Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
The Advertising Standards Agency said the sexually explicit ads on the back of the Sunday Sport could be seen by children ‘if the paper was left in public places or around the house’.
The Advertising Standards Agency said the sexually explicit ads on the back of the Sunday Sport could be seen by children ‘if the paper was left in public places or around the house’. Photograph: Nick Ansell/PA
The Advertising Standards Agency said the sexually explicit ads on the back of the Sunday Sport could be seen by children ‘if the paper was left in public places or around the house’. Photograph: Nick Ansell/PA

Sexually explicit Sunday Sport ads banned despite 'censorship' claim

This article is more than 7 years old

Publisher calls regulator’s decision to ban ads for telephone chat lines on the back page because they could be seen by children ‘highly selective’

Two sexually explicit ads for telephone chat lines on the back page of the Sunday Sport have been banned by regulators, despite claims from the advertiser that the move would amount to censorship.

The ads were illustrated with pictures of women in the process of undressing and with their breasts partly exposed, and were accompanied by taglines including “XXX Sex Stories” and “Filthy Sex Chat with Hot TGirls!”.

The publisher of the Sunday Sport argued that the newspaper was clearly targeted at adults and it had run similar ads before and had received no complaints.

The advertiser, Worldwide Digital Media, claimed that to “prohibit the ads from being placed in the newspaper, would be highly selective and restrictive, and would amount to censorship on the UK’s free press”.

The complaint was made by campaign group Not Buying It, which is currently hosting petitions against the Daily Sport and its advertising on its website.

Though the Advertising Standards Authority cleared similar ads inside the newspaper, it said their appearance on the back page could expose them to children.

In its ruling the ASA said that “if the paper was left in public places or around the house, the ad could be seen by children”.

It added: “We also understood that the Sunday Sport was usually displayed in retail stores alongside other newspapers in a readily visible position (as opposed to appearing on the top shelf), and therefore the back page was more likely to be seen inadvertently by children.”

This article was amended on 21 September 2016 to make it clear that it was the advertiser and not the publisher of the Sunday Sport that claimed the ban amounted to censorship

Most viewed

Most viewed