A girl with headphones listens to Audible. Discover hundreds of audiobooks up to 80% off.

Dracula The Un-Dead

4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 642
3.1 on Goodreads
(6,372)
Double-tap to zoom
As an alternative, the Kindle eBook is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app.
Select delivery location
See All Buying Options
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Book details

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Book overview

The authoritative sequel to Bram Stoker's original horror classic.

A quarter of a century after Count Dracula "crumbled into dust," Quincey Harker-the son of Jonathan and Mina Harker-leaves law school to pursue a career on stage, only to stumble upon the troubled production of
Dracula, directed and produced by Bram Stoker himself.

As the play plunges Quincey into the world of his parents' terrible secrets, death begins to stalk the original band of heroes that defeated Dracula a quarter-century ago. Could it be that the count survived and is now seeking revenge? Or is there another, far more sinister force at work whose relentless purpose is to destroy anything and anyone associated with Dracula, the most notorious vampire of all time?

Watch a Video

About the Author

Dacre Stoker is the great-grandnephew of Bram Stoker. He lives in South Carolina with his family.
Ian Holt is a Dracula documentarian, historian, and screenwriter. He lives on Long Island.



About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free. Explore Amazon Book Clubs
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Product information

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Submit a report

A few common reasons customers report reviews:
  • Harassment, profanity
  • Spam, advertisement, promotions
  • Given in exchange for cash, discounts
When we get your report, we'll check if the review meets our Community guidelines. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
Sorry we couldn't load the review
Thank you for your feedback

Sorry, there was an error

Please try again later.

Top reviews from the United States

5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A worthy sequel to Dracula.
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2012
This book,picks up more or less where the first left off over a hundred yrs ago.With(as read on the books web page)an attempt too bring the Dracula name back too the Stoker family.With help from Ian Holt,Darce Stoker indead does that.With this fresh look on the old... See more
This book,picks up more or less where the first left off over a hundred yrs ago.With(as read on the books web page)an attempt too bring the Dracula name back too the Stoker family.With help from Ian Holt,Darce Stoker indead does that.With this fresh look on the old tale.This story is the effects of the aftermath of the previous book,and a primary focus is on Quincy Harker-son of Johnathan,and Mina Harker.Who has been kept in the dark all his life about family secrets.while on break from the law school hes attending,Quincy vists the London theatre district.Where he chances too meet the famous actor,Basarab:His role model.Quincy is taken under Basarab's wing and set off too follow his true dream,notthe one his father whiches for him.durning these early stages of the book the rest of the surving cast of Dracula is introduced into the story.Each dealing with the past in there own way or tringto forget.Mina is dealing with a quarter centry of guilt,her druken husband,her affair with her Dark Prince,and worries for her son.Arthur Holmwood-with all his wealth has become excessivly lonely and longs for death.Van Helsing,now a 75yrold man still more or less on noble quest.Jack Seward-pretty much is off his rocker,and becomes the first victem,in a grand sceam too bring the Band of Heros back together.and pick them off one by one.But who is pulling the strings?Is it Dracula as the group Belevies or someone else?How far will Mina go to protect her son?Will Quincey find his dream or be swept in a living nightmare?Has the Dark Prince really returned too take his revenge?there are many other charecters,of interest in this book,but to go into anymore detail,will be a spoiler,if a previous reveiwer has not done it allready,I will not take away some of the mystery of the book.In this Story of Gothic horror ,and mystery.The game is most deffently a foot.The mysteries ofthe book are notthat hard to ofigure once your into it,but they drive the action nicely.
I give this book 4.5 stars but that is not an option so I rounded up.Besides the story its self,what is catching about this book,is all the famous real life people used in the story including Bram.Who is struggling with failing health,and the lack luster success of Dracula,tring too redeam himself by directing a play of his book.People such as Doyl and Irving are mentioned.Along with charecters who are over looked,or didnot make the orginal book.Even Jack the ripper has a role in this tale of a Gothic London.General historical references:Along with events pretaning too Dracula,and another charecter,for whom, he is based off of :also aid in this books tale.This book was broughttoo my attention less then a month ago-when i finished reading last years Graphic novel Dracula Everlasting(pretty good story its self).In that book it states,the creators found evedence fromThe Novel Dracula's publisher that Stoker,Seemed too beleive his story to be real.Atleast too a point.I found this book,while tringtoo find clarification on that,as it was something I donot ever remember reading or hearing.As a result i found this book,withthe subtitle "UNDEAD"ment too be used as the first books title.And this find was well worith it enjoy.
6 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
super vampire thriller
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2009
Twenty-five years has passed since the horrific events of 1897 ended with Dracula turning into dust; none involved have moved on as each remains haunted by the encounter with the Count. Mina and Jonathon married, but neither obtained closure when the vampire was killed;... See more
Twenty-five years has passed since the horrific events of 1897 ended with Dracula turning into dust; none involved have moved on as each remains haunted by the encounter with the Count. Mina and Jonathon married, but neither obtained closure when the vampire was killed; stressed and estrnaged, they conceal from their son Quincey what happened. Seward survives with heroin while Holmwood became a hermit. Their mentor Van Helsing obsessively lives for the return of Dracula as the vampire's death was his life's goal so he has nothing else. Scotland Yard believes Van Helsing was involved in the unsolved Ripper murders.

In 1912, Stoker is frustrated as he struggles to convert his horror thriller Dracula to the London stage. However, although the author knows the full truth, he and the others except perhaps the ever vigilant Van Helsing are unprepared for a gruesome serial killer horrifying London. Scotland yard once again believes a fanatic Van Helsing is deeply connected to the killings, but too old to perform them. Those involved with what happened back then find themsleves and their loved ones under siege as if Van Helsing's belief the Count will return from the dust has occurred. The survivors of the previous encounter regroup to battle evil again although they are unsure who stalks them.

This is a super vampire thriller that brings forward the stars of Dracula into the Edwardian Era with a where are they now tale. The clever story line is fast-paced while introducing the audience to the survivors of the previous horrific encounter to include Bram Stoker. Dacre Stoker and Ian Holt explore the essence of evil and good through a cast of humans who have used psychological defense mechanisms to barely survive and a vampire who may or may not be Dracula, but has the same attitude re the food chain as well as a thirst for the blood of vengeance. Filled with terrific twists fans of Dracula and those who appreciate a strong historical urban fantasy will relish the THE UN-DEAD.

Harriet Klausner
11 people found this helpful
Share
Report
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Unusual for a sequel, but very enjoyable.
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2021
A lot of readers apparently hate this book and prefer Dracul, Dacre Stoker's other Dracula adaption. I had the opposite experience. This was a great book in my honest opinion. Seeing Dracula in a heroic light is a rare, but usually enjoyable experience. Bathory was a great... See more
A lot of readers apparently hate this book and prefer Dracul, Dacre Stoker's other Dracula adaption. I had the opposite experience. This was a great book in my honest opinion. Seeing Dracula in a heroic light is a rare, but usually enjoyable experience. Bathory was a great villain and the rest of the characters were enjoyable to follow with the acceptation of Jonathan Harker and in all honesty, Quincy himself. Seeing Dacre's depiction of his own great uncle was a nice touch as well. My few genuine criticisms are three things:
1. The title doesn't make much sense and could easily get confused with the 1997 book of the same name, also a sequel to the original book.
2. Calling it a sequel doesn't add up when the original is depicted as a book in-universe and said to be inaccurate.
3. The note of hope at the end seemingly being cancelled out by the book's last line. It felt rather sad and almost mean-spirited.
But all in all, a great read. My main gripe is the fact that Dacre left it open for a sequel by revealing Bathory's connection to an unrevealed rival of Dracula and never followed up. Maybe some day.
6 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
I love this legitimate sequel!
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2016
I bought this book when it was brand new, and I absolutely loved it. I should have posted a Review back then, but I kept waiting for another sequel. Obviously, Dacre and his assistant left it so that there could be a sequel, or the story would simply end. He was offered... See more
I bought this book when it was brand new, and I absolutely loved it. I should have posted a Review back then, but I kept waiting for another sequel. Obviously, Dacre and his assistant left it so that there could be a sequel, or the story would simply end. He was offered from many to create a movie, but I remember him saying at the very beginning that he would only allow it if he could make sure they'd stick to the story and not change anything. Naturally, with his assistant, he added in the true history of Dracula and how he became a vampire. And, like the greatly loved Vampire Lestat, Dracula was explained as a hero, not at all evil, although he had problems in his real human life, around 600 years ago. And I remember on TV seeing the history of Dracula's cousin or niece, who lived about 100 years later, and was killing women and putting their blood in her bathtub, thinking it would make her immortal. That's a true story, and she was eventually arrested. Dacre added her into the story and she had also become a Vampire, but very evil, causing terrible problems in London, and Dracula was able to end it. I've recently been chatting with Dacre, since I was disappointed no sequel had been published yet. But get ready, as he's working on a prequel, which should be out within a year or so. And, there most likely will be a sequel, but we'll probably have to wait several more years for that. I have a pretty good idea as to how it will begin, but it would be wrong for me to explain it. Anyway, Bram Stoker wasn't respected, and there were many other stories about Dracula in books and movies, for which his family was paid nothing. But I didn't consider any of the other stories to be true sequels until Dracula the Un-Dead was published. I love it, and I'm very excited about the coming prequel.
2 people found this helpful
Share
Report
3.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
At least "He returned."
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2010
When I saw news about this book, Dracula, The Undead online, I knew I had to read it. The line on the book cover was: He returns . . . What?! Dracula wasn't dead and he's coming back? I was into it. Great marketing on the publisher's part. This book is a direct sequel to... See more
When I saw news about this book, Dracula, The Undead online, I knew I had to read it. The line on the book cover was: He returns . . . What?! Dracula wasn't dead and he's coming back? I was into it. Great marketing on the publisher's part. This book is a direct sequel to Bram Stoker's Dracula and a member of the Stoker family was part of the writing process (more on that later). Let me say, I'm a huge Dracula fan. I loved the novel by Bram Stoker, and have loved so many of the movies. In college I entered an MTV sponsored contest sending in 25 postcards for the chance to visit Romania and see Vlad Dracula's castle in Wallachia. I didn't win, but my interest in Dracula only grew.

The historical figure was a true monster, and the fictional Vlad was another kind of monster. Sexy, cool, and so powerful. Vampires have always fascinated me, espeically the Anne Rice type of vampires, like Lestat, and the True Blood HBO series vampires. This novel was a lot of fun. The intro features a letter from Mina Harker telling her son, Quincy, that she may have been killed by a vampire, and reveals that a lot was kept from him over the years. The letter is genius, and Dracula's fangs were in my neck right after I read the letter from Mina--I mean the literary hook was solidly set into my brain. I wanted to know more. It's set during the early 1900's and had a very Victorian feel to it. I didn't fly through the novel, but found it quite entertaining, though predictable. The best thing about it was that the original Bram Stoker story was turned on its head. We find out that the events recounted in the novel by Bram Stoker were not represented accurately. Yes, it really happened, but not as Stoker described.

All the survivng characters from the book are back, and they are so messed up and flawed. Dark and gloomy would be an understatement. It was like a car crash you couldn't look away from. Ian Holt and Dacre Stoker did a pretty good job portraying the characters and keeping the plot moving, but by skipping into so many points of view it lessened the impact for me. The idea of the novel was to weave historical events into the narrative, and though I found that interesting, I didn't think it was totally necessary. I can see why the authors took this tactic, but I would have rather had "the Prince" be the main focus, rather than the extremely famous murders that acutally happened in London.

I would recommend this book to any fans of Bram Stoker's original novel. It was cool to see what the greatest living Dracula fan (Ian Holt) and a descendent of Bram himself (Dacre Stoker) would do. Reading the very long Afterward about the writing of the book was possibly the best part of my reading experience. Bram Stoker's widow went through terrible times regarding the copyright of the original novel, and now we Dracula fans have a chance to help the Stoker family get back some of what was stolen from them so long ago. And we get to read the direct sequel to the original classic! What else can I write except: He returns . . .

Paul Genesse
Author of The Dragon Hunters
[...]
One person found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A great horror read, highly recommend.
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2010
I really enjoyed this book, from start to finish. The story is very well written, rich in character, story and scenery detail. I never read the original Dracula book, my only background into this story is from watching Coppola's 1992 film, which I also enjoyed.... See more
I really enjoyed this book, from start to finish. The story is very well written, rich in character, story and scenery detail. I never read the original Dracula book, my only background into this story is from watching Coppola's 1992 film, which I also enjoyed.

There are many twists and turns in this book which kept me turning the pages late into the night, many readers will moan and complain about liberties taken with the history/intentions of the original characters, but not I. I enjoy the way Stoker and Holt twist and maneuver into new territory with the Characters and allows you to delve further into the what-if and thoughts of the characters.

The character of Bathory almost overthrows the entire story because I found her background and determination at times to be more powerfully interesting then all of the other subplots combined.

The most convincing moment came not from reading a passage in this book, but when I was walking past a book shelf at Target and picked up a copy of 'Twilight' (Never seen nor read any of those books) so I decided to look and see how the two vampire books compared. I was appalled at how badly written Twilight is, it seems to be written for simpleton's seeking out cheap juvenile vampire hi-jinks. Sad to see the explosion of teenage Vampire books flooding the market, all poorly written and unimaginative.

I recommend anyone wanting to read a Vampire book to pick up this sequel to the original Dracula and PUT DOWN those over Twilight/Vampire Diaries/whatever books.
8 people found this helpful
Share
Report
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Dracula the Undead
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2011
For just a little while, forget about Bram Stoker's Dracula (the original) because Dracula:The Undead, is a real doozy. It is very action packed and it gives a new twist on the original, along with its own story. Very fast-paced, so much so, that I didnt want to put it down... See more
For just a little while, forget about Bram Stoker's Dracula (the original) because Dracula:The Undead, is a real doozy. It is very action packed and it gives a new twist on the original, along with its own story. Very fast-paced, so much so, that I didnt want to put it down (I read it from beginning to midpoint in a few hours..cover-to-cover in a total of 5 hrs). The story of this book begins 25 yrs after the original dracula ends (these are the same characters from the original w/a few new characters thrown into the mix..because we're 25 yrs into the future)..of course I cant give away the plot, but here's a teaser..there's the infamous Blood Countess Bathory,among a few others..so to make my point, you will love this book..its a quick read with a ton of surprises,twists and turns around every corner without losing you in the process_you will definitely like this book!
Share
Report
1.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
This terrible, toothless book must have Bram Stoker rolling over in his grave!
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2009
I was excited about this book because it was supposedly written by a descendent of Bram Stoker so I expected a respectful, thoughtful sequel that would be true to the spirt of the original source. I could not have been more wrong! This book was so awful, so... See more
I was excited about this book because it was supposedly written by a descendent of Bram Stoker so I expected a respectful, thoughtful sequel that would be true to the spirt of the original source.

I could not have been more wrong! This book was so awful, so terribly written and had such a ridiculous plot that I could barely even finish it! I must admit I pretty much skimmed the final third - before throwing the horrible thing across the room in disgust.

This book is just awful - it contradicts and even re-writes Stoker. The treatment of the original characters is disrespectful and an insult to Stoker's intent. The writer tries to bring historic characters into the mix throwing in everything from Elisabeth Bathory (who here is a true vampire), Jack the Ripper, even (and I saw this one coming a mile away), The Titanic!

Dacre was obviously influenced by Francis Ford Coppola's film, "Bram Stoker's Dracula" and that could have been a good thing, except that the writer handles plot and character development so ineptly that the whole story falls flat and is anything but sexy. Coppola's version may not have been true to the letter of the original book, but it did retain the original spirit, was a fun adaptation and was intelligently executed on the screen. Of course Coppola played up the love angle between Dracula and Mina, which was NOT in Stoker. But that was Coppola's take on the tale, we've been there and done that now - one expected this book, written by a Stoker, to go back to basics and evoke Stoker's original vision. But no - 'Ol Dacre has to go and handle the whole thing so incompetently that there are not even any entertaining passages, and at no point is the reader truly engaged on any level. It is impossible to feel anything toward the unlikable characters this fool of a writer throws at us.

One thing that really disgusted me was that Dacre perpetuates the silly notion that sunlight is fatal to vampires, a concept not in the original novel, nor in any other vampire fiction or mythology until Hollywood invented the notion! To Coppola's credit, he went back to Bram Stoker on this concept - in his film, the Van Helsing character explains in a voice-over, "contrary to some beliefs, vampires, like all nocturnal creatures, can move about by day, though it is not their natural time and their powers are weak." But 'ol Dacre ignores his grandfather and all vampire mythology and has the vampires bursting into flame in the sunlight! Yawn!

Maybe the silliest aspect to the book, besides the whole Bathory vs. Dracula angle which makes no sense whatsoever, is making Bram Stoker a character alongside his fictional characters. I mean, WTF?! And the author does nothing interesting with this concept at all! That whole subplot is just unbelievably silly and ludicrous! In fact the whole damn book is a sloppy, unfocused, infuriating mess that had me laughing out loud at how ridiculous the author's little twists were as the lame "plot" stumbled along! It was also over the top gory and mean spirited in how it dispatched some of Stoker's original characters.

Avoid this mess at all costs! Will we ever get a worthy sequel to Dracula? It is seeming more and more unlikely! I hated this book - it was a complete waste of money and I regret buying it and supporting this writer and his silly book! Don't make the same mistake!
56 people found this helpful
Share
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Laura Vargas
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Great book
Reviewed in Canada on January 27, 2021
Great book
Great book
Report
Kevin Kelly
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A STEP BACK IN TIME.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 21, 2020
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't. This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside...See more
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't. This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside out, giving the old story a new found sense of life. Don't miss out reading this if your a fan of horror, or Dracula.
If you like a good horror story then surely you'll want to read this one. Ok, so you think you'll have seen and read it all before, believe me when I say you haven't.
This is another take on the well known tale, and it's a cracker, turning everything upside down and inside out, giving the old story a new found sense of life.
Don't miss out reading this if your a fan of horror, or Dracula.
3 people found this helpful
Report
Reima R.
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Vielen Dank!
Reviewed in Germany on September 23, 2014
Danke schön! Sehr gut. Ich spreche Deutsch nur ein bisschen, aber das Buch ist sehr gut. Highly recommended to everyone. Und es war sehr billig.
Danke schön! Sehr gut. Ich spreche Deutsch nur ein bisschen, aber das Buch ist sehr gut. Highly recommended to everyone. Und es war sehr billig.
Report
John
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
I enjoyed it
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 23, 2023
I did enjoy this book, easy read get it 😁
I did enjoy this book, easy read get it 😁
Report
Andrea S.
4.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Spannende Fortsetzung
Reviewed in Germany on February 19, 2010
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch. Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und...See more
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch. Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und auch Bram Stoker selbst spielt als Theaterregisseur mit. Die beiden Autoren haben sich in vielen Punkten eher an dem Film mit Gary Oldman orientiert und so einiges eingebaut, was mit dem Vorgängerbuch nicht so ganz zusammenpaßt. Sie haben aber im Nachhinein auch erklärt wieso sie dies gemacht haben, um auch die Filmgemeinde, die das Buch nicht kennen, zu erreichen. Mir hat das Buch gefallen und ich würde es jederzeit wieder lesen.
Also mir hat die Fortsetzung sehr gut gefallen, ich fand sie fesselnd von Anfang bis zum Ende. Sicher ist eine Fortsetzung nie so gut wie das Original, aber es ist doch ein guter Versuch.
Es wurde die blutrünstige Gräfin Elisabeth Bathory als Bösewicht eingeflochten und auch Bram Stoker selbst spielt als Theaterregisseur mit. Die beiden Autoren haben sich in vielen Punkten eher an dem Film mit Gary Oldman orientiert und so einiges eingebaut, was mit dem Vorgängerbuch nicht so ganz zusammenpaßt. Sie haben aber im Nachhinein auch erklärt wieso sie dies gemacht haben, um auch die Filmgemeinde, die das Buch nicht kennen, zu erreichen.
Mir hat das Buch gefallen und ich würde es jederzeit wieder lesen.
2 people found this helpful
Report

How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon