WO2002008950A2 - Automatic summarization of a document - Google Patents
Automatic summarization of a document Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2002008950A2 WO2002008950A2 PCT/US2001/023384 US0123384W WO0208950A2 WO 2002008950 A2 WO2002008950 A2 WO 2002008950A2 US 0123384 W US0123384 W US 0123384W WO 0208950 A2 WO0208950 A2 WO 0208950A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- document
- target document
- training
- documents
- target
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
- G06F16/34—Browsing; Visualisation therefor
- G06F16/345—Summarisation for human users
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
- G06F16/35—Clustering; Classification
- G06F16/353—Clustering; Classification into predefined classes
Definitions
- This invention relates to information retrieval systems, and in particular, to methods and systems for automatically summarizing the content of a target document.
- a typical document includes features that suggest the semantic content of that document.
- Features of a document include linguistic features (e.g. discourse units, sentences, phrases, individual words, combinations of words or compounds, distributions of words, and syntactic and semantic relationships between words) and non-linguistic features (e.g. pictures, sections, paragraphs, link structure, position in document, etc.).
- linguistic features e.g. discourse units, sentences, phrases, individual words, combinations of words or compounds, distributions of words, and syntactic and semantic relationships between words
- non-linguistic features e.g. pictures, sections, paragraphs, link structure, position in document, etc.
- many documents include a title that provides an indication of the general subject matter of the document.
- Certain of these features are particularly useful for identifying the general subject matter of the document. These features are referred to as “essential features.” Other features of a document are less useful for identifying the subject matter of the document. These features are referred to as “unessential features.”
- document summarization amounts to the filtering of a target document to emphasize its significant features and de-emphasize its unessential features.
- the summarization process thus includes a filtering step in which individual features comprising the document to be summarized are weighted by an amount indicative of how important those features are in suggesting the subject matter of the document.
- a major difficulty in the filtering of a target document lies in the determination of what features of the target document are important and what features can be safely discarded.
- the invention is based on the recognition that this determination can be achieved, in part, by examination of contextual data that is external to the target document.
- This contextual data is not necessarily derivable from the target document itself and is thus not dependent on the semantic content of the target document.
- An automatic document summarizer incorporating the invention uses this contextual data to tailor the summarization of the target document on the basis of the structure associated with typical documents having the same or similar contextual data.
- the document summarizer uses contextual data to determine what features of the target document are likely to be of importance in a summary and what features can be safely ignored.
- a target document is known to have been classified by one or more search engines as news
- a news-story is often written so that the key points of the story are within the first few paragraphs
- it is preferable, when summarizing a news-story to assign greater weight to semantic content located at the beginning of the news- story.
- a document summarizer would have no external basis for weighting one portion of the target document more than any other portion.
- an automatic document summarizer incorporating the invention knows, even before actually inspecting the semantic content of the target document, something of the general nature of that document. Using this contextual data, the automatic document summarizer can adaptively assign weights to different features of the target document depending on the nature of the target document.
- a target document having a plurality of features is summarized by collecting contextual data external to the document. On the basis of this contextual data, the features of the target document are then weighted to indicate the relative importance of that feature. This results in a weighted target document that is then summarized.
- Contextual data can be obtained from a variety of sources.
- contextual data can include meta-data associated with the target document, user data associated with a user for which a summary of the target document is intended, or data from a network containing the target document.
- a set of training documents each of the training documents having a corresponding training document summary is maintained. This set of training documents, is used to identify, from the training documents, a document cluster that includes documents similar to the target document.
- a set of weights used to generate the training document summaries from the training documents in the document cluster.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an automatic-summarization system
- FIG. 2 shows the architecture of the context analyzer of FIG. 1
- FIG. 3 shows document clusters in a feature space
- FIG. 4 a hierarchical document tree.
- An automatic summarization system 10 incorporating the invention, as shown in FIG. 1, includes a context analyzer 12 in communication with a summary generator 14.
- the context analyzer 12 has access to: an external-data source 18 related to the target document 16, and to a collection of training data 19.
- the external-data source 18 provides external data regarding the target document 16.
- data is external to the target document when it cannot be derived from the semantic content of that document.
- Examples of such external data include data available on a computer network 20, data derived from knowledge about the user, and data that is attached to the target document but is nevertheless not part of the semantic content of the target document.
- the training data 19 consists of a large number of training documents 19a together with a corresponding summary 19b for each training document.
- the summaries 19b of the training documents 19a are considered to be of the type that the automatic summarization system 10 seeks to emulate.
- the high quality of these training-document summaries 19b can be assured by having these summaries 19b be written by professional editors. Alternatively, the training document summaries 19b can be machine-generated but edited by professional editors.
- the external data enables the context analyzer 12 to identify training documents that are similar to the target document 16.
- the training data 19 is used to provide information identifying those features of the target document 16 that are likely to be of importance in the generation of a summary.
- This information in the form of weights to be assigned to particular features of the target document 16, is provided to the summary generator 14 for use in conjunction with the analysis of the target documents text for the generation of a summary of the target document 16.
- the resulting summary, as generated by the summary generator 14, is then refined by a summary selector 17 in a manner described below.
- the output of the summary selector 17 is then sent to a display engine 21.
- the external-data source 18 can include the network itself. Examples of such external data available from the computer system 20 include:
- External data such as the foregoing is readily available from a server hosting the target document 16, from server logs, conventional profiling tools, and from documents other than the target document 16.
- the external-data source 18 can include a user-data source 22 that provides user data pertaining to the particular user requesting a summary of the target document 16.
- This user data is not derivable from the semantic content of the target document 16 and therefore constitutes data external to the target document 16. Examples of such user data include user profiles and historical data concerning the types of documents accessed by the particular user.
- a target document 1 can be viewed as including metadata 16a and semantic content 16b.
- Semantic content is the portion of the target document that one typically reads.
- Metadata is data that is part of the document but is outside the scope of its semantic content. For example, many word processors store information in a document such as the documents author, when the document was last modified, and when it was last printed. This data is generally not derivable from the semantic content of the document, but it nevertheless is part of the document in the sense that copying the document also copies this information.
- Such information which we refer to as metadata, provides yet another source of document external information within the external-data source 18.
- the context analyzer 12 includes a context aggregator 24 having access to the network 20 on which the target document 16 resides.
- the context aggregator 24 collects external data concerning the target document 16 by accessing information from the network 20 on which the target document 16 resides and inspecting any web server logs for activity concerning the target document 16. This external data provides contextual information concerning the target document 16 that is useful for generating a summary for the target document 16.
- the context aggregator 24 obtains corresponding data for documents that are. similar to the target document 16. Because these documents are only similar and not identical to the target document 16, the context aggregator 24 assigns to external data obtained from a similar document a weight indicative of the similarity between the target document 16 and the similar document.
- the similarity between two documents can be measured by graphing similarity distances on a lexical semantic network (such as Wordnet), by observing the structure of hyperlinks originating from and terminating in the documents, and by using statistical word distribution metrics such as term frequency and inverse document frequency (TF.IDF) to provide information indicative of the similarity between two documents.
- a lexical semantic network such as Wordnet
- TF.IDF inverse document frequency
- the context aggregator 24 defines a multidimensional feature space and places the target document 16 in that feature space. Each axis of this feature space represents an external feature associated with that target document 16. On the basis of its feature space coordinates, the domain and genre of the target document 16 can be determined. This function of determining the domain and genre of the target document 16 is carried out by the context miner 26 using information provided by the context aggregator 24.
- the context miner 26 probabilistically identifies the taxonomy of the target document 16 by matching the feature-space coordinates of the target document 16 with corresponding feature-space coordinates of training documents 27 from the training data 19. This can be accomplished with, for example, a hypersphere classifier or support vector machine autocategorizer. On the basis of the foregoing inputs, the context miner 26 identifies a genre and domain for the target document 16. Depending on the genre and domain assigned to the target document 16, the process of generating a document summary is altered to emphasize different features of the document.
- Examples of genres that the context miner 26 might assign to a target document 16 include:
- Typical domains associated with, for example, the news-story genre include
- genres and domains are exemplary only and are not intended to represent an exhaustive list of all possible genres and domains.
- taxonomy of a document is not limited to genres and domains but can include additional subcategories or supercategories.
- the process of assigning a genre and domain to a target document 16 is achieved by comparing selected feature-space coordinates of the target document 16 to corresponding feature-space coordinates of training documents 27 having known genres and domains.
- the process includes determining the distance, in feature space, between the target document and each of the training documents. This distance provides a measure of the similarity between the target document and each of the training documents. Based on this distance, one can infer how likely it is that the training document and the target document share the same genre and domain.
- the result of the foregoing process is therefore a probability, for each domain/genre combination, that the target document has that domain and genre.
- the context miner 26 probabilistically classifies the target document 16 into one or more domains and genres 29. This can be achieved by using the feature space distance between the target document 16 and a training document to generate a confidence measure indicative of the likelihood that the target document 16 and that training document share a common domain and genre.
- the context miner 26 identifies the presence and density of objects embedded in the target document 16. Such objects include, but are not limited to: frames, tables, Java applets, forms, images, and pop-up windows.
- the context miner 26 then obtains an externally supplied profile of documents having similar densities of objects and uses that profile to assist in classifying the target document 16. Effectively, each of the foregoing embedded objects corresponds to an axis in the multi-dimensional feature space.
- the density of the embedded object in the target document 16 maps to a coordinate along that axis.
- the density of certain types of embedded objects in the target document 16 is often useful in probabilistically classifying that document. For example, using the density of pictures, the context miner 26 may distinguish a product information page, with its high picture density, from a product review, with its comparatively lower picture density. This will likely affect which parts of the target document 16 are weighted as significant for summarization.
- the context miner 26 In probabilistically classifying the target document 16, the context miner 26 also uses document external data such as: the file directory structure in which the target document 1 is kept, link titles from documents linking to the target document 16, the title of the target document 16, and any contextual information derived from the classification of that target document 16 in databases maintained by such websites as Yahoo, ODP, and Firstgov.gov. In this way, the context miner 26 of the invention leverages the efforts already expended by others in the classification of the target document 16.
- document external data such as: the file directory structure in which the target document 1 is kept, link titles from documents linking to the target document 16, the title of the target document 16, and any contextual information derived from the classification of that target document 16 in databases maintained by such websites as Yahoo, ODP, and Firstgov.gov.
- the context miner 26 passes this information to a context mapper 30 for determination of the weights to be assigned to particular portions of the target document 16.
- the feature vectors of the documents or clusters of documents matching the target document 16 are mapped to weights assigned to the features of the target document 16.
- the weights for documents in a given cluster can be inferred by examination of training documents within that cluster together with corresponding summaries generated from each of the training documents in that cluster.
- a cluster is a set of training documents that have been determined, by a clustering algorithm such as ⁇ -nearest neighbors, to be similar with respect to some feature space representation.
- the clustering of the training data prior to classification of a target document is desirable because it eliminates the need to compare the distance (in feature space) between the feature space representation of the target document and the feature space representation of every single document in the training set. Instead, the distance between the target document and each of the clusters can be used to classify the target document. Since there are far fewer clusters than there are training documents, clustering of training documents significantly accelerates the classification process.
- the context miner 26 determines that the target document 16 is likely to be associated with a particular cluster of training documents. For each training document cluster, the context mapper 30 can then correlate, using algorithms disclosed above (e.g. support vector machines), the distribution of features (such as words and phrases) in the summary of that training set with the distribution of those same features in the training document itself.
- algorithms disclosed above e.g. support vector machines
- the context mapper 30 assigns weights to selected features of the training document. For example, if a particular feature in the training set is absent from the summary, that feature is accorded a lower weight in the training set. If that feature is also present in the target document 16, then it is likewise assigned a lower weight in the target document 16. Conversely, if a particular feature figures prominently in the summary, that feature, if present in the target document 16, should be accorded a higher weight. In this way, the context mapper 30 effectively reverse engineers the generation of the summary from the training document.
- the context mapper 30 provides the weights to the summary generator 14 for incorporation into the target document 16 prior to generation of the summary.
- the summary generator 14 lemmatizes the target document 16 by using known techniques of morphological analysis and name recognition. Following lemmatization, the summarizer 14 parses the target document 16 into a hierarchical document tree 31, as shown in FIG. 4. Each node in the document tree 31 corresponds to a document feature that can be assigned a weight. Beginning at the root node, the illustrated document tree 31 includes a section layer 32, a paragraph layer 34, a phrase layer 36, and a word layer 38. Each node is tagged to indicate its linguistic features, such as morphological, syntactic, semantic, and discourse features as it appears in the target document 16.
- the total weights generated are a function of both the contextual information generated by the context mapper 30 and by document internal semantic content information as determined by analysis performed by the summary generator 14. This permits different occurrences of a feature to be assigned different weights depending on where those occurrences appear in the target document 16.
- the summary generator 14 next annotates each node of the document tree 31 with a tag containing information indicative of the weight to be assigned to that node.
- a tag containing information indicative of the weight to be assigned to that node.
- the process of annotating the target document 16 can be efficiently carried out by tagging selected features of the target document 16. Each such tag includes information indicative of the weight to be assigned to the tagged feature.
- the annotation process can be carried out by sentential parsers, discourse parsers, rhetorical structure theory parsers, morphological analyzers, part-of-speech taggers, statistical language models, and other standard automated linguistic analysis tools.
- the annotated target document and a user-supplied percentage of the target document or some other limit on length are provided to the summary selector 17. From the user-supplied percentage or length limit, the summary selector 17 determines a weight threshold. The summary selector 17 then proceeds through the document tree layer by layer, beginning with the root node. As it does so, it marks each feature with a display flag. If a particular feature has a weight higher than the weight threshold, the summary selector 17 flags that feature for inclusion in the completed summary. Otherwise, the summary selector 17 flags that feature such that it is ignored during the summary generation process that follows.
- the summary selector 17 smoothes the marked features into intelligible text by marking additional features for display. For example, the summary selector 17 can mark the subject of a sentence for display when the predicate for that sentence has also been marked for display. This results in the formation of minimally intelligible syntactic constituents, such as sentences. The summary selector 17 then reduces any redundancy in the resulting syntactic constituents by unmarking those features that repeat words, phrases, concepts, and relationships (for example, as determined by a lexical semantic network, such as WordNet) that have appeared in the linearly preceding marked features. Finally, the summary selector 17 displays the marked features in a linear order.
- WordNet lexical semantic network
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Memory System Of A Hierarchy Structure (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2001278000A AU2001278000A1 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2001-07-25 | Automatic summarization of a document |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US22056800P | 2000-07-25 | 2000-07-25 | |
US60/220,568 | 2000-07-25 | ||
US09/908,443 | 2001-07-18 | ||
US09/908,443 US20020078091A1 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2001-07-18 | Automatic summarization of a document |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2002008950A2 true WO2002008950A2 (en) | 2002-01-31 |
WO2002008950A8 WO2002008950A8 (en) | 2002-08-01 |
WO2002008950A3 WO2002008950A3 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
Family
ID=26914988
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2001/023384 WO2002008950A2 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2001-07-25 | Automatic summarization of a document |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20020078091A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002008950A2 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7546295B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2009-06-09 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining expertise based upon observed usage patterns |
US7698270B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2010-04-13 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge |
US8095523B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2012-01-10 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for context-based content recommendation |
US9034639B2 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2015-05-19 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus using optical techniques to measure analyte levels |
US9072842B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9089294B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-28 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Analyte measurement device with a single shot actuator |
US9089678B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-28 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9248267B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2016-02-02 | Sanofi-Aventis Deustchland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US9261476B2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2016-02-16 | Sanofi Sa | Printable hydrogel for biosensors |
US9427532B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2016-08-30 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US9561000B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2017-02-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for improving fluidic flow and sample capture |
US9560993B2 (en) | 2001-11-21 | 2017-02-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Blood testing apparatus having a rotatable cartridge with multiple lancing elements and testing means |
US9694144B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2017-07-04 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Sampling module device and method |
US9724021B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2017-08-08 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9795747B2 (en) | 2010-06-02 | 2017-10-24 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Methods and apparatus for lancet actuation |
US9820684B2 (en) | 2004-06-03 | 2017-11-21 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for a fluid sampling device |
US9836765B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2017-12-05 | Kibo Software, Inc. | System and method for context-aware recommendation through user activity change detection |
US9839386B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2017-12-12 | Sanofi-Aventis Deustschland Gmbh | Body fluid sampling device with capacitive sensor |
US10034628B2 (en) | 2003-06-11 | 2018-07-31 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Low pain penetrating member |
US10191970B2 (en) | 2015-08-19 | 2019-01-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for customized data parsing and paraphrasing |
CN111898369A (en) * | 2020-08-17 | 2020-11-06 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Article title generation method, model training method and device and electronic equipment |
Families Citing this family (129)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6036924A (en) | 1997-12-04 | 2000-03-14 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Cassette of lancet cartridges for sampling blood |
US6391005B1 (en) | 1998-03-30 | 2002-05-21 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for penetration with shaft having a sensor for sensing penetration depth |
DE10057832C1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2002-02-21 | Hartmann Paul Ag | Blood analysis device has syringe mounted in casing, annular mounting carrying needles mounted behind test strip and being swiveled so that needle can be pushed through strip and aperture in casing to take blood sample |
US20020078096A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2002-06-20 | Milton John R. | System and method for pruning an article |
JP3916124B2 (en) * | 2001-02-15 | 2007-05-16 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Digital document browsing system, browser, digital document display method, program, and storage medium |
GB0107772D0 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2001-05-16 | Hewlett Packard Co | Improvements relating to data delivery |
US8337419B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2012-12-25 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
EP1404234B1 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2011-02-09 | Pelikan Technologies Inc. | Apparatus for improving success rate of blood yield from a fingerstick |
ES2336081T3 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2010-04-08 | Pelikan Technologies Inc. | SELF-OPTIMIZATION PUNCTURE DEVICE WITH MEANS OF ADAPTATION TO TEMPORARY VARIATIONS IN CUTANEOUS PROPERTIES. |
US9226699B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2016-01-05 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Body fluid sampling module with a continuous compression tissue interface surface |
WO2002100254A2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-19 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for lancet launching device integrated onto a blood-sampling cartridge |
DE60238119D1 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2010-12-09 | Pelikan Technologies Inc | ELECTRIC ACTUATOR ELEMENT FOR A LANZETTE |
US7981056B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-07-19 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for lancet actuation |
JP4272051B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2009-06-03 | ペリカン テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Blood sampling apparatus and method |
US7409335B1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2008-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers based on application being employed by the user |
US7519529B1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2009-04-14 | Microsoft Corporation | System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of results in response to questions posed to an automated information-retrieval or question-answering service |
AU2002316581A1 (en) | 2001-07-03 | 2003-01-21 | University Of Southern California | A syntax-based statistical translation model |
US20030018617A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-01-23 | Holger Schwedes | Information retrieval using enhanced document vectors |
US8028001B2 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2011-09-27 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating access to documents via a set of content selection tags |
KR100849272B1 (en) * | 2001-11-23 | 2008-07-29 | 주식회사 엘지이아이 | Method for automatically summarizing Markup-type documents |
US6944616B2 (en) * | 2001-11-28 | 2005-09-13 | Pavilion Technologies, Inc. | System and method for historical database training of support vector machines |
JP3682529B2 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2005-08-10 | 独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 | Summary automatic evaluation processing apparatus, summary automatic evaluation processing program, and summary automatic evaluation processing method |
AU2003269808A1 (en) | 2002-03-26 | 2004-01-06 | University Of Southern California | Constructing a translation lexicon from comparable, non-parallel corpora |
US20050144555A1 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2005-06-30 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method, system, computer program product and storage device for displaying a document |
US7547287B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2009-06-16 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7909778B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-03-22 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7717863B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2010-05-18 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7371247B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2008-05-13 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7291117B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2007-11-06 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7491178B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2009-02-17 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US8372016B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2013-02-12 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for body fluid sampling and analyte sensing |
US7331931B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2008-02-19 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7674232B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2010-03-09 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7976476B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-07-12 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for variable speed lancet |
US8221334B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2012-07-17 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7297122B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2007-11-20 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7232451B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2007-06-19 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9314194B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2016-04-19 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US8267870B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2012-09-18 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for body fluid sampling with hybrid actuation |
US7901362B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-03-08 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7229458B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2007-06-12 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7648468B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2010-01-19 | Pelikon Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7175642B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2007-02-13 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for lancet actuation |
US8360992B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2013-01-29 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US7892183B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-02-22 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for body fluid sampling and analyte sensing |
AU2003267974B2 (en) * | 2002-06-25 | 2010-11-04 | The Bureau Of National Affairs, Inc. | Electronic management and distribution of legal information |
US7280957B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2007-10-09 | Palo Alto Research Center, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for generating overview information for hierarchically related information |
ATE476137T1 (en) | 2003-05-30 | 2010-08-15 | Pelikan Technologies Inc | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INJECTING LIQUID |
DK1633235T3 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2014-08-18 | Sanofi Aventis Deutschland | Apparatus for sampling body fluid and detecting analyte |
US8548794B2 (en) | 2003-07-02 | 2013-10-01 | University Of Southern California | Statistical noun phrase translation |
EP1671096A4 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2009-09-16 | Pelikan Technologies Inc | Method and apparatus for an improved sample capture device |
US7366666B2 (en) * | 2003-10-01 | 2008-04-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Relative delta computations for determining the meaning of language inputs |
EP1680014A4 (en) | 2003-10-14 | 2009-01-21 | Pelikan Technologies Inc | Method and apparatus for a variable user interface |
US7822454B1 (en) | 2005-01-03 | 2010-10-26 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Fluid sampling device with improved analyte detecting member configuration |
US20050187772A1 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for synthesizing speech using discourse function level prosodic features |
US8296127B2 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2012-10-23 | University Of Southern California | Discovery of parallel text portions in comparable collections of corpora and training using comparable texts |
US20050222973A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2005-10-06 | Matthias Kaiser | Methods and systems for summarizing information |
US8666725B2 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2014-03-04 | University Of Southern California | Selection and use of nonstatistical translation components in a statistical machine translation framework |
US9775553B2 (en) | 2004-06-03 | 2017-10-03 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for a fluid sampling device |
US7266548B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2007-09-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated taxonomy generation |
JP5452868B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2014-03-26 | ユニヴァーシティー オブ サザン カリフォルニア | Training for text-to-text applications that use string-to-tree conversion for training and decoding |
US20060085740A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2006-04-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Parsing hierarchical lists and outlines |
US8652831B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-02-18 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for analyte measurement test time |
US8676563B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2014-03-18 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Providing human-generated and machine-generated trusted translations |
US8886517B2 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2014-11-11 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Trust scoring for language translation systems |
US7813918B2 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2010-10-12 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Identifying documents which form translated pairs, within a document collection |
GB0521552D0 (en) * | 2005-10-22 | 2005-11-30 | Ibm | Method and system for constructing a classifier |
US10319252B2 (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2019-06-11 | Sdl Inc. | Language capability assessment and training apparatus and techniques |
US8943080B2 (en) | 2006-04-07 | 2015-01-27 | University Of Southern California | Systems and methods for identifying parallel documents and sentence fragments in multilingual document collections |
US8886518B1 (en) | 2006-08-07 | 2014-11-11 | Language Weaver, Inc. | System and method for capitalizing machine translated text |
US9495358B2 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2016-11-15 | Abbyy Infopoisk Llc | Cross-language text clustering |
US8433556B2 (en) | 2006-11-02 | 2013-04-30 | University Of Southern California | Semi-supervised training for statistical word alignment |
US9122674B1 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2015-09-01 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Use of annotations in statistical machine translation |
US8468149B1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2013-06-18 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Multi-lingual online community |
US8615389B1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2013-12-24 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Generation and exploitation of an approximate language model |
US8831928B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2014-09-09 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Customizable machine translation service |
US20080281927A1 (en) * | 2007-05-11 | 2008-11-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Summarization tool and method for a dialogue sequence |
US8209617B2 (en) * | 2007-05-11 | 2012-06-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Summarization of attached, linked or related materials |
CN101308494A (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-19 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and equipment for demonstrating content |
US8825466B1 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2014-09-02 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Modification of annotated bilingual segment pairs in syntax-based machine translation |
WO2009048149A1 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2009-04-16 | Nec Corporation | Electronic document equivalency decision system and equivalency decision method |
US10216761B2 (en) * | 2008-03-04 | 2019-02-26 | Oath Inc. | Generating congruous metadata for multimedia |
WO2009126900A1 (en) | 2008-04-11 | 2009-10-15 | Pelikan Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for analyte detecting device |
US8984398B2 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2015-03-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Generation of search result abstracts |
US9375169B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2016-06-28 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Cam drive for managing disposable penetrating member actions with a single motor and motor and control system |
US8990064B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2015-03-24 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Translating documents based on content |
US8380486B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2013-02-19 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Providing machine-generated translations and corresponding trust levels |
US10417646B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 | 2019-09-17 | Sdl Inc. | Predicting the cost associated with translating textual content |
US8965476B2 (en) | 2010-04-16 | 2015-02-24 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US8788260B2 (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2014-07-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Generating snippets based on content features |
US20120197630A1 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Lyons Kenton M | Methods and systems to summarize a source text as a function of contextual information |
US11003838B2 (en) | 2011-04-18 | 2021-05-11 | Sdl Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring post translation editing |
US8694303B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2014-04-08 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Systems and methods for tuning parameters in statistical machine translation |
US8983963B2 (en) * | 2011-07-07 | 2015-03-17 | Software Ag | Techniques for comparing and clustering documents |
US8886515B2 (en) | 2011-10-19 | 2014-11-11 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Systems and methods for enhancing machine translation post edit review processes |
JP5623369B2 (en) * | 2011-11-04 | 2014-11-12 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Text summarization apparatus, method and program |
US9679163B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2017-06-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Installation and management of client extensions |
US9256445B2 (en) | 2012-01-30 | 2016-02-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic extension view with multiple levels of expansion |
US9449112B2 (en) * | 2012-01-30 | 2016-09-20 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Extension activation for related documents |
WO2013123182A1 (en) * | 2012-02-17 | 2013-08-22 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Computer-implemented systems and methods of performing contract review |
US8942973B2 (en) | 2012-03-09 | 2015-01-27 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Content page URL translation |
US10261994B2 (en) | 2012-05-25 | 2019-04-16 | Sdl Inc. | Method and system for automatic management of reputation of translators |
US9727556B2 (en) | 2012-10-26 | 2017-08-08 | Entit Software Llc | Summarization of a document |
US9152622B2 (en) | 2012-11-26 | 2015-10-06 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Personalized machine translation via online adaptation |
US9213694B2 (en) | 2013-10-10 | 2015-12-15 | Language Weaver, Inc. | Efficient online domain adaptation |
US9842592B2 (en) | 2014-02-12 | 2017-12-12 | Google Inc. | Language models using non-linguistic context |
US9412365B2 (en) | 2014-03-24 | 2016-08-09 | Google Inc. | Enhanced maximum entropy models |
US20150317313A1 (en) * | 2014-05-02 | 2015-11-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Searching locally defined entities |
US10111099B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2018-10-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Distributing content in managed wireless distribution networks |
US9874914B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2018-01-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Power management contracts for accessory devices |
US20170109439A1 (en) * | 2014-06-03 | 2017-04-20 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Document classification based on multiple meta-algorithmic patterns |
US9717006B2 (en) | 2014-06-23 | 2017-07-25 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Device quarantine in a wireless network |
US10134394B2 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2018-11-20 | Google Llc | Speech recognition using log-linear model |
US10127230B2 (en) * | 2015-05-01 | 2018-11-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic content suggestion in sparse traffic environment |
US20170213130A1 (en) * | 2016-01-21 | 2017-07-27 | Ebay Inc. | Snippet extractor: recurrent neural networks for text summarization at industry scale |
RU2642413C2 (en) | 2016-02-09 | 2018-01-24 | Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Яндекс" | Method (versions) and server for text processing |
US10169328B2 (en) * | 2016-05-12 | 2019-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Post-processing for identifying nonsense passages in a question answering system |
US10585898B2 (en) | 2016-05-12 | 2020-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Identifying nonsense passages in a question answering system based on domain specific policy |
US10832664B2 (en) | 2016-08-19 | 2020-11-10 | Google Llc | Automated speech recognition using language models that selectively use domain-specific model components |
US10713291B2 (en) * | 2017-03-14 | 2020-07-14 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Electronic document generation using data from disparate sources |
US10466963B2 (en) | 2017-05-18 | 2019-11-05 | Aiqudo, Inc. | Connecting multiple mobile devices to a smart home assistant account |
US10380259B2 (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2019-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Deep embedding for natural language content based on semantic dependencies |
US10929613B2 (en) | 2017-12-29 | 2021-02-23 | Aiqudo, Inc. | Automated document cluster merging for topic-based digital assistant interpretation |
US10963495B2 (en) | 2017-12-29 | 2021-03-30 | Aiqudo, Inc. | Automated discourse phrase discovery for generating an improved language model of a digital assistant |
US10963499B2 (en) | 2017-12-29 | 2021-03-30 | Aiqudo, Inc. | Generating command-specific language model discourses for digital assistant interpretation |
US10891316B2 (en) * | 2018-07-02 | 2021-01-12 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Identifying homogenous clusters |
US10742581B2 (en) * | 2018-07-02 | 2020-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Summarization-based electronic message actions |
US10795917B2 (en) | 2018-07-02 | 2020-10-06 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Automatic generation of regular expressions for homogenous clusters of documents |
CN112883711A (en) * | 2021-01-25 | 2021-06-01 | 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 | Method and device for generating abstract and electronic equipment |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5619709A (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1997-04-08 | Hnc, Inc. | System and method of context vector generation and retrieval |
WO1998047083A1 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 1998-10-22 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Data summariser |
US5931907A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1999-08-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Software agent for comparing locally accessible keywords with meta-information and having pointers associated with distributed information |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6285999B1 (en) * | 1997-01-10 | 2001-09-04 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method for node ranking in a linked database |
US6271840B1 (en) * | 1998-09-24 | 2001-08-07 | James Lee Finseth | Graphical search engine visual index |
US20030069873A1 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2003-04-10 | Kevin L. Fox | Multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system |
-
2001
- 2001-07-18 US US09/908,443 patent/US20020078091A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-07-25 WO PCT/US2001/023384 patent/WO2002008950A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5619709A (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1997-04-08 | Hnc, Inc. | System and method of context vector generation and retrieval |
US5931907A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1999-08-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Software agent for comparing locally accessible keywords with meta-information and having pointers associated with distributed information |
WO1998047083A1 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 1998-10-22 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Data summariser |
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9427532B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2016-08-30 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US9937298B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2018-04-10 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US9694144B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2017-07-04 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Sampling module device and method |
US9802007B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2017-10-31 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Methods and apparatus for lancet actuation |
US9560993B2 (en) | 2001-11-21 | 2017-02-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Blood testing apparatus having a rotatable cartridge with multiple lancing elements and testing means |
US9724021B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2017-08-08 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9795334B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2017-10-24 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9839386B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2017-12-12 | Sanofi-Aventis Deustschland Gmbh | Body fluid sampling device with capacitive sensor |
US9907502B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2018-03-06 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9072842B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9089294B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-28 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Analyte measurement device with a single shot actuator |
US9089678B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-07-28 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9186468B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2015-11-17 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for penetrating tissue |
US9248267B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2016-02-02 | Sanofi-Aventis Deustchland Gmbh | Tissue penetration device |
US9498160B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2016-11-22 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method for penetrating tissue |
US9034639B2 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2015-05-19 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus using optical techniques to measure analyte levels |
US10034628B2 (en) | 2003-06-11 | 2018-07-31 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Low pain penetrating member |
US9561000B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2017-02-07 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for improving fluidic flow and sample capture |
US9261476B2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2016-02-16 | Sanofi Sa | Printable hydrogel for biosensors |
US9820684B2 (en) | 2004-06-03 | 2017-11-21 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for a fluid sampling device |
US8095523B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2012-01-10 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for context-based content recommendation |
US8601023B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2013-12-03 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge |
US7698270B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2010-04-13 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge |
US7702690B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2010-04-20 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for suggesting/disambiguation query terms based upon usage patterns observed |
US7693836B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2010-04-06 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns |
US7856446B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2010-12-21 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset |
US7580930B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2009-08-25 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns |
US7546295B2 (en) | 2005-12-27 | 2009-06-09 | Baynote, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining expertise based upon observed usage patterns |
US9795747B2 (en) | 2010-06-02 | 2017-10-24 | Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh | Methods and apparatus for lancet actuation |
US9836765B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2017-12-05 | Kibo Software, Inc. | System and method for context-aware recommendation through user activity change detection |
US10191970B2 (en) | 2015-08-19 | 2019-01-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for customized data parsing and paraphrasing |
US10929447B2 (en) | 2015-08-19 | 2021-02-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for customized data parsing and paraphrasing |
CN111898369A (en) * | 2020-08-17 | 2020-11-06 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Article title generation method, model training method and device and electronic equipment |
CN111898369B (en) * | 2020-08-17 | 2024-03-08 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Article title generation method, model training method and device and electronic equipment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2002008950A8 (en) | 2002-08-01 |
WO2002008950A3 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
US20020078091A1 (en) | 2002-06-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20020078091A1 (en) | Automatic summarization of a document | |
Collins-Thompson et al. | Personalizing web search results by reading level | |
Carpineto et al. | Exploiting the potential of concept lattices for information retrieval with CREDO. | |
US7085771B2 (en) | System and method for automatically discovering a hierarchy of concepts from a corpus of documents | |
US6665681B1 (en) | System and method for generating a taxonomy from a plurality of documents | |
US7627571B2 (en) | Extraction of anchor explanatory text by mining repeated patterns | |
US8849787B2 (en) | Two stage search | |
Das et al. | Topic-based Bengali opinion summarization | |
Liu et al. | Video search re-ranking via multi-graph propagation | |
US20050021545A1 (en) | Very-large-scale automatic categorizer for Web content | |
US20120240032A1 (en) | System and method for document collection, grouping and summarization | |
Martinez-Romo et al. | Web spam identification through language model analysis | |
EP1520236A1 (en) | A method and system for naming a cluster of words and phrases | |
King et al. | Mining world knowledge for analysis of search engine content | |
JP2005063432A (en) | Multimedia object retrieval apparatus and multimedia object retrieval method | |
Yang et al. | A text mining approach for automatic construction of hypertexts | |
Liu et al. | An automated algorithm for extracting website skeleton | |
Das et al. | Opinion summarization in Bengali: a theme network model | |
Stamou et al. | Classifying web data in directory structures | |
Gong et al. | An implementation of web image search engines | |
Wang et al. | An effective content-based recommendation method for Web browsing based on keyword context matching | |
Lehtonen | Indexing heterogeneous XML for full-text search | |
Adebayo et al. | Towards Annotation of Legal Documents with Ontology Concepts | |
Li et al. | An image-semantic ontological framework for large image databases | |
Zettsu et al. | Discovering aspects of web pages from their referential contexts in the web |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: C1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
CFP | Corrected version of a pamphlet front page | ||
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: COMMUNICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 69 EPC (EPO FORM 1205A OF 160503) |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |