WO2007002909A2 - Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system - Google Patents
Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2007002909A2 WO2007002909A2 PCT/US2006/025716 US2006025716W WO2007002909A2 WO 2007002909 A2 WO2007002909 A2 WO 2007002909A2 US 2006025716 W US2006025716 W US 2006025716W WO 2007002909 A2 WO2007002909 A2 WO 2007002909A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- review
- information
- ads
- advertisement
- revenue
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0241—Advertisements
- G06Q30/0247—Calculate past, present or future revenues
Definitions
- the present invention concerns advertising, such as online advertising.
- the present invention concerns the review, such as the manual review, of advertisements for compliance with policies, such as quality assurance policies for example.
- Advertising systems have employed policy guidelines to which ads must adhere in order to be served. Ensuring adherence with policies often entailed manual review.
- manually reviewing all the ads is a significant challenge. For example, the continuing increase in ad submissions has forced online ad networks to allocate large amounts of human resources to manually review ads (often to the detriment of other areas such as optimization and customer support).
- the backlog of pending ad reviews may nonetheless increase as online advertising continues to become more and more popular. Such backlogs can be a source of frustration to advertisers, and can represent lost opportunity for revenue to advertising networks.
- embodiments consistent with the present invention may be used to only review manually ads (or review ads in a certain way) once they have reached a certain expected revenue threshold (instead of attempting to review manually all incoming ads as was done in the past). This strategy is motivated, at least in part, by the fact that the many advertisers submit hundreds or even thousands of ads with each individually returning relatively little revenue. Such embodiments consistent with the present invention have the potential to greatly reduce the number of ads, or at least to prioritize the order of ads, pending manual approval. [0006] At least some embodiments consistent with the present invention may use a threshold equal to the approximate cost of manually approving an ad, thereby reducing ad reviews pending manual review significantly.
- At least some embodiments consistent with the present invention may also consider a classification of the ad (e.g., forbidden, suspicious, unchecked, etc.), which maybe determined by automated means for example, to prioritize the order of ads pending manual approval.
- a classification of the ad e.g., forbidden, suspicious, unchecked, etc.
- Figure 1 is a high-level block diagram showing parties or entities that can interact with an advertising system.
- Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary environment in which, or with which, embodiments consistent with the present invention may operate.
- Figure 3 is a bubble diagram of exemplary operations that may be performed in a manner consistent with the present invention, as well as information that may be used and/or generated by such operations.
- Figure 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for prioritizing ad reviews in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- Figure 5 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for performing priority assignment operations in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- Figure 6 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for performing ad check operations in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- Figure 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary apparatus that may perform various operations and store information in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- the present invention may involve novel methods, apparatus, message formats, and/or data structures for prioritizing ad reviews.
- the following description is presented to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of particular applications and their requirements.
- the following description of embodiments consistent with the present invention provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the precise form disclosed.
- Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles set forth below may be applied to other embodiments and applications.
- a series of acts may be described with reference to a flow diagram, the order of acts may differ in other implementations when the performance of one act is not dependent on the completion of another act.
- Online ads such as those used in the exemplary systems described below with reference to Figures 1 and 2, or any other system, may have various intrinsic features. Such features may be specified by an application and/or an advertiser. These features are referred to as "ad features" below.
- ad features may include a title line, ad text, and an embedded link.
- ad features may include images, executable code, and an embedded link.
- ad features may include one or more of the following: text, a link, an audio file, a video file, an image file, executable code, embedded information, etc.
- Serving parameters may include, for example, one or more of the following: features of (including information on) a document on which, or with which, the ad was served, a search query or search results associated with the serving of the ad, a user characteristic (e.g., their geographic location, the language used by the user, the type of browser used, previous page views, previous behavior, user account, any Web cookies used by the system, user device characteristics, etc.), a host or affiliate site (e.g., America Online, Google, Yahoo) that initiated the request, an absolute position of the ad on the page on which it was served, a position (spatial or temporal) of the ad relative to other ads served, an absolute size of the ad, a size of the ad relative to other ads, a color of the ad, a host or affiliate site (e.g., America Online, Google, Yahoo) that initiated the request, an absolute position of the ad on the page on which it was served, a position (spatial or temporal)
- serving parameters may be extrinsic to ad features, they maybe associated with an ad as serving conditions or constraints. When used as serving conditions or constraints, such serving parameters are referred to simply as “serving constraints" (or “targeting criteria"). For example, in some systems, an advertiser may be able to target the serving of its ad by specifying that it is only to be served on weekdays, no lower than a certain position, only to users in a certain location, etc. As another example, in some systems, an advertiser may specify that its ad is to be served only if a page or search query includes certain keywords or phrases.
- an advertiser may specify that its ad is to be served only if a document on which, or with which the ad is to be served, includes certain topics or concepts, or falls under a particular cluster or clusters, or some other classification or classifications (e.g., "verticals").
- an advertiser may specify that its ad is to be served only to (or is not to be served to) user devices having certain characteristics.
- an ad might be targeted so that it is served in response to a request sourced from a particular location, or in response to a request concerning a particular location.
- Ad information may include any combination of ad features, ad serving constraints, information derivable from ad features or ad serving constraints (referred to as “ad derived information”), and/or information related to the ad (referred to as “ad related information”), as well as an extension of such information (e.g., information derived from ad related information).
- the ratio of the number of selections (e.g., clickthroughs) of an ad to the number of impressions of the ad (i.e., the number of times an ad is rendered) is defined as the "selection rate" (or "clickthrough rate") of the ad.
- a "conversion" is said to occur when a user consummates a transaction related to a previously served ad. What constitutes a conversion may vary from case to case and can be determined in a variety of ways. For example, it may be the case that a conversion occurs when a user clicks on an ad, is referred to the advertiser's Web page, and consummates a purchase there before leaving that Web page. Alternatively, a conversion may be defined as a user being shown an ad, and making a purchase on the advertiser's Web page within a predetermined time (e.g., seven days).
- a conversion may be defined by an advertiser to be any measurable/observable user action such as, for example, downloading a white paper, navigating to at least a given depth of a Website, viewing at least a certain number of Web pages, spending at least a predetermined amount of time on a Website or Web page, registering on a Website, etc.
- user actions don't indicate a consummated purchase, they may indicate a sales lead, although user actions constituting a conversion are not limited to this. Indeed, many other definitions of what constitutes a conversion are possible.
- conversion rate The ratio of the number of conversions to the number of impressions of the ad (i.e., the number of times an ad is rendered) and the ratio of the number of conversions to the number of selections (or the number of some other earlier event) are both referred to as the "conversion rate.”
- conversion rate The type of conversion rate will be apparent from the context in which it is used. If a conversion is defined to be able to occur within a predetermined time since the serving of an ad, one possible definition of the conversion rate might only consider ads that have been served more than the predetermined time in the past. [0024] A "property" is something on which ads can be presented.
- a property may include online content (e.g., a Website, an MP3 audio program, online games, etc.), offline content (e.g., a newspaper, a magazine, a theatrical production, a concert, a sports event, etc.), and/or offline objects (e.g., a billboard, a stadium score board, and outfield wall, the side of truck trailer, etc.).
- Online content e.g., a Website, an MP3 audio program, online games, etc.
- offline content e.g., a newspaper, a magazine, a theatrical production, a concert, a sports event, etc.
- offline objects e.g., a billboard, a stadium score board, and outfield wall, the side of truck trailer, etc.
- Properties with content e.g., magazines, newspapers, Websites, email messages, etc.
- properties may themselves be offline, pertinent information about a property (e.g., attribute(s), topic(s), concept(s), category(ies), keyword(s), relev
- an outdoor jazz music festival may have entered the topics "music" and "jazz", the location of the concerts, the time of the concerts, artists scheduled to appear at the festival, and types of available ad spots (e.g., spots in a printed program, spots on a stage, spots on seat backs, audio announcements of sponsors, etc.).
- ad spots e.g., spots in a printed program, spots on a stage, spots on seat backs, audio announcements of sponsors, etc.
- a "document” is to be broadly interpreted to include any machine-readable and machine-storable work product.
- a document may be a file, a combination of files, one or more files with embedded links to other files, etc.
- the files may be of any type, such as text, audio, image, video, etc.
- Parts of a document to be rendered to an end user can be thought of as "content" of the document.
- a document may include "structured data” containing both content (words, pictures, etc.) and some indication of the meaning of that content (for example, e-mail fields and associated data, HTML tags and associated data, etc.)
- Ad spots in the document may be defined by embedded information or instructions.
- a common document is a Web page.
- Web pages often include content and may include embedded information (such as meta information, hyperlinks, etc.) and/or embedded instructions (such as JavaScript, etc.).
- a document has an addressable storage location and can therefore be uniquely identified by this addressable location.
- a universal resource locator (URL) is an address used to access information on the Internet.
- a "Web document” includes any document published on the Web. Examples of Web documents include, for example, a Website or a Web page.
- Document information may include any information included in the document, information derivable from information included in the document (referred to as “document derived information”), and/or information related to the document (referred to as “document related information”), as well as an extensions of such information (e.g., information derived from related information).
- document derived information is a classification based on textual content of a document.
- document related information include document information from other documents with links to the instant document, as well as document information from other documents to which the instant document links.
- Content from a document may be rendered on a "content rendering application or device".
- content rendering applications include an Internet browser (e.g., Explorer,
- Netscape, Opera, Firefox, etc. a media player (e.g., an MP3 player, a Realnetworks streaming audio file player, etc.), a viewer (e.g., an Abobe Acrobat pdf reader), etc.
- a media player e.g., an MP3 player, a Realnetworks streaming audio file player, etc.
- a viewer e.g., an Abobe Acrobat pdf reader
- a "content owner” is a person or entity that has some property right in the content of a media property (e.g., document).
- a content owner may be an author of the content.
- a content owner may have rights to reproduce the content, rights to prepare derivative works of the content, rights to display or perform the content publicly, and/or other proscribed rights in the content.
- a content server might be a content owner in the content of the documents it serves, this is not necessary.
- a "Web publisher” is an example of a content owner.
- User information may include user behavior information and/or user profile information.
- E-mail information may include any information included in an e-mail (also referred to as “internal e-mail information”), information derivable from information included in the e-mail and/or information related to the e-mail, as well as extensions of such information
- information derived from e-mail information is information extracted or otherwise derived from search results returned in response to a search query composed of terms extracted from an e-mail subject line.
- information related to e-mail information include e-mail information about one or more other e-mails sent by the same sender of a given e-mail, or user information about an e-mail recipient.
- External e-mail information Information derived from or related to e-mail information may be referred to as "external e-mail information.”
- An "ad fraudster" may be an advertiser that has committed fraud against an ad network in the past, or an advertiser that is suspected of committing fraud (presently or in the future) against an ad network.
- An ad fraudster is an advertiser that has opened an account with an invalid credit card.
- Another example of an ad fraudster is an advertiser that has been delinquent in paying balances for the serving of one or more of its ads. ⁇ 4.2 EXEMPLARY ADVERTISDfG ENVIRONMENTS EV WHICH, OR
- FIG 1 is a high level diagram of an advertising environment.
- the environment may include an ad entry, maintenance and delivery system (simply referred to as an "ad server") 120.
- Advertisers 110 may directly, or indirectly, enter, maintain, and track ad information in the system 120.
- the ads may be in the form of graphical ads such as so-called banner ads, text only ads, image ads, audio ads, video ads, ads combining one of more of any of such components, etc.
- the ads may also include embedded information, such as a link, and/or machine executable instructions.
- Ad consumers 130 may submit requests for ads to, accept ads responsive to their request from, and provide usage information to, the system 120. An entity other than an ad consumer 130 may initiate a request for ads.
- usage information e.g., whether or not a conversion or selection (e.g., a click-through) related to the ad occurred) to the system 120.
- This usage information may include measured or observed user behavior related to ads that have been served.
- the ad server 120 may be similar to the one described in Figure 2 of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/375,900 (referred to as “the '900 application” and incorporated herein by reference), entitled “SERVING ADVERTISEMENTS BASED ON CONTENT,” filed on February 26, 2003 and listing Darrell Anderson, Paul Bucheit, Alex Carobus, Marie Cui, Jeffrey A. Dean, Georges R. Harik, Deepak Jindal, and Narayanan Shivakumar as inventors.
- An advertising program may include information concerning accounts, campaigns, creatives, targeting, etc.
- the term "account” relates to information for a given advertiser (e.g., a unique e-mail address, a password, billing information, etc.).
- a “campaign” or “ad campaign” refers to one or more groups of one or more advertisements, and may include a start date, an end date, budget information, geo-targeting information, syndication information, etc.
- a “campaign” or “ad campaign” refers to one or more groups of one or more advertisements, and may include a start date, an end date, budget information, geo-targeting information, syndication information, etc.
- Honda may have one advertising campaign for its automotive line, and a separate advertising campaign for its motorcycle line.
- the campaign for its automotive line may have one or more ad groups, each containing one or more ads.
- Each ad group may include targeting information (e.g., a set of keywords, a set of one or more topics, geolocation information, user profile information, etc.), and price information (e.g., maximum cost (cost per click-though, cost per conversion, etc.)).
- each ad group may include an average cost (e.g., average cost per click-through, average cost per conversion, etc.). Therefore, a single maximum cost and/or a single average cost may be associated with one or more keywords, and/or topics.
- each ad group may have one or more ads or "creatives" (That is, ad content that is ultimately rendered to an end user.).
- Each ad may also include a link to a URL (e.g., a landing Web page, such as the home page of an advertiser, or a Web page associated with a particular product or server).
- the ad information may include more or less information, and may be organized in a number of different ways.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an environment 200 in which embodiments consistent with the present invention maybe used.
- a user device also referred to as a "client” or “client device”
- a user device 250 may include a browser facility (such as the Firefox browser from Mozilla, the Explorer browser from Microsoft, the Opera Web Browser from Opera Software of Norway, the Navigator browser from AOL/Time Warner, etc.), an e-mail facility (e.g., Outlook from Microsoft), etc.
- a search engine 220 may permit user devices 250 to search collections of documents (e.g., Web pages).
- a content server 210 may permit user devices 250 to access documents.
- An e-mail server (such as Hotmail from Microsoft Network, Yahoo Mail, etc.) 240 may be used to provide e-mail functionality to user devices 250.
- An ad server 210 may be used to serve ads to user devices 250.
- the ads may be served in association with search results provided by the search engine 220.
- content-relevant ads may be served in association with content provided by the content server 230, and/or e-mail supported by the e-mail server 240 and/or user device e-mail facilities.
- ads may be targeted to documents served by content servers.
- an ad consumer 130 is a general content server 230 that receives requests for documents (e.g., articles, discussion threads, music, video, graphics, search results, Web page listings, etc.), and retrieves the requested document in response to, or otherwise services, the request.
- the content server may submit a request for ads to the ad server 120/210.
- Such an ad request may include a number of ads desired.
- the ad request may also include document request information.
- This information may include the document itself (e.g., page), a category or topic corresponding to the content of the document or the document request (e.g., arts, business, computers, arts-movies, arts-music, etc.), part or all of the document request, content age, content type (e.g., text, graphics, video, audio, mixed media, etc.), geo-location information, document information, etc.
- a category or topic corresponding to the content of the document or the document request e.g., arts, business, computers, arts-movies, arts-music, etc.
- content age e.g., text, graphics, video, audio, mixed media, etc.
- geo-location information e.g., geo-location information, document information, etc.
- the content server 230 may combine the requested document with one or more of the advertisements provided by the ad server 120/210. This combined information including the document content and advertisement(s) is then forwarded towards the end user device 250 that requested the document, for presentation to the user. Finally, the content server 230 may transmit information about the ads and how, when, and/or where the ads are to be rendered (e.g., position, click-through or not, impression time, impression date, size, conversion or not, etc.) back to the ad server 120/210. Alternatively, or in addition, such information may be provided back to the ad server 120/210 by some other means.
- information about the ads and how, when, and/or where the ads are to be rendered e.g., position, click-through or not, impression time, impression date, size, conversion or not, etc.
- search engine 220 may receive queries for search results. In response, the search engine may retrieve relevant search results (e.g., from an index of Web pages).
- relevant search results e.g., from an index of Web pages.
- An exemplary search engine is described in the article S. Brin and L. Page, "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Search Engine," Seventh International World Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia and in U.S. Patent No. 6,285,999 (both incorporated herein by reference).
- search results may include, for example, lists of Web page titles, snippets of text extracted from those Web pages, and hypertext links to those Web pages, and may be grouped into a predetermined number of (e.g., ten) search results.
- the search engine 220 may submit a request for ads to the ad server 120/210.
- the request may include a number of ads desired. This number may depend on the search results, the amount of screen or page space occupied by the search results, the size and shape of the ads, etc. In one embodiment, the number of desired ads will be from one to ten, and preferably from three to five.
- the request for ads may also include the query (as entered or parsed), information based on the query (such as geolocation information, whether the query came from an affiliate and an identifier of such an affiliate, and/or as described below, information related to, and/or derived from, the search query), and/or information associated with, or based on, the search results.
- Such information may include, for example, identifiers related to the search results (e.g., document identifiers or "docIDs"), scores related to the search results (e.g., information retrieval ("IR") scores such as dot products of feature vectors corresponding to a query and a document, Page Rank scores, and/or combinations of IR scores and Page Rank scores), snippets of text extracted from identified documents (e.g., Web pages), full text of identified documents, topics of identified documents, feature vectors of identified documents, etc.
- IR information retrieval
- the search engine 220 may combine the search results with one or more of the advertisements provided by the ad server 120/210.
- search engine 220 may transmit information about the ad and when, where, and/or how the ad was to be rendered (e.g., position, click-through or not, impression time, impression date, size, conversion or not, etc.) back to the ad server 120/210.
- such information may include information for determining on what basis the ad way determined relevant (e.g., strict or relaxed match, or exact, phrase, or broad match, etc.) Alternatively, or in addition, such information may be provided back to the ad server 120/210 by some other means.
- the e-mail server 240 may be thought of, generally, as a content server in which a document served is simply an e-mail.
- e-mail applications such as Microsoft Outlook for example
- an e-mail server 240 or application may be thought of as an ad consumer 130.
- e-mails may be thought of as documents, and targeted ads may be served in association with such documents. For example, one or more ads may be served in, under over, or otherwise in association with an e-mail.
- servers as (i) requesting ads, and (ii) combining them with content
- a client device such as an end user computer for example
- Figure 3 is a bubble diagram of exemplary operations that may be performed in a manner consistent with the present invention, as well as information that may be used and/or generated by such operations.
- Embodiments consistent with the present invention may review and score ads, and may use the score (perhaps in concert with other information such as an ad classification) to determine a priority for manual review. Doing so, allows the advertising system to better allocate human resources, reduce expenses, and reduce the backlog of ads waiting to be approved.
- embodiments consistent with the present invention may include ad review priority assignment operations 320.
- the ad review priority assignment operations 320 may obtain and process ad information 310 to prioritize ads.
- the ads maybe assigned one of at least two priorities — the lowest priority 330 and the highest priority 340.
- the highest priority ads 340 are those that are eligible for manual review 340 (e.g., those that are worth the human resources and expenses associated with a manual review), and the lowest priority ads 330 are those that are not eligible for manual review (but that might be eligible for automatic reviews only).
- priority levels may be provided, and the invention is not limited to two (2) priority levels. Indeed, although not shown, ads may simply be provided with a priority score and ordered for manual review accordingly. Thus, priority may be expressed as a discreet value or classification, or a continuous score, or some combination of the two.
- the ad review priority assignment operations 320 assign review priority values to ads using, for example, ad classification(s), score value(s), and/or threshold(s). These operations
- 320 may determine a set 340 of ads that are eligible for manual review and a set 330 of ads that are not eligible for manual review.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 400 for prioritizing ad reviews in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- the method 400 may accept ad information.
- the method 400 may score the ads (e.g., based on expected revenue).
- the method 400 may assign a review priority to the ad.
- Block 430 Collectively, review priorities of individual ads may effectively prioritize the review of a set of ads.
- the score value may simply be the revenue expected to be produced by the ad.
- the expected revenue may be the sum of expected future revenue events, perhaps discounted to a present value of money.
- the method 400 may assign priority values to an ad based on the ad's classification(s), the ad's score(s), and/or revenue threshold(s).
- the priority value may be a continuous value, such as the score determined in block 420.
- the priority value may be a discrete value, such as one of a discrete number of priority groups.
- the determined score may be an expected revenue
- the priority assignment may include an act of comparing the score with a revenue threshold (which may be set equal to the approximate cost of approving an ad manually).
- the ad if the score value of an ad exceeds the revenue threshold, the ad maybe considered eligible for manual review (e.g., prioritized as "eligible”). Otherwise, the ad should not be considered eligible for manual review (e.g., prioritized as "ineligible” or simply removed from consideration).
- the particular acts performed by methods consistent with the present invention may depend on the context in which it is used.
- a first exemplary ad serving environment it is possible that ads are not served until they have been manually reviewed. They may be served only if they pass the manual review. Otherwise, they are not served.
- Such an exemplary environment may be referred to as a "manually review before serve" ad serving environment.
- a second exemplary ad serving environment it is possible that ads are served before they are manually reviewed, but can be removed from the ad serving system if they fail manual review.
- Such an exemplary environment may be referred to as a "serve then manually review" ad serving environment.
- ads are served in a limited manner (e.g., only on limited properties or Websites (e.g., Google.com only, and not AdSense publishers, not on partner Websites, etc.), only to certain users (e.g., adults only, non-family safe), etc.) before they are manually reviewed.
- a limited manner e.g., only on limited properties or Websites (e.g., Google.com only, and not AdSense publishers, not on partner Websites, etc.), only to certain users (e.g., adults only, non-family safe), etc.) before they are manually reviewed.
- an ad can be served in a more expansive manner if they pass manual review, or continue to be served in a more limited manner (or not served at all) if they fail manual review.
- Such an exemplary environment may be referred to as a "limited serve then manually review" ad serving environment.
- the priority values that may be assigned are: DEFAULT (a priority has not been assigned), LOW (the ad will be withheld from manual review), NORMAL (the ad is eligible for human review), and HIGH (the ad is eligible for human review and the ad contains at least one "suspicious" or "forbidden” creative or keywords (e.g., as determined by an autocheck means, such as those described in the '415 application).
- the method 400 may only exempt an ad from human review when a priority value of LOW is given to the ad.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 500 for assigning ad review priorities in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- a method 500 is particularly useful in a "limited serve then manually review" ad serving environment.
- the method 500 may accept ad information along with its ad score value.
- Block 505 Once the ad information and its score value are obtained, different branches of the method 500 may be performed depending on different ad classifications.
- Block 510 If an ad has been classified as "forbidden", the method 500 may simply assign a HIGH review priority to the ad.
- the method 500 may indicate that the ad is eligible for manual review (Block 520) before the method 500 is left (Node 560). If an ad has been classified as belonging to an "advertiser fraudster" (but is not classified a "forbidden” ad), the method 500 may assign a HIGH (or NORMAL) review priority to the ad. (Block 530) The method 500 may then indicate that the ad is eligible for manual review (Block 520) before it 500 is left.
- the method 500 may determine whether the score (e.g., an expected revenue) of the ad is greater that a threshold (e.g., a cost threshold). (Block 540) If the score value is greater than the threshold, the method 500 may assign a NORMAL review priority to the ad. (Block 545) The method 500 may then indicate that the ad is eligible for manual review (Block 520) before it is left (Node 560).
- a threshold e.g., a cost threshold
- the method 500 may assign a LOW review priority to the ad (Block 550) and indicate that the ad is not eligible for manual review (Block 555) (though it may nonetheless be eligible for automatic review). The method 500 may then be left. (Node 560) [0054]
- the advertising system may have means for examining ads when submitted by advertisers for potential violations. Thus, as mentioned earlier, an ad may be classified as "forbidden”, “advertiser fraudster", or "not forbidden/non-fraudster advertiser” (meaning no detected violations so far). When assigning priority values, the method 500 considers the ad classification.
- an ad that is classified as "forbidden” may indicate that the advertising system has detected sensitive or offensive words within the ad creative or keywords.
- An ad classified as “advertiser fraudster” simply indicates that the advertising system has detected that the advertiser is (or has been, or is likely to be) involved in fraudulent activities.
- An ad classified as "not forbidden/non-fraudster advertiser” indicates that the advertising system has not detected any violation so far.
- the method 500 upon receiving an ad classified as "forbidden", the method 500 need not examine the ad's score value against the revenue threshold. Since the ad contains forbidden or suspicious keywords or creatives, the method 500 may assign a HIGH review priority value to the "forbidden" ad indicating that it is eligible for a manual review. The rationale is that if the ad is being served on a limited basis, but might violate certain policies, the ad serving system would likely want to decide whether or not to remove the ad as quickly as possible.
- the method 500 upon receiving an ad classified as "advertiser fraudster", again the method 500 need not examine the ad's score value against the revenue threshold. Since the ad's advertiser is (or has been, or is likely to be) involved in fraudulent activities, the method 500 may assign a HIGH or NORMAL review priority value to the "advertiser fraudster" ad indicating that it is eligible for a manual review. The rationale is that if the ad is being served on a limited basis, but might the ad serving system might not be compensated by the advertiser, the ad serving system would likely want to decide whether or not to remove the ad.
- the method 500 may examine the score to determine if the score value is greater than the revenue threshold.
- the revenue threshold may be set to the approximate cost to manually approve an ad.
- the present invention may allow for different revenue thresholds to accommodate billing differences in different countries. This flexibility may help the prioritization accommodate worldwide differences in revenue relations and manual review resources.
- the method 500 may assign a NORMAL review priority to the ad, thereby indicating that the ad is eligible for a manual review. Conversely, if the score value is found not to exceed the threshold, the method 500 may assign a LOW review priority to the ad indicating that the ad is not eligible for a manual review.
- ad reviews may be prioritized using the ad(s) classification, the ad(s) score, and/or a threshold.
- Using a revenue threshold may reduce the amount of ads pending a manual review, thereby reducing expenditures associated with manual reviews and allowing for better allocation of human resources.
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method 600 for performing periodic check operations in a manner consistent with the present invention.
- the method 600 may periodically poll unchecked and/or LOW priority ads to determine if the ads should be promoted to a higher priority. Particularly, when it is time to process unchecked and/or LOW priority ads, the method 600 may obtain such an unchecked or a LOW priority ad. (Blocks 610 and 620) The method 600 may also obtain the ad's classification (e.g., forbidden, advertiser is fraudster, etc) from the advertising system. (Block 630) Subsequently, the method 600 may score the ad and invoke ad review priority assignment operations.
- ad's classification e.g., forbidden, advertiser is fraudster, etc
- the method 600 may periodically reexamine LOW priority ads or any unchecked ads to see if their status has changed. For instance, if an ad's score is re-determined to be higher (e.g., ad uses an obscure term for targeting (e.g., an obscure name) that suddenly becomes popular (e.g., a popular search query term), the advertiser increases an offer, the advertiser increases its budget, etc.), and/or if the threshold is lowered (e.g., due to a lower cost of manual review, a smaller backlog, etc.), the score might possibly exceed the threshold.
- an ad's score is re-determined to be higher (e.g., ad uses an obscure term for targeting (e.g., an obscure name) that suddenly becomes popular (e.g., a popular search query term)
- the advertiser increases an offer, the advertiser increases its budget, etc.
- the threshold is lowered (e.g., due to a lower cost of manual review, a smaller
- the method 600 may detect this change and seek to update the ad's priority value.
- Another change for a LOW priority ad justifying a higher priority level assignment may be a change in the ad's classification (e.g., the ad's landing page has profane or hate content that it didn't have before).
- the method 600 may proceed to invoke ad review priority assignment operations for the ad.
- the method 600 may invoke the method 500 to determine the ad's updated priority assignment in case any changes have occurred to the ad since the last time it was examined, or in case the ad hasn't been checked at all.
- FIG. 7 is high-level block diagram of a machine 700 that may perform one or more of the operations discussed above.
- the machine 700 basically includes one or more processors 710, one or more input/output interface units 730, one or more storage devices 720, and one or more system buses and/or networks 740 for facilitating the communication of information among the coupled elements.
- One or more input devices 732 and one or more output devices 734 may be coupled with the one or more input/output interfaces 730.
- the one or more processors 710 may execute machine-executable instructions (e.g., C or C++ running on the Solaris operating system available from Sun Microsystems Inc. of Palo Alto, California or the Linux operating system widely available from a number of vendors such as Red Hat, Inc. of Durham, North Carolina) to effect one or more aspects of the present invention. At least a portion of the machine executable instructions may be stored (temporarily or more permanently) on the one or more storage devices 720 and/or may be received from an external source via one or more input interface units 730.
- machine-executable instructions e.g., C or C++ running on the Solaris operating system available from Sun Microsystems Inc. of Palo Alto, California or the Linux operating system widely available from a number of vendors such as Red Hat, Inc. of Durham, North Carolina
- the machine 700 may be one or more conventional personal computers.
- the processing units 710 may be one or more microprocessors.
- the bus 740 may include a system bus.
- the storage devices 720 may include system memory, such as read only memory (ROM) and/or random access memory (RAM).
- the storage devices 720 may also include a hard disk drive for reading from and writing to a hard disk, a magnetic disk drive for reading from or writing to a (e.g., removable) magnetic disk, and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable (magneto-) optical disk such as a compact disk or other (magneto-) optical media.
- a user may enter commands and information into the personal computer through input devices 732, such as a keyboard and pointing device (e.g., a mouse) for example.
- Other input devices such as a microphone, a joystick, a game pad, a satellite dish, a scanner, or the like, may also (or alternatively) be included.
- These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit(s) 710 through an appropriate interface 730 coupled to the system bus 740.
- the output devices 734 may include a monitor or other type of display device, which may also be connected to the system bus 740 via an appropriate interface.
- the personal computer may include other (peripheral) output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers for example.
- an ad score may be a function of expected revenue.
- the expected value may be future review streams discounted to the present time, to a time of an expected manual review, or to some other time.
- Policy violations that may be automatically checked and perhaps used to classify ads may include one or more of: (A) prohibition of superlatives, (B) prohibition of repeated words, (C) prohibition of repeated phrases, (D) prohibition of trademarks, (E) prohibition of vulgar language, (F) prohibition of ad landing pages that generate pop-up ads, (G) prohibition of ad landing pages that disable a browser "back" function, (H) inappropriate capitalization, (I) prohibition of landing pages that cannot be viewed in a standard browser, (J) prohibition of multiple exclamation points, (K) prohibition of text that is too long, (L) landing page URL that does not match the visible URL spelling, (M) prohibition of counterfeit design goods, etc.
- LOW priority ads as ads being ineligible for manual review
- such ads may be later reviewed manually if the backlog of ads awaiting manual review is reduced or eliminated.
- the LOW priority ads may be reviewed.
- some of the priority assignment methods described above, such as the method 500 of Figure 5 for example are particularly useful in the context of a "limited serve then manually review" ad serving environment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the priority may be assigned in other ways, and will often be driven by the ad serving environment used. For example, in a "manually review before serve" ad serving environment, forbidden ads and ads associated with an advertiser fraudster might be given a LOW priority, particularly if their score is low.
- the ad's score may be used in concert with its classification. For example, a score may be used to order ads, or further prioritized ads, given a HIGH priority.
- embodiments consistent with the present invention may be used to prioritize ads by (a) assigning ads to one of a plurality of priority groups, (b) sorting ads, (c) assigning ads to one of a plurality of priority groups and then further sorting them within the groups, (d) assigning ads to one or a plurality of priority groups and subgroups, etc.
- Ad classifications e.g., assigned by an auto-check means such as described in the '415 application
- ad scores e.g., expected revenue
- a revenue-based score may be used to determine whether to review ads using a first review protocol or a second review protocol, or more generally to determine a review protocol to be used.
- Different review protocols could include, for example, various manual and/or automated reviews, multi-tiered reviews, single-tiered reviews, etc.
- At least some embodiments consistent with the present invention may use revenue-based scores with respect to sets of ads, such as categories of ads for example. For example, if ads in an automobile category tend to have lower disapproval rates and much higher revenue generation than ads in some other category, they may be prioritized differently (or different revenue-based thresholds may be used).
- a threshold e.g., a revenue threshold
- an ad score e.g., revenue returns from ad
- embodiments consistent with the present invention may be used to reduce the number of manual reviews.
- Embodiments consistent with the present invention may score the ads based on the revenue they are expected to generate and use the revenue threshold, perhaps in concert with an ad classification, to prioritize ad review.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06786049A EP1913539A4 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system |
JP2008519637A JP2008545203A (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | Prioritize ad reviews in the advertising system by using expected revenue etc. |
AU2006263411A AU2006263411B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system |
BRPI0613082-8A BRPI0613082A2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | computer and device method for controlling ad review |
CA002613562A CA2613562A1 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/170,727 US8452656B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2005-06-29 | Prioritizing ad review, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system |
US11/170,727 | 2005-06-29 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2007002909A2 true WO2007002909A2 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
WO2007002909A3 WO2007002909A3 (en) | 2007-03-22 |
Family
ID=37590832
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/025716 WO2007002909A2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2006-06-29 | Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8452656B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1913539A4 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2008545203A (en) |
KR (1) | KR101018987B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101248450A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2006263411B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0613082A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2613562A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007002909A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2013543203A (en) * | 2010-11-22 | 2013-11-28 | アリババ・グループ・ホールディング・リミテッド | Predict cost and revenue estimates associated with a bid ranking model |
Families Citing this family (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10204316B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2019-02-12 | Leaf Group Ltd. | User generated content publishing system |
US8296179B1 (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2012-10-23 | Monster Worldwide, Inc. | Targeted advertisement placement based on explicit and implicit criteria matching |
US20080288348A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Ranking online advertisements using retailer and product reputations |
US20080288481A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Ranking online advertisement using product and seller reputation |
US20080319841A1 (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2008-12-25 | Robert Ian Oliver | Per-Machine Based Shared Revenue Ad Delivery Fraud Detection and Mitigation |
US8392241B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2013-03-05 | Google Inc. | Publisher ad review |
US8392246B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2013-03-05 | Google Inc. | Advertiser ad review |
US9501337B2 (en) * | 2008-04-24 | 2016-11-22 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Systems and methods for collecting and distributing a plurality of notifications |
KR101020929B1 (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2011-03-09 | 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 | Method and system for inspecting advertisement |
US8886636B2 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2014-11-11 | Yahoo! Inc. | Context transfer in search advertising |
WO2010129108A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-11-11 | Scott Jones | Method and system for improving targeting of advertising |
WO2011068957A2 (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2011-06-09 | Google Inc. | Distributing content |
US20120011003A1 (en) * | 2010-07-07 | 2012-01-12 | Google Inc. | Review of Advertisements |
US8832735B2 (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2014-09-09 | Hulu, LLC | Processing workflow for recommending media programs |
US8732014B2 (en) * | 2010-12-20 | 2014-05-20 | Yahoo! Inc. | Automatic classification of display ads using ad images and landing pages |
CN102946565B (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2015-06-24 | 乐视致新电子科技(天津)有限公司 | System and method for automatic updating of buffer video advertisements |
US20140214524A1 (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2014-07-31 | Facebook, Inc. | Ranking of advertisements for policy compliance review |
US11132719B2 (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2021-09-28 | Facebook, Inc. | Real-time feedback of advertisement review |
US20140279595A1 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Facebook, Inc. | Reviewing advertisement components for compliance with policies of an online system |
US10410245B2 (en) * | 2013-05-15 | 2019-09-10 | OpenX Technologies, Inc. | System and methods for using a revenue value index to score impressions for users for advertisement placement |
CA2885858A1 (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2015-10-04 | Bradford A. Folkens | Image tagging system |
JP6114329B2 (en) * | 2015-03-20 | 2017-04-12 | ヤフー株式会社 | Advertiser evaluation apparatus, advertiser evaluation method, and advertiser evaluation program |
US20170068964A1 (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2017-03-09 | Facebook, Inc. | Ranking of sponsored content items for compliance with policies enforced by an online system |
CN106920117B (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2020-06-30 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Method and device for putting promotion information |
CN106919586B (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2020-06-30 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Rapid verification method and device for promotion information |
US10354653B1 (en) * | 2016-01-19 | 2019-07-16 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | Cooperative delegation for digital assistants |
CN107545500A (en) * | 2016-06-28 | 2018-01-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Sort calibration method, device and server |
JP6259049B1 (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2018-01-10 | ヤフー株式会社 | Calculation device, calculation method, and calculation program |
CN106447239B (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2020-09-29 | 北京字节跳动科技有限公司 | Data release auditing method and device |
JP6463400B2 (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2019-01-30 | ヤフー株式会社 | Advertiser evaluation apparatus, advertiser evaluation method, and advertiser evaluation program |
CN108269123B (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2021-03-12 | 阿里巴巴(中国)有限公司 | Advertisement putting control method and device |
CN108596506A (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2018-09-28 | 山东汇贸电子口岸有限公司 | A kind of great administrative law enforcement determines legal system checking method and device |
CN111898912A (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2020-11-06 | 成都新潮传媒集团有限公司 | Method and device for preselecting advertisement material to be examined and computer equipment |
US11210596B1 (en) | 2020-11-06 | 2021-12-28 | issuerPixel Inc. a Nevada C. Corp | Self-building hierarchically indexed multimedia database |
CN113837772A (en) * | 2021-09-24 | 2021-12-24 | 支付宝(杭州)信息技术有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for auditing marketing information |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5848397A (en) | 1996-04-19 | 1998-12-08 | Juno Online Services, L.P. | Method and apparatus for scheduling the presentation of messages to computer users |
US6243375B1 (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 2001-06-05 | Gregory J. Speicher | Internet-audiotext electronic communications system with multimedia based matching |
US6665653B1 (en) * | 1999-07-03 | 2003-12-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Noise reduction for a cluster-based approach for targeted item delivery with inventory management |
US7031932B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2006-04-18 | Aquantive, Inc. | Dynamically optimizing the presentation of advertising messages |
KR20020038141A (en) | 2000-11-16 | 2002-05-23 | 윤종용 | Advertisement method and apparatus in the internet |
KR20030020443A (en) | 2001-06-06 | 2003-03-08 | 소니 가부시끼 가이샤 | Advertisement insert apparatus and advertisement insert method, and storage medium |
US7136871B2 (en) | 2001-11-21 | 2006-11-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for selectively displaying advertisements |
US7162451B2 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2007-01-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information content distribution based on privacy and/or personal information |
CA2471830A1 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-24 | Earnix Ltd. | Pricing optimization apparatus and method |
US20040148222A1 (en) | 2003-01-24 | 2004-07-29 | John Sabella | Method and system for online advertising |
US20040225562A1 (en) | 2003-05-09 | 2004-11-11 | Aquantive, Inc. | Method of maximizing revenue from performance-based internet advertising agreements |
US7711779B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2010-05-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Prevention of outgoing spam |
US7363302B2 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2008-04-22 | Googole, Inc. | Promoting and/or demoting an advertisement from an advertising spot of one type to an advertising spot of another type |
US20050043345A1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2005-02-24 | Pfizer Inc | Pharmaceutical composition for the prevention and treatment of addiction in a mammal |
US20050096980A1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2005-05-05 | Ross Koningstein | System and method for delivering internet advertisements that change between textual and graphical ads on demand by a user |
US7533090B2 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2009-05-12 | Google Inc. | System and method for rating electronic documents |
US20060069613A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-03-30 | Microsoft Corporation | System for partial automation of content review of network advertisements |
-
2005
- 2005-06-29 US US11/170,727 patent/US8452656B2/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-06-29 WO PCT/US2006/025716 patent/WO2007002909A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-06-29 BR BRPI0613082-8A patent/BRPI0613082A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-06-29 EP EP06786049A patent/EP1913539A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2006-06-29 CN CNA200680030709XA patent/CN101248450A/en active Pending
- 2006-06-29 KR KR1020087002365A patent/KR101018987B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-06-29 AU AU2006263411A patent/AU2006263411B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2006-06-29 CA CA002613562A patent/CA2613562A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-06-29 JP JP2008519637A patent/JP2008545203A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2012
- 2012-01-13 JP JP2012004943A patent/JP5290439B2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of EP1913539A4 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2013543203A (en) * | 2010-11-22 | 2013-11-28 | アリババ・グループ・ホールディング・リミテッド | Predict cost and revenue estimates associated with a bid ranking model |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1913539A4 (en) | 2009-11-11 |
CN101248450A (en) | 2008-08-20 |
KR101018987B1 (en) | 2011-03-07 |
BRPI0613082A2 (en) | 2010-12-28 |
JP2008545203A (en) | 2008-12-11 |
JP2012104145A (en) | 2012-05-31 |
EP1913539A2 (en) | 2008-04-23 |
AU2006263411B2 (en) | 2010-12-02 |
KR20080028975A (en) | 2008-04-02 |
WO2007002909A3 (en) | 2007-03-22 |
US20070005418A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
CA2613562A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
US8452656B2 (en) | 2013-05-28 |
JP5290439B2 (en) | 2013-09-18 |
AU2006263411A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2006263411B2 (en) | Prioritizing ad reviews, by using expected revenue for example, in an advertising system | |
AU2005242763B2 (en) | Facilitating the serving of ads having different treatments and/or characteristics, such as text ads and image ads | |
US8370197B2 (en) | Controlling the serving of advertisements, such as cost per impression advertisements for example, to improve the value of such serves | |
CA2581864C (en) | Managing on-line advertising using metrics such as return on investment and/or profit | |
US10504153B2 (en) | Using the utility of configurations in ad serving decisions | |
CA2592742C (en) | Improving advertisement approval | |
US20140046763A1 (en) | Using search query information to determine relevant ads for a landing page of an ad | |
US20130024283A1 (en) | Using per document or document type performance of ad configurations in ad serving decisions | |
US20160034972A1 (en) | Generating and using ad serving guarantees in an online advertising network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200680030709.X Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2613562 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2008519637 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 144/MUMNP/2008 Country of ref document: IN Ref document number: 2006786049 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006263411 Country of ref document: AU Ref document number: 1020087002365 Country of ref document: KR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2006263411 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20060629 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0613082 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20071228 |