WO2014204704A1 - Cross-model filtering - Google Patents
Cross-model filtering Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2014204704A1 WO2014204704A1 PCT/US2014/041626 US2014041626W WO2014204704A1 WO 2014204704 A1 WO2014204704 A1 WO 2014204704A1 US 2014041626 W US2014041626 W US 2014041626W WO 2014204704 A1 WO2014204704 A1 WO 2014204704A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- data
- results
- data set
- query
- computer
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2455—Query execution
- G06F16/24564—Applying rules; Deductive queries
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/21—Design, administration or maintenance of databases
- G06F16/215—Improving data quality; Data cleansing, e.g. de-duplication, removing invalid entries or correcting typographical errors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2455—Query execution
- G06F16/24553—Query execution of query operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
Definitions
- Computers and computing systems have affected nearly every aspect of modern living. Computers are generally involved in work, recreation, healthcare, transportation, entertainment, household management, etc.
- computing system functionality can be enhanced by a computing systems ability to be interconnected to other computing systems via network connections.
- Network connections may include, but are not limited to, connections via wired or wireless Ethernet, cellular connections, or even computer to computer connections through serial, parallel, USB, or other connections. The connections allow a computing system to access services at other computing systems and to quickly and efficiently receive application data from other computing system.
- computers are intended to be used by direct user interaction with the computer.
- computers have input hardware and software user interfaces to facilitate user interaction.
- a modern general purpose computer may include a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, camera, etc. for allowing a user to input data into the computer.
- various software user interfaces may be available. Examples of software user interfaces include graphical user interfaces, text command line based user interface, function key or hot key user interfaces, and the like.
- One embodiment illustrated herein includes a method that may be practiced in a distributed computing environment.
- the method includes acts for presenting data from different data providers in a correlated fashion.
- the method includes performing a first query on a first data set controlled by a first entity to capture a first set of data results.
- the method further includes performing a second query on a second data set controlled by a second entity to capture a second set of data results.
- the method includes receiving a selection of one or more results from the first data set.
- the method further includes using the one or more selected results, consulting a relationship ontology that correlates data stored in different data stores controlled by different entities, to identify one or more relationships between data in the selected results set and the second data set.
- Figure 1A illustrates database queries from a client machine on different database models and displaying visualizations based on the queries;
- Figure IB illustrates cross model filtering of the different database queries from the client machine on the different database models;
- Figure 1C illustrates an additional example of cross model filtering of the different database queries from the client machine on the different database models
- Figure 2 illustrates a method of presenting data from different data providers in a correlated fashion.
- embodiments may include functionality for performing filtering, slicing, and dicing of data across multiple different data models (e.g. databases) where the data models are separate.
- different data models may be controlled by different entities, and thus are not natively interrelated within the particular data models themselves. This can be accomplished using various mechanisms.
- An initial inference of relationships across models can be established based on reference data and a set of rules and heuristics. Also, manual definition of relationships or adjustment of the inferred relationships can be performed by a user.
- Cross filtering across models based on relationship information that is inferred automatically and/or explicitly defined between models can then be performed.
- Figure 1A illustrates a first data store 102, referred to herein as the Music model and a second data store 104 referred to herein as the Music Sales model. While only two data stores are shown, it should be appreciated that embodiments can be implemented with virtually any number of data stores, but two are shown for convenience.
- the illustrated example shows that if there exists inferable or definable relationships between multiple data models, filtering one visualization bound to a particular model based on selection of a value from another model may be performed.
- a filter may be applied to a query to a first model for the first visualization based on selection of a value or element from a second visualization for a second model.
- embodiments may highlight or otherwise ornament a portion of the first visualization based on selection of an element of the second visualization.
- the filter may be generated based on the definition of the relationship between the source and the target of the relationship. In the illustrated example, this relationship can be maintained by a relationship ontology illustrated at 106. The following illustrates the functionality.
- FIG. 1A there are two visuals shown on the screen of a client machine 100:
- the first is a column chart 108 showing the total number of albums per music genre (e.g.: total number of albums for Pop, Rock, etc.).
- the information in the column chart 108 is sourced by sending a query 110 to the Music model 102 which returns the information displayed in the column chart 108.
- the information is sourced from the Albums table 109 in the Music model 102.
- the second visualization shows the total sales per music genre as a bar chart 112. This data is obtained by sending a query 114 to the Music Sales model 104 to query the Sales table 116 in the Music Sales model.
- embodiments may attempt locate a relationship between the Music model 102 and the Music Sales model 104 based the genre information. This may be formed, for example, by looking up a relationship between the Genre column in the Albums table 109 in the Music model 102 and the Genre column in the Sales table 116 in the Music Sales model 104. In the example illustrated, this lookup may be against a relationship ontology 106. For example, this information lookup may be performed against relationship metadata that is inferred automatically and stored in the relationship ontology 106. Additionally or alternatively, this information lookup may be performed against relationship metadata that is explicitly defined by the model designer and stored in the relationship ontology 106.
- Relationships in the relationship ontology can be discovered or manually defined in a number of different ways. For example, in some embodiments, automatic discovery can be made by comparing column names in different tables. Columns with the same or very similar names from different models may be used to create a correlating ontology. For example, in the example illustrated in Figure 1A, the Albums table 109 of the Music model 102 may have a column titles "Genre”. Similarly, the Sales table 116 of the Music Sales model 104 may have a "genre" column. An inference engine at the relationship ontology 106 could determine that the different columns from the different data models stored entries for the same or substantially the same data items or data vales.
- the explicit bar 118 representing the value for total sales for the Pop genre is highlighted in bar chart 112.
- the method 200 may be practiced in a distributed computing environment.
- the method 200 includes acts for presenting data from different data providers in a correlated fashion.
- the method 200 includes performing a first query on a first data set controlled by a first entity to capture a first set of data results (act 202).
- Figure 1 A illustrates a query 110 being sent to a data model 102 to obtain data for the column chart 108 visualization.
- the method 200 further includes performing a second query on a second data set controlled by a second entity to capture a second set of data results (act 204).
- Figure 1A illustrates a query 114 being sent to a model 104 to obtain data for the bar chart 112 visualization.
- the method 200 further includes receiving a selection of one or more results from the first data set (act 206). For example, as illustrated in Figure IB and 1C, a user may select the "pop" entry in the column chart 108. Note however, that embodiments are not limited to "user selection" as illustrated, but rather selection may include any of a number of different activities. For example, a software application may select a result for further processing.
- the method 200 further includes using the one or more selected results, consulting a relationship ontology that correlates data stored in different data stores controlled by different entities, to identify one or more relationships between data in the selected results set and the second data set (act 208).
- the client machine 100 may consult the ontology 106 to determine relationships between data from the first query to the data model 102 and data from the second query to the data model 104. These relationships may be used in various ways to manipulate visualizations, perform operations on data, etc.
- the method 200 may further include constructing a new query over the second data set based on identifying one or more relationships between data in the selected results set and the second data set, and performing the new query on the second data set such that results from the new query are correlated with the selection of the one or more results. For example, a new query could be issued on the Sales table 116 limiting results to those where the Genre is Pop. This would affect the data returned from the data model 104 and the visualization displayed.
- the method 200 may further include performing additional operations on the second set of data results based on the relationships between data in the selected results set and the second data set. For example, performing additional operations on the second set of data results may include highlighting element in the second data set. Alternatively or additionally, performing additional operations on the second set of data results may include analyzing results in the second data set. Alternatively, performing additional operations on the second set of data results may include categorizing results in the second data set. Alternatively or additionally, performing additional operations on the second set of data results may include sorting results in the second data set. Alternatively or additionally, performing additional operations on the second set of data results comprises filtering results in the second data set.
- the method 200 may further include displaying a correlation between the first data set and the second data set. For example, selection of elements in the first data set may result in displaying the second data set with correlating data highlighted.
- the methods may be practiced by a computer system including one or more processors and computer readable media such as computer memory.
- the computer memory may store computer executable instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause various functions to be performed, such as the acts recited in the embodiments.
- Embodiments of the present invention may comprise or utilize a special purpose or general-purpose computer including computer hardware, as discussed in greater detail below.
- Embodiments within the scope of the present invention also include physical and other computer-readable media for carrying or storing computer-executable instructions and/or data structures.
- Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer system.
- Computer-readable media that store computer-executable instructions are physical storage media.
- Computer- readable media that carry computer-executable instructions are transmission media.
- embodiments of the invention can comprise at least two distinctly different kinds of computer-readable media: physical computer readable storage media and transmission computer readable media.
- Physical computer readable storage media includes RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD- ROM or other optical disk storage (such as CDs, DVDs, etc.), magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.
- a "network” is defined as one or more data links that enable the transport of electronic data between computer systems and/or modules and/or other electronic devices.
- a network or another communications connection can include a network and/or data links which can be used to carry or desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of computer-readable media.
- program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures can be transferred automatically from transmission computer readable media to physical computer readable storage media (or vice versa).
- program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures received over a network or data link can be buffered in RAM within a network interface module (e.g., a "NIC"), and then eventually transferred to computer system RAM and/or to less volatile computer readable physical storage media at a computer system.
- NIC network interface module
- computer readable physical storage media can be included in computer system components that also (or even primarily) utilize transmission media.
- Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions.
- the computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, or even source code.
- the invention may be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computer system configurations, including, personal computers, desktop computers, laptop computers, message processors, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, mobile telephones, PDAs, pagers, routers, switches, and the like.
- the invention may also be practiced in distributed system environments where local and remote computer systems, which are linked (either by hardwired data links, wireless data links, or by a combination of hardwired and wireless data links) through a network, both perform tasks.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- the functionally described herein can be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components.
- illustrative types of hardware logic components include Field- programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Program-specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Program-specific Standard Products (ASSPs), System-on-a-chip systems (SOCs), Complex Programmable Logic Devices (CPLDs), etc.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
RU2015153987A RU2015153987A (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | CROSSMODEL FILTRATION |
BR112015031250A BR112015031250A2 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | cross model filtration |
EP14736194.3A EP3011478A1 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | Cross-model filtering |
JP2016519581A JP2016521889A (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | Cross model filtering |
CN201480034549.0A CN105431841A (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | Cross-model filtering |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/919,857 US9720972B2 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2013-06-17 | Cross-model filtering |
US13/919,857 | 2013-06-17 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2014204704A1 true WO2014204704A1 (en) | 2014-12-24 |
Family
ID=51134390
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/041626 WO2014204704A1 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-06-10 | Cross-model filtering |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9720972B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3011478A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2016521889A (en) |
CN (1) | CN105431841A (en) |
BR (1) | BR112015031250A2 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2015153987A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014204704A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9720972B2 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2017-08-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Cross-model filtering |
US10360501B2 (en) | 2015-12-31 | 2019-07-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time capture and translation of human thoughts and ideas into structured patterns |
US11120025B2 (en) * | 2018-06-16 | 2021-09-14 | Hexagon Technology Center Gmbh | System and method for comparing and selectively merging database records |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1918827A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-07 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Data processing |
Family Cites Families (108)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5418943A (en) * | 1991-10-23 | 1995-05-23 | At&T Corp. | Information system with knowledge base and data base |
US6484149B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2002-11-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for viewing product information, and methods for generating web pages |
US6775674B1 (en) * | 1998-03-26 | 2004-08-10 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Auto completion of relationships between objects in a data model |
US6437785B1 (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2002-08-20 | Intel Corporation | Method of conveying a relationship between objects in a scene |
US7200563B1 (en) * | 1999-08-20 | 2007-04-03 | Acl International Inc. | Ontology-driven information system |
US6990238B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2006-01-24 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Data processing, analysis, and visualization system for use with disparate data types |
WO2002001416A2 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2002-01-03 | The Johns Hopkins University | Architecture for distributed database information access |
AU2001295820A1 (en) * | 2000-09-25 | 2002-04-02 | Transactions, Inc. | System and method to correlate and access related text with locations on an electronically displayed map |
WO2002035395A2 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2002-05-02 | Entigen Corporation | Integrating heterogeneous data and tools |
US6519618B1 (en) * | 2000-11-02 | 2003-02-11 | Steven L. Snyder | Real estate database search method |
US7099885B2 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2006-08-29 | Unicorn Solutions | Method and system for collaborative ontology modeling |
US7526425B2 (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2009-04-28 | Evri Inc. | Method and system for extending keyword searching to syntactically and semantically annotated data |
US20040243595A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2004-12-02 | Zhan Cui | Database management system |
US7509303B1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2009-03-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Information retrieval system using attribute normalization |
US7149983B1 (en) * | 2002-05-08 | 2006-12-12 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface and method to facilitate hierarchical specification of queries using an information taxonomy |
US20040010491A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-15 | Markus Riedinger | User interface framework |
US20040083199A1 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2004-04-29 | Govindugari Diwakar R. | Method and architecture for data transformation, normalization, profiling, cleansing and validation |
US8719284B2 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2014-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program product for filtering an entry of data items |
AU2004258349B2 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2010-11-11 | Kinor Technologies Inc. | Information access using ontologies |
US9189568B2 (en) * | 2004-04-23 | 2015-11-17 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to display and search in a language independent manner |
US7386565B1 (en) * | 2004-05-24 | 2008-06-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and methods for aggregating data from multiple sources |
US20060010156A1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Relational reporting system and methodology |
US20060031187A1 (en) * | 2004-08-04 | 2006-02-09 | Advizor Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for enterprise-wide visualization of multi-dimensional data |
US20060053172A1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2006-03-09 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for creating, editing, and using multi-relational ontologies |
US20060074832A1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2006-04-06 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for utilizing an upper ontology in the creation of one or more multi-relational ontologies |
US7493333B2 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2009-02-17 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for parsing and/or exporting data from one or more multi-relational ontologies |
US7542969B1 (en) * | 2004-11-03 | 2009-06-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Domain knowledge-assisted information processing |
US8335753B2 (en) * | 2004-11-03 | 2012-12-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Domain knowledge-assisted information processing |
US20060136380A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-06-22 | Purcell Terence P | System and method for executing a multi-table query |
ATE510259T1 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2011-06-15 | Ontoprise Gmbh | MAPPING WEB SERVICES TO ONTOLOGIES |
US20060224692A1 (en) * | 2005-03-29 | 2006-10-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Adhoc queries for services |
US7792817B2 (en) * | 2005-04-19 | 2010-09-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing complex relationships over distributed heterogeneous data sources |
US20060265352A1 (en) * | 2005-05-20 | 2006-11-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for information integration in accordance with web services |
US20070011147A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2007-01-11 | Affiniti, Inc. | Systems and methods for retrieving data |
US20070106520A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-05-10 | Akkiraju Ramakalyani T | System and method for conducting dependency analysis of business components |
US7853590B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2010-12-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote read-write access to disparate data stores |
CN100481077C (en) * | 2006-01-12 | 2009-04-22 | 国际商业机器公司 | Visual method and device for strengthening search result guide |
US20070198449A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2007-08-23 | Achille Fokoue-Nkoutche | Method and apparatus for safe ontology reasoning |
US7792821B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2010-09-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Presentation of structured search results |
US8316013B2 (en) * | 2006-08-09 | 2012-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmatic retrieval of tabular data within a cell of a query result |
JP4343206B2 (en) * | 2006-09-27 | 2009-10-14 | 株式会社東芝 | Structured document search support apparatus and program |
US20080082578A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Andrew Hogue | Displaying search results on a one or two dimensional graph |
US20080147709A1 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2008-06-19 | Iac Search & Media, Inc. | Search results from selected sources |
US8521711B2 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2013-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing persistent refined intermediate results selected from dynamic iterative filtering |
US20080172360A1 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2008-07-17 | Lipyeow Lim | Querying data and an associated ontology in a database management system |
US8176440B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2012-05-08 | Silicon Laboratories, Inc. | System and method of presenting search results |
US8583592B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2013-11-12 | Innography, Inc. | System and methods of searching data sources |
WO2008120030A1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2008-10-09 | Sobha Renaissance Information | Latent metonymical analysis and indexing [lmai] |
US8234261B2 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2012-07-31 | Ebay Inc. | Digital content hub |
US8244714B1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2012-08-14 | Salesforce, Inc. | On-demand database service system, method and computer program product for generating a custom report utilizing outer joins |
US8655868B2 (en) * | 2007-09-12 | 2014-02-18 | Ebay Inc. | Inference of query relationships based on retrieved attributes |
WO2009042931A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Initiate Systems, Inc. | Method and system for associating data records in multiple languages |
US8972434B2 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2015-03-03 | Kayak Software Corporation | Multi-phase search and presentation for vertical search websites |
US20090171899A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | Yahoo! Inc. | One-stop travel search |
US20090307200A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Liviu Ignat | System and Method For Providing Suppression of Zero, Null, Overflow, and Divide by Zero Values in Sparse Query Results |
US8612438B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2013-12-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Techniques for dynamic cross-filtering |
US8375014B1 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2013-02-12 | BioFortis, Inc. | Database query builder |
US8078645B2 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2011-12-13 | Yahoo! Inc. | Operations on multi-level nested data structure |
US20110087670A1 (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2011-04-14 | Gregory Jorstad | Systems and methods for concept mapping |
US20100138357A1 (en) * | 2008-12-03 | 2010-06-03 | Morgan Stanley (A Delaware Corporation) | Trading system |
WO2010067295A1 (en) * | 2008-12-12 | 2010-06-17 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | A method and module for linking data of a data source to a target database |
US8438177B2 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2013-05-07 | Apple Inc. | Graphical result set representation and manipulation |
US20100241610A1 (en) * | 2009-03-19 | 2010-09-23 | Gibson James Allen | Methods and systems for preserving and accessing information related to decision-making |
US8495151B2 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2013-07-23 | Chandra Bodapati | Methods and systems for determining email addresses |
US20100325206A1 (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2010-12-23 | Umeshwar Dayal | Providing collaborative business intelligence |
US20110040796A1 (en) * | 2009-08-12 | 2011-02-17 | Raytheon Company | Method and system for querying an ontology model |
US8959079B2 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2015-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing relationships in search results |
EP2488960A4 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2016-08-03 | Hewlett Packard Entpr Dev Lp | Heterogeneous data source management |
US8407238B2 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2013-03-26 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and methods for enabling arbitrary developer code consumption of web-based data |
US8326797B2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2012-12-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Supporting set-level slice and dice in data warehouses |
US8429179B1 (en) * | 2009-12-16 | 2013-04-23 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Method and system for ontology driven data collection and processing |
US8983989B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2015-03-17 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Contextual queries |
US8949236B2 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2015-02-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for analyzing data from multiple sources |
EP2365447A1 (en) * | 2010-03-11 | 2011-09-14 | British Telecommunications | Data integration system |
US20110262102A1 (en) * | 2010-04-13 | 2011-10-27 | Lahr Nils B | System and methods for optimizing buffering heuristics in media |
US10108620B2 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2018-10-23 | Google Llc | Associating still images and videos |
US8516016B2 (en) * | 2010-07-07 | 2013-08-20 | Johnson Controls Technology Company | Systems and methods for facilitating communication between a plurality of building automation subsystems |
US8489641B1 (en) * | 2010-07-08 | 2013-07-16 | Google Inc. | Displaying layers of search results on a map |
JP5639417B2 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2014-12-10 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program |
US8468167B2 (en) * | 2010-10-25 | 2013-06-18 | Corelogic, Inc. | Automatic data validation and correction |
US20120166415A1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Supplementing search results with keywords derived therefrom |
CA2741212C (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2020-12-08 | Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee | Automated self-service user support based on ontology analysis |
US9348941B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2016-05-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Specification of database table relationships for calculation |
CN102999553B (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2016-02-24 | 微软技术许可有限责任公司 | Based on user and data attribute recommending data |
US20130117218A1 (en) * | 2011-11-03 | 2013-05-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Cross-store electronic discovery |
US20130124555A1 (en) * | 2011-11-15 | 2013-05-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Navigating related items in documents based on their classification, grouping, hierarchy or ontology |
US20130173428A1 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2013-07-04 | Martin Moser | Augmenting product information on a client device |
US9443021B2 (en) * | 2011-12-30 | 2016-09-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Entity based search and resolution |
US20130262449A1 (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2013-10-03 | Playence GmBH | System and method for search refinement using knowledge model |
US20130282761A1 (en) * | 2012-04-18 | 2013-10-24 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System and method for entity shape abstraction in an on demand environment |
US8868648B2 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2014-10-21 | Business Objects Software Ltd. | Accessing open data using business intelligence tools |
US20140033120A1 (en) * | 2012-07-26 | 2014-01-30 | David BENTAL | System and methods for presenting market analyses using intuitive information presentation |
US8799959B2 (en) * | 2012-08-16 | 2014-08-05 | Hoi L. Young | User interface for entertainment systems |
US9563674B2 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2017-02-07 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Data exploration user interface |
US9218481B2 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2015-12-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing password strength |
US10324917B2 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2019-06-18 | Qliktech International Ab | Methods and systems for data management |
US20140114720A1 (en) * | 2012-10-18 | 2014-04-24 | The Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc | Apparatus and method for processing market data |
US20140114949A1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2014-04-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Knowledge Management System |
US9275112B2 (en) * | 2012-11-09 | 2016-03-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Filtering views with predefined query |
US20140136518A1 (en) * | 2012-11-12 | 2014-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Multi-pane presentation of multidimensional search results |
US10733182B2 (en) * | 2012-12-10 | 2020-08-04 | Healthagen International Limited | Method and system for aggregate banding |
WO2014093385A1 (en) * | 2012-12-10 | 2014-06-19 | Parastructure Inc. | Systems and methods for data relationship visualization |
US9183261B2 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2015-11-10 | Shutterstock, Inc. | Lexicon based systems and methods for intelligent media search |
US9824118B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-11-21 | Looker Data Sciences, Inc. | Querying one or more databases |
US9710534B2 (en) * | 2013-05-07 | 2017-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and systems for discovery of linkage points between data sources |
US9720972B2 (en) * | 2013-06-17 | 2017-08-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Cross-model filtering |
US10261950B2 (en) * | 2013-11-26 | 2019-04-16 | Sap Se | Table as query language parameter |
US9348880B1 (en) * | 2015-04-01 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Federated search of multiple sources with conflict resolution |
-
2013
- 2013-06-17 US US13/919,857 patent/US9720972B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-06-10 EP EP14736194.3A patent/EP3011478A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2014-06-10 WO PCT/US2014/041626 patent/WO2014204704A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-06-10 RU RU2015153987A patent/RU2015153987A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2014-06-10 JP JP2016519581A patent/JP2016521889A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2014-06-10 CN CN201480034549.0A patent/CN105431841A/en active Pending
- 2014-06-10 BR BR112015031250A patent/BR112015031250A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2017
- 2017-07-25 US US15/659,246 patent/US10606842B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1918827A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-07 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Data processing |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2015153987A (en) | 2017-06-23 |
CN105431841A (en) | 2016-03-23 |
JP2016521889A (en) | 2016-07-25 |
RU2015153987A3 (en) | 2018-04-28 |
BR112015031250A2 (en) | 2017-07-25 |
US20170322978A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 |
US10606842B2 (en) | 2020-03-31 |
US20140372481A1 (en) | 2014-12-18 |
EP3011478A1 (en) | 2016-04-27 |
US9720972B2 (en) | 2017-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11797532B1 (en) | Dashboard display using panel templates | |
US10521448B2 (en) | Application of actionable task structures to disparate data sets for transforming data in the disparate data sets | |
US10514827B2 (en) | Resequencing actionable task structures for transforming data | |
US9275121B2 (en) | Interoperable shared query based on heterogeneous data sources | |
AU2014290354B2 (en) | Retrieval of attribute values based upon identified entities | |
US10311062B2 (en) | Filtering structured data using inexact, culture-dependent terms | |
US10481766B2 (en) | Interfaces and methods for generating and applying actionable task structures | |
US8548973B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for filtering search results | |
US20150278315A1 (en) | Data fitting selected visualization type | |
US20080082494A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for generating queries and reports | |
US20140330821A1 (en) | Recommending context based actions for data visualizations | |
US20190354599A1 (en) | Ai model canvas | |
US11609942B2 (en) | Expanding search engine capabilities using AI model recommendations | |
US20140136503A1 (en) | Personalized search result re-rank based on relationship bond strength alteration among different keywords | |
US20120022855A1 (en) | Searching and Browsing of Contextual Information | |
US9858260B2 (en) | System and method for analyzing items using lexicon analysis and filtering process | |
US10606842B2 (en) | Cross-model filtering | |
US9792355B2 (en) | Searches for similar documents | |
US20080082493A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for receiving a report | |
US8615733B2 (en) | Building a component to display documents relevant to the content of a website | |
US20130227422A1 (en) | Enterprise portal smart worklist | |
US10176230B2 (en) | Search-independent ranking and arranging data | |
Pennell et al. | Implementing a real-time suggestion service in a library discovery layer | |
KR20100070779A (en) | Metadata managing system using tags and method thereof | |
Lechevalier et al. | NIST ontological visualization interface for standards: User’s guide |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201480034549.0 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 14736194 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
DPE1 | Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2016519581 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2014736194 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2015153987 Country of ref document: RU Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: 112015031250 Country of ref document: BR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 112015031250 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20151214 |