CA2054467C - Intrusion alarm sensing unit - Google Patents
Intrusion alarm sensing unitInfo
- Publication number
- CA2054467C CA2054467C CA002054467A CA2054467A CA2054467C CA 2054467 C CA2054467 C CA 2054467C CA 002054467 A CA002054467 A CA 002054467A CA 2054467 A CA2054467 A CA 2054467A CA 2054467 C CA2054467 C CA 2054467C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- unconfirmed
- signal
- event signals
- sensors
- sensing unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
- G08B29/183—Single detectors using dual technologies
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/02—Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/16—Security signalling or alarm systems, e.g. redundant systems
Abstract
The present invention is directed to an intrusion detection system having two different types of motion sensors and processing of the signals produced by the motion sensors in a manner to provide a reliable indication of motion within the space being sensed. The intrusion detection system includes a microprocessor and produces an alarm signal if each sensor is activated within a predetermined time period of each other. The unit is also capable of producing what is referred to as a "trouble"
signal, based upon a certain number of unconfirmed event signals, i.e. a signal from only one sensor being received, within a predetermined time, indicating that one of the sensors is not operating properly. Once a certain number of unconfirmed event signals are received, the unit operates in one of at least two different default modes whereby a trouble signal or trouble signal and alarm signal are produced by means of a different logic processing step.
The invention is also directed to an intrusion detection system having dual sensors where the user can automatically reset the unit should the system have gone into default mode operation. This is particularly useful in that it reduces service on the units and also provides an easy, convenient manner for the user to restore the device to normal operation when required.
signal, based upon a certain number of unconfirmed event signals, i.e. a signal from only one sensor being received, within a predetermined time, indicating that one of the sensors is not operating properly. Once a certain number of unconfirmed event signals are received, the unit operates in one of at least two different default modes whereby a trouble signal or trouble signal and alarm signal are produced by means of a different logic processing step.
The invention is also directed to an intrusion detection system having dual sensors where the user can automatically reset the unit should the system have gone into default mode operation. This is particularly useful in that it reduces service on the units and also provides an easy, convenient manner for the user to restore the device to normal operation when required.
Description
TITLE: INTRUSION ALARM SENSING UNIT
FIELD OE' THE INVENTIO~
The present invention is directed to a sensing unit of an intrusion detection system with each sensing unit havins at least two motion sensors and the processing of the signals from the motion sensors. The invention is also directed to improvements with respect to resetting of such a sensing unit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A number of intrusion detection systems have been proposed using a sensing unit having two motion detecting sensors and processing the signals from these motion detection sensors to produce an alarm signal when appropriate. Typically, signals produced by the sensors within a predetermined time period of each other, indicate a confirmed event and result in an alarm signal. Some sensing units produce a trouble alarm based on certain characteristics of the responses received from the motion detection sensors other than a confirmed event and often are identified as unconfirmed events. Examples of such prior art systems are United S-tates Patent 4,710,750 (Johnson), United States Patent 4,195,286 (Galvin), United States Patent ~,611,197 (Sansky), and United States Patent 4,833,450 (Buccola et al).
Such sys-tems produce an alarm signal based on a confirmed event or produce a trouble signal based on some processing of the signals received from the motion sensors based on uncon~irmed events. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the user to significantly vary the characteristics of the sensing unit to suit his own needs or to suit the particular environment in which the unit is being placed. For example, in monitori.ng of certain space, a very high degree of security may be required where it would be worthwhile if the sensing unit could produce an alarm based on confirmed events or produce an alarm based '~5~
on certain characteristics of the unconfirmed responses received from the individual sensiny units indicating that the unit may not be working satisfactorily or that environmental conditions are creating spurious lndications of motion for either one of the sensors. In other environments it may prove particularly bothersome -to produce an alarm based on unconfirmed events and it would be much more desirable merely to produce a trouble signal which can then be investigated by the user. Furthermore, it would be desirable to be able to have a system where the user has much more control with respect to resetting of the sensing unit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A sensing unit of an intrusion detection system, according to the present invention, comprises at least two motion sensors. The motion sensors, when activated, produce an unconfirmed event signal indicating detection of motion. Logic processing means monitors the unconfirmed event signals and produces an alarm signal if both sensors produce unconfirmed event signals within a predetermined time of each other, thus confirming the event signals.
Logic processing means processes the unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit or its application within the environment and produces a trouble signal based upon the processed unconfirmed event signaIs received. The logic processing means when a trouble signal is produced uses one of at least two logic alternatives which are selectable at the sensing unit for determining which logic alternative is used by the sensing unit for subsequent operating characteristics.
In an intrusion detection system, according to the present invention, having at least one sensing unit with each sensing unit comprising at least two motion sensors, a logic processing means monitors unconfirrned event signals originating from the motion sensors and produces an alarm signal when both sensors produced unconfirmed event signals , ' .
, ' ' Z~5~
with a predetermined time of each other, thus confirming the event signals. The logic processing means processes the unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit and produces a trouble signal based on the processed unconfirmed event signals received. The logic processing means includes a user effected reset condition function for resetting ~rom a default condition based upon sensing a predetermined number of consecutive confirmed event signals whereafter the unit returns to normal operation.
The intrusion detection system of the present invention not only produces an alarm when confirming signals are received from each of the sensors within a specified time of each other, but it also processes unconfirmed event signals and produces a trouble signal based upon a certain requirement or characteris-tics of the unconfirmed event signals. Two separate and distinct modes with respect to operation of the sensing unit after a trouble signal is produced are included whereby the sensing unit may operate in one of the at least two separate and distinct modes according to the particular requirements of the space being protected or the requirements of the user by varying of the sensing unit.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic of a sensing unit used in the intrusion detection system;
Figure 2 is a logic chart showing the logic for operating of the sensing unit for producing an alarm based upon confirmed event signals and for allowing operation of different default modes;
Figure 3 is a logic chart showing the logic for producing a trouble plus alarm function based on certain characteristics of the unconfirmed event signals; and - , .
'' ' "- ~ '.' - ' ' . ' ~ .
WH-8161-91 - 4 - z~ 7 Figure 4 is a logic diagram showing a different mode of operation where only a trouble signal is produced and an alarm signal is only produced when confirmed event signals are received.
DETAII,ED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 schematically illustrates the sensing unit 2 having a passive infrared sensor 4 and a microwave sensor 6 for producing unconfirmed signals with respect ~o motion within the particular space being protected. The output from sensor 4 is to signal conditioning arrangement 8 rendering it recognizable by the microprocessor 12. The microwave sensor 6 includes a sample and hold logic 10 by means of which a determination of a motion within the space is determined and then this confirmation signal is processed by the signal conditioning arrangement 8 and received by the microprocessor 12. The signal of the microwave sensor 6 requires some analysis by the microprocessor 12 and thus a signal is fed back from the microprocessor by means of line ll. Two separate sensors are used and in the event of a detection of motion in the space by the sensors, a signal is received by the microprocessor indicating that that sensor believes there has been motion within the space. If both sensors produce a signal indicating motion within the space within a predetermined time limit of one another, this results in what is referred to as a confirmed event, i.e. both sensors agree that there has been motion in the space being protected. In such an event, an alarm signal is produced by the microprocessor and outputted to the alarm relay 14.
It is believed this type of confirming operation, where a response is required from both sensors, will reduce the possibility of false alarms over the type of motion sensor that only uses a single technology.
One problem with respect to this dual technology is if one of the sensors should fail to operate, or should one of the sensors produce spurious alarms due to environmental , ~:.
WH-8161-91 - 5 - ~ ~5~
conditions, a confirmed alarm may not be produced. In order to avoid such a situation, the present invention processes the signals received from the respective sensors 4 and 6 and evaluates whether a malfunction may have occurred. The microprocessor 12 includes a counter which keeps track of the total unconfirmed event signals received from the sensors. An unconfirmed event signal is a signal produced from one of the sensors which is not confirmed by a similar signal received from the other sensor within a specified period of time. This normal mode of operation is allowed to continue until a certain number of unconfirmed event signals are received. At that point in time, the unit will operate in an additional mode called a default mode.
Preferably, two alternatives are available in default mode with these alternatives being selectable at the sensing unit. The first alternative is referred to as TROUBLE ONLY. In the TROUBLE ONLY mode, the unit produces a trouble signal indicating the specified number of unconfirmed event signals have been received but continues to operate in the normal manner with respect to the alarm signal, i.e. only producing an alarm signal if confirmed event signals are received. The second alternative is referred to as TROUBLE/ALARM mode. In this mode, after the predetermined number of unconfirmed event signals are received, the trouble signal is produced and an alarm signal is produced if confirmed event signals are received or a specified further number of unconfirmed event signals are received within the preset time period. In either mode, the sensor that produced the unconfirmed event signal resultlng in the production of the trouble signal is indicated.
The sensing unit 2 also includes an arrangement 24 whereby certain jumpers can be adjusted with respect to the microprocessor 12 for varying of the set for the number of unconfirmed event signals required to initiate the default mode as well as a means for varying the default WH-8161-91 - 6 ~
characteristics of the sensing system between one of two separate and distinct modes of default operation referred to as TROUBLE ONLY or TROUBLE/ALARM.
The logic diagram of Figure 2 is the normal logic for operating the alarm system based upon receiving confirmed event signals and i-t also illustrates how the device can start to operate in one of the two separate and distinct default modes indicated in the logic diagrams of Figures 3 and 4.
In Figure 2, the device starts at position A, labelled 30, and asks the question, "Is the timer, which starts running upon recei~ing of a unconfirmed event signal, running?" If the answer is 'yes', it is outputted on line 32 and a second question is asked whether the timer has stopped. If the timer has stopped, indicated by a 'yes', an output is produced on line 34 which results in the decision indicated by box 36 of an unconfirmed alarm and the step of incrementing an unconfirmed alarm counter is carried out. This unconfirmed alarm counter, labelled UCAC, is used to produce a change in the operation of the sensing unit when the unconfirmed alarm counter reaches a predetermined point. After incrementing of the unconfirmed alarm counter, an output is produced at 38 and the question is asked, "Does the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter equal the preset count?" The preset count is preset by the user and will be used to control the actuation point where the device goes into defauIt mode. If the unconfirmed alarm counter has not reached the preset count, the decision follows path 39 and returns to start position A, which is, in effect, a return to position 30 shown in Figure 2. If the unconfirmed alarm count does equal the pre3et condition, the answer is 'yes' and the output is produced on line 40. At this point, a determination is made of which of the two default modes is the unit set.
This question is asked at 42. If the unit is set for TROUBLE ON~Y, path 43 is followed leading to the additional processing indicated by start C indicated as 44. This ~:
.
WH-~161-91 - 7 - 2 ~ 5~ ~l~7 logic will be discussed with respect to Figure 4. If the device is not set for trouhle only, the output is produced on line 45 and the device then starts a set of operations for indicating a trouble operation on the individual sensing unit, by means of flashing lights etc., and then the logic associated with Figure 3 is followed.
The logic shown in Figure 3 produces a signal based on confirmed event signals or on the basis of a specified number of unconfirmed even-t signals being received from the sensors. The logic is started by the question indicated as 50, ''Is the timer running?" The timer is only running if one of the sensors 4 or 6 have sensed a signal. If the question is answered 'yes' path 52 is followed and the following question is asked, "Is the timer stopped?" If the timer is stopped, the action of continuing the trouble alarm operation indicated by box 54 is carried out. This then causes a return to the start position indicated as 49.
If, on the other hand, the timer has stopped, path 53 is followed where the next question 55 is asked, "Has a second alarm signal been received from the first sensor?" If the answer is 'yes', an alarm signal is produced indicated by box 57 and the logic will eventually return you to start position 49. If, on the other hand, a second unconfirmed signal from the sensors has not been received, the question is then asked, "Has the other sensor now sensed an unconfirmed event?'i If this indeed happens, an alarm is produced at 59. If the other sensor has not sensed a condition, path 60 is followed returning to position 49.
The step indicated as 59 where an alarm has been produced also produces the step of decreasing the unconfirmed alarm counter by one. This logic is then passed to the question indicated as 61, "Is the unconfirmed alarm counter equal to zero?" This logic allows the usex to conveniently reset the device. The device is reset by producing a host of consecutive confirmed alarm conditions. The user can do this by merely moving within the space and watching that both sensors indicate that motion is being sensed. With ~H--8161--91 -- 8 - Z~5~7 each confirmed event, the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter is decreased by one. When the unconfirmed alarm counter reaches zero, the unit ls restored to normal operation, indicated by action 62, and returning to start A
indicated as 30. Thus, the user has been able to automatically reset the device from the trouble condition of Figure 3 to return it to normal operation indicated by the logic of Figure 2 by producing confirmed events sensed by the unit~
The logic of ~igure 4 is for producing only an alarm signal based on confirmed events while producing a trouble signal based on the unconfirmed event signals. The device starts at position 70 and then asks the question, "Is the timer running?", indicated by 72. If the answer to the questions is 'yes', then the question indicated as 74 is asked, "Is the timer stopped?" If the timer is stopped, the device continues to operate in the trouble mode ;
indicated by operation 76. This then returns you to the start position 70. If, on the other hand, the timer is not stopped, question 78 is asked, "Has the other sensor indicated an unconfirmed event signal?" If the question is answered 'yes', an alarm is produced at 80 and the unconfirmed alarm counter is decreased by one. This is part of the automatic reset which is followed by the question 82, "Does the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter equal zero?" When it does equal zero, the device is restored to normal operation indicated as start A by means of step 84. If, on the other hand, the unconfirmed alarm counter does not equal zero, the logic goes to start position 70. Following question 78, if the answer to the question is 'no', i.e. the other sensor is not in an alarm condition, the logic returns to start position 70.
In Figures 3 and 4, if the answer is 'no' to the question indicated as 50 in Figure 3 and 72 in Figure 4, i.e. is the timer still running, then the question is asked, "Has a signal from either sensor been received?", and if there is a signal from either sensor indicated by WH-8161-91 - 9 - Z ~
questions 51 and 73, the timer is ~hen started and you return to the initial position of 49 in Figure 3, or 70 in Figure 4. Therefore, this portion of the loop allows the device to start the timer on a signal being received from either sensor, once the device has been switched to operate in one of the two different default modes indicated in the logic drawings of Figures 3 and 4.
Returning to Figure 2, it can be seen that if the timer is not running, indicated by question 31, the logic proceeds to the next question, indicated as 35, "Has an unconfirmed event signal been received from either sensor?"
If the answer is 'no', you return to the start position 30.
If the answer is 'yes', you start -the timer, indicated by means of operation 37, and you also serve to set a flip-flop arrangement indicating which sensor was the one toactually sense the alarm condition. This flip-flop keeps track of which sensor was the last sensor to produce a signal and will be used for diagnostic purposes. For example, when the unconfirmed alarm counter equals the preset value indicated on output 40, the flip-flop will indicate the last sensor to operate causing the unconfirmed alarm counter to reach the preset number. In this way, the user can recognize which sensor was the last to operate prior to starting the default mode.
The intrusion protection system of the present invention allows adjusting of a microprocessor whereby the alarm outputs or trouble outputs can be customized according to the user's requirements. This is particularly beneficial where the same sensing unlt can be adjusted by the installer with respect to very sensitive areas applying the logic of Figure 3, and for less sensitive areas the logic of Figure 4 can be applied such that an alarm is only produced when confirmed event signals are received. It is ; generally recognized that other forms of motion can produce responses in these signals which do not indicate an actual intrusion in the protected space. For example, a window could be left open and something could be blowing or moving .
' ' .
WH-8161-91 - 10 ~
with respect to the wind, or, in a house, a dog may have wandered into the unprotected area. In any event, there are applications where a higher degree of security is required in one area and a lesser degree of security in a different area. Areas near windows, etc. in a home might well operate under the logic of Figure 4, whereas a highly sensitive area, for example an interior room having a safe, etc., might operate under the logic of Figure 3j as this is a very sensitive area and requires a higher degree of security.
The means of operating the device is such that the unconfirmed alarm counter can have different counts associated with merely different arrangements of the jumper settings shown as 24 in Figure 1. Also, different arrangement of these four jumper settings will program the device to operate in the TROUBLE ONLY mode of Figure 4 or the TROUBLE/ALARM mode of Figure 3.
Although various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described herein in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
FIELD OE' THE INVENTIO~
The present invention is directed to a sensing unit of an intrusion detection system with each sensing unit havins at least two motion sensors and the processing of the signals from the motion sensors. The invention is also directed to improvements with respect to resetting of such a sensing unit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A number of intrusion detection systems have been proposed using a sensing unit having two motion detecting sensors and processing the signals from these motion detection sensors to produce an alarm signal when appropriate. Typically, signals produced by the sensors within a predetermined time period of each other, indicate a confirmed event and result in an alarm signal. Some sensing units produce a trouble alarm based on certain characteristics of the responses received from the motion detection sensors other than a confirmed event and often are identified as unconfirmed events. Examples of such prior art systems are United S-tates Patent 4,710,750 (Johnson), United States Patent 4,195,286 (Galvin), United States Patent ~,611,197 (Sansky), and United States Patent 4,833,450 (Buccola et al).
Such sys-tems produce an alarm signal based on a confirmed event or produce a trouble signal based on some processing of the signals received from the motion sensors based on uncon~irmed events. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow the user to significantly vary the characteristics of the sensing unit to suit his own needs or to suit the particular environment in which the unit is being placed. For example, in monitori.ng of certain space, a very high degree of security may be required where it would be worthwhile if the sensing unit could produce an alarm based on confirmed events or produce an alarm based '~5~
on certain characteristics of the unconfirmed responses received from the individual sensiny units indicating that the unit may not be working satisfactorily or that environmental conditions are creating spurious lndications of motion for either one of the sensors. In other environments it may prove particularly bothersome -to produce an alarm based on unconfirmed events and it would be much more desirable merely to produce a trouble signal which can then be investigated by the user. Furthermore, it would be desirable to be able to have a system where the user has much more control with respect to resetting of the sensing unit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A sensing unit of an intrusion detection system, according to the present invention, comprises at least two motion sensors. The motion sensors, when activated, produce an unconfirmed event signal indicating detection of motion. Logic processing means monitors the unconfirmed event signals and produces an alarm signal if both sensors produce unconfirmed event signals within a predetermined time of each other, thus confirming the event signals.
Logic processing means processes the unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit or its application within the environment and produces a trouble signal based upon the processed unconfirmed event signaIs received. The logic processing means when a trouble signal is produced uses one of at least two logic alternatives which are selectable at the sensing unit for determining which logic alternative is used by the sensing unit for subsequent operating characteristics.
In an intrusion detection system, according to the present invention, having at least one sensing unit with each sensing unit comprising at least two motion sensors, a logic processing means monitors unconfirrned event signals originating from the motion sensors and produces an alarm signal when both sensors produced unconfirmed event signals , ' .
, ' ' Z~5~
with a predetermined time of each other, thus confirming the event signals. The logic processing means processes the unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit and produces a trouble signal based on the processed unconfirmed event signals received. The logic processing means includes a user effected reset condition function for resetting ~rom a default condition based upon sensing a predetermined number of consecutive confirmed event signals whereafter the unit returns to normal operation.
The intrusion detection system of the present invention not only produces an alarm when confirming signals are received from each of the sensors within a specified time of each other, but it also processes unconfirmed event signals and produces a trouble signal based upon a certain requirement or characteris-tics of the unconfirmed event signals. Two separate and distinct modes with respect to operation of the sensing unit after a trouble signal is produced are included whereby the sensing unit may operate in one of the at least two separate and distinct modes according to the particular requirements of the space being protected or the requirements of the user by varying of the sensing unit.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic of a sensing unit used in the intrusion detection system;
Figure 2 is a logic chart showing the logic for operating of the sensing unit for producing an alarm based upon confirmed event signals and for allowing operation of different default modes;
Figure 3 is a logic chart showing the logic for producing a trouble plus alarm function based on certain characteristics of the unconfirmed event signals; and - , .
'' ' "- ~ '.' - ' ' . ' ~ .
WH-8161-91 - 4 - z~ 7 Figure 4 is a logic diagram showing a different mode of operation where only a trouble signal is produced and an alarm signal is only produced when confirmed event signals are received.
DETAII,ED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 schematically illustrates the sensing unit 2 having a passive infrared sensor 4 and a microwave sensor 6 for producing unconfirmed signals with respect ~o motion within the particular space being protected. The output from sensor 4 is to signal conditioning arrangement 8 rendering it recognizable by the microprocessor 12. The microwave sensor 6 includes a sample and hold logic 10 by means of which a determination of a motion within the space is determined and then this confirmation signal is processed by the signal conditioning arrangement 8 and received by the microprocessor 12. The signal of the microwave sensor 6 requires some analysis by the microprocessor 12 and thus a signal is fed back from the microprocessor by means of line ll. Two separate sensors are used and in the event of a detection of motion in the space by the sensors, a signal is received by the microprocessor indicating that that sensor believes there has been motion within the space. If both sensors produce a signal indicating motion within the space within a predetermined time limit of one another, this results in what is referred to as a confirmed event, i.e. both sensors agree that there has been motion in the space being protected. In such an event, an alarm signal is produced by the microprocessor and outputted to the alarm relay 14.
It is believed this type of confirming operation, where a response is required from both sensors, will reduce the possibility of false alarms over the type of motion sensor that only uses a single technology.
One problem with respect to this dual technology is if one of the sensors should fail to operate, or should one of the sensors produce spurious alarms due to environmental , ~:.
WH-8161-91 - 5 - ~ ~5~
conditions, a confirmed alarm may not be produced. In order to avoid such a situation, the present invention processes the signals received from the respective sensors 4 and 6 and evaluates whether a malfunction may have occurred. The microprocessor 12 includes a counter which keeps track of the total unconfirmed event signals received from the sensors. An unconfirmed event signal is a signal produced from one of the sensors which is not confirmed by a similar signal received from the other sensor within a specified period of time. This normal mode of operation is allowed to continue until a certain number of unconfirmed event signals are received. At that point in time, the unit will operate in an additional mode called a default mode.
Preferably, two alternatives are available in default mode with these alternatives being selectable at the sensing unit. The first alternative is referred to as TROUBLE ONLY. In the TROUBLE ONLY mode, the unit produces a trouble signal indicating the specified number of unconfirmed event signals have been received but continues to operate in the normal manner with respect to the alarm signal, i.e. only producing an alarm signal if confirmed event signals are received. The second alternative is referred to as TROUBLE/ALARM mode. In this mode, after the predetermined number of unconfirmed event signals are received, the trouble signal is produced and an alarm signal is produced if confirmed event signals are received or a specified further number of unconfirmed event signals are received within the preset time period. In either mode, the sensor that produced the unconfirmed event signal resultlng in the production of the trouble signal is indicated.
The sensing unit 2 also includes an arrangement 24 whereby certain jumpers can be adjusted with respect to the microprocessor 12 for varying of the set for the number of unconfirmed event signals required to initiate the default mode as well as a means for varying the default WH-8161-91 - 6 ~
characteristics of the sensing system between one of two separate and distinct modes of default operation referred to as TROUBLE ONLY or TROUBLE/ALARM.
The logic diagram of Figure 2 is the normal logic for operating the alarm system based upon receiving confirmed event signals and i-t also illustrates how the device can start to operate in one of the two separate and distinct default modes indicated in the logic diagrams of Figures 3 and 4.
In Figure 2, the device starts at position A, labelled 30, and asks the question, "Is the timer, which starts running upon recei~ing of a unconfirmed event signal, running?" If the answer is 'yes', it is outputted on line 32 and a second question is asked whether the timer has stopped. If the timer has stopped, indicated by a 'yes', an output is produced on line 34 which results in the decision indicated by box 36 of an unconfirmed alarm and the step of incrementing an unconfirmed alarm counter is carried out. This unconfirmed alarm counter, labelled UCAC, is used to produce a change in the operation of the sensing unit when the unconfirmed alarm counter reaches a predetermined point. After incrementing of the unconfirmed alarm counter, an output is produced at 38 and the question is asked, "Does the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter equal the preset count?" The preset count is preset by the user and will be used to control the actuation point where the device goes into defauIt mode. If the unconfirmed alarm counter has not reached the preset count, the decision follows path 39 and returns to start position A, which is, in effect, a return to position 30 shown in Figure 2. If the unconfirmed alarm count does equal the pre3et condition, the answer is 'yes' and the output is produced on line 40. At this point, a determination is made of which of the two default modes is the unit set.
This question is asked at 42. If the unit is set for TROUBLE ON~Y, path 43 is followed leading to the additional processing indicated by start C indicated as 44. This ~:
.
WH-~161-91 - 7 - 2 ~ 5~ ~l~7 logic will be discussed with respect to Figure 4. If the device is not set for trouhle only, the output is produced on line 45 and the device then starts a set of operations for indicating a trouble operation on the individual sensing unit, by means of flashing lights etc., and then the logic associated with Figure 3 is followed.
The logic shown in Figure 3 produces a signal based on confirmed event signals or on the basis of a specified number of unconfirmed even-t signals being received from the sensors. The logic is started by the question indicated as 50, ''Is the timer running?" The timer is only running if one of the sensors 4 or 6 have sensed a signal. If the question is answered 'yes' path 52 is followed and the following question is asked, "Is the timer stopped?" If the timer is stopped, the action of continuing the trouble alarm operation indicated by box 54 is carried out. This then causes a return to the start position indicated as 49.
If, on the other hand, the timer has stopped, path 53 is followed where the next question 55 is asked, "Has a second alarm signal been received from the first sensor?" If the answer is 'yes', an alarm signal is produced indicated by box 57 and the logic will eventually return you to start position 49. If, on the other hand, a second unconfirmed signal from the sensors has not been received, the question is then asked, "Has the other sensor now sensed an unconfirmed event?'i If this indeed happens, an alarm is produced at 59. If the other sensor has not sensed a condition, path 60 is followed returning to position 49.
The step indicated as 59 where an alarm has been produced also produces the step of decreasing the unconfirmed alarm counter by one. This logic is then passed to the question indicated as 61, "Is the unconfirmed alarm counter equal to zero?" This logic allows the usex to conveniently reset the device. The device is reset by producing a host of consecutive confirmed alarm conditions. The user can do this by merely moving within the space and watching that both sensors indicate that motion is being sensed. With ~H--8161--91 -- 8 - Z~5~7 each confirmed event, the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter is decreased by one. When the unconfirmed alarm counter reaches zero, the unit ls restored to normal operation, indicated by action 62, and returning to start A
indicated as 30. Thus, the user has been able to automatically reset the device from the trouble condition of Figure 3 to return it to normal operation indicated by the logic of Figure 2 by producing confirmed events sensed by the unit~
The logic of ~igure 4 is for producing only an alarm signal based on confirmed events while producing a trouble signal based on the unconfirmed event signals. The device starts at position 70 and then asks the question, "Is the timer running?", indicated by 72. If the answer to the questions is 'yes', then the question indicated as 74 is asked, "Is the timer stopped?" If the timer is stopped, the device continues to operate in the trouble mode ;
indicated by operation 76. This then returns you to the start position 70. If, on the other hand, the timer is not stopped, question 78 is asked, "Has the other sensor indicated an unconfirmed event signal?" If the question is answered 'yes', an alarm is produced at 80 and the unconfirmed alarm counter is decreased by one. This is part of the automatic reset which is followed by the question 82, "Does the count of the unconfirmed alarm counter equal zero?" When it does equal zero, the device is restored to normal operation indicated as start A by means of step 84. If, on the other hand, the unconfirmed alarm counter does not equal zero, the logic goes to start position 70. Following question 78, if the answer to the question is 'no', i.e. the other sensor is not in an alarm condition, the logic returns to start position 70.
In Figures 3 and 4, if the answer is 'no' to the question indicated as 50 in Figure 3 and 72 in Figure 4, i.e. is the timer still running, then the question is asked, "Has a signal from either sensor been received?", and if there is a signal from either sensor indicated by WH-8161-91 - 9 - Z ~
questions 51 and 73, the timer is ~hen started and you return to the initial position of 49 in Figure 3, or 70 in Figure 4. Therefore, this portion of the loop allows the device to start the timer on a signal being received from either sensor, once the device has been switched to operate in one of the two different default modes indicated in the logic drawings of Figures 3 and 4.
Returning to Figure 2, it can be seen that if the timer is not running, indicated by question 31, the logic proceeds to the next question, indicated as 35, "Has an unconfirmed event signal been received from either sensor?"
If the answer is 'no', you return to the start position 30.
If the answer is 'yes', you start -the timer, indicated by means of operation 37, and you also serve to set a flip-flop arrangement indicating which sensor was the one toactually sense the alarm condition. This flip-flop keeps track of which sensor was the last sensor to produce a signal and will be used for diagnostic purposes. For example, when the unconfirmed alarm counter equals the preset value indicated on output 40, the flip-flop will indicate the last sensor to operate causing the unconfirmed alarm counter to reach the preset number. In this way, the user can recognize which sensor was the last to operate prior to starting the default mode.
The intrusion protection system of the present invention allows adjusting of a microprocessor whereby the alarm outputs or trouble outputs can be customized according to the user's requirements. This is particularly beneficial where the same sensing unlt can be adjusted by the installer with respect to very sensitive areas applying the logic of Figure 3, and for less sensitive areas the logic of Figure 4 can be applied such that an alarm is only produced when confirmed event signals are received. It is ; generally recognized that other forms of motion can produce responses in these signals which do not indicate an actual intrusion in the protected space. For example, a window could be left open and something could be blowing or moving .
' ' .
WH-8161-91 - 10 ~
with respect to the wind, or, in a house, a dog may have wandered into the unprotected area. In any event, there are applications where a higher degree of security is required in one area and a lesser degree of security in a different area. Areas near windows, etc. in a home might well operate under the logic of Figure 4, whereas a highly sensitive area, for example an interior room having a safe, etc., might operate under the logic of Figure 3j as this is a very sensitive area and requires a higher degree of security.
The means of operating the device is such that the unconfirmed alarm counter can have different counts associated with merely different arrangements of the jumper settings shown as 24 in Figure 1. Also, different arrangement of these four jumper settings will program the device to operate in the TROUBLE ONLY mode of Figure 4 or the TROUBLE/ALARM mode of Figure 3.
Although various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described herein in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (16)
1. In an intrusion detection system having at least one sensing unit, each sensing unit comprising at least two motion sensors with each sensor, when activated, producing an unconfirmed event signal indicating detection of motion, logic processing means for monitoring said unconfirmed event signals and producing an alarm signal if both sensors produce unconfirmed event signals within a predetermined time of each other thus confirming the event signals; said logic processing means processing said unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit and, upon determination of a malfunction, producing a trouble signal; said logic processing means, when a trouble signal is produced, altering the logic for producing an alarm signal, between one of at least two alternatives selectable by a selecting means provided on said sensing unit and wherein said at least two alternatives include a) producing a separate trouble alarm when required and producing an alarm signal if said sensors produce a specified number of unconfirmed event signals within a preset time period or when confirming event signals are received, and b) producing a separate trouble alarm and continuing to produce an alarm signal only if confirming event signals are received.
2. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 1 wherein one motion sensor is a passive infrared motion sensor and one motion sensor is a microwave motion sensor.
3. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 1 including means for determining the last sensor to produce an unconfirmed event signal prior to altering the logic of said logic processing means based on the processed unconfirmed event signals to assist in user system analysis.
4. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 3 wherein said at least two alternatives include producing an alarm signal upon the further receipt of two additional unconfirmed event signals within a preset time period or the receipt of confirming event signals.
5. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 1 wherein each sensor includes a light emitting diode which flashes when the unit is activated and which remains on if the sensor is the last sensor to produce an unconfirmed event signal which causes said logic processing means to alter the logic for producing an alarm signal.
6. In an intrusion detection system having at least one sensing unit having two motion sensors which cooperate in normal operation to produce an alarm when both sensors are activated and which can operate in a default mode to produce a warning type signal based upon the characteristics of the signals other than activation of both sensors, a method of automatically resetting the unit from the default mode to normal operation by creating and the unit senses a predetermined number of consecutive occurrences where both sensors are activated whereby the unit is reset to normal operation.
7. In an intrusion detection system having at least one sensing unit with each sensing unit having at least two motion sensors, a method of processing the signals of the sensors comprising monitoring the sensors and determining when each sensor is activated and producing an unconfirmed event signal indicating detection of motion by the activated sensor, in normal operation monitoring the unconfirmed event signals and producing an alarm signal if both sensors produce unconfirmed event signals within a predetermined time of each other thus confirming the event signals; processing the unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit and when a malfunction is indicated operating the unit in a default condition which produces a trouble signal based on the processed unconfirmed event signals received and applying a different set of parameters for creating an alarm signal in certain occurrences in addition to confirmed event signals, and continuing to monitor the signals to recognize a user effected reset condition function for resetting from a default condition to normal operation based upon sensing a predetermined number of consecutive confirmed event signals.
8. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 7 including counting the unconfirmed events of said sensors and when a trouble signal is produced counting confirmed event signals and decreasing by one the counted unconfirmed event signals and upon reaching zero resetting the sensing unit.
9. In an intrusion detection system having at least one sensing unit, each sensing unit comprising at least two motion sensors with each sensor, when activated, producing an unconfirmed event signal indicating detection of motion, and logic processing means for monitoring said unconfirmed event signals and producing an alarm signal if both sensors produce unconfirmed event signals within a predetermined time of each other thus confirming the event signals; said logic processing means processing said unconfirmed event signals to determine a possible malfunction of the sensing unit and producing a trouble signal based on the processed unconfirmed event signals received, said logic processing means including user effected reset condition function for resetting from a trouble condition based upon sensing a predetermined number of consecutive confirmed event signals whereafter the unit returns to normal operation.
10. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 9 wherein the predetermined number of consecutive counts is the same number as the number of unconfirmed event signals required to produce a trouble signal.
11. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 10 wherein said logic means includes a counting means for counting unconfirmed events of said sensors, said counting means when a trouble signal is produced counting confirmed event signals and decreasing by one the counted unconfirmed event signals and upon reaching zero resetting the sensing unit.
12. In an intrusion detection system having at least one sensing unit, each sensing unit comprising at least two motion detection sensors scanning the same area and logic processing means for processing the output of said motion sensors, each sensing unit including input means by means of which said logic processing means may be adjusted to operate in one of at least two separate and distinct modes with respect to operation of the sensing unit when a trouble signal is generated, said logic processing means producing an alarm signal when separate output signals of said sensors are received within a predetermined time period of each other to indicate a confirmed event , said logic processing means further processing said signals to provide a trouble signal based upon receipt and processing of unconfirmed events, an unconfirmed event being determined by a signal being received from one of said sensors without receiving a corresponding signal from the at least one other sensor within the predetermined time period; and wherein said at least two separate and distinct modes include:
a) producing only a trouble signal while continuing to operate the sensing unit to produce an alarm signal upon a confirmed event, and b) producing a trouble signal and producing an alarm signal upon a confirmed event or upon receipt and processing of unconfirmed events which occur after the generation of a trouble signal.
a) producing only a trouble signal while continuing to operate the sensing unit to produce an alarm signal upon a confirmed event, and b) producing a trouble signal and producing an alarm signal upon a confirmed event or upon receipt and processing of unconfirmed events which occur after the generation of a trouble signal.
13. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 12 wherein the generation of an alarm upon receipt and processing of unconfirmed events is produced upon receipt of a certain number of unconfirmed events within a preset time period.
14. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 12 wherein the generation of an alarm upon receipt and processing of unconfirmed events is produced upon receipt of a certain number of unconfirmed events received from any sensor within a preset time period.
15. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 12 wherein said sensing unit includes means for indicating the last sensor to operate causing the generation of a trouble signal.
16. In an intrusion detection system as claimed in claim 12 wherein said logic processing means including user effected reset condition function for resetting from a trouble condition based upon sensing a predetermined number of consecutive confirmed event signals whereafter the unit returns to normal operation.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/614,239 | 1990-11-16 | ||
| US07/614,239 US5216410A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1990-11-16 | Intrusion alarm sensing unit |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2054467A1 CA2054467A1 (en) | 1992-05-17 |
| CA2054467C true CA2054467C (en) | 1997-11-18 |
Family
ID=24460412
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002054467A Expired - Lifetime CA2054467C (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1991-10-29 | Intrusion alarm sensing unit |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5216410A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2054467C (en) |
Families Citing this family (24)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU708732B2 (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1999-08-12 | Schlumberger Electricity, Inc. | Apparatus and method for sensing tampering of utility meter |
| US5473322A (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1995-12-05 | Schlumberger Industries, Inc. | Apparatus and method for sensing tampering with a utility meter |
| US5331308A (en) * | 1992-07-30 | 1994-07-19 | Napco Security Systems, Inc. | Automatically adjustable and self-testing dual technology intrusion detection system for minimizing false alarms |
| GB2288681B (en) * | 1994-04-14 | 1998-05-20 | Pyronix Ltd | Fault monitoring event detection device |
| US5450062A (en) * | 1994-09-23 | 1995-09-12 | Detection Systems, Inc. | Detection system with reduced sensitivity to pin diode effect |
| GB2308482B (en) * | 1995-12-20 | 2000-03-29 | Pyronix Ltd | Event detection device with fault monitoring capability |
| US5684458A (en) * | 1996-02-26 | 1997-11-04 | Napco Security Systems, Inc. | Microwave sensor with adjustable sampling frequency based on environmental conditions |
| GB2311158B (en) * | 1996-05-10 | 1998-04-29 | Pyronix Ltd | Event detection device |
| US6759954B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2004-07-06 | Hubbell Incorporated | Multi-dimensional vector-based occupancy sensor and method of operating same |
| US6288644B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2001-09-11 | Caretaker System, Inc. | Perimeter monitoring system |
| US6232886B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2001-05-15 | Schlumberger Resource Management Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for indicating meter tampering |
| GB2375207A (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2002-11-06 | Samada Securities Ltd | Alarm signal transmission system with delayed confirmation response |
| ITMI20011043A1 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2002-11-18 | Beghelli Spa | ANTI-INTRUSION DEVICE |
| US20040075548A1 (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2004-04-22 | Beggs Ryan P. | Monitoring a remote body detection system of a door |
| US7034682B2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2006-04-25 | Rite-Hite Holding Corporation | Door with a safety antenna |
| DE102004041709C5 (en) * | 2004-08-28 | 2009-11-12 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Vehicle with automatic opening flap |
| GB2422970B (en) * | 2005-02-02 | 2008-09-10 | Pyronix Ltd | Detection apparatus |
| US7403109B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2008-07-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method of reducing false alarms during auto-arm |
| DE102006044112A1 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2008-03-27 | Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. | Motor vehicle with a sensor arrangement |
| US7671739B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2010-03-02 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | System and method for implementing ranging microwave for detector range reduction |
| US8310365B2 (en) * | 2010-01-08 | 2012-11-13 | Utc Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. | Control system, security system, and method of monitoring a location |
| GB2504523A (en) * | 2012-08-01 | 2014-02-05 | Martin James Haines Fenner | Intruder alarm system incorporating at least one passive infrared sensor and at least one microwave sensor |
| US11558573B2 (en) * | 2019-02-11 | 2023-01-17 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Sensor for accumulation signal |
| US20230110861A1 (en) * | 2021-10-08 | 2023-04-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for guiding intrusion sensor installation |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4611197A (en) * | 1985-02-19 | 1986-09-09 | Sansky Michael J | Malfunction-detecting status monitoring system |
| US4660024A (en) * | 1985-12-16 | 1987-04-21 | Detection Systems Inc. | Dual technology intruder detection system |
| US4710750A (en) * | 1986-08-05 | 1987-12-01 | C & K Systems, Inc. | Fault detecting intrusion detection device |
| GB2217889B (en) * | 1988-04-08 | 1992-09-23 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Composite type crime preventive sensor |
| US4833450A (en) * | 1988-04-15 | 1989-05-23 | Napco Security Systems, Inc. | Fault detection in combination intrusion detection systems |
-
1990
- 1990-11-16 US US07/614,239 patent/US5216410A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1991
- 1991-10-29 CA CA002054467A patent/CA2054467C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2054467A1 (en) | 1992-05-17 |
| US5216410A (en) | 1993-06-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2054467C (en) | Intrusion alarm sensing unit | |
| US5083106A (en) | Intruder detection system with programmable countdown timer for self-supervision | |
| US5012223A (en) | Sound activated device and method | |
| US5659292A (en) | Apparatus including a fire sensor and a non-fire sensor | |
| US4570157A (en) | Infrared intrusion alarm system capable of preventing false signals | |
| US4612442A (en) | Passive infrared intrusion detection system | |
| US5164703A (en) | Audio intrusion detection system | |
| EP0581569B1 (en) | Intrusion detection system utilizing adaptive sensor technology | |
| US5093656A (en) | Active supervision of motion-detection systems | |
| GB2342205A (en) | An ambient condition detector with variable sample rate responsive to a non-threshold based profile | |
| US4757303A (en) | Alarm system | |
| WO1988000747A3 (en) | Intrusion detection system | |
| US4084135A (en) | System and method for checking the sensitivity and performance of an electromagnetic field variation detector | |
| US5151682A (en) | Fail-safe testing of an infrared sensor arrangement | |
| EP0870287B1 (en) | Event detection device with fault monitoring capability | |
| EP1407435B1 (en) | Distributed verification, confirmation or delay time system and method | |
| EP0375270B1 (en) | Radiation detection arrangements and methods | |
| US4222046A (en) | Abnormal condition responsive means with periodic high sensitivity | |
| EP0507025A2 (en) | Intruder detection arrangements and methods | |
| JPS63314697A (en) | Fire alarm system | |
| EP0755551B1 (en) | Fault monitoring event detection device | |
| CA2220429A1 (en) | System and method for arming an alarm system when an occupant fails to turn the system on | |
| US5057816A (en) | Multizone intruder detection system with forced walk-test | |
| JP3364349B2 (en) | Storage type fire receiving system and storage type fire detector | |
| JP3350601B2 (en) | Multiple transmission type fire alarm system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |