WO2015154679A1

WO2015154679A1 - Method and device for ranking search results of multiple search engines

Info

Publication number: WO2015154679A1
Application number: PCT/CN2015/076111
Authority: WO
Inventors: 杨浩; 吴凯
Original assignee: 北京奇虎科技有限公司; 奇智软件（北京）有限公司
Priority date: 2014-04-08
Filing date: 2015-04-08
Publication date: 2015-10-15
Also published as: CN103870607A

Abstract

Disclosed are a method and device for ranking search results of multiple search engines. The method comprises: receiving a search request of a user, and respectively acquiring search results obtained by various search engines in response to the search request; according to user behaviour weights of various search results, respectively re-ranking the search results of the various search engines, and ranking the various search engines; and displaying ranking results of the various search engines and the re-ranked search results of the various search engines in the manner of an on-line application of a tab page. The method uses user behaviour weights to respectively re-rank search results of various search engines, and ranks and optimizes the various search engines.

Description

Multi-search engine search result sorting method and device

Technical field

The present invention relates to the field of the Internet, and in particular to a method and apparatus for sorting search results of multiple search engines.

Background technique

There are two main types of existing search engine ranking systems, one is an independent search engine, such as Google Music, and the other is a multi-search engine, such as meta search. The first type of search engine lacks certain resources due to copyright resource issues, etc., and cannot satisfy user requirements. Because of the sorting analysis based on its own user behavior, other engine user behavior data is missing, and non-optimal sorting in big data. The second type of search engine, while satisfying the resource requirements, displays multiple search engine ranking results according to a fixed sorting method. It does not calculate multi-search engine result weights based on big data, and lacks reordering of results within the engine. Sorting analysis between engines, while optimizing the search results of multiple search engines, the results of each search engine are not well ordered and cannot meet the needs of users.

Summary of the invention

In view of the above problems, the present invention has been made in order to provide a sorting method for a plurality of search engine search results and a corresponding sorting device for a plurality of search engine search results that overcome the above problems or at least partially solve the above problems.

According to an aspect of the present invention, a method for sorting search results of multiple search engines is provided, including:

Receiving a search request of the user, and respectively obtaining search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request;

According to the user behavior weight of each search result, the search results of each search engine are separately rearranged, and each search engine is sorted;

The ranking results of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after rearrangement are displayed in the form of an online application of the tab.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a sorting apparatus for a plurality of search engine search results is provided, including:

a user requirement obtaining module adapted to receive a search request of the user;

a multiple search engine result obtaining module, configured to respectively obtain search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request;

The sorting module is adapted to re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and sort the search engines;

The multi-search engine result presentation module is adapted to display the sorting result of each search engine and the search result of each search engine after the rearrangement in the form of an online application of the tab page.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, a computer program is provided, comprising computer readable code, when the computer readable code is run on a computing device, causing the computing device to perform the multiple search engine of the present invention The sorting method of the search results.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, a computer readable medium storing the computer program of the present invention is provided.

The beneficial effects of the invention are:

According to the method of the present invention, after receiving the search request of the user, the search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request are respectively acquired, and the search results of the respective search engines are respectively rearranged according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results. And sorting each search engine, displaying the sorting result of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after rearranging in the form of an online application of the tab page. The method uses user behavior weights to reorder the search results of each search engine separately, and sorts each search engine, which is better than the lack of resources and sorting of independent search engines, so that the ranking of each search engine in multiple search engines is optimized. Engine-to-engine sequencing is also optimized.

The above description is only an overview of the technical solutions of the present invention, and the above-described and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention can be more clearly understood. Specific embodiments of the invention are set forth below.

DRAWINGS

Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting. Throughout the drawings, the same reference numerals are used to refer to the same parts. In the drawing:

1 shows a flow chart of a method for ranking multiple search engine search results in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

2 is a flow chart showing a method of sorting search results of multiple search engines according to another embodiment of the present invention;

3 is a block diagram showing the structure of a sorting apparatus for multiple search engine search results according to an embodiment of the present invention;

4 is a block diagram schematically showing a computing device for performing a ranking method of multiple search engine search results in accordance with the present invention;

Fig. 5 schematically shows a storage unit for holding or carrying program code of a method of implementing a file upload cloud disk according to the present invention.

detailed description

Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While the embodiments of the present invention have been shown in the drawings, the embodiments Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be more fully understood and the scope of the disclosure will be fully disclosed.

1 shows a flow chart of a method of ranking multiple search engine search results in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the method includes the following steps:

Step S100: Receive a search request of the user, and respectively obtain search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request.

Step S110: Re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and sort the search engines.

The user behavior weight mainly reflects the amount of clicks on a certain search result by the users of the whole network, or the amount of click statistics of the group users on a certain search result within a certain period of time.

Step S120, displaying the sorting result of each search engine and the search result of each search engine after the rearrangement in the form of an online application of the tab page.

According to the method provided by the foregoing embodiment of the present invention, after receiving the search request of the user, the search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request are respectively obtained, and the search results of the search engines are respectively performed according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results. Rearrange and sort each search engine to display the sorting results of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after rearranging in the form of an online application of the tab. The method uses user behavior weights to reorder the search results of each search engine separately, and sorts each search engine, which is better than the lack of resources and sorting of independent search engines, so that the ranking of each search engine in multiple search engines is optimized. Engine The ordering is also optimized.

2 shows a flow chart of a method for ranking multiple search engine search results in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the method includes the following steps:

Step S200: Receive a search request of the user, and respectively obtain search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request.

For example, the user inputs a certain artist name XX through the client, and after receiving the user's search request, the server sends the user's search request to various search engines such as A, B, C, D, and E to obtain respective search engine responses. Searching for the search result obtained by the search engine A, wherein the search results obtained by the search engine A are: a, c, d, e, b; the search results obtained by the search engine B are: c, e, f, h, a; the search engine C The search results obtained are: f, k, m, d, b; the search results obtained by the search engine D are: m, n, k, a, h; the search results obtained by the search engine E are: a, e, o, d, n, analyze each search result and the sort position of each search result in each search engine.

Step S210, performing weight removal processing on the search results of the respective search engines.

The search results of the search engines obtained in step S200 are subjected to weighting processing, and the results obtained by the weighting are: a, b, c, d, e, f, h, k, m, n, o.

Step S220: Acquire user behavior weights of each search result and search engine relevance weights.

User behavior weight mainly reflects the number of clicks on a certain search result by users on the whole network, rather than just based on the click volume of a certain user or several users on a certain search result. User behavior weights are based on big data, big data is also called Big data, or massive data, massive data, which means that the amount of data involved is so large that it cannot be reached in a reasonable time through current mainstream software tools. Capture, manage, process, and organize information that is more positive for helping business decisions. Big data is characterized by scale, high speed, diversity, and value. It integrates different forms of data from different sources, enabling real-time analysis rather than batch analysis, and discovering internal correlations between massive and frequent data. The invention utilizes the advantage of big data, counts the clicks of the search results of the whole network users, and calculates the user behavior weights of the search results according to the clicks. Specifically, by counting the click amount of the search result in the step S200 by the user of the whole network, the user behavior weights of the search result after the weighting in step S210 are calculated according to the click amount: 20, 18, 25, 10, 14, 15 respectively. , 12, 19, 21, 13, 16.

Analyze the number of search results that appear in each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner, based on the search results appearing in each search engine and the number of occurrences on the partner. Search engine relevance weights. For example, analyzing the positions of each search result in the search engines A, B, C, D, and E, and using the position weights to indicate the order in which the search results appear in the search engine, the search results are in the search engine. The position weights are: 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, respectively. Since the same search result may appear in different search engines, the weighted average of the position weights of the search results in different engines is taken as the search result. The position weight of the search result a in the search engines A, B, D, E is 50, 10, 20, 50, respectively, and the position weight of the search result a is (50+10+20+). 50) / 4 = 32.5, using this method to calculate the position weights of other search results, calculate the position weights of b, c, d, e, f, h, k, m, n, o are: 10, 45 , 23.3, 50, 40, 15, 35, 40, 25, 30. Analyze the number of times the search result appears on the partner, and the number of times the search result after the statistical weighting appears on the partner is: 4, 2, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, according to The number of times the search result appears on the partner is determined by the number of times 40, 20, 20, 30, 30, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 10. The relevance weight of the search engine is the weighted weight of the position weight and the number of times of the search result, and the multi-engine correlation weights of each search result are: 72.5, 30, 65, 53.3, 80, 60, 35 , 55, 60, 45, 40.

Step S230, according to the user behavior weights of each search result and the search engine relevance weights, the search results of all the search engines are comprehensively sorted to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result.

Specifically, the weighted weights of the user behavior weights and the search engine correlation weights of the respective search results are separately calculated as the weight values of the respective search results, and the weight values of the respective search results are ranked to all the search engines in descending order. The search results are sorted, and the ideal integrated sorting result is obtained by sorting the weight values of the respective search results from high to low. Calculated the weight values of each search result are: 92.5, 48, 90, 63.3, 94, 75, 47, 74, 81, 58, 56, according to the weight value of each search result from high to low for all search engines The search results are sorted to obtain the ideal comprehensive sorting results: e, a, c, m, f, k, d, n, o, b, h.

In step S240, the search results of the respective search engines are separately rearranged by using the ideal integrated sorting result, and each search engine is sorted.

Specifically, the search results of the search engines in step S200 are rearranged according to the ideal integrated sorting result obtained in step S220. Preferably, the order of the search results rearranged by each search engine should be compared with the ideal integrated sort result. The order of precedence is the same. The search results of the rearranged search engine A are: e, a, c, d, b; the search results of the search engine B are: e, a, c, f, h; the search result of the search engine C is: m, f, k, d, b; search engine D search results are: a, m, k, n, h; search engine E search results are: e, a, d, n, o.

The sum of the weight values of all the search results of each search engine is calculated as the weight value of the search engine, and each search engine is sorted according to the weight values of the respective search engines. For example, the sum of the weights of all search results of search engine A is: 94+92.5+90+63.3+48=387.8, and the weights of all search results of search engines B, C, D, and E are calculated in the same way. They are: 398.5, 341.3, 352.5, 363.8. According to the calculated sum of user behaviors of search results in the search engine, each search engine is sorted, and the rankings of each search engine are: B, A, E, D, C.

In this embodiment, an ideal comprehensive ranking result is obtained according to the user behavior weight and the search engine correlation weight. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the ideal integrated ranking result may be obtained only according to the user behavior weight or only the search engine correlation weight. The specific method is similar to the above method, and details are not described herein again. In addition, the specific calculation methods of the user behavior weights, the search engine correlation weights, the weight values of the respective search results, and the weight values of the search engines described in the foregoing embodiments are all specific examples of the present invention, and according to actual conditions, The specific calculation method can be adjusted.

Step S250, displaying the sorting result of each search engine and the search result of each search engine after the rearrangement in the form of an online application of the tab page.

After obtaining the sorting result of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after the rearrangement, the client displays in the form of an online application of the tab page. Such a presentation manner may be various. For example, in an online application, a plurality of buttons having a sequential order respectively represent respective search engines, wherein the order of the plurality of buttons is consistent with the order of the respective search engines. The search results of the rearranged search engines are displayed by switching between a plurality of buttons. Through this online application, users can know at a glance which search engines provide search results that are superior, which search results are preferred, and users can prioritize recommendations based on recommendations.

According to the method provided by the foregoing embodiment of the present invention, a search request of a user is received, and search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request are respectively obtained, and search results of each search engine are subjected to weight processing to obtain user behavior weights of each search result. And the search engine correlation weights, according to the user behavior weights of each search result and the search engine relevance weights, the search results of all the search engines are comprehensively sorted to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result, and the ideal comprehensive sorting result is utilized. The search results of each search engine are separately rearranged, and each search engine is sorted, and the sorting result of each search engine and the search results of each rearranged search engine are displayed in the form of an online application of the tab page. The method first performs weight processing on the search results, and then uses User behavior weights and search engine correlation weights reorder search results and sort search engines, using big data about user behavior across the network to more accurately sort search results and search engines Sorting, which is better than the lack of resources, big data missing and sorting of independent search engines, makes the optimization of each search engine in multiple search engines and the inter-engine sorting is also optimized.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the structure of a sorting apparatus for multiple search engine search results according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the device includes: a user requirement acquisition module 300, a multi-search engine result acquisition module 310, a ranking module 320, and a multi-search engine result presentation module 330.

The user requirement obtaining module 300 is adapted to receive a search request of the user.

The multiple search engine result obtaining module 310 is adapted to respectively obtain search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request.

The sorting module 320 is adapted to re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and sort the search engines.

The sorting module 320 further includes: an integrated sorting sub-module 340, a multi-search engine result rearranging sub-module 350, and a multi-search engine sorting sub-module 360.

The comprehensive sorting sub-module 340 is adapted to comprehensively sort the search results of all the search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result.

The integrated sorting sub-module 340 further includes a weight calculating unit 370 adapted to acquire user behavior weights of the respective search results and search engine relevance weights.

User behavior weights mainly reflect the number of clicks on a search result by users across the network.

The weight calculation unit 370 is further adapted to: count the click amount of the search result of the whole network user, and calculate the user behavior weight of the search result according to the click amount.

The weight calculation unit 370 is further adapted to: analyze the position where the search result appears in each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner, and calculate the search engine relevance according to the position of the search result appearing in each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner. Weight.

The comprehensive sorting unit 380 is adapted to comprehensively sort the search results of all the search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results and the search engine relevance weights, to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result.

The comprehensive sorting unit 380 is further adapted to: respectively calculate the weighted weights of the user behavior weights and the search engine correlation weights of the respective search results as the weight values of the respective search results, according to the weight values of the respective search results in descending order Sort the search results of all search engines.

The multiple search engine result rearrangement sub-module 350 is adapted to re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines by using the ideal integrated sorting result;

The multiple search engine sorting sub-module 360 is adapted to sort the individual search engines by using the ideal integrated sorting result.

The ideal comprehensive sorting result is obtained by sorting the weight values of the respective search results from high to low;

The multiple search engine ranking sub-module 360 is further adapted to: calculate a sum of weight values for all search results for each search engine as a weight value for the search engine; sort the individual search engines according to the weight values of the respective search engines.

The multiple search engine result presentation module 330 is adapted to present the ranking results of the respective search engines and the search results of the respective search engines after the rearrangement in the form of an online application of the tabs.

The multiple search engine result presentation module 330 is further adapted to: in the online application, each of the search engines is represented by a plurality of buttons having a sequence, wherein the order of the plurality of buttons is consistent with the order of the respective search engines, and the multiple Switch between buttons to show the search results of each search engine after rearrangement.

Optionally, the sorting device further includes: a weighting module 390, configured to perform a weighting process on the search results of the respective search engines.

The weighting module 390 is adapted to perform a weighting process on the search results obtained by the multiple search engine result obtaining module 310.

According to the foregoing embodiment of the present invention, after receiving the search request of the user, the search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request are respectively obtained, and the search results of the search engines are respectively performed according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results. Rearrange and sort each search engine to display the sorting results of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after rearranging in the form of an online application of the tab. The device first performs weight processing on the search results, and then rearranges the search results according to the user behavior weights and the search engine relevance weights, and sorts the search engines, and utilizes the big data about the user behaviors in the entire network. More accurate sorting of search results and sorting of search engines is superior to independent search engine resource shortage, big data missing and sorting, which optimizes the ranking of each search engine in multiple search engines and optimizes engine-to-engine sorting.

In the description provided herein, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that the embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, not Well-known methods, structures, and techniques are shown in detail so as not to obscure the description.

Similarly, the various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together into a single embodiment, in the above description of the exemplary embodiments of the invention, Figure, or a description of it. However, the method disclosed is not to be interpreted as reflecting the intention that the claimed invention requires more features than those recited in the claims. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects reside in less than all features of the single embodiments disclosed herein. Therefore, the claims following the specific embodiments are hereby explicitly incorporated into the embodiments, and each of the claims as a separate embodiment of the invention.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the modules in the devices of the embodiments can be adaptively changed and placed in one or more devices different from the embodiment. The modules or units or components of the embodiments may be combined into one module or unit or component, and further they may be divided into a plurality of sub-modules or sub-units or sub-components. In addition to such features and/or at least some of the processes or units being mutually exclusive, any combination of the features disclosed in the specification, including the accompanying claims, the abstract and the drawings, and any methods so disclosed, or All processes or units of the device are combined. Each feature disclosed in this specification (including the accompanying claims, the abstract and the drawings) may be replaced by alternative features that provide the same, equivalent or similar purpose.

In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that, although some embodiments described herein include certain features that are included in other embodiments and not in other features, combinations of features of different embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the present invention. Different embodiments are formed and formed. For example, in the following claims, any one of the claimed embodiments can be used in any combination.

The various component embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in hardware, or in a software module running on one or more processors, or in a combination thereof. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that some or all of some or all of the components of the ranking device for multiple search engine search results in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in practice using a microprocessor or digital signal processor (DSP). Features. The invention can also be implemented as a device or device program (e.g., a computer program and a computer program product) for performing some or all of the methods described herein. Such a program implementing the invention may be stored on a computer readable medium or may be in the form of one or more signals. Such signals can be downloaded from the Internet website, or Provided on the body signal, or in any other form.

For example, Figure 4 illustrates a computing device that can implement ranking of multiple search engine search results in accordance with the present invention. The computing device conventionally includes a processor 410 and a computer program product or computer readable medium in the form of a memory 420. The memory 420 may be an electronic memory such as a flash memory, an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM, a hard disk, or a ROM. Memory 420 has a memory space 430 for program code 431 for performing any of the method steps described above. For example, storage space 430 for program code may include various program code 431 for implementing various steps in the above methods, respectively. The program code can be read from or written to one or more computer program products. These computer program products include program code carriers such as hard disks, compact disks (CDs), memory cards or floppy disks. Such computer program products are typically portable or fixed storage units as described with reference to FIG. The storage unit may have storage segments, storage spaces, and the like that are similarly arranged to memory 420 in the computing device of FIG. The program code can be compressed, for example, in an appropriate form. Typically, the storage unit includes computer readable code 431', ie, code readable by a processor, such as 410, that when executed by a computing device causes the computing device to perform each of the methods described above step.

"an embodiment," or "an embodiment," or "an embodiment," In addition, it is noted that the phrase "in one embodiment" is not necessarily referring to the same embodiment.

It is to be noted that the above-described embodiments are illustrative of the invention and are not intended to be limiting, and that the invention may be devised without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as a limitation. The word "comprising" does not exclude the presence of the elements or steps that are not recited in the claims. The word "a" or "an" The invention can be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the unit claims enumerating several means, several of these means can be embodied by the same hardware item. The use of the words first, second, and third does not indicate any order. These words can be interpreted as names.

In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been selected for the purpose of readability and teaching, and is not intended to be construed or limited. Thus, in Numerous modifications and changes will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims. The disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive, and the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

A method for ranking multiple search engine search results, including:

Receiving a search request of the user, and respectively obtaining search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request;

According to the user behavior weight of each search result, the search results of each search engine are separately rearranged, and each search engine is sorted;

The ranking results of each search engine and the search results of each search engine after rearrangement are displayed in the form of an online application of the tab.
The sorting method according to claim 1, wherein the retrieving the search results of the respective search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and sorting the search engines further includes:

According to the user behavior weights of each search result, the search results of all search engines are comprehensively sorted to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result;

The search results of the respective search engines are separately rearranged and the search engines are sorted by using the ideal integrated sorting result.
The sorting method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the sorting result of each search engine in the form of an online application of the tab page and the search result of each search engine after the rearrangement further include:

In the online application, each of the search engines is represented by a plurality of buttons having a sequence, wherein the order of the plurality of buttons is consistent with the order of the respective search engines, by being between the plurality of buttons Switch to show the search results of each search engine after rearrangement.
The sorting method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the search results of all the search engines are comprehensively sorted according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and the ideal integrated sorting result is further obtained:

Obtain user behavior weights and search engine relevance weights for each search result;

According to the user behavior weights of each search result and the search engine relevance weights, the search results of all search engines are comprehensively sorted to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result.
The ranking method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the user behavior weights of the respective search results are obtained by: counting the clicks of the search results by the users of the entire network, and calculating the user behavior weights of the search results according to the clicks. .
The ranking method according to any one of claims 1-5, wherein the search engine correlation weights of the respective search results are obtained as follows:

The search result is displayed in the position of each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner, and the search engine relevance weight is calculated according to the position of the search result appearing in each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner.
The sorting method according to any one of claims 1-6, wherein the search results of all search engines are comprehensively sorted according to user behavior weights of respective search results and search engine relevance weights, thereby obtaining an ideal integrated sorting. The results further include:

Calculating, respectively, the weighted weights of the user behavior weights and the search engine correlation weights of the respective search results as the weight values of the respective search results, and the weight values of the respective search results are in descending order Sort all search engine search results.
The sorting method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the ideal integrated sorting result is obtained by sorting the weight values of the respective search results from high to low;

The sorting each search engine by using the ideal integrated sorting result further includes:

Calculating the sum of the weight values of all search results for each search engine as the weight value of the search engine;

Each search engine is sorted according to the weight value of each search engine.
The sorting method according to any one of claims 1-8, before the comprehensive sorting of the search results of all search engines to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result, the method further comprises:

The search results of the respective search engines are subjected to weight processing.
A sorting device for multiple search engine search results, comprising:

a user requirement obtaining module adapted to receive a search request of the user;

a multiple search engine result obtaining module, configured to respectively obtain search results obtained by each search engine in response to the search request;

The sorting module is adapted to re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines according to the user behavior weights of the respective search results, and sort the search engines;

The multi-search engine result presentation module is adapted to display the sorting result of each search engine and the search result of each search engine after the rearrangement in the form of an online application of the tab page.
The apparatus of claim 10, the ordering module further comprising:

Integrated sorting sub-module, suitable for all searches based on user behavior weights for individual search results The engine search results are comprehensively sorted to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result;

a multi-search engine result re-arranging sub-module adapted to re-arrange the search results of the respective search engines by using the ideal integrated sorting result;

A multi-search engine sorting sub-module that sorts each search engine using the ideal integrated sorting result.
The apparatus of claim 10 or 11, the multi-search engine result presentation module is further adapted to:

In the online application, each of the search engines is represented by a plurality of buttons having a sequence, wherein the order of the plurality of buttons is consistent with the order of the respective search engines, by being between the plurality of buttons Switch to show the search results of each search engine after rearrangement.
The apparatus of any of claims 10-12, the integrated sorting sub-module further adapted to:

a weight calculation unit, configured to obtain a user behavior weight of each search result and a search engine relevance weight;

The comprehensive sorting unit is adapted to comprehensively sort the search results of all the search engines according to the user behavior weights of each search result and the search engine relevance weights, to obtain an ideal comprehensive sorting result.
The apparatus according to any one of claims 10-13, wherein the weight calculation unit is further adapted to: count the amount of clicks of the search results by the users of the entire network, and calculate the user behavior weights of the search results according to the clicks.
The apparatus according to any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein the weight calculation unit is further adapted to: analyze the position at which the search result appears in each search engine and the number of occurrences in the partner, appearing according to the search result Search engine relevance weights are calculated at the location of each search engine and the number of times it appears on the partner.
The apparatus according to any one of claims 10-15, wherein the integrated sorting unit is further adapted to: respectively calculate a weighted weight of the user behavior weight and the search engine relevance weight of each search result as each The weight value of the search result, and the search results of all the search engines are sorted according to the weight value of each search result in descending order.
The apparatus according to any one of claims 10-16, wherein the ideal integrated sorting result is obtained by sorting the weight values of the respective search results from high to low;

The multiple search engine ranking sub-module is further adapted to: calculate all searches for each search engine The sum of the weight values of the results is used as the weight value of the search engine; each search engine is sorted according to the weight values of the respective search engines.
The apparatus according to any one of claims 10-17, further comprising: a weighting module adapted to perform a weighting process on the search results of the respective search engines.
A computer program comprising computer readable code causing the computing device to perform a multi-search engine search result according to any one of claims 1-9 when the computer readable code is run on a computing device Sorting method.
A computer readable medium storing the computer program of claim 19.