Analog drive for ultrasonic probe with tunable phase angle

[54] ANALOG DRIVE FOR ULTRASONIC PROBE WITH TUNABLE PHASE ANGLE

[75] Inventors: Ying-Ching Lo, Fremont; Tolentino Escorcio, San Leandro; Samuel Zambre, Palo Alto; Ajeet Singh, Berkeley, all of Calif.

[73] Assignee: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Tex.

[21] Appl. No.: 426,465

[22] Filed: Oct. 20, 1989

Related U.S. Application Data

[63] Continuation of Ser. No. 928,761, Nov. 7, 1986, abandoned.

[51] Int. CI.' H03L 7/00

[52] U.S. CI 364/481; 364/484;

323/208; 323/211; 310/316; 318/116; 331/36 R; 73/589; 73/648

[58] Field of Search 364/481, 482, 483, 484,

364/492; 323/208, 209, 210, 211; 318/116; 73/589, 648; 310/316, 317, 318; 331/1 R, 36 R

[56] References Cited

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

2,752,512 6/1956 Sarratt 310/8.1

2,799,787 7/1957 Guttner 310/8.1

2,872,578 2/1959 Kaplan et al 250/36

2,917,691 12/1959 De Prisco et al 318/118

3,139,577 8/1960 Krezek 323/102

(List continued on next page.)

FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS

0128635 12/1984 European Pat. Off. .

0151003 7/1985 European Pat. Off. .

0180214 5/1986 European Pat. Off. .

1130442 1/1966 United Kingdom .

2142163 1/1985 United Kingdom .

2167305 5/1986 United Kingdom .

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Chmielnik et al., Klin. Oczna (1981) 83:307-309. Clayman, Australian J. Ophthalmol. (1984) 12:71-77.

Chinese J. Ophthalmol. (1979) 15(3): 135-137.
Chinese! Ophthalmol. (1981) 17(1):29-31.
Heslin et al., /. Amer. Intraoccul. Implant Soc, (Fall,
1983) 9(4):445-449.

Coopervision Ultrasonic Decoupling Sleeve Brochure Article (pub. available May 1986) per article.

Primary Examiner—Thomas G. Black
Assistant Examiner—V. N. Trans
Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Ronald C. Fish

[57] ABSTRACT

The system uses a tunable inductor in series with the piezoelectric crystal excitation transducer in the probe which has a flux modulation coil. The bias current through this flux modulation coil is controlled by the system. It is controlled such that the inductance of the tunable inductor cancels out the capacitive reactance of the load impedance presented by the probe when the probe is being driven by a driving signal which matches the mechanical resonance frequency of the probe. The resulting overall load impedance is substantially purely resistive. The system measures the phase angle and monitors the power level. The system uses this information to adjust the bias current flowing through the flux modulation coil to maintain the substantially purely resistive load impedance for changing power levels. This information is also used to adjust the frequency of the driving signal to track changing mechanical resonance conditions for the probe at different power levels. This method of operation insures substantially maximum power transfer efficiency and substantially linear power control over a range of power dissipation levels. There is also disclosed an analog circuit to measure the phase angle for the load driving signal and to adjust the frequency of the driving signal for best performance. This system includes an integrator to eliminate the effect of offset errors caused by operational amplifiers. There is also disclosed a system to determine the mechanical resonance frequency by sweeping the drive frequency and monitoring the drive current for the frequency at which the drive current is a maximum.

14 Claims, 18 Drawing Sheets

Page 2

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

3,152,295 10/1964 Schebler 318/118

3,223,907 12/1965 Blok et al 318/118

3,263,124 7/1966 French et al 331/181

3,296,511 1/1967 Van Der Burgt et al 318/116

3,365,657 1/1968 Webb 323/56

3,379,972 4/1968 Foster et al 324/61

3,422,343 11/1968 Specht 323/43.5

3,432,691 3/1969 Shoh 310/8.1

3,443,130 5/1969 Shoh 310/8.1

3,524,085 8/1970 Shoh 310/8.1

3,936,727 2/1976 Kelley, Jr. et al 323/102

3,946,280 3/1976 Quist 317/31

3,955,134 5/1976 Woodford 323/61

3,963,798 6/1976 Kelley, Jr. et al 323/102

3,963,978 6/1976 Kelly, Jr. et al 323/210

3,968,432 7/1976 Kelley, Jr 324/107

3,992,661 11/1976 Kelley, Jr 323/102

4,013,937 3/1977 Pelly 321/7

4,028,614 6/1977 Kelly, Jr 323/210

4,127,805 11/1978 Lukoshov 323/120

4,134,302 1/1979 Matay 73/612

4,227,110 10/1980 Douglas et al 310/316

4,271,371 6/1981 Furuichi et al 310/316

4,271,705 6/1981 Crostack 73/602

4,277,758 7/1981 Mishiro 331/1 R

4,310,891 1/1982 Niki 364/484

4,312,044 1/1982 Baba 364/554

4,344,328 8/1982 Hawkins 73/651

4,365,301 12/1982 Arnold et al 364/475

4,371,816 2/1983 Wieser 318/116

4,385,208 5/1983 Tow 179/84 VF

4,395,762 7/1983 Wondergem 364/484

4,409,659 10/1983 Devine 364/475

4,445,063 4/1984 Smith 310/316

4,445,082 4/1984 Roberge 323/206

4,450,082 4/1984 Bolduc .

4,503,380 3/1985 Thanawala 323/206

4,525,790 6/1985 Nakamura 364/484

4,551,690 11/1985 Quist 331/362

4,583,529 4/1986 Briggs 128/24 A

4,590,416 5/1986 Porche 323/205

4,597,388 7/1986 Koziol et al 128/303.1

4,599,553 7/1986 Brennan 323/205

4,605,890 8/1986 Ogle 323/209

4,623,838 11/1986 Nakamura 324/142

4,626,728 12/1986 Flachenecker et al 310/316