metal and which is, therefore, more reliable and of more predictable resistance.
2. The Prior Art
Antifuses and metal-to-metal antifuses are well known in the art. A problem exists, however, which affects the useful life of devices incorporating metal-to-metal antifuses. Most metal-to-metal antifuses exist between two aluminum metal film metallization layers in an integrated circuit device such as a CMOS-type device. When a voltage of sufficient magnitude is applied between the metallization layers in the vicinity of the antifuse, the antifuse material layer and a portion of the adjacent metallization layers will disrupt and/or melt or vaporize and a conductive link will form through the antifuse material layer due to metal from the adjacent metallization layer being drawn in and intermixed through mass transport and thermal driven material diffusion and chemical reaction, effectively shorting the two metallization layers together at the location of the antifuse. The conductive link is primarily formed of the material in the adjacent metallization layer in the immediate vicinity of the disruption.
Unfortunately, in many cases it has been noticed that under certain types of stress such conductive links will open up or become non-conductive. This failure mode often manifests itself after a period of time during which the antifuse links appear to have been properly formed. This failure mode is commonly known as "read disturb" because the small currents used to read the state of the antifuse - - much smaller than the typical current used to program the antifuse -- eventually cause a state reversal in the programmed antifuse. Such a failure can destroy not only the particular link that fails, but the entire device in which the antifuse is located and, potentially, the equipment in which the device is placed. This problem has substantially retarded the commercial acceptance and development of metal-to- metal antifuses.
One factor that is now believed to contribute to read disturb is the presence of any significant quantity of aluminum in the antifuse conductive links. Aluminum is well known to be subject to electromigration, i.e., in the presence of" an electron current flow, the aluminum metal atoms tend to move along with the electron current flow (opposite to the direction of normal positive to ground electric current flow) . Accordingly, researchers in the prior art have attempted to block aluminum flow into the antifuse material layer with barrier layers of various materials and various thicknesses. The barrier metals, in turn, have to take the place of the aluminum and provide essentially the entirety of the conductive material which flows into the antifuse material layer to form the conductive links that short the two metallization layers together. During the programming of the antifuse, the resistance between the two metallization layers of the antifuse goes from a few gigaohms to less than 1 00 ohms -- a change of over seven orders of magnitude. A relatively large amount of heat is also released during this process. This heat, if near enough to the aluminum metallization layer, can melt or vaporize it, making it easy for aluminum to flow into the antifuse material layer to undesirably participate in the formation of conductive links.
One prior art method for forming antifuses is illustrated in FIG. 1 . According to this method, an antifuse aperture or via 1 0 is formed between two metallization layers 1 2, 1 4 separated by a dielectric material 1 6 such as SiO2
("interlayer dielectric layer") . In this type of structure, the lower antifuse electrode 1 8 is formed of an aluminum metallization layer 1 2 covered by a barrier metal layer 20; the upper antifuse electrode 22 is formed of aluminum metallization layer 14 disposed over barrier metal layer 24. Antifuse material layer 26 is deposited into the antifuse aperture 10 with any of a number of techniques and may comprise any of a number of materials including multiple layers of different materials, and is subject to step coverage problems which occur whenever a material is deposited into an aperture, namely, a thinning of the deposited layers at the edges or corners of the aperture 28, 30 relative to the thickness of the layer at the center 32 of the aperture 10. This thinning of both antifuse material layer 26 and barrier metal layer
24 tends to force the antifuse to "blow" or "program" in one of the corners 28, 30 at a somewhat unpredictable voltage and can lead to aluminum from metallization layer 14 breaching the thinned barrier metal layer 24 to enter antifuse material layer 26 during the programming of the antifuse and thereby contaminate the conductive link with aluminum metal.
A similar antifuse structure, known as the "half-stack", is shown in FIG. 2. The FIG. 2 antifuse 34 comprises a lower electrode 36 formed of an aluminum metallization layer 38 overlaid by a layer of a barrier metal 40. Over the barrier metal layer 40 is disposed an antifuse material layer 42 which may be of a multi-layer multi-material construction or other construction as is well known in the art. Over the antifuse material layer 42 is an antifuse via 44 through interlayer dielectric layer 52 into which is deposited upper electrode 46 which consists of barrier metal layer 48 and aluminum metallization layer 50. An interlayer dielectric layer 52 is disposed between the electrodes 36, 46. Such an antifuse may be programmed as follows: provide a first voltage pulse across electrodes 36, 46 with the less positive voltage tied to electrode 46 and the more positive voltage tied to electrode 36, the difference between the less positive and more positive voltages being a potential sufficient to program the antifuse, followed by a series of other voltage pulses, known as an "ac soak" (See, e.g. , United States Patent Application Serial No. 08/1 1 0,681 filed August 23, 1 993 in the name of Steve S. Chiang, et al., entitled "Methods For Programming Antifuses Having at Least One Metal Electrode", which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) , to aid in the formation of the conductive link. This approach of applying the more positive
(greater) voltage first to the bottom electrode is known as "VOB" or voltage on bottom. The converse arrangement is known as "VOT" or voltage on top. A method often used in programming antifuses is to apply a series of programming pulses having an amplitude in one direction greater than the amplitude in the other direction, e.g., + 10 volt pulse followed by -8 volt pulse. In this way, the greater stress is applied during the + 10 volt pulse, thus the antifuse is more likely to program during the + 1 0 volt pulse. If it fails to program on the first pulse, it probably won't program on the -8 volt pulse and will likely program on a subsequent + 10 volt pulse. In this way it can be assured that the antifuse will only disrupt while the current is flowing in one particular and predetermined direction.
As used herein, the terms VOT and VOB refer to either a pure DC programming voltage, or more commonly, to the first pulse, or to the pulse having the greater magnitude when it is not the first pulse. Thus VOT and VOB refer to the conditions during actual initial formation of the conductive link.
When a series of half-stack antifuses having upper barrier layers of TiN of minimum thickness of less than about 2000A were programmed in this fashion, VOB, the results shown in FIG. 3 were obtained. FIG. 3 is a histogram plot showing the resulting resistance of the programmed antifuse along the horizontal axis against the number of antifuses having that resistance along the vertical axis. As can be seen, the grouping is not very tight with an average of 21 ohms, an outlier at nearly 100 ohms and a standard deviation of 3.1 . Aluminum content in the conductive links is believed responsible for this relatively poor performance.
Photographs 1 and 2 are scanning electron micrographs of sectioned, programmed antifuses. Referring now to Photographs 1 and 2 (P1 and P2, respectively), in P1 and P2 antifuses comprising upper aluminum metal layer A, barrier layer B, antifuse layer C, lower barrier layer D and lower aluminum metal layer E are shown. The antifuse of P1 was programmed VOT resulting in visible disruption/mixing of layers D and C but no visible effects to layer B. In this case, a more positive voltage applied to the top electrode (A/B) produces a downward electric current and an upward electron current. The result is a conductive filament shorting layers B and D. If the disruption (shown at "X") of layer D is sufficient to extend all of the way through layer D (which it can be seen that it does not do here), aluminum in layer E will also likely be disrupted/intermixed and the potential for inclusion of aluminum in the conductive filament is substantially increased. In P2, the antifuse was programmed VOB and the opposite results obtain. Layer D is apparently entirely unscathed, but layers B and C are disrupted. Because such via- type antifuses have well known step coverage problems, the thickness of layer B is thinner in the corners of the antifuse aperture, hence the antifuse tends to program in the corners due to less overall electrical resistance in these locations. As can be seen, layer B is significantly eroded to the point of almost complete penetration where the antifuse programmed.
United States Patent No. 5,302,546 to Gordon, et al., describes a possible solution to this problem. In FIG. 1 of Gordon, et al., reproduced here as FIG. 4, an antifuse 54 is shown which incorporates non-conductive spacers 56, 58 disposed in the corners 60, 62, respectively, of the antifuse aperture 64. These spacers 56, 58 force the conductive metal electrode 66 formed of barrier metal 68 and aluminum metallization layer 70 away from the comers 60, 62 so that it is disposed immediately above only the thickest part 72 of the antifuse material layer 74. Antifuse 54 is constructed over a lower electrode 78 which is disposed over dielectric layer 80 which is in turn disposed over substrate 82. Interlayer dielectric layer 84 separates electrodes 66 and 76. An important drawback to this solution is that formation of spacers 56, 58 requires additional process steps which increase costs. Gordon, et al. further teach using a VOT programming scheme with their antifuse, however, they do not suggest why this is to be preferred to a
VOB scheme, nor do they teach any utility in providing differential barrier metal layer thicknesses in conjunction with such a scheme or a realization that the spacers 56, 58 may be obviated by choice of materials and programming technique. Accordingly, it would be extremely desirable to formulate a design for a metal-to-metal via-type antifuse which is not susceptible to conductive link failure or "read-disturb" as a solution to this problem would open the door to wide commercial acceptance of metal-to-metal antifuses.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention solves the problem of conductive link failure in metal-to-metal via-type antifuses. The solution is essentially independent of antifuse configuration. According to a first aspect of the invention, for antifuses including an upper barrier metal layer disposed in an antifuse via directly over an antifuse material layer, either in, or below the via, the solution is to form the lower barrier metal layer below the via thicker than the upper barrier metal layer in the via and to provide for programming the antifuse VOT so as to drive electrons upward through the thinner upper barrier metal layer and into the overlying aluminum layer during programming. This results in the creation of an essentially aluminum free conductive link (preferably less than 1 % aluminum content in the link itself) . It is highly preferred to use Titanium Nitride (TiN) as the barrier metal because of its low thermal conductivity which holds heat in a small region around the rupture caused by blowing the antifuse thus allowing a minimum of electrical energy to be used
(and deposited in the antifuse) and because of its high resistance to aluminum diffusion through it which further minimizes the likelihood of disrupting/intermixing aluminum and preventing aluminum from diffusing through the TiN which could then form a part of the conductive link of the programmed antifuse. According to a second aspect of the invention, an antifuse having a first barrier metal layer of a first minimum thickness and a second barrier metal layer of a second minimum thickness may be fabricated wherein the first minimum thickness is less than the second minimum thickness and wherein programming of the antifuse is accomplished by placing the more positive voltage of the programming voltage supply on the electrode of the antifuse adjacent the first
(thinner) barrier metal layer.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, it is possible to fabricate reliable antifuses having upper and lower TiN barrier metal layers surrounding an antifuse material layer and adjacent to aluminum metallization layers with one barrier metal layer thinner than the other, and having a minimum thickness of as little as 1 00θΛ by applying the programming signal as follows: (I) where the upper barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 1 000A - 2000A and the lower barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 200θΛ or more, using VOT programming to take advantage of the thicker lower barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion and (II) where the upper barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 2000A or more and the lower barrier layer has a minimum thickness in the range of 1 000A - 2000A, using VOB programming to take advantage of the thicker upper barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, it is possible to fabricate reliable antifuses having upper and lower TiN barrier metal layers both exceeding 2000A in minimum thickness surrounding an antifuse material layer and adjacent to aluminum metallization layers with by applying the programming signal as follows: using either VOT or VOB programming as the thick barrier layers will protect the antifuse filament from aluminum incursion.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide metal- to-metal via-type antifuses which are not subject to conductive link failure.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a programmed antifuse structure having a conductive link formed therein lacking any significant amount of aluminum metal.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse structures.
Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide improved programming methods for use with metal-to-metal via-type antifuse structures which result in programmed antifuses having increased life and reliability. These and many other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS FIG. 1 is a cross sectional diagram of a prior art antifuse. FIG. 2 is a cross sectional diagram of an antifuse. FIG. 3 is a histogram of resistance vs. quantity for a series of tests run with antifuses fabricated according to FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a cross sectional diagram of a prior art antifuse. FIG. 5 is a cross sectional diagram of an antifuse structure according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is an enlargement of a portion of FIG. 5 additionally showing a conductive link formed according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a histogram of resistance vs. quantity for a series of tests run with antifuses fabricated according to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a typical metal/barrier/antifuse/barrier/metal antifuse structure.
PHOTOGRAPH 1 is a scanning electron micrograph of a sectioned, programmed antifuse which was programmed VOT.
PHOTOGRAPH 2 is a scanning electron micrograph of a sectioned, programmed antifuse which was programmed VOB.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons from an examination of the within disclosure.
The preferred embodiment described herein is for an antifuse having an antifuse aperture of diameter approximately 1 0000A or less and programmable with an applied potential preferably in the range of about 9.5 V to about 1 2 V at a programming current of about 10 - 30 mA. Changes in the programming voltage will scale with changes in dimension and antifuse material(s) choice as known to those of ordinary skill in the art. One of the main purposes for developing metal-to-metal antifuses is so that they may be disposed over an active region of a semiconductor substrate which has transistors formed in it. In this way, the "real estate" taken by the transistors is reused by the antifuses, much the way as a sky scraper is able to reuse the same land with each additional floor thus increasing areal building density. The ability to safely place antifuses over an active region of a semiconductor substrate depends upon the ability of the antifuses to behave in a manner before, during and after programming that does not result in contamination or other damage to the transistors already constructed in the active region.
It is thus desirable to program the antifuses with a minimum energy so that a minimum heating of the aluminum metallization layer is achieved thus minimizing the likelihood that aluminum will migrate into the active transistor region of the semiconductor substrate as well as into the conductive links of the antifuse itself. According to a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, the structure of FIG. 5 is capable of meeting these requirements. Referring to FIG. 5, and beginning at the bottom, the layers are: active transistor region 86, insulating layer 88 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 7500 A presently preferred, preferred material(s): SiO2), barrier metal layer 90 (thickness range of about 100 - 1000 A with about 500 Λ presently preferred, preferred material(s) : Ti adhesion layer of thickness about 100 - 500 A (preferably about 250 A) under a TiN barrier layer of thickness about 100 - 500 A (preferably about 250 A)), first metallization layer or "Metal-1 " 92 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 8000 A presently preferred), interlayer dielectric 94 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 7500 A presently preferred, preferred material(s) : SiO2), second metallization layer or "Metal-2" 96 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A with about 8000 A presently preferred), another barrier metal layer 98 (thickness range of about 1 000 - 4000 A with about 2000 A presently preferred), interlayer dielectric 1 00 (thickness range of about 4000 - 1 5000 A with about 7500 A presently preferred, preferred material(s): SiO2), antifuse aperture 102 (preferably round in shape with a depth in the range of about 3000 - 14000 A with about 6500 Λ presently preferred, and a diameter of about 3000 - 1 5000 A with about 1 0000 A presently preferred), antifuse material layer 104 (thickness range 300 - 1 500 Λ with the following materials/thicknesses choices presently preferred: ( 1 ) SiN/amorphous Si/SiN in a thickness ratio of 75
A:500 A:75 A); (2) SiN/amorphous Si in a thickness ratio of 1 50 A:500 A; (3) amorphous silicon of thickness about 1000 A; or (4) SiN of thickness about 300 Λ; barrier metal layer 1 06 (thickness range of about 1 000 - 4000 Λ) disposed in antifuse aperture 102, and, finally, third metallization layer of "Metal-3" 108 (thickness range of about 5000 - 1 5000 A, with about 8000 A presently preferred) . In a standard CMOS process, as envisioned here, the three metallization layers 92, 96 and 1 08 are all fabricated of an aluminum alloy in a conventional and well-known manner.
FIG. 6 is an enlarged portion of FIG. 5 showing a conductive antifuse link 1 1 0 formed in antifuse material layer 104 shorting barrier metal layer 98 to barrier metal layer 106.
According to the present invention, TiN is highly preferred for the barrier metal layers 98 and 106. TiN is a very poor thermal conductor, unlike Titanium Tungsten (TiW) which is often used as a barrier metal. TiN's thermal conductivity is 0.291 Wcm"1 K"1. Because TiN acts, in essence, as a thermal insulator, it is preferred in this application as follows: When a voltage is applied between MetaI-2 and Metal-3 of sufficient magnitude to blow antifuse material layer 104, great amounts of thermal energy will be released as evidenced by P1 and P2 discussed above. If barrier metal layers 98 and 106 had a high thermal conductivity, they would rapidly conduct away the heat released in blowing the antifuse 1 04 with two results: first, it would simply take more energy to disrupt/intermix enough of barrier metal layers 98 and 1 06 to form the conductive links bridging antifuse material layer 104; and second, this additional energy would be likely to result in melting and/or vaporization of Metal-2 and/or Metal-3, freeing up aluminum so that it can participate in link formation within antifuse material layer 104. This is highly undesirable because, as discussed above, aluminum is subject to electromigration and its presence in any significant quantity (i.e., more than 1 %) within these conductive links may result in an unacceptably high probability of read disturb in programmed antifuses and, thus, the failure of the device.
While one might thus seek to coat all antifuses with copious layers of TiN, a practical limitation on the use of TiN in this application is that it is difficult to put an arbitrarily large thickness of TiN within an aperture in a conventional CMOS- type fabrication process. For circular apertures of diameter approximately 1 .Oμm d OOOOA), or less, as presently preferred, it is convenient to deposit a layer of TiN of approximately 100θλ thickness (at the edge of the aperture which may require that up to about 300θA be deposited (due to step coverage-caused thinning at the edges) within such an aperture. This thickness at the edge may be stretched to approximately 2000A thickness at increased cost and throughput, and significantly thicker films are difficult to achieve with TiN in an aperture using available technology. Accordingly, to take advantage of TiN's desirable properties (good barrier metal and poor thermal conductor), one is practically limited by the available manufacturing processes to a film thickness of 1000A - 2000A at the edge with the thinner film thickness preferred for manufacturability reasons. This desire for thinner films of TiN is in direct conflict with the opposite desire discussed above to deposit as much TiN as possible in the aperture to protect against inadvertent breakthrough of aluminum metal into either the antifuse material layer or, potentially, lower levels of the semiconductor device such as the active transistor region.
Referring now to FIG. 8, a schematic diagram of an antifuse fabricated according to the present invention is shown. In FIG. 8, the antifuse 1 12 has a lower aluminum metallization layer 1 1 4 covered by a lower TiN barrier layer 1 1 6 of minimum thickness BB. Over layer 1 1 6 is disposed antifuse material layer(s) 1 1 8 which may be of any desired construction including multi-layer multi-material construction as known in the art. Through antifuse material layer 1 18 is disposed conductive antifuse filament 124 shown schematically as a jagged line. Over antifuse layer 1 1 8 is upper TiN barrier layer 1 20 of minimum thickness AA and over that is upper metallization layer 122 of aluminum.
According to the present invention, it is now possible to fabricate reliable antifuses with one barrier metal layer thinner than the other, and having a thickness of as little as 1000A by applying the programming signal as follows: (I)
Where the upper barrier layer 120 has a minimum thickness AA in the range of 100θΛ - 2000A and lower barrier layer 1 1 6 has a minimum thickness BB in the range of 200θA or more, VOT programming as in P1 will take advantage of the thicker lower barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament 1 24 from aluminum incursion; (II) Where the upper barrier layer 1 20 has a minimum thickness AA in the range of 2000A or more and lower barrier layer 1 1 6 has a minimum thickness BB in the range of 1000A - 2000A, VOB programming as in P2 will take advantage of the thicker upper barrier layer to protect the antifuse filament 124 from aluminum incursion; (III) Where the upper barrier layer 120 has a minimum thickness AA of more than about 2000A and lower barrier layer 1 1 6 has a minimum thickness BB of more than about 2000A, either VOT or VOB programming can be used as the thick barrier layers will protect the antifuse filament 1 24 from aluminum incursion in any event. This technique assures that the more positive voltage side (as opposed to ground or the less positive voltage side) of the first (or only) pulse is applied to the side of the antifuse having the thinnest layer of TiN barrier metal. In this way, the electron current (opposite the direction of the electric current) flows toward the more positive terminal, thus, the thinner barrier metal at the more positive terminal is not likely to allow the release of aluminum into the antifuse material layer because the electron flow toward the aluminum will cause any flow of aluminum to be away from the antifuse material layer and since less disruption occurs to the low potential material the TiN will retain enough material to prevent aluminum diffusion at some later time during chip operational lifetime.
Referring now to FIG. 7, a histogram much like that of FIG. 3 is shown. In this case, the devices were programmed "VOT" rather than "VOB" as in FIG. 3. The result is a much tighter distribution with no outliers, an average programmed antifuse resistance of 20 ohms, and a standard deviation of 1.25. The antifuse design of FIG. 7 incorporated a lower TiN barrier layer having a thickness of 200θA or more and an upper TiN barrier layer having a thickness in the range of about 100θA - 200θA
Accordingly, a large class of antifuse structures have been shown which can be programmed as described to provide substantially aluminum-free conductive links. Such antifuse structures will not suffer from read disturb due to aluminum contamination and will provide stable reliable metal-to-metal antifuses for use in semiconductor devices.
While illustrative embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than have been mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts set forth herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be limited except in the spirit of the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1 . A programmed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of 1000A - 200θA and said first minimum thickness being greater than said second minimum thickness; an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer; a conductive link electrically connecting said lower barrier metal layer and said upper barrier metal layer, said conductive link comprising substantially no aluminum metal.
2. A programmed antifuse according to claim 1 wherein said conductive link comprises less than 1 % aluminum by weight.
3. A programmed antifuse comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of 100θA - 200θA and said first minimum thickness being greater than said second thickness; an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer; a substantially aluminum-free conductive link electrically connecting said lower barrier metal layer and said upper barrier metal layer.
4. A programmed antifuse according to claim 3 wherein said conductive link comprises less than 1 % aluminum by weight.
5. An antifuse comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse mateπal layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of 100θA - 200θA and said first minimum thickness being greater than said second thickness; an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer; programming means for programming the antifuse, said programming means including a power supply capable of providing at least a first potential, a second potential and a third potential, said first, second and third potentials being different, a potential difference between said first potential and said third potential sufficient to program the antifuse and constituting a first programming potential, a potential difference between said second potential and said third potential being insufficient to program the antifuse and constituting a second programming potential, said programming means adapted to apply at least the following:
(a) said first programming potential across the antifuse for a first period of time with said first potential applied to said upper electrode and said third potential applied to said lower electrode;
(b) said second programming potential across the antifuse for a second period of time following said first period of time with said second potential applied to said lower electrode and said third potential applied to said upper electrode;
(c) said first programming potential across the antifuse for a third period of time following said second period of time with said first potential applied to said upper electrode and said third potential applied to said lower electrode; and
(d) said second programming potential across the antifuse for a fourth period of time following said third period of time with said second potential applied to said lower electrode and said third potential applied to said upper electrode.
6. An antifuse comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of 100θA - 200θA and said first minimum thickness being greater than said second thickness; an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer; programming means for programming the antifuse, said programming means including a power supply capable of providing at least a first potential, a second potential and a third potential, said first, second and third potentials being different, a potential difference between said first potential and said third potential sufficient to program the antifuse and constituting a first programming potential, a potential difference between said second potential and said third potential being insufficient to program the antifuse and constituting a second programming potential, said programming means adapted to apply at least the following: (a) said first programming potential across the antifuse for a first period of time with said first potential applied to said upper electrode and said third potential applied to said lower electrode;
(b) said second programming potential across the antifuse for a second period of time following said first period of time with said second potential applied to said lower electrode and said third potential applied to said upper electrode;
(c) said first programming potential across the antifuse for a third period of time following said second period of time with said first potential applied to said upper electrode and said third potential applied to said lower electrode; and (d) said second programming potential across the antifuse for a fourth period of time following said third period of time with said second potential applied to said lower electrode and said third potential applied to said upper electrode, so as to form an aluminum-free conductive link permanently electrically connecting said first barrier metal layer and said second barrier metal layer.
7. An antifuse according to claim 1 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
8. An antifuse according to claim 2 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
9. An antifuse according to claim 3 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
10. An antifuse according to claim 4 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
1 1 . An antifuse according to claim 5 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
12. An antifuse according to claim 6 disposed in a semiconductor device over an active transistor region.
13. An unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness of at least 200θA; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of
100θA - 200θA; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer.
14. A method for programming an unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit, said unprogrammed antifuse including: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness of at least 200θA; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness, said second minimum thickness being in the range of about 100θA to about 200θA; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer, said method comprising: programming the antifuse with a VOT programming method.
1 5. An unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness in the range of about 100θA to about 200θA; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness of at least 200θA; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer.
16. A method for programming an unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit, said unprogrammed antifuse including: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness in the range of about 100θA to about 200θA; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness of at least 2000A; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer, said method comprising: programming the antifuse with a VOB programming method.
1 7. An unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit comprising: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness of at least about 200θA; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness of at least about 200θA; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer.
1 8. A method for programming an unprogrammed antifuse disposed in an integrated circuit, said unprogrammed antifuse including: a lower electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum; a lower barrier metal layer disposed over and in electrical contact with said lower electrode, said lower barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a first minimum thickness of at least about 2000A; an antifuse material layer disposed over and in contact with said lower barrier metal layer; an upper barrier metal layer disposed over and in contact with said antifuse material layer, said upper barrier metal layer formed of TiN and having a second minimum thickness of at least about 200θA; and an upper electrode formed of a film of material including aluminum, said film disposed over and in electrical contact with said upper barrier metal layer, said method comprising: programming the antifuse with either a VOT or a VOB programming method.
1 9. A programmed antifuse according to claim 5 wherein said conductive link comprises less than 1 % aluminum by weight.
20. A programmed antifuse according to claim 6 wherein said conductive link comprises less than 1 % aluminum by weight.
21 . A programmed antifuse according to claim 1 1 wherein said conductive link comprises less than 1 % aluminum by weight.
PCT/US1996/015872 1995-10-04 1996-10-03 Improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse and methods of programming WO1997015068A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/538,962 US5741720A (en) 1995-10-04 1995-10-04 Method of programming an improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse
US08/538,962 1995-10-04

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997015068A2 true WO1997015068A2 (en) 1997-04-24
WO1997015068A3 WO1997015068A3 (en) 1997-06-19
WO1997015068A9 WO1997015068A9 (en) 1997-09-18

Family

ID=24149173

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1996/015872 WO1997015068A2 (en) 1995-10-04 1996-10-03 Improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse and methods of programming

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US5741720A (en)
WO (1) WO1997015068A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101887883A (en) * 2010-06-04 2010-11-17 无锡中微晶园电子有限公司 MTM antifuse element structure and preparation method thereof

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6458645B2 (en) * 1998-02-26 2002-10-01 Micron Technology, Inc. Capacitor having tantalum oxynitride film and method for making same
US6455913B2 (en) * 2000-01-31 2002-09-24 United Microelectronics Corp. Copper fuse for integrated circuit
US6630724B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2003-10-07 Micron Technology, Inc. Gate dielectric antifuse circuits and methods for operating same
US6383924B1 (en) 2000-12-13 2002-05-07 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of forming buried conductor patterns by surface transformation of empty spaces in solid state materials
US6603142B1 (en) 2000-12-18 2003-08-05 Actel Corporation Antifuse incorporating tantalum nitride barrier layer
US7142577B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2006-11-28 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of forming mirrors by surface transformation of empty spaces in solid state materials and structures thereon
US6717215B2 (en) 2001-06-21 2004-04-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Memory structures
US6559516B1 (en) * 2002-01-16 2003-05-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company Antifuse structure and method of making
US20040176483A1 (en) 2003-03-05 2004-09-09 Micron Technology, Inc. Cellular materials formed using surface transformation
US7132348B2 (en) 2002-03-25 2006-11-07 Micron Technology, Inc. Low k interconnect dielectric using surface transformation
US6943065B2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2005-09-13 Micron Technology Inc. Scalable high performance antifuse structure and process
US6737686B2 (en) * 2002-06-13 2004-05-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Non-volatile programmable memory device
US6936909B2 (en) * 2002-08-29 2005-08-30 Micron Technology, Inc. Gate dielectric antifuse circuit to protect a high-voltage transistor
US6751150B2 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-06-15 Micron Technology, Inc. Circuits and method to protect a gate dielectric antifuse
WO2004061851A2 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-07-22 Matrix Semiconductor, Inc An improved method for making high-density nonvolatile memory
US7307268B2 (en) * 2005-01-19 2007-12-11 Sandisk Corporation Structure and method for biasing phase change memory array for reliable writing
US20060184880A1 (en) * 2005-02-17 2006-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Discoverability of tasks using active content wizards and help files - the what can I do now? feature
ATE543186T1 (en) * 2005-05-24 2012-02-15 Nxp Bv ANTI-FUZZLE MEMORY UNIT
US20070069241A1 (en) 2005-07-01 2007-03-29 Matrix Semiconductor, Inc. Memory with high dielectric constant antifuses and method for using at low voltage
US20070205485A1 (en) * 2006-03-02 2007-09-06 International Business Machines Corporation Programmable anti-fuse structures, methods for fabricating programmable anti-fuse structures, and methods of programming anti-fuse structures
US20080157268A1 (en) * 2006-12-30 2008-07-03 Kim Deok-Kee Fuse Element Using Low-K Dielectric
TWI387086B (en) * 2009-06-18 2013-02-21 Ind Tech Res Inst Wafer and method for improving yield rate of wafer
EP2453475A4 (en) * 2009-07-09 2016-05-11 Murata Manufacturing Co Anti-fuse element
JP5467536B2 (en) * 2009-07-22 2014-04-09 株式会社村田製作所 Antifuse element
KR20130044655A (en) * 2011-10-24 2013-05-03 에스케이하이닉스 주식회사 Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing the same
US10128184B2 (en) 2015-07-01 2018-11-13 Zhuhai Chuangfeixin Technology Co., Ltd. Antifuse structure in via hole in interplayer dielectric
US9754903B2 (en) * 2015-10-29 2017-09-05 Globalfoundries Inc. Semiconductor structure with anti-efuse device

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993004499A1 (en) * 1991-08-19 1993-03-04 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. An improved antifuse and method of manufacture thereof
US5403778A (en) * 1994-01-06 1995-04-04 Texas Instruments Incorporated Limited metal reaction for contact cleaning and improved metal-to-metal antifuse contact cleaning method
EP0660408A1 (en) * 1993-12-16 1995-06-28 United Technologies Corporation A method of manufacturing antifuse devices
EP0661745A1 (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-07-05 Actel Corporation Metal-to-metal antifuse including etch stop layer
US5485031A (en) * 1993-11-22 1996-01-16 Actel Corporation Antifuse structure suitable for VLSI application

Family Cites Families (123)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3634929A (en) * 1968-11-02 1972-01-18 Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co Method of manufacturing semiconductor integrated circuits
US3699403A (en) * 1970-10-23 1972-10-17 Rca Corp Fusible semiconductor device including means for reducing the required fusing current
US3877049A (en) * 1973-11-28 1975-04-08 William D Buckley Electrodes for amorphous semiconductor switch devices and method of making the same
JPS5267532A (en) * 1975-12-03 1977-06-04 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Semiconductor memory unit
US4099069A (en) * 1976-10-08 1978-07-04 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Circuit producing a common clear signal for erasing selected arrays in a mnos memory system
JPS53136980A (en) * 1977-05-04 1978-11-29 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Resistance value correction method for poly crystal silicon resistor
US4361599A (en) * 1981-03-23 1982-11-30 National Semiconductor Corporation Method of forming plasma etched semiconductor contacts
US4814853A (en) * 1981-10-28 1989-03-21 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Semiconductor device with programmable fuse
US4562639A (en) * 1982-03-23 1986-01-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Process for making avalanche fuse element with isolated emitter
US4491857A (en) * 1982-03-23 1985-01-01 Texas Instruments Incorporated Avalanche fuse element with isolated emitter
US4545111A (en) * 1983-01-18 1985-10-08 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. Method for making, parallel preprogramming or field programming of electronic matrix arrays
US4649413A (en) * 1983-08-29 1987-03-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated MOS integrated circuit having a metal programmable matrix
US4847732A (en) * 1983-09-15 1989-07-11 Mosaic Systems, Inc. Wafer and method of making same
US4796075A (en) * 1983-12-21 1989-01-03 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Fusible link structure for integrated circuits
US4651409A (en) * 1984-02-09 1987-03-24 Ncr Corporation Method of fabricating a high density, low power, merged vertical fuse/bipolar transistor
US4870302A (en) * 1984-03-12 1989-09-26 Xilinx, Inc. Configurable electrical circuit having configurable logic elements and configurable interconnects
KR880700464A (en) * 1985-07-29 1988-03-15 마이클 와이.엡스타인 Three Level Interconnection Techniques for Integrated Circuits
US4748490A (en) * 1985-08-01 1988-05-31 Texas Instruments Incorporated Deep polysilicon emitter antifuse memory cell
AU6596286A (en) * 1985-10-29 1987-05-19 4C Electronics, Inc. Progammable integrated crosspoint switch
US5134457A (en) * 1986-05-09 1992-07-28 Actel Corporation Programmable low-impedance anti-fuse element
US4899205A (en) * 1986-05-09 1990-02-06 Actel Corporation Electrically-programmable low-impedance anti-fuse element
US4943538A (en) * 1986-05-09 1990-07-24 Actel Corporation Programmable low impedance anti-fuse element
US5266829A (en) * 1986-05-09 1993-11-30 Actel Corporation Electrically-programmable low-impedance anti-fuse element
US4874711A (en) * 1987-05-26 1989-10-17 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Method for altering characteristics of active semiconductor devices
US4822753A (en) * 1988-05-09 1989-04-18 Motorola, Inc. Method for making a w/tin contact
US4933576A (en) * 1988-05-13 1990-06-12 Fujitsu Limited Gate array device having macro cells for forming master and slave cells of master-slave flip-flop circuit
GB2222024B (en) * 1988-08-18 1992-02-19 Stc Plc Improvements in integrated circuits
US5093711A (en) * 1988-10-14 1992-03-03 Seiko Epson Corporation Semiconductor device
US5008855A (en) * 1989-07-18 1991-04-16 Actel Corporation Method of programming anti-fuse element
US4914055A (en) * 1989-08-24 1990-04-03 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Semiconductor antifuse structure and method
US5989943A (en) * 1989-09-07 1999-11-23 Quicklogic Corporation Method for fabrication of programmable interconnect structure
US5200920A (en) * 1990-02-08 1993-04-06 Altera Corporation Method for programming programmable elements in programmable devices
US5070384A (en) * 1990-04-12 1991-12-03 Actel Corporation Electrically programmable antifuse element incorporating a dielectric and amorphous silicon interlayer
US5614756A (en) 1990-04-12 1997-03-25 Actel Corporation Metal-to-metal antifuse with conductive
US5404029A (en) * 1990-04-12 1995-04-04 Actel Corporation Electrically programmable antifuse element
US5272101A (en) * 1990-04-12 1993-12-21 Actel Corporation Electrically programmable antifuse and fabrication processes
US5541441A (en) * 1994-10-06 1996-07-30 Actel Corporation Metal to metal antifuse
KR910019241A (en) * 1990-04-30 1991-11-30 리챠드 데이빗 라우만 Integrated circuit with antifuse
US5126282A (en) * 1990-05-16 1992-06-30 Actel Corporation Methods of reducing anti-fuse resistance during programming
US5194759A (en) * 1990-05-18 1993-03-16 Actel Corporation Methods for preventing disturbance of antifuses during programming
JPH0834292B2 (en) * 1990-06-22 1996-03-29 シャープ株式会社 Writing method of semiconductor memory device
DE69127143T2 (en) * 1990-06-25 1997-12-18 Matsushita Electronics Corp Cold cathode element
US5095362A (en) * 1990-10-23 1992-03-10 Instant Circuit Corporation Method for reducing resistance for programmed antifuse
US5367207A (en) 1990-12-04 1994-11-22 Xilinx, Inc. Structure and method for programming antifuses in an integrated circuit array
US5130777A (en) 1991-01-04 1992-07-14 Actel Corporation Apparatus for improving antifuse programming yield and reducing antifuse programming time
JPH06505368A (en) * 1991-01-17 1994-06-16 クロスポイント・ソルーションズ・インコーポレイテッド Improved antifuse circuit structure and method for its fabrication for use in field programmable gate arrays
US5166556A (en) * 1991-01-22 1992-11-24 Myson Technology, Inc. Programmable antifuse structure, process, logic cell and architecture for programmable integrated circuits
DE69231858T2 (en) * 1991-02-19 2002-03-28 Texas Instruments Inc Anti-fuse structure with sidewall and manufacturing process
US5100827A (en) * 1991-02-27 1992-03-31 At&T Bell Laboratories Buried antifuse
US5322812A (en) * 1991-03-20 1994-06-21 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. Improved method of fabricating antifuses in an integrated circuit device and resulting structure
US5196724A (en) * 1991-04-26 1993-03-23 Quicklogic Corporation Programmable interconnect structures and programmable integrated circuits
US5557136A (en) * 1991-04-26 1996-09-17 Quicklogic Corporation Programmable interconnect structures and programmable integrated circuits
US5233217A (en) * 1991-05-03 1993-08-03 Crosspoint Solutions Plug contact with antifuse
US5120679A (en) * 1991-06-04 1992-06-09 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Anti-fuse structures and methods for making same
US5290734A (en) * 1991-06-04 1994-03-01 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Method for making anti-fuse structures
US5242851A (en) * 1991-07-16 1993-09-07 Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Programmable interconnect device and method of manufacturing same
US5258643A (en) * 1991-07-25 1993-11-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Electrically programmable link structures and methods of making same
US5544070A (en) * 1991-07-31 1996-08-06 Quicklogic Corporation Programmed programmable device and method for programming antifuses of a programmable device
US5327024A (en) * 1992-07-02 1994-07-05 Quicklogic Corporation Field programmable antifuse device and programming method therefor
US5243226A (en) * 1991-07-31 1993-09-07 Quicklogic Corporation Programming of antifuses
US5302546A (en) * 1991-07-31 1994-04-12 Quicklogic Corporation Programming of antifuses
US5241496A (en) * 1991-08-19 1993-08-31 Micron Technology, Inc. Array of read-only memory cells, eacch of which has a one-time, voltage-programmable antifuse element constructed within a trench shared by a pair of cells
WO1993005514A1 (en) * 1991-09-04 1993-03-18 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Anti-fuse structures and methods for making same
US5126290A (en) * 1991-09-11 1992-06-30 Micron Technology, Inc. Method of making memory devices utilizing one-sided ozone teos spacers
US5272666A (en) * 1991-10-18 1993-12-21 Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Programmable semiconductor antifuse structure and method of fabricating
EP0539197A1 (en) * 1991-10-23 1993-04-28 Fujitsu Limited Semiconductor device with anti-fuse and production method
US5233206A (en) * 1991-11-13 1993-08-03 Micron Technology, Inc. Double digitlines for multiple programming of prom applications and other anti-fuse circuit element applications
US5257222A (en) * 1992-01-14 1993-10-26 Micron Technology, Inc. Antifuse programming by transistor snap-back
US5257225A (en) * 1992-03-12 1993-10-26 Micron Technology, Inc. Method for programming programmable devices by utilizing single or multiple pulses varying in pulse width and amplitude
US5298784A (en) * 1992-03-27 1994-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Electrically programmable antifuse using metal penetration of a junction
US5329153A (en) * 1992-04-10 1994-07-12 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. Antifuse with nonstoichiometric tin layer and method of manufacture thereof
US5237219A (en) * 1992-05-08 1993-08-17 Altera Corporation Methods and apparatus for programming cellular programmable logic integrated circuits
US5272388A (en) * 1992-06-09 1993-12-21 Actel Corporation High-yield methods for programming antifuses
JPH065068A (en) * 1992-06-24 1994-01-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Dynamic ram
US5294846A (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-03-15 Paivinen John O Method and apparatus for programming anti-fuse devices
US5293133A (en) * 1992-08-27 1994-03-08 Quicklogic Corporation Method of determining an electrical characteristic of an antifuse and apparatus therefor
US5316971A (en) * 1992-09-18 1994-05-31 Actel Corporation Methods for programming antifuses having at least one metal electrode
US5284788A (en) * 1992-09-25 1994-02-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method and device for controlling current in a circuit
US5248632A (en) * 1992-09-29 1993-09-28 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method of forming an antifuse
US5341043A (en) * 1992-09-30 1994-08-23 Actel Corporation Series linear antifuse array
US5308795A (en) * 1992-11-04 1994-05-03 Actel Corporation Above via metal-to-metal antifuse
FR2698222B1 (en) * 1992-11-18 1994-12-16 Gemplus Card Int Method and circuit for blowing a fuse in an integrated circuit.
US5395797A (en) * 1992-12-01 1995-03-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Antifuse structure and method of fabrication
TW232091B (en) * 1992-12-17 1994-10-11 American Telephone & Telegraph
US5373169A (en) * 1992-12-17 1994-12-13 Actel Corporation Low-temperature process metal-to-metal antifuse employing silicon link
US5314840A (en) * 1992-12-18 1994-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method for forming an antifuse element with electrical or optical programming
US5387311A (en) * 1993-02-16 1995-02-07 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Method for manufacturing anti-fuse structures
US5270251A (en) * 1993-02-25 1993-12-14 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Incoherent radiation regulated voltage programmable link
US5550404A (en) 1993-05-20 1996-08-27 Actel Corporation Electrically programmable antifuse having stair aperture
US5371414A (en) 1993-05-26 1994-12-06 Actel Corporation Simultaneous multiple antifuse programming method
US5300456A (en) * 1993-06-17 1994-04-05 Texas Instruments Incorporated Metal-to-metal antifuse structure
JP3256603B2 (en) * 1993-07-05 2002-02-12 株式会社東芝 Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof
US5581111A (en) 1993-07-07 1996-12-03 Actel Corporation Dielectric-polysilicon-dielectric antifuse for field programmable logic applications
US5449947A (en) * 1993-07-07 1995-09-12 Actel Corporation Read-disturb tolerant metal-to-metal antifuse and fabrication method
US5390141A (en) * 1993-07-07 1995-02-14 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Voltage programmable links programmed with low current transistors
US5414364A (en) * 1993-09-08 1995-05-09 Actel Corporation Apparatus and method for measuring programmed antifuse resistance
US5391518A (en) * 1993-09-24 1995-02-21 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Method of making a field programmable read only memory (ROM) cell using an amorphous silicon fuse with buried contact polysilicon and metal electrodes
US5391513A (en) * 1993-12-22 1995-02-21 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Wet/dry anti-fuse via etch
US5682058A (en) 1994-03-31 1997-10-28 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. Multilayer antifuse with low leakage and method of manufacture therefor
US5424655A (en) * 1994-05-20 1995-06-13 Quicklogic Corporation Programmable application specific integrated circuit employing antifuses and methods therefor
US5635854A (en) 1994-05-24 1997-06-03 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Programmable logic integrated circuit including verify circuitry for classifying fuse link states as validly closed, validly open or invalid
US5502395A (en) * 1994-05-25 1996-03-26 Allen; William J. Method for programming antifuses for reliable programmed links
US5444290A (en) * 1994-05-26 1995-08-22 Symetrix Corporation Method and apparatus for programming antifuse elements using combined AC and DC electric fields
US5469379A (en) * 1994-06-30 1995-11-21 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Multi-level vROM programming method and circuit
US5572458A (en) 1994-06-30 1996-11-05 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Multi-level vROM programming method and circuit
US5485105A (en) * 1994-08-01 1996-01-16 Texas Instruments Inc. Apparatus and method for programming field programmable arrays
US5641985A (en) 1994-09-29 1997-06-24 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Antifuse element and semiconductor device having antifuse elements
US5679974A (en) 1994-09-29 1997-10-21 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Antifuse element and semiconductor device having antifuse elements
US5552743A (en) * 1994-09-27 1996-09-03 Micron Technology, Inc. Thin film transistor redundancy structure
US5495181A (en) 1994-12-01 1996-02-27 Quicklogic Corporation Integrated circuit facilitating simultaneous programming of multiple antifuses
US5495436A (en) * 1995-01-13 1996-02-27 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Anti-fuse ROM programming circuit
US5663591A (en) 1995-02-14 1997-09-02 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. Antifuse with double via, spacer-defined contact
US5684732A (en) 1995-03-24 1997-11-04 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Semiconductor devices
US5514980A (en) * 1995-05-31 1996-05-07 Integrated Device Technology, Inc. High resolution circuit and method for sensing antifuses
US5635855A (en) 1995-07-21 1997-06-03 Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Method for simultaneous programming of in-system programmable integrated circuits
US5689455A (en) 1995-08-31 1997-11-18 Micron Technology, Inc. Circuit for programming antifuse bits
US5661412A (en) 1995-10-10 1997-08-26 Quicklogic Corporation Reducing programming time of a field programmable gate array employing antifuses
US5658819A (en) 1995-11-01 1997-08-19 United Technologies Corporation Antifuse structure and process for manufacturing the same
US5631862A (en) 1996-03-05 1997-05-20 Micron Technology, Inc. Self current limiting antifuse circuit
US5726484A (en) 1996-03-06 1998-03-10 Xilinx, Inc. Multilayer amorphous silicon antifuse
US5602053A (en) 1996-04-08 1997-02-11 Chartered Semidconductor Manufacturing Pte, Ltd. Method of making a dual damascene antifuse structure
US5668751A (en) 1996-08-01 1997-09-16 Micron Technology, Inc. Antifuse programming method and apparatus
US5687116A (en) 1996-10-09 1997-11-11 Programmable Microelectronics Corp. Programming pulse ramp control circuit

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993004499A1 (en) * 1991-08-19 1993-03-04 Crosspoint Solutions, Inc. An improved antifuse and method of manufacture thereof
US5485031A (en) * 1993-11-22 1996-01-16 Actel Corporation Antifuse structure suitable for VLSI application
EP0660408A1 (en) * 1993-12-16 1995-06-28 United Technologies Corporation A method of manufacturing antifuse devices
EP0661745A1 (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-07-05 Actel Corporation Metal-to-metal antifuse including etch stop layer
US5403778A (en) * 1994-01-06 1995-04-04 Texas Instruments Incorporated Limited metal reaction for contact cleaning and improved metal-to-metal antifuse contact cleaning method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101887883A (en) * 2010-06-04 2010-11-17 无锡中微晶园电子有限公司 MTM antifuse element structure and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5962910A (en) 1999-10-05
US5741720A (en) 1998-04-21
WO1997015068A3 (en) 1997-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5962910A (en) Metal-to-metal via-type antifuse
WO1997015068A9 (en) Improved metal-to-metal via-type antifuse and methods of programming
US5485032A (en) Antifuse element with electrical or optical programming
US5989943A (en) Method for fabrication of programmable interconnect structure
JP2571785B2 (en) Programmable low impedance anti-fuse element
US6111302A (en) Antifuse structure suitable for VLSI application
US5717230A (en) Field programmable gate array having reproducible metal-to-metal amorphous silicon antifuses
US5550404A (en) Electrically programmable antifuse having stair aperture
US5449947A (en) Read-disturb tolerant metal-to-metal antifuse and fabrication method
US5552627A (en) Electrically programmable antifuse incorporating dielectric and amorphous silicon interlayers
US5304508A (en) Method of making electrically programmable link structures
JP3121589B2 (en) Interconnect structure and method of forming the same
US5581111A (en) Dielectric-polysilicon-dielectric antifuse for field programmable logic applications
JP3256603B2 (en) Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof
JP3095811B2 (en) Electrically programmable non-fusible element, semiconductor device including the element, and method of forming the element
JPH023278A (en) Electrically programmable low impedance non-fusible device
JPH0629396A (en) Electrically programmable antifuse
US5572062A (en) Antifuse with silicon spacers
US5659182A (en) Three-terminal fuse
US5510646A (en) Metal-to-metal antifuse with improved diffusion barrier layer
US6362100B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for forming a copper interconnect
EP0146688A1 (en) An integrated circuit with a fusible link structure
US5523612A (en) Method of manufacturing an antifuse with doped barrier metal layer and resulting antifuse
JPS6249651A (en) Antifuse, making thereof, electrically programmable memory cell and programming thereof
Tamura et al. ON-state programming and OFF-state reliability of metal-to-metal antifuse based 10 nm-thick SiNx film for 3.3 V operation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CA JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CA JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1-14,DESCRIPTION,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1-12;PAGES 15-23,CLAIMS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 13-20;PAGES 1/9-9/9,DRAWINGS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/5-5/5;DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA