WO2013111072A1 - Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements - Google Patents
Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2013111072A1 WO2013111072A1 PCT/IB2013/050595 IB2013050595W WO2013111072A1 WO 2013111072 A1 WO2013111072 A1 WO 2013111072A1 IB 2013050595 W IB2013050595 W IB 2013050595W WO 2013111072 A1 WO2013111072 A1 WO 2013111072A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- dimensional
- basis
- recorded
- measurement
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/7203—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0033—Features or image-related aspects of imaging apparatus classified in A61B5/00, e.g. for MRI, optical tomography or impedance tomography apparatus; arrangements of imaging apparatus in a room
- A61B5/004—Features or image-related aspects of imaging apparatus classified in A61B5/00, e.g. for MRI, optical tomography or impedance tomography apparatus; arrangements of imaging apparatus in a room adapted for image acquisition of a particular organ or body part
- A61B5/0042—Features or image-related aspects of imaging apparatus classified in A61B5/00, e.g. for MRI, optical tomography or impedance tomography apparatus; arrangements of imaging apparatus in a room adapted for image acquisition of a particular organ or body part for the brain
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R29/00—Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
- G01R29/12—Measuring electrostatic fields or voltage-potential
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/0017—Means for compensating offset magnetic fields or the magnetic flux to be measured; Means for generating calibration magnetic fields
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
- G01R33/025—Compensating stray fields
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
- G01R33/035—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using superconductive devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
- G01R33/035—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using superconductive devices
- G01R33/0354—SQUIDS
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/20—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
- G01R33/44—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance using nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR]
- G01R33/48—NMR imaging systems
- G01R33/54—Signal processing systems, e.g. using pulse sequences ; Generation or control of pulse sequences; Operator console
- G01R33/56—Image enhancement or correction, e.g. subtraction or averaging techniques, e.g. improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and resolution
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network
- A61B5/0015—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network characterised by features of the telemetry system
- A61B5/0024—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network characterised by features of the telemetry system for multiple sensor units attached to the patient, e.g. using a body or personal area network
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves
- A61B5/055—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves involving electronic [EMR] or nuclear [NMR] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
- A61B5/242—Detecting biomagnetic fields, e.g. magnetic fields produced by bioelectric currents
- A61B5/245—Detecting biomagnetic fields, e.g. magnetic fields produced by bioelectric currents specially adapted for magnetoencephalographic [MEG] signals
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
- A61B5/316—Modalities, i.e. specific diagnostic methods
- A61B5/369—Electroencephalography [EEG]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2218/00—Aspects of pattern recognition specially adapted for signal processing
- G06F2218/02—Preprocessing
- G06F2218/04—Denoising
Definitions
- the invention relates to multichannel meas ⁇ urements applied e.g. in magnetoencephalography (MEG), electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and especially to improving the quality of the results of such measurements.
- MEG magnetoencephalography
- EEG electroencephalography
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- the signal recorded by each individual sensor in these multichannel devic ⁇ es contains both information on the neural activity (or on precession of nuclear magnetization in case of MRI), and interference from environmental sources, and artifacts and random noise related to the sensor tech- nology. Since the neurological electric and magnetic fields are very weak, such sensor noise tends to hamper the detection of the interesting neurological sig ⁇ nals. Therefore, the sensors must have very low-noise characteristics and they should be situated close to the measured object.
- the typical noise level of a measurement sensor measuring a magnetic field is of the order of a few femtoteslas.
- the magnetic flux densities to be measured are very low (for example of the order of 10 ... 1000 fT) , and the external inter ⁇ ference fields prevailing in the measurement situation may be quite large in comparison to the flux densi ⁇ ties, even of the order of 1 ... 10 ⁇ .
- the estimation of the portion of different interference signals in the overall measurement signal and the elimination of the effect of interferences from measurement results is thus extremely essential in multichannel biomagnet ⁇ ic measurement methods.
- a calculatory method used in the analysis of measured signals and to reject environmental interfer- ence from multichannel MEG signals is the so-called Signal Space Separation method (abbreviated as the SSS method) , which is discussed for example in patent pub ⁇ lication FI 115324.
- the SSS method is currently quite amply used in the art. It is a calculatory method for separating multichannel measurement signal infor ⁇ mation, on the basis of the locations of the sources, into various signal bases, i.e. subspaces that are linearly independent of one another.
- the SSS is purely based on the geometry of the sensor assembly and natu ⁇ ral laws.
- the calculation according to the principle of the SSS begins by applying Maxwell's equations de ⁇ scribing the relations of electric and magnetic fields.
- the SSS method it is possible to separate the magnetic fields generated by the useful sources (such as the brain) and the magnetic fields originat- ing from external interference sources.
- series developments are calculated in the SSS method using division according to sources located in different sites. It may be referred to as a source modeling method for the multichannel measurement sig- nal in a volume where the magnetic fields to be deter ⁇ mined are irrotational and sourceless.
- the SSS method does not need advanced information about the types or locations of the different signal sources but it works correctly in the cases of different types of signal sources, also when examined as a function of time even when the location and/or intensity of the sources changes.
- the geometry of the sensor assembly thus plays an important role. Associated to the geometry is also the fact that, in addition to the location, the orienta ⁇ tion of the sensors significantly affects the measured signal because the magnetic field is a direction- dependent quantity.
- an n-dimensional basis is formed for the N-dimensional signal space of the N-channel MEG device.
- the number of basis vectors n is smaller than N.
- the basis vectors are chosen so that each of them corresponds to a physically possible magnetic field shape in a source free space. Further ⁇ more, based on the asymptotic behaviour of the corre- sponding magnetic potential functions, when r -> 0 and r -> °°, these basis vectors are divided into two groups: the ones that correspond to magnetic fields arising from sources inside of the MEG sensor helmet, and the others corresponding to magnetic fields aris ⁇ ing from sources in the environment, outside of the MEG helmet.
- the former group contains the field of in ⁇ terest, arising from neuromagnetic sources, and the latter group contains the environmental interference contribution to the signals that is wanted to be re ⁇ moved.
- the basic idea of the SSS method is to simply leave out from the SSS-basis representation of the recorded signals the components belonging to the lat ⁇ ter group, and thus, the desired biomagnetic signal is achieved more accurately.
- An advantage of the SSS method is that it can observe all interferences regardless of time and place. Since the calculation is made independently for each sample, it observes the changing situations re- gardless of whether the interference sources are changing inside or outside the measurement area, which can be e.g. a magnetically shielded room.
- a problem of the SSS method is that it is sensitive to calibration errors. This means that, for example, a signal devia- tion measured by one of the sensors may not be due to interference but a small unrecognized deviation in the position or direction (angle of its axis) of the sensor .
- the objective of the invention is to disclose a method for getting rid of artifacts and noise pre ⁇ sent in individual sensors for multichannel measure ⁇ ments made using MEG, EEG or MRI imaging devices.
- a further objective of the invention is to remedy the above-mentioned problems.
- the present invention introduces a method for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in at least one measurement channel of a multichannel mag ⁇ netic field or electric potential measurement, wherein a measurement device comprises a set of N measurement sensors and a data processing logic, and wherein the method comprises the step of generating a basis defin- ing an n-dimensional subspace of the N-dimensional signal space, where n is smaller than N, using in the definition of the n-dimensional basis a physical model of a Signal Space Separation method, or a statistical model based on the statistics of recorded N- dimensional signals.
- the method is further characterized in that the method further comprises the steps of forming a combined (n+m) -dimensional basis by adding m signal vectors to the n-dimensional basis, each of these m signal vectors representing a signal present only in a single channel of the N-channel device, decomposing the recorded N-dimensional signal vector into n+m com ⁇ ponents in the combined basis, and subtracting from the recorded N-dimensional signal vector the compo- nents corresponding to the m added vectors in the com ⁇ bined basis.
- the signal is recorded at a spatial sampling rate ex ⁇ ceeding the highest spatial frequencies in the signal of interest, so that n+m is smaller than N.
- only one basis vector is added, representing the sig ⁇ nal in this one channel only, to the n-dimensional ba ⁇ sis, where m is equal to 1.
- the decomposition of the recorded signal into the n+1 components in the combined basis is repeated N times, using as the one additive basis vector a vector corre ⁇ sponding to each one of the channels at a time, and the N signal components corresponding to the additive basis vectors are subtracted in each decomposition from the original data.
- a solution of a linear problem related to the decomposi ⁇ tion of the N-dimensional signal into the n+m compo- nents is numerically stabilized by using the Wiener- Kolmogorov method described by Foster (Manus Foster in "An Application of the Wiener-Kolmogorov Smoothing Theory to Matrix Inversion, J. Soc. Indust. Appl . Math., volume 9, no. 3, September 1961") or by any similar regularization method.
- the statistical correlations of the sensor noise be ⁇ tween the N channels are estimated from the correla- tions in high-pass filtered recorded signals.
- the signal is recorded at a temporal sampling rate ex ⁇ ceeding the highest frequencies in the signal of in ⁇ terest .
- the steps of forming, decomposing and subtracting are realized by a cross validation method where the signal of m channels are derived from the signals of the oth ⁇ er N-m channels based on the n-dimensional physical model, or based on the n-dimensional statistical model of the original N-dimensional signal.
- the method is applied to recordings made by a multi ⁇ channel magnetoencephalography (MEG) device.
- MEG magnetoencephalography
- the method is applied to recordings made by a multi ⁇ channel electroencephalography (EEG) device.
- EEG electroencephalography
- the method is applied to recordings of magnetic reso- nance signals obtained by a multichannel MRI device.
- the inventive idea comprises a multichannel measurement device arranged to recognize and remove undesired artifacts in at least one measurement chan- nel of a multichannel magnetic field or electric po ⁇ tential measurement, wherein the measurement device comprises a set of N measurement sensors, and a data processing logic, which is arranged to generate a ba ⁇ sis defining an n-dimensional subspace of the N- dimensional signal space, where n is smaller than N, using in the definition of the n-dimensional basis a physical model of a Signal Space Separation method, or a statistical model based on the statistics of record ⁇ ed N-dimensional signals.
- the data processing logic is further characterized by that it is arranged to form a combined (n+m) -dimensional basis by adding m signal vectors to the n-dimensional basis, each of these m signal vectors representing a signal present only in a single channel of the N-channel device, decompose the recorded N-dimensional signal vector into n+m compo- nents in the combined basis, and subtract from the recorded N-dimensional signal vector the components corresponding to the m added vectors in the combined basis .
- the set of N measurement sensors is further arranged to record the signal at a spatial sampling rate ex ⁇ ceeding the highest spatial frequencies in the signal of interest, so that n+m is smaller than N.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to add only one basis vector, representing the signal in this one channel only, to the n-dimensional basis, where m is equal to 1.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to re ⁇ peat the decomposition of the recorded signal into the n+1 components in the combined basis N times, using as the one additive basis vector a vector corresponding to each one of the channels at a time, and subtract the N signal components corresponding to the additive basis vectors in each decomposition from the original data .
- the data processing logic is further arranged to sta- bilize numerically a solution of a linear problem re ⁇ lated to the decomposition of the N-dimensional signal into the n+m components by using the Wiener-Kolmogorov method described by Foster or by any similar regulari- zation method.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to esti- mate statistical correlations of the sensor noise be ⁇ tween the N channels, which correlations are needed in the numerical regularization method, from differences between consecutive samples in the recorded signals.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to esti ⁇ mate the statistical correlations of the sensor noise between the N channels from the correlations in high- pass filtered recorded signals.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to rec ⁇ ord the signal at a temporal sampling rate exceeding the highest frequencies in the signal of interest.
- the data processing logic is further arranged to real ⁇ ize the steps of forming, decomposing and subtracting by a cross validation method where the signal of m channels are derived from the signals of the other N-m channels based on the n-dimensional physical model, or based on the n-dimensional statistical model of the original N-dimensional signal.
- the device is a multichannel magnetoencephalography (MEG) device.
- MEG multichannel magnetoencephalography
- the device is a multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) device.
- EEG electroencephalography
- the device is a multichannel magnetic resonance imag- ing (MRI) device obtaining magnetic resonance signals.
- MRI magnetic resonance imag- ing
- the inventive idea further comprises a com ⁇ puter program for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in at least one measurement channel of a multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurement, wherein a measurement device comprises a set of N measurement sensors and a data processing logic.
- the computer program comprises program code which, when run on the data processing logic, is arranged to execute the step of generating a basis de- fining an n-dimensional subspace of the N-dimensional signal space, where n is smaller than N, using in the definition of the n-dimensional basis a physical model of a Signal Space Separation method, or a statistical model based on the statistics of recorded N- dimensional signals.
- the computer program is charac ⁇ terized by that it is further arranged to execute the steps of forming a combined (n+m) -dimensional basis by adding m signal vectors to the n-dimensional basis, each of these m signal vectors representing a signal present only in a single channel of the N-channel de ⁇ vice, decomposing the recorded N-dimensional signal vector into n+m components in the combined basis, and subtracting from the recorded N-dimensional signal vector the components corresponding to the m added vectors in the combined basis.
- the computer program is stored on a medium readable by the data processing logic.
- Figure 1 shows an example of the measurement arrangement of an MEG apparatus, including different types of magnetic signals present in the system
- Figure 2 shows an example of the method ac- cording to the invention in the form of a flow chart
- FIGS 3a and 3b graphically illustrate an example of the effect of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
- the present invention introduces a method for identifying and removing artifacts and sensor-specific interference signals in multichannel magnetic measure- ments.
- the present invention is related to suppres ⁇ sion of individual sensor noise and artifacts in a multichannel measurement containing N measurement channels.
- the basis of the algorithm described here is a comprehensive n-dimensional (n ⁇ N) signal model that describes the magnetic signal in magnetoenceph- alography (MEG) measurements.
- the aim is to build this model in such a way that any deviation from the model can only be explained as measurement errors of indi- vidual sensors, which are also uncorrelated with all other sensors. Such errors are typically caused by random sensor noise or electronics-based artifacts.
- the principle of the invention preferably is based on the Signal Space Separation method, abbrevi ⁇ ated as the SSS method, which has been summarized above.
- the SSS method the central idea is that by utilizing Maxwell's equations and information about the geometry of the sensor assembly, it is possible to calculate a result indicating which part of the meas ⁇ ured signal comprises of interesting biomagnetic sig ⁇ nals originating from inside the measurement sensors and which part comprises the external interferences originating from outside the volume defined by the sensors.
- volume it is typically meant a sensor helmet which is placed around the patient's head, in case of brain signal measurements.
- the magnetic multipole moments i.e.
- the weights of signal components, in a linearly independent signal basis of the useful signal and, in turn, in a signal basis formed by interference signals, can be calculat ⁇ ed.
- the SSS method adapts to currently prevailing interference situation, i.e. the SSS method always measures the real prevailing magnet ⁇ ic field, regardless of the changes of the signal sources inside or outside the volume to be measured that normally may occur as a function of time.
- the re ⁇ sults provided by the SSS method are, however, affect- ed by the above-mentioned calibration error, i.e.
- an SSS basis for the measured multichannel signal is first defined, similarly as it has been done in the prior art.
- one more basis vector is added to the n-dimensional SSS- basis :
- This basis vector describes the part of the N- dimensional signal that is seen in the kth channel on ⁇ ly, with no correlation to the signals of the other N-l channels. Such an uncorrelated signal must be due to the artifacts and noise of the kth channel itself, when the sensor density (spatial oversampling from point of view of neuromagnetic sources) is high enough.
- the signal component falling on this new basis vector is left out from the signal. It may be the only component left out from the signal in case it is want ⁇ ed to reject the sensor noise and occasional artifacts only, or it can be left out together with other outside originated interference components of the SSS- basis if the outside interference is also desired to be removed.
- this procedure is repeated for each of the N channels by including the corresponding additional vector to the SSS-basis.
- This is the part describing the "physical model" of the present invention.
- the channel noise is modeled in a similar way as the external interference is modeled in the SSS- method .
- the method described here can be also consid- ered as a kind of cross-validation method based on spatial oversampling, and on a rigorous model for the physical signal (magnetic field in a source free space) .
- any such MRI appli ⁇ cation it will be practically unavoidable that sensor artifacts and elevated noise levels will show up in some of the sensors of a multichannel array after eve- ry polarization sequence.
- the method described in this invention helps to solve this problem related to low field MRI .
- the "physical model” can be based on statistics, for example on a principal component analysis (PCA) of the multichannel EEG re ⁇ cordings.
- PCA principal component analysis
- n-dimensional signal basis described above for MEG and MRI applications is not an orthogo- nal basis in the N-dimensional signal space.
- the linear operation needed to convert the rec ⁇ orded N-dimensional signal vector into the n- dimensional physical representation becomes increas ⁇ ingly unstable numerically, when n approaches N. This tends to increase noise in the n-dimensional represen ⁇ tation of the physical signal and thus counteracts the intended noise reduction.
- the ratio n/N must be kept as low as possible. This means that ample spatial oversampling of the neuromagnetic field is necessary for successful application of the method described here.
- N The number of channels, N, must clearly exceed the number of magnetic degrees of free ⁇ dom (field shapes) that are included in the physical model. This number of degrees of freedom in MEG geome ⁇ try has been shown to be about 15 + 80 (external in- terference + neuromagnetic field shapes) , see "Taulu S., Simola J. and Kajola M. : Applications of the Sig ⁇ nal Space Separation Method. IEEE Trans. Sign. Proc. 53 (2005) 3359-3372".
- the present invention is based on utilization of spatial oversampling of the detectable features in a multichannel measurement and further enhanced by utilization of temporal oversampling for accurate estimation of random noise covariance patterns.
- Spatial oversampling means here that the number of measurement channels substantially exceeds the number of degrees of freedom, where the degrees of freedom represent different field shapes included in the physical model of the measurement arrangement.
- Temporal oversampling means here that signals are measured on a substantial- ly wider frequency band than the frequency band of the useful signal.
- Ax 4- (1) where m is the W-dimensional instantaneous measurement signal with each element corresponding to one individ ⁇ ual channel, A is the [N x n] -dimensional signal mod ⁇ el, x is the n-dimensional amplitude or coordinate vector corresponding to the components of A, and n corresponds to the measurement noise, i.e., any signal not related to model A.
- A will be devel ⁇ oped in such a way that it always covers all degrees of freedom in the actual detectable signal of inter ⁇ est, so that only sensor noise and measurement arti ⁇ facts fall into n.
- A should be physically general and as insensitive to calibration errors as possible. It is previously shown in the case of MEG application that such a physical model exists and it can be furthermore divided geometrically into the internal, containing the human brain, and exter- nal, only containing interference fields, parts as:
- This model is called as the signal space separation (SSS) model and it has been shown to be linearly inde ⁇ pendent for any practical multichannel sensor array.
- SSS signal space separation
- empty room signals without any sub ⁇ ject may be measured, perform a statistical analysis, typically the principal component analysis (PCA) , and add any deviation of the dominating PCA components into the computational interference part as where ⁇ stands for such a deviation (see patent appli ⁇ cation FI 20105769) .
- PCA principal component analysis
- the model is further modified to include individual sensor noise and artifacts.
- the accuracy and reliability of sensor noise suppression is determined by the completeness and gen- erality of the model A as well as the stability of ma ⁇ trix inversion needed to solve equations (1) or (5) . It is shown before that in MEG, and probably in many other multichannel modalities, such a comprehensive model can be found. Furthermore, it is shown here that the cross-validation approach is equivalent to using orthogonal unit vectors u - , which enables us to model the individual sensor activity for each sensor one by one by using eqs . (1) or (5) without any overlapping between the contributions of the sensor models ( u . » u ,
- the covariance estimate can be calculated even with the signal of interest present in the measurement, provid ⁇ ed that we have temporal oversampling, because it can be mathematically proven that a covariance calculated from difference vectors between subsequent samples leads to a noise covariance corresponding to the true white noise covariance multiplied by a factor of two.
- temporal oversampling means that the difference vectors do not contain the signal of interest as it cancels out in the subtraction of two temporally close samples .
- the ob ⁇ ject to be measured is a human head 10 in which the brain 11 produces signals which are interesting.
- An interesting source 12 produces interesting magnetic fields 13 originating in the brain 11.
- the MEG meas ⁇ urement device and especially the control electronics is shown in a simplified form as 17.
- the measurement channels represented by a plurality of measurement sensors 14a-f (only the first and fourth ones are marked in the figure for simplicity, and of course the total number of six sensors is only a simplified case of the actual measurement arrangement comprising usu ⁇ ally several hundreds of sensors) are located e.g. as a helmet formation around the patient's head 10.
- All measurement sensors 14a-f are connected to the control electronics 17.
- the control logic of the system com ⁇ prising a processor, memory and all other analysis tools are comprised in the MEG measurement device 19, connected to the control electronics 17 and the meas ⁇ urement sensors 14a-f.
- the raw signal collected by a sensor 14d of the MEG device is a superposition of three contribu ⁇ tions or signal types:
- the first one is formed by the interesting neuromagnetic signals represented by 13.
- the second one is generally all noise and interference from the environment, shown in the figure by large- capacity line 16, creating magnetic interfering field 15.
- the third kind of signal is relevant to the pre- sent invention; these are formed by the artifacts 18 related to an individual sensor 14d and its electron- ics 17.
- the SSS method is capable to separate the fields 13 of the interesting magnetic sources, and the fields 15 of the interfering magnetic sources 16.
- the present invention is further capable to separate the artifact 18 relating to the sensor 14d, and remove it from the magnetic field signal measured by sensor 14d. This is performed by the algorithm disclosed above in detail, run by the processor in the MEG measurement device 19. The results with much better S/N ratio can be seen in Figure 3.
- Figure 2 illustrates a flow chart of the method according to an example of the invention.
- the measurement arrangement is set up, by put ⁇ ting a measurement helmet comprising sensors around the patient's head, for example.
- the arrangement comprises 306 measurement sensors.
- the raw signal is recorded 21.
- an n-dimensional "magnetic subspace" following SSS analysis according to prior art is set up 22.
- the SSS method separates the interesting magnetic sources from the interfering magnetic sources, the first ones locating inside the measurement helmet, and the others clearly outside the measurement helmet, usually outside the measurement room, too.
- the number of magnetic field shapes repre- senting the interesting signals is in one example 80, and the number of magnetic field shapes representing the interferences signals is 15, for instance.
- the subspace 22 is in this example a 95*306 ma ⁇ trix representing all signals originating from magnet- ic sources.
- the artifact analysis of the invention is started by forming a combined basis by adding m vectors of type ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) T to the n-dimensional subspace in order to model artifacts and independent channel noise 23.
- the combination is made according to equation 4.
- the recorded N-dimensional signal is decomposed into n+m components in the combined basis. Finally, the components corresponding to the m added vectors are subtracted from the raw signal 25.
- FIGs 3a and 3b illustrate two seconds of data from an MEG recording of human somatosensory re- sponse. Signals from six MEG channels are shown. The y-scale of the figures is illustrated by a vertical segment of a line whose length in this case is 200 fT/cm. In Figure 3a, there is the original recorded raw data. In Figure 3b, the same signals after pro- cessing the data with the method of the present inven ⁇ tion are illustrated. The two somatosensory responses, simultaneously seen in five of the six channels, are clearly seen in the processed data. Only the sensor noise intrinsic to each channel has been removed in this case. The reduction in random sensor noise is about a factor of five. Most of the variation of the signals outside of the somatosensory response periods is from ongoing spontaneous brain activity independent from the somatosensory stimulus.
- the present invention can even be applied in analyzing Gallup results of different kinds of polls where gathered results represent the opinions other ⁇ wise realistically, but there are some peculiar re ⁇ sults which can be clearly regarded as not real opin- ions. Such opinions can be regarded as artifacts which need to be cleared from the results in order to achieve much more reliable poll result.
- sensors with higher noise characteristics may be used.
- Fur- thermore, superconductors applied in higher tempera ⁇ tures may be used in the used sensor technology. This releaves the requirements of cooling of the sensors, because higher temperatures are possible.
- the most important advantage of the present invention is that the artifactual noise in the set of measurement channels can be clearly reduced, improving the overall quality in analyzing the biomag- netic signals.
- the presented method is broadly applicable in many different applications, comprising multichannel magnetoencephalography, elec- troencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements .
- the steps of the method presented for the in ⁇ vention can be carried out in applicable parts as a computer program that can be run on the data pro- cessing logic of the MEG device, the EEG device or the MRI device i.e. typically on the processor of the de ⁇ vice.
- the device may include a memory or other storage medium wherein the computer program, the data input and other parameters required by the method and the results obtained from the measurements can be stored.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13740539.5A EP2806789B1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2013-01-24 | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
US14/374,365 US10307105B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2013-01-24 | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
CA2862189A CA2862189C (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2013-01-24 | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
JP2014553840A JP6143794B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2013-01-24 | Method and apparatus for recognizing and removing unwanted artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or charge potential measurements |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FI20125075 | 2012-01-24 | ||
FI20125075A FI125397B (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2012-01-24 | Method for using spatial and temporal oversampling in multichannel measurements |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2013111072A1 true WO2013111072A1 (en) | 2013-08-01 |
Family
ID=48872936
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2013/050595 WO2013111072A1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2013-01-24 | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10307105B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2806789B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6143794B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2862189C (en) |
FI (1) | FI125397B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013111072A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10307105B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2019-06-04 | Elekta Ab | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
JP2021120001A (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2021-08-19 | ハイパーファイン リサーチ,インコーポレイテッド | Noise suppression methods and apparatus |
US11540778B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2023-01-03 | University Of Washington | Reducing sensor noise in multichannel arrays using oversampled temporal projection and associated systems and methods |
US11701042B2 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2023-07-18 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method |
US11768258B2 (en) | 2019-11-27 | 2023-09-26 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Signal separating apparatus, signal separating method, and non-transitory recording medium |
US11841408B2 (en) | 2016-11-22 | 2023-12-12 | Hyperfine Operations, Inc. | Electromagnetic shielding for magnetic resonance imaging methods and apparatus |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8593141B1 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2013-11-26 | Hypres, Inc. | Magnetic resonance system and method employing a digital squid |
US8970217B1 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2015-03-03 | Hypres, Inc. | System and method for noise reduction in magnetic resonance imaging |
WO2019060298A1 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2019-03-28 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement |
US11717686B2 (en) | 2017-12-04 | 2023-08-08 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to facilitate learning and performance |
WO2019133997A1 (en) | 2017-12-31 | 2019-07-04 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response |
US11364361B2 (en) | 2018-04-20 | 2022-06-21 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method for inducing sleep by transplanting mental states |
WO2020032998A1 (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2020-02-13 | Hi Llc | Systems and methods to reduce data and complexity in neural signal processing chain |
US20210186400A1 (en) * | 2018-08-24 | 2021-06-24 | University Of Washington | Apparatuses, systems, and methods for suppression of artifacts in non-invasive electromagnetic recordings |
EP3849410A4 (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2022-11-02 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method of improving sleep |
JP6936405B2 (en) | 2018-12-26 | 2021-09-15 | 旭化成エレクトロニクス株式会社 | Magnetic field measuring device |
US11497425B2 (en) | 2019-03-08 | 2022-11-15 | Asahi Kasei Microdevices Corporation | Magnetic field measurement apparatus |
US11786694B2 (en) | 2019-05-24 | 2023-10-17 | NeuroLight, Inc. | Device, method, and app for facilitating sleep |
JP2022111838A (en) | 2021-01-20 | 2022-08-01 | 旭化成エレクトロニクス株式会社 | Magnetic field measurement device, magnetic field measurement method, and magnetic field measurement program |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2012004458A1 (en) * | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-12 | Elekta Ab (Publ). | Method for adjusting interference signal space in bio-magnetic field measurements |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2478466C (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2013-09-17 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Squid detected nmr and mri at ultralow fields |
FI115324B (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2005-04-15 | Elekta Neuromag Oy | A method and system for processing a multichannel measurement signal |
FI115737B (en) | 2003-09-26 | 2005-06-30 | Elekta Neuromag Oy | A method for using a multichannel measurement signal in source modeling |
JP5361131B2 (en) | 2007-01-03 | 2013-12-04 | エレクタ アクチボラゲット | Analysis of multi-channel measurement data using orthogonal virtual channels |
FI125397B (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-09-30 | Elekta Ab | Method for using spatial and temporal oversampling in multichannel measurements |
-
2012
- 2012-01-24 FI FI20125075A patent/FI125397B/en active IP Right Grant
-
2013
- 2013-01-24 CA CA2862189A patent/CA2862189C/en active Active
- 2013-01-24 EP EP13740539.5A patent/EP2806789B1/en active Active
- 2013-01-24 WO PCT/IB2013/050595 patent/WO2013111072A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-01-24 US US14/374,365 patent/US10307105B2/en active Active
- 2013-01-24 JP JP2014553840A patent/JP6143794B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2012004458A1 (en) * | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-12 | Elekta Ab (Publ). | Method for adjusting interference signal space in bio-magnetic field measurements |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
MEDVEDOVSKY, M ET AL.: "Fine tuning the correlation limit of spatio-temporal signal space separation for magnetoencephalography", JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, vol. 177, 2009, pages 203 - 211, XP025841283 * |
OZKURT, T. E ET AL.: "Decomposition of Magnetoencephalographic Data Into Components Corresponding to Deep and Superficial Sources", IEEE TRANSACTION OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 55, no. 6, 2008, pages 1716 - 1727, XP011342702 * |
See also references of EP2806789A4 * |
TAULU S. ET AL.: "Spatiotemporal Signal Space Separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements", PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, vol. 51, no. 7, 2006, pages 1759 - 1768, XP020096211 * |
VRBA, J ET AL.: "Signal Space Separation Beamformer", BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, vol. 23, 2010, pages 128 - 133, XP019814315 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10307105B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2019-06-04 | Elekta Ab | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements |
JP2021120001A (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2021-08-19 | ハイパーファイン リサーチ,インコーポレイテッド | Noise suppression methods and apparatus |
US11662412B2 (en) | 2014-09-05 | 2023-05-30 | Hyperfine Operations, Inc. | Noise suppression methods and apparatus |
US11540778B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2023-01-03 | University Of Washington | Reducing sensor noise in multichannel arrays using oversampled temporal projection and associated systems and methods |
US11841408B2 (en) | 2016-11-22 | 2023-12-12 | Hyperfine Operations, Inc. | Electromagnetic shielding for magnetic resonance imaging methods and apparatus |
US11701042B2 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2023-07-18 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method |
US11768258B2 (en) | 2019-11-27 | 2023-09-26 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Signal separating apparatus, signal separating method, and non-transitory recording medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FI125397B (en) | 2015-09-30 |
EP2806789A1 (en) | 2014-12-03 |
CA2862189A1 (en) | 2013-08-01 |
CA2862189C (en) | 2018-09-11 |
EP2806789A4 (en) | 2015-10-21 |
US10307105B2 (en) | 2019-06-04 |
EP2806789B1 (en) | 2017-08-30 |
US20140343882A1 (en) | 2014-11-20 |
JP2015508318A (en) | 2015-03-19 |
FI20125075A (en) | 2013-07-25 |
JP6143794B2 (en) | 2017-06-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2862189C (en) | Method and device for recognizing and removing undesired artifacts in multichannel magnetic field or electric potential measurements | |
Taulu et al. | Suppression of interference and artifacts by the signal space separation method | |
Long et al. | State-space solutions to the dynamic magnetoencephalography inverse problem using high performance computing | |
Giraldo-Suarez et al. | Reconstruction of neural activity from EEG data using dynamic spatiotemporal constraints | |
US20160051161A1 (en) | Method for locating a brain activity associated with a task | |
US20140107464A1 (en) | Method for Locating a Brain Activity | |
Taulu et al. | MEG recordings of DC fields using the signal space separation method (SSS) | |
Bonaiuto et al. | Estimates of cortical column orientation improve MEG source inversion | |
JP6996135B2 (en) | Information processing equipment, information processing methods, and programs | |
Yao et al. | Estimating the number of sources in magnetoencephalography using spiked population eigenvalues | |
US20210186400A1 (en) | Apparatuses, systems, and methods for suppression of artifacts in non-invasive electromagnetic recordings | |
Aram et al. | Model-based estimation of intra-cortical connectivity using electrophysiological data | |
Taulu et al. | The signal space separation method | |
Sorrentino | Particle filters for magnetoencephalography | |
Krieger et al. | Referee consensus: A platform technology for nonlinear optimization | |
Pascarella et al. | Particle filtering, beamforming and multiple signal classification for the analysis of magnetoencephalography time series: a comparison of algorithms | |
JP3709443B2 (en) | Brain function measuring device and brain function measuring program | |
Darvas et al. | Functional imaging of brain activity and connectivity with MEG | |
Lamus et al. | An analysis of how spatiotemporal dynamic models of brain activity could improve MEG/EEG inverse solutions | |
Ahrens et al. | A comparison of minimum norm and MUSIC for a combined MEG/EEG sensor array | |
Pfeiffer et al. | Sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration in on-scalp MEG | |
Badier et al. | Realistic synthetic background neuronal activity for the analysis of MEG probe configurations | |
US20230349998A1 (en) | Magnetic resonance system, surface coil, physiological motion sensing apparatus and gating method thereof | |
Lamus et al. | Parameter estimation and dynamic source localization for the magnetoencephalography (MEG) inverse problem | |
Nurminen | The magnetostatic multipole expansion in biomagnetism: applications and implications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 13740539 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2862189 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2014553840 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 14374365 Country of ref document: US |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2013740539 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2013740539 Country of ref document: EP |