US20160028860A1 - Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags - Google Patents

Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160028860A1
US20160028860A1 US14/876,595 US201514876595A US2016028860A1 US 20160028860 A1 US20160028860 A1 US 20160028860A1 US 201514876595 A US201514876595 A US 201514876595A US 2016028860 A1 US2016028860 A1 US 2016028860A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
packet
tag header
remaining portion
type
reading
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/876,595
Inventor
Lawrence Howard Rubin
Harish Kumar Shakamuri
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Ltd
Original Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP Singapore Pte Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Avago Technologies General IP Singapore Pte Ltd filed Critical Avago Technologies General IP Singapore Pte Ltd
Priority to US14/876,595 priority Critical patent/US20160028860A1/en
Assigned to EMULEX CORPORATION reassignment EMULEX CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EMULEX DESIGN AND MANUFCTURING CORPORATION
Publication of US20160028860A1 publication Critical patent/US20160028860A1/en
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Assigned to AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. reassignment AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EMULEX CORPORATION
Assigned to AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. reassignment AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Assignors: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/22Parsing or analysis of headers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/12Protocol engines
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/30Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
    • H04L69/32Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
    • H04L69/322Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
    • H04L69/324Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the data link layer [OSI layer 2], e.g. HDLC

Definitions

  • This relates to data transfer and processing in computer networks such as the Ethernet, and more particularly, to parsing network packets in which additional information such as a tag header is inserted according to future-defined standards and protocols.
  • FIG. lA illustrates an exemplary packet frame 100 in which an Internet Protocol (IP) packet is encapsulated or embedded.
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • this frame 100 includes different fields, such as the Media Access Control (MAC) destination address 102 and the MAC source address 104 , which identify the destination of the packet and the source of the packet, respectively, in the network.
  • MAC Media Access Control
  • EtherType 106 Usually following the MAC source address 104 is the EtherType field, i.e., EtherType 106 , as shown in FIG. 1A .
  • the EtherType 106 has a value of 0 ⁇ 0800, which indicates the encapsulated or embedded packet protocol is Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4).
  • IPv4 Internet Protocol version 4
  • the EtherType 106 is followed by an IPv4 header 108 .
  • Different values in the EtherType field identify different packet protocols encapsulated or embedded in the frame. For example, if the EtherType has a value of 0 ⁇ 8906, that means the protocol is Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), and if the EtherType is 0 ⁇ 86DD, the identified protocol is Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
  • FCoE Fibre Channel over Ethernet
  • IPv6 Internet Protocol version 6
  • the device may delegate the packet processing task to some dedicated hardware, typically a particular protocol offload engine, if the received packet has an EtherType indicating the encapsulated packet is of a certain protocol.
  • a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Offload Engine (TOE) in a network interface card (NIC) may be dedicated for processing TCP/IP stacks.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • TOE Transmission Control Protocol
  • NIC network interface card
  • CNAs converged network adapters
  • the network device may use a software module or software client, such as a driver program, to perform parsing and other processing functions of the received packet.
  • SANs storage area networks
  • FIG. 1C is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of parsing a network packet in existing network devices.
  • the device receiving the packet reads the EtherType field in the received packet to identify the packet type. Because the EtherType field is in a defined portion of the packet, i.e., usually following the MAC Source Address as shown in FIG. 1A , the device can quickly identify and read the EtherType from the receive packet. Then the device determines at step 132 whether the packet is of a known EtherType or network protocol. If so, the process proceeds to step 134 , where the device offloads the processing of the packet to some dedicated hardware. Otherwise, the process continues to step 136 , where the device sends the packet as a raw packet to a software client for further processing.
  • An existing packet frame as shown in FIG. 1A may be modified to include additional fields according to newly-developed standards and protocols. However, adding these fields may confuse the device when the device is trying to read the EtherType field from a received packet in the above-described process in FIG. 1C .
  • the IEEE 802.1Q standard adds a tag header into the packet frame for storing additional information about the packet, such as a virtual local area network (VLAN) identifier.
  • VLAN virtual local area network
  • an exemplary packet frame 110 with an 802.1Q tag header inserted therein includes two additional fields, namely, an 802.1Q tag header type 116 and an 802.1Q tag header 118 .
  • the 802.1Q tag header 118 takes two bytes in the frame, as can be indicated by the 802.1Q tag header type 116 . These fields are typically inserted between the MAC source address 114 and the EtherType 122 . As a result, the EtherType 122 is no longer positioned right after the MAC source address 114 . If the network device is not appropriately re-configured to be compatible with the 802.1Q protocol, it will not be able to recognize the inserted fields 116 and 118 , as the device still expects to read the EtherType field following the MAC source address 114 . As illustrated in FIG.
  • the 802.1Q tag header type 0 ⁇ 8100 may be considered to be an unrecognized EtherType, as a valid EtherType is expected to be 0 ⁇ 0800.
  • the receiving device would either drop the packet as an invalid packet or send the packet to a software client as a raw packet. In either case, the device will not be able to receive the benefit of hardware processing. Accordingly, there is a need for existing network devices to be able to recognize and read the EtherType field from any future-defined or modified packet frame, albeit how many additional fields, such as one or more tag headers, are inserted in the packet frame.
  • This relates to allowing an existing or legacy network device to recognize and parse packets defined in accordance with future-defined standards without having to be re-configured to be compatible with such standards.
  • the device can skip past unknown or newly-inserted fields, such as tag headers in a tagged packet, to parse and process the remainder of the packet.
  • a parser in the device when parsing a tagged packet, can skip a tag header based on the tag header type, which usually indicates a fixed or pre-defined length of the tag header, and continue to read an EtherType field past the tag header. Based on the EtherType, the device can recognize the encapsulated protocol and offload further processing of the packet to appropriate dedicated hardware for efficiency. By skipping those added fields such as a tag header, the device can accommodate various future-defined standards without incurring additional engineering or design costs or compromising packet processing efficiency.
  • FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary packet frame in the existing network systems
  • FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary packet frame with an 802.1Q tag header inserted therein
  • FIG. 1C is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of parsing a network packet in existing network devices
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary packet frame with scalability to include additional fields such as one or more tag headers according to various embodiments of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of parsing a network packet of FIG. 2 according to various embodiments of the invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary network device capable of implementing various embodiments of the invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary network environment in which various embodiments of the invention can be implemented
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate exemplary tables in which different tag header types are associated with their respective tag header lengths
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary configuration of a network device capable of implementing various embodiments of the invention.
  • Embodiments of the invention allow an existing or legacy network device to recognize and parse packets defined in accordance with future-defined standards without having to be re-configured to be compatible with such standards.
  • the device can skip past unknown or newly-inserted fields, such as tag headers in a tagged packet, to parse and process the remainder of the packet.
  • a parser in the device when parsing a tagged packet, can skip a tag header based on the tag header type, which usually indicates a fixed or pre-defined length of the tag header, and continue to read an EtherType field past the tag header. Based on the EtherType, the device can recognize the encapsulated protocol and offload further processing of the packet to appropriate dedicated hardware for efficiency. By skipping those added fields such as a tag header, the device can accommodate various future-defined standards without incurring additional engineering or design costs or compromising packet processing efficiency.
  • embodiments of the invention may be described and illustrated herein using tag headers under 802.1Q as examples, it should be understood that embodiments of this invention are not so limited, but are applicable to many future-developed or defined standards and protocols. Additionally, embodiments of the invention are not limited to Ethernet networks and are compatible with any networking protocol that uses an enumerated field to indicate what type of content follows within a packet or byte stream. Also, embodiments of the invention can be implemented in a host bus adapter (HBA), a converged network adapter (CNA), a network interface card (NIC), target channel adapter (TCA), or any other similar device that enables hardware offloading of packet processing.
  • HBA host bus adapter
  • CNA converged network adapter
  • NIC network interface card
  • TCA target channel adapter
  • the tag header type 206 of the packet 200 identifies the type of the tag header 208 to be an 802.1Q tag header. Because all tag headers of a given tag header type typically have the same fixed or pre-defined length, the tag header type 206 can be used to determine conclusively the tag header length 210 . In this example, the tag header type indicates that the tag header is an 802.1Q tag header, which is known to be 2 bytes long. Accordingly, a device receiving the packet can bypass the tag header 208 and continue to read the EtherType 212 of the tagged packet 200 .
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of parsing a network packet with one or more tag headers inserted therein. Such a parsing method can be performed by different components in a network device, which will be described in detail later with reference to FIG. 4 .
  • the device when a device receives the network packet, at step 300 the device reads a first portion of the packet, for example, the portion immediately following the MAC source address field. As aforementioned, this first portion contains either an EtherType or a tag header type, depending on the structure of the packet frame.
  • the first portion of exemplary packet frame 100 in FIG. 1A contains the EtherType 106
  • the first portion of exemplary packet frame 110 in FIG. 1B contains the 802.1Q header type 116 .
  • the device determines whether the first portion of the packet contains a known EtherType. If so, the device can proceed with offloading the processing of the packet to dedicated hardware at step 304 .
  • the parser of the network device may recognize the EtherType as indicating an IP packet being encapsulated in the received packet, as illustrated in FIG. 1A , and thus sends the packet to a TCP/IP stack or processing engine within the network device.
  • the device would simply drop the packet as a defective or invalid packet or send it to a software client as a raw packet if the first portion does not include any known EtherType.
  • the packet is valid but structured differently according to a newly-defined protocol that inserts tag headers or other fields in the first portion.
  • the process in FIG. 3 performs further parsing of the received packet to identify the EtherType in a different portion of the packet, as will be described below.
  • the device further determines at step 306 whether the first portion contains a known tag header type.
  • the first portion may contain a tag header type indicating the inserted tag header is an 802.1Q header, as shown in FIG. 1B .
  • the packet will be sent as a raw packet to a software client for further parsing at step 308 .
  • a software client includes a network driver or software programmed to execute packet parsing algorithms.
  • the device proceeds to step 310 to determine a tag header length associated with the tag header type so that the parser in the device can bypass the inserted tag header to read the remainder of the packet.
  • the device may include one or more programmable registers (as shown in FIG. 4 ) for storing different tag header lengths associated with their respective tag header types. Such associations can be implemented through tables or databases as will be described later with reference to FIGS. 6A-B .
  • the parser in the device can determine the remainder of the packet at step 312 .
  • the parser can bypass the tag header 208 , i.e., a length 210 of the frame, to identify the remainder of the packet starting at the EtherType field 212 .
  • the remainder of the packet past the tag header may include additional tag headers followed by the EtherType and payload.
  • the parser in the device can repeat the steps 300 - 312 to identify and bypass other inserted tag headers until a known EtherType is identified.
  • the processing of the packet can depend on the tag header type.
  • a network device can drop all packets of a certain tag header type, hardware offload can be disallowed for packets of a certain tag header type, or packets of a certain tag header type can be sent to a programmable receive client.
  • network devices can process a packet in this way only based on the tag header type with no capability to interpret or process the tag header.
  • a network device with no capability to interpret an 802.1Q tag header can nonetheless recognize an 802.1Q tag header type.
  • Such a device can recognize and then drop all packets with an 802.1Q tag header type, even though it has no capability to interpret or process an 802.1Q tag header. In this way, devices that lack hardware to interpret or process future-defined tag headers can still process packets containing such tag headers based only on the tag header type.
  • the algorithm in FIG. 3 can be implemented in an exemplary network device as illustrated in FIG. 4 .
  • a network device 400 includes a parser 406 for receiving and parsing a network packet 402 .
  • the parser 406 is configured to implement the above-described process of bypassing certain portions of the packet (e.g., inserted tag headers) to identify the EtherType in the network packet 402 . If the first portion of the packet contains a known EtherType, then further processing of the packet is offloaded to the dedicated hardware 404 .
  • the parser will access the programmable registers 408 to retrieve the appropriate tag length associated with the tag header type. For example, if length 1 410 is determined to be the tag length associated with the identified tag header type 1 409 , the parser 406 will bypass the tag header in the network packet 402 by skipping a length 1 410 after the first portion. If the first portion of the packet does not include either a known EtherType or a known tag header type, the packet is sent as a raw packet to a software client 416 coupled to the parser 406 .
  • the various lengths 410 , 412 and 414 in the programmable registers 408 can be pre-defined tag lengths according to respective network protocols. Alternatively, these lengths stored in the programmable registers 408 can be updated dynamically each time a new tag header type is added.
  • the tables in FIGS. 6A-B illustrate exemplary tag header types associated with different tag header lengths.
  • tag header type A is defined as having a tag header length of 4 bytes
  • tag header type B is defined as having a tag header length of 2 bytes
  • tag header type C is defined as having a tag header length of 2 bytes.
  • This table in FIG. 6A can be updated when additional tag header types are included.
  • FIG. 6B shows such an updated table when tag header types D and E have been added, with lengths of 1 byte and 4 bytes, respectively.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary computer network environment in which the network device in FIG. 4 can operate and communicate with other network elements according to various network protocols.
  • the network device 500 communicates with other devices on the network 512 , such as storage or target devices 514 and a server 516 .
  • incoming packets are received at the receiver 502 , which includes a parser 504 and programmable registers 506 .
  • the receiver 502 can be configured to carry out the packet-parsing method as illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • outgoing packets are prepared and sent out to the network by the transmitter 508 in the network device 500 .
  • the transmitter 508 includes a packet tagger 510 for building a network packet with one or more inserted tag headers before sending the packet off to the network. This packet with tag headers inserted therein can then be received and interpreted by other network devices that are similarly configured as the demonstrated network device 500 .
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary configuration of a network device 700 .
  • the network device 700 includes one or more input/output (I/O) interfaces 702 , at least one processor 704 , and memory space 706 .
  • the I/O interfaces 702 enable the network device 700 to communicate over one or more networks 710 , such as an Ethernet network that enables different network protocols such as Fibre Channel (FC), Fibre Channel over the Ethernet (FCoE), SAS, TCP/IP, and so forth.
  • the I/O interfaces 702 include interfaces such as a network interface card, a modem, a USB connector, one or more network ports (e.g., Ethernet_Port), and some combination thereof.
  • Processor(s) 704 may be implemented using any applicable processing-capable technology.
  • Processor(s) 704 may be one or more processors such as central processing units (CPUs), microprocessors, controllers, dedicated processing circuits, digital signal processors (DSPs), processing portion(s) of an ASIC, some combination thereof, and so forth.
  • processors 704 are capable of executing, performing, and/or otherwise effectuating processor-executable instructions, such as processor-executable instructions 708 in the memory 706 .
  • the memory 706 comprises portions of computer-readable storage media, which may include volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media, storage and transmission media, and so forth.
  • the memory 706 is tangible media when it is embodied as a manufacture and/or a composition of matter.
  • storage media may include an array of disks or flash memory for longer-term mass storage of processor-executable instructions, random access memory (RAM) for shorter-term storing of instructions that are currently being executed and/or otherwise processed, hard-coded logic media (e.g., an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate-array (FPGA), etc.), some combination thereof, and so forth.
  • Transmission media may include link(s) on networks for transmitting communications and so forth.
  • the memory 706 is comprised of one or more processor-accessible media, such as the processor-executable instructions 708 that are executable by the processor 702 to enable the network device 700 to perform the various functions and operations described herein, including (by way of example only) any of those that are associated with the illustrated features, aspects, components, and flow diagrams of FIG. 1-5 .
  • processor(s) 702 and memory 706 including the processor-executable instructions 708 thereof, may be integrated on a single chip or otherwise interwoven.
  • a network switch can be configured in a way similar to the above-described exemplary network device 700 , except that the processor-executable instructions implemented therein enable the network switch to perform additional functions and operations described herein, such as acceptance or rejection of network device registration, traffic forwarding between different Network devices, etc.
  • the network switch may include various components as defined by the Network and FC standards and customized by different vendors.
  • the methods, processes or steps described herein may constitute one or more programs made up of machine-executable or computer-executable instructions.
  • the above description particularly with reference to the steps and flow chart in FIG. 3 , enables one skilled in the art to develop such programs, including such instructions to carry out the operations represented by logical blocks on suitably-configured processors.
  • the machine-executable instructions may be written in a computer programming language or may be embodied in firmware logic or in hardware circuitry. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, such instructions can be executed on a variety of hardware platforms for interfacing with a variety of operating systems.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are not described with reference to any particular programming language, but it will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, logic), as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of saying that execution of the software by a machine causes the processor of the machine to perform an action or produce a result. It will be further appreciated that more or fewer processes may be incorporated into the methods illustrated in the flow diagrams without departing from the scope of the invention and that no particular order is implied by the arrangement of blocks shown and described herein. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the terms “computer-readable storage medium” or “machine readable medium” include memory space and any type of storage device accessible by a processor.

Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for enabling existing or legacy network devices to handle packets defined in accordance with future-defined standards, without having to be re-configured to be compatible with these standards. A transmitting network device may generate packets, and may set in the packets indication fields (e.g., tag header type fields) to indicate when particular fields (e.g., tag header fields) are inserted into the packets, including unknown or newly-defined fields. The indication fields may enable a receiving device to handle the packets by skipping, when necessary, over these fields (e.g., including the unknown or newly-defined fields). The indication fields may, for example, identify for each packet a remaining portion to jump to without reading the inserted fields.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This relates to data transfer and processing in computer networks such as the Ethernet, and more particularly, to parsing network packets in which additional information such as a tag header is inserted according to future-defined standards and protocols.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • One way of transmitting a packet defined in accordance with an existing network protocol (e.g., a Fibre Channel packet) over the Ethernet network is to encapsulate such a packet in the payload portion of an Ethernet frame. As a result, the Ethernet frame with the packet encapsulated therein typically contains an EtherType field that indicates the type of the protocol of the encapsulated packet. For example, FIG. lA illustrates an exemplary packet frame 100 in which an Internet Protocol (IP) packet is encapsulated or embedded. As can be seen, this frame 100 includes different fields, such as the Media Access Control (MAC) destination address 102 and the MAC source address 104, which identify the destination of the packet and the source of the packet, respectively, in the network. Usually following the MAC source address 104 is the EtherType field, i.e., EtherType 106, as shown in FIG. 1A. In this example, the EtherType 106 has a value of 0×0800, which indicates the encapsulated or embedded packet protocol is Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4). Accordingly, the EtherType 106 is followed by an IPv4 header 108. Different values in the EtherType field identify different packet protocols encapsulated or embedded in the frame. For example, if the EtherType has a value of 0×8906, that means the protocol is Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), and if the EtherType is 0×86DD, the identified protocol is Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
  • When a network packet, such as the one illustrated in FIG. 1A, is received at a device in the network, the device may delegate the packet processing task to some dedicated hardware, typically a particular protocol offload engine, if the received packet has an EtherType indicating the encapsulated packet is of a certain protocol. For example, a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Offload Engine (TOE) in a network interface card (NIC) may be dedicated for processing TCP/IP stacks. Likewise, converged network adapters (CNAs) may have dedicated hardware or firmware for processing FCoE packets. Alternatively, the network device may use a software module or software client, such as a driver program, to perform parsing and other processing functions of the received packet. Generally speaking, using dedicated hardware for processing packets can add costs, but is significantly faster and more efficient than the software approach. Therefore, the dedicated hardware solution is generally more desirable in storage area networks (SANs) where speed is an essential concern. In operation, both hardware and software approaches are utilized in a network device when parsing and processing a received network packet.
  • FIG. 1C is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of parsing a network packet in existing network devices. Starting at step 130, the device receiving the packet reads the EtherType field in the received packet to identify the packet type. Because the EtherType field is in a defined portion of the packet, i.e., usually following the MAC Source Address as shown in FIG. 1A, the device can quickly identify and read the EtherType from the receive packet. Then the device determines at step 132 whether the packet is of a known EtherType or network protocol. If so, the process proceeds to step 134, where the device offloads the processing of the packet to some dedicated hardware. Otherwise, the process continues to step 136, where the device sends the packet as a raw packet to a software client for further processing.
  • An existing packet frame as shown in FIG. 1A may be modified to include additional fields according to newly-developed standards and protocols. However, adding these fields may confuse the device when the device is trying to read the EtherType field from a received packet in the above-described process in FIG. 1C. For instance, the IEEE 802.1Q standard adds a tag header into the packet frame for storing additional information about the packet, such as a virtual local area network (VLAN) identifier. As illustrated in FIG. 1B, an exemplary packet frame 110 with an 802.1Q tag header inserted therein includes two additional fields, namely, an 802.1Q tag header type 116 and an 802.1Q tag header 118. The 802.1Q tag header 118 takes two bytes in the frame, as can be indicated by the 802.1Q tag header type 116. These fields are typically inserted between the MAC source address 114 and the EtherType 122. As a result, the EtherType 122 is no longer positioned right after the MAC source address 114. If the network device is not appropriately re-configured to be compatible with the 802.1Q protocol, it will not be able to recognize the inserted fields 116 and 118, as the device still expects to read the EtherType field following the MAC source address 114. As illustrated in FIG. 1C, the 802.1Q tag header type 0×8100 may be considered to be an unrecognized EtherType, as a valid EtherType is expected to be 0×0800. As a result, without reading the packet further to identify the EtherType 122, the receiving device would either drop the packet as an invalid packet or send the packet to a software client as a raw packet. In either case, the device will not be able to receive the benefit of hardware processing. Accordingly, there is a need for existing network devices to be able to recognize and read the EtherType field from any future-defined or modified packet frame, albeit how many additional fields, such as one or more tag headers, are inserted in the packet frame.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This relates to allowing an existing or legacy network device to recognize and parse packets defined in accordance with future-defined standards without having to be re-configured to be compatible with such standards. In particular, the device can skip past unknown or newly-inserted fields, such as tag headers in a tagged packet, to parse and process the remainder of the packet. In one embodiment, when parsing a tagged packet, a parser in the device can skip a tag header based on the tag header type, which usually indicates a fixed or pre-defined length of the tag header, and continue to read an EtherType field past the tag header. Based on the EtherType, the device can recognize the encapsulated protocol and offload further processing of the packet to appropriate dedicated hardware for efficiency. By skipping those added fields such as a tag header, the device can accommodate various future-defined standards without incurring additional engineering or design costs or compromising packet processing efficiency.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary packet frame in the existing network systems;
  • FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary packet frame with an 802.1Q tag header inserted therein;
  • FIG. 1C is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process of parsing a network packet in existing network devices;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary packet frame with scalability to include additional fields such as one or more tag headers according to various embodiments of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of parsing a network packet of FIG. 2 according to various embodiments of the invention;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary network device capable of implementing various embodiments of the invention;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary network environment in which various embodiments of the invention can be implemented;
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate exemplary tables in which different tag header types are associated with their respective tag header lengths;
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary configuration of a network device capable of implementing various embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • In the following description of preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which it is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments can be used and structural changes can be made without departing from the scope of the embodiments of this invention.
  • Embodiments of the invention allow an existing or legacy network device to recognize and parse packets defined in accordance with future-defined standards without having to be re-configured to be compatible with such standards. In particular, the device can skip past unknown or newly-inserted fields, such as tag headers in a tagged packet, to parse and process the remainder of the packet. In one embodiment, when parsing a tagged packet, a parser in the device can skip a tag header based on the tag header type, which usually indicates a fixed or pre-defined length of the tag header, and continue to read an EtherType field past the tag header. Based on the EtherType, the device can recognize the encapsulated protocol and offload further processing of the packet to appropriate dedicated hardware for efficiency. By skipping those added fields such as a tag header, the device can accommodate various future-defined standards without incurring additional engineering or design costs or compromising packet processing efficiency.
  • Although embodiments of the invention may be described and illustrated herein using tag headers under 802.1Q as examples, it should be understood that embodiments of this invention are not so limited, but are applicable to many future-developed or defined standards and protocols. Additionally, embodiments of the invention are not limited to Ethernet networks and are compatible with any networking protocol that uses an enumerated field to indicate what type of content follows within a packet or byte stream. Also, embodiments of the invention can be implemented in a host bus adapter (HBA), a converged network adapter (CNA), a network interface card (NIC), target channel adapter (TCA), or any other similar device that enables hardware offloading of packet processing.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, an exemplary packet frame with scalability to include additional fields such as one or more tag headers will be described. As seen in FIG. 2, the tag header type 206 of the packet 200 identifies the type of the tag header 208 to be an 802.1Q tag header. Because all tag headers of a given tag header type typically have the same fixed or pre-defined length, the tag header type 206 can be used to determine conclusively the tag header length 210. In this example, the tag header type indicates that the tag header is an 802.1Q tag header, which is known to be 2 bytes long. Accordingly, a device receiving the packet can bypass the tag header 208 and continue to read the EtherType 212 of the tagged packet 200.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of parsing a network packet with one or more tag headers inserted therein. Such a parsing method can be performed by different components in a network device, which will be described in detail later with reference to FIG. 4. As shown in FIG. 3, when a device receives the network packet, at step 300 the device reads a first portion of the packet, for example, the portion immediately following the MAC source address field. As aforementioned, this first portion contains either an EtherType or a tag header type, depending on the structure of the packet frame. For example, the first portion of exemplary packet frame 100 in FIG. 1A contains the EtherType 106, while the first portion of exemplary packet frame 110 in FIG. 1B contains the 802.1Q header type 116.
  • At step 302, the device determines whether the first portion of the packet contains a known EtherType. If so, the device can proceed with offloading the processing of the packet to dedicated hardware at step 304. For example, the parser of the network device may recognize the EtherType as indicating an IP packet being encapsulated in the received packet, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, and thus sends the packet to a TCP/IP stack or processing engine within the network device. Traditionally, the device would simply drop the packet as a defective or invalid packet or send it to a software client as a raw packet if the first portion does not include any known EtherType. However, it is possible that the packet is valid but structured differently according to a newly-defined protocol that inserts tag headers or other fields in the first portion. Thus, the process in FIG. 3 performs further parsing of the received packet to identify the EtherType in a different portion of the packet, as will be described below.
  • In one embodiment, if the first portion is not a known EtherType, the device further determines at step 306 whether the first portion contains a known tag header type. For example, the first portion may contain a tag header type indicating the inserted tag header is an 802.1Q header, as shown in FIG. 1B. But if the first portion does not include any known tag header type, the packet will be sent as a raw packet to a software client for further parsing at step 308. Typically, a software client includes a network driver or software programmed to execute packet parsing algorithms.
  • If the first portion is a known tag header type, the device proceeds to step 310 to determine a tag header length associated with the tag header type so that the parser in the device can bypass the inserted tag header to read the remainder of the packet. In one configuration, the device may include one or more programmable registers (as shown in FIG. 4) for storing different tag header lengths associated with their respective tag header types. Such associations can be implemented through tables or databases as will be described later with reference to FIGS. 6A-B.
  • Once the tag header length is determined from the associated tag header type, the parser in the device can determine the remainder of the packet at step 312. Using the example in FIG. 2, the parser can bypass the tag header 208, i.e., a length 210 of the frame, to identify the remainder of the packet starting at the EtherType field 212. The remainder of the packet past the tag header may include additional tag headers followed by the EtherType and payload. In that case, the parser in the device can repeat the steps 300-312 to identify and bypass other inserted tag headers until a known EtherType is identified.
  • According to some embodiments, the processing of the packet can depend on the tag header type. For example, a network device can drop all packets of a certain tag header type, hardware offload can be disallowed for packets of a certain tag header type, or packets of a certain tag header type can be sent to a programmable receive client. According to some embodiments, network devices can process a packet in this way only based on the tag header type with no capability to interpret or process the tag header. For example, a network device with no capability to interpret an 802.1Q tag header can nonetheless recognize an 802.1Q tag header type. Such a device can recognize and then drop all packets with an 802.1Q tag header type, even though it has no capability to interpret or process an 802.1Q tag header. In this way, devices that lack hardware to interpret or process future-defined tag headers can still process packets containing such tag headers based only on the tag header type.
  • The algorithm in FIG. 3 can be implemented in an exemplary network device as illustrated in FIG. 4. Such a network device 400 includes a parser 406 for receiving and parsing a network packet 402. In parsing the network packet 402, the parser 406 is configured to implement the above-described process of bypassing certain portions of the packet (e.g., inserted tag headers) to identify the EtherType in the network packet 402. If the first portion of the packet contains a known EtherType, then further processing of the packet is offloaded to the dedicated hardware 404. If the first portion does not contain a known EtherType but one of the known tag header types, such as 409, 411, or 413, then the parser will access the programmable registers 408 to retrieve the appropriate tag length associated with the tag header type. For example, if length1 410 is determined to be the tag length associated with the identified tag header type 1 409, the parser 406 will bypass the tag header in the network packet 402 by skipping a length1 410 after the first portion. If the first portion of the packet does not include either a known EtherType or a known tag header type, the packet is sent as a raw packet to a software client 416 coupled to the parser 406.
  • In one embodiment, the various lengths 410, 412 and 414 in the programmable registers 408 can be pre-defined tag lengths according to respective network protocols. Alternatively, these lengths stored in the programmable registers 408 can be updated dynamically each time a new tag header type is added. For instance, the tables in FIGS. 6A-B illustrate exemplary tag header types associated with different tag header lengths. In FIG. 6A, tag header type A is defined as having a tag header length of 4 bytes, tag header type B is defined as having a tag header length of 2 bytes, and tag header type C is defined as having a tag header length of 2 bytes. This table in FIG. 6A can be updated when additional tag header types are included. FIG. 6B shows such an updated table when tag header types D and E have been added, with lengths of 1 byte and 4 bytes, respectively.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary computer network environment in which the network device in FIG. 4 can operate and communicate with other network elements according to various network protocols. In FIG. 5, the network device 500 communicates with other devices on the network 512, such as storage or target devices 514 and a server 516. Within the network device 500, incoming packets are received at the receiver 502, which includes a parser 504 and programmable registers 506. As aforementioned, the receiver 502 can be configured to carry out the packet-parsing method as illustrated in FIG. 3. On the other hand, outgoing packets are prepared and sent out to the network by the transmitter 508 in the network device 500. In one embodiment, the transmitter 508 includes a packet tagger 510 for building a network packet with one or more inserted tag headers before sending the packet off to the network. This packet with tag headers inserted therein can then be received and interpreted by other network devices that are similarly configured as the demonstrated network device 500.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary configuration of a network device 700. As illustrated in FIG. 7, the network device 700 includes one or more input/output (I/O) interfaces 702, at least one processor 704, and memory space 706. The I/O interfaces 702 enable the network device 700 to communicate over one or more networks 710, such as an Ethernet network that enables different network protocols such as Fibre Channel (FC), Fibre Channel over the Ethernet (FCoE), SAS, TCP/IP, and so forth. The I/O interfaces 702 include interfaces such as a network interface card, a modem, a USB connector, one or more network ports (e.g., Ethernet_Port), and some combination thereof.
  • Processor(s) 704 may be implemented using any applicable processing-capable technology. Processor(s) 704 may be one or more processors such as central processing units (CPUs), microprocessors, controllers, dedicated processing circuits, digital signal processors (DSPs), processing portion(s) of an ASIC, some combination thereof, and so forth. Generally, processors 704 are capable of executing, performing, and/or otherwise effectuating processor-executable instructions, such as processor-executable instructions 708 in the memory 706.
  • The memory 706 comprises portions of computer-readable storage media, which may include volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media, storage and transmission media, and so forth. The memory 706 is tangible media when it is embodied as a manufacture and/or a composition of matter. By way of example only, storage media may include an array of disks or flash memory for longer-term mass storage of processor-executable instructions, random access memory (RAM) for shorter-term storing of instructions that are currently being executed and/or otherwise processed, hard-coded logic media (e.g., an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate-array (FPGA), etc.), some combination thereof, and so forth. Transmission media may include link(s) on networks for transmitting communications and so forth.
  • In one embodiment, the memory 706 is comprised of one or more processor-accessible media, such as the processor-executable instructions 708 that are executable by the processor 702 to enable the network device 700 to perform the various functions and operations described herein, including (by way of example only) any of those that are associated with the illustrated features, aspects, components, and flow diagrams of FIG. 1-5. It should be noted that processor(s) 702 and memory 706, including the processor-executable instructions 708 thereof, may be integrated on a single chip or otherwise interwoven.
  • A network switch can be configured in a way similar to the above-described exemplary network device 700, except that the processor-executable instructions implemented therein enable the network switch to perform additional functions and operations described herein, such as acceptance or rejection of network device registration, traffic forwarding between different Network devices, etc. The network switch may include various components as defined by the Network and FC standards and customized by different vendors.
  • In practice, the methods, processes or steps described herein may constitute one or more programs made up of machine-executable or computer-executable instructions. The above description, particularly with reference to the steps and flow chart in FIG. 3, enables one skilled in the art to develop such programs, including such instructions to carry out the operations represented by logical blocks on suitably-configured processors. The machine-executable instructions may be written in a computer programming language or may be embodied in firmware logic or in hardware circuitry. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, such instructions can be executed on a variety of hardware platforms for interfacing with a variety of operating systems. Embodiments of the present invention are not described with reference to any particular programming language, but it will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, logic), as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of saying that execution of the software by a machine causes the processor of the machine to perform an action or produce a result. It will be further appreciated that more or fewer processes may be incorporated into the methods illustrated in the flow diagrams without departing from the scope of the invention and that no particular order is implied by the arrangement of blocks shown and described herein. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the terms “computer-readable storage medium” or “machine readable medium” include memory space and any type of storage device accessible by a processor.
  • Although embodiments of this invention have been fully described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of embodiments of this invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (21)

1-17. (canceled)
18. A method, comprising:
generating a packet;
inserting a tag header in the packet;
setting a tag header type in a first portion of the packet to:
indicate that the tag header is inserted; and
identify a remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the remaining portion of the packet without reading the tag header inserted in the packet.
19. The method of claim 18, comprising, when an additional tag header is inserted in the packet, setting an additional tag header type in a second portion of the packet to indicate that the additional tag header is inserted;
wherein the additional tag header type is set to identify a second remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the second remaining portion of the packet without reading the additional tag header inserted in the packet.
20. The method of claim 18, comprising setting the tag header type based on one or more tag header lengths, associated with corresponding one or more tag header types.
21. The method of claim 18, comprising generating the packet such that to enable controlling processing of the packet at a receiving device.
22. The method of claim 21, comprising setting a field in the remaining portion of the packet to enable controlling the processing of the packet at the receiving device.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the field comprises an indication of which type of network frame is encapsulated in the packet.
24. The method of claim 21, wherein controlling the processing of the packet comprises offloading processing of the packet to a particular component of the receiving device, the particular component comprising hardware or software client.
25. A system, comprising:
one or more circuits for use in a device, the one or more circuits are operable to:
generate a packet;
insert a tag header in the packet; and
set a tag header type in a first portion of the packet to:
indicate that the tag header is inserted; and
identify a remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the remaining portion of the packet without reading the tag header inserted in the packet.
26. The system of claim 25, wherein the one or more circuits are operable to, when an additional tag header is inserted in the packet set an additional tag header type in a second portion of the packet to indicate that the additional tag header is inserted;
wherein the additional tag header type is set to identify a second remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the second remaining portion of the packet without reading the additional tag header inserted in the packet.
27. The system of claim 25, wherein the one or more circuits are operable to set the tag header type based on one or more tag header lengths, associated with corresponding one or more tag header types.
28. The system of claim 25, wherein the identified remaining portion of the packet includes an indication of which type of network frame is encapsulated in the packet.
29. The system of claim 25, wherein the device is incorporated into a host bus adapter (HBA).
30. The system of claim 25, wherein the device is incorporated into a converged network adapter (CNA).
31. The system of claim 25, wherein the device is incorporated into a target channel adapter (TCA).
32. The system of claim 25, wherein the device is a network interface card (NIC).
33. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising processor-executable instructions, said instructions, while executed, causing a processor to:
generate a packet;
insert a tag header in the packet;
set a tag header type in a first portion of the packet to:
indicate that the tag header is inserted; and
identify a remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the remaining portion of the packet without reading the tag header inserted in the packet.
34. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein said instructions, while executed, cause the processor to, when an additional tag header is inserted in the packet, set an additional tag header type in a second portion of the packet to indicate that the additional tag header is inserted;
wherein the additional tag header type is set to identify a second remaining portion of the packet, such that to enable reading the second remaining portion of the packet without reading the additional tag header inserted in the packet.
35. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein said instructions, while executed, cause the processor to set a field in the remaining portion of the packet to enable controlling the processing of the packet at a receiving device.
36. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein the field comprises an indication of which type of network frame is encapsulated in the packet.
37. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 33, wherein controlling the processing of the packet comprises offloading processing of the packet to a particular component of the receiving device.
US14/876,595 2011-10-28 2015-10-06 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags Abandoned US20160028860A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/876,595 US20160028860A1 (en) 2011-10-28 2015-10-06 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/284,447 US8867568B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US14/488,975 US9154586B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2014-09-17 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US14/876,595 US20160028860A1 (en) 2011-10-28 2015-10-06 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/488,975 Continuation US9154586B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2014-09-17 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160028860A1 true US20160028860A1 (en) 2016-01-28

Family

ID=48172397

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/284,447 Active 2032-07-10 US8867568B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US14/488,975 Active US9154586B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2014-09-17 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US14/876,595 Abandoned US20160028860A1 (en) 2011-10-28 2015-10-06 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/284,447 Active 2032-07-10 US8867568B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US14/488,975 Active US9154586B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2014-09-17 Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US8867568B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11711453B2 (en) * 2021-10-24 2023-07-25 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. Template-based packet parsing

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8867568B2 (en) * 2011-10-28 2014-10-21 Emulex Corporation Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US9282173B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2016-03-08 Viavi Solutions Inc. Reconfigurable packet header parsing
KR101319561B1 (en) * 2013-04-18 2013-10-23 (주) 위즈네트 Ipv4/ipv6 dual stack software/hardware apparatus and method for processing internet packet
GB201321821D0 (en) * 2013-12-10 2014-01-22 Ibm Opague message parsing
US20150165560A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-18 Corning Incorporated Laser processing of slots and holes
KR101551729B1 (en) * 2015-05-22 2015-09-10 (주) 위즈네트 Communication chipset and apparatus secure from internet attack
US10880211B2 (en) 2019-05-06 2020-12-29 Seth Gregory Friedman Transaction encoding and verification by way of data-link layer fields
US10868707B1 (en) 2019-09-16 2020-12-15 Liquid-Markets-Holdings, Incorporated Zero-latency message processing with validity checks
US11935120B2 (en) 2020-06-08 2024-03-19 Liquid-Markets GmbH Hardware-based transaction exchange
CN112532593B (en) * 2020-11-16 2022-06-28 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 Method, device, equipment and medium for processing attack message

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6061089A (en) * 1995-03-24 2000-05-09 Ppt Vision, Inc. High-speed digital video serial link
US20070043849A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2007-02-22 David Lill Field data collection and processing system, such as for electric, gas, and water utility data
US20110058573A1 (en) * 2009-09-04 2011-03-10 Brocade Communication Systems, Inc. User selectable multiple protocol network interface device
US8848727B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2014-09-30 Oracle International Corporation Hierarchical transport protocol stack for data transfer between enterprise servers

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7492763B1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2009-02-17 Applied Micro Circuits Corporation User-specified key creation from attributes independent of encapsulation type
JP2011502384A (en) * 2007-10-15 2011-01-20 トムソン ライセンシング High-definition television transmission with mobile function
US8867568B2 (en) * 2011-10-28 2014-10-21 Emulex Corporation Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6061089A (en) * 1995-03-24 2000-05-09 Ppt Vision, Inc. High-speed digital video serial link
US20070043849A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2007-02-22 David Lill Field data collection and processing system, such as for electric, gas, and water utility data
US8848727B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2014-09-30 Oracle International Corporation Hierarchical transport protocol stack for data transfer between enterprise servers
US20110058573A1 (en) * 2009-09-04 2011-03-10 Brocade Communication Systems, Inc. User selectable multiple protocol network interface device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11711453B2 (en) * 2021-10-24 2023-07-25 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. Template-based packet parsing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130107892A1 (en) 2013-05-02
US8867568B2 (en) 2014-10-21
US9154586B2 (en) 2015-10-06
US20150003461A1 (en) 2015-01-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9154586B2 (en) Method for parsing network packets having future defined tags
US11221972B1 (en) Methods and systems for increasing fairness for small vs large NVMe IO commands
US9294302B2 (en) Non-fragmented IP packet tunneling in a network
US10673650B2 (en) Programmable tunnel creation for hardware-based packet processing
JP6269999B2 (en) Packet processing method and apparatus
US11729300B2 (en) Generating programmatically defined fields of metadata for network packets
US11936562B2 (en) Virtual machine packet processing offload
CN112953949B (en) Message header processing method, device, equipment and storage medium of network message
US20210392084A1 (en) Transmission Of Packets Over A TSN Aware Network
US20220393908A1 (en) Message Encapsulation Method and Apparatus, and Message Decapsulation Method and Apparatus
CN110932890A (en) Data transmission method, server and computer readable storage medium
CN108737239B (en) Message forwarding method and device
KR102337516B1 (en) Method of extracting data from packets and an apparatus thereof
US11740920B2 (en) Methods and systems for migrating virtual functions in association with virtual machines
US10887234B1 (en) Programmatic selection of load balancing output amongst forwarding paths
EP3491792B1 (en) Deliver an ingress packet to a queue at a gateway device
CN112804185B (en) Anti-counterfeit inspection of IPV4 fragment in IPV6 without reassembly
US11968119B1 (en) Service Function Chaining using uSID in SRv6
US11438266B2 (en) Generic packet header insertion and removal
CN110505137B (en) Function expansion type wired network device
CN105991307B (en) Method and device for remotely controlling router
JP2023177208A (en) Ethernet device capable of efficient transmission
CN116320087A (en) Message processing method, message processing device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN117480744A (en) Method for forwarding messages, switch and network interface card
CN110943896A (en) PPPoE data message transmission method, device, equipment and storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EMULEX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMULEX DESIGN AND MANUFCTURING CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036744/0246

Effective date: 20131205

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:037808/0001

Effective date: 20160201

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:037808/0001

Effective date: 20160201

AS Assignment

Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMULEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:039235/0317

Effective date: 20150831

AS Assignment

Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:041710/0001

Effective date: 20170119

Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:041710/0001

Effective date: 20170119

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION