US8321236B2 - Method and apparatus for prescription processing - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for prescription processing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8321236B2
US8321236B2 US10/353,277 US35327703A US8321236B2 US 8321236 B2 US8321236 B2 US 8321236B2 US 35327703 A US35327703 A US 35327703A US 8321236 B2 US8321236 B2 US 8321236B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
prescription
time
patient
labels
scheduled delivery
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US10/353,277
Other versions
US20030149599A1 (en
Inventor
Charles Goodall
Sam Libo
Peter Liccardo
Dejan Kozic
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Walgreen Co
Original Assignee
Walgreen Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Walgreen Co filed Critical Walgreen Co
Priority to US10/353,277 priority Critical patent/US8321236B2/en
Assigned to WALGREEN CO. reassignment WALGREEN CO. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GOODALL, CHARLES, KOZIC, DEJAN, LIBO, SAM, LICCARDO, PETER
Publication of US20030149599A1 publication Critical patent/US20030149599A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8321236B2 publication Critical patent/US8321236B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H20/00ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
    • G16H20/10ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H40/00ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
    • G16H40/20ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H40/00ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
    • G16H40/60ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices
    • G16H40/67ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices for remote operation

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to pharmaceutical services, and more particularly to, a method and apparatus for processing a prescription from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient.
  • a typical prescription scenario may include a patient visiting a pharmacy to request that a prescription be filled. If the patient does not wait for the prescription to be filled then a subsequent phone call by a pharmacy staff member may notify the patient when the prescription has been filled and is ready for pick-up. A return visit by the patient to pickup the prescription may follow.
  • Each step of the typical prescription scenario requires interaction between the patient and the pharmacy staff.
  • many steps are required to be performed by the pharmacy staff between the time that the prescription is ordered and the time the prescription is delivered to the patient.
  • a variety of tasks may be performed such as, but not limited to, logging the prescription order into the prescription system, checking the availability of the drug for the prescription order, prioritizing in time the prescription order with other prescription orders, verifying insurance coverage, checking for the possibility of using a generic drug substitute, placing one or more phone calls to the prescriber, checking for the possibility of drug interactions, checking for a patient's drug sensitivity, dispensing the proper drug in the proper quantity, and printing and affixing labels to the prescription.
  • the efficiency of the prescription workflow is important to the success and profitability of a pharmacy.
  • the safety of patients is also important to the success and profitability of the pharmacy. Ensuring patient safety requires that the pharmacy staff have expertise in a variety of areas. In addition to medical expertise, for example, a pharmacist must possess the organizational skills necessary to manage a high volume of prescriptions while ensuring that each patient's prescription is properly dispensed at the proper dosage level and in the proper amount. This requires a timely flow of both patient and prescription information in an easy-to-understand format to the pharmacy staff during the time between receiving the prescription order and delivering the prescription to the patient (“order-to-delivery”). Further, this also requires the timely flow of both patient and prescription information in an easy-to-understand format to the patient and the prescriber.
  • FIG. 1 is a high level block diagram of a pharmacy network system
  • FIGS. 4 , 5 , and 6 are three parts of a flowchart of a main routine that may be performed during operation of an automated label printing system
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 are graphic displays to show the types and the numbers of priority exceptions
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a pharmacy network system 2 constructed to manage a high volume prescription workload.
  • the pharmacy network system 2 may include multiple pharmacies or facilities, generally shown as 4 and 6 , operatively coupled to a network 10 via multiple network data links 14 , 16 .
  • the pharmacies 4 , 6 may be located in different areas of the same city, in different cities, or in different states.
  • the network 10 may be provided using a wide variety of techniques known to persons of ordinary skill in the art to transfer pharmacy data that includes, but is not limited to, prescription information, patient information, and provider information.
  • the network 10 may include, but is not limited to, dedicated access lines, plain ordinary telephone (POT) lines, satellite links, and combinations of such lines and/or links.
  • the network 10 may also include a plurality of network computers or server computers (not shown), each of which may be operatively interconnected. Where the network 10 comprises the Internet, data communication may take place via the network data links 14 , 16 in accordance with an Internet communication protocol.
  • the prescription order may enter the prescription workflow 52 via manual entry by a pharmacy staff member, via an electronic data interchange (EDI) transmission from a physician's office, via an Internet entry by a patient (e.g., www.walgreens.com), or via a touch-tone telephone prescription entry by the patient.
  • EDI electronic data interchange
  • the prescription order may enter into the prescription workflow 52 via automatic entry, i.e., set up in a pharmacy system computer to automatically initiate a refill of a prescription when a predetermined number of days has elapsed since the last delivery to the patient.
  • the time at which the prescription label is automatically printed is based on a number of factors such as, but not limited to, the promised time for delivery of the prescription to the patient, the current volume of additional prescription orders to be prepared in a 24-hour time period, an identification parameter associated with the patient such as the patient's primary phone number or last name, and the pharmacy workload (i.e., whether is pharmacy is experiencing peak prescription traffic hours).
  • the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescription order is filled relative to other prescription orders in addition to printing the prescription labels.
  • the prescription is verified by a pharmacist at a block 62 .
  • the verification step includes, inter alia, a bar code scan that produces a visual display of patient/prescription information on a graphic user interface (GUI) that is reviewed and compared to the filled prescription by the pharmacist to ensure patient safety.
  • GUI graphic user interface
  • possible drug interaction between the patient's prescription and the patient's current medication may be uncovered. Immediate notification of the possible drug interaction is necessary—both to the pharmacy staff member and the patient. Obviously, presenting the drug interaction information to the pharmacy staff member in an easy-to-understand format may mitigate possible delays associated with notifying the patient and/or the patient's prescription.
  • the pharmacy 6 of the pharmacy network system 2 includes a controller 18 operatively connected to workstations, generally shown as 20 and 22 , via a network link 23 .
  • the network link 23 may be a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), or any other type of network known to persons of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the workstation 20 includes a user interface (U/I) 36 configured to assist pharmacy staff members in performing their duties and to display graphics.
  • the workstation 22 includes a user interface 38 .
  • a central pharmacy database (not shown) configured to store patient information (e.g., customer preferences, and other drugs the patient may be taking) is operatively coupled to the controller 18 .
  • the pharmacy logistical organizer 24 , the ALPS 26 , the exception manager 28 , and the Rx-ready manager 30 are shown as being operatively connected to the controller 18 , those components of the pharmacy 6 may reside as software within the controller 18 (i.e., stored on a tangible medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), or a memory).
  • a tangible medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), or a memory.
  • a tangible medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), or a memory.
  • DVD digital versatile disk
  • persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that one or more of the pharmacy logistical organizer 24 , the ALPS 26 , the exception manager 28 , and the Rx-ready manager 30 could alternatively be implemented by hardware and/or firmware in a well known manner.
  • a prescription/exception may include a prescription refill that requires a doctor's approval before filling.
  • the exception manager 28 will automatically assign a higher priority to a prescription/exception scheduled for patient pick-up within the hour than it will assign to a same prescription/exception scheduled for patient pick-up the following day.
  • the exception manager 28 assists the pharmacy staff with task prioritization in a high volume prescription workflow environment of the pharmacy 6 .
  • the Rx-ready manager 30 is representative of a method for automatic patient notification when the patient's prescription will not be ready for pick-up at its promised time (i.e., a not-ready notification).
  • Prescriptions that are candidates for the Rx-ready manager 30 include (1) those prescriptions/exceptions that were not resolved prior to their promise time, (2) those prescriptions which have printed labels and have been filled but are not yet verified by their promised time, and (3) those prescriptions entered into the system but do not have a printed label by their promised time.
  • the Rx-ready manager 30 is also configured to automatically notify patients who have been previously notified of a not-ready status of their prescription but now their prescription is ready for pick-up (i.e., a now-ready notification).
  • Both the not-ready and now-ready notification occur in any number of ways such as, but not limited to, an automated telephone call to deliver a pre-recorded voice message to the patient, a page to the patient, a short message page to the patient, and e-mail.
  • a summary status bar (hereinafter referred to as a “dashboard”) is displayed on the user interfaces 36 , 38 or workstations 20 , 22 .
  • a dashboard 40 displayed on the user interface 36 and/or a dashboard 42 displayed on the user interface 38 may provide a visual status of prescription orders currently in the prescription workflow 52 .
  • the dashboards 40 , 42 (shown in detail in FIG. 14 ) may be configured in any manner suitable to provide an easy-to-understand visual display of the prescription workflow 52 .
  • the dashboards 40 , 42 may display a status of all prescription/exceptions having promised times of less than an hour or less than four hours. The selected time intervals may be determined by either the exception manager 26 or a pharmacy staff member.
  • the pharmacy data network 2 is shown to include one network 10 and two pharmacies 4 , 6 , it should be understood that different numbers of networks including different numbers of network computers (not shown) and different numbers of pharmacies may be utilized.
  • the network 10 may include multiple network computers operatively coupled to hundreds or thousands of stores.
  • the I/O circuit 86 is shown as a single block, it should be appreciated that the I/O circuit 86 may include a number of different types of I/O circuits.
  • the controller 18 may be operatively connected to the network 10 via the network data link 16 , which may or may not be part of a WAN or a LAN. Further, the controller 18 is operatively coupled to the user interfaces 36 , 38 .
  • pharmacies may optimize a prescription workflow 52 from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient.
  • the computer program portions or routines may be written at any high level language such as, but not limited to, C, C++, C#, and Java, or any low-level, assembly or machine language.
  • various portions of the memories are physically and/or structurally configured in accordance with the computer program instructions.
  • FIGS. 4 , 5 , and 6 illustrate some of the steps of an operating routine or subroutine 100 that may be stored in the memory of the controller 18 .
  • the routine 100 may be performed during operation of the ALPS 26 and may continue to run during normal operating hours of the pharmacy. While executing the routine 100 , the controller 18 may cause an adjustable amount of prescription labels to be printed to ensure a steady organized flow of the overall prescription workflow 52 .
  • the adjustment to the label printing amount is predicated on a number of factors, which primarily includes whether the pharmacy is experiencing a peak operation period.
  • the order in which prescription labels are printed by the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescriptions are subsequently filled and verified with the assumption that the drugs are available.
  • the label print order is based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, promised times for prescription delivery to patients, the peak prescription workflow period for that particular pharmacy, pharmacy operation hours, the number of batches of prescription labels printed per hour, and the number of prescriptions labels printed per batch.
  • the ALPS 26 provides a fully automated label scheduling and printing system that translates into steady pharmacy workflow throughout the day for a pharmacy with traditional hours of operation.
  • the ALPS 26 also provides a fully automated label scheduling and printing system that translates into an adjustable pharmacy workflow throughout a 24-hour time period required for a pharmacy that is opened 24 hours.
  • the controller 18 at a block 114 may determine if the current time falls within a peak prescription workflow time period. If the controller 18 at a block 116 determines that the current time is within the peak prescription workflow period, the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be printed in the next printing batch of prescription labels. For example, if the peak prescription workflow period is between the hours of 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. and a prescription 9 has a promised time past the current time by more than the predetermined time range, the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be considered for printing until the peak period has elapsed.
  • the controller 18 at a block 118 may determine whether a predetermined wait time (e.g., 15 minutes) has elapsed since the previous batch of printed labels. If the predetermined wait time has not elapsed, the controller 18 proceeds to the block 116 and the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be considered for printing. However, if the predetermined wait time has elapsed, the controller 18 may consider printing the prescription label for the prescription 9 in the next batch of printed labels. The decision to print the prescription label for the prescription 9 in the next batch of printed labels is based on a number of prescription labels to be printed in that next print batch.
  • a predetermined wait time e.g. 15 minutes
  • routine 100 may include blocks that group prescriptions associated with the same primary phone number (indicating the same patient or patients living in the same household) so that the prescription labels for the group prescriptions may be printed in the same batch of prescription labels.
  • grouping prescriptions in this way may reduce the number of trips to the pharmacy by a patient to accept delivery of the prescriptions.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the steps to calculate the promised time of the prescription 9 entered into the prescription workflow 52 in further detail.
  • the controller 18 at a block 106 may determine that the entered prescription has not been assigned a promised time. Accordingly, the controller 18 at a block 120 may determine if one or more prescription labels have been printed during a recent predetermined time span (e.g., previous 90 minutes).
  • the controller 18 determines that the prescription label(s) were not printed during the recent predetermined time span, the controller 18 proceeds to the block 120 until the prescription label(s) were printed during the recent predetermined time span. If the controller 18 determines that the prescription label(s) were printed during the recent predetermined time span, the controller 18 at a block 122 may determine if a predetermined wait period has elapsed since a previous calculation of a promised time. For example, the controller 18 may calculate prescription delivery promised times every 5 minutes to ensure that the promised times reflect up-to-date calculation variables (e.g., the number of prescriptions requested, and the number of patients waiting in the pharmacy). If the predetermined wait period has elapsed, the controller 18 at a block 124 may identify the prescription labels printed during the recent predetermined time span (e.g., 90 minutes) (hereinafter referred to as a “group of labels”).
  • group of labels e.g. 90 minutes
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the steps to determine the number of prescription labels to be printed (hereinafter referred to as a “label print number calculation”).
  • the prescription labels to be printed are associated with prescriptions having a promised time past the current time by more than the predetermined time range.
  • the controller 18 performs a label print number calculation based on a number of factors such as, but not limited to, the number of prescriptions in the prescription workflow, the pharmacy hours of operation, and the number of times per hour the label print number calculation is performed.
  • the controller 18 at a block 140 may determine the number of prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) an “entered” status.
  • the controller 18 at a block 142 may determine the hours of operation of the pharmacy (i.e., when the pharmacy is open).
  • the controller 18 may subtract a preselected number of hours from the number of hours that the pharmacy is open to form a “reduced number”. For example, if the pharmacy is opened from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
  • the controller 18 at the block 144 may reduce that number by a preselected number such as four to reduce the hours of operation to eight hours, which is the number of hours that the pharmacy is open.
  • the controller 18 at a block 146 may determine the number of times the label print number calculation is performed in an hour.
  • the number of prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) the “entered” status is divided by the reduced number to yield an estimated number of prescriptions per hour.
  • the estimated number of prescriptions per hour is then divided by the number of times the label print number calculation is performed in an hour at a block 150 .
  • the resulting number (i.e., the “label print number”) represents the number of labels to be printed in the next batch of printed prescription labels.
  • the controller 18 at a block 152 may sort the prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) the “entered” status in ascending order of their prescription promised time. Finally, a number of prescription labels equivalent to the label print number is printed in ascending order of their associated prescription promised times at a block 154 . In addition, prescriptions having (1) promised times during the next 24-hour time period, (2) the “entered” status, and (3) the same primary phone number may have their prescription labels printed in the same batch of prescription labels.
  • the prescription label for the prescription 9 may be a two-sided prescription label having a front side and a back side printed by the printer 27 .
  • the front side may include a bar code used by the pharmacist to verify the prescription/patient information.
  • the front side may also include, but is not limited to, the patient's primary phone number, the patient's address, the prescription's promised time of delivery to the patient, prescription instructions and warning labels, and general consumer drug information.
  • the back side may include a copy of some of the information displayed on the front side including the bar code, and the patient's primary phone number.
  • a pharmacy or store logo may be included on the back side. Additional useful information such as, but not limited to, the prescription drug name, a common drug use comment, prescription drug usage information, a list of cautions, a list of possible side effects, as well as any additional notes may be included by the pharmacy.
  • the front side and back side of the two-sided prescription label may contain the necessary information for tracking, verifying, and filling the prescription as well as provide a way to transmit pertinent information to the patient. Additional details on the two-sided prescription label may be found in the patent application entitled “Duplex Pharmacy Label and Method,” having U.S. Ser. No. 10/022,583, filed on Dec. 17, 2001, and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the timing of the printing of the two-sided prescription label is determined by the ALSP 26 . Therefore, the ALPS 26 may provide automatic printing of the optimal number of prescription labels based on the “promised times” and the current number of prescriptions to be printed during the next 24-hour time period. Further, the ALPS 26 may enable a steady flow of prescription fills based upon the printing time of the prescription labels.
  • a prescription order 8 is received and entered into the prescription workflow 52 . Accordingly, automatic printing of a prescription label for the prescription 9 associated with the prescription order 8 is directed by the ALPS 26 based on a number of factors as discussed above. Optimally, the order in which the prescription label for the prescription 9 is printed by the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescription 9 is filled and verified. However, exceptions (i.e., unresolved tasks associated with filling and verifying the prescription) may prevent the prescription 9 from being timely filled, verified, and/or delivered to the patient.
  • exceptions i.e., unresolved tasks associated with filling and verifying the prescription
  • the exceptions include a need to call a medical doctor to renew the patient's prescription, to await a call back from the medical doctor, or to re-call the medical doctor.
  • the exceptions may also include verifying the patient's insurance coverage, which may require a call to or from a third party insurance provider.
  • the exceptions may include a need to research a possible drug interaction between the prescription ordered and other prescriptions that the patient is currently taking. Other exceptions may involve a requirement to check possible generic drug substitutes or a situation where only a portion of the prescription is available for immediate dispensing to the patient.
  • One method for noting an exception(s) associated with a prescription is to use short identifiers such as acronyms or abbreviations. For example, a list of exceptions with their associated abbreviations is shown in Table 1.
  • the exception manager 28 ( FIG. 2 ) operates to reduce the amount of pharmacy staff time required to track the exceptions to their conclusion.
  • the exception manager 28 allows automatic priority ranking and identifying of prescription/exceptions to be resolved prior to prescription delivery to the patient.
  • the exception may be attached to the prescription either manually by the pharmacy staff as in the case of a miscellaneous exception or automatically as in the case where a shortage of a particular drug has been identified at the step of entering the prescription order into the prescription workflow 52 (e.g., identified as a zero stock status within the inventory of the pharmacy).
  • the exception manager 28 is configured to allow a pharmacy staff member to quickly identify and resolve prescription/exceptions that have promised times within a specified time duration (e.g., within 75 minutes of the promised time). Once identified as a prescription/exception having a promised time with the specified time duration, the prescription is termed a “priority exception.”
  • Access to information associated with the priority exceptions may be accomplished via a user interface such as the user interface 36 shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the user interface 36 may display one or more graphics displaying information associated with the priority exception.
  • the graphic may also include the steps necessary to resolve the priority exception.
  • the information associated with the priority exception shown in the graphic display may be posted on the user interface 36 in priority order of the nearest promised time. For example, a priority exception that is closest to its promised time will be displayed first, followed by a priority exception that is second closest to its promised time, and so on.
  • the user interface 36 may be used to post prescription/exceptions including priority exceptions. That is, the user interface 36 may provide, but not limited to, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of priority exceptions that have promised times in less than an hour, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that have promised times in less than four hours, and a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that have promised times in less than 24 hours. Referring to FIG. 7 , for example, the user interface 36 may provide a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that are past their promised time.
  • the graphic displays of priority exceptions represented by FIGS. 7 and 8 are configured to prompt the pharmacy staff member viewing the display to call and notify the patient of the status of his/her prescription.
  • the pharmacy staff member may be able to prioritize tasks associated with the prescription workflow 52 efficiently to resolve prescription exceptions and to reduce inconvenience to the patient.
  • the prescriptions may be grouped based on their promised times (e.g., prescriptions having promised times in less than an hour, prescriptions having promised times in less than four hours, and prescriptions having promised times in less than 24 hours).
  • selection of a “Printed Not Verified” tab may provide a graphic display 370 as shown in FIG. 11 .
  • the graphic display 370 may provide the number of prescription orders that have been entered into the prescription workflow 52 and the prescriptions have been filled but have not yet been verified.
  • the statistics of the graphic displays 350 , 360 , 370 illustrated by FIGS. 9-11 may provide another tool for pharmacy staff members to prioritize tasks associated with the prescription workflow 52 .
  • the exception manager 28 may automatically “serve up” the highest priority (based on the promised time) prescription with an exception to the pharmacy staff members to allow resolution of the exception or to prompt notification to the patient as to when the prescription may be ready for pick-up.
  • the exception manager 28 provides graphic displays showing prescription/exception information including text instructions that notify the pharmacy staff member of the steps necessary to resolve the exception and to move the prescription order along in the prescription workflow.
  • the instructions may prompt a pharmacy staff member to call and notify the patient of the status of his/her prescription.
  • the pharmacy staff member is provided with instructions to resolve the exception to save valuable staff time, the pharmacy staff member is required to perform an additional task. That is, the pharmacy staff member must manually place a phone call to the patient to notify him/her of the not-ready status of the prescription.
  • Prescriptions that are candidates for the Rx-ready manager 30 may include, but are not limited to, (1) prescriptions with exceptions that were not resolved prior to the promised time, (2) prescriptions that have printed labels and have been filled but have not been verified by the promised time, and (3) prescriptions of prescription orders that have been entered into the system but do not have printed labels by the promised time.
  • Both not-ready and now-ready notification may occur in a number of ways such as, but not limited to, an automated telephone call with a prerecorded voice message to the patient, a page to the patient, a short message page to the patient, and e-mail.
  • FIGS. 12 and 13 illustrate some of the steps of an operating routine or subroutine 400 that may be stored in the memory of the controller 18 .
  • the routine 400 may be performed during operation of the Rx-ready manager 30 and may continue to run during normal operating hours of the pharmacy. While executing the routine 400 , the controller 18 may cause automated phone calls to be made to patients to inform them that their prescription is either not ready or ready. Accordingly, execution of the routine 400 may reduce the workload of the pharmacy staff members by replacing inconsistent, manual prescription not-ready and prescription ready phone calls with consistent, automatic phone calls to the patient. Thus, the quality of customer service provided to the patient may increase.
  • the controller 18 may determine whether the patient has requested that no phone calls be made to his/her primary phone number by the pharmacy staff members for each prescription/exception determined to be within the delta time-frame before the promised time (As previously mentioned, the pharmacy customer database stores information regarding the patient's preferences). If the patient has requested that no phone calls be made then all prescriptions associated with that patient may be exempt from the Rx-ready manager 30 . If the patient has not made a no-phone-calls request, the controller 18 at a block 414 may determine whether the patient's primary phone number is on record. If the patient's primary phone number is not on record, then all prescriptions associated with that patient may be exempt from the Rx-ready manager 30 unless the patient reveals his/her phone number.
  • the controller 18 at a block 416 may determine whether the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved or can be immediately resolved. If the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved or can be immediately resolved, the prescription is not a candidate for the Rx-ready manager 30 . If the exception associated with the prescription has not been resolved or cannot be immediately resolved, the controller 18 at a block 418 may determine whether the prescription has been sold or is ready for delivery to the patient. This type of situation may occur, for example, when a prescription with an MSC (miscellaneous) exception created by a pharmacy staff member is sold to the patient despite the exception or when the resolution status of the MSC exception may not have been properly logged into the prescription workflow.
  • MSC microcontroller
  • the prescription is not a candidate for the Rx-ready manager 30 . If the prescription has not been sold or is not ready for delivery to the patient then the prescription may be added to a not-ready list of prescriptions that are (1) not ready for patient pick-up and (2) have promised times that are within the preselected delta time frame at a block 420 .
  • the controller 18 at a block 422 may cause automated phone calls to be placed to the patients having prescriptions on the not-ready list to inform them that their prescription is “not ready.” If the not-ready phone call is not properly received, the controller 18 may cause additional phone calls to be placed to the patient's primary phone number until receipt of the not-ready phone call is acknowledged either by an answering machine or a person at the location having the primary phone number, or until a predetermined number of attempts have been made.
  • the controller 18 at a block 424 may determine whether the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved. If the exception associated with the prescription has not been resolved, the prescription is held in the prescription workflow 52 . However, if the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved, the controller 18 at a block 426 may determine whether the prescription is ready for delivery to the patient. If the prescription is not ready for delivery to the patient, the prescription is held in the prescription workflow 52 .
  • an automated phone call or other notification is placed to the patients having prescriptions on the now-ready list to inform them that their prescription is “now ready.” If the now-ready phone call is not received, the controller 18 may cause additional phone calls to be placed to the patient's primary phone number either until receipt of the now-ready phone call is acknowledged either by an answering machine or a person at the location having the primary phone number or until a predetermined number of attempts have been made.
  • routine 400 may also include steps to form a group of now-ready and not-ready prescriptions associated with the same primary phone number.
  • the controller 18 may not cause the automated now-ready phone call to be placed to the patient until all of the prescriptions in the group have attained a “now-ready” status. Grouping prescriptions this way may reduce the number of trips to the pharmacy by a patient to accept delivery of the prescriptions and may reduce the overall number of phone calls to the patient.
  • a summary status bar (i.e., referred to as a “dashboard” 40 , 42 displayed on the user interfaces 36 , 38 as described above) may provide an easy-to-read, up-to-date visual graphic display of data associated with the pharmacy, the prescription workflow 52 , and the performance of the pharmacy staff.
  • the dashboard 40 may be configured in a number of ways and may display various combinations of data, depending on the needs of the pharmacy and the pharmacy staff.
  • the dashboard 40 , 42 is divided into four areas: a gauge area 510 , an exceptions area 520 , an alerts area 530 , and a statistics area 540 .
  • the gauge area 510 may represent time-sensitive data and may be further divided into three sections: a promised time (PTIME) 512 section, a patient hold time (PAT) 514 section, and a prescriber hold time (PBR) 516 section. Based on the promised times, the PTIME 512 may be an indicator of the wait time associated with prescriptions for patients currently waiting in the pharmacy.
  • PTIME promised time
  • PAT patient hold time
  • PBR prescriber hold time
  • the PAT 514 may be configured to display current telephone hold times for patients requesting a prescription or for patients inquiring about a prescription.
  • the PAT 514 may be divided into three wedges, wedge #1, wedge #2, and wedge #3, with each wedge having a different color representing a different wait time range.
  • wedge #1 may be shown in green to represent a wait time of less than 10 seconds
  • wedge #2 may be shown in yellow to represent a wait time of between 11 and 20 seconds
  • wedge #3 may be shown in red to represent a wait time of greater than 20 seconds.
  • the PBR 516 may be divided into three wedges: wedge #1, wedge #2, and wedge #3, with each wedge having a different color representing a different wait-time range.
  • wedge #1 may be shown in green to represent a wait time of less than 10 seconds
  • wedge #2 may be shown in yellow to represent a wait time of between 11 and 20 seconds
  • wedge #3 may be shown in red to represent a wait time of greater than 20 seconds.
  • the exceptions area 520 may display a number of pushbuttons: pushbutton 522 , pushbutton 523 , pushbutton 524 , and pushbutton 525 , with each push button representing a category of promised times for a number of prescription/exceptions having promised times falling within a specific time range.
  • pushbutton 522 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times past the current time.
  • the graphic display shown in FIG. 7 may be displayed on the user interface 36 .
  • pushbutton 523 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than an hour from the current time.
  • Pushbutton 524 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than four hours from the current time.
  • Pushbutton 525 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than four hours from the current time.
  • the alerts area 530 may display alerts associated with operation of the pharmacy 6 .
  • the alerts area 530 may display an icon for e-mail (MAIL) 532 , messages generated by touch-tone prescription phone orders (MSGQ) 534 that could not be filled automatically, or EDI prescriptions that could not be filled automatically because, for example, the drug is discontinued.
  • MAIL icon for e-mail
  • MSGQ touch-tone prescription phone orders
  • EDI prescriptions that could not be filled automatically because, for example, the drug is discontinued.
  • the alerts area 530 may also display an icon for voice mail messages (VMX) 535 .
  • VMX voice mail messages
  • the MAIL 532 icon may alert the pharmacy staff that an e-mail has been received via an Internet prescription service.
  • the MAIL 532 icon may disappear when a pharmacy staff member opens the e-mail via the user interface or the workstation.
  • the statistics area 540 may also display a pushbutton. When selected, the pushbutton may cause data representing prescription statistics to be displayed on the user interface 36 .
  • the prescription statistics may include, but are not limited to, (1) the current time prescription statistics for entered, printed, ready, and sold prescriptions, (2) the prescriptions that were entered by not printed with promised times of less than an hour, less than four hours, and less than twenty-four hours, and (3) prescriptions printed and filled but not verified with promised times of less than an hour, less than four hours, and less than twenty-four hours.
  • the technique for automating the prescription workflow 52 from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient as described herein is particularly well suited to be implemented in software, it may be implemented in hardware, firmware, or by any other processor associated with the store.
  • the routines described herein may be implemented in a standard multi-purpose CPU or on specifically designed hardware or firmware as desired.
  • the software routine may be stored in any computer readable memory such as, but not limited to, a magnetic disk, a laser disk, and a RAM or ROM of a computer or processor.

Abstract

A method and an apparatus for processing a prescription order are described herein. A prescription label for the prescription order may be generated in response to receipt of the prescription order. The prescription label being generated in a priority order based on a plurality of pharmacy factors. The prescription order may be filled according to the priority order based on the plurality of pharmacy factors. Based on the prescription label, a plurality of graphic displays may be generated to verify the prescription order. The patient may be notified of the status of the prescription associated with the prescription order based on the plurality of graphic displays.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a non-provisional application claiming priority from Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/353,983, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Prescription Processing” filed Feb. 1, 2002.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure relates generally to pharmaceutical services, and more particularly to, a method and apparatus for processing a prescription from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient.
BACKGROUND
Pharmacies have traditionally used labor intensive methods of accepting, prioritizing, and dispensing prescriptions requested by patients, physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and others. For example, a typical prescription scenario may include a patient visiting a pharmacy to request that a prescription be filled. If the patient does not wait for the prescription to be filled then a subsequent phone call by a pharmacy staff member may notify the patient when the prescription has been filled and is ready for pick-up. A return visit by the patient to pickup the prescription may follow.
Each step of the typical prescription scenario requires interaction between the patient and the pharmacy staff. In addition, many steps are required to be performed by the pharmacy staff between the time that the prescription is ordered and the time the prescription is delivered to the patient. Upon receipt of the request, a variety of tasks may be performed such as, but not limited to, logging the prescription order into the prescription system, checking the availability of the drug for the prescription order, prioritizing in time the prescription order with other prescription orders, verifying insurance coverage, checking for the possibility of using a generic drug substitute, placing one or more phone calls to the prescriber, checking for the possibility of drug interactions, checking for a patient's drug sensitivity, dispensing the proper drug in the proper quantity, and printing and affixing labels to the prescription. Thus, the efficiency of the prescription workflow is important to the success and profitability of a pharmacy.
The safety of patients is also important to the success and profitability of the pharmacy. Ensuring patient safety requires that the pharmacy staff have expertise in a variety of areas. In addition to medical expertise, for example, a pharmacist must possess the organizational skills necessary to manage a high volume of prescriptions while ensuring that each patient's prescription is properly dispensed at the proper dosage level and in the proper amount. This requires a timely flow of both patient and prescription information in an easy-to-understand format to the pharmacy staff during the time between receiving the prescription order and delivering the prescription to the patient (“order-to-delivery”). Further, this also requires the timely flow of both patient and prescription information in an easy-to-understand format to the patient and the prescriber.
In addition to efficiency and patient safety, patient satisfaction and patient loyalty are important factors in determining the success of the pharmacy. Quick delivery of the prescription to the patient is one way of ensuring patient satisfaction. If quick delivery of the prescription is not possible then adherence to promised delivery time may suffice. In that case, the patient will know when he or she may pick-up the prescription. Accordingly, the patient will not have to make repeated trips to the pharmacy.
A few systems have been developed to assist pharmacy staffs in the tasks associated with accepting, prioritizing, and dispensing prescriptions. However, these systems have primarily been directed to discrete tasks such as allowing patient and prescriber access to prescription ordering using the Internet or e-mail. Further, current systems do not address the overall flow of the process from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a high level block diagram of a pharmacy network system;
FIG. 2 is a high level flowchart of a prescription workflow from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the electronic components of the controller shown schematically in FIG. 1;
FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 are three parts of a flowchart of a main routine that may be performed during operation of an automated label printing system;
FIGS. 7 and 8 are graphic displays to show the types and the numbers of priority exceptions;
FIGS. 9, 10, and 11 are graphic displays to show statistics of prescription orders;
FIGS. 12 and 13 are two parts of a flowchart of a main routine that may be performed during operation of an Rx-ready manager; and
FIG. 14 is a graphic display of a dashboard.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In general, the system described herein allows the pharmacy staff to efficiently manage a high volume prescription workload from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient and to maintain high patient safety standards. In operation, (1) a prescription order is received and entered into a prescription workflow or work queue, (2) based on numerous pharmacy factors, a promised time is calculated and assigned to the prescription or an override promised time is assigned based on information from the patient, and (3) the prescription is filled and verified. Any outstanding tasks or problems associated with the prescription (hereinafter referred to as “exceptions”) are timely displayed to the pharmacy staff in an easy-to-understand format to mitigate delays that may be associated with the exceptions.
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a pharmacy network system 2 constructed to manage a high volume prescription workload. Referring to FIG. 1, the pharmacy network system 2 may include multiple pharmacies or facilities, generally shown as 4 and 6, operatively coupled to a network 10 via multiple network data links 14, 16. The pharmacies 4, 6 may be located in different areas of the same city, in different cities, or in different states. The network 10 may be provided using a wide variety of techniques known to persons of ordinary skill in the art to transfer pharmacy data that includes, but is not limited to, prescription information, patient information, and provider information. For example, the network 10 may include, but is not limited to, dedicated access lines, plain ordinary telephone (POT) lines, satellite links, and combinations of such lines and/or links. The network 10 may also include a plurality of network computers or server computers (not shown), each of which may be operatively interconnected. Where the network 10 comprises the Internet, data communication may take place via the network data links 14, 16 in accordance with an Internet communication protocol.
The pharmacies 4, 6 are configured to facilitate a method for managing an efficient prescription workflow from receipt of a prescription order 8 to delivery of the prescription to a patient 9. FIG. 2 illustrates the steps of the prescription workflow 52 from receipt of the prescription order 8 at a block 54 to delivery of the prescription to the patient 9 at a block 68. Upon receipt of the prescription order at the block 54, the prescription order enters the prescription workflow 52 at a block 56 in one of a number of ways, depending on how the prescription order was received. For example, the prescription order may enter the prescription workflow 52 via manual entry by a pharmacy staff member, via an electronic data interchange (EDI) transmission from a physician's office, via an Internet entry by a patient (e.g., www.walgreens.com), or via a touch-tone telephone prescription entry by the patient. In addition, the prescription order may enter into the prescription workflow 52 via automatic entry, i.e., set up in a pharmacy system computer to automatically initiate a refill of a prescription when a predetermined number of days has elapsed since the last delivery to the patient.
After the prescription order has been entered into the prescription workflow 52 at the block 56, the prescription order and other associated prescription information (i.e., prescription drug information, patient information, prescriber information, and special instructions) are routed to an automated label printing scheduler (ALPS, which is shown as 26 in FIG. 1) at a block 58 (discussed below in connection with FIGS. 4, 5, and 6). At the block 58, the ALPS 26 may produce a printed prescription label having a front side and a back side that includes, but is not limited to, a bar code associated with the prescription order. The time at which the prescription label is automatically printed is based on a number of factors such as, but not limited to, the promised time for delivery of the prescription to the patient, the current volume of additional prescription orders to be prepared in a 24-hour time period, an identification parameter associated with the patient such as the patient's primary phone number or last name, and the pharmacy workload (i.e., whether is pharmacy is experiencing peak prescription traffic hours).
Based on the chronological order that the prescription labels were printed, a pharmacist or a pharmacy technician fills the prescription orders corresponding to the printed prescription labels at a block 60. Thus, the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescription order is filled relative to other prescription orders in addition to printing the prescription labels. After the labeled prescription is filled at the block 60, the prescription is verified by a pharmacist at a block 62. The verification step includes, inter alia, a bar code scan that produces a visual display of patient/prescription information on a graphic user interface (GUI) that is reviewed and compared to the filled prescription by the pharmacist to ensure patient safety. Upon completion of the verification step, the prescription is ready for patient pick-up at a block 64 if there are no unresolved tasks or problems associated with filling and verifying the prescription order (hereinafter referred to as “exceptions” discussed in connection with FIGS. 7 and 8). If the prescription is picked-up by the patient, the patient's family member, or friend within 24 hours of being ready or after its promised time, the prescription has been “delivered” to the patient at a block 68. However, if the prescription is not picked-up by the patient, the patient's family member, or friend within 24 hours of being ready or after its promised time, the patient is notified that the prescription is ready for pick-up at a block 70.
The occurrence of an exception(s) may have a delaying effect on the overall prescription workflow. The length of the delay is typically related to pharmacy staff handling of the exception. For example, if a third party insurance company indicates that it will deny payment for the prescription, a pharmacy staff member often may notify the patient to arrange alternate payment methods. In some cases, the time delay introduced by the required notification to the patient increases the overall time period between receipt of the prescription order and delivery of the prescription to the patient, which adversely affects delivery of the prescription before or at the prescription's promised time.
However, timely notification to the patient is often contingent on the availability of the relevant information to a pharmacy staff member, which requires that the relevant information be presented to the pharmacy staff member quickly and in an easy-to-understand format. Thus, efficiently and affectively presenting “exception” information to the pharmacy staff member enables quick notification to the patient to prevent payment delays associated with third-party payment denials.
In some cases, possible drug interaction between the patient's prescription and the patient's current medication may be uncovered. Immediate notification of the possible drug interaction is necessary—both to the pharmacy staff member and the patient. Obviously, presenting the drug interaction information to the pharmacy staff member in an easy-to-understand format may mitigate possible delays associated with notifying the patient and/or the patient's prescription.
Referring again to FIG. 1, the pharmacy 6 of the pharmacy network system 2 includes a controller 18 operatively connected to workstations, generally shown as 20 and 22, via a network link 23. The network link 23 may be a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), or any other type of network known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. The workstation 20 includes a user interface (U/I) 36 configured to assist pharmacy staff members in performing their duties and to display graphics. Similarly, the workstation 22 includes a user interface 38. Further, a central pharmacy database (not shown) configured to store patient information (e.g., customer preferences, and other drugs the patient may be taking) is operatively coupled to the controller 18.
The pharmacy 6 also includes a pharmacy logistical organizer 24, an ALPS 26 operatively coupled to a printer 27, an exception manager 28, and a prescription-ready manager (Rx-ready manager) 30 operatively coupled to a public switched telephone network (PSTN) 32. The printer 27 may be any type of printer capable of generating prescription labels and associated prescription information (e.g., a laser printer).
Although the pharmacy logistical organizer 24, the ALPS 26, the exception manager 28, and the Rx-ready manager 30 are shown as being operatively connected to the controller 18, those components of the pharmacy 6 may reside as software within the controller 18 (i.e., stored on a tangible medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), or a memory). In addition, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that one or more of the pharmacy logistical organizer 24, the ALPS 26, the exception manager 28, and the Rx-ready manager 30 could alternatively be implemented by hardware and/or firmware in a well known manner.
In particular, the pharmacy logistical organizer 24 is representative of a method for coordinating the steps (see FIG. 2) of managing the prescription workflow from receipt of each prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient while maintaining high patient safety standards. The ALPS 26 is representative of a method for automatically prioritizing prescription orders based on a number of factors, and directing the printer 27 to print the correct number of prescription labels at the correct time in batches based on the priority of the prescription orders. Accordingly, operation of the ALPS 26 contributes to ensuring a steady prescription workflow throughout the day. The exception manager 28 is representative of a method for automatically identifying and ranking prescription orders which have one or more exceptions (hereinafter referred to as a “prescription/exception”) that must be resolved prior to prescription delivery to the patient. For example, a prescription/exception may include a prescription refill that requires a doctor's approval before filling. The exception manager 28 will automatically assign a higher priority to a prescription/exception scheduled for patient pick-up within the hour than it will assign to a same prescription/exception scheduled for patient pick-up the following day. Thus, the exception manager 28 assists the pharmacy staff with task prioritization in a high volume prescription workflow environment of the pharmacy 6.
The Rx-ready manager 30 is representative of a method for automatic patient notification when the patient's prescription will not be ready for pick-up at its promised time (i.e., a not-ready notification). Prescriptions that are candidates for the Rx-ready manager 30 include (1) those prescriptions/exceptions that were not resolved prior to their promise time, (2) those prescriptions which have printed labels and have been filled but are not yet verified by their promised time, and (3) those prescriptions entered into the system but do not have a printed label by their promised time. The Rx-ready manager 30 is also configured to automatically notify patients who have been previously notified of a not-ready status of their prescription but now their prescription is ready for pick-up (i.e., a now-ready notification). Both the not-ready and now-ready notification occur in any number of ways such as, but not limited to, an automated telephone call to deliver a pre-recorded voice message to the patient, a page to the patient, a short message page to the patient, and e-mail.
Referring again to FIG. 1, a summary status bar (hereinafter referred to as a “dashboard”) is displayed on the user interfaces 36, 38 or workstations 20, 22. A dashboard 40 displayed on the user interface 36 and/or a dashboard 42 displayed on the user interface 38 may provide a visual status of prescription orders currently in the prescription workflow 52. The dashboards 40, 42 (shown in detail in FIG. 14) may be configured in any manner suitable to provide an easy-to-understand visual display of the prescription workflow 52. For example, the dashboards 40, 42, may display a status of all prescription/exceptions having promised times of less than an hour or less than four hours. The selected time intervals may be determined by either the exception manager 26 or a pharmacy staff member. The dashboards 40, 42 may provide an easy-to-understand indication of the duration that prescribers are on telephone hold, and awaiting a response from a pharmacy staff member. Further, the dashboards 40, 42 may provide an indication of the duration that patients are on telephone hold awaiting a response from a pharmacy staff member.
Although the pharmacy data network 2 is shown to include one network 10 and two pharmacies 4, 6, it should be understood that different numbers of networks including different numbers of network computers (not shown) and different numbers of pharmacies may be utilized. For example, the network 10 may include multiple network computers operatively coupled to hundreds or thousands of stores.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the electronic components of the controller 18 shown schematically in FIG. 1. The controller 18 may include a program memory 80, a micro-controller or a microprocessor (MP) 82, a random access memory (RAM) 84, and an input/output (I/O) circuit 86, all of which may be interconnected via an address/data bus 88. It should be appreciated that although only one microprocessor 82 is shown, the controller 18 may include multiple microprocessors. Similarly, the memory of the controller 18 may include multiple RAMs (one shown as 84) and multiple programs memories (one shown as 80). The RAM(s) and programs memories may be implemented as semiconductor memories, magnetically readable memories, and/or optically readable memories. Although the I/O circuit 86 is shown as a single block, it should be appreciated that the I/O circuit 86 may include a number of different types of I/O circuits. In addition, the controller 18 may be operatively connected to the network 10 via the network data link 16, which may or may not be part of a WAN or a LAN. Further, the controller 18 is operatively coupled to the user interfaces 36, 38.
One manner in which one or more of the pharmacies may optimize a prescription workflow 52 from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient is described below in connection with a number of flow charts, which represent a number of portions or routines of one or more computer programs that may be stored in one or more of the memories in the controller 18. The computer program portions or routines may be written at any high level language such as, but not limited to, C, C++, C#, and Java, or any low-level, assembly or machine language. By storing the computer program portions or routines therein, various portions of the memories are physically and/or structurally configured in accordance with the computer program instructions.
Operation of the Automated Label Printing Manager
FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 illustrate some of the steps of an operating routine or subroutine 100 that may be stored in the memory of the controller 18. The routine 100 may be performed during operation of the ALPS 26 and may continue to run during normal operating hours of the pharmacy. While executing the routine 100, the controller 18 may cause an adjustable amount of prescription labels to be printed to ensure a steady organized flow of the overall prescription workflow 52. The adjustment to the label printing amount is predicated on a number of factors, which primarily includes whether the pharmacy is experiencing a peak operation period.
As previously described, the order in which prescription labels are printed by the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescriptions are subsequently filled and verified with the assumption that the drugs are available. The label print order is based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, promised times for prescription delivery to patients, the peak prescription workflow period for that particular pharmacy, pharmacy operation hours, the number of batches of prescription labels printed per hour, and the number of prescriptions labels printed per batch. Thus, the ALPS 26 provides a fully automated label scheduling and printing system that translates into steady pharmacy workflow throughout the day for a pharmacy with traditional hours of operation. The ALPS 26 also provides a fully automated label scheduling and printing system that translates into an adjustable pharmacy workflow throughout a 24-hour time period required for a pharmacy that is opened 24 hours.
Referring to FIG. 4, the routine 100 begins operation at a block 102 to determine if the prescription order 8 has been entered into the prescription workflow 52. For example, the prescription order 8 has been entered into the prescription workflow 52 when the prescription order 8 has been assigned an “Entered” status on the pharmacy work queue. Otherwise, the prescription order 8 is entered into the prescription workflow 52 at a block 104. After the prescription order 8 is entered into the prescription workflow 52, the controller 18 at a block 106 may determine whether a promised time has been calculated and assigned to the prescription 9 associated with the prescription order 8 (e.g., the prescription 9 will be ready in 20 minutes). If the promised time has been calculated and assigned, the promised time is compared with the current time at a block 108. If the controller 18 determines that the promised time falls within the next 24-hour time period at a block 109, the prescription 9 is considered for printing (i.e., a prescription label and instructions for the prescription 9 are printed by the printer 27). If the promised time is outside of the 24-hour time period, the prescription 9 is not considered for printing.
After the promised time of the prescription 9 is determined to fall within the 24-hour time period, the controller 18 at a block 110 may determine whether the promise time is past the current time by less than a predetermined time range (e.g., the promised time for delivery of the prescription 9 is within the next 30 minutes). If the promised time is past the current time (i.e., delivery of the prescription 9 is due shortly), the controller 18 at a block 112 directs the ALPS 26 to print the prescription label for the prescription 9 in the next printing of a batch of prescription labels. Thus, the prescription label for the prescription 9 would be among the next batch of printed prescription labels printed by the printer 27.
Referring back to the block 110, if the controller 18 determines that the promised time is past the current time by more than the predetermined time range (e.g., the promised time for delivery of the prescription 9 is beyond the next 30 minute window), the controller 18 at a block 114 may determine if the current time falls within a peak prescription workflow time period. If the controller 18 at a block 116 determines that the current time is within the peak prescription workflow period, the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be printed in the next printing batch of prescription labels. For example, if the peak prescription workflow period is between the hours of 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. and a prescription 9 has a promised time past the current time by more than the predetermined time range, the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be considered for printing until the peak period has elapsed.
As soon as the peak period elapses, prescriptions having promise times past the current time by more than the predetermined time range will be considered for label printing. Next, the controller 18 at a block 118 may determine whether a predetermined wait time (e.g., 15 minutes) has elapsed since the previous batch of printed labels. If the predetermined wait time has not elapsed, the controller 18 proceeds to the block 116 and the prescription label for the prescription 9 will not be considered for printing. However, if the predetermined wait time has elapsed, the controller 18 may consider printing the prescription label for the prescription 9 in the next batch of printed labels. The decision to print the prescription label for the prescription 9 in the next batch of printed labels is based on a number of prescription labels to be printed in that next print batch.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that other methods of performing the routine 100 are contemplated. For example, some of the blocks may be changed, the order of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or some of the blocks described may be optional. In addition, the routine 100 may include blocks that group prescriptions associated with the same primary phone number (indicating the same patient or patients living in the same household) so that the prescription labels for the group prescriptions may be printed in the same batch of prescription labels. In addition to enhancing pharmacy staff efficiency, grouping prescriptions in this way may reduce the number of trips to the pharmacy by a patient to accept delivery of the prescriptions.
Returning back to the block 106 (shown in FIG. 4), FIG. 5 illustrates the steps to calculate the promised time of the prescription 9 entered into the prescription workflow 52 in further detail. Referring to FIG. 5, the controller 18 at a block 106 may determine that the entered prescription has not been assigned a promised time. Accordingly, the controller 18 at a block 120 may determine if one or more prescription labels have been printed during a recent predetermined time span (e.g., previous 90 minutes).
If the controller 18 determines that the prescription label(s) were not printed during the recent predetermined time span, the controller 18 proceeds to the block 120 until the prescription label(s) were printed during the recent predetermined time span. If the controller 18 determines that the prescription label(s) were printed during the recent predetermined time span, the controller 18 at a block 122 may determine if a predetermined wait period has elapsed since a previous calculation of a promised time. For example, the controller 18 may calculate prescription delivery promised times every 5 minutes to ensure that the promised times reflect up-to-date calculation variables (e.g., the number of prescriptions requested, and the number of patients waiting in the pharmacy). If the predetermined wait period has elapsed, the controller 18 at a block 124 may identify the prescription labels printed during the recent predetermined time span (e.g., 90 minutes) (hereinafter referred to as a “group of labels”).
Next, the controller 18 at a block 126 may identify those prescription labels from the group of labels that have been verified by a pharmacist and assigned a “verified” status. As previously described, a prescription label is assigned a “verified” status upon completion of a verification process by the pharmacist. The verification process includes, but is not limited to, scanning a prescription label bar code on the prescription label to cause a screen of prescription/patient information to be display on the user interface 36, inspecting the displayed prescription/patient information, and acknowledging the correctness of the displayed prescription/patient information such as contents of the prescription.
Based on the number of verified labels of the group of labels, the controller 18 at a block 128 may determine an average print-to-verified time (i.e., the average time between printing the prescription labels and verifying the prescription labels during recent pharmacy conditions). At a block 130, a “verification time estimate” is calculated by adding a buffer time period (e.g., 3 minutes) to the average print-to-verified time to allow for miscellaneous tasks. The buffer time is selected to include a time period for entering the prescription plus a time period to prepare the prescription for sale after it has been verified. The verification time estimate is added to the current time to form an “approximate promise time” at a block 132. Finally, the approximate promise time is converted to the “prescription promised time” at a block 134 by rounding up the approximate promised time to a new time, wherein the new time represents the beginning of a next set of predetermined time increments. For example, rounding up an approximate promise time of 3:16 pm to a new time of 3:20 p.m., wherein the new time of 3:20 marks the beginning of the next five-minute increment of a set of 12 five-minute increments for each hour. Based on recent past data, the resulting prescription promised time is used by the controller 18 to determine which prescription labels are to be printed in the immediate future.
FIG. 6 illustrates the steps to determine the number of prescription labels to be printed (hereinafter referred to as a “label print number calculation”). Referring to the block 118 (shown in FIG. 4), the prescription labels to be printed are associated with prescriptions having a promised time past the current time by more than the predetermined time range. Referring to FIG. 6, the controller 18 performs a label print number calculation based on a number of factors such as, but not limited to, the number of prescriptions in the prescription workflow, the pharmacy hours of operation, and the number of times per hour the label print number calculation is performed.
If the controller 18 at a block 140 determines that the predetermined wait time (e.g., 15 minutes) has elapsed subsequent to the previous prescription label print batch, the controller 18 may determine the number of prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) an “entered” status. Next, the controller 18 at a block 142 may determine the hours of operation of the pharmacy (i.e., when the pharmacy is open). At a block 144, the controller 18 may subtract a preselected number of hours from the number of hours that the pharmacy is open to form a “reduced number”. For example, if the pharmacy is opened from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (i.e., twelve hours), the controller 18 at the block 144 may reduce that number by a preselected number such as four to reduce the hours of operation to eight hours, which is the number of hours that the pharmacy is open. The controller 18 at a block 146 may determine the number of times the label print number calculation is performed in an hour.
At a block 148, the number of prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) the “entered” status is divided by the reduced number to yield an estimated number of prescriptions per hour. The estimated number of prescriptions per hour is then divided by the number of times the label print number calculation is performed in an hour at a block 150. The resulting number (i.e., the “label print number”) represents the number of labels to be printed in the next batch of printed prescription labels.
Next, the controller 18 at a block 152 may sort the prescriptions having (1) a promised time during the next 24-hour time period and (2) the “entered” status in ascending order of their prescription promised time. Finally, a number of prescription labels equivalent to the label print number is printed in ascending order of their associated prescription promised times at a block 154. In addition, prescriptions having (1) promised times during the next 24-hour time period, (2) the “entered” status, and (3) the same primary phone number may have their prescription labels printed in the same batch of prescription labels.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that other methods of performing label print number calculation are contemplated. For example, some of the blocks may be changed, the order of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or some of the blocks described may be optional.
As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, the particular arrangement of the sections of the prescription label along with numerous variations may be created. The prescription label for the prescription 9 may be a two-sided prescription label having a front side and a back side printed by the printer 27. The front side may include a bar code used by the pharmacist to verify the prescription/patient information. The front side may also include, but is not limited to, the patient's primary phone number, the patient's address, the prescription's promised time of delivery to the patient, prescription instructions and warning labels, and general consumer drug information.
The back side may include a copy of some of the information displayed on the front side including the bar code, and the patient's primary phone number. In addition, a pharmacy or store logo may be included on the back side. Additional useful information such as, but not limited to, the prescription drug name, a common drug use comment, prescription drug usage information, a list of cautions, a list of possible side effects, as well as any additional notes may be included by the pharmacy. Thus, the front side and back side of the two-sided prescription label may contain the necessary information for tracking, verifying, and filling the prescription as well as provide a way to transmit pertinent information to the patient. Additional details on the two-sided prescription label may be found in the patent application entitled “Duplex Pharmacy Label and Method,” having U.S. Ser. No. 10/022,583, filed on Dec. 17, 2001, and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
As previously mentioned, the timing of the printing of the two-sided prescription label is determined by the ALSP 26. Therefore, the ALPS 26 may provide automatic printing of the optimal number of prescription labels based on the “promised times” and the current number of prescriptions to be printed during the next 24-hour time period. Further, the ALPS 26 may enable a steady flow of prescription fills based upon the printing time of the prescription labels.
Operation of the Exception Manager
As discussed in connection with FIG. 2, a prescription order 8 is received and entered into the prescription workflow 52. Accordingly, automatic printing of a prescription label for the prescription 9 associated with the prescription order 8 is directed by the ALPS 26 based on a number of factors as discussed above. Optimally, the order in which the prescription label for the prescription 9 is printed by the ALPS 26 determines the order in which the prescription 9 is filled and verified. However, exceptions (i.e., unresolved tasks associated with filling and verifying the prescription) may prevent the prescription 9 from being timely filled, verified, and/or delivered to the patient. For example, the exceptions include a need to call a medical doctor to renew the patient's prescription, to await a call back from the medical doctor, or to re-call the medical doctor. The exceptions may also include verifying the patient's insurance coverage, which may require a call to or from a third party insurance provider. Further, the exceptions may include a need to research a possible drug interaction between the prescription ordered and other prescriptions that the patient is currently taking. Other exceptions may involve a requirement to check possible generic drug substitutes or a situation where only a portion of the prescription is available for immediate dispensing to the patient. In addition, there are numerous other possible exceptions that may prevent the prescription from being timely filled, verified, and/or delivered to the patient, and which may fall into a catch-all category hereinafter referred to as a miscellaneous category.
One method for noting an exception(s) associated with a prescription is to use short identifiers such as acronyms or abbreviations. For example, a list of exceptions with their associated abbreviations is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Type of Exception Identifier
Call medical Dr. CMD
Dr. will call back WCB
Re-call medical Dr. RMD
Third-party insurance rejection TPR
Prescription is out of stock OOS
Generic substitute is available GEN
Prescription may only be partially filled PFL
Miscellaneous MSC
Drug utilization review for drug interaction needs to be DUR
completed
Of course, manual tracking of the exception(s) associated with a prescription consumes a substantial amount of the pharmacy staff's time. The exception manager 28 (FIG. 2) operates to reduce the amount of pharmacy staff time required to track the exceptions to their conclusion. After an exception has been attached to a prescription, the exception manager 28 allows automatic priority ranking and identifying of prescription/exceptions to be resolved prior to prescription delivery to the patient. The exception may be attached to the prescription either manually by the pharmacy staff as in the case of a miscellaneous exception or automatically as in the case where a shortage of a particular drug has been identified at the step of entering the prescription order into the prescription workflow 52 (e.g., identified as a zero stock status within the inventory of the pharmacy).
Because resolution of an exception becomes more critical as the promised time draws near, the exception manager 28 is configured to allow a pharmacy staff member to quickly identify and resolve prescription/exceptions that have promised times within a specified time duration (e.g., within 75 minutes of the promised time). Once identified as a prescription/exception having a promised time with the specified time duration, the prescription is termed a “priority exception.”
Access to information associated with the priority exceptions may be accomplished via a user interface such as the user interface 36 shown in FIG. 1. When prompted by a pharmacy staff member via executing a key stroke on a workstation keyboard, the user interface 36 may display one or more graphics displaying information associated with the priority exception. The graphic may also include the steps necessary to resolve the priority exception. In addition, the information associated with the priority exception shown in the graphic display may be posted on the user interface 36 in priority order of the nearest promised time. For example, a priority exception that is closest to its promised time will be displayed first, followed by a priority exception that is second closest to its promised time, and so on.
The user interface 36 may be used to post prescription/exceptions including priority exceptions. That is, the user interface 36 may provide, but not limited to, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of priority exceptions that have promised times in less than an hour, a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that have promised times in less than four hours, and a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that have promised times in less than 24 hours. Referring to FIG. 7, for example, the user interface 36 may provide a bar graph showing the types and numbers of prescription/exceptions that are past their promised time.
Further, the user interface 36 may provide a graphic display to show information associated with a priority exception. Referring to FIG. 8, for example, the graphic display 300 may show information associated with a prescription having the CMD (call medical doctor) exception. The exemplary graphic display 300 may include, but is not limited to, patient contact information 302, the promised time 304, a prescription identifier number 306, the exception type 308, and resolution instructions 310 to the pharmacy staff member providing the step(s) necessary to resolve the exception. The user interface 36 may provide a graphic display to show information associated with other priority exceptions such as, but not limited to, the TPR exception, the MSC exception, the GEN exception, and the DUR exception.
As noted above, priority exceptions past their promised time are referred to as “priority prescriptions.” Priority prescriptions also include those prescriptions past their promised time that have been entered into the prescription workflow but do not have printed labels. Further, priority prescriptions may also include those prescriptions past their promised time that have had prescription labels printed and have been filled but have not been verified.
In addition to providing priority and status to a pharmacy staff member, the graphic displays of priority exceptions represented by FIGS. 7 and 8 are configured to prompt the pharmacy staff member viewing the display to call and notify the patient of the status of his/her prescription. Thus, the pharmacy staff member may be able to prioritize tasks associated with the prescription workflow 52 efficiently to resolve prescription exceptions and to reduce inconvenience to the patient.
Another type of graphic display, hereinafter referred to as a “statistics display” is provided by the exception manager 28 to present a quick status of all prescription orders in the prescription workflow to the pharmacy staff (e.g., outstanding prescription orders). For example, a graphic display 350 shown in FIG. 9 may provide the number of prescription orders that have entered into the prescription workflow 52, the number of prescription labels printed by the printer 27, the number of prescriptions ready for patient pick-up, and the number of prescriptions sold. In another example, selection of an “Entered Not Printed” tab may provide a graphic display 360 as shown in FIG. 10. The graphic display 360 may provide a status of a number of prescription orders that have been entered into the prescription workflow 52 but do not have printed prescription labels for the prescriptions. Thus, those prescriptions have not been filled or verified (i.e., Entered Not Printed). The prescriptions may be grouped based on their promised times (e.g., prescriptions having promised times in less than an hour, prescriptions having promised times in less than four hours, and prescriptions having promised times in less than 24 hours). Alternatively, selection of a “Printed Not Verified” tab may provide a graphic display 370 as shown in FIG. 11. The graphic display 370 may provide the number of prescription orders that have been entered into the prescription workflow 52 and the prescriptions have been filled but have not yet been verified. Thus, the statistics of the graphic displays 350, 360, 370 illustrated by FIGS. 9-11 may provide another tool for pharmacy staff members to prioritize tasks associated with the prescription workflow 52.
Therefore, the exception manager 28 may automatically “serve up” the highest priority (based on the promised time) prescription with an exception to the pharmacy staff members to allow resolution of the exception or to prompt notification to the patient as to when the prescription may be ready for pick-up.
Operation of the Rx Ready Manager
As described above in FIG. 2, the exception manager 28 provides graphic displays showing prescription/exception information including text instructions that notify the pharmacy staff member of the steps necessary to resolve the exception and to move the prescription order along in the prescription workflow. For example, the instructions may prompt a pharmacy staff member to call and notify the patient of the status of his/her prescription. Although the pharmacy staff member is provided with instructions to resolve the exception to save valuable staff time, the pharmacy staff member is required to perform an additional task. That is, the pharmacy staff member must manually place a phone call to the patient to notify him/her of the not-ready status of the prescription.
The addition of the Rx-ready manager 30 as shown in FIG. 2 enables automatic notification to a patient when a prescription will not be ready for pick-up at the promised time. The Rx-ready manager 30 is also configured to automatically notify patients, who have been previously notified of the not-ready status of his/her prescription, that his/her prescription is now ready for pick-up. The workload of the pharmacy staff members may decrease by automating the not-ready and now-ready phone calls, which were previously made by manually calling the patients. In addition, the number of patients served may increase by providing the not-ready and now-ready phone calls as needed rather than being part of the standard procedure. Prescriptions that are candidates for the Rx-ready manager 30 may include, but are not limited to, (1) prescriptions with exceptions that were not resolved prior to the promised time, (2) prescriptions that have printed labels and have been filled but have not been verified by the promised time, and (3) prescriptions of prescription orders that have been entered into the system but do not have printed labels by the promised time. Both not-ready and now-ready notification may occur in a number of ways such as, but not limited to, an automated telephone call with a prerecorded voice message to the patient, a page to the patient, a short message page to the patient, and e-mail.
FIGS. 12 and 13 illustrate some of the steps of an operating routine or subroutine 400 that may be stored in the memory of the controller 18. The routine 400 may be performed during operation of the Rx-ready manager 30 and may continue to run during normal operating hours of the pharmacy. While executing the routine 400, the controller 18 may cause automated phone calls to be made to patients to inform them that their prescription is either not ready or ready. Accordingly, execution of the routine 400 may reduce the workload of the pharmacy staff members by replacing inconsistent, manual prescription not-ready and prescription ready phone calls with consistent, automatic phone calls to the patient. Thus, the quality of customer service provided to the patient may increase.
The routine 400 begins at a block 402 where the controller 18 may determine whether the current time is within a predetermined time window, (e.g., a window of time between 10 a.m. and 9 p.m). If the current time is not within the predetermined time window, the controller 18 may not proceed to the next step of the routine 400. However, if the current time is within a predetermined time window, the controller 18 at a block 404 may determine whether the current time is one of a number of preselected times within the predetermined time window. The preselected times within the predetermined time window may include, for example, the times of 10:01 a.m., 10:16 a.m., 10:31 a.m., 10:46 a.m., 11:01 a.m., and so on until the predetermined time window has elapsed. If the current time is not one of the preselected times within the predetermined time window, the controller 18 may not proceed to the next step of the routine 400.
If the current time is one of the preselected times within the predetermined time window, the controller 18 may conduct a systematic search for prescription/exceptions that may require a phone call to the patient (e.g., a not-ready phone call or a now-ready phone call). The controller 18 at a block 406 may determine the prescription/exceptions with the current time being within a delta time-frame before the promised time of the prescription. The delta time-frame may be any suitable time-frame that is preselected to allow the pharmacy staff ample time to resolve the exception(s) while at the same time, to enable notification to the patient in a timely manner. For example, if 60 minutes is selected as the delta time-frame, a prescription/exception having a promised time of 45 minutes may be determined by the controller 18 as being a prescription/exception that is within a preselected delta time-frame before the promised time of the prescription.
Referring to FIG. 13, the controller 18 may determine whether the patient has requested that no phone calls be made to his/her primary phone number by the pharmacy staff members for each prescription/exception determined to be within the delta time-frame before the promised time (As previously mentioned, the pharmacy customer database stores information regarding the patient's preferences). If the patient has requested that no phone calls be made then all prescriptions associated with that patient may be exempt from the Rx-ready manager 30. If the patient has not made a no-phone-calls request, the controller 18 at a block 414 may determine whether the patient's primary phone number is on record. If the patient's primary phone number is not on record, then all prescriptions associated with that patient may be exempt from the Rx-ready manager 30 unless the patient reveals his/her phone number.
Next, the controller 18 at a block 416 may determine whether the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved or can be immediately resolved. If the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved or can be immediately resolved, the prescription is not a candidate for the Rx-ready manager 30. If the exception associated with the prescription has not been resolved or cannot be immediately resolved, the controller 18 at a block 418 may determine whether the prescription has been sold or is ready for delivery to the patient. This type of situation may occur, for example, when a prescription with an MSC (miscellaneous) exception created by a pharmacy staff member is sold to the patient despite the exception or when the resolution status of the MSC exception may not have been properly logged into the prescription workflow. If the prescription/exception has been sold or is ready for delivery to the patient, the prescription is not a candidate for the Rx-ready manager 30. If the prescription has not been sold or is not ready for delivery to the patient then the prescription may be added to a not-ready list of prescriptions that are (1) not ready for patient pick-up and (2) have promised times that are within the preselected delta time frame at a block 420. Finally, the controller 18 at a block 422 may cause automated phone calls to be placed to the patients having prescriptions on the not-ready list to inform them that their prescription is “not ready.” If the not-ready phone call is not properly received, the controller 18 may cause additional phone calls to be placed to the patient's primary phone number until receipt of the not-ready phone call is acknowledged either by an answering machine or a person at the location having the primary phone number, or until a predetermined number of attempts have been made.
After receipt of the not-ready phone call is acknowledged, the controller 18 at a block 424 may determine whether the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved. If the exception associated with the prescription has not been resolved, the prescription is held in the prescription workflow 52. However, if the exception associated with the prescription has been resolved, the controller 18 at a block 426 may determine whether the prescription is ready for delivery to the patient. If the prescription is not ready for delivery to the patient, the prescription is held in the prescription workflow 52. However, if the prescription is ready for delivery to the patient (e.g., has a fill_status=Ready) then at a block 428, the prescription is added to a now-ready list of prescriptions that (1) have had previous automated not-ready phone calls made to the patient, and (2) are currently ready for delivery to the patient. Finally, at a block 430, an automated phone call or other notification is placed to the patients having prescriptions on the now-ready list to inform them that their prescription is “now ready.” If the now-ready phone call is not received, the controller 18 may cause additional phone calls to be placed to the patient's primary phone number either until receipt of the now-ready phone call is acknowledged either by an answering machine or a person at the location having the primary phone number or until a predetermined number of attempts have been made.
It should be noted that the routine 400 may also include steps to form a group of now-ready and not-ready prescriptions associated with the same primary phone number. In that case, the controller 18 may not cause the automated now-ready phone call to be placed to the patient until all of the prescriptions in the group have attained a “now-ready” status. Grouping prescriptions this way may reduce the number of trips to the pharmacy by a patient to accept delivery of the prescriptions and may reduce the overall number of phone calls to the patient.
Dashboard Display
As mentioned above, pharmacy staff efficiency and customer satisfaction are at their highest levels when the prescription workflow is timely and patient information is made available to the pharmacy staff in an easy to understand format. A summary status bar (i.e., referred to as a “dashboard” 40, 42 displayed on the user interfaces 36, 38 as described above) may provide an easy-to-read, up-to-date visual graphic display of data associated with the pharmacy, the prescription workflow 52, and the performance of the pharmacy staff.
Although only one dashboard configuration is described herein, the dashboard 40 may be configured in a number of ways and may display various combinations of data, depending on the needs of the pharmacy and the pharmacy staff. Referring to FIG. 14, the dashboard 40, 42 is divided into four areas: a gauge area 510, an exceptions area 520, an alerts area 530, and a statistics area 540. The gauge area 510 may represent time-sensitive data and may be further divided into three sections: a promised time (PTIME) 512 section, a patient hold time (PAT) 514 section, and a prescriber hold time (PBR) 516 section. Based on the promised times, the PTIME 512 may be an indicator of the wait time associated with prescriptions for patients currently waiting in the pharmacy. The PTIME 512 may also reflect those prescriptions printed and verified during the previous ninety-minute time span. Thus, the PTIME 512 is a partial summary of the promised times generated by the ALPS 26 as discussed above. The PTIME 512 may be further divided into three wedges: wedge #1, wedge #2, and wedge #3, with each wedge having a different color representing a different wait time range. For example, wedge #1 may be shown in green to represent a wait time of less than or equal to 15 minutes, wedge #2 may be shown in yellow to represent a wait time of between 15 minutes and less than or equal to 30 minutes, and wedge #3 may be shown in red to represent a wait time of greater than 30 minutes.
The PAT 514 may be configured to display current telephone hold times for patients requesting a prescription or for patients inquiring about a prescription. As with the PTIME 512, the PAT 514 may be divided into three wedges, wedge #1, wedge #2, and wedge #3, with each wedge having a different color representing a different wait time range. For example, wedge #1 may be shown in green to represent a wait time of less than 10 seconds, wedge #2 may be shown in yellow to represent a wait time of between 11 and 20 seconds, and wedge #3 may be shown in red to represent a wait time of greater than 20 seconds. Similarly, the PBR 516 may be divided into three wedges: wedge #1, wedge #2, and wedge #3, with each wedge having a different color representing a different wait-time range. For example, wedge #1 may be shown in green to represent a wait time of less than 10 seconds, wedge #2 may be shown in yellow to represent a wait time of between 11 and 20 seconds, and wedge #3 may be shown in red to represent a wait time of greater than 20 seconds.
The exceptions area 520 may display a number of pushbuttons: pushbutton 522, pushbutton 523, pushbutton 524, and pushbutton 525, with each push button representing a category of promised times for a number of prescription/exceptions having promised times falling within a specific time range. For example, pushbutton 522 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times past the current time. When the pushbutton 522 is selected, the graphic display shown in FIG. 7 may be displayed on the user interface 36. Similarly, pushbutton 523 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than an hour from the current time. Pushbutton 524 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than four hours from the current time. Pushbutton 525 may represent the prescriptions with exceptions having promised times less than four hours from the current time.
The alerts area 530 may display alerts associated with operation of the pharmacy 6. For example, the alerts area 530 may display an icon for e-mail (MAIL) 532, messages generated by touch-tone prescription phone orders (MSGQ) 534 that could not be filled automatically, or EDI prescriptions that could not be filled automatically because, for example, the drug is discontinued. The alerts area 530 may also display an icon for voice mail messages (VMX) 535. The MAIL 532 icon may alert the pharmacy staff that an e-mail has been received via an Internet prescription service. The MAIL 532 icon may disappear when a pharmacy staff member opens the e-mail via the user interface or the workstation. Similarly, the MSGQ 534 icon may alert the pharmacy staff that a new prescription has been received via a message queue. The MSGQ 534 icon may disappear when a pharmacy staff member opens the message queue via the user interface or the workstation. The VMX 535 icon may alert the pharmacy staff that a patient and/or prescriber voice mail message has been received: The VMX 535 icon may disappear when a pharmacy staff member listens to the voicemail via a telephone.
The statistics area 540 may also display a pushbutton. When selected, the pushbutton may cause data representing prescription statistics to be displayed on the user interface 36. The prescription statistics may include, but are not limited to, (1) the current time prescription statistics for entered, printed, ready, and sold prescriptions, (2) the prescriptions that were entered by not printed with promised times of less than an hour, less than four hours, and less than twenty-four hours, and (3) prescriptions printed and filled but not verified with promised times of less than an hour, less than four hours, and less than twenty-four hours.
Although the technique for automating the prescription workflow 52 from receipt of the prescription order to delivery of the prescription to the patient as described herein is particularly well suited to be implemented in software, it may be implemented in hardware, firmware, or by any other processor associated with the store. Thus, the routines described herein may be implemented in a standard multi-purpose CPU or on specifically designed hardware or firmware as desired. When implemented in software, the software routine may be stored in any computer readable memory such as, but not limited to, a magnetic disk, a laser disk, and a RAM or ROM of a computer or processor. Likewise, the software may be delivered to a user or process control system via any known or desired delivery method including, for example, on a computer readable disk or other transportable computer storage mechanism or over a communication channel such as, but not limited to, a telephone line, and the Internet (which are viewed as being the same as or interchangeable with providing such software via transportable storage medium).
Many changes and modifications to the embodiments described herein could be made. The scope of some changes is discussed above. The scope of others will become apparent from the appended claims.

Claims (28)

1. A method for processing an order for a prescription, the method implemented by a computer apparatus programmed to perform the method, the method comprising:
generating by the computer apparatus a scheduled delivery time for the prescription order, the scheduled delivery time being a time when the prescription associated with the prescription order is estimated to be ready for delivery to the patient and being based on information received from the patient;
printing a prescription label for the prescription order, the prescription label being printed according to the prescription order's priority among one or more other prescription orders, the priority based on at least the scheduled delivery time such that a first prescription label having an earlier scheduled delivery time is printed before a second prescription label having a later scheduled delivery time;
providing to pharmacy personnel an indication of each prescription order's priority among all of the prescription orders;
generating by the computer apparatus, based on the prescription label, a plurality of graphical verification displays to facilitate verification of the prescription order by the pharmacy personnel;
generating by the computer apparatus a plurality of statistics, the statistics displayed as one or more graphs and providing information related to a number of prescription orders entered into the system, a number of prescription labels printed, a number of prescriptions ready for delivery, a number of prescriptions sold, a number of prescription orders entered but for which labels have not been printed, or a number of prescription orders for which labels have been printed and orders filled but which have not been verified; and
notifying the patient of the status of the prescription associated with the prescription order based on the displayed statistics.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the priority is based on either (1) the scheduled delivery time associated with the prescription order and an identification parameter associated with the patient, or (2) the scheduled delivery time, a current volume of other prescription orders within a queue of a pharmacy, and an identification parameter associated with the patient.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of printing a prescription label comprises printing a prescription label having a bar code configured to verify the prescription order.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of printing a prescription label comprises:
printing the prescription label for the prescription in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by less than a second time period.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of generating a scheduled delivery time comprises:
determining whether a wait period has elapsed since a prior scheduled delivery time was generated in response to one or more prior prescription labels being generated within a third time period, the prior scheduled delivery time being associated with a prior prescription order;
determining a number of verified prescription labels from the one or more prior prescription labels generated during the third time period;
determining an average generated-to-verified time from generating the one or more prior prescription labels to verifying the one or more prior prescription labels based on the number of verified prescription labels;
determining a verification time based on the average generated-to-verified time and a buffer time; and
determining the scheduled delivery time based on the verification time and the current time.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of printing a prescription label comprises:
printing a plurality of prescription labels in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by greater than a second time period based on one of the operation hours of the pharmacy, the number of prescription orders to be processed, and the number of times that a calculation of prescription labels to be printed is performed in a third time period.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating a plurality of graphical verification displays comprises:
scanning a bar code associated with the prescription label; and
generating a plurality of graphical verification displays based on the bar code, the plurality of graphical verification displays having information associated with the prescription order.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating a plurality of statistics comprises generating and displaying at least one graph configured to display a condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery to the patient of a prescription, and wherein the condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the prescription is one of a condition associated with a prescriber of the prescription, a condition associated with allocation of drugs for the prescription, and a condition associated with insurance coverage of the patient.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of notifying the patient comprises notifying the patient that the prescription will not be ready by the scheduled delivery time in response to the prescription order being unfilled, unverified, or having an unresolved condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery of the prescription to the patient.
10. In a system having a computer operating in accordance with a computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium for processing a prescription order, wherein the computer includes a memory and a processor operatively coupled to the memory, the computer program comprising:
a first routine that directs the processor to generate a scheduled delivery time for the prescription order, the scheduled delivery time being a time when the prescription associated with the prescription order is estimated to be ready for delivery to the patient and being based on information received from the patient;
a second routine that directs the processor to print a prescription label for the prescription order, the prescription label being printed according to the prescription order's priority among one or more other prescription orders, the priority based on at least the scheduled delivery time such that a first prescription label having an earlier scheduled delivery time is printed before a second prescription label having a later scheduled delivery time;
a third routine that directs the processor to generate a plurality of graphical verification displays to facilitate verification of the prescription order by pharmacy personnel after the prescription order is filled;
a fourth routine that directs the processor to generate a plurality of statistics, the statistics displayed as one or more graphs and providing information related to a number of prescription orders entered into the system, a number of prescription labels printed, a number of prescriptions ready for delivery to the patient, a number of prescriptions sold, a number of prescription orders entered but for which labels have not been printed, or a number of prescription orders for which labels have been printed and orders filled but which have not been verified; and
a fifth routine that directs the processor to notify the patient of the status of the prescription associated with the prescription order based on the displayed statistics.
11. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the priority is based on either (1) the scheduled delivery time associated with the prescription order and an identification parameter associated with the patient, or (2) the scheduled delivery time, a current volume of other prescription orders within a queue of a pharmacy, and an identification parameter associated with the patient.
12. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the second routine directs the processor to print a prescription label having a bar code configured to verify the prescription order.
13. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the second routine directs the processor to print the prescription label for the prescription in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by less than a second time period.
14. The computer program of claim 13, wherein the first routine:
directs the processor to determine whether a wait period has elapsed since a prior scheduled delivery time was generated in response to one or more prior prescription labels being printed within a third time period, the prior scheduled delivery time being associated with a prior prescription order;
directs the processor to determine a number of verified prescription labels from the one or more prior prescription labels printed during the third time period;
directs the processor to determine an average generated-to-verified time from printing the one or more prior prescription labels to verifying the one or more prior prescription labels based on the number of verified prescription labels;
directs the processor to determine a verification time based on the average generated-to-verified time and a buffer time; and
directs the processor to determine the scheduled delivery time based on the verification time and the current time.
15. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the second routine:
directs the processor to print a plurality of prescription labels in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by greater than a second time period based on one of the operation hours of the pharmacy, the number of prescription orders to be processed, and the number of times that a calculation of prescription labels to be printed is performed in a third time period.
16. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the third routine:
directs the processor to scan a bar code associated with the prescription label; and
directs the processor to generate a plurality of graphical verification displays based on the bar code, the plurality of graphical verification displays having information associated with the prescription order.
17. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the third routine directs the processor to generate and display at least one graph configured to display a condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery to the patient of a prescription, and wherein the condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the prescription is one of a condition associated with a prescriber of the prescription, a condition associated with allocation of drugs for the prescription, and a condition associated with insurance coverage of the patient.
18. The computer program of claim 10, wherein the fifth routine directs the processor to notify the patient that the prescription will not be ready by the scheduled delivery time in response to the prescription order being unfilled, unverified, or having an unresolved condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery of the prescription to the patient.
19. A system for processing a prescription order, the system comprising:
a workstation having a user interface, the user interface configured to generate a graphical display;
a printing device configured to generate a prescription label; and
a controller operatively coupled to the workstation and the printing device, the controller having a memory and a processor, the processor operatively coupled to the memory,
the controller being programmed to:
generate a scheduled delivery time for the prescription order, the scheduled delivery time being a time when the prescription associated with the prescription order is estimated to be ready for delivery to the patient and being based on information received from the patient;
print a prescription label for a prescription order, according to the prescription order's priority among one or more other prescription orders, the priority based on at least the scheduled delivery time such that a first prescription label having an earlier scheduled delivery time is printed before a second prescription label having a later scheduled delivery time;
generate, via the user interface, a plurality of graphical verification displays to facilitate verification of the prescription order by pharmacy personnel after the prescription order is filled;
generate a plurality of statistics, the statistics displayed as one or more graphs and providing information related to a number of prescription orders entered into the system, a number of prescription labels printed, a number of prescriptions ready for delivery to the patient, a number of prescriptions sold, a number of prescription orders entered but for which labels have not been printed, or a number of prescription orders for which labels have been printed and orders filled but which have not been verified; and
notify the patient of the status of the prescription associated with the prescription order based on the displayed statistics.
20. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to the priority based on either (1) the scheduled delivery time associated with the prescription order and an identification parameter associated with the patient, or (2) the scheduled delivery time, a current volume of other prescription orders within a queue of a pharmacy, and an identification parameter associated with the patient.
21. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to print a prescription label having a bar code configured to verify the prescription order.
22. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to print the prescription label for the prescription in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by less than a second time period.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein the controller is programmed to determine whether a wait period has elapsed since a prior scheduled delivery time was generated in response to one or more prior prescription labels being generating within a third time period, to determine a number of verified prescription labels from the one or more prior prescription labels generated during the third time period, to determine an average generated-to-verified time from generating the one or more prior prescription labels to verifying the one or more prior prescription labels based on the number of verified prescription labels, to determine a verification time based on the average generated-to-verified time and a buffer time, and to determine the scheduled delivery time based on the verification time and the current time, and wherein the prior scheduled delivery time is associated with a prior prescription order.
24. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to print a plurality of prescription labels in response to the scheduled delivery time being within a first time period of the current time and being past the current time by greater than a second time period based on one of the operation hours of the pharmacy, the number of prescription orders to be processed, and the number of times that a calculation of prescription labels to be printed is performed in a third time period.
25. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to scan a bar code associated with the prescription label and to generate a plurality of graphical verification displays based on the bar code, the plurality of graphical verification displays having information associated with the prescription order.
26. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to generate and display at least one graph configured to display a condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery to the patient of a prescription, and wherein the condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the prescription is one of a condition associated with a prescriber of the prescription, a condition associated with allocation of drugs for the prescription, and a condition associated with insurance coverage of the patient.
27. The system of claim 19, wherein the controller is programmed to notify the patient that the prescription will not be ready by the scheduled delivery time in response to the prescription order being unfilled, unverified, or having an unresolved condition suggesting a potential for a delay of the delivery of the prescription to the patient.
28. The system of claim 19, wherein the memory comprises one of a hard disk, a floppy disk, a memory card, a memory stick, a compact disc, a digital versatile disc, a magnetic memory, a read-only memory, an erasable programmable read-only memory, a random-access memory, and an optical memory.
US10/353,277 2002-02-01 2003-01-29 Method and apparatus for prescription processing Active 2029-03-16 US8321236B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/353,277 US8321236B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-01-29 Method and apparatus for prescription processing

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US35398302P 2002-02-01 2002-02-01
US10/353,277 US8321236B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-01-29 Method and apparatus for prescription processing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030149599A1 US20030149599A1 (en) 2003-08-07
US8321236B2 true US8321236B2 (en) 2012-11-27

Family

ID=27669103

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/353,277 Active 2029-03-16 US8321236B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-01-29 Method and apparatus for prescription processing

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8321236B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140350947A1 (en) * 2013-05-22 2014-11-27 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication delivery management
US10492987B2 (en) 2017-06-26 2019-12-03 Parata Systems, Llc Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing multiple drug product packaging systems using a common database management system
US11182728B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2021-11-23 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication workflow management
US11581079B1 (en) 2012-04-10 2023-02-14 Walgreen Co. System and method for virtual review of a pharmaceutical product filling process

Families Citing this family (85)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7769601B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2010-08-03 Walgreen Co. Apparatus and method for accessing pharmacy information and ordering prescriptions
US20120016683A1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2012-01-19 Paul Morinville Automated Execution of Business Processes Using Reverse Nesting
US8706538B1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2014-04-22 Paul V. Morinville Business process nesting method and apparatus
US9427520B2 (en) 2005-02-11 2016-08-30 Carefusion 303, Inc. Management of pending medication orders
US10353856B2 (en) 2011-03-17 2019-07-16 Carefusion 303, Inc. Scalable communication system
US7860583B2 (en) 2004-08-25 2010-12-28 Carefusion 303, Inc. System and method for dynamically adjusting patient therapy
US9741001B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2017-08-22 Carefusion 303, Inc. Predictive medication safety
US10062457B2 (en) 2012-07-26 2018-08-28 Carefusion 303, Inc. Predictive notifications for adverse patient events
US9069887B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2015-06-30 Carefusion 303, Inc. Patient-specific medication management system
US11087873B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2021-08-10 Carefusion 303, Inc. Context-aware healthcare notification system
AU6172301A (en) 2000-05-18 2001-11-26 Alaris Meidical Systems Inc Distributed remote asset and medication management drug delivery system
US8321236B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2012-11-27 Walgreen Co. Method and apparatus for prescription processing
US7493263B2 (en) * 2002-04-30 2009-02-17 Medco Health Solutions, Inc. Prescription management system
US8025314B2 (en) 2002-05-15 2011-09-27 Target Brands, Inc. Medication packaging and labeling system
US8478604B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2013-07-02 Mckesson Technologies Inc. Closed loop medication use system and method
US7860724B2 (en) * 2002-10-30 2010-12-28 Automed Technologies, Inc. System and method for management of pharmacy workflow
US7753085B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2010-07-13 Forhealth Technologies, Inc. Automated drug preparation apparatus including automated drug reconstitution
US10688021B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2020-06-23 Baxter Corporation Englewood Automated drug preparation apparatus including automated drug reconstitution
US20040172289A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-02 Dejan Kozic Method and system for remotely verifying a prescription
JP2007501407A (en) * 2003-03-03 2007-01-25 長岡実業株式会社 Methods and apparatus used for the detection and quantification of various cell types and the use of optical biodiscs to do this
US10275723B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2019-04-30 Oracle International Corporation Policy enforcement via attestations
US10063523B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2018-08-28 Oracle International Corporation Crafted identities
US9781154B1 (en) 2003-04-01 2017-10-03 Oracle International Corporation Systems and methods for supporting information security and sub-system operational protocol conformance
US20050080651A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Morrison Kelly L. System and method for remote processing of pharmacy orders
CA2560277A1 (en) * 2004-03-19 2005-09-29 Oversight Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for transaction compliance monitoring
US7827041B2 (en) * 2004-03-31 2010-11-02 Cvs Pharmacy, Inc. System and methods of providing pharmacy services
US20050267765A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2005-12-01 Jun-Jang Jeng Apparatus and method for policy-driven business process exception handling
US8335694B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2012-12-18 Bruce Reiner Gesture-based communication and reporting system
US7801642B2 (en) 2004-08-18 2010-09-21 Walgreen Co. System and method for checking the accuracy of a prescription fill
US8688507B2 (en) * 2005-03-21 2014-04-01 Oversight Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for monitoring transaction entity versions for policy compliance
US8165908B2 (en) * 2005-07-29 2012-04-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Tool tip with additional information and task-sensitive direct access help for a user
US7711583B2 (en) * 2005-10-05 2010-05-04 Medco Health Solutions, Inc. System and method for clinical strategy for therapeutic pharmacies
US7765108B2 (en) * 2005-10-18 2010-07-27 Walgreen Co. Method and apparatus for inter-pharmacy workload balancing
US7734478B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2010-06-08 Walgreen Co. Method and apparatus for inter-pharmacy workload balancing using resource function assignments
US20070088590A1 (en) * 2005-10-18 2007-04-19 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for out of stock medication
US8175891B2 (en) * 2005-10-18 2012-05-08 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for compound medication
US8315887B2 (en) * 2005-10-18 2012-11-20 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for specialty medication
US8666780B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2014-03-04 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing
US20070088569A1 (en) * 2005-10-18 2007-04-19 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for prescription verification
US8311891B2 (en) * 2005-10-18 2012-11-13 Walgreen Co. System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for medication payments
US20070130191A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-06-07 Promontory Compliance Solutions, Llc Method and system for analyzing effectiveness of compliance function
US20070179833A1 (en) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-02 Infosys Technologies Ltd. Assisted business process exception management
US8639530B2 (en) * 2006-02-27 2014-01-28 Gt Angel, Llc Medication advisory system
US20070226009A1 (en) * 2006-03-24 2007-09-27 Hicks H D Methods and systems for prescription review to identify substitutions
US20080162188A1 (en) * 2006-06-12 2008-07-03 Sunil Kripalani Method and system for generating graphical medication information
US20080306761A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Walgreen Co. System and Method of Performing Remote Verification of a Prescription in Combination with a Patient Access Terminal
US8738383B2 (en) * 2007-06-07 2014-05-27 Aesynt Incorporated Remotely and interactively controlling semi-automatic devices
US20090024412A1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2009-01-22 Mark Medvitz Systems and methods for processing requests for pharmaceuticals that require insurer preapproval
US20090012820A1 (en) * 2007-07-06 2009-01-08 Shane Bishop Medication dose administration and inventory management
US20090012813A1 (en) 2007-07-06 2009-01-08 Mckesson Financial Holdings Limited Systems and methods for managing medical information
US8032393B2 (en) * 2007-07-23 2011-10-04 Walgreen Co. System and method of prescription alignment
US8005689B2 (en) * 2007-07-23 2011-08-23 Walgreen Co. Method and system for aligning a plurality of prescription refills to multiple alignment dates
US7856363B2 (en) * 2007-07-23 2010-12-21 Walgreen Co. Method and system for aligning a plurality of refill dates for prescriptions associated with a plurality of customers
US7835924B1 (en) * 2007-07-23 2010-11-16 Walgreen Co. Method and system for delivering to a customer a plurality of prescriptions having aligned refill dates
US8775198B2 (en) * 2007-07-25 2014-07-08 Walgreen Co. System and method for performing a remote verification of a pharmacy fill utilizing an image to image comparison
US20110160901A1 (en) * 2008-01-04 2011-06-30 Abrams Jr George Raymond System and Method for Dispensing Prescriptions
US20100037146A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-02-11 Behance Llc Systems, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Generating or Managing an Action Plan for a User
US8306651B2 (en) * 2008-07-30 2012-11-06 Chudy Group, LLC Pharmacy will-call and prescription order article management system
US8271128B1 (en) 2008-07-30 2012-09-18 Kirby Lester, Llc Pharmacy workflow management system including plural counters
US8165929B2 (en) 2008-08-04 2012-04-24 Chudy Group, LLC Adaptive pharmaceutical product management methods and system
US8145501B1 (en) 2008-10-09 2012-03-27 Walgreen Co. System and method for performing pharmacy product filling using non-registered pharmacists
US8554579B2 (en) 2008-10-13 2013-10-08 Fht, Inc. Management, reporting and benchmarking of medication preparation
US7941325B2 (en) * 2008-11-14 2011-05-10 Walgreen Co. System and method of using a non-retail central filling facility to process pharmacy product prescriptions in a pharmacy retail network
US20100168904A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Cerner Innovation, Inc. Unverified order presentation mechanism
US20110029441A1 (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-02-03 Gupta Pronob K Method to generate workflow tasks directly from flowcharts for processing events in event-driven judicial case management systems with workflow control
US20130110526A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 Sargas Pharmaceutical Adherence and Compliance International, LLC System and method for monitoring authorization, compliance, and adherence of drug prescriptions and treatments
US9697331B2 (en) * 2011-11-01 2017-07-04 Codonics, Inc. Adaptable information extraction and labeling method and system
CA2889352C (en) 2012-10-26 2021-12-07 Baxter Corporation Englewood Improved work station for medical dose preparation system
KR101974258B1 (en) 2012-10-26 2019-04-30 백스터 코포레이션 잉글우드 Improved image acquisition for medical dose preparation system
US10430554B2 (en) * 2013-05-23 2019-10-01 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication preparation queue
WO2014159280A1 (en) 2013-03-13 2014-10-02 Carefusion 303, Inc. Patient-specific medication management system
EP2973370A4 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-08-17 Carefusion 303 Inc Predictive medication safety
US20140278466A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Cvs Pharmacy, Inc. Pharmacy workflow
WO2014189695A1 (en) * 2013-05-23 2014-11-27 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication preparation queue
US20150058034A1 (en) * 2013-08-23 2015-02-26 Ateb, Inc. Methods, systems and computer program products for selecting patients and filling prescriptions at automatic periodic fill dates
US10078811B2 (en) 2013-11-29 2018-09-18 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Determining node location based on context data in a wireless node network
US10453023B2 (en) 2014-05-28 2019-10-22 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Methods and node apparatus for adaptive node communication within a wireless node network
US11107574B2 (en) 2014-09-30 2021-08-31 Baxter Corporation Englewood Management of medication preparation with formulary management
EP3937116A1 (en) 2014-12-05 2022-01-12 Baxter Corporation Englewood Dose preparation data analytics
US11238397B2 (en) 2015-02-09 2022-02-01 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Methods, apparatus, and systems for generating a corrective pickup notification for a shipped item using a mobile master node
JP6533396B2 (en) * 2015-03-05 2019-06-19 Phcホールディングス株式会社 Dispensing reservation acceptance device
US10491479B2 (en) 2015-07-08 2019-11-26 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Systems, apparatus, and methods of time gap related monitoring for an event candidate related to an ID node within a wireless node network
US10417387B2 (en) * 2016-01-28 2019-09-17 Walmart Apollo, Llc System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable storage media for mobile check-in in retail store
JP6957496B2 (en) 2016-03-23 2021-11-02 フェデックス コーポレイト サービシズ,インコーポレイティド Radio node-based methods for auto-tuning the broadcast settings of nodes in a radio node network, non-temporary computer-readable media containing instructions to perform that method, and auto-tuning broadcast node equipment in a radio node network.
US20210158413A1 (en) * 2019-11-25 2021-05-27 Breckenridge Capital Llc System and method for automating electronic pharmaceutical transactions

Citations (105)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4852001A (en) 1986-07-25 1989-07-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Job scheduling method and system
US4918604A (en) * 1988-10-03 1990-04-17 Medco Containment Services, Inc. Prescription drug depiction and labeling system
US4958280A (en) * 1987-07-10 1990-09-18 Vistakon, Inc. Apparatus and method for satisfying disposable contact lens prescriptions
US5053970A (en) 1987-09-18 1991-10-01 Hitachi, Ltd. Work scheduling method
US5072383A (en) 1988-11-19 1991-12-10 Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc. Medical information system with automatic updating of task list in response to entering orders and charting interventions on associated forms
US5208762A (en) * 1990-12-06 1993-05-04 Baxter International Inc. Automated prescription vial filling system
US5260868A (en) 1986-08-11 1993-11-09 Texas Instruments Incorporate Method for calendaring future events in real-time
US5289370A (en) 1991-05-31 1994-02-22 At&T Bell Laboratories Automated resource allocation method employing a learning arrangement
US5337919A (en) 1993-02-11 1994-08-16 Dispensing Technologies, Inc. Automatic dispensing system for prescriptions and the like
WO1996013790A1 (en) 1994-10-28 1996-05-09 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corporation Prescription management system
US5548518A (en) 1994-05-31 1996-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Allocation method for generating a production schedule
US5559710A (en) 1993-02-05 1996-09-24 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Apparatus for control and evaluation of pending jobs in a factory
US5597995A (en) * 1995-11-08 1997-01-28 Automated Prescription Systems, Inc. Automated medical prescription fulfillment system having work stations for imaging, filling, and checking the dispensed drug product
US5615121A (en) 1995-01-31 1997-03-25 U S West Technologies, Inc. System and method for scheduling service providers to perform customer service requests
US5619991A (en) 1995-04-26 1997-04-15 Lucent Technologies Inc. Delivery of medical services using electronic data communications
US5737728A (en) 1994-02-25 1998-04-07 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company System for resource assignment and scheduling
US5737539A (en) 1994-10-28 1998-04-07 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corp. Prescription creation system
US5748907A (en) 1993-10-25 1998-05-05 Crane; Harold E. Medical facility and business: automatic interactive dynamic real-time management
US5758095A (en) 1995-02-24 1998-05-26 Albaum; David Interactive medication ordering system
US5765139A (en) 1996-04-30 1998-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for transforming a resource planning data structure into a scheduling data structure
US5790785A (en) 1995-12-11 1998-08-04 Customer Communications Group, Inc. World Wide Web registration information processing system
US5797515A (en) 1995-10-18 1998-08-25 Adds, Inc. Method for controlling a drug dispensing system
US5801755A (en) 1996-04-09 1998-09-01 Echerer; Scott J. Interactive communciation system for medical treatment of remotely located patients
US5826252A (en) 1996-06-28 1998-10-20 General Electric Company System for managing multiple projects of similar type using dynamically updated global database
US5826236A (en) 1994-12-09 1998-10-20 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method for allocating resources and processes for design and production plan scheduling
US5842976A (en) 1996-05-16 1998-12-01 Pyxis Corporation Dispensing, storage, control and inventory system with medication and treatment chart record
US5845255A (en) 1994-10-28 1998-12-01 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corporation Prescription management system
US5852259A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-12-22 Anritsu Corporation Capsule weight measuring apparatus
JPH1195940A (en) * 1997-09-18 1999-04-09 Konica Corp Network system, information processor, computer-readable recording medium recording program, and peripheral equipment
US5907493A (en) 1997-01-31 1999-05-25 Innovation Associates, Inc. Pharmaceutical dispensing system
EP0921488A1 (en) 1997-12-08 1999-06-09 Kopel H. Cohen Automated database-oriented prescription drug ordering system
US5911687A (en) 1995-11-15 1999-06-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Wide area medical information system and method using thereof
US5915240A (en) 1997-06-12 1999-06-22 Karpf; Ronald S. Computer system and method for accessing medical information over a network
US5924074A (en) 1996-09-27 1999-07-13 Azron Incorporated Electronic medical records system
US5946883A (en) 1996-05-03 1999-09-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Drug filling machine
US5950630A (en) * 1996-12-12 1999-09-14 Portwood; Michael T. System and method for improving compliance of a medical regimen
US5954640A (en) 1996-06-27 1999-09-21 Szabo; Andrew J. Nutritional optimization method
US5963911A (en) 1994-03-25 1999-10-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Resource allocation
US5963453A (en) * 1996-11-25 1999-10-05 Medication Management, Inc. System and method for processing prescription medications
US5970462A (en) 1997-10-31 1999-10-19 Reichert; Richard R. On-line pharmacy automated refill system
US5974393A (en) 1997-01-17 1999-10-26 Mccullough; Robert K. Automatic customer number paging system
US5987519A (en) 1996-09-20 1999-11-16 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Telemedicine system using voice video and data encapsulation and de-encapsulation for communicating medical information between central monitoring stations and remote patient monitoring stations
US6067524A (en) 1999-01-07 2000-05-23 Catalina Marketing International, Inc. Method and system for automatically generating advisory information for pharmacy patients along with normally transmitted data
US6104798A (en) 1998-02-12 2000-08-15 Mci Communications Corporation Order processing and reporting system for telecommunications carrier services
US6112182A (en) 1996-01-16 2000-08-29 Healthcare Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for integrated management of pharmaceutical and healthcare services
US6181979B1 (en) * 1997-01-13 2001-01-30 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Medication processing system
WO2001008393A1 (en) 1999-07-26 2001-02-01 Socias Gili Monica Multifunction telecommunication system for public and/or private use
US6202923B1 (en) 1999-08-23 2001-03-20 Innovation Associates, Inc. Automated pharmacy
US6208973B1 (en) 1998-02-27 2001-03-27 Onehealthbank.Com Point of service third party financial management vehicle for the healthcare industry
EP1096364A2 (en) * 1999-10-28 2001-05-02 Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation Estimation of time to complete a print job
US20010009005A1 (en) 1996-07-11 2001-07-19 Godin Paul H. Computer auction system
US6292786B1 (en) 1992-05-19 2001-09-18 Incentech, Inc. Method and system for generating incentives based on substantially real-time product purchase information
US6294999B1 (en) 1999-12-29 2001-09-25 Becton, Dickinson And Company Systems and methods for monitoring patient compliance with medication regimens
US20010028304A1 (en) 2000-04-11 2001-10-11 I'anson Colin Monitoring of location-associated events
US6311163B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2001-10-30 David M. Sheehan Prescription-controlled data collection system and method
US20010047285A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2001-11-29 Webvan Group,Inc. Scheduling delivery of products via the internet
US6330491B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2001-12-11 Nicholas Lion Integrated system and method of vending prescription medications using a network of remotely distributed, automated dispensing units
US6364517B1 (en) 1997-02-26 2002-04-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Drug dispenser and quantity input device
US6370841B1 (en) 1999-12-03 2002-04-16 Automed Technologies, Inc. Automated method for dispensing bulk medications with a machine-readable code
US6381577B1 (en) 1997-03-28 2002-04-30 Health Hero Network, Inc. Multi-user remote health monitoring system
US20020052762A1 (en) * 1998-06-16 2002-05-02 Paul Kobylevsky Remote prescription refill system
US20020062230A1 (en) 1999-09-13 2002-05-23 Assaf Morag Message and program system supporting communication
US6397190B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2002-05-28 Gerald E. Goetz Veterinary medication monitoring system and apparatus
US6421650B1 (en) 1998-03-04 2002-07-16 Goetech Llc Medication monitoring system and apparatus
US20020103726A1 (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-08-01 Jones Kevin T. Flexible ordering of inventory from material sources according to material requirements for manufacturing operations
US20020120573A1 (en) 1998-11-03 2002-08-29 Mccormick Douglas Secure extranet operation with open access for qualified medical professional
US20020130065A1 (en) 2001-03-16 2002-09-19 Gregg Bloom Method and apparatus for efficient packet delivery and storage
US6463417B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2002-10-08 Carekey.Com, Inc. Method and system for distributing health information
US20020147642A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-10-10 Royal Ahold Nv And Unipower Solutions, Inc. Methods and systems for providing personalized information to users in a commercial establishment
US6464142B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2002-10-15 Si/Baker, Inc. Automated will call system
US20020153411A1 (en) 2001-04-23 2002-10-24 Dadong Wan Online medicine cabinet
US20020161658A1 (en) 2001-02-13 2002-10-31 Lester Sussman System and method for a complete and convenient shopping experience
US6477442B1 (en) 1995-08-10 2002-11-05 Fred M. Valerino, Sr. Autoacceptertube delivery system with a robotic interface
US20020174025A1 (en) 2001-05-17 2002-11-21 Hind John R. Method and system for providing targeted advertising and personalized customer services
US6493427B1 (en) 1998-06-16 2002-12-10 Telemanager Technologies, Inc. Remote prescription refill system
US20020188467A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2002-12-12 Louis Eke Medical virtual resource network
US6496427B2 (en) 2000-08-28 2002-12-17 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device
US20030018495A1 (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-01-23 Lester Sussman System and method for medical drug prescription acquisition
US6523009B1 (en) 1999-11-06 2003-02-18 Bobbi L. Wilkins Individualized patient electronic medical records system
US6530518B1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2003-03-11 General Electric Company Method, system and storage medium for viewing product delivery information
US6539360B1 (en) 1999-02-05 2003-03-25 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Special handling processing in a package transportation system
US20030074234A1 (en) 2002-02-06 2003-04-17 Stasny Jeanne Ann Customer-centered pharmaceutical product and information distribution system
WO2003037637A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-08 Hewlett-Packard Company Location based print job distribution
US6564121B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-05-13 Telepharmacy Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for drug dispensing
US6591243B1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2003-07-08 Ma-System Ab Method and system for supply chain control
US20030132298A1 (en) 1996-09-05 2003-07-17 Jerome Swartz Consumer interactive shopping system
US20030149599A1 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-08-07 Charles Goodall Method and apparatus for prescription processing
US20030179287A1 (en) 2002-03-22 2003-09-25 Dejan Kozic System and method for providing pharmaceutical services to a plurality of remote sites from a central site
US6625952B1 (en) 1998-12-04 2003-09-30 Automed Technologies, Inc. Medication collecting system
US20030188200A1 (en) 2002-03-26 2003-10-02 Anthony Paquin Processes, apparatus and systems for secure messaging
US20040019502A1 (en) 2000-09-04 2004-01-29 Enigma Health Uk Limited Information management systems
US6711460B1 (en) 2001-06-18 2004-03-23 Diebold Incorporated Pharmaceutical system in which pharmaceutical care is provided by a remote professional serving multiple pharmacies
US20040078231A1 (en) 2002-05-31 2004-04-22 Wilkes Gordon J. System and method for facilitating and administering treatment to a patient, including clinical decision making, order workflow and integration of clinical documentation
US20040133705A1 (en) 2002-08-09 2004-07-08 Brian Broussard Controller for dispensing products
US20040172289A1 (en) 2003-02-28 2004-09-02 Dejan Kozic Method and system for remotely verifying a prescription
US20040220829A1 (en) 1999-03-22 2004-11-04 Ofir Baharav Distributed system and method for managing communication among healthcare providers, patients and third parties
US20040221034A1 (en) 2002-12-18 2004-11-04 Kausik Balas Natarajan Centralized measurement of web performance
US20040260577A1 (en) 1999-11-15 2004-12-23 Recare, Inc. Electronic healthcare information and delivery management system with an integrated medical search architecture and capability
US20050102203A1 (en) * 2000-08-21 2005-05-12 Keong Koh S. Order-handling inventory management system and method
US6917922B1 (en) 2001-07-06 2005-07-12 Amazon.Com, Inc. Contextual presentation of information about related orders during browsing of an electronic catalog
US20060041330A1 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-02-23 Walgreen Co. System and method for checking the accuracy of a prescription fill
US7111780B2 (en) 2002-10-18 2006-09-26 Mckesson Automation Systems Inc. Automated drug substitution, verification, and reporting system
US7139639B2 (en) 2002-07-29 2006-11-21 Mckesson Automation Systems Inc. Article dispensing and counting method and device
US20060276933A1 (en) 2001-10-23 2006-12-07 Chavez Jeffrey A Controlled inventory device and method using pressure transducer
US7337129B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2008-02-26 Drugstore.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for on-line prescription ordering

Patent Citations (111)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4852001A (en) 1986-07-25 1989-07-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Job scheduling method and system
US5260868A (en) 1986-08-11 1993-11-09 Texas Instruments Incorporate Method for calendaring future events in real-time
US4958280A (en) * 1987-07-10 1990-09-18 Vistakon, Inc. Apparatus and method for satisfying disposable contact lens prescriptions
US5053970A (en) 1987-09-18 1991-10-01 Hitachi, Ltd. Work scheduling method
US4918604A (en) * 1988-10-03 1990-04-17 Medco Containment Services, Inc. Prescription drug depiction and labeling system
US5072383A (en) 1988-11-19 1991-12-10 Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc. Medical information system with automatic updating of task list in response to entering orders and charting interventions on associated forms
US5208762A (en) * 1990-12-06 1993-05-04 Baxter International Inc. Automated prescription vial filling system
US5289370A (en) 1991-05-31 1994-02-22 At&T Bell Laboratories Automated resource allocation method employing a learning arrangement
US6292786B1 (en) 1992-05-19 2001-09-18 Incentech, Inc. Method and system for generating incentives based on substantially real-time product purchase information
US5559710A (en) 1993-02-05 1996-09-24 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Apparatus for control and evaluation of pending jobs in a factory
US5337919A (en) 1993-02-11 1994-08-16 Dispensing Technologies, Inc. Automatic dispensing system for prescriptions and the like
US5748907A (en) 1993-10-25 1998-05-05 Crane; Harold E. Medical facility and business: automatic interactive dynamic real-time management
US5737728A (en) 1994-02-25 1998-04-07 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company System for resource assignment and scheduling
US5963911A (en) 1994-03-25 1999-10-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Resource allocation
US5548518A (en) 1994-05-31 1996-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Allocation method for generating a production schedule
US5737539A (en) 1994-10-28 1998-04-07 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corp. Prescription creation system
US5845255A (en) 1994-10-28 1998-12-01 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corporation Prescription management system
WO1996013790A1 (en) 1994-10-28 1996-05-09 Advanced Health Med-E-Systems Corporation Prescription management system
US5826236A (en) 1994-12-09 1998-10-20 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method for allocating resources and processes for design and production plan scheduling
US5615121A (en) 1995-01-31 1997-03-25 U S West Technologies, Inc. System and method for scheduling service providers to perform customer service requests
US5758095A (en) 1995-02-24 1998-05-26 Albaum; David Interactive medication ordering system
US5619991A (en) 1995-04-26 1997-04-15 Lucent Technologies Inc. Delivery of medical services using electronic data communications
US6477442B1 (en) 1995-08-10 2002-11-05 Fred M. Valerino, Sr. Autoacceptertube delivery system with a robotic interface
US5797515A (en) 1995-10-18 1998-08-25 Adds, Inc. Method for controlling a drug dispensing system
US5597995A (en) * 1995-11-08 1997-01-28 Automated Prescription Systems, Inc. Automated medical prescription fulfillment system having work stations for imaging, filling, and checking the dispensed drug product
US5911687A (en) 1995-11-15 1999-06-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Wide area medical information system and method using thereof
US5790785A (en) 1995-12-11 1998-08-04 Customer Communications Group, Inc. World Wide Web registration information processing system
US6112182A (en) 1996-01-16 2000-08-29 Healthcare Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for integrated management of pharmaceutical and healthcare services
US5801755A (en) 1996-04-09 1998-09-01 Echerer; Scott J. Interactive communciation system for medical treatment of remotely located patients
US5765139A (en) 1996-04-30 1998-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for transforming a resource planning data structure into a scheduling data structure
US5946883A (en) 1996-05-03 1999-09-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Drug filling machine
US5842976A (en) 1996-05-16 1998-12-01 Pyxis Corporation Dispensing, storage, control and inventory system with medication and treatment chart record
US5954640A (en) 1996-06-27 1999-09-21 Szabo; Andrew J. Nutritional optimization method
US5826252A (en) 1996-06-28 1998-10-20 General Electric Company System for managing multiple projects of similar type using dynamically updated global database
US20010009005A1 (en) 1996-07-11 2001-07-19 Godin Paul H. Computer auction system
US5852259A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-12-22 Anritsu Corporation Capsule weight measuring apparatus
US20030132298A1 (en) 1996-09-05 2003-07-17 Jerome Swartz Consumer interactive shopping system
US5987519A (en) 1996-09-20 1999-11-16 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Telemedicine system using voice video and data encapsulation and de-encapsulation for communicating medical information between central monitoring stations and remote patient monitoring stations
US5924074A (en) 1996-09-27 1999-07-13 Azron Incorporated Electronic medical records system
US6347329B1 (en) 1996-09-27 2002-02-12 Macneal Memorial Hospital Assoc. Electronic medical records system
US5963453A (en) * 1996-11-25 1999-10-05 Medication Management, Inc. System and method for processing prescription medications
US5950630A (en) * 1996-12-12 1999-09-14 Portwood; Michael T. System and method for improving compliance of a medical regimen
US6181979B1 (en) * 1997-01-13 2001-01-30 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Medication processing system
US5974393A (en) 1997-01-17 1999-10-26 Mccullough; Robert K. Automatic customer number paging system
US5907493A (en) 1997-01-31 1999-05-25 Innovation Associates, Inc. Pharmaceutical dispensing system
US6364517B1 (en) 1997-02-26 2002-04-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho Drug dispenser and quantity input device
US6381577B1 (en) 1997-03-28 2002-04-30 Health Hero Network, Inc. Multi-user remote health monitoring system
US5915240A (en) 1997-06-12 1999-06-22 Karpf; Ronald S. Computer system and method for accessing medical information over a network
JPH1195940A (en) * 1997-09-18 1999-04-09 Konica Corp Network system, information processor, computer-readable recording medium recording program, and peripheral equipment
US5970462A (en) 1997-10-31 1999-10-19 Reichert; Richard R. On-line pharmacy automated refill system
EP0921488A1 (en) 1997-12-08 1999-06-09 Kopel H. Cohen Automated database-oriented prescription drug ordering system
US6104798A (en) 1998-02-12 2000-08-15 Mci Communications Corporation Order processing and reporting system for telecommunications carrier services
US6208973B1 (en) 1998-02-27 2001-03-27 Onehealthbank.Com Point of service third party financial management vehicle for the healthcare industry
US6421650B1 (en) 1998-03-04 2002-07-16 Goetech Llc Medication monitoring system and apparatus
US6493427B1 (en) 1998-06-16 2002-12-10 Telemanager Technologies, Inc. Remote prescription refill system
US20020052762A1 (en) * 1998-06-16 2002-05-02 Paul Kobylevsky Remote prescription refill system
US6397190B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2002-05-28 Gerald E. Goetz Veterinary medication monitoring system and apparatus
US6591243B1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2003-07-08 Ma-System Ab Method and system for supply chain control
US6311163B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2001-10-30 David M. Sheehan Prescription-controlled data collection system and method
US20020120573A1 (en) 1998-11-03 2002-08-29 Mccormick Douglas Secure extranet operation with open access for qualified medical professional
US6625952B1 (en) 1998-12-04 2003-09-30 Automed Technologies, Inc. Medication collecting system
US6067524A (en) 1999-01-07 2000-05-23 Catalina Marketing International, Inc. Method and system for automatically generating advisory information for pharmacy patients along with normally transmitted data
US6539360B1 (en) 1999-02-05 2003-03-25 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Special handling processing in a package transportation system
US20040220829A1 (en) 1999-03-22 2004-11-04 Ofir Baharav Distributed system and method for managing communication among healthcare providers, patients and third parties
US20020062175A1 (en) 1999-07-21 2002-05-23 Nicholas Lion Integrated system and method of vending prescription medications using a network of remotely distributed, automated dispensing units
US6438451B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2002-08-20 Nicholas Lion Integrated system and method of vending prescription medications using a network of remotely distributed, automated dispensing units
US6330491B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2001-12-11 Nicholas Lion Integrated system and method of vending prescription medications using a network of remotely distributed, automated dispensing units
WO2001008393A1 (en) 1999-07-26 2001-02-01 Socias Gili Monica Multifunction telecommunication system for public and/or private use
US6202923B1 (en) 1999-08-23 2001-03-20 Innovation Associates, Inc. Automated pharmacy
US20020062230A1 (en) 1999-09-13 2002-05-23 Assaf Morag Message and program system supporting communication
US6564121B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-05-13 Telepharmacy Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for drug dispensing
US6735497B2 (en) 1999-09-22 2004-05-11 Telepharmacy Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for dispensing medical products
EP1096364A2 (en) * 1999-10-28 2001-05-02 Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation Estimation of time to complete a print job
US6874684B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2005-04-05 Mckesson Automation Systems Inc. Automated will call system
US6464142B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2002-10-15 Si/Baker, Inc. Automated will call system
US6523009B1 (en) 1999-11-06 2003-02-18 Bobbi L. Wilkins Individualized patient electronic medical records system
US20040260577A1 (en) 1999-11-15 2004-12-23 Recare, Inc. Electronic healthcare information and delivery management system with an integrated medical search architecture and capability
US6370841B1 (en) 1999-12-03 2002-04-16 Automed Technologies, Inc. Automated method for dispensing bulk medications with a machine-readable code
US6294999B1 (en) 1999-12-29 2001-09-25 Becton, Dickinson And Company Systems and methods for monitoring patient compliance with medication regimens
US7337129B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2008-02-26 Drugstore.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for on-line prescription ordering
US6463417B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2002-10-08 Carekey.Com, Inc. Method and system for distributing health information
US20010028304A1 (en) 2000-04-11 2001-10-11 I'anson Colin Monitoring of location-associated events
US20010047285A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2001-11-29 Webvan Group,Inc. Scheduling delivery of products via the internet
US6530518B1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2003-03-11 General Electric Company Method, system and storage medium for viewing product delivery information
US20050102203A1 (en) * 2000-08-21 2005-05-12 Keong Koh S. Order-handling inventory management system and method
US6496427B2 (en) 2000-08-28 2002-12-17 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device
US20040019502A1 (en) 2000-09-04 2004-01-29 Enigma Health Uk Limited Information management systems
US20020103726A1 (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-08-01 Jones Kevin T. Flexible ordering of inventory from material sources according to material requirements for manufacturing operations
US20020161658A1 (en) 2001-02-13 2002-10-31 Lester Sussman System and method for a complete and convenient shopping experience
US20020130065A1 (en) 2001-03-16 2002-09-19 Gregg Bloom Method and apparatus for efficient packet delivery and storage
US20020147642A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-10-10 Royal Ahold Nv And Unipower Solutions, Inc. Methods and systems for providing personalized information to users in a commercial establishment
US6539281B2 (en) 2001-04-23 2003-03-25 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Online medicine cabinet
US20020153411A1 (en) 2001-04-23 2002-10-24 Dadong Wan Online medicine cabinet
US20020188467A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2002-12-12 Louis Eke Medical virtual resource network
US20020174025A1 (en) 2001-05-17 2002-11-21 Hind John R. Method and system for providing targeted advertising and personalized customer services
US6711460B1 (en) 2001-06-18 2004-03-23 Diebold Incorporated Pharmaceutical system in which pharmaceutical care is provided by a remote professional serving multiple pharmacies
US6917922B1 (en) 2001-07-06 2005-07-12 Amazon.Com, Inc. Contextual presentation of information about related orders during browsing of an electronic catalog
US20030018495A1 (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-01-23 Lester Sussman System and method for medical drug prescription acquisition
US20060276933A1 (en) 2001-10-23 2006-12-07 Chavez Jeffrey A Controlled inventory device and method using pressure transducer
WO2003037637A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-08 Hewlett-Packard Company Location based print job distribution
US20030149599A1 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-08-07 Charles Goodall Method and apparatus for prescription processing
US20030074234A1 (en) 2002-02-06 2003-04-17 Stasny Jeanne Ann Customer-centered pharmaceutical product and information distribution system
US20030179287A1 (en) 2002-03-22 2003-09-25 Dejan Kozic System and method for providing pharmaceutical services to a plurality of remote sites from a central site
US20030188200A1 (en) 2002-03-26 2003-10-02 Anthony Paquin Processes, apparatus and systems for secure messaging
US20040078231A1 (en) 2002-05-31 2004-04-22 Wilkes Gordon J. System and method for facilitating and administering treatment to a patient, including clinical decision making, order workflow and integration of clinical documentation
US7139639B2 (en) 2002-07-29 2006-11-21 Mckesson Automation Systems Inc. Article dispensing and counting method and device
US20040133705A1 (en) 2002-08-09 2004-07-08 Brian Broussard Controller for dispensing products
US7111780B2 (en) 2002-10-18 2006-09-26 Mckesson Automation Systems Inc. Automated drug substitution, verification, and reporting system
US20040221034A1 (en) 2002-12-18 2004-11-04 Kausik Balas Natarajan Centralized measurement of web performance
US20040172289A1 (en) 2003-02-28 2004-09-02 Dejan Kozic Method and system for remotely verifying a prescription
US20060041330A1 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-02-23 Walgreen Co. System and method for checking the accuracy of a prescription fill

Non-Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"The Virtual Pharmacist," Rural Electric, vol. 60, No. 6, Mar. 2002, p. 20.
Anonymous, "CVS, Merck-Medco in E-commerce Alliance," Chain Drug Review, 21(18):2 (1999).
Anonymous, "Name Change Reflects CVS' Commitment to E-commerce," Chain Drug Review, 21(15):2 (1999).
Bar Codes Effect Liquor Distribution Efficiency, May 1995, Packaging Digest, v. 32, n6, p26(3). *
Colchamiro, "Independents Look to Go Online," American Druggist, Sep. 1999, pp. 1-3.
McNaughton, "Can Net Drugstores Outpace the Chains?" CNET News.com, Feb. 24, 1999, 1 page.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/697,783 dated Sep. 29, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/715,872, filed Nov. 15, 2000, entitled "Apparatus and Method for Accessing Pharmacy Information and Ordering Prescriptions."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,759, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing for Medication Payments."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,775, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "Method and Apparatus for Inter-Pharmacy Workload Balancing."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,776, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing for Specialty Medication."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,947, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing for Compound Medication."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/253,185, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing for Prescription Verification."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/253,252, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing."
U.S. Appl. No. 11/253,253, filed Oct. 18, 2005, entitled "System for Separating and Distributing Pharmacy Order Processing for Out of Stock Medication."
Walgreens On-line Prefills (Website Printout Packet-printed Jul. 5, 2006) archived as Jun. 17, 1998, p. 1-13.
Wolverton, "Online Pharmacies Partner for Power," CNET News.com, Oct. 8, 1999, pp. 1-2.

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11581079B1 (en) 2012-04-10 2023-02-14 Walgreen Co. System and method for virtual review of a pharmaceutical product filling process
US11182728B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2021-11-23 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication workflow management
US20140350947A1 (en) * 2013-05-22 2014-11-27 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication delivery management
US10380326B2 (en) * 2013-05-22 2019-08-13 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication delivery management
US10971259B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2021-04-06 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication delivery management
US11651846B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2023-05-16 Carefusion 303, Inc. Medication delivery management
US10492987B2 (en) 2017-06-26 2019-12-03 Parata Systems, Llc Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing multiple drug product packaging systems using a common database management system
US11327469B2 (en) 2017-06-26 2022-05-10 Parata Systems, Llc Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing multiple drug product packaging systems using a common database management system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20030149599A1 (en) 2003-08-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8321236B2 (en) Method and apparatus for prescription processing
US8688473B2 (en) System and methods of providing pharmacy services
US8639554B2 (en) Prescription management system
US10192034B2 (en) System and method for clinical strategy for therapeutic pharmacies
US8165900B2 (en) Patient check-in/scheduling kiosk
US10311534B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for planning and management of clinical trials
US7860724B2 (en) System and method for management of pharmacy workflow
US20070214014A1 (en) Pharmacy quality checking and alert system and method
US20150154528A1 (en) Task manager for healthcare providers
US8315887B2 (en) System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for specialty medication
US7689441B1 (en) Integrated order and scheduling in a healthcare administration system
US20110307270A1 (en) System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing for prescription verification
WO2014152525A1 (en) Pharmacy workflow
US11610670B1 (en) System and method of dynamically generating work assignments
CA2422513A1 (en) Medication dispensing apparatus override check and communication system
US20020035491A1 (en) System and associated methods for providing claimant services with increased quality assurance
Mao et al. On-demand meal delivery platforms: Operational level data and research opportunities
US20140278521A1 (en) Location limited check-in kiosk method and apparatus
US20020077994A1 (en) System and associated methods for providing claimant services with prioritized dispatch
US20020091552A1 (en) System and associated methods for providing claimant services and access to claimant records and reports via a computer network
JP2004078970A (en) Prescription system and program
US20210313031A1 (en) System, methods, and apparatus for remote verification of pharmacy prescription preparation
Godin et al. Faster test results
Salman Workflow Analysis, Scheduling, and Chance Constraint Models in Community Pharmacy Operations
Zaki Developing a DSS for a distribution facility: An application in the healthcare industry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WALGREEN CO., ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GOODALL, CHARLES;LIBO, SAM;LICCARDO, PETER;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013775/0214

Effective date: 20030205

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8