WO2009103834A2

WO2009103834A2 - System for incorporating chance into interactive games requiring the application of intellectual or motor skills

Info

Publication number: WO2009103834A2
Application number: PCT/ES2009/000092
Authority: WO
Inventors: Ignacio Gerson
Original assignee: Ignacio Gerson
Priority date: 2008-02-21
Filing date: 2009-02-19
Publication date: 2009-08-27
Also published as: PA8816501A1

Description

SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING AZAR TO INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION GAMES FOR INTELLECTUAL OR MOTOR SKILL

FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention is in the field of digital interactive games. It is operable on various devices such as terminals with "touch screen" monitors, video game consoles, cabinets or slot machines, personal computers, cell phones, interactive digital television, and offers the possibility of participating in skill games either by mere fun, for prizes or for money.

The invention is essentially applied in games of resolution by intellectual or motor ability, contemplating the case in which they also include a chance quota in its development, although its resolution necessarily depends on the intellectual or motor capacity of the player.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a novel system from which the chance and skill of the player influence the outcome of a game, to a degree that allows the incorporation of prizes (including payments with money), in addition to mere fun .

For this, the application of different schemes is used, including some that dynamically adjust the difficulty or level of the game providing incentives according to that ability.

As is known per se, many skill games contain, to a greater or lesser extent, a degree of chance whose result can be saved, improved or worsened by the participation of each player's ability.

For example, games involving dice (Generala, Backgammon, TEG), cards (Solitaires, One), while essentially random, have a component of intellectual ability and strategy.

The same happens in games where letters are drawn to form words (Scrabble, Boggle, Word Search), or where there are options to choose questions

(multiple cholee, Trivia), chance and intellectual ability intervene.

On the contrary there are some games that do not contain any chance and that depend solely on the skill or knowledge of the player: Chess, Checkers, Crosswords. The present invention proposes a system so that skill games (intellectual or motor) in which chance does not intervene, as well as in those where chance intervenes, to a greater or lesser extent, can be played so that, in addition to Intrinsic appeal that each game offers, an additional incentive that includes access to a prize (including money) is incorporated.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Slot machines

Games of pure chance without challenge, without participation of the skill and without possibilities to change the destiny. Game systems are designed to attract players' attention to an entertainment experience. The games usually attract attention through the use of lights, colors, sounds, musical themes, new topics, varied bonuses and prizes. They also incorporate more and new payment combinations.

However, when the player intervenes in these games, the experience offered by such systems is highly repetitive. The operation of the systems behind these games is always the same. They consist of a set of wheels that contain symbols of the most varied that rotate to randomly throw a result that may or may not consist of one or more paying combinations.

It is known that these systems, which continuously offer the same type of game, cause the player's boredom and loss of interest.

This loss of interest is manifesting the need for new game systems to appear that offer a varied and stimulating experience for the player, which increases his interest and encourages him to continue playing while placing a bet.

Precisely, the system of the present invention patent is a clear solution to the problem posed, since it allows to define gambling games where different levels of difficulty are incorporated, designed to challenge the intellectual or motor skill of the player, meaning new entertainment experiences, superior, always new and attractive.

In traditional "slots" the game behaves in a stable manner throughout an entire session, being the activity required by the player always the same and the results obtained completely random and absolutely independent of any type of skill by the same.

These games do not present any intellectual or motor challenge to the player.

On the other hand, there are games of "slots", such as the one detailed in US 6193696, which offer the possibility of answering a trivia question while playing the slot.

The player who answers the question correctly can access to play the slot with a jackpot of prizes. In any case, the probability of winning or losing continues to depend on chance and the fact of obtaining a certain combination of symbols in the slot game, a combination that, once achieved, awards the prize beyond any skill on the part of the player.

It stands out again that, beyond the possibility of increasing or decreasing the value of the prize that is accessed, through the question of "Trivia", the player does not It has any chance of influencing the resolution of the slot game.

The system of the present invention patent incorporates as a novelty, in addition to the random component, existing in every gambling game, the need to put into play the intellectual or motor skills of the player in the resolution thereof. That is, your intellectual or motor skills can change the fate of the game session.

Current "Arcade" Video Games

In the current arcade video games or games it is about the player overcoming obstacles and solving tasks, moving towards increasing levels of difficulty. This is always the case, therefore the player knows and incorporates this dynamic, knows that it follows a more difficult level, can exercise the required skills and in general can learn to solve all the difficulty levels presented by the game. This is so because ultimately all levels of difficulty, even the most difficult, depend almost exclusively on the skill of the player.

Although this type of game presents several challenges, a prize-paying mechanism or a payout cannot be established, since the odds of winning or losing depend directly on the player's ability and never on chance. That is, a very skilled player in a certain game would be a winner systematically.

With the system of additional incentives of the present invention patent, a draw of random and varied levels of difficulty is executed, which can even include unattainable levels of resolution, which makes it impossible for practice or learning to allow a player to win systematically. In this way it is guaranteed that there will be players who win and players who lose, being able to establish a specific math that allows a game development where the awarding of prizes is viable, even the payment with money.

Another notable drawback that can be seen in current video games is that the amount of difficulty levels is limited and they occur according to a fixed sequence, from least to greatest. In this type of games an extremely skilled player can play for hours, which is not economically profitable.

With the system of the present invention patent, it is possible to incorporate a lot of difficulty levels by drawing a game session of a predetermined amount of said levels. In this way, the duration of a session can be established, and thus ensure that a significant number of players will pass through a certain machine, where a percentage of them will win and another will lose, complying with a pre-established payout. .

Console games

With respect to games for consoles such as "Sony Playstation", "Nintendo", "Xbox", etc., although they incorporate a much more sophisticated multimedia with respect to the aforementioned "arcade" video games, they have a similar structure as far as to the succession fixed levels of difficulty, from the easiest to the most difficult.

Although it is a large number of very varied levels, following a fixed sequence implies, in the same way as "arcade" games, very long sessions where the success of the task is directly related to the player's ability, for Therefore, it would be impossible to establish a mathematics that allows a specific payout to be offered because the expense in prizes would be very high. There is no guarantee that the balance between the winning players and losing is maintained at a certain level that allows to calculate a "payout"^'.

With the incentive application system of the present invention patent, it is possible to incorporate levels of difficulty that are impossible to solve, similar in probability of resolution to obtaining the "Jackpot" in a slot machine, ensuring a balance that allows to raise funds to deliver prizes based on a pre-established proper payout.

Gambling for money

Gambling for money when there is a bank, are based on the study of the probability of the various winning combinations over the total possible combinations.

Normally, a payment table is established based on that probability. In the long run (that is, given a sufficiently large number of moves, with respect to the total possible combinations), a given payment table generates a certain payout (or percentage of money that the game - the bank - returns to the punters). If the payout is less than 100%, then the bank does not lose money.

For example, be a roulette with 37 different lockers

(numbered from 0 to 36) and a cloth in which the player can only bet on which number will come out (full bet), where the payment table establishes that the bank will pay the bettor who hits the number that goes on the roulette wheel. 35 to 1 ratio (that is, for each peso the player bets, the bank will pay him $ 35 if he hits; if the player loses, the bank keeps his bet).

If the roulette is well balanced, the probability of

any of the numbers is 37, as the payout table is $ 1— $ 35 (for any of the 37 numbers) in the long run (after thousands of plays), this payout

35Dl the game will be 37 (because when the player wins, he keeps the weight he bet, in addition to the 35 that the bank pays him), that is, almost 97.3%.

This establishes that after a sufficiently large number of games, the bank will have a net profit of about $ 0.70 for every $ 100 wagered.

All games of chance for money that are fair are based on the probabilistic study and work in the same way, that is, using a payment table that defines a certain "payout". Skill games, for money

Traditionally, skill games (either intellectual and / or motor) can only be played for money when it is made between pairs, where two or more players challenge each other by betting money and establishes the way in which money will be distributed according to the result of the game (for example, the winner takes everything, or the money is distributed proportionally to the final score of each player).

The punters do not necessarily have to be the same players, there can also be simple punters that bet on one or the other player. In fact, it could even be that the player itself is not a bettor.

The only place where there is a bank with regard to this type of games is when it is a simple mediator (or broker) of mutual trust. If there is such a broker, your win may be defined as a small percentage of each bet, regardless of which player is the winner; or through the management of probabilistic payment schemes leaving a consistent margin in favor of banking.

General considerations about resources of chance Chance in games

There are two mechanisms widely used to generate randomness in games of chance: a) Extraction lottery (or bolillero lottery) b) Chance of combinatorial probability Depending on the way both are implemented, they could be equivalent in some cases.

Extraction lottery The extraction or bollard lottery is one where one is randomly chosen from n items in a bag or bolillero.

Normally, the n elements are different from each other (for example, numbered from 1 to n) and the probability of choosing any of them is the same (the shape, size and weight of the n elements are equal). In fact, in this case, the probability of choosing any one of them

It is exactly _n .

When more than one element is to be extracted successively, there are two traditional ways of doing so: a) with replacement b) without replacement

Extraction with replacement

In the first, the element, once extracted and verified, is replaced in the bag or bolillero, so that it participates in the next extraction, with which, the probability that any of the n j_ objects in the second extraction, is still „.

Extraction without replacement

In the second form, the element, once extracted and verified, is left out of the bag or bolillero, of such that it is not possible to choose it again. In this case, there will be n-1 elements in the bag and the probability of choosing in the second extraction

1 any of them will be _n - \. For the third extraction, there will be n-2 items left in the bag and the probability of choosing any one of them will be

1 n-2 and so on. If elements are still extracted without replacement, the nth extraction will be done with a single element in the bag (the only one that was not chosen in the previous n-1 extractions), whose selection is safe (that is, the probability of choosing that one element is exactly 1).

Extraction with partial replacement - replacement window There is the possibility of using a mixed system where the extracted tickets are not immediately replenished, but that prevents "the bag from emptying", so that the probability of extracting a specific ticket is never exactly one.

Given n elements, a number i is defined such that ® ^{<i <rι} and it is defined that the number of tickets in the bag can never be less than i.

One possible form of implementation is that each or extractions (that is, when the quantity of items left in the bag or bolillero is exactly i), the already used elements are not replaced. Another possibility is to replace only part of the elements. In fact, if we allow the number i chosen to comply with ^{0≤ i≤} ", then the extraction with replacement and without replacement ^becomes the specific cases of the limits of i in the general partial replacement mechanism (í = 0 is without replacement ei = n is with replacement).

Non-equiprobable variants

In the cases described here, equiprobable elements were always used (that is, the probability of choosing any one that is in the bag is equal to choosing any of the others). If it were desired that the probabilities were different, it could be done in various ways: physical properties of the elements could be modified (such as, heavier or smaller balls will be more likely to come out of a bollard than lighter or larger balls), or it could modify the quantity of elements of each value (that is, use n elements with k different values with ^{k <n} so that some elements are repeated one or more times, increasing their probability of being chosen).

Random combinatorial probability

The chance of combinatorial probability is one in which one or more random elements are used (throw a coin, a dice, a whirligig, etc.).

For example, if a dice of k faces is thrown n times, the number of possible combinations (in which respect is respected k the order in which they came out) is n, that is, the

J_ probability of each of the combinations is _n k.

These probabilities can be modified by not distinguishing the order or repeating values on different faces of the dice.

Mechanism equivalences

In some cases, it is possible to simulate the chance of combinatorial probability using extraction lottery.

For example: All possible combinations of two 6-sided dice result in 36 (6) assuming that we distinguish the combination 1 - 2 from 2 - 1 (otherwise it can also be implemented).

If you want to simulate this event of chance of combinatorial probability using the extraction lottery, it is simply necessary to enter 36 tickets in the bag, each representing a possible combination of the two dice. The extraction must be replenished, since throwing two dice over and over again never depends on the previous result. Figure 1 shows both ways of representing the same game.

In the United States jurisdictions differ in law, requiring in some of them, that the raffle of a slot machine be random tape by tape, where the final combination is a probability of chance of each tape (Random model of combinatorial probability).

However, other jurisdictions require that the draw be made by first defining ALL possible combinations, putting all of them in a bag and drawing one (Extraction Lottery model). Even the condition so that this draw is fair for each player requires that once drawn, the combination gets back into the bag for the next draw and is not discarded (Extraction lottery with replenishment).

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Philosophy

The philosophy on which this system is based, is what considers the game an essential activity of the human being and factor of development of its potential, a cultural enrichment, favoring new interests, a stimulus for socialization.

The games of pure chance, not involving the player with their intelligence and skills, are prone to create habits of mechanization and compulsion, which often translates into more or less serious gambling.

The system of the present invention patent implies the use of skills and knowledge. It requires the participation of the person as a whole, with his ingenuity, visual, motor, spatial, linguistic skills, added to his knowledge.

With its implementation, games are obtained that favor, in the human being, the affirmation of their identity and avoid mechanization in their behavior, therefore decreases the propensity to compulsive behaviors.

Based on what is indicated in the preceding paragraphs, it is possible to affirm that the system for applying additional incentives in interactive games in general referred to in the present invention patent represents a true innovation in the field of entertainment since stimuli are integrated cultural type, replacing the compulsion with a real challenge in testing the knowledge acquired.

Principle of Operation The system of the present invention patent conceives a way of performing skill games maintaining a mathematical balance, equivalent to that presented in games of chance, a probability that allows to maintain a balance between winners and losers and, in Based on this, offering prizes as an additional incentive to the game itself.

Starting from the stated conception, it can be said that the principle of operation of the invented incentive system consists in the incorporation of various engines or resources that can be applied to the implementation of each game, so that a random component is incorporated into the game existing.

These resources can be used in isolation or in combination according to the type of game in which the invented system is applied.

These resources can be titled as follows: 1) Maximum results lottery / la) Maximum results lottery with statistical compensation;

Ib) Lottery of maximum results with compensation of skill imbalance by pure chance; 2) Lottery of difficulty levels;

3) Probabilistic balance system;

4) Multilevel well system 1) Lottery of maximum results

A first applicable resource to incorporate chance in a given game is the so-called maximum results lottery, which is based on the concept of establishing the prizes to be delivered in advance and thus knowing the mathematical results of the same. That is, 10,000 lottery tickets are sold at $ 1 each, a first prize of $ 5,000, a second of $ 2,000, a third of $ 1,000 and a four of $ 500 are awarded. It is known in advance that the calculation will result in a certain value that will allow to distribute these prizes.

The Maximum Results Lottery is one in which a series of conditions is randomly drawn that will limit the maximum result that the player can achieve in a given play.

The draw can be done with any variant of the Extraction Lottery.

The draw that is made (the part of chance involved in the game) is made on a maximum result that can reach a previously defined set of combinations of cards, dice, letters, spatial arrangements, or what will be determined for a specific game.

Once this draw is made, the player's ability will be the one that defines if he manages to take advantage of that randomly selected set of combinations or if he takes advantage of a smaller part. The prize will win him over what he could really take advantage of (and not over the maximum possible result of that combination), so his ability will also influence the prize he receives.

In this way, an intelligent selection of combinations associated with maximum results and a payment table associated with the results will generate a bounded payout for the game, allowing it to be played for money with a bank, in the same way as traditional slot machines .

Problems inherent in the maximum results lottery The Maximum Results Lottery allows you to control the maximum payout level by taking as the only reference a perfect player in a given game. While this can be used so that the bank does not lose money

(defining a maximum payout strictly less than 100% for said perfect player), this may not be desirable.

If most players have a much lower skill than the hypothetical perfect player, the effective payout will be well below the maximum payout, leaving the player feeling that he never wins or that the game pays little.

la) Maximum results lottery with statistical compensation

A possible solution to this is to have statistical game data for a given population and adjust the payment table so that the statistical payout has the desired value, even if the maximum payout remains for over 100%. If the statistical data is based on a sufficiently large number of plays and the set of players that generated such statistics is significantly representative of the set of players who will use the game, this solution is viable.

In fact, to make a payment table so that if all the players were perfect, the house systematically lose money, however, by making a statistical study of the players' behavior, an appropriate payout can be established so that the imbalance that may occur in favor of the house when players have little ability, is reserved for use in payments to the most skilled players.

While this mechanism can give satisfactory results, it is true that it is something that is certainly empirical and involves a double risk to the house: If for a long period the distribution of the players' ability is systematically higher than expected, the house lose money If on the contrary, it is lower than expected, the house could earn money in excess which is never convenient because it ends up generating disgruntled customers. A "payout" is established lower than the one sought.

For this reason, another resource is incorporated through which it is definitely ensured that if the payout is not the most appropriate, the bank will invariably proceed to pay compensation prizes. Ib) Lottery of maximum results with compensation of skill imbalance by pure chance.

One solution is to compensate for a possible imbalance of house-friendly ability using exclusively a resource ruled completely by chance.

Said compensation resource includes leaving the payment table based on the maximum payout (that is, considering a maximum use of the player's ability), in which case the amount of the imbalance that occurs in favor of the house will be drawn in prizes applied to the same game (mistery prizes, multilevel jackpots, etc.).

The proposal is to make a payment table that gives the desired "payout" on the hypothesis (almost certainly false) that all players are perfect. That is, a proportion of maximum results is drawn in the same way that combinations are drawn in a slot machine and this proportion generates a desired payout in the long term.

As it is presumed that the probability that the players are not perfect is very high, it is known that an imbalance in favor of the house is necessarily generated, that is, the "payout" ends up being lower than configured.

Taking into account the above, the invention contemplates that all those amounts that are unfairly left in favor of the house be used in the execution of raffles during the games generating surprise prizes for the players in a totally random way, independent of the skill of the player, that is to say, by pure chance.

In the exposed way, this new draw, by pure chance, which is incorporated, by using the aforementioned imbalance in favor of the house as a well to pay for the prizes, regardless of the player's ability, guarantees that the payout established by The payment table is always the most appropriate.

2) Lottery of difficulty levels

This second resource of incorporation of chance that can be used by the system of the present invention patent is based on the draw of Difficulty Levels of a given game.

When the elements, questions or combinations involved in a game can be assigned the concept of difficulty level, a difficulty level is drawn first and then an element, question or combination associated with said difficulty level.

When it is possible to determine in advance that there are elements, questions or combinations that result from such a high level of difficulty that it is virtually impossible to solve, it is possible to achieve a distribution of these elements to control the payout of the game. Problems inherent in the lottery of difficulty levels

The only way in which the Difficulty Level Lottery allows you to control the maximum level of the payout is to abuse the high (or virtually impossible) levels. While this can be used so that the bank does not lose money, this may not be desirable. If most players have a not very high ability, the effective payout will be well below that level, leaving the player feeling that he always loses or that the game pays little.

A possible solution to this is to have statistical game data for a given population and adjust the difficulty levels so that the statistical payout is close to the desired value.

If the statistical data is based on a sufficiently large number of plays and the set of players that generated such statistics is significantly representative of the set of players who will use the game, this solution is viable.

Variants of the Lotteries of maximum results and Difficulty Levels

Now, the Lottery of maximum results and the Lottery of difficulty levels have, in turn, two possible scenarios: a) with replacement of tickets or b) without replacement of tickets (by discard). As explained previously in the chapter on general considerations about resources of chance, in the first case, the ticket drawn (drawn) returns to the bag for the next play providing equal conditions between players, that is, all players They play the same draw, with the same amount of tickets and with the same chances of winning.

The second case proposes that the ticket drawn (drawn) from the entire bag of results tickets be discarded and the next move continues to extract tickets but with one less and so on until the tickets run out, at which time the bag is renewed.

The difference between these two scenarios is that the second one (without replenishment) is handled through exact prizes, that is, if in a bag of 10,000 tickets there is only one jackpot, it is known exactly that a prize will be awarded between 10,000 tickets , neither one more nor one less, while the first form (with replenishment) proposes only a probability and not an exact knowledge of the prizes to be distributed, that is, when replenishing the ticket, the raffle is still over 10,000 tickets.

Now, in this second case, it is only the probability that says that such prize should go out on an average of 1 in 10,000, but in this case there is no guarantee that this prize goes out exactly 1 time every 10,000, it can be variable and go to the 12,000, 15,000 or up to 20,000, and even leave more than once for 10,000 consecutive extractions. The reality is that it is not accurate, which makes it more natural. However, different games require, depending on their functionality, the use of one of these two ways.

3) Probabilistic balance system

A third resource that can use the incentive system of the present invention patent to incorporate chance in a given game, is the so-called Probabilistic Balance System, [SBP] that acts as a payout corrector, allowing both lotteries to be balanced (maximum results and of difficulty levels) based on the more or less local or temporary deviation of the effective payout with respect to the desired payout. In the case of the Maximum Results Lottery, the Probabilistic Balance System dynamically varies the proportion of elements, questions or combinations with high and low maximum results.

That is, if it is detected that the effective payout is well below the desired payout, the Probabilistic Balance System will increase the probability of choosing objects with high maximum results.

If, on the contrary, the effective payout is well above the desired payout, the Probabilistic Balance System will decrease the probability of choosing objects with high maximum results (but in no case will it eliminate it).

In the case of the Difficulty Level Lottery, the

Probabilistic balance system dynamically varies the proportion of low, medium, high and virtually impossible levels of difficulty.

That is, if it is detected that the effective payout is well below the desired payout, the Probabilistic Balance System will increase the proportion of objects with low or medium difficulty level.

If, on the contrary, the effective payout is well above the desired payout, the Probabilistic Balance System will increase the proportion of objects with a high or virtually impossible level of difficulty.

Frequency, discretionality and location of the SBP The Probabilistic Balance System can be applied continuously or with different frequencies, be it each determined time interval, each determined number of plays or a combination of both.

On the other hand, you can allow large adjustments or narrow the difference between the previous state and the subsequent state of the system, so that the player does not notice that suddenly the game is much easier or more difficult.

Finally, the adjustment can be made on an individual player or on a set of players (either those in a given region or local or other profile that can be identified). SBP Effect

From a bag full of elements or combinations with a certain amount of difficulty levels and by randomly choosing one of them, the game presents the player with a more or less complicated challenge depending on the difficulty level drawn.

This form that involves challenging the player with different levels of difficulty, can result in different scenarios depending on the ability of each player. That is, a medium level of difficulty can be successfully resolved by a skilled person and not be solved by a person without the same skill and / or knowledge.

In this case, the Probabilistic Balance System is in charge, in sessions executed every certain time, as the game requires, to level the lottery bag to reach a mathematical balance again.

Then, said Balance System manages to balance the payout when a draw of difficulty levels yields unexpected results. For example if the system raffled a high level of difficulty almost impossible to solve for a session and the same, thanks to the player's ability, could be resolved, then the system can then balance that session with more raffles of high levels of difficulty. SBP Exemplification

The system of the invention allows difficulty levels to be selected in two different ways: 1) randomly

(by different methods) and 2) in an artificially intelligent way according to the performance of the player (or a set of players) through the SBP. In both ways you can reach the same payout. The two examples of the above explained follow:

Application Examples Example 1 (without SBP)

If we have 3 difficulty levels A, B and C where A is the easy one, B is one of the intermediate levels and C is the impossible one, a player J who sits in a terminal will receive one of these three difficulty levels by lottery.

Then, the player places his bet and the game raffles the difficulty levels. The drawn level is presented to the player who gives his answer, which is evaluated by the system.

If the answer is correct, the game again draws the difficulty levels, takes one out and presents it again to the player, and so on.

If the answer is incorrect, the game proceeds in exactly the same way. Re-draw difficulty levels. That the player obtains an easy, intermediate or difficult level is completely random and the prize depends on the performance. Ex emplo 2 (with SBP)

The player sits down to play and the system defines a

Proportional distribution of difficulty levels (DPND) at baseline, related to the proportion represented by each of the difficulty levels A (easy), B

(intermediate) and C (practically impossible).

The draw is made and the resulting difficulty level is presented to the player through different game structures. The player gives an answer that is sent to the system for analysis and for the evaluation of the balance between the three defined levels.

Every certain time (or a certain number of plays), the Probabilistic Balance System analyzes the state of the system. If the answers correspond to the expected, that is, the user correctly resolved most of the easy levels, some of the intermediate levels, and incorrectly the impossible levels, the SBP maintains the state.

If, on the contrary, the state was modified by the fact that the user answered correctly at an impossible level or the user incorrectly answered several easy levels, the System executes the SBP that will intelligently modify the proportional Distribution of difficulty levels to be drawn. .

Simple use cases of the SBP 4 very simple use cases can be used to understand the operation. To exemplify them We will start from an initial DPND of 10 Difficulty Levels

Minimum (MIN) and 9 Levels of Maximum Difficulty (MAX):

The system draws an impossible level (MAX) and the player returns a winning response. The system executes the SBP resulting in a new equilibrium now consisting of 13 Impossible Levels (MAX) and 9 Levels

Easy (MIN) increasing the probability that a Impossible Level (MAX) will be drawn again.

The system draws an impossible level (MAX) and the player returns a losing response (P). The balance is not modified therefore the system maintains the state. The system draws an Easy Level (MIN) and the player returns a losing response. The system executes the SBP resulting in a new equilibrium now consisting of 9 Impossible Levels (MAX) and 13 Easy Levels (MIN) increasing the probability of being drawn, this time, an easy level (MIN). The system draws an Easy Level (MIN) and the player returns a winning response. The balance is not modified therefore the system maintains the state.

Process description

The player starts a game session in the system;

The System defines an initial DPND according to the selected game;

The System draws the difficulty levels;

The System presents the difficulty level drawn in the form of a game; An "input" is received from the player and the system performs its corresponding analysis; The System compares the new state (easy levels versus impossible levels) with the initial state and maintains the same state, or runs the SBP; The SBP balances the status of the System according to the "input" received.

Based on the foregoing, it can be said that the system of the present invention patent stands out because it defines a first stage in which, through the lottery of maximum results or that of difficulty levels, it raffles (selects) maximum results or difficulty levels, which will be presented to the user in the form that is most appropriate for each game.

The Probabilistic Balance System, the second stage, will be executed, if necessary, within a certain time or each certain amount of plays, which may be stipulated in each of the games or more globally, and it will be in charge of balancing the prizes to keep a balanced payout.

Payout To reach a probability on the Lottery model of maximum results or levels of difficulty with or without replacement, it is necessary to define a hypothesis about the level of skill of the player, said hypothesis that is demanding and used as reference the perfect player, that is, the one who meets the ceilings raised by the maximum result or level of difficulty (for this it is necessary that said player can be modeled).

This establishes the maximum possible skill. It is clear that the real player will have a lower performance (or at most equal) to that of the perfect player. In this way it is possible to establish a probability and by means of a simulation manage to predict an approximate and close payout to the desired one.

Another possible variant is to have the amounts accumulated due to the imbalance between the ability of the real player and that of the perfect player be used in prize payments granted by pure chance, in order to comply with the pre-established payout.

4) Multilevel Well System

A completely different approach, within the same principle of operation, possible to use, includes the payment of the skill through a poceado system, so that the payment table is dynamic and based on the current level of accumulation in a series of wells associated with the levels payable.

4a) Simple multi-level well system

This scheme exclusively rewards skill.

The possible scores that can be reached are divided into a series of discrete levels, where, from a certain level, it is defined that the game will pay to those who reach that level or a higher level. The levels will be defined based on the game in question, but it can be a certain trajectory traveled, a quantity of items collected, places reached, screens completed, ranges of scores, etc.

A well will be assembled for each awarded level, that is, for all levels between the minimum that is defined to receive a prize and the maximum possible level of the game. In this way, there will be as many wells as levels that pay prize.

Of the amount that each player pays to play, one part goes to the company's profit and the rest is divided into as many parts as wells must be maintained. The proportion in which it is contributed to each well must be set for each game instance (they could be the same or different from each other).

In turn, each well is divided into two parts (not necessarily equal, but of fixed proportions for each game): an immediate part and a reserve part.

When a player reaches a level that pays a prize, then the well corresponding to that level is given plus the sum of a pre-established percentage of the immediate parts of all the wells of the levels below that level. For example, if levels 6 to 10 pay a prize and the player reaches level 8, then he will charge the immediate part of the level 8 well and the sum of the predefined percentages of the immediate parts of wells 6 and 7. When the immediate part of a well is awarded as a prize, the reserve part is divided into the same fixed proportion, leaving a new immediate part and a smaller part of the reserve.

Then, if the wells were not arranged in such a way that a larger well corresponds to a higher level, they are rearranged to make this happen. In the trivial case where the predefined percentage that is delivered from the lower level wells is 100%, this rearrangement never occurs.

The game does not have a payout table since all prizes are awarded dynamically by wells.

These wells could have upper limits in order to avoid unlimited growth. Once a well reaches the limit, the new contributions that would correspond to it, will be distributed among the rest of the wells in the same proportion as the original distribution is made, but not counting the wells that have already reached their respective limits.

You can also define a minimum level for each well, where the house would be responsible for covering the difference between the minimum level and the current level as long as the amount of the well is below that threshold.

Dynamic adjustment of contributions to wells Given the superior limitation of wells, it may be the case (especially at higher levels with a low frequency of occurrence) that these limits are reached and that the wells do not grow for a long time (until the well is used to pay a prize).

One way to avoid this is to make the contribution percentages to each well, instead of being predefined fixed values, proportional to the differences between the upper limit of the well and the current value of the well, so that, as the The value of the well is close to the limit, the contribution is less and less (and is higher at levels that are farther from its limit).

A mixed technique can also be used where dynamic mode begins to be used after the amount of the well reaches a predetermined level.

4b) Mixed multilevel well system with chance

This scheme allows you to add a random percentage in the awards ceremony.

Of the amount that each player pays to play, one part goes to the company's profit, another part goes to the payment of prizes by chance and the rest is divided into as many parts as wells must be maintained. The proportion in which it is contributed to each well must be set for each game instance (they could be the same or different from each other) in the same way that it will be done with the proportion that is destined to the prizes by chance.

The mechanism is the same as in the case of the simple multi-level well system, but additionally, at any time during the game a prize is drawn for random using any type of extraction lottery or using random combinatorial probability.

These awards are governed by the same mechanisms as a bonus or a motivator in a traditional slot machine and the payout is defined in the same way. If it is desired that the totality of the proportion destined for prizes by chance be distributed (so that the profit of the house comes only from the proportion already separated for that purpose), then the payout of these prizes will be adjusted 100%.

The proportion assigned to the random part of the game will depend on the weight you want to give the player's ability to chance.

4c) Multilevel well system with random multiplier This scheme allows you to add a multiplier draw to any of the previous multilevel well schemes. The multiplier applies exclusively to the part of multi-level wells by skill.

A set of possible multipliers is selected with their frequency of occurrence (where normally the one with the highest frequency is Ix, equivalent to not using a multiplier).

The largest multiplier in the table is taken and its value is doubled, obtaining a z factor (that is, if the largest multiplier is 1Ox, then the z factor will be 20). This factor will be used to define the proportion between the immediate part and the reserve part of each well of so that the immediate part is _z and the part of _z- 1 reserve is _z . Thus, even if large multipliers are obtained by lot, the reserves will be sufficient to cover them.

It is clear from the foregoing that it is an invention that defines a new combination of means designed to achieve a superior result, being the same unpredictable and surprising even for an expert in the field. Consequently, in addition to being new, its constitutive and functional conception shows a clear inventive activity, so that it meets the conditions required by the Law to be considered an invention patent.

Inventive Activity

No interactive game known today, does not even suggest the solution that arises from what is indicated in the preceding paragraphs, which is why it is a proposal that, besides being innovative, has a clear inventive activity.

Description of application examples

To specify the advantages thus briefly commented, to which users and those skilled in the art can add many more, and to facilitate the understanding of the invented incentive system, some preferred examples of realization are described below, with the express clarification that precisely because they are examples, it does not apply assign to them a limiting or exclusive character of the scope of protection of the present invention patent, but simply a purely explanatory intention of the basic conception on which it is based assists.

Example 1: Tx ± track.

As is known in itself, the Trivia is a game of questions and answers that deal with a specific topic or topic, or with general culture issues. There are many versions of this type of games, from traditional board games (Trivial Pursuit, Mind Race, etc.), to mass media versions {Who wants to be a millionaire ?, Odol Question, Jeopardy, etc.).

Possible implementation

One possible implementation is to design a base of multiple choice questions and answers, which have a level of difficulty associated between 1 and 10, where 1 is very easy and 10 is virtually impossible to solve.

A modality of asking ten consecutive questions can be implemented where the player can choose, after answering each one, if he continues playing or retires.

If the player answers a question incorrectly (or does not answer within the predetermined 30 seconds), the player loses. At the start of the game, the player places his bet (it can be fixed or variable value) and the first question is presented. As you answer correctly, new questions appear.

If he answers ten straight questions correctly, the player wins the Jackpot.

Use of the invention The mechanisms of the invention are applicable at various levels in this game. It is possible to use the Difficulty Level Lottery for each question. In turn, a simple Extraction Lottery (with or without replenishment) could be used to circumvent the proportion of levels of difficulty in the series of questions presented.

Finally, the Probabilistic Balance System can be used to increase the probability that the proportional distribution of difficulty levels includes more or less questions of greater difficulty level based on the historical functioning of the game (for example, if during the last time the The vast majority of people lost in the first three questions, the SBP can make the probability that the DPND of each play includes a higher proportion of questions from level 1 to 3.

Payment tables Payment tables will be assembled based on the probabilistic study of difficulty levels and will incorporate payments based on a specific question. (probably between the first and the fourth), so that in some correct answer (possibly between the fourth and the sixth) the player recovers his bet and, from there, obtains an increasing profit for each answer obtained.

Example 2: Memory Test

As it is known in itself, the memory test consists of a set of cards all with the same back and with various figures on the front. Normally the front figures are repeated in pairs.

The game starts with all the chips face down and the player must turn pairs of chips. If they have the same front, remove them, if not, you should leave them face down as you found them.

Usually two or more players are played taking turns choosing the chips. The game ends when there are no more chips face down and the player with the most pairs withdrew wins.

Possible implementation

The game can be implemented so that a player plays alone against the machine and can be finished when there are no more chips (traditional variant) or after a certain amount of moves.

In the first case, it would be paid for the amount of moves (the smaller the number, the more it will be paid), in the second case, it can be paid for the number of pairs found. The level of difficulty of the game is normally associated with the initial amount of tokens and the images in them (there could be similar to each other although different, a thematic version could be made, for example with Renaissance paintings, where knowledge of the particular subject it would be an additional advantage for the player).

You can also lower the difficulty level by presenting more than one pair with the same image.

Use of the invention

You can use the Difficulty Level Lottery to define the number of repeated pairs that will be displayed. It could also be used to enlarge or reduce the distance on the board between both pieces of a pair.

Finally, the game could also be implemented in such a way that the initial position of the chips is not fully established at the start of the game, but it is established as the player discovers chips (obviously, once a chip was discovered , it is fixed). In this way, the Maximum Results Lottery can be used in such a way as to prevent the player from finding a pair in the first P plays (where P can be any number less than or equal to the number of different pairs).

The Probabilistic Balance System can be applied to change the probability distribution of the different maximum results and / or difficulty levels. Payment tables

The payment tables will depend on various parameters related to the actual implementation of the game. One possibility is to set the maximum number of moves at a number greater than or equal to the number of pairs and pay per pair found.

Another possibility is to play until the board is completed and pay for the amount of moves (the smaller the number of moves, the greater the payment).

Example 3: Generate it.

Another game known in itself is the so-called "Generala" which is made with five dice and a beaker. Each move consists of throwing the dice one to three times (choosing the dice that are reintroduced into the beaker from the second roll) and a series of special games must be completed: ladder (five consecutive numbers), full (two dice with one number and three with another), poker (four dice with the same number), generate it (the five equal dice) and double-generate it (a second one generates it in the same match); and a series of plays with specific numbers (number of ones, number of dozen, etc.).

Normally the special games have a specific value (ladder: 20, full: 30, poker: 40, generate it: 50 and double-generate it: 100) and in the plays of specific numbers the points of the equal dice are added (if you draw three doces scores 6 points (3x2) in the box corresponding to number two; if he takes two fives he scores 10 points (2x5) in the box corresponding to number five).

In total a game has eleven moves.

The special games, if they come out in the first of the three shots, are called "served" and their score is 5 points more than normal, except for the general who simply "wins the game."

The strategy of the player consists in the way to write down the results of each move (if he took four six, should he score 24 to 6 or a poker of 40 ?, if he did not take any game that he can score, does he score 0 in the general, on a number or on the stairs?

Possible implementation

You can play in a traditional way in which after each move the player chooses what he scores. It can also be played in such a way that the machine presents to the player what type of play he should score in the next move. You can implement a global bet for a complete play or a bet for each move.

Use of the invention

You can use the Maximum Results Lottery so that you can control the output of the dice in a game or move based on that Lottery.

The Probabilistic Balance System can be applied to change the probability distribution of the different maximum results. Payment tables

It can be paid based on the traditional score of the game, either linearly or by increasing the top prizes so as to make it more attractive. Payments can be implemented for reaching certain point thresholds. You can implement specific prizes for special games or if you get them at a certain time.

As indicated above, it is possible to use the Multilevel Well System so that players contribute to a series of staggered wells according to the level reached (when betting on full game) and players who reach those levels are charging the parts corresponding.

Examples of Well Payment Methods

Scores are awarded according to the traditional form of the game and are assembled (as an example): Jackpot Well (for those who serve generate it served)

Well 4 (level 300 points or more)

Well 3 (level 220 to 299 points)

Well 2 (level 150 to 219 points)

Well 1 (level 100 to 149 points)

It is defined that at each level the Immediate part of the well will be 40% and the reserve part of the well will be 60%.

The amount of a player's bet will be distributed as follows: Win for the house: 10%

Contribution to well 1: 25%

Contribution to well 2: 20% Contribution to well 3: 20% Contribution to well 4: 15% Contribution to Jackpot well: 10%

At any given time the wells could be configured as follows:

corresponding to the level

Suppose a player, with this well configuration, obtains 178 points. Then he reached level 2. The player charges the immediate part of this well only ($ 1,725) and the reserve part ($ 2,586) is returned from an immediate 40% and a 60% reserve part leaving $ 1,035 and $ 1,551 respectively.

But this well is now smaller than the level 1 well and that should not happen, so the wells are rearranged by their amounts and the following table remains:

If a player now scores 246 points, he is entitled to the immediate part of the level 3 pit ($ 25,315); the corresponding reserve part ($ 15,189) is returned from 40% / β0%, leaving the new immediate part at $ 6,076 and the new reserve part at $ 9,113; As this well is still larger than the level 2 well, they are not rearranged and the following table remains:

Note: To simplify the explanation, the constant contributions to the wells by all the players that start a game are not being considered. Alternative: Deliver the immediate part of the well corresponding to the level plus the sum of 100% of all the wells of the lower levels

Given the same original table, suppose again that a player gets 178 points. It reached level 2.

Now what you are going to charge is the immediate part of the level 2 well ($ 1,725) plus the immediate part of the level 1 well ($ 1,173), totaling $ 2,898. The reserve parts of both wells are again divided into 40% / 60% and the following well configuration remains:

If a player now scores 246 points (level 3), he will charge the sum of the immediate parts of the level 1, 2 and 3 wells, in total $ 11,865. The reserve parts of the three wells are again divided and it remains:

Note that in this alternative, it is never necessary to reorder since all the lower wells are emptied at the same time as the well of the successful level.

Note; To simplify the explanation, the constant contributions to the wells by all the players that start a game are not being considered.

Intermediate alternatives

The two previous examples gave the extreme cases of taking only the immediate part of the corresponding level (and 0% of the lower levels) and taking the immediate part of the corresponding level plus the total sum of 100% of the immediate parts of the lower levels. .

Different percentages of the percentages of the lower levels could be established and different payment methods scenarios can be put together. Effect of the contribution of the players' payment If it is considered that given the original initial table ten users start to play $ 10 each ($ 100 in total), $ 10 would go to the house profit and the rest is added to the respective wells in the proportion indicated at the beginning (level 1 25%; level 2 20%; level 3 20%, level 4 15%, jackpot 10%), so that the new table would remain this way:

Well Total well Part Part of immediate reservation

Level 1 $ 2,956 $ 1,183 $ 1,773

Level 2 $ 4,331 $ 1,733 $ 2,598

Level 3 $ 25,335 $ 10,134 $ 15,201 Level 4 $ 310,106 $ 124,043 $ 186,063

Jackpot $ 593,017 $ 237,207 $ 355,810

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Terms associated with games

Game

A specific implementation of a specific game is defined as a game, with its start, finish and award conditions.

Example: "generate it by total score of 11 moves" is a game; the "memory test of 10 different chips on a 5x4 board by number of moves until all pairs are found" is another game.

Departure

A specific instance of a game is defined as a game (or play). The game starts with a bet and ends when the player wins, loses or withdraws. Once a game is over, the player must bet again if he wishes to start another game.

A specific full run of the generala is a game. A specific trivia session (from the first question until you lose or answer the tenth question correctly) is a game.

Move

It is defined as moving to a specific action of the player within a game. A roll of one to three shots of generala is a move. A selection of a pair in the memory test is a move. An answer to a specific question in a trivia is a move. Depending on how the game is defined, a move could also involve a bet and a possible payment.

Note that there may be games in which the game is a single move, by definition (not only because the player loses fast) such as being the crux of only one question per time or a traditional slot game.

Payout

It is the amount of prizes, both in diverse objects and in money, that a machine or a set of machines delivers. The level of the "payout" is measured proportionally based on the amount of resources or money collected by the corresponding machines. That is to say: it is the percentage of money that the game - the bank - returns to the punters. If the payout is less than 100%, then the bank does not lose money.

Generic random mechanisms

Extraction Lottery (Bolillero Lottery)

Random choice of one among n tickets (or balls) of a bag or locker. Probability of choosing one and any (if all tickets are different) is _n .

If you want to increase the probability of some tickets with respect to others, they can be repeated (that is, they put in the bag n tickets with k different values where k <n). Using different amounts the probabilities are handled. Extraction lottery with replacement

Once a ticket has been removed, it is replaced in the bag. The probability of each extraction from the bag is independent of what happened before.

Extraction Lottery without replacement

Once a ticket has been removed, it is left out of the bag and does not play anymore (at least until the bag is empty). The probability of extraction of each element depends on the previous extractions.

Extraction lottery with partial replacement (replenishment window)

It is a mixed system in which tickets are not immediately replenished, if not from a certain moment (in general when there are k tickets left in the bag (with k <n). It can be implemented in different ways: once it starts to replenish, it is continually replenished (either the one that was extracted more time or one at random), or they are replenished all at once and they are expected again to play again to replenish.

Random combinatorial probability

One or more elements are thrown that can take different values (dice, coins, whirlpools, roulettes, etc.).

Specific mechanisms of the invention Maximum results lottery

It can be used for games in which you can define starting conditions (chips on a board, order of cards in a deck, etc.) or control conditions weighted for the development of the game (order in that the chips are displayed once they are discovered, combinations of chips or dice that will appear, etc.), so that they guarantee that a player, even if he plays perfectly, cannot overcome a maximum result (a roof) when These conditions are given for the given item.

In these games, a certain proportion of maximum results are put in the bag and before each game it is chosen which one will be used using the extraction lottery either with replacement, without replacement or with partial replacement.

Once this is done, they are selected (possibly also using the extraction lottery either with replacement, without replacement or with partial replacement) starting conditions (or control conditions, as appropriate to the specific game) that meet the maximum selected result.

-Attention: Note that, in principle, the maximum results are drawn on the one hand and, on the other, the specific items.

Proportional distribution of maximum results (DPRM)

The proportional distribution of maximum results (DPBM) is the distribution of the various maximum results that exist at any given time in the stock market when the maximum results lottery is used. Difficulty Level Lottery

In games where you can define different levels of difficulty either for the entire game or for each move, a certain proportion of each level of difficulty is put in the bag and before the game or move (as appropriate) you choose what level of difficulty will be used using the extraction lottery either with replacement, without replacement or with partial replacement.

-Note that the lottery of difficulty levels can be applied both to the game as a whole, as only to a move (this will depend on the game in question).

-Note that this lottery of difficulty levels can be combined (if the game allows) with the lottery of maximum results. For example, you can sort by lottery of maximum results one game (board) of word search so that it only contains 5 words and, in addition to circumvent the level of difficulty and choose medium difficulty (there are boards with 5 easier words What others) . Finally one is chosen from the boards with 5 words of medium difficulty and that is what is presented to the player.

Proportional distribution of difficulty levels (DPND) The proportional distribution of difficulty levels (DPND) is the distribution of the various levels of difficulty that exist at any given time inside the bag when the difficulty level lottery is used. Probabilistic Balance System (SBP)

The Probabilistic Balance System (SBP) is the mechanism that dynamically modifies the proportions within the stock market; either the bag of maximum results, the bag of difficulty levels, or both; based on the previous behavior.

The SBP allows you to increase (or decrease) the chances of winning or getting good results based on what is happening. The mechanism is general and could be applied to a set of players, a set of games, or a combination of both.

Ultimately, what the SBP allows is to dynamically vary the proportional distribution of maximum results or the proportional distribution of difficulty levels in the corresponding exchanges if the actual behavior of the players differs from that expected for the distribution that was being used.

Claims

1.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING AZAR TO INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION GAMES FOR INTELLECTUAL OR MOTOR SKILLS, such as digital interactive games operable from specific terminals, video game consoles, personal computers, cell phones, digital interactive television, even if they include a initial random fee for its usual development, in order to incorporate the possibility of obtaining prizes

(including payments with money), in addition to the mere fun characterized in that it includes the incorporation of at least one random resource capable of maintaining a mathematical balance between winners and losers equivalent to the one that governs the games of pure chance, maintaining the condition that, for The resolution of each game requires the participation of the person, with their ingenuity and visual, motor, spatial, linguistic skills, added to their knowledge.

2.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the randomized resource incorporated is managed by a probabilistic balance system that ensures the adequate proportion between winners and losers based on the pre-established payout.

3.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO GAMES

INTERACTIVE, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the random resource incorporated is a lottery of maximum results comprising the previous draw of the maximum result that the player can reach (even if he plays perfectly).

4.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 3, characterized in that the maximum results lottery is an extraction lottery with replacement.

5.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 3, characterized in that the maximum result lottery is an extraction lottery without replacement.

6.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 3, characterized in that the maximum results lottery is an extraction lottery with partial replacement.

7.- SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the random resource incorporated is a lottery of difficulty levels that raffles the level of difficulty that is established for each game between a maximum level

(virtually impossible to overcome) and a minimum level (extremely easy to overcome).

8.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 7, characterized in that the lottery of difficulty levels is extraction with replacement.

9.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 7, characterized in that the lottery of difficulty levels is extraction without replacement.

10.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 7, characterized in that the lottery of difficulty levels is extraction with partial replacement.

11.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 7, characterized in that the lottery of difficulty levels is executed to establish the level of difficulty of a complete game.

12.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 7, characterized in that the lottery of difficulty levels is executed to establish the level of difficulty of each of the game's events.

13.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the random resource incorporated is the combination of the lottery of maximum results and the lottery of difficulty levels.

14.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is the resource that modifies the proportions of the levels maximum, minimum and intermediate that are drawn in a lottery of difficulty levels, based on previous behaviors.

15.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is the resource that modifies the proportions of the maximum results, which are drawn in a lottery of maximum results, depending on of previous behaviors.

16.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied continuously.

17.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied every certain time interval.

18.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied every certain amount of plays.

19.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied by combining time intervals with number of plays.

20.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied to each intervening player.

21.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 2, characterized in that the probabilistic balance system is applied to groups of players involved.

22.- SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that, the resource that allows to establish a pre-established payout and to distribute prizes proportional to the ability is a multi-level well system.

23.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22, characterized in that the ability is rewarded based on the simple multi-level well system.

24.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22 characterized in that the ability is rewarded based on the system of mixed multinível wells with chance.

25.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22 characterized in that the ability is rewarded based on the multi-level well system with random multiplier.

26.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22, characterized in that the wells that constitute the system are formed based on pre-established proportions.

27.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22 characterized in that the wells that constitute the system are established based on functions related to the amount of prizes in each well and the minimum and maximum amounts of each of they.

28.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22, characterized in that each well is satisfied with a proportion of immediate delivery and a reserve proportion.

29.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 22, characterized in that the prizes corresponding to each level are made up of the entire immediate delivery part corresponding to that level plus the sum of a predetermined proportion of each one of the wells corresponding to lower levels.

30.- SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the amounts accumulated due to the imbalance between the ability of the real player and that of the perfect player, which involve obtaining a payout lower than the preset, are used in prize payments granted by pure chance, in order to comply with the preset payout.

31.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 30, characterized in that the random resource incorporated is the combination of the lottery of maximum results and the lottery of difficulty levels and where the imbalance in favor of the house is Delivery to players in the form of random prizes.

32.- SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that prizes are awarded by pure chance taken from a fixed proportion of the players' contribution, in addition to the prizes awarded for their ability.

33.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that a multiplier to be applied to the prize corresponding to the skill is drawn by chance.

34.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 1, characterized in that the skill prize is combined with the multiplier by pure chance and the prize by chance.

35.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier and the random prize are obtained through an extraction lottery without replacement.

36, - SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier and the random prize are obtained by means of an extraction lottery with replacement.

37.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier and the random prize are obtained through an extraction lottery with partial replacement.

38.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained by means of an extraction lottery without replacement and the prize by chance is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with replacement.

39.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained by means of an extraction lottery without replacement and the prize by chance is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with partial replacement .

40.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO GAMES

INTERACTIVE, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained through a replacement lottery with replacement and the prize by chance It is obtained through an extraction lottery without replacement.

41.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with replacement and the prize by chance is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with partial replacement .

42.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with partial replacement and the prize by chance is obtained by means of an extraction lottery without replacement .

43.- SYSTEM FOR INCORPORATING THE AZAR TO INTERACTIVE GAMES, as claimed in 34, characterized in that the random multiplier is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with partial replacement and the prize by chance is obtained by means of an extraction lottery with replacement .