A girl with headphones listens to Audible. Discover hundreds of audiobooks up to 80% off.

Dracula: The Un-Dead

4.3 out of 5 stars 642
3.1 on Goodreads
(6,373)
Loading Images...
Double-tap to zoom
$14.44 with 46 percent savings
List Price: $26.95

The List Price is the suggested retail price of a new product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier, or seller. Except for books, Amazon will display a List Price if the product was purchased by customers on Amazon or offered by other retailers at or above the List Price in at least the past 90 days. List prices may not necessarily reflect the product's prevailing market price.
Learn more
FREE Returns
FREE delivery Tuesday, April 30 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery Friday, April 26. Order within 20 hrs 27 mins
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$14.44 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$14.44
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
FREE delivery Tuesday, April 30 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery Friday, April 26. Order within 8 hrs 42 mins
Sold by Martistore and fulfilled by Amazon.
$$14.44 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$14.44
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Book details

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Book overview

A sequel cowritten by Bram Stoker's great-grandnephew and based on the original author's handwritten notes takes place twenty-five years later and finds Van Helsing's morphine-addicted protégé obsessed with countering evil forces and Quincey Harker learning disturbing truths about his parents' dark secrets in the wake of several murders.

From Publishers Weekly

In this sequel to Bram Stoker's Dracula, his great-grandnephew offers one of the rowdiest revisionist treatments of the most influential vampire novel ever written. In 1912, as Stoker labors to adapt Dracula for the stage, its characters are dying gruesomely all over London. It turns out they are as real as Stoker himself, who learned their secret story on the sly and took creative liberties when turning it into his popular penny dreadful. Dracula's true story involves the passing of his blood line through Mina Harker to her son; a malignant Dr. Van Helsing, who Scotland Yard suspects had a hand in the murders attributed to Jack the Ripper; and the exploits of a 16th-century vampire countess, Dracula's former lover, who cuts a bloody swath through London seeking the survivors of Dracula's last stand in Transylvania. Energetically paced and packed with outrageously entertaining action, this supernatural thriller is a well-needed shot of fresh blood for the Dracula mythos. (Oct.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review

"Energetically paced and packed with outrageously entertaining action, this supernatural thriller is a well-needed shot of fresh blood for the Dracula mythos."
Publisher's Weekly

"The authors (Stoker is a descendant of Bram, and Holt is a noted Dracula historian) skillfully explore the nature of evil while weaving together several complex plotlines throughout this mesmerizing story. Readers who enjoy dark fantasy with fast-paced action will plow through this book, not wanting to stop."
Library Journal

Who could resist sinking their teeth into a sequel by a writer with Stoker blood in his veins?”
—Carol Memmott,
USA Today Critics’ Picks

About the Author

Dacre Stoker is the great-grandnephew of Bram Stoker. He lives in South Carolina with his family.

Ian Holt is a Dracula documentarian, historian, and screenwriter. He lives on Long Island.

From The Washington Post

From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by by Michael Sims Dracula will not die. Never mind the stake through his heart. Forget that sunlight turned him into ash. Nowadays, when the fiend comes to his predictably messy end, it's easy to imagine him, like Tom Sawyer, watching his own funeral and chuckling over his upcoming resurrection. A descendant of Dracula's creator is managing the 2009 comeback tour. Dacre Stoker, Bram Stoker's great-grandnephew, and Ian Holt, a screenwriter and Dracula fanatic, have co-authored "Dracula the Un-Dead." In a behind-the-scenes afterword, they speak of the famous Stoker on a first-name basis -- but after all, he's family. "In the end it was our most important goal with this sequel," they claim, "to right the wrongs done to Bram's original classic." Repeatedly they harp on this point, yet surely no Hollywood movie has ever taken greater liberties with Bram Stoker's characters. Stoker and Holt upend many of the original premises about Count Dracula. I laughed aloud at their assertion of the vampire's "moral compass." In this sequel, it has been 25 years since the "death" of Dracula, and the ragtag band of vigilantes who dispatched him are being murdered in uncomfortable ways. Who could the villain be? Quincey Harker, the son of Jonathan and Mina from the original novel, is about to inherit the family troubles. Along the way, while trying to become an actor, he meets a theater manager named Bram Stoker, who in writing an adaptation of his novel must wrestle with a mysterious European who thinks he knows better how to play a vampire. Stoker and Holt dump everything into their furiously boiling kettle of cliches -- bucketfuls of gore, creepy sex, a torture scene that comes across as lesbian vampire porn. They toss in Jack the Ripper, DNA, a plot twist borrowed from "Star Wars," an ancient religiously motivated conspiracy and even the Titanic. They name some characters after actors who played Dracula (watch for references to Christopher Lee, Louis Jourdan and Frank Langella). And they work in a historical figure often mistakenly associated with vampires, Elizabeth Báthory, who tortured and murdered countless young women and whom legend credits with bathing in the blood of virgins to prolong her youth. But I don't mean to complain that this cheeseburger is not caviar. "Un-Dead" is cinematically fast-paced, flying from London to Paris to Transylvania, and the historical texture is mostly convincing. The primary theme of vampire stories applies as well to authors and sequels. As a character borrowed from the original "Dracula" puts it: "Death is only the beginning, my love." bookworld@washpost.com
Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Prologue

Letter from Mina Harker to her son, Quincey Harker, Esq.

(To be opened upon the sudden or unnatural death of Wilhelmina Harker)

9th March 1912

Dear Quincey,

My dear son, all your life you have suspected that there have been secrets between us. I fear that the time has come to reveal the truth to you. To deny it any longer would put both your life and your immortal soul in jeopardy.

Your dear father and I chose to keep the secrets of our past from you in order to shield you from the darkness that shrouds this world. We had hoped to allow you a childhood free from the fears that have haunted us all our adult lives. As you grew into the promising young man you are today, we chose not to tell you what we knew lest you think us mad. Forgive us. If you are reading this letter now, then the evil we so desperately and perhaps wrongly sought to shield you from has returned. And now you, like your parents before you, are in grave danger.

In the year 1888, when your father and I were still young, we learned that evil lurks in the shadows of our world, waiting to prey upon the unbelieving and the unprepared.

As a young solicitor, your father was sent into the wilds of Transylvania. His task was to help Prince Dracula conclude the purchase of a property in Whitby, an ancient monastery known as Carfax Abbey.

During his stay in Transylvania, your father discovered that his host and client, Prince Dracula, was in truth a creature thought to exist only in folktale and legend, one of those which feed upon the blood of the living in order to attain immortal life. Dracula was what the locals called Nosferatu, the Un-Dead.

You may more readily recognize the creature by its more common name:vampire.

Prince Dracula, fearing that your father would expose the truth of what he was, imprisoned him in his castle. Dracula himself then booked passage to England on the sailing vessel the Demeter, spending the many days of his voyage hidden in one of dozens of crates in the hull. He concealed himself in this strange fashion because although a vampire may have the strength of ten men and the ability to take many forms, he will burn to ash if struck by the light of the sun.

At this time, I was staying in Whitby at the home of my closest and dearest friend, Lucy Westenra. A storm had blown in off the sea, and the treacherous Whitby cliffs were shrouded in a dense mist. Lucy, unable to sleep, saw from her window the storm-driven ship heading for the rocks. Lucy raced into the night in an attempt to raise the alarm before the ship was wrecked, but she was too late. I awoke in a panic, saw that Lucy was not beside me in bed, and raced out into the storm to search for her. I found her at the cliff's edge, unconscious and with two small holes in her neck.

Lucy became deathly ill. Her fiancé, Arthur Holmwood, the son of Lord Godalming, and his dear friend, a visiting Texan whom you know as your namesake, Quincey P. Morris, raced to her side. Arthur called every doctor in Whitby and beyond, but none could explain Lucy's illness. It was our friend who owned the Whitby Asylum, Dr. Jack Seward, who called in his mentor from Holland, Dr. Abraham Van Helsing.

Dr. Van Helsing, a learned man of medicine, was also acquainted with the occult. He recognized that Lucy was suffering from the bite of a vampire.

It was then that I finally received word from your father. He had escaped from Dracula's castle and taken refuge in a monastery where he, too, was deathly ill. I was forced to leave Lucy's bedside and travel to meet him. It was there in Buda-Pesth that we were married.

Your father told me of the horrors he had seen, and it was from this that we learned the identity of the vampire that had attacked Lucy and now threatened all our lives: Prince Dracula.

Upon returning from Buda-Pesth, we were told that Lucy had died. But worse was to follow. Days after her death, she had risen from her grave. She was now a vampire and was feeding on the blood of small children. Dr. Van Helsing, Quincey Morris, Dr. Seward, and Arthur Holmwood were faced with a terrible decision. They had no choice but drive a wooden stake through Lucy's heart in order to free her poor soul.

Shortly thereafter, Prince Dracula returned in the night to attack me. After this attack, we all swore an oath to hunt down and destroy the vampire, and rid the world of his evil. And so it was that we became the band of heroes and chased Dracula back to his castle in Transylvania. There, Quincey Morris died in battle although, like the hero he was, he managed to plunge a knife into Dracula's heart. We watched as Prince Dracula burst into flames, crumbling into dust in the light of the setting sun.

Then, we were free, or so I thought. But about a year after you were born, I began to suffer horrible nightmares. Dracula was haunting me in my dreams. It was then that your father reminded me of the dark prince's warning and how he had claimed, "I shall have my revenge. I shall spread it over centuries. Time is on my side."

From that day onward, your father and I have had no peace. We have spent our years looking over our shoulders. And now I fear we are no longer strong enough to protect you from his evil and I have made a terrible misjudgment in character.

Know this, my son, if you are to survive the evil that is now hunting you; embrace the truth I speak in these pages. Look deep within your young self and, as your father and I were once forced to do, find the brave hero within. Dracula is a wise and cunning foe. You cannot run, and there is nowhere to hide. You must stand and fight.

Good luck, my dear son, and do not be afraid. If Van Helsing is correct, then vampires are truly demons, and God will be at your side as you do battle.

With all my undying love,

Your mother, Mina


Chapter I.

OCEANS OF LOVE, LUCY.

The inscription was the only thing Dr. Jack Seward could focus on as he felt the darkness overtake him. In the darkness was peace, with no harsh light to illuminate the tattered remains of his life. For years, he had devoted himself to fighting back the darkness. Now he simply embraced it.

Only at night could Seward find peace with the memory of Lucy. In his dreams, he still felt her warm embrace. For a fleeting moment, he could go back to London, to a happier era, when he found meaning through his place in the world and his research. This was the life he had wished to share with Lucy.

The early morning din of milk wagons, fishmongers' carts, and other merchant vehicles rattling hurriedly across the cobblestone streets of Paris intruded on Seward's dream and thrust him back into the harsh present. Seward forced his eyes open. They stung worse than fresh iodine on an open wound. As the cracked ceiling of the stale Parisian flophouse room he had been renting came into focus, he reflected on how much his life had changed. It saddened him to see all the muscle tone he had lost. His bicep sagged, resembling one of those hand-sewn muslin tea bags after it had just been removed from a teapot. The veins on his arm were like rivers on a tattered map. He was a shadow of his former self.

Seward prayed that death would come quickly. He had willed his body to science, to be used in a classroom at his alma mater. He took comfort from the fact that in death he would help to inspire future doctors and scientists.

After a time, he remembered the watch, still nestled in his left hand. He turned it over. Half past six! For an instant, panic overtook him. Damn it to hell. He had overslept. Seward staggered to his feet. An empty glass syringe rolled off the table and shattered on the grimy wooden floor. A small, smoked brown bottle of morphine was about to follow the fate of the syringe, but he quickly caught the precious liquid, untying the leather belt from his left bicep with a practiced movement. Normal circulation returned as he rolled down his sleeve and returned the silver monogrammed cuff link to his frayed dress shirt. He buttoned up his vest and slipped on his jacket. Wallingham & Sons were the finest tailors in London. If his suit had been made by anyone else, it would have disintegrated ten years ago. Vanity dies hard, Seward thought to himself with a humorless chuckle.

He had to hurry if he still wanted to make the train. Where was that address? He had put it in a safe place. Now, when he needed it, he could not recall where exactly that was. He overturned the straw-filled mattress, inspected the underside of the wobbly table, and peered under the vegetable crates that served as dining chairs. He sifted through piles of aged newspaper clippings. Their headlines spoke of Seward's current preoccupation: gruesome stories of Jack the Ripper. Autopsy photos of the five known victims. Mutilated women posed, legs open, as if waiting to accept their deranged killer. The Ripper was deemed a butcher of women—but a butcher is more merciful to the animals he slaughters. Seward had reread the autopsy notes countless times. Loose pages of his theories and ideas written on scrap paper, torn cardboard, and unfolded matchboxes fluttered around him like windblown leaves.

The sweat flowing from Seward's brow began to sting his bloodshot eyes. Damn, where had he put it? The Benefactor had taken enormous risks to get him this information. Seward could not bear the thought of disappointing the only person who still believed in him. Everyone else—the Harkers, the Holmwoods—all thought he had taken leave of his senses. If they could see this room, Seward knew, they would feel justified in that belief. He scanned the crumbling plaster walls, which bore the evidence of his morphine-induced rants, his wild insights handwritten in ink, coal, wine, even his own blood. No madman would be so obvious. He was certain that these writings would one day prove his sanity.

Amidst it all, there was a page torn from a book, stabbed into the wall with a bone-handled bowie knife whose blade was stained with old blood. The page featured a portrait of an elegant, raven-haired beauty. Beneath the picture, an inscription: Countess Elizabeth Bathory circa 1582.

Of course, that's where I hid it. He laughed at himself as he pulled the knife out of the wall, seizing the page and turning it over. In his own barely legible handwriting, he found the address of a villa in Marseilles. Seward removed the cross, wooden stake, and garlic wreaths that hung next to Bathory's picture and scooped up a silver knife from the floor. He placed everything into a false bottom in his medical bag and covered it all with standard medical supplies.

The train left the Gare de Lyon exactly on time. Seeing it pull away just as he was paying for his ticket, Seward sprinted across the flood-stained building to reach the chugging behemoth as it left the seventh bay door. He managed to catch the last Pullman car and hoist himself on before it had a chance to pick up speed. His heart surged with pride as he made the daring leap. He had done this sort of thing in his youth with the Texan Quincey P. Morris and his old friend Arthur Holmwood. Youth was wasted on the young. Seward smiled to himself as he recalled the reckless days of his innocence…and ignorance.

The doctor took a seat in the elaborate dining car as the train lumbered southward. It wasn't moving quickly enough. He glanced down at his pocket watch; only five minutes had passed. Seward lamented that he could no longer pass the time by writing in his journal, as he was unable to afford the luxury of such a thing. They were not scheduled to reach Marseilles for ten more hours. There, he would finally have the evidence to prove his theories and show those who had shunned him that he was not mad, that he had been right all along.

These were going to be the longest ten hours of Seward's life.

"Billets, s'il vous plaît!"

Seward stared wide-eyed at the conductor standing over him with a stern look of impatience.

"Forgive me," Seward said. He handed the conductor his ticket, adjusting his scarf to cover the torn breast pocket.

"You are British?" the conductor asked with a heavy French accent.

"Why, yes."

"A doctor?" The conductor nodded toward the medical bag between Seward's feet.

"Yes."

Seward watched the conductor's gray eyes catalogue the threadbare person in front of him, the ill-fitting suit and well-worn shoes. He was hardly the image of a respectable doctor. "I will see your bag, please."

He handed over the bag, for it was not as if he had much choice in the matter. The conductor methodically pulled out medical bottles, read the labels, and dropped them back in with a clink. Seward knew what the conductor was looking for and hoped he wouldn't dig too deeply.

"Morphine," announced the conductor in a voice so loud that other passengers glanced over. He held up the brown bottle.

"I sometimes have to prescribe it as a sedative."

"I will see your license, please."

Seward searched his pockets. Over a month ago, the International Opium Convention had been signed, prohibiting persons from importing, selling, distributing, and exporting morphine without a medical license. It took him so long to find it that by the time Seward finally produced the license, the conductor was about to pull the cord to stop the train. The conductor examined the paper, frowning, then turned his steely eyes to the travel document. The United Kingdom was the first to use photo identification on their passports. Since that picture had been taken, Seward had lost a tremendous amount of weight. His hair was now much grayer, his beard wild and untrimmed. The man in the train bore little resemblance to the man in the photo.

"Why are you going to Marseilles, doctor?"

"I am treating a patient there."

"What ails this patient?"

"He's suffering from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder."

"Qu'est-ce que c'est?"

"It is a psychological instability causing the patient to inflict predatory, autoerotic, antisocial, and parasitic control on those around them. As well as—"

"Merci." The conductor cut Seward off by handing him back his papers and ticket with a deft flick. He turned and addressed only the men at the next table. "Billets, s'il vous plaît."

Jack Seward sighed. Replacing his papers in his jacket, he checked the pocket watch again, a nervous habit. It seemed as if the interrogation had lasted hours, but only another five minutes had passed. He rolled down the fringed window shade to shield his eyes from the daylight and reclined into the plush, burgundy upholstered seat.

Oceans of Love, Lucy.

He held the beloved watch close to his heart and closed his eyes to dream.

It was a quarter century ago. Seward held the same watch up to the light the better to read the inscription: "Oceans of love, Lucy."

She was there. Alive. "You don't like it," she said, and pouted.

He couldn't break his stare away from her green eyes, soft as a summer meadow. Lucy had an odd idiosyncrasy of watching a speaker's mouth as if trying to taste the next word before it passed by his lips. She had such a lust for life. Her smile could bring warmth to the coldest heart. As she sat on the bench in the garden that spring day, Seward marveled at how the sunlight illuminated the loose strands of red hair that danced in the breeze, haloing her face. The scent of fresh lilacs mixed with the salty sea air of Whitby Harbor. In the years since, whenever he smelled lilacs, he would remember this beautiful, bitter day.

"I can only conclude," Seward said, clearing his throat before his voice had a chance to break, "since you wrote on the gift card 'Dearest Friend' rather than 'Fiancé,' that you have chosen not to accept my proposal of marriage."

Lucy looked away, her eyes moistening. The silence spoke volumes.

"I thought it best that you hear it from me," Lucy finally sighed. "I have consented to wed Arthur."

Arthur had been Jack Seward's friend since they were lads. Seward loved him like a brother, yet always envied how easily everything came to Arthur. He was handsome and rich, and had never in his life known worry or struggle. Or heartbreak.

"I see." Seward's voice sounded like a squeak in his ears.

"I do love you," Lucy whispered. "But . . ."

"But not as much as much as you love Arthur." Of course he could not compete with the wealthy Arthur Holmwood, nor was he as dashing as Lucy's other suitor, the Texan Quincey P. Morris.

"Forgive me," he went on in a softer tone, suddenly afraid he'd hurt her. "I forgot my place."

Lucy reached out and patted his hand, as one would a beloved pet. "I will always be here."

Back in the present, he stirred in his sleep. If he could just see the beauty in Lucy's eyes . . . The last time he had gazed into them, that terrible night in the mausoleum, he had seen nothing but pain and torment. The memory of Lucy's dying screams still seared Seward's brain.

After leaving the train, Seward walked in a torrential downpour through Marseilles's labyrinth of white buildings and cursed his timing. Of course, his quest brought him to the French Riviera in March, the only rainy month.

He slogged farther inland, glancing back to see Fort Saint-Jean standing like a stone sentinel in the indigo harbor. Then he turned about to study the Provençal city, which had been built around a 2,600-year-old village. Artifacts of the city's Greek and Roman founders were found throughout the streets. Seward lamented that he was in this picturesque haven for such a sinister purpose. Though it would not be the first time malevolence had made its presence felt here: Over the last century, this seaside town had been marred by plague and pirates.

Seward stopped. Looming in front of him was a typical two-story Mediterranean villa with large wooden shutters and wrought-iron bars on the windows. The winter moon peering through the rain clouds cast a spectral glow on the traditional white walls. The roof was covered in red terra-cotta tiles that reminded him of some of the old Spanish houses he had seen when he visited Quincey P. Morris in Texas so many years ago. It created a decidedly foreboding ambience, even unwelcoming, for an ornate villa on the French Riviera. It appeared entirely devoid of life. His heart sank at the thought that he might be too late. Seward looked again at the address.

This was it.

Suddenly, he heard the thunderous approach of a horse-drawn carriage splashing along the cobblestones. He ducked into a vineyard across from the building. There were no grapes on the dripping, weblike branches. A black carriage with ornate gold trim sailed up the hill, pulled by two glistening black mares. The animals drew to a stop without a command. Seward looked up and, to his surprise, saw there was no driver. How was that possible?

A strapping figure emerged from the carriage. The mares nipped at each other and squealed, necks arched. Then, again to Seward's amazement, they moved off, in perfect step, with no coachman to direct them. The figure held a walking stick aloft with one black-gloved hand, and dipped into a pocket with the other for a key, then stopped suddenly as if becoming aware of something.

"Damn," Seward muttered to himself.

The person at the door cocked his head, almost as if he heard Seward's voice through the rain, and turned slowly toward the vineyard. Seward felt waves of panic and adrenaline wash over him but managed to hold his breath. The gloved hand reached up to the brim of the velvet top hat and Seward choked back a gasp as he saw the top hat removed to reveal sensuous locks of black hair cascading onto the figure's shoulders.

His mind reeled. It is she! The Benefactor had been right.

Countess Elizabeth Bathory stood at the doorway of the villa, looking exactly as she had in the portrait painted over three hundred years ago.

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free. Explore Amazon Book Clubs
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Frequently bought together

Dracula: The Un-Dead
+
Dracul
+
Powers of Darkness: The Lost Version of Dracula

Frequently bought together

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Total price: $00
Details
Added to Cart
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Features & details

Features

  • Vampires

Product information

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Submit a report

A few common reasons customers report reviews:
  • Harassment, profanity
  • Spam, advertisement, promotions
  • Given in exchange for cash, discounts
When we get your report, we'll check if the review meets our Community guidelines. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
Sorry we couldn't load the review
Thank you for your feedback

Sorry, there was an error

Please try again later.

Top reviews from the United States

5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A worthy sequel to Dracula.
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2012
This book,picks up more or less where the first left off over a hundred yrs ago.With(as read on the books web page)an attempt too bring the Dracula name back too the Stoker family.With help from Ian Holt,Darce Stoker indead does that.With this fresh look on the old... See more
This book,picks up more or less where the first left off over a hundred yrs ago.With(as read on the books web page)an attempt too bring the Dracula name back too the Stoker family.With help from Ian Holt,Darce Stoker indead does that.With this fresh look on the old tale.This story is the effects of the aftermath of the previous book,and a primary focus is on Quincy Harker-son of Johnathan,and Mina Harker.Who has been kept in the dark all his life about family secrets.while on break from the law school hes attending,Quincy vists the London theatre district.Where he chances too meet the famous actor,Basarab:His role model.Quincy is taken under Basarab's wing and set off too follow his true dream,notthe one his father whiches for him.durning these early stages of the book the rest of the surving cast of Dracula is introduced into the story.Each dealing with the past in there own way or tringto forget.Mina is dealing with a quarter centry of guilt,her druken husband,her affair with her Dark Prince,and worries for her son.Arthur Holmwood-with all his wealth has become excessivly lonely and longs for death.Van Helsing,now a 75yrold man still more or less on noble quest.Jack Seward-pretty much is off his rocker,and becomes the first victem,in a grand sceam too bring the Band of Heros back together.and pick them off one by one.But who is pulling the strings?Is it Dracula as the group Belevies or someone else?How far will Mina go to protect her son?Will Quincey find his dream or be swept in a living nightmare?Has the Dark Prince really returned too take his revenge?there are many other charecters,of interest in this book,but to go into anymore detail,will be a spoiler,if a previous reveiwer has not done it allready,I will not take away some of the mystery of the book.In this Story of Gothic horror ,and mystery.The game is most deffently a foot.The mysteries ofthe book are notthat hard to ofigure once your into it,but they drive the action nicely.
I give this book 4.5 stars but that is not an option so I rounded up.Besides the story its self,what is catching about this book,is all the famous real life people used in the story including Bram.Who is struggling with failing health,and the lack luster success of Dracula,tring too redeam himself by directing a play of his book.People such as Doyl and Irving are mentioned.Along with charecters who are over looked,or didnot make the orginal book.Even Jack the ripper has a role in this tale of a Gothic London.General historical references:Along with events pretaning too Dracula,and another charecter,for whom, he is based off of :also aid in this books tale.This book was broughttoo my attention less then a month ago-when i finished reading last years Graphic novel Dracula Everlasting(pretty good story its self).In that book it states,the creators found evedence fromThe Novel Dracula's publisher that Stoker,Seemed too beleive his story to be real.Atleast too a point.I found this book,while tringtoo find clarification on that,as it was something I donot ever remember reading or hearing.As a result i found this book,withthe subtitle "UNDEAD"ment too be used as the first books title.And this find was well worith it enjoy.
6 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
super vampire thriller
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2009
Twenty-five years has passed since the horrific events of 1897 ended with Dracula turning into dust; none involved have moved on as each remains haunted by the encounter with the Count. Mina and Jonathon married, but neither obtained closure when the vampire was killed;... See more
Twenty-five years has passed since the horrific events of 1897 ended with Dracula turning into dust; none involved have moved on as each remains haunted by the encounter with the Count. Mina and Jonathon married, but neither obtained closure when the vampire was killed; stressed and estrnaged, they conceal from their son Quincey what happened. Seward survives with heroin while Holmwood became a hermit. Their mentor Van Helsing obsessively lives for the return of Dracula as the vampire's death was his life's goal so he has nothing else. Scotland Yard believes Van Helsing was involved in the unsolved Ripper murders.

In 1912, Stoker is frustrated as he struggles to convert his horror thriller Dracula to the London stage. However, although the author knows the full truth, he and the others except perhaps the ever vigilant Van Helsing are unprepared for a gruesome serial killer horrifying London. Scotland yard once again believes a fanatic Van Helsing is deeply connected to the killings, but too old to perform them. Those involved with what happened back then find themsleves and their loved ones under siege as if Van Helsing's belief the Count will return from the dust has occurred. The survivors of the previous encounter regroup to battle evil again although they are unsure who stalks them.

This is a super vampire thriller that brings forward the stars of Dracula into the Edwardian Era with a where are they now tale. The clever story line is fast-paced while introducing the audience to the survivors of the previous horrific encounter to include Bram Stoker. Dacre Stoker and Ian Holt explore the essence of evil and good through a cast of humans who have used psychological defense mechanisms to barely survive and a vampire who may or may not be Dracula, but has the same attitude re the food chain as well as a thirst for the blood of vengeance. Filled with terrific twists fans of Dracula and those who appreciate a strong historical urban fantasy will relish the THE UN-DEAD.

Harriet Klausner
11 people found this helpful
Share
Report
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Unusual for a sequel, but very enjoyable.
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2021
A lot of readers apparently hate this book and prefer Dracul, Dacre Stoker's other Dracula adaption. I had the opposite experience. This was a great book in my honest opinion. Seeing Dracula in a heroic light is a rare, but usually enjoyable experience. Bathory was a great... See more
A lot of readers apparently hate this book and prefer Dracul, Dacre Stoker's other Dracula adaption. I had the opposite experience. This was a great book in my honest opinion. Seeing Dracula in a heroic light is a rare, but usually enjoyable experience. Bathory was a great villain and the rest of the characters were enjoyable to follow with the acceptation of Jonathan Harker and in all honesty, Quincy himself. Seeing Dacre's depiction of his own great uncle was a nice touch as well. My few genuine criticisms are three things:
1. The title doesn't make much sense and could easily get confused with the 1997 book of the same name, also a sequel to the original book.
2. Calling it a sequel doesn't add up when the original is depicted as a book in-universe and said to be inaccurate.
3. The note of hope at the end seemingly being cancelled out by the book's last line. It felt rather sad and almost mean-spirited.
But all in all, a great read. My main gripe is the fact that Dacre left it open for a sequel by revealing Bathory's connection to an unrevealed rival of Dracula and never followed up. Maybe some day.
6 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
I love this legitimate sequel!
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2016
I bought this book when it was brand new, and I absolutely loved it. I should have posted a Review back then, but I kept waiting for another sequel. Obviously, Dacre and his assistant left it so that there could be a sequel, or the story would simply end. He was offered... See more
I bought this book when it was brand new, and I absolutely loved it. I should have posted a Review back then, but I kept waiting for another sequel. Obviously, Dacre and his assistant left it so that there could be a sequel, or the story would simply end. He was offered from many to create a movie, but I remember him saying at the very beginning that he would only allow it if he could make sure they'd stick to the story and not change anything. Naturally, with his assistant, he added in the true history of Dracula and how he became a vampire. And, like the greatly loved Vampire Lestat, Dracula was explained as a hero, not at all evil, although he had problems in his real human life, around 600 years ago. And I remember on TV seeing the history of Dracula's cousin or niece, who lived about 100 years later, and was killing women and putting their blood in her bathtub, thinking it would make her immortal. That's a true story, and she was eventually arrested. Dacre added her into the story and she had also become a Vampire, but very evil, causing terrible problems in London, and Dracula was able to end it. I've recently been chatting with Dacre, since I was disappointed no sequel had been published yet. But get ready, as he's working on a prequel, which should be out within a year or so. And, there most likely will be a sequel, but we'll probably have to wait several more years for that. I have a pretty good idea as to how it will begin, but it would be wrong for me to explain it. Anyway, Bram Stoker wasn't respected, and there were many other stories about Dracula in books and movies, for which his family was paid nothing. But I didn't consider any of the other stories to be true sequels until Dracula the Un-Dead was published. I love it, and I'm very excited about the coming prequel.
2 people found this helpful
Share
Report
3.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
At least "He returned."
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2010
When I saw news about this book, Dracula, The Undead online, I knew I had to read it. The line on the book cover was: He returns . . . What?! Dracula wasn't dead and he's coming back? I was into it. Great marketing on the publisher's part. This book is a direct sequel to... See more
When I saw news about this book, Dracula, The Undead online, I knew I had to read it. The line on the book cover was: He returns . . . What?! Dracula wasn't dead and he's coming back? I was into it. Great marketing on the publisher's part. This book is a direct sequel to Bram Stoker's Dracula and a member of the Stoker family was part of the writing process (more on that later). Let me say, I'm a huge Dracula fan. I loved the novel by Bram Stoker, and have loved so many of the movies. In college I entered an MTV sponsored contest sending in 25 postcards for the chance to visit Romania and see Vlad Dracula's castle in Wallachia. I didn't win, but my interest in Dracula only grew.

The historical figure was a true monster, and the fictional Vlad was another kind of monster. Sexy, cool, and so powerful. Vampires have always fascinated me, espeically the Anne Rice type of vampires, like Lestat, and the True Blood HBO series vampires. This novel was a lot of fun. The intro features a letter from Mina Harker telling her son, Quincy, that she may have been killed by a vampire, and reveals that a lot was kept from him over the years. The letter is genius, and Dracula's fangs were in my neck right after I read the letter from Mina--I mean the literary hook was solidly set into my brain. I wanted to know more. It's set during the early 1900's and had a very Victorian feel to it. I didn't fly through the novel, but found it quite entertaining, though predictable. The best thing about it was that the original Bram Stoker story was turned on its head. We find out that the events recounted in the novel by Bram Stoker were not represented accurately. Yes, it really happened, but not as Stoker described.

All the survivng characters from the book are back, and they are so messed up and flawed. Dark and gloomy would be an understatement. It was like a car crash you couldn't look away from. Ian Holt and Dacre Stoker did a pretty good job portraying the characters and keeping the plot moving, but by skipping into so many points of view it lessened the impact for me. The idea of the novel was to weave historical events into the narrative, and though I found that interesting, I didn't think it was totally necessary. I can see why the authors took this tactic, but I would have rather had "the Prince" be the main focus, rather than the extremely famous murders that acutally happened in London.

I would recommend this book to any fans of Bram Stoker's original novel. It was cool to see what the greatest living Dracula fan (Ian Holt) and a descendent of Bram himself (Dacre Stoker) would do. Reading the very long Afterward about the writing of the book was possibly the best part of my reading experience. Bram Stoker's widow went through terrible times regarding the copyright of the original novel, and now we Dracula fans have a chance to help the Stoker family get back some of what was stolen from them so long ago. And we get to read the direct sequel to the original classic! What else can I write except: He returns . . .

Paul Genesse
Author of The Dragon Hunters
[...]
One person found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A great horror read, highly recommend.
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2010
I really enjoyed this book, from start to finish. The story is very well written, rich in character, story and scenery detail. I never read the original Dracula book, my only background into this story is from watching Coppola's 1992 film, which I also enjoyed.... See more
I really enjoyed this book, from start to finish. The story is very well written, rich in character, story and scenery detail. I never read the original Dracula book, my only background into this story is from watching Coppola's 1992 film, which I also enjoyed.

There are many twists and turns in this book which kept me turning the pages late into the night, many readers will moan and complain about liberties taken with the history/intentions of the original characters, but not I. I enjoy the way Stoker and Holt twist and maneuver into new territory with the Characters and allows you to delve further into the what-if and thoughts of the characters.

The character of Bathory almost overthrows the entire story because I found her background and determination at times to be more powerfully interesting then all of the other subplots combined.

The most convincing moment came not from reading a passage in this book, but when I was walking past a book shelf at Target and picked up a copy of 'Twilight' (Never seen nor read any of those books) so I decided to look and see how the two vampire books compared. I was appalled at how badly written Twilight is, it seems to be written for simpleton's seeking out cheap juvenile vampire hi-jinks. Sad to see the explosion of teenage Vampire books flooding the market, all poorly written and unimaginative.

I recommend anyone wanting to read a Vampire book to pick up this sequel to the original Dracula and PUT DOWN those over Twilight/Vampire Diaries/whatever books.
8 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Dracula the Undead
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2011
For just a little while, forget about Bram Stoker's Dracula (the original) because Dracula:The Undead, is a real doozy. It is very action packed and it gives a new twist on the original, along with its own story. Very fast-paced, so much so, that I didnt want to put it down... See more
For just a little while, forget about Bram Stoker's Dracula (the original) because Dracula:The Undead, is a real doozy. It is very action packed and it gives a new twist on the original, along with its own story. Very fast-paced, so much so, that I didnt want to put it down (I read it from beginning to midpoint in a few hours..cover-to-cover in a total of 5 hrs). The story of this book begins 25 yrs after the original dracula ends (these are the same characters from the original w/a few new characters thrown into the mix..because we're 25 yrs into the future)..of course I cant give away the plot, but here's a teaser..there's the infamous Blood Countess Bathory,among a few others..so to make my point, you will love this book..its a quick read with a ton of surprises,twists and turns around every corner without losing you in the process_you will definitely like this book!
Share
Report
1.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
This terrible, toothless book must have Bram Stoker rolling over in his grave!
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2009
I was excited about this book because it was supposedly written by a descendent of Bram Stoker so I expected a respectful, thoughtful sequel that would be true to the spirt of the original source. I could not have been more wrong! This book was so awful, so... See more
I was excited about this book because it was supposedly written by a descendent of Bram Stoker so I expected a respectful, thoughtful sequel that would be true to the spirt of the original source.

I could not have been more wrong! This book was so awful, so terribly written and had such a ridiculous plot that I could barely even finish it! I must admit I pretty much skimmed the final third - before throwing the horrible thing across the room in disgust.

This book is just awful - it contradicts and even re-writes Stoker. The treatment of the original characters is disrespectful and an insult to Stoker's intent. The writer tries to bring historic characters into the mix throwing in everything from Elisabeth Bathory (who here is a true vampire), Jack the Ripper, even (and I saw this one coming a mile away), The Titanic!

Dacre was obviously influenced by Francis Ford Coppola's film, "Bram Stoker's Dracula" and that could have been a good thing, except that the writer handles plot and character development so ineptly that the whole story falls flat and is anything but sexy. Coppola's version may not have been true to the letter of the original book, but it did retain the original spirit, was a fun adaptation and was intelligently executed on the screen. Of course Coppola played up the love angle between Dracula and Mina, which was NOT in Stoker. But that was Coppola's take on the tale, we've been there and done that now - one expected this book, written by a Stoker, to go back to basics and evoke Stoker's original vision. But no - 'Ol Dacre has to go and handle the whole thing so incompetently that there are not even any entertaining passages, and at no point is the reader truly engaged on any level. It is impossible to feel anything toward the unlikable characters this fool of a writer throws at us.

One thing that really disgusted me was that Dacre perpetuates the silly notion that sunlight is fatal to vampires, a concept not in the original novel, nor in any other vampire fiction or mythology until Hollywood invented the notion! To Coppola's credit, he went back to Bram Stoker on this concept - in his film, the Van Helsing character explains in a voice-over, "contrary to some beliefs, vampires, like all nocturnal creatures, can move about by day, though it is not their natural time and their powers are weak." But 'ol Dacre ignores his grandfather and all vampire mythology and has the vampires bursting into flame in the sunlight! Yawn!

Maybe the silliest aspect to the book, besides the whole Bathory vs. Dracula angle which makes no sense whatsoever, is making Bram Stoker a character alongside his fictional characters. I mean, WTF?! And the author does nothing interesting with this concept at all! That whole subplot is just unbelievably silly and ludicrous! In fact the whole damn book is a sloppy, unfocused, infuriating mess that had me laughing out loud at how ridiculous the author's little twists were as the lame "plot" stumbled along! It was also over the top gory and mean spirited in how it dispatched some of Stoker's original characters.

Avoid this mess at all costs! Will we ever get a worthy sequel to Dracula? It is seeming more and more unlikely! I hated this book - it was a complete waste of money and I regret buying it and supporting this writer and his silly book! Don't make the same mistake!
56 people found this helpful
Share
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Laura Vargas
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Great book
Reviewed in Canada on January 27, 2021
Great book
Great book
Report
Kevin Kelly
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A STEP BACK IN TIME.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 21, 2020
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't. This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside...See more
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't. This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside out, giving the old story a new found sense of life. Don't miss out reading this if your a fan of horror, or Dracula.
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't.
This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside out, giving the old story a new found sense of life.
Don't miss out reading this if your a fan of horror, or Dracula.
3 people found this helpful
Report
Reima R.
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Vielen Dank!
Reviewed in Germany on September 23, 2014
Danke schön! Sehr gut. Ich spreche Deutsch nur ein bisschen, aber das Buch ist sehr gut. Highly recommended to everyone. Und es war sehr billig.
Danke schön! Sehr gut. Ich spreche Deutsch nur ein bisschen, aber das Buch ist sehr gut. Highly recommended to everyone. Und es war sehr billig.
Report
John
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
I enjoyed it
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 23, 2023
I did enjoy this book, easy read get it 😁
I did enjoy this book, easy read get it 😁
Report
Andrea S.
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Spannende Fortsetzung
Reviewed in Germany on February 19, 2010
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch. Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und...See more
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch. Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und auch Bram Stoker selbst spielt als Theaterregisseur mit. Die beiden Autoren haben sich in vielen Punkten eher an dem Film mit Gary Oldman orientiert und so einiges eingebaut, was mit dem Vorgängerbuch nicht so ganz zusammenpaßt. Sie haben aber im Nachhinein auch erklärt wieso sie dies gemacht haben, um auch die Filmgemeinde, die das Buch nicht kennen, zu erreichen. Mir hat das Buch gefallen und ich würde es jederzeit wieder lesen.
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch.
Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und auch Bram Stoker selbst spielt als Theaterregisseur mit. Die beiden Autoren haben sich in vielen Punkten eher an dem Film mit Gary Oldman orientiert und so einiges eingebaut, was mit dem Vorgängerbuch nicht so ganz zusammenpaßt. Sie haben aber im Nachhinein auch erklärt wieso sie dies gemacht haben, um auch die Filmgemeinde, die das Buch nicht kennen, zu erreichen.
Mir hat das Buch gefallen und ich würde es jederzeit wieder lesen.
2 people found this helpful
Report

How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon